User talk:Jack1755: Difference between revisions

2982:

Saxe-Lauenburgian history is somewhat stepmothered in historiography and the general audience. I visited last year the historical museum of Saxe-Lauenburg in its former capital Ratzeburg, but there was no conclusive presentation of the duchy as a state. The exhibition concentrates a lot on ethnography of the 18th-20th c. The museum shop did not even offer a conclusive short history of the duchy, but rather booklets on curious stories. They are all o.k. with me, if they would also offer something adequate on the long history of that duchy. So your article compensates for these shortcomings. Thank you!

5046: 5010: 4974: 4938: 4902: 4866: 4830: 4794: 4758: 4722: 4686: 4267: 4205: 3559: 3231: 3209: 3187: 3165: 3143: 3121: 3099: 3077: 3055: 2834: 2812: 2790: 2768: 2746: 2724: 2702: 2680: 2658: 2636: 2614: 2592: 2363: 2316: 2294: 2166: 2144: 2122: 2100: 2078: 2056: 2034: 2012: 1990: 1968: 1946: 1924: 1902: 1880: 1858: 1836: 1814: 1792: 1770: 1748: 1726: 1704: 1682: 1309: 1287: 1265: 1243: 1221: 1199: 299: 3893:(*)My statement about "one man" refers to things I deleted like the detailed record of Louis XVI's children, of the constitutional changes during the revolition (but missing the biographically very relevant fact that Charles as passed by as potential regent), about who died when in the Temple, a whole retelling of the 100 Days etc. These facts are important but they are not that relevant to an article about Charles X. 71: 5307: 4652: 3910:

rude. Could you please explain why you "refuse to even spend a thought on the figures"? You never gave edit summaries for such a large deletion, that's my problem, Str. How is mentioning the result of Charles's abdication an "imbalance"? Could you please elaborate? And Louis XVI's children pushed Charles down the ladder of the succession. Is that not relevant? Faithfully, --

2410: 282:

needs to be done on the article. I encourage you to contact an independent copyeditor (perhaps ]) who can help you to massage the prose to meet the FA criteria (which is set at a higher level than that of GA). When it has undergone a copyedit and several weeks have passed, you can then renominate the article. ] (]) 14:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

5393:. The FAC guidelines clearly state that an article should not be immediately renominated once it has been archived. In the first FAC, several reviewers commented that the prose needed work. This generally implies that more work needs to be done on the article. I encourage you to contact an independent copyeditor (perhaps 4120:

de facto). She was certainly entitled to use the style used by her husband. I doubt she was entitled to use the style of Royal Highness because she was not recognized as heiress (assuming the heir was entitled to use the style of Royal Highness at all). You are right about playing it safe with her husband's style.

3989:

What do you mean by "politic"? I was not patronising you, I was (again!) explaining my reasoning towards the former article text that repeatedly claimed that constitutional was not constitutional. If anything, it is a criticism of the editor who inserted such opinions into the article. If you take it

3864:

7,419 bytes (roughly 6 % of the page ) from the article. Charles' granddaughter and sons, however, ought to be mentioned. His line was perpetuated by the former, and the murder of the duc de Berry, the younger son, sparked a succession crisis. On the other hand, Louis-Antoine can be scrapped. Kindest

1660:

so far, I'm trying to create as many polish related articles as possible because I wanna get a barnstar, it's sorta embaressing because out of everyone on wikipedia I'm the only one without a barstar. There is one user with a barnstar, I'm not gonna mention their name but I don't know how they got it

4119:

Anna Maria Luisa had no right to succeed to the throne of Tuscany. Her father tried to have her recognized as heiress but Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor, and other European powers did not agree - thus, Anna Maria Luisa could not succeed and she was never Grand Duchess of Tuscany (neither de iure nor

3982:

WHAT IS RUDE is to disregard my conerns like that. How would you like it if I told you "I think eveyrthing you're talking about is pointless". And not filling in edit summaries is not politic. And, yes, I know what a constitutional monarchy is, there is no need to be patronising. Yours, -- 22:53, 26

3968:

Under normal circumstances, Charles would have been regent for his nephew Louis XVII if the Count of Provence hadn't been avaiable. Instead the bill put the Duke of Orleans in second spot, followed by someone elected. I am sure that this affected Charles a bit. Much more than some editor's view that

3909:

But Charles was never considered as a potential regent, was he not the younger brother? After all, Louis-Stansilas-Xavier de France, comte d'Artois, declared himself regent for Louis XVI the moment he found out about the failed flight to Varrenes in 1791. And as for the figures, you're being awfully

3413:

Well I've been ill recently that's the reason for my late reply. I'm also finding a shortage of articles that need creating at the moment. Looks like X Factor for #1 this week! I've got nothing against the fact it's for Great Almonds Street Hospital, but Simon Cowell could just reach into his pocket

1083:

What kind of music do you sing, FW? As for Adele, my brother said she came "runner-up", but I later found out that that was himself and Adele's mother being fanciful just before the judging! Anyway... she ended up in the top 10. She was disappointed, but I managed to cheer her up a bit with a little

380:

Well, I didn't think it was in doubt. The Bourbons might not have identified as conservatives, as you might expect in modern day politics, but there seems to be a large degree of consensus that it was a conservative regime, more so than the First Republic, Empire, or July Monarchy at the very least.

