70:
1803:
must include more than a select group, and thus is also a questionable number, perhaps unverifiable, and even if is said to be any legitimate majority of contributors – like those who were recently allowed to write on
Knowledge. Vague words of idealistic concepts are dangerous and may be misleading from what is then experienced in actuality when reading or writing on Knowledge.
135:
1735:. Although users might engage in the practices described above, that activity should not be considered proof of malicious intent. The actual level of intent should also be considered separately, as to whether the action was premeditated, or spur-of-the-moment, or merely copying an older tactic that seemed effective for other editors in the past. The term
723:, by finding within its wording some apparent justification for disruptive actions and stances that policy is clearly not at all intended to support. In doing this, the gamester separates policies and guidelines from their rightful place to document community consensus, and attempts to use them selectively for a personal agenda. An editor is
1607:
Example: Editor A reverts an edit made by Editor B because it did not adhere to a neutral point of view and they did not provide a reliable source. Editor B starts a discussion on the talk page in which Editor A participates, but the discussion fails to generate consensus. Later on, Editor B reverts
846:
There are several types of gaming the system. The essence of gaming is the willful and knowing misuse of policies or processes. The following is an (incomplete) list of examples. Actions that are similar to the below, where there is no evidence of intent to act improperly, are usually not considered
1739:
is not meant to vilify those involved, with the word "gaming" also referring to playful activity in the manner of a game of sport. The goal is to focus on
Knowledge activities as a serious effort to improve articles, not an arena for playing games and sparring with opponents as a form of amusement.
1802:
What is "intent", consciously or otherwise, and what actually is "good"-enough "faith" must also be clearly defined. Only then, the definers's power and status position must also be openly noted when making such any determinations. The common assumptions that what is claimed as "communally agreed"
765:
In each case, willfulness or knowing is important. Misuse of policy, guidelines or practice is not gaming if it is based upon a genuine mistake. But it may well be, if it is deliberate, where the editor continues to game policy even when it is clear there is no way they can reasonably claim to be
1718:
raises procedural or evidentiary points in a manner analogous to that used in formal legal proceedings, often using ill-founded legal reasoning. Wikilawyering often serves to evade an issue or even obstruct the crafting of a workable solution. For example, it is often impossible to definitely
788:
Using policies and guidelines to build (or push) a patently false case that some editor is editing in bad faith, with the "evidence" for this itself being an obviously unreasonable bad-faith interpretation of that person's action. This is more often categorized as a breach of the guideline to
1247:
Example: An editor performs page-wide, uncontroversial copy editing and code cleanup, but another editor thinks some ostensibly minor changes subtly altered the meaning of two sentences, and so reverts several hours of work instead of just the two disputed
1378:– asking an editor to take an action (e.g. change their stance in a discussion) on the basis of your efforts taken elsewhere on their behalf; or suggesting that you will withhold efforts on their behalf unless they take your desired action.
727:
if they are using a few words of policy to claim support for a viewpoint that clearly contradicts those policies, to attack a genuinely policy-based stance by willfully misapplying
Knowledge policies, or to derail Knowledge processes.
1182:
Example: Editors reach a consensus. The author of the final agreed-on text is supposed to post it but never does. Weeks later, a second editor tires of waiting and posts a modified version, which the first editor immediately
1582:
Example: An editor responds to a disagreement by saying, "You're obviously wrong, wrong, wrong. Did you even pass 9th-grade history?" Later, they defend this statement as a good-faith question about the other editor's
1786:
is related to gaming. It involves knowingly trying to use the communally agreed and sanctioned processes described by some policies, to advance a purpose for which they are clearly not intended. Abuse of process is
1188:
Example: An editor withholds agreement to a change unless additional, more satisfactory sources are provided, but declares all the new sourcing to be unsatisfactory despite the citation work clearly fulfilling the
703:
games. If an editor ignores a warning and repeats their behavior, or if they find new creative ways to achieve the same disruption, it is likely that editor is gaming the system in bad faith.
