Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Ibaranoff24

3018:- but they aren't just for you. They are a courtesy for other users. So we don't have to delve into each of your contribs to see what you've done. Ironically, blank edit summaries make it especially difficult to evaluate a candidate for adminship. I for one would feel better if you pledged above (under my nom) that you will fill in edit summaries from now on, and then started doing so immediately. Admins especially, are expected to fill them in. One of the main things candidates are judged on at RfAs is admin-like behavior. That includes participation in and closing XfDs, reverting and reporting vandalism, resolving disputes and maintaining composure at all times, filling in edit summaries, etc. And everything you do at your RfA - you are being critiqued as if you were already an acting admin. RfA's are kind of a test, complete with a trap or two, because if you accept the nomination (and it is transcluded) before you've answered the questions, you may be opposed for not answering them. That type of thing should really be explained in the nomination instructions, but even so an admin already knows this stuff, and so some may assume that if you are ready for adminship, you should know this stuff too. People can change their votes, and might do so if you convince them in your answers to the optional questions above that you understand Knowledge and know what it takes to be an admin. Good luck. 2298:

such people are few and far between. Power cannot be restricted to those who do not desire it (as many are wholly unsuited to it), so we must accept that some people will seek power and receive it. In the real world, we hold this in check via democracy and constitutionalism; no individual, however noble his intentions, may accumulate too much personal power. On Knowledge, exactly the same principle applies. Not everyone wants to be an admin, and some people, even long-term editors, are not suited to the responsibility of adminship. It would be ideal if all admins were like Cincinnatus, and reluctantly accepted power which was thrust upon them; however, we are a volunteer project and the supply of such people is not endless. So we must accept that some people will seek the "power" of adminship and will receive it; and we must hold this process in check, not by rejecting all self-noms, but by ensuring that the power wielded by admins is limited (as indeed it is) and that admins are held to account by the community (which is the area in which, IMO, we need to improve).

119:

and featured article candidates departments and has had plenty of exposure to Knowledge's content policies and quality standards. He has improved steadily in how he handles others since he started editing here, and his past six months of contribs show that he gets along with others well. I believe he would not abuse the admin tools, and feel confident that we can trust him with them. He stated what he would use them for (in answer to question #1), and I think that's a good idea. Knowledge could use additional competent editors on its protected pages and with page moving. I'm sure he'll expand his use of the tools beyond those activities carefully. The only reservation I have is that he has filled in only about half his edit summaries. Edit summaries help others understand what you are doing more easily, and are pretty important (admins need to set a good example for others to follow). But if Ibaranoff24 were to pledge that he will fill-in edit summaries from now on, I would take his word for it.

1511:- Initially, I was leaning towards oppose due to some of the lack of detail in the candidate's answers above, and concerns below, but at the same time, I see a lot of potential to be a fantastic administratior. True, not all good editors make good sysops, but 15,000 edits over 2 years and the fact that he has 5 featured article nominations makes me believe that he will truly work to improve our encyclopedia from a content standpoint, which is just as important (if not moreso) than maintainence, vandal fighting, and whatnot (and I'm sure with time he might gain some understanding in these areas.) 1407:- Ibaranoff24 has a specific need for the tools - doing occasional administrative tasks as he encounters them whilst editing. I acknowledge, as many of those who oppose have acknowledged, that he is lacking in experience with some areas of encyclopaedia administration, but I think that he will be able to learn as he goes, I do not think that he will abuse the tools, and I do not think that he will go rouge. I thus support Ibaranoff24's request for adminship. -- 2294:

rationale and judge it, and if they believe it to be a meritorious argument, it will influence their vote; if they believe it to be specious, then it will not influence their vote. This is part of how a democratic process works; different arguments are presented to the electorate, who then weigh up the arguments and vote according to their individual judgment.

3194:: Outside of the edit summary issue, which is quite important to other editors, there are not as many WP-namespace edits as I would like to see. Most are related to GA, FA or AFD nominations, whereas an admin needs variety throughout preferably. The edits you have made thus far are not overly negative but I don't think that you are prepped yet for adminship. 1420:

already proven himself a good Wikipedian, chastising him for not using edit summaries enough or not citing a source for everything he writes is all very well but many people make it as admins who barely write articles or add anything which needs a source at all. That said Transhumanist is right and he should pledge to use edit summaries in the future.

2660:: Changed from neutral. The answers you provided were very weak and vague at best, and some of your attitudes concern me. With answers to the edit summary issue being, "...I see it as a bit of a chore..." and generalizations to administrator issues, I don't see a pressing need for the RFA to pass at the moment. Not without some serious improvements. 3101:

enough knowledge of policy and guidelines just yet. If you dazzle me with the answers to the optional questions, I may still switch to support, though I don't think it would be bad for you to postpone the request for the tools for a while, untill you are a little deeper entreched in the Knowledge community.

2293:

Ah, the perennial debate - I think I'll take this opportunity to give my thoughts on the issue. First of all, Mr Weber is entitled to vote however he wishes on an RfA, provided that he is acting in good faith and can back up his opinion with a rationale, which he has done. Other editors will read his

2258:

Quite. He's got his knee-jerk universal response, which takes all of four seconds of thought for each candidate, and that's the way it goes. Possibly someone could explain to me what makes this more objectionable than anyone else's four second flat, knee-jerk hobby horse (not enough edit summaries!

1528:

I don't place too much stock in evaluating RfAs based on edit summary usage or brevity in answers to questions. You are clearly an experienced and knowledgeable editor. The only question we really need to ask at RfA is whether giving you the tools is going to help or hurt the project, and I think the

1419:

Iamunknown sums it up for me, we have lots of admins who know all about twinkle but how many have worked properly to produce featured articles? We need admins with a range of skills, we can't expect everyone to know everything. I'm sure he'd work on what he knows and learn more as he needs to. He's

118:

I'm sorry I spotted this self-nomination only after a negative (5) and neutral (4) pile-on had already begun. I second the nomination. Please consider me Ibaranoff24's nominator. I've gone over his contributions carefully, and I'm impressed. He's had a great deal of experience in the good articles

2314:

Sampling the nom's contributions to the mainspace, I do not find enough sourcing of the information put forward - much of the editing appears to be based on personal knowledge of the subjects. If I missed consistent sourcing by the nom, please provide us with a handful, or two handfuls, of articles

2766:

While the questions are optional, if you're going to give one-liner answers you need to sell yourself in the essay. While there's nothing in your edit history I can see to oppose on, the combination of the lack of answers and the edit summary usage don't give me enough to support on. If you expand

