User talk:Raul654 - Knowledge

1091:

global warming skeptics is decreasing. And in this real world, we create encyclopedias like Knowledge to document these facts. Someone who edits the earth article to say the world is flat is vandalizing the article. It's not subjective, it's not a judgment call - it's flat out wrong. And if you are unable to grasp this not-too-difficult concept, then you have no business trying to lecture anyone about our policies.

3345:. In short - she'll do on FAC exactly what I do. (2) No, I do not know her in real life - in fact, I know very little about her at all beyond what does on here. (3) I was not appointed my Jimbo. I started doing the job back in early 2004 when it was clear that it needed to be done by someone, and some months later the community affirmed my role by giving the job a name. Jimbo has never had anything to do with it. 2321:. This table contains a column "Portfolio" for links that display candidates' pertinent skills. I will be going through each candidate's statements and gradually populate the column, but this may take some time. Please feel free to add some links in the form if you feel it shows conflict resolution skills, or otherwise. It would also be helpful if you can check if the information about you is correct. 2202:

resolved or consensus for promotion has not been reached, a nomination will be removed from the list and archived. The director determines the timing of the process for each nomination." I realize it is up to your discretion, but was wondering if I could have some kind of rationale for your decision. At any rate, thanks for the time.

1888:(2) At any given time, there are probably well over 1,000 comments and replies on the FAC. No single person could possibly keep track of them all. The onus is on the reviewer to keep up with replies to his comments. In borderline cases, I usually check the article myself, but only a cursory review - I don't read the whole thing. 1016:. Additionally, you have no absolutely no ground to say whether dissenting scientists are increasing or decreasing in number, especially since I suspect nobody knows. This is obviously a content dispute, and your edit warring helps none. (Note, boldface text was edited after original post, to convey original meaning.) ~ 3270:. It's been up for a month, has 3 supports and no Opposes, but I saw some minor MOS issues that needed to be dealt with before archiving/promoting, so I added that commentary and the nominator complied. I feel comfortable asking for final minor tweaks at that stage; does that seem an appropriate way to handle? 3366:

Sandy is a complicated person in real life. She passes her time in simple surroundings, trying to deflect the worship of those who know her and use her gifts to help others. She has been hunted as a fugitive, cursed as a tomb-robber, and is renowned as a lover and duelist. She is a worshiped as a God

1184:

Even if a change from "A few" to "An increasing number" is demonstrably false (and while I'm not sure that you can indeed demonstrate that, I agree it is against the orthodox view and can be perceived as an attempt to mislead) I do not believe an indefinite block is called for, barring a long history

1809: 1283:

May I also mention that Obedium edits his talk page back and forth repeatedly. The net change is to add "Test embedded..." AGF on this one is out of the question for a paranoid fella like myself, I think Obedium is trying to make the warnings become archaeological relics in the history of his talk

1214:

Please unprotect Obedium's talk page. Tak page protection is generally reserved for users who abuse the unblock template, thereby wasting other admins' time. There is a broad consensus that users can remove warnings; it is still there in the history and your edit summary is easily visible as well.

426: 3354:

50,000 edits by Sandy is hardly indicative of a new editor. Susan, while I'm sure you post with the best of intentions, asking someone about personal details of a third party on-site is not a good idea—they might inconsiderately provide answers. It's no one's business but Sandy's to answer question

3326:

process. I believe she or he is a very hard worker but is new to Knowledge. May I ask please 1) what role SandyGeorgia will be assuming? and 2) If you know him or her in "real life"? (This can make a difference sometimes I realize). Just a question from another newbie (about 1.5 years here). Thank

3265:

OK, I'll leave for you those I've taken strong-ish stands on or that I was involved with before you delegated me; generally, I'll aim to be conservative while I'm coming up to speed, and leave it to you to sweep up what I leave. But, I need one more piece of guidance; as a sample, please review my

2991:

Just wanted to let you know, I appreciate the hard work you're putting into this. I may be raisin' hell at the Arbcom right now (and hell needs to be raised, in my view), but it appears that you're taking a relatively clear-eyed look at the facts at hand, and for that, I'm appreciative. For all his

588:

As for adding the TGGWS section, I did not. It has been a long standing section which was introduced by someone other than myself. I simply reverted a deletion by another editor who provided no satisfactory reason for the deletion. It is POV pushing that I am seeking to avoid here, not introduce

510:

Actually, the semi-protection expired before I got there (07:46, 26 October 2007 Riana (Talk | contribs | block) protected Honoré de Balzac ‎ (vandalism of an unsavoury nature (expires 07:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC))) (Change)) I just removed the semi-protection template (which was on an unprotected

489:

is slated for Today's Featured Article on Nov. 17 – cheers for that. I notice also that you've removed the semi-protected status for that page. Alas, I worry that when he is put up on the front page, clever 12-year-olds around the world will go nuts with the vandalism. Maybe we should re-protect it

3220:

Once I start, how do we keep from getting crossed up? That is, how do we avoid promoting/archiving at the same time? I would plan to set a very conservative threshold initially for my own archives/promotes, leaving anything that's not pretty clear for you, so a "sweep" by you sometime after I go

2573:

I would like to share with you that today, November 28, 2007, I was honored by the Senate of Puerto Rico with the "Resolution of the Senate Number 3603" in appreciation for my work in Knowledge regarding Puerto Rican military related articles. I was given the resolution on behalf of the Senate by

2331:

actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well. I believe that conflict resolution skills are most pertinent to the position, but if you want to highlight other skills, please feel free to use a new letter and

1863:

2. How do you check whether all the problems are fixed? For example, I oppose an FAC for a few reasons, including not enough references and spelling mistakes. The nominator says he fixed everything, but he did not fix the spelling mistakes. Do you read the article to check whether all the spelling

1784:

Raul, we disagree strongly, but your questions page was probably not the best place to air that contentious debate. So feel free to refactor/move/remove our back-and-forth debate from that page. I stand by everything I wrote, and I have no problem with it staying exactly the way it is, but I would

1064:

vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated" Your lack of good faith in editors is apparent across the board. Simply because you lack good faith in many of our contributing editors does not warrant

3149:

and I'm struck by the proposed restriction on Giano. I'm not familiar with the case or his conduct, so perhaps I'm missing vital information, but I can't see how restricting someone's ability to edit pages in the Knowledge space fosters any kind of respect for the collaborativeness of the project

2613:

I appreciate the comments you made at the proposed decision on the Durova ArbCom. Sometimes it feels like, in their anger at a particular contributor, ArbCom's decisions become difficult to grasp in the context of what actually makes the project better. Seeing your reasoning, and your justifiable

1090:

filled-world you come from that with a straight face you say something like that. In the real world, the one that I live in, there is an objective reality. There are things that are true, and things are not. The world is not flat. The earth circles around the sun. It's 2006 AD. And the number of

862:

Hi there, We of WikiProject Seattle have been working diligently to correct all the issues brought up during its Featured Article review, and do believe we've brought it back up to snuff. The original nominator hasn't been seen in the discussion for a while and we were wondering when and how the

3469:

After yesterday's sock, I got really tired of Raspor and blocked for 6 months every IP he's ever used (no editing - either logged in or otherwise - and no account registration). Thomasdid is not from any IP or range that Raspor has ever used - so my tentative conclusion is no, it is not Rapsor.

