242:. Consensus or lack thereof is what bureaucrats are tasked with assessing when it comes to the closure of RfXās. How this assessment is to be conducted and how consensus is to be determined requires a more extended response and consideration of a number of factors. Our policy on the matter asserts that candidates with over 80% support are generally promoted and candidates with under 70% support are generally not promoted, and, as far as RfA goes, this has generally been a precedent. However, my liberal use of the word āgenerallyā here is intentional, because bureaucrats are not appointed for their proficiency with calculators or their ability to count. In the RfA process, numbers and percentages can be quite opaque, and the content of participantsā supports and opposes are integral to the judgement of consensus. The role of the bureaucrat, therefore, is to qualitatively rather than quantitatively evaluate the concerns of the opposition and the approvals of the supporters in order to ascertain where the general agreement lies and if, ultimately, the community has consensus as to whether they are comfortable with the user in question having the administrator functions. Thatās what it all comes down to.
881:
hand, perhaps the concerns are relatively minor and that's why the community is not in self-consonance; however, on the flipside, perhaps there are just a great number of concerns, and that's why the participants are each contributing different evidence or making different comments. For those reasons, I'd be uncomfortable in dealing an absolute here, but, if I had to, I think I'd be tending towards saying that an opposition in concordance is often indicative of more deeply-seated concerns, and the community's consistency enforces this. Naturally, there can certainly be elements of both in RfA, where the community objects for a large number of reasons but is unified in its objection at the same time.
752:
the reasons for opposition were based on "incriminating" evidence that was invalidated later in the RfA, and that was the reason for John and Jane Doe's re-evaluation, then this needs to be taken into account when we look at John and Jane Smith's oppositionāperhaps these two aren't apprised of the changes in situation? However, if John and Jane Doe initially opposed for solid and valid reasoning, such as incivility or a worrying incident, but later shifted position because they'd had a simple change of heart, the view for John and Jane Smith is again different; X and Y could still be very valid and their opposition could remain wholly justified. So it all depends. Does that answer your question? ā
812:
collective disagreement with the closures of the past. To address your other question: my alternate ways of closure were influenced primarily by elements particular to each of the individual RfA's, rather than by a general belief that changed communal views on consensus would lead to a different result in the current climate. So, overall, I suppose I could reply to both of your questions by saying that my answers to 7 were drawn from analysis of each of the RfA's separately, and there isn't necessarily an underlying correlation between these responses. I've probably taken a long while to say something fairly simple here, so I hope you'll excuse the loquaciousness.Ā ;-)
4976:. I'm sorry AD. I think you're preternaturally mature, but I still think you're more impulsive and temperamental than I'd feel comfortable with. I'm worried that you think RFA is broken and that the goal of RFA is to produce more admins; I worry how that would influence your action as 'crat. Finally, I'm concerned about your civility answer. Too many candidates and their wikifriends interpret most opposition as personal attacks (when the vast majority of it is merely personal evaluation which is inevitable in a forum that exists to evaluate persons). Someone inevitably paints any discussion as badgering. We do need 'crats to take a stand -- in the
931:
thoughts are that the mechanics of the process work fine, but that we as a community partaking in this process need to introspectively take a look several things, such as 1) Our attitudes towards it, 2) The standards we have for admins, 3) How we feel about the atmosphere at RfA and whether we could make the process less daunting for prospective candidates and 4) Whether we're happy with the process and our promotion rates in the context of the previous three points. As noted above, I could go into plenty more detail, but those are my personal views articulated concisely.
2076:ā Yes. Anonymous Dissident is one of Knowledge's stand-out administrators, helping out wherever he is needed without provoking needless drama or other nonsense. He is mature, friendly, and down-to-earth, and maintains a good sense of humour to boot (and knows when to use it). He has significant experience in all of the major 'crat areas and I am willing to trust his judgment determining consensus upon closing an RfA. I have the utmost confidence in Anonymous Dissident, and to be honest, I can't think of an editor better qualified for the job than he is.
256:. In situations where candidacies are split and the contributing elements on either side of the debate are complex, I think second opinions are always of benefit. A bureaucrat discussion is a good way of sorting through problems like this. However, a "crat chat" like this should never be conducted in the way that the bureaucrats are forging a more privatised and "elite" form of consensus about the RfA amongst themselves; rather, it should be used to discuss the
3829:
407:: Bureaucrat discussion: I'd have made sure to have taken into consideration and to have noted several key factors, including: 1) the fact that ^demon resigned his bit in uncontroversial circumstances 2) the fact that the opposition were quite unified in their reasoning... 3) but also that many were "reluctant" or "on the fence" as closer WjBscribe pointed out.
275:. As outlined in my nomination statement, I feel quite confident in my knowledge of policy in relation to the 'crat tasks, and I think I'm able to communicate well with others. However, I won't say much more here; I leave it up to the community to determine, one way or the other, whether they think I would make a suitable bureaucrat in these regards.
2027:
while before running for bureaucratship. I am very, very pleased to see this request: when I supported
Anonymous Dissident in his RfA, I believe I could have given him a better rationale for supporting, for he well and truly exceeded my expections for him. I cannot think of a better candidate for bureaucratship. Consider this a very strong support.
5105:). Now, I realize bureaucrats arenāt closing AfDs and all, but how one argues in those reflects how one judges things in general and the above examples give me a pause when it comes to judgment. Anyway, good job earning so many awards and never being blocked (I donāt count blocking and unblocking yourself as a block!). Sincerely, --
490:
the community gave these bureaucrats the tools in the first place because they assumed the candidate would make actual use of the access. However, I won't give an absolute here; if a proposal were drawn up about the removal of tools from inactive 'crats, I'd really have to review the proposal in its full depth and in its entirety.
188:ā I seem to be coming down with an eye infection. I'm finding it difficult to concentrate on my computer screen for any substantial length of time. With proper medication, I hope to be back on-wiki in a day or two. I ask you to bear with me with regard to the answering of questions and such. Thanks for your understanding. ā
971:
Do you take the the position that "old timers", those editors who have been on
Knowledge for many years and contributed much in the way of FAs, should be given more slack that those here only a few years, and that that "old timers" be allowed to personally attack and in other ways be uncivil without
880:
This is an astute question. I think that if the opposition are in noted harmony, it can be symptomatic of a serious problem (or problems) that requires particular attention when analysing an RfA. An opposition that opposes for a wide variety of unrelated reasons can suggest a number of things. On one
3104:
JayHenry, you're perfectly entitled to your opposition. If you've taken the impression that I'd not be a suitable bureaucrat and you're able to rationalise that, your input is valid; and you have. If you believe my demeanour is unsuited and you believe that my actions may be rash as a result of that
504:
A. An extension of the endtime may be an appropriate course of action if new evidence has come to light and the RfX is changing dramatically as a result of this, with many of the participants rethinking their positions and the like. It's my belief that the extension of RfX's is an option that should
489:
A. I'm not sure a minimum activity criterion that would mandate the removal of a user's tools by default would be for the best, but I certainly think that bureaucrats should make it a priority to be active in the position that the community has given them. After all, it's only natural to assume that
125:
of the same year. Not long after this, I began to explore
Wikimedia more deeply, and am now a contributor to several of the sister projects, including Meta, the English Wikisource, Commons and Wikispecies; and here I am now, spending my time on Knowledge doing the things I've done for the most of my
3957:
I'll have $ 20 on pump 5... Oh, wrong queue. I typed up my neutral, read through it, and realized it sounded oddly like a support... so it's here now. He's done all good work so far, although the fact that he's only got 2 years of WP under his waistline (idioms are weird like that). Overall, sounds
2190:
Support. Just a note that three of the active bureaucrats have voted here, and a fourth has commented... You folks might want to use your handy mailing list to make sure you don't all vote expecting someone else to closeĀ :-P I like the answers to number 7, myself. Shows consideration of the current
862:
Well, anons can't "participate" in an RfA in the traditional, numeric sense, but they are able to comment in the discussion section. Therefore, were an anon to make constructive commentary or insightful remarks, I would regard and consider what they've said as necessary. After all, an astute remark
3064:
I'm aware, Biblio. Look, I know what a delicate issue this is for young editors. I'm not talking about age, however, and I'm not really sure how old he is. Is he more mature than many 16-year-olds or even 32-year-olds or 64-year-olds? Absolutely. It's not about age and I'm opposed to immature
917:
Do I think RfA is broken? Hmm. This is quite a philosophical question, and there are several schools of thought about this matter. I really could go into a very long spiel about this, but that probably wouldn't be appropriate here, so I'll try and be succinct as I can. It's my personal belief that
751:
This is quite an interesting question. I'm not sure I can answer fully or with the thoroughness that would be required at a real RfA, as the question is quite generic, but I'll give it a shot. I think the way that John Smith and Jane Smith's comments are to be viewed largely depends on X and Y. If
121:- Hello, I am Anonymous Dissident, a Wikipedian since 17 January, 2007. From the day of my registry I was very attracted to this idea of a š that anyone could edit, an open fountainhead of information. This being the source of my involvement, I soon became a regular contributor, and I was granted
2026:
encountered. He is very civil, intelligent, highly familiar with policy, highly familiar with bureaucrat-related tasks, and is incredibly calm. I offered to nominate him a few months ago, and he was very grateful for the offer, but after some thinking he reckoned that it would be better to wait a
811:
The fact that the closures happen to be mostly different from what actually happened is more coincidental than anything else, I think. I'd be happy to expound upon my way of closure for any of them should you ask, but, as I say, my answer as a whole is more a product of happenstance than any kind
702:
I'm open to recall because I feel the need to be answerable to my actions as an administrator in a more cemented way; yes, recall isn't watertight, as many people note, and it is open to circumvention by admins, but, for me, the extra layer of accountability is a worthwhile thing if it comes to a
930:
contributed. I think some of the points he made there surmised the issue well; he went into detail about the way we view admin promotion and the way potential candidates can be daunted by the RfA process, to the backdrop of the dropped promotion rate that was observed last year. Essentially, my
627:
Hi AD. It's not really a suprise to see this - I've been watching you clerking at the username board and figured this was coming. I was set for a support but looking at your contributions I can't really see any evidence in the last six months of you judging consensus - for example by closing an
337:
NPA is a policy we have for a reason. Personal attacks on
Knowledge damage what should be a cordial and friendly environment, and this can be especially harmful on places such as RfA, where the atmosphere is often already tense and stressed. Therefore, at RfA, I think that it's imperative that
5498:
I do personally oppose the opposition !votes as I think they are immaterial to this RFB, (I argue that they would be in the original RFA, but I am not for holding users' feet to the fire continuously until they fall off.) but I would like to hear responses from the last two questions (Q16 and
5293:
per A Nobody. Down from regular oppose to weak oppose per all the praises of his temperament, but i'm a bit concerned about the judgement in those xfd closes. If AD can explain the closes in question in the Qs, i'd be willing to change my mind. When it comes to 'crats though, the precision in
837:
My thoughts on the matter are that those who oppose should, in particular, provide reasoning for their choice. While supporters would do well to explain themselves too, a support for an RfA is justified if the supporter sees no issue with the user becoming an admin, whereas an oppose instead
146:
closures and the like). I also think I have a reasonable understanding of the bot flagging process and related policies; although, not being much of a programmer or a bot operator, I've not been involved as much in this area as the previous two. Lastly, although bureaucratship on the
English
610:
I'd require all of them to re-run RfB, with the exception of WJBscribe. The last bureaucrat to resign their position before WJB was Danny, and he did so in March 2007. Now, I think it's a fairly widely-held belief that community standards for bureaucrats and the climate at RfB have changed
3105:
demeanour, that's entirely reasonable. I think it comes down to the fact that you've stated you more have a problem with what you perceive to be youth of character rather than the physical, real-world youth that, in most cases and in my case, underpins it. Is my analysis accurate...? ā
1641:
User has used his admin tools well .The use rhas been around since Jan 2007 and looking at the 489 blocks done show the user has used his tools well and also his protects and deletions are okay.Similarly the protects
Excellent and fully trustworthy user who has contributed immensely to
3024:
I find your comments dead on the money about ten times out of ten, so you're probably right. While AD is an extraordinarily precocious young guy he still seems very young to me, with all that such youth entails. I don't mean that as a jab; we'll all be older sooner than we wish.