3964:

I refuse to spend a tought on the figures because I don't care about these figures. I do not care how many bytes, characters, per cent I removed (and note, that this is merely the difference between the two versions, not accouting for that I did not so much remove but change) - the discussion about

3927:

The article stated that the regency bill provided for the later Louis XVIII being the first, the Duke of Orleans (Philippe Egalite) to be the second candidate and in their absende someone elected. Sure, Louis' rights preceded that of Charles but Charles was certainly a closer relative than Philippe

3793:

Jack! They've split up, pussycat dolls are no more. It's all Nicole's fault! they had a big argument with her and now they've decided to end it. I've been really saddened by this news, I knew Nicole was too go to be true and she would be the death of the dolls. She apparently shouted at them on the

3725:

Even though it allows itself some exceptions, en:wiki looks at French history & historical figures through rigid glasses. The case of Louis-Philippe is flagrant for several reasons, the principal one being that he personally chose to be *Roi des Français*, and not *Roi de France*, thus I cannot

3285:

The deficiencies that I noted in my review are quite extensive, and I haven't listed all of them. I saw you started correcting them, which is great, so I thought I'd let you know that there will be a lot more work that needs to be done before a GA review could be fruitful. Keep up the effort, and I

2465:

What if the 100 year-old books are still more widely read/reliable? Just because they were published in the last 20 years doesn't mean that they are all authoritative. Well, why can't the boundary be pushed back to 1950? And what about books over 100 years-old that have been re-printed, and come up

1182:

page, I posted a new referendum on possibly creating a C-Class for the project back in March. However, only two editors (including myself) have written opinions regarding it (both of which support the referendum). Would you mind just reading over the referndum and then writing an opinion and voting

859:

While nobody can deny that Laura Patterson (Miss Ireland) is a good-looking girl, she does not possess the extraordinary and charismatic beauty of Adele. I expect the judges opted for safety rather than sultry, if you know what I mean. Irish model agencies always choose models that have that mildly

695:

Jack, I am extremely busy in real life & will not be participating much in Knowledge for a few days or weeks; which means that I will check articles of interest on my checklist, but stay away from windmills' discussions. However, since I will be checking my talk page, please leave me a note if

2535:

Hello Jack, I've expanded an article on Anna, Queen of Spain, wife of Philip II and mother of Philip III. I just typed her in on google and there was a dutch website that had a full page on her, I've found the same with other nobles assossiated with Netherlands. Is it any good, could I nominate it

1565:

Not really, I'll stay in touch with my friends but I'll need this holiday to recover from school, the teachers have given me essays and projects to do (annoying) but it's my mum's birthday in a few days, something entertaining will come up there and of course it's halloween! Cheryl has just got #1

1373:

Did you hear Cheryl's comment at the end! Do you like Paloma Faith, I love her song New York. People don't believe PCD are gonna do a third album after all the fighting with our old friend Nicole Scherzinger (she's not my friend) I still don't blame the girls for what they've said about her in the

281:

Hi Jack1755, I've removed and deleted your recent FAC nomination of ]. The FAC guidelines clearly state that an article should not be immediately renominated once it has been archived. In the first FAC, several reviewers commented that the prose needed work. This generally implies that more work

3324:

I didn't list them all because copyediting takes a lot of time, and in order for it to be done right, I had to stop after a while to let my mind rest. Today I was going to continue the copyediting where I left off, and I'll take a look at your changes. I know that some editors here will just give

2504:(c. 400: c. 70). If the 100-year-old book is still considered authoritative and reliable, of course it should be taken into consideration. However, most 19th-century books have been superseded. I usually narrow the search to books published after 1990 because those who disagree with me often say: 1580:

A geography one and an english one. I don't mind the english one because I'm in the top set for it and I enjoy it, but I'm also in set one for geography but I hate it! Nobody in my family knows how i got into the top set for geography, they've all said they're rubbish at it. On geography tests, I

645:

I can see one problem already: sections. I can't manage to arrange sections so that they contain information about one aspect of her reign and keep them in chronological order. War, peace, reforms, family matters, religion and diplomacy interfer with each other. I believe it would be good to have

617:

It should be fairly easy to improve the article, given that many Wiki articles contain sourced information about her and there are more than enough digitalized books about her. The problem with more users working on the same article is that there are lots of edit conflicts, so be sure to copy the

4155:

Hi Jack1755! I am just reminding you that it has been more than a monht from your GA assessment of Walls of Dubrovnik. Since than it is on hold. Would you mind looking at the article next chance you get? We improved it much since than, especially references and in-line citations. If you have any

3384:

it came out this morning, I've downloaded it, I think it's a nice little song she's got. It won't be a big as Release Me though. I've been watching the itunes chart, sugababes are having trouble they keep falling, there at number 9 at the moment. I can't believe they've been beaten by N-Dubz and

1358:

them, plus I love Alexandra's new song, I've got it on my ipod. I don't miss keisha, Mutya, Amelle and that other girl who used to be in the group all called her a bully, I don't think they were making it up. The only strange thing about it is that Heidi (don't know how to spell her name) hasn't

2886:

Bosnian is my native language. I've learned English in school and, well, here. I don't know how to improve the article about Maria Theresa of Austria anymore. The article shouldn't go into details so unimportant details are not included. Yet there is a difference between the article about Maria

3946:

May I ask which language you found so? Somehow, we have strayed from the main point, and you still are to tell me why you "refuse to even spend a thought on the figures". That's exactly it, normal circumstances weren't applicable. He was never considered a potential regent. Sincere regards, --

3886:

I wasn't saying you were saying that*, just briefly giving my reasoning. Sure, the children etc. should be mentioned - I only removed them from the intro, which also was imbalanced putting more focus on 20 minutes in 1830 than on the rest of his life. Sure, the article should note these events

3761:

Fortunately, the water has subsided. The rest of the country has not been so fortunate. Parts of the Shannon basin are under 25 feet of water. My school is on the Northside of the city, where the city council has had to cease pumping water to consumers; some schools are closed -- still! Mine,

2450:

Because modern sources are more relevant (sometimes even more reliable) than 100-year-old books. It is possible that, 100 years ago, authors called her Johanna, but that she is now known as Joanna. I picked 1990 as a boundary between old and new, though of course a 1989 source could still be

3931:

The imbalance only refers to the intro. And I never said that the result of the abdication - the July Monarchy - was the imbalance. The imbalance is noting a highly disputed 20 minute reign of the Duke of Angouleme and the even more disputed succession of the later Count of Chambord. This

499:

hehe. I'll take care of myself. Bar a few hallucinations (I thought there was an earthquake a moment ago, and I woke everyone up :P), I'm not too bad. In light of this, my edits are liable to become a bit zany. I can't guarantee that I won't re-direct your user page to your real identity,

2981:

I have to requite your compliment, because without your page on Anna Maria I would not have figured out, that there were daughters to the last male Ascanian duke, who were even entitled by Saxe-Lauenburgian law to succeed him. So your impressive article gave me the impetus to learn more.

2887:

Theresa of Austria and a FA. I believe it is the prose and MoS but I can't improve the prose as English is not my native language and I am too lazy to study the MoS :) Let's just wait for someone else to improve it a bit and then we'll take the credit when it shows up on the main page :)

532:

Jack, there can be such heated discussions on article talk pages, it is better to keep it more "professional" there. I hope you get over the flu & that the whole of Ireland does not get it. I must go now & leave you to your earthquakes & sneeze. à+ (= "à plus tard").

1455:

Yeah you're right. I am not extremly enthusiastic about the courses, but i reckognise that they are required to actually understand and learn how to work with i.e. history in practice. Some of the things is however actually kind of interesting though. So it's not all bad.

3484:

Hello Jack! I was wondering about the status of the GA nomination, and then I found this exchange between you and Laurinavicius, which prompted me to do one more round of minor cleanup regarding reference parameters and formatting. I squeezed as much as I could in this

899:

Oh, you're in Tyrone I see. I visited Omagh back in 2001. It was very depressing as I visited the grave of one of the bombing victims. I also saw the site on Lower Market Street where the bomb had gone off. It was a very gloomy place with a grey pall of tragedy in the

714:

Jack! I said "aurevoir", not "adieu"! It is just that I am extremely busy right now & cannot spend hours on Knowledge, but I will check my page & check list as often as possible and, if you need help or have a question, I shall always be (t)here for you.

4482:

is leaving and they've got a new girl who claims there is no lead singer, Nicole is staying but she's going to take more of a back seat and let other dolls come forward. I think they'll all leave bar Nicole and Ashley. I'm surprised that Jessica is still there.

