Knowledge

:Requests for bureaucratship/Anonymous Dissident - Knowledge

Source šŸ“

242:. Consensus or lack thereof is what bureaucrats are tasked with assessing when it comes to the closure of RfXā€™s. How this assessment is to be conducted and how consensus is to be determined requires a more extended response and consideration of a number of factors. Our policy on the matter asserts that candidates with over 80% support are generally promoted and candidates with under 70% support are generally not promoted, and, as far as RfA goes, this has generally been a precedent. However, my liberal use of the word ā€œgenerallyā€ here is intentional, because bureaucrats are not appointed for their proficiency with calculators or their ability to count. In the RfA process, numbers and percentages can be quite opaque, and the content of participantsā€™ supports and opposes are integral to the judgement of consensus. The role of the bureaucrat, therefore, is to qualitatively rather than quantitatively evaluate the concerns of the opposition and the approvals of the supporters in order to ascertain where the general agreement lies and if, ultimately, the community has consensus as to whether they are comfortable with the user in question having the administrator functions. Thatā€™s what it all comes down to. 881:
hand, perhaps the concerns are relatively minor and that's why the community is not in self-consonance; however, on the flipside, perhaps there are just a great number of concerns, and that's why the participants are each contributing different evidence or making different comments. For those reasons, I'd be uncomfortable in dealing an absolute here, but, if I had to, I think I'd be tending towards saying that an opposition in concordance is often indicative of more deeply-seated concerns, and the community's consistency enforces this. Naturally, there can certainly be elements of both in RfA, where the community objects for a large number of reasons but is unified in its objection at the same time.
752:
the reasons for opposition were based on "incriminating" evidence that was invalidated later in the RfA, and that was the reason for John and Jane Doe's re-evaluation, then this needs to be taken into account when we look at John and Jane Smith's oppositionā€”perhaps these two aren't apprised of the changes in situation? However, if John and Jane Doe initially opposed for solid and valid reasoning, such as incivility or a worrying incident, but later shifted position because they'd had a simple change of heart, the view for John and Jane Smith is again different; X and Y could still be very valid and their opposition could remain wholly justified. So it all depends. Does that answer your question? ā€”
812:
collective disagreement with the closures of the past. To address your other question: my alternate ways of closure were influenced primarily by elements particular to each of the individual RfA's, rather than by a general belief that changed communal views on consensus would lead to a different result in the current climate. So, overall, I suppose I could reply to both of your questions by saying that my answers to 7 were drawn from analysis of each of the RfA's separately, and there isn't necessarily an underlying correlation between these responses. I've probably taken a long while to say something fairly simple here, so I hope you'll excuse the loquaciousness.Ā ;-)
4976:. I'm sorry AD. I think you're preternaturally mature, but I still think you're more impulsive and temperamental than I'd feel comfortable with. I'm worried that you think RFA is broken and that the goal of RFA is to produce more admins; I worry how that would influence your action as 'crat. Finally, I'm concerned about your civility answer. Too many candidates and their wikifriends interpret most opposition as personal attacks (when the vast majority of it is merely personal evaluation which is inevitable in a forum that exists to evaluate persons). Someone inevitably paints any discussion as badgering. We do need 'crats to take a stand -- in the 931:
thoughts are that the mechanics of the process work fine, but that we as a community partaking in this process need to introspectively take a look several things, such as 1) Our attitudes towards it, 2) The standards we have for admins, 3) How we feel about the atmosphere at RfA and whether we could make the process less daunting for prospective candidates and 4) Whether we're happy with the process and our promotion rates in the context of the previous three points. As noted above, I could go into plenty more detail, but those are my personal views articulated concisely.
2076:ā€” Yes. Anonymous Dissident is one of Knowledge's stand-out administrators, helping out wherever he is needed without provoking needless drama or other nonsense. He is mature, friendly, and down-to-earth, and maintains a good sense of humour to boot (and knows when to use it). He has significant experience in all of the major 'crat areas and I am willing to trust his judgment determining consensus upon closing an RfA. I have the utmost confidence in Anonymous Dissident, and to be honest, I can't think of an editor better qualified for the job than he is. 256:. In situations where candidacies are split and the contributing elements on either side of the debate are complex, I think second opinions are always of benefit. A bureaucrat discussion is a good way of sorting through problems like this. However, a "crat chat" like this should never be conducted in the way that the bureaucrats are forging a more privatised and "elite" form of consensus about the RfA amongst themselves; rather, it should be used to discuss the 3829: 407:: Bureaucrat discussion: I'd have made sure to have taken into consideration and to have noted several key factors, including: 1) the fact that ^demon resigned his bit in uncontroversial circumstances 2) the fact that the opposition were quite unified in their reasoning... 3) but also that many were "reluctant" or "on the fence" as closer WjBscribe pointed out. 275:. As outlined in my nomination statement, I feel quite confident in my knowledge of policy in relation to the 'crat tasks, and I think I'm able to communicate well with others. However, I won't say much more here; I leave it up to the community to determine, one way or the other, whether they think I would make a suitable bureaucrat in these regards. 2027:
while before running for bureaucratship. I am very, very pleased to see this request: when I supported Anonymous Dissident in his RfA, I believe I could have given him a better rationale for supporting, for he well and truly exceeded my expections for him. I cannot think of a better candidate for bureaucratship. Consider this a very strong support.
5105:). Now, I realize bureaucrats arenā€™t closing AfDs and all, but how one argues in those reflects how one judges things in general and the above examples give me a pause when it comes to judgment. Anyway, good job earning so many awards and never being blocked (I donā€™t count blocking and unblocking yourself as a block!). Sincerely, -- 490:
the community gave these bureaucrats the tools in the first place because they assumed the candidate would make actual use of the access. However, I won't give an absolute here; if a proposal were drawn up about the removal of tools from inactive 'crats, I'd really have to review the proposal in its full depth and in its entirety.
188:ā€“ I seem to be coming down with an eye infection. I'm finding it difficult to concentrate on my computer screen for any substantial length of time. With proper medication, I hope to be back on-wiki in a day or two. I ask you to bear with me with regard to the answering of questions and such. Thanks for your understanding. ā€” 971:
Do you take the the position that "old timers", those editors who have been on Knowledge for many years and contributed much in the way of FAs, should be given more slack that those here only a few years, and that that "old timers" be allowed to personally attack and in other ways be uncivil without
880:
This is an astute question. I think that if the opposition are in noted harmony, it can be symptomatic of a serious problem (or problems) that requires particular attention when analysing an RfA. An opposition that opposes for a wide variety of unrelated reasons can suggest a number of things. On one
3104:
JayHenry, you're perfectly entitled to your opposition. If you've taken the impression that I'd not be a suitable bureaucrat and you're able to rationalise that, your input is valid; and you have. If you believe my demeanour is unsuited and you believe that my actions may be rash as a result of that
504:
A. An extension of the endtime may be an appropriate course of action if new evidence has come to light and the RfX is changing dramatically as a result of this, with many of the participants rethinking their positions and the like. It's my belief that the extension of RfX's is an option that should
489:
A. I'm not sure a minimum activity criterion that would mandate the removal of a user's tools by default would be for the best, but I certainly think that bureaucrats should make it a priority to be active in the position that the community has given them. After all, it's only natural to assume that
125:
of the same year. Not long after this, I began to explore Wikimedia more deeply, and am now a contributor to several of the sister projects, including Meta, the English Wikisource, Commons and Wikispecies; and here I am now, spending my time on Knowledge doing the things I've done for the most of my
3957:
I'll have $ 20 on pump 5... Oh, wrong queue. I typed up my neutral, read through it, and realized it sounded oddly like a support... so it's here now. He's done all good work so far, although the fact that he's only got 2 years of WP under his waistline (idioms are weird like that). Overall, sounds
2190:
Support. Just a note that three of the active bureaucrats have voted here, and a fourth has commented... You folks might want to use your handy mailing list to make sure you don't all vote expecting someone else to closeĀ :-P I like the answers to number 7, myself. Shows consideration of the current
862:
Well, anons can't "participate" in an RfA in the traditional, numeric sense, but they are able to comment in the discussion section. Therefore, were an anon to make constructive commentary or insightful remarks, I would regard and consider what they've said as necessary. After all, an astute remark
3064:
I'm aware, Biblio. Look, I know what a delicate issue this is for young editors. I'm not talking about age, however, and I'm not really sure how old he is. Is he more mature than many 16-year-olds or even 32-year-olds or 64-year-olds? Absolutely. It's not about age and I'm opposed to immature
917:
Do I think RfA is broken? Hmm. This is quite a philosophical question, and there are several schools of thought about this matter. I really could go into a very long spiel about this, but that probably wouldn't be appropriate here, so I'll try and be succinct as I can. It's my personal belief that
751:
This is quite an interesting question. I'm not sure I can answer fully or with the thoroughness that would be required at a real RfA, as the question is quite generic, but I'll give it a shot. I think the way that John Smith and Jane Smith's comments are to be viewed largely depends on X and Y. If
121:- Hello, I am Anonymous Dissident, a Wikipedian since 17 January, 2007. From the day of my registry I was very attracted to this idea of a šŸ’• that anyone could edit, an open fountainhead of information. This being the source of my involvement, I soon became a regular contributor, and I was granted 2026:
encountered. He is very civil, intelligent, highly familiar with policy, highly familiar with bureaucrat-related tasks, and is incredibly calm. I offered to nominate him a few months ago, and he was very grateful for the offer, but after some thinking he reckoned that it would be better to wait a
811:
The fact that the closures happen to be mostly different from what actually happened is more coincidental than anything else, I think. I'd be happy to expound upon my way of closure for any of them should you ask, but, as I say, my answer as a whole is more a product of happenstance than any kind
702:
I'm open to recall because I feel the need to be answerable to my actions as an administrator in a more cemented way; yes, recall isn't watertight, as many people note, and it is open to circumvention by admins, but, for me, the extra layer of accountability is a worthwhile thing if it comes to a
930:
contributed. I think some of the points he made there surmised the issue well; he went into detail about the way we view admin promotion and the way potential candidates can be daunted by the RfA process, to the backdrop of the dropped promotion rate that was observed last year. Essentially, my
627:
Hi AD. It's not really a suprise to see this - I've been watching you clerking at the username board and figured this was coming. I was set for a support but looking at your contributions I can't really see any evidence in the last six months of you judging consensus - for example by closing an
337:
NPA is a policy we have for a reason. Personal attacks on Knowledge damage what should be a cordial and friendly environment, and this can be especially harmful on places such as RfA, where the atmosphere is often already tense and stressed. Therefore, at RfA, I think that it's imperative that
5498:
I do personally oppose the opposition !votes as I think they are immaterial to this RFB, (I argue that they would be in the original RFA, but I am not for holding users' feet to the fire continuously until they fall off.) but I would like to hear responses from the last two questions (Q16 and
5293:
per A Nobody. Down from regular oppose to weak oppose per all the praises of his temperament, but i'm a bit concerned about the judgement in those xfd closes. If AD can explain the closes in question in the Qs, i'd be willing to change my mind. When it comes to 'crats though, the precision in
837:
My thoughts on the matter are that those who oppose should, in particular, provide reasoning for their choice. While supporters would do well to explain themselves too, a support for an RfA is justified if the supporter sees no issue with the user becoming an admin, whereas an oppose instead
146:
closures and the like). I also think I have a reasonable understanding of the bot flagging process and related policies; although, not being much of a programmer or a bot operator, I've not been involved as much in this area as the previous two. Lastly, although bureaucratship on the English
610:
I'd require all of them to re-run RfB, with the exception of WJBscribe. The last bureaucrat to resign their position before WJB was Danny, and he did so in March 2007. Now, I think it's a fairly widely-held belief that community standards for bureaucrats and the climate at RfB have changed
3105:
demeanour, that's entirely reasonable. I think it comes down to the fact that you've stated you more have a problem with what you perceive to be youth of character rather than the physical, real-world youth that, in most cases and in my case, underpins it. Is my analysis accurate...? ā€”
1641:
User has used his admin tools well .The use rhas been around since Jan 2007 and looking at the 489 blocks done show the user has used his tools well and also his protects and deletions are okay.Similarly the protects Excellent and fully trustworthy user who has contributed immensely to
3024:
I find your comments dead on the money about ten times out of ten, so you're probably right. While AD is an extraordinarily precocious young guy he still seems very young to me, with all that such youth entails. I don't mean that as a jab; we'll all be older sooner than we wish.