1903:

in your edit summary. I feel that those things are necessary to become an admin, and not so much the article writing (that's merely my opinion though). Lastly, a small detail, but an important one nonetheless, I feel that your edit summary usage is way too low. All users should explain the reasons

1747:

because he answered all the questions with a level head. I think it was inappropriate for TTH to pose so many questions (Even given the limited earlier responses - a talk page post should've sufficed, and TTH did that as well) but I'm pleased to see that TTH is contacting neutral voters and asking

1587:

I support Ibaranoff24. I think he will not abuse the tools. Here, we have some smart admins who abuse their power. For example, I have seen admins blocking established users in the name of the 3RR. Even a established user who is about 1-2 month old, may not know about 3RR. In fact, I realized that

1451:

No, I don't think that was what Nick was trying to say. While, in a perfect world, all admins would be perfect in all areas, the fact is that we are a volunteer project. Different admins work in different areas, and you can't expect everyone to have vast experience in every area of potential admin

624:

A POV pusher, someone who keeps changing an article to express his particular viewpoint, keeps coming back to a page and editing it in different ways to favor his stance even though the consensus has perpetually been against him. He's careful not to violate 3RR, but he never gives up. What would

3058:

do just fine as an administrator. However he likely needs a little polishing to pass muster here. Could I suggest you take a month or two, delve deeply into the Administrator functions; begin to use edit summaries always and monitor AfD to learn the usual conventions here. I'd be happy to support

2297:

However, the argument itself (regarding self-noms), although backed up with sound reasoning, is essentially wrong IMO. Yes, in an ideal world, positions of power would be filled only by those who did not seek power, but accepted it for the good of the community. However, the real world shows that

1767:

Certainly an original approach to answering the questions, but he was right every time. a longer essays wouldnt have said it any better. TTH was right to ask the questions, of course, and I would have said support without it. if this should fail, just try again a little later. We need admins like

3100:

I see some good edits, but for me to support, I prefer to see an edit summary usage of 100% on major edits. I would also be more convinced if there were more edits to administrative areas. I see a good job on requested moves, and the moves in general. You don't however, convince me that you have

1833:. I see absolutely no evidence in his contributions that he'd be in any way problematic. Actually a little bit disappointed in the opposes (and not just Kurt and Malleus). Yeah, look at his answers to the questions, but look at his contributions to the project too. Maybe even ask yourself if 187:

My main reason for applying here is that I've found myself at ends with attempting to make needed edits when I do not have the ability to do so - for instance, fixing major errors on protected templates, or moving articles to their correct names when that article name is already being used as a

2501:

be a need to communicate, especially to people who don't understand or who disagree with whatever action taken, no matter how uncontroversial). And the block for edit warring is also a (minor) concern. Granted, it was over six months ago, which is what makes it minor to me, but it amplifies my

1336:. I believe that this candidate is more than qualified and that the precision work he or she is used to in Featured Article work - which the candidate has extensive experience in - ensures that the candidate can be trusted to stay within the areas they state they will specialize in. 84:) - I won't pretend to be the most qualified candidate for adminship, but I'm a fairly good editor, I've been on here for two years and have made over 15000 edits, if that's any importance. I've also been commended for my "valued contibutions to the Films WikiProject". 2866:, not the most convincing answers to the questions, and as above, weak edit summary usage. Admins need to be able to communicate well, and I'm not sure you can do that. I second the suggestion of finding a coach, because otherwise you seem a pretty solid editor. 3118:

User appears to be afraid of any major communication, as shown in usage of edit summaries and just in the question responses (or lack thereof). The quality of edits is not particularly negative, but the lack of communication pushes this into a neutral vote.

3137:

I appreciate TTH's dedication to making sure the vote is conducted properly, and I respect his additional questions and talk page messages to notify those of the update. Regardless, my vote stands. For whatever reason, I just can't seem to get around it.

2594:, regretfully. Too many concerns have been expressed above for me to support this request. I suggest working on the points expressed by the contributors to this discussion, and trying again after you have some more experience under your belt. 1898:

I'm sorry, but I don't think your ready for adminship. First, you need to provide a little bit more detailed answers to demonstrate that you have an interest in becoming an admin. Second, I didn't see much contributions to things such as

1093:

You don't need to be an admin to create redirects. Just click on the name you were directed from, copy and paste the real content into there, then create a redirect from the former aticle title. Other than that, you just crave power.

1697:, on "I can't see anything wrong" grounds, in light of the multiple question answers. I don't think TTH is unreasonable in asking so many questions in this case, given that so little information was given by the candidate initially. 1904:

why they made the actions they did in their summaries. Consider going into your preferences and checking the box that sets a reminder for edit summaries. No hard feelings, I just feel that you're almost ready, but not quite there.

3080:

Pretty much poer JodyB: well on the way there, good editor; start taking more part in the policy-based parts of Knowledge, polish up those answers to the "optional" questions, more usage of edit summaries, and next time...

1999:

Sorry, but the answers to your questions don't really make clear how you would use the tools. Maybe more experience in AfD would be good as well and possibly more edit summary usage. Otherwise, you're almost there. Cheers,

1723:. Originally, was neutral because of short answers to original questions, but after taking all the time to answer all of those, I must say that this editor has thought everything through. (Thanks for notifying me TTH) 2186:

You will notice that that was over two years ago, and I only began categorically opposing self-noms about six months ago. Heaven forbid someone might change his mind over the course of a year and a half or so.

2113:

You assume too much. And If I was Kurt I would find the "It's only Kurt" comment to be insulting. Actually I, for one, agree with Kurt's opposition to self-nominations, for exactly the same reason that he does.

984: 2384:

You're lacking in communication skills, and I believe communication is a vital part of Knowledge. Also, your edit summary usage is less than ideal. Please consider addressing these and other concerns. Thanks!

1456:

admins without having done a lot of article-building or sourcing; a detailed knowledge of sourcing is not a necessary pre-requisite for adminship (though it is certainly a desirable characteristic).

2419:. Answer to my question about edit summaries demonstrates that this editor is not ready yet. Ibaranoff, please read the comments made by another editor after your answer to my question below. 304:

An administrator has the option to lift a block if they feel that the user/IP should be given another chance. Outright banning a user/IP is an option taken if the editor has no hope of reform. (

2128:

Then you are easily insulted. Anyway, my point with "it's just Kurt" was that Kurt uses this rationale on all self noms and there's really no need to get worked up about it every single time.--

1488:- 5 Featured Article noms speaks loads - this is a great 'pedia builder and apart from some shortish answers above I see nothing to suggest his being an admin will be a net negative. cheers, 1139:, I get redirected to 'Dave Bautista' - if I click on the link where it says "Redirected from David Batista" (just under the article name), I get taken to a page with an arrow pointing to ' 2912:

Good editor, but poor edit summaries and answers to questions 2 and 3 are a concern. I can't decide whether to support or oppose. But I will support if you improve your edit summaries.

