506:
and in my efforts I did include relevant links in the
External Links sections of relevant Wiki articles. Please be assured that my intention was not to spam or disrupt Knowledge at all--I love Knowledge, and I experience and hate spam like any avid Internet user--but to provide interested parties visiting those Knowledge articles to related quality extra reading or watching material. But after receiving your message and reviewing the Guidelines I understand what I've done was a violation thereof and I will cease immediately. As far as I know, the warning this IP address received should have been the work of only one person (me), so any additional suspicious activity is not the work of my department or publication, and because I am on my university's network, blocking this IP would likely affect many innocent people. Again, I'm very sorry for any trouble I might have caused you or Knowledge's community in general, and I will cease immediately and let my supervisors know about Knowledge's guidelines. Thank you! -SN
594:
disambig page was valid. the Cp user also admits that: "I didn't even think of dogging but that is another one that I would also imagine people would be looking for if people are trying to reach an article entitled "dog sex"" So he admits that people who are looking for dogging might type in dog sex. I am bascially looking out for the type of people that hear about dogging, or zoophilia, etc., and don't have all the facts so they come to wikipedia looking for information on dogging or sex with dogs. They are unlikely to type in dog sex to figure out how dogs have sex with eachother. But the glrious thing about disabmigauous page is that they will also find the information about
196:
155:
1100:
Flynn's character reveals his "fake" name to Zach Braff's character J.D. which everyone leaves out of the article. The
Janitor in fact never reveals his true name and is known to be a consistent liar, especially to J.D. This is not speculation, the "extra" that calls him Tony "implies" this fact and it is not speculation or guessing, as you cite in your reason for removing my edit.
1023:
Hello Ckatz, I'm finally writing you to explain my latest activities. If possible, I beg you to not remove my external links: I'm not spamming at all, nor promoting or advertising, just putting appropriate sources of information related to those
Knowledge enties. If it is a matter of guidelines, I'll
431:
What should be linked: "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the
Knowledge article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons."
977:
together. A typical editor/admin who did as Ckatz did with SG1 would acknowledge it and simply say, "My bad!" and personally resolve to do better. Ckatz instead accuses those who edit after her of "hounding" and "vandalism" and "trolling" and "harassment" (yes, those are quotes of Ckatz). An accused
593:
is completely deleted it will remain an article. Regardless of your problems with 24*, he does support the change and i believe he has come to his colclusion based upon good reasoning. There are other editors who edited before it was reverted by you, thereby giving their implecit agreement that the
438:
The website
SkiingtheBackcountry.com is a leading source of information, resources, gear reviews, where to ski and all sorts of other stuff related to ski touring. My understanding is that it's based in Jackson Hole, but I don't even know who is behind it. It's a core site, and I was simply trying
1157:
article, the title uses "tyre". We would not change the spelling of the article without first changing the title to "slick tire". If you feel strongly about the spelling, you are welcome to open a discussion to move the page and change the spelling. I can provide tips if you like, but it should not
1106:
This is an integral part of the character "revealing" his name to J.D. and therefore is not speculation or guessing. The current information about
Janitor revealing his name to J.D. shouldn't even be in the article (if the article isn't amended) as it is misleading information (a lie from Janitor).
505:
I'd like to apologize for my misuse of
Knowledge's External Links sections and my ignorance of the guidelines for including them. I am a student who was hired part time to assist in generating traffic for a publication by distributing their articles to related forums, blogs, and interested parties,
384:
Therefore, if 98.89.12.105 did not create the entry and only undid what 76.73.140.26 undid, all of this refers back to the original poster Admin
Animate as the spammer, right? I highly doubt that one of your administrators could be considered a spammer? What in the world is going on here? Please,
598:
along with information about dogging and bestiality. It is for the ever-growing number of people who turn to wikipedia as their first source of information that I am concerend about, not people who know EXACTLY what it is they want to look at, but those who might overhear about dogging on the bus,
1115:
Tire is an older spelling than tyre, but both were used in the 15th and 16th centuries for a metal tire; tire became the settled spelling in the 17th century. In the UK, tyre was revived in the 19th century for pneumatic tires, possibly, though many continued to use tire for the iron variety. The
465:
I know remotegoat is not well known, but there are so few sites that review theatre productions, particularly fringe/amateur/local, theatre that it would be a shame to lose this resource which, for the official reviews at least, appears to me to meet the requirements for being a reliable source.