365:
As I mentioned in my response to the first question, I consider the reviewing of participants' comments to be an integral part of the determination of consensus at RfA. The consensus is for the community to form; therefore, an RfA cannot be closed without proper regard for this
2311:
already, will be benefit us all if he has the "special" crat tools rather than "only" his "ordinary" admin tools. There is no shortage of work for crats and there is certainly no shortage of need for them, so I'm glad that such a good candidate offered himself for it. Regards
3958:
like a good candidate for being a crat. I haven't seen him around much, but when I have, it was a good experience. He doesn't have any get-up-in-someone's-ass-about-something skills (from what I've seen), which could be good or bad. (concluding parenthetical statement)
169:: the large number of questions asked was something I was prepared for when I decided to run. However, it will take me some time to get to them all, and I want to take the time to give them the consideration they deserve. Please bear with me in those respects. Thanks, ā€” 338:
civility is maintained and calm discussion is had. So yes, giving consideration to the mood of the forum, we shouldn't have a great deal of tolerance towards attacks on other editors; it's just not constructive, and, furthermore, there is no justification for it.
873:
In your answer to question 7, you said you'd consider whether "the opposition were quite unified in their reasoning" If so, is that a bigger or smaller negative than if the oppostion was divided in many camps each with an identified problem they didn't like?
500:
Of the 3,500+ prior RFAs, only eight have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime; of over 100 prior RFBs, only two have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime. Under what circumstances and by what process would you extend an RFA in general?
3010:
Nine times out of ten I find JayHenry's comments to be dead on the money; I guess this is the one in ten. AD may occasionally have rash impulses but I don't recall the last time they translated to rash actions (and I have a long memory).
5377:
Bingo. Sorry about that. I said it in the wrong way. I'm moving my !vote to neutral and if you can answer the questions posed by A Nobody, I'd be more than happy to move it to support. Thanks for reaching out, please feel better soon.
5035:
admins were promoted in 2009 than 2008, however, this is not ipso facto an improvement -- and because of attrition, resignation, etc. we may indeed see a net decrease in the number of administrators. This would not mean RFA is broken.
632:
debate or similar. Whilst you have my trust, I require more than that to support an RFB - can you provide some evidence of where you have been asked to read, interpret and act on a consensus seeking discussion within en.wikipedia?
5357:
Hey Spinach Monster. I think the misunderstanding here stems from your use of the term "machine level". On the one hand, I think you meant to say that 'crats should be unbiased and neutral, but the reference to "machines" made it
129:
At the core of it, I've decided to have a shot at bureaucratship because I believe I would make an effective addition to the current cohort and have good experience in a number of bureaucrat-related fields. I've been a clerk at
5247:
I don't see what's wrong with opposing and citing AfDs. However, what bothers me with the oppose is the fact that none of the links are to recent AfD articles, and only appear to be ones in which the two users disagreed.
1761:
Expletives are only offensive if you want them to be, and this one certainly wasn't used maliciously. Frankly, I take it as a compliment. I wish someone would offer to let me copulate with them in a horizontal fashion.
662:
and I sometimes close discussions there; and the nature of the username policy makes the proper review of consensus crucial in this area. As it happens, there is one such request that I've closed on the page right now:
1356:
I do realize that you supported, but I really don't know what you mean about judgment. Can you please explain? Is there a hidden, buried part of Anonymous Dissident's past that everyone has forgotten or overlooked?
5432:
Are you sure you haven't mistaken this for a request for adminship? Automated editing and conflict resolution are generally matters for that forum, although that doesn't necessarily make them invalid for this one.
4151:
Not. Ā :-) I noticed the RfB all of 15 seconds before !voting in it, if that much. "Hey, an RfB. Anonymous Dissident?!" *click support section edit button* *scroll, scroll, scroll* *typeity-type-type* *submit*
260:
consensus (or lack thereof) with regard to the RfA. Depending on circumstance, it may also be appropriate to extend the ending date of the RfA to see whether more time might allow the community to find a clearer
1055: 5261:
I have a hard time explaining myself, but you did a good job for me. That is what my point was. It seems to me that A nobody holds grudges, and links that old are of no importance. That is what I meant.
4645:
per candidate's overall record, strong contributions both in mainspace and wikispace, excellent answers to questions, and many of the comments above. Additional support per insipid shaggy doggerel:
2418:
A user I would definitely trust with the tools, capable, reliable, and friendly admin. I see no reason not to emphatically support the candidacy, and the candidate wherever this ends up going. --
486:
One of of the bureaucrats elected in 2004 has yet to use any of the crat tools and others have used them very rarely. Do you think the bureaucrat position should have a minimum level of activity?
134:
and its subpages for over a year, and with over 600 edits between these pages, I feel confident in my knowledge of Knowledge's rename process and our username policy. I'm an active participant at
5115: 1049: 116: 5078: 1838:
He's one of the few reasons stereotypes about young users haven't gained widespread support, a fact which is a credit to him. Attends a fine education institution, also, which always helpsĀ :)
1551:
I see no issues with Anonymous Dissident's behavior around Knowledge. He would most definitely be an asset to the community if he was promoted to a crat. Good on you for wanting to help more!
1890:- Everything I've seen from you has been generally sensible and mature. I fully trust you to reasonably judge RfA consensus and otherwise fiddle with the odd selection of bureaucrat tools. ~ 214: 783: 3835:
As AnonDiss' RfA nominator (which passed with over 150 supports BTW), I am shocked that he didn't ask me to nom him again. But meh what's the difference, he'll make an excellent 'crat. :D
5387: 5372: 863:
is an astute remark, regardless of who it comes from, and it should be appreciated throughout Knowledge that many contributors have valid reasons for feeling uncomfortable in registering.
3115: 1381:
Not his judgment himself; the very recent thing with Keeper on the RFA talk page ensures he is calm during arguments, but there's just a sort of premonition about him. At least for me.
269:
Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
5339:, but there is a large amount of discrepancy as to what it means in discussions. So for me with 'crats, the judgement process has to be nearly without any emotion or bias whatsoever. 5352: 3214: 3200: 762: 5362:
as if you were saying the process of consensus-judgement requires mechanical counting or tallying (which it shouldn't). Am I right in saying that may be where the confusion lies? ā€”
474: 5090: 4397: 4379: 458: 4745: 4294:
Reassuringly nice answers to questions and, from the general gestalt of comments on various WP talk pages, I have a generally positive feeling toward this editor's good sense. --
1789: 4796: 2013: 1961: 1943: 1396: 1376: 5535: 5137: 3099: 3074: 3059: 2635: 5228: 5212: 5199: 5098: 5062: 4364: 1982: 5486: 5303: 5270: 5256: 5242: 5183: 3872:- my first support in a RfB ever. As I tend to think there are enough Bs around. But we are growing a lot, and attrition is not to be ignored, and this a great candidate.-- 1756: 5472: 5330: 150:
With that, I humbly present my candidacy to the community, with thanks to all who participate. It would be my deepest honour to serve our great project in this position. ā€”
5023: 3034: 694: 5045: 5007: 1773: 2761: 1996: 5170: 4565: 5455: 5441: 5070: 4156: 4146: 649: 551: 2234:
While we don't always agree, I've seen him around and had a positive enough opinion of him that I can't think of anything that anybody will find to oppose over.---
1665: 3079:
Yes, I know that. I really don't want to kindle the perennial debates and stuff over ageism. Just wondering what rash impulses you might have been thinking of...
357: 615:
have since 2004 and 2005. Therefore, I'd think it only best that these users present their requests to the community should they desire the 'crat position again.
3154:- Good answers to the questions. Giving the bureaucrat tools to an experienced and sensible contributor isn't very dangerous, and we do need more bureaucrats. 805:
I see that almost all of your closes are different from the actual results. Why? Do you think the community shifted its stance on consensus levels since then?
122: 4371: 3777: 1651: 555: 198: 179: 160: 3065:
adults being bureaucrats. I miss the rash impulses of my extreme youth, but not enough not to recognize them; as they say, youth is wasted on the young. --
2913: 5074: 3478: 390:
How would you close these RfA/Bs? If you opine for a crat chat, please express what you would have said there as the final determination of the outcome.
33: 5175:
What do you mean "same oppose"? His opposes are never blanket, as the AfD links always change to the ones in which they both participated and disagreed.
1703: 1660: 547: 3180: 2570: 2514: 2094: 2490: 951: 5520: 4081: 2536: 1331: 1266: 1170: 3680: 3663: 2248: 1731: 1247: 4332: 4098: 4034: 3484: 3362: 3258: 3243: 2603: 1927: 1214: 846:
opposes made without any explanation most often resign themselves to a lesser weighting than those that come with reasoning or explanation appended.
