Knowledge

:Splitting - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

956: 42: 1497: 1454: 1404: 1360: 1312: 1266: 120: 673:, whether the result of a split discussion or a bold split that was contested, usually results in the article remaining whole. A contested bold split may be reverted; however it is not always appropriate to redirect the new article to the old as the new article may stand on its own, even if the main article that it came from is not split. 584:. This will help bring it to the attention of editors who may assist in establishing consensus, in deciding if a split is appropriate, or in carrying out the split. Templates used without an accompanying rationale, and where there is no obvious reason for the split request, may be removed at any time. 968:
If the material you want for the new article is scattered around the source article, then prepare the source article by grouping the material to be split out into a single section. Save your changes with an edit summary like "preparing to split article". If the material you want for the new article
405:
Since "un-doing" a split may be labor-intensive if significant editing happens to either page after the split, try to avoid splitting until after a community discussion. If there is another way to reduce the "post-expanded size" that is easier to "undo" than a split, consider doing it first, then
963:
The following procedure can be used for splitting from a single source article to a new article. These instructions are provided for guidance, but some steps may not be necessary in all cases and these instructions may not cover every eventuality. It is advisable to read through the whole of this
785:
In more unclear, controversial cases, the determination that a consensus to split has or has not been achieved should be made by an editor who is neutral and not directly involved in the split proposal or the discussion. If necessary, a request that an administrator, who is not
658:
To generate a discussion and to notify people who know a lot about the topic, it is recommended to contact involved users. These users can be: frequent contributors, the creator of the page or users who have a lot of posts on the talk page. You can notify them by
192:
The two main reasons for splitting material out from an article are size and content relevance. If either the whole article, or the specific material within one section becomes too large, or if the material is seen to be inappropriate for the article due to being
258:
of the subject, or would simply duplicate the summary that would be left behind, then it may be too soon to move it. Unsourced material shouldn't be used to create new articles as it may have notability or verifiability issues.
137:
The two reasons for splitting are page size and content relevance. For uncontroversial splits, no permission is needed to split; just do it. If unsure, use one of the tags/templates below, and start a discussion on the
1057:
If the new article is not being created from scratch (e.g. there is already a redirect), then go to the new article, click on 'View history' tab, select the edit where the copy was made, open it and copy the
1031:
Add a summary, usually of a couple of paragraphs and one image, of the newly created subtopic (unless complete removal is appropriate). Alternatively, with a strong lead paragraph in the new article, use an
995:
A References section should be added and categories should be added. There may also be sections of a bibliography, navboxes, See also section or External links that can be copied from the source article.
576:
If unsure, or with high-profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). Additionally, adding one of the
959:
Don't give up yet! Splitting an article isn't as difficult as it looks. There are a lot of steps, but they're pretty easy. Just take them one at a time until you get to the end of the list.
409:
Likewise, if a split would be controversial, try to find a less controversial way to temporarily reduce the "post-expanded size" then open a discussion to find consensus for a long-term fix.
975:
Open the source article (or relevant section) to edit in another browser window (or tab) and copy the contents to be split out (from the section created in step #1) from the source article.
416:
and splitting the page, then immediately opening a discussion to see if the community accepts the split or if it offers alternative solutions. In this case, be prepared to undo the split.
154:
If an article becomes too large, or a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article, it may be appropriate for some or all of the article to be
1222: 488:
When two or more distinct topics with the same or a similar titles are being written about on the same page, even if they are closely related, a content split may be considered, and a
775: 1004:
Resolve any cite errors that occur when invocations of a named reference are separated from their definition – i.e. copy the relevant information from the source article.
791: 637:
Create a discussion on the talkpage of the page that content is to be split from. Include what sections are to be split and what the new page name should be. Example:
318:
If an article or list has remained this size for over a couple of months, consider combining it with a related page. Alternatively, the article could be expanded; see
375: 158:
into new articles. In some cases, refactoring an article into child or sister articles can allow subtopics to be discussed more fully elsewhere without dominating a
1181: 739: 1051:
to see whether some inlinks to the source article (especially any that were to the section that has been split off) can now be changed to point to the new article.
500:. If one or more of the topics is not notable on its own, it may be more appropriate to simply remove the material from Knowledge than to create a new article. 1083:
to source article talk page, and paste the diff URL into it, add the title of the new article and the date, add a descriptive edit summary and save the edit.
