73:
93:
66:
228:
53:
83:
103:
63:
113:
215:
properly no longer does so. Instead, at various times it has shown indefinite blocks as expiring either at the precise time the list is being viewed by the reader, or at the time the block was initially implemented. Thus, an admin going through the list to reverse expired blocks must sort through this incorrect information to avoid undoing a valid block.
214:
Expiration times are available by checking the list of currently active blocks, but due to an additional malfunction, the list has to be used carefully so as not to make mistakes. A number of blocks are deliberately set indefinitely, with no expiration time, but the list, which used to indicate these
182:
determined that fewer than one percent of all edits had been marked as patrolled. Newpages, which contains a substantial amount of
Knowledge's garden-variety vandalism, was patrolled somewhat more often at eight percent, but this reporter's experience suggests that the real amount of patrolling done
191:
Meanwhile, automated logs of activity such as uploads and deletions have undergone a conversion to act more like page and contribution histories, although some functionality was missing. More seriously, however, the software change has broken the blocking feature—or, as it might be more appropriate
174:
was more hopeful but commented, "I think the little exclamation marks are going to have to appear on watchlists too before this will really take off." But in spite of the potential to help improve
Knowledge's review processes, the feature was deactivated again, and will presumably get an overhaul
155:
enabled it for a trial run. In the few days that it was available, users checking the diff of a change could mark it as "patrolled" by clicking a link on the diff page. Unpatrolled changes showed up with bright exclamation marks on
Recentchanges and were highlighted in yellow on
349:
318:
199:
This bug or collection of bugs has several manifestations, the most serious of which is that when an admin sets a block to expire at a given time, the block nevertheless does not expire. Instead, the user account or IP address stays blocked until it is unblocked manually.
166:
Additionally, the way the system was set up, a change could only be patrolled once, and users could even patrol their own edits. In fact, there was no way to know who had checked an edit or evaluate whether the patrollers were themselves trustworthy.
106:
76:
245:
218:
The developers are aware of these problems, but due to other issues connected with the software upgrade, as well as the basic work needed to simply keep the site operational, haven't been able to fix them as yet.
116:
134:
The upgrade to MediaWiki 1.4 continues to struggle, as implementation of new features is aborted and bugs in previously working features remain to be fixed. A number of fixes were in the works, as developer
96:
33:
211:, neither of which is displaying properly. The block log fails to indicate when any of the blocks are supposed to expire, making it of little use in determining which blocks are ready to be undone.
163:
As it turned out, a number of people struggled to figure out the new feature and wondered whether it would really work out. Quite a few observed that hardly anybody seemed to be actually using it.
39:
282:
307:
252:
86:
302:
272:
262:
151:
as being checked by a reader, a long-awaited feature that would reduce the redundancy involved in RC patrol, was shut off again
Thursday after developer
277:
287:
267:
239:
297:
257:
139:
announced the experimental release of a fourth beta version early
Saturday prior to the final public release, but some problems still persist.
416:
183:
on
Newpages is significantly higher. As might be expected, anon edits were checked with greater frequency than those of logged-in users.
21:
392:
330:
387:
382:
142:
337:
377:
56:
372:
227:
17:
186:
322:
170:
Starling criticized it as a flawed feature and said, "I'd rather write my own from scratch."
148:
398:
363:
8:
208:
204:
152:
136:
126:
157:
410:
179:
171:
178:
Running some statistics after the experiment shut down, developer
203:
The problem is compounded by the confusing situation on the
335:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
408:
124:
346:No comments yet. Yours could be the first!
361:Make sure we cover what matters to you –
338:
34:Work continues to fix MediaWiki upgrade
14:
409:
417:Knowledge Signpost archives 2005-01
27:
226:
175:before we see it in action again.
28:
428:
111:
101:
91:
81:
71:
61:
51:
331:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
147:The ability to mark edits on
143:Abortive RC patrol experiment
314:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
10:
433:
231:
230:
209:list of active blocks
328:To follow comments,
187:Problems with blocks
364:leave a suggestion
323:Discuss this story
283:Arbitration report
232:
196:blocking feature.
339:purging the cache
424:
401:
366:
342:
340:
334:
321:
250:
242:
235:
129:
115:
114:
105:
104:
95:
94:
85:
84:
75:
74:
65:
64:
55:
54:
432:
431:
427:
426:
425:
423:
422:
421:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
397:
395:
390:
385:
380:
375:
368:
362:
358:
357:
352:
350:+ Add a comment
347:
344:
336:
329:
326:
325:
319:+ Add a comment
317:
313:
312:
311:
308:Speedy deletion
253:From the editor
243:
240:10 January 2005
238:
236:
233:
221:
189:
145:
131:
130:
123:
122:
121:
112:
102:
92:
82:
72:
62:
52:
46:
43:
32:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
430:
420:
419:
396:
391:
386:
381:
376:
371:
370:
369:
360:
359:
356:
355:
354:
353:
348:
345:
327:
324:
316:
315:
310:
305:
300:
295:
290:
285:
280:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
249:
237:
225:
224:
223:
222:
188:
185:
144:
141:
132:
120:
119:
109:
99:
89:
79:
69:
59:
48:
47:
44:
38:
37:
36:
35:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
429:
418:
415:
414:
412:
400:
394:
389:
384:
379:
374:
365:
351:
341:
332:
320:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
247:
241:
234:In this issue
229:
220:
216:
212:
210:
206:
201:
197:
195:
184:
181:
176:
173:
168:
164:
161:
159:
154:
150:
149:Recentchanges
140:
138:
128:
118:
110:
108:
100:
98:
90:
88:
80:
78:
70:
68:
60:
58:
50:
49:
41:
23:
19:
303:AMA election
292:
246:all comments
217:
213:
202:
198:
193:
192:to say, the
190:
177:
169:
165:
162:
153:Tim Starling
146:
137:Brion Vibber
133:
127:Michael Snow
57:PDF download
399:Suggestions
273:Instapundit
263:Credibility
107:X (Twitter)
278:Fundraiser
45:Share this
40:Contribute
22:2005-01-10
393:Subscribe
205:block log
411:Category
388:Newsroom
383:Archives
288:QuakeAID
268:Features
180:Jamesday
158:Newpages
97:Facebook
87:LinkedIn
77:Mastodon
20: |
298:Top 100
293:Upgrade
31:Upgrade
258:Portal
117:Reddit
67:E-mail
378:About
172:Pcb21
16:<
373:Home
207:and
125:By
42:—
413::
194:un
160:.
367:.
343:.
333:.
248:)
244:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
