Knowledge

User talk:Raul654: Difference between revisions

Source 📝

1227:
global warming skeptics is decreasing. And in this real world, we create encyclopedias like Knowledge to document these facts. Someone who edits the earth article to say the world is flat is vandalizing the article. It's not subjective, it's not a judgment call - it's flat out wrong. And if you are unable to grasp this not-too-difficult concept, then you have no business trying to lecture anyone about our policies.
3481:. In short - she'll do on FAC exactly what I do. (2) No, I do not know her in real life - in fact, I know very little about her at all beyond what does on here. (3) I was not appointed my Jimbo. I started doing the job back in early 2004 when it was clear that it needed to be done by someone, and some months later the community affirmed my role by giving the job a name. Jimbo has never had anything to do with it. 71: 2457:. This table contains a column "Portfolio" for links that display candidates' pertinent skills. I will be going through each candidate's statements and gradually populate the column, but this may take some time. Please feel free to add some links in the form if you feel it shows conflict resolution skills, or otherwise. It would also be helpful if you can check if the information about you is correct. 2338:
resolved or consensus for promotion has not been reached, a nomination will be removed from the list and archived. The director determines the timing of the process for each nomination." I realize it is up to your discretion, but was wondering if I could have some kind of rationale for your decision. At any rate, thanks for the time.
2024:(2) At any given time, there are probably well over 1,000 comments and replies on the FAC. No single person could possibly keep track of them all. The onus is on the reviewer to keep up with replies to his comments. In borderline cases, I usually check the article myself, but only a cursory review - I don't read the whole thing. 252::After yesterday's sock, I got really tired of Raspor and blocked for 6 months every IP he's ever used (no editing - either logged in or otherwise - and no account registration). Thomasdid is not from any IP or range that Raspor has ever used - so my tentative conclusion is no, it is not Rapsor. ] 17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 245::After yesterday's sock, I got really tired of Raspor and blocked for 6 months every IP he's ever used (no editing - either logged in or otherwise - and no account registration). Thomasdid is not from any IP or range that Raspor has ever used - so my tentative conclusion is no, it is not Rapsor. ] 17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 1152:. Additionally, you have no absolutely no ground to say whether dissenting scientists are increasing or decreasing in number, especially since I suspect nobody knows. This is obviously a content dispute, and your edit warring helps none. (Note, boldface text was edited after original post, to convey original meaning.) ~ 3406:. It's been up for a month, has 3 supports and no Opposes, but I saw some minor MOS issues that needed to be dealt with before archiving/promoting, so I added that commentary and the nominator complied. I feel comfortable asking for final minor tweaks at that stage; does that seem an appropriate way to handle? 3502:
Sandy is a complicated person in real life. She passes her time in simple surroundings, trying to deflect the worship of those who know her and use her gifts to help others. She has been hunted as a fugitive, cursed as a tomb-robber, and is renowned as a lover and duelist. She is a worshiped as a God
1320:
Even if a change from "A few" to "An increasing number" is demonstrably false (and while I'm not sure that you can indeed demonstrate that, I agree it is against the orthodox view and can be perceived as an attempt to mislead) I do not believe an indefinite block is called for, barring a long history
1945: 1419:
May I also mention that Obedium edits his talk page back and forth repeatedly. The net change is to add "Test embedded..." AGF on this one is out of the question for a paranoid fella like myself, I think Obedium is trying to make the warnings become archaeological relics in the history of his talk
1350:
Please unprotect Obedium's talk page. Tak page protection is generally reserved for users who abuse the unblock template, thereby wasting other admins' time. There is a broad consensus that users can remove warnings; it is still there in the history and your edit summary is easily visible as well.
562: 3490:
50,000 edits by Sandy is hardly indicative of a new editor. Susan, while I'm sure you post with the best of intentions, asking someone about personal details of a third party on-site is not a good idea—they might inconsiderately provide answers. It's no one's business but Sandy's to answer question
3462:
process. I believe she or he is a very hard worker but is new to Knowledge. May I ask please 1) what role SandyGeorgia will be assuming? and 2) If you know him or her in "real life"? (This can make a difference sometimes I realize). Just a question from another newbie (about 1.5 years here). Thank
3401:
OK, I'll leave for you those I've taken strong-ish stands on or that I was involved with before you delegated me; generally, I'll aim to be conservative while I'm coming up to speed, and leave it to you to sweep up what I leave. But, I need one more piece of guidance; as a sample, please review my
3127:
Just wanted to let you know, I appreciate the hard work you're putting into this. I may be raisin' hell at the Arbcom right now (and hell needs to be raised, in my view), but it appears that you're taking a relatively clear-eyed look at the facts at hand, and for that, I'm appreciative. For all his
724:
As for adding the TGGWS section, I did not. It has been a long standing section which was introduced by someone other than myself. I simply reverted a deletion by another editor who provided no satisfactory reason for the deletion. It is POV pushing that I am seeking to avoid here, not introduce
646:
Actually, the semi-protection expired before I got there (07:46, 26 October 2007 Riana (Talk | contribs | block) protected HonorĂ© de Balzac ‎ (vandalism of an unsavoury nature (expires 07:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC))) (Change)) I just removed the semi-protection template (which was on an unprotected
625:
is slated for Today's Featured Article on Nov. 17 – cheers for that. I notice also that you've removed the semi-protected status for that page. Alas, I worry that when he is put up on the front page, clever 12-year-olds around the world will go nuts with the vandalism. Maybe we should re-protect it
3356:
Once I start, how do we keep from getting crossed up? That is, how do we avoid promoting/archiving at the same time? I would plan to set a very conservative threshold initially for my own archives/promotes, leaving anything that's not pretty clear for you, so a "sweep" by you sometime after I go
2709:
I would like to share with you that today, November 28, 2007, I was honored by the Senate of Puerto Rico with the "Resolution of the Senate Number 3603" in appreciation for my work in Knowledge regarding Puerto Rican military related articles. I was given the resolution on behalf of the Senate by
2467:
actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well. I believe that conflict resolution skills are most pertinent to the position, but if you want to highlight other skills, please feel free to use a new letter and
1999:
2. How do you check whether all the problems are fixed? For example, I oppose an FAC for a few reasons, including not enough references and spelling mistakes. The nominator says he fixed everything, but he did not fix the spelling mistakes. Do you read the article to check whether all the spelling
1920:
Raul, we disagree strongly, but your questions page was probably not the best place to air that contentious debate. So feel free to refactor/move/remove our back-and-forth debate from that page. I stand by everything I wrote, and I have no problem with it staying exactly the way it is, but I would
1200:
vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated" Your lack of good faith in editors is apparent across the board. Simply because you lack good faith in many of our contributing editors does not warrant
3285:
and I'm struck by the proposed restriction on Giano. I'm not familiar with the case or his conduct, so perhaps I'm missing vital information, but I can't see how restricting someone's ability to edit pages in the Knowledge space fosters any kind of respect for the collaborativeness of the project
2749:
I appreciate the comments you made at the proposed decision on the Durova ArbCom. Sometimes it feels like, in their anger at a particular contributor, ArbCom's decisions become difficult to grasp in the context of what actually makes the project better. Seeing your reasoning, and your justifiable
1226:
filled-world you come from that with a straight face you say something like that. In the real world, the one that I live in, there is an objective reality. There are things that are true, and things are not. The world is not flat. The earth circles around the sun. It's 2006 AD. And the number of
998:
Hi there, We of WikiProject Seattle have been working diligently to correct all the issues brought up during its Featured Article review, and do believe we've brought it back up to snuff. The original nominator hasn't been seen in the discussion for a while and we were wondering when and how the
3605:
After yesterday's sock, I got really tired of Raspor and blocked for 6 months every IP he's ever used (no editing - either logged in or otherwise - and no account registration). Thomasdid is not from any IP or range that Raspor has ever used - so my tentative conclusion is no, it is not Rapsor.
