Knowledge

:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

380: 451: 590:
Considering the entire point of this task force is to improve and uphold the quality of Good articles, only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this initial sweep. It is key that clearly substandard articles be removed from the GA list, while
620:
Quality is the goal here. For that reason, awards will be given out based on the quality of reviews, not solely on quantity. What awards will be given out will not all be known until the sweep is completed. Reviews should be done for the betterment of the project and the encyclopedia, not for a
544:
In the case of minor issues, or issues which can be easily addressed, try to fix as many problems as you can, list any remaining issues on the review subpage, then allow editors seven days to address them, as you would with "on hold" at GAN. Be sure to keep track of the article. You may find it
39: 489:
Start the review on the talk page of the article by adding {{subst:GAR}}. Save the page, and then follow the first bold link ("individual reassessment") to create the subpage for the review. Review the article against the
530:), the GAN nominator (check the article history), as well as any related WikiProjects. Give editors enough time to respond to the issues (usually a week), and if progress is being made, consider extending the deadline. 631: 591:
those that are almost there are brought up to current GA standards. The point is to target articles that have "fallen through the cracks", so we can't have any fall through the cracks a second time during this sweep.
582: 482: 35: 476: 570:
Do your best, remain courteous with the articles' editors (they may have spent a lot of time working on the article and may not want to hear about changes you are recommending), and have fun reviewing!
42:
was kept, so if you are interested in bringing an article up to GA, this list may be helpful. Thank you to all reviewers who helped complete this monumental task of maintaining the integrity of GAs.
145: 289: 307: 347: 21: 602:
and all GA processes. We thank everyone for their interest, but only selected individuals will be invited to participate in the sweeps. Those who have participated can use
217: 370: 315: 327: 253: 335: 181: 323: 355: 526:
to meet the criteria, list what issues need to be addressed on the subpage. Leave a message on the talk pages of the main contributors of the article (using
486:
page if has already been reviewed or is currently on hold (also view the article's talk page to see if it already has been delisted, has become an FA, etc.).
311: 319: 331: 67:. The aim of this project is to "sweep" through the current good articles to check that they meet the criteria. To participate, pick a sub-category at 47: 365: 303: 359: 396: 342: 34:
Sweeps was completed in March 2010, after initially beginning in August 2007. A list of all reviewed articles can be seen at the
122: 298: 91: 17: 651: 404: 110: 558:
whether the article meets the criteria, or you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for community review at
392: 116: 266: 621:
star... But you'll still get a star (maybe something better) if you make a significant impact during the sweeps.
388: 131: 275: 50:
on GA Sweeps, explaining its origins, purpose, and achievements. There are no plans to repeat the process.
400: 408: 260: 463: 606: 598:. Keep in mind that we're looking for those individuals that have a very strong understanding of 538: 513: 97: 595: 546: 75:
when reviews of the sub-category have been completed. Editor's contributions can be recorded
203: 194: 433: 426: 8: 239: 418: 167: 230: 76: 72: 527: 71:
and review the articles; take appropriate action, as described below, and mark the
599: 491: 467: 188: 64: 158: 567:
If you have any questions about the process, leave a message on the talk page.
645: 559: 533:
In the case of a clear failure to meet the criteria, remove the article from
499: 495: 624: 534: 224: 68: 60: 63:
requires that all articles tagged and listed as Good articles meet the
450: 152: 574: 594:
If you are interested in helping, please leave a message on
445: 615: 54: 537:
and leave a message on the review subpage, using {{