192:. And if you don't think that adminship isn't what I'm looking for, can you point me towards the right area to sign up for? Otherwise, voice your support or opposition to my request. ( 602:

I've mostly been able to keep articles at high quality working with the rules. I can't really think of any instances where I've had to ignore a rule in order to improve an article. (

2259:

not active enough in AN/I! not enough interest in XfD! not enough mainspace/talkspace contribs! answers to the questions too wordy! answers to the questions not wordy enough!).

2063:

You're assuming he's hungry for power because he nominated himself? You're assuming he has a bad motive. You're assuming he's asking for adminship in bad faith. That violates

2474:- Your article work is great, but the lack of strong answers to the questions are worrying. Also, the lack edit summary usage with the reason: "Because I often don't need them" 174:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

2477:- is a concern. You should know (Transhumanist explained this below that comment) that they're for other contributors use aswell. I'm sorry but I cannot support at this time. 2497:

editors. The all-too-brief answers to the above questions led me to this editor's talk page, where I'm not seeing good communication. (The minute you pick up the mop, there

354:

How do you understand WP:NFC as it applies to promotional images and other non-free portraits of living people used for the purpose of showing what the subject looks like?

896: 868: 840: 812: 784: 756: 728: 700: 668: 640: 611: 579: 551: 1564: 3043: 2971: 2408: 2253: 1446: 489: 162: 719:

I was once accused of uploading an altered/fake image. Since then, I've included links to the websites where I got any image I've uploaded to avoid such accusations. (

262:

Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

2239: 1460: 3148: 2352: 2335: 2092: 1985: 1968: 1065: 429: 401: 369: 341: 277: 2123: 1353:

I see no reason why this user's adminship would be a negative thing for the project. I am not incredibly impressed with his work but just because an editor is not

3007: 2106: 1474: 1191: 247: 229: 111: 2267: 2137: 3255: 2902: 1271:

Excellent editor, underappreciated like most, and I'm glad he's on Knowledge's side, but there hasn't been a lot of experience at AfD. Good luck to him anyway.

2990: 2276: 465: 2804: 2785: 2302: 2180: 1947: 1280: 1233: 3304: 3234: 2225: 1217: 1168: 1126: 1048: 238:(CONT'D): I have had five successful featured article nominations, two in the field of music-related topics and three in the field of film-related topics. ( 2201: 2156: 1173:

Also, doing cut-and-paste moves like this is a pretty good way to get yourself blocked for disruption if you make a habit of it - they take forever to fix.

960: 313: 2457:

Kurt), communication and lack of participation in process and policy fora appear to be major issues. Answers to questions are extremely weak, to boot. --

2214: 1792: 201: 2856: 1147:

with the redirect coding (#REDIRECT ]). Adminship is not what you should look for in this case, but to ask for help on the appropriate pages, be it the

2520: 2316: 1905: 1246: 1314: 3327: 1588:

the 3RR also applies in AfD just about a month ago. We need admins who don't abuse their power. I believe that Ibaranoff24 will not abuse the tools.

920: 3249: 2913: 2750:

Even though you have quite good edits, 25% edit summary usage and not as specific as could be on answering questions bumps my decision to Neutral.

2629: 682: 383: 2475: 990: 1788: 1239: 144: 1922: 1579: 1574: 1225: 3345: 1399: 3110: 2391: 326:

If you ran into a extreme POV pusher, and he/she has not committed any vandalism, what steps would you take to deal with this individual?

2445: 1597: 1026: 93: 3312: 2687:- sorry, you haven't convinced me that you are ready to be an admin yet. I thought the answers to Q12 and Q16 were not very convincing. 775:

I can make improvements on issues that I have noticed, but other administrators might not have that have not been pointed out to them. (

65: 3129: 2721: 1520: 1429: 1345: 3185: 2941: 2016: 1739: 564:

In light of the opinions expressed on this page, has your attitude toward edit summaries changed? If so, what is your attitude now?

169: 3092: 2539: 2511: 2321: 1913: 1715: 1636: 1411: 3278: 2923: 2875: 2619: 2171: 1864: 1645: 947: 3171: 2757: 2635: 2466: 1846: 1538: 1503: 1366: 1143:'. Just edit the dab on the page, or grab the content from Dave Bautista, place it on David Bautista, then replace the content on 916: 3295: 2735: 2428: 2376: 1796: 1688: 1668: 1624: 1555: 1111: 2831: 2586: 2556: 2485: 2058: 1759: 3072: 2679: 1930: 1890: 1817: 153:

For those of you concerned over my use of edit summaries, I have been using edit summaries more frequently as of recent date. (

2493:, for several reasons. I'm bothered about both the lack of edit summaries and the lack of understanding that they are to help 2032: 1779: 2696: 2602: 2230:

I think you need to think carefully about your "jokes" in future, because that didn't look to to me like a "joke" at all. --

1787:

Ibaranoff24 appears to be well-intentioned and to be familiar with how things work; he is unlikely to act inappropriately.

1641:

Good article building, keeping cool throughout this RfA, and answering a ridiculous amount of questions makes me support.

954: 2327: 1804:, clear and concise answers to the questions, great article writer. His weak edit summary usage is a minor issue only. -- 1272: 332:

Place a message on their talk page, suggesting that they keep a cool head, and if they persist, briefly block the user. (

3145: 3126: 2011: 1963: 1939: 747:

I was briefly blocked during an argument over spoiler warnings. I agreed not to continue, and was quickly unblocked. (

2244:

Kurt's entitled to his oppose and his reasoning, there's no point having this heated discussion about it every time.

1007: 940: 653:

You come across an article of a person with 10 non-free images of that person on the page. What would you do? Why?

524: 81: 30: 17: 797:

Assuming you are an admin, if another admin came to you and asked you to help clear a backlog, what would you do?

2885:. Per the oppose section. Won't oppose you for that, however. Think it through a little more next time, sorry. 978: 1499: 1567: 3229: 3208: 2846: 2821: 2674: 1927: 1230: 3167: 2981:, (change to Oppose, per answer to question) with a question. Why is your use of edit summaries so low? 2389: 2219:

I meant it only as a joke. I am truly sorry if it offended anyone, especially you, Daniel, and you Kurt.

