594:
1332:(2022), which was only made possible by creating a new stereo remix using de-mixing technology, creating an entirely new recording in the process. And there are entire fields and disciplines that exist solely to recreate the past and predict and forecast the future, such that the content and the images they create are nothing but artist's conceptions. I don't see the process of photographic restoration wholly removed from these issues. History itself is nothing but an artist's conception of the past, and the same can be said about human memory, which reconstructs events in a crude and often fictional way. While it's nice to think that there's an objective, encyclopedic reality we can lean on for stability and guidance, no such singular reality can truly be found. We are always recreating the past in some form or another, even when we document it with cameras, since we choose to highlight and frame one thing over another. The very act of observing something is a form of bias, and there's no escape from it.
1197:
misprint in the long double horizontal line under the heading on the right side that you've "fixed". The misprint likely existed in the original printing---it's not an artifact introduced in the scan, it's part of the "original work". What motivated to you fix that? In undoing creases, such as with the Utopia, Limited poster, you may be forced to invent details under the crease that likely was but may not have been there. And the color correction certainly involves creative/aesthetic choices. Of course, I agree subjectively that the restored images "look better" to my untrained eye. What's your perspective on what you think you're doing? Are you "restoring the image to how it (may have) actually looked like when it was first produced"? Are there cases where you think you may have made the image look better than it ever has in the past? Do we lose anything by presenting restored images as if they were the original?
289:
258:
249:
298:
401:
538:
622:
482:
427:
524:
269:
675:
439:
687:
468:
1272:
lots of people are talking about using deep-fake-like software to bring dead images to life, and to give them voices and movement. It may be the case that we are entering a new era where static images become a thing of the past, and a new generation arises that expects an old image to speak, read poetry, sing a song, or recite the
Gettysburg Address, depending on who they were in history. I think it would be an incredible and worthy endeavor, like the famous videographer who restores old films of cityscapes from a century ago and turns them into 4K videos complete with added sound.
368:
278:
233:
510:
552:
222:
580:
380:
461:. This was the point I realised that there was rather a gender bias in my contributions, and I began work to improve things. It wasn't that I hadn't done images of women before, but they were a sometimes food, and images of women should be more of a main course. Here's a selection of my favourite images of women I brought to featured pictures after joining Women in Red, in no particular order because Knowledge galleries work best if you space out landscape images with as many portrait orientation ones as possible:
213:
110:
130:
1372:
entertainment. In the near future, 2D images will be perceived as we view cave paintings today. "Why donāt they move? Why donāt they speak?" kids will say. Thatās where the technology is going. Nobody is going to sit down at a desktop computer to study these things. It will be created as needed and presented as if they are sitting on a chair in front of me. Iām not talking about restoring images, Iām talking about recreating the past. This is already happening, of course. Itās called
777:
90:
496:
608:
240:
120:
566:
36:
140:
100:
103:
150:
1287:
range, so you're speculating. We don't have the sound of a cityscape from a century ago, we're doing it in foley. Used well, it's a powerful tool, but it's not that much different than an actor playing
Lincoln in a play. It's not going to be a perfect reconstruction. Further, we don't have a lot of the things of the past. We aren't going to have the noise of twelve
1376:. And despite your objections, we are already doing it. We do it every time we write about the past, and every time we upload media illustrating that past. The next step is to simulate it, or in other words, recreate it, beyond the written word and static images. I donāt expect you to agree. But itās going to happen.
