678:
which tbf did not require much due to limited attestations - and will soon, probably in 2-3 weeks, work on the former), Hadad and Adad/Ishkur were merged a few years ago which seems rather unreasonable. German wiki seems to have a much better division of the material, with a "weather god of Aleppo" treated separately from the
Mesopotamian weather god, ie. Sumerian Ishkur = Akkadian Adad = Aramaic Hadad. I'm pretty sure Polish wiki and a few other editions also treat Ishkur separately though that's much more nebulous and English wikipedia is not consistent on the Sumero-Akkadian names issue. I would be in favor of separation due to analogy with cases such as Nergal and Erra, Hendursaga and Ishum, or the individual medicine goddesses, since Ishkur's low position in the early sources sets him apart from his northern peers, but it's not a pressing issue and it could be remedied just with splitting the article into Mesopotamian and "Aleppo-focused" ones, similarly to how there's 0 need for splitting Utu and Shamash (on the other hands, separate articles for Gibil and Girra - with the latter not even using the common spelling - feel like an elaborate joke, especially when as late as 2021 there were distinct arguably more major deities like Ilaba with no articles). I've outlined some issues with the Hadad article on the talk page, but they were not met with any response there, sadly. There's also the matter of entire major sites which are left out as is - Adad had 1500 years worth of Elamite evidence due to introduction to Susa (with attestations as late as in the
2340:
Brill, JSTOR, virtually anywhere will just bring up a very different figure, the Hindu Manu, notably not made up by a single
Frenchman who was not rigorous even by the standards of his era. I fail to see how a single author's fabrication from a time when cuneiform wasn't even really deciphered is significant in any shape or form. Pretty sure notability criteria exist for a reason. I also feel there is something, dare I say, morally heinous about the fact that "Manu the Great" had a page for years but multiple major deities like Ilaba or Ninisina or somehow even Gula, the second most commonly worshiped Mesopotamian goddess through the entire first millennium BCE, either didn't or their names were redirects to unrelated pages prior to me getting fed up with this. Imagine if for years the Greek category had no pages about Athena and Helios and Apollo was a redirect to Sol Invictus, but there was an article about some hoax like Mesperyian which failed to inform the reader they are looking at a fabrication and also used completely outdated terms ("Chaldean" deity?) - that was roughly comparable to the state of affairs in the Mesopotamian deities category as late as 2020. Weird priorities on display imo.
609:), and by extension coverage of Kumarbi in at least one more article. A long time ago, while still relatively new to editing, in good faith I decided to add a Tell Halaf relief which is labeled as Kumarbi on wikimedia commons. The area and time period did seem to fit, but upon reexamination it would appear that the identification of the relief is the work of an editor not well versed in Hurrian mythology, who took the parallels between Hesiod's Theogony and Kumarbi myths as an indication that Kumarbi would necessarily have iconography similar to descriptions (not even depictions) of Kronos - ie. sickle and what they assume are cut off genitals (which isn't even how the parallel event happens in Hurrian mythology). Rather obviously this is not Kumarbi, but due to lack of good photos of the only certain depiction of him I am aware of, from Yazilikaya, I am not sure what to replace it with.
690:
me, El is pretty rare in
Phoenician sources, the various Baals obviously are not). Some of the sources used are from the 19th century, and the article as a whole, at least to me, seems to have a generally biblical (in at least some paragraphs - distinctly protestant), rather than Assyriological, flair which I would argue goes against the neutrality principle. There'a also obviously no such a thing as a singular "Semitic religion" contrary to the heading used there indicates; this creates a false sense of homogenity between every non-Abrahamic source, and an equally false sense of distunity between Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic ones. I suppose doing something about that would also be in scope of the proposal.
2325:, since he is mentioned in secondary sources (although not many and mostly old). It would be better to have articles that discussed him and similar figures as fabrications/errors... if sources exist discussing the fact that the figure is a fabrication/error. This would be desirable both because that process is part of the history of Assyriological scholarship and so that readers who encounter Manu and similar figures in unreliable sources can consult wikipedia and see that he is a fabrication/error. The key words there are "if sources exist." If they don't, then deletion is a reasonable outcome.
338:, the list goes on) have been a target of disprutive editing, courtesy of a single user who seems to have a poor grasp of the purpose of these templates; in addition to the usual routine of adding equivalents based on superficial similarities with 0 concern for what sources have to say, this batch of them includes nonsensical addition of empty sections with "??" given as value. It is admiteddly difficult for a single person to keep up with similar issues - which do pop up periodically - which is why I feel this should be brought up on the project talk page.
738:
I also don't know how
Template:Middle Eastern mythology and Template:Middle Eastern deities and Template:Mesopotamian myth and etc fit into this but perhaps some consolidation would be in order. And I have wondered before if some of the tiny articles for tiny deities should be consolidated into single "minor gods of X" articles to make them easier to maintain. As before, Religion is not my strong suit but if I can be of assistance to review or whatever feel free. PS The deity categories are a mess too Category:Middle Eastern deities.
694:
I'd be aiming more at the second half of this year or so if anyone would be interested with working together on this project. I'd be willing to provide the sources and even do the bulk of the work needed, especially on the early attestations or "peripheral" sites like Susa or Emar or circle of deities linked with Adad or his western counterparts, but sadly I can't viably do everything (especially when it comes to material I'm not very fimilar with, like the first millennium BCE Aramaic evidence which is a big deal in this case).
2644:
2474:
actual (modern) research (it's not so bad as it has been say 10 years ago, but it's still bad). A similar fight is going on in
Knowledge surrounding other nationalistic/cultural/ethnic/religious labels in the Near East, to make them as old as possible ("We Have Always Been Here!"). Also, I wouldn't be surprised that the (former) focus on the SKL being "historical" has something to do with the discussions about the bible being historical (i.e. creationism): the flood is in the SKL, therefore the bible must be true.
454:
thousands of years it's virtually impossible to claim they can be accurately summarized this way (try doing that with all traditions regarding Nergal's wife, or with every area of influence attributed to IShara, or with all deities ever attributed as children to Enlil, or with every deity who got to be represented by the same logogram as Ishkur without the infobox starting to look unwieldy). Simply writing a paragraph with a historical overview of related phenomena is always the better solution.
2374:
massive scale on which sites were excavated back than will never be achieved again and is therefore just as valuable as the small-scale, high-precision excavations that are done today on the same sites). However, for people this usually does not work the same way. In the 19th century, understanding of ancient languages was absent, lacking, or just wrong, and I feel that, in this case, not having an article at all is better than having an article with wrong information. I think @
2781:
2737:(p. 295), which is generally meant to reflect consensus at the time of publication (in this case - the 2010s) that this baffling speculation "won few adherents" and I can't think of a single credible modern Assyriologist who subscribes to it. It seems like the sort of thing you'd mostly see among hobbyists obsessed with Proto-Indo-European reconstructions for less than noble reasons, tbh, much like in the case of some of the more famous Mitanni hot takes.
205:
254:
1168:, who unfortunately doesn't seem to be active anymore). But as long as the SKL and the legendary kings also continue to show up on various widely-used templates and categories, this continues to be a mess. I have actually successfully submitted one legendary king article for deletion, so with reference to that one it might be possible to delete more of them. But I would not be surprised if there was going to be (some) disagreement there.
236:
174:
781:
centers, individual associations, and because if random one note personified virtues and vices from Greek mythology have articles whose existence nobody questions, I do not think deities with more actual material history behind them deserve less. Plus some already had articles long before I started working on wikipedia at all. I would also argue
Mesopotamian mythological creatures category is mostly consolidation-worthy tbh.
2809:! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least
3273:
3171:
3132:
3028:
2609:
570:
714:
elevates
Babylonian school texts to the rank of some primordial wisdom and creates an artificial distinction between "Sumerian" and "Akkadian" culture. My proposal is to rename and overhaul it, making it fully comprehensive (we have over 2000 articles on Mesopotamian deities, most of which are, at this point, at least serviceable; a problem is that some of the weakest ones, ex.