1177:
Moreover, your analogy is transparently false, as is the logic behind it. Statements like "this band sucks" or "this band is awesome" are obviously subjective. The number of critics of global warming is not subjective. The number of critics has been steadily decreasing for 20+ years (down to a
2337:
after it had been there for less than week. While it had two opposes, one of them had been addressed and the other had only been there for a few hours. As such, I do not really feel as though this meets "If, after sufficient time, objections considered actionable by the director have not been
3071:
Hi Mark—Please see my edits, prompted initially by Sandy's request to review a sentence she added. I've left a note with Bishonen asking her to review the template as well. I don't think it's premature to add a statement saying that "director" includes your delegate. That last item could be
947:, I have moved it to a more appropriate title. I've also permanently semi-protected the page to stop anons from abusing it. I'll also keep a permanent watch on the page - those who add images of others without their permissions will get reverted. Could you also add it to your watchlist? - 2055:
Sorry Kaypoh - rather than unpromote an article, why not simply fix the spelling mistakes yourself? I generally do these days as it is often simpler than actually writing about them on the FAC page. Remember the aim is to make FAs, not to pass or fail others as such. cheers,
925:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1178:
quantifiable few; indisputably fewer than 5 or 10 years ago) and continues to decrease as the evidence piles up. Obedium's edits are, then, flatly false. And I find it very convenient that you choose to ignore his obviously misleading edit summary ("Improved phrasing").
2592:
article. I just wanted to say thanks for letting it wait for that long actually, because with the help of other contributors we were able to make some good quality improvements to the article. Your judgment and the work you do is appreciated around here, thanks.
288:, for mediating in disputes, for adding lots of really nice pictures, and for still finding the time to work on articles! In a few months you've already become a highly valued member of the community. Stay with us and don't burn out, please. --Eloquence Apr 10, 2004 63: 1267:
The 1RR provision exists only through the consensus of involved editors. If we allow editors with a history of POV-pushing and sockpuppetry to game the 1RR provision in order to insert outright lies, then that consensus will (and should) dissolve.
2589: 2565: 818:}} for articles needing a sound file? I am planning on doing some recordings of medieval and baroque music, and it would be nice to identify articles looking for specific pieces. If there is no category or template, I'd happily create one. 1899: 1509: 505:. I'm not sure what you meant by "(Legit user?)". Also, I am not sure how to read that checkuser tree. If you have more information on Thin Arthur or if that checkuser tree reveals information that would help out at SSP, please post it at 541:
The structure of the tree is (conceptually) easy to understand: all IPs under a username are IPs that user has been known to have used; usernames under an IP are usernames that trace to that IP. Repeats are omitted as they are found.
871:
If by a "non-date specific request", you mean a request that doesn't specify a date -- no, you have to pick some date. However, with that said, the date you pick doesn't have to have a relationship with the article being requested.
2616:
Raul, I'm not sure what to do with this article. I believe it complies with the Featured Article criteria, but if I renominate it I think I'm going to come across the same impossible objections. Do you have any recommendations?
3146: 1493: 1078:
The second of those reverts was to vandalism (changing it to increasing - which is flatly objectively false, and using a misleading edit summary to boot). Vandalism reverts are not normally counted against 3rr and whatnot.
2127:
This is not bad faith. I opposed one FAC (I forgot which one) because about 10 paragraphs had no references. The nominator added references to only 3 or 4 paragraphs and the other paragraphs still had no references.
1599: 961: 3556:
Hi Raul. I sent Sandy Ordonez an e-mail as requested, but I haven't heard anything yet. I wondering if you could do me favor and check with her to find out if something is wrong. I will apreciate it, Take care.
2469: 382: 1334:
would be if I could drop a week on anyone without warning for single edits? Unless there is a long history with this user making delibreately misleading edits to GW topics, I think a week is pretty long.
375: 1632:
to the bottom of the article. Please wait for the bot to do the rest of the updating to articlehistory and the article talk page. If you do that yourself, it creates extra work and stalls the bot.
1375:. (which is why letting people scrub these warnings is not a good idea). Beacuse you asked, I've gone ahead and unprotected his talk page - I expect he'll get rid of the current block message too. 2904:
I'd like to create a userbox similar to the one I did for NYB (It's on my talk page). But to do so, I'd like a.) to know if you're opposed to it; and b.) your suggestion of an appropriate image.
1682: 1017:, or do you have a policy of not featuring an article for a second time? That'd be logical given so many have never appeared, but... :-) Also, fyi, 20/12/07 would have been the 102nd birthday of 1093:
I don't know how you can reasonably state that the second revert was vandalism. You may believe that it is completely false, but the other user doesn't think so - It's a bog standard edit war.
15: 3503:
in Honduras, but is an outlaw in Peru. No living man knows her real name, as she only whispers it into the ears of those she is about to kill. All love her and hate her, she is SandyGeorgia.
2454: 2372:
I noticed on your user page that you have some background in the field of biomedical engineering. So i decided to forward a question I found on the twin articles talk page. The question is
3525: 3039: 2333:
Hi. I'm not really sure if it is the norm to approach you on your decisions on promotion of FAC but I guess I will just be bold and go ahead and do so. You recently achieved the FAC for
3298: 2348:
I'll tell you what - go ahead, fix Tony's objection, and then go ahead and renominate it. We normally tell people to wait a bit, but you're right that I might have been rather hasty.
277: 1906:. Did you find a problem with the article, or were there simply not enough "votes"? If there were not enough votes, then about how many votes does an article need to be promoted? — 1048:. Two reverts would not normally be a problem, but you've already been blocked for edit warring on this article. Please think about this and discuss your future edits to the page. 2561: 1420:
page by artificially pushing time forward. He cannot escape by doing so sice everything is recorded, but it is annoying when trying to figure out how many warnings Obedium has.
2636:
Thanks for noticing the LtWinters sock. How did you catch that? I'm surprised he'd vandalize my user and talk pages but then revert back and warn himself. Seems pointless. --
3042:- Though, as I mentioned to others when working on NYB's - I'm on the lookout for alternate "bottom-line" comments. (It's configurable for that and for floating left/right.) - 2499:
indefinately, and is there evidence that he/she/what-ever group is behind the account is the same people that were behind another indef blocked editor? Just curious. Regards,
1921:
also not object to you refactoring it. Regardless of our respective positions on that case, the questions page was probably not the best place to get into an extended debate.
1697: 1657: 3152:
If the person that Opposes it does not come back and Supports the article, despite that I've commented on their points, would their oppose be counted when you close the FAC?
1534: 1201:
edit warring. The policy continues, rather clearly, "NPOV violations ... Making bold edits ... Unintentional misinformation ... Unintentional nonsense ... Stubbornness" are
402: 3128:
faults (and they're not few), Giano is an overwhelming net asset to this project. He loves the 'pedia, and any "remedy" that keeps him from contributing hurts the project.
715:
It would be helpful if you would participate in the discussion page rather than here. All of my actions are adequately discussed in the discussion page, none of yours are.
