1501:
redirecting. But in this case, there has been plenty of discussion on the talk pages of the series in question and no basis for retention has been adduced for almost all the articles in question. This is a disruptive effort by a small and determined set of editors, steadfast in their conviction that
Knowledge policy can be trumped by the aggregation of committed interests and apparently blithe to the policies we have in place. That is shameful, given the clarity with which our policies indicate the standard that needs to be met. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. These actions are wholly legitimated by the standards we have collectively derived.
923:, I have included all the users who I found to be involved in these edit wars as parties to the case, without attempting to ascertain their degree of involvement or relative fault. Should this case be accepted, users with only incidental involvement obviously would not have any findings or remedies issued against them. Moreover, because I have not scrutinized the page history of every involved article, there may be some users with significant involvement in the edit wars who I have neglected to include, and who would need to be added to this case.
1364:
from a dedication to the project, I do not see anything in the way of contributing to the encyclopedia (though there was a little to start off with in 2006) and I find it hard to believe the motive is positive (i.e. benefit to
Knowledge) rather than from a negative reason (i.e. some form of massive vandalism). However, I am happy to wait for Arbcom and work collaboratively with all concerned in the future. cheers,
2171:
909:. Of course, the Arbitration Committee is not asked to resolve the underlying content dispute on its merits, or even to interpret the present state of community consensus regarding this issue. However, edit warring this severe presents clear user conduct issues that are amenable to resolution by the Arbitration Committee.
2237:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
2204:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
1813:
4) Knowledge users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute.
1793:
3) Editors who are collectively or individually making large numbers of similar edits, and are apprised that those edits are controversial or disputed, are expected to attempt to resolve the dispute through discussion. It is inappropriate to use repetition or volume in order to present opponents with
1634:
Accept to look at the conduct of all, and if possible, to provide some kind of basic perspective regarding the principles being disputed over. Not only follow-up of a previous case, but unlikely to be resolved by anything less, short of "blunt instrument" use of admin tools. It was hoped that general
1523:
Bringing this back to ArbCom would appear to be the only way of reining in the disruptive editing which is occurring (and is not limited to one "side"). Episode articles are a tricky breed - there is every opportunity available for them to be made into viable articles that meet policy, but it is all
2074:
2) The parties are instructed to cease engaging in editorial conflict and to work collaboratively to develop a generally accepted and applicable approach to the articles in question. They are warned that the
Committee will look very unfavorably on anyone attempting to further spread or inflame this
1697:
1) For the duration of this case, no editor shall redirect or delete any currently existing article regarding a television series episode or character; nor un-redirect or un-delete any currently redirected or deleted article on such a topic, nor apply or remove a tag related to notability to such an
1392:
Instead of a whole new case, I urge arbcom to just look at some of the proposed stuff from the last case, and re-evaluate that. However, even that might not be necessary, since those fighting with reverting are asking for a block. (I say this to both sides of the dispute). It no longer matters who's
1775:
2) The purpose of
Knowledge is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia, in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. While disagreements among editors are inevitable, all editors are expected to work calmly and reasonably towards resolving them, to collaborate
1351:
I agree with
Crotalus that part of the issue is where we draw the line at notability and essentially how much detail/depth wikipedia should go into. The great pity is that large swathes of material is deleted after there has only been a cursory, if any, look for independent sources. Sadly, much is
1137:
in any way, shape, or form. I request an explanation as to why I have been included in this second RfA and evidence that I have been involved in "massive edit warring" regarding episode articles, as I only did a single revert in the two articles mentioned as per some discussion over in ANI. I did
2058:
is prohibited for six months from making any edit to an article or project page related to a television episode or character that substantially amounts to a merge, redirect, deletion, or request for any of the preceding, to be interpreted broadly. He is free to contribute on the talk pages or to
1363:
of removing as much TV-related material as possible, and has become fixated upon it, whether rightly or wrongly. From the issues at AN/I and frequency of conflict I see an inability to interact constructively with others who do not share his (her?) point of view. If we are to presume this zeal is
1500:
episodes and subsequently reverted Pixel's ill-advised attempts to restore them (which has provoked the latest tempest) I'll offer a brief commentary. When consensus changes with respect to TV episodes requiring substantial real-world impact as a basis for standalone articles, I'll gladly desist
2245:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
2241:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
1484:
episode articles and then stopped removing them. I have been open to discuss my edits. No action was brought against me. I've never been accused before of edit-warring after performing one edit to several articles I've never edited before, and such a definition of "edit war" is news to me.