2454:
redirects (it took me months to untangle the mess that medicine goddesses-related redirects were). I do think gender plays a role in this, honestly, especially since many of the missing yet well attested goddesses did not neatly fit the beloved hobbyist (and vintage researcher) molds of "mother goddess" or "fertility deity" (and many which did have pages were treated as such -
1208:
the other attestations in literary or religious texts. I would not be opposed ex. to an article about
Hadanish being created, because despite being fictional, he did rack in a plenty of attestations as a minor deity paired with Lumma. Same goes for keeping, say, Ur-Nungal, who does have some importance as a literary character (which his article does not mention, though).
1132:
inventing regnal dates for kings known from it. There are quite literally dozen articles like that, I think to fix this issue a concentrated effort and perhaps the creation of categories explicitly separating the strictly legendary rulers, the
Kubabas and Ziziz and Alanagars and so on, from actual historical figures whose existence is backed by material evidence.
354:
so that seems equivalent to me. Maybe the problem is the header. Are you thinking it should be more like "gods derived from" or some proper words for that? In mean, to the casual
Knowledge reader they ARE equivalent. So I guess I;m saying maybe the infobox structure needs to be poked to make it clearer what is meant. Unless I totally missed your point. :-)
2307:, probably the worst "deity" article the wiki has to offer rn), original "research" or irrelevance - I will let you know if it worked afterwards, and if our argument about limited relevance in these cases holds true. I think we might get somewhere with this eventually, even if there's maybe half a dozen of us actually working on related articles.
1186:
Emar text corpus). I just think we need a healthier balance. I think having an actually function template related to Mesopotamian religion and literature, something I mentioned in another discussion here, could help a lot, since that's the natural place for the actually significant legendary kings. Sadly, right now we have the nightmarish
424:
given how much baseless speculation there has been about gods in the literature I'm sure they could find a source for that. So I guess what I'm saying is that is having an Equivalents field in the Infobox really worth the long term hassle? If it is, consider changing the header to maybe Derived Deities or something.
861:
many things related only to Ugarit are categorized as "Phoenician" on wikipedia which makes no sense spatially or temporally. Let's starting calling Ebla and Mari Phoenician while at it (the Enki article comes close btw, with Eblaite finds labeled as "Canaanite" but then the whole thing is a nightmare, anyway).
2282:
but there are also a number of no-account towns mentioned in some obscure text, and people like "the assistant cushion fluffer of King X" that should also be reaped. I have never actually gotten an article deleted though I have garbage collected a few via merging away. Clearly there are more of those
1126:
I did not really notice this before, since I mostly edit articles pertaining to deities and only started branching out into cities, rulers and individual texts recently, but it would appear we have an absolutely dire original research issue when it comes to articles about kings. For years someone (it
944:
I tried working on the Inanna article long ago but I think it's a lost cause and I do not plan to ever come back to it. Last I checked it had astrology websites among sources. I maintain that the good article status was awarded to it prematurely, same as in a few other cases (Enlil...), but there are
737:
I actually have never used or even knew about this template but looking at it yes it needs work. One problem I see is that there are SO many gods in the ANE space that if you widen the scope very far the template would get huge. BTW, I would support just deleting the Template:Sumerian_Gods_Genealogy.
693:
The reason why I am asking for help is because I am under the impression the sheer volume of material is simply too much for one person to handle, but the current state of affairs is difficult to bear with. Of course, I am not asking if anyone is ready to commit an enormous amount of time right away,
689:
article which is all over the place and, at least for my liking, does not exhaust the topic even with regards to sites as major as Ugarit, while the Phoenicia-focused section is a sad joke (where are the well attested Phoenician "Baals" with own wiki articles? The only statement there seems fringe to
2521:
To tie some threads together, yes the reason there was so much attention to the SKL, and the creation of kings articles, was that when it was found we were in the Biblical Archaeology phase of archaeology so the SKL was smushed together with the narratives of the Hebrew Bible. Ever noticed that LOTS
2453:
I know I am repeating myself but I will note it is overall peculiar that fictional kings or personified debate poem concepts with no broader significance or random one off monsters from a single poem were seen as worthy of articles, but major goddesses either were not or were notoriously turned into
2397:
would have to go as well. But when I rewrote the SKL article, I did so from the perspective of it being a written text. So I looked at how WP writes about novels, and took clues from there about how to structure the article. And for (major) novels, it's perfectly fine to have separate articles about
1207:
To go back to the main topic: I think the obvious solution would be to gradually aim towards the deletion of all articles of rulers only present in king lists and turn their names into redirects to relevant articles, but keep the rest - as long as someone would expand the article to rigorously cover
1155:
itself has been cleaned up to a large degree, but the discussions there show that it continues to be really, really hard to get rid of the information about all the kings that aren't mentioned anywhere else. Apart from rewriting the SKL article, I have also done a lot of work to relink other history
894:
Yeah, there are certainly problems like how to treat Susiana, Arrapha (and Hurrian deities in general - rn the ones who are in the "Mesopotamian" category are only these directly attested in Sumerian or Akkadian texts, like Shaushka and Shuwala who have a plenty from Ur III, or Kumarbi thanks to his
879:
Thanks for clarifying. I would say that the deletion or uncontested merging away of the articles like Nintulla makes a lot of sense. And given just the template focus on Mesopotamian deities the scope is reasonable, though I don't envy the task of defining the edges of Mesopotamia the way gods oozed
510:
That's strange - I thought I had fixed that one in the last few hours; I've reverted it now. If I may, when I find myself thinking like that, it generally means that I'm approaching burn out and need to take a break for a little while. There's nothing wrong with that. On the other hand, while one is
353:
I took a quick look. I would say that yes, the question mark thing is not helpful. You want to keep infoboxes to the minimum necessary to hold the needed info. The equivalents thing is more nuanced. Like they added Hermes to a messenger god in the Equivalents" section which Hermes is a messenger god
2568:
Weighed on the issue on the talk page, naturally in favor of your approach as opposed to the anonymous user's. Seems like another issue which could be avoided if many articles on wikipedia didn't have a decade+ of basically unrestricted use of long outdated sources, tbh. I think especially the fact
2473:
Interesting, your point about gender. My take has always been that it also has something to do with (modern) nationality/ethnicity/religion. If you read many of the articles about Sumer, there's always been this weird distinction and focus on Semitic vs non-Semitic/Sumerian that is not borne out by
2378:
recently mentioned somewhere else how WP still suffers from the material that was once copied from the Encyclopedia Britannica as a case in point. I feel that some of these 19th-century sources should just be labelled as being of not sufficient quality (anymore) to be used on Knowledge. Our readers
2355:
domain trash put up in the early 2000s by amateurs and it is great that experts like you, Zoeperkoe, and Ploversegg are fixing things. My point is only that being an "outdated fabrication" does not necessarily mean that something is not notable (we have articles on far more nonsensical things, like
2354:
There are plenty of articles on Greek and Roman topics like this (more places than gods, to be fair, but it is extremely common to look up a well excavated site and find something copy-pasted from an early 19th C gazeteer or similar). It is the nature of the project that a lot of material is public
2339:
These "sources" are two 19th century publications, one of which depends on the other, and a non-academic 1970s book which just quotes the first of the above uncritically. He is absent altogether from any credible publications - no entry in the Reallexikon, search for "Manu the great" on De Gruyter,
453:
I must admit I am personally not a huge fan of infoboxes and focusing on "equivalencies" in the first place, no matter how hard one tries they present a synthetic, overly simplified image of the deity. Given that we are talking about figures which often were the topic of theological speculation for
423:
Actually I agree with both of you. We know there are definite processes by which deities develop from other deities (Syncretism etc). The average Wiki editor will not know this. So if you have an "Equivalents" section then sooner or later someone will say "Hey, Mercury is a messenger god too!". And
1185:
I obviously do not think all legendary ruler articles need to be deleted, some of them are quite significant as literary characters after all; I stumbled upon the discussed issue precisely because I worked on some (Alulim and Didanu) and actually created one (for Bazi, since I am interested in the
1135:
It also strikes me as an issue that virtually every legendary king with an entry in king lists, even ones who are nothing but names with no actual legend behind them (ex. almost everyone but Didanu in the Assyrian King List) has an article but many well documented historical rulers of major states
1131:
and similar texts as an actual objective record of history rather than a literary composition (you'd think the references to flood myths and hilariously exaggerated reigns would be an obvious giveaway, not to mention the well known theories about ideological motivation behind king lists), but also
860:
Last but not least: I think most individual categories are fine (ie. Mesopotamian deities, Hurrian deities, Hittite deities, Hattian deities, Luwian deities, Ugaritic deities, Eblaite deities, Elamite deities) but yeah, that one and "West Semitic deities" are nightmarish. Another awful case is how
780:
and hardly a major one at that. If anything, there was too much merging in the past (see my comment on weather god articles in another discussion here). I considered making a single "Mesopotamian craftmanship deities" article initially but I went with multiple individual ones due to different cult
713:
I've noticed that in contrast with ancient Egypt or Greece, Mesopotamia has no particularly good footer to add to deity articles; there is an awkward "Sumerian mythology" template which presents a completely artificial image of the region, based on popular understanding of 1960s publications which
677:
Would anyone be potentially interested in working collaboratively on brining the articles of individual broadly "Syro-Mesopotamian" weather gods to an acceptable level reflecting modern consensus? At the moment, while Teshub and Wer thankfully do have their own articles (I'm done with the latter -
636:
In both cases, I'd remove the image first and worry about what to replace it with later. If there is no image of Kumarbi, then we must do without. Or perhaps one could use an image of an object/inscription/location associated with him? I don't know whether you edit on commons. If not, I'm happy to
2725:
I am not sure if this is within the scope of our project, but I've recently noticed that some wiktionary entries focused on specific cuneiform signs uncritically promote the ridiculous "Proto-Euphratean" theory which assigns Indo-European (sic) etymologies to sumerian words, an example is ex. the
2526:
Archaeologists also thought every tablet they pulled out of the ground was History. They didn't yet understand the whole literary forms of Sumerian writing (or the semi-literary nature of the Hebrew Bible for that matter). Even worse, the Neo-Babylonian and Neo-Assyrian stuff was on top so it was
2458:
was a "fertility" deity somehow). Thankfully I think that is a problem which has already been solved in most cases or at least is in the process of being solved. I think the Inanna article is still low quality, though, and tbh I see no real hope for it; same goes for a small number of other major
620:
While obviously it is preferable for infoboxes of major deities to have images, I would like to consult other ANE contributors in particular - what do you think is the right course of action here? As far as I am aware, in both cases just removing the images would be preferable to keeping them for
460:
This is digression but I guess it saddens me greatly how often basically the only venue where some of the oldest writing of the world can reach a bigger audience also puts it at the mercy of people simply unprepared to properly engage with this sort of material. Simplifications of the sort we are
2433:
who is about as well attested as many SKL rulers. I think the only figures awared similarly inflated importance are deities exclusively appearing in Theogony of Dunnu (or rather - deities T. Jacobsen though appear there, seeing as other restorations ex. by Lambert or Foster vary) a text nowadays
438:
I see your point and I agree with you that we should aim for a high bar on this. I do think that the field is useful when equivalents are firmly established (e.g. Greek-Roman equivalents like Minerva = Athena, Zeus = Jupiter). I understand that the Akkadian-Sumerian-Hittite equivalents are often
368:
I think the equivalents section should reflect what primary sources offer - what actually arose through Mesopotamian god lists, interpretatio graeca, and the like. Ex. Philo of Byblos uses Pontos as stand-in for Yam, not Poseidon; Shapash's equivalent rather obviously wasn't Hermes, either. They
2732:
entry. The state of such articles is generally poor across wiki projects (ex. describing a sign with phrases like "it has many uses in the Epic of Gilgamesh" is a recurring peculiar choice) but this stands out to me as what seems like an attempt at pushing a very specific, largely forgotten and
2373:
Good points. The comparison between 19th-century sources on places and people is interesting, though. For places you are quite right that many 19th-century sources are invaluable, because they are the only sources we have on them, or because they provide a contexct for more modern material (the
995:
page to exist since they are both about immediately preceding/succeeding states created by the same continuous population group. And because Iškuza and Scythia both cover immediately preceding/succeeding but also partially overlapping parts of the history of the Scythians, multiple sections and
899:
cameo, but I think there is a valid point to be made that Nuzi is no less of a "variant" Mesopotamian pantheon than Lagash or Der) or where does the scope of "Mesopotamian religion" end for the west (Mari is obvious, so Itur-Mer, Shalash or Ikshudum are not an issue, but how to treat Emar? Tell
1199:
which seems to confuse "present in a myth Kramer translated or Enuma Elish" for "major" including baffling picks like Enkimdu or Kingu (curious where these implicit Kingu worshipers were, and how many temples this "major" deity had according to the editors responsible), but not actually, well,
752:
I am against having a single "Middle Eastern mythology" template because that would be a wastebasket. I am merely arguing for "Mesopotamian" over "Sumerian". I would argue a single Mesopotamian one is hardly more daunting of a task than existing, well maintained templates for Egyptian or Greek
996:
sub-sections of each page covering the culture, population, external relations, etc of these states also had to be copied from the Scythians page (e.g. the "Background" sub-section and "Society" section in Scythia, and the "Origins," "Impact," and "Legacy" sections of Iškuza). Moreover, the
391:. "Equivalents" in these infoboxes should be restricted as much as possible. It should include equivalents that are stated in ancient texts (e.g. bilingual inscriptions and the like), and perhaps cases where gods' names are revealed by modern research to be etymological cognates (e.g. Greek
1030:
The problem is that, despite months having passed, the discussion for the merger proposal is still at a deadlock, with three users opposed to the merger, and three users (including myself) in favour of it. In this difficult situation, I have been advised to bring this issue to the various
2287:. Anyway, I agree with the above and would be ok with occassionaly picking away some low hanging fruit given guidance on how to do an actual deletion. Caveat, I am on the record as predicting that inscriptions will turn up for at least 2 of the mythical SKL rulers someday. :-)
2527:
stuff that was like 5 hand, passed down thru the millennium. Anyway, thats the context. PS I am not mocking the old archaeologists. Imagine if you are Bible focused and you found a doc the mentions a flood and even rulers named in the Bible. They must have been gobsmacked.
784:
Merging aside, after a close examination I think there are many single line stubs from ages ago which are basically deletion-worthy due to the subjects being either tentative readings of poorly preserved theonyms present only in one, not exactly major at that, text,
654:
I plan to fix the commons issue myself in a few days with regards to the not-actually-Kumarbi, but the wikimedia commons Astarte category is such a mess that I do not think it's possible to fix it without just starting from scratch, which obviously isn't possible.
940:
It's ancient aliens stuff sadly, note how high nephilim are too. Sadly the average person browsing these articles is not actually interested in their subject in the way you or me are, they just want more of what they saw on History Channel and fringe facebook
900:
Leilan? Harran?). I think a core of "Major deities" and functionally sorted minor ones (sea/river, agriculture, war, underworld, courtiers of major deities, etc) is doable without much of a problem though, I will try to produce a draft of some sort next week.
612:
The other case is even more troublesome - in the Astarte article the photo isn't Astarte at all, it's a statue from Mesopotamia rather obviously depicting a Mesopotamian, not Levantine, goddess (see discussion, with link to a source discussing identification,
402:
The alternative of including every god that seems similar is unsustainable: there are tens of thousands of "messenger gods" in religions around the world, for example, and it would be completely impractical and unhelpful to include them all in the infoboxen.
2302:
I have not gotten anything deleted yet save for a few articles which were doubles resulting from low quality books used by way too many editors over a decade ago misspelling names, but I plan to try soon with some obvious cases of outdated fabrications
2733:
irrelevant fringe theory. I'm not sure what can be done but this seems like a huge problem. A user in the edit history of the gud article specifically claims that there's no consensus in the field but that's a brazen lie, Jerrold Cooper affirms in the
2406:
named character in it. Not even for a literary composition/historical text as important/influential as the Bible do we have separate articles about every named character in there. So why should we have those for an insignificant text such as the SKL?
495:
at work. I'm honestly not sure if there is a point in even trying to keep ANE articles credible, honestly. It's virtually all I've been trying to do since the middle of 2021 but to put it lightly it does not feel like much changed, I guess.
491:) left out in favor of dumping every vaguely Venus-related figure there... including Amatsu-Mikaboshi. Early Japanese royal chronicles are known for their influence on bronze age Ugarit and iron age South Arabia, after all, truly a cultural
529:
As Furius said, maybe take a Wiki-break, or do what I just did and take a palette cleansing trip to some other area of Knowledge you have an interest in. I just finished a diversion in early North American archaeology, wrote a site article
1190:
which I plan to nominate for deletion since it breaks WP:NOR (and one actually cannot in good faith claim such a thing can be prepared anyway since as already pointed out ex, by Lambert in the 1990s, most deities had fluid genealogy),
2459:
deity articles, though I do want to eventually try to bring Enlil (vintage, severly lacking in material evidence of worship) and Adad (a wastebasket article) to an acceptable level, like I did with their Hurrian counterparts already.
2813:(or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
439:
similarly stable and the field is probably also useful in that case. But you're right that in many cases things are complicated or disputed or speculative and that sort of information belongs in main text, not the infobox.
597:
I wanted to bring up two related cases of images being labeled incorrectly, either on wikimedia commons or directly on wikipedia; in two cases I started discussions on related talk pages (one long ago, one very recently)
3162:
3264:
2569:
that early on it was common to just have users copy paste from vintage religious encyclopedias or Britannica editions from over a century ago contributed to this state of affairs, but this is naturally a digression.
3057:
Hello all. Someone gave me advice to the ANE WikiProject for discussion on this (see most recent of my talk page for the detail), my apologies if this is not the right way to do it. I have recently created the page
1027:, not because I support a merger for the sake of merging itself, which I do not favour, but because Iškuza and Scythia require too much context and the information on these pages is too intertwined with each other.
967:
I've been editing the articles relating to the Scythians over the course of several months, and since most editors tend to favour splitting pages after they reach a certain size, I split two further pages,
2477:
So, to get this discussion somewhere; why aren't we going to be bold and actually turn some of these needless king articles into redirects to, for example, the SKL article, and just see what comes of it?
1054:
Quality assessments are used by Knowledge editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at
3019:
2600:
3291:
1195:
which I already mentioned here (fellow hobbyists are often still stuck in the land of vintage fantasies where speakers of Sumerian and Akkadian basically exist on separate planes of existence) and
991:
requiring large amounts of material regarding the role of the prior and subsequent histories of the Scythians in the creation and destruction of those states copied from each other and from the
3201:
538:, and generally poked around. I'm refreshed and also got an appreciation of how good things really are in the ANE area of Wiki. Serious, it was a hot mess where I was the last couple weeks. :-)
2634:
2434:
basically treated as an irrelevant oddity by most authors as far as I can tell. I suppose a similar phenomenon is the baffling attempt at turning figures from debate poems into deities, like
310:
I've been having trouble reading all of the fonts in various articles about the ancient Near East (e.g., 'Enlil', the article about the Sumerian wind lord). I have the fonts Akkadian from
3047:
2629:
2421:
Worth noting that this is also seemingly one of the only Mesopotamian literary texts treated this way on wikipedia. We do not have articles for random characters briefly appearing in the
962:
1107:
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.
1060:
2686:
1044:
2450:?). Once again a case of weird priorities - Gula had no article until 2021 as I already highlighted, despite being a well attested goddess with entire monographs dedicated to her.
561:
82:
703:
3123:
3118:
587:
719:
165:
3157:
2954:
1093:
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass
3070:). But ANE cosmology is the main one I am here to talk of (and I was honestly shocked when I saw that a page for this did not even exist, although there was the related
35:
2894:
672:
461:
discussing here are nothing compared to articles written relying on sources from the 19th century or hoaxes, sadly, and these are plentiful in ANE categories still.
3074:): I have put a lot of effort into it and I wanted to come here for advice on how the page could be improved. My ultimate goal is to get it to Good article status.
2942:
2429:, an obvious candidate for deletion/turning into a redirect), let alone in less well known works; nobpdy is out there making an article for Ra'im-kini-Marduk from
2672:
in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
3218:
1145:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
3230:
3088:
2523:
2925:
3247:
42:
3259:
2757:
2930:
2911:
2715:
2665:
2536:
2296:
630:
1116:
505:
3206:
3178:
3164:
2882:
28:
3014:
3315:
3310:
3305:
511:
always fighting fires and there is always more to be done, the long-term trajectory really is towards improvement (however glacial). I mean, look at
3280:
3266:
651:
I've already done so with the Kumarbi image in both cases, I'll wait a few more days with Astarte as I did not raise the issue anywhere previously.
2316:
954:
935:
909:
889:
870:
747:
547:
433:
378:
363:
3235:
3083:
2826:
2592:
2578:
2501:
2487:
2468:
1225:
Yes, there are a number of tiny articles, created back in the day, that should be reaped. The non-attested kings of the SKL are the most obvious
1217:
1177:
3246:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
3217:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2997:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2941:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2910:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2899:
2881:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
2583:
I suspect that the first two paragraphs of their addition are from the old Encyclopedia Britannica 11th ed., but I haven't bothered to check.--
2368:
2349:
2334:
664:
646:
524:
470:
412:
2870:
2798:
731:
2981:
1249:
1080:
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to
3106:
2998:
2746:
1187:
448:
2769:
2416:
2388:
1706:
1090:, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
1049:
617:). I cannot figure out how did it end up misinterpreted as Astarte, and its addition to infobox predates my wiki activity altogether.
347:
117:
2840:
2865:
2805:
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme
1121:
2697:
2616:
2602:
1182:
I did notice, yes. I do appreciate your effort, I've noticed you either succeeded or tried in many of the individual articles too.
797:; this is just some coffee table book treating Jacobsen as gospel, nvm that Foster's or Lambert's restorations differ), outdated (
457:
The only worse trend in the deity articles were/are family tree templates typically synthesizing completely unrelated traditions.
261:
241:
67:
21:
1077:, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
3035:
3021:
2986:
2774:
637:
update the image descriptions there, as you direct. Inaccurate uncited image descriptions are a common commons (ha!) problem.
1004:, given that most of the information relating to this polity also is also the same basic information that is required on the
123:
718:, are the most major deities, but that's another topic). I've started a discussion on the matter on the relevant talk page (
2791:
173:
3114:
821:" is a misspelling of the title of a poem courtesy of a disreputable author; note the text itself has a proper wiki page,
592:
2562:
1204:
local deities like Tishpak, Ishtaran or Nanshe (note also the anachronistic obsession with "seven gods who decree") etc.
2660:
926:
which is an article that I have looked at several times and thought "needs work" if I knew what I was doing with this.
3052:
1084:
1071:
1035:
as a way to possibly resolve the deadlock, and all good faith assistance to reach a consensus would be much welcome.
772:(both incredibly minor, a "Mesopotamian dream deities" article would be preferable, with Mamu kept separate). Also,
3250:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
3221:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
3001:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2945:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2914:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
2885:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
1242:
834:
679:
269:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2703:
3110:
3059:
2959:
1157:
945:
simply too few people with even just basic knowledge about the region on wikipedia to properly judge, I guess.
63:
577:
563:
112:
2393:
And I completely agree that it's perfectly fine to have articles about made-up stuff; otherwise things like
2950:
2890:
2847:
2546:
1056:
614:
216:
2841:
Video - Tell Khaiber as a Fortified Centre of the First Sealand Dynasty - Daniel Calderbank - ARWA - 2022
2033:
In the army of Gutium, at first no king was famous; they were their own kings and ruled thus for 3 years.
1235:
1192:
1156:
articles away from the SKL article to the article with the list of actual, attested Mesopotamian rulers (
722:), I'd be happy to hear out the thoughts of other users contributing to articles on ancient Mesopotamia.
103:
3139:
3125:
2742:
2669:
2574:
2497:
2464:
2345:
2312:
1213:
1196:
1141:
950:
905:
866:
727:
699:
660:
626:
501:
466:
374:
343:
136:
2112:
1001:
188:
3284:
2946:
2886:
2024:
837:- waiting for the "date palm" and "tamarisk" articles!) or outright made up (worst offender is
2751:
1012:
708:
2442:, and whatever is going on in the category for mythical creatures (do we need "articles" like
976:, covering the phases of Scythian history respectively in West Asia and in Europe, out of the
3063:
2831:
2765:
2738:
2711:
2570:
2493:
2460:
2341:
2308:
1552:
1209:
1137:
1097:
1040:
1016:
946:
901:
862:
723:
695:
656:
622:
497:
462:
386:
370:
339:
222:
3079:
3043:
3007:
2861:
2853:
2620:
2532:
2292:
931:
885:
743:
543:
531:
429:
359:
8:
2720:
2588:
2558:
2483:
2412:
2384:
2150:
1607:
1173:
1163:
93:
3193:
3151:
3071:
2938:
2932:
2920:
2822:
2447:
1946:
1729:
1259:
1152:
1112:
584:
108:
2728:
756:
I personally do not see many articles which would be fit for consolidation other than
753:
deities were. It's perfectly doable and can easily cover everything wikipedia has atm.
3214:
3208:
2976:
786:
765:
606:
321:
266:
89:
682:; recently treated by Wouter Henkelman), and let's not even get into Ebla and Emar.
2761:
2734:
2707:
2364:
2330:
1951:
1775:
1577:
1337:
1227:
1036:
642:
520:
444:
408:
335:
1127:
seems to largely be the work of a single person) was apparently not only treating
305:
3255:
3226:
3075:
3039:
3002:
2857:
2849:
2528:
2375:
2288:
2188:
1931:
1923:
927:
881:
739:
539:
476:
425:
355:
2643:
3243:
3237:
2584:
2554:
2479:
2443:
2408:
2380:
2322:
2304:
2261:
1971:
1961:
1524:
1401:
1355:
1314:
1169:
1151:
Yes, this has been a problem for years. As you might have seen, the article on
842:
838:
720:
Template talk:Sumerian mythology#"Sumerian" mythology or Mesopotamian mythology
318:
installed. Can someone tell me what other fonts I need? Thanks for your help
2492:
Terribly sorry for the very late response, but I'm in favor of this solution.
326:
Recently the infoboxes of many articles of Ugaritic and/or Canaanite deities (
184:
3299:
3183:
3143:
3098:
2972:
2915:
2907:
2901:
2818:
2679:
1981:
1913:
1724:
1406:
1329:
1309:
1108:
822:
581:
480:
2878:
2872:
2226:
2216:
1867:
1818:
1660:
1645:
1501:
1411:
1388:
922:
was 6 out of 1000. Never ever heard of it. The next non-biblical deity was
773:
535:
488:
327:
399:). In either case, citations to reliable sources are necessary, of course.
2360:
2326:
2236:
2231:
2211:
2206:
2057:
1941:
1799:
1785:
1767:
1620:
1615:
1597:
1592:
1572:
1567:
1506:
1476:
810:
761:
638:
516:
440:
404:
2658:, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the
983:
However, trying to split it has resulted into three articles, with both
189:
3251:
3222:
2961:
2256:
2251:
2241:
2221:
2201:
2196:
2140:
2117:
1875:
1625:
1547:
1471:
1466:
1373:
1301:
2780:
3067:
2541:
2399:
2092:
2062:
2037:
1986:
1880:
1587:
1562:
1557:
1496:
1365:
1032:
1005:
992:
977:
846:
814:
806:
790:
3107:
Talk:Cain_and_Abel#Should_Cain_and_Abel_be_merged_into_this_article?
984:
969:
857:
is not attested in Mesopotamia but only in western Aramaic sources).
512:
484:
2394:
2379:(few as they may be for this obscure part of WP) deserve better...
2178:
2168:
2158:
2067:
2052:
2042:
1542:
1291:
919:
850:
813:
is a vintage rendering of an epithet which should be covered under
802:
798:
794:
186:
918:
As an aside, I just checked the ANE Project most popular list and
311:
3179:
Talk:Ancient near eastern cosmology#Requested move 23 August 2024
3165:
Talk:Ancient near eastern cosmology#Requested move 23 August 2024
2635:
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
2455:
2356:
2284:
2246:
2173:
2122:
2102:
2087:
1673:
1582:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1319:
1136:
like Eshnunna do not but this is not the core problem right now.
997:
988:
973:
963:
Assistance required to end deadlock in merger proposal discussion
818:
602:
253:
235:
3281:
Talk:Macedonia (ancient kingdom)#Requested move 9 September 2024
3267:
Talk:Macedonia (ancient kingdom)#Requested move 9 September 2024
2550:
2426:
2321:
As an outside observer, I would be on the fence about deleting
2163:
2107:
2097:
2047:
1936:
1836:
1826:
1698:
1668:
1635:
1486:
1451:
1446:
1396:
1347:
1286:
923:
854:
777:
331:
3272:
3170:
3131:
3027:
2608:
776:
should be a redirect, not an article, it's just an epithet of
569:
190:
2994:
2988:
2968:
2654:
2439:
2435:
2082:
2077:
2072:
1976:
1630:
1516:
1481:
1461:
1456:
1416:
1278:
830:
826:
769:
757:
396:
1059:, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent
315:
3094:
3090:
2132:
1996:
1905:
1716:
1534:
1491:
1441:
880:
into Elam and Anatolia and Syria/Levant and back again. :-)
715:
686:
479:
mentioned - just spotted a pretty awful case of that n the
392:
3142:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. --
2549:
on whether/how to include an IP's addition to the article
833:
are only characters in a single short "disputation poem",
1966:
3283:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
3181:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
3038:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
2619:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
580:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1742:
764:" (nobody credible spells it this way afaik) and maybe
3036:
Talk:Amytis of Babylon#Requested move 12 February 2024
3022:
Talk:Amytis of Babylon#Requested move 12 February 2024
2617:
Talk:Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze#Requested move 26 April 2023
2603:
Talk:Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze#Requested move 26 April 2023
801:
is just Kramer's botched 1940s reading of Ninsikila =
673:
Messy state of weather god articles - request for help
2975:
that might interest members of this project. Thanks!
2846:
Some of the other talks in the series are also good.
2524:
Knowledge:WikiProject Ancient Near East/Popular pages
1257:
265:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
58:
369:shouldn't come from imagination of random editors.
2553:might be of interest to members of this project.--
1011:Given this resulting situation, I have started a
3297:
3062:, alongside creating other related pages (like
2522:of ANE articles are also in the Bible project?
1063:was approved and has been implemented to add a
70:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
2799:Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023
2704:Talk:Tel_Ashkelon#Requested_move_20_June_2023
1243:
3066:) and cleaning up/expanding on others (like
2425:(with the exception of entirely unnecessary
845:) There are a few which are miscategorized (
483:article. The actually attested equivalents (
1188:Template:Family tree of the Babylonian gods
2836:Nice, if you are into this sort of thing.
1250:
1236:
1000:page as it exists now also functions as a
578:Talk:Naqiʾa#Requested move 16 January 2023
564:Talk:Naqiʾa#Requested move 16 January 2023
215:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
3316:Ancient Near East articles by assessment
3311:NA-importance Ancient Near East articles
3306:Project-Class Ancient Near East articles
3279:There is a requested move discussion at
3177:There is a requested move discussion at
3140:Talk:Ascalon#Requested move 20 July 2024
3138:There is a requested move discussion at
3126:Talk:Ascalon#Requested move 20 July 2024
3034:There is a requested move discussion at
2615:There is a requested move discussion at
576:There is a requested move discussion at
515:- that didn't even exist two years ago!
1050:Project-independent quality assessments
279:Knowledge:WikiProject Ancient Near East
3298:
2787:Hello WikiProject Ancient Near East:
2702:Please see the project-relevant RM at
1122:Pressing issues with multiple articles
475:Also, on the approach to equivalents @
282:Template:WikiProject Ancient Near East
2698:Move discussion about ancient Ascalon
1231:
1957:Then who was king? Who was not king?
853:has nothing to do with Mesopotamia;
805:, not to be confused with the other
685:There's also an incredibly nebulous
204:
202:
198:
15:
1031:WikiProjects which are relevant to
221:It is of interest to the following
13:
3271:
3169:
3130:
3026:
2779:
2642:
2607:
568:
14:
3327:
2398:its main characters (for example
534:, completely redid a couple like
259:This page is within the scope of
2967:Hi, there is a request to merge
2775:Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
2758:Zechariah (New Testament figure)
978:main page covering the Scythians
835:Debate between Winter and Summer
680:Persepolis Fortification Archive
593:Dubious identification of images
252:
234:
203:
172:
83:Click here to start a new topic.
312:http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
3292:04:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3260:22:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
3236:Good article reassessment for
3207:Good article reassessment for
3060:Ancient near eastern cosmology
3053:Ancient near eastern cosmology
2987:Good article reassessment for
2931:Good article reassessment for
2900:Good article reassessment for
2871:Good article reassessment for
2827:14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
2955:21:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
2866:02:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
1045:18:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
955:21:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
936:20:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
910:20:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
890:20:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
871:20:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
748:19:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
732:11:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
273:and see a list of open tasks.
262:WikiProject Ancient Near East
80:Put new text under old text.
68:WikiProject Ancient Near East
2926:18:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
1057:Knowledge:Content assessment
704:12:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
665:07:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
647:14:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
631:14:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
588:13:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
548:03:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
525:02:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
506:21:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
471:21:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
449:19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
434:19:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
413:18:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
379:18:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
364:14:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
348:11:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
7:
3231:18:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
3202:12:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
2895:01:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
2807:Around the World in 31 Days
2770:07:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
1193:Template:Sumerian mythology
1015:to resolve this issue, per
88:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
3332:
3084:14:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
3048:05:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
3015:09:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
2816:We hope to see you there!
2792:WikiProject Women in Green
2593:19:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
2579:18:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
2563:13:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
2537:14:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2502:18:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
2488:10:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2469:10:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2431:Ninurta-Pāqidāt's Dog Bite
2417:08:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2389:07:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2369:21:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
2350:19:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
2335:18:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
2317:17:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
2297:16:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
1379:Then the flood swept over.
1218:17:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
1197:Template:Mesopotamian myth
1178:13:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
1146:08:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
285:Ancient Near East articles
3194:
3158:11:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
3119:07:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
2982:17:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
2747:07:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
2716:06:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
2689:on behalf of the AFI team
2668:to appear on Knowledge's
2187:
2149:
2131:
2023:
1995:
1922:
1904:
1866:
1835:
1817:
1784:
1766:
1741:
1715:
1697:
1659:
1644:
1606:
1533:
1515:
1387:
1364:
1346:
1328:
1300:
1277:
1266:
1117:13:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
316:http://gmalingue.free.fr/
247:
229:
118:Be welcoming to newcomers
3105:Your view is welcome at
2687:00:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
2661:Articles for improvement
1105:|QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
1085:WikiProject banner shell
1072:WikiProject banner shell
2630:19:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
3276:
3174:
3135:
3031:
2784:
2647:
2612:
1997:Fourth dynasty of Uruk
1868:Fourth dynasty of Kish
1717:Second dynasty of Uruk
1661:Second dynasty of Kish
573:
113:avoid personal attacks
3275:
3173:
3134:
3064:Early Greek cosmology
3030:
2947:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2887:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2783:
2646:
2611:
2133:Fifth dynasty of Uruk
1906:Third dynasty of Uruk
1819:Third dynasty of Kish
1553:Dumuzid the Fisherman
1535:First dynasty of Uruk
1389:First dynasty of Kish
1061:Village pump proposal
841:, but there are also
601:The first one is the
572:
166:Auto-archiving period
1753:Mesh-ki-ang-Nanna II
1743:Second dynasty of Ur
817:), misinterpreted ("
306:Question about fonts
2760:of relevance here.
2752:Zechariah/Zacharias
2151:Third Dynasty of Ur
1608:First dynasty of Ur
709:Template discussion
532:Cooper's Ferry site
3277:
3265:Requested move at
3175:
3163:Requested move at
3136:
3124:Requested move at
3111:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
3072:biblical comsology
3032:
3020:Requested move at
2939:Achaemenid Assyria
2933:Achaemenid Assyria
2832:Tell Khaiber video
2785:
2756:There is an RM at
2648:
2613:
2601:Requested move at
2448:Battle Bison beast
1859:Shu-Suen of Akshak
1730:Lugal-kinishe-dudu
1260:Sumerian King List
1160:, a great work by
1153:Sumerian King List
1129:Sumerian King List
605:article (see talk
574:
562:Requested move at
314:and Sumerian from
217:content assessment
124:dispute resolution
85:
36:Recognized content
3248:reassessment page
3219:reassessment page
3215:Battle of Plataea
3209:Battle of Plataea
3156:
2999:reassessment page
2960:Merge request at
2943:reassessment page
2912:reassessment page
2883:reassessment page
2695:
2694:
2664:. The article is
2652:Please note that
2423:Epic of Gilgamesh
2402:), but not about
2279:
2278:
2274:
2273:
2270:
2269:
1837:Dynasty of Akshak
1760:
1759:
1002:WP:Semi-duplicate
787:Dynasty of Dunnum
301:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
276:Ancient Near East
267:Ancient Near East
242:Ancient Near East
197:
196:
104:Assume good faith
81:
57:
56:
3323:
3289:
3200:
3198:
3192:
3188:
3148:
3012:
3005:
2979:
2739:HaniwaEnthusiast
2721:Wiktionary issue
2685:
2682:
2670:Community portal
2639:
2638:
2627:
2571:HaniwaEnthusiast
2494:HaniwaEnthusiast
2461:HaniwaEnthusiast
2342:HaniwaEnthusiast
2309:HaniwaEnthusiast
1952:Shar-Kali-Sharri
1924:Dynasty of Akkad
1776:Lugal-Anne-Mundu
1764:
1763:
1578:En-nun-tarah-ana
1338:En-sipad-zid-ana
1275:
1274:
1269:
1268:
1252:
1245:
1238:
1229:
1228:
1210:HaniwaEnthusiast
1167:
1138:HaniwaEnthusiast
1106:
1102:
1096:
1089:
1083:
1076:
1070:
1066:
947:HaniwaEnthusiast
902:HaniwaEnthusiast
863:HaniwaEnthusiast
724:HaniwaEnthusiast
696:HaniwaEnthusiast
657:HaniwaEnthusiast
623:HaniwaEnthusiast
498:HaniwaEnthusiast
463:HaniwaEnthusiast
390:
387:HaniwaEnthusiast
371:HaniwaEnthusiast
340:HaniwaEnthusiast
336:Kothar-wa-Khasis
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
256:
249:
248:
238:
231:
230:
208:
207:
206:
199:
191:
177:
176:
167:
59:
16:
3331:
3330:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3296:
3295:
3285:
3270:
3241:
3212:
3190:
3184:
3182:
3168:
3129:
3103:
3097:be merged into
3055:
3025:
3008:
3003:
2992:
2977:
2965:
2936:
2924:
2905:
2876:
2834:
2829:
2777:
2754:
2723:
2700:
2690:
2680:
2676:
2637:
2621:
2606:
2547:This discussion
2544:
2280:
2275:
2266:
2189:Dynasty of Isin
2183:
2145:
2127:
2019:
1991:
1918:
1900:
1862:
1831:
1813:
1786:Dynasty of Mari
1780:
1756:
1737:
1711:
1693:
1655:
1640:
1602:
1529:
1511:
1383:
1360:
1342:
1324:
1296:
1262:
1256:
1161:
1124:
1104:
1100:
1094:
1087:
1081:
1074:
1068:
1064:
1052:
1013:merger proposal
965:
711:
675:
595:
567:
384:
324:
308:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
193:
192:
187:
164:
130:
129:
99:
66:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
3329:
3319:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3269:
3263:
3244:Artaxerxes III
3240:
3238:Artaxerxes III
3234:
3211:
3205:
3167:
3161:
3128:
3122:
3102:
3087:
3054:
3051:
3024:
3018:
2991:
2985:
2964:
2958:
2935:
2929:
2918:
2904:
2898:
2875:
2869:
2844:
2843:
2833:
2830:
2804:
2803:
2778:
2776:
2773:
2753:
2750:
2722:
2719:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2692:
2674:
2673:
2651:
2636:
2633:
2605:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2543:
2540:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2475:
2451:
2444:Lord Saman-ana
2391:
2359:, after all).
2323:Manu the Great
2305:Manu the Great
2277:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2268:
2267:
2265:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2193:
2191:
2185:
2184:
2182:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2166:
2161:
2155:
2153:
2147:
2146:
2144:
2143:
2137:
2135:
2129:
2128:
2126:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2029:
2027:
2025:Gutian dynasty
2021:
2020:
2018:
2017:
2014:
2011:
2008:
2005:
2001:
1999:
1993:
1992:
1990:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1928:
1926:
1920:
1919:
1917:
1916:
1910:
1908:
1902:
1901:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1892:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1878:
1872:
1870:
1864:
1863:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1854:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1841:
1839:
1833:
1832:
1830:
1829:
1823:
1821:
1815:
1814:
1812:
1811:
1808:
1805:
1802:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1788:
1782:
1781:
1779:
1778:
1772:
1770:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1745:
1739:
1738:
1736:
1735:
1732:
1727:
1721:
1719:
1713:
1712:
1710:
1709:
1703:
1701:
1695:
1694:
1692:
1691:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1679:
1676:
1671:
1665:
1663:
1657:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1612:
1610:
1604:
1603:
1601:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1550:
1545:
1539:
1537:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1525:Meshkiangasher
1521:
1519:
1513:
1512:
1510:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1424:
1419:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1402:Kullassina-bel
1399:
1393:
1391:
1385:
1384:
1382:
1381:
1376:
1370:
1368:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1356:En-men-dur-ana
1352:
1350:
1344:
1343:
1341:
1340:
1334:
1332:
1326:
1325:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1315:En-men-gal-ana
1312:
1306:
1304:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1294:
1289:
1283:
1281:
1272:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1258:Rulers in the
1255:
1254:
1247:
1240:
1232:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1205:
1183:
1164:Ichthyovenator
1123:
1120:
1051:
1048:
1017:WP:MERGEREASON
964:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
942:
915:
914:
913:
912:
876:
875:
874:
873:
858:
849:wasn't a god;
843:Ma (mythology)
839:Manu the Great
782:
754:
710:
707:
674:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
652:
594:
591:
566:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
527:
458:
455:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
400:
323:
322:Infobox issues
320:
307:
304:
299:
298:
295:
294:
291:
290:
288:
271:the discussion
257:
245:
244:
239:
227:
226:
220:
209:
195:
194:
185:
183:
182:
179:
178:
132:
131:
128:
127:
120:
115:
106:
100:
98:
97:
86:
77:
76:
73:
72:
71:
55:
54:
52:
47:
45:
40:
38:
33:
31:
26:
24:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3328:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3303:
3301:
3294:
3293:
3290:
3288:
3287:Reading Beans
3282:
3274:
3268:
3262:
3261:
3257:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3239:
3233:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3210:
3204:
3203:
3199:
3197:
3189:
3187:
3180:
3172:
3166:
3160:
3159:
3155:
3153:
3147:
3146:
3141:
3133:
3127:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3100:
3099:Cain and Abel
3096:
3092:
3086:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3050:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3029:
3023:
3017:
3016:
3013:
3011:
3006:
3000:
2996:
2990:
2984:
2983:
2980:
2974:
2973:Atuna (state)
2970:
2963:
2957:
2956:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2934:
2928:
2927:
2923:
2922:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2908:Ionian Revolt
2903:
2902:Ionian Revolt
2897:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2874:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2851:
2848:
2842:
2839:
2838:
2837:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2808:
2801:
2800:
2795:is holding a
2794:
2793:
2788:
2782:
2772:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2731:
2730:
2718:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2705:
2691:
2688:
2684:
2683:
2675:Delivered by
2671:
2667:
2663:
2662:
2657:
2656:
2645:
2641:
2640:
2632:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2625:
2618:
2610:
2604:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2576:
2572:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2539:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2525:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2476:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2405:
2401:
2396:
2392:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2194:
2192:
2190:
2186:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2157:
2156:
2154:
2152:
2148:
2142:
2139:
2138:
2136:
2134:
2130:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2031:
2030:
2028:
2026:
2022:
2015:
2012:
2009:
2006:
2003:
2002:
2000:
1998:
1994:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1929:
1927:
1925:
1921:
1915:
1914:Lugal-zage-si
1912:
1911:
1909:
1907:
1903:
1896:
1894:Ishme-Shamash
1893:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1869:
1865:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1840:
1838:
1834:
1828:
1825:
1824:
1822:
1820:
1816:
1809:
1806:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1789:
1787:
1783:
1777:
1774:
1773:
1771:
1769:
1765:
1762:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1746:
1744:
1740:
1733:
1731:
1728:
1726:
1725:Enshakushanna
1723:
1722:
1720:
1718:
1714:
1708:
1705:
1704:
1702:
1700:
1696:
1689:
1686:
1683:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1652:
1651:
1649:
1647:
1643:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1611:
1609:
1605:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1544:
1541:
1540:
1538:
1536:
1532:
1526:
1523:
1522:
1520:
1518:
1514:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1438:
1435:
1433:
1430:
1428:
1425:
1423:
1420:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1408:
1407:Nangishlishma
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1392:
1390:
1386:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1367:
1363:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1351:
1349:
1345:
1339:
1336:
1335:
1333:
1331:
1327:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1310:En-men-lu-ana
1308:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1284:
1282:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1265:
1261:
1253:
1248:
1246:
1241:
1239:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1226:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1203:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1165:
1159:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1133:
1130:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1099:
1091:
1086:
1078:
1073:
1067:parameter to
1062:
1058:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
994:
990:
986:
981:
979:
975:
971:
956:
952:
948:
943:
939:
938:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:
911:
907:
903:
898:
893:
892:
891:
887:
883:
878:
877:
872:
868:
864:
859:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
824:
823:Agushaya Hymn
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
788:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
736:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
706:
705:
701:
697:
691:
688:
683:
681:
666:
662:
658:
653:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
635:
634:
633:
632:
628:
624:
618:
616:
610:
608:
604:
599:
590:
589:
586:
583:
579:
571:
565:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
526:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
459:
456:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
422:
421:
414:
410:
406:
401:
398:
394:
388:
383:I agree with
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
319:
317:
313:
303:
289:
272:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
243:
240:
237:
233:
232:
228:
224:
218:
214:
210:
201:
200:
181:
180:
175:
171:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
138:
134:
133:
125:
121:
119:
116:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
101:
95:
91:
90:Learn to edit
87:
84:
79:
78:
75:
74:
69:
65:
61:
60:
53:
51:
48:
46:
44:
41:
39:
37:
34:
32:
30:
27:
25:
23:
20:
18:
17:
3286:
3278:
3242:
3213:
3195:
3185:
3176:
3149:
3144:
3137:
3104:
3056:
3033:
3009:
2993:
2966:
2937:
2919:
2906:
2879:Western Wall
2877:
2873:Western Wall
2845:
2835:
2815:
2811:31 countries
2810:
2806:
2796:
2790:
2789:
2786:
2755:
2727:
2724:
2701:
2678:
2659:
2653:
2649:
2623:
2622:
2614:
2545:
2520:
2430:
2422:
2403:
2283:to do, like
2281:
2217:Lipit-Ishtar
2032:
1956:
1810:Sharrum-iter
1646:Awan dynasty
1502:Enmebaragesi
1412:En-tarah-ana
1378:
1224:
1201:
1134:
1128:
1125:
1098:WPBannerMeta
1092:
1079:
1053:
1029:
1024:
1020:
1010:
982:
966:
896:
774:Nunbarsegunu
712:
692:
684:
676:
619:
611:
600:
596:
575:
536:Clovis point
492:
489:Lugal-Marada
325:
309:
302:
270:
260:
223:WikiProjects
213:project page
212:
169:
135:
62:This is the
49:
43:Participants
2797:month-long
2762:Iskandar323
2735:Reallexikon
2708:Iskandar323
2237:Erra-imitti
2232:Lipit-Enlil
2212:Ishme-Dagan
2207:Iddin-Dagan
2058:Inimabakesh
1942:Manishtushu
1891:Eshtar-muti
1853:Puzur-Nirah
1616:Mesannepada
1598:Mesannepada
1593:Lugal-kitun
1568:Udul-kalama
1477:Barsal-nuna
1037:Antiquistik
811:Belit Ilani
3300:Categories
3152:talk to me
3076:Pogenplain
3040:asilvering
3004:Spinixster
2962:Talk:Tunna
2858:Ploversegg
2850:Ploversegg
2624:SkyWarrior
2529:Ploversegg
2376:Ploversegg
2289:Ploversegg
2257:Ur-du-kuga
2252:Iter-pisha
2242:Enlil-bani
2222:Ur-Ninurta
2202:Shu-Ilishu
2197:Ishbi-Erra
2141:Utu-hengal
2118:Yarlaganda
2113:Puzur-Suen
1876:Puzur-Suen
1626:Meskiagnun
1621:A'annepada
1573:La-ba'shum
1548:Lugalbanda
1472:Melem-Kish
1467:En-me-nuna
1374:Ubara-Tutu
1302:Bad-tibira
928:Ploversegg
882:Ploversegg
740:Ploversegg
540:Ploversegg
477:Ploversegg
426:Ploversegg
395:and Vedic
356:Ploversegg
3068:Firmament
2666:scheduled
2585:Ermenrich
2555:Ermenrich
2480:Zoeperkoe
2409:Zoeperkoe
2400:Galadriel
2381:Zoeperkoe
2262:Sîn-Māgir
2093:La-erabum
2063:Igeshaush
2038:Inkishush
2013:Puzur-ili
2004:Ur-ningin
1987:Shu-turul
1947:Naram-Sin
1888:Usi-watar
1881:Ur-Zababa
1588:Melem-ana
1563:Ur-Nungal
1558:Gilgamesh
1497:Iltasadum
1366:Shuruppak
1170:Zoeperkoe
1033:Scythians
1006:Scythians
993:Scythians
847:Urshanabi
815:Ninhursag
807:Ninsikila
791:Kus (god)
170:1460 days
126:if needed
109:Be polite
64:talk page
50:Talk page
22:Main page
3186:Remsense
3145:Bolter21
2916:Hog Farm
2819:Grnrchst
2681:MusikBot
2395:Superman
2179:Ibbi-Sin
2169:Amar-Sin
2159:Ur-Nammu
2068:Yarlagab
2053:Elulmesh
2043:Sarlagab
2007:Ur-gigir
1847:Undalulu
1734:Argandea
1707:Hadanish
1690:Lugalngu
1687:Men-nuna
1543:Enmerkar
1292:Alalngar
1109:Aymatth2
920:Anunnaki
897:takultu
851:Al Basty
803:Meskilak
799:Nintulla
795:Ua-Ildak
582:UtherSRG
137:Archives
94:get help
29:Curation
3089:Should
3010:(chat!)
2978:ASUKITE
2456:Ninimma
2357:Lemuria
2285:Puranda
2247:Zambiya
2227:Būr-Sîn
2174:Shu-Sin
2123:Tirigan
2103:Ibranum
2088:Apilkin
1897:Nanniya
1885:Zimudar
1856:Ushi-Il
1678:Mamagal
1674:Dadasig
1583:Mesh-he
1437:Zuqaqip
1432:Kalumum
1427:Kalibum
1422:Puannum
1320:Dumuzid
1065:|class=
1025:Context
1021:Overlap
998:Scythia
989:Scythia
974:Scythia
819:Agasaya
603:Kumarbi
2650:Hello,
2551:Moloch
2542:Moloch
2427:Silili
2361:Furius
2327:Furius
2164:Shulgi
2108:Hablum
2098:Irarum
2048:Shulme
2016:Ur-Utu
1937:Rimush
1932:Sargon
1827:Kubaba
1699:Hamazi
1681:Kalbum
1669:Susuda
1636:Balulu
1487:Tizqar
1452:Arwium
1447:Mashda
1397:Jushur
1348:Sippar
1287:Alulim
1202:major
1103:a new
1008:page.
985:Iškuza
970:Iškuza
941:sites.
924:Inanna
855:Ashima
778:Nisaba
639:Furius
585:(talk)
517:Furius
513:Aštabi
493:koine
485:Aštabi
481:ʿAṯtar
441:Furius
405:Furius
332:Shalim
328:Shahar
219:scale.
3252:Z1720
3223:Z1720
2995:Isaac
2989:Isaac
2971:with
2969:Tunna
2655:Bible
2440:Emesh
2436:Enten
2404:every
2083:Kurum
2078:Yarla
2073:Ibate
1977:Ilulu
1972:Nanum
1962:Igigi
1807:Limer
1750:Nanni
1631:Elulu
1517:Eanna
1482:Zamug
1462:Balih
1457:Etana
1417:Babum
1330:Larak
1279:Eridu
831:Enten
827:Emesh
770:Zaqar
766:Sisig
762:Gerra
760:and "
758:Gibil
621:now.
397:Dyaus
211:This
122:Seek
3256:talk
3227:talk
3115:talk
3095:Abel
3093:and
3091:Cain
3080:talk
3044:talk
2951:talk
2921:Talk
2891:talk
2862:talk
2854:talk
2823:talk
2766:talk
2743:talk
2712:talk
2589:talk
2575:talk
2559:talk
2533:talk
2498:talk
2484:talk
2465:talk
2438:and
2413:talk
2385:talk
2365:talk
2346:talk
2331:talk
2313:talk
2293:talk
2010:Kuda
1982:Dudu
1850:Urur
1844:Unzi
1804:Zizi
1800:Bazi
1796:Anba
1793:Anbu
1768:Adab
1684:Tuge
1492:Ilku
1442:Atab
1214:talk
1174:talk
1158:here
1142:talk
1113:talk
1041:talk
987:and
972:and
951:talk
932:talk
906:talk
886:talk
867:talk
829:and
768:and
744:talk
728:talk
716:Enki
700:talk
687:Baal
661:talk
643:talk
627:talk
615:here
607:here
544:talk
521:talk
502:talk
467:talk
445:talk
430:talk
409:talk
393:Zeus
375:talk
360:talk
344:talk
111:and
2729:gud
2446:or
1967:Imi
1507:Aga
3302::
3258:)
3229:)
3191:‥
3117:)
3109:.
3082:)
3046:)
2953:)
2893:)
2864:)
2856:)
2825:)
2768:)
2745:)
2714:)
2706:.
2677:—
2591:)
2577:)
2561:)
2535:)
2500:)
2486:)
2467:)
2415:)
2387:)
2367:)
2348:)
2333:)
2315:)
2295:)
1216:)
1176:)
1144:)
1115:)
1101:}}
1095:{{
1088:}}
1082:{{
1075:}}
1069:{{
1043:)
1023:,
1019::
980:.
953:)
934:)
908:)
888:)
869:)
825:;
809:;
793:,
746:)
730:)
702:)
663:)
645:)
629:)
546:)
523:)
504:)
487:,
469:)
447:)
432:)
411:)
377:)
362:)
346:)
334:,
330:,
168::
160:,
156:,
152:,
148:,
144:,
92:;
3254:(
3225:(
3196:论
3154:)
3150:(
3113:(
3101:?
3078:(
3042:(
2949:(
2889:(
2860:(
2852:(
2821:(
2802:!
2764:(
2741:(
2710:(
2587:(
2573:(
2557:(
2531:(
2496:(
2482:(
2463:(
2411:(
2383:(
2363:(
2344:(
2329:(
2311:(
2303:(
2291:(
1251:e
1244:t
1237:v
1212:(
1172:(
1166::
1162:@
1140:(
1111:(
1039:(
949:(
930:(
904:(
884:(
865:(
789:(
742:(
726:(
698:(
659:(
641:(
625:(
542:(
519:(
500:(
465:(
443:(
428:(
407:(
389::
385:@
373:(
358:(
342:(
225::
162:6
158:5
154:4
150:3
146:2
142:1
139::
96:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.