Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

3776:

veracity of the claim here. A previous diff was provided to show how bad the IP was with the note of "see this edit summary" upon viewing the edit summary I found nothing wrong with it. It was a factual and accurate description of an edit made that appeared to be a legitimate edit. That's just an example. So far about 2 out of 3 edits being show as indications of problem don't indicate any problem. I've seen a few questionable diffs, but I've seen them from both sides. My point with the accounts comment is that claiming this IP has made accounts to harass you is wrong and can cause a bias. Someone might read that without actually checking think "wow this guy is bad". If you want to cause someone to be banned, do it on facts and not hyperbole. He's had a lot of IPs, but I don't see anything actually tying him to an account, and if the worst thing he has done is get hung up on a claim you made (which honestly for all your explanation, can still be interpreted as claiming multiple degrees, no where did you ever state when making those claims that those were just classes that were part of a single degree) then a site ban really isn't in order. A mutual restraining order is more in order as I've seen you get just as worked up about him as he gets worked up about you.--

2014:

treated with care, to the point where we must be using third party commentary. The article is in need of serious pruning and restructuring at this point, regardless, and there is a seperate move by PalestineRemembered to get citations in I believe. The latest attempt at the edit that has been warred over does encourage synthesis (It uses a primary source of poor visual quality and certainly a lack of clarity in its content and draws definitive conclusions from that) and also uses sources for the report predating the report by 13 years (It lists the view points of the creators of the report, sources them, then passes this off as the conclusion of the report. Synthesis again). Finding information on the report has not proved easy and even those wanting the edit in disagree over what it says. I do think there is a place for the report, I do not think the tactics being used to get it in are in anyway compliant with policy or conducive to the good of wikipedia. I also take particular umbridge at the accusations of 'censorship' and the accusation that I have ome 'Personal stake in this'. As far as I am aware, I wasn't even born at the time, so was certainly not piloting an Israeli Mirage jet.

7520:

confused about that, as I think that word applies in a "Godzilla-like" way to the above link on the Bellinghaus site about myself). At most, there a little sarcasm on my page, which outlines my looking into the reason for the phonecalls etc. I don't see how it can be viewed as "accusatory" either, as it simply reproduces "on record" wiki conversations between myself and DC including Bellinghaus's own words. Accusations? I am not accusing him of making a threatening phone call, it actually happened and you can hear a recording of it on my page. Yes the text is somewhat damning - yes, the text gives a very bad impression of Bellinghaus - but he authored it and admitted his wiki ids! He is the author of his own bannings all over the net. No, the page is an explanation for anyone catching a very bad impression of DC and myself via highly critical and incorrect information on Bellinghaus blogs.

6396:

the place, was desysopped by Jimbo, but had the bit back within hours. Such is Wiki; that all of this happened in about a month gives us an idea of the circus we've got going. The Tony1's and Ceoil's, who work to turn out what we put on our main page every day but aren't admins, are judged and hung on one word or edit, while admins are protected even if they toss out a truckload of F-bombs. And then some admins don't understand why hard working volunteers are insulted about having their block log smeared. There needs to be some dialogue somewhere on Wiki to get better understanding about those who are toiling away at the different tasks in different areas of Wiki. Admin tools and tasks are needed and welcomed, but all too often, the vandal fighting mentality is turned on our most productive writers.

4027:

to my satisfaction. It would be nice also if Arcayne agreed to reciprocal self-restriction of his editing, but not required. I would, however, take it as a complete dick-move should Arcayne take the opportunity to "poke" or "prod" 75.X.X.X given his inability to respond; however I have faith that Arcayne has no desire to do that. I pray he does not make a fool of me for thinking that, because it could turn badly for either party in this dispute should hostilities resume. I think we have reached a good solution, and I thank Crossmr for taking the lead in mediating this. Once again, I endorse this solution, and consider for myself the matter closed, so long as neither party starts it up again. If either side in this dispute DOES start up again, they can expect blocks coming their way... --

1605:

Commandant of the Marine Corps), Rear Admiral Merlin Staring (former U.S. Navy JAG), and Ambassador James Akins (former ambassador to Saudi Arabia). Among the findings of the commission was that " there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew; evidence of such intent is supported by statements from Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Undersecretary of State George Ball, former CIA director Richard Helms, former NSA directors Lieutenant General William Odom, USA (Ret.) and Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, USN (Ret.)...". The Moorer Report continues: "in attacking USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against American servicemen and an act of war against the United States".

3463:

effects. The anon has stated in April that they prefer to edit as a "public user", and more recently that they wish to avoid the "social networking aspects" of Wiki, and simply concentrate on articles. Quite lofty; if only it were true. Out of all the IPs connected to the account (and again the RfCU only addresses those IPs that intersected with my edits), less that a tenth actually add content to an article (and uncited content, in point of fact). The remainder of all of these contributions consist of reverting me, attacking me in article discussion or filing various administrative actions, all against me. All of that seems to pointedly fly in the face of someone trying to avoid the non-encyclopedia-building aspects of Knowledge.

4012:

and instead chooses to edit articles the IP edits. I made the request in the interest of keeping peace, but it is in no part a requirement of the IPs interaction ban. If arcayne follows the ip around and calls his mother dirty names I'd still consider it a violation of the interaction ban if the IP said anything to him or about him (other than to link me the diffs on my talk page). You do understand the difference between asking another user something and telling them they either do it or there are repercussions right? I did actually mean ask in the traditional sense of the word and not like when the police show up at a club and "ask" someone to leave.--

3132:. The anon had a clear habit of following Arcayne around, unprovoked, reverting him on a multitude of unrelated pages with no other purpose than to annoy him, jumping into disputes that didn't concern him except for his urge to hit out at Arcayne, bringing up the degrees issue again and again without any factual need, again with no other purpose than to taunt Arcayne, and incidentally also distorting every word of what Arcayne was actually saying about the issue. In fact, Arcayne has very clearly stated what degree he has, it is absolutely plausible and matches everything he said earlier, and there is not the slightest reason to doubt his veracity. 3708:

Sometimes you can force a new IP address by rebooting/leaving your modem off for the lease period (typically a day) and sometimes your ISP just decides to randomly reshuffle all the leases, or there is some other problem going on which causes everyone to grab a new ip address. Generally rebooting your modem doesn't grant a new ip address as the DHCP process will typically give you the same address you had if the lease is still valid, or if no one else has taken that address after the lease is up your modem will ask for the last address it had. So it actually can be a little difficult to get a new IP address that way. If you're not familiar with

4124:, which as you admitted is just one degree, So even if you want to argue that you somehow meant that the history degree was from another university(which is a stretch to read in that context), when did you pick up the separate political and international relations degrees? The consensus for an interaction ban is 6 users vs only 3 who want a site ban. There isn't any kind of majority in favour of a site ban. If he doens't respect the interaction ban then his next stop is a full ban. If he ever talks to you again touches one of your edits etc, you don't have to do anything, calmly post it on ANI, and CC me and you're done and so is he.-- 10236:) to promote the adoption of IEC prefixes: computer-related issue whereby Thunderbird2 would have Knowledge using terms like “kibibytes (KiB)” instead of “kilobytes (KB)”. On WP:MOSNUM we went back to using the terminology observed by the rest of the real world. This editor refuses to get the point, won’t let it go, continually brings the issue up again and again (in what appears like the vain hope to catch WT:MOSNUM when we’re sleeping), is making a thorough pest of himself, and needs to be banned. The disruption he causes here (significant) far outweighs the value of his contributions (zero, since he is a single-purpose account). 317:

at the fact that someone is questioning his judgment, became extremely defensive and was eager to shut me up by saying "let's close this discussion". He accused me of NPA against ban-evading sock Alex. He then tried to exonerate Alex's pass transgression and sockpuppetry ] as well as demonstrating a flawed understanding of ]. He then failed to assume good faith ] by accusing me of ''boosting your Arbcom candidature by creating a tough-guy profile on ANI? Good lord. Go do what you must and get your "landmark case" rolling, but try to not waste the time of your more mature fellow wikipedians all too much in the process, willya?'']

3946:

they were in fact false and that Arcayne was lying. I'm uncomfortable about the message we are sending out by allowing someone back that easily with this serious libellous allegation still hanging around. At the very least, I would expect (as a last word before shutting up forever about the topic) that the anon should fully and unconditionally apologise and retract. The whole topic of casting doubts on Arcayne's credentials was an arbitrary fabrication on the anon's part, thought up for no other reason than to harass him and based on no factual evidence or likelihood whatsoever, and I would want to see the anon acknowledge this.

7551:

in conflict with, so the idea of me or Ty asking him to do anything like that is out of the question. Let me also clarify that I have no interest whatsoever in your blog, Bellinghaus's blog or any other blog. My interest has only ever been in removing this offending material from Knowledge. Once that is done the matter is concluded for me. Furthermore BLP is not entirely predicated on the likelihood of a user actually filing suit against the Wikimedia Foundation, but simply in preventing harm to living people. However ironic it may seem after MB's abusive behavior, I remain committed to correcting this situation on-wiki. --

1660:"Editors can't be bothered to provide secondary sources to support edit". As I have already explained, I provided 5 secondary sources. You merely chose to ignore all of them and write your comment. In fact, not only did you ignore the sources, you incorrectly applied WP:SYN to the sources. They are confirming that the sources actually have said what the Moorer Reports describes them as saying. I 'synthesized' nothing. They spoke - on record - and I reproduced sources confirming that they did indeed say what the Moorer Report claims they said. I can not imagine how this can violate any Knowledge policy whatsoever. 5349:, have rejected. Building consensus through negotiation, the way that disagreements are overcome on Knowledge, is alien to the JIDF. It lacks the glamour and spectacle of taking over an anti-Zionist Facebook group and displaying an Israeli flag on it. So long as they operate like this on Knowledge, they will get blocked and barred, just like some of the people on the opposing side who behave similarly get barred and blocked (e.g NobodyofConsequence and puttyshool). And if they stop acting like this and grow up, they will no longer be the same JIDF and could actually contribute something here instead.-- 1928:- if you place a dot in your "UserPage", then your name will no longer show up in red on pages such as this one. Thankyou for the Barnstar, I deeply regret that it was considered a good excuse to jeer at both of us. The idea of WP is to be collegiate - it's disturbing there are still admins around who feel no need to uphold some of the most fundamental principles (not to say policy) of the project. It damages the workings of the whole project, and may explain why I was shortly snippy with another un-named admin as you can see below. 11414:(e/c) A long while ago, I had a very similar situation: an edit warrior asked for a second chance, and when I unblocked his first act was to put a swastika on the talk page of the admin who blocked him. I reblocked indef. I recently became aware they're editing under a new name. Since there's no indication of edit warring or harassing the admin he harrassed before, I figure Knowledge is reults oriented, not rules oriented, and ignored it. If they ever edit war or put up more swastikas, I can reblock immediately with no warnings. 4057:

a consensus for a site ban, though he may be counting folk who were unsure of the limits of the ban, but it seemed to me that banning the anon was the right way to go, as the anon seems either unrepentant or unwilling to see their culpability. Their very last comments (dated only a few hours ago) on their talk page support this lack of agreement. As FuturePerfect pointed out, the anon still has his prefacing remarks calling me a liar in his user talk space. As far as I know, we don't allow attack pages here, and yet, there it is.

3810:

originated. I'm trying to condense a few diffs myself, seeing as some people still fail to see the obvious, but as it's across so many pages and IPs it takes a bit of time. – As far as I'm concerned, Arcayne himself is still not the issue here. He was involved in what was originally a legitimate though heated content dispute back at the time; since then, he's simply been the stalking victim. (And I'm not saying this as somebody who particularly likes Arcayne; I know it can be exasperating to deal with him at times.)

7996:(edit conflict) Interesting that you comment about British editors - it was something that also occured to me. I could say that I have an onus and duty to uphold the court's decision and should remove the material on that basis irregardless of consensus or 3RR! But I can't delete it entirely, which is why I've come here. The "do no harm" is a policy I can agree with without any hint of sarcasm and wonder if that's enough to scrub the edit history. I can do the work in finding the diffs if required of me. 3965:

he had to leave the IP alone but asked and recommended to him politely that he do so. Unless arcayne is out to start trouble he should have no problem agreeing to that. The IP has pointed out that they generally edit different areas and it was just a coincidence they ended up together on this article. As to an apology and retraction regarding the comments made about arcayne, I'm afraid I don't really see it the way you do. As far as I'm concerned Arcayne still used the language "degrees"

8882:. If he insists or edit wars over the reversion, then there is some "incident". However, absent behavior like that, it is ok for most policies to be changes slightly without discussion beforehand. Let's say (for an example) that the changes made were uncontroversial--simply making the changes and waiting for reversion would be MUCH easier than proposing them, ensuring that no one had objections, then making the changes. If I am missing something about this, please let me know. 10075:

to protect Knowledge the account should be blocked at the first sign of any new problems. As Moonriddengirl has pointed out, a good contribution history often does result in the odd hiccup being overlooked, but copyright violation could have consequences for Knowledge as a whole and we have no option but to take this very seriously. If we don't get these reassurances as to future behaviour, but editing continues, I'd suggest perhaps blocking the account until we do.

10038:

since we do run the risk that copyright violations will work their way into what should be Knowledge's best content. I hope that this contributor has simply misunderstood the policies and laws in question and that there won't be any further infringement, but his defensiveness in response to these concerns (including in the initial article's talk page, on my talk page and in response to the issues raised by TheIslander above) and his removal of the matter from

338:

to block me, even claiming that "conflict of interest" does not apply despite the fact that no other editor reverted me during this time except himself. ] He seems to be reverting out of personal vendetta. Even my attempt to compromise by telling him to move the objectionable sentence to another part of the article was rebuffed as he continued to hurl insults in edit summary such as accusing me of being a sexist, misogynist, among other personal attacks.

81: 3380:

a range block, will effect innocent editors from posting their opinions to the guy. Right now Arcayne is not the one in question, his qualifications certainly are not. I could call myself someone famous, I don't have to prove it, just like people don't have to register. However there is a bit of pathetic EW-ing, both disagreeing with each others edits. I don't know what the solution is unless we start a discussion about Arcayne's edits too.

1666:

no way to reach consensus if you delete the entry, and every other variation of the entry you see. WP:CONSENSUS is impossible to reach if the only act you perform is to delete the entry. You have never even attempted to edit the entry to rid it of your objections. That is both a violation of WP:CONSENSUS and the first reason for why I make the charge that you are trying to censor any mention of the report on the USS Liberty incident page.

3842:

HOWEVER, that does not justify the incessant harrassment of him SINCE then. That was 6 months ago, and there has been no defense for the rude edit summaries and the frivolous ANIs and the talk page rudeness that has been cited above, and which dates for every month SINCE then. Seriously, if there is no more recent evidence of provocation by Arcayne, then I fail to see how some diffs from April can be used to justify this behavior... --

3207:

He did nothing wrong in doing so. I'm sure I've mentioned my own qualifications too at some point or other. Anybody is free to draw whatever conclusions they wish from such a statement, or not to draw any. The anon never had any legitimate cause in making this an issue in the first place. Warning: by continuing to talk about this non-topic, you are actually continuing the harassment and could be treated accordingly if you overdo it.

6521:

sought out by academic writers in many disciplines, and we are privileged that he donates so much time and energy to Knowledge. If he is sometimes uncivil, it is in the face of unrelenting provocation from the likes of Anderson, who should consider (once more) backing off and examining what he might do that is constructive, himself. Let him first look to Tony's additional work in coaching editors striving to improve their work (see

235:] is persistently attempting to out someone as a BNP member, using as his source, 'the BNP membership list'. This person's name has not been published in any media source at all. I have removed this four times as it is clearly unjustifiable, and there is simply no justification for using a private membership list as a source on Knowledge. Please could you ensure this doesn't continue ] (]) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 228:] is persistently attempting to out someone as a BNP member, using as his source, 'the BNP membership list'. This person's name has not been published in any media source at all. I have removed this four times as it is clearly unjustifiable, and there is simply no justification for using a private membership list as a source on Knowledge. Please could you ensure this doesn't continue ] (]) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7271:) was recently indef blocked here for similar comments. I am simply linking to the page on her site where Pauline Berry defends herself against Bellinghaus' accusations. I don't feel that the content of that page is offensive, but it's a moot point since it is a private website and WP rules don't apply. She has, as a result of the discussion on my talk page and unbidden by me, changed the title of the page to 11800:. Now with ALL this continuing even now, as pointed out in my complaint raised here, I seriously cannot believe how the Admins let someone clean up their talk page to make it look nice and still continue organized mafia-type hounding, uncivility, sockpuppetry and policy violations to let one guy get away with ALL this, just to write POV nonsense. Can something be done about this? Seriously!! Thanks ] (] 14439: 3976:

himself, but was he being truthful? The anon provided evidence. Oxford doesn't have those degrees and Arcayne later confirmed that indeed it is a single degree, not multiple degrees. I think they can both learn a lesson here. I've also pointed out that as far as I'm concerned Arcayne is guilty of edit warring in August (that he instigated not the IP) over the moving of his comment on a talk page.

7403:

question, and both of us in the last 24 hours have received what I can only describe as the most abusive communication I have ever received in my life, so I can assure you there is no motivation for personal favours. I am, for the record, apparently John, as well as some other people I've never heard of before, and am in league with Delicious Carbuncle. Now, will you kindly remove the link.

5589:(ec)Yes, it seems a little heavy-handed for one edit, made more than a week after the last one. Blocks are a black mark on an editor, especially wrongful blocks, even if they do get overturned. Tony's been here what, 3 years, and has never been blocked before, so it is a little dismaying to see this. I would encourage Tony to stop edit warring though, whether the block was right or wrong. – 14471: 14382: 12975: 12894: 11304: 11034: 10983: 10947: 10613: 9262: 9121: 8851: 7794: 5409: 2765: 12851:) that he is being discussed on an Administrators' noticeboard. Should you mention an editor (and especially an Administrator whose actions are being scrutinised) on a noticeboard, please take a second to issue them a notice in the interests of courtesy, and to solicit their view and/or an explanation on the matter—such is the routine discussion etiquette and procedure, really. Thanks, 4702:

the JIDF are so wedded to the glamour of clandestine action that they can't create an account with their name that contributes to the talk page alone. Then they could draw our attention to new articles about them and complain about and explain anything they considered misrepresentation. Instead they have this series of edit warrior accounts that are transparently connected to them.--

7110:. If people could feel comfortable asking for clarification and/or elaboration ("What do you mean? ~~~~") without being looked down on as trolls or threadshitters, not only would we all collectively end up with a lot more clarity and elaboratification, but long-winded folk (*cough*) wouldn't feel as pressured to address every single conceivable point in one long mass of 3751:, but then spread to almost everywhere I edited. The result was antagonizing, creepy and annoying as all get out. I am sorry, but I am not getting where you are coming from here. I mean, if you are asking to be spoon-fed diffs of what everyone else can feast upon themselves, maybe I am not the guy to do it. I realize that the list of IPs in the RfCU is daunting, but 4170:

I support an interaction ban and a 1 screw up and you're gone rule. If I actually thought arcayne was intentionally trying to mislead us, I would have already opened a new section about just that. No one needs to bring up anything about the april incident again. With the interaction ban in place it should be completely irrelevant at this point.--

3823:

about it on AN/I. We have admittance that you think he can be exasperating and down below Jayron admits that Arcayne could be just as much to blame for the original dispute as the IP. I don't think its a stretch to imagine he might have helped this along (as evidenced by the poking of the IP in august by edit warring over his comment placement)--

9502:, i mean to a sock you suspect that its me, well i dont really dont know about that. It just only happened because i'm a celebrity fanatic who wants to edit showbiz related articles. And dont tell to everybody that my uploaded images were copybio because its really my own work and you have no right to say it because you have no proff. Excuse me 8418:. However, I havent oversighted when there are too many diffs between the introduction and removal of the information (i.e. there is an editorial reason to keep the diffs). Editors have been firm in reverting this information being added to the article, and one other more experienced oversighter acted on a request for oversight on this issue. 12574:, but it is obvious that we're dealing with InternetHero acting anonymously. InternetHero has been blocked once over a not-too-bright response to a warning, but has been warned for breaches of policy several times. Additionally, the way he/she evaluates "consensus" (8 votes against 5) is clearly not the way things are done in Knowledge. -- 12716:", so you should not have added a notability tag, what you might question is the references, my chines is not so good and a better reference should be resonably easy to find. On the other hand, to just revert you was not really correct either, the user that removed the tag should have explained in the comment why he removed your tag. -- 12432:

a WHOIS check on any IP that isn't vandalising; so the results for your test get wildly skewed towards looking like schools are all vandalising. Its sort of like going to a courthouse and deciding that the entire town must be criminals because everyone at the courthouse is a criminal; law abiding citizens don't show up at court... --

2799:: A ban on contacting or discussing Arcayne in any way, broadly construed. The user is allowed to edit wikipedia content and constructively contribute to the encyclopedia, but if any IP address he/she uses comments on, asks a question about, makes contact with, or in any way references Arcayne or his credentials is blocked on sight. 2461:

plenty wrong in being a meatpuppet, and it was uninvolved admin who have raised those concerns, as it was an uninvolved admin who initiated the Check User. There was no 'brush off'. Policies were clearly mentioned to them, over and over again, with the main problem being that the SPAs appear to have made the common mistake of

8462:. Redvers is right, the court is seeking to protect the siblings of the dead child, and possibly members of his extended family. I do not see that adding the names of the two adults concerned to our articles would add anything encyclopædic, but I do believe it would increase the risk of harm, to the surviving family members. 13861:

inclusion of many names on that list (Which you then *instantly* moved to a random title so that literally anything could go on the page and you could avoid my question) - well I'm sorry but that's what talkpages are for. ANI is for specific issues, so let's have them "those are bad men! wah!" isn't a specific complaint.--

7032:. I am relaxed about most things but this is a flagrant breach of a policy which exists to keep our organization safe from being sued. I am not relaxed about this. I do not want to see anyone blocked over this, I just want the offending and unencyclopedic content removed in accordance with our policy on user pages. -- 6973:. Editors may also defend themselves. They're not spamming/advertising. Case closed. I see very little support for your attempts to remove their defense. On top of that, I know that I am a cunning linguist, and the block of a user noted above is partly because of comments made in this thread, so relax a little. 7090:, either, but there are tons of editors linking to their personal blogs on their userpage. Instead of racing to claim the lofty moral righteousness of Policy, why can't people start off with the basics - that the page linked in DC's userpage makes them feel uneasy; nothing more, nothing less - and then have a 7603:

steered clear of), but essentially geared to negative information about a third party. Jimbo's statement is not criticising a third party: it is defending his own actions and relationship to wikipedia. Had there been a litany of Rachel Marsden's perceived flaws, it would have been received very differently.

6716:

Most of the page is actually just cut and paste of WP discussions. I am not refusing to take down the link, but I don't have time for this discussion at the moment. If a consensus is reached that the link must go, please leave the userbox intact and just remove the link. Thanks. 19:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

11397:

might be invoked so that it is made clear this is an alternate account of a blocked editor, that any transgressions will be treated in this knowledge, but if they keep editing usefully then they are to be allowed to do so. I would like Orangemikes comments, he has always struck me as being reasonable

9996:

He is a serious contributor, and has a featured article to his name (much more than I have) and I have dealt with him cordially in the past. I notice that he has done little editing in the last two weeks, and I sincerely hope that he acts to de-escalate things, and we can look forward to more of his

9840:

I agree. I've warned the user, and will block without further warning should they persist in either restoring removed copyvios or introducing more copyvio material. Ignorance of our copyright restrictions is excusable, but quibbling over the details once they've been pointed out and removing a notice

9664:

I know his comment about Wynchard is a little harsh, but I also observed that behaviour, too. His patterns seem to be suspicious, and so he decided to tag him as a Gerald sock. It's also true that Wynchard also acted rather uncivil and called some other editors names (either by using derogatory words

9372:

Just adding "My own work" on the infobox for images says very little on how it became your own work. For instance, did you personally took the photographs as Angel Locsin's oficial photographer? Or, as what sometimes happen to other photos that later become deleted, did you download it from a website

8948:

I agree with you. I changed it back to the version that baseball bugs did. That was the last change made that did not actually change policy. It only clarified it. The other changes actually took the policy in another direction, then used the template as an explanation for the change. That never made

8938:

OK, someone needs to 'splain just what the bleep is going on here. You changed it back to the way I had it, and now someone has put "item" back, based on some argument that doesn't make sense. So tell me - is, or is not, that infobox supposed to be used for people? If it is, then "item" is offensive,

8914:

In all fairness Baseball bugs, your edit was what I would consider the least controversial and in good faith. They were made in good faith. I only added it here to show the progression of the policy change. That being said, the second edit is what I would consider the most controversial, based on the

8191:

case in the sense that what is best for the encyclopedia is to avoid propagating harm against individuals who themselves did nothing to deserve it. I endorse the removal and oversight of their names; and feel that there is no value to the information being added to the article. I am not bothered by

7291:

No. If somebody accuses you of something on-wiki, we can deal with it, as you have seen. Off-wiki stuff doesn't need to be dealt with on your Knowledge user page. I find it astonishing the amount of time and energy you have spent defending this link. It contributes nothing at all to the reason we are

7132:

At the risk of being accused of wikilawyering, I think there's a difference between the content actually being on WP and being on an external site. If the guidelines are to protect WP from being sued, as John suggests, there is good reason to disallow certain content on user pages, but that no longer

6693:

by linking to pages that merely exist to contain information that would not normally be allowed at Knowledge. We do not allow this sort of information on a userpage, so we also should not allow links to this sort of information. A userpage is not about discussing the behaviors of other people in this

6520:

and its associated pages. Anderson is notorious at those pages for his weakening of established and new guidelines, in accord with his obscurely motivated wish that there be no clear standards for high-quality editing. Tony himself is a highly skilled professional editor in his life beyond Knowledge,

6115:

I think it is clear that Rjd0060 should probably be immediate desysoped. This is ridiculous, and no admin should have ever have blocked Tony1 in this situation. Thus, he is either not fit to use the powers, or his account is compromised. Either way, that means that he should be stripped of any access

5805:

I certainly agree that edit warring like that is very bad, but the block was over the one latest diff. Blocks are supposed to be preventative, not punitive. What is the use of blocking a productive editor like this, for 12 hours (which he may not even notice)? It's not supposed to be a punishment, or

5628:(ec)Unless they were officially told not to revert at all on this page, I don't see how one revert could count as edit warring. I also note that the person who reverted Tony's changes was not blocked or warned. I'm glad Bishonen brought this here because I was just about to. Tony should be unblocked. 5344:

Well yes, POV-pushers exist on both sides, not only of the Israel-Palestine dispute but of many others. Some of these POV pushers have learnt after a few blocks to conform to Knowledge process, and are developing into good Wikipedians. Others get blocked long term or banned. The JIDF's methods is to

4235:

Unfortunately I came in after all was said in done and didn't notice the timestamps when I first went through and commented. I'm not sure if arcayne has seen it or not but his call to move on was about 90 minutes after that thread. Unless arcayne wants to show leniency then I'd agree with leaving him

4169:

I was pointing it out because FP was insisting on a full retraction/apology on the part of the anon calling it libelous. I felt that was 1) counter productive and 2) in fact false since there are reasonable discrepancies in what Arcayne has said. I certainly don't condone the IPs actions which is why

4026:

I think that Crossmr's solution to the problem is quite reasonable, and I endorse it as within the spirit of why I started this thread, which was to find a solution to the problem at hand. If 75.X.X.X stops his harassment of Arcayne through the mediation of Crossmr, then the problem has been solved,

3503:

The thing with blocking the IPs he's caused trouble on is that he's clearly on a dynamic IP, which means someone else is also and theres a chance they could end up on a blocked IP (I know its a super-slim chance but still) Its a very extreme idea to ban IPs permanently. Heres an idea, I don't know if

3470:

person with whom the (s)he has taken exception to in the past. However, because the anon has chosen to twist one of our most cherished Foundational ideals - that anyone, anonymous or otherwise, can edit here - and used it to avoid repercussions for their behavior, they should not be afforded the same

3434:

The anon claims that some of the IPs are not his/hers; that might possibly be true. Using fairly ham-fisted IP-matching techniques, it would appear that about 3/4's of the IPs are centered around the Chicago metropolitan area (which includes part of Indiana, for purposes of this discussion); the rest

3219:

There is no need to threaten me. I am a reasonable person who responds well to well-reasoned argument. I don't agree with you, you have not convinced me that I am wrong. You clearly feel the same. We will have to live with that. I will not press the matter any further as I have clearly made my point.

2806:

Some background for anyone unfamiliar with this case: It goes back many months. Apparently, a long time ago, Arcayne made a note of some credentials he may or may not have had. The issue over whether or not Arcayne has these credentials is not what this discussion is really about. This person has

1665:

An attempt at WP:CONSENSUS is impossible with your methods, primarily since you violate the tenets of WP:CONSENSUS yourself. Specifically, the policy calls for changes to entries if one feels that entries are incorrect. You have chosen to delete the entry every single time you see it. There is simply

14130:

No-one is suggesting that the article be censored out of sympathy for his family; I only mentioned BLPN so that editors here would not recommend I post it there. I would simply like responsible editors, preferably including some admins to watch the article so that vandalism is quickly dealt with and

12431:

To half-shadow; its because only those IPs which are the source of vandalism are the ones that get checked for WHOIS and get tagged as school-based IPs. Lots of great edits likely come from school-based IPs; and lots of registered users probably edit from school computers. The deal is, no one does

11848:

is suddenly qualified to call me a problem editor when no one following Knowledge policies and guidelines seem to have had 'problems' with me. My record in Knowledge has been perfect and consistently clean for over two years. I haven't had ANY blocks or spats and I am trying to constructively expand

10037:

I believe you have been the very model of civility in this. :) Good contributions can balance well against a lot of concerns, but persistent copyright infringement is not among them. In my opinion, on the contrary, copyright problems are even more worrisome with a prolific and dedicated contributor,

9510:

too much. I've mensioned that Im a cousin of Locsin which is true and why are you complaining, are you only just insecure or envious with me? I also put sock tag on your userpage because you deserve it, you almost put sock tags 7 times on my userpage. Because you're blaming me as a sock which is not

8713:

I was under the impression that using these other accounts that mean scrutiny is evaded was a big no no. The thing is, I'm not sure his edits completely cross the line to sanction him for pro-pedopdilia editing - I think there is a minor POV problem, but it's small fish compared to some of the other

8438:

The court would be seeking to protect the siblings from ridicule and harassment. They'll be in care or fostered and may be subject to undue interest (eg bullying) from other children in the children's home, at school or in the street, or from adults or the press. The protection order should cut down

8295:

I'm not sure that it matters much, but it's apparently on some blogs and also on Myspace (I'm told). The BBC did publish the names, but then took the report down although it can still be found through google if you're really desperate. A paper referred to as "gutter press" published the names. Can't

8151:

I realise that the decision of the British courts was made to "protect the children" however I am not quite agreeing with this decision, especially as the talk page seems barren of any real discussions of concensus apart from some randomly placed yells of wikipedia is not cneosred. It brings to mind

8096:

Also, we have the ability to add notice when a specific page is edited - could someone create one of those for this article, informing the would-be editor that these names are being systematically reverted by editors, and oversighters are removing the edits. Note that semi-protection isnt likely to

7977:

Legally wikipedia doesn't have to do anything. (Although British editors should take care!) However, our "do no harm" rule comes in here. The law is passed to prevent harm to minors, by reducing the prominence of their names in print. (A prominence that will endure into adulthood!). Given the intent

7703:

I would be quite happy to make a signed statement on DC's page that there is no evidence that DC is Pauline Berry and all the evidence indicates that (s)he is not, and that DC is a respected editor on wikipedia. If some other editors provided something similar, it would be immediately informative to

7602:

I don't think there is an objection to a simple statement of denial (especially as the RL person mentioned is supportive). It's the link that is problematic. The linked page had an extremely inflamatory heading, which has now been toned down, so it is an unpredictable page (just the reason blogs are

7550:

Thanks for that, Restawhile. If you read upthread a few posts you will see that Mark Bellinghaus and I are no longer in contact with one another as a result of some highly abusive emails he has sent to me and Tyrenius, accusing us of both being one and the same and also being someone who he has been

7531:

On another note; Ty and John are worried about threats of Knowledge being sued, rest assured Mark's threats are simply that. I have heard all that before (as can you if you listen to the recordings on my site). Now a question: is the threat of a lawsuit an actual threat? i.e. an empty lawsuit threat

5857:

The page was protected for a week, none of the involved parties attempted to discuss their differences during the protection and resumed the edit war when the protection expired. Locking down an entire guidelines page for 3-4 edit warriors is not beneficial to the 10,000 other users who are editing

4701:

As the person reverted by POVPusher, I did consider coming here or going to a senior admin but decided not to. I also considered the POVPusher = ED equation, but POVPusher didn't react to my reference to JIDF as "your lot" whilst ED always vigorously denied any such connection. It's unfortunate that

4119:

because if you actually meant those from different places you shouldn't have gone out of your way to name drop one place without name dropping the other place and tying them together with "and". The double paste of the diffs was just a copying problem on my part, I've updated it to reflect the other

4056:

I have been trying to stay out of this process as much as possible, aware that it wasn't really about me (or even the anon), but rather about enforcing those policies which make Knowledge a fun place to work. As such, while I am not sure how Jayron orCrossmr is arriving at the idea that there is not

3964:

We can't tell one person to avoid someone and then not ask the other person to reciprocate. Otherwise we're creating a situation where one person can poke the other with impunity and the moment the person being poked says anything they can run to AN/I and demand they be blocked. I never told Arcayne

3730:

user is responsible for most if not all of the IPs. Maybe take a closer look at the most current RfCU; I've listed the prior RfCU's regarding the user, and the anon him/herself acknowledged that the IP addresses were theirs. All I did was point out the string of IPs editing in the same RfCU, and the

3439:

that 75. counts for about 1% of the internet (about 67.1 million IPs), and the wiki benefits from the input of them. We cannot block them out because one particular user is being a jerk. And don't think I am not creeped out (and a little frightened) by the fact that the anon would appear to be in my

3379:

The thing for me is that everyone knows a range block is out of the question because it will effect innocent editors. Obviously this guy admits hes been here 7 years, he's well aware of this fact and is in a way using it to his advantage. Again, any kind of block, whether it be contacting Arcayne or

3344:

I just pointed out above, where he insulted him and then edit warred over the placement of the IPs comment on a talk page when the IP placed his first. That seems plenty provocative to me. This is why I'm insisting on full disclosure on all the events leading up to here, not just a few cherry picked

3313:

Indeed, to refocus the discussion, the fact that Arcayne once, a year ago, claimed some Oxon degree is not in dispute by anyone. The problem is that in the intervening year, this user has done nothing EXCEPT browbeat Arcayne over that fact. Almost on a continuous basis, there is some edit summary,

3206:

Arcayne has nothing to prove, nothing to explain and nothing to account for here. He did nothing wrong. There's no problem he'd have to justifiy himself over. He mentioned his academic qualifications once, in passing (and then, later, explained them again a couple of times when pressed by the anon).