710: 1093:
to the new article talk page, and paste the diff into it, add the title of the source page and the date, add a descriptive edit summary and save the edit.
262:
Below 8,000 words, an article may not need splitting based on size alone, and at 6,000 words and below a split would generally only be justified based on
247:
of 40 to 50 minutes. Also, some users may have technical limitations, such as a low speed service, an unstable connection, or a pay per megabyte service.
648:. The content of the section is only marginally related to the main article, and this section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page. 65:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of 425: 1132: 1229: 388:
are accounted for, if the resulting "post-expanded include size" may reach a limit. Symptoms include templates lower in the page, such as
1042:
There may be some external links, bibliography items, etc. that can be removed from the source article as they are now in the new article.
250:
At 8,000 words and above it may benefit the reader to consider moving some sections to new articles and replace them with summaries per
254:. Consideration, however, needs to be given to the amount and quality of material to be moved. If the material for the new article is 50: 1020:}}" (use the order: image, main tag, text). If all the content of the section is being removed (e.g. in the case of a list) use the " 950: 1150: 577: 1543: 455:
Sometimes two or more distinct topics may share the same base title or similar titles, such as "light", which may refer to
332:(also accessible via Page History from Page Statistics link at the top) under "Prose" in the "General statistics" section; 239:
Large articles may have readability and technical issues. A page of about 10,000 words takes roughly 40 minutes to read at
770:
may close the discussion and move forward with the split if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there
1001:
Add any background information about the parent subject that will be necessary for the reader to understand the subtopic.
902:), then a summary section is unlikely to be required. On the talk page of the new and old articles, include the template 1503: 946: 614: 293:
Probably should be divided or trimmed, although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material.
159: 142: 17: 595:, which require that all content contributors receive attribution, the page receiving the split material must have an 1176: 412:
However, if splitting the page is the easiest-to-undo solution and such a split would not be controversial, consider
62: 787: 1155:
There are a number of templates that can be used on articles and their talk pages as part of splitting articles.
771: 24: 890:
template should be placed at the top of the section to link to the new page. In general, if the split is due to
58: 860: 492:
created to point readers to the separate pages. Before proposing a split, consideration must be given both to
1164: 992:
The lead sentence will need to be changed to use bold font and usually includes a link to the source article.
581: 399: 70: 1553: 1215: 1158: 1137:
If you or another editor split an article without adding the correct attribution, follow the procedure at
915: 621: 613:
template can also be placed on the talk page of both articles. For further information, refer to the main
460: 28: 1340: 811: 1502:
Text and/or other creative content from was copied or moved into ]. The former page's now serves to
955: 1548: 1466: 1422: 1412: 1372: 1324: 1280: 603:.) A note should also be made in the edit summary of the source article, "split content to ]". The 489: 352: 344: 333: 1506:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
1296: 1196: 1186: 877: 801: 697:. This template adds a box to notify users about the split. If the new page name is unknown, use 251: 929: 446: 1438: 1368: 979: 936: 899: 560: 385: 231: 194: 1124:(If possible) Connect the new article to any corresponding articles in other Wikipedias – see 753: 1202: 1048: 670: 369: 337: 221: 183: 95: 524: 439: 102: 592: 493: 356: 1065:
If the new article is being created from scratch, it's a bit more complicated to obtain a
570:
If an article meets the criteria for splitting and no discussion is required, editors can
8: 1125: 1110: 1100: 891: 763: 402:
at the bottom of the page not displaying properly. One solution is to split the article.
88: 66: 676: 162:
to which they are non-central (but only if the new articles are themselves sufficiently
1518: 1388: 921: 895: 745: 540: 516: 431: 381: 348: 213: 175: 80: 23:
This page is about splitting of articles. For splitting and merging of categories, see
644:
I propose that the section about blinker liquids be split into a separate page called
1349: 1191: 774:
or if there is unanimous consent to split. Closing of split discussions differs from
596: 571: 497: 200: 871: 1033: 782:
are allowed. Admin tools are not needed unless page protection prohibits editing.
779: 464: 392: 704: 419: 1482: 1070: 906: 607: 1163:
A list of articles that have been tagged for consideration for splitting are at
1250: 1182:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (lists) § Long (split) list naming recommendations
1066: 1059: 684: 550: 478: 413: 319: 255: 244: 1207: 134:
is the procedure by which the contents of a page are split into several pages.
