831:
be brushed once or twice a week (it is helpful to spray-mist with water when brushing). Mats can be commonly found behind the ears, under the elbow on each front leg, and in the fluffy fur on the hind legs (the "skirts"). Although its coat might appear to be a time-consuming task, a once-weekly, but thorough, brushing is all that is needed, though more frequent groomings will contribute to a beautiful and tidy coat. Shelties 'blow' coat usually twice a year, often at spring and fall, and should be groomed more often at those times. A good brushing with an undercoat rake, which removes the dead and loose hair from its coat daily should reduce the amount of hair that is shed. It is easiest to teach a dog to tolerate, or even enjoy, grooming if they are shown that it is a pleasurable thing from a young age. Breeders usually teach the dogs to lie on their side, be brushed, and then flip over to the other side. Toenails and hair between the pads need to be trimmed every couple of weeks. Show dogs may require more frequent brushing to keep their coats in top condition. Regular brushing encourages undercoat growth, distributes healthful oils produced by the skin, and prevents sores known as "hotspots" which can occur when dead undercoat is allowed to accumulate close to the skin. Most
Shelties learn to love the attention that grooming provides, if the routine is started when the dog is still young.
779:
to 1/4 of the ear tipped. If a dog's ears are not bent (referred to as prick ears) it is acceptable to help the ears along to the desired position by bracing them into the correct position and leaving them on for several weeks to several months. Wideset ears can also be a problem, often breaking too low down (referred to as 'hound' ears). These are often harder to correct than prick ears, and must be braced early and consistently throughout the first year. It is easiest to train a dog's ears when the dog is a puppy. Beginning at 6 to 8 weeks, the puppy's ears may be taped. Many popular household items used to "fix" ears are things such as moleskin (used on the inside of the ears to incite the ears to stand up and have the tips fold in the proper position), masking tape, fabric glue (used to glue the tips of the ears to the moleskin, or used to create a hair bridge to bring the ears together), and string (also used to make a bridge). There are many other items an owner can buy that are promoted to fix the earset of a puppy. Once that cartilege in the ears is hard (usually by the time the puppy is 6 months old), it's impossible to fix the earset with veterinary procedures.
789:, there is this part of the home site: "Shelties' ears are required to bend slightly or "tip" at the top to be qualified to show in Canadian Kennel Club (CKC) www.ckc.ca/en shows. The proper earset is to have the top 1/3 of the ear tipped. If a dog's ears are not bent (referred to as prick ears) it is acceptable to help the ears along to the desired position by bracing them into the correct position and leaving them on for several weeks. Wideset ears can also be a problem, often breaking too low down (referred to as 'hound' ears). These are often harder to correct than prick ears, and must be braced early and consistently throughout the first year. It is easiest to train a dog's ears when the dog is a puppy. Beginning at 6 to 8 weeks, the puppy's ears may be taped and glued to help induce a proper earset. There are also veterinary procedures to "fix" improper earsets, although any reputable breeder will not go to those extremes."
1113:
to convince me of that, rather than flying off the handle with a rant about us bad oppose folks. My oppose is based on the candidate's comments. When they start off their third attempt by whining about the RFA process rather than pointing out how they've seriously improved, then it shows a lack of maturity and the proper attitude to adminship. Someone who can't acknowledge that failing multiple previous RFAs actually might have something to do with their previous inadequacy as a candidate (i.e. show a little humility) is not someone who I trust with the tools. Playing the game of criticizing the process, rather than simply demonstrating the improvements that make you a candidate I should trust, is not something I am going to support.
3208:
2370:
1254:
1861:
901:, both threads started by Jimbo himself, so I'd guess it was his concerns that prompted the tag's placement. I don't know if the issues in the talk page were resolved, but I thought I'd just let you know when it was placed there. (I just happen to remember because I was doing RC patrol when it was placed, lol) You're probably more familiar with the issues than I am, but I thought I'd try to help, if possible. Perhaps you already knew all this, in which case, feel free to ignore me!
708:
1446:
Thankfully, each time, s/he gets reverted very quickly; so I didn't have to go through each and every one. Strangely, it seems like it's one person (maybe two) making the same types of jokes and doing them repeadetly. Is there any way to nix his/her editing power here? If you check it out yourself, you'll see that this goes way beyond warnings -- it's totally flagrant. I've never dealt with something like this before so I'm clueless! Many thanks. Cheers!
3359:
1018:'s work, then state it on the article talk page. Precisely one of your tags has not been removed, the one from a sentence I added after reading about eight difference sources so I couldn't tell you which it came from, but it's such an obvious statement I rather doubt anyone who has the slightest familiarity with the subject would contest it as a contributing influence, though one could obviously make a list of further reasons for U.S. involvement. -
2087:
662:
349:
1495:
71:
1147:
1512:
904:
2810:
deleted.We can prove our statements with pedigrees showing we did in fact develop the F1b strain of
Labradoodle. It would seem that Wiki,either knowingly or not descriminates in some cases as to what content will be displayed. I have edited the "type" catagory again in the hopes we will not be discriminated against. Sincerely, Paul L. Buccilli St. Clair Labradoodle Kennels
242::In consideration of the blatantly racist POV this carries, I would suggest taking this to AIV. An admin would definitely be more able to mediate things. Making a full protection request at ] might be a good idea until the conflict is over as well. I'll stop by though, and thanks for bringing this to my attention! ] <sup>]</sup> 20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
235::In consideration of the blatantly racist POV this carries, I would suggest taking this to AIV. An admin would definitely be more able to mediate things. Making a full protection request at ] might be a good idea until the conflict is over as well. I'll stop by though, and thanks for bringing this to my attention! ] <sup>]</sup> 20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
3022:
2984:
3424:. Some of the stuff on popular culture information at the end also looks a bit like a trivia section as well, so that could be a minor issue (although some of it is cited, so it's not a major issue). I can't see any major issues with edit-warring, though I wonder if we should consider the "review-warring' as going against the stability criterion of
1529:, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on
2917:(brace yourself, I warn!). The discrimination in this section is so strong it's hard to believe that Sze_cavalry01 doesn't see it. In any event, I don't know how to proceed from here or who to go to. The arguing has gone on long enough. It's in one ear and out the other with this guy/gal... Many thanks for your help. Cheers,
2645:: I'm a bit lost over how to fix the article now if wiki doesn't like me editing it myself. Cheers for giving the article an independent look over, though: just to check - should the redlinks be kept even if they're trying to link to articles that probably won't be written? I doubt anybody but me would write about
3043:
changes since they first came to GA/R; please judge the article only on its merits as of its current version. If you reviewed an earlier version of any of these articles, please also consider re-reading them and either revise or endorse any earluer comments you have made. Thanks for your help with this! --
3042:
is experiencing a considerable backlog problem. There are several articles dating from August that still have not generated enough discussion to close. Could you please take a look at the oldest article and make some fresh comments on them? Please note that some of these have undergone signigicant
2730:
My change was not vandalism and was justified, so I wonder why you did that. Could you explain why you undid my change? And could you list atheistic beliefs? Because I'm an atheist and I can't think a single one of them - except maybe that there is no god, but that is only one belief (and not beliefs
778:
I have a question about plagiarism. I wrote part of this article (from the
Shetland Sheepdog page): "Shelties' ears should bend slightly or "tip" at the top to be shown in American Kennel Club (AKC) shows because they contribute to the proper Sheltie expression. The proper ear is to have the top 1/3
3443:
anyway. So if we pose it as a simple quick-fail per that, and keep the debate over the review as a side issue, then I think it would be fair. The article has a devoted following of editors, so it will easily be re-nominated once this has been worked out, and then a proper, uncontroversial review can
2896:
