180:. It was deleted 15 hours after its creation as something inappropriate for Knowledge, although some participants considered the deletion discussion itself to be the work of art. The artists later created the wikipediaart.org website and presented the project in terms that, according to the Wikimedia Foundation, could be interpreted as suggesting a close connection between the project and Knowledge. Based on concerns brought to the Foundation's attention by Wikipedians, legal counsel for Wikimedia Foundation Douglas Isenberg emailed the artists, who addressed the Foundation's concerns by adding a disclaimer to the website noting its non-association with Knowledge.
82:
279:
109:
99:
33:
119:
79:
129:
89:
200:
it as "about the gentlest "demand letter" one can possibly write" and considers the mattered settled with the disclaimer. He noted that "if someone decided to use the EFF website as a staging ground for a performance art piece, I'd entirely support their efforts to prevent anyone's confusing the
344:
191:
decried what she characterized as a threat to the artists' free speech. The first email sent to the artists stated that use of the "Knowledge" name was infringing on trademark rights and requested that the domain name wikipediaart.org be turned over to the
Foundation, although
175:
article, intended to "point to the 'invisible authors and authorities' of
Knowledge, and by extension the Internet, as well as the site's extant criticisms: bias, consensus over credentials, reliability and accuracy, vandalism, etc." the article was soon sent to
248:) Knowledge to the UK government. He said, "Our government spends nearly £400 million a year on advertising to reach sixty million people while Knowledge, one of the largest websites in the world, spends about one per cent of that to reach 280 million people".
102:
296:
122:
218:
concludes that "ased on its search engine ranking and page view statistics, the
English Knowledge is a prominent source of online health information compared to the other online health information providers studied."
92:
132:
152:
65:
323:
333:
318:
405:
328:
359:
215:
112:
308:
381:
In the last sentence of the first paragraph, did the WMF counsel really add the disclaimer to the non-WMF website, or did he merely suggest that it be added?
303:
266:
257:
390:
290:
160:
241:
177:
481:
167:) that the two artists responsible for the "Knowledge Art" project have been threatened by the Foundation's legal counsel over the website
223:
found that "early 50% of US physicians going online for professional purposes are visiting
Knowledge for health and medical information".
220:
59:
364:
21:
456:
348:
371:
451:
446:
234:) that "things that are offered for 'free' are quite fragile in terms of sustainability", while talking about Knowledge.
441:
382:
227:
188:
436:
278:
41:
32:
17:
386:
197:
184:
211:
462:
8:
401:
355:
204:
475:
397:
237:
172:
146:
193:
157:
424:
171:. On February 15, artists Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern created the
245:
231:
164:
428:
420:
142:
153:
Knowledge Art dispute pits artists against
Wikimedia Foundation
240:, leader of the Conservative Party in the British Parliament,
168:
216:
Journal of the
American Medical Informatics Association
369:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
473:
196:, lead counsel for the Wikimedia Foundation,
140:
60:Knowledge Art dispute, and brief headlines
185:Knowledge Threatens Artists for Fair Use
372:
14:
474:
396:The latter. I clarified it, thanks.--
482:Knowledge Signpost archives 2009-04
27:
277:
31:
28:
493:
354:These comments are automatically
127:
117:
107:
97:
87:
77:
201:artists' work with their own."
365:add the page to your watchlist
189:Electronic Frontier Foundation
13:
1:
340:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
498:
406:01:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
391:17:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
183:In a commentary titled "
362:. To follow comments,
282:
187:", an attorney at the
36:
281:
178:Articles for Deletion
35:
379:==Serious problem==
358:from this article's
226:Informationweek.com
221:Another recent study
324:Features and admins
349:Discuss this story
334:Arbitration report
319:WikiProject report
283:
37:
373:purging the cache
329:Technology report
242:recently compared
214:published in the
489:
465:
376:
374:
368:
347:
301:
293:
286:
269:
261:
169:wikipediaart.org
149:
131:
130:
121:
120:
111:
110:
101:
100:
91:
90:
81:
80:
48:
497:
496:
492:
491:
490:
488:
487:
486:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
461:
459:
454:
449:
444:
439:
432:
412:
411:
378:
370:
363:
352:
351:
345:+ Add a comment
343:
339:
338:
337:
294:
289:
287:
284:
273:
272:
270:"In the news" →
267:
264:
259:
207:
155:
150:
139:
138:
137:
128:
118:
108:
98:
88:
78:
72:
69:
58:
51:
49:
45:
44:
42:← Current issue
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
495:
485:
484:
460:
455:
450:
445:
440:
435:
434:
433:
414:
413:
410:
409:
408:
353:
350:
342:
341:
336:
331:
326:
321:
316:
311:
309:News and notes
306:
300:
288:
276:
275:
274:
265:
256:
255:
254:
252:
250:
249:
235:
224:
206:
203:
154:
151:
136:
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
74:
73:
70:
64:
63:
62:
61:
56:
55:
53:
50:
47:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
494:
483:
480:
479:
477:
464:
458:
453:
448:
443:
438:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:Keep up with
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
375:
366:
361:
357:
346:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
298:
292:
291:27 April 2009
285:In this issue
280:
271:
263:
262:"In the news"
253:
247:
243:
239:
238:David Cameron
236:
233:
229:
225:
222:
217:
213:
209:
208:
202:
199:
195:
190:
186:
181:
179:
174:
173:Knowledge Art
170:
166:
162:
159:
148:
144:
134:
126:
124:
116:
114:
106:
104:
96:
94:
86:
84:
76:
75:
67:
54:
43:
34:
23:
19:
417:The Signpost
416:
380:
313:
304:Lazy Virtues
297:all comments
251:
182:
158:Ars Technica
156:
52:
463:Suggestions
383:208.54.4.69
356:transcluded
314:In the news
194:Mike Godwin
57:In the news
46:In the news
71:Share this
66:Contribute
22:2009-04-27
457:Subscribe
360:talk page
246:permalink
232:permalink
212:new study
198:described
165:permalink
147:Sage Ross
476:Category
452:Newsroom
447:Archives
429:Mastodon
425:Facebook
398:ragesoss
260:Previous
113:LinkedIn
93:Facebook
20: |
421:Twitter
205:Briefly
161:reports
103:Twitter
123:Reddit
83:E-mail
442:About
228:notes
16:<
437:Home
402:talk
387:talk
268:Next
145:and
133:Digg
427:or
419:on
141:By
68:—
478::
423:,
404:)
389:)
258:←
210:A
143:X!
431:.
400:(
385:(
377:.
367:.
299:)
295:(
244:(
230:(
163:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