4615: 4270: 4223: 3760: 2931: 2768: 2612: 1675: 1510: 1282: 4961: 4714: 4494: 4305: 4189: 3714: 3606: 3431: 2785: 2687: 2299: 5553: 4637: 4595: 4206: 3985: 3468: 3390: 3338: 3163: 3146: 2725: 2705: 2587: 2342: 2257: 2185: 1865: 1313: 5233:
I know that he uses different links in his oppostion, but what I'm saying is that he generally opposes on the same grounds, on AFD disscussions.
4586: 4541: 4444: 4320: 3907: 3731: 3570: 3275: 2743: 2669: 2620: 2168: 2103: 2031: 1562: 1351: 664: 5503: 5086: 4828: 4600: 4472: 4286: 4116: 4051: 3932: 3881: 3822: 3646: 3590: 3317: 3019: 2949: 2886: 2858: 2835: 2282: 1833: 1616: 1578: 1492: 1294: 5109: 4989: 4511: 4346: 3967: 3949: 3696: 3629: 3447: 2804: 2652: 2429: 2410: 2157: 2140: 1882: 1812: 1526: 1470: 1441: 147:
Knowledge differs in many ways from bureaucratship on smaller wikis, I have prior experience with this position on both Meta and Wikispecies.
5427: 4939: 4877: 4246: 4172: 3864: 3501: 3300: 2818: 2473: 2396: 2360: 2199: 1847: 1687: 1684: 1633: 1543: 1423: 1093: 220: 4913: 4896: 4427: 4128: 3854: 3414: 2961: 2325: 2124: 2068: 1906: 542:
were decratted at their own requests between 2004 and 2008. Of them all, the only controversial decrattings could be considered Ugen64 who
4854: 3550: 2980: 2895: 2447: 1061: 5156: 4008: 3743: 2377: 1183: 4608:- I realized that A.D is a very qualified candidate for 'cratship as looking at some old RfBs of others. I switch my vote from Neutral.-- 4062: 3002: 2051: 1069: 658:
Hey there, Pedro. It is to be admitted that I am not hugely active at forums such as AfD and the like, but I do regularly participate at
1085: 562:, all in connection with his ceasing employment at the Wikimedia Foundation. Which of these users would you re-crat if they asked at 2989: 1001: 659: 80: 434: 4994:"I'm worried that you think... that the goal of RFA is to produce more admins..." Just what is the goal of RFA then? Fewer admins? 3525: 509:
the length for an RfA that we as a community have decided on, and this should only be waived if the circumstances really demand it.
5310:
That is disturbing. We need less crats who use machine-counts and tallies and more crats who can actually understand a consensus.
5418:. If you could show me some instances where you successfully settled a conflict, I'll be more than happy to switch to support.-- 2563: 92: 3722:. Based both on my interactions with Anonymous Dissident and his replies to the questions above, I think he will do a good job. 3196: 2223: 1534:
I agree with pretty much everything above, and on top of that, I'm more likely to support at RfB than the average voter. - Dan
1166: 110: 98: 4076: 1621:
The most qualified 'crat hopeful I've ever !voted for. No chance of abuse, every chance of great work at CHU. Good luck...
1328: 86: 17: 5323: 4738: 3972:
I commented on AD's first RFA that his ability to learn impressed me very much. I don't think that has changed therefore I
3092: 3052: 1724: 236:
Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
104: 543: 4028: 1077: 558:
over tallying RFA results. Danny's remains the unusual case of him resigning both crat and sysop rights and later being
440: 428: 404: 398: 1778:
Discussion on Biblio's comment is taking place on his talk page; let's try and keep future discussion here on topic. ā€”
1041: 422: 5511:
Moved from Oppose. Will be happy to move to support if AD can satisfactorily answer why he did in A Nobody's examples.
4266: 1670: 1280: 410: 559: 416: 5446:
No, but to me, promoting someone to a bureaucrat is a big deal, and I'd like to be completely sure before I vote.--
3773: 2701: 1647: 135: 5058: 4528: 3895: 3566: 2906: 923: 1228:
Excellent and fully trusted user in my book. I have no qualms about him being added to the bureaucrat position.
250:
How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
225:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as a Bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following
4823: 3797: 2854: 2276: 1486: 126:
time on the project: writing encyclopedic articles, helping with maintenance, and partaking in administration.
5370: 5188:
Feel free to disagree with his !vote, but please, don't incorrectly claim that he uses a boilerplate oppose.
3113: 2256:
Good level of productivity, AD is quite down to earth and seems to strive for equity. Nice job clerking too.
1803:. Highly qualified candidate. Used admin tools well, extremely civil, knows the bureaucrat responsibilities. 1033: 995: 760: 456: 212: 196: 177: 158: 74: 4313:, has exhibited good judgment in his wikicareer and might as well be allowed to use it in a few more areas. 4934: 3521: 3293: 2358: 1453:'crat, in my opinion. He has demonstrated an undertsanding of consensus and the cordiality to implement it 1149: 131: 52: 1117: 348:
Will you consider the validity and usefulness of the comments at an RFA important in your final decision?
3838: 3769: 3210: 3176: 2555: 2505: 2099:
No issues with trust, no issues with judgement and I have full faith that he will use the tools wisely. ā€”
1643: 1123: 1103: 895: 774: 717: 45: 2207:
I've been waiting for this. AD is a great user, and an asset to the community. He'd make a great 'crat.
1111: 5534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
5102: 5094: 5066: 3806: 3542: 2899: 2486: 2219: 2088: 1129: 1025: 918:
no, RfA isn't broken, but there is clear room for improvement. I'm not sure if you've ever tuned in to
5516: 5383: 5348: 5299: 4351:
In the interest of clarity and killing all humour, can you clarify this meant as a humorous support?
4071: 2733:
per A Nobody. No not really, just support because i trust his judgment, and that's all that matters.
2524: 2243: 1784: 1325: 1261: 733:
On day 1 of an RFA User John Doe opposes citing reason X and User Jane Doe opposes citing reason Y.
2148:
I rarely !vote in RfX these days, but Anon Diss would (will?) be a welcome addition to our ranks. --
2108:
Reasonable answer to my question, but great answer to Q10. Skilled at username bits so no problems.
1336:
Seems to be good, though not fully sure about judgment. I suspect some opposition in that movement.
1274:- AnonDiss is among our most well-qualified candidates for bureaucratship. I give my full support. ā€“ 1009: 5364: 5318: 5128: 4733: 3676: 3659: 3107: 3087: 3047: 1719: 1367: 1238: 991: 754: 450: 206: 190: 171: 152: 69: 4575:
Absolutely! Anonymous Dissident is an excellent admin and will make a fine bureaucrat, no doubt!
1178: 1017: 831:
Are RFA "support" !votes without explanation more valid than "oppose" !votes without explanation?
736:
On day 2 of the RFA User John Smith opposes per John Doe and User Jane Smith opposes per Jane Doe.
4391: 4358: 4094: 4023: 3517: 3497: 3238: 1955: 1921: 1694: 1609: 3509:
Does a pretty good job as admin, see no reason not to trust. Cheers. 15:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
742:
Five days later when you close the RFA neither John nor Jane Smith have altered their position.
5466: 4609: 4262: 4219: 3756: 3206: 3189: 3172: 2925: 2629: 2547: 2500: 1506: 1278: 1159: 911:
Do you think that RFA is broken, and if so what if anything would you do about this as a crat?
890: 769: 712: 5410:
You certainly seem to have enough edits, and you are definitely not too reliant on tools like
5161:
Excellent research? A nobody has the same oppose for everyone when it comes to RFA and or RFB.
3739:; solid responses to questions, impressive project experience, and copious clue and maturity. 2422: 983: 4956: 4710: 4487: 4300: 4185: 3708: 3602: 3427: 2781: 2683: 2482: 2462: 2295: 2215: 2077: 1086: 382: 5401: 1222: 5512: 5379: 5344: 5295: 4631: 4202: 4068: 3981: 3513: 3463: 3382: 3332: 3159: 3140: 2879: 2583: 2338: 2236: 2211: 2181: 1779: 1322: 1308: 1256: 1208: 1094: 842:
the caseā€”and explanation of why that is should be given. Ultimately, I think that supports
4967: 1062: 8: 5313: 5266: 5238: 5166: 5119: 5077:(if we went by strength of arguments and not a head count, it would have been a ā€œkeepā€), 4728: 4580: 4533: 4440: 4317: 3901: 3793: 3727: 3672: 3656: 3271: 3082: 3042: 2665: 2616: 1714: 1560: 1389: 1358: 1344: 1229: 820: 690: 374: 448:
If you have questions as to why I answered thus, I'm happy to expound at your request. ā€”
5500: 5041: 5002: 4985: 4818: 4457: 4386: 4376: 4353: 4329: 4284: 4141: 4112: 4090: 4047: 4018: 3924: 3877: 3816: 3784: 3642: 3588: 3348: 3313: 3250: 3226: 3070: 3030: 3017: 2947: 2874: 2848: 2831: 2596: 2290:
We need some more 'crats right now, and he's as good a candidate as you could ask for.
2266: 2010: 1977: 1950: 1916: 1877: 1601: 1573: 1501:. Even temperament, haven't seen anything to make me oppose. We need more good 'crats. 1458: 1142: 470: 301:. Certainly. Time constraints will not be a problem for me, and I have the inclination. 138:, both in the evaluation of candidates and the general maintenance of RfA candidacies ( 1070: 5482: 4507: 4256: 4215: 3963: 3945: 3752: 3622: 3443: 3186: 3012: 2918: 2800: 2753: 2649: 2153: 2133: 1992: 1808: 1502: 1466: 1436: 1275: 1156: 353: 328: 3614:
with such an experience level, I am surprised that he hasn't been given the duties.
3133:
Certainly.Ā :) Fantastic answers to Q's, has more than enough tenure and experience.
2939:
You're certainly trustworthy for the job. And I love your taste in signature fonts.
5451: 5439: 5423: 5082: 4948: 4870: 4706: 4481: 4295: 4239: 4181: 3704: 3599: 3423: 3289: 2954:
AUSCABAL support. Extremely fine user who is deserving and capable. A rare bird. ~
2777: 2678: 2467: 2392: 2356: 2291: 2197: 1843: 1624: 1539: 1414: 143: 5250: 5221: 5206: 5192: 5177: 5016: 4910: 4891: 4789: 4624: 4420: 4198: 3977: 3845: 3455: 3410: 3371: 3327: 3155: 3134: 2955: 2719: 2696: 2579: 2334: 2319: 2177: 2117: 2064: 1936: 1858: 1766: 1749: 1303: 1197: 1078: 939: 642: 572: 519: 288: 5217:
It was directed at America69, I just forgot to level it right on the indent.Ā :)
2898:. I certainly trust AD as an admin, no reason not to trust him as a bureaucrat. 5340: 5262: 5234: 5162: 5152: 4847: 4576: 4558: 4521: 4436: 4314: 3889: 3724: 3560: 3545: 3267: 2976: 2826:- excellent answers to the questions and a fine contribution and admin record. 2776:- Three of your answers to number seven were those that I strongly agree with. 2734: 2661: 2445: 2163: 2100: 2028: 1587: 1552: 1383: 1338: 927: 919: 686: 675: 602: 584: 539: 527: 139: 1736:
I have no doubt this will create a firestorm about my prudishness but is that
5547: 5336: 5106: 5037: 4981: 4813: 4279: 4108: 4043: 4042:
Anonymous Dissident would certainly make a fine bureaucrat and we need more.