2498:

As far as I am aware, Justin was referring to the past editors of the page not necessarily current editors of the page. There have been problems in the past with people with extreme views either way. The second half of that seems like a pretty poorly veiled legal threat, PR, though I will assume you

2394:

we can "assure" that a particular set of facts is in an article, no matter how obviously relevant they may seem to us. Telling a new editor that seems really, really helpful. MRG: the g-news links are mostly to sources that would be considered biased -- Electronic intifada, for example -- except for

2205:

on my talk page? If you want to show support for an editor, do it at their page. I don't desire the spam. The first part of your comment is strange, as far as I am aware, I've merely commented on an ANI thread in which I am involved. Just as you have. I don't propose, not would I want, to watch you,

2043:

rules should be enforced against editors who keep re-inserting mention of the Moorer report without being willing to join in a Talk page discussion of that report, or supply appropriate references when requested. Repeated re-insertion of the same thing, each time it is reverted, can't be viewed as a

337:

He then launched a relentless campaign to wiki-stalk/harass my contributions as well as censor/impede my editing. He even threatened to block me ] just because I questioned his unblock of a ban-evading sock. After he stalked my contribution, an edit war occured at ] ] ] ] ]. He continued to threaten

11889:

is still continuing to do Wikistalking and uncivility without the faintest remorse and how WP Admins aren't noticing a troll who is hiding all the warnings in his talk page, as pointed out above, by sweeping them under the carpet! If an editor with such a bad editing history and an outrageously bad

11758:

The sort of wikihounding behaviour described here is troubling and unacceptable. It's as if he's seeing how much he can hound a user before he gets blocked, given that his reports of wikistalking in the past were dismissed as frivolous. Additionally, reuploading deleted images and using them in the

11526:

Well, consider that the blocking admin has raised no objections, I think the matter is largely closed. Yes, this is a dangerous precedant, and because we have allowed this user to edit, the sun will run dry, the earth will stop turning on its axis, and every nuclear bomb in the world will detonate

11503:

My own opinion on this matter is that we're kinda undermining our own rules by not reblocking here. An indef block is an indef block. Failing to re-block him gives the clear message that "If you've done wrong, and have been indefinitely blocked for it, just come back with a new account and, so long

10074:

Yes, me too. Personally I'd like to have some kind of assurance from Chrisieboy that he now understands the issues and won't be repeating them. In the light of what looks like attempts to cover up the copyvios and even laugh them off, I think future contributions will also need to be monitored, and

9393:

You may wish to revisit your personal definition of "vandalism". There is, as noted above, a Sockpuppet case that involves your userid. Placing a "suspected sock" tag on your userpage is therefore a valid action. If proven that it's NOT true, it can be removed. Could you please provide diffs of

9205:

I did file an SSP, so if anyone wants to archive it, feel free. I have no doubt that once the current block wears off, he'll be back. If you look at the IP, and the blocked socks, he's pretty persistent, and there's no apparent reason to think otherwise in this case. He's had the same IP for over a

9056:

Looks from here like he's blocked now, on the way to being banned, and the stuff on his talkpage (Am I right that that's what you're referring to??) remains only as part of an ongoing discussion. It ain't pretty, I'm with you there, but it may fall under the category of "giving him enough rope with

8748:

As a further comment on policy, if their other account is linked or traceable to their RL identity, then using an alternate account to edit particularly contentious articles would be OK. The best course of action I can see is for ForesticPig to register their main and alternate accounts with ArbCom

8692:

People are allowed to use another account for contentious articles, for instance there have been problems with aggro writings on other sites over these articles. There are separate sanctions on the paedo articles though which he could fall under if he becomes/is too pro-paedo though, aren't there?

7573:

I find the suggestion that John or I are not neutral because we have received emails from MB to be absurd, unless it means we are biased against MB, which I don't think is what was intended. I mean, DC, please actually read the post you are answering: it describes the emails received as "what I can

7488:

earlier in this thread. NE2's statement is pretty clearly against removal. I don't know how to take Badger Drink's comments. BMW also finds that no consensus has been reached. You and John have dominated this thread. Given that both of you have been involved with Bellinghaus' bio and have off-wiki

7306:

The time I've spent defending it is only as the direct result of your attempts to have me remove it. I've explained several times now why the link is on my userpage. As I said at the beginning of this thread, I will remove the link if that is the consensus that is reached. I honestly don't see that

6783:

C'est folie ! L'escarboucle doit utiliser tous les outils il ou elle a à leur disposition pour se défendre du "bellinghaus" d'équipe et n'importe quelle suggestion autrement serait comme mettre un tas des briques sur un hamster et l'instruire au " équilibre, " de monsieur. Les tendrils de la marque

6715:

The very short version of this is that I am falsely identified in several places on the internet, including Bellinghaus' own blog as Pauline Berry. I am not Pauline Berry. I have linked to the page on Berry's site where she addressed this misidentification. I do not control the content of the site.

6395:

admin later misunderstood another set of jokes between Ceoil and another editor, and baited Ceoil on his talk page, specifically mentioning his block log, and then threatened to block him because of how Ceoil responded to being blatantly baited. Then that admin tossed a truckful of F-bombs all over

6358:

SandyGeorgia, I too have been sleeping down under; and I am appalled to wake up and find that Tony has been treated like this, simply for adjusting a tag. I think there should be a formal apology, and everything should be done to ensure that this mistake by an admin will never count against Tony in

4011:

The majority is clearly in favour of an interaction ban not a site ban. Last I checked I wasn't under some kind of restriction from making a request of another user. Its up to arcayne whether or not he wants to fulfill that request. I didn't outline any penalty if he chose not to act on the request

3951:

The second thing is, some of the things that have been said on the anon's talk page still sound as if there should be a reciprocal expectation on Arcayne to avoid the anon. I want to see it made clear that there is none. I'd sure wish he would see no further need of talking about the case much, but

3634:

You do realize that if the ISP releases his dhcp release and gives him a new IP it isn't "creating a new account" and your usage of that indicates either a complete lack of understanding or an attempt to make something sound worse than it is. Your last CU failed I believe on an account you tried to

3604:

If we are still counting votes on this, I'd add my support to option 1. In practice, the two options are similar, since if a new IP shows up from this range who doesn't attack Arcayne it's unlikely that anyone will react to him in any way or connect him to this issue. The value of making this a ban

3462:

It has also been argued by the anon that they have edited anonymously for seven years. While that is a statement we cannot really prove - again, no single IP means edit histories are difficult to track, what is more telling is the stated reason the anon prefers to edit via dynamic IP and the actual

3322:

to one. I personally feel that Proposal 2, which still allows the user to edit, but prevents him from continuing his harassment of Arcayne a good idea. No one has presented any counterevidence to indicate that Arcayne has done anything in the past year to provoke this guy, so I don't see where he

2168:

Could someone please look at this the talk page is littered with yet another extensive diatribe, that editors are suppressing the truth. I'm just about done with reasonably explaining that synthesising an argument from original material and promoting pet fringe theories just isn't on. My patience

316:

As a neutral editor, I noticed the AN/I thread and immediately questioned Future Perfect's judgment in this episode as well as his categorization of "fundamental opposition". Alex from L.A. was extremely hostile, but Future Perfect's continue to patronize the ban-evading sock. Future Perfect, angry

8263:

As for the comment about lack of discussion on the talk page, yes, there wasn't much, but it seemed pretty clear to me that the prospective harm outweighed the insignificant benefits. I also wanted to take discussion away from the talk page to an arena that was more likely to be neutral - ie here.

7519:

I know its almost too simple a solution to consider. Then DC I am sure would have no problem removing the link, the same as I would have no problem with taking down the page itself referring to this wiki dispute. I have to say there is nothing attacking in my page, (Ty said "vicious" - I am really

7433:

External sites can follow whatever policies they want, but users on this site have to follow wikipedia policies. That is a requiring of having the privilege of editing here, and that is why one of the individuals involved in this dispute has been blocked from this site. It is not appropriate for a

7219:

Wrong, I'm afraid. WP:BLP exists to ensure that this project does no unnecessary harm to living individuals. It way beyond what might be legally actionable. It certainly does apply to userspace, and can at times apply to links that contain libels, or other grossly unhelpful material. We don't link

7046:

I'm not attempting to settle any dispute through having this link on my userpage, either on- or off-wiki. I'm simply trying to correct the misidentification by pointing to the web site of the other person being falsely identified. Let me point out again that what you refer to as "the offending and

6620:

I agree with Pete. Tony1 has worked closely with the FAC and FAR groups and his view on the MoS seems to be built after months (and even years) of learning about how people in those areas feel. That is not to say that he hasn't also done the same with those outside of those areas. However, it sure

6489:

Tony is a persistently uncivil editor with a bad case of ownership over all of MOS. Those of us who know him have learned to deal with this; but the assertion that this block is outrageous is nonsense. He (and his supporters here) are one side of the current date-linking rumpus; Locke Cole is a

6430:

Sadly true. Admins takes a quick look at a block log and then double the last block. What that has to do with building an encyclopedia will forever remain a mystery to me. Administrators get away with murder, but regular editors have every one of their alleged misdemeanours recorded in their block

4202:

The anon knows where (s)he stands at this time. Interaction ban it is. I won't poke the user, or seek them out. I don't need an apology, and while it would be spiffy if the usertalk page comments by the anon calling me a liar were removed, it isn't required. It isn't our job to fix users - we just

4198:

Look, this has gone on long enough. FuturePerfect, Jayron and Crossmr (and many others who emailed me), I appreciate the concern, support and interest. It's time to let this go and move on. I am confident that Crossmr and FutPerf are not going to forget about the anon, and I am fairly certain that

4138:

I cant believe you are defending the anon's attack on his qualifications. no-one except the anon and you really give a crap. we have the right to claim whatever we want whether its true or B-S. Arcayne knows he was wrong to have a superior-than-thou attitude over his quals, and has openly admitted

3945:

As recently as four days ago, at the top of his current talk page, the anon was repeating his bogus accusation against Arcayne of "false credentials". Mind you, he was not just criticising Arcayne for using his credentials without giving proof of them, he was presenting it as an outright fact that

3107:

has a history of accussing other users. He seems to always be in some sort of dispute that ends up on this message board. Also, Arcayne's weakness is that he always has to have the last word. He responds to every little comment and attacks anyone who disagres with him. If he just ignored the anon,

3060:

Proposal 1 - As the target of this user (and I admit that pride of my educational background kinda caused a bit of the initial issue), this has gone on too long. There are users with whom I have disagreed with, but they are all active in actually expanding the project. This user isn't, and most of

2129:. I believe this is enough evidence of abuse to justify a checkuser. I've notified all four editors that they are being discussed at ANI. Their sudden appearance, the narrowness of their interests, and their sophistication in Knowledge policy matters cry out for any explanation other than socking. 1893:

I assume that is when WORLDFACTS is talking about his edit where he uses source from 1990 for a report from 2003? I do see that we are onto the silly hyperbole about self serving, censorship and 'Oh noes the dead people!' again....along with a bit of 'The Truth (tm)'. Someone should make SPA rants

1735:

of the contents of the report? Your inconsistent treatment of this entry speaks volumes about your intentions. You only delete any quotes or entries made on the Moorer Report, but you do not appear to object to a link to the report. Is my belief that you are trying to censor the report really that

1703:

and come to a conclusion. That you do not like the conclusion of the report is not my problem. One of the numbered conclusions of the report is that "there is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew". This point is not

295:

In his most recent exploit, Future Perfect at Sunrise aggressively albeit controversially pushed for the lifting of the ban of ], who has a habit of making death threats, creating ban-evading sockpuppets, and possessing an overall lack of respect for the due process. ] He controversially unblocked

14160:

Well, in a way, I guess I am. I don't mean per the exact wording of BLP, but the philosophy behind it; that we should try not to be dicks when it affects real people, like any family or friends. Having this pop up as an article while the body is still warm just makes me feel like I'm associated

11565:

I have read the arguments presented and my view is that unless both of you find a way to work together and without edit-warring or making comments on each others supposed motives, it will not end up well, resulting in either or both of you being eventually blocked for disruption. My advice: seek

8734:

Obviously my concern is that he is not an admin and faking it on his userpage to avoid being blocked. I have been in email communication with him and would urge that we hold off blocking for another day or so until he can verify to a third party the identity of his primary account. Obviously if

7418:

Through no actions of my own, my username has been inserted into a pre-existing off-wiki dispute between two people and my userpage linked to by one of those parties. As Bellinghaus' own blog entry shows, the parts of the linked web page that you picked out as offensive are factual. I don't think

7061:

BUt the whole point is, if its information that would not normally be allowed on your userpage, then its not information you should be able to link to from your userpage. The distinction between "actually printed on my userpage" vs. "printed in a link from my userpage" is moot, and attempting to

6656:

and finding nothing that seemed relevant. I asked you in the edit summary to bring it here or MFD if you continued to have concerns. Your comments on my talk page were added after I had restored it, fully 20 minutes after you had removed the material from my userpage. I would appreciate it if you

3971:

when in fact he has only a single degree from oxford and instead the degree is comprised of the various classes he took and he has even stretched it so far to defend his comment of various degrees by claiming larger sections had smaller sections in it. If I take a class of german as an elective I

3702:

The current RFCU is pointless as all a RFCU is is to look at the underlying IPs to see if they're the same or similar. Since all you have are IPs, you're not checking anything. I'm not contending anything other than to tell you to stop claiming that this individual has made accounts to attack you

2706:

Meatpuppets arn't something one can check for. They are merely SPA whose only purpose is to espouse the view of annother (Hence they are like a sock puppet in their actions but acctually are filled by something, annother editor ). Meatpuppets are usually far more difficult as I imagine each admin

2460:

Shall we avoid legalistic terms like libelous, hrm? I am all infavour of avoiding personal attacks, though I note that WorldFacts has yet to remove his and even seems to view personal attacks as a valid fall back to be resorted to. As for nothing necessarily wrong in being a SPA, no, but there is

2250:

Thank you MRG. Not sure about the sources, but I'm going through, I think we should be able to source there was a report, but it never seems to explicitly state the conclusion. Though I'll keep looking through. My search through academic sites has netted me bupkiss. Edited to add: The book hit is

2013:

I should point out, they did offer a 'secondary source'...which was an editorial by the reports author. I don't necessarily agree with Justin on some issues(specifically I remain unconvinced that this is, necessarily, a fringe theory or report), but certainly it is a conspiracy theory and must be

1616:

The Entry contains the quote "there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew; evidence of such intent is supported by statements from...". This quote is lifted directly from the report. What follows, are the names of

1604:

The Moorer Commission was a group of retired senior-level military and government officials who conducted an investigation of the USS Liberty attack. The Commission was composed of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer (former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff), Marine General Raymond G. Davis (former Assistant

11907:

thinks that an edit war with a blatant POV troll with a miserable edit history in Knowledge, requires also the other editor, with a two-year clean record, to be blocked for 'equality' reasons. I have heard of 'equality', but this is nuts! Maybe he thinks that one user has to be blocked for every

11830:

I am saying that he is making his vandal behavior look unnoticeable by being very organized about not letting admins gain the impression that he is a POV vandal. He is basically sweeping it all under his carpet so that a first look would not reveal anything. Can something be done about ALL these

11251:

and this is the to the admin who is warning him in the most kind of ways. Wow. I am not trying to be an ass here, but this guy sincerely appears to have "issues" when it comes to socialization. The more I read of his posts, the most it seems like the rest of the world are idiots in his eyes.

8821:

Avoid linking the PI associated with my main account with my work on psychology/sexology/race articles and other articles that may be used to maliciously and unreasonably infer conclusions about my personality. The protection offered by the account is also family-related. It is not an attempt to

5484:

which contains the entire timeline. The page was protected at one point, and immediately after unprotection Tony, and others continued to edit war. I felt that since protection was attempted, and failed, blocking was the best alternative. I've blocked all three users who continued to edit war

4873:

Howdy's "Glad I could help" on the talk page acknowledges that this is the same person as POVPUSHER. Obviously not sockpuppetry, as it's overt, and not block evasion as they were given explicit permission to come back in a new guise. (The above is in relation to POVPUSHER, obviously the prior CU

4515:

This is "drama?" My apologies. I don't know what you are talking about. I just learned about the JIDF from the Ha'aretz piece and didn't feel the WP article was very fair to the organization, so I created an account to help make it better. I accidentally took out the "Criticism" section upon

4060:

I am not realy convinced that an interaction ban is going to be effective. While I am certainly not going to run out and edit where the anon does, or slam him any time he makes a comment, it's clear that the anon does not have the same self-restraint. It is unfair of us to expect him to suddenly

3822:

I'm not entirely convinced that there isn't an issue with arcayne here. Which is why I've asked for more detail so we can try and read this dispute from the beginning without bias. I'd like to see diffs of every time they've interacted since April as well as each time one of them started a topic

3746:

And while my IT-skills aren't anywhere near your apparent level, I am not sure they are really required when the same user keeps popping up in articles you are working to attack your edits. In the same ways. Using the same arguments. And the same unpleasant behavior. I mean, I didn't pull the IP

3707:

are tied to him which you don't. You just have a mess of IPs from the same address. Which are not accounts. Personally I've had occasion where my IP has remained the same for months, and other times where it changed 2 or 3 times in a week. Such is the nature of a dynamically assigned IP address.

3252:

Agree. What he claims has no relevence. Only how users act in wikipedia matters. Although Arcayne can be a pill at times, I know, through interactions with him, that he is passionate about what he believes. There is no reason to believe that Arcayne is not telling the truth about what degrees he

1741:

You have argued that there is no secondary sources for the Moorer Report Findings for some time. I am astounded that the following reports, also listed on the "USS Liberty incident" page do not have a single secondary reference listed. The reports listed which do not have a secondary source are:

1649:

The comment you made when you last removed the entry above is: 20:50, 14 November 2008 Justin A Kuntz (Talk | contribs) (76,838 bytes) (rv no talk page consensus for this edit. Relevant policies WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE, WP:UNDUE editors can't be bothered to provide secondary sources to support

11775:

Thanks for your points. Is there something that can be done about this? This user is very simply an wikihounding troll pushing POV, but does not get noticed because of the fact that he is actually very well organized and gets away with it all the time. He has been issued several warnings but he

11417:

If this user has stopped spamming, and is leaving OrangeMike alone, I'd be inclined to let it go. I know it's slightly trickier since he's left a couple of messages on your talk page, but that would still be my inclination. But if he spams even once, or bugs OrangeMike again, I'd reblock in a

10277:

Ignore, and return images; this is on the level of "I'm going to hold my breath until you say you are sorry..!" I am also suspicious of the use of language by these "muslims" (they would, I should have thought, have capitalised the word) in that "rats ass" is no real insult or invective in such

9992:

I noticed 2 or 3 lapses into cutting and pasting by Chrisieboy, that I cleaned up one by one without disagreement. I hadn't wished to trawl through all his contributions, so after inviting Moonriddengirl's intervention, I am surprised to learn that there are so many so early in the search, and

8896:

Those are not changes in policy, they're changes in wording. I made the initial change because someone was pointing to that page as a guideline on person infoboxes, and it occurred to me that a person is not an "item". Then someone pointed out (and added to the writeup) that there is a separate

7402:

That is quite irrelevant to our policies, which are not dictated by people's blogs; nor is wikipedia a place to promote off-wiki attacks on people, whether justified or not. Your implication about John above is quite unfounded. Both he and I have had email correspondence with the individual in

7256:

John, I know you've corresponded with Bellinghaus and you may feel that you need to protect him. If he were simply posting nasty remarks about "Delicious carbuncle", I really wouldn't care. Sadly, he is targeting an entirely innocent party and claiming that we are one and the same. Bellinghaus'

6134:

Abuse is what people have done in threatening those who challenged this action. This actual action is something that cannot be said because of the civility policy. But I wonder if that is true, especially with yourself declared "snark" acknowledging that no one really cares about civil anymore.

5973:

Damn, what a blow to my ego. I'll try to get blocked a bit more often then in order to increase my profile. (That was a joke, just in case anyone...) But seriously, this whole issue is ample evidence that WP's dispute-resolution and rule-establishing mechanisms, though doubtless philosophically

3975:

Its a bit of a hop skip and jump to go from "degrees in X" to "I had some classes that had some of that in it". Those are all his words, his usage of degrees more than once and then his admittance to having a mixed degree. I'm willing to extend him good faith that he didn't try to misrepresent

3841:

I looked at the IPs' talk page and still see a pile of difs from April 2008. That dipute seems long over at this point. The IP-user in question has STILL not answered for his behavior in every month since then; one could claim that Arcayne was as to blame for the April 2008 dispute as anyone,

3471:

protection that we afford to any other anon who comes here to actually add to the Project. The assumption of Good Faith is not a set of blinders by which we overlook extensive, recurring and nasty behavior. This user has abrogated their right to edit in our community; using Knowledge instead to

14328:

manner. Its not the place to post random rants about personal beliefs over conspiracies and the like. Knowledge is about building an encyclopedia, if one wants to post their personal political views, there's another place called "the rest of the internet" where such views are quite welcome.

13941:. I looked at the sources and at least half didn't say anything about their deaths being linked to their transgendered nature. I mentioned this on the talkpage and Benjiboi pretty much instantly moved it to the new title to avoid the issue. I guess that's the root of this complaint - WP:OWN. -- 13860:

of misconduct and provide specific examples where I have acted incorrect on the two articles you mention that I have editted (I have never edited either the murder of amanda milan and Matthew Shepherd]]. You seem pissed off with me because I raised the fact that the sourcing didn't support the

11151:

Lots of "just accept what I say as facts" going on and an open willingness to disregard common courtesy and Knowledge policy. But hey, thats just what I am seeing. And by this I mean I don't think he is very interested in a 3rd opinion. Or a 2nd one. And he has been here long enough to know

10592:

I have removed the link from the talk page; there are many comments between the introduction and removal of this link, which would all need to be removed if oversight was going to be used here. Obviously that is a lot of collateral damage. BNP will need to specifically request WMF that these

7578:

mandates that no contentious material about living people has any place on the project, unless it is properly referenced by reliable sources, not personal interpretations of the blogosphere. That includes links on wikipedia which go to such material. Find acceptable sources which think it is a

4571:

Checkuser is a good idea for thoroughly investigating sock puppetry that may involved use of multiple accounts or block or ban evasion. It would be best to connect the account to a master account and empty any sock drawer. Is there a CU hanging around or do we need to bring this case over to

12299:

So he is here in WP:ANI to "get me first out of the way" by drawing attention to blocks placed on me two years ago, and his imaginary wikihounding that I have allegedly been doing him. Apart from these few articles which I check periodically, I have no interest in Sudharsansn's edits in other

8368:

The Express article was from the first day the "trio" appeared in court and is therefore likely to be before the court secrecy order. If the fact that this article is still on their website were brough to their attention, the Express might actually remove it, as the BBC did with their similar

4631:

This is a disruptive username? Huh? It only is one because of who it might be, and/or the edits they have made. I hate to say so, but NPOV is a key policy, and how many times a day does wikidrama occur in this forum because people are POV-pushing. I hate to use the example, but "Master of

3775:

I'm asking you to prove your case which this is about since you've chosen to make so many complaints about this IP. However many of the diffs I've been provided in the various attempts to show how bad this IP is, don't really show anything bad about this IP which is what makes me question the

3589:

As I keep saying, it's highly unlikely this will have to be enforced with long-term blocks at all, be it of ranges or individual IPs. Short blocks whenever he turns up again, depending of course on the intensity of his activities. In the unlikely event that more wide-reaching blocks should be

3191:

I agree that degrees are not relevant here at WP, and that reliable sources are. My point is that attempting to block the unregistered user is not dealing with the issue, and is somewhat futile as discussed above. The unregistered user has an issue with Arcayne who, somewhat foolishly, has in

1685:

page is the Moorer Report. Since it is niether an American nor Israeli government report, it was explicitly listed as an Independent American Investigation. It is you who are in violation of WP:UNDUE, buy allowing mention and quotes of the other reports, but consistently deleting any contents

358:

I urge the community to take decisive action against this rogue admin who plays by his own rule, have little regards for the due process or wikipedia policies. I demand a formal apology and I also sincerely hope this admin can refrain from wikistalking and censoring my edits based on personal

7651:

It seems a highly tenuous connection for you to make for two reasons. One is that the Jimbo sex scandal was a major gossip story back in March, placing it in a different class entirely from these people bickering over who said what about Marilyn Monroe's dress. The other is that while people

7047:

unencyclopedic content" isn't on my userpage. People coming to my userpage will not see it unless they choose to click on the external link. I don't think there's anything even remotely actionable on the external web page, but I'm not a lawyer so I'm not really qualified to offer an opinion.

146: 3871:, asCrossmr had asked me in the anon's usertalk page to stay away from the anon's edits. I've posted the link, rather than take up any more space here (yes, I am a bit long-winded). I guess its a moot point now, but I thought maybe folk might want something with a bit less varnish on it. - 3809:

The troll's diffs, unsurprisingly, omit all the relevant stuff, namely how he kept following Arcayne around all these months. The original dispute in early April is hardly of interest at this point, except as an explanation of where the various harassment memes (such as the "Oxford" issue)

3654:. Now, for you or I, that's nothing, but those who've interacted with the anon know this is extraordinary in the extreme. I am reckoning that, knowing it would only hurt him/her if a new IP were to pop up amidst an AN/I specifically addressing all these multiple IP identities, the anon has 6926:

I would strongly suggest resolving any off-wiki problems off-wiki and just doing stuff on here that is designed to improve our encyclopedia. I don't think this falls into that area which is why I raised it here, after my attempts to persuade Delicious carbuncle to remove the material were

6528:

I am happy to count myself also as one who believes in our Manual of Style, and who has also worked hard to maintain excellence – though nowhere near as hard as Tony. Surely now Anderson will have some gall to spread against me, too. But let anyone interested enough consult the history of

7489:

communication with Bellinghaus, I question your neutrality in this matter.I think I've said everything I need to say here and I'm tired of repeating myself, so my only request is that someone other than you or John remove the link if they decide that there is consensus to do so. Thanks.

4516:

making edits, and re-added it. However, I'm not sure what WP's policy is of using articles which are originally in German. I feel if criticism is to be made about an organization, that we should only rely upon an accurate, FAZ approved, translation. I'm not sure one is available? --

11392:

the editor self identifies with being 14 years old - I don't think that we are going to get a great deal of maturity from a 14 yo (apologies and stuff) yet I also think that having such an editor contributing usefully is far better than causing a potential vandal. In this case I think

12416:

You are welcome to extend the block. IMO, some schools when they see their IP blocked, make some effort to educate students about how not to use the school computers to vandalize Knowledge, so that is why I always start with one month block and escalate the blocks if needed later on.

2897:

I'd go for P1, as per FPaS. If this individual has anything useful to contribute, then they will be able to do so easily by getting an account; if they insist on continuing harassment as 75.X they should be blocked. Note/disclaimer: I blocked 75.X for I think 12h a little while back

13018:

What I am looking at is the suggestion that there might a darker agenda or modus operandi at operation here. Something will require closer admin and checkuser inspection. Something does does not fit into the establish category of sock puppetry or tag teaming but that suggests group

2707:

will have a different intepretation. Certainly at least one of those who was suspected of puppetry of some kind has proven himself as his own person (Yellabina). It requires an admin to examine the page, examine cotribution histories and decide what, if any, sanctions are required.

2251:

certainly the most likely source. Though it does admit to taking a selective quote of the report. Certainly from that I think an edit could start to be constructed that said Moorer held an independent investigation, which he reported as having found Israel culpable for the attack.

8939:

or at least confusing. If not, then what infobox are they supposed to use? If it's another one, why not state it in that writeup? P.S. This is why I usually don't bother messing around with infoboxes, categories, etc. - they are shifting sand, and not worth the effort they cause.

1612:

There are descriptions and titles supplied of the primary authors. It is difficult to imagine how any real American Citizen loyal to the Unites States could consider an Ambassador, a Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Marine General, and a Rear Admiral are behind a Fringe

1729:

page. Your charges of WP:FRINGE on the entry I made has never actually caused you to remove the link at the bottom of the page to the Moorer report. Are we to understand that the Moorer Report is an acceptable link when a link to it in "Sources claiming attack was deliberate -:

6468:

in action! The real danger is that it can be totally arbitrary and retrospective, as it appears this incident to have been. I'm totally quaking in my boots now to learn that any old admin can come along, see me doing something xhe disagrees with, and blocks me without warning.

13833: 6605:

I am appalled at the above attacks on Tony. We might disagree on some things, but I have found him to be ever sincere, polite, a tireless worker for understanding and clarity, and one of those editors that Knowledge should fight to keep around performing volunteer excellence.

6309:

Is it clear yet what Tony1 has been dealing with as he tries to keep the MoS pages usable and coherent? All this while Tony sleeps down under, and will awake to find his work was rewarded with a block log. Gee, I want one, too; seems all good editors have one these days.

8120:

I think that semi-protection still could be more effective than nothing at all. I will add the edit notice if necessary, but for now I would think that the standard comment warning will suffice. Naturally, if someone feels different, the page is at the /Editnotice subpage.

12216:

was Dravidian, and that the dravidian languages are attested to 600 BCE, and misquotes references towards that aim, indulges in revert warring, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_languages_by_first_written_accounts&diff=251706471&oldid=251701594 1,

4970:

situation. It's not a content problem. The problem isn't what Knowledge has to say about the JIDF; it's that there are people who want the JIDF to get more attention. Usual troll management applies; revert slowly, ignore minor annoyances, and block if overly disruptive.

2865:

Thanks for taking this initiative of making it official. This was more or less what I had in mind. I'd go for Proposal 1, being aware of course that in practice there won't be much of a difference, because the duck test is going to be just that hounding of Arcayne anyway.

14417:

I've left a hopefully gently-worded note on his talk page. Usually I think giving someone a chance to retract before blocking is a good idea, but this threat was so crystal clear and unambiguous that I've gone ahead and blocked the account until the threat is withdrawn.

5772:

That doesn't appear to be true. The edit war was over adding and removing part of the text, or a "disputed" tag. That happened on the 10th. On the 18th, Tony did not remove the "Disputed" tag when it was replaced, but proposed replacing it with an "under discussion" tag.

3167:

I think you misread, and in fact are both arguing the same point. Degrees don't matter on WP. Asserting special knowledge/prowess because of degrees is bogus. What matters are properly cited edits. Users therefore cannot browbeat, and they're morons if they try to.

3649:

Okay, let's assume that for a moment: in every account listed in the RfCU, the anon had the IP for a day (two at the most) before the ISP would reassign a new IP address. However, the anon has had this particular IP (the one most recently blocked) since November 7th -

11861:

on the other hand has had a history of bad editing in Knowledge, some of which I have pointed out. He has been blocked five times, he has re-uploaded deleted images, has been served civility warnings, POV warnings and a longer history of bad behavior on Knowledge. So

4074:

degrees. One from the Ox and one from an university here in the States. That the second one is only an A.S. in History doesn't mitigate its value as a degree, Additionally, the two links that Crossmr posted in supposed support of his statement are in fact to the same

3435:

are uniformly from New York. There might be a pattern there to be found - the user might take monthly trips to NY for work or whatever - but I think that it serves everyone's interest to not tar an innocent user editing from 75. with the same brush. Avi mentioned in

4491:

Does this need a checkuser? The name alone is probably blockable, but combined with single-purpose account behaviour and obvious previous editing experience, this is a clearly disruptive second account. An experienced editor can make controversial edits under his

7633:

I don't understand your point. The diff shows him removing the link(s). If you mean he removed the user box as well as the link in it, well, that's just nit-picking, and is not going to help reach a solution, which seems to be evolving further down the discussion.

4673:

Oh, I completely agree that it's not a new user - but we're talking right now about a block due to the username alone. Prove it's a sock (or have a little more duck-like properties than an obvious knock-off of policy) and I'm good with it. Maybe someone wants to

2971:

Per technical concerns expressed by Black Kite, I endorse Proposal 2. Granted, this user would have gotten an account if s/he'd ever intended to edit constructively after this long--but given the circumstances, Proposal 2 will likely have the effect of a siteban.

7817:

Done, but I'm more concerned about what he's planning on doing with his user page. Language like "you can browse through photos, view my discussions, and more" plus email him if someone edits it tells me he probably doesn't understand what Knowledge is about.

11924:

while at the same time being hyper-active and removing ALL warning messages and hiding traces of his bad behavior by occasionally taking breaks from Knowledge. All necessary information pertaining to his current behavior has been listed very clearly with diffs.

10359:

Question; could we revert the "remove the images!" requests from the talk page itself, and save everyone the trouble of pointing out the guidelines of censorship, etc...every time? Or was that in reference to just reverting the attempted removal of the images?

9665:

or something). I guess it's normal for him (and also me), to vent out especially when dealing with fanboys and persistent socks, but we don't really want to bash or trash-talk at other people here, it's just that the socks seem to be the fire-starter sometimes.

9559:

For crying out loud WB, you're in a forum full of admins and you're tossing out incivilities towards another editor like candy from a Santa Claus parade float. Tone it down if you a) expect any positive light on your complaint and b) don't have a Wikibreakwish

7449:

As I stated at the very beginning of this pointlessly long thread, I am perfectly willing to remove the link of there is consensus for me to do so. Despite John's constantly shifting reasons for deleting the link and your assertion that this is in violation of

5363:

The article has quieted down since semi-protection was imposed. We may have trouble in future, but for now, nobody is editing the article and peace has broken out. This item can probably be marked "Resolved" and allowed to scroll off AN/I. Thanks, everyone.

10869:

I tried contacting someone at the Hungadunga office, but none of the Hungadungas were there. I spoke to McCormick, and he gave me some good a-spice. I wanted to challenge the defendant to a handball match, but my lawyer recommended an out-of-court settlement.

1680:

page. Without it, WP:UNDUE is valid for the list of reports, since it gives undue weight to those reports mentioned, and none to the Moorer Report, entries to which you invariably delete. Amazingly enough, the only report which is not quoted explicitly in the

8339:

I concur, and I'm in agreement that the names should be left out, at least for the present. I only brought it up to illustrate two points: that oversight can be fickle and that the legal position in the UK (relevant for British editors) may not be clear cut.