1446:
Avatars aren't some new concept. Having dead people come to life is as old as theatre. There's nothing inherently wrong with them, but, for purposes of an encyclopedia, they're not necessarily any better than theatre. That's not to say there's no educational merit in them, but, by their nature, where
1271:
I would be interested in hearing more about the tech-heavy side of this in a second essay; details about your tools, workflow, and maybe some speculation about where it's all going with the new AI tools increasingly being talked about, and if you've had a chance to play around with them. For example,
1319:
all the time on the encyclopedia and elsewhere (astronomy and maths articles, for example) to show the "extrapolated appearance of something for which the actual appearance is not known or cannot be seen". The same would be true for recreating the past. Philosophically, this argument is just one of
1286:
Put simply, I think a lot of the AI things are interesting, but they're hardly encyclopedic. You're adding details that we don't have - we don't have a recording of
Lincoln; old photography had constraints, like a long exposure time, that means that the base expressions are going to not be the full
1196:
May I invite you to wax philosophical about the topic of "image restoration"? Obvious image artifacts aside (coffee stains, creases, etc.), there seems to be a wide latitude in your restorations to "be creative", so to speak. For example, in the
Illustrated London News, there's what appears to be a
1430:
educational, but it can also be used to push an agenda. For example, in
America, there's a lot of looking to the intent of the founding fathers when interpreting laws. A malicious avatar creator can make sure those founding fathers, or whoever they want, all agree with them on the points they care
705:
library collections. But then, I suppose it's always going to be somewhere a little unexpected if you checked everywhere you expected. I think this is one of my featured pictures where zooming in is necessary to really tell the work done, but having an image of him that can be safely zoomed in to
1371:
Forgive me, but I think something might have been lost in translation. Iām not talking about animating paintings or photos. Iām talking another bringing dead people back to life and recreating their identities using our sources to inform their avatars, which can then be used for education and
892:
1086:. I'd be just as interested to read someone's account of how and why they wrote a selection of featured articles. It would be nice to see the Signpost focus more on the making of the encyclopaedia rather than just being a vehicle for some people's opinions on the WMF.
187:
And sometimes, no one else cares about this fact. So how does one write an article about oneself while not appearing completely vain and self-promotional? Well, one doesn't, but let's do it anyway because it'll be at least a couple years until the next milestone.
1346:
At the same time, we need to be clear about level of knowledge. And some tools aren't ready for primetime. The further we leave the sources, the less accuracy we're going to have. This doesn't mean animating paintings or photos is bad, but it's not good for us.
394:. Would I do it different now? Well, I'd probably fix up the border a bit, but it's not bad. It's also so large that I couldn't upload the original file, because Commons wasn't configured to allow anything as large as a lossless file of that type has to be:
1320:
purism (or conservatism) versus pluralism (or liberalism), and while the purists will always have their place, technology promotes pluralism by its very nature. You can see this everywhere. The latest example in the news this last week was the reissue of
335:
You could describe how you got into your field of editing. For example, I got into image restoration through an image that I don't even count as one of my "official" list of featured pictures anymore (I do my official count based on the ones featured on
312:
1165:
Or, alternatively, you could try celebrating the hard work and efforts of others and engage with the subject of the piece. But please, continue to police and gatekeep what other people write instead. Thatās so much more constructiveā¦
196:
Why not make a gallery of your favourite restorations, showing off how much work you put into these? For example, you could go to your user page and copy over the conveniently pre-formatted list you made, that shows before and after!
716:
Was kind of odd, though: I found him in a collection I thought I knew very well already. Which just goes to show you, I suppose. Anyway, he will hopefully be joining many more in the next months and years. See you for Number 700!
354:. It's not the biggest restoration, nor the most impressive original, but if you look roughly under the "T" of "THE ILLUSTRATED LONDON NEWS" you'll see a very obvious white line that shouldn't be there. I spent hours fixing that
741:
There's a bit of a mess of old account names due to anonymity vs. real names, for a while, shifting over to anonymity after some harassment on here. This was before most of the current policies around that kind of thing were
143:
1105:
It's clearly labeled an "essay". Not sure why you have a problem with it. It just goes to show, people will complain about anything, and when they can't find something to complain about, they will make something up.
1396:
if not that with the tools of the time? But such things are corruptible. There's plenty of examples of people bending famous people's views to support them; A digital avatar is no less capable of being used for an
320:
113:
593:
1400:
But this doesn't make things bad by default. Thucydides isn't bad because he made up speeches in the style of the people he portrayed to try and convey the impact despite not having exact words available.
650:
One could discuss the thing that pushed you over the top, and how it relates to your history in
Knowledge. While I don't talk about it much, I have eight featured articles, my first, from October 2006, was
939:
So how does one write an article about oneself while not appearing completely vain and self-promotional? Well, one doesn't, but let's do it anyway because it'll be at least a couple years until the next
1483:
article where the criteria are quite rightly nothing to do with the criteria for Wiki-articles. Of course it's right that we can read and celebrate editorial accomplishments of all kinds. More, please!