1517: 1501: 1495: 930: 1520:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
3282: 3190: 1478:(Note - the above RFC had no merit, was rejected by almost every person who commented on it, and was shortly thereafter deleted because it was not properly certified.) 1783: 2041:
Thanks for answering. :) If the nominator did not fix the spelling mistakes and you promote the article to FA, is there a way to ask you to unpromote the article? --
1886: 1577: 1642:
If you're coming here to ask, why did a bot promote or fail my nomination, the bot didn't; Raul did (see the diffs above). The bot only updates the articlehistory.
1636: 660:
Ah, I see. Is it possible to apply for semi-protection before it appears on the front page, on the presumption that it will be vandalized unless it is protected? –
2076:
That is an example. If the problems are bigger than spelling mistakes, and the nominator says he fixed them but he did not, and the article is promoted wrongly? --
1991: 1639:, it was not promoted. Please wait for the bot to close the FAC and update the articlehistory. If you do that yourself, it creates extra work and stalls the bot. 1192:
What one considers an improvement or not is wholly subjective, so it's not worth mentioning, especially in this case. Also, I believe you are incorrect on policy.
210: 147: 2210:
Please respond on my talk page. We'll probably go to press late Monday or early Tuesday (UTC), but late responses will be added as they're submitted. Thanks,
2622: 2608: 987: 2110:
And please note the instructions there regarding the minimum time between promotion and review; in that time, often issues can be addressed without review.
502: 3313: 2907:(Note for anyone else reading this, there are only two bureaucrats running, and I think both are at least decent choices (smile), so I'm asking them both.) 2557: 1834:
I added it after it came up in my computational immunology class (in reference to AIDS). I also assumed it could refer to other situations like septicaemia
3172: 2666: 2641: 1741: 1437: 971: 897: 415: 1894:
I'm wondering what your standard is for determining whether an article should be promoted to featured status or not. I ask this because I'm trying to get
2837: 1910: 1594: 2974: 2618: 2319:
was the TFA on July 27. If you think it's too soon, then please let me know and I'll withdraw the request so that someone else can have the slot. --
2250:, and in his statement he requested you recuse yourself from the case due to your having promoted him to adminship. Just in case you hadn't noticed. 1812: 393: 3582: 3403: 974: 3467:
to select featured articles and to select placement on the Knowledge home page. I guess I owe you a barnstar for your roles (only gave you one). -
1790:
was really helpful, since it was archived without waiting for any new comments. Maybe the relevant projects should have been notified. Previously
3162: 2637: 1704: 1368:
As Raymond says, this is most certainly not out of the blue for this editor, seeing as how he's been warned for doing this several times before:
889: 2626: 3129: 2751: 2680: 2195:
In the past year, are there any cases that you think the Arbitration Committee handled exceptionally well? Any you think they handled poorly?
2090:
This is a distinctly unpleasant line of questioning, bordering on assuming all kinds of bad faith. If there's a FA that shouldn't be one, see
1521: 510: 2015: 1325: 2525: 2227:
Just a quick note to wish you good luck in the forthcoming silly season. How does it feel not to be the most controversial candidate? Lol. --
2129: 2077: 2042: 2007: 734:
The information removed was redundant and available elsewhere (which I attempted to clarify on the page when you conducted a second revert).
389: 3545: 3304: 1414: 1135: 1117: 1088: 856: 494: 490: 3477:(1) Sandy's been here almost two years now. I don't think she can reasonably be called "new". I have described the role she will fulfill 3238: 3224: 2920:
Yes, I'm fine with that. For an iconic picture, it's too bad the ceiling cat picture got deleted - that would have been perfect. I guess
1729: 1675: 1144:
is considered a good band by Americans, which is not true, but it wouldn't be vandalism. It's a content dispute, and as such fall under
159: 93: 3447: 3259:
releated article outside USA to feature. Moreover the last article of this type to show in the main page was probably in January 2007.
2400: 1903: 1472: 1072: 977: 2701: 2122: 1355: 1339: 31: 28: 2885: 2870: 2852: 2823: 2723: 2651:
I found them using checkuser. He warned himself, I suspect, so that the account would look like a legit user if someone saw it later.
2476: 1771: 430: 3507: 2448: 1915: 1429: 1282:
I agree, Dr. Arritt, "1RR is a delicate thing and abuse must not be allowed." Just as 3RR should not ever be violated simply because
506: 498: 474: 3571: 3418: 3396: 3387: 2798: 2738: 2695: 2137: 1384: 1299: 1277: 1205:
vandalism, and you cannot treat them as such. Own your mistakes and apologize for them, or you your should very well be blocked. ~
968: 943:
It was put up for MFD. I have speedy closed this as keep. Honestly! However, due to privacy concerns and because of confusion with
850: 803: 385:
still valid? The one year revert ban has expired, but the Ban violations and Parole violations have not expired. Is this correct?
3610: 3516: 3485: 3208:
CM, I'll move that to archive for you, and GimmeBot will be by soon to tag it closed; please let the bot update the talk page per
3116: 2302: 1571: 743:
The criticism of NSTA's action were made by a group with no direct knowledge of the events and it was redundant to boot making it
452: 72: 3323: 3286:
mentioned in the point directly after it. Discussion is vital for anyone who wishes to work in collaboration. Can you clarify? -
2105: 3495: 2660: 2357: 1876: 1862: 1843: 546: 3368: 2247: 2085: 2071: 1172:
Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Knowledge.
1030: 922: 751: 674: 651: 3375:
There are several FACs in the current pipeline that I've been very involved with in the past, so I'll also leave them to you.
2050: 2036: 1930: 865: 3459: 1759: 876: 285: 3437: 3083: 3046: 3034: 3020: 3008: 2990: 2962: 2945: 2933: 1752: 1619: 1487: 1236: 1214: 1187: 1161: 493:
Checkuser tree, but left it unfinished. In that tree, the only name you posted "(Legit user?)" next to was Thin Arthur. See
2537: 2257: 1126:
article and edit it to say that the earth is flat, that's vandalism too. Both statements are flatly, objectively not true.
184: 118: 2376:
Thanks for your help if you have time to give it. And thanks anyway if you don't. Good luck with the upcoming election. :
2287: 1614:, but haven't gotten to it yet. Anticipating the rush of people asking if articles are featured after today's promotion: 2415: 2385: 2241: 965: 951: 579: 155: 89: 2549: 2521: 1867:
You appear to be correct. If that's the case (that it has no meaning outside of an AIDS context), what do you suggest?
1816: 2782: 2027:(3) An actionable objection is one that can be fixed. Determining what is and is not action is up to the FA director. 831: 703: 699: 695: 3293: 2921: 2428: 926: 918: 3202: 1405:
sockpuppet). So, it's not as if it were a week's block applied out of the blue to an otherwise-constructive editor.
710: 2443: 2262: 1286:
with the content, 1RR should not be abused if there is a consensus to have it in place as you say. And I think our
793: 640: 177: 111: 3098: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1196:
quite clearly states, "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is
3592: 3149:(which I'm working on) has 2 supports and 1 oppose, so would it currently if it stayed like that not be promoted? 2482: 2342: 957: 921:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 846: 827: 3620: 3599: 3535: 3271: 2481:(I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and 2323: 2236: 397: 3167: 2067: 1828: 1791: 1735: 1046: 1044: 527: 3561: 2578: 2217: 1556: 1025: 538:"(Legit user?)" means that I was not sure when I was doing the checkuser if that user was a legit user or not. 3066: 2941:
Not because I intend to bypass anything, but just out of curiosity, do you have a link to the deleted one? -
1974: 809: 685: 2514: 3428: 3134: 2761: 2165: 1801: 1508:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 613: 605: 532: 166: 100: 3471: 2496: 3179: 3072:
pluralised if/when you appoint another delegate. You might consider naming the delegate—unsure. The C in
2553: 369: 2773:
is an FA (YAY!!!) but it dosen't have a a small bronze star on its page like other FA articles do. Why?