365:
As I mentioned in my response to the first question, I consider the reviewing of participants' comments to be an integral part of the determination of consensus at RfA. The consensus is for the community to form; therefore, an RfA cannot be closed without proper regard for this
2311:
already, will be benefit us all if he has the "special" crat tools rather than "only" his "ordinary" admin tools. There is no shortage of work for crats and there is certainly no shortage of need for them, so I'm glad that such a good candidate offered himself for it. Regards
3958:
like a good candidate for being a crat. I haven't seen him around much, but when I have, it was a good experience. He doesn't have any get-up-in-someone's-ass-about-something skills (from what I've seen), which could be good or bad. (concluding parenthetical statement)
169:: the large number of questions asked was something I was prepared for when I decided to run. However, it will take me some time to get to them all, and I want to take the time to give them the consideration they deserve. Please bear with me in those respects. Thanks, ā
338:
civility is maintained and calm discussion is had. So yes, giving consideration to the mood of the forum, we shouldn't have a great deal of tolerance towards attacks on other editors; it's just not constructive, and, furthermore, there is no justification for it.
873:
In your answer to question 7, you said you'd consider whether "the opposition were quite unified in their reasoning" If so, is that a bigger or smaller negative than if the oppostion was divided in many camps each with an identified problem they didn't like?
500:
Of the 3,500+ prior RFAs, only eight have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime; of over 100 prior RFBs, only two have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime. Under what circumstances and by what process would you extend an RFA in general?
3010:
Nine times out of ten I find JayHenry's comments to be dead on the money; I guess this is the one in ten. AD may occasionally have rash impulses but I don't recall the last time they translated to rash actions (and I have a long memory).
5377:
Bingo. Sorry about that. I said it in the wrong way. I'm moving my !vote to neutral and if you can answer the questions posed by A Nobody, I'd be more than happy to move it to support. Thanks for reaching out, please feel better soon.
5035:
admins were promoted in 2009 than 2008, however, this is not ipso facto an improvement -- and because of attrition, resignation, etc. we may indeed see a net decrease in the number of administrators. This would not mean RFA is broken.
632:
debate or similar. Whilst you have my trust, I require more than that to support an RFB - can you provide some evidence of where you have been asked to read, interpret and act on a consensus seeking discussion within en.wikipedia?
5357:
Hey
Spinach Monster. I think the misunderstanding here stems from your use of the term "machine level". On the one hand, I think you meant to say that 'crats should be unbiased and neutral, but the reference to "machines" made it
129:
At the core of it, I've decided to have a shot at bureaucratship because I believe I would make an effective addition to the current cohort and have good experience in a number of bureaucrat-related fields. I've been a clerk at
5247:
I don't see what's wrong with opposing and citing AfDs. However, what bothers me with the oppose is the fact that none of the links are to recent AfD articles, and only appear to be ones in which the two users disagreed.
1761:
Expletives are only offensive if you want them to be, and this one certainly wasn't used maliciously. Frankly, I take it as a compliment. I wish someone would offer to let me copulate with them in a horizontal fashion.
662:
and I sometimes close discussions there; and the nature of the username policy makes the proper review of consensus crucial in this area. As it happens, there is one such request that I've closed on the page right now:
1356:
I do realize that you supported, but I really don't know what you mean about judgment. Can you please explain? Is there a hidden, buried part of
Anonymous Dissident's past that everyone has forgotten or overlooked?
5432:
Are you sure you haven't mistaken this for a request for adminship? Automated editing and conflict resolution are generally matters for that forum, although that doesn't necessarily make them invalid for this one.
4151:
Not. Ā :-) I noticed the RfB all of 15 seconds before !voting in it, if that much. "Hey, an RfB. Anonymous
Dissident?!" *click support section edit button* *scroll, scroll, scroll* *typeity-type-type* *submit*
260:
consensus (or lack thereof) with regard to the RfA. Depending on circumstance, it may also be appropriate to extend the ending date of the RfA to see whether more time might allow the community to find a clearer
1055:
5261:
I have a hard time explaining myself, but you did a good job for me. That is what my point was. It seems to me that A nobody holds grudges, and links that old are of no importance. That is what I meant.
4645:
per candidate's overall record, strong contributions both in mainspace and wikispace, excellent answers to questions, and many of the comments above. Additional support per insipid shaggy doggerel:
2418:
A user I would definitely trust with the tools, capable, reliable, and friendly admin. I see no reason not to emphatically support the candidacy, and the candidate wherever this ends up going. --
486:
One of of the bureaucrats elected in 2004 has yet to use any of the crat tools and others have used them very rarely. Do you think the bureaucrat position should have a minimum level of activity?
134:
and its subpages for over a year, and with over 600 edits between these pages, I feel confident in my knowledge of
Knowledge's rename process and our username policy. I'm an active participant at
5115:
1049:
116:
5078:
1838:
He's one of the few reasons stereotypes about young users haven't gained widespread support, a fact which is a credit to him. Attends a fine education institution, also, which always helpsĀ :)
1551:
I see no issues with Anonymous Dissident's behavior around Knowledge. He would most definitely be an asset to the community if he was promoted to a crat. Good on you for wanting to help more!
1890:- Everything I've seen from you has been generally sensible and mature. I fully trust you to reasonably judge RfA consensus and otherwise fiddle with the odd selection of bureaucrat tools. ~
214:
783:
3835:
As AnonDiss' RfA nominator (which passed with over 150 supports BTW), I am shocked that he didn't ask me to nom him again. But meh what's the difference, he'll make an excellent 'crat. :D
5387:
5372:
863:
is an astute remark, regardless of who it comes from, and it should be appreciated throughout Knowledge that many contributors have valid reasons for feeling uncomfortable in registering.
3115:
1381:
Not his judgment himself; the very recent thing with Keeper on the RFA talk page ensures he is calm during arguments, but there's just a sort of premonition about him. At least for me.
269:
Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
5339:, but there is a large amount of discrepancy as to what it means in discussions. So for me with 'crats, the judgement process has to be nearly without any emotion or bias whatsoever.
5352:
3214:
3200:
762:
5362:
as if you were saying the process of consensus-judgement requires mechanical counting or tallying (which it shouldn't). Am I right in saying that may be where the confusion lies? ā
474:
5090:
4397:
4379:
458:
4745:
4294:
Reassuringly nice answers to questions and, from the general gestalt of comments on various WP talk pages, I have a generally positive feeling toward this editor's good sense. --
1789:
4796:
2013:
1961:
1943:
1396:
1376:
5535:
5137:
3099:
3074:
3059:
2635:
5228:
5212:
5199:
5098:
5062:
4364:
1982:
5486:
5303:
5270:
5256:
5242:
5183:
3872:- my first support in a RfB ever. As I tend to think there are enough Bs around. But we are growing a lot, and attrition is not to be ignored, and this a great candidate.--
1756:
5472:
5330:
150:
With that, I humbly present my candidacy to the community, with thanks to all who participate. It would be my deepest honour to serve our great project in this position. ā
5023:
3034:
694:
5045:
5007:
1773:
2761:
1996:
5170:
4565:
5455:
5441:
5070:
4156:
4146:
649:
551:
2234:
While we don't always agree, I've seen him around and had a positive enough opinion of him that I can't think of anything that anybody will find to oppose over.---
1665:
3079:
Yes, I know that. I really don't want to kindle the perennial debates and stuff over ageism. Just wondering what rash impulses you might have been thinking of...
357:
615:
have since 2004 and 2005. Therefore, I'd think it only best that these users present their requests to the community should they desire the 'crat position again.
3154:- Good answers to the questions. Giving the bureaucrat tools to an experienced and sensible contributor isn't very dangerous, and we do need more bureaucrats.
805:
I see that almost all of your closes are different from the actual results. Why? Do you think the community shifted its stance on consensus levels since then?
122:
4371:
3777:
1651:
555:
198:
179:
160:
3065:
adults being bureaucrats. I miss the rash impulses of my extreme youth, but not enough not to recognize them; as they say, youth is wasted on the young. --
2913:
5074:
3478:
390:
How would you close these RfA/Bs? If you opine for a crat chat, please express what you would have said there as the final determination of the outcome.
33:
5175:
What do you mean "same oppose"? His opposes are never blanket, as the AfD links always change to the ones in which they both participated and disagreed.
1703:
1660:
547:
3180:
2570:
2514:
2094:
2490:
951:
5520:
4081:
2536:
1331:
1266:
1170:
3680:
3663:
2248:
1731:
1247:
4332:
4098:
4034:
3484:
3362:
3258:
3243:
2603:
1927:
1214:
846:
opposes made without any explanation most often resign themselves to a lesser weighting than those that come with reasoning or explanation appended.
4615:
4270:
4223:
3760:
2931:
2768:
2612:
1675:
1510:
1282:
4961:
4714:
4494:
4305:
4189:
3714:
3606:
3431:
2785:
2687:
2299:
5553:
4637:
4595:
4206:
3985:
3468:
3390:
3338:
3163:
3146:
2725:
2705:
2587:
2342:
2257:
2185:
1865:
1313:
5233:
I know that he uses different links in his oppostion, but what I'm saying is that he generally opposes on the same grounds, on AFD disscussions.
