559:
123:
956:"List of places of worship in..." lists, with all the Wiki markup, images, references and everything else (in excess of 120KB!), into the Planning Statement. It was clearly an attempt to demonstrate that other places of worship existed locally; but in the largely rural area in question, the fact that it is irrelevant that churches of an entirely different denomination happen to exist anything up to 20 villages and 40 miles away was apparently lost on them. Needless to say, no acknowledgement of the copying was given. I never did get to photograph the chapel, incidentally ... it was demolished before I could visit the village in question!
130:
150:
720:
110:
1211:
especially our lists of landmarks and historic places. At
Knowledge Day NYC I saw an OpenStreetMaps guy explaining something to a Wikipedian and it was too bad the HMDB guy wasn't there to get in on that. Anyway I was busy explaining the birth and childhood of an article to a pair of WP newbies at the moment. Opportunities for collaboration are many, but of course we tend to become too busy playing around with our own insiders.
140:
36:
160:
120:
934:
219:
448:
170:
930:, that I had written, copied word for word with my references, in an academic journal published in Africa! No credit was given - as if they had done the months of research themselves! (It was easy to prove it wasn't me doing the copying because of the dates.) I guess they didn't realize Wiki is global! I contacted the publisher and ratted them out.
1145:
is my favorite, it shows him and his schtick much better than any words could, and essentially confirms the facts as stated in
Knowledge. Sure there are almost always minor grumbles and fine tuning interpretations, but for the series as a whole, the 14 vs. 15 and "only a great portion of the house"
1027:
Yes, plagiarism of
Knowledge has been an ongoing issue for as long as I can remember. Back in the day, I once found a magazine article on a topic I'd written about that was about 50% cribbed from the Knowledge article. It will continue to happen, particularly in non-mainstream sources; the kinds of
652:
was launched on 8 January 2024, with the goal of placing the first U.S.-manufactured lunar lander on the Moon since the days of the space race. Among the items aboard the unmanned lander was a copy of
Knowledge. Alas, Knowledge did not make it to the Moon—the mission was abandoned less than one day
955:
about the proposed demolition of a disused chapel building which I hadn't yet photographed. I was bemused to find that, as an attempt to justify the point that it was no longer required, the applicant (a housebuilding firm which wanted to buy the site) had copied and pasted the whole of one of my
346:
Though this reporter is not a lawyer, it appears that plagiarism can be avoided in most, but not all, situations simply by complying with copyright law. Copying
Knowledge text into an academic work has long been viewed as possible plagiarism, even if done by university freshmen, as shown in a 2010
204:
1150:
radio. It appeared to me like some middle talent rocker showed up unexpectedly at the studio, and they wanted to do an interview but had done no prep. So just read the
Knowledge article and ask if it's true. Somehow I'd love to do a whole on-Wiki series like this, but I have no video production
1210:
Yeah, there's plenty of groups doing small, well-organized scholarly websites with parallels to bits of our
Wikimedia sites. I've been corresponding with one of the regional editors of Historic Markers Database about setting up links from Wikidata to their pages and back, and Commons, and ENWP
1059:
I first came to
Knowledge because some of my work had been copied onto Knowledge, and I was asked to make some corrections to the Knowledge version. I resolved this by re-licensing my work under Creative Commons, so there was no copyright violation any more. Some people might be curious about
884:
A while back I spotted an article on a
Facebook history interest page that was a direct unattributed copy of a Knowledge article that I had contributed to. I contacted the page admin (who was not the author of the piece) and it was removed. I suspect that (unattributed copying) happens a lot.
163:
805:
409:
An interesting sidelight to the above story is that Bill Ackman in the same set of tweets also wrote "I also wish I knew how to reach a human being at
Knowledge as my Knowledge biography needs correcting, and could be meaningfully improved if there was someone I could speak to."
133:
90:
313:. After right-wing sources accused Gay of plagiarism, Ackman also called for Gay's removal based on the plagiarism accusation. These events were widely covered in the national and international press and did not involve Knowledge. We limit this discussion to the question
437:
who says they have been editing for you from May 2022 through at least October 2023. They have been fairly polite compared to other paid editors, but you might ask them to be a bit less aggressive. They have no special editing rights that other editors do not have.