2876: 2858:
A FAC/FAQ could result in instruction creep; I had in mind sticking to botification/archiving issues.
2756: 2602: 2411: 2381: 1983: 1039:. There seems to be a consensus that the lead sentences are to be subjected to a 1RR. From a report at 1018: 936: 914: 2645: 2170:. We're interviewing all ArbCom candidates for an article next week, and your response is requested. 376:
Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Long-term_edit_warring_at_Winter_Soldier_Investigation
2714:. It was a total surprise which I did not expect and that is why I want to share this news with you. 2490: 2363: 2328: 2222: 1818:
I can only see the term in the context of AIDS-related literature. Is this what you're referring to?
1626: 1003: 771: 3276: 3184: 2914: 2543: 2155: 1749: 1410: 1273: 904: 762: 3349: 411:
featured on November 8th- I really appreciate your time and assistance with making it possible! --
3532: 3291: 3252: 2460:
My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see
2420: 1806: 1094: 1049: 1008: 2789: 1450:
has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found by your name in
3577: 3478: 3414: 3383: 3246: 3234: 3220: 3198: 3112: 3104:
Thanks for the ce and cleanup, but I only wanted a review of that one sentence about opposes.
2866: 2819: 2719: 2439: 2334: 2118: 1895: 1777: 1725: 1693: 1685:
by Gimmetrow and Tony1. Please edit as you see fit, and we can use the associated talk page.
1671: 1653: 983:
Say goodbye to this extremely useful page Raul. Looks like the MFD deleters are at it again. -
363: 358: 353: 348: 343: 2566:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant
1510:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them
3434: 2676: 2407: 2377: 1907: 1352: 1336: 1322: 788: 338: 333: 328: 323: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 66: 1744:
was going to receive further updates. I like it as resource and I am volunteering to help.--
1401:
a long history of this user making deliberately misleading edits to GW topics (see also his
1330:
My mistake, it was a week. Still, that seems rather heavy. Do you realize how much easier
3265: 3122: 2848: 2778: 2770: 2470:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table#Columns of this table
2308: 2283: 2100: 1552: 1539: 984: 948: 470: 448: 173: 107: 3458:
Hi, Raul654. Quick question. I see SandyGeorgia has been given some new delegation in the
8: 3586: 3339: 3076:
is ambiguous (criteria/candidate), so I've spelt it out where possible. I've abbreviated
2880: 2841: 2793: 2583: 1852:
To my knowledge it is immune hyperactivity that makes septiciaemia such a nasty problem.
1745: 1425: 1406: 1269: 1193: 1167: 842: 823: 484: 412: 2572:
for inappropriate changes it is probably best if you make the appropraite correction. --
383:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Winter_Soldier/Proposed_decision#Proposed_enforcement
3551: 3287: 2711: 2473: 2278:, not a blender. Perhaps a different, more appropriate image could be used instead? -- 2254: 2061: 1857: 1823: 1794:
about the renomination policy, do you think notifying projects should be part of it? –
1587: 1451: 1287: 937: 521: 2315:
I was wondering if you thought that it was too soon to put it on the main page, since
3558: 3407: 3376: 3230: 3213: 3194: 3139: 3132: 3105: 2967:
Some weren't that good (and not a fan of any of the captions), but the basic picture
2859: 2812: 2754: 2715: 2432: 2320: 2232: 2111: 1969: 1718: 1686: 1664: 1646: 1283: 815: 667: 633: 552: 2983:
Maybe it's been enough time to try again on the article? (or as a part of a list...)
1140:
The truthfulness of a statement is not considered in vandalism. I may very well say
3453: 3209: 2996: 2950:
Ceiling Cat is an internet meme - one which I happen to find particularly funny --
2808: 2750:
critique of the contributor in the process, is illuminating, and much-appreciated.
2744: 2672: 2588:
I noticed you held off for a good long while there in deciding what to do with the
2271: 2214: 2133: 2081: 2046: 2011: 1935: 1040: 783: 584: 281: 16: 962:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Images of Wikipedians (2nd nomination)
3617: 3596: 3504: 3468: 3260: 3093: 2899: 2774: 2461: 2421: 2316: 2279: 2275: 2095: 1926: 1798: 1548: 1454:, and the actual discussion can be found at ], where you may want to participate. 993: 744: 602: 597: 466: 444: 408: 1959:
For being with us for so many years, and for many years to come, raise a glass.
3524: 3309: 3256: 2631: 2598: 1468: 1421: 1295: 1210: 1157: 1036: 838: 819: 440: 3492: 2671:
The table for Image:Sharp_Hall_Dorm_Room.jpg states that there is no source.
2507: 2339: 2251: 2091: 2057: 1853: 1819: 1513: 1505: 1447: 1149: 514: 2373: 47: 3607: 3568: 3542: 3513: 3482: 3444: 3393: 3365: 3346: 3320: 3080:, since it's widely used elsewhere and makes the template easier to read. 3026: 3000: 2954: 2925: 2730: 2687: 2652: 2569: 2529: 2392: 2349: 2309: 2294: 2228: 2028: 1960: 1868: 1835: 1763: 1711: 1608: 1563: 1479: 1443: 1402: 1376: 1331: 1228: 1179: 1145: 1127: 1080: 1022: 1013:
Hi Raul, noticed it's a bit short and wondered if you'd consider including
873: 800: 748: 707: 690:
Why have you reverted my edits? Please discuss this on the AIT talk page.
661: 648: 627: 543: 422: 1166:
Thanks your your pontifications on what is and is not vandalism, however,
767:
Here you go.. since you're all about policing template colors and such...
3464: 3329: 2574: 2246:
Hi Raul. Videmus Omnia filed a request for arbitration regarding Ryulong
2211: 2161: 1787: 1544: 1000: 882: 592: 1622:, it has been promoted by Raul654. Yes you can add the star, by adding 591:
but I have never been there—thank you and if it is all right to say so,
3086: 2556:
even though the edit summary showed 9 articles had been promoted. From
1922: 1795: 1223: 862: 3255:
on the front page on any date in December. This is the first and only
2568:
was the FAC not to be added. Based on the number of people who watch
2174:
What positions do you hold (adminship, arbitration, mediation, etc.)?
3043: 3017: 2987: 2942: 2911: 2594: 2455:
Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table
1944: 1464: 1291: 1206: 1174:) Deliberately adding false information into an article is vandalism. 1153: 1141: 1021:
if he hadn't already gone to the great cricket pitch in the sky... --
561: 2453:
Hello! As we did for last year's election, we are again compiling a
2188:
Have you been involved in any arbitration cases? In what capacity?
1703:
Tony1 and Gimmetrow looked at the sandbox version, so I moved it to
276: 2501: 944: 694:
Because you are sytematically introducing POV into that article by
407:
Just a quick note to say thank you very much for arranging to have
3531:
Best of luck! The committee wouldn't be the same without you. :)--
696:
adding claims made by the TGGWS pseudo-documentary propaganda film
2562:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2007
2528:. I ran the checkuser, and confirmed that he's the same person. 1600:
Anticipating the inevitable "Is this article featured" questions
1586:
article for tomorrow? It came on the main page 2 yrs before...