1041:

Moreover, your analogy is transparently false, as is the logic behind it. Statements like "this band sucks" or "this band is awesome" are obviously subjective. The number of critics of global warming is not subjective. The number of critics has been steadily decreasing for 20+ years (down to a

2201:

after it had been there for less than week. While it had two opposes, one of them had been addressed and the other had only been there for a few hours. As such, I do not really feel as though this meets "If, after sufficient time, objections considered actionable by the director have not been

2935:

Hi Mark—Please see my edits, prompted initially by Sandy's request to review a sentence she added. I've left a note with Bishonen asking her to review the template as well. I don't think it's premature to add a statement saying that "director" includes your delegate. That last item could be

811:, I have moved it to a more appropriate title. I've also permanently semi-protected the page to stop anons from abusing it. I'll also keep a permanent watch on the page - those who add images of others without their permissions will get reverted. Could you also add it to your watchlist? - 1919:

Sorry Kaypoh - rather than unpromote an article, why not simply fix the spelling mistakes yourself? I generally do these days as it is often simpler than actually writing about them on the FAC page. Remember the aim is to make FAs, not to pass or fail others as such. cheers,

789:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1042:

quantifiable few; indisputably fewer than 5 or 10 years ago) and continues to decrease as the evidence piles up. Obedium's edits are, then, flatly false. And I find it very convenient that you choose to ignore his obviously misleading edit summary ("Improved phrasing").

2456:

article. I just wanted to say thanks for letting it wait for that long actually, because with the help of other contributors we were able to make some good quality improvements to the article. Your judgment and the work you do is appreciated around here, thanks.

152:, for mediating in disputes, for adding lots of really nice pictures, and for still finding the time to work on articles! In a few months you've already become a highly valued member of the community. Stay with us and don't burn out, please. --Eloquence Apr 10, 2004 1131:

The 1RR provision exists only through the consensus of involved editors. If we allow editors with a history of POV-pushing and sockpuppetry to game the 1RR provision in order to insert outright lies, then that consensus will (and should) dissolve.

2453: 2429: 682:}} for articles needing a sound file? I am planning on doing some recordings of medieval and baroque music, and it would be nice to identify articles looking for specific pieces. If there is no category or template, I'd happily create one. 1763: 1373: 369:. I'm not sure what you meant by "(Legit user?)". Also, I am not sure how to read that checkuser tree. If you have more information on Thin Arthur or if that checkuser tree reveals information that would help out at SSP, please post it at 405:

The structure of the tree is (conceptually) easy to understand: all IPs under a username are IPs that user has been known to have used; usernames under an IP are usernames that trace to that IP. Repeats are omitted as they are found.

735:

If by a "non-date specific request", you mean a request that doesn't specify a date -- no, you have to pick some date. However, with that said, the date you pick doesn't have to have a relationship with the article being requested.

2480:

Raul, I'm not sure what to do with this article. I believe it complies with the Featured Article criteria, but if I renominate it I think I'm going to come across the same impossible objections. Do you have any recommendations?

3010: 1357: 942:

The second of those reverts was to vandalism (changing it to increasing - which is flatly objectively false, and using a misleading edit summary to boot). Vandalism reverts are not normally counted against 3rr and whatnot.

1991:

This is not bad faith. I opposed one FAC (I forgot which one) because about 10 paragraphs had no references. The nominator added references to only 3 or 4 paragraphs and the other paragraphs still had no references.

1463: 825: 3420:

Hi Raul. I sent Sandy Ordonez an e-mail as requested, but I haven't heard anything yet. I wondering if you could do me favor and check with her to find out if something is wrong. I will apreciate it, Take care.

2333: 246: 1198:

would be if I could drop a week on anyone without warning for single edits? Unless there is a long history with this user making delibreately misleading edits to GW topics, I think a week is pretty long.

239: 1496:

to the bottom of the article. Please wait for the bot to do the rest of the updating to articlehistory and the article talk page. If you do that yourself, it creates extra work and stalls the bot.

1239:. (which is why letting people scrub these warnings is not a good idea). Beacuse you asked, I've gone ahead and unprotected his talk page - I expect he'll get rid of the current block message too. 2768:

I'd like to create a userbox similar to the one I did for NYB (It's on my talk page). But to do so, I'd like a.) to know if you're opposed to it; and b.) your suggestion of an appropriate image.

1546: 881:, or do you have a policy of not featuring an article for a second time? That'd be logical given so many have never appeared, but... :-) Also, fyi, 20/12/07 would have been the 102nd birthday of 957:

I don't know how you can reasonably state that the second revert was vandalism. You may believe that it is completely false, but the other user doesn't think so - It's a bog standard edit war.

3367:

in Honduras, but is an outlaw in Peru. No living man knows her real name as she only whispers it into the ears of those she is about to kill. All love her and hate her, she is SandyGeorgia.

2318: 2236:

I noticed on your user page that you have some background in the field of biomedical engineering. So i decided to forward a question I found on the twin articles talk page. The question is

3389: 2903: 2197:

Hi. I'm not really sure if it is the norm to approach you on your decisions on promotion of FAC but I guess I will just be bold and go ahead and do so. You recently achieved the FAC for

3162: 2212:

I'll tell you what - go ahead, fix Tony's objection, and then go ahead and renominate it. We normally tell people to wait a bit, but you're right that I might have been rather hasty.

141: 1770:. Did you find a problem with the article, or were there simply not enough "votes"? If there were not enough votes, then about how many votes does an article need to be promoted? — 912:. Two reverts would not normally be a problem, but you've already been blocked for edit warring on this article. Please think about this and discuss your future edits to the page. 2425: 1284:

page by artificially pushing time forward. He cannot escape by doing so sice everything is recorded, but it is annoying when trying to figure out how many warnings Obedium has.

2500:

Thanks for noticing the LtWinters sock. How did you catch that? I'm surprised he'd vandalize my user and talk pages but then revert back and warn himself. Seems pointless. --

2906:- Though, as I mentioned to others when working on NYB's - I'm on the lookout for alternate "bottom-line" comments. (It's configurable for that and for floating left/right.) - 2363:

indefinately, and is there evidence that he/she/what-ever group is behind the account is the same people that were behind another indef blocked editor? Just curious. Regards,

1785:

also not object to you refactoring it. Regardless of our respective positions on that case, the questions page was probably not the best place to get into an extended debate.

1561: 1521: 3016:

If the person that Opposes it does not come back and Supports the article, despite that I've commented on their points, would their oppose be counted when you close the FAC?

1398: 1065:

edit warring. The policy continues, rather clearly, "NPOV violations ... Making bold edits ... Unintentional misinformation ... Unintentional nonsense ... Stubbornness" are

266: 2992:

faults (and they're not few), Giano is an overwhelming net asset to this project. He loves the 'pedia, and any "remedy" that keeps him from contributing hurts the project.

579:

It would be helpful if you would participate in the discussion page rather than here. All of my actions are adequately discussed in the discussion page, none of yours are.