4586:
4541:
4444:
4320:
3907:
3731:
3570:
3275:
2743:
2669:
2620:
2168:
2103:
2031:
1562:
1351:
664:
5503:
5086:
4828:
4600:
4472:
4286:
4116:
4051:
3932:
3881:
3822:
3646:
3590:
3317:
3019:
2949:
2886:
2858:
2835:
2282:
1833:
1616:
1578:
1492:
1294:
5109:
4989:
4511:
4346:
3967:
3949:
3696:
3629:
3447:
2804:
2652:
2429:
2410:
2157:
2140:
1882:
1812:
1526:
1470:
1441:
147:
Knowledge differs in many ways from bureaucratship on smaller wikis, I have prior experience with this position on both Meta and Wikispecies.
5427:
4939:
4877:
4246:
4172:
3864:
3501:
3300:
2818:
2473:
2396:
2360:
2199:
1847:
1687:
1684:
1633:
1543:
1423:
1093:
220:
4913:
4896:
4427:
4128:
3854:
3414:
2961:
2325:
2124:
2068:
1906:
542:
were decratted at their own requests between 2004 and 2008. Of them all, the only controversial decrattings could be considered Ugen64 who
4854:
3550:
2980:
2895:
2447:
1061:
5156:
4008:
3743:
2377:
1183:
4608:- I realized that A.D is a very qualified candidate for 'cratship as looking at some old RfBs of others. I switch my vote from Neutral.--
4062:
3002:
2051:
1069:
658:
Hey there, Pedro. It is to be admitted that I am not hugely active at forums such as AfD and the like, but I do regularly participate at
1085:
562:, all in connection with his ceasing employment at the Wikimedia Foundation. Which of these users would you re-crat if they asked at
2989:
1001:
659:
80:
434:
4994:"I'm worried that you think... that the goal of RFA is to produce more admins..." Just what is the goal of RFA then? Fewer admins?
3525:
509:
the length for an RfA that we as a community have decided on, and this should only be waived if the circumstances really demand it.
5310:
That is disturbing. We need less crats who use machine-counts and tallies and more crats who can actually understand a consensus.
5418:. If you could show me some instances where you successfully settled a conflict, I'll be more than happy to switch to support.--
2563:
92:
3722:. Based both on my interactions with Anonymous Dissident and his replies to the questions above, I think he will do a good job.
3196:
2223:
1534:
I agree with pretty much everything above, and on top of that, I'm more likely to support at RfB than the average voter. - Dan
1166:
110:
98:
4076:
1621:
The most qualified 'crat hopeful I've ever !voted for. No chance of abuse, every chance of great work at CHU. Good luck...
1328:
86:
17:
5323:
4738:
3972:
I commented on AD's first RFA that his ability to learn impressed me very much. I don't think that has changed therefore I
3092:
3052:
1724:
236:
Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
104:
543:
4028:
1077:
558:
over tallying RFA results. Danny's remains the unusual case of him resigning both crat and sysop rights and later being
440:
428:
404:
398:
1778:
Discussion on Biblio's comment is taking place on his talk page; let's try and keep future discussion here on topic. ā
1041:
422:
5511:
Moved from Oppose. Will be happy to move to support if AD can satisfactorily answer why he did in A Nobody's examples.
4266:
1670:
1280:
410:
559:
416:
5446:
No, but to me, promoting someone to a bureaucrat is a big deal, and I'd like to be completely sure before I vote.--
3773:
2701:
1647:
135:
5058:
4528:
3895:
3566:
2906:
923:
1228:
Excellent and fully trusted user in my book. I have no qualms about him being added to the bureaucrat position.
250:
How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
225:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as a Bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following
4823:
3797:
2854:
2276:
1486:
126:
time on the project: writing encyclopedic articles, helping with maintenance, and partaking in administration.
5370:
5188:
Feel free to disagree with his !vote, but please, don't incorrectly claim that he uses a boilerplate oppose.
3113:
2256:
Good level of productivity, AD is quite down to earth and seems to strive for equity. Nice job clerking too.
1803:. Highly qualified candidate. Used admin tools well, extremely civil, knows the bureaucrat responsibilities.
1033:
995:
760:
456:
212:
196:
177:
158:
74:
4313:, has exhibited good judgment in his wikicareer and might as well be allowed to use it in a few more areas.
4934:
3521:
3293:
2358:
1453:'crat, in my opinion. He has demonstrated an undertsanding of consensus and the cordiality to implement it
1149:
131:
52:
1117:
348:
Will you consider the validity and usefulness of the comments at an RFA important in your final decision?
3838:
3769:
3210:
3176:
2555:
2505:
2099:
No issues with trust, no issues with judgement and I have full faith that he will use the tools wisely. ā
1643:
1123:
1103:
895:
774:
717:
45:
2207:
I've been waiting for this. AD is a great user, and an asset to the community. He'd make a great 'crat.
1111:
5534:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
5102:
5094:
5066:
3806:
3542:
2899:
2486:
2219:
2088:
1129:
1025:
918:
no, RfA isn't broken, but there is clear room for improvement. I'm not sure if you've ever tuned in to
5516:
5383:
5348:
5299:
4351:
In the interest of clarity and killing all humour, can you clarify this meant as a humorous support?
4071:
2733:
per A Nobody. No not really, just support because i trust his judgment, and that's all that matters.
2524:
2243:
1784:
1325:
1261:
733:
On day 1 of an RFA User John Doe opposes citing reason X and User Jane Doe opposes citing reason Y.
2148:
I rarely !vote in RfX these days, but Anon Diss would (will?) be a welcome addition to our ranks. --
2108:
Reasonable answer to my question, but great answer to Q10. Skilled at username bits so no problems.
1336:
Seems to be good, though not fully sure about judgment. I suspect some opposition in that movement.
1274:- AnonDiss is among our most well-qualified candidates for bureaucratship. I give my full support. ā
1009:
5364:
5318:
5128:
4733:
3676:
3659:
3107:
3087:
3047:
1719:
1367:
1238:
991:
754:
450:
206:
190:
171:
152:
69:
4575:
Absolutely! Anonymous Dissident is an excellent admin and will make a fine bureaucrat, no doubt!
1178:
1017:
831:
Are RFA "support" !votes without explanation more valid than "oppose" !votes without explanation?
736:
On day 2 of the RFA User John Smith opposes per John Doe and User Jane Smith opposes per Jane Doe.
4391:
4358:
4094:
4023:
3517:
3497:
3238:
1955:
1921:
1694:
1609:
3509:
Does a pretty good job as admin, see no reason not to trust. Cheers. 15:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
742:
Five days later when you close the RFA neither John nor Jane Smith have altered their position.
5466:
4609:
4262:
4219:
3756:
3206:
3189:
3172:
2925:
2629:
2547:
2500:
1506:
1278:
1159:
911:
Do you think that RFA is broken, and if so what if anything would you do about this as a crat?
890:
769:
712:
5410:
You certainly seem to have enough edits, and you are definitely not too reliant on tools like
5161:
Excellent research? A nobody has the same oppose for everyone when it comes to RFA and or RFB.
3739:; solid responses to questions, impressive project experience, and copious clue and maturity.
2422:
983:
4956:
4710:
4487:
4300:
4185:
3708:
3602:
3427:
2781:
2683:
2482:
2462:
2295:
2215:
2077:
1086:
382:
5401:
1222:
5512:
5379:
5344:
5295:
4631:
4202:
4068:
3981:
3513:
3463:
3382:
3332:
3159:
3140:
2879:
2583:
2338:
2236:
2211:
2181:
1779:
1322:
1308:
1256:
1208:
1094:
842:
the caseāand explanation of why that is should be given. Ultimately, I think that supports
4967:
1062:
8:
5313:
5266:
5238:
5166:
5119:
5077:(if we went by strength of arguments and not a head count, it would have been a ākeepā),
4728:
4580:
4533:
4440:
4317:
3901:
3793:
3727:
3672:
3656:
3271:
3082:
3042:
2665:
2616:
1714:
1560:
1389:
1358:
1344:
1229:
820:
690:
374:
448:
If you have questions as to why I answered thus, I'm happy to expound at your request. ā
5500:
5041:
5002:
4985:
4818:
4457:
4386:
4376:
4353:
4329:
4284:
4141:
4112:
4090:
4047:
4018:
3924:
3877:
3816:
3784:
3642:
3588:
3348:
3313:
3250:
3226:
3070:
3030:
3017:
2947:
2874:
2848:
2831:
2596:
2290:
We need some more 'crats right now, and he's as good a candidate as you could ask for.
2266:
2010:
1977:
1950:
1916:
1877:
1601:
1573:
1501:. Even temperament, haven't seen anything to make me oppose. We need more good 'crats.
1458:
1142:
470:
301:. Certainly. Time constraints will not be a problem for me, and I have the inclination.
138:, both in the evaluation of candidates and the general maintenance of RfA candidacies (
1070:
5482:
4507:
4256:
4215:
3963:
3945:
3752:
3622:
3443:
3186:
3012:
2918:
2800:
2753:
2649:
2153:
2133:
1992:
1808:
1502:
1466:
1436:
1275:
1156:
353:
328:
3614:
with such an experience level, I am surprised that he hasn't been given the duties.
3133:
Certainly.Ā :) Fantastic answers to Q's, has more than enough tenure and experience.
2939:
You're certainly trustworthy for the job. And I love your taste in signature fonts.
5451:
5439:
5423:
5082:
4948:
4870:
4706:
4481:
4295:
4239:
4181:
3704:
3599:
3423:
3289:
2954:
AUSCABAL support. Extremely fine user who is deserving and capable. A rare bird. ~
2777:
2678:
2467:
2392:
2356:
2291:
2197:
1843:
1624:
1539:
1414:
143:
5250:
5221:
5206:
5192:
5177:
5016:
4910:
4891:
4789:
4624:
4420:
4198:
3977:
3845:
3455:
3410:
3371:
3327:
3155:
3134:
2955:
2719:
2696:
2579:
2334:
2319:
2177:
2117:
2064:
1936:
1858:
1766:
1749:
1303:
1197:
1078:
939:
642:
572:
519:
288:
5217:
It was directed at America69, I just forgot to level it right on the indent.Ā :)
2898:. I certainly trust AD as an admin, no reason not to trust him as a bureaucrat.
5340:
5262:
5234:
5162:
5152:
4847:
4576:
4558:
4521:
4436:
4314:
3889:
3724:
3560:
3545:
3267:
2976:
2826:- excellent answers to the questions and a fine contribution and admin record.
2776:- Three of your answers to number seven were those that I strongly agree with.
2734:
2661:
2445:
2163:
2100:
2028:
1587:
1552:
1383:
1338:
927:
919:
686:
675:
602:
584:
539:
527:
139:
1736:
I have no doubt this will create a firestorm about my prudishness but is that
5547:
5336:
5106:
5037:
4981:
4813:
4279:
4108:
4043:
4042:
Anonymous Dissident would certainly make a fine bureaucrat and we need more.
4001:
3918:
3873:
3811:
3801:
3740:
3638:
3579:
3309:
3066:
3026:
2941:
2869:
2844:
2827:
2481:. A great addition and a truly positive addition to the ranks. Good luck.