3433:
Thank you for featuring this F-article on main page, yesterday.
2427:
Is back at FAC again; DrKiernan has done some work on it, so I
1220:"What one considers an improvement or not is wholly subjective" 622: 615: 280:
For your tireless work in making Knowledge better, for keeping
3319:
I don't really feel strongly about that one way or the other.
1516:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
3361: 3342:, but for now I understand how to do the archiving manually. 2951: 2729:
Excellent news! Congratulations! I'll let the signpost know.
1123: 1014: 588: 2999:
and the ceiling-cat related humor links from his user page.
1900:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Opera (Internet suite)
1583: 1518:
Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them
1502:
Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them
1496:
Knowledge:Newcomers are_delicious,_so_go_ahead_and_bite_them
388:
Thanks in advance. I will watch your page for the response.
3443:
You're most certainly welcome. Thank you for writing it ;)
3299:
Moving the featured content portals to the portal namespace
3283:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Durova/Proposed_decision
2365: 1035:
Hi Raul, I'm a little concerned about your recent edits on
700:
removing subsequent paragraphs describing the film as such
1996:
1. If you are on holiday, busy or sick, who closes FACs?
465:
Hee! Thanks for the little note & pic. You're fab. --
3305:
Knowledge talk:Featured content#move to portal namespace
2710:
the President of the Puerto Rican Senate, the honorable
3345:
Sure - anytime you feel ready to start, jump right in.
3145:
How many Supports does an FAC need for you to pass it?
1604:
I had every intention of writing an FAQ to be added to
1122:
It's vandalism for the same reason that if I go to the
861:
Are we allowed to make non-date requests on this page?
54: 503:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Railpage Australia
403:
Thanks for getting Webley Revolver on the front page!
3338:
I'm trying to find someone to do an archival bot at
3303:
Could you, as featured article director, comment at
1562:
Yes, I just caught another half-dozen of his socks.
284:
up-to-date, for doing the grunt work of cleaning up
236:{{user|Thomasdid}} -- ] 17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 229:{{user|Thomasdid}} -- ] 17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 2495:Hey Raul. Could you explain why you chose to block 2293:Yes, you are correct! I mixed up my terminology ;) 2181:Why are you running for the Arbitration Committee? 2003:3. What is an "actionable" oppose and what is not? 3334:Ready as I'll ever be; do you want me to start? 1887:Determining what is and is not a featured article 1578:Fauna_of_Australia (Can u feature this tomorrow?) 515: 1992:Some questions about your job as the FA director 909: 814:Is there a category and template analogous to {{ 1705:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/archiving 3193:for me? I'd like to withdraw the nomination.-- 1898:up to featured article status, and so I filed 1523: 511:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dbromage 2526:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Scibaby 1504:, a page you created, has been nominated for 964:. As page creator you might wish to comment. 509:. F.Y.I., there is an open checkuser case at 2667:No source for Image:Sharp_Hall_Dorm_Room.jpg 2202:Why do you think users should vote for you? 1438:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Raul654) 131: 3512:I admit that comment really cracked me up. 2552:that 8 articles were added to the list at 364:Archive 14: September 2007 - December 2007 3364:for the time being and see what happens. 3155:How long are FAC's open for at a maximum? 704:removing criticismo of the NSTA's actions 507:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Dbromage 499:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Dbromage 349:Archive 11: December 2006 - February 2007 3229:I know the drill, thanks for the hand.-- 887:Sorry if I'm disturbing you....FACs.... 275: 3463:you. I understand you are appointed by 1321:of similar and intentional disruption. 344:Archive 10: August 2006 - November 2006 1942: 559: 378:is a case which you were involved in. 329:Archive 7: August 2005 - November 2005 314:Archive 4: August 2004 - November 2004 299:Archive 1: August 2003 - November 2003 263:Thanks. ] 17:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3460:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 1760:Knowledge:Featured article statistics 1043:, I see you've reverted twice already 334:Archive 8: December 2005 - March 2006 319:Archive 5: December 2004 - March 2005 304:Archive 2: December 2003 - March 2004 286:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 270:Revision as of 17:27, 3 December 2007 156:Revision as of 17:27, 3 December 2007 90:Revision as of 17:26, 3 December 2007 3541:Thank you for your very kind words. 595:and Co. and a cast of thousands for 80: 46: 2986:Anyway, thanks for the links : ) - 2702:Honored by the Puerto Rican Senate 956:Note that WP:Facebook was moved to 359:Archive 13: June 2007 - August 2007 209: 196: 165: 153: 146: 130: 99: 87: 13: 3040:User:Jc37/Userboxes/Raul6544Arbcom 2522:Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Obedium 580:Knowledge:Today's featured article 272: 35: 3631: 3357:through would always be helpful. 3094: 3087: 2449:ArbCom table with portfolio links 1916:Our debate on your questions page 890: 857:Today's featured article/requests 354:Archive 12: March 2007 - May 2007 339:Archive 9: April 2006 - July 2006 324:Archive 6: April 2005 - July 2005 309:Archive 3: April 2004 - July 2004 200: 1943: 999:review can be closed. Thanks! -- 560: 3266: 3261: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1096: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1053: 1051: 958:Knowledge:Images of Wikipedians 898: 497:Thin Arthur now is included in 3163: 2877:User talk:SandyGeorgia#FAC/FAQ 2769:Listen, I was just wondering, 2520:Obedium's user page led me to 1031:Edit warring on Global warming 960:. Right now its on MfD again: 779:{{Template:WikiProject Iowa}} 528: 522: 1: 3409: 3378: 3215: 3203:23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3180:16:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3168: 3135:04:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3117:02:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3107: 3099:01:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3047:04:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3035:04:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3021:04:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 3009:04:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2991:04:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2980:The deletions, not-so-much... 2963:03:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2946:03:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2934:02:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2915:20:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2886:03:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2871:03:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2861: 2853:03:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2824:02:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2814: 2799:01:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2783:01:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 2757:20:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2739:12:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2724:06:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2696:04:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2681:04:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2661:03:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2646:03:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2627:01:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2603:00:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 2579:21:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2538:14:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2515:07:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2477:05:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC) 2444:17:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2434: 2416:07:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2401:03:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2386:07:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2358:03:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2343:07:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2324:02:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2303:02:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 