1537: 1138: 1013: 884: 689:
to notify users of the proposed split. On the article (not the talkpage) add
240: 207: 1199:– there are acceptable and unacceptable content forks. Know the difference. 1021: 709:
In many cases, a hybrid discussion/straw poll is used, but remember that
329: 163: 1054:(Optionally) Add templates referring to the split to the talk pages: 972:
Create the new article by opening the empty page (or redirect page).
169: 426:
Knowledge:Ambiguous subjects § Multiple subjects with the same name
355:
articles, especially if splitting them would require breaking up a
1086:
Open the new (destination) article talk page to edit in a new tab.
1024:" template instead of the "Main" template. Use the edit summary " 1121:(Optionally) Put WikiProject tags on the new article's talk page. 665:{{Subst:Splitnote | ARTICLE NAME | NEW ARTICLE NAME | TALK PAGE}} 503:
If unsure, start a discussion on the article's talk page using a
302:
May need to be divided or trimmed; likelihood goes up with size.
467:. Sometimes the distinct topics may be closely related, such as 1062:
of the edit where the cut was made from the browser URL window.
474: 469: 406:
opening a discussion to see what the long-term fix should be.
199:
Consideration must be given to size, notability and potential
1009:
Create a good summary of the subtopic at the parent article.
894:, then a summary section is required; if the split is due to 456: 1144: 1116:
tag to create a banner that refers back to the main article.
510: 482: 1170: 984:
Contents ] from ]; please see its history for attribution.
768:
Any user, including the user who first proposed the split,
876:
If material is split from an article, consider whether a
778:
in that closings of uncontroversial split discussions by
376:
Category:Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded
1526:
Notify users though their talk page about proposed split
740:
Step 4: Close the discussion and determine the consensus
1076:
Open the source article talk page to edit in a new tab.
1096:
On the talk page of the new article, you can put the
695:{{split|Article 1|Article 2|...|date=September 2024}} 1490:
Record split on talk pages of the source and target
1319:
It has been suggested that portions of this page be
969:
is already in a single section, then skip this step.
580:
will display a notice on the article and list it at
310:
Length alone does not justify division or trimming.
1133:Fixing attribution for an improperly split article 724:– <insert reason for supporting split here: --> 236:Articles should be neither too big nor too small. 1367:It has been suggested that parts of this page be 1535: 1273:It has been suggested that this page should be 732:– <insert reason for opposing split here: --> 268: 1237: 284:Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed. 1446:Use on original article when section is known 197:, then a split may be considered or proposed. 1223: 243:, which is right on the limit of the average 817:templates are used in the following manner: 1461:It has been suggested that this section be 601:Do not omit this step or omit the page name 556:. If section to be split out is known, use 141:Use a good edit summary to comply with the 1495: 1396:Use on original article if disambiguation 1230: 1216: 797:To close a split proposal discussion, the 790:, close the discussion can be made at the 711:polling is not a substitute for discussion 328:Word counts can be found with the help of 256:too short to provide encyclopedic coverage 1091:{{Copied|from=|from_oldid=|to=|to_diff=}} 1081:{{Copied|from=|from_oldid=|to=|to_diff=}} 839:The result of this discussion was to ... 663:or by using a notice for their talk page 203:before proposing or carrying out a split. 954: 951:Knowledge:How to fix cut-and-paste moves 343:These guidelines apply somewhat less to 16:For broader coverage of this topic, see 691:{{split|Article 1|date=September 2024}} 496:of the offshoot topic and to potential 27:. For splitting of page histories, see 1536: 1348:Split content to an existing article ( 766:may emerge to proceed with the split. 