519:, add an entry and classify the action as GAR kept. 643: 541:}} with a detailed list of issues below it. 449: 480:. Before reviewing double-check on the 454:Progress as of the end of February 2010 14: 644: 581:Participants list and progress found 86:WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks 477:full list of articles left to review 366:WikiProject Good articles newsletter 95:identifies, organizes and improves 27: 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles 494:as you would an article listed at 28: 663: 466:need to be reviewed against the 378: 117:Frank Butler (American football) 29: 13: 1: 464:listed before 26 August 2007 7: 629:Keep track of your reviews 46:The Knowledge Signpost has 10: 668: 416: 308:Ottawa Senators (original) 22:Project quality task force 652:WikiProject Good articles 560:Good article reassessment 474:Choose articles from the 386: 84: 61:Knowledge's Good articles 458:For this initial sweep, 261:AĂ©rospatiale SA 330 Puma 596:OhanaUnited's talk page 455: 612:on their user pages. 600:good article criteria 453: 389:Good article criteria 539:subst:GASweepsDelist 328:Battle of the Yarmuk 336:Mary McLeod Bethune 38:. A list of all of 547:subst:GASweepsHold 456: 356:GAN Backlog Drives 316:Siege of Szigetvár 36:running total page 640: 639: 545:helpful to use {{ 415: 414: 324:Battle of Plataea 59:The integrity of 40:delisted articles 659: 611: 605: 518: 512: 436: 429: 405:Nominations list 382: 381: 292: 285: 284: 283: 281: 280: 272: 271: 256: 249: 248: 247: 245: 244: 236: 235: 220: 213: 212: 211: 209: 208: 200: 199: 184: 177: 176: 175: 173: 172: 164: 163: 148: 141: 140: 139: 137: 136: 128: 127: 82: 81: 30: 667: 666: 662: 661: 660: 658: 657: 656: 642: 641: 627: 618: 609: 603: 577: 516: 510: 505:If the article 448: 440: 439: 432: 425: 421: 411: 379: 348:Project quality 312:British Airways 288: 278: 276: 269: 267: 264: 263: 259: 252: 242: 240: 233: 231: 228: 227: 223: 216: 206: 204: 197: 195: 192: 191: 189:Wuert Engelmann 187: 180: 170: 168: 161: 159: 156: 155: 151: 144: 134: 132: 125: 123: 120: 119: 115: 102: 57: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 665: 655: 654: 638: 637: 626: 623: 617: 614: 607:User GA sweeps 588: 587: 576: 573: 572: 571: 568: 565: 564: 563: 552: 551: 550: 542: 522:If an article 520: 514:ArticleHistory 487: 462:Good articles 447: 444: 442: 438: 437: 430: 422: 417: 413: 412: 403: 387: 384: 383: 376: 375: 374: 369:(last updated 362: 339: 295: 104: 103: 89: 88: 56: 53: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 664: 653: 650: 649: 647: 636: 634: 633: 625:Running total 622: 613: 608: 601: 597: 592: 586: 584: 579: 578: 575:Participation 569: 566: 561: 557: 553: 548: 543: 540: 536: 532: 531: 529: 525: 521: 515: 508: 504: 503: 501: 497: 493: 488: 485: 484: 483:running total 479: 478: 473: 472: 471: 469: 465: 461: 452: 443: 435: 431: 428: 424: 423: 420: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 385: 377: 372: 368: 367: 363: 361: 357: 353: 349: 346: 344: 340: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 320:Robbie Fowler 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 300: 296: 293: 291: 282: 273: 262: 257: 255: 246: 237: 226: 221: 219: 210: 201: 190: 185: 183: 174: 165: 154: 149: 147: 138: 129: 118: 114: 112: 108: 107: 106: 105: 101:on Knowledge. 100: 99: 98:good articles 94: 93: 87: 83: 80: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 52: 51: 49: 43: 41: 37: 32: 31: 23: 19: 630: 628: 619: 593: 589: 580: 555: 523: 506: 481: 475: 459: 457: 441: 371:January 2013 364: 351: 341: 332:Key Biscayne 299:Reassessment 297: 290:start review 287: 254:start review 251: 225:Zud Schammel 218:start review 215: 182:start review 179: 146:start review 143: 109: 96: 92:This project 90: 85: 58: 45: 44: 33: 554:If you are 509:review, in 468:GA criteria 401:Changes log 343:Task forces 111:Nominations 73:sweeps list 502:and save. 397:GAN Report 393:Statistics 48:an article 528:this tool 434:WP:SWEEPS 427:WP:GAPQ/S 419:Shortcuts 153:Hal Hinte 646:Category 492:criteria 65:criteria 20:‎ | 446:Process 616:Awards 556:unsure 507:passes 500:WP:GAR 496:WP:GAN 360:GA Cup 352:Sweeps 279:istory 243:istory 207:istory 171:istory 135:istory 535:WP:GA 524:fails 304:Bidni 258:) • 222:) • 186:) • 150:) • 69:WP:GA 55:Intro 16:< 632:here 583:here 409:edit 77:here 549:}}. 498:or 460:all 294:) 270:alk 234:alk 198:alk 162:alk 126:alk 79:. 648:: 635:. 610:}} 604:{{ 517:}} 511:{{ 470:. 407:| 399:| 391:| 373:) 358:• 354:• 350:• 338:• 334:• 330:• 326:• 322:• 318:• 314:• 310:• 306:• 286:| 274:| 250:| 238:| 214:| 202:| 178:| 166:| 142:| 130:| 585:. 562:. 395:| 345:: 301:: 277:h 268:t 265:( 241:h 232:t 229:( 205:h 196:t 193:( 169:h 160:t 157:( 133:h 124:t 121:( 113::

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles
Project quality task force
running total page
delisted articles
an article
Knowledge's Good articles
criteria
WP:GA
sweeps list
here
This project
good articles
Nominations
Frank Butler (American football)
talk
history
start review
Hal Hinte
talk
history
start review
Wuert Engelmann
talk
history
start review
Zud Schammel
talk
history
start review
AĂ©rospatiale SA 330 Puma

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