4001: 3918: 3873: 3811: 3801: 3740: 3638: 3579: 3309: 3066: 3026: 2941: 2869: 2844: 2827: 2481:. A great addition and a truly positive addition to the ranks. Good luck. 2373: 2308: 1823: 1596: 1568: 1479: 1291: 960: 795: 629: 465: 320: 292: 284: 5031:, as in, a higher rate. We agree that RFA is currently producing admins. If 1987:
OMG, he's an eBayer? Group kick! Oh wait... I'm getting my MMOs confused. --
5478: 5415: 5411: 4996: 4503: 4342: 4135: 3960: 3941: 3690: 3617: 3439: 3355: 2795: 2646: 2419: 2405: 2149: 2044: 1988: 1971: 1871: 1804: 1520: 1462: 1430: 563: 378: 349: 324: 309: 3940:. I think this candidate is competent enough to become a bureaucrat here. 3596:
Was hoping to be #100 but had to fix a kitchen light and missed it support
2628:, thank you for making Knowledge more colorful with your unique view. :D-- 1518:
I still wish we could get a bot-focused crat, but Anon Diss is qualified.
5499:
particularly Q17) before deciding. Am leaning towards a support, though.
5447: 5434: 5419: 4923: 4865: 4232: 4169: 3859: 3493: 3284: 2969:- Positive contributor in multiple varied capacities. Builds the 'pedia. 2813: 2457: 2387: 2351: 2192: 2006: 1839: 1535: 1409: 739:
Later on day 2 John Doe shifts to neutral and Jane Doe shifts to support.
590: 535: 2022:
Anonymous Dissident is, by far, one of the most mature Wikipedians I've
5465:
I've not seen him around much, so don't know him to be a good 'crat'.--
5079:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Optimus Prime (person) (4th nomination)
5012:
I'm not being picky - I genuinely have no idea what that meant either.
4906: 4904:
because opposing wouldn't do anything, and I have no reason to oppose.
4887: 4414: 4153: 4125: 3399: 2314: 2111: 2060: 1891: 1743: 856:
How would you consider an anon's comments and participation in an RFA?
636: 596: 578: 531: 523: 5538:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
5477:
Perhaps you'd take a few moments to check his contrib record then? --
5148: 4838: 4549: 3537: 2971: 2438: 926:
on adminship and the RfA process was had, to which former bureaucrat
5528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
4921:
I've never seen AD's name pop up on my watchlist and not liked it.
3996: 3346:- I'm glad my ban ended in time, so I could express my support.Ā :) 2369: 2368:. A very capable and reliable admin, he should make a great 'crat. 59: 3637:
for an experienced, level-headed editor with solid credentials. -
4254:
Only seen great things from this admin, definitely trustworthy! -
4057: 2037: 2036:
I asked about this like 4 months ago. I do not change my stance.
5091:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/PlayStation 3 technical problems
3796:. (Translation: SKIP THE RFB AND MAKE HIM A CRAT ALREADY!!! :P) 1010: 972:
censor because their content contribution has been rewarded?
1321:
Ran into you a few times, and think you are fully qualified.--
685:
You are listed as "open to recall," as an administrator. Why?
5204:
I hope that wasn't directed at me, because I agree with you.
5099:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Stonehenge in popular culture
5063:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Stonehenge_in_popular_culture
2714: 2625: 1659:
Very active editor, I am sure he will make an excellent crat
4089:- I've seen this candidate's work, and I fully trust him. - 3828: 2595:. Absolutely. Fantastic candidate, will be a great 'crat. ā€” 3671:
answers to questions and seems well prepared for the task.
62: 1002: 5071:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fictional Child Prodigies
4594:- Long time administrator with a all around good resume. 4328:ā€” glad I noticed this before close. Not a worry. Cheers, 283:
Do you have the time and do you have the desire to visit
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
4411:- and thanks for taking on this under-appreciated task. 3598:
Active in the right areas, dependable and will be fine.
3507:
Almost WP:100 but of all the bleeding bad luck...Support
3185:
Just to clarify, do you support the candidate himself? ā€“
1967: 1480: 1026: 1818:
Edit-conflicted-why-does-everyone-seem-love-you-support
1104: 703:
point where I really need to call it a day as an admin.
2437:- I wish we had snow closes for obvious promotions. // 1914:- I would trust this user with my life, if I had one. 5337:
I want to believe that all users understand consensus
5089:(merge discussions should take place on talk pages), 2695:
without qualms, reservations, concerns, or doubts. ā€”
1692:
No problems with Anon Diss - he'll make a fine crat.
1683:
Some things are worth coming out of retirement for.
1042: 1034: 745:
How do you treat John and Jane Smith's votes and why?
5075:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gargoyles in fiction
4765:
If you think you're shit then I'll show you the door
4686:
More troubling, one could ask just what the sense is
2990: 665:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/User names#FeygeleGoy
4759:
He gonna rewind the beats and start that shit again
4756:
But your boy, Neurolysis, oh yeah, that wigga Chris
4680:
There aren't many good rhymes found for "Anonymous"
4659:
Bringing some cheer through supports cast in rhyme.
4231:ā€” Qualified, clueful; no reservations on my part. ā€” 952:Knowledge:Removing administrator rights/Proposal 2 4725:*Sniff* What an inspiring poem from the milkman. 4502:- Yes a trusted user, should make a great 'crat. 1785: 1780: 1449:(and I do not give that often). AD would make an 1262: 1257: 1018: 550:over the promotionĀ % for RFBs and Francs2000 who 5545: 4780:Because you just triggered my wack MC prevention 4668:For this, some lines of verse aren't much to ask 3039:He's not much younger than quite a few of us... 2763:click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! 2479:First support of anything in five months support 1853:On the condition that he stops failing at MathML 505:be used with care and proper discretion; 7 days 295:on a regular basis to attend to those requests? 229:questions to provide guidance for participants: 186:Additional note dated 08:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 4783:Never ever mess a guy with an ipblock-exemption 4683:(Which fits, for Dissidents must be autonomous) 4067:Support. Even-headed/handed and experienced. - 2385:- extremely capable and he has my full trust. - 437:: No consensus at all (default to unsuccessful) 5294:judgment has to be near machine level for me. 5087:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Patronus Charm 4957: 4949: 3370:- Sure, will do fine with the tools. Cheers, 1390: 1384: 1345: 1339: 4698:And so, to the 'crat ranks, we bid him enter: 4692:But all in all, let's praise the notion that 4653:And far too many harsh words here are spoken 2812:Preternaturally mature, as expressed below. 2406: 1948:Not sure, I'm looking in the man pages now. 4656:To help the mood, I choose to pass the time 3347: 3171:to cancel out the absurd AFD Oppose below. 566:and which would you require to re-run RfB? 4777:It's a hard time living with a passing RfB 4771:Opened up the door, then guess who he saw? 4452:. I see no reason not to let them do even 3654:Trustworthy and dedicated to the project. 3476:I think you will do just fine, good luck! 1567:Full support. My ideal choice for a crat. 5343:. A's diffs made me wonder here with AD. 4762:Admins can't rap, never mind in text form 4701:Three cheers for the Anonymous Dissenter 4689:To pick a "Dissident" to judge consensus! 4214:Long time solid user with good judgment. 2162:One metapedian I have a lot of time for. 660:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User names 4674:I found my typing fingers all but frozen 3976:taking this to the next level of trust. 3325:Of course - extrordinary contributions! 1155:Editing stats posted at the talk page. ā€“ 1141:Please keep discussion constructive and 990: 611:substantially since that time, and they 4671:But when I came to sit down to the task 4278:Trustworthy admin, solid reputation. ā€” 1302:. Has the knowledge and dedication. -- 14: 5554:Successful requests for bureaucratship 5546: 4864: 4677:By the username Anon. Diss. has chosen 2843:scrupulous, sensible and trustworthy. 2498:Good candidate, good question answers 4768:Brad ran upstairs up to the top floor 2404:I'll trust this user with the tools. 463:Why promote Gracenotes but not DHMO? 18:Knowledge:Requests for bureaucratship 4665:For English Wiki's newest bureaucrat 4662:Today it's time to lay a welcome mat 4133:Well, you did hesitate 5 days...Ā :) 3792:Yes. Yes. Yessie, yessun', yessir o- 3398:- You'll do fine. No problems here. 1711:. I suppose the badgering paid off. 167:To those who have asked me questions 5218: 5189: 5147:per A nobody's excellent research. 5013: 4786: 1933: 1855: 1763: 319:Will you strengthen enforcement of 23: 4753:RfB rhymes? Now that's a hard sell 4695:Our Pizzaboy will be a bureaucrat! 1932:A life? Where can I download one? 435:DHMO 3 (at this point in time) 79% 24: 5565: 4774:Me, yeah, your man Neurol-you-see 4650:Some users say that RfA is broken 4197:I'm pleased to add my support! -- 2677:. Knows him well and trusts him. 2074:Very, very, very strongly support 4623:- Will make a great bureaucrat. 4058: 3827: 3479: 3205:Oh absolutely. I love the guy. 2660:: What an extraordinary editor. 136:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 5222: 5193: 5059:User:Anonymous Dissident/Awards 5017: 4790: 4168:Good answers to the questions. 3404: 3401: 3356: 3232: 3228: 2269: 2259: 2191:consensus on 'crat promotions. 1937: 1859: 1767: 1740:a helpful use of an expletive? 1487: 989:Links for Anonymous Dissident: 4750:NYB's rhymes are wack as hell, 4632: 4625: 4534: 4529: 4522: 4435:He's a remarkable young man... 3916: 3860: 3807: 3794:yes yes a-yesyes a-yes BAM BOO 3623: 3618: 3422:No problems here. Good luck! 3197: 3190: 2237: 1569: 1167: 1160: 13: 1: 4107:this user.Ā :) Kind regards, ā€” 2548: 1574: 5114:Longish discussion moved to 4862:Dedicated and has my trust. 