2373:
2308:
1823:
1596:
1568:
1479:
1291:
960:
795:
629:
465:
320:
292:
284:
5031:, as in, a higher rate. We agree that RFA is currently producing admins. If
1987:
OMG, he's an eBayer? Group kick! Oh wait... I'm getting my MMOs confused. --
5478:
5415:
5411:
4996:
4503:
4342:
4135:
3960:
3941:
3690:
3617:
3439:
3355:
2795:
2646:
2419:
2405:
2149:
2044:
1988:
1971:
1871:
1804:
1520:
1462:
1430:
563:
378:
349:
324:
309:
3940:. I think this candidate is competent enough to become a bureaucrat here.
3596:
Was hoping to be #100 but had to fix a kitchen light and missed it support
2628:, thank you for making Knowledge more colorful with your unique view. :D--
1518:
I still wish we could get a bot-focused crat, but Anon Diss is qualified.
5499:
particularly Q17) before deciding. Am leaning towards a support, though.
5447:
5434:
5419:
4923:
4865:
4232:
4169:
3859:
3493:
3284:
2969:- Positive contributor in multiple varied capacities. Builds the 'pedia.
2813:
2457:
2387:
2351:
2192:
2006:
1839:
1535:
1409:
739:
Later on day 2 John Doe shifts to neutral and Jane Doe shifts to support.
590:
535:
2022:
Anonymous Dissident is, by far, one of the most mature Wikipedians I've
5465:
I've not seen him around much, so don't know him to be a good 'crat'.--
5079:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Optimus Prime (person) (4th nomination)
5012:
I'm not being picky - I genuinely have no idea what that meant either.
4906:
4904:
because opposing wouldn't do anything, and I have no reason to oppose.
4887:
4414:
4153:
4125:
3399:
2314:
2111:
2060:
1891:
1743:
856:
How would you consider an anon's comments and participation in an RFA?
636:
596:
578:
531:
523:
5538:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
5477:
Perhaps you'd take a few moments to check his contrib record then? --
5148:
4838:
4549:
3537:
2971:
2438:
926:
on adminship and the RfA process was had, to which former bureaucrat
5528:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
4921:
I've never seen AD's name pop up on my watchlist and not liked it.
3996:
3346:- I'm glad my ban ended in time, so I could express my support.Ā :)
2369:
2368:. A very capable and reliable admin, he should make a great 'crat.
59:
3637:
for an experienced, level-headed editor with solid credentials. -
4254:
Only seen great things from this admin, definitely trustworthy! -
4057:
2037:
2036:
I asked about this like 4 months ago. I do not change my stance.
5091:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/PlayStation 3 technical problems
3796:. (Translation: SKIP THE RFB AND MAKE HIM A CRAT ALREADY!!! :P)
1010:
972:
censor because their content contribution has been rewarded?
1321:
Ran into you a few times, and think you are fully qualified.--
685:
You are listed as "open to recall," as an administrator. Why?
5204:
I hope that wasn't directed at me, because I agree with you.
5099:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Stonehenge in popular culture
5063:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Stonehenge_in_popular_culture
2714:
2625:
1659:
Very active editor, I am sure he will make an excellent crat
4089:- I've seen this candidate's work, and I fully trust him. -
3828:
2595:. Absolutely. Fantastic candidate, will be a great 'crat. ā
3671:
answers to questions and seems well prepared for the task.
62:
1002:
5071:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Fictional Child Prodigies
4594:- Long time administrator with a all around good resume.
4328:ā glad I noticed this before close. Not a worry. Cheers,
283:
Do you have the time and do you have the desire to visit
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
4411:- and thanks for taking on this under-appreciated task.
3598:
Active in the right areas, dependable and will be fine.
3507:
Almost WP:100 but of all the bleeding bad luck...Support
3185:
Just to clarify, do you support the candidate himself? ā
1967:
1480:
1026:
1818:
Edit-conflicted-why-does-everyone-seem-love-you-support
1104:
703:
point where I really need to call it a day as an admin.
2437:- I wish we had snow closes for obvious promotions. //
1914:- I would trust this user with my life, if I had one.
5337:
I want to believe that all users understand consensus
5089:(merge discussions should take place on talk pages),
2695:
without qualms, reservations, concerns, or doubts. ā
1692:
No problems with Anon Diss - he'll make a fine crat.
1683:
Some things are worth coming out of retirement for.
1042:
1034:
745:
How do you treat John and Jane Smith's votes and why?
5075:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gargoyles in fiction
4765:
If you think you're shit then I'll show you the door
4686:
More troubling, one could ask just what the sense is
2990:
665:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/User names#FeygeleGoy
4759:
He gonna rewind the beats and start that shit again
4756:
But your boy, Neurolysis, oh yeah, that wigga Chris
4680:
There aren't many good rhymes found for "Anonymous"
4659:
Bringing some cheer through supports cast in rhyme.
4231:ā Qualified, clueful; no reservations on my part. ā
952:Knowledge:Removing administrator rights/Proposal 2
4725:*Sniff* What an inspiring poem from the milkman.
4502:- Yes a trusted user, should make a great 'crat.
1785:
1780:
1449:(and I do not give that often). AD would make an
1262:
1257:
1018:
550:over the promotionĀ % for RFBs and Francs2000 who
5545:
4780:Because you just triggered my wack MC prevention
4668:For this, some lines of verse aren't much to ask
3039:He's not much younger than quite a few of us...
2763:click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!
2479:First support of anything in five months support
1853:On the condition that he stops failing at MathML
505:be used with care and proper discretion; 7 days
295:on a regular basis to attend to those requests?
229:questions to provide guidance for participants:
186:Additional note dated 08:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
4783:Never ever mess a guy with an ipblock-exemption
4683:(Which fits, for Dissidents must be autonomous)
4067:Support. Even-headed/handed and experienced. -
2385:- extremely capable and he has my full trust. -
437:: No consensus at all (default to unsuccessful)
5294:judgment has to be near machine level for me.
5087:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Patronus Charm
4957:
4949:
3370:- Sure, will do fine with the tools. Cheers,
1390:
1384:
1345:
1339:
4698:And so, to the 'crat ranks, we bid him enter:
4692:But all in all, let's praise the notion that
4653:And far too many harsh words here are spoken
2812:Preternaturally mature, as expressed below.
2406:
1948:Not sure, I'm looking in the man pages now.
4656:To help the mood, I choose to pass the time
3347:
3171:to cancel out the absurd AFD Oppose below.
566:and which would you require to re-run RfB?
4777:It's a hard time living with a passing RfB
4771:Opened up the door, then guess who he saw?
4452:. I see no reason not to let them do even
3654:Trustworthy and dedicated to the project.
3476:I think you will do just fine, good luck!
1567:Full support. My ideal choice for a crat.
5343:. A's diffs made me wonder here with AD.
4762:Admins can't rap, never mind in text form
4701:Three cheers for the Anonymous Dissenter
4689:To pick a "Dissident" to judge consensus!
4214:Long time solid user with good judgment.
2162:One metapedian I have a lot of time for.
660:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User names
4674:I found my typing fingers all but frozen
3976:taking this to the next level of trust.
3325:Of course - extrordinary contributions!
1155:Editing stats posted at the talk page. ā
1141:Please keep discussion constructive and
990:
611:substantially since that time, and they
4671:But when I came to sit down to the task
4278:Trustworthy admin, solid reputation. ā
1302:. Has the knowledge and dedication. --
14:
5554:Successful requests for bureaucratship
5546:
4864:
4677:By the username Anon. Diss. has chosen
2843:scrupulous, sensible and trustworthy.
2498:Good candidate, good question answers
4768:Brad ran upstairs up to the top floor
2404:I'll trust this user with the tools.
463:Why promote Gracenotes but not DHMO?
18:Knowledge:Requests for bureaucratship
4665:For English Wiki's newest bureaucrat
4662:Today it's time to lay a welcome mat
4133:Well, you did hesitate 5 days...Ā :)
3792:Yes. Yes. Yessie, yessun', yessir o-
3398:- You'll do fine. No problems here.
1711:. I suppose the badgering paid off.
167:To those who have asked me questions
5218:
5189:
5147:per A nobody's excellent research.
5013:
4786:
1933:
1855:
1763:
319:Will you strengthen enforcement of
23:
4753:RfB rhymes? Now that's a hard sell
4695:Our Pizzaboy will be a bureaucrat!
1932:A life? Where can I download one?
435:DHMO 3 (at this point in time) 79%
24:
5565:
4774:Me, yeah, your man Neurol-you-see
4650:Some users say that RfA is broken
4197:I'm pleased to add my support! --
2677:. Knows him well and trusts him.
2074:Very, very, very strongly support
4623:- Will make a great bureaucrat.
4058:
3827:
3479:
3205:Oh absolutely. I love the guy.
2660:: What an extraordinary editor.
136:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
5222:
5193:
5059:User:Anonymous Dissident/Awards
5017:
4790:
4168:Good answers to the questions.
3404:
3401:
3356:
3232:
3228:
2269:
2259:
2191:consensus on 'crat promotions.
1937:
1859:
1767:
1740:a helpful use of an expletive?
1487:
989:Links for Anonymous Dissident:
4750:NYB's rhymes are wack as hell,
4632:
4625:
4534:
4529:
4522:
4435:He's a remarkable young man...
3916:
3860:
3807:
3794:yes yes a-yesyes a-yes BAM BOO
3623:
3618:
3422:No problems here. Good luck!
3197:
3190:
2237:
1569:
1167:
1160:
13:
1:
4107:this user.Ā :) Kind regards, ā
2548:
1574:
5114:Longish discussion moved to
4862:Dedicated and has my trust.
3817:
2564:
1457:drama. He is unquestionably
1175:For those that prefer them:
132:Knowledge:Changing usernames
7:
5291:Weak Oppose, Almost Neutral
5061:, but I have to oppose per
3812:
3802:
2556:
1820:- agree with Garden 110%. ā
221:Questions for the candidate
10:
5570:
5521:12:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5504:05:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5487:09:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5473:01:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5456:13:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5442:12:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5428:20:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
5388:12:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5373:05:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5353:03:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5341:basically NPOV on steroids
5331:03:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5304:03:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5271:20:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5257:19:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5243:18:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
5229:20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
5213:20:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
5200:20:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
5184:00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
5171:22:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
5157:10:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
5138:15:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
5110:22:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5103:Knowledge:Merge and delete
5095:Knowledge:Merge and delete
5067:Knowledge:Merge and delete
5046:20:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5024:20:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5008:18:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
4990:15:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
4962:16:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4940:16:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4914:11:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4897:10:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4878:06:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4855:02:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4829:00:47, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4797:00:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4746:00:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4715:00:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4638:23:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4616:23:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4601:23:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4587:21:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4566:02:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
4542:21:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4512:19:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4495:19:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4480:. Will make a fine 'crat.