1813: 685:. Immediately after this, 5 people who opposed you in your RfA ask for your recall. What would you do? 3326:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either

3106: 2441: 2235: 2119: 1442: 593: 3243:

I'm not too convinced of his competence, but he still seems to be a good editor, though. Maybe later.

1593: 972: 3308: 2067:, and is totally inappropriate. You are entitled to vote any way you want, but your reason sucks. 1014: 2326:

Dude, he has something like three featured articles. He's added lots of references to Knowledge.

1437:. So, to summarise, we already have lots of crap admins, so one more won't make any difference? -- 414:

What is your interpretation of WP:IAR and under what circumstances should one follow that policy?

2713: 2331: 1276: 1196:

No they don't. As for getting yourself blocked, well that's just standard for conflicts, such as

1020:

Could you please answer your questions? I know they're optional but I like to hear the answers.--

542:

Expand and improve articles on subjects to which I am most knowledgeable. That's basically it. (

3142: 3123: 3021: 2949: 2386: 2249: 2070: 2006: 1979: 1958: 1943: 1676:

Short concise answers to many stupid questions, which is probably more then I would have done.

1516: 1470: 1425: 1377: 1341: 1296: 741:

Why were you blocked? Why shouldn't we be worried that you won't do that kind of thing again?

443: 122: 1546:

Can be trusted with the tools. I'm sure he will start giving more edit summaries from now on.

3181: 3102: 3003: 2937: 2897: 2507: 2437: 2404: 2348: 2231: 2115: 1909: 1734: 1438: 934: 892: 864: 836: 808: 780: 752: 724: 696: 664: 636: 607: 575: 547: 485: 425: 397: 365: 337: 309: 273: 243: 225: 197: 158: 107: 89: 75: 2741: 1323: 881:

What is your opinion of the RfA process? Should it be improved? How would you improve it?

659:

Put a note on the article's talk page saying that the number of images should be cut down. (

3083: 2837: 2777: 2273: 1707: 1589: 1408: 1183: 1076:

Conversation where a user strangely advocates performing cut-and-past moves. Please don't.

516: 1870: 966: 8: 3286:. Sorry, concerns raised by others lead me to ask you to come back in two months' time. 3274: 2918: 2871: 2461: 1148: 60: 45: 3158:

Good user, but a low use of edit summaries and short answers to not inspire confidence.

3163: 2986: 2706: 2424: 2154: 1842: 1534: 1493: 1362: 1003: 713:

What conflicts have you been in? What did you do? What would you do differently now?

508: 2729:

I have good faith in you, but the brief answers to the questions do not convince me.

1921:

per Icestorm815. Answers to questions don't prove a sufficient knowledge of policies.

905: 420:

One should contribute to the best of their own judgment without resorting to excess. (

3291: 3139: 3120: 2552: 2483: 2245: 2001: 1974: 1953: 1685: 1663: 1616: 1551: 1512: 1466: 1421: 1337: 1332:

I have seen this candidate around frequently, way back when I used to participate in

1122: 1061: 1022: 3225: 3204: 2999: 2946:

There's plenty of time left. We should wait to see his answers to the questions.

2932: 2893: 2851: 2826: 2670: 2503: 2400: 2344: 1885: 1754: 1730: 1309: 930: 912: 888: 860: 832: 804: 776: 748: 720: 692: 660: 632: 603: 571: 543: 481: 421: 393: 361: 333: 305: 269: 239: 221: 193: 154: 103: 85: 71: 2502:

concerns about communication. Perhaps after a few months work on communication? --

2097:

Let it go, it's just Kurt. No one cares about his cut-and-paste opposes but him.--

3066: 2797: 2770: 2614: 2299: 2220: 2175: 2133: 2102: 1879:

per the answers to questions not doing anything for me and per Soxred's neutral.

1809: 1700: 1633: 1457: 1243: 1176: 512: 3270: 2867: 2458: 2260: 1855: 1642: 1208: 1159: 1102: 1039: 570:

Honestly, I see it as a bit of a chore, but I'll try my best to include them. (

55: 825:

What is your wiki-philosophy? How will that affect your actions as an admin?

3339: 3320:

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.

3159: 3059:

then. We do appreciate your good edits so far and your desire to help more. -

2982: 2931:

to avoid pile-on the oppose. I would suggest nomination withdrawal per SNOW.

2751: 2730: 2692: 2420: 2372: 2367: 2149: 2064: 1900: 1838: 1826: 1775: 1530: 1489: 1358: 1333: 1197: 1144: 1140: 1136: 360:

Non-free portraits should not be used if a free substitute can be provided. (

3287: 3266: 2641: 2565: 2548: 2478: 2188: 2144:...as if we should expect anything different from Mr. “I view self-noms as 2045: 1678: 1655: 1621: 1607: 1547: 502:

What are the names of the articles you brought to featured article status?

2206:

That was an unneeded bad-faith jibe which should be stricken, Dreamafter.

3216: 3195: 2841: 2816: 2795:

I agree with the above, so I can't support, but I won't oppose this. <

2661: 2208: 1749: 1304: 3060: 2129: 2098: 2026: 1805: 520: 2767:

the answers and/or statement, I could be swung to support on this one.

3330:

or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

1880: 1201: 1152: 1095: 1032: 2024:

Poor edit summary usage and one-line answers to questions. Sorry.

220:

Film and music articles, based on knowledge of subjects discussed. (

2688: 2595: 1854:

due to his handling of the utterly ridiculous amount of questions.

1830: 1770: 1006:. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review 288: 3179:- The edits summaries, to be short. Otherwise, a very good user. 298:

What is the difference between banning and indefinite blocking?

1151:

or a administator's (or some other helpful user's) talkpage.

2315:

showing the opposite, so I can re-consider. Thank you. --

100:

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

2627:

The answers you gave aren't good enough, also per icestorm.

1452:

work. Nick was, I think, pointing out that some people are

2815:

Pretty weak answers to questions, and edit summary usage.

2399:— I was working on other things and too busy to respond. ( 29:

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a

681:

Right after you've become an admin, you add yourself to

214:

What are your best contributions to Knowledge, and why?

853:

Imagine the Knowledge of the future. What do you see?