1330:
I should point out there have been other editors involved in several other debates over the past few months with different TV series, so that restricting this debate to these two series and these participants may not be helpful in the long run - in agrement with
Sceptre above. cheers,
1644:
I have felt this issue needed additional remedies for some time but I had hoped that it could be done through a motion in the existing case (which closed as recently as 28 December). Perhaps the easiest way would be to reopen that case, but the issue needs to be addressed.
1352:
not directly accessible online and requires actually having written material. In this way I feel WP can raise the standard of much pop. culture material that is circulated. Many editors are young who have never seen a university library and the wealth of material therein.
1877:
1) The dispute centers on the existence of articles regarding individual episodes and characters from television series, and is part of a broader disagreement regarding the interpretation of notability guidelines with reference to fictional and popular culture topics.
1402:
I was not involved in this specific set of articles, but as someone who said they'd watch for these situations to help avoid them, I'd like to be added as a party. Although, again, I urge arbcom to just add something onto the past case, instead of a whole new case. --
1257:. Though (as anyone would guess looking through my contribs) I am an inclusionist, I have abided by results of AfD debates. However, I noted this one had not been discussed at TTN had merged content and removed redlinks without any formal process, so I reverted
2138:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
789:
The parties are urged to work collaboratively and constructively with the broader community and the editors committed to working on the articles in question to develop and implement a generally acceptable approach to resolving the underlying content
2205:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
1574:. TTN has repeatly reveted in spite of this fact. Since it would appear that TTN is no longer even skim reading the articles they redirect I belive that they need to be prevented from such activities in order to facilitate a negotated settlement.
1420:
I'm really not surprised the issue of television episode articles is again before the committee, but I do not believe I have been involved in any edit wars over television episodes articles. On
January 13, 2008 I removed redirects from 96
1605:
It may be that, for each series/etc whose episode pages have been redirectified in this way, some sort of AfD-type discussion may need to be started to decide whether to restore its episode pages, after this discussion has come to a
1600:, and if I find football matter in a newspaper I skip over it, and if it comes on the television I switch off or switch over; but I know that it is important to many people and I do not delete it or redirect it out in Knowledge.
1393:
right or wrong. I know how TTN and others feel, and I know how frustrating it is, but we have to do something that tells others that we honestly are trying to help others understand, and not just doing things with force. --
1635:
encouragement to work together at a solution would help last time, but it seems it was insufficient. The consensus related norms which might have helped, seem to have gone unheeded. We can try to do better here, I think.
2200:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
2128:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the
Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
2059:
comment on any AfD, RfD, DRV, or similar discussion initiated by another editor, as appropriate. Should he violate this restriction, he may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below.
2238:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
2095:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
1723:
58:
2323:
He was unblocked after agreeing to avoid initiating discussions related to his restriction and to refrain from asking others to act on his behalf, until ArbCom may review his appeal for clarification.
1628:
42:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you are either 1) an
Arbitrator, 2) an Arbitration Clerk, or 3) adding yourself to this case. Statement on this page are originally comments provided at
1654:
1536:, which isn't. Other less notable TV series, however, have spawned numerous episode articles which are little more than plot summaries, and have little chance of being expanded past this state (
1686:
1672:
660:
54:
47:
1639:
1320:
1313:
2102:
2271:
Log any block, ban or extension under any remedy in this decision here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it.
2258:
1932:
1496:
I am indifferent as to whether this goes to arbitration again, although if it can offer fuirther elucidation it may be salutary. As the editor who initiated the recent redirects of
782:
1618:
714:
1216:
73:
1916:
3) Editors from all sides of the dispute have at times engaged in inappropriate behavior, including incivility, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, and edit-warring.
2336:
1117:
1086:
1006:
927:
1147:
2158:
1134:
1698:
article. Administrators are authorized to revert such changes on sight, and to block any editors that persist in making them after being warned of this injunction.