2288:04:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 2258:23:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2237:17:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 2218:04:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 2138:10:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2123:13:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2113: 2106:05:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2086:04:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2072:02:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2051:01:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2037:03:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2016:02:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1984:05:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 1975: 1970: 1962: 1931:17:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1911:23:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1877:02:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 1863:23:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 1844:01:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1829:22:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1802:21:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1782:I don't think restarting the 1772:21:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1753:21:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1730:01:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 1720: 1698:01:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1688: 1676:01:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1666: 1658:18:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1648: 1595:03:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1572:18:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1557:00:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1535:22:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1527: 1525: 1488:15:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 1473:06:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1430:09:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 1415:02:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1385:03:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1356:02:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1340:02:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1326:02:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1300:02:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1278:01:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1237:03:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1215:01:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1188:00:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1162:00:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1136:00:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1118:00:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1089:00:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1073:23:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1026:19:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1004:08:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 988:02:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 978:01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 952:04:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 905:01:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 877:15:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 866:13:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 851:06:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 832:05:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 804:03:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 794:02:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 752:04:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 711:03:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 675:15:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 652:02:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 641:21:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 606:19:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 547:01:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 475:05:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 453:21:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 431:03:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 268: 259: 137: 3621:17:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3611:17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3600:17:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3572:17:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3567:I just sent her a reminder. 3562:14:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3546:17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3536:02:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3517:17:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3508:17:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3496:16:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) 3486:21:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3472:21:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3448:18:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3438:18:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3419:19:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3397:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3388:03:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3369:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3360:Let's ignore the need for a 3350:18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3324:18:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 3314:21:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3294:16:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3272:10:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3239:00:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3225:00:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 3173: 2510:WikipĂ©dia Prends Des Forces. 1663:That seems to have worked. 1290:explains why rather well. ~ 533:22:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 501:(which I am working on) and 416:11:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 398:05:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 18:Browse history interactively 7: 2554:Knowledge:Featured_articles 2270:The image you added to the 2242:Ryulong arbitration request 1811:I noticed your request for 1222:- I don't know what weird, 439:And hey, thanks for adding 10: 3636: 3025:That would be fine too :) 3016:How about that picture? - 2952:http://www.ceilingcat.com/ 2612:Featured Article Candidacy 2524:, which in turn led me to 929:. Reviewers' concerns are 915:Music of the United States 489:Hi Raul654. You posted an 443:too. Much appreciated!! -- 198: 135: 2406:Thanks for your help. : 2274:article seems to be of a 1949: 1446:. Please be aware that a 1168:policy disagrees with you 1019:Bill O'Reilly (cricketer) 917:has been nominated for a 566: 257: 220: 217: 152: 86: 2924:is the next best thing. 2910:Thanks in advance : ) - 2263:Image in Blender Article 1740:I was wondering whether 185:Extended confirmed users 119:Extended confirmed users 3253:Kaziranga National Park 1681:Raul, I'm going to run 1332:Arbitration enforcement 919:featured article review 85: 3189:Could you please fail 2807:I created a shortcut, 2335:The Preuss School UCSD 1953:The Invisible Barnstar 1904:declined to promote it 1896:Opera (Internet suite) 1736:Subpage Test2 updating 1512:and please be sure to 1288:policy on edit warring 289: 3067:Edits to FAC-template 1707:and linked it to the 810:Requested sound files 686:An Inconvenient Truth 626:on the 16th or so? – 570:An Invisible Barnstar 279: 3429:Hoysala architecture 2771:Superman film series 2762:Superman film series 2000:mistakes are fixed? 1582:Hi Raul, How about, 1448:request for comments 601:. Wow. Best wishes. 587:". Jupiter has been 3340:Knowledge:Goings on 2610:Knights of the Nine 1902:, but you recently 1146:tendentious editing 370:Arbcom still valid? 3533:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 3191:1080° Snowboarding 2712:Kenneth McClintock 2167:Knowledge Signpost 1742:User:Raul654/test2 1635:If the article is 1618:If the article is 1532: 1514:sign your comments 1494:MfD nomination of 938:Knowledge:Facebook 294: 290: 163: 97: 3268: 2938:Great picture : ) 2855: 2513: 2491:Re: Sysop action. 