1381: 1365: 1359: 794: 1384:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3146: 3054: 1342:(Note - the above RFC had no merit, was rejected by almost every person who commented on it, and was shortly thereafter deleted because it was not properly certified.) 1647: 1905:

Thanks for answering. :) If the nominator did not fix the spelling mistakes and you promote the article to FA, is there a way to ask you to unpromote the article? --

1750: 1441: 1506:

If you're coming here to ask, why did a bot promote or fail my nomination, the bot didn't; Raul did (see the diffs above). The bot only updates the articlehistory.

1500: 524:

Ah, I see. Is it possible to apply for semi-protection before it appears on the front page, on the presumption that it will be vandalized unless it is protected? –

1940:

That is an example. If the problems are bigger than spelling mistakes, and the nominator says he fixed them but he did not, and the article is promoted wrongly? --

1855: 1503:, it was not promoted. Please wait for the bot to close the FAC and update the articlehistory. If you do that yourself, it creates extra work and stalls the bot. 1056:

What one considers an improvement or not is wholly subjective, so it's not worth mentioning, especially in this case. Also, I believe you are incorrect on policy.

2074:

Please respond on my talk page. We'll probably go to press late Monday or early Tuesday (UTC), but late responses will be added as they're submitted. Thanks,

2486: 2472: 851: 1974:

And please note the instructions there regarding the minimum time between promotion and review; in that time, often issues can be addressed without review.

366: 3177: 2771:(Note for anyone else reading this, there are only two bureaucrats running, and I think both are at least decent choices (smile), so I'm asking them both.) 2421: 1698:

I added it after it came up in my computational immunology class (in reference to AIDS). I also assumed it could refer to other situations like septicaemia

3036: 2530: 2505: 1605: 1301: 835: 761: 279: 1758:

I'm wondering what your standard is for determining whether an article should be promoted to featured status or not. I ask this because I'm trying to get

2701: 1774: 1458: 2838: 2482: 2183:

was the TFA on July 27. If you think it's too soon, then please let me know and I'll withdraw the request so that someone else can have the slot. --

2114:, and in his statement he requested you recuse yourself from the case due to your having promoted him to adminship. Just in case you hadn't noticed. 1676: 257: 3446: 3267: 838: 3331:

to select featured articles and to select placement on the Knowledge home page. I guess I owe you a barnstar for your roles (only gave you one). -

1654:

was really helpful, since it was archived without waiting for any new comments. Maybe the relevant projects should have been notified. Previously

3026: 2501: 1568: 1232:

As Raymond says, this is most certainly not out of the blue for this editor, seeing as how he's been warned for doing this several times before:

753: 2490: 2993: 2615: 2544: 2059:

In the past year, are there any cases that you think the Arbitration Committee handled exceptionally well? Any you think they handled poorly?

1954:

This is a distinctly unpleasant line of questioning, bordering on assuming all kinds of bad faith. If there's a FA that shouldn't be one, see

1385: 374: 1879: 1189: 2389: 2091:

Just a quick note to wish you good luck in the forthcoming silly season. How does it feel not to be the most controversial candidate? Lol. --

1993: 1941: 1906: 1871: 598:

The information removed was redundant and available elsewhere (which I attempted to clarify on the page when you conducted a second revert).

122: 110: 253: 3409: 3168: 1278: 999: 981: 952: 720: 358: 354: 3341:(1) Sandy's been here almost two years now. I don't think she can reasonably be called "new". I have described the role she will fulfill 3102: 3088: 2784:

Yes, I'm fine with that. For an iconic picture, it's too bad the ceiling cat picture got deleted - that would have been perfect. I guess

1593: 1539: 1008:

is considered a good band by Americans, which is not true, but it wouldn't be vandalism. It's a content dispute, and as such fall under

3311: 3123:

releated article outside USA to feature. Moreover the last article of this type to show in the main page was probably in January 2007.

2264: 1767: 1336: 936: 841: 2565: 1986: 1219: 1203: 126: 106: 2749: 2734: 2716: 2687: 2587: 2515:

I found them using checkuser. He warned himself, I suspect, so that the account would look like a legit user if someone saw it later.

2340: 1635: 294: 118: 3371: 2312: 1779: 1293: 1146:

I agree, Dr. Arritt, "1RR is a delicate thing and abuse must not be allowed." Just as 3RR should not ever be violated simply because

370: 362: 338: 3435: 3282: 3260: 3251: 2662: 2602: 2559: 2001: 1248: 1163: 1141: 1069:

vandalism, and you cannot treat them as such. Own your mistakes and apologize for them, or you your should very well be blocked. ~

832: 807:

It was put up for MFD. I have speedy closed this as keep. Honestly! However, due to privacy concerns and because of confusion with

714: 667: 249:

still valid? The one year revert ban has expired, but the Ban violations and Parole violations have not expired. Is this correct?

3474: 3380: 3349: 3072:

CM, I'll move that to archive for you, and GimmeBot will be by soon to tag it closed; please let the bot update the talk page per

2980: 2166: 1435: 607:

The criticism of NSTA's action were made by a group with no direct knowledge of the events and it was redundant to boot making it

316: 3187: 3150:

mentioned in the point directly after it. Discussion is vital for anyone who wishes to work in collaboration. Can you clarify? -

1969: 3359: 2524: 2221: 1740: 1726: 1707: 410: 3232: 2111: 1949: 1935: 1036:

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge.

894: 786: 615: 538: 515: 3239:

There are several FACs in the current pipeline that I've been very involved with in the past, so I'll also leave them to you.

1914: 1900: 1794: 729: 3323: 1623: 740: 149: 3301: 2947: 2910: 2898: 2884: 2872: 2854: 2826: 2809: 2797: 1616: 1483: 1351: 1100: 1078: 1051: 1025: 357:

Checkuser tree, but left it unfinished. In that tree, the only name you posted "(Legit user?)" next to was Thin Arthur. See

2401: 2121: 990:

article and edit it to say that the earth is flat, that's vandalism too. Both statements are flatly, objectively not true.

2240:

Thanks for your help if you have time to give it. And thanks anyway if you don't. Good luck with the upcoming election. :

2151: 1478:, but haven't gotten to it yet. Anticipating the rush of people asking if articles are featured after today's promotion: 2279: 2249: 2105: 829: 815: 443: 2413: 2385: 1731:

You appear to be correct. If that's the case (that it has no meaning outside of an AIDS context), what do you suggest?

1680: 2646: 1891:(3) An actionable objection is one that can be fixed. Determining what is and is not action is up to the FA director. 695: 567: 563: 559: 3157: 2785: 2292: 790: 782: 3066: 1269:

sockpuppet). So, it's not as if it were a week's block applied out of the blue to an otherwise-constructive editor.