148: 927:? I think its probably the best and most accessable book on the Medici in the English language. Theres lots of good stuff in it, which could be useful here. Sadly I lent my copy to somebody who hasn't given it back, so can't access it for a reference! - 63: 1641:

Have you seen these user boxes on my user page that I found. You can say how much of a fan you are of a certian band or singer on a scale of 1-3, you can guess who I put for number 3. I'm annoyed Miss Frank was kicked off X Factor, while those twins

1353:

About a girl hasn't been released over here yet, I heard it on the radio a whileback but I forgot what it goes like. I'll go on youtube and listen to it. Do you watch X factor? If you do, what do you think of John and Edward, most people I know

2414: 3496:. That's why I personally find the "Main sources" section somewhat redundant, but I'll defer to what other editors think is best. If you have any suggestions regarding possible leftover issues with the article - well, we'll do it! Cheers, 3719:

Bonjour Jack! Tout d'abord, pardonne-moi de n'avoir pas répondu à ton premier msg sur le changement de titre de Louis-Philippe. Comme je te l'ai déjà dit, je suis très occupée en dehors de wikiland et ne suis de passage que de temps en

3676:

Jack, seeing as you're interested in the Bourbons, I thought I'd mention that I created a couple of articles on Bourbon-related people about a year and a half ago. Why not look them over and see if you can add something. Here they are:

696:

you need help. Stay out of trouble, concentrate on your school work & do not reject the study of the Irish language, which will only survive if the young Irish keep it alive. You will understand its importance when you get older.

2924: 2927:. I am reviewing the case history and the disputed talk page itself. First, I would like to know whether you fully agree to be participate in the good faith effort of the mediation to avoid further dispute. Thank You 5397:) who can help you to massage the prose to meet the FA criteria (which is set at a higher level than that of GA). When it has undergone a copyedit and several weeks have passed, you can then renominate the article. 2341:

Hi! I took the liberty to move your GA-nomination from "Places" to "World History", as this is an historic entity no longer in existence. There are several other histories of cities, countries etc. there. Good luck!

1178:? Do you feel that it is ready for a GA-assessment? I feel that it does meet GA-class standards, but I would like your feelings on the article before it is suggested. Second, would you mind doing a favor? On the 3644:

Hey Jack! I would just like to let you know that I have nominated this article for GA-class. I feel that it is ready for a GAN and meets the GA-standards, and thus, should be nominated for GA-class. My regards,

599: 595: 587: 3734:. I read the note you left on 16 November & agree with you that whoever made the move should have discussed it beforehand, particularly in view of the previous discussion that had taken place last May. 591: 3996:

I have above told you in general what my objective was - the things I could have written into an edit summary - I don't want to repeat it again and again unless you really have some specific issues with my

3726:

understand why en:wiki wants to ignore his peculiarity, and not treat him as the weird case he was. Nowhere should there be "de France" or "of France" associated with his name or title of any kind: he was

1084:

factoid: "Miss Ireland loves her job at Tesco and has no intention of leaving the UK for Dublin." Blasphemey! She's the first Miss Ireland in 10 years not to do so. Do you miss us all here at wikipedia? --

1334:

Jack, what a pleasant surprise to discover your barnstar on my user page. Thanks a million; for the barnstar itself and for the sentiments included with it. It's people like you who make Knowledge great.--

381:

I'll try to provide a reference. There is referenced material in the main body explaining how the Catholic Church assumed a more prominent role in everyday life, but I'll try and back that up too.

1135:

Sorry, Jack, but I don't have an E-mail from you. Would it be okay to resend it? And BTW, we LOVED Cork. We visited several of the historic sites, including the cathedral, in the City of Cork.

3839:

I have done it because the article badly needed attention in reorganising, removing off topic stuff (this is about one man, not a retelling of his family's history), stylistic improvements etc.

15: 4558:

Hi Jack, I just spent the entire morning creating my latest article. Could you please check it out for typos, et. I'm wiped out with fatigue after a whole morning at my computer. Thank you.--

3986:

I am NOT saying everything you say is pointless. What I consider rude is that you keep on harping on these technical figures after I have repeateedly told you that they mean nothing to me.

518:

Jack, may I remind you that this is the talk page for the Kings of France... We're way off the subject now, quite distant from 10 August 1792. You should put both dates for Louis XVI.

758:

First, if you add two, you should made them under a single mother section ("Biography"). Since anyway they are rather short by themselves, perhaps no need of them. Ciao and good work! --

3969:

the constitutional monarchy of 1791 was not a constitutional monarchy (which merely means a monarchy with a written constitution). The article was full of such declarations of opinion.

1551:, now I know alot of Medieval History is about rivalry and battles, but the polish nobles and kings were going to a different battle every week! It's hard to believe. Is it any good?-- 658:, etc. There are more than enough information about each of these topics; we just need to find way to include them into article while avoiding interference with the existing sections. 2976: 956:

I agree Jeanne. Thanks for the offer anyway, Yorkshirian! P.S. I support your stance on the Baroness Thatcher - the whole "murder" thing is absurd! Have a nice day everyone! :) --

839:

I'm tired and I have a headache + I should study French and physics for tomorrow, but I'm too lazy. I'll just pray that I avoid a bad mark :) Other than that, I am happy enough.