173:
500:, also known as Mojahedin-e-Khalq or MEK, which opposes the government. The article is based on information provided by an unknown Wikipedian identified only as "Marco", which is not their username. Someone claiming to be Marco recently has also contacted
153:
626:
community, which now numbers only about 600 people. Where to start? "Wikimedia Community User Group Malaysia (Wikimedia Malaysia) is involved in efforts to preserve the Mendriq language by inputting Mendriq words into online multilingual dictionary
580:: Fake Knowledge screenshot used to spread hoax about destruction of a Disneyland in Oklahoma (that never existed) ... supposedly "destroyed in 2022 after the International Space Station fell and crushed it", reports the
327:. Copyright violations are a matter of law generally decided in civil courts; plagiarism is an ethical matter generally covered by university policies. Most text in Knowledge is copyrighted, with the exceptions of short "
331:" quotes and a limited amount of text taken from the public domain, for example in articles that state at the end "This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "
284:
cited in any paper. Before Business Insider emailed last night, I never thought about this before. And on this point, what was the standard 15 years ago for citing WikiPedia? Was it different then versus now?
1146:
are about as extreme as the "mistakes of fact" get. I only quit putting these videos into articles because I don't really like heavy metal music. The genre goes back - as far as I can tell - to about 2005 on
372:
Academics who wish to check whether copying text from Knowledge is plagiarism need to check their university policies, but copying text from Knowledge without attribution generally is a violation of the
492:
1085:
Yes, I have gotten in serious trouble a couple of times for copying myself - which I thought was allowed - and it is, but not without noting it in the edit summary. Big fire on head!
895:
It happens. I remember one time I asked another editor to translate a quote from Turkish so I could put it in an article. They did and I did. Later, I found the exact same words in
1105:. -At the age of 15 you started a fire in your home to scare your sister, but you accidentally burned the house down. -I was 14 and I only burnt a great portion of the house down.
96:
1064:. The classic exception is self-plagiarism, where the same article is submitted a second time. There is no copyright violation, but it is still plagiarism because it is not an
581:
774:
820:
754:
1256:
744:
143:
660:
654:
1205:
921:
784:
759:
749:
1185:
1129:
946:
707:
698:
508:
481:
1220:
280:
Can one use a definition from an online dictionary or encyclopedia without attribution ? I honestly don’t know the answer. I have never seen WikiPedia or
737:
470:
1196:
The bit about Mendriq is really cool to hear, I think more cross-site integration like that for wikiprojects could go a long way in Wikimedia's future.
615:
994:
974:
1114:
789:
686:
1164:
1037:
1020:
779:
764:
731:
55:
44:
1094:
872:'s X video about the same topic as the top Ackman story. She did a wonderful job (in under 10 minutes). My 560 word text suffers in comparison. -
377:
license and copyright law. If you present the words or ideas in Knowledge as if they are your own, this is generally considered to be plagiarism.
1051:
889:
1028:
media that we normally consider reliable sources now use better anti-plagiarism software prior to publishing than they did in the "old days".
851:
794:
512:
1322:
1079:
294:
634:
642:; examples they give from the Arabic Knowledge include "such claims as Jews not having inhabited the land until around 200 years ago".
496:. The story claims that an Iranian government cyber army is removing information from Knowledge about atrocities committed against the
298:
310:
825:
442:
516:
497:
421:, pretty much whatever you would like, but I suggest it be in the form "The following text is incorrect, it should be replaced by
519:
article have been given harsh bans or blocks of varying severity. All of them appear to have supported the MEK side of the issue.
339:(11th ed.). Cambridge University Press." Other material is copyrighted by the Knowledge editor who first added it and is licensed
21:
1298:
832:
353:. The same article suggests that "using words did not write is a serious misdeed" if those words are not attributed. The book
113:
681:
Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit our next edition in the
417:
you can communicate with Wikipedians fairly directly. If you register an account on Knowledge you can write on the talkpage,
1293:
1288:
1267:
1252:
682:
558:
528:
253:
343:, which requires that the text be linked and the author attributed. Attribution can be done by linking to the page history.
462:
for our next issue I'd be happy to drop off my contact details at your office with my formatting and other requirements. –
404:
254:"Academic celebrity Neri Oxman plagiarized from Knowledge, scholars, a textbook, and other sources without any attribution"
211:
1181:
1110:
917:
536:
1237:, and c) old news but multiple counts of unattributed copying from Knowledge were discussed (or found in some cases) by
1283:
809:
524:
366:
306:
540:
532:
428:
319:
Several commentators at the discussion threads on the platform formerly known as Twitter appear to have confused
1177:
1136:
1106:
913:
539:, have received indefinite blocks from a checkuser, which usually indicates an egregious case of sockpuppetry.