363:Too large after templates are expanded 1211: 1151:Knowledge:Template messages/Splitting 776:closing of requested move discussions 166:to be included in the encyclopedia). 1491: 1447: 1397: 1353: 1305: 1304:Same as above but different wording 1259: 868:. This is the most important step! 114: 36: 865: 351:. They also apply less strongly to 13: 947:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 593:Knowledge's licensing requirements 374:Pages exceeding this limit are in 263: 63:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 18:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 14: 1565: 1411:It has been suggested that this 1177:Knowledge:Proposed article splits 880:should be created, and whether a 656:Notify involved users (optional): 1452: 1402: 1371:into another existing article. ( 1358: 1310: 1264: 1159:Articles nominated for splitting 978:Paste into the new article with 916:How to properly split an article 847:. . . <End of discussion: --> 599:noting "split content from ]". ( 118: 40: 1141:to add attribution afterwards. 461:a component that produces light 370:Help:Template § Template limits 25:Knowledge:Category intersection 701:by itself with no parameters. 536:For disambiguation pages, use 504: 1: 1165:Category:Articles to be split 861:Step 5: Perform the splitting 582:Category:Articles to be split 846:<Start of discussion: --> 671:Failure to reach a consensus 7: 1544:Knowledge information pages 986:" and save the new article. 964:procedure before starting. 622:Step 1: Create a discussion 29:Knowledge:History splitting 10: 1570: 1148: 944: 919: 743: 514: 429: 423: 373: 367: 347:pages and do not apply to 229: 211: 173: 78: 34:Knowledge information page 22: 15: 1515: 1479: 1465:out into another page. ( 1435: 1385: 1337: 1323:out into another page. ( 1293: 1247: 989:Tidy up the new article: 661:{{ping |USER1|USER2|...}} 457:electromagnetic radiation 274: 271: 1258:Use on original article 1036:to replace the section: 998:Adjust section headings. 819: 718: 642:== Splitting proposal == 639: 615:Copying within Knowledge 574:and carry out the split. 160:general overview article 126:This page in a nutshell: 1197:Knowledge:Content forks 1187:Knowledge:Summary style 252:Knowledge:Summary style 1421:into multiple pages. ( 1279:into multiple pages. ( 1038:{{Excerpt|Page title}} 960: 772:has been no discussion 628: 465:spiritual illumination 232:Knowledge:Article size 1203:Lumpers and splitters 1049:Special:WhatLinksHere 958: 945:Further information: 762:During discussion, a 334:Shubinator's DYK tool 1028:" and save the edit. 822:== Split proposal == 792:Requests for Closure 716:Example formatting: 400:navigation templates 143:license requirements 59:encyclopedic article 1554:Knowledge splitting 1504:provide attribution 1413:disambiguation page 578:splitting templates 490:disambiguation page 961: 677:Step 2: Add notice 477:(the product), or 245:concentration span 1531: 1530: 1510: 1509: 1474: 1473: 1430: 1429: 1380: 1379: 1341:Section move from 1332: 1331: 1288: 1287: 1192:Knowledge:Merging 852:Discussion bottom 812:Discussion bottom 498:neutrality issues 326: 325: 201:neutrality issues 152: 151: 113: 112: 1561: 1549:Knowledge how-to 1522: 1499: 1498: 1492: 1486: 1456: 1455: 1448: 1442: 1406: 1405: 1398: 1392: 1362: 1361: 1354: 1344: 1314: 1313: 1306: 1300: 1268: 1267: 1260: 1254: 1232: 1225: 1218: 1209: 1208: 1115: 1109: 1105: 1099: 1092: 1082: 1034:excerpt template 1018:new article name 939: 932: 911: 905: 889: 883: 872:Step 6: Clean up 856: 853: 850: 845: 842: 838: 835: 832: 829: 826: 823: 816: 810: 806: 800: 756: 735: 731: 727: 723: 700: 696: 692: 688: 666: 662: 651: 647: 643: 612: 606: 565: 559: 555: 549: 545: 539: 527: 473:(the plant) and 449: 442: 397: 391: 307:< 6,000 words 269: 224: 186: 122: 121: 115: 105: 98: 91: 51:information page 44: 43: 