Knowledge

:WikiProject Conservatism/About us - Knowledge

Source 📝

940: 322: 460: 31: 352: 214:
the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the
225:
Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered
213:
at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in
277:. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article 379:. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas 380: 344: 342:
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a
179: 722: 210: 376: 542: 229:
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.
370: 83: 278: 270: 535: 507: 765: 745: 45:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
411: 178: 971: 886: 416: 306: 855: 732: 528: 111: 347:. The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a " 90: 682: 709: 501: 421: 104: 865: 621: 891: 692: 611: 97: 132: 406: 401: 385: 282: 246: 118: 69: 896: 780: 590: 677: 580: 471: 466: 396: 62: 46: 17: 928: 834: 240: 226:
with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
966: 921: 631: 616: 839: 870: 231:
Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.
661: 575: 570: 790: 775: 514: 860: 760: 595: 155:
through history, and the people, groups and events that have shaped the ideology. We accomplish this by:
770: 362:"Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned." 332: 687: 819: 717: 491:
You can use this template to welcome new users to Knowledge and invite them to join Conservatism:
829: 513:
Socially conservative user boxes along with those of other tendencies in society can be found
914: 651: 585: 824: 475:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed. 215: 8: 944: 365:"Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve." 348: 76: 165:
Striving for a neutral point of view and balance in articles that fall under our purview
804: 750: 235: 38: 30: 520: 447:
Do you know someone who may be interested in the project? Put this on their talk page:
740: 266: 558: 274: 506:
Interested in populating your userpage with political party userboxes? Find them
328: 310: 359:
53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
755: 351:" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an 960: 785: 626: 656: 299: 262: 204: 152: 146: 238:
page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism
369:
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at
169: 327:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
459: 162:
Improving every conservative article to Featured Article status
441: 550: 221:
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about
500:
More templates regarding membership can be found at
37:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
452:{{WikiProject Conservatism invite|Signature=~~~~}} 353:analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I 958: 536: 581:Check against the featured article criteria 543: 529: 269:is the first article promoted at the new 198:WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire 972:WikiProject Conservatism inactive pages 271:WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review 14: 959: 524: 502:WP:WikiProject Conservatism/Templates 256:Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again 316: 56: 25: 586:Get creative feedback (Peer review) 551:Handy-dandy policies and guidelines 151:WikiProject Conservatism documents 23: 177: 24: 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism 983: 929:Category:WikiProject Conservatism 591:Apply for featured article status 159:Identifying conservative articles 938: 825:Post at Conservatism noticeboard 458: 320: 29: 922:Category:Conservatism templates 209:WikiProject Conservatism was a 13: 1: 481:to accept! {{{Signature}}} 309:of The Signpost; written by 7: 305:Reprinted in part from the 10: 988: 866:Request for Comment (RfCU) 761:Recognized content listing 693:Conservatism Collaboration 355:. Some notable takeaways: 909: 879: 848: 840:Request for Comment (RfC) 830:Post at other noticeboard 812: 803: 731: 708: 701: 670: 644: 604: 566: 556: 420: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 791:WikiProject announcement 766:Quality/Importance stats 472:Conservatism WikiProject 495:{{subst:RightWelcome}} 967:Inactive project pages 182: 915:Category:Conservatism 771:Unreferenced BLP list 756:Update Recent changes 632:Good article criteria 622:Biography Peer Review 617:Automated Peer Review 273:. Congratulations to 181: 386:(Discuss this story) 307:April 26, 2018 issue 283:(Discuss this story) 247:(Discuss this story) 945:Conservatism portal 786:Popular pages stats 776:Newsletter delivery 662:Closing discussions 576:Develop the article 571:Start a new article 465:Please accept this 293:Research About AN/I 211:topic of discussion 805:Dispute resolution 683:Topic coordination 627:Did You Know (DYK) 612:Conservatism stubs 236:Project Discussion 183: 954: 953: 905: 904: 861:Wikiquette alerts 856:Warning templates 799: 798: 640: 639: 596:Featured articles 485: 484: 434: 427: 426: 339: 338: 267:Margaret Thatcher 194:DISCUSSION REPORT 140: 139: 54: 53: 979: 943: 942: 941: 887:Personal attacks 835:Formal mediation 810: 809: 751:New article list 706: 705: 564: 563: 559:Featured Article 545: 538: 531: 522: 521: 462: 455: 454: 433:Delivered: ~~~~~ 432: 393: 392: 349:boomerang effect 324: 323: 317: 245: 243: 223:The Right Stuff. 