933:, and how proud they are of it? Adam, you're well within your rights to be proud of the image restoration work you've done. But how does that translate to this getting put in the Signpost, written
645:
153:
958:
It was originally meant to be by someone else interviewing me, but holidays and timeliness proved an issue with availability. It was do this or get very annoyed at an offer being rescinded.
1260:
They should just rename the process something like "Adam
Cuerden Memorial Featured Pictures" like how people who donate a lot to a college tend to get halls and buildings named after them.
133:
1137:. On a mostly harmless ocean planet, where an essay is defined as "an interpretative literary composition usually dealing with its subject from a limited or personal point of view".
1447:
records conflict, they're going to have to choose one of the two sides, and that smooths over the roughness of the historical record. They're not bad, they're just not a final word.
76:
821:
70:
876:
836:
856:
1435:
All it takes is not caring about actual facts, or using biased sources to inform your avatar. Or it might get scrubbed of elements. Do parents object to avatars
851:
846:
871:
801:
991:
929:
Why exactly was this published? I realize this isn't a professional newspaper, but on what planet is it a good idea to have someone write a whole essay about
1460:
1360:
1304:
1266:
1231:
1063:
971:
881:
806:
1206:
184:, which, as far as I can tell, is more than anyone else has ever achieved, about 8.2% of all featured pictures, and the result of fifteen years of work.
123:
1069:
977:
831:
794:
907:
1281:
1175:
1160:
1146:
1129:
1115:
288:
1038:
1024:
811:
191:
537:
861:
788:
621:
55:
44:
1251:
1237:
866:
816:
1098:
951:
257:
1493:
1466:
1385:
1366:
1341:
1310:
826:
764:
755:
523:
481:
1560:
297:
713:
is, if anything, harder to find an image of than
Gilbert. I mean, I did, he's Featured Picture number 601, but it wasn't easy to find.
248:
330:
21:
311:
1536:
1151:
Ah but you ignore the whole accusing me of malice part. Of course. This is the last time I bother with these comment sections.
400:
1531:
1526:
912:
340:, which ignores or gives half-value to anything I didn't work hard enough on, leaves out a lot of my very early works, and
1135:"on what planet is it a good idea to have someone write a whole essay about their own work, and how proud they are of it"
426:
919:
1521:
674:
896:
93:
706:
about a foot wide or so is probably going to be very helpful to a lot of
Gilbert and Sullivan societies out there.
551:
697:
I had been looking for a high-resolution picture of him for, well, over a decade, probably. I stumbled upon the
1156:
1125:
1034:
1011:
947:
467:
438:
1120:
It just goes to show, people will find any method they can to assume bad faith towards others. Shame on you.
1423:
doesn't lose its importance to encouraging the study of
African-American history for being based on a novel.
509:
1516:
776:
686:
367:
49:
35:
17:
268:
1001:
Because this is a significant milestone worthy of celebrating. Congrats to Adam and their hard work.
579:
1328:
1152:
1121:
1077:
1045:
1030:
943:
634:
I was originally planning for Ulmar to be my 600th featured picture. However, the vagaries of "Does
1322:
1261:
529:
379:
638:
have enough participation for things to pass?" said no, which leads us into our next technique of
1489:
1419:
1247:
1202:
702:
557:
515:
416:
1426:
But there's a difference between a primary source and a dramatisation. The latter might well be
1403:
986:
458:
1417:, but it's hardly bad or uneducational for taking dramatic liberties. Hell, for that matter,
1093:
495:
277:
1542:
1507:
1316:
1390:
Well, under those grounds, we've been doing that for millennia. What's, say, Aeschulus's
1242:
This seems to touch on issues raised by Viriditas below as well. I'll look forward to it.
607:
323:
before and after restoration, with a certain amount of degradation from conversion to GIF.
8:
1414:
1381:
1373:
1337:
1277:
1171:
1142:
1111:
346:
1485:
1291:
at a beach, or the squelch of people driving through that much horse shit on the road.
1243:
1213:
1198:
1007:
487:
473:
420:
image, which is also about the time I started to get a bit more confident with colour:
450:
1450:
1350:
1294:
1221:
1081:
1053:
961:
903:
337:
172:
Sometimes, we all reach milestones in our time at Knowledge. Sometimes you reach 100
163:
221:
30:
The Six Million FP Man: Okay, six hundred, but either way, the bionic editor speaks.