4473:17:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4445:14:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4428:12:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4398:12:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4380:12:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4365:12:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4347:11:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4333:11:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4321:08:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4306:05:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4287:03:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4271:02:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4247:02:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4224:01:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
4207:20:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4190:18:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4173:16:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4157:21:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4147:15:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4129:15:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4117:14:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4103:It's a pleasure for me to
4099:11:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4082:05:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4063:04:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4056:Support, rather strongly.
4052:03:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4035:01:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
4009:23:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3986:22:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3968:22:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3950:20:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3933:20:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3908:15:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3882:08:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3865:04:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3855:02:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3823:00:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3778:00:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3761:00:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
3744:22:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3732:22:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3715:22:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3697:21:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3681:20:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3664:19:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3647:17:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3630:16:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3607:15:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3591:15:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3571:15:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3551:15:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3502:14:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3485:14:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3469:05:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3448:02:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3432:02:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3415:01:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3391:00:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3363:00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
3339:23:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3318:22:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3301:21:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3276:18:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3259:18:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3244:18:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3215:18:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3201:17:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3181:17:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3164:17:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3147:12:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3116:05:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
3100:03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
3075:03:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
3060:03:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
3035:02:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
3020:11:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
3003:10:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2988:Took you long enough... Ā·
2981:08:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2962:07:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2950:06:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2932:05:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2914:05:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2887:04:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2859:03:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2836:03:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2819:03:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2805:03:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2786:03:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2769:02:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2744:02:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2726:02:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2706:01:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2688:00:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2670:00:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2653:00:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2636:00:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2621:00:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
2604:23:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2588:23:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2571:23:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2537:23:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2515:23:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2491:21:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2474:21:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2448:21:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2430:21:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2411:20:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2397:19:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2378:18:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2361:18:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2343:16:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2326:14:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2300:14:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2283:13:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2249:13:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2200:12:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2186:12:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2169:11:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2158:10:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2141:10:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2125:07:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2104:05:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2095:03:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2069:01:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2052:01:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2032:00:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
2014:11:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
1997:01:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1983:00:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1962:00:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1944:00:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1928:00:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1907:23:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1883:23:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1866:23:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1848:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1834:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1813:23:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1790:23:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1774:23:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1757:23:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1732:22:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1704:22:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1688:22:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1676:22:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1652:22:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1634:22:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1617:22:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1579:22:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1563:22:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1544:21:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1527:21:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1511:21:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1493:21:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1471:21:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1442:21:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1424:21:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1397:00:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
1377:21:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1352:21:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1332:20:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1314:20:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1295:20:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1283:20:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1267:20:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1248:20:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1215:05:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
1171:18:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
784:23:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
763:21:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
695:21:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
650:21:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
475:23:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
459:06:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
358:20:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
215:20:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
204:It seems to be clearing. ā
199:08:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
180:05:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
161:20:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
34:request for bureaucratship
4340:too young to be a crat.
4124:; without hesitation. ā
123:sysop rights in September
5531:Please do not modify it.
5065:(which we cannot do per
4812:to Brad's brilliance. ā
1196:
1179:WikiChecker edit counter
950:What's your position on
373:Optional questions from
308:Optional questions from
58:(159/3/3); ended 20:43,
5408:Neutral Leaning support
5057:. I would support per
2715:Impressive article work
1184:Soxred93's edit counter
959:Optional question from
938:Optional question from
838:indicates that this is
819:Optional question from
674:Optional question from
38:Please do not modify it
4546:Where Ariel@Verbosity?
3768:, no problems here. ā
3266:No issues. Good luck.
2611:- the 'crats are few.
1644:Pharaoh of the Wizards
1478:Why not? Great user.--
4016:You've got my trust.
2578:- trustworthy admin.
2307:, does great work at
5101:(another please see
3492:, no resaon not to.
1966:To Neuro: try here:
5366:Anonymous Dissident
5093:(again, please see
3109:Anonymous Dissident
2645:a good candidate --
2455:I trust this user.
2333:- Great candidate.
1290:. Definitely. --
992:Anonymous Dissident
821:User:Carlossuarez46
756:Anonymous Dissident
452:Anonymous Dissident
208:Anonymous Dissident
192:Anonymous Dissident
173:Anonymous Dissident
154:Anonymous Dissident
70:AnonymousĀ Dissident
47:Anonymous Dissident
5437:
5369:
4384:Sneaky bugger.Ā :)
3730:
3518:ImperatorExercitus
3112:
2946:
2472:
2195:
1428:Yes, I trust you.
759:
455:
211:
195:
176:
157:
39:
5435:
5363:
4938:
4895:
4585:
4540:
4510:
4426:
4304:
4269:
4245:
4115:
4080:
3955:Mid-grade support
3850:
3788:
3723:
3530:
3516:comment added by
3298:
3296:So let it be done
3291:
3242:
3207:Crotchety Old Man
3173:Crotchety Old Man
3106:
2940:
2928:
2911:
2560:
2552:
2456:
2278:
2273:
2228:
2214:comment added by
2193:
2123:
2048:
1995:
1755:
1632:
1491:
753:
648:
449:
205:
189:
170:
151:
37:
5561:
5533:
5367:
5335:That's just it.
5326:
5321:
5316:
5307:Moved to Neutral
5253:
5227:
5224:
5209:
5198:
5195:
5180:
5131:
5122:
5055:Regretful oppose
5022:
5019:
5005:
4999:
4959:
4953:
4931:
4927:
4886:
4875:
4873:
4868:
4853:
4850:
4826:
4821:
4816:
4795:
4792:
4741:
4736:
4731:
4635:
4629:
4598:
4583:
4579:
4564:
4561:
4538:
4531:
4526:
4520:
4506:
4491:
4469:
4463:
4425:
4423:
4417:
4412:
4394:
4389:
4374:
4372:embedded comment
4361:
4356:
4315:Heimstern LƤufer
4298:
4282:
4261:
4237:
4144:
4138:
4111:
4074:
4060:
4031:
4026:
4021:
4007:
4004:
3966:
3931:
3927:
3921:
3904:
3898:
3892:
3862:
3852:
3848:
3844:
3841:
3831:
3819:
3814:
3809:
3804:
3782:
3713:
3693:
3662:
3627:
3625:
3620:
3586:
3548:
3540:
3529:
3510:
3481:
3466:
3461:
3406:
3403:
3361:
3358:
3335:
3330:
3294:
3290:
3257:this message! -
3236:
3234:
3230:
3198:
3191:
3143:
3137:
3110:
3095:
3090:
3085:
3055:
3050:
3045:
3015:
3000:
2959:
2944:
2929:
2927:
2923:
2910:
2907:
2904:
2882:
2877:
2872:
2816:
2803:
2798:
2764:
2756:
2741:
2722:
2601:
2566:
2561:
2558:
2553:
2550:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2512:
2508:
2503:
2483:The Rambling Man
2470:
2465:
2460:
2443:
2408:
2354:
2322:
2317:
2277:
2271:
2267:
2261:
2239:
2227:
2216:Perfect Proposal
2208:
2166:
2137:
2122:
2120:
2109:
2091:
2085:
2081:
2049:
2046:
2042:
1991:
1980:
1974:
1958:
1953:
1942:
1939:
1924:
1919:
1904:
1880:
1874:
1864:
1861:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1787:
1782:
1772:
1769:
1754:
1752:
1741:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1700:
1697:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1631:
1629:
1622:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1599:
1595:
1576:
1571:
1558:
1555:
1523:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1439:
1433:
1421:
1412:
1394:
1386:
1370:
1361:
1349:
1341:
1311:
1306:
1264:
1259:
1241:
1232:
1211:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1168:
1161:
1133:
1106:
1096:
1088:
1080:
1072:
1064:
1044:
1036:
1028:
1020:
1012:
1004:
984:General comments
922:, but last year
902:
898:
893:
781:
777:
772:
757:
724:
720:
715:
647:
645:
634:
453:
209:
193:
174:
155:
120:
5569:
5568:
5564:
5563:
5562:
5560:
5559:
5558:
5544:
5543:
5542:
5536:this nomination
5529:
5513:Spinach Monster
5404:
5380:Spinach Monster
5365:
5345:Spinach Monster
5324:
5319:
5314:
5296:Spinach Monster
5251:
5207:
5178:
5134:
5129:
5120:
5003:
4997:
4970:
4937:
4925:
4871:
4866:
4848:
4836:
4824:
4819:
4814:
4739:
4734:
4729:
4596:
4581:
4559:
4547:
4504:Camaron | Chris
4489:
4467:
4461:
4421:
4415:
4413:
4392:
4387:
4370:
4359:
4354:
4326:Pile-on Support
4280:
4142:
4136:
4029:
4024:
4019:
4002:
3994:
3959:
3925:
3919:
3902:
3896:
3890:
3851:
3846:
3839:
3837:
3702:
3691:
3655:
3616:
3580:
3569:
3558:- no problems.
3546:
3538:
3511:
3464:
3456:
3360:
3333:
3328:
3308:Well deserved.
3297:
3141:
3135:
3108:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3013:
2957:
2942:
2926:
2919:
2908:
2900:
2880:
2875:
2870:
2814:
2799:
2794:
2762:
2754:
2735:
2720:
2704:
2597:
2529:
2527:
2525:
2510:
2506:
2501:
2468:
2463:
2458:
2439:
2427:
2395:
2352:
2320:
2315:
2281:
2272:
2209:
2164:
2135:
2118:
2110:
2089:
2083:
2079:
2047:clamation point
2045:
2038:
1978:
1972:
1956:
1951:
1922:
1917:
1892:
1878:
1872:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1750:
1742:
1725:
1720:
1715:
1698:
1695:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1625:
1623:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1593:
1591:
1556:
1553:
1521:
1459:worthy of trust
1437:
1431:
1415:
1410:
1373:
1368:
1359:
1309:
1304:
1244:
1239:
1230:
1225:
1213:
1209:
1201:
1198:
1152:
1099:
986:
940:User:S Marshall
900:
896:
891:
794:Follow up from
779:
775:
770:
755:
722:
718:
713:
643:
635:
451:
441:Riana's RfB 86%
223:
207:
191:
172:
153:
72:
55:
50:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5567:
5557:
5556:
5541:
5540:
5524:
5523:
5506:
5493:
5492:
5491:
5490:
5489:
5460:
5459:
5458:
5403:
5400:
5399:
5398:
5397:
5396:
5395:
5394:
5393:
5392:
5391:
5390:
5308:
5287:
5286:
5285:
5284:
5283:
5282:
5281:
5280:
5279:
5278:
5277:
5276:
5275:
5274:
5273:
5142:
5141:
5140:
5126:
5121:NuclearWarfare
5052:
5051:
5050:
5049:
5048:
5026:
4969:
4966:
4965:
4964:
4942:
4933:
4919:Strong support
4916:
4899:
4880:
4857:
4831:
4803:
4802:
4801:
4800:
4799:
4784:
4781:
4778:
4775:
4772:
4769:
4766:
4763:
4760:
4757:
4754:
4751:
4723:
4722:
4721:
4720:
4719:
4718:
4717:
4699:
4696:
4693:
4690:
4687:
4684:
4681:
4678:
4675:
4672:
4669:
4666:
4663:
4660:
4657:
4654:
4651:
4640:
4618:
4603:
4589:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4514:
4497:
4475:
4447:
4430:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4401:
4400:
4335:
4323:
4308:
4289:
4273:
4249:
4226:
4209:
4192:
4175:
4163:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4119:
4101:
4091:Richard Cavell
4084:
4065:
4054:
4037:
4011:
3988:
3970:
3952:
3935:
3913:Strong support
3910:
3884:
3867:
3857:
3843:
3825:
3780:
3763:
3746:
3734:
3717:
3699:
3683:
3673:Carlossuarez46
3666:
3657:Steven Walling
3649:
3632:
3609:
3593:
3573:
3565:
3553:
3531:
3504:
3487:
3471:
3450:
3434:
3417:
3393:
3365:
3354:
3341:
3320:
3303:
3295:
3278:
3261:
3247:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3217:
3166:
3149:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3005:
2983:
2964:
2952:
2934:
2916:
2889:
2864:Strong support
2861:
2838:
2821:
2807:
2788:
2771:
2749:Strong support
2746:
2728:
2708:
2700:
2690:
2672:
2655:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2606:
2593:Strong support
2590:
2573:
2539:
2517:
2493:
2476:
2450:
2432:
2423:
2416:Strong support
2413:
2399:
2391:
2380:
2363:
2345:
2328:
2302:
2285:
2268:
2264:
2251:
2238:I'm Spartacus!