954:
Selectively "cherry-picking" wording from a policy (or cherry-picking one policy to apply, but willfully ignoring others) to support a view that does not in fact match or comply with policy.
1942:
1464:
1419:
2089:
330:
1618:
Example: Editor A posts uncivil comments while at the same time accusing Editor B of uncivil behavior, demanding sanctions and citing policies that Editor A clearly violates.
1740:
Judging intent might include discussions with others, rather than escalate the situation as an issue for direct confrontation. The situation might warrant special mediation
2336:
1929:
2251:
1847:
1796:
778:
665:
219:
1460:
972:
Spuriously and knowingly claiming protection, justification, or support under the words of a policy, for a viewpoint or stance that actually contradicts policy.
1122:
800:
If gaming is also knowingly used as a basis to impugn another editor or to mischaracterize them as a bad-faith editor, then this may also violate the policy of
1231:
2583:
1614:
Playing victim – violating a rule and at the same time claiming that others are in violation of the same or a closely related rule. Also known as hypocrisy.
400:
1456:
1328:
1114:
1568:
your claim, and accusing the editor of being disruptive for making repeated requests. Citations should be accurate so that other editors may verify them.
684:
963:
2082:
306:
1005:
Attempting to force an untoward interpretation of policy, or impose your own novel view of "standards to apply" rather than those of the community.
2509:
477:
377:
143:
Playing games with policies and guidelines to avoid the spirit of consensus, or thwart the intent and spirit of the policy, is strictly forbidden.
1922:
1312:
1707:
758:
the consensus-building process by reverting another editor for minor errors, or sticking to a viewpoint that the community has clearly rejected.
777:
towards another editor, prove a point, or muddy the water in a dispute can also be a form of gaming. However, it is more often categorized as
1662:
486:
1589:"Borderlining" – habitually treading the edge of policy breach or engaging in low-grade policy breach, to make it hard to prove misconduct.
924:
2542:
1871:
1523:
1177:
from one article, because it is already covered in a second article. Afterward, the editor deletes the material from the second article.
1169:– luring other editors into a compromise by making a concession, only to withhold that concession after the other side has compromised.
2266:
1915:
1823:
1691:
241:
214:
1732:
1090:
Example: An editor refuses to accept a change unless some condition is complied with, but it is not a condition that has any basis in
995:
641:
538:
2742:
1853:
850:
2803:
637:
602:
181:
77:
706:
2537:
2276:
2018:
1490:
2557:
2343:
2212:
458:
695:. A warning from an administrator is usually the best way to prevent gaming, because a clear warning should help correct both
547:
1687:
1020:
354:
282:
1516:
Example: Resubmitting a draft that has been rejected by removing the rejection rather than discussing it with the reviewer.
1118:
891:
2640:
1666:
500:
423:
345:
2719:
2530:
1223:
692:
437:
17:
552:
2562:
1939:
1757:
1756:. The risks of continued involvement should be carefully considered, especially if the intent seems overly severe or
1594:
1126:
1103:) insisting that the change sought violates some policy or other principle, in a way they cannot clearly demonstrate.
1091:
1058:
941:
852:
716:
621:
391:
55:
2552:
2547:
1900:
1865:
447:
382:
93:
575:
246:
2567:
2504:
2013:
2008:
1504:
1452:
1190:
989:
959:
817:
812:) by an administrator. Violating the principles of Knowledge's behavior guidelines may prejudice the decision of
673:
442:
2281:
2241:
2182:
2099:
2027:
2003:
1723:, and it is not a defense that none of the sockpuppets which emerge were named in the request for arbitration.
1603:
Retribution – deliberately reverting an editor's edits in one article in retaliation for a dispute in another.
1482:
649:
625:
335:
264:
199:
2177:
1792:
1575:
1556:
Mischaracterizing other editors' actions to make them seem unreasonable, improper, or deserving of sanction.