1230:
they fall under. "Going to be used in a few weeks" (and and I would describe 2010 as more than a few weeks away, and even then nothing is likely to go into the categories for a while) is not an exception to C1. In fact, C1 is there to specifically delete these categories that aren't likely to be
1099:
Hi, you removed an edit regarding "Janitor's" name on the Scrubs TV series entry. You stated "no implying, speculation, guessing, etc" as the reason. The word imply does not mean speculating or guessing. It means "To express or indicate indirectly". The edit I made was part of the joke when Neil
822:
All anyone needs to do is to look at your contribution history, which parallels mine. Funny how you "just happen" to edit articles I've edited, in many cases in exactly the same order I've edited them in. Funny, too, how that pattern appears to be transferring itself from your IP account to your
613:
Sure, Ckatz, we're all lawyers picking at the exact name of a
Knowledge entry. Well, if we're lawyers then forgive us for looking at the evidence (...does so and returns...). No, Ckatz claims are unsupported by the evidence. She is the only editor who advocates reverting to a redirect. Ckatz has
455:
Remote Goat is a bit like IMDb in that any visitor to the site can create an account and post a review of an event. Unquestionably, I think such reviews should be deleted as self-published/personal reviews. However, there are also "official Remote Goat" reviews which are submitted by an official
558:
FYI, it's not an article, it's a redirect page that you've proposed for conversion to a disambiguation page. So far, the serious arguments seem to lean toward keeping the redirect; the 24.* IP is just a disgruntled IP that is hounding my edits, and another editor has already commented that the
1272:
Ah, but them becoming empty makes them elligible for speedy deletion regardless of them being kept via a previous deletion discussion. Are you saying that no category, after being kept via CfD, can become elligible for C1? If so, I don't think the wording of C1 supports that. It says anything
380:
On entry 07:41, 17 September 2009, Admin
Animate reworked the Prattville Wiki and added the Our Prattville link where it should be under Media. Then on 10:16 of that same day IP Address 76.73.140.26 undid his revision and stated no reason. Then on 11:57 of the same day IP address 98.89.12.105
451:
Hi. I see you've been deleting lots of links to Remote Goat reviews. I'm sure that some of these deletions were justified, but I think some of them might not be. If I explain how the site works, perhaps you'd let me know whether you'd still consider them all to be spam/inappropriate links.
1277:
deletion debate, not a previous one. Also, such categories for 2011, 2012, etc. are also more or less guaranteed to be populated. Does that mean we should create them now as well? I thought the C1 criteria was there to prevent premature creation of a bunch of categories like
905:
an example of "hounding" or "vandalism" or "harassment" or "trolling" or some other pejorative prevarication? You throw around your empty accusations and too-hasty deletions in a way that costs you credibility and costs Knowledge useful work. Please stop it.
559:
entries you've proposed aren't especially necessary. Myself, I don't care either way what the page is, as long as proper procedure is followed. That is why I'm acting in an administrative role there, rather than as an editor with a particular preference. --
290:. Although many links are deleted because they were placed by spammers, links to good sites are also removed on a regular basis. This is because Knowledge isn't a directory service; the mere fact a site exists does not mean it warrants a link.
534:
article, when will you 'feel' that the discussion is complete? I do not want to revert your over-zealous reverts for fear of starting yet another edit war with you. So far I have noted that you, yourself, have not chimed in on the merits of
181:
below. I don't have a convention as to where I'll respond, be it here, your talk page, or the talk page of the subject we're discussing - but I'll do my best to keep things clear. Let me know if you have a preference... now, get typing!
983:
442:
Is ski touring something that you care deeply about? If so, have you been to the site I was linking to? And if so, why would you care to remove it? And if you are not interested in ski touring, please leave the page alone. -MBailey
1119:
In addition to that, the article on "Tire"s in general is spelled "Tire". Why change the spelling of a specific type of tire when the article on all "Tires" is spelled with an "i"? This is basically a sub-article, if you will.
1148:
Hello... thanks for the note. You raise some valid points - and personally, I don't really care either way. (Keep in mind that I'm Canadian, so I use "tire", not "tyre".) However, the important consideration here is that per
484:
I have restored some of the links that you removed, confirming theatre listings and officially published theatre reviews for which there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of the source and no other source available.