from the ye-old days of imperialism. Some people on the talk page have even said that the content is copied from it's source. Funny thing, is the source is so old it's in the public domain! (The source is Sir George Scott
Robertson's Book titled "The Kafirs of Hindukush" from 1895.) I'm not invested
1112:
I will ignore your philosophizing about RFA, except to say that little hints about being superficial border on personal attacks, and that arrogant admonishments to "reconsider my approach to RFA" do not help to make me change my mind. If you really think this is such a great candidate, you might try
1090:
I'm sorry, there's really not much left to add to that. Unfortunately, there are some folks who oppose far too often, maybe because they know that because of the required 70+ per cent support ratio for a success, any oppose weighs more than a support and it somehow makes their opinion more important
1037:
Thanks for the proposal. IĀ“ll investigate; however I donĀ“t remember any peer-review paper on the subject. Nevertheles if you know any you can add a brief paragraph to the alternative treatments section. It will be welcome. You can also help reviewing the whole article since it has been nominated for
830:
Grooming
Shelties have a double coat. The topcoat consists of long, straight, water-repellent hair, which provides some protection from cold and the elements. The undercoat is short, furry, and very dense in order to help keep the dog warm. The Sheltie is usually a clean dog and should only need to
289:
I've left two notices on the
Administrators noticeboard/Indicents page but, unfortunately, haven't gotten any responses. Meanwhile, Sze_cavalry01 has gotten more aggressive. Is there any better way to get administrator attention? Post on their talk pages perhaps? Thanks. Cheers, ] ] 17:48, 4 October
2631:
Did you have anything particular in mind when you decided to add the warning about conflict of interest to my talk? I've never made any secret about who I am, and I don't think I've been particularly self-agrandising: I'm just not a big enough celebrity that somebody else would write the page about
1835:
Thanks for taking the time for writing a helpful GA review. The points reflecting the concerns clearly point out what needs to be done in order to improve the quality of the article. My response in form of editing the article to address those concerns would have been swift but I have been down with
1094:
As far as I can see, there's no reason not to grant EM the tools. Going neutral I could understand because he is the kind of guy who simply wouldn't give the community shit by inflating his edit count or by clever political manoeuvring, and some people simply can't look past superficial things like
920:
I wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look at the above article for me. A new user has been removing sourced content about a controversy surrounding the group and adding a lot of apparently unsourced (but new) info. I have reverted twice, wholesale, but I'd like a 3rd opinion on whether any of the
2946:
Thanks for your help! Will definitely contact AIV and also request full protection. I tried to explain to Sze_cavalry01 that there was no way he could possibly defend his position, given the policies/guidelines of
Knowledge and the flagrantly discriminatory content. But he was really passionate in
2840:
they cannot be included, and including them as "references" is inappropriate considering you have no editorial review or reliable fact checking. I cannot speak for all of the present refs, but I will check them out and remove any inappropriate ones. The presence of other inadmissible links is not
2318:
page. I must admit I did not realise just how much I was getting myself into, but I believe that the result has been well worth it, and the page has now been assessed as GA which is very satisfying. So give yourself a big pat on the back for giving me the idea, I have learnt a great deal through
2210:
At first I was put back by your question. Why wouldn't you welcome everyone? But, then I thought, perhaps you do not always assume good faith - that perhaps the user in question can be brought out of the depths of spamming and be an editor. Well, to me, there is always hope. So, to answer your
2063:
as soon as you can to read my comments regarding both changes I've made because of your comments but also how your observations were partially inaccurate. It seems like you may have only read the lead section of the article and assumed that the rest of the article was done the same way, since it's
1174:, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to
792:
I wrote most of that article-altered it from the beginning to the end (case in point: the last sentence about the veterinary prodecures-they are almost identical. Case in point: all of the words in the parenthesis and quotation marks-I wrote those, in both articles. All the
Sherwood Shelties did
259:
Thanks for your help! Will definitely contact AIV and also request full protection. I tried to explain to Sze_cavalry01 that there was no way he could possibly defend his position, given the policies/guidelines of
Knowledge and the flagrantly discriminatory content. But he was really passionate in
251:
Thanks for your help! Will definitely contact AIV and also request full protection. I tried to explain to Sze_cavalry01 that there was no way he could possibly defend his position, given the policies/guidelines of
Knowledge and the flagrantly discriminatory content. But he was really passionate in
2809:
Van, Every organization listed under your references in "Labradoodle" is in the business of selling memberships. Why is it we cannot add useful links to our business? Also,under Types of Labradoodle,we added useful content describing the origin of the F1b Labradoodle which we developed and it was
1977:
have always been in the best interest, and you are to be applauded for your efforts to the article. Unfortunately, you've hit upon one of the least block-happy admins, but, should Frikkers resort to personal attacks against you when he returns (such as calling you a vandal) despite already being
946:
Ha, i came to your user page fascinated by your name, because i thought it reflected me, and wondered if there was a similarity between us. Alas, no. I spent much of my childhood in Vancouver (the big one), and moved to KY when i got married, hence i, too, could be Vantucky; it's interesting to
1687:
An RfC is a very good idea. I'm happy to go through things paragraph by paragraph on the talk page. What I've done with other articles of contention is to go through the article paragraph-by-paragraph with everyone over a couple of weeks on the talk page and reach consensus on each issue of
3378:
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5). Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Knowledge.
1445:
Got a wee vandal problem. It's coming from IP: 64.90.250.32. It appears to be a school library computer in Orange County, NY -- very easy to trace. But, that aside, almost every edit by this IP is blatant vandalism, and there are dozens upon dozens of instances recorded in the IP's history.
1013:
template, to be disingenuous, to put it charitably. Each of those paragraphs had a citation and picking sentences out from the paragraph and demanding that the citation from the end of the paragraph be repeated for each of those sentences is the sort of mindless sourcing cruft I detest on
2957:
I've left two notices on the Administrators noticeboard/Indicents page but, unfortunately, haven't gotten any responses. Meanwhile, Sze_cavalry01 has gotten more aggressive. Is there any better way to get administrator attention? Post on their talk pages perhaps? Thanks. Cheers,
1933:
982:
Van Tucky, please explain your immediate reversal of my addition to the Dahn Yoga article. The quote cited in the article is clearly from an article by a single author, not a group of former members. My change was meant to rectify that misrepresentation of the quote.
1972:
as very much a consensus version. Should Frikkers revert against what we are doing, he will have to answer why his edits are improving the article against consensus, and should he fail to do so, he can be reverted on sight. We all realize that your contributions to
163:
3112:
I reverted your edits to The Chatopug.JPG Image.. I feel an old aged pug has nothing to do the text Appearance section of the article. A front facing young fawn pug however, can show the distinct features on a Pug's face as described by the text in a more in depth
1071:
Being bitter and negative about the RFA process, rather than taking criticism constructively and having the humility to admit that failed attempts may have actually been due to the candidates attributes (rather than the failings of the process) is not desirable. ā
1471:
Thank you for participating in my RfA. I appreciate your taking the time to comment, and plan on learning from the experience and keeping the criticism in mind. If, in the future, you see me doing something that still concerns you, please let me know about it.
2195:
Thanks VanTucky, that's what I needed to hear. I have twice seen my edit deleted by an anonymous user without explanation and was beginning to get quite annoyed. I was not aware that blog links were not appropriate but now that I do I will cease and desist.
1785:
I noticed the picture at the top of the article and of course removed it. Since the practice is democratically spread across populations with different orientations, the homosexualization of the article is gratuitously provocative and possibly worse.