1409:
1288:
1087:
1019:
942:
really doesn't make it okay. I'm thoroughly disappointed in this month's Signpost.
667:
501:
232:
177:
565:
710:
627:
613:
357:
212:
391:
1377:
1333:
1273:
1167:
1138:
1107:
1015:
454:
410:
1432:
390:
By 2009, I was scanning my own books, and doing rather impressive images from
1554:
1003:
663:
652:
635:
585:
543:
351:
1456:
1392:
1356:
1300:
1227:
1059:
967:
181:
173:
1218:
I think that's probably a whole secondary essay. I'll try to write it up.
1440:
1436:
571:
239:
599:
344:
ignores anything I just nominated). It's an illustration to the play
658:
So, when choosing something significant to my Knowledge career....
701:, decided to give it a go, and found this, of all places, in the
646:
Option three: Talk about the thing that pushed you over the top
1029:
The point is that the subject wrote the article themselves.
361:. 2007 was a very different time. I got better from there.
1407:
doesn't cease to be educational for having reenactments.
308:
It's a good start! But maybe some sort of animation too?
655:, and that really got me into Knowledge as a whole.
1479:Great work, Adam, and obviously this is great as a
917:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
414:we saw earlier. 2012 saw this incredibly difficult
720:
1433:We see things like this being done today already.
698:
408:2010 saw the stitching together of the poster of
1552:
161:
192:Option one: Select some of your favourites
1505:Make sure we cover what matters to you ā
709:Oh, and to answer the obvious question,
1413:isn't a 100% accurate portrayal of the
920:
14:
1553:
54:
29:
1561:Knowledge Signpost archives 2022-11
1094:
937:? That you lampshaded it by saying
27:
998:"Why exactly was this published?"
775:
310:
296:
287:
276:
267:
256:
247:
220:
211:
56:
34:
28:
1572:
1443:being open about their sexuality?
902:These comments are automatically
699:Digital Public Library of America
685:
673:
642:dealing with the issue at hand.
620:
606:
592:
578:
564:
550:
536:
522:
508:
494:
480:
466:
437:
425:
399:
378:
366:
331:Option two: How about a history?
319:Animation of a small section of
238:
231:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
1074:I don't see a problem with it,
176:. Sometimes you get elected to
913:add the page to your watchlist
735:
726:
13:
1:
1494:19:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
1282:22:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1267:14:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1207:22:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1147:23:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1130:22:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1116:21:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1099:21:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
1070:23:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
1039:23:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
1025:22:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
992:20:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
978:20:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
952:19:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
1467:21:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1459:. Currently celebrating his
1386:04:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1367:21:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1359:. Currently celebrating his
1342:19:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1311:16:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1303:. Currently celebrating his
1252:20:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1238:16:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1230:. Currently celebrating his
1176:03:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
1161:02:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
1062:. Currently celebrating his
1050:Responded to you higher up.
970:. Currently celebrating his
888:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
662:My 600th Featured Picture:
636:Featured Picture Candidates
455:Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
10:
1577:
1329:Revolver: Special Edition
1095:Penny for your thoughts?