1320:
801:
255:
158:
2714:
1768:
for dealing with problematic editing behavior, patterns of which tend to speak for themselves when properly
2772:
2593:
2271:
2246:
2192:
1841:
1788:
1761:
1650:
1227:
1110:
744:
724:
657:
595:
507:
325:
209:
204:
167:
2129:
945:
2635:
2411:
2358:
2331:
2236:
1836:
1683:
1130:
790:
688:
561:
495:
194:
1830:
1511:
Example: Removing the record of previous reviews (which says not to remove it) and resubmitting a draft.
2757:
2207:
2202:
2172:
2077:
2033:
1961:
1608:
a well-sourced, neutral addition that Editor A made, saying it did not comply with the Manual of Style.
1174:
1010:
985:
909:, while using a different set of notifications to lure a partisan audience to view that neutral notice.
628:
for personal advantage at the expense of other editors or the
Knowledge community. This may range from
467:
318:
301:
172:
150:
85:
1975:
2525:
2406:
2326:
2109:
2104:
1877:
1597:, but takes several months to repeatedly push the same edits over the objections of multiple editors.
809:
645:
432:
340:
313:
1493:
from a sockpuppet account after a previous submission has been declined because it is seen to be an
573:
2588:
2494:
2449:
2401:
2396:
2114:
2072:
2038:
1561:
1444:
1300:
981:
881:
874:
813:
569:
410:
405:
296:
291:
1546:
2482:
2303:
2067:
1998:
1715:
1670:
1565:
1494:
1355:
1336:
1332:
1239:
977:
920:
898:
735:
588:
1731:
Use of the term "gaming the system" should be done with caution, as it can be interpreted as an
1539:
1041:
2477:
2197:
2187:
1954:
1889:
1883:
1765:
1720:
1478:
1471:
Example: Submitting a draft or article with almost the same title as a recently deleted article
1386:
on the basis of prior support given or other actions taken on their behalf by the first editor.
1267:
1145:
937:
669:
367:
2724:
1048:
867:
774:
2348:
1751:
1625:
1362:
1340:
1034:
472:
1907:
1433:
1260:
1205:
837:
2781:
2647:
2286:
2162:
2094:
2062:
2023:
906:
512:
269:
236:
2704:
1726:
117:
8:
2652:
2353:
2256:
2167:
2157:
1743:
1674:
1639:
1242:, but it is removed entirely because of a typographical error that could easily be fixed.
1079:
933:
661:
517:
226:
47:
739:
110:
2664:
2659:
2152:
1894:
1859:
1631:
1531:
1425:
1347:
1304:
1252:
1197:
1152:
1137:
1100:
1057:"WP:STONEWALL" redirects here. For the Knowledge essay on status quo stonewalling, see
1026:
859:
829:
794:
793:; and in particular, repeated unjustified "warnings" may also be viewed as a breach of
529:
524:
102:
89:
2499:
2489:
2373:
1813:
1284:
633:
616:
372:
59:
2681:
1403:
review of the admin's article may be in jeopardy if action isn't taken by the admin.
1783:
782:
653:
51:
43:
2709:
1764:
about the mentalities or motivations of other editors. Knowledge has a variety of
1658:
35:
2426:
1760:
behavior. However clear such an intent might subjectively seem, you should not
1392:
577:
1701:
2797:
1818:
1791:, and depending on circumstances may be also described as gaming the system,
1409:
1400:
1396:
1383:
761:
Attempting to twist
Knowledge sanctions or processes to harass other editors.
39:
1711:
31:
1778:
1673:
a promotional draft to article space, or otherwise edits disruptively or
1375:
1308:
1280:
1013:
that was written by a single editor as though it were a consensus policy.
1296:
1071:
755:
1799:. Communally agreed processes are intended to be used in good faith.
