Knowledge

:Thankspam - Knowledge

Source 📝

24: 81:. It is far better to restrict the use of the THANK button to edits which you found particularly appropriate, or after a period of heavy editing to add a note of thanks at the bottom of the article or discussion talk page. 64:
It annoys some recipients, it wastes your own time, and it proves nothing. It is far better to add a note of thanks at the bottom of the discussion, or on the discussion talk page.
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
40: 57: 70: 44: 73:
after every single edit that every person makes to an article or talk page you created or edit frequently.
98: 93: 8: 47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 32: 56:
There is no need to individually thank every single person who comments on your
87: 78: 77:
It annoys some recipients, and it gives the impression of
85: 86: 69:There is no need to send individual 18: 13: 45:thoroughly vetted by the community 41:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 14: 110: 22: 1: 7: 10: 115: 16:Essay on editing Knowledge 58:request for adminship 43:, as it has not been 71:THANK notifications 99:Knowledge culture 53: 52: 106: 94:Knowledge essays 26: 25: 19: 114: 113: 109: 108: 107: 105: 104: 103: 84: 83: 49: 48: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 112: 102: 101: 96: 66: 51: 50: 38: 37: 29: 27: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 111: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 89: 82: 80: 75: 74: 72: 65: 62: 61: 59: 46: 42: 36: 34: 28: 21: 20: 76: 68: 67: 63: 55: 54: 30: 31:This is an 88:Categories 79:ownership 33:essay 90:: 60:. 35:.

Index

essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
request for adminship
THANK notifications
ownership
Categories
Knowledge essays
Knowledge culture

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.