3682: 1581:

normally just take a guess and get it right, wierd! I like to learn about countries but not about boring things like how rocks are formed. Are you watching the X Factor later?--

942:

Yorkshirian, you should never lend anyone your books. For some reason people don't feel they need to return them. I never lend my books, clothes, DVDs, CDs, money to anyone.--

316: 4610:

I wholeheartedly concur! It's a rather striking portrait; great choice, thanks! I'm in lovely Dublin ATM, alone in a hotel room.... the story of my life, it would seem. --

2962:

Jack, I love the infobox you placed on my talk page. I just made a few wee corrections as regards my date of birth, parents names ,etc. Thanks again. I really enjoyed it.--

4060: 586:

article. I've started expanding the article myself, so we could cooperate. I've found some interesting and available books about Maria Theresa using Google Book Search:

345:

Jack, I reverted your change to Irish Life & Permanent. As a former employee I can say that they sell in the North and, to a lesser extent, in the rest of the UK.

2871:. It will probably be chosen as December's featured article there. I just wanted you to know because you too have significantly expanded the article. Congratulations! 3965:

these figures is pointless and totally irrelevant. Please don't bring them up again. (PS. I don't think it rude at all that I tell you I don't care a bit about them.)

1656:

Are you going to add some, maybe I'll change Leona, I did vote for her every week when she was on X Factor. I don't think much of her new song. What do you think of

2200:

the article in order not to be influenced in the controversy that may be in the discussion. Can it wait a few hours? Wish me good luck on my trip to Planet Earth!

1155:

Let's not stop there! We can get it to the status of a FA. I'll try improving the article about Joseph II using the information in the article about Maria Theresa.

777:

Yeah, it's been good. I've heard the Pussycat Dolls are gonna do a third album, they did an interview with Jessica, she's not sure if Nicole is going to join them--

690: 199: 131: 3890:

Again, I refuse to even spend a thought on the figures you give. If you have any substantial issues with my edits I am willing to listen but not to these figures.

1627:

Do you use google translate, I use that for some articles, many of the polish nobles I've created for have french articles, I'm better with them than the polish--

3459:

Good day Jack! I just remind you that Kebeta, GregorB, and I have been waiting about ten days for you to get back to us about whether or not our improvements to

3251: 1374:

papers. People are acting like they are being really mean, well she was for hogging the vocals and camera! I think she should leave and give the girls a break--

739:

Hello Jack thank you. I got an ipod touch for my birthday and I uploaded the video to little boots remedy, since itunes don't seem to have the song by itself--

2994: 1533:

Oh, I'm lovin' About a girl by the Sugababes, it was on 4music three times today and Jade is lookin good! I want to download it but it's not out yet, pity--

3961:

It was various words here and there. I won't look it up now but the repeated harping on his wives ugliness was one thing (once is okay, repeatedly is not).

1478: 1462: 1444: 791:

Same old stuff, this girl in school has a crush on me and she's dead ugly (and fat) she been giving the girl I like the evils, girls can be very strange--

708: 1179: 4098:

Hi! I took a short Wiki-break to ger some rest and celebrate Eid al-Adha and now I'm back. I can't find your question on Jeanne's page. Where is it?

3880: 5121: 2277: 2248: 2228: 728: 542: 1058:

First one of the season is over, but more are to come, so expect me to disappear again. (I do not write songs!) By the way, I did not follow the

396:

Did you not reply to my note regarding it on the talk page? I have literature contradicting the "conservative regime" consensus. King regards, --

5199: 1039: 425:

Jack, no, not glued to the 'paedia', like you. I am working at the computer & do take a break once in a while checking if you have sent a

5275: 5261: 5240: 5226: 5185: 3510:

My bad, the whole thing was awfully confusing! Call me when you need me. Apologies for my tardiness, I've been ill for the last two weeks. --

4545: 1174:

Good day Jack! How are you? It's been a while, eh? Anyways, I'd like to speak briefly to you about two things. First, how do you feel about

4567: 4417: 4403: 4141: 3604:

Jack1755, are you better? If you could take a look on Walls of Dubrovnik, it would be great. It is still waiting your assessment. Thanks.

1093: 1075: 1053: 1004: 986: 559: 527: 513: 494: 464: 143: 93: 951: 2418: 31: 28: 4076: 3590:

No problem Jack, there is no rush really... I've left a comment regarding latest tweaks at the article's talk page and that's about it.

3463:

are sufficient and bring it up to GA-class. Not to rush you, but you would you mind looking at the article next chance you get? Thanks!