30:
What is plagiarism? Oklahoma Disneyland? Reaching a human being at Knowledge?: Watch out for those space ships!
1278:
1234:
719:
520:
49:
35:
17:
666:
1141:- I just love the format on that show and think I've put links in about 20 Wikiarticles to the videos.
1246:
909:
441:
If you'd like something more private, you can contact our Volunteer Response Team (VRT) by email at
864:! I should emphasize that I'm somewhat embarrassed that, while we were trying to publish, I found
305:
to resign after she and three other presidents of major universities testified in a congressional
1216:
1201:
1062:
plagiarism can be avoided in most, but not all, situations simply by complying with copyright law
886:
601:
963:
414:
1229:
Three tangents: a) I wish there were a way to teach Knowledge readers about the existence of
649:
567:
362:
1004:
349:
257:
1304:
1242:
1230:
1157:
1125:
1090:
1047:
1013:
952:
942:
867:
847:
385:
191:
276:
faculty for plagiarism, and even questioning whether somebody could plagiarize Knowledge.
8:
1174:
990:
389:
1212:
1197:
1074:
927:
604:. Use of Knowledge for source authentication is first mentioned at 10:30 in the story.
958:
816:
571:
ahead of launch. Unfortunately, Knowledge didn't make it to the Moon this time round.
320:
597:
515:. The only information we can add is that over the past year several editors of the
1033:
897:
418:
241:
1152:
1121:
1086:
1043:
1008:
938:
902:
873:
859:
843:
638:
551:
545:
464:
398:
392:) scooped me on this story with a 9 minute 42 second video published on Youtube.
195:
986:
1102:
1000:
393:
1316:
1069:
616:
reports on efforts to save some of Malaysia's threatened indigenous languages
332:
187:
91:
What is plagiarism? Oklahoma Disneyland? Reaching a human being at Knowledge?
1233:, b) unattributed copies of Knowledge are a pain because they can result in
1173:. There was another thing called WikiWhat? And something called Actually me
483:
How Knowledge is being changed to downgrade Iranian human rights atrocities
358:
309:. Ackman and many others believed their plans to counter antisemitism were
302:
1029:
236:
1238:
1170:
623:
507:
This dispute has a long history with a stop made at ArbCom in the 2021
324:
249:
476:
374:
340:
328:
183:
926:
It's true! The copyvio tester found almost the entire article on
619:
273:
261:
908:
I liked Molly's little video-note on "Oxman is not currenlty on
365:, is an example of how to attribute. The 544 page book includes
1142:
527:
were globally banned by Wikimedia Foundation office actions.
268:, defending his wife, saying that he would check the work of
218:
203:
431:
who says they were editing on your behalf through 2021, and
1147:
905:
found some of her WP-work in some sort of academic journal.
487:
427:
You can also continue using declared paid editors such as
1103:
Pantera - Knowledge Fact or Fiction (Best of Compilation)
269:
985:
Molly's video is published on YouTube not on X/Twitter.
281:
912:- Correction, she wasn't when I recorded this, but..."
433:
543:
received a basic indefinite block for sockpuppetry. –
592:: Just in time for the story above, KUOW (Seattle)'s
227:
490:), also available in a slightly abridged version in
830:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
511:, which resulted in Iranian politics being named
293:Ackman's interest in plagiarism started with his
1314:
367:references to more than 80 Knowledge articles
181:
471:Downgrading Iranian human rights atrocities?
1241:for his "Plagiarism and You(tube)" video.
239:must have been very angry after reading
1151:experience. Anybody want to volunteer?
833:
517:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran
498:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran
307:investigation on antisemitism on campus
264:totaling over 5,100 words, challenging
14:
1315:
1266:Explore Knowledge history by browsing
1176:that looked at WP at least sometimes.
598:"How to sort online fact from fiction"
458:Or if you'd like to be interviewed by
504:without offering us any information.
54:
29:
931:
653:after takeoff owing to a fuel leak.
1323:Knowledge Signpost archives 2024-01
631:Arabic Knowledge spreads propaganda
27:
718:
646:Knowledge goes to the Moon, almost
557:
217:
56:
34:
28:
1334:
815:These comments are automatically
1042:That' good to know. Thank you.