1714:, legal procedures and terms have no bearing on Knowledge. Typically,
1769:
1324:
1288:
720:
629:
1391:
Example: An editor asks an admin to warn another editor for alleged
1331:
your question has not already been answered, misrepresenting what a
1578:
to make it seem less hostile than it was, rather than apologizing.
1292:
769:
Actions that game the system may also overlap with other policies:
680:
571:
1451:
Example: Submitting multiple drafts with almost the same title to
1420:
Gaming of article titles, review processes, and deletion processes
1123:
WP:Don't bludgeon the process § No one is obligated to satisfy you
1086:
does not agree, effectively preventing a policy-based resolution.
652:
or other community discussion. Gaming the system may represent an
901:– arguing the word of policy to defeat the principles of policy.
1343:
when your position has been disproved or rejected by consensus.
958:
Example: Adding content that is restricted under the policy on
892:
Policy on changing rules to gain advantage in a content dispute
693:
Knowledge sanctions are meant to be preventative, not punitive
578:
1937:
2612:
919:
Example: Saying you refuse to remove content that violates
30:"WP:GAME" redirects here. For WikiProject Video games, see
1806:
1234:, and Knowledge is built through incremental improvement.
823:
773:
Misusing
Knowledge processes in order to be intentionally
683:
or trick that allows them to evade community standards or
58:. For the essay on how Knowledge is not a video game, see
88:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
1848:
Knowledge:Do not disrupt
Knowledge to illustrate a point
1682:
Example: An editor makes many unconstructive edits in a
1408:
Example: An editor asks another editor to support their
1382:
Example: An editor asks another to change their vote at
923:, because that content is protected by the policy that "
905:
Example: Posting a neutral notice that does not violate
1748:
or perhaps even, in extreme cases, formal arbitration
1099:
Example: Editors reach a consensus, except one (or a
932:
Example: Telling another user that by reverting your
1443:
Using different or variant forms or spellings of an
1412:
in exchange for their support in another discussion.
1395:-pushing, and hints that the first editor's pending
1173:
Example: An editor negotiates a consensus to remove
1824:
He who comes into equity must come with clean hands
2795:
2090:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
996:WP:Neutral point of view § Due and undue weight
946:Vandalism is an exception to the 3-revert rule.
808:Disruption of any kind merits being warned (or
660:, or otherwise evading the spirit of community
2252:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
1923:
596:
38:. For WikiProject Board and table games, see
2678:
984:to a source, when in fact the source is not
2584:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1872:Knowledge:Not here to build an encyclopedia
1524:Gaming of sanctions for disruptive behavior
1219:Removing a large addition for a minor error
84:Editors should generally follow it, though
46:. For the "game" of deleting articles, see
1930:
1916:
1833:(policy on seeking out a supportive forum)
1719:establish the actual user behind a set of
1690:, and then makes controversial changes to
1665:, and then makes controversial changes to
1649:Making unconstructive edits to raise your
1315:a discussion by sowing doubt and discord.
603:
589:
687:, it should not be treated the same as a
76:This page documents an English Knowledge
1854:Knowledge:Don't stuff beans up your nose
1337:prevaricating about the obvious meaning
1238:Example: An editor adds a paragraph of
962:, while cherry-picking the words that "
664:. Editors typically game the system to
14:
2796:
1593:Example: An editor never violates the
1560:Example: Refusing to provide a proper
620:means deliberately misusing Knowledge
478:Deletion guidelines for administrators
1911:
1119:WP:What is consensus? § Not unanimity
1021:Gaming the consensus-building process
988:, or the content twists the source's
964:Knowledge is not a paper encyclopedia
915:Playing policies against each other.
