568:. The article is about the historic buiding that has been known for a century in the historic perservation world as the "Hotel Constance". (Despite that name change, we did not change the Knowledge article name to suit the branding decision. The building was purchased in 2014 and rebranded as the DusitD2 Constance Pasadena. It went into bankruptucy and was sold again in 2022, and the new owner in 2023 decided to rebrand the hotel that operates in the building as the "Pasadena Hotel & Pool". With historic buildings, it has been my understanding that we typically seek constancy (no pun intended). We don't change the name every time a new owner comes along and decides to rebrand the business. This is based, as I understand it, on the fact that the notability flows from the historic building and not from the hotel operation which may change its corporate affiliation and/or branding every decade or so. Accordingly, it is my pressent intention to revert the rename. Before doing so, I am interested in feedback from experienced users in this project.
71:
53:
126:
616:
200,000 markers are almost all USA. They have hundreds of "Contributors" who actually write most of the pages and snap the photos (they are big on photos) but new entries only get published into the site when the Editor approves, unless the
Contributor has done well enough, often enough, to be promoted to Correspondent. (Have I reversed the ranks?) This all results, far as I see, in slow production of pages but high quality and rare revision after it's published.
22:
447:{{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|New South Wales State Heritage Register|]|~2000|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER; NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW; NSW SHR}} {{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|New South Wales Heritage Database|]|???|NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE; NSW HERITAGE DATABASE; NSWHD; NSW HD}}
459:
620:
something, it raises an error flag because a church or town hall or battlefield or whatever isn't a historical marker, even if it has one standing on the lawn. Also I notice that ENWP has a
Template for HMDB, but it seems broken and unused. And, in our List Articles (List of National Register of Historic Places in . . . ) most list items have not even a Wikidata link, much less a HMDB one.
615:
about possible collaboration. They have a little more than a dozen "Regional
Editors" some of whom double as a "Topic Editor" like for war memorials or something. Each Regional Editor has a bit of the United States, and one of them also handles the Americas and another the rest of the world. So, the
619:
I figured every article that mentions something for which HMDB has a marker page, and every WD item about it, and every
Wikimedia Commons picture of the marker, ought to have a link to the HMDB page. I have noticed that Wikidata has a Property for HMDB but if I put it in the WD item for a church or
295:
The text should be "South
African Heritage Resources Agency" (which is its official name and is unambiguous). If it needed to be shorter, the acronym "SAHRA" could be used. The national colours of South Africa are Green and Gold and as World Heritage Sites are indicated by Yellow/gold it would be
415:|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = New South Wales State Heritage Register |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = New South Wales Heritage (Local) Register
380:
heritage. As a result, the existing designation structure on
Knowledge does not allow the reader to distinguish if a heritage item is of local or state significance. It is proposed that seperate codes be established, as follows:
747:
450:
735:
310:
626:
Can anyone suggest good ways for how we might go about linking this stuff together? I haven't even asked about links in the opposite direction; first I'd like to figure what we can do in our own house.
320:
484:
623:
There is also an "Open
Plaques" website that seems pretty much limited to the United Kingdom; presumably it works similarly but I'm concentrating on USA which implies sticking with HMDB.
761:
334:
673:
669:
Strange that there aren't any supported designations for China considering its importance in human cultural heritage. Here are a few designations I think should be added.
432:|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = #DACAA5 |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = #A8BDEC
398:|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = #DACAA5 |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = #A8BDEC
730:
778:
718:
792:
521:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
766:
706:
494:
811:
777:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
746:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
717:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
636:
466:
452:
816:
743:
737:
441:
506:
806:
689:
545:
319:
The article failed its FAC, but it was much expanded and edited in the process since it became a GA, and actually got some support:
701:
681:
Historical and
Cultural Sites Protected at the Level of a City Divided into Districts or at the Level of an Autonomous Prefecture
365:
286:
268:
261:
600:
659:
533:
78:
58:
577:
376:
260:
323:. It most probably fulfils all the criteria to be promoted A-Class. Thank you in advance to all future reviewers! --
781:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
750:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
721:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
292:
Its scope is of
National importance and currently has 1720+/- entries (and will continue to grow slowly over time)
606:
517:
502:
726:
423:
33:
389:
205:
612:
692:, and all have an abundance of cultural relics listed under them. Please update the list, thank you.
536:
on the placement and size of the images in the article, please join in if you would like. Thank you,
527:
406:
565:
513:
498:
437:
312:
86:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
722:
632:
355:
299:
Hundreds of pages already exist from the SAHRA registry and I would like to make more over time.
188:
479:
224:
664:
39:
650:
about image placement and infobox format which would benefit from editor input. Thank you,
647:
584:
561:
328:
231:
8:
697:
591:
turns up 5,610 hits for "Hotel Constance" and zero hits for "Pasadena Hotel & Pool".
243:
787:
756:
655:
641:
628:
550:
541:
348:
341:
216:
304:
271:(SAHRA) and so I need a designation. I believe this register meets all the criteria:
254:
774:
768:
489:
714:
708:
596:
573:
557:
551:
473:
370:
324:
242:
693:
588:
564:. Three days ago, the article was moved unilaterally and without discussion to
184:
800:
782:
751:
651:
537:
125:
83:
368:
is proposed. The Register currently lists items of international, national,
276:
250:
70:
52:
190:
592:
569:
321:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Palais Rohan, Strasbourg/archive1
296:
preferable for the South African Register to be a dark Green colour.
674:
Major Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the National Level
186:
335:
Revise designation for the New South Wales State Heritage Register
267:
I would like to use the Historic Site infobox for articles on the
678:
Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the Provincial Level
458:
191:
611:
Lately I have been corresponding with a "Regional Editor" at
684:
Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the County Level
467:
Talk:Åsumi Kurumazuka Kofun#Requested move 31 October 2023
453:
Talk:Åsumi Kurumazuka Kofun#Requested move 31 October 2023
249:
Could someone please reassess the above articleĀ ? Thanks
469:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
497:
is a historical/heritage site in Karachi, Pakistan.
119:
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
281:National Heritage Resources Act, number 25 of 1999
275:It is a register that exists under legislation of
798:
315:, for A-Class (this time without interference)
199:This page has archives. Sections older than
744:George Rogers Clark National Historical Park
738:George Rogers Clark National Historical Park
442:Template:Designation/Supported designations
690:National Cultural Heritage Administration
688:These are all under adminstration of the
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
465:There is a requested move discussion at
560:is an NRHP-listed historic building in
366:New South Wales State Heritage Register
287:South African Heritage Resources Agency
269:South African Heritage Resources Agency
262:South African Heritage Resources Agency
209:when more than 10 sections are present.
799:
289:has existed for some time on Knowledge
812:NA-importance Historic sites articles
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Historic sites
21:
19:
15:
817:WikiProject Historic sites articles
436:Explanatory notes for inclusion in
364:of the exiting designation for the
99:Template:WikiProject Historic sites
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
457:
14:
828:
203:may be automatically archived by
76:This page is within the scope of
807:NA-Class Historic sites articles
124:
69:
51:
20:
767:Good article reassessment for
736:Good article reassessment for
707:Good article reassessment for
534:an RfC at Talk:Montacute House
512:How do I add it to Knowledge?
150:ArchiveĀ 2 March 2009-July 2009
1:
522:16:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
507:16:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
702:11:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
660:20:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
637:04:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
485:06:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
7:
601:10:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
578:09:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
546:11:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
10:
833:
762:14:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
613:Historical Marker Database
607:Historical Marker Database
331:) 10:13 pm, Today (UTC+2)
214:
79:WikiProject Historic sites
731:02:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
646:There are discussions at
566:Pasadena Hotel & Pool
64:
46:
438:Template:Designation/doc
313:Palais Rohan, Strasbourg
793:17:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
102:Historic sites articles
528:RfC at Montacute House
462:
206:Lowercase sigmabot III
175:ArchiveĀ 7 2013-present
723:~~ AirshipJungleman29
461:
648:Talk:Montacute House
562:Pasadena, California
155:ArchiveĀ 3 July 2009-
145:ArchiveĀ 1 March 2009
532:Hello! I've opened
514:Y Abdullah Jahangir
499:Y Abdullah Jahangir
424:Designation/colour2
244:Cradle of Humankind
665:China Designations
463:
451:Requested move at
390:Designation/colour
34:content assessment
779:reassessment page
748:reassessment page
719:reassessment page
483:
356:The Drover's Wife
305:User:SpringbokSam
213:
212:
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
824:
775:Golubac Fortress
769:Golubac Fortress
470:
428:
422:
411:
407:Designation/text
405:
394:
388:
359:
352:
345:
234:
227:
208:
192:
128:
120:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
832:
831:
827:
826:
825:
823:
822:
821:
797:
796:
791:
772:
760:
741:
715:Cannons (house)
712:
709:Cannons (house)
667:
644:
642:Montacute House
609:
583:With regard to
558:Hotel Constance
555:
552:Hotel Constance
530:
492:
456:
448:
433:
426:
420:
416:
409:
403:
399:
392:
386:
353:
346:
339:
337:
317:
265:
247:
238:
237:
230:
223:
219:
204:
193:
187:
133:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
830:
820:
819:
814:
809:
785:
771:
765:
754:
740:
734:
711:
705:
686:
685:
682:
679:
676:
666:
663:
643:
640:
608:
605:
604:
603:
589:Newspapers.com
587:, a search of
554:
549:
529:
526:
525:
524:
491:
488:
455:
449:
446:
445:
444:
431:
430:
429:
414:
413:
412:
397:
396:
395:
336:
333:
316:
309:
307:27 March 2017
301:
300:
297:
293:
290:
283:
264:
259:
246:
241:
236:
235:
228:
220:
215:
211:
210:
198:
195:
194:
189:
185:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
172:
170:ArchiveĀ 6 2012
167:
165:ArchiveĀ 5 2011
162:
160:ArchiveĀ 4 2010
157:
152:
147:
139:
138:
135:
134:
129:
123:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
93:Historic sites
88:the discussion
84:historic sites
74:
62:
61:
59:Historic sites
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
829:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
804:
802:
795:
794:
790:
789:
784:
780:
776:
770:
764:
763:
759:
758:
753:
749:
745:
739:
733:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
710:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
683:
680:
677:
675:
672:
671:
670:
662:
661:
657:
653:
649:
639:
638:
634:
630:
629:Jim.henderson
624:
621:
617:
614:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:WP:COMMONNAME
582:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
553:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
495:Siddiqa Lodge
490:Siddiqa Lodge
487:
486:
481:
477:
476:
475:
468:
460:
454:
443:
439:
435:
434:
425:
418:
417:
408:
401:
400:
391:
384:
383:
382:
379:
378:
373:
372:
367:
363:
357:
350:
349:Kerry Raymond
343:
342:Aguyintobooks
332:
330:
326:
322:
314:
308:
306:
298:
294:
291:
288:
284:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
270:
263:
258:
256:
252:
245:
240:
233:
229:
226:
222:
221:
218:
207:
202:
197:
196:
182:
181:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
137:
136:
132:
127:
122:
121:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
786:
773:
755:
742:
713:
687:
668:
645:
625:
622:
618:
610:
556:
531:
493:
472:
471:
464:
375:
369:
361:
338:
318:
302:
285:The article
280:
277:South Africa
266:
248:
239:
200:
130:
87:
77:
40:WikiProjects
30:project page
29:
311:Nominating
303:Thank you,
801:Categories
474:Polyamorph
325:Edelseider
419:Code for
402:Code for
385:Code for
225:WT:HSITES
217:Shortcuts
783:Hog Farm
752:Hog Farm
652:A.D.Hope
538:A.D.Hope
362:revision
201:365 days
131:Archives
279:as the
251:Anthere
374:, and
36:scale.
593:Cbl62
570:Cbl62
377:local
371:State
232:WT:HS
28:This
788:Talk
757:Talk
727:talk
698:talk
656:talk
633:talk
597:talk
574:talk
542:talk
518:talk
503:talk
480:talk
440:and
329:talk
255:talk
803::
729:)
700:)
694:Hi
658:)
635:)
599:)
576:)
544:)
520:)
505:)
427:}}
421:{{
410:}}
404:{{
393:}}
387:{{
360:A
257:)
725:(
696:(
654:(
631:(
595:(
572:(
540:(
516:(
501:(
482:)
478:(
358::
354:@
351::
347:@
344::
340:@
327:(
253:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