72: 4637: 4619: 4072: 3533: 2265:

ni tipos muy lindos ni divos ni niños ricos yo se lo que quiero pasarla muy bien y portarme muy mal en los brazos de algún caballero...

1022: 965: 888: 405: 3928:

Egalite. Under normal circumstances, the lineage for the regency would have been the one that was later employed for the crown itself.

3896:

After editing, I read the talk page. I think I adressed at least some of these issues (tabloid language - but also pompous language).

3505: 3300: 3278: 3009: 1609:

Well Done with Anna Maria Luisa de' Medici (is that her name). I'm thinking about creating a page on Euphemia of Kuyavia, daughter of

860:

pretty, girl-next-door look, as if they're afraid of genuine beauty that is just a touch out of the ordinary. Obviously the judges of

369: 4129: 3353: 3339: 3319: 2910: 2896: 1144: 848: 639: 4165: 3860:

Str, it is about one man, and I never said it wasn't, but the fact of the matter is you didn't provide edit summaries for deleting

2516: 2475: 2460: 2445: 4513: 4047:

Hey Jack! I know you know a lot about French history. I don't know if you be interested but I created a few new French list like

3808:

Oh, Robin Antin (manager of PCD) has said they're not splitting, I wish they'd give it to us straight instrad of all this rubish--

2560: 1483: 1467: 3977: 3956: 3941: 3919: 3904: 3874: 3519: 873: 485:? Please stay away from Noah's Ark, with all its animals inventing flus of all types. Joke aside, take care of yourself. à+ ! 111: 4006: 3488:

I must correct you regarding your claim that "out of the 15 main sources only 8 have corresponding in-line citations" - in fact

2951: 2238:

Tengo tacones de aguja magnetica para dejar a la manada frenetica. La luna llena como una fruta no da consejos ni los escucha...

1434:. Though I am going to study History I have not yet started with that exactly as everyone is required to take some courses like 3613: 1397:

Promise not to be mad :P; I've nominated Louis XVIII for a good article review. -- Jack1755 (talk) 23:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

451:, all I can really do is sit. And don't worry; I got an A in my most recent test. ^_^ Hope you're having a fun day...being the 5376: 4243: 3762:

however, was open all week bar Tuesday, the Public Service stike. Noone has replied to my post on talk:Louis-Philippe yet. --

1120:

Hi Jack, I sent you an E-mail and was hoping you could respond. You can use my talk page if it is more convenient. Thanks.

854: 442: 4546: 4068: 909: 5406: 4665: 2971: 2545: 1497: 622:... I've just seen that you removed the word saying that Tuscany and Lorraine used Salic law. Since Maria Theresa held many 3654: 173: 139: 89: 4067:. Also I wanted to ask if you know anything about a François d'O, Count of Dreux. See French article of Count of Dreux -- 3883:, whose efforts have garnered her 10s of good articles and several featured; we should subject ourselves to her judgment. 2351: 5059: 5023: 4987: 4951: 4915: 4879: 4843: 4807: 4771: 4735: 4699: 4280: 4218: 3572: 3244: 3222: 3200: 3178: 3156: 3134: 3112: 3090: 3068: 2847: 2825: 2803: 2781: 2759: 2737: 2715: 2693: 2671: 2649: 2627: 2605: 2528: 2376: 2329: 2307: 2179: 2157: 2135: 2113: 2091: 2069: 2047: 2025: 2003: 1981: 1959: 1937: 1915: 1893: 1871: 1849: 1827: 1805: 1783: 1761: 1739: 1717: 1695: 1322: 1300: 1278: 1256: 1234: 1212: 673: 100: 3753: 3472: 3325:

general statements, so what I'm doing here is actually a lot more work than what most would do... don't get spoiled! :P

3260:

that you nominated for a GA review. The corresponding review page that reflects the review in progress can be found at

2399: 2196:

I will read the article & discussion with pleasure, however, I cannot do it right now as it will take time to read

5365: 4321: 3694: 3414:

and give them 1 million. Imagine what artists could have got to number 1 this week in the UK and Ireland but aren't.--

2551:

I'm sure you could! However, what fact do you intend to nominate? It's imperative that it's sourced. Your welcome, --

2409:

Hello! I agree with replacing those years with the title, but Grand Duchess Joanna of Tuscany is much better known as

5329: 1670: 1651: 1636: 1622: 1613:. I've joined the Wiki Project Royalty plus I've joined the Polish one, since I was sent a request to join that one-- 1604: 1590: 1575: 1560: 1542: 1528: 1420: 5164: 1509: 2936: 2430: 2213: 4598: 4589:

Hi Jack, do you like the new image I put on Anna De Medici's article? It's nicer than the helmuted version, IMO.--

3599: 5095: 3261: 3048: 2880: 2529: 1343: 1164: 894: 833: 1192: 5257: 5222: 5160: 3771: 3437: 3423: 3408: 3394: 2957: 2818: 2811: 2796: 2789: 2774: 2767: 2730: 2723: 2686: 2679: 2642: 2635: 2336: 685: 667: 611: 166: 390: 4345: 3631: 2868: 1472:

Firstly: No problem, and hope you get the issue resolved! ..and secondly: Well, you can just call me Jarle. -

354: 3935:

As for the "tabloid" point, I found some language in there that I didn't think suitable for a encyclopedia.