1831:Knowledge:Consensus § Forum shopping
129:
64:
2743:List of all policies and guidelines
1078:pushing a viewpoint with which the
976:Example: Saying that content meets
54:. For the Knowledge Adventure, see
24:
2782:Summaries of values and principles
2623:
2461:
2224:
2050:
707:The meaning of "gaming the system"
92:. When in doubt, discuss first on
25:
2815:
1303:of your own foibles onto others,
1059:Knowledge:Status quo stonewalling
748:of policy to violate the broader
2692:
2689:
2620:
2437:
2384:
2381:
2314:
2311:
2267:Please do not bite the newcomers
2140:
1986:
1465:Draft:Ralph Zwogli (businessman)
1325:agreed to something they did not
1092:Knowledge policies or guidelines
779:using Knowledge to prove a point
133:
68:
2804:Knowledge behavioral guidelines
1901:Knowledge:Too long; didn't read
1866:Knowledge:Maldoror's Conjecture
1733:accusation of bad-faith editing
1657:Example: A new editor makes 10
731:Gaming the system may include:
1222:. If the error is minor, then
966:" to evade those restrictions.
679:If an editor finds and uses a
13:
1:
2277:Responding to threats of harm
2019:Biographies of living persons
1131:WP:BRD misuse § Filibusterers
221:Don't disrupt to make a point
34:. For WikiProject Games, see
2344:Criteria for speedy deletion
2213:Paid-contribution disclosure
1842:Knowledge:Disruptive editing
1692:extended confirmed protected
401:Categories, lists, templates
7:
1837:Knowledge:Civil POV pushing
1749:
1741:
1319:Examples: Denying that you
1108:
993:
978:the policy on verifiability
921:the policy on verifiability
907:the guideline on canvassing
672:, or to enforce a specific
242:Other behavioral guidelines
42:. For Knowledge games, see
10:
2820:
1797:disruption to make a point
1629:
1529:
1423:
1374:Transactional politics or
1345:
1283:tactics – such as history
1250:
1232:Perfection is not required
1195:
1135:
1127:WP:Status quo stonewalling
1115:"refusal to get the point"
1056:
1024:
889:
857:
827:
742:, and otherwise using the
685:misuse administrator tools
151:Knowledge:Ignore all rules
148:
100:
94:this guideline's talk page
56:WP:The Knowledge Adventure
29:
2737:
2677:
2610:
2576:
2518:
2473:
2458:
2434:
2424:
2371:
2301:
2221:
2137:
2127:
2047:
1983:
1973:
1949:
1878:Knowledge:Policy shopping
925:Knowledge is not censored
674:non-neutral point of view
636:, to simply engineering "
247:WMF friendly space policy
50:. For the joke page, see
1727:Various levels of intent
1564:to an editor looking to
383:Other editing guidelines
346:Other content guidelines
215:Don't bite the newcomers
141:This page in a nutshell:
2720:Licensing and copyright
1940:policies and guidelines
853:policies and guidelines
632:attempts to thwart the
1890:Knowledge:Sockpuppetry
1884:Knowledge:POV railroad
1489:Example: Submitting a
1481:accounts to conceal a
1240:verifiable information
1175:well-verified material
1009:Example: Presenting a
2715:Friendly space policy
2505:Broad-concept article
2014:What Knowledge is not
2009:Neutral point of view
1626:Gaming of permissions
1505:Articles for creation
1461:Draft:Ralph A. Zwogli
1453:Articles for Creation
1323:, suggesting someone
1191:core content policies
1166:Bad-faith negotiating
1111:WP:Disruptive editing
960:what Knowledge is not
818:Arbitration Committee
331:Don't copy long texts
27:Knowledge policy page
2282:Talk page guidelines
2242:Conflict of interest
2183:Ownership of content
2028:Copyright violations
2004:No original research
1758:obsessive–compulsive
1483:conflict of interest
1333:policy actually says
1109:See also the policy
265:Talk page guidelines