794:
Actually, however, the participants in this content dispute have choosen to settle the matter through massive edit warring -- for example, see the page histories of
2002:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1191:
1835:
1143:
282:
1407:
1397:
1596:" and similar. But cruftiness is often relative or a matter of opinion; one man's cruft may be another man's relevant matter. For example, I have no interest in
1428:
1510:
1379:
1346:
1164:
I've been involved in this get up. One revert, to me, does not count as "edit warring". If I'm listed here because I often side with TTN on occasions regarding
2315:
1236:
913:
1552:
would expend their time improving the articles to the standard of the one above, we wouldn't be here again. This is along the lines of the statement made by
1139:
1127:
920:
277:
1578:
1548:
the right decision. In my opinion if a number of editors who are spending large amounts of time attempting to wikilawyer their way round our policies
1324:
1798:
or to exhaust their ability to contest the change. This applies to many editors making a few edits each, as well as a few editors making many edits.
1463:
69:
1294:
should exist as such on wikipedia and whether there is a link to a larger article or not is irrelevant. I am concerned that what is happening is
325:
1760:. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.
2289:
1443:
1432:
858:
853:
888:
clearly indicates that these edit wars have affected a large number of articles, and have therefore become quite disruptive. For instance,
960:) to this request. Both of these users are clearly involved in the edit warring over the redirection of a large number of articles -- for
862:
2320:
TTN was blocked for two weeks violating his restrictions shortly after a previous block, notably requesting a redirect on a project page.
1111:
2147:
897:
845:
1567:
1080:
582:
294:
1265:
813:
808:
817:
624:
246:
57:. That page may also be used for general comments on the evidence. Arbitrators will then vote on a final decision in the case at
2151:
1757:
1583:
534:
486:
2266:
1549:
1752:, and for helping the debate move to better approaches by discussing their differences rationally. Edit-warring, whether by
800:
636:
438:
342:
150:
1571:
2354:
1299:
738:
654:
642:
390:
1230:
This is a case that needs to be examined more in more detail. The previous RfAr did nothing at all to stop the edit wars.
1748:, rather than through disruptive editing. Editors are each responsible for noticing when a debate is escalating into an
1103:
630:
1298:
to bypass AfD and avoid analysis over removal of material. It is certainly inconsistent with recent policy on AfD. Even
1022:
1030:
998:
977:
867:
648:
576:
288:
17:
1776:
in good faith, and to compromise where appropriate—even if they believe that their viewpoint is the only correct one.
1355:
Finally, I should add that the above is complicated by the fact that TTN is showing behaviour consistent with being a
1062:
901:
2292:
1125:
907:
198:
1460:
1442:
leave a message on my talk page asking me to stop before he initiated that ANI thread. Four minutes after initiating
1058:
996:
975:
2029:
1957:
1356:
1211:
1186:
1050:
903:
893:
678:
240:
102:
46:
and serve as opening statements. As such, they should not be altered. All further changes to comments should go on
988:
967:
879:
822:
2222:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
1152:
1138:
not repeat the revert and didn't even put the page in my watch list. So please provide evidence specific to me.
1072:
1048:
957:
528:
480:
1282:
1042:
986:
965:
2193:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
1756:
or otherwise, is prohibited; this is so even when the disputed content is clearly problematic, with only a few
1384:
1375:
1342:
1275:
1268:
1258:
1107:
1097:
1052:
1046:
943:
849:
690:
432:
336:
144:
2326:
2324:
2321:
1198:
1066:
2069:
1894:
1815:
1623:
1488:
1241:
994:
973:
905:
834:
732:
708:
696:
384:
2090:
1470:
said "Pixelface is reverting all of TTN's edits." and that is patently false. I was removing redirects from
1076:
606:
318:
1745:
1677:
Accept to look at editor conduct issues that are preventing collaborative, consensus building discussions.
1477:
1286:
The rationale used is that it is a redirect not a delete, yet the material on the episode pages is deleted
1222:
1105:
1099:
1056:
1000:
979:
773:
684:
1036:
1016:
990:
969:
594:
306:
270:
1839:
1823:
1614:
1295:
1078:
1074:
1044:
1034:
1028:
1026:
895:
702:
618:
558:
510:
2197:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
2110:
1692:
1064:
1024:
899:
875:
462:
366:
258:
174:
2162:
1986:
has not "worked collaboratively and constructively with the broader community" as he was urged to do.