37: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1516: 1511: 1496: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1457: 1453: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1407: 1403: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1363: 1359: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1315: 1311: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1269: 1265: 1248: 1243: 1236: 1173: 1161: 1153: 1147: 1135: 1113: 1107: 1103: 1097: 1090: 1080: 1071:Template:Copied 1026:Material ] to ] 953: 943: 942: 935: 930:WP:CORRECTSPLIT 928: 924: 918: 909: 903: 887: 881: 878:summary section 874: 863: 858: 857: 854: 851: 848: 843: 840: 836: 833: 830: 827: 824: 821: 814: 808: 804: 798: 764:rough consensus 760: 759: 752: 748: 742: 737: 736: 733: 729: 725: 721: 707: 705:Step 3: Discuss 698: 694: 690: 682: 679: 664: 660: 653: 652: 649: 645: 641: 624: 610: 604: 591:To comply with 563: 557: 553: 547: 543: 537: 531: 530: 523: 519: 513: 453: 452: 447:WP:CONTENTSPLIT 445: 438: 434: 428: 422: 395: 389: 378: 372: 234: 228: 227: 220: 216: 210: 190: 189: 182: 178: 172: 148: 119: 109: 108: 101: 94: 87: 83: 75: 74: 41: 35: 32: 21: 12: 11: 5: 1567: 1557: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1500: 1489: 1487: 1477: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1460: 1458: 1451: 1445: 1443: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1410: 1408: 1401: 1395: 1393: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1366: 1364: 1357: 1347: 1345: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1318: 1316: 1309: 1303: 1301: 1297:Split portions 1291: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1272: 1270: 1263: 1257: 1255: 1245: 1244: 1235: 1234: 1227: 1220: 1212: 1206: 1205: 1200: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1172: 1169: 1160: 1157: 1146: 1143: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1094: 1087: 1084: 1077: 1074: 1063: 1052: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1029: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 996: 993: 987: 976: 973: 970: 941: 940: 937:WP:PROPERSPLIT 933: 925: 920: 917: 914: 873: 870: 862: 859: 828:Discussion top 820: 802:Discussion top 780:involved users 758: 757: 749: 744: 741: 738: 719: 706: 703: 678: 675: 640: 623: 620: 529: 528: 520: 515: 512: 509: 479:thermal energy 451: 450: 443: 435: 430: 421: 418: 357:sortable table 345:disambiguation 324: 323: 320:Knowledge:Stub 316: 315:< 150 words 312: 311: 308: 304: 303: 300: 295: 294: 291: 286: 285: 282: 277: 276: 273: 264:content issues 226: 225: 217: 212: 209: 206: 188: 187: 179: 174: 171: 168: 150: 149: 147: 146: 139: 135: 128: 123: 111: 110: 107: 106: 99: 92: 84: 79: 76: 56: 55: 47: 45: 33: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1566: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1539: 1524: 1520: 1514: 1505: 1501: 1494: 1493: 1488: 1484: 1478: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1440: 1439:split section 1434: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1400: 1399: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1356: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1336: 1326: 1322: 1317: 1308: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1292: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1271: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1252: 1246: 1241: 1233: 1228: 1226: 1221: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1210: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1168: 1166: 1156: 1152: 1142: 1140: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1112: 1102: 1095: 1089:Add template 1088: 1085: 1079:Add template 1078: 1075: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1041: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 990: 988: 985: 981: 977: 974: 971: 967: 966: 965: 957: 952: 948: 938: 934: 931: 927: 926: 923: 913: 908: 901: 897: 893: 886: 879: 869: 867: 818: 813: 803: 795: 794:noticeboard. 