574: 2307: 2126: 1150:

with the content, 1RR should not be abused if there is a consensus to have it in place as you say. And I think our

657: 504: 2962: 1237: 1235: 1233: 1060:

quite clearly states, "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is

3456: 3013:(which I'm working on) has 2 supports and 1 oppose, so would it currently if it stayed like that not be promoted? 2346: 2206: 821: 785:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 710: 691: 3463: 3399: 3135: 2345:(I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and 2187: 2100: 261: 3031: 1931: 1692: 1655: 1599: 910: 908: 391: 3425: 2442: 2081: 1420: 889: 402:"(Legit user?)" means that I was not sure when I was doing the checkuser if that user was a legit user or not. 2930: 2805:

Not because I intend to bypass anything, but just out of curiosity, do you have a link to the deleted one? -

1838: 673: 549: 86: 37: 2378: 3292: 2998: 2625: 2029: 1665: 1372:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 477: 469: 396: 3335: 2360: 3043: 2936:

pluralised if/when you appoint another delegate. You might consider naming the delegate—unsure. The C in

2417: 233: 2637:

is an FA (YAY!!!) but it dosen't have a a small bronze star on its page like other FA articles do. Why?

2740: 2722:

A FAC/FAQ could result in instruction creep; I had in mind sticking to botification/archiving issues.

2620: 2466: 2275: 2245: 1847: 903:. There seems to be a consensus that the lead sentences are to be subjected to a 1RR. From a report at 882: 800: 778: 2509: 2034:. We're interviewing all ArbCom candidates for an article next week, and your response is requested. 240:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Long-term_edit_warring_at_Winter_Soldier_Investigation

2578:. It was a total surprise which I did not expect and that is why I want to share this news with you. 2354: 2227: 2192: 2086: 1682:

I can only see the term in the context of AIDS-related literature. Is this what you're referring to?

1490: 867: 635: 75: 26: 3140: 3048: 2778: 2407: 2019: 1613: 1274: 1137: 768: 626: 3213: 275:

featured on November 8th- I really appreciate your time and assistance with making it possible! --

3396: 3155: 3116: 2324:

My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see

2284: 1670: 958: 913: 872: 2653: 1314:

has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found by your name in

3441: 3342: 3278: 3247: 3110: 3098: 3084: 3062: 2976: 2968:

Thanks for the ce and cleanup, but I only wanted a review of that one sentence about opposes.

2730: 2683: 2583: 2303: 2198: 1982: 1759: 1641: 1589: 1557: 1549:

by Gimmetrow and Tony1. Please edit as you see fit, and we can use the associated talk page.

1535: 1517: 847:

Say goodbye to this extremely useful page Raul. Looks like the MFD deleters are at it again. -

227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 2430:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant

1374:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them

3298: 2540: 2271: 2241: 1771: 1216: 1200: 1186: 652: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 177: 172: 167: 162: 1608:

was going to receive further updates. I like it as resource and I am volunteering to help.--

1265:

a long history of this user making deliberately misleading edits to GW topics (see also his

1194:

My mistake, it was a week. Still, that seems rather heavy. Do you realize how much easier

3129: 2986: 2712: 2642: 2634: 2334:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table#Columns of this table

2172: 2147: 1964: 1416: 1403: 848: 812: 334: 312: 3322:

Hi, Raul654. Quick question. I see SandyGeorgia has been given some new delegation in the

8: 3450: 3203: 2940:

is ambiguous (criteria/candidate), so I've spelt it out where possible. I've abbreviated

2744: 2705: 2657: 2447: 1716:

To my knowledge it is immune hyperactivity that makes septiciaemia such a nasty problem.

1609: 1289: 1270: 1133: 1057: 1031: 706: 687: 348: 276: 61: 2436:

for inappropriate changes it is probably best if you make the appropraite correction. --

247:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Winter_Soldier/Proposed_decision#Proposed_enforcement

3415: 3151: 2575: 2337: 2142:, not a blender. Perhaps a different, more appropriate image could be used instead? -- 2118: 1925: 1721: 1687: 1658:

about the renomination policy, do you think notifying projects should be part of it? –

1451: 1315: 1151: 801: 385: 2179:

I was wondering if you thought that it was too soon to put it on the main page, since

3422: 3271: 3240: 3094: 3077: 3058: 3003: 2996: 2969: 2831:

Some weren't that good (and not a fan of any of the captions), but the basic picture

2723: 2676: 2618: 2579: 2296: 2184: 2096: 1975: 1833: 1582: 1550: 1528: 1510: 1147: 679: 531: 497: 416: 114: 82: 33: 21: 2847:

Maybe it's been enough time to try again on the article? (or as a part of a list...)

1004:

The truthfulness of a statement is not considered in vandalism. I may very well say

3317: 3073: 2860: 2814:

Ceiling Cat is an internet meme - one which I happen to find particularly funny --

2672: 2614:

critique of the contributor in the process, is illuminating, and much-appreciated.

2608: 2536: 2452:

I noticed you held off for a good long while there in deciding what to do with the

2135: 2078: 1997: 1945: 1910: 1875: 1799: 904: 647: 448: 145: 826:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Images of Wikipedians (2nd nomination)

3460: 3368: 3332: 3124: 2957: 2763: 2638: 2325: 2285: 2180: 2143: 2139: 1959: 1790: 1662: 1412: 1318:, and the actual discussion can be found at ], where you may want to participate. 857: 608: 466: 461: 330: 308: 272: 1823:

For being with us for so many years, and for many years to come, raise a glass.

3388: 3173: 3120: 2495: 2462: 1332: 1285: 1159: 1074: 1021: 900: 702: 683: 304: 3356: 2535:

The table for Image:Sharp_Hall_Dorm_Room.jpg states that there is no source.

2371: 2203: 2115: 1955: 1921: 1717: 1683: 1377: 1369: 1311: 1013: 378: 2237: 3471: 3432: 3406: 3377: 3346: 3308: 3257: 3229: 3210: 3184: 2944:, since it's widely used elsewhere and makes the template easier to read. 2890: 2864: 2818: 2789: 2594: 2551: 2516: 2433: 2393: 2256: 2213: 2173: 2158: 2092: 1892: 1824: 1732: 1699: 1627: 1575: 1472: 1427: 1343: 1307: 1266: 1240: 1195: 1092: 1043: 1009: 991: 944: 886: 877:

Hi Raul, noticed it's a bit short and wondered if you'd consider including

737: 664: 612: 571: 554:

Why have you reverted my edits? Please discuss this on the AIT talk page.

525: 512: 491: 407: 286: 1030:

Thanks your your pontifications on what is and is not vandalism, however,

631:

Here you go.. since you're all about policing template colors and such...

3328: 3193: 2438: 2110:

Hi Raul. Videmus Omnia filed a request for arbitration regarding Ryulong

2075: 2025: 1651: 1408: 864: 746: 456: 1486:, it has been promoted by Raul654. Yes you can add the star, by adding 455:

but I have never been there—thank you and if it is all right to say so,

2950: 2420:

even though the edit summary showed 9 articles had been promoted. From

1786: 1659: 1087: 726: 3119:

on the front page on any date in December. This is the first and only

2432:

was the FAC not to be added. Based on the number of people who watch

2038:

What positions do you hold (adminship, arbitration, mediation, etc.)?

2907: 2881: 2851: 2806: 2775: 2458: 2319:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table

1808: 1328: 1155: 1070: 1038:) Deliberately adding false information into an article is vandalism. 1017: 1005: 885:

if he hadn't already gone to the great cricket pitch in the sky... --

425: 2317:

Hello! As we did for last year's election, we are again compiling a

2052:

Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?