6592:

Unfortunately, I agree with Noetica that it's clear who has been constructive and consensual, and who has been negative and a deletionist (pun intended) maverick, but, as we don't agree which is which, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to dwell on it. —

7517: 7381: 1671:

WP:UNDUE claims: WP:UNDUE says, in part: "NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each.". There is little mention of the

4280:

I concur with the block, Crossmr and FuturePerfect. He's gone for a month; let's avoid giving him any more of our time; could someone blank the anon's attack page, please? Or is that tantamount to asking for an apology (which I reiterate I do not need). -

1639:

It is interesting that you played the 'anti-semitic' card. I suppose I am supposed to cringe at this thought and somehow defend my actions. I think not. I am merely trying to get portions of an Independent Report from the 4 reputable persons listed on the

3192:

argument claimed degrees that he has not substantiated. I still suggest that Arcayne prove it to the Arbcom, for privacy, (or withdraw the claims) so that the issue might be resolved, and there be no need to chase around blocking anonymous IP addresses.

3658:(as opposed to it being an ISP choice - and the ISP apparently hasn't changed since March) to either not reboot the modem (which is what I have assumed the user has done to also reboot their anonymity). In prior instance when the anon was saddled with 73: 14161:

with jackels and hyenas. I wish we were more civilized and let one of the 10,000 websites devoted to immediate pop-internet phenomena deal with stuff like this. I also wish I had a million dollars, though, and that's not going to happen either. --

11436:

I was kinda leaning that way anyways. I think I will IAR this as well; he seems to be doing NONE of the problems he was blocked for, and his new account has caused no problems. Thanks for the input. I think I will leave this guy alone for now...

5329:

One interesting thing to note is that some of the edits they refer to are in fact seriously POV. But they are undermining their case by a) including actually NPOV edits that they just don't like and b) trying out and harass editors in the process.

3454:

By banning the user, we remove ourselves from Proposal Two's added duty (and me the additional nuisance) of reporting behavior which would likely reoccur (case in point: the anon has been blocked three different times for this behavior, and each of

3939:

He is to refrain from talking about arcayne on wiki except in the case where Arcayne edits an article the IP has edited or revets an edit the IP has done. At that point he's not to engage Arcayne and instead leave me a diff and I'll have a look at

8153: 9331:

is an obvious copyvio up for deletion, and the other three, frankly, don't give me a ton of confidence that you actually took the pictures with your own camera, as you assert. I'm not surprised other users, like Starczamora, feel the same way.

11141:

I haven't looked the merits of his arguments, since he was arguing them with threats and I don't edit those articles. He's been an editor since 2006 over 500 edits, people have approached him on his talk page, he was already blocked once, his

3482:

Since they have shown they cannot follow our rules, and instead use them to continue action against their fellow users, I think that Proposal One removes the problem user without really interrupting the contributions of similar IP accounts. -

9886:

in his archives), in which Chrisieboy tries hard to Wikilawyer us into believing he's right. It's crystal-clear that Chrisieboy has learnt nothing from this, and the observable trend is concerning - we have a serious copyright violator here.

5479:

I encourage you (and everybody else reading this) to take a close look at the history of edit warring on that article. Tony1 was one of the primary "warrers". There were two others, who were also blocked. Please review my comment to Tony,

4910:. The latter has been cautioned against edit-warring on his Talk, and has not reverted since 18:18 UTC on 17 November. Between the two of them they are over 3RR but is unlikely that action will be taken if the reverting has actually stopped. 9179:

No, I took care of it. In the future, should this re-arise, SSP is an appropriate venue to take this; however there is no need to jump through the hoops for such obvious socks. The "investgation" took me all of 2 minutes to verify via the

3296:

every time people provide diffs to try and paint how bad the IP is, I just see more evidence that makes me question arcayne. Your last diff wasn't reported by the IP (he contributed, but someone else started the discussion complaining about

4086:

I don't loathe the anon. I don't know (and don't much care) about their edits. I certainly haven't been following their edits around for eight months. The anon has, and has followed my edits to articles they had never made a single edit in

2293:

Don't worry Jayjg, the award is fairly comical. 'Various topic areas' being just one and of course I think more people should be honoured for 'boundrylessness'. It is practically Colbert-like. Not sure anyone is going to take it seriously.

2106:

I've had my suspicions but not sure there is enough evidence to support a Check User. I've done sock puppet reports before but only where it was very obvious as the sock puppet master was none too subtle. If there enough evidence there?

3669:

did not connect the anon to a known user. Perhaps it is my own bad faith assumption that the user is previously blocked or banned user, and my apologies to Jojhutton for disturbing him while trying to connect some dots about the anon. The

5847:

A page protection should have worked better, again what's the point of blocking productive editors over one edit. If the edit waring was a day ago instead of a week, a block could have been in order, but it's not. Blocks aren't punitive.

3253:

holds. Asking him to prove it is irrelevent. Arcayne, I just wanted you to know that I don't always disagree with you. I have seem many of your edits and you seem to to be smack on most of the time. I just think you need to relax, and

6067:

The answer is surely obvious. Those who vote people like Rjd0060 to be admins are generally those who want to be admins themselves. Who else in their right mind would choose to hang around the corrupted slough of despond that is Rfa?

3674:

makes no such mistake, simply addressing the various 75.etc. IPs that keep popping up to attack my edits, and the prior checkusers have been useful in that the anon had previously admitted to editing under the anons denoted in bold

11679:

Sudharsansn, u have to make u'r case clearer to admins. For example when you said that edit comments were uncivil, first that it does not link to any edit comments, second you have to say what comment was uncivil. This is just one

1628:

Since statements by each of the 5 above are reproduced in the articles listed, there is no violation of WP:OR. There is no original research involved. The articles are published, and readily available, via link, directly from the

12555:

The originator of this request has only three edits prior to this request, all of which are related to the content in dispute. Two of those edits are reverts, and the third one contains the exact same text previously inserted by

5467:

While I see some editwarring in the history, that was over a week ago. I don't get how one edit deserves a block, especially of one of the more variable editors in the project. I also agree that this should be discussed further.

6130:

I find your comment to be lacking in (a) use of exclamation marks; and (b) use of the words "abuse" and/or "harassment." A more appropriate comment would be in the form, "How dare he block an editor! Abuse!11! Desysop at once!"

197: 129: 11980:

Well, I am not the angry user here and I don't need a 'cool-down' break for having reported this behavior here. If reporting such behavior would earn a block, it would only create an aversion towards the very purpose of having

7574:

only describe as the most abusive communication I have ever received in my life". So I am under no illusion about the nature of the aggravation involved. But it has no place on wikipedia. We are here to write an encyclopedia.

8487:

Nice to see you are polite, civil, and non-aggressive. On your user page you've told us all to 'go to hell'. I won't be going there, but I'm certainly not going to spend time looking into your 'demand'. I'm not your servant.

11504:

as you behave, you'll be fine", in which case an indef block is no better than a finite block. Worse, in fact, because the user can dictate the length of the block by the length of time before they create their new account.

11146:

show a complete disrespect for other people's opinions. I am trying not to read too much into this, but he is pretty consistant in his actions and attitudes if you read his talk comments on other issues. Example summary:

7515:

OK, my 10c worth as owner of the site pointed to from DC's page is this: since both Ty and John are in contact with Bellinghaus could they possibly suggest he could solve his own problems by removing HIS accusations on his

4655:

BMW, I partially agree with you but I also think that such a name is somewhat indicative of puppetry. Think about it, POV Pusher is uniquely Wikipedian lingo, it's unlikely that a new user would use it right off the bat...

3988:

It does take two to edit war, but the IP certianly didn't make the first move there, and I have no idea why it was so important to arcayne that he insert his comment on top. With that in mind I don't think its untoward to

9879: 1620:

Each of these persons are identified, and each of thier statements have the stated third party reference as part of the entry. The assertion that "Despite explaining to those editors the need for secondary sources as per

4496:

account or not at all. (Blanking sections of a controversial article takes us clearly into 'bad-hand' sock territory.) The only useful purpose that a checkuser might serve here is to clear the drawer of sleeper socks.

7525:

Furthermore, I dare not communicate with Bellinghaus myself, as anything I could possibly say (and I tried total understanding and kindness, believe me) will be twisted against me and reproduced a 100 times on various

11559: 8477: 6750:, and the lengths someone went to in order to trash them. I have NO issue with DC defending themselves. You insist they remove the link, then DC can just copy and paste a whole whack of it ... and place <ref: --> 12533:

would be a better location for that information, and mention of these Arab scientists should be done in no more than one sentence in the articles listed above. Ibn Sahl did not invent the telescope, and that's that.

8777:

I was requested via email to confirm that ForesticPig belongs to an administrator. (Sorry for the delay, I don't check that address often...) This is the case. I am personally acquainted with the account's operator.

3590:

necessary, ability for logged-in editors to edit through the block and ability to create new accounts through them are parameters that can be individually fine-tuned, just like we do with vandal blocks all the time.

2779: 1994:

The article is in an utterly crap state but what do you expect with SPA shoe horning in pet theories at every opportunity. It desperately needs some quality editing but they're put off by the nonsense it attracts.

14257:

I think that an RfC is for less clear-cut cases than this one. Here, according to the proclamations at his talk page and his actions, we have a self-described POV warrior whose main motivation on Knowledge is to do

9498:, well she's famous and many loves her, well theres no doubt that many wikipedians are interested to make her article good, but only you is against her, well i dont care. If my works are the same or related to your 8919:

must somehow trump the actual policy. That user may not like it, but I may have to remove that part, and then fix the template to fall in line with the policy. I was hoping to get more guidance before I did so, but

6390:

Noetica, if you harbor delusions that this won't be held against Tony, you missed the Ceoil case. He was blocked because an admin misunderstood jokes between him and another friend on their own talk pages. Then yet

5507:" Really? He made one (notably harmless) edit, and that was the entirety of his "continuation". Theoretically, you blocked him for it. But what I take from your post is that you either blocked him for edit warring 5787:

Yes, and the disputed tag had been placed by Locke Cole in objection to the under discussion tag placed by Kotinski. Since there was disagreement over the tag type, Tony1 should have known better than to revert.

9877:

It might interest people to know that Chrisieboy is an old hand at this - back in January this year he tried to get me 3RR-blocked for reverting his addition of a non-free-use image without valid rationale - see

8603: 5926: 7978:

of the law, the possibility of harm to minors, and the fact that the names add little to the reader's appreciation of the case and its significance, then all such names should be expunged from wikipedia pages.--

7745:

I too would be happy with this solution. Far better than linking to an attack blog out of some misguided sense of equal time. Knowledge is not here to provide equal time or to address perceived wrongs off-site.

6588:

provides that almost all day-of-the-year links and most year links shouldn't be linked, but "most" is not adequate for bots or certain editors who don't check each individual link before approving semiautomated

7386:"Pauline Berry, 45, the Cyberstalker & Marilyn Monroe mocker is bored to death in New Zealand and hiding behind names like Delicious Carbuncle on Knowledge and more of the hired haters, freaks & creeps" 3504:

its possible, but is there a way you can block the IPs but still allow registration from them? That way if he does register whilst banned and then abuse Arcayne from an account, then we can sort it from there?

2757: 13967:

compliant as a title. I take no position as to whether or not the list should stay or go, but the list MUST be renamed to a more neutral one. Maybe something like "Transgender murder victims" or something...

12989: 7468:

To date those asking for removal are John, Jayron32, Scott MacDonald, Tyrenius. The only clear supporter (in English) of this link is BMW. It's quite obvious that the consensus is that it is not appropriate.

14718: 12727:

Okay, thank you for explaining. I'm not really worried about the other user, I'm just trying to understand the reasoning. Does this mean that every Olympian can have an article? What about Div. 1 athletes?

11807:

I haven't looked through those diffs, but users are generally allowed to remove warnings and comments from their talk page - except if they're blocked, where the block notice+reasons should remain viewable.

1720:

can be considered Neutral if it explicitly does NOT provide at least some conclusion of the Moorer Report. So we have again you making an accusation, when it is in fact you who are guilty of the accusation.

12069:. All this has been happening for over ten days, and for over a week after I have reported it here. I have listed ALL of them in the posts above this one. I request someone to look into this. Thanks. ] (] 11689: 8439:

on this. Knowledge isn't obliged to obey the order, but I don't think there's any harm in voluntarily following it and practicing some self-censorship when we're dealing with the ruined lives of minors. ➨

6032:

to have the power to block one of Knowledge's most valuable edotors? How dare he? Who on earth votes these peole t be Admins? No wonder this site is going to the dogs. Make sure he never crosses my path.

13734:

I think this guy's trolling. A misguided user doesn't write a long, elegant rant citing bizarre historical precedents in response to a minor error - i really get the feeling he's just after a reaction. ~

11531:. He's been a good user since, so we'll risk the end of world in allowing this user to continue... I consider the matter closed, given the thoughtful opinions of everyone above. Thanks for the help. -- 11091:? They certainly seem to make a good case for their preferred version of the content, and providing them with a venue to pursue the issue may also end the edit war, and coincidentally improve Knowledge. 141: 103: 12460: 4392: 2241:. Obviously, some of those sources are more reliable than others and in the google news search, some are false positives. I do not know the degree to which they may or may not address weight concerns. -- 1036: 1031: 14802:

I would support unblocking and monitoring, given the situation. Knowledge always needs more good editors, and we shouldn't lock people out forever if they wish to be a genuinely positive contributor.

4082:

in fact make the first move there. I tried to ignore the fellow by not replying to him/her. The anon kept moving my comments around, and I undid the moves before getting tired of the nonsense and moved

3150:

card to brow beat his opponents in argument he should provide reliable sources to show that he is so qualified. I am certainly not convinced, and I think there is plenty of scope to doubt his veracity.

296:

the ban-evading sockpuppet Alex contribution from L.A. himself after little discussion on AN/I claiming that there was ''since there doesn't seem to be any fundamental opposition here, I've unblocked''

41: 38: 14858: 11960:

sneaking under the system of policies and guidelines and continuing to be a previously blocked five times, uncivil, wikihounding POV troll is, simply, just a problem with the system, seriously!! ] (]

5209: 11890:

block/warning history can continue to go on a POV rampage, without any civility, to stalk other editors thereby creating a negative edit atmosphere, I fail to see the need for guidelines or policies.

4747: 14354:

is about. Someone who, according to their own user page, comes to Knowledge with a self-professed agenda of fighting some political and ideological battles here should find another place to do it.

10314:

That is what I was thinking. Not to stereotype or anything, but this rant just doesn't sound like the usual requests for image removal, which usually come in a more reverential-of-Muhammad style.

4632:

Puppets", based on meaning alone would be considered more disruptive (no offence intended). If someone created the usernames "AlwaysAGF" and "DontBeAnEditWarrer", are we going to delete them too?

9820:

as another cut-and-paste job by him. You're in the right here - these are obvious copyvios and I simply don't believe his wikilawyering over the precise definition of plagiarism and copyright. ➨

14828:

Agreed, I think it doesn't matter as much as how long he's been blocked, but that it did it's job and he'll do the right thing from now on. It's how I would want to be treated in the situation.

5432:

Unless you understand the background here, I advise not unblocking without discussion. The background is a lengthy war concerning MOSNUM that has led to admins being given block warnings, etc.

12967: 11068:

as well, and it's a slow edit-war on whether Simmons is American or Israeli (wouldn't it be Israeli-American?). Concur that a block may be in order, if only to prevent the threatened edit war.

9759:

We can assume that such testimonial would not be written by a relative of Locsin. We can also assume that the person who uploaded the image on Knowledge is not a cousin of Locsin as claimed.

25: 14868: 4236:

blocked. First time through I didn't notice the date stamp and just saw the time and thought the thread was started before his acceptance but I went back and noticed it was about +22 hours.--

153: 5820:

If I'm reading the timestamps correctly, Rjd blocked Tony three minutes after his last edit, I don't think the "he knew he was asleep and still blocked" argument applies to that timeline.

5425: 137: 99: 14024:

Topics like this always resurface, and reliable coverage of them tends to emerge slightly slower than coverage in tabloids/blogs. To delete now would not serve any long term purpose. See

11849:

Knowledge by reliable citations and I haven't made ANY edits without proper referencing. My work in Knowledge has been completely within the framework of Knowledge policy and guidelines.

10744:

Who are you calling a sob? Them's fightin' words, boy! You'll hear from my lawyer - Hon. Charles H. Hungadunga, of the firm Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga, and McCormick.

8572:

I demand that everyone who edits this page gives me $ 1,000,000. I suspect we're going to get the same response...except my demand might not be received with an understandable eye-roll.

5912:

Isn't Locke Cole still in Arbcom Enforsement, also most of the edits I saw from him is edit warning of many articles. I'll support the block of him unless there is something I'm missing?

1790:

Anti-Semetic? Showing Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty and lied about it is Anti-semetic ? I don't like Gefilte fish - does that make me an anti-semite? Give me a break. --

12860:

I didn't know he was an administrator, as his userpage contains no such designation and he's not in the category. Either way, it was more of an aside than anything. Not worth any drama.

5833:

Sorry, when I said notice I meant it wouldn't affect him because he'd be able to go and do something else (be that sleep, eat, work whatever). I'm sure he's noticed he's been blocked. –

5951:

I'm not familiar with Locke Cole, but now see that he has a lengthy block log. Still, a week seems a bit long when page protection could work instead. And, I don't know anything about

4538:

By the same token, I added other cited material from the new Ha'aretz article, which was quickly reverted by Nagle. It was new background information which I thought was important. --

3420:

I am the first one to admit - freely - that I am sometimes less tactful than I could be. I also agree that I should never have noted my educational background in a discussion (the only

3372: 12781:

In future, why don't you ask the person undoing your edits why they did do so? It is much easier and friendlier than directly going to an noticeboard over something like that. Regards

3605:

is that any admin who notices the usual pattern will be able to block the IP without further ado. Most likely these blocks will be short, a month or less, and they will be anon-only.

9113: 6684: 10856: 10845: 9107: 9066:

yes, it's the stuff on his talk page. His ranting and attacking there has nothing to do with trying to be unblocked, and all to do with giving him a forum to continue his attacks.

3597: 1632:

WP:SYN is also not violated here. Each of the sources speaks of ONLY that person speaking - effectively making the point that is stated in the Moorer Report quote which I reproduced.

11327: 7434:

user page to direct people to extreme accusations in a vicious blog war. As you don't seem to be willing to take the link off, I am making a proposal that it is removed regardless.

2576:

The age old 'I'm not going to beat you up but you might have an accident' routine, PR? Please, pull the other, it has bells on. Can an admin deal with this as they deem appropiate?

1625:

none have been provided" is 100% incorrect. Each of the 5 persons listed has a secondary source identifying that each of these five have said what is implied in the quoted Sentence.

12512: 10874: 6336: 4472:

This account appears indistinguishable from Einsteindonut in terms of interests and behaviors. Whether it is them, or a sympathizer following the same agenda does not matter, per

3614: 3128:

Nonsense. Arcayne's real-world qualifications are not at issue here, nor is his overall behaviour (which, I agree, can sometimes be annoying). What is at issue here is the fact of

10464: 7229: 3287: 3266: 3017:

to be a dynamic range) would keep out those users who haven't done anything wrong, and that's the reason why it was avoided previously. The tech is a little beyond me, frankly. -

2326:

What causes problems is other editors who are doing it but don't advise others of what they're up to - the I-P conflict topic would be hugely improved if all of them were blocked.

13116: 11252:

Everyone. I have no idea if he is "right or wrong" as I can't seem to get passed the tone to get to the content. We shall see, but I just don't see this ending any other way.

5815: 5308:

Whatever. The JIDF, according to their web site, is currently annoyed with about twenty Knowledge editors, Haaretz, the ADL, Obama and the 78% of American Jews who voted for him

2873: 2385: 13047: 12692: 12584: 12544: 12035:, otherwise no one would report anything here owing to the fear of being 'blocked' just for reporting bad behaviour, since some admin might be trying to foster 'equality'. ] (] 9328: 4547: 4245: 4021: 4002: 3959: 3832: 3817: 3405: 3229: 3214: 3160: 3139: 2890: 11458:

As long as 1) he isn't vandalizing, and 2) he isn't once again creating vanity pages about himself, his garage band, etc., I'm agreeable enough. (And thanx for the compliment,

8725: 8708: 6464:. WTF? True that Tony's been very vocal on the talk pages, which everybody bar none agrees is the correct action. He discusses, makes one teeny edit and he's blocked - This is 5598: 5525:

No, I blocked for continuing to revert edits without pursuing dispute resolution. Long-time editors should know better. Why did he continue to revert? Why did he not pursue

14616: 12961: 11117:

Based on their history, I expect they'll continue. I left a final warning before another block. I'll follow up with SheffieldSteel's advice on reminding them about WP:DR. --

8647: 6736: 5842: 5828: 4525: 3803: 2415:, which seems to suggest that the commission existed but the report wasn't publicised. Whatever's in the Fox article seems mainstream enough for a few lines in the article. -- 12328:, which is obvious from a simple perusal of the last 100-200 edits while Sudharsansn has made absolutely none, apart from these revert wars to inject his Original research. 11215: 10287: 8656: 6363:

and its associated pages – where I for my part simply left, finding certain editors' lack of good will and good sense too much to endure. I am sure others have done the same.

14208: 11870:

of his uncivil, inappropriate, POV Wikihounding. Post ONLY what is relevant to this complaint made here, your judgments and opinions can come in when required. Thanks. ] (]

11296: 10818: 9704: 9367: 6621:

shows that Tony1 has worked with dozens upon dozens of some of the best content contributors in establishing consensus upon MoS before making changes. That is indisputable.

6440: 5612:

is the edit in question, it was not even removing a tag, but instead changing which tag is used. I'm astounded that somebody could consider blocking somebody for that edit.

5529:? Why, just because he is a long time editor, does he get off the hook for reverting edits without following basic policies that even the new users are expected to follow, 3339: 2936: 2907: 2245: 1980:. In my experience, dealing with people who have the time to make hundred line posts is an exercise in futility. I'd cut the whole article down to bare bones at this point. 13707: 13691: 13608: 13524: 13504: 13420: 13269: 13232: 13144: 11280: 9081: 9061: 7498: 7479: 7463: 7444: 7428: 7413: 7397: 7365: 7142: 7082: 6710: 3498: 3306: 2426: 2406: 2351: 1839:

I would dispute how 'serious' a conversation is when one side screams 'CENSORSHIP' and 'Look at our dead Americans!' followed by more 'CENSORSHIP!' and then legal threats.

14610: 14483:

The IP has had its block extended and their talk page protected for the duration. I don't really see where this sort of thing needs to go much farther. Its not really a

13950: 13811: 13255: 11206: 11180: 11104: 9715: 8497: 7810: 5126:

Suggest with the next incarnation the page be protected; semi would serve no purpose as they are named accounts and he doesn't seem intelligent enough to stop on his own.

1799: 12665: 10933: 10903: 10894: 10879:

Geez, I thought this was a serious attempt to indef block Baseball Bugs. I guess I have to go back to trying to get him blocked for having bad taste in baseball teams.

10766: 9532: 9483: 8743: 8005: 7987: 2596: 2571: 2519: 2493: 2483: 2345: 1966: 1957: 1932: 13036:"...20 hour solid block of edits...", is that taken from the "Edits by Time of Day and Day of Week (UTC)" graph? If so that means that I must be several people as well, 12829: 11078: 10632: 10309: 9674: 8674: 8652:

It is simply impossible for anyone here to imagine how utterly crushed I am that I didn't come up with that reference. I will be under the bed crying if anyone needs me.

7963: 7835: 6793: 6077: 5049:

has been blocked for a year, and he seemed to have the same interests as this editor, I believe it would be justified. Jehochman issued the block on October 10 based on

2653: 2138: 1781: 14678: 13928: 13909: 10748: 10739: 10081: 9868: 9851: 9341: 8597: 8363: 8349: 8334: 7316: 7301: 7286: 7251: 7220:

bios to attack blogs for instance, and we don't link the names of private individuals to unauthoritive attack pages. BLP is pertinent here. Please do remove the link.--

7214: 7056: 6770: 6666: 6564:

established consensus; after looking over the history, it seems he's outlasted his critics, rather than providing a reasoned discussion. Tony may think he's improving

6095: 5576: 4078:

What Crossmr apparently missed in the "edit-warring" in the Ibiza article was that the anon showed up there out of the blue and started attacking me. So yeah, the anon

3314:

some comment in a talk page discussion, something where this guy gets his digs in. Its rude, its insulting, and its way overboard. At this point, we appear to have 7

2662:

A good block OrangeMike, but just BTW, you wrote "infinite" on the block log. I wouldn't disagree with that, given how very long that log is, but did you mean do that?

1989: 13827: 12947: 11407: 10789: 10354: 9975: 9945: 9904: 9622: 9578: 9319: 9297: 8958: 8943: 8933: 8867: 8615: 6818: 6108: 6019: 4480:. What shall we do? I think we should consider whether to block them as a sock. Perhaps a checkuser could take a quick look. I've invited the user to comment here. 2952: 2226: 2101: 1914: 1886: 1859: 1826: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 82: 14410: 13984: 13870: 13063: 12748: 12737: 12722: 11817: 11768: 11126: 10720: 10711: 10688: 10679: 10561: 10049: 9833: 9386: 9373:

and uploaded it on Knowledge and then, by virtue of you personally uploading the photo, claim it as "My own work"? Or at least, have you tried providing a reasonable

7945: 6694:

way; we don't maintain lists of "perceived wrongs" at Knowledge, and therefore we should not also link to such pages from our userpage. The link should be removed. --

6262:

As I indicated I won't revert again. But it'd be nice if we could get more than fifteen minutes of discussion before someone closely involved tries to shut it down. —

5994:

I support an unblock of Tony1. He's put a tremendous amount of work into the MoS trying to make it consistent and correct, and a block isn't a good way to repay him.

4961: 3061:

the IP accounts (s)he's created were single-purpose, attack accounts. This is beyond basic pest-control; we need to tent the 75. house and gas the thing. But then, I

2943:

Proposal 2. If harassing Arcayne is their only purpose then it becomes P1 by default, but it gives WP the AGF defence that good edits from that range are encouraged.

2008: 14596: 14503: 13790: 13776: 12794: 12253:

who was mainly undoing Sudharsansn's OR & reverts, although I did the same as Dbachmann once or twice. Here too Sudharsansn is irate and uses uncivil language -

10966: 10265: 10222: 9020: 8901: 8398: 8064: 7925: 7856: 7672:

I don't see how someone's user page can be considered part of the building of the encyclopedia, its simply a user page, of no consequence to actual articles on wiki

7127: 6425: 6144: 6042: 3584: 3554: 3447:

from editing here from whatever account or IP they choose to edit from. While this means that anyone being crafty with the same IP domain is going to get probed for

2749: 2727: 2614: 2562: 2537: 2271: 2186: 2120: 2034: 12776: 10665: 9659: 6615: 6600: 6408: 6202: 6125: 4711: 4696: 4668: 4506: 4296: 4275: 4179: 4164: 3920: 3529: 3096: 2451: 14889:"The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967, and the 32-Year Cover-up That Has Followed, James E. Akins, Washington-Report, December 1999, Pages 28-34,36 14848: 14637: 14219: 12396:

And before anyone starts saying 'Assume good faith', I defy anyone here to show me no fewer than three school-IPs that aren't a giant list of warnings and blocks.

12378: 11478: 10450: 10423: 10249: 9768: 9006: 8989: 8532: 8378: 8273: 8208: 7732: 7714: 7541: 6630: 6274: 6257: 6173: 5983: 5759:

He did revert to a version that was part of the edit war post-protection. Having one's opponent blocked for edit warring is not authorization to revert his edit.

5621: 5358: 5078: 4993: 3112:

attempted to have this user blocked. WMC blocked the anon, but was told by the community, that the block was wrong, so this must be the next attempt for a block.--

2685: 2668: 569: 14662: 14345: 11496: 11018: 10648: 10480: 10166: 10127: 9238: 8758: 8471: 7904: 7882: 7183:

That's a non sequitur though. I am not objecting to this because of BADSITES but because it contravenes WP:USER and WP:BLP, neither of which has been rejected. --

6897: 6555: 6322: 6002: 5796: 5782: 5767: 5754: 5070: 4650: 3049: 2979: 2234: 14797: 14579: 14552: 14534: 14139: 14113: 14079: 14062: 14040: 14019: 13751: 12767:

Okay, thanks for the input and the pointer to the relevant discussion. It's been helpful to me. I think this is resolved unless anyone else wants to weigh in...

11547: 11521: 10539: 8891: 8567: 8130: 8103: 8042: 8024: 7936:

Unfortunately, you can't undo moves if there's been intervening changes, as was the case here. I tried moving back in order and it failed, as I had expected. --

7778: 6785: 6490:

champion on the other side. We should seriously consider demoting MOSNUM either from being a guideline, or from controlling FA; it is no service to the project.

6482: 6193:

Seeing as how this was one revert, and this is a well established user, a week old "warning" by a different administrator is not even close to being acceptable.

5938: 5637: 5454: 5441: 5387: 5373: 5324: 5296: 4897: 4883: 4832: 4610: 4589: 4580: 4338: 3121: 2856: 2524:

I was referring to past editors of the page, its quite plain I was not excusing anyone of antisemitism. I'm deeply unimpressed with the threat of a libel case.

2238: 2163: 2061: 1937:

Really? You don't find it dilutes the already watered down notion of 'barnstars' when SPA are awarded barnstars for their work in 'various topics' by other SPA?

1179: 14700: 12927: 12426: 12411: 11453: 11427: 10016: 9416: 9216: 9200: 8831: 8787: 6852: 6499: 6304: 6242: 6188: 5732: 5542: 5519: 5498: 5141: 4980: 4919: 4224: 4133: 4107: 4043: 3886: 3858: 3354: 3201: 3186: 3080: 2431:

Exactly the source I was planning on using :) I have proposed a short edit on the talk page concerning the report, along the lines of the suggested edit above.

14455: 14427: 14316:

the place to post ones political views regardless of whether said views support the left or right wing of any political system. Knowledge is about collecting

14303: 13090: 11004: 10512: 9036: 8973: 8805: 8452: 8431: 7755: 7560: 5966: 5916: 5472: 5050: 4484: 3785: 3770: 3721: 3697: 3644: 757: 14820: 14363: 14271: 14252: 14170: 14071:

The usual response would be family, friends etc. You can imagine how inaccurate information about Abe's suicide disseminated via Knowledge might effect them.

12448: 11725:""which ignoramus altered this?", "formed by your own ignorance and prejudice", "Under what authority do you find yourself competent to make mass reverts " - 10392: 10369: 10345: 10323: 9174: 9159: 8305: 8290: 8162: 7694: 7681: 6385: 5866: 5852: 5175: 3001: 14654: 14513: 13531: 13343: 12874: 12855: 10599: 10414:

These are different article spaces so I wouldn't move them about, else things could later be even harder to follow: Instead, make a note in the current AfD.

8670: 7589: 7041: 6991: 6936: 5905: 5401: 5339: 5155: 4562: 3032: 1529: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1477: 1472: 1467: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1437: 1432: 1305: 1183: 1061: 828: 13081:

Considering the idiosyncrasies in Caspian Blues behavior I would say that if the account is multiple people then they would have to be fairly good actors.

12339: 8822:

escape justifiable scrutiny towards the work in and of itself. There would tend to be more attention paid to the edits of an account with a narrower focus.

7644: 7626: 7613: 6351: 4364: 2314: 2288: 13615: 13427: 13276: 13151: 12762: 10271: 6225: 5121: 3930: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 10585: 10350:

The next time someone states that images of Muhammad are not allowed in Islam, point out to them that Knowledge is not Islam. The two are often confused.

13938: 12885: 10004:

either. However, Google Scholar seems pretty certain that the text I deleted came from that 1996 article. Chrisieboy did not contest my deletion there.

9774: 8414:

I have actioned all the outstanding oversight requests for this article. I believe it is within policy due to the court order that Baby P should remain

6810:

Parlez en anglais, s'il vous plait. C'est la "English" Knowledge. (Putting bricks on a hamster and telling it to "balance" - have to remember that one.)

4370: 3662:

on their talk page that connected them to their prior ids by admin reinforcement, that IP would go silent, and a new one would pop up a week or so later.

1296: 715: 514: 11733:

which are listed alongside the edits in the edit history page. His behavior has also been pointed out as being uncivil and rude by other editors in the

10209:

that is why the page has been restored to the last good version. The above user has also been attempting to forum shop (edit disruptively) as described

7661: 7192: 7178: 2690:

I see the legal threats have been deleted, surely policy indicates using strikethrough as now the narrative is destroyed. 20:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

11334: 5379: 5350: 5192: 5161: 5054: 4875: 4703: 4206:

As mentioned before, if a problem arises with the anon again, I will post it here and cc Crossmr and FutPerf and that - as the man said - will be that.

3936:

The IP has to avoid, with all reason, editing any article that Arcayne edits. He's self-imposed on himself all types of articles Arcayne usually edits.

2837: 1423: 1301: 12263:

reverts Yogagates' edits and calls us all as "Sanskrit chauvinism revert mafia trolling the same pages" and asks us to "read the damn WP:RS citations"

11866:

suddenly jumping into this and accusing me of being something, does not absolve the reason for this complaint being made and it also does not absolve

11681: 9817: 8843: 7895:

The way he is using his user page seems unacceptable - he's using it like a Myspace page or a blog. His only edits are to his userpage or PicJungle.

7786: 7724: 7673: 7533: 6263: 6231: 5887: 2836:

This lists above are BY NO MEANS COMPREHENSIVE, but a sampling to give both the nature of this harassment, and to the long-period of it. This RFCU:

1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 3712:

and how it works I suggest reading up on, its not always possible on a system you don't control to go and get yourself a new IP address on demand.--

2920:. I am not going to answer these questions directly myself, but anyone is free to answer them as they see fit, either here or on that talk page. -- 11853:

may disagree with the contents of the edit, however, that does not give him the right to limit that information or accuse me of being a POV editor.

9499: 9432: 9333: 9285: 9270: 7419:

that it is accurate to characterise Berry's site as an attack page, nor is it reasonable to expect that any external site will follow WP policies.

7335:. We got your point from the start. Further repetition of the same point, although with different wording, is not swaying anyone. I see no real 3747:

addresses out of the air, Crossmr; they came up because the same person kept attacking me in places where they never had before. It started out in

1695:

WP:NPOV claims: Another interesting one. The Moorer report makes several numbered statements, the collection of which is it's conclusion available

606: 473: 5485:

despite the protection and despite being warned. All users responded to the warning last week and Tony1's response is noteworthy. Please review

14620: 14562: 14517: 14371: 14104:

etc. If material otherwise conforms to WP policies and guidelines, we should not, in my view, be censoring it out of sympathy for his family. –

14029: 10439: 6359:

any future deliberations on Knowledge. Tony is a fiercely hard-working and remarkably competent editor, passionately concerned to bring order to

6252: 6183: 5975: 5952: 5891: 5345:

try to get what they want through aggression, deception, and sabotage, using techniques that even groups that agree with their aims, such as the

4326: 2126: 1057: 747: 110: 12911: 12319:. I am a bonafide editor who has made significant constructive contributions to the article in question (and related articles on Sanskrit), see 9494:

Excuse me but Its really just normal to improved many articles including Filipino related articles including actors, film, tv series ect. About

5609: 14772: 14669:

That picture...wow what has been seen cannot be unseen. On topic, that talk page might need to be locked down to prevent further, uh....rants.

11949: 11050: 9465:

on my own userpage (saying in the edit summary "if you are not a sock then prove it" to that effect), suspecting me as a puppet of Gerald whom

9226: 7950:

An admin has now undone the move properly. The content of this editor's user page is tolerable, in my view. Anyone who wants to propose it for

7258: 5745:

after he had stopped the edit-warring by proposing a different tag in a single edit. He was then blocked. That's just not a sensible response.

3459:

different AN/I's have all commented about how the user had acted inappropriately - to date, that behavior has only abated by blocking the anon)

710: 7307:

consensus here, nor do I feel that I am in violation of any WP rules, but I'm sure there's an admin or two who will weigh in shortly. Thanks.

5714: 5711: 5708: 5705: 5702: 5699: 5696: 5693: 5690: 5687: 5684: 5681: 5678: 5675: 5672: 5669: 5666: 5663: 5660: 5657: 5654: 5651: 5648: 5645: 4558:

I have indefed the account for a username vio. It also looks like a sock to me but as this is clearly a disruptive name we can do without it.

2052:

are two editors who've been re-inserting almost identical material. Neither has made any contributions outside this article or its Talk page.

13078:, multiple people sharing an account is frowned upon. I doubt there is any way of proving this unless the persons edit from different ISP's. 9277: 9222: 8033:

That's very kind. There are other examples in the edit history. Would you like me to go back over it and provide you with the diffs? Thanks.

4462: 4405: 12246: 12242: 12238: 12234: 12230: 12226: 12222: 12218: 12210: 10256:

Thank you for the explanation Quilbert, but I don't see any edits on the page dated 15 September. Where can I see that the case is closed?

9938: 9883: 7201:

exists to protect WP from potential legal issues, then there is no issue here since the content is not on WP. I still don't see any part of

2962:, s/he'd have gotten an account. I'd have supported Proposal 2, but this has been going on since January. This needs to end, and end now. 10841: 8575:

Plus, if it was "ignored" the first time(s) it was brought up, then nobody here must have agreed with this being a situation that required

6230:

FWIW, I'm done reverting this. But it's getting REALLY frustrating seeing these kinds of actions from editors who are clearly involved... —

2320: 10197: 10192: 5279: 275:

Admin ] seems incline to take the definition of admin abuse to a new level. He is the ultimate epitome of unsavory administrator conducts.

13835: 13548: 13360: 12500: 12202: 7844: 7819: 4817: 1544: 776: 549: 391: 14898:"A Look Over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency, By Richard Helms with William Hood, Random House 2003,Pages 300-301 12022:

who is stalking me to create a distaste and aversion towards Knowledge. You'd succeed in helping him if you block me to 'cool' me down!!

11741:

citations and talk page comments that I have added. This is turning out to be a nuisance to have an editor who is out on a spree. ] (]

9941:." I've been working on some other copyright concerns, but hope to have time to take a deeper look at some other contributions later. -- 13896:

and If I remember correctly, my own (and only) connection with the guy was here when I supported a block on him for a different issue.

13632: 13444: 13293: 13168: 12266: 12262: 12254: 11936:

And he continues, for the fifth consecutive day, to stalk me wherever I go. Also, please note that I understand the difference between

11903:

recommending his 'newfound' invention, 'cool down' block, is immature and outright silly. I don't know why I should be blocked because

6746:

Having read all the proof (following the links on DC's talk page)((PS: I read it a long time ago)), I was astounded at the attempts to

5222: 5020: 2830: 2378: 1418: 786: 705: 554: 12300:

articles and I dont have any motive to stalk him. However I see him as a desperate editor with a strong tendency towards indulging in

7277:. I don't feel that I am violating any policy or guideline by linking to the page, but does the title change alleviate your concerns? 3146:

How civil of you to dismiss my suggestion as nonsense. I think Arcayne's qualifications are an issue here. If he is going to play the

1772:

Lastly, a checkuser (whatever that is) is welcome, as would be any other WP investigation you choose. I do not worry about my actions.

1026: 13072:

Caspian blue is a renamed account. His old edit history is maintained. So the registration date is when he registred as Appletrees.

8383:

For the record, the Daily Telegraph (which is a considerably more reliable source) also published the names at the time of the trial.

6212: 5302: 4760: 2881:

I finally got curious as to why the anon wasn't defending himself and went and checked the talk page to find out what was going on.--

751: 14096:

applies only to living people. I agree that the article should stick to the facts and avoid tabloidism etc, but that is pursuant to

13260:

It is not a high traffic talkpage, so if there is a spate of ip vandalism then a request for a short semi protection could be made.

13109:

and many others. Checkuser just came back "inconclusive" due to age of the other accounts, but behaviour pattern is pretty obvious.

17: 11351: 10110:

I've asked Chrisieboy to come, take a look at and comment on this thread - hopefully he will, and if so, we'll take it from there.

7579:

sufficiently important matter, and then it can go in the article. Until such time, wikipedia does not provide space to promote it.

7114:, perhaps skipping over important nuances in our drive to explain all. Focused conversations are good, but there's such a thing as 2371: 2281: 534: 13135:

has sprotected the article, and I blocked the most recent ip for 31 hours. Hopefully this is an end to it (for a while, at least).

9506:

but i never harassed you? huh! And I'm not that wikipedian to harrased to a fanboy and a desperate wikipedian who hate my cousin,

4438: 13101:

It is becoming ever more obvious that "Occidentalist" is just another in a never-ending row of harassment socks, same pattern as

12031:

Presenting or endorsing a case to block me, just to foster 'equality' is sheer nonsense. Please don't create an aversion towards

6533:; taking a long view, it is clear who has been constructive and consensual, and who has been negative and a deleterious maverick. 877: 647: 164: 13054:

I'd just like to say that I believe the sort of thing Occidentalist is trying to do here ought to be very strongly discouraged.

13725: 10939: 4730: 4398: 3431:

purpose of attacking another person. I have not stalked that person's edits, nor have I done so for eight months. The anon has.

1052: 870: 642: 564: 436: 14779:

The concepts I have seen written on their userpage make perfect sense to me. We also monitor if they return. Maybe mentor.

14131:

high standards of sourcing (note the types of sources that have been used so far in the article's history) observed. Regards,

10521:

Someone might want to contact the BNP to inform the of the leak as well. May be a UK version of the "Privacy Act" violation.

8792:

Just for the record, can you also confirm whether or not you think that this alternate account is being used in line with the

7484:

I took Scott MacDonald's comments as a request to reduce unnecessary drama, and I think I addressed Jayron32's concerns about

14741: 3220:

I will ask however, that you take the time to deal with me in a more civil tone in future; I do not expect to be threatened.

2374: 2341:

PR apologises - although he felt this way on seeing it, there was no indication or real reason to believe it was intentional

2044:

good-faith effort to reach consensus. If multiple editors re-insert the same thing, sanctions for all should be considered.

1866:

Wow, nice come back. Really. Tell you what, go away, think real hard, then try and come up with a comment about the content.

803: 544: 483: 5255: 2143:

Rlevse has confirmed they are unrelated (Though with a comment that Meatpuppetting and SPA violations should be looked at).

359:

vendetta. If this desysopping is the only solution, then we have to do what we have to.--] (]) 19:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

14863: 14463: 14186: 13566: 13542: 13378: 13354: 9861: 9699: 9527: 9362: 9314: 9184:

test that this was Moleman 9000. If he wants to edit, he can request an unblock on his main account or contact arbcom. --

7652:

half-jokingly refer to Jimmy Wales as a god-king, we all know that he does not create policy or precedent by his actions.--

6522: 6343:

Me too! Let's dilute the hell out of the system. This whole debacle has done nothing for the dignity of the admin process.

6165:

Erm, I warned everyone Rjd0060 blocked today that I would block for further disruption and edit warring earlier this week.

5185: 882: 622: 539: 171: 13650: 13462: 13311: 13186: 11920:

is a classic example of someone getting away from all the hue and cry by cleverly posting an 'inactive' status message in

9740:......i got the chance to visit and see gelo on the set of their movie 'land down under' in bukidnon..spent 3days there... 6689:

I would say that a block is premature until DC refuses to take down the link. This link is definately bad; one should not

5886:. Blocking established editors like this is not the way to go. I suggest instead using page protection. Also note that 4793: 3451:, I think we already tend to do this passively and unofficially with most folk who act similar to banned or blocked users. 2840:

shows a list of IPs, some of which can be shown to doing this behavior back as early as April, 2008. This has to stop. --

1767:

Why does the Moorer Report require a secondary source, when not a single one of the other reports listed have a reference?

14841: 13688: 13626: 13605: 13521: 13501: 13438: 13417: 13287: 13252: 13229: 13162: 13113: 12986: 10210: 10206: 6332: 5838: 5811: 5594: 5421: 5215: 5109: 5014: 4320: 3956: 3952:

it should be made quite clear that Arcayne is under no obligation to restrict his choices of article editing in any way.

3814: 3594: 3362: 3284: 3211: 3136: 2870: 2776: 1549: 742: 667: 522: 453: 11645: 11637: 8079:(e/c) Yes, if one person could please email the list of diffs (any/all that contain the names) to the list mentioned at 3682:

created an SPA/rebooted his/her modem simply to have it appear that more than one IP were complaining about my edits? -

14592: 13856:

Again with the bad-mouthing (I was homophobic yesterday, which for personal reasons makes me chuckle) - please provide

13241: 13238: 13217: 12848: 12567: 11273: 11173: 11074: 10230: 8980:

I've given them a 3RR warning, if they revert one more time contact me and I'll block them for long-term edit warring.

8949:

sense to me. I researched the template's history and found that it was also changed last year without any discussion.--

8425:

those news sources went to print. Are overseas sources covering this? Are they disregarding the British court order?

8255: 7321:

Personally, I'm growing rather tired of John's continual one-sided arguments about this. It's starting to look like a

6015: 4753: 4267: 4156: 3912: 3576: 3521: 3397: 855: 850: 835: 672: 662: 627: 498: 12293: 12290: 12287: 12283: 9918: 4989:

I have removed the resolved tag. Does this need further discussion? Does anyone else have views on the need for a CU?

2329:

There is a much smaller problem if newly arrived editors appear initially to act as SPAs - but we have the example of

13802:

Don't worry about it - it's gone now. I guess there is a bit of a delay between the servers, or something like that.

12018:. Blocking me, just because someone thinks that I should be, for a 'cool-down' effect would work exactly in favor of 11386: 11345: 10972: 7910: 4312: 860: 793: 689: 682: 632: 12312: 12258: 11797: 11785: 9458: 9011:

The address is the University of South Florida, I've added the appropriate template, so they can get a schoolblock.

7619: 6100:

All just reinforces Douglas Adams' sentiments: "the only people who should have power are those who don't want it".

3973: 3424:

instance of that ended several months ago, without recurrence), and I was properly chastised for doing so by others.

3041:

Also, it's too wide a range - being effectively AT&T dynamic access for the whole of the East Coast of the USA.

2390:

PR, if you are talking about that, I see MRG's response as perfectly justified. All of us should know that there is

12688: 12669: 12508: 12353: 10899:

Hey, haven't we Cubs fans suffered enough? We're lapping 100 years now. We've practically got our own Y2K problem.

8080: 6431:

logs. It's about time that administrators were held equally to account. Number of blocks reversed, for instance. --

6271: 6239: 1018: 994: 493: 458: 12489: 12484: 2823: 14931: 14658: 14508:

In any event, judging from a traceroute, the IP in question is related to the Brandon Valley School District, or

14291: 13921: 10406: 9462: 9447:

also claims to be a cousin of Locsin, and also exhibited patterns that are similar to the puppet master such as:

7454:, I don't believe that I am in violation of any WP policy and I don't see any consensus for removal of the link. 6927:

unsuccessful. And, although naturally we are all highly able linguists here, this is best resolved in English. --

1806:

He was speaking of people the article has attracted in the long term. Stop with the persecution complex already.

1554: 894: 845: 798: 657: 579: 468: 384: 11953: 9633:"Unfit to be a Wikipedian" is a little harsh. The ACTIONS and EDITS of the person are unfit for Knowledge, but 8252: 8247: 8244: 8239: 8236: 4966:

Agree with Cohen that this can no longer be considered "resolved". But it's not a big deal. I look at this as a

4432: 3895:

therefore refer to him as "the troll" its wrong. you can say he has trolling behaviour but thats a bit too far.

2878:

You didn't feel the need to disclose that you blocked the anon for 48 hours at the beginning of this discussion?

2700: 14791: 14735: 14708: 14631: 14573: 14528: 14498: 14340: 14190: 13979: 13110: 12983: 12443: 11542: 11448: 11322: 10705: 10605: 10533: 9830: 9653: 9572: 9410: 9195: 8591: 8561: 8526: 8449: 8203: 7879: 7359: 7077: 6985: 6891: 6764: 6705: 4690: 4644: 4425: 4316: 4038: 3953: 3853: 3811: 3591: 3548: 3368: 3334: 3281: 3280:

on the person in question we are talking about, to be enforced by short term blocks of any new reincarnations.

3208: 3180: 3133: 2931: 2903: 2879: 2867: 2851: 2773: 952: 781: 725: 677: 596: 559: 13590: 13402: 12191: 12187: 12183: 12179: 12175: 12171: 12167: 12163: 12159: 12155: 12152: 11886: 11781: 11383: 4823:

was created and began editing only the JIDF article. Something to watch; no action requested at this time. --

4449: 4418: 4113: 3966: 3103:

I agree with Crossmr. I also believe that there is not precident to ban a user from entering into discussion.

13674: 13486: 13335: 13210: 13044: 12958: 12492: 12062: 12058: 11249:

Well, thanks to ignorant users instigating an edit war (the ones you really should be talking to, by the way)

11056: 9711: 9213: 9171: 7494: 7459: 7424: 7393: 7312: 7282: 7268: 7210: 7138: 7052: 6680: 6662: 5249: 5095: 5044: 4949: 4371: 3986: 3983: 3980: 3977: 3969: 2084:]) have all been registered in the past few days, and have all made edits exclusively about the USS Liberty. 983: 601: 589: 584: 13554: 13366: 12708:

Hi, I'm not an expert either, but if the contents on the page is correct the page does meet notability, see

11945: 11882: 11759:

same fashion that they were used prior to deletion is disruptive - see his deleted contribs. Tools, anyone?

11617: 11149:

Changed to Israeli again. It's very annoying that I have to keep doing this - please, just accept the facts.

6568:, but there is real debate on that subject. I believe that those parts of the manual of style which have a 5741:

However, instead of continuing to edit war against there being a tag Tony1 was trying to reach a compromise

4787: 4456: 4329:) declined the third unblock request, so hopefully we will get a one month reprieve from this wikidrama. -- 2202: 13638: 13584: 13450: 13396: 13299: 13174: 13025:

Is it possible to tell whether Caspian blue is actually more than one person editing from the same account?

12702: 12496: 11793: 11375: 11143: 8972: 8231: 8228: 8225: 6328: 5834: 5807: 5590: 5417: 5266: 5235: 5032: 1580: 964: 865: 735: 527: 12482: 12113: 12102: 12091: 10292:

I think the notion that a sincere follower of Islam posting in good faith would let slip an uncapitalized

9727: 9302:

Thanks for notifying him so that he'll stop doing these disruptive things to me which i dont really know.

9092:

Unless his Talk page is blocked, banning him does no good, since he still has an outlet for his attacks.

8766: 8192:

the lack of policy guidance in how to proceed here; common sense says that removal is the right move... --

4804: 4773: 3726:

Respectfully, I would submit that the RfCU is only pointless in that it points out the obvious - that the

14812: 13668: 13480: 13329: 13204: 13126: 12684: 12504: 12326: 12323: 12320: 12148: 12140: 12136: 12132: 12128: 12124: 12120: 12116: 12109: 12105: 12098: 12094: 12087: 11363: 10835: 10186: 9164:

So even tho this is a known IP of the blocked user, I should still go thru the sock reporting procedure?

8511: 7690:

apply everywhere, including user pages. The question is whether it applies to this statement and link. --

6288: 5273: 5242: 5038: 4874:

suggestion is different.) There are potential 3RR issues but it depends how new we regard this user as.--

730: 410: 160: 14765: 13698:

Stick 'em up at AIV - you will likely get a quicker response. The most recent ip has been blocked, btw.

12277: 4888:

Ah. Howdy has no user page or talk page, and I hadn't noticed that note on the article's talk page. --

4811: 2673:

Actually, it's the software for the blocking mechanism which says "infinite" instead of "indefinite"! --

13796: 12609: 11737:. As listed again, he is basically stalking me and undoing all my edits just to push a POV in spite of 10915: 9754:. Meanwhile, the "sisters" refer to the people who belonged in the same fan club as the photographer.) 9670: 8507: 6789: 6473:

Tony's block will forever be an ugly wart on his nose, unless it is rolled back or expunged forthwith.

6436: 6073: 5572: 4903: 4780: 4724: 4543: 4521: 4445: 4386: 2807:

spent months hounding Arcayne by continuosly bringing up this minor fact over and over and over again.

2355: 1795: 652: 478: 463: 448: 418: 377: 14753: 14487:

threat, just some loser high school kid vandalizing Knowledge. I personally would pay it no mind. --

9453:

Harassing Wikipedians who do not agree with his "style" of editing, calling them "insane" (as seen in

8459:

FYI, the police are investigating a number of websites which may have breached the order, see the BBC

5644:

I believe this sequence of edit warring from Aug 1 to Nov 18 establishes the ground for such a block:

5511:, or else because he spoke to those who warned him in an uppity way. Those are not blocking matters. 4606:

I'm am shutting down for the night. Please do list it, because there seems to be a reasonable basis.

2319:

May I remind people there's nothing wrong with being an SPA? An attempt to force me to change my name

1655:

I would now like to address each of these objections, and others which have been voiced, individually:

13106: 12884: 12772: 12733: 12570:). Now because of dynamically allocated IPs, I would refrain from assuming that we're dealing with a 12486: 11369: 11212: 10853: 10828: 10762: 9377:

rationale for uploading the photo on WIkipedia in case you weren't the photo's original creator? ---

9058: 9046: 8653: 8330: 7983: 7225: 6732: 5026: 5002:

A checkuser should be run, to determine if Howdypardner is evading the block on Einsteindonut. Since

3472: 3364: 2899: 2826: 637: 488: 8771: 8187:, to do no harm. While this situation may not be covered within the text of any policy, this is an 6251:

behavior from you. If you revert again, in any shape or form you will be blocked. Enough is enough.

5262: 14674: 13994: 13703: 13536: 13348: 13265: 13140: 13041: 13037: 12955: 12613: 11403: 11202: 10283: 9252: 8684: 7941: 7490: 7455: 7420: 7389: 7308: 7278: 7206: 7134: 7048: 6676: 6658: 4948:

The edits of DontbeaPOVPUSHER, when combined with those of Howdypardner, may have gone over 3RR on

4800: 4502: 3868: 2948: 2744: 2609: 2568: 2532: 2490: 2342: 2181: 2115: 2003: 1963: 1929: 958: 823: 7768:

I don't know what people's IP addresses are, but for the rest I have the evidence of my own eyes.

5927:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Locke_Cole/Proposed_decision#Locke_Cole_placed_on_revert_parole

5890:

was blocked by Rjd0060 for a week, which seems quite excessive. He should be unblocked as well.

4120:

instance where you stated "degrees" and in fact claimed political science and international degree

2542:

Ah, as I expected. I do hope someone talks to PR and explains how inappropiate such silliness is.

14836: 14225: 13946: 13905: 13866: 13807: 13726: 13684: 13620: 13601: 13517: 13497: 13432: 13413: 13281: 13248: 13225: 13156: 11357: 10814:

All things considered, I would rather be "indefinitely" blocked than to be "definitely" blocked.

10628: 10557: 8716: 8701: 8154:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Deletion of Walter Sedlmayr edit history required

7971: 6282: 5203: 5103: 5008: 4412: 4064:

I know we all want to give folk the benefit of the doubt, but I think it is a wasted effort here.

2421: 2401: 13560: 13372: 11997:

However, an angry user who is also being disruptive can be blocked to prevent further disruption

11789: 11777: 9958:

Actually, that last message from Chrisieboy in you post is very concerning, to say the least...

9806: 8735:

this sock is being disruptive, knowing both accounts would help in that both should be blocked.

7028:

Knowledge is not a place for this sort of "defense". "He did it first" is not a defense against

14759: 14588: 13843: 13644: 13456: 13305: 13180: 12842: 12561: 11269: 11169: 11026: 10261: 9925:

to begin with, and he has been correct with respect to other contributions, as when he cleaned

9100: 9074: 7123: 6597: 6516:: PMAnderson is the foremost opponent of Tony's selfless campaign of improving and maintaining 6404: 6318: 6011: 4907: 4741: 2917: 1567: 840: 400: 117: 12753:

A discussion on this line of WP:BIO is currently happening at the talk page of the guideline.

11606: 8279: 5229: 4250:

Think its pretty much "Game Over" for him now. I can't see him getting any support this time.

3635:

tie to him. So do you have any evidence that he's actually created an account to harass you?--

3323:

has any culpability in this problem Any further ideas or comments as to how to handle this?--

13839: 13102: 13006: 12943: 12902: 11813: 11776:

removes them from his talk page accusing the admins/editors of being vandals. Here are some:

11764: 11339: 11057: 10641:

Yeah, this kind of kooky ranting has no place here. I've blanked it and told the user why.

10001: 9914: 9764: 9666: 9618: 9609:

as you posted that same message on three different pages. (including my userpage and that of

9479: 8829: 8319: 6626: 6513: 6478: 6432: 6198: 6140: 6121: 6069: 5568: 5383: 5354: 4879: 4767: 4720: 4707: 4539: 4517: 4306: 1925: 1791: 1716:

actually completes the NPOV of the USS Liberty Page. After all, there can be no way that the

76: 13001: 9794: 5053:. Organized campaigns to edit WP articles toward a particular POV have been commented on in 3671: 3436: 2206:

as you put it. I wasn't aware you were such a threat to wikipedia that you needed watching.

14747: 14646: 14239:

fit that bill nicely? That is, that would be the best way to go if a topic ban is desired.

12768: 12729: 12633: 12617: 12465: 12404: 12363: 11995:, as they often have the opposite effect. So I cannot be blocked 'solely' to cool me down. 11685: 11473: 11398:

and if he is content to allow this account to edit then I suggest we proceed as I suggest.

11197:

So it's "my way or the highway" for this editor....well the highway might be a good start.

11014: 10926: 10758: 10734: 10375: 9790: 9234: 9016: 8985: 8801: 8754: 8493: 8467: 8393: 8374: 8326: 8301: 8269: 8038: 8001: 7979: 7959: 7920: 7900: 7831: 7806: 7728: 7723:

That sounds like a great solution to me. Perhaps mention there is no isp number in common?

7677: 7537: 7221: 6728: 6495: 6267: 6235: 5934: 5778: 5750: 5617: 5134: 5066: 4957: 4915: 3610: 3043: 2680: 2648: 2134: 2057: 1777: 1732: 1726: 1717: 1705: 1700: 1682: 1677: 1641: 1569: 12683:

has an awful lot of people contributing to pre-telescope optics, not just Ibn al-Haytham.

12661: 12276:

thread, the same thing happens with Sudharsansn pushing his bias and Dbachmann undoing it.

10012: 9930: 9802: 9229:. The common theme is 'YouTube Poop.' Blocks have been issued; nothing more to do here. 8284:

How widely disseminated are the names? Appearances in news sources or on blogs/forums? ––

5309: 8: 14670: 14213: 14133: 14073: 14034: 13823: 13818:

There can be a server delay, it can also be your own browser cache (for sundry reasons).

13786: 13772: 13699: 13261: 13136: 12869: 12824: 12659: 12311:

Finally notwithstanding his bogus charge about my uncivility, I request everyone to read

11669: 11459: 11399: 11198: 11093: 11046: 10552:

It's been headline news for two days, they are well aware of the leak at this stage... --

10493: 10486: 10444: 10419: 10341: 10305: 10279: 10046: 9942: 9865: 9786: 9689: 9517: 9444: 9352: 9337: 9304: 9269:

Wynchard Bloom has been blocked as an obvious sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez, per the SSP

8954: 8929: 8636: 8015: 7937: 7336: 6848: 5486: 5481: 4498: 4334: 3666: 3262: 3117: 2985: 2976: 2966: 2944: 2738: 2603: 2526: 2382: 2363: 2242: 2175: 2109: 2085: 2045: 1997: 813: 720: 414: 13572: 13384: 13013:

Now, frankly, I have to believe it is inhuman for one person to be able to keep that up.

11730: 10572:

Oversight is pointless, just remove the links and report anybody who edit wars over it.

9882:. More relevant would be the simultaneous discussion on Ryan Postlethwaite's talk page ( 8460: 6969:

Off-wiki things are often brought here, such as threats, etc. We have a policy against

6572:

consensus should be followed. I just don't see consensus on this particular section of

5315:, indeed. I suggest about 48 hours of semi-protection to stop editing by new socks. -- 3087:

Nobody is talking about blocking all of 75.X.X.X. That would be 1/256 of all IP space.

2601:"I'm not threatening...But" Please pull the other one, legal threats are out of order. 933: 14831: 14815: 14781: 14729: 14547: 14492: 14334: 14247: 13973: 13942: 13925: 13901: 13862: 13803: 13680: 13656: 13597: 13513: 13493: 13468: 13409: 13317: 13244: 13221: 13192: 13059: 12812: 12525:

this does not look to me like something that went into the right article. The articles

12437: 11536: 11505: 11442: 11316: 10900: 10871: 10815: 10745: 10717: 10695: 10685: 10675: 10662: 10624: 10553: 10523: 10508: 10475: 10351: 10218: 10111: 9959: 9888: 9643: 9562: 9400: 9327:

currently has four images that you present as your own work, Wynchard Bloom. At least

9293: 9189: 9004: 8940: 8898: 8694: 8581: 8551: 8516: 8359: 8345: 8197: 7349: 7171: 7102:

discussion from there? Part of what's dragging the project down (as well as many other

7071: 6975: 6881: 6754: 6699: 6585: 6509: 6423: 6038: 5979: 5633: 5516: 5451: 5437: 5099: 5003: 4680: 4634: 4032: 3847: 3538: 3466:

Indeed, if the anon has been editing here anonymously for seven years, I cannot be the

3328: 3170: 3092: 2925: 2845: 2417: 2397: 2367: 2330: 2040: 1586:

The very last entry I made which you deleted concerning the Moorer Report was this one:

926: 918: 818: 574: 9450:

Uploading copyvio images taken from Flickr into Commons, and claim it as his/ her own.

3632:

However, I have not created accounts for the sole purpose of attacking another person.

14696: 14585: 14584:

I'm going to agree with Jayron here. It seems like pure vandalism, and little else. –

14451: 14423: 14406: 14394: 14372: 14166: 14109: 14058: 14015: 14010:, "articles that drag the encyclopedia even further down into the tabloid gutter"? -- 13764: 13075: 12909: 12838: 12680: 12629: 12625: 12557: 12478: 12469: 11624: 11610: 11600: 11492: 11423: 11255: 11211:--desperately tries to stop a "Highway to Hell" comment from bursting forth...fails-- 11155: 11122: 11069: 11000: 10992: 10961: 10880: 10852:

Someone called the authorities, but nothing was done; they were too busy having sax.

10785: 10257: 10233: 9922: 9824: 9683:

Thanks Blake, you're my friend and I believe on you but I'm really not the sock that

9474:

I find his actions immature, narrow-minded, and definitely UNFIT to be a Wikipedian.

9382: 9210: 9168: 9094: 9068: 9047: 8887: 8793: 8611: 8502:

Of course, "demanding action" will get you nowhere. I will draw admins attention to

8443: 8325:

Call me a moralistic ass, but I'd like us to aim at higher ethics than the Express.--

7873: 7262: 7119: 7087: 6644: 6611: 6594: 6540: 6397: 6370: 6311: 6248: 6090: 6008: 5538: 5494: 5335: 5151: 5089: 4657: 4360: 4289: 4254: 4241: 4217: 4175: 4143: 4129: 4100: 4017: 3998: 3899: 3879: 3828: 3781: 3763: 3717: 3690: 3640: 3563: 3508: 3491: 3384: 3350: 3302: 3225: 3197: 3156: 3073: 3025: 2886: 2412: 1985: 4112:

What you apparently missed is that you previously claimed both degrees from oxford

2988:. But I am assuming this is a dynamic IP? Is the range too broad for a range block? 14712: 14351: 14259: 14204: 13995: 13847: 13086: 12939: 12746: 12720: 12521:

The sources seem to be valid although they are pretty hard to browse, however, per

12334: 12144: 11809: 11760: 10645: 10244: 10205:

The above user has attempted to edit a case after it has been closed, as explained

9760: 9684: 9614: 9512: 9503: 9475: 9253: 9152: 8863: 8823: 8661:

How about you step up to the plate and take the action suggested by user:Bwilkins?

8503: 7485: 6970: 6816: 6747: 6622: 6474: 6194: 6136: 6117: 5721: 5292: 5171: 5112:) expressing somewhat similar sentiments to those expressed by the above user. -- 4302: 3972:

don't think anyone is going to sit here and let me claim I have a degree in german.

3536:

Yes, you can make IP ranges so that they may only edit from accounts and not anon.

2718: 2587: 2553: 2510: 2474: 2442: 2305: 2262: 2217: 2154: 2091: 2025: 1948: 1905: 1877: 1850: 1817: 187: 26: 11831:

other complaints raised about blanking content, uncivility and wikihounding? ] (]

6671:

Rather than repeat the discussion here, please see the discussion on my talk page

1731:

Other Sources" is available, but is a Fringe Theory if any mention is made on the

14809: 14359: 14299: 14267: 14236: 14226: 14196: 14007: 14003: 13882: 13760: 12788: 12672: 12641: 12422: 12397: 12374: 12305: 12066: 12054: 12015: 11986: 11594: 11583: 11467: 11010: 11009:

I've gone through the article as well and don't see any major POV issues myself.

10919: 10727: 9934: 9781: 9641:

has something to add to Knowledge, but only if they follow the rules/processes.

9610: 9274: 9230: 9012: 8981: 8797: 8750: 8489: 8463: 8388: 8370: 8297: 8265: 8125: 8059: 8034: 7997: 7955: 7914: 7896: 7851: 7827: 7802: 7704:

anyone going to the user page, having read about it elsewhere in a negative way.

6672: 6491: 6295: 5996: 5930: 5774: 5746: 5613: 5369: 5320: 5312: 5127: 5117: 5062: 4976: 4967: 4953: 4911: 4893: 4828: 3606: 2995: 2674: 2642: 2130: 2053: 2049: 1773: 13898:

just mentioning that in case people think there is some team editing between us.

12657: 12387:

I still say any IP identified as a school-IP should be permanently soft-blocked.

12010:

Now I am neither angry nor disruptive, but seeking action by reporting it here.

10008: 9454: 8874:

I'm not sure I understand. I would say you should just accept that he is being

8217:

More diffs should they wish to be oversighted. I think you got the rest. Thanks:

7333:

relentless-chase-very-much-along-the-same-line-as-the-hunt-for-the-one-armed-man

14650: 13964: 13819: 13782: 13768: 12923: 12862: 12817: 12758: 12676: 12649: 12601: 12250: 11904: 11900: 11863: 11850: 11845: 11528: 11042: 10772: 10415: 10382: 10365: 10337: 10319: 10301: 10161: 10076: 9846: 9798: 9181: 9138: 9031: 8950: 8925: 8875: 8779: 8666: 8264:

Also, the names will doubtless be released in time and they can be added then.

8183:

solution. It is certainly within the spirit of the relevent policies, such as

7751: 7657: 7556: 7297: 7247: 7202: 7188: 7063: 7037: 6932: 6844: 6690: 6653: 6645: 6465: 5961: 5900: 4607: 4577: 4573: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4352: 4330: 4061:

alter their personality after eight months of doing things in a particular way.

3448: 3258: 3113: 2973: 2963: 2790: 12255:

calls my reverts to his Original Research claims as POV edits and me a stalker

10670:

Careful Bugs! Some other very nasty editors are know for their poor spelling.

9864:

at my talk page will help underscore the seriousness of copyright concerns. --

1565: 14925: 14724: 14541: 14488: 14330: 14313: 14241: 14093: 14050: 13969: 13756: 13055: 12852: 12709: 12637: 12571: 12522: 12433: 12032: 11982: 11575: 11532: 11514: 11438: 11394: 11312: 10754: 10671: 10580: 10574: 10498: 10469: 10333: 10215: 10120: 10039: 9968: 9926: 9897: 9842: 9747: 9634: 9289: 9185: 9134: 8995: 8921: 8879: 8818:

Avoid linking alternate locations I edit from, in light of security concerns.

8355: 8341: 8193: 8188: 8184: 7951: 7823: 7771: 7707: 7691: 7637: 7623: 7606: 7582: 7575: 7472: 7451: 7437: 7406: 7198: 7175: 7067: 7029: 6695: 6576:, or any of the specific alternatives proposed. I see a weak consensus that 6573: 6565: 6530: 6517: 6414: 6360: 6034: 5717: 5629: 5512: 5447: 5433: 4028: 3843: 3324: 3088: 2921: 2841: 2814: 2811: 2664: 2170: 14642:

This is the same Florentino Floro who claimed to talk to invisible dwarfs?

14557:

Not sure, but if someone wants to the appropriate local office would be the

14262:

and whose actions confirm this. I do not believe that this is a close call.

13937:

It was moved to that name in the last couple of hours, previously it was at

10771:

Scott, I would have indef blocked him for that, except it's clear Bugs is a

8354:

Actually, I am a cretin; the edits weren't oversighted, the page got moved.

7954:

is welcome to do so, but I see nothing further for us to do in this thread.

5061:, one of their interests is influencing the content of Knowledge articles. 2817: 973: 57: 14709: 14692: 14447: 14419: 14402: 14390: 14321: 14162: 14105: 14101: 14054: 14011: 13132: 12906: 12301: 12273: 12213: 12206: 11738: 11641: 11571: 11567: 11560:

User: Srkris - Persistent uncivility, wikihounding and disruptive POV edits

11488: 11419: 11240: 11118: 11088: 11065: 10996: 10956: 10781: 9719: 9507: 9495: 9440: 9378: 9324: 9207: 9165: 8883: 8737: 8607: 8542: 8415: 7106:-style projects, I should add) is this notion of discussion as a "race" of 6607: 6167: 6084: 6029: 5860: 5822: 5790: 5761: 5726: 5534: 5526: 5490: 5416:

Tony1 unblocked, dispute resolution recommended instead of edit warring. –

5331: 5147: 5085: 4990: 4586: 4559: 4356: 4282: 4237: 4210: 4171: 4125: 4093: 4013: 3994: 3872: 3824: 3777: 3756: 3713: 3683: 3636: 3484: 3346: 3298: 3221: 3193: 3152: 3066: 3018: 2882: 2359: 2339:

was apparently given the brush-off by an admin when enquiring about policy.

1981: 1622: 10716:

Hey, now yer fiddlin' with me. Stringin' me along. But I won't fret none.

9917:

seems also to have been an infringement I cannot read the source, but the

8296:

recall the details. That's about all I know based on the article history.

8156:

where the opposite decision to this one was reached on a similar case. ––

7062:

claim that the former should be allowed where the latter is not is simply

4952:. I've left a note for Spartaz to consider undoing his 'Resolved' banner. 4199:

Jayron wants nothing more than to do precisely that (good guy that he is).

1725:

There is a link to the Findings of the Moorer Report at the bottom of the

1713: 1709: 1696: 1687: 1673: 1596: 1016: 14325: 14317: 14097: 14025: 13082: 12743: 12717: 12663: 12653: 12605: 12330: 12050: 12019: 12011: 11957: 11941: 11921: 11917: 11867: 11858: 11726: 11633: 10974: 10642: 10595: 10300:, much less in a posting having to do with Muhammad, is highly unlikely. 10239: 9143: 8859: 8479: 8427: 8278:

PS, there is a guideline that is relevant to the mother and her partner:

8179: 8099: 8097:

be effective - it is also regular contributors who are adding the names.

8020: 7242:

Well and good; but BLP trumps USER I'm afraid. Please remove the link. --

6811: 6344: 6101: 5913: 5849: 5469: 5287: 5166: 3108:

then the problem might have gone away by now. Recently, both Arcayne and

2710: 2579: 2545: 2502: 2466: 2434: 2336: 2297: 2254: 2209: 2146: 2017: 1940: 1897: 1869: 1842: 1809: 12835: 8537:

If you can't resolve it by consensus on the talkpages, then I recommend

4906:

was blocked indef for username, but this doesn't rule out his return as

2916:

The user in question has posted some questions on an IP talk page. See:

2233:

For what it's worth, though I've remained uninvolved, I did find a few:

417:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see 14804: 14355: 14295: 14263: 13737: 12783: 12530: 12418: 12370: 11579: 10378:

on the article page linking to the FAQ that they could then ignore. --—

9751: 6219: 5365: 5316: 5113: 4972: 4889: 4824: 2989: 2758:

Request for formal community ban of 75.57.X.X user who harasses Arcayne

2285: 14719:

User:Plyjacks requesting unblock, pledges that he has changed his ways

14509: 11993:

Blocks intended solely to "cool down" an angry user should not be used

11782:

blocked five times for sockpuppetry, wikistalking and uncivil behavior

11590: 9461:, as said by Wynchard himself/ herself). Not to mention when he/ she 1979:

I am not an admin, and I would not touch this one if I were <g: -->

1617:

presumably reputable persons who are in agreement with that statement.

957:

If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on

14286:

Really? You do not think that the passage about the Jews ending with

13881:

Not that my name is all that good here, but , I've had run-in's with

12919: 12754: 12714:

Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports.

12671:

do not include them in their summery of the topic or support the the

12632:

is adding to a summery something that is not in the intro summery of

12621: 12461: 12176:

says it is "POV pushing" & "sheer nonsense" in reply to Dbachmann

10361: 10315: 9606: 9605:

Too long, and I do not bother to read it. Besides, it is an obvious

9026: 8813:

Just to clarify, the reasons I cite for the use of this account are:

7747: 7653: 7552: 7532:

is simply a tool of intimidation, thus a threat, is it not . . . . ?

7293: 7243: 7184: 7107: 7033: 6928: 5956: 5895: 413:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the 12815:

of rollback by Yellow Monkey. He reverted clearly good faith edits.

12667: 12491:. He gets allot of encouragement from similar (pro Islamic?) editors 12014:

on the other hand is angry, disruptive, uncivil and is indulging in

10000:

Oh, by the way, I can't read the source for the possible copyvio at

3891:

Sorry but nothing has been finalised yet. FuturePerfect, you should

3755:

am not the one who chose to edit from that many places, now am I? -

255:== Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level == 14880:"As I Saw It", Dean Rusks' memoirs, by W.W. Norton, 1990, Page 388 12645: 12597: 12195: 12083: 11627:

and ALL of this without leaving any edit comments on the talk page.

10778::) <-- to avoid being templated or blocked for a personal attack 10684:

Oh, now you're intimitating me. "Help! Help! I'm bein' repressed!"

9723: 9374: 8286: 8158: 4067:

A few clarifying points, mostly in response to Crossmr's comments:

2641:

I've indefinitely blocked that account, as it's a NLT violation. --

12211:

he wants inclusion of his Original Research that the undeciphered

13040:, or that I work shifts and can edit at work as well as at home. 12918:

It was already done by Persian Poet Gal, indefinitely blocked. --

10827:

Related to the above, there was a threat of violins above. Have

9993:

surprised that his perception of free content has lasted so long.

9933:. His response to that contributor for restoring infringement to 9511:

true. And last I'm not totally immature, im just immature to the

9436: 7103: 6218:...and Locke Cole's gone and reverted the close, invoking IAR. -- 2463:

Truth' over Verifiability'. (edit conflict....damn you MRG! ^.^ )

14859:

User:Ohlookwhoitisn't possible Joshuarooney/Igniateff sockpuppet

14539:

Didn't someone also notify the FBI the last time this happened?

14290:

as offensive and repulsive? Now, that is pretty sad. What about

14235:

If you're asking for a community review as you said, wouldn't a

13038:

http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=CambridgeBayWeather&l=2000

12127:. Each time his reverts were undone by different editors such as 8055:

I have got one more oversighted, and added a commented warning.

3659: 188:→‎Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level 14558: 12968:

Is Caspian blue more than one person? (long-term Korean issues)

10465:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Preacher's kid (2nd nomination)

10442:

links to the previous one now at least. Thanks for the advice,

8858:

Refinement of the guideline instruction resolved this dispute.

4381: 2333:

where two such SPAs arrived and were given near carte-blanche.

1570: 369: 14869:

Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level

14211:, with the aforementioned coverage in reliable sources added. 14199:

does not justify speedy deleting articles, it only justifies—"

10757:, I have applied the necessary template to your userpage!!!!-- 9515:

i mean person who's most immature wikipedian. Ive ever known.

6839:

Bloqué pendant une semaine pour perturbation, je suppose avec

2335:

My only regret in this case is that one of the new editors at

1571: 7111: 5446:

Discussion is what I'm after. That's why I posted it on ANI.

14049:

I don't mean to be callous, but if he is dead how is this a

11786:

blocked again, and comments, warnings removed from talk page

11087:

Has there been any attempt to encourage this user to follow

5955:, except see that the user has never been blocked before. -- 5198: 3678:

As for attack accounts, is it your contention that the anon

3559:

what about registering though? thats what im worried about.

2072:

Something doesn't look right about some of these SPAs: ] (]

12526: 9726:. It was allegedly taken by a fan of Locsin, as testified 9225:. For a previous report that mentions the same editor, see 9206:

month, which has never been used by anyone other than him.

6727:(Hey, if I say my name is Xing, will you do as I ask? ;) -- 5058: 4736: 3709: 3109: 3104: 2793:

test as clearly coming from this user are blocked on sight.

13007:

http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=Caspian%20blue&l=all

12086:

article, he has been revert warring to push his bias, see

12057:

describes: "following another user around" accompanied by

11734: 9114:

Question about indef blocked user, and editing anonymously

6247:

Well, I am not involved and what I am seeing is some very

4209:

Let's move on, and get back to editing an encyclopedia. -

3443:

Proposal One doesn't block the IP range; it just bans the

3276:

Of course not. Nobody has suggested a range block. It's a

3148:

I've got degrees in this subject so I know better than you

2489:

I'm not aware of anyone having been found to meat-puppet.

13002:

http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=Caspian_blue&l=2000

11887:

FIVE blocks for uncivility, Wikistalking and Sockpuppetry

11311:

The blocking admin doesn't see a problem, why should I?--

7343:

still don't get why there was any feeling that immediate

5346: 5098:). Incidentally, I just received a Knowledge e-mail from 14401::Legal threat retracted, user unblocked, all is well. -- 13578: 13390: 11243:

is trying to reach him, but he keeps saying stuff like:

6652:

Block? For what? I restored the userbox after reviewing

4268: 4157: 3913: 3577: 3522: 3398: 2958:

Proposal 1. If this user had any intention of actually

2789:: A total site ban on this user, all IPs which pass the 13662: 13474: 13323: 13198: 12938:

at it. I've left word with PPG, but no answer yet. --

12488:. although he is supposed to be hanging with his gf 9435:, who has a history of beautifying articles related to 8545:) between the 3 of you. There's nothing that requires 7822:("to be completed in January 2009") also looks to be a 6657:

could withdraw your comment about blocking me. Thanks.

4255: 4144: 3900: 3564: 3509: 3475:

a protracted guerilla action against one or more users

3385: 14516:. It might be prudent to contact a LEO in the area. —/ 12267:

calls Yogagates' edits again as "blatant POV nonsense"

11644:

cited edits with a clear POV and a personal agenda as

9929:. The contributor attempted to restore that, too. See 8634:

there for a minute. I demand that I may or may not be

6091: 6085: 64: 14203:"—moving and refocusing articles. I propose that the 12317:

textbook definition of uncivility directed against me

11937: 11297:

User evading block, seeking outside help in resolving

11064:

Got to run, but it looks like they're starting in on

9025:...which amuses me, since their mascot is the Bulls. 7620:

apparently has a problem with more than just the link

6525:, one of several such initiatives he has undertaken). 5974:

pleasing to many, are seriously broken in practice.--

3993:

him to avoid the person he seems to loathe so much.--

2350:

I suspect the "brush off" reference is in respect to

14611:

Another troubling user page - Judge Florentino Floro

10467:to free up space for possible later AfDs. Cheers. 6281:

I've removed Locke Cole's rollback access; see also

4678:

to a new name (highly unlikely, but it can happen).

1644:

Page. There is nothing anti-semitic about the truth.

13939:

list of people killed because they were transgender

12349:

No further edits should be made to this discussion.

6082:Surely not those are aren't cut out to be one. ^_^ 1754:

Senate Foreign Intelligence Committee Investigation

12982:spurious complaint by self-confessed banned user. 12679:was the (only) optical "father of the telescope". 10623:Large sections of it certainly fail WP:SOAPBOX. -- 9611:an administrator who banned you in the first place 8630:Phew. I thought "Your Radio Enemy" was talking to 7292:here; why is it so important to you to keep it? -- 5559:Your logic seems to be as poor as your judgement. 5193:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Howdypardner 5146:Should we just make Einstiendonut block be indef? 5055:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying 3345:diffs which half the time make arcayne look bad.-- 2838:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/75.49.223.52 13408:are both involved in the same abusive behaviour. 11885:. I seriously cannot understand how someone with 9860:Thank you both. Hopefully your input and that of 5925:Looks like his 1RR parole expired last year, see 1699:. That is it's purpose. To have investigated the 14923: 12656:since "History of telescope" articles on the web 12296:not to push his bias through unreferenced edits. 11245:it's a shame we have to be civil about ignorance 9286:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez 9271:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez 8177:This case is a unique situation, and requires a 6327:Your sarcasm isn't the slightest bit helpful. – 4203:need them to color within the lines whilst here. 3361:As far as I'm concerned, #2 is already in place 1017: 14185:The story has been picked up by, among others, 12259:warns Dbachmann not to use POV to counter facts 6508:Some context for those unfamiliar with life at 2127:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yellabina 14773:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks 11483:I think all he's saying is that you're a very 10725:Move along and sing your sob song elsewhere--- 10693:Come see the violins inherent in the system! 9457:, told by a previously banned sockpuppet; and 7205:that applies here - can you be more specific? 4117:both History and Political Science from Oxford 3013:- I imagine that a range block (yes, it would 2354:, a follow-up to my personal note to the user 991:Do not report breaches of personal information 14214: 14134: 14074: 14035: 13030:Would this constitute an abuse of the system? 12481:based on his continual comment "I'll be back" 10445: 7801:The page move has been reverted by an admin. 5402:Tony1 blocked for edit warring after one edit 3427:However, I have not created accounts for the 2323:. Policy specifically defends what I'm doing. 385: 12284:Dbachmann the admin issues him a 3RR warning 12192:says it's all "pure nonsense by POV editors" 10272:Possible threat regarding images of Muhammad 9939:Sorry, I thought (hoped) you had disappeared 9746:(Note that "Gelos" refers to the Locsin and 4585:I guess we list it as there is no rush now. 2381:was evidently insufficient in PR's eyes.) -- 1757:House Armed Services Committee Investigation 993:on this highly visible page – instead go to 13963:Yeah, "Violently killed" is definately NOT 13836:List of violently killed transgender people 12501:Knowledge:Requests for comment/InternetHero 12203:List of languages by first written accounts 9775:Serious copyright concerns, input requested 9350:I swear to you that Its really my own work. 2567:I'm not threatening anybody with anything. 2499:genuinely thought we would be amused by it. 14916:Naval Institute Proceedings, March 5, 2003 14907:Naval Institute Proceedings, March 3, 2003 12164:"blatant POV nonsense" in reply to Mitsube 10492:It's certainly inappropriate. Contact an 5311:, Germany, Egypt, Harvard, and socialism. 2395:the couple of obits from wire services. -- 2379:Knowledge:No original research/noticeboard 392: 378: 18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard 13512:now posting abusive comments on my blog. 11706:Thanks for pointing it out Taprobanus :-) 11253: 11153: 11041:Taken care of (for the moment at least). 10229:Complainant is a single-purpose account ( 9913:I am inclined to agree, considering that 8844:Major Policy Changes Behind Our Backs.... 8421:I think the court order came into effect 7787:Revert move from userspace into mainspace 1591:===Independent American Investigations=== 13920:"Violently killed" as opposed to what? " 12477:FYI: This anonymous post seems to be by 10657:He also can't spell. Although he may be 9736:thanks to my sisters (from gelos) of pex 8018:, and I am leaving the user a note now. 7274:"Mark Bellinghaus Accusations Addressed" 5489:section. Should help clarify things. - 3703:unless you have a check user which says 2736:Is there an admin prepared to do that? 1032:Review of the RfA discussion-only period 14389:user blocked until threat withdrawn – 12053:is involved in every single thing that 11462:; I usually see myself denounced as an 9431:actually reported about sockpuppets of 9227:WP:Suspected sock puppets/Particleman24 8482:keeps getting ignored: I demand action! 6784:Bellinghaus vont loin et profondément. 6752:with it, so that it's properly cited. 6178:And honestly, how many warnings does a 14: 14924: 14691:Aagggghhhhh where's my eye bleach?! – 14312:In response to Beamathan: Sorry no... 14092:I can see the point, but as it stands 12168:calls me a patently obvious POV pusher 10198:addition of "archive" tag to same page 10193:revert of recent additions to RfC page 9921:is the one who brought the problem to 9223:WP:Suspected sock puppets/Moleman 9000 5164:has proven that he has been evading. - 4719:within a few hours after the block of 1962:It's called cruft, and it's harmless. 953:these tips for dealing with incivility 910:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 366:Revision as of 19:46, 21 November 2008 138:Revision as of 19:46, 21 November 2008 100:Revision as of 19:42, 21 November 2008 12742:I'm not 100% sure, but I think so. -- 9845:is not. Thank you for catching this. 2375:Knowledge:Fringe theories/Noticeboard 373: 14478:IP reblocked and talk page protected 14324:and reporting that information in a 14237:request for comment for user conduct 12493:User talk:InternetHero#Don't give up 9443:whom Gerald claimed as his cousin. 8915:fact that the user decided that the 7133:applies if the content only linked. 6471:How can this be considered resolved? 411:discussion, request, and help venues 90: 56: 12286:and also explains to him patiently 10332:wrote above, I would also add that 10278:culture. I think this is trolling. 8384: 8122: 8056: 7848: 196: 183: 152: 135: 128: 123: 109: 97: 23: 12497:User talk:InternetHero#August 2008 11487:eviallll deletionist poopyhead. -- 11468: 8880:the cycle of bold, revert, discuss 7915: 7847:PRODded, I will AfD if necessary. 5057:. According to our own article on 3318:of some form of injunction, and 3 2675: 2643: 368: 45: 14943: 14207:article be restored and moved to 12194:. This much only pertains to the 11804:]) 03:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 11676:]) 04:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 9288:. I'll also notify Starczamora.-- 8514:to see the oh-so-fun background. 7911:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion 7066:. The link should come down! -- 5894:was also blocked for 12 hours. -- 3733:admitting that they were his/hers 1597:Findings of the Moorer Commission 14469: 14437: 14397:) 17:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14380: 14350:Exactly, that is precisely what 12973: 12892: 12345:The discussion above is closed. 12073:]) 08:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12039:]) 08:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11973:]) 23:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11964:]) 21:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 11929:]) 10:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 11874:]) 19:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 11835:]) 23:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 11745:]) 04:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 11652:]) 04:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 11507: 11302: 11032: 10981: 10945: 10611: 10387: 10113: 9961: 9890: 9688: 9516: 9351: 9303: 9260: 9119: 8897:infobox for persons. And so on. 8849: 8081:Knowledge:Requests for oversight 7792: 5716:as well as indicating a serious 5407: 5285:is back and blatantly evading. - 3867:I actually addressed them in a 2763: 399: 14292:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 14201:cover the event, not the person 13736: 12278:He calls it again "POV pushing" 11908:troll who is blocked or warned. 11778:Removing warnings from tal page 11256: 11156: 10777:Insert smiley face here --: --> 9997:very useful contributions here. 9637:says don't attack the editor. 8703: 8696: 8392: 8387: 7772: 7708: 7638: 7607: 7583: 7473: 7438: 7407: 7339:to take punitive action, and I 6560:I quite disagree that Tony has 6289: 4666: 4659: 895:Category:Knowledge noticeboards 14910: 14901: 14892: 14883: 14874: 14593: 14589: 14288:This is how you pay us back ?! 14212: 14132: 14072: 14033: 14002:Can't we just speedy this per 12180:later deletes his rash remarks 11474: 11092: 10940:User page that needs attention 10881: 10728: 10443: 9698: 9526: 9361: 9313: 8720: 8635: 8547:immediate administrator action 8280:Knowledge:Blp#Privacy_of_names 7921: 7384:on Bellinghaus' blog entitled 6016: 6012: 6007:He's already been unblocked. – 4658: 3479:not part of our core policies. 2681: 2649: 13: 1: 14849:19:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14821:19:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14798:19:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14701:19:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14679:18:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14663:18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14638:18:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14597:18:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14580:18:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14553:18:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14535:18:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14504:18:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14456:17:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14428:17:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14411:18:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14364:18:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14346:17:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14304:18:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14272:17:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14253:17:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14220:18:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14171:17:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14140:17:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14114:17:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14080:17:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14063:17:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14041:17:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 14020:17:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13985:18:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13951:18:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13929:17:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13910:17:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13871:16:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13828:13:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13812:13:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13791:13:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13777:13:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13752:13:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13708:13:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13692:09:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13609:23:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 13525:01:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 13505:09:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 13421:22:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 13274:I'll suggest that. Meanwhile 13270:21:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 13256:18:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 13233:17:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 13145:11:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 13117:08:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13091:08:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13064:08:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 13048:07:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12990:12:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12962:07:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12948:07:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12928:06:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12912:15:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12875:18:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12856:18:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12830:18:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12795:18:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12777:18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12763:08:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12749:07:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12738:07:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12723:06:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12693:05:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12585:05:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12545:04:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12513:03:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12495:, but also gets into trouble 12449:04:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12427:00:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12412:00:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12405: 12379:00:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 12340:18:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11818:03:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 11769:17:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 11690:04:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 11548:18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11522:17:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11497:15:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11479:15:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11454:04:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11428:22:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11408:22:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11328:18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11281:23:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11216:22:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11207:22:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11181:22:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11127:22:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11105:22:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11089:dispute resolution procedures 11079:22:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11051:22:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 11019:02:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 11005:21:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10991:User blocked for 24 hours by 10967:20:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10934:20:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10927: 10916:You have balls. I like balls. 10904:19:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10895:19:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10875:18:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10857:19:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10846:18:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10819:19:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10790:18:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10767:18:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10749:18:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10740:17:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10721:17:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10712:17:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10689:17:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10680:17:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10666:17:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10649:16:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10633:16:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10600:03:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 10586:16:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10562:16:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10540:15:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10513:15:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10481:22:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10468: 10451:15:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10424:15:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10393:21:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10370:19:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10355:19:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10346:17:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10324:17:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10310:14:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10288:14:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10266:18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 10250:20:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10223:17:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10167:13:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 10128:12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 10082:11:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 10050:23:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 10017:22:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9976:21:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9946:21:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9905:20:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9869:16:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9852:15:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9834:13:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9769:11:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9705:01:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9675:22:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9660:15:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9623:06:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9579:12:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9533:01:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9484:14:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9417:12:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9387:02:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9368:01:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9342:12:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9320:10:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9298:10:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9278:16:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9239:19:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9217:13:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9201:13:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9175:11:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9160:11:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9108:00:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9082:00:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 9062:09:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9037:19:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9021:06:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 9007:03:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8990:03:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8959:15:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 8944:02:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 8934:12:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8902:09:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8892:05:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8868:16:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 8832:21:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8806:21:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8788:21:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8759:03:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8744:23:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8726:23:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8717: 8709:23:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8675:16:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 8657:22:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8648:20:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8616:14:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8598:00:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8568:22:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8533:17:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8498:17:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8478:Ongoing abuse and attacks by 8472:21:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8453:08:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 8432:21:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8399:18:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8379:17:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8364:16:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8350:15:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8335:15:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8306:13:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8291:13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8274:13:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8209:13:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8163:13:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8131:12:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8104:11:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8065:11:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8043:10:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8025:10:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 8006:10:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7988:10:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7964:15:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7946:20:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7926:15:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7905:15:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7883:15:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7857:11:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7836:09:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7811:15:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7779:06:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7756:05:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7733:05:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7715:05:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7695:04:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7682:04:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7662:05:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7645:06:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7627:05:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7614:05:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7590:03:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7561:02:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7542:00:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 7499:20:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7480:19:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7464:19:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7445:19:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7429:17:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7414:16:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7398:16:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7366:15:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7317:14:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7302:14:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7287:05:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7252:02:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 7230:09:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7215:05:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7193:05:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7179:04:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7143:04:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7128:03:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7083:03:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7057:03:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 7042:00:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6992:22:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6937:22:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6898:22:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6853:21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6819:20:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6794:20:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6771:19:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6737:19:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6711:19:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6685:19:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6667:19:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6631:03:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 6616:23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6601:15:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6556:00:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 6500:18:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6483:07:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6441:00:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6426:00:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6409:00:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6399: 6386:23:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6352:22:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6337:22:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6323:21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6313: 6305:20:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6275:20:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6258:20:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6243:20:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6226:20:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6203:01:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 6189:22:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6174:22:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6145:22:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6126:21:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6109:23:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6096:21:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6078:21:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6043:20:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6020:19:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 6003:19:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5995: 5984:19:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5967:19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5939:18:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5917:18:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5906:18:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5867:18:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5853:18:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5843:18:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5829:18:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5816:18:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5797:18:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5783:18:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5768:18:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5755:18:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5733:18:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5638:18:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5622:18:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5599:18:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5577:18:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5543:18:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5520:18:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5503:I have reviewed it, thanks. " 5499:18:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5473:18:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5455:18:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5442:18:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5426:18:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 5388:10:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 5374:00:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 5359:22:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5340:16:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5325:05:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5297:00:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5176:05:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5156:05:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 5142:23:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5135: 5122:22:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 5071:15:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4994:07:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4981:03:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4962:22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 4950:Jewish Internet Defense Force 4920:23:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4898:18:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4884:17:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4833:16:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4712:14:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4697:12:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4669:11:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4651:10:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4611:06:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4590:06:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4581:06:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4563:06:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4548:06:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4526:06:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4507:05:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4485:04:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 4372:Jewish Internet Defense Force 4365:04:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 4339:23:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4297:15:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4276:09:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4246:08:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4225:04:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4180:02:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 4165:21:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4134:21:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4108:14:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4044:13:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4022:09:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 4003:07:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 3960:06:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 3921:21:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 3887:20:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3859:19:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3833:22:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3818:15:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3786:08:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3771:03:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3731:anon derailed the process by 3722:03:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3698:02:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 3645:22:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3615:17:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3598:17:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3585:17:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3555:16:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3530:16:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3499:15:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3406:13:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 3373:21:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3355:22:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3340:20:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3307:22:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3288:15:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3267:15:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3230:22:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3215:21:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3202:20:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3187:20:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3161:19:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3140:15:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3122:15:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3097:06:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3081:22:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 3050:00:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 3044: 3033:22:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 3002:22:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2980:05:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2969:22:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2953:22:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2937:21:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2908:21:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2891:04:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2874:20:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2857:21:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2780:11:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2750:10:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 2728:22:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 2686:18:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 2669:16:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 2663: 2654:16:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 2615:21:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2597:19:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2572:18:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2563:14:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 2538:20:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2520:18:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2494:17:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2484:15:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2452:16:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2427:15:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2407:15:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2386:15:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2346:15:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2315:09:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2289:03:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 2282:awarding each other barnstars 2272:20:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2246:20:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2227:18:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2187:19:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2164:16:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 2139:22:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2121:22:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2102:22:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2092: 2062:22:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2035:21:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2009:21:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1990:21:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1967:08:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1958:14:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC) 1933:18:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1915:19:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1887:14:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC) 1860:10:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC) 1827:09:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1800:02:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1782:18:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC) 1748:Joint Chief of Staff's Report 1736:far fetched, in this respect? 515:Biographies of living persons 364: 354: 345: 333: 324: 312: 303: 291: 282: 271: 262: 251: 242: 14546: 14540: 14464:206.176.127.131 Death threat 14246: 14240: 12863: 12818: 12398: 11527:at the same time. However, 11515: 10920: 10886: 10383: 10121: 9969: 9898: 9687:thinks on me! Cheers Blake. 9398:to your userpage? Thanks. 7869:Clear CSD#A7 (web). Gone. ➨ 6537: 6367: 6296: 6287: 5505:Tony...continued to edit war 5128: 1751:CIA Intelligence Memorandums 28:Browse history interactively 7: 14446:- will mark as resolved. – 14209:Suicide of Abraham K. Biggs 12160:bad tone reply to Dbachmann 12149:calls us a group of vandals 11668:Well, well, well........... 11466:deletionist poopyhead .) -- 9831:a sweet and tender hooligan 9821: 9712:I found the original source 8512:User_talk:Baseball_Card_Guy 8450:a sweet and tender hooligan 8440: 7880:a sweet and tender hooligan 7870: 4315:) protected the page after 3255:don't sweat the small stuff 2996: 2960:working on the encyclopedia 2203:my removal of your comments 2095: 1745:U.S. Naval Court of Inquiry 10: 14948: 14510:Brandon Valley High School 14467: 14378: 12971: 12890: 12616:are already dealt with in 11300: 11030: 10979: 10943: 10609: 9919:contributor who cleaned it 9258: 9117: 8847: 8749:through the mailing list. 8508:User_talk:Your_Radio_Enemy 7790: 7197:If, as you suggest above, 5405: 5079:New JIDF-related editor(s) 2810:See these contribs lists: 2761: 2173:is just about exhausted. 1563: 1540: 1535: 1417: 1295: 1173: 1051: 916: 883:Discussions for discussion 185: 13107:User:Lucyintheskywithdada 12249:. In this article it was 12184:its all "patently obvious 12156:issues me a bogus warning 12153:indulges in wikilawyering 11646:evident from the comments 9427:As you may have noticed, 8606:Law. I demand that I am 6221: 6182:editor need to be given? 5051:a previous ANI discussion 4317:Future Perfect at Sunrise 1550:Sockpuppet investigations 987:demonstrating the problem 891: 766: 698: 615: 507: 426: 407: 352: 343: 331: 322: 310: 301: 289: 280: 269: 260: 249: 240: 207: 204: 134: 96: 12614:Giambattista della Porta 12354:203.33.181.133 Shared IP 12347:Please do not modify it. 11670:he is indeed stalking me 11591:Uncivil in the talk page 10593:revisions are expunged. 10296:in the same sentence as 9057:which to hang himself". 6346: 6103: 5160:I'd say we should since 3065:biased on this issue. - 1708:but is available in the 1037:ArbCom election RFC 2024 575:Scalable vector graphics 409:Knowledge's centralized 172:Extended confirmed users 14864:'Outing' of BNP members 14294:being a hoax fact tag? 13727:User:Jayhawk of Justice 10407:AfD assistance required 10211:here in the pending RfC 9738:(or PinoyExchange.com) 9722:riding on horseback in 8230:, rest of info removed 7380:You may want to review 6329:How do you turn this on 5835:How do you turn this on 5808:How do you turn this on 5591:How do you turn this on 5418:How do you turn this on 4733:), a new user account, 1419:Arbitration enforcement 419:formal review processes 95: 14932:Knowledge noticeboards 14006:or something? Or per 13844:Murder of Amanda Milan 13834:Tenditious editing on 13683:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13600:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13516:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13496:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13412:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13247:(User:Pigsonthewing); 13224:(User:Pigsonthewing); 12954:Not anymore he ain't. 12901:Blocked infinitely by 12685:Fountains of Bryn Mawr 12572:single-purpose account 12505:Fountains of Bryn Mawr 10837:This flag once was red 10606:Questionable userpage? 9750:"loveteam," much like 9463:added a sockpuppet tag 9096:Little Red Riding Hood 9070:Little Red Riding Hood 8604:Majikthise–Vroomfondel 8083:, that would be great. 5858:pages constructively. 5720:issue for Tony1 w.r.t 5563:, in the plural; what 5533:after being warned. - 2918:User talk:75.49.223.52 2358:. (My pointing him to 2201:I assume you refer to 1894:into a drinking game. 1760:The NSA History Report 1019:Centralized discussion 995:Requests for oversight 459:Centralized discussion 14375:- Legal threat report 13840:Murder of Gwen Araujo 13103:User:Documentingabuse 11794:more uncivil behavior 11601:Uncivil edit comments 11058:User:Suicidal Lemming 10002:The Co-operative Bank 9937:seems illuminating: " 9915:The Co-operative Bank 9221:The SSP report is at 6580:is deprecated, and a 1704:made anywhere on the 1047:Noticeboard archives 981:Be brief and include 974:recently active admin 878:WikiProject proposals 777:Committee noticeboard 726:Personal restrictions 711:Contributor copyright 550:Neutral point of view 14187:the Associated Press 12703:Tagging v. untagging 12634:history of telescope 12618:history of telescope 12466:history of telescope 8974:User:131.247.244.234 8917:template for persons 8227:, some info removed 6584:weak consensus that 6283:#Edit_warring_at_MFD 3365:William M. Connolley 3110:William M. Connolley 2900:William M. Connolley 1733:USS Liberty incident 1727:USS Liberty incident 1718:USS Liberty incident 1706:USS Liberty incident 1701:USS Liberty incident 1683:USS Liberty incident 1678:USS Liberty incident 1642:USS Liberty incident 1581:USS Liberty Incident 1027:Administrator recall 836:Requests for comment 752:Requests for comment 716:Edit warring and 3RR 706:Conflict of interest 508:Articles and content 14514:Template:City-state 13127:98.18.130.129 et al 13042:CambridgeBayWeather 12956:CambridgeBayWeather 12308:as indicated above. 12133:Dbachmann, an admin 12067:disruptive behavior 11905:User:Dab(Dbachmann) 11901:User:Dab(Dbachmann) 11864:User:Dab(Dbachmann) 11851:User:Dab(Dbachmann) 11846:User:Dab(Dbachmann) 11640:and undoing all my 11607:POV Content forking 10187:request for comment 9445:User:Wynchard Bloom 9439:, especially about 8014:They have all been 7909:Clearly belongs at 7491:Delicious carbuncle 7456:Delicious carbuncle 7421:Delicious carbuncle 7390:Delicious carbuncle 7309:Delicious carbuncle 7279:Delicious carbuncle 7207:Delicious carbuncle 7135:Delicious carbuncle 7049:Delicious carbuncle 6677:Delicious carbuncle 6659:Delicious carbuncle 6523:this page of Tony's 6413:Well said Sandy. — 6028:And who exactly is 5191:Checkuser results: 5084:Already blocked by 2039:I suggest that the 1712:. Inclusion of the 1686:mentioned from the 1048: 970:Just want an admin? 14559:Minneapolis office 13922:Killing him softly 13797:Vandalism on Image 13781:I left a warning. 12813:an appropriate use 12188:calls me desperate 12172:says I am hellbent 12147:becomes irate and 11944:. He continues it 11735:Sanskrit talk page 11727:From the talk page 11568:dispute resolution 11278: 11178: 10336:comes to mind. -- 9716:the disputed image 9685:this immature user 9128:IP blocked 1 month 8224:information added 6814: 6466:kangaroo adminship 4351:Anyone want to go 4270:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 4159:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 3915:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 3804:Finally some diffs 3579:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 3524:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 3400:LOOK AT WHAT I DID 2368:Knowledge:Edit war 2331:Muhammed al-Durrah 1046: 965:dispute resolution 736:Contentious topics 535:Dispute resolution 523:Questions on media 150: 107: 14666: 14649:comment added by 14634: 14626: 14576: 14568: 14531: 14523: 14501: 14495: 14373:User:NoKindOfName 14343: 14337: 14320:information from 13982: 13976: 13076:meta:Role_account 12886:User:Krazy Komodo 12681:History of optics 12630:user:InternetHero 12626:Optical telescope 12582: 12542: 12479:user:InternetHero 12472:articles have POV 12470:optical telescope 12446: 12440: 12425: 12377: 12143:(multiple times). 12135:(multiple times), 12131:(multiple times), 11844:I don't know how 11659:And he continues, 11586: 11545: 11539: 11451: 11445: 11325: 11319: 11277: 11264: 11260: 11254: 11177: 11164: 11160: 11154: 11144:contrib summaries 11101: 11097: 11077: 10993:User:Arthur Rubin 10955:Deleted, thanks, 10893: 10779: 10584: 10511: 9198: 9192: 9048:User:75.49.223.52 9035: 8994:Thank you Tim. — 8644: 8640: 8549:that I can see. 8401: 8206: 8200: 7080: 7074: 7064:gaming the system 6841:Google translator 6812: 6708: 6702: 6552: 6498: 6382: 6300: 6001: 5965: 5904: 4294: 4274: 4222: 4163: 4105: 4041: 4035: 3919: 3884: 3856: 3850: 3768: 3695: 3583: 3528: 3496: 3404: 3337: 3331: 3078: 3030: 2934: 2928: 2854: 2848: 2827:this edit summary 2822:See these diffs: 2748: 2613: 2536: 2321:was defeated 12-1 2185: 2119: 2007: 1926:@Henrywinklestein 1577: 1576: 1015: 1014: 902: 901: 731:General sanctions 570:Resource requests 555:Original research 363: 155:Certified Gangsta 136: 98: 78: 14939: 14917: 14914: 14908: 14905: 14899: 14896: 14890: 14887: 14881: 14878: 14847: 14844: 14839: 14834: 14796: 14794: 14790: 14784: 14769: 14742:deleted contribs 14665: 14643: 14630: 14624: 14594: 14590: 14572: 14566: 14550: 14544: 14527: 14521: 14499: 14493: 14479: 14473: 14472: 14445: 14441: 14440: 14413: 14384: 14383: 14341: 14335: 14322:reliable sources 14314:Knowledge is not 14250: 14244: 14218: 14216: 14205:Abraham K. Biggs 14138: 14136: 14078: 14076: 14039: 14037: 13996:Abraham K. Biggs 13980: 13974: 13848:Matthew Shepherd 13750: 13679: 13678: 13633:deleted contribs 13595: 13594: 13549:deleted contribs 13491: 13490: 13445:deleted contribs 13407: 13406: 13361:deleted contribs 13340: 13339: 13294:deleted contribs 13215: 13214: 13169:deleted contribs 12992: 12977: 12976: 12914: 12903:Persian Poet Gal 12896: 12895: 12865: 12820: 12791: 12786: 12581: 12579: 12541: 12539: 12444: 12438: 12421: 12409: 12402: 12373: 12368: 12362: 12338: 12306:personal attacks 12063:personal attacks 11790:personal attacks 11625:disruptive edits 11582: 11543: 11537: 11519: 11511: 11476: 11470: 11449: 11443: 11379: 11352:deleted contribs 11330: 11323: 11317: 11306: 11305: 11279: 11267: 11265: 11262: 11258: 11179: 11167: 11165: 11162: 11158: 11103: 11099: 11095: 11073: 11053: 11036: 11035: 10985: 10984: 10949: 10948: 10931: 10924: 10892: 10890: 10885: 10838: 10776: 10730: 10710: 10708: 10704: 10698: 10615: 10614: 10598: 10578: 10538: 10536: 10532: 10526: 10507: 10474: 10449: 10447: 10388: 10385: 10374:We could put an 10248: 10164: 10125: 10117: 10079: 9973: 9965: 9902: 9894: 9849: 9829: 9811: 9810: 9702: 9692: 9658: 9656: 9652: 9646: 9577: 9575: 9571: 9565: 9530: 9520: 9415: 9413: 9409: 9403: 9396:actual vandalism 9365: 9355: 9317: 9307: 9280: 9264: 9263: 9254:User:Starczamora 9196: 9190: 9158: 9155: 9129: 9123: 9122: 9106: 9103: 9097: 9080: 9077: 9071: 9029: 9002: 8924:, here I come.-- 8870: 8853: 8852: 8785: 8782: 8740: 8722: 8719: 8705: 8698: 8685:User:ForesticPig 8646: 8642: 8638: 8596: 8594: 8590: 8584: 8566: 8564: 8560: 8554: 8531: 8529: 8525: 8519: 8504:User_talk:Libro0 8448: 8430: 8403: 8397: 8396: 8391: 8204: 8198: 8129: 8102: 8063: 8023: 7923: 7917: 7878: 7855: 7813: 7796: 7795: 7774: 7710: 7640: 7609: 7585: 7475: 7440: 7409: 7364: 7362: 7358: 7352: 7174:was rejected. -- 7078: 7072: 6990: 6988: 6984: 6978: 6896: 6894: 6890: 6884: 6786:Cahiers du jason 6769: 6767: 6763: 6757: 6706: 6700: 6553: 6550: 6494: 6433:Malleus Fatuorum 6421: 6401: 6383: 6380: 6348: 6315: 6302: 6298: 6294: 6291: 6255: 6223: 6186: 6170: 6105: 6093: 6087: 6070:Malleus Fatuorum 6017: 6013: 6000: 5999: 5959: 5898: 5863: 5825: 5793: 5764: 5729: 5569:Malleus Fatuorum 5428: 5411: 5410: 5284: 5282: 5245: 5225: 5223:deleted contribs 5201: 5195:, it seems that 5139: 5132: 5048: 5021:deleted contribs 4904:DontbeaPOVPUSHER 4822: 4820: 4783: 4763: 4761:deleted contribs 4739: 4721:DontbeaPOVPUSHER 4695: 4693: 4689: 4683: 4667: 4664: 4663: 4649: 4647: 4643: 4637: 4540:DontbeaPOVPUSHER 4518:DontbeaPOVPUSHER 4467: 4465: 4428: 4408: 4406:deleted contribs 4384: 4382:DontbeaPOVPUSHER 4293: 4290: 4287: 4272: 4271: 4266: 4259: 4258: 4221: 4218: 4215: 4161: 4160: 4155: 4148: 4147: 4104: 4101: 4098: 4039: 4033: 3917: 3916: 3911: 3904: 3903: 3883: 3880: 3877: 3854: 3848: 3767: 3764: 3761: 3694: 3691: 3688: 3581: 3580: 3575: 3568: 3567: 3553: 3551: 3547: 3541: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3513: 3512: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3437:the related RfCU 3402: 3401: 3396: 3389: 3388: 3335: 3329: 3185: 3183: 3179: 3173: 3077: 3074: 3071: 3046: 3029: 3026: 3023: 2998: 2932: 2926: 2852: 2846: 2782: 2767: 2766: 2742: 2726: 2723: 2715: 2683: 2677: 2667: 2651: 2645: 2607: 2595: 2592: 2584: 2561: 2558: 2550: 2530: 2518: 2515: 2507: 2482: 2479: 2471: 2450: 2447: 2439: 2425: 2405: 2313: 2310: 2302: 2270: 2267: 2259: 2225: 2222: 2214: 2179: 2162: 2159: 2151: 2113: 2097: 2094: 2033: 2030: 2022: 2001: 1956: 1953: 1945: 1913: 1910: 1902: 1885: 1882: 1874: 1858: 1855: 1847: 1825: 1822: 1814: 1792:Henrywinklestein 1572: 1427: 1309: 1297:Edit-warring/3RR 1187: 1065: 1049: 1045: 936: 929: 907: 906: 565:Reliable sources 499:User permissions 479:Main Page errors 474:Interface admins 464:Closure requests 394: 387: 380: 371: 370: 194: 193: 191: 178: 168: 149: 144: 126: 121: 106: 79: 70: 69: 67: 62: 60: 52: 49: 31: 29: 14947: 14946: 14942: 14941: 14940: 14938: 14937: 14936: 14922: 14921: 14920: 14915: 14911: 14906: 14902: 14897: 14893: 14888: 14884: 14879: 14875: 14871: 14866: 14861: 14842: 14837: 14832: 14829: 14819: 14792: 14786: 14782: 14780: 14727: 14721: 14716: 14644: 14635: 14613: 14577: 14532: 14480: 14477: 14475: 14470: 14466: 14438: 14436: 14414: 14388: 14386: 14381: 14377: 14230: 14227:User:Krzyzowiec 13999: 13899: 13851: 13799: 13731: 13618: 13614: 13534: 13530: 13430: 13426: 13346: 13342: 13279: 13275: 13154: 13150: 13129: 13124: 13123: 12997: 12993: 12981: 12979: 12974: 12970: 12915: 12900: 12898: 12893: 12889: 12789: 12784: 12769:ChildofMidnight 12730:ChildofMidnight 12705: 12575: 12535: 12474: 12366: 12360: 12356: 12351: 12350: 12329: 12059:tendentiousness 11597:warning issued. 11562: 11512: 11337: 11331: 11310: 11308: 11303: 11299: 11061: 11054: 11040: 11038: 11033: 11029: 10988: 10987: 10982: 10978: 10952: 10951: 10946: 10942: 10844: 10836: 10829:the authorities 10759:Scott MacDonald 10706: 10700: 10696: 10694: 10618: 10617: 10612: 10608: 10596:John Vandenberg 10594: 10534: 10528: 10524: 10522: 10489: 10440:the current AfD 10409: 10328:Extending what 10274: 10237: 10231:{contributions} 10189: 10162: 10160:Sounds good ;) 10118: 10077: 10011:(or Hrothulf) ( 9966: 9935:Anglia Regional 9895: 9847: 9818:UIA (Insurance) 9784: 9782:User:Chrisieboy 9780: 9777: 9718:which featured 9703: 9654: 9648: 9644: 9642: 9573: 9567: 9563: 9561: 9531: 9433:Gerald Gonzalez 9411: 9405: 9401: 9399: 9366: 9318: 9281: 9268: 9266: 9261: 9257: 9153: 9141: 9130: 9127: 9125: 9120: 9116: 9101: 9095: 9093: 9075: 9069: 9067: 9051: 8996: 8977: 8871: 8857: 8855: 8850: 8846: 8783: 8780: 8774: 8769: 8738: 8687: 8592: 8586: 8582: 8580: 8562: 8556: 8552: 8550: 8527: 8521: 8517: 8515: 8484: 8428:John Vandenberg 8426: 8327:Scott MacDonald 8322: 8254:, removed here 8246:, removed here 8238:, removed here 8100:John Vandenberg 8098: 8021:John Vandenberg 8019: 7980:Scott MacDonald 7974: 7972:Death of Baby P 7814: 7800: 7798: 7793: 7789: 7360: 7354: 7350: 7348: 7222:Scott MacDonald 6986: 6980: 6976: 6974: 6892: 6886: 6882: 6880: 6878:Sacré phoque!!! 6765: 6759: 6755: 6753: 6729:Scott MacDonald 6691:game the system 6649: 6549: 6548: 6544: 6492:Septentrionalis 6415: 6379: 6378: 6374: 6301: 6253: 6215: 6184: 6168: 5888:User:Locke Cole 5884:Support unblock 5861: 5823: 5791: 5762: 5727: 5606:Support unblock 5465:Support unblock 5429: 5415: 5413: 5408: 5404: 5305: 5295: 5258: 5238: 5218: 5197: 5196: 5188: 5174: 5081: 5006: 4796: 4776: 4756: 4735: 4734: 4691: 4685: 4681: 4679: 4645: 4639: 4635: 4633: 4441: 4421: 4401: 4380: 4379: 4376: 4291: 4283: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4256: 4219: 4211: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4145: 4102: 4094: 3933: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3901: 3881: 3873: 3806: 3765: 3757: 3692: 3684: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3565: 3549: 3543: 3539: 3537: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3510: 3493: 3485: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3181: 3175: 3171: 3169: 3075: 3067: 3027: 3019: 3000: 2783: 2771: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2719: 2711: 2708: 2703: 2588: 2580: 2577: 2554: 2546: 2543: 2511: 2503: 2500: 2475: 2467: 2464: 2443: 2435: 2432: 2416: 2396: 2306: 2298: 2295: 2263: 2255: 2252: 2218: 2210: 2207: 2155: 2147: 2144: 2026: 2018: 2015: 1949: 1941: 1938: 1906: 1898: 1895: 1878: 1870: 1867: 1851: 1843: 1840: 1818: 1810: 1807: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1559: 1421: 1299: 1177: 1055: 1053:Administrators' 1043: 1042: 1041: 1021: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1000: 959:their talk page 941: 940: 939: 932: 925: 921: 903: 898: 887: 804:False positives 762: 694: 611: 560:Pending changes 545:Fringe theories 503: 433:Administrators 422: 403: 398: 360: 348: 339: 327: 318: 306: 297: 285: 276: 265: 256: 245: 236: 229: 220: 215: 200: 195: 186: 184: 182: 181: 180: 176: 174: 158: 156: 151: 145: 140: 132: 130:← Previous edit 127: 125:No edit summary 124: 122: 115: 113: 108: 102: 94: 93: 92: 91: 89: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 75: 71: 65: 63: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48:Content deleted 47: 44: 39:← Previous edit 36: 35: 34: 27: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 14945: 14935: 14934: 14919: 14918: 14909: 14900: 14891: 14882: 14872: 14870: 14867: 14865: 14862: 14860: 14857: 14856: 14855: 14854: 14853: 14852: 14851: 14807: 14776: 14775: 14770: 14720: 14717: 14715: 14707: 14706: 14705: 14704: 14703: 14686: 14685: 14684: 14683: 14682: 14681: 14671:Wildthing61476 14629: 14612: 14609: 14608: 14607: 14606: 14605: 14604: 14603: 14602: 14601: 14600: 14599: 14571: 14526: 14468: 14465: 14462: 14461: 14460: 14459: 14458: 14431: 14430: 14379: 14376: 14370: 14369: 14368: 14367: 14366: 14310: 14309: 14308: 14307: 14306: 14279: 14278: 14277: 14276: 14275: 14274: 14229: 14224: 14223: 14222: 14182: 14181: 14180: 14179: 14178: 14177: 14176: 14175: 14174: 14173: 14149: 14148: 14147: 14146: 14145: 14144: 14143: 14142: 14121: 14120: 14119: 14118: 14117: 14116: 14085: 14084: 14083: 14082: 14066: 14065: 14046: 14045: 14044: 14043: 13998: 13993: 13992: 13991: 13990: 13989: 13988: 13987: 13956: 13955: 13954: 13953: 13932: 13931: 13917: 13916: 13915: 13914: 13913: 13912: 13897: 13889: 13888: 13887: 13886: 13876: 13875: 13874: 13873: 13850: 13832: 13831: 13830: 13815: 13814: 13798: 13795: 13794: 13793: 13779: 13754: 13730: 13724: 13723: 13722: 13721: 13720: 13719: 13718: 13717: 13716: 13715: 13714: 13713: 13712: 13711: 13710: 13700:LessHeard vanU 13611: 13532:174.131.99.180 13527: 13507: 13423: 13344:174.131.13.112 13262:LessHeard vanU 13137:LessHeard vanU 13128: 13125: 13122: 13121: 13120: 13119: 13096: 13095: 13094: 13093: 13079: 13073: 13067: 13066: 13051: 13050: 13045:Have a gorilla 13033: 13032: 13027: 13021: 13020: 13015: 13014: 13010: 13009: 13004: 12998: 12995: 12994: 12972: 12969: 12966: 12965: 12964: 12959:Have a gorilla 12951: 12950: 12931: 12930: 12891: 12888: 12883: 12882: 12881: 12880: 12879: 12878: 12877: 12808: 12807: 12806: 12805: 12804: 12803: 12802: 12801: 12800: 12799: 12798: 12797: 12704: 12701: 12700: 12699: 12698: 12697: 12696: 12695: 12677:Ibn al-Haytham 12650:Ibn al-Haytham 12640:we have major 12610:Leonard Digges 12602:Ibn al-Haytham 12590: 12589: 12588: 12587: 12550: 12549: 12548: 12547: 12516: 12515: 12473: 12459: 12458: 12457: 12456: 12455: 12454: 12453: 12452: 12451: 12391: 12390: 12389: 12388: 12382: 12381: 12359:Softblock for 12355: 12352: 12344: 12343: 12342: 12309: 12297: 12281: 12270: 12251:User:Dbachmann 12199: 12079: 12078: 12077: 12076: 12075: 12074: 12043: 12042: 12041: 12040: 12026: 12025: 12024: 12023: 12005: 12004: 12003: 12002: 11975: 11974: 11966: 11965: 11933: 11932: 11931: 11930: 11912: 11911: 11910: 11909: 11894: 11893: 11892: 11891: 11883:continues here 11876: 11875: 11855: 11854: 11841: 11840: 11839: 11838: 11837: 11836: 11823: 11822: 11821: 11820: 11772: 11771: 11755: 11754: 11753: 11752: 11751: 11750: 11749: 11748: 11747: 11746: 11714: 11713: 11712: 11711: 11710: 11709: 11708: 11707: 11697: 11696: 11695: 11694: 11693: 11692: 11663: 11662: 11661: 11660: 11654: 11653: 11629: 11628: 11623:Most recently 11621: 11618:Peacock/Weasel 11614: 11603: 11598: 11587: 11564: 11563: 11561: 11558: 11557: 11556: 11555: 11554: 11553: 11552: 11551: 11550: 11506: 11501: 11500: 11499: 11460:LessHeard vanU 11431: 11430: 11415: 11411: 11410: 11400:LessHeard vanU 11389: 11388: 11380: 11301: 11298: 11295: 11294: 11293: 11292: 11291: 11290: 11289: 11288: 11287: 11286: 11285: 11284: 11283: 11227: 11226: 11225: 11224: 11223: 11222: 11221: 11220: 11219: 11218: 11199:Wildthing61476 11188: 11187: 11186: 11185: 11184: 11183: 11134: 11133: 11132: 11131: 11130: 11129: 11110: 11109: 11108: 11107: 11082: 11081: 11060: 11055: 11031: 11028: 11027:AIV backlogged 11025: 11024: 11023: 11022: 11021: 10980: 10977: 10973:Disclaimer at 10971: 10970: 10969: 10944: 10941: 10938: 10937: 10936: 10912: 10911: 10910: 10909: 10908: 10907: 10906: 10864: 10863: 10862: 10861: 10860: 10859: 10840: 10832: 10824: 10823: 10822: 10821: 10809: 10808: 10807: 10806: 10805: 10804: 10803: 10802: 10801: 10800: 10799: 10798: 10797: 10796: 10795: 10794: 10793: 10792: 10751: 10652: 10651: 10638: 10637: 10636: 10635: 10610: 10607: 10604: 10603: 10602: 10589: 10588: 10569: 10568: 10567: 10566: 10565: 10564: 10545: 10544: 10543: 10542: 10516: 10515: 10504: 10501: 10488: 10485: 10484: 10483: 10460: 10459: 10458: 10457: 10456: 10455: 10454: 10453: 10429: 10428: 10427: 10426: 10408: 10405: 10404: 10403: 10402: 10401: 10400: 10399: 10398: 10397: 10396: 10395: 10384:Gadget850 (Ed) 10357: 10290: 10280:LessHeard vanU 10273: 10270: 10269: 10268: 10253: 10252: 10226: 10225: 10202: 10201: 10195: 10188: 10185: 10184: 10183: 10182: 10181: 10180: 10179: 10178: 10177: 10176: 10175: 10174: 10173: 10172: 10171: 10170: 10169: 10143: 10142: 10141: 10140: 10139: 10138: 10137: 10136: 10135: 10134: 10133: 10132: 10131: 10130: 10112: 10095: 10094: 10093: 10092: 10091: 10090: 10089: 10088: 10087: 10086: 10085: 10084: 10061: 10060: 10059: 10058: 10057: 10056: 10055: 10054: 10053: 10052: 10047:Moonriddengirl 10045:concern me. -- 10026: 10025: 10024: 10023: 10022: 10021: 10020: 10019: 10005: 9998: 9994: 9983: 9982: 9981: 9980: 9979: 9978: 9960: 9951: 9950: 9949: 9948: 9943:Moonriddengirl 9908: 9907: 9889: 9874: 9873: 9872: 9871: 9866:Moonriddengirl 9855: 9854: 9837: 9836: 9813: 9812: 9776: 9773: 9772: 9771: 9756: 9755: 9743: 9742: 9732: 9731: 9708: 9707: 9697: 9690:Wynchard Bloom 9681: 9680: 9679: 9678: 9677: 9667:Blake Gripling 9631: 9630: 9629: 9628: 9627: 9626: 9625: 9594: 9593: 9592: 9591: 9590: 9589: 9588: 9587: 9586: 9585: 9584: 9583: 9582: 9581: 9544: 9543: 9542: 9541: 9540: 9539: 9538: 9537: 9536: 9535: 9525: 9518:Wynchard Bloom 9472: 9471: 9470: 9469:have reported. 9451: 9425: 9424: 9423: 9422: 9421: 9420: 9419: 9360: 9353:Wynchard Bloom 9348: 9347: 9346: 9345: 9344: 9312: 9305:Wynchard Bloom 9259: 9256: 9251: 9250: 9249: 9248: 9247: 9246: 9245: 9244: 9243: 9242: 9241: 9118: 9115: 9112: 9111: 9110: 9089: 9088: 9087: 9086: 9085: 9084: 9050: 9045: 9044: 9043: 9042: 9041: 9040: 9039: 9009: 8976: 8971: 8970: 8969: 8968: 8967: 8966: 8965: 8964: 8963: 8962: 8961: 8907: 8906: 8905: 8904: 8848: 8845: 8842: 8841: 8840: 8839: 8838: 8837: 8836: 8835: 8834: 8819: 8811: 8808: 8773: 8770: 8768: 8765: 8764: 8763: 8762: 8761: 8732: 8731: 8730: 8729: 8728: 8686: 8683: 8682: 8681: 8680: 8679: 8678: 8677: 8627: 8626: 8625: 8624: 8623: 8622: 8621: 8620: 8619: 8618: 8600: 8483: 8476: 8475: 8474: 8456: 8455: 8435: 8434: 8419: 8411: 8410: 8409: 8408: 8407: 8406: 8405: 8404: 8352: 8321: 8318: 8317: 8316: 8315: 8314: 8313: 8312: 8311: 8310: 8309: 8308: 8258: 8257: 8249: 8241: 8233: 8221: 8220: 8219: 8218: 8212: 8211: 8174: 8173: 8172: 8171: 8170: 8169: 8168: 8167: 8166: 8165: 8140: 8139: 8138: 8137: 8136: 8135: 8134: 8133: 8111: 8110: 8109: 8108: 8107: 8106: 8089: 8088: 8087: 8086: 8085: 8084: 8072: 8071: 8070: 8069: 8068: 8067: 8048: 8047: 8046: 8045: 8028: 8027: 8011: 8010: 8009: 8008: 7991: 7990: 7973: 7970: 7969: 7968: 7967: 7966: 7938:Michael Devore 7933: 7932: 7931: 7930: 7929: 7928: 7890: 7889: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7862: 7861: 7860: 7859: 7839: 7838: 7791: 7788: 7785: 7784: 7783: 7782: 7781: 7763: 7762: 7761: 7760: 7759: 7758: 7738: 7737: 7736: 7735: 7718: 7717: 7700: 7699: 7698: 7697: 7670: 7669: 7668: 7667: 7666: 7665: 7664: 7649: 7648: 7647: 7597: 7596: 7595: 7594: 7593: 7592: 7566: 7565: 7564: 7563: 7545: 7544: 7528: 7527: 7522: 7521: 7513: 7512: 7511: 7510: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7506: 7505: 7504: 7503: 7502: 7501: 7377: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7368: 7347:was required. 7239: 7238: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7153: 7152: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7130: 7088:WP:NOT#MYSPACE 7009: 7008: 7007: 7006: 7005: 7004: 7003: 7002: 7001: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6997: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6952: 6951: 6950: 6949: 6948: 6947: 6946: 6945: 6944: 6943: 6942: 6941: 6940: 6939: 6911: 6910: 6909: 6908: 6907: 6906: 6905: 6904: 6903: 6902: 6901: 6900: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6861: 6860: 6859: 6858: 6857: 6856: 6855: 6828: 6827: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6796: 6776: 6775: 6774: 6773: 6741: 6740: 6724: 6723: 6722: 6721: 6720: 6719: 6718: 6717: 6648: 6643: 6642: 6641: 6640: 6639: 6638: 6637: 6636: 6635: 6634: 6633: 6590: 6578:autoformatting 6546: 6545: 6538: 6534: 6526: 6503: 6502: 6486: 6485: 6458: 6457: 6456: 6455: 6454: 6453: 6452: 6451: 6450: 6449: 6448: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6443: 6428: 6376: 6375: 6368: 6364: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6293: 6279: 6278: 6277: 6214: 6211: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6206: 6205: 6162: 6161: 6160: 6159: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6154: 6153: 6152: 6151: 6150: 6149: 6148: 6147: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6098: 6054: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6048: 6047: 6046: 6045: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5987: 5986: 5970: 5969: 5944: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5920: 5919: 5909: 5908: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5845: 5803: 5802: 5801: 5800: 5799: 5736: 5735: 5641: 5640: 5625: 5624: 5602: 5601: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5476: 5475: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5406: 5403: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5304: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5291: 5187: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5170: 5144: 5080: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5073: 4997: 4996: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4931: 4930: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4923: 4922: 4852: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4837: 4836: 4835: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4566: 4565: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4510: 4509: 4499:TenOfAllTrades 4488: 4487: 4469: 4468: 4375: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4264: 4253: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4207: 4204: 4200: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4153: 4142: 4139:that. move on 4110: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4076: 4065: 4062: 4058: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4005: 3948: 3947: 3942: 3941: 3937: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3909: 3898: 3862: 3861: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3805: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3744: 3724: 3676: 3663: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3573: 3562: 3518: 3507: 3480: 3464: 3460: 3452: 3441: 3432: 3425: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3394: 3383: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3291: 3290: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3125: 3124: 3100: 3099: 3084: 3083: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3036: 3035: 3005: 3004: 2994: 2986:LessHeard vanU 2982: 2955: 2945:LessHeard vanU 2941: 2940: 2939: 2911: 2910: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2820: 2801: 2800: 2794: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2731: 2730: 2702: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2657: 2656: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2409: 2383:Moonriddengirl 2327: 2324: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2243:Moonriddengirl 2230: 2229: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2088:time perhaps? 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1918: 1917: 1890: 1889: 1863: 1862: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1785: 1784: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1738: 1737: 1722: 1721: 1692: 1691: 1668: 1667: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1618: 1614: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1593: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1560: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1415: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1374: 1369: 1363: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1311: 1310: 1293: 1292: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1241: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1189: 1188: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1088: 1083: 1078: 1073: 1067: 1066: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 999: 998: 988: 979: 978: 977: 967: 961: 955: 946:Before posting 942: 938: 937: 930: 922: 917: 915: 912: 911: 905: 900: 899: 892: 889: 888: 886: 885: 880: 875: 874: 873: 868: 863: 858: 853: 848: 838: 833: 832: 831: 826: 824:Reference desk 821: 816: 808: 807: 806: 801: 791: 790: 789: 784: 779: 770: 768: 764: 763: 761: 760: 755: 745: 740: 739: 738: 733: 728: 718: 713: 708: 702: 700: 696: 695: 693: 692: 687: 686: 685: 680: 675: 670: 665: 660: 650: 645: 640: 635: 630: 625: 623:History merges 619: 617: 613: 612: 610: 609: 604: 602:Titleblacklist 599: 594: 593: 592: 587: 577: 572: 567: 562: 557: 552: 547: 542: 540:External links 537: 532: 531: 530: 525: 517: 511: 509: 505: 504: 502: 501: 496: 491: 486: 481: 476: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 445: 444: 439: 430: 428: 424: 423: 408: 405: 404: 397: 396: 389: 382: 374: 367: 362: 361: 357: 355: 353: 350: 349: 346: 344: 341: 340: 336: 334: 332: 329: 328: 325: 323: 320: 319: 315: 313: 311: 308: 307: 304: 302: 299: 298: 294: 292: 290: 287: 286: 283: 281: 278: 277: 274: 272: 270: 267: 266: 263: 261: 258: 257: 254: 252: 250: 247: 246: 243: 241: 238: 237: 234: 232: 230: 227: 225: 222: 221: 218: 216: 213: 210: 209: 206: 202: 201: 175: 170: 169: 154: 133: 111: 80: 74: 72: 54: 46: 37: 33: 32: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 14944: 14933: 14930: 14929: 14927: 14913: 14904: 14895: 14886: 14877: 14873: 14850: 14846: 14845: 14840: 14835: 14827: 14824: 14823: 14822: 14817: 14814: 14811: 14806: 14801: 14800: 14799: 14795: 14789: 14785: 14778: 14777: 14774: 14771: 14767: 14764: 14761: 14758: 14755: 14752: 14749: 14746: 14743: 14740: 14737: 14734: 14731: 14726: 14723: 14722: 14714: 14711: 14702: 14698: 14694: 14690: 14689: 14688: 14687: 14680: 14676: 14672: 14668: 14667: 14664: 14660: 14656: 14652: 14648: 14641: 14640: 14639: 14633: 14627: 14623: 14618: 14615: 14614: 14598: 14595: 14591: 14587: 14583: 14582: 14581: 14575: 14569: 14565: 14560: 14556: 14555: 14554: 14549: 14543: 14538: 14537: 14536: 14530: 14524: 14520: 14515: 14511: 14507: 14506: 14505: 14502: 14496: 14490: 14486: 14482: 14481: 14457: 14453: 14449: 14444: 14435: 14434: 14433: 14432: 14429: 14425: 14421: 14416: 14415: 14412: 14408: 14404: 14400: 14396: 14392: 14374: 14365: 14361: 14357: 14353: 14349: 14348: 14347: 14344: 14338: 14332: 14327: 14323: 14319: 14315: 14311: 14305: 14301: 14297: 14293: 14289: 14285: 14284: 14283: 14282: 14281: 14280: 14273: 14269: 14265: 14261: 14256: 14255: 14254: 14249: 14243: 14238: 14234: 14233: 14232: 14231: 14228: 14221: 14217: 14215:the skomorokh 14210: 14206: 14202: 14198: 14194: 14193: 14188: 14184: 14183: 14172: 14168: 14164: 14159: 14158: 14157: 14156: 14155: 14154: 14153: 14152: 14151: 14150: 14141: 14137: 14135:the skomorokh 14129: 14128: 14127: 14126: 14125: 14124: 14123: 14122: 14115: 14111: 14107: 14103: 14099: 14095: 14091: 14090: 14089: 14088: 14087: 14086: 14081: 14077: 14075:the skomorokh 14070: 14069: 14068: 14067: 14064: 14060: 14056: 14052: 14048: 14047: 14042: 14038: 14036:the skomorokh 14031: 14030:Jason Fortuny 14027: 14023: 14022: 14021: 14017: 14013: 14009: 14005: 14001: 14000: 13997: 13986: 13983: 13977: 13971: 13966: 13962: 13961: 13960: 13959: 13958: 13957: 13952: 13948: 13944: 13943:Cameron Scott 13940: 13936: 13935: 13934: 13933: 13930: 13927: 13926:Baseball Bugs 13923: 13919: 13918: 13911: 13907: 13903: 13902:Cameron Scott 13895: 13894: 13893: 13892: 13891: 13890: 13884: 13880: 13879: 13878: 13877: 13872: 13868: 13864: 13863:Cameron Scott 13859: 13855: 13854: 13853: 13852: 13849: 13845: 13841: 13837: 13829: 13825: 13821: 13817: 13816: 13813: 13809: 13805: 13804:StephenBuxton 13801: 13800: 13792: 13788: 13784: 13780: 13778: 13774: 13770: 13766: 13762: 13758: 13755: 13753: 13749: 13748: 13744: 13740: 13733: 13732: 13728: 13709: 13705: 13701: 13697: 13696: 13695: 13694: 13693: 13690: 13686: 13682: 13676: 13673: 13670: 13667: 13664: 13661: 13658: 13655: 13652: 13649: 13646: 13643: 13640: 13637: 13634: 13631: 13628: 13625: 13622: 13617: 13616:174.131.11.88 13612: 13610: 13607: 13603: 13599: 13592: 13589: 13586: 13583: 13580: 13577: 13574: 13571: 13568: 13565: 13562: 13559: 13556: 13553: 13550: 13547: 13544: 13541: 13538: 13533: 13528: 13526: 13523: 13519: 13515: 13511: 13510:162.39.211.92 13508: 13506: 13503: 13499: 13495: 13488: 13485: 13482: 13479: 13476: 13473: 13470: 13467: 13464: 13461: 13458: 13455: 13452: 13449: 13446: 13443: 13440: 13437: 13434: 13429: 13428:162.39.211.92 13424: 13422: 13419: 13415: 13411: 13404: 13401: 13398: 13395: 13392: 13389: 13386: 13383: 13380: 13377: 13374: 13371: 13368: 13365: 13362: 13359: 13356: 13353: 13350: 13345: 13337: 13334: 13331: 13328: 13325: 13322: 13319: 13316: 13313: 13310: 13307: 13304: 13301: 13298: 13295: 13292: 13289: 13286: 13283: 13278: 13277:98.18.130.129 13273: 13272: 13271: 13267: 13263: 13259: 13258: 13257: 13254: 13250: 13246: 13242: 13239: 13236: 13235: 13234: 13231: 13227: 13223: 13219: 13212: 13209: 13206: 13203: 13200: 13197: 13194: 13191: 13188: 13185: 13182: 13179: 13176: 13173: 13170: 13167: 13164: 13161: 13158: 13153: 13152:150.226.95.18 13148: 13147: 13146: 13142: 13138: 13134: 13131: 13130: 13118: 13115: 13112: 13108: 13104: 13100: 13099: 13098: 13097: 13092: 13088: 13084: 13080: 13077: 13074: 13071: 13070: 13069: 13068: 13065: 13061: 13057: 13053: 13052: 13049: 13046: 13043: 13039: 13035: 13034: 13031: 13028: 13026: 13023: 13022: 13017: 13016: 13012: 13011: 13008: 13005: 13003: 13000: 12999: 12991: 12988: 12985: 12963: 12960: 12957: 12953: 12952: 12949: 12945: 12941: 12937: 12933: 12932: 12929: 12925: 12921: 12917: 12916: 12913: 12910: 12908: 12904: 12887: 12876: 12873: 12872: 12871: 12867: 12866: 12859: 12858: 12857: 12854: 12850: 12847: 12844: 12840: 12837: 12833: 12832: 12831: 12828: 12827: 12826: 12822: 12821: 12814: 12810: 12809: 12796: 12793: 12792: 12787: 12780: 12779: 12778: 12774: 12770: 12766: 12765: 12764: 12760: 12756: 12752: 12751: 12750: 12747: 12745: 12741: 12740: 12739: 12735: 12731: 12726: 12725: 12724: 12721: 12719: 12715: 12711: 12707: 12706: 12694: 12690: 12686: 12682: 12678: 12674: 12670: 12668: 12666: 12664: 12662: 12660: 12658: 12655: 12651: 12647: 12643: 12639: 12635: 12631: 12627: 12623: 12619: 12615: 12611: 12607: 12603: 12599: 12596: 12595: 12594: 12593: 12592: 12591: 12586: 12578: 12573: 12569: 12566: 12563: 12559: 12554: 12553: 12552: 12551: 12546: 12538: 12532: 12528: 12524: 12520: 12519: 12518: 12517: 12514: 12510: 12506: 12502: 12498: 12494: 12490: 12487: 12485: 12483: 12480: 12476: 12475: 12471: 12467: 12463: 12450: 12447: 12441: 12435: 12430: 12429: 12428: 12424: 12420: 12415: 12414: 12413: 12410: 12408: 12403: 12401: 12395: 12394: 12393: 12392: 12386: 12385: 12384: 12383: 12380: 12376: 12372: 12365: 12358: 12357: 12348: 12341: 12336: 12332: 12327: 12324: 12321: 12318: 12316: 12310: 12307: 12303: 12298: 12295: 12292: 12289: 12285: 12282: 12279: 12275: 12271: 12268: 12264: 12260: 12256: 12252: 12248: 12244: 12240: 12236: 12232: 12228: 12224: 12220: 12215: 12212: 12208: 12204: 12200: 12197: 12193: 12189: 12185: 12181: 12177: 12173: 12169: 12165: 12161: 12157: 12154: 12150: 12146: 12142: 12138: 12134: 12130: 12126: 12122: 12118: 12114: 12111: 12107: 12103: 12100: 12096: 12092: 12089: 12085: 12081: 12080: 12072: 12068: 12064: 12060: 12056: 12052: 12049: 12048: 12047: 12046: 12045: 12044: 12038: 12034: 12030: 12029: 12028: 12027: 12021: 12017: 12013: 12009: 12008: 12007: 12006: 12000: 11998: 11994: 11988: 11984: 11979: 11978: 11977: 11976: 11972: 11968: 11967: 11963: 11959: 11955: 11951: 11947: 11943: 11939: 11935: 11934: 11928: 11923: 11919: 11916: 11915: 11914: 11913: 11906: 11902: 11898: 11897: 11896: 11895: 11888: 11884: 11880: 11879: 11878: 11877: 11873: 11869: 11865: 11860: 11857: 11856: 11852: 11847: 11843: 11842: 11834: 11829: 11828: 11827: 11826: 11825: 11824: 11819: 11815: 11811: 11806: 11805: 11803: 11799: 11795: 11791: 11787: 11783: 11779: 11774: 11773: 11770: 11766: 11762: 11757: 11756: 11744: 11740: 11736: 11732: 11731:edit comments 11729:and also the 11728: 11724: 11723: 11722: 11721: 11720: 11719: 11718: 11717: 11716: 11715: 11705: 11704: 11703: 11702: 11701: 11700: 11699: 11698: 11691: 11687: 11683: 11678: 11677: 11675: 11671: 11667: 11666: 11665: 11664: 11658: 11657: 11656: 11655: 11651: 11647: 11643: 11639: 11636:is basically 11635: 11631: 11630: 11626: 11622: 11619: 11615: 11612: 11608: 11604: 11602: 11599: 11596: 11592: 11589: 11588: 11585: 11581: 11577: 11573: 11569: 11549: 11546: 11540: 11534: 11530: 11525: 11524: 11523: 11520: 11518: 11513: 11510: 11502: 11498: 11494: 11490: 11486: 11482: 11481: 11480: 11477: 11471: 11465: 11461: 11457: 11456: 11455: 11452: 11446: 11440: 11435: 11434: 11433: 11432: 11429: 11425: 11421: 11418:heartbeat. -- 11416: 11413: 11412: 11409: 11405: 11401: 11396: 11391: 11390: 11387: 11384: 11381: 11377: 11374: 11371: 11368: 11365: 11362: 11359: 11356: 11353: 11350: 11347: 11344: 11341: 11336: 11333: 11332: 11329: 11326: 11320: 11314: 11282: 11275: 11271: 11266: 11250: 11246: 11242: 11239: 11238: 11237: 11236: 11235: 11234: 11233: 11232: 11231: 11230: 11229: 11228: 11217: 11214: 11210: 11209: 11208: 11204: 11200: 11196: 11195: 11194: 11193: 11192: 11191: 11190: 11189: 11182: 11175: 11171: 11166: 11150: 11145: 11140: 11139: 11138: 11137: 11136: 11135: 11128: 11124: 11120: 11116: 11115: 11114: 11113: 11112: 11111: 11106: 11102: 11090: 11086: 11085: 11084: 11083: 11080: 11076: 11071: 11067: 11063: 11062: 11059: 11052: 11048: 11044: 11020: 11016: 11012: 11008: 11007: 11006: 11002: 10998: 10994: 10990: 10989: 10976: 10968: 10964: 10963: 10958: 10954: 10953: 10935: 10932: 10930: 10925: 10923: 10917: 10913: 10905: 10902: 10901:Baseball Bugs 10898: 10897: 10896: 10891: 10889: 10884: 10878: 10877: 10876: 10873: 10872:Baseball Bugs 10868: 10867: 10866: 10865: 10858: 10855: 10851: 10850: 10849: 10848: 10847: 10843: 10839: 10833: 10831:been alerted? 10830: 10826: 10825: 10820: 10817: 10816:Baseball Bugs 10813: 10812: 10811: 10810: 10791: 10787: 10783: 10774: 10770: 10769: 10768: 10764: 10760: 10756: 10752: 10750: 10747: 10746:Baseball Bugs 10743: 10742: 10741: 10738: 10737: 10736: 10732: 10731: 10724: 10723: 10722: 10719: 10718:Baseball Bugs 10715: 10714: 10713: 10709: 10703: 10699: 10692: 10691: 10690: 10687: 10686:Baseball Bugs 10683: 10682: 10681: 10677: 10673: 10669: 10668: 10667: 10664: 10663:Baseball Bugs 10660: 10656: 10655: 10654: 10653: 10650: 10647: 10644: 10640: 10639: 10634: 10630: 10626: 10625:Cameron Scott 10622: 10621: 10620: 10619: 10601: 10597: 10591: 10590: 10587: 10582: 10577: 10576: 10571: 10570: 10563: 10559: 10555: 10554:Cameron Scott 10551: 10550: 10549: 10548: 10547: 10546: 10541: 10537: 10531: 10527: 10520: 10519: 10518: 10517: 10514: 10510: 10506: 10505: 10502: 10499: 10495: 10491: 10490: 10482: 10479: 10478: 10473: 10472: 10466: 10462: 10461: 10452: 10448: 10446:the skomorokh 10441: 10437: 10436: 10435: 10434: 10433: 10432: 10431: 10430: 10425: 10421: 10417: 10413: 10412: 10411: 10410: 10394: 10391: 10389: 10386: 10377: 10373: 10372: 10371: 10367: 10363: 10358: 10356: 10353: 10352:Baseball Bugs 10349: 10348: 10347: 10343: 10339: 10335: 10331: 10327: 10326: 10325: 10321: 10317: 10313: 10312: 10311: 10307: 10303: 10299: 10295: 10291: 10289: 10285: 10281: 10276: 10275: 10267: 10263: 10259: 10255: 10254: 10251: 10246: 10242: 10241: 10235: 10232: 10228: 10227: 10224: 10221: 10220: 10217: 10212: 10208: 10204: 10203: 10199: 10196: 10194: 10191: 10190: 10168: 10165: 10159: 10158: 10157: 10156: 10155: 10154: 10153: 10152: 10151: 10150: 10149: 10148: 10147: 10146: 10145: 10144: 10129: 10126: 10124: 10119: 10116: 10109: 10108: 10107: 10106: 10105: 10104: 10103: 10102: 10101: 10100: 10099: 10098: 10097: 10096: 10083: 10080: 10073: 10072: 10071: 10070: 10069: 10068: 10067: 10066: 10065: 10064: 10063: 10062: 10051: 10048: 10044: 10041: 10036: 10035: 10034: 10033: 10032: 10031: 10030: 10029: 10028: 10027: 10018: 10014: 10010: 10006: 10003: 9999: 9995: 9991: 9990: 9989: 9988: 9987: 9986: 9985: 9984: 9977: 9974: 9972: 9967: 9964: 9957: 9956: 9955: 9954: 9953: 9952: 9947: 9944: 9940: 9936: 9932: 9928: 9927:District Bank 9924: 9920: 9916: 9912: 9911: 9910: 9909: 9906: 9903: 9901: 9896: 9893: 9885: 9881: 9876: 9875: 9870: 9867: 9863: 9859: 9858: 9857: 9856: 9853: 9850: 9844: 9839: 9838: 9835: 9832: 9827: 9826: 9819: 9815: 9814: 9808: 9804: 9800: 9796: 9792: 9788: 9783: 9779: 9778: 9770: 9766: 9762: 9758: 9757: 9753: 9749: 9748:Piolo Pascual 9745: 9744: 9741: 9737: 9734: 9733: 9729: 9725: 9721: 9717: 9713: 9710: 9709: 9706: 9701: 9696: 9695: 9691: 9686: 9682: 9676: 9672: 9668: 9663: 9662: 9661: 9657: 9651: 9647: 9640: 9636: 9632: 9624: 9620: 9616: 9612: 9608: 9604: 9603: 9602: 9601: 9600: 9599: 9598: 9597: 9596: 9595: 9580: 9576: 9570: 9566: 9558: 9557: 9556: 9555: 9554: 9553: 9552: 9551: 9550: 9549: 9548: 9547: 9546: 9545: 9534: 9529: 9524: 9523: 9519: 9514: 9509: 9505: 9501: 9497: 9493: 9492: 9491: 9490: 9489: 9488: 9487: 9486: 9485: 9481: 9477: 9473: 9468: 9464: 9460: 9456: 9452: 9449: 9448: 9446: 9442: 9438: 9434: 9430: 9426: 9418: 9414: 9408: 9404: 9397: 9392: 9391: 9390: 9389: 9388: 9384: 9380: 9376: 9371: 9370: 9369: 9364: 9359: 9358: 9354: 9349: 9343: 9339: 9335: 9330: 9326: 9323: 9322: 9321: 9316: 9311: 9310: 9306: 9301: 9300: 9299: 9295: 9291: 9287: 9283: 9282: 9279: 9276: 9272: 9255: 9240: 9236: 9232: 9228: 9224: 9220: 9219: 9218: 9215: 9212: 9209: 9204: 9203: 9202: 9199: 9193: 9187: 9183: 9178: 9177: 9176: 9173: 9170: 9167: 9163: 9162: 9161: 9156: 9150: 9149: 9147: 9140: 9136: 9132: 9131: 9109: 9105: 9104: 9098: 9091: 9090: 9083: 9079: 9078: 9072: 9065: 9064: 9063: 9060: 9055: 9054: 9053: 9052: 9049: 9038: 9033: 9028: 9024: 9023: 9022: 9018: 9014: 9010: 9008: 9005: 9003: 9001: 9000: 8993: 8992: 8991: 8987: 8983: 8979: 8978: 8975: 8960: 8956: 8952: 8947: 8946: 8945: 8942: 8941:Baseball Bugs 8937: 8936: 8935: 8931: 8927: 8923: 8918: 8913: 8912: 8911: 8910: 8909: 8908: 8903: 8900: 8899:Baseball Bugs 8895: 8894: 8893: 8889: 8885: 8881: 8877: 8873: 8872: 8869: 8865: 8861: 8833: 8830: 8828: 8827: 8820: 8817: 8816: 8815: 8814: 8812: 8809: 8807: 8803: 8799: 8795: 8794:WP:SOCK#LEGIT 8791: 8790: 8789: 8786: 8776: 8775: 8760: 8756: 8752: 8747: 8746: 8745: 8742: 8741: 8733: 8727: 8724: 8723: 8721:Postlethwaite 8712: 8711: 8710: 8707: 8706: 8700: 8699: 8691: 8690: 8689: 8688: 8676: 8672: 8668: 8664: 8660: 8659: 8658: 8655: 8651: 8650: 8649: 8645: 8633: 8629: 8628: 8617: 8613: 8609: 8605: 8601: 8599: 8595: 8589: 8585: 8579:intervention 8578: 8574: 8573: 8571: 8570: 8569: 8565: 8559: 8555: 8548: 8544: 8540: 8536: 8535: 8534: 8530: 8524: 8520: 8513: 8509: 8505: 8501: 8500: 8499: 8495: 8491: 8486: 8485: 8481: 8473: 8469: 8465: 8461: 8458: 8457: 8454: 8451: 8446: 8445: 8437: 8436: 8433: 8429: 8424: 8420: 8417: 8413: 8412: 8402: 8400: 8395: 8390: 8382: 8381: 8380: 8376: 8372: 8367: 8366: 8365: 8361: 8357: 8353: 8351: 8347: 8343: 8338: 8337: 8336: 8332: 8328: 8324: 8323: 8307: 8303: 8299: 8294: 8293: 8292: 8289: 8288: 8283: 8282: 8281: 8277: 8276: 8275: 8271: 8267: 8262: 8261: 8260: 8259: 8256: 8253: 8250: 8248: 8245: 8242: 8240: 8237: 8235:on talk page 8234: 8232: 8229: 8226: 8223: 8222: 8216: 8215: 8214: 8213: 8210: 8207: 8201: 8195: 8190: 8186: 8182: 8181: 8176: 8175: 8164: 8161: 8160: 8155: 8150: 8149: 8148: 8147: 8146: 8145: 8144: 8143: 8142: 8141: 8132: 8128: 8127: 8119: 8118: 8117: 8116: 8115: 8114: 8113: 8112: 8105: 8101: 8095: 8094: 8093: 8092: 8091: 8090: 8082: 8078: 8077: 8076: 8075: 8074: 8073: 8066: 8062: 8061: 8054: 8053: 8052: 8051: 8050: 8049: 8044: 8040: 8036: 8032: 8031: 8030: 8029: 8026: 8022: 8017: 8013: 8012: 8007: 8003: 7999: 7995: 7994: 7993: 7992: 7989: 7985: 7981: 7976: 7975: 7965: 7961: 7957: 7953: 7949: 7948: 7947: 7943: 7939: 7935: 7934: 7927: 7924: 7918: 7912: 7908: 7907: 7906: 7902: 7898: 7894: 7893: 7892: 7891: 7884: 7881: 7876: 7875: 7868: 7867: 7866: 7865: 7864: 7863: 7858: 7854: 7853: 7846: 7843: 7842: 7841: 7840: 7837: 7833: 7829: 7825: 7821: 7816: 7815: 7812: 7808: 7804: 7780: 7777: 7776: 7775: 7767: 7766: 7765: 7764: 7757: 7753: 7749: 7744: 7743: 7742: 7741: 7740: 7739: 7734: 7730: 7726: 7722: 7721: 7720: 7719: 7716: 7713: 7712: 7711: 7702: 7701: 7696: 7693: 7689: 7685: 7684: 7683: 7679: 7675: 7671: 7663: 7659: 7655: 7650: 7646: 7643: 7642: 7641: 7632: 7631: 7630: 7629: 7628: 7625: 7621: 7617: 7616: 7615: 7612: 7611: 7610: 7601: 7600: 7599: 7598: 7591: 7588: 7587: 7586: 7577: 7572: 7571: 7570: 7569: 7568: 7567: 7562: 7558: 7554: 7549: 7548: 7547: 7546: 7543: 7539: 7535: 7530: 7529: 7524: 7523: 7518: 7514: 7500: 7496: 7492: 7487: 7483: 7482: 7481: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7467: 7466: 7465: 7461: 7457: 7453: 7448: 7447: 7446: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7432: 7431: 7430: 7426: 7422: 7417: 7416: 7415: 7412: 7411: 7410: 7401: 7400: 7399: 7395: 7391: 7387: 7383: 7379: 7378: 7367: 7363: 7357: 7353: 7346: 7342: 7338: 7334: 7331: 7330: 7326: 7325: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7314: 7310: 7305: 7304: 7303: 7299: 7295: 7290: 7289: 7288: 7284: 7280: 7276: 7275: 7270: 7267: 7264: 7260: 7255: 7254: 7253: 7249: 7245: 7241: 7240: 7231: 7227: 7223: 7218: 7217: 7216: 7212: 7208: 7204: 7200: 7196: 7195: 7194: 7190: 7186: 7182: 7181: 7180: 7177: 7173: 7170: 7169: 7144: 7140: 7136: 7131: 7129: 7125: 7121: 7117: 7113: 7109: 7105: 7101: 7097: 7093: 7089: 7086: 7085: 7084: 7081: 7075: 7069: 7065: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7054: 7050: 7045: 7044: 7043: 7039: 7035: 7031: 7027: 7026: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7022: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7018: 7017: 7016: 7015: 7014: 7013: 7012: 7011: 7010: 6993: 6989: 6983: 6979: 6972: 6968: 6967: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6954: 6953: 6938: 6934: 6930: 6925: 6924: 6923: 6922: 6921: 6920: 6919: 6918: 6917: 6916: 6915: 6914: 6913: 6912: 6899: 6895: 6889: 6885: 6879: 6876: 6875: 6874: 6873: 6872: 6871: 6870: 6869: 6868: 6867: 6866: 6865: 6854: 6850: 6846: 6842: 6838: 6837: 6836: 6835: 6834: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6830: 6829: 6820: 6817: 6815: 6809: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6795: 6791: 6787: 6782: 6781: 6780: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6772: 6768: 6762: 6758: 6751:</ref: --> 6749: 6745: 6744: 6743: 6742: 6738: 6734: 6730: 6726: 6725: 6714: 6713: 6712: 6709: 6703: 6697: 6692: 6688: 6687: 6686: 6682: 6678: 6674: 6670: 6669: 6668: 6664: 6660: 6655: 6651: 6650: 6647: 6632: 6628: 6624: 6619: 6618: 6617: 6613: 6609: 6604: 6603: 6602: 6599: 6596: 6591: 6587: 6583: 6579: 6575: 6571: 6567: 6563: 6559: 6558: 6557: 6543: 6542: 6535: 6532: 6527: 6524: 6519: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6506: 6505: 6504: 6501: 6497: 6493: 6488: 6487: 6484: 6480: 6476: 6472: 6467: 6463: 6460: 6459: 6442: 6438: 6434: 6429: 6427: 6424: 6422: 6420: 6419: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6394: 6389: 6388: 6387: 6373: 6372: 6365: 6362: 6357: 6356: 6355: 6354: 6353: 6350: 6349: 6342: 6338: 6334: 6330: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6320: 6316: 6308: 6307: 6306: 6303: 6299: 6292: 6284: 6280: 6276: 6273: 6269: 6265: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6256: 6250: 6246: 6245: 6244: 6241: 6237: 6233: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6224: 6217: 6216: 6204: 6200: 6196: 6192: 6191: 6190: 6187: 6181: 6177: 6176: 6175: 6172: 6171: 6164: 6163: 6146: 6142: 6138: 6133: 6132: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6123: 6119: 6114: 6110: 6107: 6106: 6099: 6097: 6094: 6089: 6088: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6066: 6065: 6064: 6063: 6062: 6061: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6056: 6055: 6044: 6040: 6036: 6031: 6027: 6026: 6025: 6024: 6023: 6022: 6021: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6006: 6005: 6004: 5998: 5993: 5992: 5985: 5981: 5977: 5972: 5971: 5968: 5963: 5958: 5954: 5953:User:Kotniski 5950: 5949: 5948: 5947: 5946: 5945: 5940: 5936: 5932: 5928: 5924: 5923: 5922: 5921: 5918: 5915: 5911: 5910: 5907: 5902: 5897: 5893: 5892:User:Kotniski 5889: 5885: 5882: 5881: 5868: 5865: 5864: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5851: 5846: 5844: 5840: 5836: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5827: 5826: 5819: 5818: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5804: 5798: 5795: 5794: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5780: 5776: 5771: 5770: 5769: 5766: 5765: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5752: 5748: 5744: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5734: 5731: 5730: 5723: 5719: 5715: 5712: 5709: 5706: 5703: 5700: 5697: 5694: 5691: 5688: 5685: 5682: 5679: 5676: 5673: 5670: 5667: 5664: 5661: 5658: 5655: 5652: 5649: 5646: 5643: 5642: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5627: 5626: 5623: 5619: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5604: 5603: 5600: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5587: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5544: 5540: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5523: 5521: 5518: 5514: 5510: 5506: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5496: 5492: 5488: 5483: 5478: 5477: 5474: 5471: 5466: 5463: 5462: 5456: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5431: 5430: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5371: 5367: 5362: 5361: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5348: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5337: 5333: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5322: 5318: 5314: 5310: 5307: 5306: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5289: 5281: 5278: 5275: 5272: 5268: 5264: 5261: 5257: 5254: 5251: 5248: 5244: 5241: 5237: 5234: 5231: 5228: 5224: 5221: 5217: 5214: 5211: 5208: 5205: 5200: 5199:Einsteindonut 5194: 5190: 5189: 5177: 5173: 5169: 5168: 5163: 5159: 5158: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5143: 5140: 5138: 5133: 5131: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5119: 5115: 5111: 5108: 5105: 5101: 5100:Einsteindonut 5097: 5094: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5082: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5052: 5046: 5043: 5040: 5037: 5034: 5031: 5028: 5025: 5022: 5019: 5016: 5013: 5010: 5005: 5004:Einsteindonut 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4995: 4992: 4988: 4987: 4982: 4978: 4974: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4946: 4921: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4905: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4886: 4885: 4881: 4877: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4863: 4862: 4861: 4860: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4799: 4795: 4792: 4789: 4786: 4782: 4779: 4775: 4772: 4769: 4766: 4762: 4759: 4755: 4752: 4749: 4746: 4743: 4738: 4732: 4729: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4694: 4688: 4684: 4677: 4676:properly move 4672: 4671: 4670: 4665: 4662: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4648: 4642: 4638: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4612: 4609: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4601: 4600: 4599: 4598: 4591: 4588: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4579: 4575: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4564: 4561: 4557: 4556: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4527: 4523: 4519: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4495: 4490: 4489: 4486: 4483: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4470: 4464: 4461: 4458: 4455: 4451: 4447: 4444: 4440: 4437: 4434: 4431: 4427: 4424: 4420: 4417: 4414: 4411: 4407: 4404: 4400: 4397: 4394: 4391: 4388: 4383: 4378: 4377: 4374:-- more drama 4373: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4325: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4311: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4295: 4288: 4286: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4273: 4263: 4262: 4260: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4234: 4233: 4226: 4223: 4216: 4214: 4208: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4162: 4152: 4151: 4149: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4131: 4127: 4123: 4118: 4114: 4111: 4109: 4106: 4099: 4097: 4091: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4066: 4063: 4059: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4045: 4042: 4036: 4030: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4010: 4009: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3987: 3984: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3967: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3958: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3944: 3943: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3922: 3918: 3908: 3907: 3905: 3894: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3885: 3878: 3876: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3860: 3857: 3851: 3845: 3840: 3839: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3816: 3813: 3808: 3807: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3769: 3762: 3760: 3754: 3750: 3745: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3729: 3725: 3723: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3706: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3696: 3689: 3687: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3668: 3664: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652:over ten days 3648: 3647: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3633: 3630: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3596: 3593: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3572: 3571: 3569: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3546: 3542: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3517: 3516: 3514: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3490: 3488: 3481: 3478: 3474: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3458: 3453: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3440:own backyard. 3438: 3433: 3430: 3426: 3423: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3407: 3403: 3393: 3392: 3390: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3363: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3338: 3332: 3326: 3321: 3317: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3213: 3210: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3178: 3174: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3149: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3079: 3072: 3070: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3051: 3048: 3047: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3034: 3031: 3024: 3022: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3003: 2999: 2993: 2992: 2987: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2975: 2970: 2968: 2965: 2961: 2956: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2935: 2929: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2864: 2863: 2858: 2855: 2849: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2824: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2809: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2741: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2729: 2724: 2722: 2716: 2714: 2705: 2704: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2684: 2678: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2655: 2652: 2646: 2640: 2639: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2606: 2605: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2593: 2591: 2585: 2583: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2559: 2557: 2551: 2549: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2516: 2514: 2508: 2506: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2478: 2472: 2470: 2459: 2453: 2448: 2446: 2440: 2438: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2423: 2419: 2418:Relata refero 2414: 2410: 2408: 2403: 2399: 2398:Relata refero 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2338: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2322: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2311: 2309: 2303: 2301: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2273: 2268: 2266: 2260: 2258: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2223: 2221: 2215: 2213: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2188: 2184: 2183: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2160: 2158: 2152: 2150: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2031: 2029: 2023: 2021: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2005: 2000: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1978: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1954: 1952: 1946: 1944: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1916: 1911: 1909: 1903: 1901: 1892: 1891: 1888: 1883: 1881: 1875: 1873: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1856: 1854: 1848: 1846: 1838: 1837: 1828: 1823: 1821: 1815: 1813: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714:Moorer Report 1711: 1710:Moorer Report 1707: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1688:Moorer Report 1684: 1679: 1675: 1674:Moorer Report 1670: 1669: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1637: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1562: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1375: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1286: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1261: 1258: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1107: 1104: 1102: 1099: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1011: 1010: 996: 992: 989: 986: 985: 980: 975: 971: 968: 966: 962: 960: 956: 954: 950: 949: 947: 944: 943: 935: 931: 928: 924: 923: 920: 914: 913: 909: 908: 904: 897: 896: 890: 884: 881: 879: 876: 872: 871:Miscellaneous 869: 867: 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 843: 842: 839: 837: 834: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 815: 812: 811: 809: 805: 802: 800: 797: 796: 795: 792: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 774: 772: 771: 769: 765: 759: 756: 753: 749: 746: 744: 741: 737: 734: 732: 729: 727: 724: 723: 722: 719: 717: 714: 712: 709: 707: 704: 703: 701: 697: 691: 688: 684: 681: 679: 676: 674: 671: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 655: 654: 651: 649: 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 620: 618: 616:Page handling 614: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 591: 588: 586: 583: 582: 581: 578: 576: 573: 571: 568: 566: 563: 561: 558: 556: 553: 551: 548: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 529: 526: 524: 521: 520: 518: 516: 513: 512: 510: 506: 500: 497: 495: 492: 490: 487: 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 443: 440: 438: 435: 434: 432: 431: 429: 425: 420: 416: 412: 406: 402: 395: 390: 388: 383: 381: 376: 375: 372: 365: 356: 351: 347: 342: 335: 330: 326: 321: 314: 309: 305: 300: 293: 288: 284: 279: 273: 268: 264: 259: 253: 248: 244: 239: 233: 231: 226: 224: 223: 219: 217: 214: 212: 211: 203: 199: 189: 173: 166: 162: 157: 148: 143: 139: 131: 119: 114: 105: 101: 83: 68: 61: 51:Content added 43: 40: 30: 19: 14912: 14903: 14894: 14885: 14876: 14833:SteelersFan- 14830: 14825: 14787: 14762: 14756: 14750: 14744: 14738: 14732: 14710:Ad infinitum 14621: 14586:Juliancolton 14563: 14518: 14484: 14442: 14398: 14287: 14200: 14191: 13857: 13746: 13742: 13738: 13689:Andy's edits 13681:Andy Mabbett 13671: 13665: 13659: 13653: 13647: 13641: 13635: 13629: 13623: 13606:Andy's edits 13598:Andy Mabbett 13596:(same ISP). 13587: 13581: 13575: 13569: 13563: 13557: 13551: 13545: 13539: 13522:Andy's edits 13514:Andy Mabbett 13509: 13502:Andy's edits 13494:Andy Mabbett 13492:(same ISP). 13483: 13477: 13471: 13465: 13459: 13453: 13447: 13441: 13435: 13418:Andy's edits 13410:Andy Mabbett 13399: 13393: 13387: 13381: 13375: 13369: 13363: 13357: 13351: 13332: 13326: 13320: 13314: 13308: 13302: 13296: 13290: 13284: 13253:Andy's edits 13245:Andy Mabbett 13230:Andy's edits 13222:Andy Mabbett 13207: 13201: 13195: 13189: 13183: 13177: 13171: 13165: 13159: 13029: 13024: 12935: 12870: 12868: 12861: 12845: 12839:YellowMonkey 12825: 12823: 12816: 12782: 12713: 12644:problems re: 12576: 12564: 12558:InternetHero 12536: 12406: 12399: 12346: 12314: 12274:Indus Script 12214:Indus Script 12207:Indus Script 12070: 12036: 11996: 11992: 11990: 11970: 11961: 11942:wikihounding 11926: 11922:his userpage 11871: 11832: 11801: 11742: 11673: 11649: 11616:Using clear 11516: 11508: 11484: 11463: 11372: 11366: 11360: 11354: 11348: 11342: 11248: 11244: 11148: 11070:UltraExactZZ 11066:Gene Simmons 10960: 10928: 10921: 10887: 10882: 10735: 10733: 10726: 10701: 10658: 10573: 10529: 10497: 10476: 10470: 10380: 10379: 10329: 10297: 10293: 10258:Thunderbird2 10238: 10214: 10122: 10114: 10042: 9970: 9962: 9899: 9891: 9823: 9816:You can add 9739: 9735: 9720:Angel Locsin 9694: 9693: 9649: 9638: 9568: 9522: 9521: 9508:Angel Locsin 9496:Angel Locsin 9466: 9441:Angel Locsin 9428: 9406: 9395: 9357: 9356: 9325:Angel Locsin 9309: 9308: 9145: 9144: 9099: 9073: 8998: 8997: 8916: 8825: 8736: 8715: 8702: 8695: 8662: 8631: 8587: 8576: 8557: 8546: 8538: 8522: 8442: 8422: 8416:pseudonymous 8385: 8285: 8243:another one 8178: 8157: 8123: 8057: 7872: 7849: 7826:problem. -- 7770: 7769: 7706: 7705: 7687: 7636: 7635: 7605: 7604: 7581: 7580: 7471: 7470: 7436: 7435: 7405: 7404: 7385: 7355: 7345:intervention 7344: 7340: 7332: 7328: 7327: 7323: 7322: 7273: 7272: 7265: 7120:Badger Drink 7115: 7099: 7095: 7091: 6981: 6887: 6877: 6840: 6760: 6595:Arthur Rubin 6581: 6577: 6569: 6561: 6539: 6470: 6461: 6417: 6416: 6392: 6369: 6345: 6286: 6179: 6166: 6102: 6083: 6030:User:Rjd0060 6009:Juliancolton 5883: 5859: 5821: 5789: 5760: 5742: 5725: 5605: 5564: 5560: 5530: 5508: 5504: 5464: 5286: 5276: 5270: 5259: 5252: 5246: 5239: 5232: 5226: 5219: 5212: 5206: 5165: 5136: 5129: 5106: 5092: 5041: 5035: 5029: 5023: 5017: 5011: 4908:Howdypardner 4902:To clarify, 4814: 4808: 4797: 4790: 4784: 4777: 4770: 4764: 4757: 4750: 4744: 4737:Howdypardner 4727: 4716: 4686: 4675: 4660: 4640: 4493: 4459: 4453: 4442: 4435: 4429: 4422: 4415: 4409: 4402: 4395: 4389: 4355:hunting...-- 4323: 4309: 4284: 4257:chocobogamer 4252: 4251: 4212: 4146:chocobogamer 4141: 4140: 4121: 4116: 4095: 4079: 4071: 3990: 3902:chocobogamer 3897: 3896: 3892: 3874: 3758: 3752: 3748: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3727: 3704: 3685: 3679: 3672:current RfCU 3655: 3651: 3631: 3566:chocobogamer 3561: 3560: 3544: 3511:chocobogamer 3506: 3505: 3486: 3476: 3467: 3456: 3444: 3428: 3421: 3387:chocobogamer 3382: 3381: 3319: 3315: 3277: 3254: 3176: 3147: 3130:wikistalking 3129: 3068: 3062: 3042: 3020: 3014: 3010: 2990: 2984:Concur with 2959: 2957: 2796: 2786: 2743: 2737: 2720: 2712: 2701:Meat Puppets 2608: 2602: 2589: 2581: 2555: 2547: 2531: 2525: 2512: 2504: 2476: 2468: 2462: 2444: 2436: 2391: 2372:by reference 2364:WP:Consensus 2334: 2307: 2299: 2280:They're now 2264: 2256: 2219: 2211: 2180: 2174: 2156: 2148: 2114: 2108: 2090: 2089: 2086:wp:Checkuser 2081: 2080:]) and ] (] 2077: 2073: 2027: 2019: 2002: 1996: 1950: 1942: 1907: 1899: 1879: 1871: 1852: 1844: 1819: 1811: 1650:edit) (undo) 1536:Other links 1174: 990: 982: 969: 945: 893: 841:Village pump 829:New articles 794:Edit filters 773:Arbitration 699:User conduct 484:Open proxies 441: 401:Noticeboards 112:82.31.162.27 14645:—Preceding 14026:Megan Meier 13685:Andy's talk 13602:Andy's talk 13518:Andy's talk 13498:Andy's talk 13414:Andy's talk 13249:Andy's talk 13226:Andy's talk 13218:at it again 12940:PMDrive1061 12654:Taqi al-Din 12608:, and also 12606:Taqi al-Din 12364:schoolblock 12145:Sudharsansn 12065:, or other 12051:User Srkris 12020:User Srkris 12012:User Srkris 11958:User:Srkris 11918:User:Srkris 11868:User Srkris 11859:User Srkris 11810:Ncmvocalist 11761:Ncmvocalist 11638:stalking me 11634:User:Srkris 11632:Looks like 11469:Orange Mike 11335:DrummerMike 11011:Tim Vickers 10975:Kent Hovind 10494:oversignter 10487:BNP members 10234:{home page} 9862:Doug Weller 9761:Starczamora 9615:Starczamora 9504:Starczamora 9476:Starczamora 8982:Tim Vickers 8798:Tim Vickers 8767:ForesticPig 8751:Tim Vickers 8180:sui generis 8016:oversighted 7916:Orange Mike 7486:WP:USER#NOT 7172:WP:BADSITES 7116:too focused 6748:identify DC 6623:Ottava Rima 6586:WP:OVERLINK 6475:Ohconfucius 6195:Ottava Rima 6180:established 6137:Ottava Rima 6118:Ottava Rima 5931:Tim Vickers 5806:timeout. – 5775:Tim Vickers 5747:Tim Vickers 5614:Tim Vickers 5380:Peter cohen 5351:Peter cohen 5303:Attack Page 5274:investigate 4876:Peter cohen 4812:investigate 4704:Peter cohen 4661:L'Aquatique 4457:investigate 4303:FisherQueen 4301:Looks like 2676:Orange Mike 2644:Orange Mike 2370:and noting 2337:USS Liberty 2041:WP:Edit war 787:Enforcement 743:Sockpuppets 648:Importation 607:Translation 519:Copyrights 454:Bureaucrats 208:Line 1,172: 205:Line 1,172: 198:Next edit → 192:new section 42:Next edit → 14760:block user 14754:filter log 14318:verifiable 14008:WP:CSD#G13 13765:WP:SOAPBOX 13669:block user 13639:filter log 13585:block user 13555:filter log 13481:block user 13451:filter log 13397:block user 13367:filter log 13330:block user 13300:filter log 13205:block user 13175:filter log 12996:View rants 12636:. Besides 12577:Blanchardb 12537:Blanchardb 12531:Refraction 12209:articles, 12137:Bharatveer 11950:here again 11682:Taprobanus 11611:WP:POVFORK 11485:reasonable 11370:block user 11364:filter log 10995:. Thanks. 10729:Balloonman 10463:I deleted 10376:editnotice 9752:Brangelina 9231:EdJohnston 9013:dougweller 8878:and begin 8490:dougweller 8464:DuncanHill 8371:GDallimore 8298:GDallimore 8266:GDallimore 8035:GDallimore 7998:GDallimore 7956:EdJohnston 7897:dougweller 7828:Ricky81682 7803:EdJohnston 7725:Restawhile 7686:Well, BLP 7674:Restawhile 7534:Restawhile 7382:this entry 7329:witch-hunt 6675:. Thanks. 6496:PMAnderson 6462:Outrageous 6264:Locke Cole 6249:disruptive 6232:Locke Cole 6213:Locke Cole 6116:to tools. 5997:SlimVirgin 5743:seven days 5531:especially 5509:a week ago 5366:John Nagle 5317:John Nagle 5243:block user 5236:filter log 5114:John Nagle 5063:EdJohnston 5039:block user 5033:filter log 4973:John Nagle 4954:EdJohnston 4912:EdJohnston 4890:John Nagle 4825:John Nagle 4781:block user 4774:filter log 4426:block user 4419:filter log 4070:I do have 3739:mind you, 3660:a template 3607:EdJohnston 3297:Arcayne.-- 3045:Black Kite 2797:Proposal 2 2787:Proposal 1 2131:EdJohnston 2054:EdJohnston 2050:WorldFacts 1774:WorldFacts 972:Contact a 810:Questions 690:Undeletion 683:Miscellany 668:Categories 643:Protection 14766:block log 14713:arguments 14651:Shnitzled 14443:Thank you 14352:WP:BATTLE 14260:WP:BATTLE 14192:The Times 14053:issue? – 13820:Gwen Gale 13783:Gwen Gale 13769:Gwen Gale 13675:block log 13591:block log 13487:block log 13403:block log 13336:block log 13237:Ongoing: 13211:block log 13111:Fut.Perf. 12984:Fut.Perf. 12934:And he's 12673:synthesis 12622:Telescope 12462:Telescope 12419:≈ jossi ≈ 12371:≈ jossi ≈ 11985:. Citing 11954:also here 11938:edit wars 11580:≈ jossi ≈ 11529:who cares 11464:evialllll 11382:See also 11376:block log 11043:Kralizec! 10416:Gwen Gale 10338:Kralizec! 10330:Gwen Gale 10302:Gwen Gale 10163:EyeSerene 10078:EyeSerene 9848:EyeSerene 9607:flamebait 9500:boyfriend 9334:Darkspots 9284:There is 9032:reactions 8951:Jojhutton 8926:Jojhutton 8714:editors. 8667:Shnitzled 8602:It's the 8577:immediate 8539:mediation 8369:article. 7845:PicJungle 7820:PicJungle 7337:consensus 7108:some sort 6971:WP:OUTING 6845:Gwen Gale 6654:WP:UP#NOT 6646:WP:UP#NOT 6514:WT:MOSNUM 5722:WP:MOSNUM 5718:ownership 5263:CheckUser 5250:block log 5162:checkuser 5045:block log 4801:CheckUser 4788:block log 4608:Jehochman 4578:Jehochman 4482:Jehochman 4446:CheckUser 4433:block log 4331:Kralizec! 3954:Fut.Perf. 3812:Fut.Perf. 3667:last RfCU 3592:Fut.Perf. 3282:Fut.Perf. 3259:Jojhutton 3209:Fut.Perf. 3134:Fut.Perf. 3114:Jojhutton 2868:Fut.Perf. 2774:Fut.Perf. 2076:]), ] (] 2046:Yellabina 1175:Incidents 976:directly. 919:Shortcuts 856:Proposals 851:Technical 814:Help desk 799:Requested 758:Vandalism 748:Usernames 721:Sanctions 673:Templates 663:Redirects 590:Whitelist 585:Blacklist 494:Oversight 469:Education 442:Incidents 415:dashboard 14926:Category 14816:friendly 14813:contribs 14736:contribs 14725:Plyjacks 14659:contribs 14647:unsigned 14617:Dear god 14542:MuZemike 14500:contribs 14489:Jayron32 14485:credible 14474:Resolved 14385:Resolved 14342:contribs 14331:Jayron32 14242:MuZemike 14197:WP:BLP1E 14004:WP:BLP1E 13981:contribs 13970:Jayron32 13885:as well. 13761:WP:CIVIL 13627:contribs 13613:And now 13543:contribs 13529:And now 13439:contribs 13425:And now 13355:contribs 13288:contribs 13163:contribs 13056:looie496 12978:Resolved 12897:Resolved 12849:contribs 12836:notified 12646:Ibn Sahl 12642:WP:SYNTH 12620:. As to 12598:Ibn Sahl 12583:- timed 12568:contribs 12543:- timed 12445:contribs 12434:Jayron32 12369:issued. 12198:article. 12196:Sanskrit 12182:and says 12141:Jazzmand 12084:Sanskrit 12055:WP:HOUND 12016:WP:HOUND 11987:WP:BLOCK 11680:example. 11595:WP:CIVIL 11544:contribs 11533:Jayron32 11517:Islander 11450:contribs 11439:Jayron32 11346:contribs 11324:contribs 11313:Jayron32 11307:Resolved 11152:better. 11096:HEFFIELD 11075:Evidence 11037:Resolved 10986:Resolved 10950:Resolved 10834:Cheers, 10616:Resolved 10471:lifebaka 10298:rats ass 10123:Islander 9971:Islander 9900:Islander 9724:Bukidnon 9639:Everyone 9379:Tito Pao 9375:fair use 9290:Tikiwont 9265:Resolved 9197:contribs 9186:Jayron32 9124:Resolved 8854:Resolved 8796:policy? 8665:...lol. 8663:I demand 8639:HEFFIELD 8356:CIreland 8342:CIreland 8251:new one 8205:contribs 8194:Jayron32 7797:Resolved 7269:contribs 7257:account 7100:reasoned 7079:contribs 7068:Jayron32 6707:contribs 6696:Jayron32 6347:HWV 258 6254:Tiptoety 6185:Tiptoety 6104:HWV 258 5976:Kotniski 5630:Karanacs 5513:Bishonen 5448:Bishonen 5434:looie496 5412:Resolved 5378:Agreed-- 5313:WP:TROLL 5216:contribs 5110:contribs 5096:contribs 5015:contribs 4968:WP:TROLL 4754:contribs 4731:contribs 4399:contribs 4327:contribs 4313:contribs 4072:multiple 4040:contribs 4029:Jayron32 3931:Solution 3855:contribs 3844:Jayron32 3741:derailed 3705:accounts 3449:duckhood 3336:contribs 3325:Jayron32 3316:in favor 3089:looie496 2933:contribs 2922:Jayron32 2853:contribs 2842:Jayron32 2772:banned. 2768:Resolved 2665:IronDuke 2411:Oh, and 1424:archives 1302:archives 1180:archives 1058:archives 861:Idea lab 819:Teahouse 782:Requests 658:Articles 528:Problems 165:contribs 66:Wikitext 14826:Support 14693:ukexpat 14625:endaliv 14567:endaliv 14522:endaliv 14448:ukexpat 14420:barneca 14403:barneca 14391:ukexpat 14326:neutral 14163:barneca 14106:ukexpat 14055:ukexpat 14012:barneca 13965:WP:NPOV 13883:Damiens 13133:Barneca 13019:effort. 12907:GraemeL 12834:I have 12272:In the 12201:In the 12082:In the 11672:. ] (] 11648:. ] (] 11593:with a 11576:WP:RFCs 11489:barneca 11420:barneca 11241:barneca 11119:barneca 10997:Aramgar 10957:GDonato 10782:barneca 10773:WP:DOLT 10753:Oooops 10294:muslims 10009:Hroðulf 9825:ЯEDVERS 9795:history 9700:My work 9528:My work 9437:ABS-CBN 9363:My work 9315:My work 9208:Yngvarr 9182:WP:DUCK 9166:Yngvarr 9139:WP:SOCK 8999:Realist 8884:Protonk 8876:WP:BOLD 8739:MBisanz 8608:Uncle G 8444:ЯEDVERS 7874:ЯEDVERS 7259:Mmmovie 7203:WP:USER 7104:Web 2.0 6551:oetica! 6418:Realist 6400:Georgia 6393:another 6381:oetica! 6314:Georgia 6169:MBisanz 5862:MBisanz 5824:MBisanz 5792:MBisanz 5763:MBisanz 5728:MBisanz 5608:, This 5535:Rjd0060 5491:Rjd0060 5332:JoshuaZ 5148:JoshuaZ 5086:Spartaz 4991:Spartaz 4587:Spartaz 4574:WP:RFCU 4560:Spartaz 4478:WP:MEAT 4474:WP:SOCK 4357:Crossmr 4285:Arcayne 4238:Crossmr 4213:Arcayne 4172:Crossmr 4126:Crossmr 4096:Arcayne 4087:before. 4014:Crossmr 3995:Crossmr 3875:Arcayne 3869:subpage 3825:Crossmr 3778:Crossmr 3759:Arcayne 3714:Crossmr 3686:Arcayne 3637:Crossmr 3487:Arcayne 3347:Crossmr 3320:opposed 3299:Crossmr 3222:Poltair 3194:Poltair 3153:Poltair 3105:Arcayne 3069:Arcayne 3021:Arcayne 3011:Comment 2974:Blueboy 2964:Blueboy 2883:Crossmr 2791:WP:DUCK 1982:Collect 1676:on the 1613:Theory. 1599:of 2003 1555:Backlog 934:WP:AN/I 628:Mergers 427:General 14619:... —/ 14399:Update 14094:WP:BLP 14051:WP:BLP 13757:WP:AGF 13729:again, 13083:Taemyr 12864:Enigma 12819:Enigma 12744:Stefan 12718:Stefan 12710:WP:BIO 12652:, and 12638:WP:ROC 12523:WP:ROC 12423:(talk) 12407:Shadow 12375:(talk) 12325:& 12315:latest 12033:WP:ANI 11983:WP:ANI 11899:Also, 11605:Doing 11584:(talk) 11395:WP:IAR 10929:Shadow 10888:Marlin 10883:Orange 10755:WP:NLT 10646:(talk) 10643:Friday 10438:Well, 10334:WP:RBI 10240:Greg L 10040:WP:SCV 9843:WP:SCV 9635:WP:NPA 9513:animal 9135:WP:SSP 8922:WP:BRD 8860:Modocc 8824:forest 8810:Thanks 8772:Update 8704:Parkin 8697:Sticky 8480:Libro0 8189:WP:IAR 8185:WP:BLP 7824:WP:COI 7576:WP:BLP 7526:blogs. 7452:WP:BLP 7341:really 7199:WP:BLP 7030:WP:BLP 6813:Avruch 6598:(talk) 6589:edits. 6574:WP:MOS 6566:WP:MOS 6531:WP:MOS 6518:WP:MOS 6510:WT:MOS 6361:WP:MOS 6297:(talk) 5914:Secret 5850:Secret 5470:Secret 5280:cuwiki 5186:Update 5137:Shadow 4818:cuwiki 4463:cuwiki 3737:failed 3735:. Not 3675:there. 3656:chosen 3015:appear 2739:Justin 2713:Narson 2604:Justin 2582:Narson 2548:Narson 2527:Justin 2505:Narson 2469:Narson 2437:Narson 2392:no way 2300:Narson 2286:Jayjg 2257:Narson 2212:Narson 2176:Justin 2171:WP:AGF 2149:Narson 2110:Justin 2020:Narson 1998:Justin 1943:Narson 1900:Narson 1872:Narson 1845:Narson 1812:Narson 1629:entry. 1306:search 1184:search 1062:search 927:WP:ANI 846:Policy 633:Splits 77:Inline 59:Visual 14805:Ioeth 14356:Nsk92 14296:Nsk92 14264:Nsk92 14102:WP:RS 14032:etc. 13858:diffs 13645:WHOIS 13561:WHOIS 13457:WHOIS 13373:WHOIS 13306:WHOIS 13181:WHOIS 12936:still 12675:that 11969:] (] 11925:] (] 11739:WP:RS 11642:WP:RS 11620:edits 11574:, or 11572:WP:3O 11259:ENNIS 11159:ENNIS 10842:deeds 10672:Giano 10661:one. 10659:under 10581:Help! 10503:dodge 9923:WT:CP 9841:from 9803:watch 9799:links 9275:Sarah 9148:levse 8543:WP:DR 8541:(see 8423:after 8394:scent 8389:iride 8320:break 8126:neuro 8060:neuro 7852:neuro 7618:John 7516:blog? 7324:jihad 7112:tl;dr 7096:paced 7092:level 6398:Sandy 6312:Sandy 6290:Maxim 6035:Giano 5565:edits 5561:Edits 4717:Note: 4075:DIFF. 3749:Fitna 3680:never 2991:JodyB 2422:disp. 2402:disp. 2360:WP:DR 1623:WP:RS 984:diffs 951:Read 767:Other 678:Files 638:Moves 597:Style 179:edits 177:5,106 16:< 14810:talk 14748:logs 14730:talk 14697:talk 14675:talk 14655:talk 14561:. —/ 14548:talk 14494:talk 14452:talk 14424:talk 14407:talk 14395:talk 14360:talk 14336:talk 14300:talk 14268:talk 14248:talk 14189:and 14167:talk 14110:talk 14098:WP:V 14059:talk 14016:talk 13975:talk 13947:talk 13906:talk 13867:talk 13824:talk 13808:talk 13787:talk 13773:talk 13767:... 13704:talk 13663:http 13657:RBLs 13651:RDNS 13621:talk 13579:http 13573:RBLs 13567:RDNS 13537:talk 13475:http 13469:RBLs 13463:RDNS 13433:talk 13391:http 13385:RBLs 13379:RDNS 13349:talk 13341:and 13324:http 13318:RBLs 13312:RDNS 13282:talk 13266:talk 13199:http 13193:RBLs 13187:RDNS 13157:talk 13149:Now 13141:talk 13087:talk 13060:talk 12944:talk 12924:talk 12920:John 12905:. -- 12843:talk 12811:Not 12773:talk 12759:talk 12755:Fram 12734:talk 12689:talk 12624:and 12562:talk 12529:and 12527:Lens 12509:talk 12439:talk 12400:Half 12335:talk 12331:Kris 12313:his 12304:and 12245:and 12205:and 12123:and 11952:and 11946:here 11940:and 11814:talk 11798:more 11796:and 11765:talk 11686:talk 11570:via 11538:talk 11509:Talk 11493:talk 11475:Talk 11444:talk 11424:talk 11404:talk 11385:and 11358:logs 11340:talk 11318:talk 11263:ROWN 11247:and 11203:talk 11163:ROWN 11123:talk 11100:TEEL 11047:talk 11015:talk 11001:talk 10962:talk 10922:Half 10786:talk 10763:talk 10676:talk 10629:talk 10558:talk 10509:Talk 10420:talk 10366:talk 10362:Tarc 10342:talk 10320:talk 10316:Tarc 10306:talk 10284:talk 10262:talk 10245:talk 10219:aton 10216:Fnag 10207:here 10115:Talk 10043:does 10013:Talk 9963:Talk 9931:here 9892:Talk 9884:here 9880:here 9807:logs 9791:talk 9787:edit 9765:talk 9728:here 9671:talk 9619:talk 9480:talk 9459:here 9455:here 9383:talk 9338:talk 9294:talk 9235:talk 9191:talk 9154:Talk 9137:and 9133:See 9102:talk 9076:talk 9027:shoy 9017:talk 8986:talk 8955:talk 8930:talk 8888:talk 8864:talk 8802:talk 8755:talk 8718:Ryan 8671:talk 8643:TEEL 8612:talk 8510:and 8494:talk 8468:talk 8375:Talk 8360:talk 8346:talk 8331:talk 8302:Talk 8270:Talk 8199:talk 8039:Talk 8002:Talk 7984:talk 7960:talk 7942:talk 7922:Talk 7913:. -- 7901:talk 7832:talk 7807:talk 7752:talk 7748:John 7729:talk 7688:does 7678:talk 7658:talk 7654:John 7622:. -- 7557:talk 7553:John 7538:talk 7495:talk 7460:talk 7425:talk 7394:talk 7313:talk 7298:talk 7294:John 7283:talk 7263:talk 7248:talk 7244:John 7226:talk 7211:talk 7189:talk 7185:John 7139:talk 7124:talk 7073:talk 7053:talk 7038:talk 7034:John 6933:talk 6929:John 6849:talk 6790:talk 6733:talk 6701:talk 6681:talk 6673:here 6663:talk 6627:talk 6612:talk 6608:Pete 6582:very 6570:real 6562:ever 6512:and 6479:talk 6437:talk 6405:Talk 6333:talk 6319:Talk 6222:ASEM 6199:talk 6141:talk 6122:talk 6092:ergy 6074:talk 6039:talk 5980:talk 5962:talk 5957:Aude 5935:talk 5901:talk 5896:Aude 5839:talk 5812:talk 5779:talk 5751:talk 5634:talk 5618:talk 5610:diff 5595:talk 5573:talk 5567:? -- 5539:talk 5517:talk 5495:talk 5487:this 5482:here 5452:talk 5438:talk 5422:talk 5384:talk 5370:talk 5355:talk 5336:talk 5321:talk 5230:logs 5204:talk 5152:talk 5130:Half 5118:talk 5104:talk 5090:talk 5067:talk 5059:JIDF 5027:logs 5009:talk 4977:talk 4958:talk 4916:talk 4894:talk 4880:talk 4829:talk 4768:logs 4742:talk 4725:talk 4708:talk 4544:talk 4522:talk 4503:talk 4476:and 4413:logs 4387:talk 4361:talk 4353:duck 4335:talk 4321:talk 4307:talk 4242:talk 4176:talk 4130:talk 4034:talk 4018:talk 3999:talk 3849:talk 3829:talk 3782:talk 3728:same 3718:talk 3710:DHCP 3665:The 3641:talk 3611:talk 3473:wage 3468:only 3457:nine 3445:user 3429:sole 3422:real 3369:talk 3351:talk 3330:talk 3303:talk 3263:talk 3226:talk 3198:talk 3157:talk 3118:talk 3093:talk 2997:talk 2949:talk 2927:talk 2904:talk 2887:talk 2847:talk 2829:and 2825:and 2816:and 2813:and 2745:talk 2721:Talk 2682:Talk 2650:Talk 2610:talk 2590:Talk 2556:Talk 2533:talk 2513:Talk 2477:Talk 2445:Talk 2413:this 2377:and 2366:and 2356:here 2352:this 2308:Talk 2265:Talk 2239:here 2237:and 2235:here 2220:Talk 2182:talk 2169:and 2157:Talk 2135:talk 2125:See 2116:talk 2093:Rami 2058:talk 2048:and 2028:Talk 2004:talk 1986:talk 1951:Talk 1908:Talk 1880:Talk 1853:Talk 1820:Talk 1796:talk 1778:talk 1697:here 1545:Talk 1290:1167 1285:1166 1280:1165 1275:1164 1270:1163 1265:1162 1260:1161 1255:1160 1250:1159 1245:1158 1238:1157 1233:1156 1228:1155 1223:1154 1218:1153 1213:1152 1208:1151 1203:1150 1198:1149 1193:1148 963:Try 580:Spam 449:Bots 437:Main 161:talk 147:undo 142:edit 118:talk 104:edit 14788:BMW 14632:Δ's 14574:Δ's 14529:Δ's 14512:in 13924:"? 13216:is 12853:AGK 12790:Why 12265:and 12139:and 11881:It 11472:| 11272:) ( 11213:GJC 11172:) ( 10854:GJC 10702:BMW 10575:Guy 10530:BMW 10500:Den 9714:of 9650:BMW 9569:BMW 9407:BMW 9329:one 9214:(c) 9211:(t) 9172:(c) 9169:(t) 9059:GJC 8826:PIG 8654:GJC 8588:BMW 8558:BMW 8523:BMW 8287:Lid 8159:Lid 7952:MfD 7919:| 7692:NE2 7624:NE2 7356:BMW 7176:NE2 6982:BMW 6888:BMW 6761:BMW 6285:.-- 6086:Syn 5347:ADL 5293:004 5288:MBK 5267:log 5210:tag 5172:004 5167:MBK 4805:log 4748:tag 4687:BMW 4682:-t 4641:BMW 4636:-t 4494:own 4450:log 4393:tag 4083:on. 4080:did 3991:ask 3940:it. 3893:not 3545:BMW 3540:-t 3278:ban 3177:BMW 3172:-t 2819:and 2679:| 2647:| 1730:--> 1530:339 1525:338 1520:337 1515:336 1510:335 1505:334 1500:333 1495:332 1490:331 1485:330 1478:329 1473:328 1468:327 1463:326 1458:325 1453:324 1448:323 1443:322 1438:321 1433:320 1412:487 1407:486 1402:485 1397:484 1392:483 1387:482 1382:481 1377:480 1372:479 1367:478 1360:477 1355:476 1350:475 1345:474 1340:473 1335:472 1330:471 1325:470 1320:469 1315:468 1168:364 1163:363 1158:362 1153:361 1148:360 1143:359 1138:358 1133:357 1128:356 1123:355 1116:354 1111:353 1106:352 1101:351 1096:350 1091:349 1086:348 1081:347 1076:346 1071:345 866:WMF 653:XfD 489:VRT 14928:: 14699:) 14677:) 14661:) 14657:• 14636:/ 14628:// 14578:/ 14570:// 14551:) 14533:/ 14525:// 14476:– 14454:) 14426:) 14418:-- 14409:) 14387:– 14362:) 14329:-- 14302:) 14270:) 14251:) 14195:. 14169:) 14112:) 14100:, 14061:) 14028:, 14018:) 13968:-- 13949:) 13908:) 13900:-- 13869:) 13846:, 13842:, 13838:, 13826:) 13810:) 13789:) 13775:) 13763:, 13759:, 13706:) 13687:; 13604:; 13520:; 13500:; 13416:; 13268:) 13251:; 13243:. 13240:, 13228:; 13220:. 13143:) 13105:, 13089:) 13062:) 12980:– 12946:) 12926:) 12899:– 12785:So 12775:) 12761:) 12736:) 12691:) 12648:, 12628:, 12612:, 12604:, 12600:, 12534:-- 12511:) 12503:. 12499:, 12468:, 12464:, 12367:}} 12361:{{ 12322:, 12302:OR 12261:, 12257:, 12241:, 12237:, 12233:, 12229:, 12225:, 12221:, 12162:, 12158:, 12151:, 12129:me 12125:11 12121:10 12061:, 11989:, 11956:. 11948:, 11816:) 11792:, 11788:, 11784:, 11780:, 11767:) 11688:) 11578:. 11495:) 11437:-- 11426:) 11406:) 11309:– 11205:) 11125:) 11049:) 11039:– 11017:) 11003:) 10965:) 10918:' 10788:) 10780:-- 10775:. 10765:) 10678:) 10631:) 10560:) 10496:. 10477:++ 10422:) 10390:- 10381:— 10368:) 10344:) 10322:) 10308:) 10286:) 10264:) 10213:. 10015:) 10007:-- 9805:| 9801:| 9797:| 9793:| 9789:| 9767:) 9673:) 9621:) 9613:. 9482:) 9385:) 9340:) 9296:) 9273:. 9267:– 9237:) 9157:• 9151:• 9142:— 9126:– 9019:) 8988:) 8957:) 8932:) 8890:) 8866:) 8856:– 8804:) 8784:de 8781:Sa 8757:) 8673:) 8632:me 8614:) 8506:, 8496:) 8470:) 8386:– 8377:) 8362:) 8348:) 8333:) 8304:) 8272:) 8124:— 8058:— 8041:) 8004:) 7986:) 7962:) 7944:) 7903:) 7850:— 7834:) 7809:) 7799:– 7773:Ty 7754:) 7746:-- 7731:) 7709:Ty 7680:) 7660:) 7639:Ty 7608:Ty 7584:Ty 7559:) 7540:) 7497:) 7474:Ty 7462:) 7439:Ty 7427:) 7408:Ty 7396:) 7388:. 7315:) 7300:) 7285:) 7250:) 7228:) 7213:) 7191:) 7141:) 7126:) 7118:. 7098:, 7094:, 7055:) 7040:) 6935:) 6851:) 6843:. 6792:) 6735:) 6683:) 6665:) 6629:) 6614:) 6606:-- 6554:– 6481:) 6439:) 6407:) 6384:– 6335:) 6321:) 6270:• 6266:• 6238:• 6234:• 6201:) 6143:) 6124:) 6076:) 6068:-- 6041:) 5982:) 5937:) 5929:. 5841:) 5814:) 5781:) 5753:) 5724:. 5713:, 5710:, 5707:, 5704:, 5701:, 5698:, 5695:, 5692:, 5689:, 5686:, 5683:, 5680:, 5677:, 5674:, 5671:, 5668:, 5665:, 5662:, 5659:, 5656:, 5653:, 5650:, 5647:, 5636:) 5620:) 5597:) 5575:) 5541:) 5527:DR 5522:. 5515:| 5497:) 5450:| 5440:) 5424:) 5414:– 5386:) 5372:) 5364:-- 5357:) 5338:) 5323:) 5269:) 5256:CA 5154:) 5120:) 5069:) 4979:) 4971:-- 4960:) 4918:) 4896:) 4882:) 4831:) 4807:) 4794:CA 4710:) 4692:c- 4646:c- 4576:? 4546:) 4524:) 4505:) 4452:) 4439:CA 4363:) 4337:) 4292:() 4244:) 4220:() 4178:) 4132:) 4115:. 4103:() 4092:- 4020:) 4001:) 3985:, 3982:, 3979:, 3882:() 3831:) 3784:) 3766:() 3720:) 3693:() 3643:) 3613:) 3550:c- 3494:() 3477:is 3371:) 3353:) 3305:) 3265:) 3257:-- 3228:) 3200:) 3182:c- 3159:) 3120:) 3095:) 3076:() 3063:am 3028:() 2977:96 2967:96 2951:) 2906:) 2889:) 2770:– 2725:• 2717:~ 2709:-- 2594:• 2586:~ 2578:-- 2569:PR 2560:• 2552:~ 2544:-- 2517:• 2509:~ 2501:-- 2491:PR 2481:• 2473:~ 2465:-- 2449:• 2441:~ 2433:-- 2362:, 2343:PR 2312:• 2304:~ 2296:-- 2284:. 2269:• 2261:~ 2253:-- 2224:• 2216:~ 2208:-- 2161:• 2153:~ 2145:-- 2137:) 2060:) 2032:• 2024:~ 2016:-- 1988:) 1964:PR 1955:• 1947:~ 1939:-- 1930:PR 1912:• 1904:~ 1896:-- 1884:• 1876:~ 1868:-- 1857:• 1849:~ 1841:-- 1824:• 1816:~ 1808:-- 1798:) 1780:) 1304:, 1182:, 1060:, 948:: 190:: 163:| 14843:4 14838:9 14818:) 14808:( 14793:◄ 14783:► 14768:) 14763:· 14757:· 14751:· 14745:· 14739:· 14733:· 14728:( 14695:( 14673:( 14653:( 14622:M 14564:M 14545:( 14519:M 14497:. 14491:. 14450:( 14422:( 14405:( 14393:( 14358:( 14339:. 14333:. 14298:( 14266:( 14245:( 14165:( 14108:( 14057:( 14014:( 13978:. 13972:. 13945:( 13904:( 13865:( 13822:( 13806:( 13785:( 13771:( 13747:a 13745:c 13743:z 13741:a 13739:m 13702:( 13677:) 13672:· 13666:· 13660:· 13654:· 13648:· 13642:· 13636:· 13630:· 13624:· 13619:( 13593:) 13588:· 13582:· 13576:· 13570:· 13564:· 13558:· 13552:· 13546:· 13540:· 13535:( 13489:) 13484:· 13478:· 13472:· 13466:· 13460:· 13454:· 13448:· 13442:· 13436:· 13431:( 13405:) 13400:· 13394:· 13388:· 13382:· 13376:· 13370:· 13364:· 13358:· 13352:· 13347:( 13338:) 13333:· 13327:· 13321:· 13315:· 13309:· 13303:· 13297:· 13291:· 13285:· 13280:( 13264:( 13213:) 13208:· 13202:· 13196:· 13190:· 13184:· 13178:· 13172:· 13166:· 13160:· 13155:( 13139:( 13114:☼ 13085:( 13058:( 12987:☼ 12942:( 12922:( 12846:· 12841:( 12771:( 12757:( 12732:( 12712:" 12687:( 12580:- 12565:· 12560:( 12540:- 12507:( 12442:. 12436:. 12337:) 12333:( 12294:3 12291:2 12288:1 12280:. 12269:. 12247:9 12243:8 12239:7 12235:6 12231:5 12227:4 12223:3 12219:2 12190:, 12186:, 12178:, 12174:, 12170:, 12166:, 12119:, 12117:9 12115:, 12112:, 12110:7 12108:, 12106:6 12104:, 12101:, 12099:4 12097:, 12095:3 12093:, 12090:, 12088:1 12071:· 12037:· 12001:. 11999:" 11991:" 11971:· 11962:· 11927:· 11872:· 11833:· 11812:( 11802:· 11763:( 11743:· 11684:( 11674:· 11650:· 11613:) 11609:( 11541:. 11535:. 11491:( 11447:. 11441:. 11422:( 11402:( 11378:) 11373:· 11367:· 11361:· 11355:· 11349:· 11343:· 11338:( 11321:. 11315:. 11276:) 11274:C 11270:T 11268:( 11261:B 11257:D 11201:( 11176:) 11174:C 11170:T 11168:( 11161:B 11157:D 11121:( 11098:S 11094:S 11072:~ 11045:( 11013:( 10999:( 10959:( 10914:' 10784:( 10761:( 10707:◄ 10697:► 10674:( 10627:( 10583:) 10579:( 10556:( 10535:◄ 10525:► 10418:( 10364:( 10340:( 10318:( 10304:( 10282:( 10260:( 10247:) 10243:( 10200:. 9828:❞ 9822:❝ 9809:) 9785:( 9763:( 9730:: 9669:( 9655:◄ 9645:► 9617:( 9574:◄ 9564:► 9478:( 9467:I 9429:I 9412:◄ 9402:► 9381:( 9336:( 9292:( 9233:( 9194:. 9188:. 9146:R 9034:) 9030:( 9015:( 8984:( 8953:( 8928:( 8886:( 8862:( 8800:( 8753:( 8669:( 8641:S 8637:S 8610:( 8593:◄ 8583:► 8563:◄ 8553:► 8528:◄ 8518:► 8492:( 8466:( 8447:❞ 8441:❝ 8373:( 8358:( 8344:( 8329:( 8300:( 8268:( 8202:. 8196:. 8037:( 8000:( 7982:( 7958:( 7940:( 7899:( 7877:❞ 7871:❝ 7830:( 7805:( 7750:( 7727:( 7676:( 7656:( 7555:( 7536:( 7493:( 7458:( 7423:( 7392:( 7361:◄ 7351:► 7311:( 7296:( 7281:( 7266:· 7261:( 7246:( 7224:( 7209:( 7187:( 7137:( 7122:( 7076:. 7070:. 7051:( 7036:( 6987:◄ 6977:► 6931:( 6893:◄ 6883:► 6847:( 6788:( 6766:◄ 6756:► 6739:) 6731:( 6704:. 6698:. 6679:( 6661:( 6625:( 6610:( 6547:N 6541:⊥ 6536:– 6477:( 6435:( 6403:( 6377:N 6371:⊥ 6366:– 6331:( 6317:( 6272:c 6268:t 6240:c 6236:t 6220:M 6197:( 6139:( 6120:( 6072:( 6037:( 5978:( 5964:) 5960:( 5933:( 5903:) 5899:( 5837:( 5810:( 5777:( 5749:( 5632:( 5616:( 5593:( 5571:( 5537:( 5493:( 5457:. 5436:( 5420:( 5382:( 5368:( 5353:( 5334:( 5319:( 5283:) 5277:· 5271:· 5265:( 5260:· 5253:· 5247:· 5240:· 5233:· 5227:· 5220:· 5213:· 5207:· 5202:( 5150:( 5116:( 5107:· 5102:( 5093:· 5088:( 5065:( 5047:) 5042:· 5036:· 5030:· 5024:· 5018:· 5012:· 5007:( 4975:( 4956:( 4914:( 4892:( 4878:( 4827:( 4821:) 4815:· 4809:· 4803:( 4798:· 4791:· 4785:· 4778:· 4771:· 4765:· 4758:· 4751:· 4745:· 4740:( 4728:· 4723:( 4706:( 4542:( 4520:( 4501:( 4466:) 4460:· 4454:· 4448:( 4443:· 4436:· 4430:· 4423:· 4416:· 4410:· 4403:· 4396:· 4390:· 4385:( 4359:( 4333:( 4324:· 4319:( 4310:· 4305:( 4240:( 4174:( 4128:( 4122:s 4037:. 4031:. 4016:( 3997:( 3968:, 3957:☼ 3852:. 3846:. 3827:( 3815:☼ 3780:( 3753:I 3743:. 3716:( 3639:( 3609:( 3595:☼ 3367:( 3349:( 3333:. 3327:. 3301:( 3285:☼ 3269:. 3261:( 3224:( 3212:☼ 3196:( 3155:( 3137:☼ 3116:( 3091:( 2947:( 2930:. 2924:. 2902:( 2885:( 2871:☼ 2850:. 2844:. 2777:☼ 2424:) 2420:( 2404:) 2400:( 2133:( 2096:R 2082:· 2078:· 2074:· 2056:( 1984:( 1794:( 1776:( 1690:. 1426:) 1422:( 1308:) 1300:( 1186:) 1178:( 1064:) 1056:( 997:. 754:) 750:( 421:. 393:e 386:t 379:v 167:) 159:( 120:) 116:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions - Knowledge

Index