951:A few years ago I was reading a
932:
608:Shout-out for Wikimedia Malaysia
446:
424:. This can be referenced by ".
202:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
1101:Off-topic, but wanted to share
297:at Harvard and other campuses.
826:add the page to your watchlist
384:could publish, I noticed that
13:
1:
596:show provides techniques for
405:Paid editors are human beings
315:Can you plagiarize Knowledge?
295:protests against antisemitism
225:Shakespeare with addition by
212:Can you plagiarize Knowledge?
1257:21:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
1221:15:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
1206:17:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1186:18:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1165:16:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1130:21:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1115:19:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1095:21:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
1080:18:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
1052:23:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
1038:22:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
1021:22:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
995:22:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
975:21:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
947:21:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
922:16:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
901:. If I remember correctly, @
890:16:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
852:13:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
801:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
1339:
856:Thanks for the kind words
910:Plagiarism from Knowledge
622:is spoken by the Mendriq
480:raises many questions in
447:
578:Oklahoma Disneyland hoax
248:s story about his wife,
565:Reaching for the Moon:
337:Encyclopædia Britannica
235:Hedge fund billionaire
823:. To follow comments,
723:
685:or leave a tip on the
562:
291:
222:
39:
1169:Not 20, but I did do
722:
650:Peregrine Mission One
561:
509:Iranian politics case
363:Yale University Press
278:
221:
38:
1231:Special:CiteThisPage
953:planning application
819:from this article's
321:copyright violations
256:. Ackman then wrote
842:Excellent article!
513:a contentious topic
390:User:GorillaWarfare
361:, published by the
68:File:Plagiarism.jpg
1235:circular reporting
1178:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1137:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1107:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
928:Biblical criticism
914:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
810:Discuss this story
775:WikiProject report
724:
563:
357:by Yale Professor
350:The New York Times
301:Harvard President
288:— Bill Ackman on X
223:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
1001:first in You Tube
999:Ok, it's in both
970:
834:purging the cache
755:Technology report
691:
618:. In particular,
548:
467:
401:
311:not strong enough
50:View Latest Issue
1330:
1307:
1160:
1140:
1077:
1072:
1016:
973:
971:
968:
966:
937:
936:
935:
871:
863:
837:
835:
829:
808:
742:
734:
727:
711:"In the media" →
710:
702:
687:suggestions page
679:
544:
463:
453:
451:
450:
449:
436:
419:Talk:Bill Ackman
397:
289:
266:Business Insider
247:
242:Business Insider
230:
206:
198:
172:
171:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
62:
60:
58:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1274:
1263:
1262:
1243:Rotideypoc41352
1163:
1158:
1134:
1075:
1070:
1019:
1014:
969:(Floreat Hova!)
967:
964:
957:
933:
868:GorrillaWarfare
865:
857:
839:
831:
824:
813:
812:
806:+ Add a comment
804:
800:
799:
798:
745:From the editor
735:
732:10 January 2024
730:
728:
725:
714:
713:
708:
705:
700:
694:
693:
692:
639:National Review
573:
572:
555:
554:
529:Stefka Bulgaria
473:
445:
443:
432:
407:
394:Kudos to Molly!
380:Update: Before
333:Name of article
287:
245:
232:
231:
226:
215:
214:
207:
200:
199:
192:Red-tailed hawk
180:
179:
178:
169:
159:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
103:
100:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
63:
57:10 January 2024
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1336:
1326:
1325:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1155:
1100:
1098:
1097:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1011:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
906:
882:
881:
880:
879:
814:
811:
803:
802:
797:
792:
787:
785:Traffic report
782:
777:
772:
767:
762:
760:News and notes
757:
752:
750:Special report
747:
741:
729:
717:
716:
715:
706:
703:"In the media"
697:
696:
695:
678:
676:
675:
673:
672:
643:
628:
605:
587:
574:
564:
556:
553:
550:
493:The Australian
472:
469:
406:
403:
355:Victory at Sea
286:
282:Dictionary.com
233:
224:
216:
213:
210:
209:
208:
201:
177:
176:
166:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
105:
104:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1335:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1306:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1272:
1270:
1258:
1254:
1251:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1213:Jim.henderson
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:Orchastrattor
1195:
1194:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1161:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1138:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1067:
1063:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
976:
972:
962:
961:
954:
950:
949:
948:
944:
940:
929:
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
904:
900:
899:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
887:Donald Albury
878:
877:
869:
861:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
841:
840:
836:
827:
822:
818:
807:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
778:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
758:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
739:
733:
726:In this issue
721:
712:
704:
690:
688:
684:
677:
670:
669:
664:
663:
658:
657:
651:
647:
644:
641:
640:
636:
632:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
603:
599:
595:
591:
588:
585:
584:
579:
576:
575:
570:
569:
560:
549:
547:
542:
538:
537:Iraniangal777
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
503:
499:
495:
494:
489:
485:
484:
479:
478:
468:
466:
461:
456:
454:
452:wikimedia.org
439:
435:
430:
425:
423:
420:
416:
411:
402:
400:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
376:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
344:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:He called for
296:
290:
283:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
243:
238:
229:
220:
205:
197:
193:
189:
188:Andreas Kolbe
185:
175:
167:
165:
157:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
106:
98:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1269:The Signpost
1268:
1249:
1099:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1003:and then in
959:
896:
883:
875:
770:In the media
769:
738:all comments
680:
674:
667:
662:The Guardian
661:
655:
645:
637:
630:
627:Wiktionary".