63:
3419:
template on it. Has there been any conclusion regarding the controversial reviewer status? From what I can tell content wise, the biggest problems with the article appear to be references (cleanup tag on the references section) and possibly some
1084:
That has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with what RfA is about. RfA is about trust. Now it's of course easy for you to just say that because of his "bad attitude" et cetera you can't trust him. But then I call bullshit unless you present some
3438:
The debate seems to be not be on-going, at least on the GAN talk. But I would agree that an experienced reviewer, if you don't want to I will, should close the nomination forthwith until the article is stable. A cleanup tag is technically a
2999:, which passed today with a unanimous 79/0/0 tally. It feels great to be appreciated, and I will try my best to meet everyone's expectations. If you have any advice or tips, feel free to pass them along, as I am sure that I will need them!
843:
Absolutely nothing. If you read the basic intro to Knowledge - and look just below the edit window on the right - you'll notice that all contributions you make to Knowledge are not copyrighted to yourself, but they are licensed under the
867:
Interesting. I still think it's rude that they used all of the information and didn't even give a nod to Knowledge. I'm not offended because I wrote that-I only noticed it because I wrote it. Thanks for the quick answer, VanTucky.
821:(Edited to add this:) I've compared most of the information on their home page, and it's from Knowledge, without being acknowledged-they plagiarized so much information. Including all of the following:
1718:
I keep a current list of all basset hound rescues in the USA. I am assuming it is because I sell books on my website, but there are other commercial links in the basset hound Knowledge listing.
2064:
hard to call an article with nearly 100 inline-citations egregiously lacking in verifiability. There is a reason there were few citations in the lead, and it has to do with a disputed section of
921:
new user's contrbutions should be kept. This group also claims to teach "internal martial arts" for health, but seem to be a green card factory from Korea to the United States (IMHO). Thanks! --
2068:. I have now swung the article's citation style to the other side of the dispute because of your objections. Please see the FAC page for a more full explanation of all the issues. Thank you. --
15:
2140:
the fila brasileiro message board is not a board for advertising. it is for discussing fila. if you are going to continue deleting my link then delete the other message / forum boards also.
427:
2927:
In consideration of the blatantly racist POV this carries, I would suggest taking this to AIV. An admin would definitely be more able to mediate things. Making a full protection request at
633:
3144:
Just a question about the takedown of the Folsom Last Supper ad, is this picture not current news? Various news organizations have posted the picture. Would this not constitue a fair use?
931:
Hi, I've been away for a few days, there has been a lot of extra work with my new fall schedule. Thanks for your notes. I will muck in as soon as I have some time, Sunday at the latest. --
260:
his stance, although he didn't really make any empirical arguments in his favor. Crazy, crazy, crazy. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks again! Cheers, ] 03:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
252:
his stance, although he didn't really make any empirical arguments in his favor. Crazy, crazy, crazy. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks again! Cheers, ] 03:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
961:
Thanks for your support and kind words at my recent successful RfA. I'm sure we'll continue running into each other at RFCN. Let me know if I can help you out with anything. Cheers! --
571:
2601:
I was trying to look at the images when you reverted me. Please give me a little while when in a major edit. I guess I'm not very good with images without seeing them on the screen.
1677:
Hi VanTucky and thanks for your note. That is indeed unfortunate. I am just heading to the hospital for a case but will try to intervene on the talk page as soon as I get back. --
1091:
or so. At any rate, you might want to reconsider your general way of participating at RfA. So should I, probably, but I haven't given up the inconvenient hope that people can learn.
824:
Sizing The size of a sheltie (at the withers) can range from being undersize (under 13 inches) to being oversize (over 16 inches.) The average height of a sheltie is 14-15 inches.
2909:, over certain, particurly bad sections. However, Sze_cavalry01 refuses to accept the consensus. Here is a link to the version of the article that Sze_cavalry01 keeps reverting to:
1323:
827:
There have been reports of a brindle Sheltie but many Sheltie enthusiasts agree that a cross sometime in the ancestry of that specific Sheltie could have produced a brindle coat.
589:
1456:
Thanks for the help! I didn't realize that random IPs were afforded user pages. But now I can see (via the user page) that this IP's vandalism has been dealt with. Thanks again!
2258:
for the welcome note and for correcting my emphasis style. For what it's worth, I inherited it from the previous editor, questioned it, and decided to let it me. I know now.
2641:
Fairy nuff - I've read your reasons for the GA rejection and can't really argue - like I say though, nobody else is particularly interested in editing the page because I'm no
629:
216:
146:
2902:
1836:
Influenza recently and have been slow at recovering. Will edit to address the concerns in a couple of days and hope to ask for your opinion if you can still spare the time.
1103:
opposing without providing any diffs of serious misconduct, or any kind of really bad long-term pattern in the candidate's contribs ā that just gives me a mild headache. ā
499:
3274:
2561:
What did you have in mind for adding the DYK to the F&A page? Personally, It really doesn't belong because it focuses mostly on Featured items, new admins and bots.
2449:
1347:
984:
652:
597:
3286:
2461:
1820:
Hi VanTucky, I just wanted to say thank you for helping someone very green to Knowledge. I made some huge mistakes. You tolerated me for months and I appreciate it. (
1359:
609:
535:
2764:: I'm sorry to hear of this. The context rather suggests that I was the perp. I've reread the comment of mine in which I mentioned Useight, and can't see any attack,
3281:
2872:
2625:
2456:
1997:
1352:
617:
463:
2841:
leeway for more. Knowledge is not a free web host or advertising service, it is a reference work. If you truly are the first to breed F1b labradoodles, then this
2618:
2420:
1830:
1315:
605:
3262:
2440:
1845:
1335:
1022:
637:
2947:
his stance, although he didn't really make any empirical arguments in his favor. Crazy, crazy, crazy. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks again! Cheers,
593:
1065:
In his opening comments, the candidate shows a very poor attitude that is undesirable in a position that requires one to be an exemplar in the community. ā
2060:
1993:
3101:
3269:
1340:
601:
2525:
2428:
2360:
1241:
1165:
613:
158:
93:
2969:
2951:
2921:
2114:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1067:
In my and others' opinions, he has a really great attitude. Maybe you and the other more or less regular opposers are just not ready to appreciate it.
3310:
3257:
2485:
2433:
1391:
1328:
1019:
31:
28:
2152:
932:
922:
3179:
I know things can be tough at the beginning, but the rules about fair use images are strict for a good reason: so we don't get sued. Try reading:
3114:
2050:
2072:
3170:
3145:
2817:
2581:. I wikified it some but I need someone knowledgable about dog articles to take a look at it. Since you are, among other things, a member of
1886:
for nominating me. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA. Please do not hesitate to point out any errors I
1431:
647:
2884:
that violates a million and one policies (NPOV, Reliable Sources, Weasel Words, Discriminatory Content). It also uses an outdate source (from
2759:
2308:
3453:
3198:
2247:
2296:
Thanks for your input on the page. I believe I have addressed your concerns, let me know if you think I need to do some wmore work on it.
1576:
935:
3343:
3092:
even after it passed GA and would rather like to write 5 or 6 good articles for WP readers then to just push POV across a dozen articles.
3086:
Oh, I just saw that the article made itĀ ! I thought that was a remark of encouragement on my userpage and did not know about the reviewĀ !
3080:
2515:
2184:
1744:
1522:
1421:
1074:
Not every criticism is equally constructive. Besides, the main reason people opposed his 2nd RfA was because of his refusal to answer the
585:
72:
3133:
2608:
1130:
1122:
987:
861:
3192:
3173:
3163:
3148:
3015:
2974:
2866:
2686:
2042:
2029:
1486:
1078:
questions, which he did now. Did you bother to look through the other RfA at all? Your comment reads a bit like you didn't investigate.