2487: 2329:Preuss School FAC 2223:ArbCom tomfoolery 2104: 1989: 1988: 1980: 1860: 1826: 1522: 671: 637: 611: 610: 274: 267: 154: 88: 68: 3627: 3435:Dineshkannambadi 3411: 3380: 3277:Giano and Durova 3269: 3267: 3263: 3217: 3185:Withdraw request 3177: 3175: 3170: 3165: 3109: 3096: 3091: 3078:featured article 2997:user:Ceiling Cat 2863: 2846: 2816: 2564:it appears that 2544:Off by one error 2500: 2479: 2466: 2464: 2436: 2408:Albion moonlight 2378:Albion moonlight 2164:, editor of the 2156:ArbCom questions 2115: 2098: 1981: 1976: 1971: 1966: 1947: 1940: 1939: 1908:Remember the dot 1858: 1824: 1722: 1716: 1710: 1690: 1683:this sample page 1668: 1650: 1631: 1627:featured article 1625: 1613: 1607: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1114: 1112: 1110: 1108: 1106: 1069: 1067: 1065: 1063: 1061: 923:featured quality 900: 892: 837:OK, I found it! 791: 786: 776: 772:WikiProject Iowa 770: 763:WikiProject Iowa 672: 669: 664: 638: 635: 630: 585:Rings of Jupiter 577:To Raul654, for 564: 557: 556: 530: 524: 519: 421:You're welcome. 282:Template:Feature 207: 206: 204: 191: 181: 162: 144: 143: 141: 133: 125: 115: 96: 69: 60: 59: 57: 52: 50: 42: 39: 21: 19: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3580: 3559:Tony the Marine 3554: 3529: 3456: 3431: 3332: 3301: 3279: 3249: 3187: 3161: 3142: 3125: 3069: 2902: 2790:WT:FAC#FA_Stars 2764: 2747: 2716:Tony the Marine 2704: 2669: 2634: 2614: 2586: 2548:I noticed in a 2546: 2493: 2462: 2451: 2429:left him a note 2425: 2422:Mumia Abu-Jamal 2391:Replied there. 2370: 2331: 2313: 2265: 2244: 2225: 2158: 1994: 1938: 1918: 1889: 1813:immune collapse 1809: 1807:Immune collapse 1780: 1738: 1714: 1708: 1629: 1623: 1611: 1605: 1602: 1580: 1542: 1499: 1440: 1033: 1011: 1009:main page queue 996: 985:Ta bu shi da yu 949:Ta bu shi da yu 941: 912: 885: 859: 812: 789: 784: 774: 768: 765: 688: 668: 662: 634: 628: 619: 555: 487: 409:Webley Revolver 405: 372: 295: 264: 253: 246: 237: 230: 213: 208: 199: 197: 195: 194: 193: 189: 187: 171: 169: 164: 158: 150: 148:← Previous edit 145: 136: 134: 129: 128: 127: 123: 121: 105: 103: 98: 92: 84: 83: 82: 81: 79: 78: 77: 76: 75: 74: 65: 61: 55: 53: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38:Content deleted 37: 34: 29:← Previous edit 26: 25: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 3633: 3614: 3613: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3528: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3455: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3331: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3300: 3297: 3278: 3275: 3257:Protected area 3248: 3247:Just a request 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3186: 3183: 3157: 3156: 3153: 3150: 3141: 3138: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3068: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3014: 2984: 2981: 2978: 2972: 2939: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2802: 2801: 2763: 2760: 2746: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2668: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2633: 2630: 2613: 2607: 2585: 2582: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2492: 2489: 2450: 2447: 2424: 2419: 2404: 2403: 2369: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2330: 2327: 2317:Homer's Phobia 2312: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2264: 2261: 2243: 2240: 2224: 2221: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2157: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2025: 2022: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1986: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1948: 1937: 1934: 1917: 1914: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1847: 1846: 1808: 1805: 1779: 1778:Restarted FACs 1776: 1775: 1774: 1737: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1679: 1678: 1644: 1643: 1640: 1633: 1601: 1598: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1541: 1538: 1498: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1417: 1407:Raymond Arritt 1397:In fact there 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1270:Raymond Arritt 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1175: 1037:Global warming 1032: 1029: 1010: 1007: 995: 992: 991: 990: 940: 935: 911: 908: 884: 881: 880: 879: 858: 855: 854: 853: 811: 808: 807: 806: 764: 761: 759: 757: 756: 755: 754: 738: 737: 736: 735: 729: 728: 727: 726: 719: 718: 717: 716: 687: 684: 682: 680: 679: 678: 677: 655: 654: 618: 614:Protection of 612: 609: 608: 576: 573: 572: 567: 565: 554: 551: 550: 549: 539: 491:April 21, 2007 486: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 458: 457: 456: 455: 441:Cillian Murphy 434: 433: 413:Commander Zulu 404: 401: 371: 368: 367: 366: 361: 356: 351: 346: 341: 336: 331: 326: 321: 316: 311: 306: 301: 292: 273: 271: 266: 265: 262: 260: 258: 255: 254: 251: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 238: 235: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 222: 219: 215: 214: 201:→‎Raspor sock? 188: 183: 182: 167: 151: 122: 117: 116: 101: 70: 64: 62: 44: 36: 27: 23: 22: 14: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3632: 3623: 3622: 3619: 3612: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3598: 3594: 3591: 3588: 3584: 3573: 3570: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3560: 3547: 3544: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3534: 3527: 3518: 3515: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3506: 3501: 3497: 3494: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3470: 3466: 3461: 3449: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3436: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3405: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3395: 3392:Fair enough. 3391: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3374: 3370: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3358: 3355: 3351: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3311: 3306: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3289: 3284: 3274: 3273: 3270: 3264: 3258: 3254: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3211: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3182: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3154: 3151: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3097: 3092: 3090: 3085: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3048: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3019: 3015: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2995:Don't forget 2994: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2977:was cute too. 2976: 2973: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2944: 2940: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2913: 2908: 2905: 2887: 2884: 2883: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2857: 2856: 2854: 2851:was added at 2850: 2845: 2844: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2791: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2767: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2707: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2611: 2606: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2591: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2576: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2498: 2488: 2486: 2484: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2458: 2456: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2430: 2423: 2418: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2367: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2336: 2326: 2325: 2322: 2318: 2311: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2268: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2204: 2203: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2169: 2168: 2163: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1965: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1946: 1941: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1804: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1713: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1684: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1628: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1610: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1497: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1357: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1047: 1045: 1042: 1038: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1006: 1005: 1002: 989: 986: 982: 981: 980: 979: 976: 973: 970: 967: 963: 959: 954: 953: 950: 946: 939: 934: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 907: 906: 902: 901: 894: 893: 878: 875: 870: 869: 868: 867: 864: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 