3817: 2564: 1457:drama. He is unquestionably 1175:For those that prefer them: 132:Knowledge:Changing usernames 7: 5291:Weak Oppose, Almost Neutral 5061:, but I have to oppose per 3812: 3802: 2556: 1820:- agree with Garden 110%. ā€” 221:Questions for the candidate 10: 5570: 5521:12:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5504:05:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5487:09:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5473:01:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5456:13:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5442:12:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5428:20:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 5388:12:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5373:05:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5353:03:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5341:basically NPOV on steroids 5331:03:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5304:03:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5271:20:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5257:19:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5243:18:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 5229:20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 5213:20:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 5200:20:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 5184:00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 5171:22:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 5157:10:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 5138:15:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 5110:22:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5103:Knowledge:Merge and delete 5095:Knowledge:Merge and delete 5067:Knowledge:Merge and delete 5046:20:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5024:20:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 5008:18:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4990:15:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4962:16:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4940:16:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4914:11:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4897:10:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4878:06:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4855:02:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4829:00:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4797:00:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4746:00:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4715:00:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4638:23:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4616:23:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4601:23:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4587:21:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4566:02:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4542:21:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4512:19:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4495:19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4480:. Will make a fine 'crat. 4473:17:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4445:14:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4428:12:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4398:12:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4380:12:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4365:12:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4347:11:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4333:11:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4321:08:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4306:05:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4287:03:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4271:02:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4247:02:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4224:01:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 4207:20:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4190:18:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4173:16:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4157:21:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4147:15:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4129:15:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4117:14:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4103:It's a pleasure for me to 4099:11:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4082:05:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4063:04:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4056:Support, rather strongly. 4052:03:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4035:01:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 4009:23:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3986:22:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3968:22:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3950:20:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3933:20:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3908:15:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3882:08:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3865:04:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3855:02:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3823:00:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3778:00:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3761:00:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3744:22:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3732:22:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3715:22:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3697:21:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3681:20:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3664:19:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3647:17:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3630:16:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3607:15:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3591:15:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3571:15:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3551:15:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3502:14:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3485:14:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3469:05:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3448:02:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3432:02:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3415:01:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3391:00:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3363:00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3339:23:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3318:22:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3301:21:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3276:18:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3259:18:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3244:18:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3215:18:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3201:17:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3181:17:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3164:17:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3147:12:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3116:05:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3100:03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3075:03:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3060:03:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3035:02:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3020:11:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3003:10:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2988:Took you long enough... Ā· 2981:08:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2962:07:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2950:06:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2932:05:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2914:05:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2887:04:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2859:03:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2836:03:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2819:03:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2805:03:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2786:03:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2769:02:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2744:02:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2726:02:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2706:01:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2688:00:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2670:00:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2653:00:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2636:00:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2621:00:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2604:23:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2588:23:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2571:23:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2537:23:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2515:23:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2491:21:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2474:21:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2448:21:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2430:21:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2411:20:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2397:19:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2378:18:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2361:18:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2343:16:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2326:14:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2300:14:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2283:13:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2249:13:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2200:12:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2186:12:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2169:11:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2158:10:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2141:10:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2125:07:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2104:05:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2095:03:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2069:01:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2052:01:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2032:00:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2014:11:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1997:01:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1983:00:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1962:00:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1944:00:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1928:00:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1907:23:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1883:23:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1866:23:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1848:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1834:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1813:23:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1790:23:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1774:23:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1757:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1732:22:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1704:22:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1688:22:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1676:22:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1652:22:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1634:22:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1617:22:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1579:22:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1563:22:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1544:21:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1527:21:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1511:21:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1493:21:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1471:21:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1442:21:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1424:21:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1397:00:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1377:21:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1352:21:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1332:20:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1314:20:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1295:20:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1283:20:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1267:20:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1248:20:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1215:05:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 