1042:
641:
154:
89:
3432:
2940:
2551:
2234:
Thank you for your last comment as turse it may be. But, I respectfully disagree with your assesment. Thank you for stopping by. --
1652:
3314:
3139:
2996:
2796:
2787:
2653:
2636:
2489:
2164:
1775:
1395:
678:
624:
1890:
make (unintentionally of course), so I won't make them again. Please contact me if you need anything done, that's what I'm here for!
1460:
1879:
1824:
1756:
1030:
908:
2778:
Call it whatever you want, but criticizing Useight isn't a method that's going to convince me that a candidate merits my support.
1790:
1698:
2746:
2604:
I had refrained from making reversions to the text for several days because of the discussion on the talk page that you can see.
1948:
1806:
Even though you didn't positively support my self-nomination, I thank you for raising valid concerns. I learn from everything. --
1750:
2605:
3306:
3302:
2738:
2481:
2477:
2135:
1780:
1740:
1387:
1383:
404:
2931:
might be a good idea until the conflict is over as well. I'll stop by though, and thanks for bringing this to my attention!
2565:
2211:
question, that's why I placed the welcome template on the user's talk page. Oh, BTW, I also reformatted the talk page per
1815:
188:
111:
2914:
1688:
contention. I think it would work on Boerboel provided Frikkers is willing to participate in good faith. Let me know --
782:
There are also veterinary procedures to "fix" improper earsets, although no reputable breeder will go to those extremes."
2228:
2003:
1706:
1025:
877:
580:
373:
192:
3059:
3402:
3240:
2722:
Although people who self-identify as atheists are usually assumed to be irreligious, some sects within major religions
2710:
Although people who self-identify as atheists are usually assumed to be irreligious, some sects within major religions
2402:
1297:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
686:
392:
2772:
2355:
1481:
1082:
Your edit history is completely irrelevant if you can't demonstrate a positive, constructive attitude to adminship. ā
3064:
2589:
2035:
674:
2331:
2290:
1624:
Wow, thank you for fixing that typo. How could I have not noticed that earlier? Haha, thank you again very much! =)
2768:
or other -- but perhaps my stylistic cilia are a bit numb today. Please tell me where the problem lies. Thanks! --
2014:
1765:
Its closing time is near, so I would be glad if you could review my reply and possibly change your recommendation.
1450:
1031:
951:
398:
100:
1982:
548:
2624:
2160:
2130:
1913:
1667:
1000:
967:
925:
872:
837:
815:
670:
2215:
Lastly, I am ingoring your last statement per your instructions. Thank you for stopping by. Happy editing! --
2200:
3054:
2531:
2020:
Considering that the talk addition is their only contrib, I don't think a fourth-level warning is appropriate.
1951:, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified.
811:
2696:
2671:
1810:
1106:
972:
2825:
2264:
1637:
1542:
977:
413:
3393:
1955:
1681:
886:
333:
2889:
2829:
1378:
181:
3117:
2038:
is to navigate to, it seemed unlikely they are actually a novice. If I'm wrong, I owe them an apology. ā
557:
2731:
as stated in article) and that doesn't apply to atheism in general, but applies only to strong atheism.
2701:
682:
690:
542:
3403:
3207:
2752:
2582:
2369:
2115:
1253:
852:
is allowed to freely use, alter and distribute Knowledge content. That's a part of why we're "the š".
3088:
Even after the review I'll keep trying my level best to improve the article further. I keep trying on
3071:
I'll keep trying to improve the article and your message encourages me to work more dilligently on it.
3030:
2742:
2570:
1736:
1600:
1223:
2910:
2336:
2205:
1539:
1466:
1061:
Any strong oppose should be thoroughly backed up by diffs, not just some half-informed assumptions.
992:
170:
122:
107:
3154:
You have to add a fair use rationale for it to be fair use. Without one it's copyright violation.
2880:
I've got a small problem I was hoping you could help with. There is an article I've come across,
2857:
sources to be included. Verification, not truth, is the sole threshold for inclusion of content.
2562:
379:
118:
3096:
3075:
2881:
2546:
2537:
1963:
1840:
1593:
1581:
1437:
1209:
2086:
1882:, which ended succesfully with 26 supports, 3 opposes and 1 neutral. A special thanks goes to
898:
2327:
2304:
2286:
2102:
1987:
66:
485:
2813:
2734:
2650:
2633:
2148:
2077:
1732:
1728:
1722:
1565:
1530:
941:
799:
476:
1711:
Hi VanTucky: I was wondering why the link that I submitted to you was deleted recently.
8:
2556:
2541:
2522:
2341:
Thanks very much for the 'star. I'm glad to know the template will be helpful. Cheers! ā
2156:
1850:
1658:
965:
521:
2792:
Oh, I see -- though I thought I'd criticized Useight's argument rather than Useight. --
2521:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
1427:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
894:
3429:
3349:
3320:
3048:
2906:
2495:
2269:
2190:
1401:
807:
773:
449:
3413:
2893:
2821:
2585:
could you take a look at it and tell me if it is in the approved format? Thank you.
2578:
2571:
2348:
1906:
1477:
913:
512:
3009:
2964:
2658:
2594:
2320:
2297:
2279:
2109:
1968:
Hi VanTucky, yes, I suppose you are correct. I consider what we are working on at
1795:
1672:
1631:
1619:
993:
177:
16:
1095:
that, mainly because they are superficial themselves. Opposing EM makes me wonder
947:
hear your explanation, though ~ i've never run across the phrase before. Cheers,
3425:
2242:
2237:
2223:
2218:
2069:
1923:
1557:
1534:
1047:
470:
3124:
Um, in case you didn't notice, there are already facial portraits of fawn pugs.
3038:
I have noticed that you are a frequent reviewer at that Good Articles project.
2006:), but maybe it's the right combination for balance. Thanks for fixing that in
3358:
3324:
2928:
2615:
2499:
2253:
2143:
2065:
2056:
1405:
1185:
1175:
962:
956:
890:
762:
440:
1860:
758:
3445:
3440:
3184:
3180:
3155:
3125:
3089:
3044:
3039:
3032:
2932:
2858:
2804:
2779:
2678:
2540:
and have renominated the article after extensive editing. Kindly take a look
2261:
2176:
2171:
There are no other message board links, and all such links are prohibited by
2021:
2007:
1969:
1821:
1644:
1114:
1039:
1015:
1007:
948:
869:
853:
834:
803:
707:
2314:
Hi VanTucky, thank you for prompting me to proceed down the GA path for the
885:
Just thought I'd show you when and why the tag was placed, it was placed on
848:. This means that not only do you not own your own writing in articles, but
47:
3421:
2850:
2837:
2693:
2668:
2642:
2392:
2342:
2212:
2197:
2172:
2093:
2039:
2011:
1895:
1807:
1772:
1664:
1473:
1287:
506:
3107:
3004:
2959:
2948:
2918:
2913:. Also, here is a link to the most flagrant section in that old version:
2846:
2664:
2126:
1952:
1883:
1787:
1626:
1457:
1447:
1428:
1195:
879:
764:
3340:
2793:
2769:
2586:
2315:
2275:
1979:
1695:
1689:
1678:
1336:
News and notes: Template standardization, editing patterns, milestones
1204:, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
1099:
superficial people can be, but it's still their own business. However,
2614:
Don't forget you can use the preview button to see how images appear,
208:
3230:
914:
434:
1663:
Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--
3388:
3263:
News and notes: Commons uploaders, Wikimania 2008/2009, milestones
2595:
2536:
I have tried to address the concerns expressed in the GA-review of
1974:
1217:
760:
2514:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
1420:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
786:
356:
Please note: I will respond to any queries here, not on your talk.