793: 789: 783: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 755: 754:WP:SPLITCLOSE 751: 750: 747: 722:'''Support''' 717: 714: 712: 702: 686: 674: 672: 668: 657: 638: 636: 634: 630: 619: 618: 616: 609: 602: 598: 594: 589: 585: 583: 579: 575: 573: 567: 562: 561:split section 552: 542: 535: 526: 522: 521: 518: 508: 506: 501: 499: 495: 491: 486: 484: 480: 476: 472: 471: 466: 462: 458: 448: 444: 441: 437: 436: 433: 427: 420:Content split 417: 415: 410: 407: 403: 401: 394: 387: 386:transclusions 383: 377: 371: 366: 364: 360: 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 321: 317: 314: 313: 309: 306: 305: 301: 297: 296: 292: 288: 287: 283: 279: 278: 270: 267: 265: 260: 257: 253: 248: 246: 242: 241:average speed 237: 233: 223: 219: 218: 215: 205: 204: 202: 196: 185: 181: 180: 177: 170:When to split 167: 165: 161: 157: 144: 140: 136: 133: 130: 129: 127: 124: 117: 116: 104: 100: 97: 93: 90: 86: 85: 82: 77: 72: 68: 64: 61:, nor one of 60: 57:It is not an 54: 52: 46: 39: 38: 30: 26: 19: 1462: 1417: 1416: 1320: 1275: 1274: 1239: 1162: 1154: 1136: 1037: 1025: 1017: 983: 980:edit summary 962: 875: 864: 796: 784: 767: 761: 730:'''Oppose''' 715: 708: 680: 669: 655: 654: 632: 631:if making a 626: 625: 600: 597:edit summary 590: 587: 586: 569: 568: 533: 532: 502: 487: 468: 454: 411: 408: 404: 379: 362: 361: 342: 327: 281:15,000 words 261: 249: 238: 235: 222:WP:SIZESPLIT 198: 195:out of scope 191: 184:WP:WHENSPLIT 155: 153: 131: 125: 96:WP:SPLITTING 48: 1149:Main page: 546:instead of 525:WP:PROSPLIT 440:WP:CONSPLIT 368:Main page: 299:8,000 words 290:9,000 words 275:What to do 272:Word count 230:Main page: 103:WP:SPLITOUT 49:This is an 1538:Categories 1415:should be 1350:WP:SECMOVE 1111:Summary in 1101:SubArticle 617:guideline. 494:notability 424:See also: 414:being bold 380:After all 208:Size split 1519:splitnote 1389:split dab 1242:templates 1240:splitting 1145:Templates 1126:Interwiki 922:Shortcuts 866:See below 699:{{split}} 541:Split dab 511:Procedure 432:Shortcuts 382:templates 349:redirects 338:Prosesize 138:talkpage. 132:Splitting 81:Shortcuts 67:consensus 1238:Article 1171:See also 1067:diff URL 1060:diff URL 788:involved 746:Shortcut 627:Skip to 517:Shortcut 505:template 214:Shortcut 176:Shortcut 89:WP:SPLIT 1467:Discuss 1423:discuss 1373:Discuss 1325:Discuss 1281:discuss 1012:Add "{{ 896:content 572:be bold 393:reflist 164:notable 71:vetting 1483:Copied 1139:WP:RIA 1069:– see 1047:Check 907:Copied 834:result 635:split. 629:step 5 608:Copied 475:coffee 470:Coffea 330:XTools 1463:split 1418:split 1369:moved 1321:split 1276:split 1251:split 900:scope 685:split 588:Note: 551:split 534:Note: 463:, or 336:; or 298:: --> 289:: --> 280:: --> 156:split 1014:Main 949:and 898:(or 892:size 885:Main 841:~~~~ 807:and 734:~~~~ 726:~~~~ 693:or 681:Use 650:~~~~ 633:bold 483:heat 481:and 384:and 353:list 69:and 1106:or 1022:See 398:or 1540:: 1521:}} 1517:{{ 1485:}} 1481:{{ 1441:}} 1437:{{ 1391:}} 1387:{{ 1352:) 1343:}} 1339:{{ 1299:}} 1295:{{ 1253:}} 1249:{{ 1167:. 1114:}} 1108:{{ 1104:}} 1098:{{ 912:. 910:}} 904:{{ 888:}} 882:{{ 855:}} 849:{{ 844:}} 825:{{ 815:}} 809:{{ 805:}} 799:{{ 728:* 720:* 713:. 687:}} 683:{{ 667:. 611:}} 605:{{ 566:. 564:}} 558:{{ 554:}} 548:{{ 544:}} 538:{{ 507:. 485:. 459:, 396:}} 390:{{ 365:: 359:. 340:. 322:. 266:. 1469:) 1425:) 1375:) 1327:) 1283:) 1231:e 1224:t 1217:v 1128:. 1073:. 1016:| 982:" 837:= 831:| 646:] 145:. 73:. 53:. 31:. 20:.

Index

Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge
Knowledge:Category intersection
Knowledge:History splitting
information page
encyclopedic article
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
consensus
vetting
Shortcuts
WP:SPLIT
WP:SPLITTING
WP:SPLITOUT
license requirements
general overview article
notable
Shortcut
WP:WHENSPLIT
out of scope
neutrality issues
Shortcut
WP:SIZESPLIT
Knowledge:Article size
average speed
concentration span
Knowledge:Summary style
too short to provide encyclopedic coverage
content issues
Knowledge:Stub
XTools
Shubinator's DYK tool

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