1109:
1070:
1040:
1038:
1032:
1020:
762:
600:
546:
498:
414:
312:
192:
53:
Arbitrators, the parties, and other editors may suggest proposed principles, findings, and remedies at
1101:
1068:
1054:
992:
971:
450:
354:
162:
2285:
2023:
1951:
1744:. This is done through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and
1559:
1060:
1018:
885:
841:
804:
750:
402:
96:
1541:
1476:
episode articles because there appeared to me to be no consensus for those articles be redirects on
1264:. Another contributor BlackKite, whose views lie more with the TTN than mine I'd guess has conceded
871:
222:
2053:
1981:
830:
588:
300:
264:
126:
1253:
began a few hours ago when I noted the rollback of individual episodes of a famous
British sitcom
1015:
continued unabated in his edit warring over the redirection of television episode articles -- see
210:
2041:
1969:
1650:
1360:
552:
504:
114:
1893:
2) The body of precedent and convention regarding the matter under dispute is unclear, with the
1716:
1610:
1585:
826:
613:
570:
456:
360:
252:
168:
1537:
756:
540:
492:
408:
1898:
1872:
1831:
1711:: Injunction ceases to be in effect, due to closure of case, at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1207:
1182:
796:
672:
444:
348:
234:
156:
2186:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
1445:
that ANI thread and after I had removed 96 redirects, on January 13, 2008 at 22:22 (UTC),
8:
1867:
1753:
1741:
1453:
1309:
All I asked for was that the material be discussed at AfD to obtain a broader consensus.
951:
744:
522:
474:
396:
1515:
2332:
1926:
1888:
1827:
1819:
1749:
1735:
1682:
1669:
1646:
1525:
1506:
1497:
1472:
1467:
1446:
1435:
1423:
1369:
1336:
937:
426:
330:
216:
138:
68:
as needed, but this page should not be edited otherwise. Please raise any questions at
1412:
2047:
1975:
1911:
1857:
5) All editors are expected to comply with the rulings of the Arbitration Committee.
1165:
726:
565:
378:
120:
2308:
1096:
engaged in even more edit warring over the redirection of articles recently -- see
204:
1267:
that these episodes are likely to have sources. Upon which I was reverted by TTN,
2035:
1963:
1517:
1271:
1202:
1177:
1154:
667:
229:
108:
2288:) blocked one week for editing articles in violation of these restrictions. See
2085:
2006:
1786:
1553:
1414:
1404:
1394:
1386:
1306:
and other such material gets a few days then why the need to remove instantly?
1303:
1254:
982:
947:
517:
469:
186:
43:
2348:
2328:
2279:
2017:
1945:
1730:
1678:
1660:
1502:
1490:
1365:
1332:
1278:
1261:
1243:
961:
933:
421:
133:
90:
1232:
1224:
1172:, then I suggest that you, John254, remove me from this nonsense. Bear you
1169:
1114:
1083:
1003:
924:
910:
775:
721:
373:
2228:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
79:
2297:
2190:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
1996:
1852:
783:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Episodes_and_characters#Parties_urged
1529:
2143:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
1288:(and no attempt was made to move any material over to the parent page)
892:
re-redirected 8 articles in a single minute on 20:40, 13 January 2008
1770:
1575:
1561:
1533:
181:
2161:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
1316:
at the last hearing, however I have not seen that happening today.
2275:
2012:
1940:
1808:
1636:
1597:
1093:
1012:
889:
85:
1524:
too easy to create stubs which are plot summary and little else.
2259:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
1480:. After the ANI thread began, I removed 3 more redirects from
1593:
1300:
Knowledge:N#Articles_not_satisfying_the_notability_guidelines
74:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement
70:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration#Requests for clarification
2261:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
2105:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
1544:). In these situations redirecting to a summary page is
1302:
suggests some sort of time frame rather than minutes. If
1176:
sufficient evidence in my part in this so-called "ploy"?
1323:, there has been criticism over the speed it came after
1629:
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (4/0/0/0)
1462:
and informed me there was currently a discussion at
1011:Even after this request for arbitration was filed,
1570:edit summery by TTN dirrectly conflicts with the
2346:
2103:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
1528:is a good example of this - for example compare
64:Once the case is closed, editors may add to the
1464:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1703:Passed 4 to 0 at 02:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC).