2229:
2202:
2188:
2171:
2160:
2143:
2132:, good luck --
2127:
2106:
2097:
2071:
2054:
2034:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1909:
1885:
1868:
1850:
1836:
1815:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1706:
1690:
1685:Meetare Shappy
1678:
1654:
1639:Strong Support
1636:
1619:
1581:
1565:
1546:
1529:
1513:
1497:Edit conflict
1495:
1473:
1447:Strong Support
1444:
1426:
1408:Absolutely. --
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1365:
1360:NuclearWarfare
1334:
1316:
1297:
1285:
1272:Strong support
1269:
1250:
1236:
1231:NuclearWarfare
1224:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1207:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1181:
1173:
1151:
1148:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1098:
985:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
956:
955:
935:
934:
933:
932:
888:Question from
885:
884:
883:
882:
867:
866:
865:
864:
850:
849:
848:
847:
816:
815:
814:
813:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
746:
740:
737:
734:
710:Question from
707:
706:
705:
704:
676:User:Hipocrite
671:
670:
669:
668:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
607:
606:
600:
594:
588:
582:
576:
513:
512:
511:
510:
494:
493:
492:
491:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
445:
444:
438:
432:
429:Gracenotes 74%
426:
420:
419:: Unsuccessful
414:
413:: Unsuccessful
408:
402:
401:: Unsuccessful
399:Carnildo 3 61%
395:
394:
375:NuclearWarfare
370:
369:
368:
367:
342:
341:
340:
339:
305:
304:
303:
302:
278:
277:
276:
264:
263:
262:
245:
244:
243:
222:
219:
218:
217:
183:
164:
54:
51:
49:
44:
43:
42:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5566:
5555:
5552:
5551:
5549:
5539:
5537:
5532:
5526:
5525:
5522:
5518:
5514:
5510:
5507:
5505:
5502:
5497:
5494:
5488:
5484:
5480:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5471:
5469:
5464:
5461:
5457:
5453:
5449:
5445:
5444:
5443:
5440:
5438:
5431:
5430:
5429:
5425:
5421:
5417:
5413:
5409:
5406:
5405:
5389:
5385:
5381:
5376:
5375:
5374:
5371:
5368:
5361:
5356:
5355:
5354:
5350:
5346:
5342:
5338:
5334:
5333:
5332:
5329:
5328:
5327:
5322:
5317:
5309:
5306:
5305:
5301:
5297:
5292:
5288:
5272:
5268:
5264:
5260:
5259:
5258:
5255:
5254:
5246:
5245:
5244:
5240:
5236:
5232:
5231:
5230:
5226:
5225:
5216:
5215:
5214:
5211:
5210:
5203:
5202:
5201:
5197:
5196:
5187:
5186:
5185:
5182:
5181:
5174:
5173:
5172:
5168:
5164:
5160:
5159:
5158:
5154:
5150:
5146:
5143:
5139:
5136:
5135:
5132:
5123:
5117:
5116:the talk page
5113:
5112:
5111:
5108:
5104:
5100:
5096:
5092:
5088:
5084:
5080:
5076:
5072:
5068:
5064:
5060:
5056:
5053:
5047:
5043:
5039:
5034:
5030:
5027:
5025:
5021:
5020:
5011:
5010:
5009:
5006:
5001:
5000:
4993:
4992:
4991:
4987:
4983:
4980:direction. --
4979:
4975:
4972:
4971:
4963:
4960:
4954:
4952:
4946:
4943:
4941:
4936:
4930:
4929:
4920:
4917:
4915:
4912:
4909:
4908:
4903:
4900:
4898:
4893:
4889:
4884:
4881:
4879:
4876:
4874:
4869:
4861:
4858:
4856:
4851:
4845:
4844:
4842:
4835:
4832:
4830:
4827:
4822:
4817:
4811:
4807:
4804:
4798:
4794:
4793:
4785:
4782:
4779:
4776:
4773:
4770:
4767:
4764:
4761:
4758:
4755:
4752:
4749:
4748:
4747:
4744:
4743:
4742:
4737:
4732:
4724:
4716:
4712:
4708:
4705:
4704:
4703:
4702:
4700:
4697:
4694:
4691:
4688:
4685:
4682:
4679:
4676:
4673:
4670:
4667:
4664:
4661:
4658:
4655:
4652:
4649:
4648:
4647:
4646:
4644:
4641:
4639:
4636:
4634:
4630:
4628:
4622:
4619:
4617:
4614:
4612:
4607:
4604:
4602:
4599:
4593:
4590:
4588:
4584:
4578:
4574:
4571:
4567:
4562:
4556:
4555:
4553:
4545:
4544:
4543:
4539:
4537:
4532:
4527:
4525:
4519:Abso-tively!
4518:
4515:
4513:
4509:
4505:
4501:
4498:
4496:
4493:
4492:
4485:
4484:
4479:
4476:
4474:
4471:
4470:
4464:
4455:
4451:
4448:
4446:
4442:
4438:
4434:
4431:
4429:
4424:
4418:
4410:
4407:
4399:
4396:
4395:
4390:
4383:
4382:
4381:
4378:
4377:Jack Merridew
4373:
4368:
4367:
4366:
4363:
4362:
4357:
4350:
4349:
4348:
4345:
4344:
4339:
4336:
4334:
4331:
4330:Jack Merridew
4327:
4324:
4322:
4319:
4316:
4312:
4309:
4307:
4302:
4301:My narrowboat
4297:
4293:
4290:
4288:
4285:
4283:
4277:
4274:
4272:
4268:
4264:
4259:
4258:
4253:
4250:
4248:
4243:
4242:
4236:
4235:
4230:
4227:
4225:
4221:
4217:
4213:
4210:
4208:
4204:
4200:
4196:
4193:
4191:
4187:
4183:
4179:
4176:
4174:
4171:
4167:
4164:
4158:
4155:
4150:
4149:
4148:
4145:
4140:
4139:
4132:
4131:
4130:
4127:
4123:
4120:
4118:
4114:
4110:
4106:
4102:
4100:
4096:
4092:
4088:
4085:
4083:
4078:
4073:
4070:
4066:
4064:
4061:
4055:
4053:
4049:
4045:
4041:
4038:
4036:
4033:
4032:
4027:
4022:
4015:
4012:
4010:
4006:
4005:
3998:
3993:. No issues.
3992:
3989:
3987:
3983:
3979:
3975:
3971:
3969:
3965:
3962:
3956:
3953:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3936:
3934:
3929:
3928:
3922:
3914:
3911:
3909:
3905:
3899:
3893:
3888:
3885:
3883:
3879:
3875:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3849:
3842:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3824:
3821:
3820:
3815:
3810:
3805:
3799:
3795:
3791:
3786:
3785:edit conflict
3781:
3779:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3764:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3750:
3747:
3745:
3742:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3729:
3726:
3721:
3718:
3716:
3712:
3710:
3706:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3694:
3687:
3684:
3682:
3678:
3674:
3670:
3667:
3665:
3661:
3658:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3644:
3640:
3636:
3633:
3631:
3628:
3626:
3621:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3604:
3601:
3597:
3594:
3592:
3589:
3587:
3585:
3584:
3577:
3574:
3572:
3568:
3563:
3562:
3557:
3554:
3552:
3549:
3544:
3541:
3535:
3534:Full support.