2663:
Just a short note to say thanks for your help and support on the
1494:
2897:
in the article but was thoroughly disgusted by it and had to do
1146:
1721:
Thanks for your help VanTucky! Cathy Rudert, from Kentucky! (
1511:
1138:
765:
2726:, and even reject the existence of a personal, creator deity.
2714:, and even reject the existence of a personal, creator deity.
1038:
good article and nobody reviews it due to its specificity. --
793:
was to modify it a bit by deleting some words and sentences.
3253:
3021:
2983:
2706:
So you undid my change on article about Atheism. I changed:
2415:
1932:
1310:
903:
3293:
3233:
3215:
2468:
2395:
2377:
2097:
1368:
1290:
1272:
1248:
845:
3183:
to get an idea of how to upload with a proper rationale.
2429:
Wikimedia announces plans to move office to San Francisco
2034:
That thought crossed my mind. But considering how hard
1127:
Sorry that you didn't like the enquired explanation. ā
1232:. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.
54:
1978:
warned, I will view it as a very serious offense --
701:
1768:If you have any more concerns, please let me know.
209:āāPolicy violating article / conensus not respected
2873:Policy violating article / conensus not respected
2836:Links to St. Clair kennels are spam, period. Per
1992:Well, between us we delivered a mixed message to
1831:RE:Your GA nomination of Roman trade with India
138:
2915:Sze_cavalry01's Kafir Characteristics Section
1855:
1755:Thanks for expressing your opinion on my RFA (
1599:'s RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by
3282:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
2905:has many people arguing with one lone user,
2457:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
2144:http://members.boardhost.com/filabrasileiro/
2059:, I respectfully request that you return to
1353:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
1324:Wikimedia treasurer expected to depart soon
2988:
2106:was updated with a fact from the article
1930:
3409:This article still has a somewhat stale
3247:
2418:
2409:
1757:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Amire80
1313:
1304:
3428:and just fail this for the time being?
3258:WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
2051:Cillian Murphy FAC issues now addressed
1014:Knowledge. If you have a problem with
2995:Thank you for voicing your opinion in
893:, with direction to the discussion at
318:==Knowledge has a new administrator!==
311:==Knowledge has a new administrator!==
2965:
368:WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
1592:
1521:Thank you for your participation in
1208:
1164:Thank you for your participation in
648:WikiProject Good articles newsletter
343:
325:Revision as of 17:50, 4 October 2007
155:Revision as of 17:50, 4 October 2007
90:Revision as of 19:20, 3 October 2007
80:
46:
2055:Since you have opposed the FAC for
1803:I have been given the sysop tools.
1556:
377:identifies, organizes and improves
215:
204:
169:
152:
145:
134:
99:
87:
13:
3206:
2975:Knowledge has a new administrator!
2368:
1487:The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
1252:
327:
35:
3465:
3140:Takedown of Folsom Last Supper ad
2606:The way, the truth, and the light
2445:archives, conferences, milestones
2364:updated for September 24th, 2007.
2036:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Oregon
1245:updated for September 17th, 2007.
3357:
3287:The Report on Lengthy Litigation
3020:
2982:
2462:The Report on Lengthy Litigation
2328:
2321:
2305:
2298:
2287:
2280:
2085:
1931:
1859:
1725:22:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC))
1510:
1493:
1360:The Report on Lengthy Litigation
1222:This RFA thanks was inspired by
1145:
1032:Therapies for multiple sclerosis
902:
706:
660:
399:Frank Butler (American football)
347:
3097:
3076:
2760:An ad hominem attack on Useight
2547:
2421:From the editor: Survey results
1841:
1751:RfA - Amire80 (Amir E. Aharoni)
1567:
1561:
1558:
1329:WikiWorld comic: "Sarah Vowell"
787:http://www.sherwoodshelties.ca/
2867:16:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2830:12:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2797:03:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2788:03:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2773:02:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2747:23:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
2697:02:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
2692:Ditto. Very much appreciated!
2687:23:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
2672:23:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
2654:07:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
2637:07:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
2619:18:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
2609:18:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
2590:15:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
2566:18:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
2552:12:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
2526:02:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
2356:01:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
2291:22:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2265:21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2248:22:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2229:20:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2201:08:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2185:00:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2165:00:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
2131:18:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
2073:07:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
2043:01:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
2030:00:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
2015:00:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
1983:00:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
1956:19:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1914:12:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1846:11:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1825:00:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1811:23:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1791:23:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1776:13:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1745:21:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
1699:04:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
1682:01:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
1668:23:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
1653:22:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
1638:22:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
1577:20:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
1504:Click there to open your card!
1482:13:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
1461:21:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
1451:20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
1432:03:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
1316:From the editor: Reader survey
1156:Click there to open your card!
1131:22:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1123:18:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1107:06:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1052:Ok, so let me try to clarify.
1043:07:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
1026:04:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
988:04:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
973:04:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
952:18:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
936:03:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
926:14:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
909:08:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
873:23:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
862:23:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
838:23:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
816:23:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
2236:
2217:
2136:Fila Brasileiro Message Board
1878:for your participation in my
1781:Your contribution to anal sex
1601:
1594:
1224:
1210:
1196:
1186:
1176:
1166:
323:
285:
276:
267:
3337:
3228:
3202:updated for October 03, 2007
3169:Man, this is too complcated.
2981:
2890:obsolete scientific theories
2390:
2274:Thanks for your help on the
2241:
2222:
1816:Thanks for helping a newbie!
1762:I replied to your concerns.
1694:I know, give me a second --
1285:
796:What can be done about it?
139:āāElectronic voice phenomena
18:Browse history interactively
7:
3454:19:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3433:17:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3394:04:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3344:03:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3339:Automatically delivered by
3318:
3238:
3193:01:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3174:01:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3164:01:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3149:01:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
3134:21:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
3118:21:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
3102:21:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
3081:21:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
3060:02:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
3019:
3016:21:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
2970:17:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
2952:03:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
2941:20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
2922:16:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
2724:don't have theistic beliefs
2577:Someone created a stub for
2493:
2434:WikiWorld comic: "Ambigram"
2400:
2332:11:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
2309:01:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
1947:Thanks for your support in
1707:Basset Hound Rescues in USA
1399:
1295:
10:
3470:
3404:Electronic voice phenomena
3301:
3296:
3223:
2583:Knowledge:WikiProject Dogs
2544:for details. With regards,
2476:
2471:
2385:
1376:
1280:
590:Ottawa Senators (original)
339:to leave me a new message.
206:
136:
3356:
3331:
3285:
3280:
3273:
3268:
3261:
3256:
3218:
3065:RE:Roman trade with India
3040:good article reassessment
2903:talk page for the article
2667:page. Much appreciated!
2506:
2460:
2455:
2448:
2439:
2432:
2427:
2380:
2278:page, it is appreciated.
1937:
1858:
1412:
1371:
1363:
1358:
1351:
1346:
1339:
1334:
1327:
1322:
1275:
668:
366:
283:
274:
265:
226:
223:
193:Pending changes reviewers
151:
86:
2888:100 years ago) that use
1949:my request for adminship
1555:
1552:
1515:
543:AĆ©rospatiale SA 330 Puma
189:Extended confirmed users
2991:Thanks, Steven Walling!
2911:Sze_cavalry01's Version
2626:Dale Smith (Playwright)
2116:Did you know? talk page
85:
3212:
3211:The Knowledge Signpost
2882:Hindukush Kafir people
2712:have atheistic beliefs
2538:Roman trade with India
2532:Roman trade with India
2374:
2373:The Knowledge Signpost
1604:Phaedriel's RFA thanks
1258:
1257:The Knowledge Signpost
1227:Phaedriel's RFA thanks
3368:Thanks Steven Walling
3270:Wikimedia in the News
3210:
2677:You're most welcome.