1921:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1906:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1883:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1862:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1847:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1803:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1781:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1765:Passed 10 to 0 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1727:(vote counts and comments are there as well)
2225:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
2080:Passed 9 to 1 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
2064:Passed 9 to 1 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1991:Passed 9 to 1 at 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
1592:Much of the stated cause is about "removing
1901:tending towards a contradictory viewpoint.
65:
1260:and recommended that this be taken up at
1427:episode articles and then discovered an
2163:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
72:, and report violations of remedies at
14:
2347:
2242:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
2165:(or, if email access is revoked, to
1434:against me. It should be noted that
2148:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
23:
2157:submit a request for amendment at
1897:being applied inconsistently, and
1532:- a perfectly good article - with
1290:. AfD is about debating whether a
24:
18:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration
2366:
2215:For a request to succeed, either
2169:
919:With regard to the statement by
2182:Modifications by administrators
1740:1) Knowledge works by building
30:on 21:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
13:
1:
2134:Appeals by sanctioned editors
2070:Parties instructed and warned
38:on 23:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
2120:0) Appeals and modifications
1687:21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1673:20:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1655:10:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1640:13:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1619:14:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
1579:20:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1556:above, with which I concur.
1511:05:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1478:Talk:List of Scrubs episodes
1408:01:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1398:08:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1380:01:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1347:03:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1237:03:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1217:05:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1192:03:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1148:02:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1118:03:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1087:21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
1007:04:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
928:02:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
914:02:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
7:
2355:Knowledge arbitration cases
2246:discussed at another venue.
2152:administrators’ noticeboard
2091:Enforcement of restrictions
1814:Unseemly conduct, such as
785:, this Committee found that
10:
2371:
2316:11:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
1135:Episode and Characters RfA
1133:I was not involved in the
2170:
2111:Appeals and modifications
886:Special:Contributions/TTN
842:The Man Who Killed Batman
2337:15:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1899:old historical precedent
1824:assumptions of bad faith
1251:this particular standoff
1160:I'd like to know myself
2257:In accordance with the
2236:
2101:In accordance with the
1935:Episodes and characters
1933:ruling in the original
1895:major current guideline
1836:disruptive point-making
1722:All numbering based on
1281:on one of the episodes
66:#Log of blocks and bans
2267:Log of blocks and bans
2146:request review at the
1572:content of the article
1357:Single-purpose account
1312:I note TTN has voiced
792:
1624:Preliminary decisions
787:
1693:Temporary injunction
797:A Mattress on Wheels
1550:(here, for example)
44:arbitration request
1746:dispute resolution
1724:/Proposed decision
1431:had been initiated
1292:particular article
1249:My involvement in
59:/Proposed decision
2252:
2251:
2150:("AE") or at the
1842:, is prohibited.
1840:gaming the system
1736:Editorial process
1671:
1611:Anthony Appleyard
1586:Anthony Appleyard
1296:Gaming the system
1215:
1197:I reiterate, see
1190:
614:Anthony Appleyard
2362:
2314:
2311:
2305:
2176:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2116:
2115:
2057:
2030:deleted contribs
1985:
1958:deleted contribs
1873:Locus of dispute
1868:Findings of fact
1816:personal attacks
1668:
1665:
1664:
1458:
1452:
1205:
1180:
883:
865:
838:
820:
766:
739:deleted contribs
718:
664:
610:
583:deleted contribs
562:
535:deleted contribs
514:
487:deleted contribs
466:
439:deleted contribs
418:
391:deleted contribs
370:
343:deleted contribs
322:
295:deleted contribs
274:
247:deleted contribs
226:
199:deleted contribs
178:
151:deleted contribs
130:
103:deleted contribs
80:Involved parties
2370:
2369:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2345:
2344:
2309:
2298:
2295:
2269:
2253:
2209:Important notes
2168:
2166:
2121:
2113:
2093:
2088:
2072:
2015:
2009:
1999:
1943:
1929:
1914:
1891:
1875:
1870:
1855:
1811:
1791:
1773:
1738:
1733:
1719:
1695:
1662:
1661:
1631:
1626:
1589:
1565:
1521:
1494:
1459:on my talk page
1456:
1450:
1418:
1390:
1272:User:Sesshomaru
1247:
1228:
1203:Lord Sesshomaru
1178:Lord Sesshomaru
1158:
1131:
884:. A review of
856:
840:
811:
795:
779:
724:
670:
616:
568:
520:
472:
424:
376:
328:
280:
232:
184:
136:
88:
82:
39:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2368:
2358:
2357:
2342:
2340:
2339:
2318:
2268:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2226:
2223:
2217:
2216:
2195:
2194:
2191:
2184:
2183:
2179:
2178:
2155:
2144:
2136:
2135:
2123:
2122:
2119:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2071:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2008:
2007:TTN restricted
2005:
1998:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1928:
1927:Non-compliance
1925:
1924:
1923:
1913:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1890:
1889:Unclear status
1887:
1886:
1885:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1854:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1790:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1718:
1717:Final decision
1715:
1714:
1713:
1705:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1675:
1657:
1642:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1608:
1607:
1602:
1601:
1588:
1582:
1564:
1558:
1520:
1514:
1493:
1487:
1466:involving me.