1653:, excellent answers to a stupid number of questions. 1135:

That's what I was trying to explain.. see if I input

2522: 2272:

I too would be interested in an explanation. :) --

1224:

Can we please move this away from the RFA? Regards,

2547:per Fabrictramp. Pretty much says it all there. - 3337: 1605:Has made some excellent edits during his time. 1120:I think he means to move pages over redirects.-- 1059:Apparently they are, but everyon answers them.-- 683:Category:Knowledge administrators open to recall 384:Category:Knowledge administrators open to recall 2172:who can't get himself adminship with a self-nom 1837:made as valuable of contributions as he has. -- 480:It's informative, and often very trustworthy. ( 181:What admin work do you intend to take part in? 1240:Knowledge:Moving guidelines for administrators 769:Why should we trust you with the admin tools? 3269:editor, but the concerns raised trouble me. 631:Give him a warning. Block him if necessary. ( 392:Yes. I value the opinions of other editors. ( 2519:Per icestorm, and his answer to question 4. 1299:in my opinion to help torpedo this RfA with 53:Final (24/25/14); Closed as unsuccessful by 3303:Answer to Q3 and especially Q4 concern me. 1238:As a last comment, ignore this thread. See 1081:The following discussion has been closed. 2148:evidence of power hunger.” Bah, humbug! — 1374:- see my comments as add-on nom above. - 1002:Please keep discussion constructive and 382:Would you be willing to add yourself to 803:Look over it and see what I could do. ( 14: 3338: 1563:Excellent article work. Trustworthy. 2998:— Because I often don't need them. ( 2162:Well... I view "I view self-noms as 691:Ignore it. Things usually pan out. ( 3346:Unsuccessful requests for adminship 2768: 1973:They can comment, but cannot vote. 1698: 1606: 1174: 592:Under what circumstances would you 23: 1357:is no reason to deny him the mop. 474:What do you like about Knowledge? 24: 3357: 2705: 1632:per RyanGerbil and Nick mallory. 1008:Special:Contributions/Ibaranoff24 525:The Lord of the Rings (1978 film) 831:I don't have one. See "goals". ( 18:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 3156:Neutral, leaning towards oppose 2798: 2778: 2771: 2615: 2596: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2530: 2528: 2526: 2524: 2462: 2221: 2176: 1708: 1701: 1209: 1184: 1177: 1160: 1103: 1040: 3263:Neutral leaning towards Oppose 3215:Changed to oppose. See above. 2640:Weak answers, especially Q16. 2567: 2365:per all the above concerns. -- 2166:evidence of power hunger." as 919:. For the edit count, see the 268:None of any real importance. ( 13: 1: 3313:06:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 3296:20:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 3279:19:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3256:00:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 3235:01:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 3213:22:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3186:00:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 3172:21:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3149:01:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 3130:16:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3111:16:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3093:15:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3084: 3073:13:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3044:13:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 3008:12:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2991:08:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2972:12:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2942:06:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2924:03:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2903:01:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2876:01:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2857:00:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2832:00:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2805:00:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2786:21:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2758:18:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 2736:03:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 2722:20:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 2697:15:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 2680:01:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 2636:20:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2620:19:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2603:18:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2587:06:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2580: 2568: 2557:21:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2540:19:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 2512:17:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2486:15:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2467:12:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2446:06:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2429:18:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2409:07:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2392:06:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2377:05:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2353:07:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2336:04:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2322:04:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2303:15:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 2277:00:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 2268:08:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2254:03:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2240:07:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2226:01:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2215:01:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2202:03:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2181:22:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2157:22:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2138:21:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2124:06:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 2107:16:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2093:12:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2059:03:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2033:00:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2027: 2017:21:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1986:01:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 1969:21:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1948:21:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1931:21:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1914:20:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1891:19:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1865:17:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 1847:21:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1818:16:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1797:13:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1780:06:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1760:00:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1740:00:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1716:00:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1689:23:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1669:23:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1646:22:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1637:20:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1625:20:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1611:WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN 1598:08:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1580:03:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1556:19:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 1539:07:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 1521:03:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 1504:12:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 1475:12:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 1461:15:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 1447:06:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 1430:03:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 1412:02:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 1400:01:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 1367:23:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1346:18:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1315:22:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 1281:20:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1247:17:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1234:16:14, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1218:16:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1202: 1192:15:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1169:15:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1153: 1127:15:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1112:15:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1096: 1066:15:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1049:15:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 1033: 1027:15:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 897:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 869:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 841:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 813:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 785:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 757:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 729:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 701:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 669:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 641:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 612:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 580:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 552:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 490:09:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 466:08:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 430:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 402:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 386:if promoted? Why or why not? 370:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 342:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 314:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 278:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 248:08:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 230:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 202:17:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 163:08:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 145:00:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 112:16:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 94:15:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 66:17:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 2319: 1617: 1608: 1303:questions to the candidate. 7: 3067: 2836:I suggest perhaps trying a 2651:at 23:43, December 28, 2007 2044:evidence of power hunger. 915:'s edit summary usage with 170:Questions for the candidate 10: 3362: 536:What are your wiki-goals? 2564:not suitable, per above. 1355:super duper extra perfect 859:More featured articles. ( 3323:Please do not modify it. 1529:answer here is obvious. 1084:Please do not modify it. 287:Optional Questions from 39:Please do not modify it. 1031:They are not optional. 928:Links for Ibaranoff24: 439:Optional Questions from 3246:Changed vote to oppose 3054:I suspect this editor 2040:— I view self-noms as 1952:IP's can't comment. -- 188:redirect, etc. I need 1748:them to re-evaluate. 31:request for adminship 2704:per answer to Q16. 2170:evidence of someone 1242:and related pages. – 517:Fritz the Cat (film) 1569:Dihydrogen Monoxide 1465:Thank you Walton. 3254: 3135:Additional comment 2901: 2634: 2612:Changed to oppose. 2537: 1757: 1752: 1738: 1721:Changed to Support 1312: 1307: 1207: 1158: 1101: 1038: 1010:before commenting. 509:Body Count (album) 40: 3251:S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s 3248: 3247: 3233: 3212: 3087: 2892: 2756: 2678: 2653: 2631:S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s 2628: 2613: 2521: 2436:, as per Kurt. -- 2387:Master of Puppets 1982: 1889: 1755: 1750: 1729: 1344: 1310: 1305: 1260: 1259: 1205: 1156: 1099: 1036: 102:(Self-nominated. 38: 3353: 3325: 3252: 3245: 3223: 3220: 3202: 3199: 3168:Report a mistake 3103:Martijn Hoekstra 3089: 3085: 3069: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3027: 3024: 2967: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2955: 2952: 2921: 2916: 2890: 2889:Happy Holidays!! 2854: 2849: 2844: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2800: 2784: 2782: 2775: 2755:has a boring sig 2754: 2720: 2716: 2709: 2668: 2665: 2642: 2632: 2617: 2611: 2610:per everything. 2600: 2583: 2582: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2481: 2464: 2438:Malleus Fatuorum 2375: 2370: 2320: 2264: 2232:Malleus Fatuorum 2223: 2211: 2198: 2195: 2178: 2152: 2116:Malleus Fatuorum 2088: 2085: 2082: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2055: 2052: 2029: 2004: 1983: 1981: 1956: 1925: 1888: 1883: 1862: 1727: 1726:Happy New Year!! 1714: 1712: 1705: 1687: 1683: 1658: 1620: 1618: 1614: 1439:Malleus Fatuorum 1395: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1340: 1228: 1215: 1213: 1203: 1190: 1188: 1181: 1166: 1164: 1154: 1109: 1107: 1097: 1086: 1073: 1072: 1046: 1044: 1034: 994: 953: 906:General comments 887:No complaints. ( 594:Ignore all rules 461: 458: 455: 452: 449: 446: 140: 137: 134: 131: 128: 125: 63: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3328:this nomination 3321: 3265:- seems like a 3250: 3218: 3197: 3071: 3037: 3034: 3031: 3028: 3025: 3022: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2953: 2950: 2920:Happy Holidays 2919: 2914: 2888: 2852: 2847: 2842: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2744: 2719: 2714: 2707: 2663: 2647: 2630: 2479: 2453:per all above ( 2368: 2366: 2262: 2209: 2196: 2193: 2150: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2074: 2071: 2053: 2050: 2014: 2009: 2002: 1980: 1966: 1961: 1954: 1923: 1884: 1873: 1856: 1725: 1679: 1677: 1656: 1613: 1590:Masterpiece2000 1578: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1326: 1226: 1214: 1211: 1165: 1162: 1108: 1105: 1082: 1045: 1042: 1017: 946: 929: 908: 513:Coonskin (film) 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 172: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 123: 54: 50: 35:did not succeed 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3359: 3349: 3348: 3333: 3332: 3316: 3315: 3305:AliveFreeHappy 3298: 3281: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3237: 3174: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3113: 