1013:

on the challenge of stealing their friends' boyfriends. Thank God, I have never stooped to that low level.--

5390: 5377: 4107: 2918: 2580: 1514: 1449: 767: 418: 411: 4534: 4492: 4469: 3043: 3029: 936: 824:

Thank you! Yes, I've nominated and now I'm waiting for someone to review it. Do you have any suggestions?

748: 5361: 5117: 5091: 4399: 4317: 3848: 3749: 3381: 2571:

Are you OK, Jack? It's been a couple of days since I last heard from you. I hope everything is alright.--

2273: 2244: 2224: 2209: 1416: 1383: 1368: 1080: 1071: 1035: 982: 724: 704: 538: 523: 490: 438: 107: 4624:

Lucky you! I'd give up all the presents under the tree (which have not been placed there yet!) to be in

1661:

because all they seem to do is wreck other peoples article. Euphemia is in the middle of a translation--

3448: 1491: 1129: 155: 4460:

and she's #1 in the UK and Ireland, plus a good few other countries! I doubt she'll get christmas #1--

3428:

Yeah, looks like they're gonna be #1 in Irl. too. That's a coincidence: I'm sick too! True that... --

3020:

I've had a go at that nightmare thing, it's on my talk page, you can probably relate to some of them--

5253: 5218: 5156: 5150:.. Tbh, I don't fully understand why he wants to get rid of it anyway..doesn't make sense at all lol 3887:

further down. I haven't edited the Revolution and 2nd exile section but I wouldn't have removed them.

3817: 3803: 2404: 2383: 1009:

As far as men are concerned it isn't wise to introduce one's man to their female friends. Some women

805:

Does it ever get boring at an all boys school? I couldn't ever imagaine my school without girls lol--

4036: 3665: 2864: 1519:

How do you join the WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, I see you're a member and I'd love to join!--

814: 800: 786: 583: 864:

went that same route. Adele deserved to win, and the people of Kerry were certainly backing her!--

5325: 5295: 5052: 5045: 5016: 5009: 4980: 4973: 4944: 4937: 4908: 4901: 4872: 4865: 4836: 4829: 4800: 4793: 4764: 4757: 4728: 4721: 4692: 4685: 4633: 4594: 4563: 4273: 4266: 4211: 4204: 3993:

Frankly, I am not seeing the point of this discussion if you take everything I say the wrong way.

3932:

information, totally without any impact in the real world, does simply not belong into the intro.

3690: 3650: 3565: 3558: 3529: 3468: 3237: 3230: 3215: 3208: 3193: 3186: 3171: 3164: 3149: 3142: 3127: 3120: 3105: 3098: 3083: 3076: 3061: 3054: 2967: 2854: 2840: 2833: 2752: 2745: 2708: 2701: 2664: 2657: 2620: 2613: 2598: 2591: 2576: 2395: 2369: 2362: 2322: 2315: 2300: 2293: 2172: 2165: 2150: 2143: 2128: 2121: 2106: 2099: 2084: 2077: 2062: 2055: 2040: 2033: 2018: 2011: 1996: 1989: 1974: 1967: 1952: 1945: 1930: 1923: 1908: 1901: 1886: 1879: 1864: 1857: 1842: 1835: 1820: 1813: 1798: 1791: 1776: 1769: 1754: 1747: 1732: 1725: 1710: 1703: 1688: 1681: 1339: 1315: 1308: 1293: 1286: 1271: 1264: 1249: 1242: 1227: 1220: 1205: 1198: 1188: 1150: 1018: 947: 905: 869: 819: 386: 4578: 5357: 5113: 5087: 4395: 4313: 3745: 3705: 3369: 3257: 2990: 2436:

I don't mind, Surtsicna. However, why is the search narrowed to books published after 1990? --

2269: 2240: 2220: 2205: 1412: 1408: 1399:, I say that I must read the article again in order to give you my opinion, which will be only 1067: 1031: 978: 879:

Those are lovely sentiments, Jeanne! Thank you. After all, there's always next year... hehe --

720: 700: 534: 519: 486: 434: 3632: 2347: 1548: 932: 577: 66: 5340: 4293: 1610: 1435: 1431: 365: 350: 4156:

suggestions regarding possible leftover issues with the article, please tell us. Regards,

4087: 8: 4125: 4103: 4048: 3924:

P.S. The "tabloid language" was resolved months ago, re-check the date on Frania's post.