1417:
1411:
1389:
1383:
1255:Open All Hours
1246:
1240:
1227:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1157:
1151:
1130:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1091:
1090:
1089:
778:
772:
771:
770:
768:(filing party)
719:
665:
611:
563:
515:
467:
419:
371:
323:
275:
227:
179:
131:
81:
78:
34:
26:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2367:
2356:
2353:
2352:
2350:
2343:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2327:
2325:
2322:
2319:
2317:
2312:
2306:
2304:
2302:
2293:
2290:
2287:
2284:
2281:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2262:
2260:
2255:
2254:
2244:
2240:
2234:
2233:
2227:
2224:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2192:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2181:
2180:
2175:wikimedia.org
2164:
2160:
2156:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2125:
2124:
2118:
2117:
2106:
2104:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2081:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2065:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2055:
2052:
2049:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2037:
2034:
2031:
2028:
2025:
2022:
2019:
2014:
2004:
2003:
1992:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1980:
1977:
1974:
1971:
1968:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1947:
1942:
1938:
1936:
1931:4) Since the
1922:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1912:Poor behavior
1907:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1900:
1896:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1863:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1848:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1797:
1796:fait accompli
1789:
1788:Fait accompli
1782:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1766:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1728:
1726:
1725:
1712:
1710:
1706:
1704:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1647:Sam Blacketer
1643:
1641:
1638:
1633:
1632:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1587:
1584:Statement by
1581:
1580:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1563:
1560:Statement by
1557:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1546:without doubt
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1519:
1516:Statement by
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1499:
1492:
1489:Statement by
1486:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1469:
1468:Corvus cornix
1465:
1461:
1455:
1448:
1447:Corvus cornix
1444:
1441:
1437:
1436:Corvus cornix
1433:
1430:
1426:
1425:
1416:
1413:Statement by
1410:
1409:
1406:
1400:
1399:
1396:
1388:
1385:Statement by
1382:
1381:
1377:
1374:
1371:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1315:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1279:User:Eusebeus
1276:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1259:
1256:
1252:
1245:
1242:Statement by
1239:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1226:
1223:Statement by
1218:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1188:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1153:Statement by
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1129:
1126:Statement by
1119:
1116:
1112:
1110:
1108:
1106:
1104:
1102:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1079:
1077:
1075:
1073:
1071:
1069:
1067:
1065:
1063:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1055:
1053:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1045:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1037:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1029:
1027:
1025:
1023:
1021:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1001:
999:
997:
995:
993:
991:
989:
987:
984:
980:
978:
976:
974:
972:
970:
968:
966:
963:
959:
956:
953:
949:
945:
942:
939:
935:
932:I have added
931:
930:
929:
926:
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
912:
908:
906:
904:
902:
900:
898:
896:
894:
891:
887:
881:
877:
873:
869:
864:
860:
855:
851:
847:
843:
836:
832:
828:
824:
819:
815:
810:
806:
802:
798:
791:
786:
784:
777:
774:Statement by
769:
764:
761:
758:
755:
752:
749:
746:
743:
740:
737:
734:
731:
728:
723:
720:
716:
713:
710:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
674:
669:
666:
662:
659:
656:
653:
650:
647:
644:
641:
638:
635:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
615:
612:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
593:
590:
587:
584:
581:
578:
575:
572:
567:
564:
560:
557:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
519:
516:
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
494:
491:
488:
485:
482:
479:
476:
471:
468:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
423:
420:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
375:
372:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
327:
324:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
279:
276:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:
231:
228:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
183:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
135:
132:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
87:
84:
83:
77:
75:
71:
67:
62:
60:
56:
51:
49:
45:
40:
37:
32:
29:
19:
2341:
2300:
2299:
2282:
2270:
2256:
2208:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2196:
2185:
2137:
2127:
2126:
2100:
2094:
2079:
2073:
2063:
2050:
2044:
2038:
2032:
2026:
2020:
2010:
2001:
2000:
1990:
1978:
1972:
1966:
1960:
1954:
1948:
1934:
1930:
1920:
1915:
1905:
1892:
1882:
1876:
1861:
1856:
1846:
1812:
1802:
1795:
1792:
1787:
1780:
1774:
1764:
1739:
1721:
1720:
1708:
1707:
1702:
1696:
1609:
1566:
1545:
1522:
1495:
1481:
1471:
1439:
1422:
1419:
1401:
1391:
1372:
1354:
1350:
1339:
1329:
1318:
1314:this opinion
1311:
1308:
1291:
1287:
1285:
1250:
1248:
1231:
1229:
1173:
1161:
1159:
1140:Collectonian
1132:
1128:Collectonian
954:
940:
921:Collectonian
793:
788:
780:
767:
759:
753:
747:
741:
735:
729:
711:
705:
699:
693:
687:
681:
675:
657:
651:
645:
639:
633:
627:
621:
603:
597:
591:
585:
579:
573:
566:Tim Q. Wells
555:
549:
543:
537:
531:
525:
507:
501:
495:
489:
483:
477:
459:
453:
447:
441:
435:
429:
411:
405:
399:
393:
387:
381:
363:
357:
351:
345:
339:
333:
315:
309:
303:
297:
291:
285:
278:Collectonian
267:
261:
255:
249:
243:
237:
219:
213:
207:
201:
195:
189:
171:
165:
159:
153:
147:
141:
123:
117:
111:
105:
99:
93:
63:
52:
41:
35:
33:
27:
25:
2154:("AN"); and
2086:Enforcement
1659:Accept. --
1321:this debate
1199:explanation
691:protections
637:protections
36:Case Closed
28:Case Opened
2129:Committee.
2048:block user
2042:filter log
1976:block user
1970:filter log
1853:Compliance
1832:harassment
1820:incivility
1758:exceptions
1731:Principles
1530:My Musical
1518:Black Kite
1454:ANI-notice
1429:ANI thread
1319:I note in
1166:WP:EPISODE
1155:Sesshomaru
981:, and for
757:block user
751:filter log
703:page moves
668:Black Kite
649:page moves
601:block user
595:filter log
553:block user
547:filter log
505:block user
499:filter log
457:block user
451:filter log
409:block user
403:filter log
361:block user
355:filter log
313:block user
307:filter log
265:block user
259:filter log
230:Sesshomaru
217:block user
211:filter log
169:block user
163:filter log
121:block user
115:filter log
2167:arbcom-en
2075:dispute.
2054:block log
1982:block log
1754:reversion
1742:consensus
1554:SirFozzie
1534:My Mentor
1415:Pixelface
1405:Ned Scott
1395:Ned Scott
1387:Ned Scott
1359:with the
983:Pixelface
948:Pixelface
763:block log
697:deletions
643:deletions
607:block log
559:block log
518:Ned Scott
511:block log
470:Pixelface
463:block log
415:block log
367:block log
319:block log
271:block log
223:block log
175:block log
127:block log
55:/Workshop
50:subpage.
48:/Evidence
2349:Category
2329:Vassyana
2286:contribs
2024:contribs
1997:Remedies
1952:contribs
1828:trolling
1771:Struggle
1750:edit war
1679:FloNight
1663:FayssalF
1606:verdict.
1598:football
1503:Eusebeus
1491:Eusebeus
1376:contribs
1366:Casliber
1343:contribs
1333:Casliber
1325:this one
1244:Casliber
962:Eusebeus
958:contribs
944:contribs
934:Eusebeus
790:dispute.