679:
is a rational mishearing of doggy style, dogging, or bestiality, and people might try to find information on the SEXUAL position of Doggy Style by looking up dog sex. You have taken the weakest example on the
1107:
It makes people think the character's name IS in fact Glenn Matthews unless you've actually seen the final episode, which until the DVD comes out, not everybody has. DLake31565 11:35, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
988:
385:
somebody clarify this for me. Should not Animate's revision stand? Why is it being removed? He said he would do that for us and he did and we thank him for that. Now it is removed...why? Please advise.
1247:
340:, based on the topic and the article's contribution history. Please avoid changing spellings unless they differ from the appropriate version. Most spell checking software can be configured to use
168:. I'll check in when I can, but please understand that circumstances may create a significant delay between when you post and when I am able to respond. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
698:
I didn't mean that way. I meant that users that have been here longer and edit regularly tend to know policy. Also, may they search, "dog sex postion", but feel free to criticize me all you want.
456:
reviewer and edited by he Remote Goat staff before publication. You can tell these reviews from the personal reviews because the review says "by X for remotegoat". Compare this "official" review
543:, I think you are in the wrong and that it will be a disambig page. But, again, I am waiting for you to stay your hand so as to be prepared that you will not revert future contributions.
991:
869:
Laughably disingenuous! Every edit of mine is worthwhile and useful. If an edit is warranted, should others avoid making it because Ckatz might object for purely personal reasons? --
978:
editor should certainly cite the facts, no? Too, in the case of Ckatz, this incident is just one in a string of incidents which reflect a pattern of behavior that needs improvement.
643:
Most if not all the editors are newer editors with not that many contributions. I personally agree with the redirect design, no one's going to look up "Dog sex" to find a professor.
671:
Knowledge is not a meritocracy, the number of edits a user has should not trump the points they bring. Further, you point to the fact that "no one" (over generalization) would use
1043:
435:
Links to be considered: "Sites which fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources."
994:
1320:
Since you are semi-protecting ANI, please consider doing the same for AN. It is getting the same amount and same style of IP hopping vandalism ANI is. Thanks...
614:
insisted on doing so following at least five editors who have moved to reinstate or improve the disambiguation page. No one but Ckatz has advocated a redirect.
375:
539:, so assume you are abstaining. As it has now been discussed for little less than a month, with several editors giving either implicit or explicit support for
500:
1103:
My edit: As J.D. walks away, an orderly (played by an extra) passes and exclaims, "Hey Tony!", implying "Janitor" was lying to J.D about his true identity.
314:
This is a very common question, based on a misunderstanding of Knowledge's purpose. This project is not a directory, forum, or search engine, and as such
1250:, and the resulting consensus was to keep them. These are not "possible" categories, they definitely will be populated (as are their predecessors). --
638:
585:
was an article because the first little tab on the left says article and not redirect page. Maybe it is all sementics, but i believe that currently
970:
1341:
823:
shiny new registered account. (I could, of course, just be paranoid. I'm sure it is just a complete and utter coincidence that you chose to edit
517:
392:
813:
749:
721:
693:
608:
576:
1025:
1305:
126:
114:
428:
Nowhere did I find information in the external links guide that would lead me to believe that the link I published was inappropriate.
1219:
494:
130:
110:
921:
Because it is not needed. There was already a page for it. SG1 (disambugition) or however you spell it. Now please, just drop it.
666:
122:
1287:
1267:
1223:
969:" that disambiguation article to a "disambiguation" title? Perhaps because it would have taken fifteen seconds? It wasn't until
1069:
1175:
265:
1240:
817:
630:
509:
201:
847:
under your IP account on the 14th, each of those edits immediately following mine in the respective article histories.) --
756:
1297:
1279:
1232:
1010:
944:
878:
864:
777:
301:
589:
is an article that is currently a redirect, but will soon be a disambig. Regardless, it is still and article and unless
1153:
we don't arbitrarily change the spelling of an article without discussion first, and (more importantly) in the case of
689:
604:
552:
548:
412:
439:
to share information, as I said before, about an activity that I love, to the people who are involved in the sport.
760:
with a well-known chapter about bestiality called "Sex and the Single Dog", of course a researcher might Wikisearch "
1213:
1202:
1136:
1334:
1033:
269:
1140:
1018:
300:
Pages can be deleted for many reasons; there are very specific criteria that govern the process. Please review
1351:, and the page was duly deleted. This is to notify you that the article has been requested for restoration at
1089:
685:
600:
544:
400:
478:
381:
properly undid that revision and at 13:05 Admin Baseball Bugs calls 98.89.12.105 a spammer and undoes it.