2372:
1880:Request for Adminship
1771:Thanks in advance. --
1643:You're most welcome.
1341:Knowledge in the news
1256:
978:Please explain change
671:Good article criteria
1589:brazenly stolen from
1533:. Special thanks to
1518:Dear Steven Walling,
985:Rhetorician magician
610:Battle of the Yarmuk
3441:quick-fail criteria
3275:Features and admins
2892:that are, frankly,
2702:Atheistic beliefs!?
2450:Features and admins
1348:Features and admins
618:Mary McLeod Bethune
3241:About the Signpost
3225:Volume 3, Issue 40
3213:
2753:Ad hominem attack?
2563:The Placebo Effect
2403:About the Signpost
2387:Volume 3, Issue 39
2375:
1613:
1612:
1548:for nominating me.
1499:
1298:About the Signpost
1282:Volume 3, Issue 38
1259:
1235:
1234:
1151:
638:GAN Backlog Drives
598:Siege of SzigetvƔr
358:
167:
97:
3400:
3399:
3346:
3336:
3335:
3327:
3292:
3291:
3252:
3251:
3057:
3051:
3028:
3027:
2894:scientific racism
2832:
2816:comment added by
2749:
2737:comment added by
2579:Comfort retriever
2572:Comfort retriever
2528:
2511:
2510:
2502:
2467:
2466:
2441:News and notes:
2414:
2413:
2352:
2167:
2151:comment added by
2122:
2121:
2110:Baduanjin qigong
1961:
1960:
1920:
1919:
1747:
1731:comment added by
1610:
1595:Š¢hĪµ RĪ±nĪ“om EĪ“Ī¹Ļor
1579:
1572:
1554:
1505:
1491:
1434:
1417:
1416:
1408:
1367:
1366:
1309:
1308:
1268:
1267:
1215:
1211:Š¢hĪµ RĪ±nĪ“om EĪ“Ī¹Ļor
1207:
1162:Dearest VanTucky,
1157:
1143:
818:
802:comment added by
771:
770:
697:
696:
606:Battle of Plataea
362:
361:
354:
322:
153:
88:
68:
3461:
3450:
3418:
3412:
3361:
3354:
3353:
3338:
3319:
3315:Single-Page View
3294:
3254:
3216:
3189:
3160:
3130:
3099:
3078:
3055:
3049:
3024:
3014:
3012:
3007:
2986:
2979:
2978:
2967:
2962:
2937:
2863:
2811:
2784:
2732:
2683:
2549:
2513:
2494:
2490:Single-Page View
2469:
2416:
2378:
2353:
2350:
2345:
2337:Thank you kindly
2329:
2325:
2306:
2302:
2288:
2284:
2245:
2240:
2226:
2221:
2206:Welcome template
2181:
2146:
2089:
2082:
2081:
2026:
1935:
1928:
1927:
1912:
1909:
1903:
1891:
1872:
1863:
1856:
1843:
1726:
1649:
1636:
1634:
1629:
1607:
1598:
1596:
1587:This design was
1586:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1553:
1550:
1514:
1503:
1497:
1467:Barneca RfA spam
1419:
1400:
1396:Single-Page View
1369:
1311:
1273:
1264:
1249:
1230:
1214:
1212:
1202:
1192:
1182:
1172:
1155:
1149:
1119:
1012:
1006:
1001:these challenges
994:Mobutu Sese Seko
906:
878:Re: NPOV tag on
858:
797:
785:On this website
766:
710:
702:
687:Nominations list
664:
663:
574:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
554:
553:
538:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
518:
517:
502:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
482:
481:
466:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
446:
445:
430:
423:
422:
421:
419:
418:
410:
409:
364:
363:
351:
350:
344:
338:
336:
213:
212:
211:
199:
185:
166:
161:
143:
142:
141:
129:
115:
96:
69:
60:
59:
57:
52:
50:
42:
39:
21:
19:
3469:
3468:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3448:
3416:
3410:
3407:
3396:
3380:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3352:
3347:
3214:
3204:
3187:
3158:
3142:
3128:
3110:
3067:
3036:
3010:
3005:
3003:
2993:
2977:
2960:
2935:
2875:
2861:
2807:
2782:
2755:
2739:193.198.138.114
2704:
2681:
2661:
2651:Sheriff Bernard
2647:The Fire Dragon
2634:Sheriff Bernard
2629:
2599:
2575:
2559:
2534:
2376:
2366:
2349:
2343:
2339:
2272:
2256:
2208:
2193:
2179:
2138:
2080:
2053:
2024:
1990:
1966:
1926:
1921:
1907:
1896:
1893:
1874:
1866:
1853:
1833:
1818:
1808:Amir E. Aharoni
1798:
1783:
1773:Amir E. Aharoni
1753:
1733:Bassethoundtown
1723:Bassethoundtown
1709:
1675:
1661:
1647:
1632:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1584:
1507:
1498:
1489:
1469:
1440:
1262:Weekly Delivery
1260:
1247:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1220:
1159:
1150:
1141:
1117:
1050:
1035:
1010:
1004:
997:
980:
970:
959:
944:
918:
883:
856:
776:
767:
761:
715:
693:
661:
630:Project quality
594:British Airways
570:
560:
558:
551:
549:
546:
545:
541:
534:
524:
522:
515:
513:
510:
509:
505:
498:
488:
486:
479:
477:
474:
473:
471:Wuert Engelmann
469:
462:
452:
450:
443:
441:
438:
437:
433:
426:
416:
414:
407:
405:
402:
401:
397:
384:
348:
342:
341:
334:
332:
319:
312:
303:
298:
291:
279:
270:
261:
253:
243:
236:
219:
214:
207:
205:
203:
202:
201:
197:
195:
175:
173:
168:
162:
157:
149:
147:ā Previous edit
144:
137:
135:
133:
132:
131:
127:
125:
105:
103:
98:
92:
84:
83:
82:
81:
79:
78:
77:
76:
75:
74:
65:
61:
55:
53:
48:
45:
43:
40:
38:Content deleted
37:
34:
29:ā Previous edit
26:
25:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3467:
3457:
3456:
3406:
3401:
3398:
3397:
3386:
3385:
3382:
3381:
3377:
3374:
3373:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3362:
3351:
3348:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3329:
3328:
3317:
3299:
3298:
3297:
3290:
3289:
3284:
3278:
3277:
3272:
3266:
3265:
3260:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3245:
3244:
3237:
3227:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3205:
3203:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3167:
3166:
3141:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3109:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3095:
3093:
3087:
3074:
3072:
3070:
3066:
3063:
3035:
3029:
3026:
3025:
3018:
2994:
2989:
2987:
2976:
2973:
2956:
2944:
2943:
2877:Hey Vantucky!
2874:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2806:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2754:
2751:
2703:
2700:
2690:
2689:
2660:
2657:
2628:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2598:
2593:
2574:
2569:
2558:
2555:
2545:
2533:
2530:
2523:R Delivery Bot
2509:
2508:
2507:
2504:
2503:
2492:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2465:
2464:
2459:
2453:
2452:
2447:
2437:
2436:
2431:
2425:
2424:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2407:
2406:
2399:
2389:
2383:
2382:
2381:
2367:
2365:
2359:
2338:
2335:
2312:
2311:
2271:
2268:
2255:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2207:
2204:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2137:
2134:
2120:
2119:
2090:
2079:
2076:
2057:Cillian Murphy
2052:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
1989:
1986:
1965:
1964:Boerboel redux
1962:
1959:
1958:
1944:
1943:
1938:
1936:
1925:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1892:
1869:Dear VanTucky,
1864:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1839:
1837:
1832:
1829:
1817:
1814:
1797:
1794:
1782:
1779:
1752:
1749:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1674:
1671:
1660:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1621:
1618:
1583:
1580:
1549:
1520:
1519:
1517:
1516:
1508:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1492:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1442:Hey VanTucky!