3095: 3075: 3065: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 2993: 2974: 2926: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2802: 2789: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2724: 2711: 2699: 2682: 2655: 2645: 2638: 2622: 2605: 2589: 2559: 2542: 2514: 2488: 2469: 2448: 2431: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2379: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2184: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2035: 2019: 2012: 2007: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1964: 1959: 1916: 1893: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1849: 1820: 1799: 1782: 1762: 1742: 1718: 1691: 1671: 1648: 1639: 1627: 1609: 1600: 1582: 1572: 1558: 1541: 1523: 1509:Strong Support 1506: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1414: 1402: 1372:Strong support 1369: 1348: 1325: 1322: 1320: 1318: 1317: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1221: 1220: 1210: 1194: 1171: 1161: 1130: 1129: 1115: 1114: 1104: 1088: 1087: 1078: 1077: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1041: 1016: 1013: 999: 998: 997: 995: 925: 924: 917:mathbot's tool 907: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 875: 874: 873: 872: 847: 846: 845: 844: 819: 818: 817: 816: 791: 790: 789: 788: 763: 762: 761: 760: 735: 734: 733: 732: 707: 706: 705: 704: 675: 674: 673: 672: 647: 646: 645: 644: 618: 617: 616: 615: 586: 585: 584: 583: 558: 557: 556: 555: 530: 529: 528: 527: 496: 495: 494: 493: 436: 435: 434: 433: 408: 407: 406: 405: 376: 375: 374: 373: 348: 347: 346: 345: 320: 319: 318: 317: 284: 283: 282: 281: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 208: 207: 206: 205: 171: 168: 167: 166: 149: 116: 115: 49: 44: 43: 42: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3358: 3347: 3344: 3343: 3341: 3331: 3329: 3324: 3318: 3317: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3282: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3244: 3242: 3238: 3236: 3231: 3227: 3222: 3221: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3193: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3178: 3175: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3154: 3150: 3147: 3144: 3141: 3136: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3122: 3117: 3114: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3099: 3096: 3094: 3091: 3090: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3070: 3064: 3063: 3057: 3053: 3045: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3017: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2994: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2936: 2935: 2930: 2927: 2925: 2922: 2917: 2911: 2908: 2904: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2886: 2884: 2880: 2879: 2877: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2845: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2825: 2820: 2814: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2801: 2796: 2794: 2790: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2781: 2776: 2774: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2753: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2737: 2734: 2733: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2710: 2708:Corvus cornix 2703: 2700: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2666: 2659: 2656: 2654: 2652: 2649: 2639: 2637: 2633: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2618: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2599: 2593: 2590: 2588: 2585: 2584: 2563: 2560: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2518: 2515: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2484: 2482: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2465: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2415: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2390: 2388: 2383: 2380: 2378: 2374: 2371: 2364: 2361: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2328:24.64.165.129 2325: 2324: 2323: 2318: 2313: 2310: 2304: 2301: 2296: 2292: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2265: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2224: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2199: 2190: 2185: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2066: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2023: 2020: 2018: 2015: 2010: 2005: 1998: 1995: 1987: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1962: 1957: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1929: 1926: 1920: 1917: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1887: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1815: 1814:contributions 1811: 1807: 1803: 1800: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1753: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1722: 1719: 1717: 1713: 1711: 1706: 1704: 1696: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1684: 1682: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1652: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1321: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1302: 1298: 1295:Poor form of 1294: 1293: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273:24.64.165.129 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1193: 1189: 1187: 1182: 1180: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1145:Dave Bautista 1142: 1141:Dave Bautista 1138: 1137:David Batista 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1098: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1064: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1005: 996: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 962: 959: 956: 952: 949: 945: 942: 939: 936: 932: 927: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 909: 898: 894: 890: 886: 883: 882: 880: 877: 876: 870: 866: 862: 858: 855: 854: 852: 849: 848: 842: 838: 834: 830: 827: 826: 824: 821: 820: 814: 810: 806: 802: 799: 798: 796: 793: 792: 786: 782: 778: 774: 771: 770: 768: 765: 764: 758: 754: 750: 746: 743: 742: 740: 737: 736: 730: 726: 722: 718: 715: 714: 712: 709: 708: 702: 698: 694: 690: 687: 686: 684: 680: 677: 676: 670: 666: 662: 658: 655: 654: 652: 649: 648: 642: 638: 634: 630: 627: 626: 623: 620: 619: 613: 609: 605: 601: 598: 597: 595: 591: 588: 587: 581: 577: 573: 569: 566: 565: 563: 560: 559: 553: 549: 545: 541: 538: 537: 535: 532: 531: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 507: 504: 503: 501: 498: 497: 491: 487: 483: 479: 476: 475: 473: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 463: 462: 440: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 413: 410: 409: 403: 399: 395: 391: 388: 387: 385: 381: 378: 377: 371: 367: 363: 359: 356: 355: 353: 350: 349: 343: 339: 335: 331: 328: 327: 325: 322: 321: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 299: 297: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264: 263: 261: 258: 257: 249: 245: 241: 237: 234: 233: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 215: 213: 210: 209: 203: 199: 195: 191: 186: 183: 182: 180: 177: 176: 175: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151: 150: 147: 146: 143: 142: 141: 113: 109: 105: 101: 98: 97: 96: 95: 91: 87: 83: 80: 77: 73: 69: 68: 67: 62: 59: 58: 48: 41: 36: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3322: 3319: 3300: 3283: 3262: 3240: 3239: 3217: 3196: 3191: 3190: 3180: 3176: 3155: 3134: 3115: 3097: 3082: 3077: 3061: 3055: 3020: 3019: 3015: 2995: 2977: 2976: 2948: 2947: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2909: 2887: 2882: 2881: 2863: 2812: 2792: 2791: 2779: 2772: 2763: 2762: 2747: 