1206:
1368:
1259:
1167:
1080:
Why my article RenderX has been deleted? It had enough references showing the importance of the subject.
966:
954:
856:
568:
178:
88:
37:
1218:
Hello Ckatz, I was wondering if you could expand on your rationale for declining the speedy deletion of
261:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
1315:
1075:
634:
627:
625:
623:
621:
619:
617:
615:
513:
416:
902:
1301:
1293:
1283:
1236:
1110:
1054:
165:
77:
26:
1328:
962:
898:
315:
915:
245:
1340:
1198:
1190:
1132:
1124:
1094:
974:
936:
741:
713:
658:
490:
474:
408:
388:
8:
675:
to find a professor, maybe so. But, you'll have a hard time conviencing most people that
595:
446:
396:
63:
1181:
1065:
1050:
840:
460:
457:
353:
164:
and may not respond swiftly to queries.If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to
1001:
My hope is that Ckatz will recognize what others recognize, and resolve to improve. --
1322:
1085:
800:
I'm not "just a disgruntled IP that is hounding" anyone. If I really "hounded", then
525:
195:
21:
423:
1364:
1150:
892:
349:
345:
337:
316:
it is not a place for you to post advertisements about your company or your product
1194:
1128:
1029:
1006:
929:
911:
874:
809:
773:
765:
734:
706:
651:
486:
470:
341:
118:
84:
33:
1227:
1348:
599:
and come to wikipedia with a degraded memory of the actual term for the thing.
257:
1356:
1352:
1061:
1046:
950:
836:
828:
333:
1081:
824:
287:
1360:
1038:
844:
1252:
1160:
1002:
922:
907:
870:
849:
832:
805:
801:
769:
727:
699:
644:
561:
161:
530:
As the admin that insists on a full discussion on the future of the
310:
Why was information relating to my company or organization removed?
684:
disambig as an argument. I think that's refered to as a straw man.
761:
681:
676:
672:
590:
586:
582:
540:
536:
531:
957:. Also, your chronology is mistaken. Ckatz too-hastily cleared
899:
cleared the obviously legitimate disambiguation page for "SG1"
901:, replacing it with a redirect. Would you call my legitimate
348:
English; some extend this to include other varieties such as
973:
that a conscientious editor and conscientious admin created
754:
If "the professor" is the notable author of a book entitled
376:
Our Prattville removal after User:AniMate created the entry
66:
to this revision, which may differ significantly from the
958:
68:
1355:
today and was duly restored. You may wish to list it at
1158:
be done before such a discussion is complete. Cheers. --
1116:
Times newspaper was still using tire as late as 1905.
177:
Hello! Thanks for dropping by... please feel free to
1347:
I notice that you requested this page's deletion by
286:Typically, links are removed because they fail the
1246:The categories have already been vetted through a
804:would show a few examples, which she cannot do. --
282:Why was the link I added removed from an article?
1186:How do you go about getting the title changed?
252:Where can I learn more about editing Knowledge?
937:
930:
923:
742:
735:
728:
714:
707:
700:
659:
652:
645:
1231:populated within 4 days of creation. Thanks,
501:Apology for misuse of External Links sections
1220:Category:2010s American television series
76:Revision as of 15:26, 21 October 2009 by
965:to a redirect. Why didn't Ckatz simply "
47:
1226:. More specifically, what exception to
1224:Category:2010 television series endings
1024:be going further into that, thank you.
75:
14:
324:Why were my spelling changes reverted?
984:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
102:Previous editor misstates chronology.
57:Previous editor misstates chronology.
44:
25:
149:
17:
139:
108:
1060:I think you can move it back now.
140:
1379:
260:. Other useful links include the
62:. The present address (URL) is a
1292:If you would like, I can seek a
726:Also, I wasn't refering too you.
194:
173:
153:
266:list of policies and guidelines
142:
97:
52:
13:
1:
992:"Ckatz persistent reverts..."