1171:18:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 784:23:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 763:21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 695:21:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 650:21:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 475:23:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 459:06:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 358:20:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 215:20:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 204:It seems to be clearing. ā€” 199:08:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 180:05:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 161:20:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 34:request for bureaucratship 4340:too young to be a crat. 4124:; without hesitation. ā€” 123:sysop rights in September 5531:Please do not modify it. 5065:(which we cannot do per 4812:to Brad's brilliance. ā€” 1196: 1179:WikiChecker edit counter 950:What's your position on 373:Optional questions from 308:Optional questions from 58:(159/3/3); ended 20:43, 5408:Neutral Leaning support 5057:. I would support per 2715:Impressive article work 1184:Soxred93's edit counter 959:Optional question from 938:Optional question from 838:indicates that this is 819:Optional question from 674:Optional question from 38:Please do not modify it 4546:Where Ariel@Verbosity? 3768:, no problems here. āˆ— 3266:No issues. Good luck. 2611:- the 'crats are few. 1644:Pharaoh of the Wizards 1478:Why not? Great user.-- 4016:You've got my trust. 2578:- trustworthy admin. 2307:, does great work at 5101:(another please see 3492:, no resaon not to. 1966:To Neuro: try here: 5366:Anonymous Dissident 5093:(again, please see 3109:Anonymous Dissident 2645:a good candidate -- 2455:I trust this user. 2333:- Great candidate. 1290:. Definitely. -- 992:Anonymous Dissident 821:User:Carlossuarez46 756:Anonymous Dissident 452:Anonymous Dissident 208:Anonymous Dissident 192:Anonymous Dissident 173:Anonymous Dissident 154:Anonymous Dissident 70:AnonymousĀ Dissident 47:Anonymous Dissident 5437: 5369: 4384:Sneaky bugger.Ā :) 3730: 3518:ImperatorExercitus 3112: 2946: 2472: 2195: 1428:Yes, I trust you. 759: 455: 211: 195: 176: 157: 39: 5435: 5363: 4938: 4895: 4585: 4540: 4510: 4426: 4304: 4269: 4245: 4115: 4080: 3955:Mid-grade support 3850: 3788: 3723: 3530: 3516:comment added by 3298: 3296:So let it be done 3291: 3242: 3207:Crotchety Old Man 3173:Crotchety Old Man 3106: 2940: 2928: 2911: 2560: 2552: 2456: 2278: 2273: 2228: 2214:comment added by 2193: 2123: 2048: 1995: 1755: 1632: 1491: 753: 648: 449: 205: 189: 170: 151: 37: 5561: 5533: 5367: 5335:That's just it. 5326: 5321: 5316: 5307:Moved to Neutral 5253: 5227: 5224: 5209: 5198: 5195: 5180: 5131: 5122: 5055:Regretful oppose 5022: 5019: 5005: 4999: 4959: 4953: 4931: 4927: 4886: 4875: 4873: 4868: 4853: 4850: 4826: 4821: 4816: 4795: 4792: 4741: 4736: 4731: 4635: 4629: 4598: 4583: 4579: 4564: 4561: 4538: 4531: 4526: 4520: 4506: 4491: 4469: 4463: 4425: 4423: 4417: 4412: 4394: 4389: 4374: 4372:embedded comment 4361: 4356: 4315:Heimstern LƤufer 4298: 4282: 4261: 4237: 4144: 4138: 4111: 4074: 4060: 4031: 4026: 4021: 4007: 4004: 3966: 3931: 3927: 3921: 3904: 3898: 3892: 3862: 3852: 3848: 3844: 3841: 3831: 3819: 3814: 3809: 3804: 3782: 3713: 3693: 3662: 3627: 3625: 3620: 3586: 3548: 3540: 3529: 3510: 3481: 3466: 3461: 3406: 3403: 3361: 3358: 3335: 3330: 3294: 3290: 3257:this message! - 3236: 3234: 3230: 3198: 3191: 3143: 3137: 3110: 3095: 3090: 3085: 3055: 3050: 3045: 3015: 3000: 2959: 2944: 2929: 2927: 2923: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2816: 2803: 2798: 2764: 2756: 2741: 2722: 2601: 2566: 2561: 2558: 2553: 2550: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2483:The Rambling Man 2470: 2465: 2460: 2443: 2408: 2354: 2322: 2317: 2277: 2271: 2267: 2261: 2239: 2227: 2216:Perfect Proposal 2208: 2166: 2137: 2122: 2120: 2109: 2091: 2085: 2081: 2049: 2046: 2042: 1991: 1980: 1974: 1958: 1953: 1942: 1939: 1924: 1919: 1904: 1880: 1874: 1864: 1861: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1787: 1782: 1772: 1769: 1754: 1752: 1741: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1700: 1697: 1673: 1668: 1663: 1631: 1629: 1622: 1615: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1595: 1576: 1571: 1558: 1555: 1523: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1439: 1433: 1421: 1412: 1394: 1386: 1370: 1361: 1349: 1341: 1311: 1306: 1264: 1259: 1241: 1232: 1211: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1168: 1161: 1133: 1106: 1096: 1088: 1080: 1072: 1064: 1044: 1036: 1028: 1020: 1012: 1004: 984:General comments 922:, but last year 902: 898: 893: 781: 777: 772: 757: 724: 720: 715: 647: 645: 634: 453: 209: 193: 174: 155: 120: 5569: 5568: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5560: 5559: 5558: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5536:this nomination 5529: 5513:Spinach Monster 5404: 5380:Spinach Monster 5365: 5345:Spinach Monster 5324: 5319: 5314: 5296:Spinach Monster 5251: 5207: 5178: 5134: 5129: 5120: 5003: 4997: 4970: 4937: 4925: 4871: 4866: 4848: 4836: 4824: 4819: 4814: 4739: 4734: 4729: 4596: 4581: 4559: 4547: 4504:Camaron | Chris 4489: 4467: 4461: 4421: 4415: 4413: 4392: 4387: 4370: 4359: 4354: 4326:Pile-on Support 4280: 4142: 4136: 4029: 4024: 4019: 4002: 3994: 3959: 3925: 3919: 3902: 3896: 3890: 3851: 3846: 3839: 3837: 3702: 3691: 3655: 3616: 3580: 3569: 3558:- no problems. 3546: 3538: 3511: 3464: 3456: 3360: 3333: 3328: 3308:Well deserved. 3297: 3141: 3135: 3108: 3093: 3088: 3083: 3053: 3048: 3043: 3013: 2957: 2942: 2926: 2919: 2908: 2900: 2880: 2875: 2870: 2814: 2799: 2794: 2762: 2754: 2735: 2720: 2704: 2597: 2529: 2527: 2525: 2510: 2506: 2501: 2468: 2463: 2458: 2439: 2427: 2395: 2352: 2320: 2315: 2281: 2272: 2209: 2164: 2135: 2118: 2110: 2089: 2083: 2079: 2047:clamation point 2045: 2038: 1978: 1972: 1956: 1951: 1922: 1917: 1892: 1878: 1872: 1827: 1824: 1822: 1750: 1742: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1698: 1695: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1625: 1623: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1556: 1553: 1521: 1459:worthy of trust 1437: 1431: 1415: 1410: 1373: 1368: 1359: 1309: 1304: 1244: 1239: 1230: 1225: 1213: 1209: 1201: 1198: 1152: 1099: 986: 940:User:S Marshall 900: 896: 891: 794:Follow up from 779: 775: 770: 755: 722: 718: 713: 643: 635: 451: 441:Riana's RfB 86% 223: 207: 191: 172: 153: 72: 55: 50: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5567: 5557: 5556: 5541: 5540: 5524: 5523: 5506: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5403: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5308: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5283: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5142: 5141: 5140: 5126: 5121:NuclearWarfare 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5026: 4969: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4942: 4933: 4919:Strong support 4916: 4899: 4880: 4857: 4831: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4784: 4781: 4778: 4775: 4772: 4769: 4766: 4763: 4760: 4757: 4754: 4751: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4699: 4696: 4693: 4690: 4687: 4684: 4681: 4678: 4675: 4672: 4669: 4666: 4663: 4660: 4657: 4654: 4651: 4640: 4618: 4603: 4589: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4514: 4497: 4475: 4447: 4430: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4335: 4323: 4308: 4289: 4273: 4249: 4226: 4209: 4192: 4175: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4119: 4101: 4091:Richard Cavell 4084: 4065: 4054: 4037: 4011: 3988: 3970: 3952: 3935: 3913:Strong support 3910: 3884: 3867: 3857: 3843: 3825: 3780: 3763: 3746: 3734: 3717: 3699: 3683: 3673:Carlossuarez46 3666: 3657:Steven Walling 3649: 3632: 3609: 3593: 3573: 3565: 3553: 3531: 3504: 3487: 3471: 3450: 3434: 3417: 3393: 3365: 3354: 3341: 3320: 3303: 3295: 3278: 3261: 3247: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3166: 3149: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3005: 2983: 2964: 2952: 2934: 2916: 2889: 2864:Strong support 2861: 2838: 2821: 2807: 2788: 2771: 2749:Strong support 2746: 2728: 2708: 2700: 2690: 2672: 2655: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2606: 2593:Strong support 2590: 2573: 2539: 2517: 2493: 2476: 2450: 2432: 2423: 2416:Strong support 2413: 2399: 2391: 2380: 2363: 2345: 2328: 2302: 2285: 2268: 2264: 2251: 2238:I'm Spartacus! 2229: 2202: 2188: 2171: 2160: 2143: 2132:, good luck -- 2127: 2106: 2097: 2071: 2054: 2034: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1909: 1885: 1868: 1850: 1836: 1815: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1706: 1690: 1685:Meetare Shappy 1678: 1654: 1639:Strong Support 1636: 1619: 1581: 1565: 1546: 1529: 1513: 1497:Edit conflict 1495: 1473: 1447:Strong Support 1444: 1426: 1408:Absolutely. -- 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1365: 1360:NuclearWarfare 1334: 1316: 1297: 1285: 1272:Strong support 1269: 1250: 1236: 1231:NuclearWarfare 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1207: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1173: 1151: 1148: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1098: 985: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 956: 955: 935: 934: 933: 932: 888:Question from 885: 884: 883: 882: 867: 866: 865: 864: 850: 849: 848: 847: 816: 815: 814: 813: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 746: 740: 737: 734: 710:Question from 707: 706: 705: 704: 676:User:Hipocrite 671: 670: 669: 668: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 607: 606: 600: 594: 588: 582: 576: 513: 512: 511: 510: 494: 493: 492: 491: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 445: 444: 438: 432: 429:Gracenotes 74% 426: 420: 419:: Unsuccessful 414: 413:: Unsuccessful 408: 402: 401:: Unsuccessful 399:Carnildo 3 61% 395: 394: 375:NuclearWarfare 370: 369: 368: 367: 342: 341: 340: 339: 305: 304: 303: 302: 278: 277: 276: 264: 263: 262: 245: 244: 243: 222: 219: 218: 217: 183: 164: 54: 51: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5566: 5555: 5552: 5551: 5549: 5539: 5537: 5532: 5526: 5525: 5522: 5518: 5514: 5510: 5507: 5505: 5502: 5497: 5494: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5471: 5469: 5464: 5461: 5457: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5440: 5438: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5409: 5406: 5405: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5371: 5368: 5361: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5322: 5317: 5309: 5306: 5305: 5301: 5297: 5292: 5288: 5272: 5268: 5264: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5255: 5254: 5246: 5245: 5244: 5240: 5236: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5226: 5225: 5216: 5215: 5214: 5211: 5210: 5203: 5202: 5201: 5197: 5196: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5182: 5181: 5174: 5173: 5172: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5159: 5158: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5143: 5139: 5136: 5135: 5132: 5123: 5117: 5116:the talk page 5113: 5112: 5111: 5108: 5104: 5100: 5096: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5056: 5053: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5034: 5030: 5027: 5025: 5021: 5020: 5011: 5010: 5009: 5006: 5001: 5000: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4987: 4983: 4980:direction. -- 4979: 4975: 4972: 4971: 4963: 4960: 4954: 4952: 4946: 4943: 4941: 4936: 4930: 4929: 4920: 4917: 4915: 4912: 4909: 4908: 4903: 4900: 4898: 4893: 4889: 4884: 4881: 4879: 4876: 4874: 4869: 4861: 4858: 4856: 4851: 4845: 4844: 4842: 4835: 4832: 4830: 4827: 4822: 4817: 4811: 4807: 4804: 4798: 4794: 4793: 4785: 4782: 4779: 4776: 4773: 4770: 4767: 4764: 4761: 4758: 4755: 4752: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4737: 4732: 4724: 4716: 4712: 4708: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4700: 4697: 4694: 4691: 4688: 4685: 4682: 4679: 4676: 4673: 4670: 4667: 4664: 4661: 4658: 4655: 4652: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4644: 4641: 4639: 4636: 4634: 4630: 4628: 4622: 4619: 4617: 4614: 4612: 4607: 4604: 4602: 4599: 4593: 4590: 4588: 4584: 4578: 4574: 4571: 4567: 4562: 4556: 4555: 4553: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4539: 4537: 4532: 4527: 4525: 4519:Abso-tively! 