733:contribs
679:contribs
625:contribs
577:contribs
529:contribs
481:contribs
433:contribs
422:Eusebeus
385:contribs
337:contribs
326:Roses2at
289:contribs
241:contribs
193:contribs
145:contribs
134:Casliber
97:contribs
1809:Decorum
1542:another
1538:example
1449:left a
1270:, then
1225:Sceptre
1115:John254
1084:John254
1004:John254
925:John254
911:John254
859:protect
854:history
814:protect
809:history
776:John254
722:John254
374:Sceptre
2159:"ARCA"
1838:, and
1526:Scrubs
1498:Scrubs
1482:Scrubs
1473:Scrubs
1424:Scrubs
1361:agenda
1304:hoaxes
964:, see
946:) and
863:delete
818:delete
709:rights
685:blocks
655:rights
631:blocks
2303:levse
1594:cruft
1212:edits
1187:edits
1170:WP:NN
880:views
872:watch
868:links
835:views
827:watch
823:links
16:<
2333:talk
2310:Talk
2291:and
2280:talk
2036:logs
2018:talk
1964:logs
1946:talk
1937:case
1709:Note
1683:talk
1651:talk
1615:talk
1576:Geni
1568:this
1562:Geni
1507:talk
1438:did
1370:talk
1337:talk
1277:and
1274:,
1233:Will
1208:talk
1183:talk
1168:and
1144:talk
985:see
952:talk
938:talk
876:logs
850:talk
846:edit
839:and
831:logs
805:talk
801:edit
745:logs
727:talk
673:talk
619:talk
589:logs
571:talk
541:logs
523:talk
493:logs
475:talk
445:logs
427:talk
397:logs
379:talk
349:logs
331:talk
301:logs
283:talk
253:logs
235:talk
205:logs
187:talk
182:Geni
157:logs
139:talk
109:logs
91:talk
2276:TTN
2013:TTN
2011:1)
1941:TTN
1637:FT2
1440:not
1327:.
1262:AfD
1174:any
1162:how
1094:TTN
1013:TTN
890:TTN
781:In
715:RfA
661:RfA
86:TTN
61:.
2351::
2335:)
2313:•
2307:•
2296:—
2294:.
2211::
2177:).
1939:,
1834:,
1830:,
1826:,
1822:,
1818:,
1794:a
1685:)
1667:-
1653:)
1617:)
1540:,
1509:)
1457:}}
1451:{{
1378:)
1345:)
1210:•
1185:•
1146:)
1113:.
1082:.
1002:.
878:|
874:|
870:|
866:|
861:|
857:|
852:|
848:|
833:|
829:|
825:|
821:|
816:|
812:|
807:|
803:|
76:.
2331:(
2301:R
2283:·
2278:(
2056:)
2051:·
2045:·
2039:·
2033:·
2027:·
2021:·
2016:(
1984:)
1979:·
1973:·
1967:·
1961:·
1955:·
1949:·
1944:(
1681:(
1649:(
1613:(
1505:(
1373:·
1368:(
1340:·
1335:(
1214:)
1206:(
1201:.
1189:)
1181:(
1142:(
955:·
950:(
941:·
936:(
882:)
844:(
837:)
799:(
765:)
760:·
754:·
748:·
742:·
736:·
730:·
725:(
717:)
712:·
706:·
700:·
694:·
688:·
682:·
676:·
671:(
663:)
658:·
652:·
646:·
640:·
634:·
628:·
622:·
617:(
609:)
604:·
598:·
592:·
586:·
580:·
574:·
569:(
561:)
556:·
550:·
544:·
538:·
532:·
526:·
521:(
513:)
508:·
502:·
496:·
490:·
484:·
478:·
473:(
465:)
460:·
454:·
448:·
442:·
436:·
430:·
425:(
417:)
412:·
406:·
400:·
394:·
388:·
382:·
377:(
369:)
364:·
358:·
352:·
346:·
340:·
334:·
329:(
321:)
316:·
310:·
304:·
298:·
292:·
286:·
281:(
273:)
268:·
262:·
256:·
250:·
244:·
238:·
233:(
225:)
220:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
185:(
177:)
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:)
124:·
118:·
112:·
106:·
100:·
94:·
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.