338:regional varieties of English
1369:11:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
1335:04:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
1306:15:13, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
1288:18:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
1268:18:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
1241:18:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
1207:17:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
1176:16:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
1141:15:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
1090:07:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
1070:02:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
1055:22:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1034:08:47, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1011:15:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
945:14:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
916:14:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
879:14:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
865:01:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
835:earlier today as 24.dot, or
814:20:40, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
778:20:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
750:23:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
722:23:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
694:23:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
667:22:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
639:21:55, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
609:21:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
577:21:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
553:21:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
518:18:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
495:15:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
479:09:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
469:Let me know what you think.
209:
192:
190:
7:
1260:
1168:
857:
569:
296:Why was my article deleted?
256:The best place to start is
24:of this page, as edited by
10:
1384:
276:if you have any questions.
272:. Please feel free to ask
246:Frequently asked questions
95:
50:
989:"Unthinking vandalism..."
1214:Speedy deletion declines
953:was and is needed, dear
686:Peter Napkin Dance Party
601:Peter Napkin Dance Party
545:Peter Napkin Dance Party
288:external links guideline
459:with this personal one
1095:Scrubs: Janitor's name
1019:External links removal
336:recommends the use of
45:15:26, 21 October 2009
424:I read the guidelines
304:for more information.
975:SG1 (disambiguation)
995:"Ckatz misleads..."
596:Canine reproduction
115:← Previous revision
841:click-through rate
405:and associated IP
179:leave me a message
1337:
1265:
1210:
1193:comment added by
1173:
1144:
1127:comment added by
943:
903:re-creation of it
862:
748:
720:
665:
574:
420:
411:comment added by
404:
391:comment added by
373:
372:
237:
236:
189:
188:
172:
171:
160:Ckatz is busy in
1375:
1331:
1325:
1321:
1316:ANI/AN Vandalism
1262:
1257:
1209:
1187:
1170:
1165:
1143:
1121:
1076:Article deletion
941:
934:
928:
925:
897:Ckatz, you also
859:
854:
746:
739:
733:
730:
718:
711:
705:
702:
663:
656:
650:
647:
571:
566:
406:
386:
362:
361:
270:guide to editing
258:at the Help Desk
198:
191:
174:
157:
156:
150:
147:
127:Newer revision →
105:
103:
101:
92:
71:
69:current revision
61:
60:
58:
56:
46:
42:
41:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1345:
1329:
1323:
1318:
1264:
1248:deletion debate
1216:
1188:
1184:
1172:
1122:
1113:
1111:Slick Tire/Tyre
1097:
1078:
1041:
1021:
895:
861:
766:Marjorie Garber
764:" to help find
573:
528:
503:
449:
426:
378:
334:Manual of Style
274:on my talk page
248:
154:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
119:Latest revision
107:
106:
96:
93:
82:
80:
67:
51:
48:
31:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1381:
1344:
1339:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1273:involved in a
1258:
1215:
1212:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1166:
1112:
1109:
1096:
1093:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1040:
1037:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
999:
998:
997:
980:
979:
971:ten days later
894:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
855:
818:24.187.199.178
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
724:
631:24.187.199.178
567:
527:
524:
522:
510:128.197.210.89
502:
499:
498:
497:
448:
445:
425:
422:
377:
374:
371:
370:
367:
366:
360:
359:
358:
357:
327:
326:
321:
320:
319:
307:
306:
305:
293:
292:
291:
279:
278:
277:
247:
244:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
208:
207:
206:
187:
186:
170:
169:
158:
78:
64:permanent link
27:
16:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1380:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1343:
1342:Wave strategy
1338:
1336:
1332:
1326:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1298:70.150.94.194
1295:
1294:third opinion
1291:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:70.150.94.194
1276:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1255:
1254:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:70.150.94.194
1229:
1225:
1221:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1163:
1162:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1117:
1108:
1104:
1101:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
993:
990:
987:
986:
985:
981:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
947:
946:
942:
940:
935:
933:
926:
920:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
904:
900:
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:
866:
863:
860:
852:
851:
846:
842:
838:
837:J.D. (Scrubs)
834:
830:
829:arachnophobia
826:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
758:
753:
752:
751:
747:
745:
740:
738:
731:
725:
723:
719:
717:
712:
710:
703:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
664:
662:
657:
655:
648:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
626:
624:
622:
620:
618:
616:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
597:
592:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
575:
572:
564:
563:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
523:
520:
519:
515:
511:
507:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
467:
463:
461:
458:
453:
444:
440:
436:
433:
429:
421:
418:
414:
410:
402:
398:
394:
390:
382:
369:
368:
364:
363:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:
328:
325:
322:
317:
313:
312:
311:
308:
303:
299:
298:
297:
294:
289:
285:
284:
283:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
250:
249:
243:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
205:
204:
203:
197:
193:
185:
180:
176:
175:
167:
163:
159:
152:
151:
148:
145:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
99:
90:
86:
81:
74:
73:
70:
65:
54:
39:
35:
30:
23:
1346:
1324:NeutralHomer
1319:
1274:
1256:
1251:
1217:
1185:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1118:
1114:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1079:
1042:
1022:
938:
931:
896:
853:
848:
825:Jackie Tyler
755:
743:
736:
715:
708:
660:
653:
565:
560:
529:
521:
508:
504:
468:
464:
454:
450:
441:
437:
434:
430:
427:
413:98.89.12.105
407:— Preceding
387:— Preceding
383:
379:
332:Knowledge's
323:
309:
302:this article
295:
281:
273:
251:
238:
200:
199:
183:
143:
141:
22:old revision
19:
18:
1189:—Preceding
1123:—Preceding
845:Quebec City
447:Remote goat
262:style guide
98:→Redirects
53:→Redirects
20:This is an
1195:Gamezero05
1182:slick tire
1129:Gamezero05
963:2009-10-05
939:not a test
833:flashlight
744:not a test
716:not a test
661:not a test
581:I assumed
487:GDallimore
471:GDallimore
354:Australian
268:, and the
220:Page Three
144:User talk:
1228:WP:CSD#C1
1151:WP:ENGVAR
816:formerly
526:Redirects
365:Contents
228:Page Five
224:Page Four
166:use email
162:real life
1203:contribs
1191:unsigned
1137:contribs
1125:unsigned
1062:Dabomb87
1047:Dabomb87
757:Dog Love
409:unsigned
401:contribs
389:unsigned
356:English.
350:Canadian
346:American
232:Page Six
216:Page Two
212:Page One
202:Archives
89:contribs
38:contribs
1349:WP:PROD
1275:current
1082:Siringa
932:This is
762:Dog sex
737:This is
709:This is
682:Dog sex
677:Dog sex
673:Dog sex
654:This is
591:Dog sex
587:Dog sex
583:Dog sex
541:Dog sex
537:Dog sex
532:Dog sex
393:Mtp1960
342:British
1361:Stifle
1357:WP:AFD
1353:WP:DRV
264:, the
1278:this.
1253:Ckatz
1161:Ckatz
1026:Matmi
1003:24dot
955:Abce2
924:Abce2
908:24dot
871:24dot
850:Ckatz
806:24dot
802:Ckatz
770:24dot
729:Abce2
701:Abce2
646:Abce2
562:Ckatz
184:Ckatz
146:Ckatz
79:24dot
28:24dot
1365:talk
1330:Talk
1302:talk
1284:talk
1237:talk
1222:and
1199:talk
1155:this
1133:talk
1086:talk
1066:talk
1051:talk
1030:talk
1007:talk
982:See
967:move
912:talk
875:talk
843:and
831:and
810:talk
774:talk
768:. --
690:talk
635:talk
629:. --
605:talk
549:talk
514:talk
491:Talk
475:Talk
417:talk
397:talk
344:and
131:diff
125:) |
123:diff
111:diff
85:talk
34:talk
1261:spy
1169:spy
1039:FYI
961:on
959:SG1
951:dab
893:SG1
858:spy
570:spy
352:or
43:at
1367:)
1359:.
1333:•
1327:•
1304:)
1296:.
1286:)
1239:)
1205:)
1201:•
1139:)
1135:•
1088:)
1068:)
1053:)
1045:.
1032:)
1009:)
949:A
914:)
906:--
877:)
839:,
827:,
812:)
776:)
692:)
637:)
607:)
551:)
516:)
493:)
477:)
462:.
419:)
403:)
399:•
117:|
113:)
100::
87:|
55::
36:|
1363:(
1300:(
1282:(
1235:(
1197:(
1131:(
1084:(
1064:(
1049:(
1028:(
1005:(
927:|
910:(
873:(
808:(
772:(
732:|
704:|
688:(
649:|
633:(
603:(
547:(
512:(
489:(
473:(
415:(
395:(
318:.
133:)
129:(
121:(
109:(
104:)
94:(
91:)
83:(
72:.
59:)
49:(
40:)
32:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