835: 834: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 805: 802: 798: 797: 796: 795: 792: 787: 780: 777: 773: 760: 753: 750: 746: 742: 741: 740: 739: 733: 732: 731: 730: 723: 722: 721: 720: 714: 713: 712: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 692: 691: 683: 676: 673: 665: 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 650: 645: 644: 643: 642: 639: 631: 624: 617: 607: 604: 600: 599: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581: 575: 574: 571: 568: 563: 558: 548: 545: 540: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 525: 520: 518: 513:. Thanks. -- 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 437: 436: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 410: 400: 399: 395: 391: 386: 384: 379: 377: 365: 362: 360: 357: 355: 352: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 330: 327: 325: 322: 320: 317: 315: 312: 310: 307: 305: 302: 300: 297: 296: 293: 287: 283: 278: 269: 261: 256: 250: 248: 243: 241: 240: 234: 232: 227: 225: 224: 216: 212: 202: 186: 179: 175: 170: 161: 157: 149: 139: 120: 113: 109: 104: 95: 91: 73: 58: 51: 41:Content added 33: 30: 20: 3615: 3589: 3581: 3578:Raspor sock? 3555: 3530: 3457: 3432: 3402:comments at 3333: 3308: 3302: 3281:I'm reading 3280: 3250: 3188: 3160: 3158: 3126: 3123:A Brief Note 3088: 3082: 3077: 3073: 3070: 3030: 3004: 2968: 2958: 2929: 2909: 2906: 2903: 2881: 2842: 2794: 2768: 2765: 2748: 2734: 2708: 2705: 2691: 2670: 2656: 2635: 2615: 2609: 2587: 2573: 2547: 2533: 2509: 2503: 2497:User:Obedium 2494: 2480: 2459: 2452: 2426: 2405: 2396: 2371: 2353: 2332: 2314: 2310:The Simpsons 2298: 2269: 2266: 2245: 2226: 2209: 2166: 2159: 2064: 2032: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1977: 1963: 1961: 1952: 1919: 1893: 1890: 1872: 1839: 1810: 1781: 1767: 1758:Do you mean 1739: 1680: 1645: 1603: 1589: 1588: 1581: 1567: 1543: 1540:Raspor sock? 1500: 1483: 1462: 1460: 1458: 1456: 1441: 1403:User:Scibaby 1398: 1380: 1284:you disagree 1232: 1219: 1202: 1197: 1194:WP:VANDALISM 1183: 1171: 1150:edit warring 1131: 1095: 1084: 1050: 1034: 1012: 997: 955: 942: 913: 899:bananabucket 896: 888: 886: 860: 813: 781: 778: 766: 758: 689: 681: 620: 596: 578: 569: 516: 488: 426: 406: 387: 380: 373: 291: 3618:Tim Vickers 3597:Tim Vickers 3505:Tim Vickers 3465:Jimmy Wales 3307:. Cheers, — 3084:Here it is. 2847:—Preceding 2686:Self made. 2673:WhisperToMe 2558:this update 2550:recent edit 2483:let me know 2021:(1) Nobody. 1792:I asked you 1788:Golden Film 1717:template. 1637:listed here 1620:listed here 1549:Tim Vickers 1545:User:Patonq 1353:Thatcher131 1337:Thatcher131 1323:Thatcher131 782:Enjoy. -- 593:Jodi Foster 485:Thin Arthur 211:Next edit → 160:view source 94:view source 32:Next edit → 3552:Re:Contact 3469:Susanlesch 3404:Ann Bannon 3262:Amartyabag 3251:Can u put 2875:Moving to 2838:WP:FAC/FAQ 2775:Limetolime 2766:Hey Raul, 2706:DearRaul, 2619:Geuiwogbil 2468:add it to 2280:Lightforce 2267:Hi there! 2096:Rick Block 1224:truthiness 603:Susanlesch 495:this post. 467:Melty girl 445:Melty girl 168:TimVickers 138:→‎Question 102:TimVickers 3583:Thomasdid 3210:WP:FAC/ar 3140:Questions 2882:Gimmetrow 2843:Gimmetrow 2809:WP:FAC/ar 2795:Gimmetrow 2584:Thank you 2474:Sebastian 2160:Hi. I'm 1452:this list 1422:Brusegadi 1142:Metallica 1041:WP:AN/3RR 839:Jeff Dahl 820:Jeff Dahl 621:I notice 553:Thank you 517:Jreferee 221:Line 428: 218:Line 428: 3616:Thanks. 3593:contribs 3493:Marskell 3454:Question 3159:Thanks, 3147:This one 3130:Mr Which 3013:ROFL : ) 2971:cute : ) 2752:Mr Which 2638:Strothra 2368:article. 2340:SorryGuy 2321:Scorpion 2252:Picaroon 2068:contribs 2058:Casliber 1936:Barnstar 1590:Mugunth 1506:deletion 972:Mordecai 945:Facebook 891:Blnguyen 847:contribs 828:contribs 816:reqphoto 745:WP:UNDUE 178:contribs 112:contribs 56:Wikitext 3608:Raul654 3569:Raul654 3543:Raul654 3514:Raul654 3483:Raul654 3445:Raul654 3410:Georgia 3394:Raul654 3379:Georgia 3366:Raul654 3347:Raul654 3321:Raul654 3216:Georgia 3108:Georgia 3027:Raul654 3001:Raul654 2955:Raul654 2926:Raul654 2900:Request 2862:Georgia 2849:comment 2815:Georgia 2731:Raul654 2688:Raul654 2653:Raul654 2590:Pageant 2530:Raul654 2435:Georgia 2393:Raul654 2350:Raul654 2295:Raul654 2272:Blender 2229:Dweller 2114:Georgia 2029:Raul654 1964:Marlith 1891:Hello, 1869:Raul654 1836:Raul654 1764:Raul654 1721:Georgia 1689:Georgia 1667:Georgia 1649:Georgia 1564:Raul654 1480:Raul654 1444:Raul654 1442:Hello, 1377:Raul654 1229:Raul654 1180:Raul654 1128:Raul654 1081:Raul654 1023:Dweller 994:Seattle 969:Jeffrey 874:Raul654 801:Raul654 799:Fixed. 785:ALLSTAR 749:GoRight 708:Raul654 663:Scartol 649:Raul654 647:page). 629:Scartol 598:Contact 583:, the " 544:Raul654 423:Raul654 381:Is the 3526:Arbcom 3095:(talk) 2745:Thanks 2632:Thanks 2575:Allen3 2212:Ral315 2162:Ral315 2130:Kaypoh 2094:. -- 2092:WP:FAR 2078:Kaypoh 2043:Kaypoh 2008:Kaypoh 1001:Lukobe 975:Salleh 966:Awyong 623:Balzac 616:Balzac 190:58,183 124:58,183 67:Inline 49:Visual 3595:) -- 3408:Sandy 3377:Sandy 3362:mutex 3214:Sandy 3106:Sandy 2860:Sandy 2813:Sandy 2570:WP:FA 2502:Avec 2433:Sandy 2276:mixer 2112:Sandy 1923:ATren 1719:Sandy 1687:Sandy 1665:Sandy 1647:Sandy 1124:Earth 1015:Chess 747:. -- 390:Travb 205:reply 192:edits 142:tweak 126:edits 3587:talk 3479:here 3415:Talk 3384:Talk 3310:Ruud 3235:talk 3221:Talk 3199:talk 3113:Talk 3089:Tony 3044:jc37 3031:talk 3018:jc37 3005:talk 2988:jc37 2975:This 2959:talk 2943:jc37 2930:talk 2922:this 2912:jc37 2867:Talk 2836:Not 2820:Talk 2788:See 2779:talk 2735:talk 2720:talk 2692:talk 2677:talk 2657:talk 2642:talk 2623:Talk 2599:talk 2595:Cirt 2534:talk 2472:. — 2440:Talk 2412:talk 2397:talk 2382:talk 2374:here 2366:Twin 2364:The 2354:talk 2299:talk 2284:talk 2248:here 2233:talk 2134:talk 2119:Talk 2101:talk 2082:talk 2062:talk 2047:talk 2033:talk 2012:talk 1927:talk 1873:talk 1859:T@lk 1840:talk 1825:T@lk 1796:Ilse 1786:for 1768:talk 1746:Keer 1726:Talk 1694:Talk 1672:Talk 1654:Talk 1584:this 1568:talk 1553:talk 1528:cury 1484:talk 1469:talk 1465:UBeR 1426:talk 1411:talk 1381:talk 1296:talk 1292:UBeR 1274:talk 1233:talk 1211:talk 1207:UBeR 1184:talk 1158:talk 1154:UBeR 1148:and 1132:talk 1085:talk 931:here 927:here 843:Talk 824:Talk 790:ECHO 670:Talk 636:Talk 589:here 471:talk 449:talk 427:talk 394:talk 374:RE: 174:talk 108:talk 3491:2. 3330:FAC 3288:Mgm 3212:. 3169:nel 3164:Dav 3074:FAC 2811:. 2560:to 2508:... 2504:nat 2465:eir 2431:. 2255:(t) 1854:JFW 1820:JFW 1784:FAC 1750:ton 1748:lls 1712:FAC 1609:FAC 1203:not 1198:not 910:FAR 883:Nag 863:Buc 725:it. 3417:) 3386:) 3237:) 3231:CM 3223:) 3201:) 3195:CM 3174:03 3115:) 3033:) 3007:) 2969:is 2961:) 2932:) 2879:. 2869:) 2840:? 2822:) 2792:. 2781:) 2737:) 2722:) 2694:) 2679:) 2659:) 2644:) 2625:) 2605:. 2601:) 2536:) 2485:.) 2463:th 2442:) 2414:) 2399:) 2384:) 2356:) 2301:) 2286:) 2235:) 2136:) 2128:-- 2121:) 2084:) 2070:) 2049:) 2035:) 2014:) 2006:-- 1929:) 1875:) 1856:| 1842:) 1822:| 1770:) 1762:? 1728:) 1715:}} 1709:{{ 1696:) 1674:) 1656:) 1630:}} 1624:{{ 1612:}} 1606:{{ 1570:) 1555:) 1547:? 1526:er 1486:) 1471:) 1463:~ 1428:) 1413:) 1399:is 1383:) 1298:) 1276:) 1235:) 1213:) 1186:) 1160:) 1134:) 1113:te 1111:ai 1109:hw 1107:et 1105:tl 1103:os 1099:an 1097:Ry 1087:) 1068:te 1066:ai 1064:hw 1062:et 1060:tl 1058:os 1054:an 1052:Ry 933:. 903:) 849:) 845:‱ 830:) 826:‱ 775:}} 769:{{ 706:. 702:, 698:, 666:· 632:· 473:) 451:) 429:) 396:) 203:: 176:| 140:: 110:| 3590:· 3585:( 3413:( 3382:( 3290:| 3233:( 3219:( 3197:( 3111:( 3029:( 3003:( 2957:( 2928:( 2865:( 2818:( 2777:( 2733:( 2718:( 2690:( 2675:( 2655:( 2640:( 2621:( 2597:( 2532:( 2438:( 2410:( 2395:( 2380:( 2352:( 2297:( 2282:( 2231:( 2215:» 2132:( 2117:( 2103:) 2099:( 2080:( 2065:· 2060:( 2045:( 2031:( 2010:( 1978:C 1973:/ 1925:( 1871:( 1838:( 1815:. 1799:@ 1766:( 1724:( 1692:( 1670:( 1652:( 1566:( 1551:( 1524:M 1482:( 1467:( 1424:( 1409:( 1379:( 1294:( 1272:( 1231:( 1209:( 1182:( 1170:( 1156:( 1130:( 1101:P 1083:( 1056:P 895:( 841:( 822:( 529:c 526:/ 523:t 469:( 447:( 425:( 392:( 180:) 172:( 132:m 114:) 106:(

Index

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Next edit →
Visual
Wikitext

Revision as of 17:26, 3 December 2007
view source
TimVickers
talk
contribs
Extended confirmed users
→‎Question
← Previous edit
Revision as of 17:27, 3 December 2007
view source
TimVickers
talk
contribs
Extended confirmed users
→‎Raspor sock?
Next edit →

Template:Feature
Knowledge:Featured article candidates
Archive 1: August 2003 - November 2003
Archive 2: December 2003 - March 2004
Archive 3: April 2004 - July 2004
Archive 4: August 2004 - November 2004
Archive 5: December 2004 - March 2005

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