4518: 4515: 4513: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4498: 4496: 4493: 4492: 4485: 4484: 4479: 4476: 4474: 4471: 4470: 4464: 4455: 4451: 4448: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4434: 4431: 4429: 4424: 4418: 4410: 4407: 4399: 4396: 4395: 4390: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4378: 4377:Jack Merridew 4373: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4363: 4362: 4357: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4339: 4336: 4334: 4331: 4330:Jack Merridew 4327: 4324: 4322: 4319: 4316: 4312: 4309: 4307: 4302: 4301:My narrowboat 4297: 4293: 4290: 4288: 4285: 4283: 4277: 4274: 4272: 4268: 4264: 4259: 4258: 4253: 4250: 4248: 4243: 4242: 4236: 4235: 4230: 4227: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4210: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4193: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4176: 4174: 4171: 4167: 4164: 4158: 4155: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4145: 4140: 4139: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4127: 4123: 4120: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4085: 4083: 4078: 4073: 4070: 4066: 4064: 4061: 4055: 4053: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4038: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4027: 4022: 4015: 4012: 4010: 4006: 4005: 3998: 3993:. No issues. 3992: 3989: 3987: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3969: 3965: 3962: 3956: 3953: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3939: 3936: 3934: 3929: 3928: 3922: 3914: 3911: 3909: 3905: 3899: 3893: 3888: 3885: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3868: 3866: 3863: 3858: 3856: 3853: 3849: 3842: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3824: 3821: 3820: 3815: 3810: 3805: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3785:edit conflict 3781: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3764: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3747: 3745: 3742: 3738: 3735: 3733: 3729: 3726: 3721: 3718: 3716: 3712: 3710: 3706: 3700: 3698: 3695: 3694: 3687: 3684: 3682: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3658: 3653: 3650: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3633: 3631: 3628: 3626: 3621: 3613: 3610: 3608: 3605: 3604: 3601: 3597: 3594: 3592: 3589: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3577: 3574: 3572: 3568: 3563: 3562: 3557: 3554: 3552: 3549: 3544: 3541: 3535: 3534:Full support. 3532: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3508: 3505: 3503: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3488: 3486: 3483: 3482: 3480:It Is Me Here 3475: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3462: 3459: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3438: 3435: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3418: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3397: 3394: 3392: 3389: 3388: 3385: 3381: 3380: 3377: 3374: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3359: 3353: 3350: 3349:Steve Crossin 3345: 3342: 3340: 3337: 3336: 3331: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3302: 3299: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3282: 3279: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3265: 3262: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3251:Mailer Diablo 3248: 3245: 3240: 3235: 3231: 3225: 3222: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3199: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3150: 3148: 3145: 3144: 3138: 3132: 3129: 3117: 3114: 3111: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3091: 3086: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3051: 3046: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2993: 2987: 2984: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2960: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2930: 2924: 2922: 2917: 2915: 2912: 2905: 2903: 2897: 2893: 2890: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2866:- no brainer 2865: 2862: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2839: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2817: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2802: 2797: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2770: 2766: 2765: 2758: 2757: 2750: 2747: 2745: 2742: 2740: 2739: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2716: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2703: 2698: 2694: 2691: 2689: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2676: 2673: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2651: 2648: 2644: 2641: 2637: 2634: 2632: 2627: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2599:sephiroth bcr 2594: 2591: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2572: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2562: 2554: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2497: 2494: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2442: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2412: 2409: 2403: 2400: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2355: 2349: 2346: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2318: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2263: 2262: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2233: 2230: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2138: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2121: 2115: 2114: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2096: 2092: 2086: 2082: 2075: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2050: 2043: 2041: 2035: 2033: 2030: 2025: 2021: 2015: 2012: 2011:Jack Merridew 2008: 2004: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1981: 1976: 1975: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1954: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1913: 1910: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1876: 1875: 1869: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1799: 1791: 1788: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1747: 1746: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1699:Postlethwaite 1691: 1689: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1677: 1674: 1669: 1664: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1640: 1637: 1635: 1630: 1628: 1620: 1618: 1614: 1613: 1605: 1600: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1572: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1524: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1494: 1490: 1483: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1435: 1434: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1419: 1413: 1407: 1406:Total support 1404: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1388: 1387: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1371: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1307: 1301: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1233: 1227: 1226: 1216: 1212: 1206: 1204: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1135: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1089: 1084: 1081: 1076: 1073: 1068: 1065: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1040: 1037: 1032: 1029: 1024: 1021: 1016: 1013: 1008: 1005: 1000: 997: 993: 988: 987: 977: 974: 973: 970: 967: 966: 965: 964: 962: 961:User:Mattisse 953: 949: 946: 945: 944: 943: 941: 929: 925: 921: 916: 913: 912: 910: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 894: 879: 876: 875: 872: 869: 868: 861: 858: 857: 855: 852: 851: 845: 841: 836: 833: 832: 830: 827: 826: 825: 824: 822: 810: 807: 806: 804: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 785: 782: 778: 773: 766: 765: 764: 761: 758: 750: 747: 744: 743: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 716: 701: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 684: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 666: 661: 657: 654: 653: 651: 646: 640: 639: 631: 626: 623: 622: 614: 609: 608: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 574: 571: 570: 568: 567: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 518: 515: 514: 508: 503: 502: 499: 496: 495: 488: 487: 485: 482: 476: 472: 468: 467: 462: 461: 460: 457: 454: 447: 446: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 425::Unsuccessful 424: 423:Ryulong 3 69% 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 396: 392: 391: 389: 386: 385: 384: 383: 381: 380: 377:adapted from 376: 364: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 344: 343: 336: 333: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 300: 297: 296: 294: 290: 286: 282: 279: 274: 271: 270: 268: 265: 259: 255: 252: 251: 249: 246: 241: 238: 237: 235: 232: 231: 230: 228: 216: 213: 210: 203: 202: 201: 200: 197: 194: 187: 182: 181: 178: 175: 168: 163: 162: 159: 156: 148: 145: 141: 137: 133: 127: 124: 118: 115: 112: 109: 106: 103: 100: 97: 94: 91: 88: 85: 82: 79: 76: 71: 67: 66: 64: 61: 48: 41: 35: 32: 27: 26: 19: 5530: 5527: 5508: 5495: 5467: 5462: 5407: 5359: 5315:bibliomaniac 5312: 5311: 5290: 5289: 5249: 5219: 5205: 5190: 5176: 5144: 5125: 5124: 5054: 5032: 5028: 5014: 4995: 4977: 4973: 4950: 4944: 4922: 4918: 4905: 4901: 4882: 4863: 4859: 4840: 4839: 4833: 4809: 4805: 4787: 4730:bibliomaniac 4727: 4726: 4642: 4633: 4626: 4620: 4610: 4605: 4591: 4572: 4551: 4550: 4535: 4523: 4516: 4499: 4488: 4482: 4477: 4465: 4459: 4453: 4449: 4432: 4408: 4385: 4352: 4341: 4337: 4325: 4310: 4291: 4275: 4255: 4251: 4240: 4233: 4228: 4216:Sumoeagle179 4211: 4194: 4177: 4165: 4134: 4121: 4104: 4086: 4039: 4017: 4013: 4000: 3990: 3973: 3954: 3937: 3917: 3912: 3886: 3869: 3836: 3832: 3800: 3789: 3765: 3753:Infrogmation 3748: 3736: 3719: 3703: 3701:No problem. 3689: 3685: 3668: 3651: 3634: 3615: 3611: 3603: 3595: 3582: 3581: 3575: 3559: 3555: 3533: 3512:ā€”Ā Preceding 3506: 3489: 3477: 3473: 3457: 3452: 3436: 3419: 3400: 3395: 3386: 3383: 3378: 3375: 3372: 3367: 3351: 3343: 3326: 3322: 3305: 3285: 3280: 3263: 3254: 3227: 3223: 3193: 3187:Juliancolton 3168: 3151: 3139: 3130: 3084:bibliomaniac 3081: 3080: 3044:bibliomaniac 3041: 3040: 3007: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2985: 2970: 2966: 2936: 2921:the_undertow 2920: 2901: 2896:my standards 2891: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2851: 2840: 2823: 2809: 2790: 2773: 2760: 2755:YellowMonkey 2752: 2748: 2737: 2736: 2730: 2718: 2710: 2692: 2684: 2679: 2674: 2657: 2642: 2630: 2608: 2598: 2592: 2575: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2523: 2522:Definitely. 