200:Conflict of interest
159:Knowledge guidelines
78:behavioral guideline
2178:No personal attacks
2100:Don't create hoaxes
1874:(policy supplement)
1341:refusing to concede
1321:posted what you did
802:no personal attacks
336:Don't create hoaxes
2773:List of guidelines
2594:Template namespace
2272:Courtesy vanishing
2247:Disruptive editing
2193:Dispute resolution
1895:Knowledge:Tag team
1860:Knowledge:Griefing
1702:Spurious legalisms
1688:extended confirmed
1457:Draft:Ralph Zwogli
1309:off-topic rambling
882:WP:FORCEDINTERPRET
875:WP:SPURIOUSPROTECT
851:Gaming the use of
715:is seeking to use
691:mistake. However,
658:disruptive editing
548:Naming conventions
326:Offensive material
210:Disruptive editing
205:Courtesy vanishing
18:Knowledge:GASLIGHT
2791:
2790:
2733:
2732:
2673:
2672:
2636:Project namespace
2606:
2605:
2602:
2601:
2543:Dates and numbers
2510:Understandability
2420:
2419:
2367:
2366:
2359:Revision deletion
2332:Proposed deletion
2297:
2296:
2262:Gaming the system
2237:Assume good faith
2123:
2122:
1814:Gaming the system
1737:gaming the system
1695:
1678:
1651:user access level
1619:
1609:
1598:
1595:three-revert rule
1584:
1574:"Walking back" a
1569:
1547:WP:SANCTIONGAMING
1517:
1512:
1498:
1472:
1467:
1413:
1404:
1387:
1344:
1249:
1243:
1194:
1184:
1178:
1134:
1117:; and the essays
1104:
1095:
1082:of the community
1014:
1000:
967:
949:
928:
910:
791:assume good faith
713:gaming the system
634:aims of Knowledge
617:Gaming the system
613:
612:
418:
417:
378:Understandability
277:
276:
232:Gaming the system
195:Assume good faith
147:
146:
128:
127:
16:(Redirected from
2811:
2768:
2767:
2758:List of policies
2753:
2752:
2710:List of policies
2697:
2696:
2695:
2687:
2686:
2683:
2680:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2618:
2617:
2614:
2611:Project content
2471:
2470:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2432:
2431:
2428:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2379:
2378:
2375:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2309:
2308:
2305:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2208:Child protection
2203:No legal threats
2173:Ignore all rules
2145:
2144:
2143:
2135:
2134:
2131:
2078:Reliable sources
2055:
2054:
2053:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1981:
1980:
1977:
1962:Ignore all rules
1944:
1932:
1925:
1918:
1909:
1908:
1856:(humorous essay)
1784:Abuse of process
1779:Abuse of process
1755:
1747:
1708:Knowledge is not
1681:
1656:
1642:
1617:
1606:
1592:
1581:
1559:
1549:
1542:
1515:
1510:
1488:
1470:
1450:
1436:
1407:
1390:
1381:
1365:
1358:
1356:WP:TRANSACTIONAL
1318:
1270:
1263:
1246:
1237:
1221:
1220:
1208:
1187:
1181:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1155:
1148:
1133:
1113:, especially on
1107:
1098:
1089:
1069:
1068:
1051:
1044:
1037:
1008:
999:
975:
957:
936:edits, they are
931:
918:
904:
884:
877:
870:
840:
783:abuse of process
668:, to further an
654:abuse of process
605:
598:
591:
579:
468:Deletion process
362:
361:
321:
320:Non-free content
302:Reliable sources
222:
189:
188:
155:
154:
137:
136:
130:
120:
113:
72:
71:
65:
21:
2819:
2818:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2787:
2765:
2764:
2750:
2749:
2729:
2693:
2691:
2669:
2624:
2622:
2598:
2572:
2526:Manual of Style
2514:
2462:
2460:
2454:
2438:
2436:
2416:
2412:Page protection
2385:
2383:
2363:
2327:Deletion policy
2315:
2313:
2293:
2225:
2223:
2217:
2141:
2139:
2119:
2110:Patent nonsense
2105:Fringe theories
2051:
2049:
2043:
1987:
1985:
1969:
1945:
1936:
1906:
1809:
1793:personal attack
1781:
1775:with evidence.