640:shameless self-promotion
530:Victoria Clafin Woodhull
457:, and got introduced to
451:Wikimania in Esino Lario
180:. Sometimes you hit 600
703:University of Minnesota
558:Rosalind Goodrich Bates
417:Battle of Spottsylvania
1455:Has about 8.3% of all
1355:Has about 8.2% of all
1299:Has about 8.2% of all
1226:Has about 8.2% of all
1058:Has about 8.2% of all
966:Has about 8.2% of all
910:.Ā To follow comments,
780:
315:
301:
292:
281:
272:
261:
252:
225:
216:
71:The Six Million FP Man
39:
822:Disinformation report
779:
314:
300:
291:
280:
271:
260:
251:
224:
215:
38:
1317:artist's conceptions
1153:Trainsandotherthings
1122:Trainsandotherthings
1078:Trainsandotherthings
1046:Trainsandotherthings
1031:Trainsandotherthings
944:Trainsandotherthings
906:from this article's
1415:Scopes monkey trial
1374:digital immortality
984:Congrats, Adam!Ā :)
1508:leave a suggestion
897:Discuss this story
781:
488:Barbara McClintock
474:Emmeline Pankhurst
449:In 2016 I went to
316:
302:
293:
282:
273:
262:
253:
226:
217:
45:ā Back to Contents
40:
987:ThadeusOfNazereth
921:purging the cache
877:From the archives
837:Technology report
732:Editor's note: š¤
668:Elliott & Fry
306:
305:
182:featured pictures
174:featured articles
50:View Latest Issue
1568:
1545:
1510:
1465:
1410:Inherit the Wind
1365:
1309:
1289:bathing machines
1264:
1236:
1217:
1096:
1085:
1068:
1049:
1023:
990:
976:
924:
922:
916:
895:
857:Featured content
799:
791:
789:28 November 2022
784:
767:
759:
743:
739:
733:
730:
689:
677:
624:
610:
596:
582:
568:
554:
540:
526:
512:
502:Shirley Chisholm
498:
484:
470:
441:
429:
403:
382:
370:
242:
235:
200:
199:
166:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
102:
101:
92:
91:
62:
60:
58:
57:28 November 2022
1576:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1541:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1512:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1464:
1448:
1364:
1348:
1308:
1292:
1262:
1235:
1219:
1211:
1075:
1067:
1051:
1043:
1002:
985:
975:
959:
926:
918:
911:
900:
899:
893:+ Add a comment
891:
887:
886:
885:
852:Recent research
847:Tips and tricks
792:
787:
785:
782:
771:
770:
765:
762:
757:
751:
750:
746:
740:
736:
731:
727:
723:
711:Arthur Sullivan
693:
690:
681:
678:
648:
630:
628:Geraldine Ulmar
625:
616:
614:Marian Anderson
611:
602:
597:
588:
583:
574:
569:
560:
555:
546:
541:
532:
527:
518:
513:
504:
499:
490:
485:
476:
471:
445:
442:
433:
430:
404:
386:
383:
374:
371:
358:Microsoft Paint
333:
325:
194:
168:
167:
160:
159:
158:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
99:
89:
83:
80:
69:
65:
63:
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1574:
1564:
1563:
1540:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1504:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1454:
1444:
1424:
1398:
1354:
1298:
1269:
1263:casualdejekyll
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1225:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1057:
995:
994:
981:
980:
965:
955:
954:
931:their own work
901:
898:
890:
889:
884:
879:
874:
872:Traffic report
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
802:News and notes
798:
786:
774:
773:
772:
763:
754:
753:
752:
748:
745:
744:
734:
724:
722:
719:
695:
694:
691:
684:
682:
679:
672:
670:
647:
644:
632:
631:
626:
619:
617:
612:
605:
603:
598:
591:
589:
584:
577:
575:
570:
563:
561:
556:
549:
547:
542:
535:
533:
528:
521:
519:
514:
507:
505:
500:
493:
491:
486:
479:
477:
472:
465:
447:
446:
443:
436:
434:
431:
424:
411:Utopia Limited
406:
405:
398:
388:
387:
384:
377:
375:
372:
365:
332:
329:
317:
304:
303:
294:
284:
283:
274:
264:
263:
254:
244:
243:
236:
228:
227:
218:
208:
207:
204:
193:
190:
170:
169:
157:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
85:
84:
81:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1573:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1556:
1544:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1509:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1486:Chiswick Chap
1482:
1478:
1468:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1445:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1421:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1406:
1405:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1352:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1318:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1290:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1259:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:Axem Titanium
1241:
1240:
1239:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1223:
1215:
1214:Axem Titanium
1210:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:Axem Titanium
1195:
1194:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1091:
1090:
1083:
1079:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1065:
1061:
1056:
1055:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
999:
997:
996:
993:
988:
983:
982:
979:
973:
969:
964:
963:
957:
956:
953:
949:
945:
941:
936:
932:
928:
927:
923:
914:
909:
905:
894:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
796:
790:
783:In this issue
778:
769:
761:
749:
738:
729:
725:
718:
714:
712:
707:
704:
700:
688:
683:
676:
671:
669:
665:
664:W. S. Gilbert
661:
660:
659:
656:
654:
653:W. S. Gilbert
643:
641:
637:
629:
623:
618:
615:
609:
604:
601:
595:
590:
587:
586:Edmonia Lewis
581:
576:
573:
567:
562:
559:
553:
548:
545:
544:Gabrielle Ray
539:
534:
531:
525:
520:
517:
511:
506:
503:
497:
492:
489:
483:
478:
475:
469:
464:
463:
462:
460:
456:
452:
440:
435:
428:
423:
422:
421:
419:
418:
413:
412:
402:
397:
396:
395:
393:
381:
376:
369:
364:
363:
362:
360:
359:
353:
352:W. S. Gilbert
349:
348:
343:
339:
328:
324:
322:
313:
309:
299:
295:
290:
286:
285:
279:
275:
270:
266:
265:
259:
255:
250:
246:
245:
241:
237:
234:
230:
229:
223:
219:
214:
210:
209:
205:
202:
201:
198:
189:
185:
183:
179:
175:
165:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
105:
97:
95:
87:
86:
78:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1480:
1451:Adam Cuerden
1449:
1427:
1418:
1408:
1402:
1393:The Persians
1391:
1351:Adam Cuerden
1349:
1327:
1321:
1295:Adam Cuerden
1293:
1222:Adam Cuerden
1220:
1134:
1088:
1082:Adam Cuerden
1054:Adam Cuerden
1052:
962:Adam Cuerden
960:
938:
934:
930:
882:CommonsComix
841:
807:In the media
795:allĀ comments
747:
737:
728:
715:
708:
696:
657:
649:
639:
633:
516:Mary Jackson
459:Women in Red
448:
415:
409:
407:
392:Gustave DorƩ
389:
355:
347:The Princess
345:
341:
338:Adam Cuerden
334:
327:...Perfect!
326:
318:
307:
195:
186:
171:
164:Adam Cuerden
94:PDF download
1543:Suggestions
1441:Tchaikovsky
1437:Cole Porter
1089:HJĀ Mitchell
904:transcluded
832:Book review
572:Ethel Smyth
385:Restoration
144:X (Twitter)
1404:Gettysburg
1326:(1966) as
742:finalised.
600:Rosa Parks
342:definitely
82:Share this
77:Contribute
22:2022-11-28
1537:Subscribe
1378:Viriditas
1334:Viriditas
1274:Viriditas
1168:Viriditas
1139:Viriditas
1108:Viriditas
940:milestone
908:talk page
812:Interview
768:"Essay" ā
1555:Category
1532:Newsroom
1527:Archives
1481:Signpost
1323:Revolver
1004:Headbomb
989:(he/him)
862:Obituary
758:Previous
373:Original
321:an image
134:Facebook
124:LinkedIn
114:Mastodon
20: |
1397:agenda.
1315:We use
867:Concept
817:Opinion
760:"Essay"
203:BEFORE
1461:600 FP
1428:highly
1361:600 FP
1305:600 FP
1232:600 FP
1064:600 FP
972:600 FP
935:by you
680:Before
453:, met
432:Before
206:AFTER
178:ArbCom
154:Reddit
104:E-mail
1522:About
1420:Roots
842:Essay
827:Op-Ed
692:After
444:After
68:Essay
16:<
1517:Home
1490:talk
1431:to.
1382:talk
1338:talk
1278:talk
1248:talk
1203:talk
1172:talk
1157:talk
1143:talk
1126:talk
1112:talk
1080:and
1035:talk
948:talk
766:Next
721:Note
1457:FPs
1439:or
1357:FPs
1301:FPs
1228:FPs
1060:FPs
968:FPs
666:by
356:in
350:by
162:By
79:ā
1557::
1492:)
1384:)
1340:)
1280:)
1250:)
1205:)
1174:)
1159:)
1145:)
1128:)
1114:)
1092:|
1037:)
1018:Ā·
1014:Ā·
1010:Ā·
950:)
756:ā
1511:.
1488:(
1463:!
1380:(
1363:!
1336:(
1307:!
1276:(
1246:(
1234:!
1216::
1212:@
1201:(
1170:(
1155:(
1141:(
1124:(
1110:(
1084::
1076:@
1066:!
1048::
1044:@
1033:(
1022:}
1020:b
1016:p
1012:c
1008:t
1006:{
974:!
946:(
925:.
915:.
797:)
793:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
