100:
42:
86:
189:
It is thus risky (from the viewpoint of our peculiar concern for truth) to classify such or such real-world entity as being an instance of a particular concept, because we seldom have all possible information concerning that entity. Thus we may for instance precisely define the concept of a "greedy
185:
in the perfect world of ideas. We are not immediately concerned with the real world. Obviously the real world gives us inspiration to invent concepts, and we hope to have success in applying ideas to the real world. But we have to keep in mind that stuff in the real world seldom conforms exactly to
173:
The second is that we want to be able to navigate logically from concepts to closely related concepts. We wish to avoid links that lead the reader towards concepts that are not clearly related to the concept. To this end, we use a structure which reflects this concern and is homogeneous across
117:
This proposal is not in its definitive form (it may never be!). Discussion is more than welcome. The proposal is rather abstract. If you prefer to take a look at what we're talking about before you read this, take a look at the following example
169:
There are three guiding ideas here. The first is that we wish to have the simplest possible definitions for concepts, definitions that leave as little ambiguity as possible concerning their meaning. Make everything explicit when you can.
275:
122:
199:
Concepts must be given names. Some concepts don't have a generally agreed-upon name yet. In such a case you have to invent one. Try to avoid the confusion that may result from choosing
27:
312:
326:
206:
In order to easily distinguish
Knowledge entries from entries in this classification project, each concept should be identified with the prefix
215:
21:
190:
corporation"; but whether a particular real-world corporation does in fact satisfy this definition is a matter of debate.
106:
The talk page of an archived item is unlikely to be monitored, so start a discussion at an active venue like the
268:
Knowledge articles about particular real-world entities which some people believe are examples of the concept.
61:
41:
17:
107:
158:
8:
68:
250:
243:
320:
256:
A list of links to concepts whose definition directly involves this concept;
265:
The
Knowledge articles about the field(s) to which this concept is central;
200:
239:
for the concept, containing links to the concepts that are involved in it;
297:
285:
211:
142:
131:
236:
301:
214:
Concepts". For instance, the concept of an atom should be called
177:
The third idea is that we are first and foremost concerned with
262:
The
Knowledge article about the concept itself, if one exists;
203:(words that have different meanings for different people).
145:
aims to organize all known concepts in a logical manner.
94:
Proposal of a WikiProject to address high level concepts
67:don't necessarily represent current information or
28:Knowledge:Historical archive/WikiProject Concepts
318:
259:A list of links to relevant Knowledge articles:
186:the perfect, unambiguous idea that we conceive.
232:A list of alternative names for the concept;
274:A template for this structure can be found
327:Items in the Knowledge historical archive
14:
319:
284:: No hierarchy is predefined for this
308:General Strategy and Discussion forum
249:A list of links to concepts that are
242:A list of links to concepts that are
104:Looking to revive discussion on this?
36:
174:concepts to facilitate navigation.
65:. As an archive item, its contents
34:
35:
338:
98:
84:
40:
13:
1:
48:Knowledge historical archive
18:Knowledge:Historical archive
7:
59:in the English Knowledge's
10:
343:
228:A concept entry includes:
292:Directory of Participants
155:Descendant Wikiprojects:
51:This discussion page is
57:preserved for reference
282:Hierarchy definition
181:and things that are
71:on project matters
62:historical archive
114:
113:
90:Item description:
26:(Redirected from
334:
300:was proposed by
210:, standing for "
102:
101:
96:
88:
87:
49:
44:
37:
31:
342:
341:
337:
336:
335:
333:
332:
331:
317:
316:
253:of the concept;
251:specializations
246:of the concept;
244:generalizations
99:
92:
85:
73:.It was active
47:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
340:
330:
329:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
263:
257:
254:
247:
240:
233:
221:
193:
157:No descendent
128:
112:
111:
45:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
339:
328:
325:
324:
322:
315:
314:
310:
309:
305:
303:
299:
294:
293:
289:
287:
283:
279:
277:
267:
264:
261:
260:
258:
255:
252:
248:
245:
241:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
226:
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
204:
202:
197:
196:
195:Entry Naming:
191:
187:
184:
180:
175:
171:
167:
166:
162:
161:defined yet.
160:
156:
152:
150:
146:
144:
140:
136:
135:
133:
126:
124:
120:
119:
109:
105:
97:
95:
91:
82:
80:
76:
72:
70:
64:
63:
58:
54:
46:
43:
39:
38:
29:
23:
19:
311:
307:
306:
295:
291:
290:
281:
280:
273:
227:
222:
220:
207:
205:
201:loaded words
198:
194:
192:
188:
182:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
159:WikiProjects
154:
153:
148:
147:
138:
137:
129:
127:
125:of concepts
121:
116:
115:
108:village pump
103:
93:
89:
83:
78:
74:
66:
60:
56:
52:
50:
22:WikiProjects
313:/Discussion
298:WikiProject
286:WikiProject
212:WikiProject
143:WikiProject
132:WikiProject
237:definition
235:A precise
223:Formatting
151:None yet.
149:Parentage:
79:early 2001
165:Strategy:
123:/Examples
69:consensus
321:Category
216:wpc/Atom
134:Concepts
110:instead.
53:inactive
20: |
130:Title:
139:Scope:
296:This
179:ideas
141:This
118:page:
16:<
276:here
183:true
55:and
302:Seb
288:.
225::
208:wpc
77:in
323::
304:.
278:.
218:.
81:.
75:
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