3532:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3515:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3491:
3488:
3486:
3483:
3482:
3480:It Is Me Here
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3462:
3459:
3454:
3451:
3449:
3445:
3441:
3438:
3435:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3421:
3418:
3416:
3412:
3408:
3407:
3397:
3394:
3392:
3389:
3388:
3385:
3381:
3380:
3377:
3374:
3369:
3366:
3364:
3359:
3353:
3350:
3349:Steve Crossin
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3336:
3331:
3324:
3321:
3319:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3292:
3288:
3287:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3251:Mailer Diablo
3248:
3245:
3240:
3235:
3231:
3225:
3222:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3199:
3195:
3192:
3188:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3161:
3157:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3144:
3138:
3132:
3129:
3117:
3114:
3111:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3098:
3097:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3078:
3077:
3076:
3072:
3068:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3051:
3046:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3032:
3028:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3018:
3016:
3009:
3006:
3004:
3001:
2999:
2996:
2993:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2973:
2968:
2965:
2963:
2960:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2945:
2938:
2935:
2933:
2930:
2924:
2922:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2905:
2903:
2897:
2893:
2890:
2888:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2866:- no brainer
2865:
2862:
2860:
2856:
2853:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2811:
2808:
2806:
2802:
2797:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2758:
2757:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2739:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2723:
2716:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2703:
2698:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2685:
2682:
2681:
2676:
2673:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2648:
2644:
2641:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2627:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2599:sephiroth bcr
2594:
2591:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2562:
2554:
2543:
2540:
2538:
2535:
2534:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2509:
2504:
2497:
2494:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2471:
2466:
2461:
2454:
2451:
2449:
2446:
2444:
2442:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2421:
2417:
2414:
2412:
2409:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2389:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2364:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2355:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2329:
2327:
2324:
2323:
2318:
2310:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2286:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2263:
2262:
2255:
2252:
2250:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2233:
2230:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2189:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2161:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2138:
2131:
2128:
2126:
2121:
2115:
2114:
2107:
2105:
2102:
2098:
2096:
2092:
2086:
2082:
2075:
2072:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2050:
2043:
2041:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2025:
2021:
2015:
2012:
2011:Jack Merridew
2008:
2004:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1981:
1976:
1975:
1968:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1960:
1959:
1954:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1940:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1926:
1925:
1920:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1876:
1875:
1869:
1867:
1863:
1862:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1799:
1791:
1788:
1783:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1753:
1747:
1746:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1699:Postlethwaite
1691:
1689:
1686:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1640:
1637:
1635:
1630:
1628:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1605:
1600:
1589:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1572:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1559:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1494:
1490:
1483:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1435:
1434:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1419:
1413:
1407:
1406:Total support
1404:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1371:
1362:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1343:
1342:
1335:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1307:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1293:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1260:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1233:
1227:
1226:
1216:
1212:
1206:
1204:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1144:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1110:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1089:
1084:
1081:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1040:
1037:
1032:
1029:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1013:
1008:
1005:
1000:
997:
993:
988:
987:
977:
974:
973:
970:
967:
966:
965:
964:
962:
961:User:Mattisse
953:
949:
946:
945:
944:
943:
941:
929:
925:
921:
916:
913:
912:
910:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
899:
894:
879:
876:
875:
872:
869:
868:
861:
858:
857:
855:
852:
851:
845:
841:
836:
833:
832:
830:
827:
826:
825:
824:
822:
810:
807:
806:
804:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
785:
782:
778:
773:
766:
765:
764:
761:
758:
750:
747:
744:
743:
741:
738:
735:
732:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
721:
716:
701:
698:
697:
696:
692:
688:
684:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
666:
661:
657:
654:
653:
651:
646:
640:
639:
631:
626:
623:
622:
614:
609:
608:
604:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
574:
571:
570:
568:
567:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
515:
514:
508:
503:
502:
499:
496:
495:
488:
487:
485:
482:
476:
472:
468:
467:
462:
461:
460:
457:
454:
447:
446:
442:
439:
436:
433:
430:
427:
425::Unsuccessful
424:
423:Ryulong 3 69%
421:
418:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
396:
392:
391:
389:
386:
385:
384:
383:
381:
380:
377:adapted from
376:
364:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
343:
336:
333:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
300:
297:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
274:
271:
270:
268:
265:
259:
255:
252:
251:
249:
246:
241:
238:
237:
235:
232:
231:
230:
228:
216:
213:
210:
203:
202:
201:
200:
197:
194:
187:
182:
181:
178:
175:
168:
163:
162:
159:
156:
148:
145:
141:
137:
133:
127:
124:
118:
115:
112:
109:
106:
103:
100:
97:
94:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
71:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
41:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
5530:
5527:
5508:
5495:
5467:
5462:
5407:
5359:
5315:bibliomaniac
5312:
5311:
5290:
5289:
5249:
5219:
5205:
5190:
5176:
5144:
5125:
5124:
5054:
5032:
5028:
5014:
4995:
4977:
4973:
4950:
4944:
4922:
4918:
4905:
4901:
4882:
4863:
4859:
4840:
4839:
4833:
4809:
4805:
4787:
4730:bibliomaniac
4727:
4726:
4642:
4633:
4626:
4620:
4610:
4605:
4591:
4572:
4551:
4550:
4535:
4523:
4516:
4499:
4488:
4482:
4477:
4465:
4459:
4453:
4449:
4432:
4408:
4385:
4352:
4341:
4337:
4325:
4310:
4291:
4275:
4255:
4251:
4240:
4233:
4228:
4216:Sumoeagle179
4211:
4194:
4177:
4165:
4134:
4121:
4104:
4086:
4039:
4017:
4013:
4000:
3990:
3973:
3954:
3937:
3917:
3912:
3886:
3869:
3836:
3832:
3800:
3789:
3765:
3753:Infrogmation
3748:
3736:
3719:
3703:
3701:No problem.
3689:
3685:
3668:
3651:
3634:
3615:
3611:
3603:
3595:
3582:
3581:
3575:
3559:
3555:
3533:
3512:āĀ Preceding
3506:
3489:
3477:
3473:
3457:
3452:
3436:
3419:
3400:
3395:
3386:
3383:
3378:
3375:
3372:
3367:
3351:
3343:
3326:
3322:
3305:
3285:
3280:
3263:
3254:
3227:
3223:
3193:
3187:Juliancolton
3168:
3151:
3139:
3130:
3084:bibliomaniac
3081:
3080:
3044:bibliomaniac
3041:
3040:
3007:
2997:
2994:
2991:
2985:
2970:
2966:
2936:
2921:the_undertow
2920:
2901:
2896:my standards
2891:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2851:
2840:
2823:
2809:
2790:
2773:
2760:
2755:YellowMonkey
2752:
2748:
2737:
2736:
2730:
2718:
2710:
2692:
2684:
2679:
2674:
2657:
2642:
2630:
2608:
2598:
2592:
2575:
2546:
2545:
2541:
2523:
2522:Definitely.
2519:
2499:
2495:
2478:
2452:
2440:
2434:
2424:
2415:
2401:
2386:
2382:
2365:
2350:definitely.
2347:
2330:
2313:
2304:
2287:
2258:
2253:
2244:
2242:
2235:
2231:
2204:
2173:
2145:
2134:
2129:
2112:
2078:
2073:
2056:
2039:
2023:
1970:
1949:
1934:
1915:
1911:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1887:
1870:
1856:
1852:
1821:
1817:
1800:
1764:
1744:
1737:
1716:bibliomaniac
1713:
1712:
1708:
1693:
1680:
1656:
1638:
1626:
1592:
1583:
1548:
1540:push to talk
1531:
1519:
1515:
1505:
1498:
1475:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1429:
1417:
1416:
1405:
1391:
1382:
1364:
1363:
1346:
1337:
1318:
1299:
1287:
1276:Juliancolton
1271:
1252:
1235:
1234:
1195:
1163:
1157:Juliancolton
1140:
1139:
1126:
1120:
1114:
1108:
1100:
1090:
1082:
1074:
1066:
1058:
1052:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1022:
1014:
1006:
998:
975:
968:
958:
957:
947:
937:
936:
924:a discussion
914:
908:
889:
887:
886:
877:
870:
859:
853:
843:
839:
834:
828:
818:
817:
808:
802:
793:
792:
768:
767:Yes thanks,
748:
730:
711:
709:
708:
699:
682:
673:
672:
655:
637:
624:
612:
516:
506:
497:
483:
464:
443:: Successful
431:: Successful
405:^demon 3 63%
387:
372:
371:
362:
345:
334:
316:
307:
306:
298:
280:
272:
266:
257:
253:
247:
239:
233:
226:
224:
185:
184:
166:
165:
149:
128:
113:
107:
101:
95:
89:
83:
77:
68:
57:
56:
46:
30:
28:
4707:Newyorkbrad
4296:RegentsPark
4182:AdjustShift
3705:Malinaccier
3688:Of course.
3600:Bencherlite
3424:Pastor Theo
3283:Certainly.
2778:Ottava Rima
2680:OhanaUnited
2292:Daniel Case
2210:āPreceding
2080:Master&
2007:Second Life
1027:target logs
411:Krimpet 67%
258:community's
93:protections
5252:Artichoker
5208:Artichoker
5179:Artichoker
4834:Of Course!
4808:to AD and
4627:Techman224
4375:. Cheers,
4257:Senseless!
4199:Malcolmxl5
3978:Agathoclea
3156:EdJohnston
2793:Why not? -
2751:Excellent
2721:Artichoker
2580:PhilKnight
2335:KnightLago
2178:Kingturtle
2174:Definitely
2009:. Cheers,
1786:Wartenberg
1642:Knowledge.
1263:Wartenberg
1150:Discussion
920:WikiVoices
573:Francs2000
520:Francs2000
366:consensus.
261:consensus.
105:pageĀ moves
53:Nomination
31:successful
5263:America69
5235:America69
5163:America69
5083:WP:PERNOM
4577:Dreadstar
4437:Modernist
3891:rootology
3725:WJBscribe
3561:Jauerback
3268:America69
3014:Yomangani
2902:faithless
2738:Wizardman
2662:South Bay
2613:DougsTech
2165:Skomorokh
2029:Acalamari
1588:Foxy Loxy
1451:excellent
1124:deletions
1087:checkuser
1035:block log
928:WJBscribe
687:Hipocrite
613:certainly
603:WJBscribe
585:Eloquence
540:WJBscribe
528:Eloquence
417:Danny 68%
323:at RFAs?
291:, and/or
99:deletions
5548:Category
5501:MuZemike
5107:A Nobody
5038:JayHenry
4982:JayHenry
4978:opposite
4935:contribs
4815:bbatsell
4597:Tiptoety
4369:See his
4281:xaosflux
4263:says you
4109:DerHexer
4077:Contribs
4072:MacInnis
4044:Cenarium
3920:iMatthew
3874:Cerejota
3639:Dravecky
3526:contribs
3514:unsigned
3310:Eusebeus
3233:american
3067:JayHenry
3027:JayHenry
2986:Support.
2855:contribs
2845:Casliber
2828:Euryalus
2511:Chequers
2260:Wisdom89
2224:contribs
2212:unsigned
1570:Seraphim
1503:Hermione
1481:Giants27
1329:firestar
1292:Kbdank71
1253:Hell Yes
1199:ĻĪ±dĪµstĪµr
1118:protects
1003:contribs
901:Chequers
796:lucasbfr
780:Chequers
723:Chequers
560:re-RFA'd
554:after a
552:resigned
546:after a
544:resigned
289:WP:B/RFA
227:optional
81:contribs
60:31 March
5509:Neutral
5496:Neutral
5479:Dweller
5468:Caspian
5463:Neutral
5416:Twinkle
5402:Neutral
5097:), and
4998:Majorly
4945:Support
4902:Support
4883:Support
4860:Support
4810:Huzzah!
4643:Support
4621:Support
4611:Caspian
4606:Support
4592:Support
4573:Support
4517:Support
4500:Support
4478:Support
4450:Support
4433:Support
4409:Support
4393:Toaster
4360:Toaster
4343:Sceptre
4311:Support
4292:Support
4276:Support
4267:says me
4252:Support
4229:Support
4212:Support
4195:Support
4180:- Yep!
4178:Support
4166:Support
4137:Majorly
4122:Support
4105:support
4087:Support
4040:Support
4014:Support
3991:Support
3974:support
3961:flaming
3938:Support
3915:- Duh.