2731: 2726: 2712: 2701: 2684: 2662: 2657: 2650: 2643: 2624: 2607: 2597: 2591: 2566: 2561: 2544: 2516: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2471: 2454: 2450: 2433: 2416: 2396: 2381: 2362: 2340: 2311: 2261: 2246:Nick mallory 2207: 2192: 2167: 2163: 2161: 2145: 2069: 2068: 2049: 2041: 2037: 2025: 2021: 1996: 1976:the_undertow 1975: 1940:74.62.155.45 1935: 1918: 1895: 1876: 1858: 1857: 1851: 1834: 1822: 1801: 1784: 1769: 1764: 1744: 1724: 1720: 1709: 1702: 1695:Weak Support 1694: 1680: 1673: 1662: 1654: 1650: 1629: 1610: 1602: 1584: 1568: 1560: 1543: 1525: 1513:Mr Senseless 1508: 1496: 1485: 1467:Nick mallory 1453: 1434: 1422:Nick mallory 1416: 1404: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1354: 1351:Weak Support 1350: 1338:RyanGerbil10 1329: 1319: 1300: 1185: 1178: 1123:Phoenix-wiki 1121: 1083: 1062:Phoenix-wiki 1060: 1023:Phoenix-wiki 1021: 1001: 1000: 987: 981: 975: 969: 963: 957: 950: 943: 937: 884: 878: 856: 850: 828: 822: 800: 794: 772: 766: 744: 738: 716: 710: 688: 678: 656: 650: 628: 621: 599: 589: 567: 561: 539: 533: 505: 499: 477: 471: 442: 441: 438: 437: 417: 411: 389: 379: 357: 351: 329: 323: 301: 295: 286: 285: 265: 259: 235: 217: 211: 189: 184: 178: 173: 148: 121: 120: 117: 99: 78: 70: 56: 52: 51: 46: 34: 28: 3000:Ibaranoff24 2934:OhanaUnited 2894:Malinaccier 2504:Fabrictramp 2401:Ibaranoff24 2345:Ibaranoff24 2317:Iterator12n 2168:prima facie 2164:prima facie 2146:prima facie 2042:prima facie 1938:per above. 1906:Icestorm815 1731:Malinaccier 1342:(Говорить!) 931:Ibaranoff24 913:Ibaranoff24 889:Ibaranoff24 861:Ibaranoff24 833:Ibaranoff24 805:Ibaranoff24 777:Ibaranoff24 749:Ibaranoff24 721:Ibaranoff24 693:Ibaranoff24 661:Ibaranoff24 633:Ibaranoff24 604:Ibaranoff24 572:Ibaranoff24 544:Ibaranoff24 482:Ibaranoff24 422:Ibaranoff24 394:Ibaranoff24 362:Ibaranoff24 334:Ibaranoff24 306:Ibaranoff24 270:Ibaranoff24 240:Ibaranoff24 222:Ibaranoff24 194:Ibaranoff24 155:Ibaranoff24 104:Ibaranoff24 86:Ibaranoff24 72:Ibaranoff24 47:Ibaranoff24 3267:good faith 2915:NHRHS2010 2799:DREAMAFTER 2616:Dreamafter 2274:Iamunknown 2263:RGTraynor 2222:Dreamafter 2189:Kurt Weber 2177:Dreamafter 2046:Kurt Weber 2013:(contribs) 2003:Midorihana 1965:(contribs) 1955:Midorihana 1693:Change to 1409:Iamunknown 1015:Discussion 521:Freak Out! 3271:Jauerback 2868:Lankiveil 2343:— Five. ( 1859:Wizardman 1643:Acalamari 1359:-Icewedge 1149:help desk 973:block log 921:talk page 190:something 3340:Category 3230:contribs 3209:contribs 3160:JetLover 2983:Unschool 2752:Soxred93 2748:Neutral. 2732:Reywas92 2675:contribs 2421:Unschool 1936:You Fail 1839:JayHenry 1827:Casliber 1544:Support. 1526:Support. 1500:contribs 1490:Casliber 1330:Support. 941:contribs 625:you do? 82:contribs 3301:Neutral 3288:Bearian 3284:Neutral 3241:Neutral 3192:Neutral 3177:Neutral 3116:Neutral 3098:Neutral 3078:Neutral 3016:Comment 2996:Comment 2978:Neutral 2929:Neutral 2910:Neutral 2883:Neutral 2864:Neutral 2813:Neutral 2793:Neutral 2764:Neutral 2742:Neutral 2598:Anthøny 2549:Djsasso 2480:Scarian 2397:Comment 2373:iva1979 2341:Comment 1852:Support 1823:Support 1802:Support 1789:Chris.B 1785:Support 1765:support 1745:Support 1681:Prodego 1674:Support 1657:Majorly 1651:Support 1630:Support 1603:Support 1585:Support 1561:Support 1548:Epbr123 1486:Support 1435:Comment 1417:Support 1405:Support 1324:Support 948:deleted 3219:Seicer 3198:Seicer 2727:Oppose 2702:Oppose 2685:Oppose 2664:Seicer 2658:Oppose 2625:Oppose 2608:Oppose 2592:Oppose 2562:Oppose 2545:Oppose 2517:Oppose 2491:Oppose 2472:Oppose 2455:except 2451:Oppose 2434:Oppose 2417:Oppose 2382:Oppose 2363:Oppose 2312:Oppose 2300:Walton 2210:Daniel 2197:Colts! 2151:Travis 2065:WP:AGF 2054:Colts! 2038:Oppose 2022:Oppose 2008:(talk) 1997:Oppose 1960:(talk) 1919:Oppose 1901:WP:AIV 1896:Oppose 1877:Oppose 1871:Oppose 1835:you've 1768:you. 1751:Avruch 1634:Walton 1575:Review 1458:Walton 1334:WP:FAC 1306:Avruch 61:scribe 3086:BLACK 3062:JodyB 3056:could 2838:coach 2803:: --> 2780:scent 2773:iride 2495:other 2463:desat 2130:Atlan 2099:Atlan 2028:jj137 1806:Aqwis 1710:scent 1703:iride 1531:Dylan 1244:Pomte 1186:scent 1179:iride 1004:civil 955:count 33:that 16:< 3309:talk 3292:talk 3275:talk 3226:talk 3205:talk 3164:talk 3146:osky 3143:Shan 3140:Pete 3127:osky 3124:Shan 3121:Pete 3107:talk 3088:KITE 3068:talk 3026:e Tr 3004:talk 2987:talk 2954:e Tr 2898:talk 2872:talk 2843:Jmlk 2818:Jmlk 2715:talk 2693:talk 2671:talk 2644:east 2553:talk 2508:talk 2499:will 2459:Core 2442:talk 2425:talk 2405:talk 2349:talk 2332:talk 2250:talk 2236:talk 2134:talk 2120:talk 2103:talk 2075:e Tr 1944:talk 1910:talk 1881:Jack 1843:talk 1829:and 1825:Per 1810:talk 1793:talk 1776:talk 1756:talk 1735:talk 1664:talk 1594:talk 1552:talk 1535:talk 1517:talk 1494:talk 1471:talk 1454:good 1443:talk 1426:talk 1382:e Tr 1363:talk 1311:talk 1277:talk 1212:here 1163:here 1106:here 1043:here 985:rfar 967:logs 935:talk 911:See 893:talk 865:talk 837:talk 809:talk 781:talk 753:talk 725:talk 697:talk 665:talk 637:talk 608:talk 576:talk 548:talk 486:talk 448:e Tr 426:talk 398:talk 366:talk 338:talk 310:talk 274:talk 244:talk 226:talk 198:talk 159:talk 127:e Tr 108:talk 90:talk 76:talk 3228:) ( 3207:) ( 3166:) ( 3038:ist 3035:man 3029:ans 2966:ist 2963:man 2957:ans 2769:— 2689:EJF 2673:) ( 2648:718 2087:ist 2084:man 2078:ans 1831:DGG 1771:DGG 1699:— 1394:ist 1391:man 1385:ans 1297:TTH 1198:3RR 1175:— 991:spi 961:AfD 879:23. 851:22. 823:21. 795:20. 767:19. 739:18. 711:17. 679:16. 651:15. 622:14. 590:13. 562:12. 534:11. 500:10. 460:ist 457:man 451:ans 289:Nat 139:ist 136:man 130:ans 64:at 57:WjB 3342:: 3311:) 3294:) 3277:) 3182:32 3170:) 3109:) 3032:hu 3023:Th 3010:) 3006:) 2989:) 2960:hu 2951:Th 2878:. 2874:) 2840:. 2695:) 2578:nd 2572:ir 2555:) 2531:ki 2527:eW 2523:Ru 2510:) 2444:) 2427:) 2407:) 2351:) 2334:) 2252:) 2238:) 2200:) 2194:Go 2174:. 2136:) 2122:) 2114:-- 2105:) 2081:hu 2072:Th 2057:) 2051:Go 2000:-- 1946:) 1924:Rt 1912:) 1886:?! 1845:) 1816:) 1812:– 1795:) 1778:) 1667:) 1596:) 1554:) 1537:) 1519:) 1502:) 1473:) 1445:) 1428:) 1388:hu 1379:Th 1365:) 1301:15 1279:) 1227:Rt 1200:. 979:lu 895:) 885:A: 867:) 857:A: 839:) 829:A: 811:) 801:A: 783:) 773:A: 755:) 745:A: 727:) 717:A: 699:) 689:A: 667:) 657:A: 639:) 629:A: 610:) 600:A: 596:? 578:) 568:A: 550:) 540:A: 523:, 519:, 515:, 511:, 506:A: 488:) 478:A: 472:9. 454:hu 445:Th 428:) 418:A: 412:8. 400:) 390:A: 380:7. 368:) 358:A: 352:6. 340:) 330:A: 324:5. 312:) 302:A: 296:4. 276:) 266:A: 260:3. 246:) 232:) 228:) 218:A: 212:2. 200:) 185:A: 179:1. 161:) 133:hu 124:Th 110:) 92:) 37:. 3307:( 3290:( 3273:( 3232:) 3224:( 3211:) 3203:( 3162:( 3105:( 3002:( 2985:( 2900:) 2896:( 2870:( 2853:7 2848:1 2828:7 2823:1 2691:( 2677:) 2669:( 2646:. 2581:a 2575:a 2569:m 2551:( 2529:i 2525:n 2506:( 2440:( 2423:( 2411:) 2403:( 2369:S 2355:) 2347:( 2330:( 2248:( 2234:( 2191:( 2132:( 2118:( 2101:( 2048:( 1942:( 1928:. 1908:( 1841:( 1808:( 1791:( 1774:( 1737:) 1733:( 1661:( 1622:• 1592:( 1577:) 1573:( 1565:— 1550:( 1533:( 1515:( 1497:· 1492:( 1469:( 1441:( 1424:( 1361:( 1275:( 1231:. 1206:│ 1157:│ 1100:│ 1037:│ 993:) 988:· 982:· 976:· 970:· 964:· 958:· 951:· 944:· 938:· 933:( 923:. 899:) 891:( 871:) 863:( 843:) 835:( 815:) 807:( 787:) 779:( 759:) 751:( 731:) 723:( 703:) 695:( 671:) 663:( 643:) 635:( 614:) 606:( 582:) 574:( 554:) 546:( 492:) 484:( 432:) 424:( 404:) 396:( 372:) 364:( 344:) 336:( 316:) 308:( 280:) 272:( 250:) 242:( 236:A 224:( 204:) 196:( 165:) 157:( 114:) 106:( 88:( 79:· 74:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Requests for adminship/Ibaranoff24 - Knowledge

Index