1567:

Tony1 and Gimmetrow looked at the sandbox version, so I moved it to

140: 2365: 808: 558:

Because you are sytematically introducing POV into that article by

271:

Just a quick note to say thank you very much for arranging to have

3395:

Best of luck! The committee wouldn't be the same without you. :)--

560:

adding claims made by the TGGWS pseudo-documentary propaganda film

2426:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2007

2392:. I ran the checkuser, and confirmed that he's the same person. 1464:

Anticipating the inevitable "Is this article featured" questions

1450:

article for tomorrow? It came on the main page 2 yrs before...

3297:

Thank you for featuring this F-article on main page, yesterday.

2291:

Is back at FAC again; DrKiernan has done some work on it, so I

1084:"What one considers an improvement or not is wholly subjective" 486: 479: 144:

For your tireless work in making Knowledge better, for keeping

3183:

I don't really feel strongly about that one way or the other.

1380:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

3225: 3206:, but for now I understand how to do the archiving manually. 2815: 2593:

Excellent news! Congratulations! I'll let the signpost know.

987: 878: 452: 2863:

and the ceiling-cat related humor links from his user page.

1764:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Opera (Internet suite)

1447: 1382:

Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them

1366:

Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them

1360:

Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them

252:

Thanks in advance. I will watch your page for the response.

3307:

You're most certainly welcome. Thank you for writing it ;)

3163:

Moving the featured content portals to the portal namespace

3147:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Durova/Proposed_decision

2229: 899:

Hi Raul, I'm a little concerned about your recent edits on

66: 564:

removing subsequent paragraphs describing the film as such

64:

to this revision, which may differ significantly from the

1860:

1. If you are on holiday, busy or sick, who closes FACs?

329:

Hee! Thanks for the little note & pic. You're fab. --

3169:

Knowledge talk:Featured content#move to portal namespace

2574:

the President of the Puerto Rican Senate, the honorable

3209:

Sure - anytime you feel ready to start, jump right in.

3009:

How many Supports does an FAC need for you to pass it?

1468:

I had every intention of writing an FAQ to be added to

986:

It's vandalism for the same reason that if I go to the

725:

Are we allowed to make non-date requests on this page?

367:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia

267:

Thanks for getting Webley Revolver on the front page!

3202:

I'm trying to find someone to do an archival bot at

3167:

Could you, as featured article director, comment at

1426:

Yes, I just caught another half-dozen of his socks.

148:

up-to-date, for doing the grunt work of cleaning up

2359:Hey Raul. Could you explain why you chose to block 2157:Yes, you are correct! I mixed up my terminology ;) 2045:Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee? 1867:3. What is an "actionable" oppose and what is not? 3198:Ready as I'll ever be; do you want me to start? 1751:Determining what is and is not a featured article 1442:Fauna_of_Australia (Can u feature this tomorrow?) 379: 1856:Some questions about your job as the FA director 773: 678:Is there a category and template analogous to {{ 1569:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/archiving 3057:for me? I'd like to withdraw the nomination.-- 1762:up to featured article status, and so I filed 1387: 375:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dbromage 2390:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Scibaby 1368:, a page you created, has been nominated for 828:. As page creator you might wish to comment. 373:. F.Y.I., there is an open checkuser case at 2531:No source for Image:Sharp_Hall_Dorm_Room.jpg 2066:Why do you think users should vote for you? 1302:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Raul654) 3376:I admit that comment really cracked me up. 2416:that 8 articles were added to the list at 228:Archive 14: September 2007 - December 2007 3228:for the time being and see what happens. 3019:How long are FAC's open for at a maximum? 568:removing criticismo of the NSTA's actions 371:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Dbromage 363:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Dbromage 213:Archive 11: December 2006 - February 2007 74:Revision as of 17:25, 3 December 2007 by 3093:I know the drill, thanks for the hand.-- 751:Sorry if I'm disturbing you....FACs.... 139: 47: 3327:you. I understand you are appointed by 1185:of similar and intentional disruption. 208:Archive 10: August 2006 - November 2006 73: 14: 1806: 423: 242:is a case which you were involved in. 193:Archive 7: August 2005 - November 2005 178:Archive 4: August 2004 - November 2004 163:Archive 1: August 2003 - November 2003 3324:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 1624:Knowledge:Featured article statistics 907:, I see you've reverted twice already 198:Archive 8: December 2005 - March 2006 183:Archive 5: December 2004 - March 2005 168:Archive 2: December 2003 - March 2004 150:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 44: 25: 3405:Thank you for your very kind words. 459:and Co. and a cast of thousands for 17: 2850:Anyway, thanks for the links : ) - 2566:Honored by the Puerto Rican Senate 820:Note that WP:Facebook was moved to 223:Archive 13: June 2007 - August 2007 135: 104: 2904:User:Jc37/Userboxes/Raul6544Arbcom 2386:Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Obedium 444:Knowledge:Today's featured article 136: 3486: 3221:through would always be helpful. 2958: 2951: 2313:ArbCom table with portfolio links 1780:Our debate on your questions page 754: 721:Today's featured article/requests 218:Archive 12: March 2007 - May 2007 203:Archive 9: April 2006 - July 2006 188:Archive 6: April 2005 - July 2005 173:Archive 3: April 2004 - July 2004 95: 60:. The present address (URL) is a 52: 1807: 863:review can be closed. Thanks! -- 424: 3130: 3125: 968: 966: 964: 962: 960: 923: 921: 919: 917: 915: 822:Knowledge:Images of Wikipedians 762: 361:Thin Arthur now is included in 3027: 2741:User talk:SandyGeorgia#FAC/FAQ 2633:Listen, I was just wondering, 2384:Obedium's user page led me to 895:Edit warring on Global warming 824:. Right now its on MfD again: 643:{{Template:WikiProject Iowa}} 392: 386: 13: 1: 3273: 3242: 3079: 3067:23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3044:16:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3032: 2999:04:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2981:02:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2971: 2963:01:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2911:04:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2899:04:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2885:04:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2873:04:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2855:04:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2844:The deletions, not-so-much... 2827:03:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2810:03:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2798:02:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2779:20:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2750:03:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2735:03:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2725: 2717:03:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2688:02:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2678: 2663:01:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2647:01:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2621:20:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2603:12:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2588:06:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2560:04:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2545:04:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2525:03:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2510:03:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2491:01:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2467:00:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2443:21:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2402:14:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2379:07:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2341:05:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2308:17:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2298: 2280:07:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2265:03:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2250:07:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2222:03:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2207:07:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2188:02:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2167:02:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2152:04:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 2122:23:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2101:17:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 2082:04:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 2002:10:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 1987:13:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1977: 1970:05:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1950:04:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1936:02:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1915:01:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 1901:03:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 1880:02:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1848:05:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1839: 1834: 1826: 1795:17:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1775:23:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1741:02:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1727:23:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1708:01:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1693:22:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1666:21:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1646:I don't think restarting the 1636:21:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1617:21:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1594:01:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 1584: 1562:01:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1552: 1540:01:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1530: 1522:18:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1512: 1459:03:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1436:18:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1421:00:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1399:22:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1391: 1389: 1352:15:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1337:06:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1294:09:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1279:02:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1249:03:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1220:02:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1204:02:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1190:02:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1164:02:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1142:01:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1101:03:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1079:01:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1052:00:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1026:00:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1000:00:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 982:00:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 953:00:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 937:23:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 890:19:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 868:08:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 852:02:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 842:01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 816:04:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 769:01:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 741:15:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 730:13:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 715:06:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 696:05:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 668:03:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 658:02:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 616:04:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 575:03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 539:15:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 516:02:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 505:21:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 470:19:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 411:01:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 339:05:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 317:21:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 295:03:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3475:17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3464:17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3436:17:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3431:I just sent her a reminder. 