3887:Support
3870:Support
3833:Support
3766:Support
3749:Support
3737:Support
3720:Support
3692:Spencer
3686:Support
3669:Support
3652:Support
3635:Support
3619:Marlith
3612:Support
3576:Support
3556:Support
3490:Support
3474:Support
3453:Support
3440:JoshuaZ
3437:support
3420:Support
3396:Support
3368:Support
3344:Support
3323:Support
3306:Support
3281:Support
3264:Support
3255:approve
3224:Support
3169:Support
3152:Support
3131:Support
3008:Support
2967:Support
2937:Support
2892:Support
2841:Support
2824:Support
2810:Support
2796:Fastily
2791:Support
2774:Support
2731:Support
2711:Support
2693:Support
2675:Support
2658:Support
2643:Support
2631:Caspian
2609:Support
2576:Support
2559:OUNTAIN
2544:Ditto.
2542:Support
2530:Sleeps
2520:Support
2496:Support
2453:Support
2420:Neskaya
2407:AniMate
2402:Support
2383:Support
2366:Support
2348:Support
2331:Support
2305:Support
2288:Support
2254:Support
2232:Support
2205:Support
2150:Dweller
2146:Support
2130:Support
2057:Support
1989:Deskana
1973:Majorly
1957:Toaster
1923:Toaster
1912:Support
1888:Support
1873:Majorly
1805:Useight
1801:Support
1709:Support
1681:Support
1657:Support
1584:Support
1549:Support
1532:Support
1522:MBisanz
1516:Support
1499:Support
1476:Support
1319:Support
1300:Support
1288:Support
1223:Support
556:dispute
548:dispute
379:MBisanz
350:Ipatrol
325:Ipatrol
310:iPatrol
5448:Iner22
5436:Avruch
5420:Iner22
5412:Huggle
5145:Oppose
4974:Oppose
4968:Oppose
4911:(talk)
4885:sure.
4867:hmwith
4508:(talk)
4483:Valley
4456:work.
4416:Frank
4388:Flying
4355:Flying
4338:Oppose
4318:(talk)
4234:Animum
4170:GT5162
4113:(Talk)
4069:Trevor
4003:{talk}
3964:lawyer
3942:Ruslik
3861:Keegan
3847:(talk)
3728:(talk)
3660:(talk)
3624:(Talk)
3494:Stifle
3286:Xymmax
3253:and I
2995:ndonic
2956:Riana
2815:Durova
2801:(talk)
2353:Thingg
2309:WP:CHU
2194:Avruch
2176:100%.
2084:Expert
1993:(talk)
1952:Flying
1918:Flying
1840:Daniel
1738:really
1627:GARDEN
1536:Dank55
1112:blocks
1105:rights
630:WP:AFD
591:Ugen64
538:, and
536:Ugen64
321:WP:NPA
293:WP:CHU
285:WP:RFA
144:NOTNOW
111:rights
87:blocks
5360:sound
5223:neuro
5194:neuro
5018:neuro
4907:Tavix
4888:Dferg
4791:neuro
4524:Ariel
4422:talk
4154:Coren
4126:Coren
4030:Space
3840:Maxim
3567:dude.
3465:vecia
3334:broil
3329:Royal
3229:young
3142:Cobra
3136:Glass
2871:fr33k
2626:ROTFL
2551:ITTLE
2526:Until
2507:Spiel
2136:Chris
2119:Chat
2113:Pedro
2061:Dureo
1938:neuro
1860:neuro
1768:neuro
1751:Chat
1745:Pedro
1667:drink
1611:sign!
1461:. --
1385:Ceran
1340:Ceran
1310:fisto
1305:Menti
1210:Ā«talk
1143:civil
1130:moves
1095:socks
1011:count
897:Spiel
776:Spiel
719:Spiel
644:Chat
638:Pedro
597:Danny
579:Optim
564:WP:BN
532:Danny
524:Optim
466:Andre
65:(UTC)
16:<
5517:talk
5483:talk
5470:blue
5452:talk
5424:talk
5414:and
5384:talk
5349:talk
5300:talk
5267:talk
5239:talk
5167:talk
5153:talk
5149:Ikip
5130:Talk
5033:more
5029:More
5004:talk
4928:anaɢ
4892:talk
4849:Talk
4711:talk
4613:blue
4560:Talk
4536:Gold
4490:city
4460:Banj
4454:more
4441:talk
4260:...
4241:talk
4220:talk
4203:talk
4186:talk
4143:talk
4095:talk
4048:talk
4025:From
4020:Them
3982:talk
3946:talk
3926:talk
3878:talk
3790:YES.
3757:talk
3709:talk
3677:talk
3643:talk
3522:talk
3498:talk
3460:enna
3444:talk
3428:talk
3411:talk
3314:talk
3272:talk
3249:I'm
3239:wtf?
3211:talk
3177:talk
3160:talk
3071:talk
3031:talk
2977:talk
2972:Cirt
2894:per
2849:talk
2832:talk
2782:talk
2697:Ched
2666:talk
2647:Step
2633:blue
2617:talk
2584:talk
2502:Ļ¢ere
2487:talk
2441:roux
2425:talk
2374:talk
2339:talk
2296:talk
2220:talk
2182:talk
2154:talk
2101:Dark
2090:Talk
2065:talk
2024:ever
2005:try
1979:talk
1879:talk
1844:talk
1809:talk
1781:Jake
1696:Ryan
1662:Lets
1648:talk
1603:load
1598:down
1586:Per
1557:Loxy
1554:Foxy
1507:1980
1467:talk
1455:sans
1438:ergy
1392:thor
1369:Talk
1347:thor
1326:2216
1258:Jake
1240:Talk
1050:rfas
1019:logs
996:talk
892:Ļ¢ere
871:14c.
854:14b.
829:14a.
771:Ļ¢ere
714:Ļ¢ere
691:talk
471:talk
354:talk
329:talk
142:and
140:SNOW
75:talk
63:2009
5085:),
5081:(a
5069:),
4955:|
4951:Tan
4843:oJo
4806:Yep
4554:oJo
4458:--
4059:VX!
3997:TKD
3930://
3923://
3818:620
3803:Dyl
3770:\ /
3751:--
3741:AGK
3405:027
3387:ame
2943:Ray
2881:-s-
2876:man
2699:~ /
2650:hen
2459:HĆŗs
2435:Duh
2393:004
2388:MBK
2370:Rje
2321:Why
1825:Ed
1672:Tea
1590:.
1463:Avi
1432:Syn
1411:Ged
1323:Res
1079:lta
1071:rfc
1063:arb
1056:rfb
969:17.
948:16.
909:15.
840:not
803:7a.
731:13.
683:12.
625:11.
569:A.
517:10.
117:RfA
5550::
5519:)
5485:)
5454:)
5426:)
5386:)
5351:)
5302:)
5269:)
5241:)
5220:ā
5191:ā
5169:)
5155:)
5118:.
5073:,
5044:)
5036:--
5015:ā
4988:)
4958:39
4947:.
4852:ā¢
4846:ā¢
4837:ā
4820:Āæ?
4788:ā
4713:)
4563:ā¢
4557:ā¢
4548:ā
4468:oi
4443:)
4419:|
4265:,
4222:)
4205:)
4188:)
4152:ā
4097:)
4050:)
3999:::
3995:ā
3984:)
3948:)
3906:)
3900:)(
3880:)
3776:)
3759:)
3679:)
3645:)
3578:ā
3547:gy
3539:Na
3528:)
3524:ā¢
3500:)
3446:)
3430:)
3413:)
3402:Jd
3384:fl
3379:or
3373:Ra
3357:24
3316:)
3274:)
3213:)
3179:)
3162:)
3073:)
3033:)
3025:--
2979:)
2909:()
2857:)
2834:)
2784:)
2767:)
2717:.
2713:.
2668:)
2619:)
2586:)
2528:It
2489:)
2469:nd
2376:)
2341:)
2316:So
2298:)
2275:/
2226:)
2222:ā¢
2184:)
2156:)
2116::
2093:)
2067:)
2059:-
1969:.
1935:ā
1857:ā
1846:)
1828:17
1811:)
1765:ā
1748::
1650:)
1542:)
1469:)
1418:UK
1255:ā
1202:16
1194:~
1043:lu
976:A.
915:A.
878:A:
860:A.
844:or
835:A.
809:A.
749:A.
700:A.
693:)
656:A.
652:7
641::
534:,
530:,
526:,
522:,
507:is
498:9.
484:8.
473:)
393:A.
388:7.
363:A.
356:)
346:6.
335:A.
331:)
317:5.
287:,
281:4.
267:3.
248:2.
234:1.
36:.
5515:(
5481:(
5450:(
5422:(
5382:(
5347:(
5325:5
5320:1
5298:(
5265:(
5237:(
5165:(
5151:(
5133:)
5127:(
5042:t
5040:(
4986:t
4984:(
4932:/
4926:ŹØ
4924:r
4894:)
4890:(
4872:Ļ
4841:J
4825:ā
4740:5
4735:1
4709:(
4582:ā
4552:J
4530:ā„
4486:2
4466:b
4462:e
4439:(
4303:)
4299:(
4244:)
4238:(
4218:(
4201:(
4184:(
4093:(
4079:)
4075:(
4046:(
3980:(
3944:(
3903:T
3897:C
3894:(
3876:(
3813:n
3808:@
3798:ā
3787:)
3783:(
3774:ā
3772:(
3755:(
3711:)
3707:(
3675:(
3641:(
3583:R
3564:/
3543:Ā·
3536:ā
3520:(
3496:(
3458:Ł
3442:(
3426:(
3409:(
3376:z
3352:/
3312:(
3270:(
3246:]
3241:)
3237:(
3209:(
3194:Ā·
3175:(
3158:(
3094:5
3089:1
3069:(
3054:5
3049:1
3029:(
2998:O
2992:A
2975:(
2958:ā
2852:Ā·
2847:(
2830:(
2780:(
2759:(
2702:Ā©
2664:(
2615:(
2582:(
2565:5
2557:M
2549:L
2485:(
2464:ƶ
2372:(
2337:(
2294:(
2280:)
2270:T
2265:(
2218:(
2180:(
2152:(
2087:(
2063:(
2040:X
1902:a
1900:c
1898:z
1896:a
1894:m
1842:(
1807:(
1726:5
1721:1
1646:(
1607:|
1594:-
1575:ā„
1538:(
1488:C
1484:/
1465:(
1372:)
1366:(
1243:)
1237:(
1164:Ā·
1145:.
1132:)
1127:Ā·
1121:Ā·
1115:Ā·
1109:Ā·
1101:Ā·
1091:Ā·
1083:Ā·
1075:Ā·
1067:Ā·
1059:Ā·
1053:Ā·
1047:Ā·
1039:Ā·
1031:Ā·
1023:Ā·
1015:Ā·
1007:Ā·
999:Ā·
994:(
963::
954:?
942::
823::
689:(
667:.
605::
599::
593::
587::
581::
575::
469:(
352:(
327:(
299:A
273:A
254:A
240:A
119:)
114:Ā·
108:Ā·
102:Ā·
96:Ā·
90:Ā·
84:Ā·
78:Ā·
73:(
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.