Knowledge

:Knowledge Signpost/2008-07-07/Defamation suit dismissed - Knowledge

Source 📝

66: 73: 93: 163:. Although there were many editors in favor of keeping the article and all negative material was explicitly sourced, the closing administrator found that "concerns about the quality of sourcing, and issues of NPOV and BLP, were not answered in the debate, and outweighed any weight of numbers in favour of keeping the article." Bauer was first reported to have sued the WMF (among others) in March 2007, but the administrator who closed the discussion discounted arguments that invoked the lawsuit. 301: 53: 83: 103: 63: 113: 381: 174:
The lawsuit marked the first test of the legal reasoning that underlies some decisions of the Knowledge community and the WMF regarding treatment of material involving living people. It is widely assumed that Section 230 protects the Foundation in cases where damaging content published on its
179:
argued, "Section 230's blanket protection of sites like Knowledge does not mean that alleged defamation on the Internet cannot be challenged in court. Instead, the law requires that litigants direct their efforts at the speakers themselves and not the forums where statements were made."
106: 76: 116: 175:
websites is provided by others. The law states that "o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." As a
158:
website, compiled based on the volume of complaints received by Writer Beware. Some versions also reported claims that Bauer had used legal threats to suppress criticism. The article was deleted on April 7, 2007 following its
96: 142:
The Knowledge Signpost is an independent, community newspaper, and is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. The contents of this page are that of their authors alone, and may not reflect the opinion of the Wikimedia
318: 170:
protects the WMF from liability, as an "interactive computer services" provider rather than a traditional publisher that directly controls published content (although the WMF is one of many users of the service).
33: 429:
If she's notable, there is, in theory, nothing preventing us from doing so. However, her notability is questionable; her career hardly makes her notable for our purposes, meaning that the only reason she
188: 396: 151:
a defamation-of-character suit against the Wikimedia Foundation on July 1. The case involved a claim made by another organization, which was subsequently cited within a Knowledge article.
154:
Literary agent Barbara Bauer's Knowledge biography (since deleted) reported her company's appearance on a list of "twenty worst literary agencies" from the Writer Beware section of the
39: 160: 86: 443: 360: 330: 252: 222: 370: 262: 365: 257: 325: 217: 345: 237: 424: 350: 242: 355: 247: 457: 434:
be notable is her seemingly litigious nature. In my opinion, being litigious is hardly a good criterion for notability, but others might disagree.
340: 232: 312: 401: 155: 167: 408: 56: 509: 21: 485: 385: 480: 475: 277: 195:, is still ongoing, with 19 individuals and the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America still named as defendants. 470: 184: 148: 465: 300: 17: 491: 8: 392: 439: 176: 503: 130: 435: 126: 166:
In the decision, Judge Jamie S. Perri cited Wikimedia's argument that
418: 203: 276: 211: 284: 406:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try 274: 501: 156:Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America 168:Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act 124: 416:Case closed so why not start a page on her? 189:Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 34:Defamation case against Wikimedia dismissed 288: 269: 206: 409: 14: 502: 187:, the Foundation was represented by 510:Knowledge Signpost archives 2008-07 27: 299: 147:A New Jersey Superior Court judge 28: 521: 391:These comments are automatically 111: 101: 91: 81: 71: 61: 51: 458:putting together the next issue 402:add the page to your watchlist 193:Bauer et al. v. Glatzer et al. 185:Electronic Frontier Foundation 13: 1: 377: 18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost 7: 10: 526: 161:second deletion discussion 444:05:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC) 425:19:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 336:Defamation suit dismissed 228:Defamation suit dismissed 31:Defamation suit dismissed 183:In cooperation with the 177:May 2 EFF press release 399:. To follow comments, 304: 303: 395:from this article's 361:Features and admins 331:Wikimedia 2009 plan 253:Features and admins 223:Wikimedia 2009 plan 386:Discuss this story 371:Arbitration report 305: 263:Arbitration report 410:purging the cache 366:Technology report 293: 292: 258:Technology report 517: 494: 456:needs your help 421: 413: 411: 405: 384: 323: 315: 308: 204: 133: 115: 114: 105: 104: 95: 94: 85: 84: 75: 74: 65: 64: 55: 54: 525: 524: 520: 519: 518: 516: 515: 514: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 490: 488: 483: 478: 473: 468: 461: 450: 449: 419: 415: 407: 400: 389: 388: 382:+ Add a comment 380: 376: 375: 374: 326:From the editor 316: 311: 309: 306: 294: 218:From the editor 213:Also this week: 135: 134: 123: 122: 121: 112: 102: 92: 82: 72: 62: 52: 46: 43: 32: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 523: 513: 512: 489: 484: 479: 474: 469: 464: 463: 462: 452: 451: 448: 447: 446: 390: 387: 379: 378: 373: 368: 363: 358: 353: 348: 346:News and notes 343: 338: 333: 328: 322: 310: 298: 297: 296: 295: 291: 290: 289: 286: 285: 283: 275: 272: 271: 270: 267: 266: 265: 260: 255: 250: 245: 240: 238:News and notes 235: 230: 225: 220: 215: 209: 208: 207: 201: 198: 139:Editor's note: 136: 120: 119: 109: 99: 89: 79: 69: 59: 48: 47: 44: 38: 37: 36: 35: 30: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 522: 511: 508: 507: 505: 493: 487: 482: 477: 472: 467: 459: 455: 445: 441: 437: 433: 428: 427: 426: 423: 422: 412: 403: 398: 394: 383: 372: 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 357: 354: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 320: 314: 307:In this issue 302: 287: 282: 280: 273: 268: 264: 261: 259: 256: 254: 251: 249: 246: 244: 241: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 219: 216: 214: 210: 205: 202: 199: 196: 194: 191:. The case, 190: 186: 181: 178: 172: 169: 164: 162: 157: 152: 150: 145: 144: 140: 132: 128: 118: 110: 108: 100: 98: 90: 88: 80: 78: 70: 68: 60: 58: 50: 49: 41: 23: 19: 454:The Signpost 453: 431: 417: 335: 319:all comments 278: 227: 212: 200: 197: 192: 182: 173: 165: 153: 146: 141: 138: 137: 57:PDF download 492:Suggestions 393:transcluded 351:In the news 313:7 July 2008 243:In the news 143:Foundation. 107:X (Twitter) 356:Dispatches 248:Dispatches 45:Share this 40:Contribute 22:2008-07-07 486:Subscribe 397:talk page 341:WikiWorld 233:WikiWorld 149:dismissed 131:Sage Ross 504:Category 481:Newsroom 476:Archives 281:archives 279:Signpost 97:Facebook 87:LinkedIn 77:Mastodon 20:‎ | 436:Ral315 127:Ral315 117:Reddit 67:E-mail 471:About 432:might 16:< 466:Home 440:talk 420:AJUK 129:and 125:By 42:— 506:: 442:) 460:. 438:( 414:. 404:. 321:) 317:(

Index

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
2008-07-07
Contribute
PDF download
E-mail
Mastodon
LinkedIn
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Ral315
Sage Ross
dismissed
Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America
second deletion discussion
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
May 2 EFF press release
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
From the editor
Wikimedia 2009 plan
WikiWorld
News and notes
In the news
Dispatches
Features and admins
Technology report
Arbitration report
Signpost archives
S

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.