189: 147:Vision and goals 57: 50: 33: 26: 987: 986: 982: 981: 980: 978: 977: 976: 957: 956: 955: 950: 939: 937: 901: 875: 844: 795: 781:Cleanup listing 727: 697: 666: 636: 600: 552: 549: 444: 436: 430: 429: 428: 407:Discuss a story 389: 388: 340: 321: 295: 291: 289:RECENT RESEARCH 286: 285: 258: 254: 252:ARTICLES REPORT 249: 241: 239: 200: 196: 191: 190: 186: 184: 172: 170:The Right Stuff 149: 141: 44: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 985: 975: 974: 969: 952: 951: 949: 948: 933: 932: 925: 918: 910: 907: 906: 903: 902: 900: 899: 894: 889: 883: 881: 877: 876: 874: 873: 868: 863: 858: 852: 850: 846: 845: 843: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 816: 814: 807: 801: 800: 797: 796: 794: 793: 788: 783: 778: 773: 768: 763: 758: 753: 748: 743: 737: 735: 729: 728: 726: 725: 720: 714: 712: 703: 699: 698: 696: 695: 690: 688:Collaborations 685: 680: 678:Common section 674: 672: 668: 667: 665: 664: 659: 654: 648: 646: 642: 641: 638: 637: 635: 634: 629: 624: 619: 614: 608: 606: 602: 601: 599: 598: 593: 588: 583: 578: 573: 567: 561: 554: 553: 548: 547: 540: 533: 525: 519: 518: 511: 504: 496: 493: 492: 487: 483: 482: 476: 467:invite to join 463: 450: 449: 448: 443: 440: 438: 425: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 397:WPConservatism 391: 390: 367: 366: 363: 360: 337: 336: 325: 315: 296: 294: 292: 290: 288: 287: 259: 257: 255: 253: 251: 250: 201: 199: 197: 195: 193: 192: 188: 185: 176: 175: 174: 173: 171: 168: 167: 166: 163: 160: 148: 145: 143: 138: 137: 135: 130: 128: 123: 121: 116: 114: 109: 107: 102: 100: 95: 93: 88: 86: 81: 79: 74: 72: 67: 65: 60: 55: 52: 51: 43: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 984: 973: 970: 968: 965: 964: 962: 947: 946: 935: 934: 931: 930: 926: 924: 923: 919: 917: 916: 912: 911: 908: 898: 895: 893: 890: 888: 885: 884: 882: 878: 872: 869: 867: 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 853: 851: 847: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 820:Third opinion 818: 817: 815: 811: 808: 806: 802: 792: 789: 787: 784: 782: 779: 777: 774: 772: 769: 767: 764: 762: 759: 757: 754: 752: 749: 747: 744: 742: 739: 738: 736: 734: 730: 724: 721: 719: 718:Quality scale 716: 715: 713: 711: 707: 704: 700: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 675: 673: 671:Collaboration 669: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 649: 647: 643: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 613: 610: 609: 607: 603: 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 572: 569: 568: 565: 562: 560: 555: 546: 541: 539: 534: 532: 527: 526: 523: 516: 512: 509: 505: 503: 499: 498: 497: 490: 489: 488: 480: 474: 473: 468: 464: 461: 457: 456: 453: 446: 445: 439: 435: 423: 418: 413: 408: 403: 398: 394: 387: 384: 382: 378: 374: 373: 364: 361: 358: 357: 356: 354: 350: 346: 345:recent survey 334: 333:MediaWiki.org 330: 326: 319: 318: 314: 313: 312: 308: 302: 301: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 265: 264: 248: 244: 237: 233: 232: 227: 224: 219: 217: 216:WP:Canvassing 212: 207: 206: 180: 164: 161: 158: 157: 156: 154: 144: 136: 134: 131: 129: 127: 124: 122: 120: 117: 115: 113: 110: 108: 106: 103: 101: 99: 98:Collaboration 96: 94: 92: 89: 87: 85: 82: 80: 78: 75: 73: 71: 68: 66: 64: 61: 59: 58: 48: 42: 40: 35: 32: 28: 27: 19: 936: 927: 920: 913: 892:Edit warring 849:User conduct 657:Template Spa 494: 486: 478: 470: 451: 437: 431: 377:also at AN/I 372:The Signpost 371: 368: 341: 304: 303: 297: 260: 230: 228: 222: 220: 218:guideline. 208: 202: 153:conservatism 150: 142: 125: 47:village pump 36: 871:Arbitration 746:AWB Tagging 741:Bot Tagging 702:WikiProject 652:Straw polls 422:Suggestions 412:Unsubscribe 329:Phabricator 275:Neveselbert 961:Categories 733:Automation 723:Importance 710:Assessment 645:Discussion 557:Path to a 479:click here 311:Zarasophos 91:Assessment 41:reference. 39:historical 442:Templates 187:July 2018 105:Incubator 605:See also 417:Archives 402:Newsroom 234:Add the 126:About Us 119:Newsroom 84:Showcase 813:Content 477:Simply 331:and on 300:Lionelt 263:Lionelt 205:Lionelt 133:Commons 880:Urgent 77:Portal 897:Other 242:Watch 112:Guide 16:< 515:here 508:here 469:the 381:here 375:and 279:here 70:Talk 63:Main 298:By 261:By 203:By 963:: 383:. 281:. 544:e 537:t 530:v 517:. 510:. 335:. 49:.

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism

historical
village pump
Main
Talk
Portal
Showcase
Assessment
Collaboration
Incubator
Guide
Newsroom
About Us
Commons
conservatism
The Right Stuff
Lionelt
topic of discussion
WP:Canvassing
Project Discussion
Watch
(Discuss this story)
Lionelt
Margaret Thatcher
WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review
Neveselbert
here
(Discuss this story)
Lionelt

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.