1439:
1438:Vandal Problem
1436:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1398:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1356:
1355:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1301:
1294:
1284:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1246:
1240:
1219:
1216:
1205:
1163:
1160:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1144:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1088:
1087:
1080:
1069:
1063:
1049:
1046:
1034:
1029:
996:
991:
979:
976:
968:
958:
955:
943:
940:
939:
938:
917:
912:
882:
876:
865:
864:
775:
772:
769:
768:
763:
759:
757:
754:
753:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
721:
720:
717:
716:
711:
705:
699:
695:
694:
685:
669:
666:
665:
658:
657:
656:
651:(last updated
644:
621:
577:
386:
385:
371:
370:
360:
359:
352:
329:
328:
326:
321:
320:
317:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
301:
299:
296:
293:
292:
288:
286:
284:
281:
280:
277:
275:
272:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
258:
256:
254:
250:
248:
245:
244:
241:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
228:
225:
221:
220:
196:
187:
186:
171:
150:
126:
123:Administrators
117:
116:
102:Steven Walling
101:
70:
64:
62:
44:
36:
27:
23:
22:
14:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3466:
3455:
3452:
3451:
3442:
3437:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3431:
3427:
3423:
3415:
3405:
3395:
3392:
3391:
3384:
3383:
3376:
3375:
3369:
3363:
3360:
3355:
3345:
3342:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3316:
3312:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3295:
3288:
3283:
3279:
3276:
3271:
3267:
3264:
3259:
3255:
3246:
3243:
3242:
3236:
3235:
3232:
3226:
3222:
3217:
3209:
3201:
3194:
3191:
3190:
3182:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3175:
3172:
3165:
3162:
3161:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3147:
3135:
3132:
3131:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3119:
3116:
3103:
3100:
3094:With Regards,
3091:
3090:Incense Route
3085:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3079:
3073:With Regards,
3062:
3061:
3058:
3052:
3046:
3041:
3034:
3023:
3017:
3013:
3008:
3002:
2998:
2992:
2985:
2980:
2972:
2971:
2968:
2963:
2954:
2953:
2950:
2942:
2939:
2938:
2930:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2907:Sze_cavalry01
2904:
2900:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2878:
2868:
2865:
2864:
2856:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2839:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2831:
2827:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2798:
2795:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2786:
2785:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2761:
2750:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2728:
2727:
2725:
2719:
2716:
2715:
2713:
2707:
2699:
2698:
2695:
2688:
2685:
2684:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2670:
2666:
2656:
2655:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2639:
2638:
2635:
2627:
2620:
2617:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2607:
2602:
2597:
2592:
2591:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2573:
2568:
2567:
2564:
2554:
2553:
2550:
2543:
2539:
2529:
2527:
2524:
2520:
2518:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2470:
2463:
2458:
2454:
2451:
2446:
2444:
2438:
2435:
2430:
2426:
2423:
2422:
2417:
2408:
2405:
2404:
2398:
2397:
2394:
2388:
2384:
2379:
2371:
2363:
2358:
2357:
2354:
2346:
2334:
2333:
2330:
2326:
2324:
2319:the process!
2317:
2310:
2307:
2303:
2301:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2283:
2277:
2267:
2266:
2263:
2259:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2239:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2227:
2225:
2220:
2214:
2203:
2202:
2199:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2145:
2141:
2133:
2132:
2129:
2128:
2117:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2105:
2104:
2103:Did you know?
2099:
2095:
2091:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2075:
2074:
2071:
2067:
2062:
2058:
2044:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2028:
2027:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2002:
1999:
1995:
1994:Bollingersuks
1988:Bollingersuks
1985:
1984:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1970:Talk:Boerboel
1957:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1916:
1915:
1910:
1904:
1902:
1900:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1871:
1870:
1865:
1862:
1857:
1848:
1847:
1844:
1838:With Regards,
1828:
1826:
1823:
1813:
1812:
1809:
1804:
1801:
1793:
1792:
1789:
1778:
1777:
1774:
1769:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1748:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1724:
1719:
1716:
1714:
1712:
1700:
1697:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1680:
1670:
1669:
1666:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1605:
1597:
1590:
1578:
1573:
1570:
1569:(talk to me!)
1564:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1513:
1496:
1484:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1462:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1443:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1312:
1303:
1300:
1299:
1293:
1292:
1289:
1283:
1279:
1274:
1271:
1263:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1244:
1233:
1231:
1229:
1228:
1213:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1200:
1193:
1191:
1190:
1183:
1181:
1180:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1148:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1092:
1086:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1070:
1068:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1057:Strong Oppose
1055:
1054:
1053:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1033:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1016:Michela Wrong
1009:
1002:
995:
990:
989:
986:
975:
974:
971:
966:
964:
954:
953:
950:
937:
934:
930:
929:
928:
927:
924:
916:
911:
910:
905:
900:
896:
892:
888:
881:
875:
874:
871:
863:
860:
859:
851:
847:
842:
841:
840:
839:
836:
832:
828:
825:
822:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
794:
790:
788:
783:
780:
756:
755:
752:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
719:
718:
714:
709:
704:
703:
700:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
659:
654:
650:
649:
645:
643:
639:
635:
631:
628:
626:
622:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
602:Robbie Fowler
599:
595:
591:
587:
584:
582:
578:
575:
573:
564:
555:
544:
539:
537:
528:
519:
508:
503:
501:
492:
483:
472:
467:
465:
456:
447:
436:
431:
429:
420:
411:
400:
396:
394:
390:
389:
388:
387:
383:on Knowledge.
382:
381:
380:good articles
376:
375:
369:
365:
357:
353:
346:
345:
340:
337:
331:Please click
324:
316:
314:
309:
307:
306:
302:
300:
297:
295:
294:
287:
282:
278:
273:
269:
264:
257:
255:
249:
247:
246:
240:
238:
233:
231:
230:
222:
218:
210:
194:
190:
183:
179:
174:
165:
160:
156:
148:
140:
124:
120:
119:Autopatrolled
113:
109:
104:
95:
91:
73:
58:
51:
41:Content added
33:
30:
20:
3446:
3444:take place.
3408:
3389:
3367:
3239:
3229:
3224:
3199:
3185:
3168:
3156:
3143:
3126:
3111:
3068:
3037:
3000:
2990:
2955:
2945:
2933:
2898:
2885:
2879:
2876:
2859:
2854:
2842:
2808:
2780:
2765:
2757:
2756:
2729:
2723:
2721:
2720:
2717:
2711:
2709:
2708:
2705:
2691:
2679:
2662:
2646:
2643:Stephen King
2640:
2630:
2603:
2600:
2576:
2560:
2535:
2516:
2512:
2442:
2419:
2401:
2393:24 September
2391:
2386:
2361:
2340:
2322:
2313:
2299:
2281:
2273:
2260:
2257:
2235:
2216:
2209:
2198:User:Bnewsom
2194:
2177:
2142:
2139:
2125:
2123:
2108:
2107:
2101:
2094:25 September
2078:Did you know
2061:the FAC page
2054:
2022:
2000:
1991:
1967:
1940:
1898:
1897:
1887:
1875:
1873:
1868:
1867:
1834:
1819:
1805:
1802:
1799:
1784:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1754:
1720:
1717:
1713:
1710:
1676:
1662:
1645:
1623:
1603:
1602:
1591:inspired by
1588:
1585:
1568:
1543:
1538:
1531:my talk page
1524:
1523:
1509:
1470:
1444:
1441:
1422:
1418:
1377:
1314:
1296:
1288:17 September
1286:
1281:
1269:
1261:
1242:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1198:
1197:
1188:
1187:
1178:
1177:
1168:
1167:
1161:
1128:
1115:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1083:
1077:
1073:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1036:
998:
981:
960:
945:
942:Curious Name
933:Fire Star ē«ę
923:Fire Star ē«ę
919:
884:
866:
854:
849:
833:
829:
826:
823:
820:
795:
791:
784:
781:
777:
724:
712:
698:
653:January 2013
646:
623:
614:Key Biscayne
581:Reassessment
579:
572:start review
569:
536:start review
533:
507:Zud Schammel
500:start review
497:
464:start review
461:
428:start review
425:
391:
378:
374:This project
372:
367:
355:
330:
3031:Backlog at
2855:independent
2812:āPreceding
2733:āPreceding
2665:Solar power
2557:RE: F&A
2323:Nick Thorne
2300:Nick Thorne
2282:Nick Thorne
2147:āPreceding
1851:Edokter RfA
1727:āPreceding
1659:RFA Thanks!