2906: 2892: 2876: 2512: 2456: 2426: 1657: 1505: 1388: 1329: 1160: 1140: 1125: 924: 844: 829: 681: 663: 635: 607: 4177:

Passed. Congrats. The image is fine, its copyright has expired in the United States. --

2287: 5402: 5321: 4629: 4590: 4559: 4530: 4488: 4465: 4143: 3842:

To be honest, I didn't count any charactes and am not really interested in the number.

3813: 3799: 3686: 3646: 3525: 3464: 3460: 3419: 3390: 3039: 3025: 2963: 2572: 2541: 2391: 1666: 1647: 1632: 1618: 1600: 1586: 1571: 1556: 1538: 1524: 1438:

and ex.fac. for the entire first semester. But yeah, I am currently pretty satisfied! -

1425: 1379: 1364: 1335: 1184: 1169: 1014: 943: 901: 865: 810: 796: 782: 763: 753: 744: 382: 340: 162: 4525:

Have you heard about our Christmas #1? I'm happy about it Ijust wonder why that song--

4445: 4064: 4056: 4004: 3975: 3939: 3902: 3846: 3828: 3678: 3595: 3501: 3310:

Well, may I ask why didn't you list them all? How can I correct them? Faithfully, --

3015: 2986: 2384: 2186: 1404: 734: 481:? Hm! Good excuse to miss school on the second week... What will it be next? The 3722:

Right now, I cannot start a discussion on a subject which I am not able to pursue.

2923:

I have taken the mediation case submitted with you listed as a party to the dispute

4239: 4161: 4052: 3609: 2932: 2343: 1348: 928: 375: 16: 5135: 5072: 4479: 3326: 3287: 3265: 361: 346: 4475: 4121: 4099: 2902: 2888: 2872: 2508: 2452: 2422: 1501: 1156: 1136: 1121: 914: 840: 825: 677: 659: 631: 603: 5341: 2390:

Jack, what do you think of my latest article? Any typos that you can detect?--

973:

Jeanne, to the list of things you should never lend, you forgot to include...

325: 5398: 5267: 5232: 5191: 5177: 4611: 4526: 4505: 4484: 4461: 4409: 4337: 4178: 3948: 3911: 3866: 3809: 3795: 3763: 3511: 3429: 3415: 3400: 3386: 3345: 3311: 3035: 3021: 3001: 2943: 2566: 2552: 2537: 2467: 2437: 1662: 1643: 1628: 1614: 1596: 1582: 1567: 1552: 1534: 1520: 1473: 1457: 1439: 1411:) & trust what she will have to say about the article as it is now. à+ 1375: 1360: 1115: 1085: 1045: 996: 957: 880: 806: 792: 778: 759: 740: 551: 505: 501: 456: 397: 298: 1675: 47: 5394: 4456:

Hi Jack, X Factor Christmas #1 coming up. Do you like Lady Gaga? I'm lovin

4001: 3972: 3936: 3899: 3843: 3782: 3591: 3497: 241:''Joyeux Noël à toi et à ta famille!'' ] (]) 22:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 234:''Joyeux Noël à toi et à ta famille!'' ] (]) 22:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 4457: 4326:

P.S. Please keep an eye on the King of Navarre while I am gone. Merci.

4235: 4157: 3605: 2928: 1389: 1175: 329: 2585: 2356: 331: 3741:

Once in a while I pop in for a few minutes & touch up an article.

772: 3399:

LOL. I know! I Haven't heard Agnes's new one yet. How are things? --

448: 5389:

Hi Jack1755, I've removed and deleted your recent FAC nomination of

4628:. Enjoy yourself, and have a lovely cup of Bewley's coffee for me.-- 3034:

Really? What about PCD? About a girl is out tommorrow, can't wait!--

2506:

Oh, half of those books are two centuries old, so they don't matter.

327: 3794:

tour bus and then ashley had a go at her, and it went from there--

919:

I notice you're doing some work on Medici articles. Have you read

676:

how many spelling mistakes we've made. We should be more careful.

5231:

My estranged, racist great-aunt is coming over for dinner. :P --

3990:

to refer to you, I cannot help it but it was noway my intention.

582:

Hello, Jack! I've seen that you've done significant work on the

4655:"Merry Christmas, Jack"! From your friendly neighbourhood troll 3683:

Joseph Hyacinth Francois de Paule de Rigaud, Comte de Vaudreuil

3879:

P.S. The introduction was written by good article contributor

3492:

main sources have in-line citations, the only exception being

2219:

my talk page, but I cannot talk to you anymore right now. à+

626:

titles, it would be convenient to make difference between her

332: 5306: 4651: 5062: