243:
211:
872:) be worked into MoS, and the result is always a consensus against the idea, because MoS exists for ensuring quality and consistent and understandable content for the readers (and secondarily for reducing editorial conflicts about styling that content), but this sort of thing isn't styling the content, having no effect on what editors see, or any accessibility effect on editors or readers, possibly the only other reason we'd care about a code-formatting matter. There's just not a consensus to prefer one style over the other. To the extent anything in MoS would apply to this stuff, it would be
1519:
1094:
281:
222:
180:
371:
353:
315:
149:
229:
876:: if there are two acceptable styles, don't arbitrarily change from one to the other. For my part, when I encounter messy lists, I normalize to which ever style already dominates in the page. If there is no clear "winner", and just a really random mess, I usually normalize to the spaced style as marginally more readable for editors. But only if making a more substantial improvement in the same edit.
1192:, that sounds like good advice that *should* be in a Knowledge policy or guideline that discusses comparison articles -- and perhaps already is. Similarly, I think I've read somewhere that: comparison articles should cite sources that actually compare things, and if no such sources can be found, then a stand-alone "comparison article" likely doesn't meet Knowledge's
221:
228:
684:
The spaces after the asterisks only affect the page size when opening the page or section for editing, and the contents of the edit window form a surprisingly small amount of the data that is served to your browser when you do that. So the addition or removal of a few spaces won't make any measurable
560:
There is no technical reason to prefer one over the other. The difference is only when editing using the source editor, and even then it is purely aesthetic. If you are coming across people who are routinely adding spaces where there were none before (or removing them), that is the sort of thing that
1014:
test to check for multiple parameter values. And it should probably use an unbulleted list, since bulleted ones are unusual in infoboxes and waste space in them. The more general ingredients list lower in the i'box might sensibly use a bullet list, but it could be CSS kerned to waste less horizontal
932:
automatically forces a bulleted list for its main-alcohol parameters. Bulleted lists in infoboxes aren't unheard-of, though rare. However, that template forces a bullet even for single entrants, making the oxymoronic single-item list. Given there is no actual list created, should that template be
676:
You won't get consistency. First, there is no reason to either eliminate or to require them; second, most people simply won't care; and third, the sheer number of pages presently using (i) spaces; (ii) no spaces; (iii) either one indiscriminately means that the amount of work necessary to harmonise
488:
The outcome is the same, so I am wondering if there is any technical reason who one should be preferred over the other. Frankly, I would prefer to have a set house style and conform pages to it generally. It is annoying to copy lines to multiple relevant lists and to have to edit that space every
1549:
entering its third year, I am exploring the idea of converting the list of topics from a table to a list, because most of the entries do not have a description. I wish to ask what format could I employ, taking into account the use of colons, dashes, and parentheses in the topic names?
677:
two-thirds of pages to match the other third would simply not be worth the bother. Remember that every edit creates a new version of a page and all old versions are preserved, so editing a 10,000-byte page to remove ten spaces doesn't decrease the database size by 10 bytes, it
449:
I work on a lot of disambiguation pages and name lists and alumni lists, which sometimes involves copying lines from, for example, a given name page to a surname page, or from a name page to an alumni list. These are typically bulleted lists, which may either be formatted as:
550:
the same. It is just an aesthetic thing and a kindness to the next editor – having a space after the asterisk helps visually when you are editing the source. Maybe the MOS could say something about that, but I don't see it as being important enough to be stated as policy —
1084:
655:
I just want consistency. If there is no reason to have the spaces, then eliminate them (they do affect the page size, which theoretically affects loading time). If there is a reason to have them, such as improved readability while editing, then require them.
1535:
860:"Is it just to make it easier to parse the wikitext?" Yes. Some editors prefer it, and that's the only reason, but it's not a compelling reason to change the style. "Should we have a preference expressed in the MOS?" No, for
1129:
Many
Knowledge articles have a title that begins with "Comparison of ...". Is there a Knowledge policy or guideline that specifically discusses such comparison articles? I hoped to find such a discussion when I went to
1509:
1098:
1086:
970:, there's a bulleted list with one item (rum). Given how the bulleted-list markup interacts with other variables like scrapers, screen readers, and more, are there any technical, grammatical,
526:
I'm fine with having the space if someone can explain to me what purpose it serves. Is it just to make it easier to parse the wikitext? Should we have a preference expressed in the MOS?
1530:
1563:
1119:
992:
Yeah, I agree that looks odd. I'd say it should just be a plain wikilink in such a case, not a list. But ultimately you'll have to discuss that with the template authors.
140:
444:
1537:
1226:
49:
900:
Eventually, it will get mostly standardized as whatever the visual editor is doing, which is (presently, but, if memory serves, not originally) adding a space.
1428:
So I've just done a rudimentary bit of brainstorming, and I quickly realized this is a really easy—seemingly not previously addressed—itch to scratch. Behold,
1259:
504:
1504:
1367:
There are nonzero infobox situations where I'd just like to separate a bulleted list with headers thusly, even after slimming it down as appropriate. Unno.
681:
it by 9990 bytes for the page text, plus all the entries in the revision and link tables. Any intended net saving of space is always a net loss of space.
334:
1250:'s description of name-value or topic-value pairs, but I will defer to the experts here. The editor appears to have made hundreds of these edits. –
1243:
1246:, claiming that bold headers are a MOS-related improvement over semicolon and asterisk markup. The semicolon markup appears to me to conform with
1411:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
1523:
1511:
305:
1074:
1053:
909:
555:
541:
514:
84:
1031:
642:
621:
1040:) list with no bullet at all would be better, as the list of recipe ingredients would look like a list of recipe ingredients. Try
1218:
1180:
1285:
892:
864:
reasons, and more in particular because people have repeatedly proposed this and several other forms of "coding standards" (like
1001:
987:
961:
1423:
1311:
853:
581:
328:
1405:
1387:
1362:
1348:
1154:
216:
90:
1410:
Thanks for the responses. I searched the MOS:PSEUDOHEAD page for "semicolon", which I should have done earlier, and I found
946:
671:
1582:
1577:
1545:
148:
1587:
546:
The parser does not care about the space – you could have no space or five spaces and the HTML created by the parser is
1302:
is certainly right that the old syntax they are fixing is not proper deflist syntax and likely produces invalid HTML.
1445:
1069:
1026:
887:
323:
391:
1135:
1099:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Lists § Should
Template:Dynamic list be used in sections that also have Template:Main?
1087:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Lists § Should
Template:Dynamic list be used in sections that also have Template:Main?
34:
30:
17:
1203:
242:
210:
79:
1138:, which only mentions the word "comparison" once, and even then it's not referring to comparison articles.
338:
of
Knowledge's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.
290:
191:
387:
383:
378:
358:
70:
685:
difference. When you save the edit, as GhostInTheMachine pointed out, the HTML created by the parser is
258:(MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.
103:
926:
294:
255:
250:
298:
952:
What do you mean specifically? Can you point to an usage of the template where this is visible?
433:
254:, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the
1124:
1049:
905:
552:
521:
511:
293:
procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the
English Knowledge
1160:
Who is doing the comparing - you or your sources? If it's you, then you possibly fall foul of
1066:
1023:
884:
617:
562:
197:
510:
Every time you use a bulleted list without the space, a fairy dies. Your choice of course —
1431:
1193:
1142:
1131:
982:
941:
917:
163:
8:
1527:
1419:
1255:
1214:
1176:
1150:
849:
638:
577:
60:
1496:
1379:
1340:
1277:
1041:
861:
566:
425:
75:
1461:
1045:
901:
56:
1196:
guideline (but the same information may be OK as a subsection of the topic article).
1401:
1358:
1307:
1061:
1018:
997:
957:
879:
666:
630:
make a difference to the rendered output. But why would we want to do it anyway? --
613:
536:
499:
335:
guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of
Knowledge policies
1558:
1165:
976:
935:
897:
It's to make the wikitext more human-readable. The software parser doesn't care.
1058:
Made that recommendation in the template documentation. We'll see if it sticks.
1415:
1319:
1251:
1228:
1210:
1199:
Alas, I've been unable remember where I read that, hence the original question.
1189:
1169:
1146:
1037:
974:, or stylistic problems caused by a 'list' that then only has one entrant? —
842:
631:
570:
159:
1571:
1486:
1369:
1330:
1267:
1161:
280:
1538:
Conversations about
Important Things#List of Important Conversations lessons
873:
1452:
1397:
1393:
1354:
1303:
1299:
1291:
1247:
1239:
1232:
993:
953:
657:
527:
490:
1206:
category, which generally *do* already have sources doing the comparing.
164:
1551:
971:
1316:
Right, of course. How is one meant to mix the two again, just open a
1107:
322:
For information on
Knowledge's approach to the establishment of new
1202:
To answer your literal question: I'm often editing articles in the
314:
161:
1392:
In that case, just using bold markup around the header line, like
370:
352:
1524:
List of genocides § List ordering: Reverse or regular chronology
1512:
List of genocides § List ordering: Reverse or regular chronology
1141:
Is there perhaps some other
Knowledge policy or guideline that
967:
165:
689:
the same - here is the HTML from your original two examples:
1265:
This seems like a pretty core use-case of definition lists.
390:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
489:
time to conform to the variations of individual pages.
445:
Bullet-space, or not bullet-space, that is the question
966:
Sure, easy-peasy. In the infobox's implementation at
25:
1353:I have never tried, but I suppose that would work.
586:Maybe we could compromise and use halfspaces? Eg
1569:
1294:) is a ; line followed by one or more : lines,
933:invoking list markup for single variables? —
1414:, which says not to put * after ; markup. –
308:carefully and exercise caution when editing.
382:, an attempt to structure and organize all
1522:You are invited to join the discussion at
1396:does it, doesn't seem the worst solution.
1097:You are invited to join the discussion at
190:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
386:. If you wish to help, please visit the
248:This page falls within the scope of the
14:
1570:
304:Contributors are urged to review the
264:Knowledge:WikiProject Manual of Style
1546:Conversations about Important Things
301:. Both areas are subjects of debate.
267:Template:WikiProject Manual of Style
179:
177:
173:
841:the spaces simply do not appear. --
196:It is of interest to the following
33:for discussing improvements to the
23:
1134:, but that currently redirects to
313:
279:
24:
1599:
1446:Communications Workers of America
376:This page is within the scope of
1517:
1092:
369:
351:
241:
227:
220:
209:
178:
147:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
1325:
1136:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Lists
18:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style
13:
1:
1564:17:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
1204:Category:Software comparisons
1002:06:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
988:06:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
962:04:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
947:22:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
893:03:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
47:Put new text under old text.
7:
1583:NA-importance List articles
1578:Project-Class List articles
1531:00:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
1505:20:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1424:14:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1406:08:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1388:07:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1363:07:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1349:06:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1312:06:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1286:00:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1260:00:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
1120:21:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
1075:10:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
1054:07:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
1032:00:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
910:07:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
400:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
55:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1604:
1588:WikiProject Lists articles
569:rule 4 both discourage. --
423:
403:Template:WikiProject Lists
289:This page falls under the
1497:
1448:District 1 and Local 1126
1380:
1341:
1278:
854:14:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
672:20:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
364:
321:
287:
251:Knowledge:Manual of Style
236:
204:
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
1219:05:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
1010:Fixing that is a simple
766:
690:
643:12:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
622:11:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
587:
582:09:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
556:08:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
542:00:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
515:22:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
505:21:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
471:
452:
270:Manual of Style articles
1181:17:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
1155:17:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
384:list pages on Knowledge
324:policies and guidelines
1412:this explicit guidance
1145:*should* redirect to?
318:
284:
80:avoid personal attacks
1242:is making many edits
317:
299:article titles policy
283:
141:Auto-archiving period
35:Manual of Style/Lists
1298:by * list items. So
1194:Knowledge:Notability
1536:List formatting at
1290:A definition list (
1125:comparison articles
626:Now that certainly
1042:Template:Plainlist
1036:A "bullet" (i.e.,
319:
306:awareness criteria
291:contentious topics
285:
192:content assessment
91:dispute resolution
52:
1562:
1462:The Post-Standard
1227:Are these proper
1117:
1105:
918:single-item lists
553:GhostInTheMachine
522:GhostInTheMachine
512:GhostInTheMachine
422:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
379:WikiProject Lists
346:
345:
342:
341:
172:
171:
71:Assume good faith
48:
1595:
1556:
1554:
1521:
1520:
1503:
1501:
1495:
1491:
1435:
1386:
1384:
1378:
1374:
1347:
1345:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1323:
1284:
1282:
1276:
1272:
1172:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1112:
1103:
1096:
1095:
1073:
1030:
1013:
979:
938:
931:
927:infobox cocktail
925:
891:
871:
867:
845:
838:
835:
832:
828:
825:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
806:
802:
799:
796:
793:
790:
787:
783:
780:
777:
773:
770:
762:
759:
756:
752:
749:
745:
742:
739:
736:
733:
730:
726:
723:
720:
717:
714:
711:
707:
704:
701:
697:
694:
664:
634:
608:
605:
601:
598:
594:
591:
573:
534:
525:
497:
483:
479:
475:
464:
460:
456:
436:
408:
407:
404:
401:
398:
373:
366:
365:
355:
348:
347:
332:. Additionally,
272:
271:
268:
265:
262:
245:
238:
237:
232:
231:
230:
225:
224:
223:
213:
206:
205:
183:
182:
181:
174:
166:
152:
151:
142:
26:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1568:
1567:
1552:
1541:
1518:
1515:
1493:
1487:
1485:
1467:
1451:New York State
1429:
1376:
1370:
1368:
1337:
1331:
1329:
1317:
1274:
1268:
1266:
1237:
1170:
1127:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1093:
1090:
1059:
1016:
1011:
977:
936:
929:
923:
920:
877:
869:
865:
843:
840:
839:
836:
833:
829:
826:
823:
819:
816:
813:
810:
807:
804:
800:
797:
794:
791:
788:
785:
781:
778:
774:
771:
768:
764:
763:
760:
757:
753:
750:
747:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
728:
724:
721:
718:
715:
712:
709:
705:
702:
698:
695:
692:
658:
632:
611:
610:
606:
603:
599:
596:
592:
589:
571:
528:
519:
491:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
447:
440:
439:
432:
428:
405:
402:
399:
396:
395:
295:Manual of Style
269:
266:
263:
261:Manual of Style
260:
259:
256:Manual of Style
226:
219:
217:Manual of Style
168:
167:
162:
139:
97:
96:
66:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1601:
1591:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1540:
1534:
1514:
1510:Discussion at
1508:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1468:
1466:
1465:
1458:
1455:
1449:
1443:
1439:
1437:
1288:
1236:
1229:MOS:PSEUDOHEAD
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1207:
1200:
1197:
1184:
1183:
1126:
1123:
1089:
1085:Discussion at
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
919:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
898:
858:
857:
856:
767:
691:
682:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
588:
563:WP:COSMETICBOT
558:
472:
453:
446:
443:
438:
437:
429:
424:
420:
419:
416:
415:
412:
411:
409:
374:
362:
361:
356:
344:
343:
340:
339:
320:
310:
309:
303:
286:
276:
275:
273:
246:
234:
233:
214:
202:
201:
195:
184:
170:
169:
160:
158:
157:
154:
153:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
38:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1600:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1566:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1548:
1547:
1539:
1533:
1532:
1529:
1525:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1500:
1492:
1490:
1469:
1464:
1463:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1441:
1440:
1438:
1433:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1385:
1383:
1375:
1373:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1344:
1336:
1334:
1321:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1281:
1273:
1271:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:like this one
1241:
1234:
1230:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:WP:Comparison
1139:
1137:
1133:
1132:WP:Comparison
1122:
1121:
1113:
1111:
1100:
1088:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1009:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
989:
986:
984:
980:
973:
972:accessibility
969:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
945:
943:
939:
928:
922:The template
911:
907:
903:
899:
896:
895:
894:
889:
886:
883:
882:
875:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
688:
683:
680:
675:
674:
673:
670:
669:
665:
663:
662:
654:
644:
640:
636:
629:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
568:
564:
559:
557:
554:
549:
545:
544:
543:
540:
539:
535:
533:
532:
523:
518:
517:
516:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
503:
502:
498:
496:
495:
470:
451:
442:
435:
431:
430:
427:
410:
406:List articles
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
375:
372:
368:
367:
363:
360:
357:
354:
350:
349:
337:
336:
331:
330:
325:
316:
312:
311:
307:
302:
300:
296:
292:
282:
278:
277:
274:
257:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
218:
215:
212:
208:
207:
203:
199:
193:
189:
185:
176:
175:
156:
155:
150:
146:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
1544:
1542:
1516:
1498:
1488:
1484:
1460:
1442:Labor unions
1381:
1371:
1342:
1332:
1295:
1279:
1269:
1238:
1140:
1128:
1109:
1091:
1062:
1046:WhatamIdoing
1019:
975:
934:
921:
902:WhatamIdoing
880:
874:MOS:STYLEVAR
686:
678:
667:
660:
659:
627:
607: 
600: 
593: 
547:
537:
530:
529:
500:
493:
492:
487:
468:
448:
441:
388:project page
377:
333:
327:
288:
249:
198:WikiProjects
188:project page
187:
144:
102:
29:This is the
1432:Bulleted dl
1292:MOS:DEFLIST
1248:MOS:DEFLIST
1233:MOS:DEFLIST
1063:SMcCandlish
1020:SMcCandlish
881:SMcCandlish
862:WP:MOSBLOAT
614:Herostratus
567:WP:AWBRULES
329:WP:PROPOSAL
326:, refer to
1572:Categories
1457:Newspapers
1324:after the
978:Fourthords
937:Fourthords
434:WT:MOSLIST
392:discussion
297:, and the
1528:Alalch E.
1416:Jonesey95
1252:Jonesey95
1211:DavidCary
1190:Redrose64
1147:DavidCary
1038:Unordered
870:== Foo ==
679:increases
93:if needed
76:Be polite
31:talk page
1489:Remsense
1372:Remsense
1333:Remsense
1270:Remsense
1166:WP:SYNTH
426:Shortcut
104:Archives
61:get help
1543:Due to
1453:AFL–CIO
1164:and/or
1015:space.
868:versus
866:==Foo==
687:exactly
609:Foobar
548:exactly
484:Foobar
465:Foobar
145:60 days
1398:Gawaon
1394:Ost316
1355:Gawaon
1304:Gawaon
1300:Ost316
1240:Ost316
1235:edits?
1173:rose64
1162:WP:NOR
994:Gawaon
968:mojito
954:Gawaon
846:rose64
822:Foobar
746:Foobar
661:BD2412
635:rose64
574:rose64
531:BD2412
494:BD2412
194:scale.
1553:Minoa
1320:blist
837:: -->
831:</
830:: -->
824:</
820:: -->
811:: -->
805:</
801:: -->
792:: -->
786:</
782:: -->
775:: -->
761:: -->
755:</
754:: -->
748:</
744:: -->
735:: -->
729:</
725:: -->
716:: -->
710:</
706:: -->
699:: -->
628:would
397:Lists
359:Lists
186:This
89:Seek
37:page.
16:<
1559:talk
1526:. —
1420:talk
1402:talk
1359:talk
1308:talk
1256:talk
1215:talk
1177:talk
1175:🌹 (
1168:. --
1151:talk
1110:Sdkb
1104:{{u|
1050:talk
998:talk
958:talk
906:talk
850:talk
848:🌹 (
814:<
795:<
776:<
769:<
765:and
738:<
719:<
700:<
693:<
639:talk
637:🌹 (
618:talk
602:Bar
595:Foo
578:talk
576:🌹 (
565:and
480:Bar
476:Foo
469:or:
461:Bar
457:Foo
78:and
1296:not
1171:Red
1101:.
1072:😼
1029:😼
1012:#if
983:=Λ=
942:=Λ=
890:😼
844:Red
803:Bar
784:Foo
727:Bar
708:Foo
633:Red
572:Red
1574::
1550:--
1494:‥
1434:}}
1430:{{
1422:)
1404:)
1377:‥
1361:)
1338:‥
1328:?
1322:}}
1318:{{
1310:)
1275:‥
1258:)
1231:/
1217:)
1209:--
1179:)
1153:)
1116:}}
1060:—
1052:)
1044:.
1017:—
1000:)
981:|
960:)
940:|
930:}}
924:{{
908:)
878:—
852:)
834:ul
827:li
817:li
808:li
798:li
789:li
779:li
772:ul
758:ul
751:li
741:li
732:li
722:li
713:li
703:li
696:ul
641:)
620:)
612:--
580:)
143::
135:,
131:,
127:,
123:,
119:,
115:,
111:,
59:;
1561:)
1557:(
1499:论
1436::
1418:(
1400:(
1382:论
1357:(
1343:论
1326::
1306:(
1280:论
1254:(
1213:(
1149:(
1070:¢
1067:☏
1048:(
1027:¢
1024:☏
996:(
985:|
956:(
944:|
904:(
888:¢
885:☏
668:T
616:(
604:*
597:*
590:*
538:T
524::
520:@
501:T
482:*
478:*
474:*
463:*
459:*
455:*
394:.
200::
137:8
133:7
129:6
125:5
121:4
117:3
113:2
109:1
106::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