3426:14:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3410:17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3400:02:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3381:17:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3372:17:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3360:16:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3350:21:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3336:21:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3312:18:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3302:18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3283:19:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3261:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3252:03:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3233:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3224:Let's ignore the need for a 3214:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3188:18:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3178:21:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3158:16:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3136:10:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3103:00:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3089:00:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3037: 2374:Wikipédia Prends Des Forces. 1527:That seems to have worked. 1154:explains why rather well. ~ 397:22:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 365:(which I am working on) and 280:11:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 262:05:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 7: 2418:Knowledge:Featured_articles 2134:The image you added to the 2106:Ryulong arbitration request 1675:I noticed your request for 1086:- I don't know what weird, 303:And hey, thanks for adding 24:of this page, as edited by 10: 3491: 2889:That would be fine too :) 2880:How about that picture? - 2816:http://www.ceilingcat.com/ 2476:Featured Article Candidacy 2388:, which in turn led me to 793:. Reviewers' concerns are 779:Music of the United States 353:Hi Raul654. You posted an 307:too. Much appreciated!! -- 93: 50: 2270:Thanks for your help. : 2138:article seems to be of a 1813: 1310:. Please be aware that a 1032:policy disagrees with you 883:Bill O'Reilly (cricketer) 781:has been nominated for a 430: 2788:is the next best thing. 2774:Thanks in advance : ) - 2127:Image in Blender Article 1604:I was wondering whether 3117:Kaziranga National Park 1545:Raul, I'm going to run 1196:Arbitration enforcement 783:featured article review 3053:Could you please fail 2671:I created a shortcut, 2199:The Preuss School UCSD 1817:The Invisible Barnstar 1768:declined to promote it 1760:Opera (Internet suite) 1600:Subpage Test2 updating 1376:and please be sure to 1152:policy on edit warring 153: 45:17:25, 3 December 2007 2931:Edits to FAC-template 1571:and linked it to the 674:Requested sound files 550:An Inconvenient Truth 490:on the 16th or so? – 434:An Invisible Barnstar 143: 3293:Hoysala architecture 2635:Superman film series 2626:Superman film series 1864:mistakes are fixed? 1446:Hi Raul, How about, 1312:request for comments 465:. Wow. Best wishes. 451:". Jupiter has been 3204:Knowledge:Goings on 2474:Knights of the Nine 1766:, but you recently 1010:tendentious editing 234:Arbcom still valid? 111:← Previous revision 3397:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 3055:1080° Snowboarding 2576:Kenneth McClintock 2031:Knowledge Signpost 1606:User:Raul654/test2 1499:If the article is 1482:If the article is 1396: 1378:sign your comments 1358:MfD nomination of 802:Knowledge:Facebook 158: 154: 3132: 2802:Great picture : ) 2719: 2377: 2355:Re: Sysop action. 2351: 2193:Preuss School FAC 2087:ArbCom tomfoolery 1968: 1853: 1852: 1844: 1724: 1690: 1386: 535: 501: 475: 474: 138: 3482: 3299:Dineshkannambadi 3275: 3244: 3141:Giano and Durova 3133: 3131: 3127: 3081: 3049:Withdraw request 3041: 3039: 3034: 3029: 2973: 2960: 2955: 2942:featured article 2861:user:Ceiling Cat 2727: 2710: 2680: 2428:it appears that 2408:Off by one error 2364: 2343: 2330: 2328: 2300: 2272:Albion moonlight 2242:Albion moonlight 2028:, editor of the 2020:ArbCom questions 1979: 1962: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1811: 1804: 1803: 1772:Remember the dot 1722: 1688: 1586: 1580: 1574: 1554: 1547:this sample page 1532: 1514: 1495: 1491:featured article 1489: 1477: 1471: 1395: 1394: 1393: 978: 976: 974: 972: 970: 933: 931: 929: 927: 925: 787:featured quality 764: 756: 701:OK, I found it! 655: 650: 640: 636:WikiProject Iowa 634: 627:WikiProject Iowa 536: 533: 528: 502: 499: 494: 449:Rings of Jupiter 441:To Raul654, for 428: 421: 420: 394: 388: 383: 285:You're welcome. 146:Template:Feature 123:Newer revision → 101: 99: 98: 90: 69: 67:current revision 59: 58: 56: 55: 46: 42: 41: 3490: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3444: 3423:Tony the Marine 3418: 3393: 3320: 3295: 3196: 3165: 3143: 3113: 3051: 3025: 3006: 2989: 2933: 2766: 2654:WT:FAC#FA_Stars 2628: 2611: 2580:Tony the Marine 2568: 2533: 2498: 2478: 2450: 2412:I noticed in a 2410: 2357: 2326: 2315: 2293:left him a note 2289: 2286:Mumia Abu-Jamal 2255:Replied there. 2234: 2195: 2177: 2129: 2108: 2089: 2022: 1858: 1802: 1782: 1753: 1677:immune collapse 1673: 1671:Immune collapse 1644: 1602: 1578: 1572: 1493: 1487: 1475: 1469: 1466: 1444: 1406: 1363: 1304: 897: 875: 873:main page queue 860: 849:Ta bu shi da yu 813:Ta bu shi da yu 805: 776: 749: 723: 676: 653: 648: 638: 632: 629: 552: 532: 526: 498: 492: 483: 419: 351: 273:Webley Revolver 269: 236: 159: 134: 133: 132: 131: 130: 115:Latest revision 103: 102: 94: 91: 80: 78: 65: 51: 48: 31: 29: 12: 11: 5: 3488: 3478: 3477: 3443: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3417: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3392: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3319: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3294: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3195: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3164: 3161: 3142: 3139: 3121:Protected area 3112: 3111:Just a request 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3050: 3047: 3021: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3005: 3002: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2878: 2848: 2845: 2842: 2836: 2803: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2666: 2665: 2627: 2624: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2532: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2497: 2494: 2477: 2471: 2449: 2446: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2356: 2353: 2314: 2311: 2288: 2283: 2268: 2267: 2233: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2194: 2191: 2181:Homer's Phobia 2176: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2128: 2125: 2107: 2104: 2088: 2085: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2021: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1889: 1886: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1820: 1819: 1814: 1812: 1801: 1798: 1781: 1778: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1711: 1710: 1672: 1669: 1643: 1642:Restarted FACs 1640: 1639: 1638: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1543: 1542: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1497: 1465: 1462: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1405: 1402: 1362: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1281: 1271:Raymond Arritt 1261:In fact there 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1134:Raymond Arritt 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1039: 901:Global warming 896: 893: 874: 871: 859: 856: 855: 854: 804: 799: 775: 772: 748: 745: 744: 743: 722: 719: 718: 717: 675: 672: 671: 670: 628: 625: 623: 621: 620: 619: 618: 602: 601: 600: 599: 593: 592: 591: 590: 583: 582: 581: 580: 551: 548: 546: 544: 543: 542: 541: 519: 518: 482: 478:Protection of 476: 473: 472: 440: 437: 436: 431: 429: 418: 415: 414: 413: 403: 355:April 21, 2007 350: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 322: 321: 320: 319: 305:Cillian Murphy 298: 297: 277:Commander Zulu 268: 265: 235: 232: 231: 230: 225: 220: 215: 210: 205: 200: 195: 190: 185: 180: 175: 170: 165: 156: 137: 96:→‎Raspor sock? 76: 62:permanent link 53:→‎Raspor sock? 27: 16: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3487: 3476: 3473: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3462: 3458: 3455: 3452: 3448: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3424: 3411: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3398: 3391: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3365: 3361: 3358: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3334: 3330: 3325: 3313: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3300: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3269: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3259: 3256:Fair enough. 