880:Jimmy Wales
798:āPreceding
683:Changes log
625:Task forces
393:Nominations
217:Next edit ā
32:Next edit ā
3350:Thanks! :D
3069:Thank you,
2766:ad hominem
2316:Murray cod
2276:Murray cod
2270:Murray cod
2191:Crocs Blog
2070:Melty girl
1540:Dihydrogen
1139:RFA Thanks
1003:using the
899:NPOV again
774:Plagiarism
750:/Archive 7
746:/Archive 6
742:/Archive 5
738:/Archive 4
734:/Archive 3
730:/Archive 2
726:/Archive 1
679:GAN Report
675:Statistics
290:2007 (UTC)
3387:Regards,
3231:1 October
3120:Josewiki
3113:manner...
2899:something
2616:SqueakBox
2153:Robinfila
1876:Thank you
1189:Wizardman
1179:Hirohisat
1076:optional
963:Flyguy649
915:Dahn yoga
891:SqueakBox
435:Hal Hinte
227:Line 409:
224:Line 409:
3430:Dr. Cash
3426:WP:WIAGA
3414:GAReview
3321:Shortcut
3311:Tip Line
3307:Newsroom
3303:Archives
3200:Signpost
3115:Josewiki
3056:contribs
3045:Jayron32
2961:āŖask123
2851:reliable
2847:verified
2826:contribs
2814:unsigned
2735:unsigned
2596:Anal sex
2519:spamlist
2517:Signpost
2496:Shortcut
2486:Tip Line
2482:Newsroom
2478:Archives
2362:Signpost
2262:PhGustaf
2161:contribs
2149:unsigned
2004:contribs
1975:Boerboel
1822:Chaps333
1741:contribs
1729:unsigned
1673:Boerboel
1620:Typo fix
1544:Monoxide
1425:spamlist
1423:Signpost
1402:Shortcut
1392:Tip Line
1388:Newsroom
1384:Archives
1243:Signpost
1101:strongly
1040:Garrondo
969:contribs
870:Narmowen
835:Narmowen
812:contribs
804:Narmowen
800:unsigned
713:Archives
182:contribs
112:contribs
56:Wikitext
3325:WP:POST
3171:Billyca
3146:Billyca
3098:Havelok
3077:Havelok
3001:Cheers,
2929:WP:RFPP
2818:Bootss1
2694:Mrshaba
2669:Johnfos
2548:Havelok
2500:WP:POST
2344:Scartol
2066:WP:LEAD
2040:EncMstr
2012:EncMstr
1924:Thanks!
1842:Havelok
1665:JForget
1628:hmwith
1582:Credits
1474:barneca
1406:WP:POST
1218:Credits
1048:Re: RFA
999:I find
949:Lindsay
3181:WP:NFC
3033:WP:GAR
3006:hmwith
2997:my RfA
2949:ask123
2919:ask123
2901:. The
2659:Thanks
2254:Thanks
2127:Allen3
2008:WP:ORE
1953:Addhoc
1941:My RFA
1901:dokter
1884:Rlevse
1796:My RfA
1788:Haiduc
1535:Walton
1525:my RFA
1458:ask123
1448:ask123
1429:Ralbot
1199:Husond
1194:, and
1169:my RFA
1085:diffs.
1020:Banyan
957:My RfA
897:, and
887:Aug 29
850:anyone
642:GA Cup
634:Sweeps
561:istory
525:istory
489:istory
453:istory
417:istory
172:Ask123
128:49,491
67:Inline
49:Visual
3449:Tucky
3422:WP:OR
3341:COBot
3188:Tucky
3159:Tucky
3129:Tucky
2936:Tucky
2862:Tucky
2838:WP:EL
2805:Edits
2794:Hoary
2783:Tucky
2770:Hoary
2682:Tucky
2587:RJFJR
2443:Times
2243:Eagle
2238:Blind
2224:Eagle
2219:Blind
2213:WP:UW
2180:Tucky
2173:WP:EL
2025:Tucky
1980:Samir
1696:Samir
1690:Samir
1679:Samir
1648:Tucky
1562:scent
1559:iride
1506:ā ā ā
1158:ā ā ā
1118:Tucky
889:, by
857:Tucky
586:Bidni
540:) ā¢
504:) ā¢
468:) ā¢
432:) ā¢
200:edits
198:4,920
130:edits
3234:2007
3050:talk
3011:talk
2886:over
2853:and
2843:must
2822:talk
2743:talk
2632:me!
2542:here
2396:2007
2351:Talk
2157:talk
2098:2007
1998:talk
1908:Talk
1888:will
1800:Hi,
1737:talk
1633:talk
1537:and
1478:talk
1379:Home
1291:2007
1023:Tree
1008:fact
895:NPOV
846:GFDL
808:talk
691:edit
335:here
178:talk
164:undo
159:edit
108:talk
94:edit
3447:Van
3390:nat
3313:|
3309:|
3305:|
3186:Van
3157:Van
3127:Van
3108:Pug
2966:{t}
2934:Van
2860:Van
2849:by
2845:be
2781:Van
2718:to
2680:Van
2649::)
2488:|
2484:|
2480:|
2178:Van
2092:On
2023:Van
2010:. ā
1759:).
1646:Van
1394:|
1390:|
1386:|
1382:|
1116:Van
1097:how
907:.
855:Van
576:)
552:alk
516:alk
480:alk
444:alk
408:alk
3417:}}
3411:{{
3323::
2828:)
2824:ā¢
2745:)
2498::
2347:Ā·
2175:.
2163:)
2159:ā¢
2124:--
2118:.
2100:,
2096:,
1911:ā¢
1905:ā¢
1894:ā
1827:)
1743:)
1739:ā¢
1715:]
1480:)
1472:--
1404::
1184:,
1059:ā
1011:}}
1005:{{
814:)
810:ā¢
689:|
681:|
673:|
655:)
640:ā¢
636:ā¢
632:ā¢
620:ā¢
616:ā¢
612:ā¢
608:ā¢
604:ā¢
600:ā¢
596:ā¢
592:ā¢
588:ā¢
568:|
556:|
532:|
520:|
496:|
484:|
460:|
448:|
424:|
412:|
191:,
180:|
121:,
110:|
3053:|
3047:|
2820:(
2762:"
2758:"
2741:(
2155:(
2001:Ā·
1996:(
1899:E
1735:(
1609:.
1476:(
806:(
677:|
627::
583::
559:h
550:t
547:(
523:h
514:t
511:(
487:h
478:t
475:(
451:h
442:t
439:(
415:h
406:t
403:(
395::
184:)
176:(
114:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.