611:
607:
600:, using the
593:
590:Factchecking
589:
582:
577:
566:
506:
502:The Signpost
501:
491:
482:
475:
474:
460:The Signpost
459:
457:
440:
426:
422:
415:several ways
412:
408:
382:The Signpost
381:
379:
371:
359:Paul Kennedy
354:
348:
345:
336:
318:
314:
303:Claudine Gay
292:
279:
265:
240:
234:
114:PDF download
88:In the media
1305:Suggestions
876:no relation
874:Smallbones
817:transcluded
656:India Today
614:(Malaysia)
525:ParadaJulio
386:Molly White
347:article in
237:Bill Ackman
164:X (Twitter)
1239:Hbomberguy
1171:Dee Snider
1153:Smallbones
1122:Jenhawk777
1087:Jenhawk777
1044:Jenhawk777
1009:Smallbones
939:Jenhawk777
903:Jenhawk777
860:Smallchief
844:Smallchief
624:Orang Asli
602:SIFT model
413:There are
325:plagiarism
258:two tweets
250:Neri Oxman
196:Smallbones
102:Share this
97:Contribute
22:2024-01-10
1299:Subscribe
1159:smalltalk
1076:(discuss)
1015:smalltalk
987:Barkeep49
821:talk page
790:Crossword
594:Soundside
583:Oklahoman
568:Peregrine
541:MA Javadi
533:Fad Ariff
477:The Times
444:info-en-q
429:NinaSpezz
1317:Category
1294:Newsroom
1289:Archives
1271:archives
1253:contribs
1071:Hawkeye7
1066:original
960:Hassocks
780:Obituary
765:In focus
701:Previous
683:Newsroom
668:Indy 100
552:In brief
434:FMatPSCM
375:CC-BY-SA
341:CC-BY-SA
329:fair use
154:Facebook
144:LinkedIn
134:Mastodon
20: |
620:Mendriq
612:The Sun
488:archive
274:Harvard
1120:OMG!
1068:work.
1030:Risker
535:, and
521:Alex-h
228:Durova
194:, and
174:Reddit
124:E-mail
71:Durova
1284:About
1143:Ice-T
795:Comix
388:(aka
323:with
16:<
1279:Home
1247:talk
1217:talk
1202:talk
1182:talk
1148:WBEZ
1126:talk
1111:talk
1091:talk
1048:talk
1034:talk
991:talk
965:5489
943:talk
918:talk
898:Dawn
848:talk
709:Next
635:says
523:and
272:and
83:1000
335:".
270:MIT
260:on
184:Bri
182:By
99:—
80:367
77:240
1319::
1255:)
1219:)
1204:)
1184:)
1128:)
1113:)
1093:)
1050:)
1036:)
1007:.
993:)
945:)
920:)
850:)
699:←
665:,
659:,
648::
633:,
610::
531:,
455:.
396:–
369:.
252:,
190:,
186:,
74:PD
1273:.
1250:·
1245:(
1215:(
1200:(
1180:(
1162:)
1156:(
1139::
1135:@
1124:(
1109:(
1089:(
1046:(
1032:(
1018:)
1012:(
1005:X
989:(
941:(
916:(
870::
866:@
862::
858:@
846:(
838:.
828:.
740:)
736:(
689:.
671:.
586:.
546:S
486:(
465:S
399:S
262:X
246:'
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