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3238: 3234: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3205: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3189: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3176: 3175: 3170: 3160: 3159: 3156: 3153: 3148: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3128: 3122: 3118: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3040: 3035: 3030: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3008: 3007: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2995: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2961: 2956: 2954: 2949: 2945: 2943: 2939: 2912: 2909: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2859:Don't forget 2858: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2849: 2846: 2843: 2841:was cute too. 2840: 2837: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2817: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2777: 2772: 2769: 2751: 2748: 2747: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2721: 2720: 2718: 2715:was added at 2714: 2709: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2664: 2661: 2660: 2655: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2631: 2623: 2622: 2619: 2617: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2571: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2475: 2470: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2455: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2370: 2369: 2362: 2352: 2350: 2348: 2342: 2339: 2335: 2322: 2320: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2294: 2287: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2231: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2200: 2190: 2189: 2186: 2182: 2175: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2132: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2103: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2068: 2067: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2027: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1829: 1822: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1756: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1668: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1577: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1548: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1492: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1474: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1449: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1361: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1323: 1321: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1282: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1221: 1218: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1205: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 980: 979: 956: 955: 954: 950: 946: 941: 940: 939: 938: 935: 934: 911: 909: 906: 902: 892: 891: 888: 884: 880: 870: 869: 866: 853: 850: 846: 845: 844: 843: 840: 837: 834: 831: 827: 823: 818: 817: 814: 810: 803: 798: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 771: 770: 766: 765: 758: 757: 742: 739: 734: 733: 732: 731: 728: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 669: 666: 662: 661: 660: 659: 656: 651: 644: 641: 637: 624: 617: 614: 610: 606: 605: 604: 603: 597: 596: 595: 594: 587: 586: 585: 584: 578: 577: 576: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 547: 540: 537: 529: 523: 522: 521: 520: 517: 514: 509: 508: 507: 506: 503: 495: 488: 481: 471: 468: 464: 463: 458: 454: 450: 446: 445: 439: 438: 435: 432: 427: 422: 412: 409: 404: 401: 400: 399: 398: 395: 389: 384: 382: 377:. Thanks. -- 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 301: 300: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 283: 282: 281: 278: 274: 264: 263: 259: 255: 250: 248: 243: 241: 229: 226: 224: 221: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 169: 166: 164: 161: 160: 157: 151: 147: 142: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 97: 88: 84: 79: 72: 71: 68: 63: 54: 39: 35: 30: 23: 3453: 3445: 3442:Raspor sock? 3419: 3394: 3321: 3296: 3266:comments at 3197: 3172: 3166: 3145:I'm reading 3144: 3114: 3052: 3024: 3022: 2990: 2987:A Brief Note 2952: 2946: 2941: 2937: 2934: 2894: 2868: 2832: 2822: 2793: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2745: 2706: 2658: 2632: 2629: 2612: 2598: 2572: 2569: 2555: 2534: 2520: 2499: 2479: 2473: 2451: 2437: 2411: 2397: 2373: 2367: 2361:User:Obedium 2358: 2344: 2323: 2316: 2290: 2269: 2260: 2235: 2217: 2196: 2178: 2174:The Simpsons 2162: 2133: 2130: 2109: 2090: 2073: 2030: 2023: 1928: 1896: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1841: 1827: 1825: 1816: 1783: 1757: 1754: 1736: 1703: 1674: 1645: 1631: 1622:Do you mean 1603: 1544: 1509: 1467: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1431: 1407: 1404:Raspor sock? 1364: 1347: 1326: 1324: 1322: 1320: 1305: 1267:User:Scibaby 1262: 1244: 1148:you disagree 1096: 1083: 1066: 1061: 1058:WP:VANDALISM 1047: 1035: 1014:edit warring 995: 959: 948: 914: 898: 876: 861: 819: 806: 777: 763:bananabucket 760: 752: 750: 724: 677: 645: 642: 630: 622: 553: 545: 484: 460: 442: 433: 380: 352: 290: 270: 251: 244: 237: 155: 22:old revision 19: 18: 3461:Tim Vickers 3369:Tim Vickers 3329:Jimmy Wales 3171:. Cheers, — 2948:Here it is. 2711:—Preceding 2550:Self made. 2537:WhisperToMe 2422:this update 2414:recent edit 2347:let me know 1885:(1) Nobody. 1656:I asked you 1652:Golden Film 1581:template. 1501:listed here 1484:listed here 1413:Tim Vickers 1409:User:Patonq 1217:Thatcher131 1201:Thatcher131 1187:Thatcher131 646:Enjoy. -- 457:Jodi Foster 349:Thin Arthur 20:This is an 3416:Re:Contact 3333:Susanlesch 3268:Ann Bannon 3126:Amartyabag 3115:Can u put 2739:Moving to 2702:WP:FAC/FAQ 2639:Limetolime 2630:Hey Raul, 2570:DearRaul, 2483:Geuiwogbil 2332:add it to 2144:Lightforce 2131:Hi there! 1960:Rick Block 1088:truthiness 467:Susanlesch 359:this post. 331:Melty girl 309:Melty girl 3447:Thomasdid 3074:WP:FAC/ar 3004:Questions 2746:Gimmetrow 2707:Gimmetrow 2673:WP:FAC/ar 2659:Gimmetrow 2448:Thank you 2338:Sebastian 2024:Hi. I'm 1316:this list 1286:Brusegadi 1006:Metallica 905:WP:AN/3RR 703:Jeff Dahl 684:Jeff Dahl 485:I notice 417:Thank you 381:Jreferee 3457:contribs 3357:Marskell 3318:Question 3023:Thanks, 3011:This one 2994:Mr Which 2877:ROFL : ) 2835:cute : ) 2616:Mr Which 2502:Strothra 2232:article. 2204:SorryGuy 2185:Scorpion 2116:Picaroon 1932:contribs 1922:Casliber 1800:Barnstar 1454:Mugunth 1370:deletion 836:Mordecai 809:Facebook 755:Blnguyen 711:contribs 692:contribs 680:reqphoto 609:WP:UNDUE 87:contribs 38:contribs 3472:Raul654 3433:Raul654 3407:Raul654 3378:Raul654 3347:Raul654 3309:Raul654 3274:Georgia 3258:Raul654 3243:Georgia 3230:Raul654 3211:Raul654 3185:Raul654 3080:Georgia 2972:Georgia 2891:Raul654 2865:Raul654 2819:Raul654 2790:Raul654 2764:Request 2726:Georgia 2713:comment 2679:Georgia 2595:Raul654 2552:Raul654 2517:Raul654 2454:Pageant 2394:Raul654 2299:Georgia 2257:Raul654 2214:Raul654 2159:Raul654 2136:Blender 2093:Dweller 1978:Georgia 1893:Raul654 1828:Marlith 1755:Hello, 1733:Raul654 1700:Raul654 1628:Raul654 1585:Georgia 1553:Georgia 1531:Georgia 1513:Georgia 1428:Raul654 1344:Raul654 1308:Raul654 1306:Hello, 1241:Raul654 1093:Raul654 1044:Raul654 992:Raul654 945:Raul654 887:Dweller 858:Seattle 833:Jeffrey 738:Raul654 665:Raul654 663:Fixed. 649:ALLSTAR 613:GoRight 572:Raul654 527:Scartol 513:Raul654 511:page). 493:Scartol 462:Contact 447:, the " 408:Raul654 287:Raul654 245:Is the 77:Raul654 28:Raul654 3390:Arbcom 2959:(talk) 2609:Thanks 2496:Thanks 2439:Allen3 2076:Ral315 2026:Ral315 1994:Kaypoh 1958:. -- 1956:WP:FAR 1942:Kaypoh 1907:Kaypoh 1872:Kaypoh 865:Lukobe 839:Salleh 830:Awyong 487:Balzac 480:Balzac 3459:) -- 3272:Sandy 3241:Sandy 3226:mutex 3078:Sandy 2970:Sandy 2724:Sandy 2677:Sandy 2434:WP:FA 2366:Avec 2297:Sandy 2140:mixer 1976:Sandy 1787:ATren 1583:Sandy 1551:Sandy 1529:Sandy 1511:Sandy 988:Earth 879:Chess 611:. -- 254:Travb 3451:talk 3343:here 3279:Talk 3248:Talk 3174:Ruud 3099:talk 3085:Talk 3063:talk 2977:Talk 2953:Tony 2908:jc37 2895:talk 2882:jc37 2869:talk 2852:jc37 2839:This 2823:talk 2807:jc37 2794:talk 2786:this 2776:jc37 2731:Talk 2700:Not 2684:Talk 2652:See 2643:talk 2599:talk 2584:talk 2556:talk 2541:talk 2521:talk 2506:talk 2487:Talk 2463:talk 2459:Cirt 2398:talk 2336:. — 2304:Talk 2276:talk 2261:talk 2246:talk 2238:here 2230:Twin 2228:The 2218:talk 2163:talk 2148:talk 2112:here 2097:talk 1998:talk 1983:Talk 1965:talk 1946:talk 1926:talk 1911:talk 1897:talk 1876:talk 1791:talk 1737:talk 1723:T@lk 1704:talk 1689:T@lk 1660:Ilse 1650:for 1632:talk 1610:Keer 1590:Talk 1558:Talk 1536:Talk 1518:Talk 1448:this 1432:talk 1417:talk 1392:cury 1348:talk 1333:talk 1329:UBeR 1290:talk 1275:talk 1245:talk 1160:talk 1156:UBeR 1138:talk 1097:talk 1075:talk 1071:UBeR 1048:talk 1022:talk 1018:UBeR 1012:and 996:talk 949:talk 795:here 791:here 707:Talk 688:Talk 654:ECHO 534:Talk 500:Talk 453:here 335:talk 313:talk 291:talk 258:talk 238:RE: 127:diff 121:) | 119:diff 107:diff 83:talk 34:talk 3355:2. 3194:FAC 3152:Mgm 3076:. 3033:nel 3028:Dav 2938:FAC 2675:. 2424:to 2372:... 2368:nat 2329:eir 2295:. 2119:(t) 1718:JFW 1684:JFW 1648:FAC 1614:ton 1612:lls 1576:FAC 1473:FAC 1067:not 1062:not 774:FAR 747:Nag 727:Buc 589:it. 43:at 3281:) 3250:) 3101:) 3095:CM 3087:) 3065:) 3059:CM 3038:03 2979:) 2897:) 2871:) 2833:is 2825:) 2796:) 2743:. 2733:) 2704:? 2686:) 2656:. 2645:) 2601:) 2586:) 2558:) 2543:) 2523:) 2508:) 2489:) 2469:. 2465:) 2400:) 2349:.) 2327:th 2306:) 2278:) 2263:) 2248:) 2220:) 2165:) 2150:) 2099:) 2000:) 1992:-- 1985:) 1948:) 1934:) 1913:) 1899:) 1878:) 1870:-- 1793:) 1739:) 1720:| 1706:) 1686:| 1634:) 1626:? 1592:) 1579:}} 1573:{{ 1560:) 1538:) 1520:) 1494:}} 1488:{{ 1476:}} 1470:{{ 1434:) 1419:) 1411:? 1390:er 1350:) 1335:) 1327:~ 1292:) 1277:) 1263:is 1247:) 1162:) 1140:) 1099:) 1077:) 1050:) 1024:) 998:) 977:te 975:ai 973:hw 971:et 969:tl 967:os 963:an 961:Ry 951:) 932:te 930:ai 928:hw 926:et 924:tl 922:os 918:an 916:Ry 797:. 767:) 713:) 709:• 694:) 690:• 639:}} 633:{{ 570:. 566:, 562:, 530:· 496:· 337:) 315:) 293:) 260:) 113:| 109:) 85:| 36:| 3454:· 3449:( 3277:( 3246:( 3154:| 3097:( 3083:( 3061:( 2975:( 2893:( 2867:( 2821:( 2792:( 2729:( 2682:( 2641:( 2597:( 2582:( 2554:( 2539:( 2519:( 2504:( 2485:( 2461:( 2396:( 2302:( 2274:( 2259:( 2244:( 2216:( 2161:( 2146:( 2095:( 2079:» 1996:( 1981:( 1967:) 1963:( 1944:( 1929:· 1924:( 1909:( 1895:( 1874:( 1842:C 1837:/ 1789:( 1735:( 1702:( 1679:. 1663:@ 1630:( 1588:( 1556:( 1534:( 1516:( 1430:( 1415:( 1388:M 1346:( 1331:( 1288:( 1273:( 1243:( 1158:( 1136:( 1095:( 1073:( 1046:( 1034:( 1020:( 994:( 965:P 947:( 920:P 759:( 705:( 686:( 393:c 390:/ 387:t 333:( 311:( 289:( 256:( 129:) 125:( 117:( 105:( 100:) 92:( 89:) 81:( 70:. 57:) 49:( 40:) 32:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index