2519: 2499: 2495: 2478: 2452: 2440: 2434: 2424: 2415: 2401: 2386: 2382: 2365: 2350:definitely. 2347: 2330: 2313: 2304: 2287: 2258: 2253: 2244: 2242: 2235: 2231: 2204: 2173: 2145: 2134: 2129: 2112: 2078: 2073: 2056: 2039: 2023: 1970: 1949: 1934: 1915: 1911: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1887: 1870: 1856: 1852: 1821: 1817: 1800: 1764: 1744: 1737: 1716:bibliomaniac 1713: 1712: 1708: 1693: 1680: 1656: 1638: 1626: 1592: 1583: 1548: 1540:push to talk 1531: 1519: 1515: 1505: 1498: 1475: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1429: 1417: 1416: 1405: 1391: 1382: 1364: 1363: 1346: 1337: 1318: 1299: 1287: 1276:Juliancolton 1271: 1252: 1235: 1234: 1195: 1163: 1157:Juliancolton 1140: 1139: 1126: 1120: 1114: 1108: 1100: 1090: 1082: 1074: 1066: 1058: 1052: 1046: 1038: 1030: 1022: 1014: 1006: 998: 975: 968: 958: 957: 947: 937: 936: 924:a discussion 914: 908: 889: 887: 886: 877: 870: 859: 853: 843: 839: 834: 828: 818: 817: 808: 802: 793: 792: 768: 767:Yes thanks, 748: 730: 711: 709: 708: 699: 682: 673: 672: 655: 637: 624: 612: 516: 506: 497: 483: 464: 443:: Successful 431:: Successful 405:^demon 3 63% 387: 372: 371: 362: 345: 334: 316: 307: 306: 298: 280: 272: 266: 257: 253: 247: 239: 233: 226: 224: 185: 184: 166: 165: 149: 128: 113: 107: 101: 95: 89: 83: 77: 68: 57: 56: 46: 30: 28: 4707:Newyorkbrad 4296:RegentsPark 4182:AdjustShift 3705:Malinaccier 3688:Of course. 3600:Bencherlite 3424:Pastor Theo 3283:Certainly. 2778:Ottava Rima 2680:OhanaUnited 2292:Daniel Case 2210:ā€”Preceding 2080:Master& 2007:Second Life 1027:target logs 411:Krimpet 67% 258:community's 93:protections 5252:Artichoker 5208:Artichoker 5179:Artichoker 4834:Of Course! 4808:to AD and 4627:Techman224 4375:. Cheers, 4257:Senseless! 4199:Malcolmxl5 3978:Agathoclea 3156:EdJohnston 2793:Why not? - 2751:Excellent 2721:Artichoker 2580:PhilKnight 2335:KnightLago 2178:Kingturtle 2174:Definitely 2009:. Cheers, 1786:Wartenberg 1642:Knowledge. 1263:Wartenberg 1150:Discussion 920:WikiVoices 573:Francs2000 520:Francs2000 366:consensus. 261:consensus. 105:pageĀ moves 53:Nomination 31:successful 5263:America69 5235:America69 5163:America69 5083:WP:PERNOM 4577:Dreadstar 4437:Modernist 3891:rootology 3725:WJBscribe 3561:Jauerback 3268:America69 3014:Yomangani 2902:faithless 2738:Wizardman 2662:South Bay 2613:DougsTech 2165:Skomorokh 2029:Acalamari 1588:Foxy Loxy 1451:excellent 1124:deletions 1087:checkuser 1035:block log 928:WJBscribe 687:Hipocrite 613:certainly 603:WJBscribe 585:Eloquence 540:WJBscribe 528:Eloquence 417:Danny 68% 323:at RFAs? 291:, and/or 99:deletions 5548:Category 5501:MuZemike 5107:A Nobody 5038:JayHenry 4982:JayHenry 4978:opposite 4935:contribs 4815:bbatsell 4597:Tiptoety 4369:See his 4281:xaosflux 4263:says you 4109:DerHexer 4077:Contribs 4072:MacInnis 4044:Cenarium 3920:iMatthew 3874:Cerejota 3639:Dravecky 3526:contribs 3514:unsigned 3310:Eusebeus 3233:american 3067:JayHenry 3027:JayHenry 2986:Support. 2855:contribs 2845:Casliber 2828:Euryalus 2511:Chequers 2260:Wisdom89 2224:contribs 2212:unsigned 1570:Seraphim 1503:Hermione 1481:Giants27 1329:firestar 1292:Kbdank71 1253:Hell Yes 1199:Ļ‰Ī±dĪµstĪµr 1118:protects 1003:contribs 901:Chequers 796:lucasbfr 780:Chequers 723:Chequers 560:re-RFA'd 554:after a 552:resigned 546:after a 544:resigned 289:WP:B/RFA 227:optional 81:contribs 60:31 March 5509:Neutral 5496:Neutral 5479:Dweller 5468:Caspian 5463:Neutral 5416:Twinkle 5402:Neutral 5097:), and 4998:Majorly 4945:Support 4902:Support 4883:Support 4860:Support 4810:Huzzah! 4643:Support 4621:Support 4611:Caspian 4606:Support 4592:Support 4573:Support 4517:Support 4500:Support 4478:Support 4450:Support 4433:Support 4409:Support 4393:Toaster 4360:Toaster 4343:Sceptre 4311:Support 4292:Support 4276:Support 4267:says me 4252:Support 4229:Support 4212:Support 4195:Support 4180:- Yep! 4178:Support 4166:Support 4137:Majorly 4122:Support 4105:support 4087:Support 4040:Support 4014:Support 3991:Support 3974:support 3961:flaming 3938:Support 3915:- Duh. 3887:Support 3870:Support 3833:Support 3766:Support 3749:Support 3737:Support 3720:Support 3692:Spencer 3686:Support 3669:Support 3652:Support 3635:Support 3619:Marlith 3612:Support 3576:Support 3556:Support 3490:Support 3474:Support 3453:Support 3440:JoshuaZ 3437:support 3420:Support 3396:Support 3368:Support 3344:Support 3323:Support 3306:Support 3281:Support 3264:Support 3255:approve 3224:Support 3169:Support 3152:Support 3131:Support 3008:Support 2967:Support 2937:Support 2892:Support 2841:Support 2824:Support 2810:Support 2796:Fastily 2791:Support 2774:Support 2731:Support 2711:Support 2693:Support 2675:Support 2658:Support 2643:Support 2631:Caspian 2609:Support 2576:Support 2559:OUNTAIN 2544:Ditto. 2542:Support 2530:Sleeps 2520:Support 2496:Support 2453:Support 2420:Neskaya 2407:AniMate 2402:Support 2383:Support 2366:Support 2348:Support 2331:Support 2305:Support 2288:Support 2254:Support 2232:Support 2205:Support 2150:Dweller 2146:Support 2130:Support 2057:Support 1989:Deskana 1973:Majorly 1957:Toaster 1923:Toaster 1912:Support 1888:Support 1873:Majorly 1805:Useight 1801:Support 1709:Support 1681:Support 1657:Support 1584:Support 1549:Support 1532:Support 1522:MBisanz 1516:Support 1499:Support 1476:Support 1319:Support 1300:Support 1288:Support 1223:Support 556:dispute 548:dispute 379:MBisanz 350:Ipatrol 325:Ipatrol 310:iPatrol 5448:Iner22 5436:Avruch 5420:Iner22 5412:Huggle 5145:Oppose 4974:Oppose 4968:Oppose 4911:(talk) 4885:sure. 4867:hmwith 4508:(talk) 4483:Valley 4456:work. 4416:Frank 4388:Flying 4355:Flying 4338:Oppose 4318:(talk) 4234:Animum 4170:GT5162 4113:(Talk) 4069:Trevor 4003:{talk} 3964:lawyer 3942:Ruslik 3861:Keegan 3847:(talk) 3728:(talk) 3660:(talk) 3624:(Talk) 3494:Stifle 3286:Xymmax 3253:and I 2995:ndonic 2956:Riana 2815:Durova 2801:(talk) 2353:Thingg 2309:WP:CHU 2194:Avruch 2176:100%. 2084:Expert 1993:(talk) 1952:Flying 1918:Flying 1840:Daniel 1738:really 1627:GARDEN 1536:Dank55 1112:blocks 1105:rights 630:WP:AFD 591:Ugen64 538:, and 536:Ugen64 321:WP:NPA 293:WP:CHU 285:WP:RFA 144:NOTNOW 111:rights 87:blocks 5360:sound 5223:neuro 5194:neuro 5018:neuro 4907:Tavix 4888:Dferg 4791:neuro 4524:Ariel 4422:talk 4154:Coren 4126:Coren 4030:Space 3840:Maxim 3567:dude. 3465:vecia 3334:broil 3329:Royal 3229:young 3142:Cobra 3136:Glass 2871:fr33k 2626:ROTFL 2551:ITTLE 2526:Until 2507:Spiel 2136:Chris 2119:Chat 2113:Pedro 2061:Dureo 1938:neuro 1860:neuro 1768:neuro 1751:Chat 1745:Pedro 1667:drink 1611:sign! 1461:. -- 1385:Ceran 1340:Ceran 1310:fisto 1305:Menti 1210:Ā«talk 1143:civil 1130:moves 1095:socks 1011:count 897:Spiel 776:Spiel 719:Spiel 644:Chat 638:Pedro 597:Danny 579:Optim 564:WP:BN 532:Danny 524:Optim 466:Andre 65:(UTC) 16:< 5517:talk 5483:talk 5470:blue 5452:talk 5424:talk 5414:and 5384:talk 5349:talk 5300:talk 5267:talk 5239:talk 5167:talk 5153:talk 5149:Ikip 5130:Talk 5033:more 5029:More 5004:talk 4928:anaÉ¢ 4892:talk 4849:Talk 4711:talk 4613:blue 4560:Talk 4536:Gold 4490:city 4460:Banj 4454:more 4441:talk 4260:... 4241:talk 4220:talk 4203:talk 4186:talk 4143:talk 4095:talk 4048:talk 4025:From 4020:Them 3982:talk 3946:talk 3926:talk 3878:talk 3790:YES. 3757:talk 3709:talk 3677:talk 3643:talk 3522:talk 3498:talk 3460:enna 3444:talk 3428:talk 3411:talk 3314:talk 3272:talk 3249:I'm 3239:wtf? 3211:talk 3177:talk 3160:talk 3071:talk 3031:talk 2977:talk 2972:Cirt 2894:per 2849:talk 2832:talk 2782:talk 2697:Ched 2666:talk 2647:Step 2633:blue 2617:talk 2584:talk 2502:Ļ¢ere 2487:talk 2441:roux 2425:talk 2374:talk 2339:talk 2296:talk 2220:talk 2182:talk 2154:talk 2101:Dark 2090:Talk 2065:talk 2024:ever 2005:try 1979:talk 1879:talk 1844:talk 1809:talk 1781:Jake 1696:Ryan 1662:Lets 1648:talk 1603:load 1598:down 1586:Per 1557:Loxy 1554:Foxy 1507:1980 1467:talk 1455:sans 1438:ergy 1392:thor 1369:Talk 1347:thor 1326:2216 1258:Jake 1240:Talk 1050:rfas 1019:logs 996:talk 892:Ļ¢ere 871:14c. 854:14b. 829:14a. 771:Ļ¢ere 714:Ļ¢ere 691:talk 471:talk 354:talk 329:talk 142:and 140:SNOW 75:talk 63:2009 5085:), 5081:(a 5069:), 4955:| 4951:Tan 4843:oJo 4806:Yep 4554:oJo 4458:-- 4059:VX! 3997:TKD 3930:// 3923:// 3818:620 3803:Dyl 3770:\ / 3751:-- 3741:AGK 3405:027 3387:ame 2943:Ray 2881:-s- 2876:man 2699:~ / 2650:hen 2459:HĆŗs 2435:Duh 2393:004 2388:MBK 2370:Rje 2321:Why 1825:Ed 1672:Tea 1590:. 1463:Avi 1432:Syn 1411:Ged 1323:Res 1079:lta 1071:rfc 1063:arb 1056:rfb 969:17. 948:16. 909:15. 840:not 803:7a. 731:13. 683:12. 625:11. 569:A. 517:10. 117:RfA 5550:: 5519:) 5485:) 5454:) 5426:) 5386:) 5351:) 5302:) 5269:) 5241:) 5220:ā€” 5191:ā€” 5169:) 5155:) 5118:. 5073:, 5044:) 5036:-- 5015:ā€” 4988:) 4958:39 4947:. 4852:ā€¢ 4846:ā€¢ 4837:ā€” 4820:Āæ? 4788:ā€” 4713:) 4563:ā€¢ 4557:ā€¢ 4548:ā€” 4468:oi 4443:) 4419:| 4265:, 4222:) 4205:) 4188:) 4152:ā€” 4097:) 4050:) 3999::: 3995:ā€” 3984:) 3948:) 3906:) 3900:)( 3880:) 3776:) 3759:) 3679:) 3645:) 3578:ā€” 3547:gy 3539:Na 3528:) 3524:ā€¢ 3500:) 3446:) 3430:) 3413:) 3402:Jd 3384:fl 3379:or 3373:Ra 3357:24 3316:) 3274:) 3213:) 3179:) 3162:) 3073:) 3033:) 3025:-- 2979:) 2909:() 2857:) 2834:) 2784:) 2767:) 2717:. 2713:. 2668:) 2619:) 2586:) 2528:It 2489:) 2469:nd 2376:) 2341:) 2316:So 2298:) 2275:/ 2226:) 2222:ā€¢ 2184:) 2156:) 2116:: 2093:) 2067:) 2059:- 1969:. 1935:ā€” 1857:ā€” 1846:) 1828:17 1811:) 1765:ā€” 1748:: 1650:) 1542:) 1469:) 1418:UK 1255:ā€” 1202:16 1194:~ 1043:lu 976:A. 915:A. 878:A: 860:A. 844:or 835:A. 809:A. 749:A. 700:A. 693:) 656:A. 652:7 641:: 534:, 530:, 526:, 522:, 507:is 498:9. 484:8. 473:) 393:A. 388:7. 363:A. 356:) 346:6. 335:A. 331:) 317:5. 287:, 281:4. 267:3. 248:2. 234:1. 36:. 5515:( 5481:( 5450:( 5422:( 5382:( 5347:( 5325:5 5320:1 5298:( 5265:( 5237:( 5165:( 5151:( 5133:) 5127:( 5042:t 5040:( 4986:t 4984:( 4932:/ 4926:ŹØ 4924:r 4894:) 4890:( 4872:Ļ„ 4841:J 4825:āœ 4740:5 4735:1 4709:( 4582:ā€  4552:J 4530:ā™„ 4486:2 4466:b 4462:e 4439:( 4303:) 4299:( 4244:) 4238:( 4218:( 4201:( 4184:( 4093:( 4079:) 4075:( 4046:( 3980:( 3944:( 3903:T 3897:C 3894:( 3876:( 3813:n 3808:@ 3798:ā†’ 3787:) 3783:( 3774:ā‚ 3772:( 3755:( 3711:) 3707:( 3675:( 3641:( 3583:R 3564:/ 3543:Ā· 3536:ā†’ 3520:( 3496:( 3458:Ł„ 3442:( 3426:( 3409:( 3376:z 3352:/ 3312:( 3270:( 3246:] 3241:) 3237:( 3209:( 3194:Ā· 3175:( 3158:( 3094:5 3089:1 3069:( 3054:5 3049:1 3029:( 2998:O 2992:A 2975:( 2958:ā‚ 2852:Ā· 2847:( 2830:( 2780:( 2759:( 2702:Ā© 2664:( 2615:( 2582:( 2565:5 2557:M 2549:L 2485:( 2464:ƶ 2372:( 2337:( 2294:( 2280:) 2270:T 2265:( 2218:( 2180:( 2152:( 2087:( 2063:( 2040:X 1902:a 1900:c 1898:z 1896:a 1894:m 1842:( 1807:( 1726:5 1721:1 1646:( 1607:| 1594:- 1575:ā™„ 1538:( 1488:C 1484:/ 1465:( 1372:) 1366:( 1243:) 1237:( 1164:Ā· 1145:. 1132:) 1127:Ā· 1121:Ā· 1115:Ā· 1109:Ā· 1101:Ā· 1091:Ā· 1083:Ā· 1075:Ā· 1067:Ā· 1059:Ā· 1053:Ā· 1047:Ā· 1039:Ā· 1031:Ā· 1023:Ā· 1015:Ā· 1007:Ā· 999:Ā· 994:( 963:: 954:? 942:: 823:: 689:( 667:. 605:: 599:: 593:: 587:: 581:: 575:: 469:( 352:( 327:( 299:A 273:A 254:A 240:A 119:) 114:Ā· 108:Ā· 102:Ā· 96:Ā· 90:Ā· 84:Ā· 78:Ā· 73:( 40:.

Index

Knowledge:Requests for bureaucratship
request for bureaucratship
Anonymous Dissident
31 March
2009
AnonymousĀ Dissident
talk
contribs
blocks
protections
deletions
pageĀ moves
rights
RfA
sysop rights in September
Knowledge:Changing usernames
Knowledge:Requests for adminship
SNOW
NOTNOW
Anonymous Dissident

20:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous Dissident

05:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous Dissident

08:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous Dissident

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