1762:cast aspersions
1729:
1704:
1646:
1645:
1638:
1634:
1628:
1576:personal attack
1553:
1552:
1545:
1540:WP:SANCTIONGAME
1538:
1534:
1526:
1440:
1439:
1432:
1428:
1422:
1369:
1368:
1361:
1354:
1350:
1339:of a claim, or
1274:
1273:
1266:
1259:
1255:
1230:for clean-up).
1218:
1217:
1212:
1211:
1204:
1200:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1151:
1144:
1140:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1042:WP:ONEHANDGIVES
1040:
1033:
1029:
1023:
1011:Knowledge essay
894:
888:
887:
880:
873:
866:
862:
856:
844:
843:
836:
832:
826:
709:
646:untoward result
642:content dispute
609:
580:
572:
487:Project content
433:Manual of Style
341:Patent nonsense
319:
314:Fringe theories
220:
168:Guidelines list
153:
134:
124:
123:
116:
109:
105:
97:
69:
63:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2817:
2807:
2806:
2789:
2788:
2786:
2785:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2761:
2738:
2735:
2734:
2731:
2730:
2728:
2727:
2725:Privacy policy
2722:
2717:
2712:
2707:
2701:
2699:
2684:
2675:
2674:
2671:
2670:
2668:
2667:
2662:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2632:
2630:
2615:
2608:
2607:
2604:
2603:
2600:
2599:
2597:
2596:
2591:
2589:Categorization
2586:
2580:
2578:
2577:Classification
2574:
2573:
2571:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2522:
2520:
2516:
2515:
2513:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2495:Disambiguation
2492:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2474:
2468:
2456:
2455:
2453:
2452:
2450:Editing policy
2446:
2444:
2429:
2422:
2421:
2418:
2417:
2415:
2414:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2397:Administrators
2393:
2391:
2376:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2364:
2362:
2361:
2356:
2351:
2346:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2329:
2323:
2321:
2306:
2299:
2298:
2295:
2294:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2233:
2231:
2219:
2218:
2216:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2180:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2160:
2155:
2149:
2147:
2132:
2125:
2124:
2121:
2120:
2118:
2117:
2115:External links
2112:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2092:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2075:
2073:Citing sources
2070:
2065:
2059:
2057:
2045:
2044:
2042:
2041:
2039:Article titles
2036:
2031:
2021:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1995:
1993:
1978:
1971:
1970:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1950:
1947:
1946:
1938:Knowledge key
1935:
1934:
1927:
1920:
1912:
1905:
1904:
1898:
1892:
1887:
1881:
1875:
1869:
1863:
1857:
1851:
1845:
1839:
1834:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1816:
1810:
1808:
1805:
1780:
1777:
1752:WP:Arbitration
1728:
1725:
1703:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1679:
1667:semi-protected
1644:
1643:
1635:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1551:
1550:
1543:
1535:
1530:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1513:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1468:
1438:
1437:
1429:
1424:
1421:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1405:
1388:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1366:
1359:
1351:
1346:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1268:WP:GASLIGHTING
1264:
1256:
1251:
1244:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1201:
1196:
1185:
1179:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1149:
1146:WP:BADFAITHNEG
1141:
1136:
1105:
1096:
1085:
1077:
1053:
1052:
1045:
1038:
1030:
1025:
1022:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1003:
1002:
1001:
980:because it is
970:
969:
968:
952:
951:
950:
929:
913:
912:
911:
886:
885:
878:
871:
863:
858:
855:
849:
842:
841:
833:
828:
825:
822:
814:administrators
806:
805:
798:
786:
763:
762:
759:
753:
752:of the policy.
751:
747:
708:
705:
702:
698:
611:
610:
608:
607:
600:
593:
585:
582:
581:
576:
574:
570:
568:
565:
564:
558:
557:
556:
555:
550:
542:
541:
535:
534:
533:
532:
527:
522:
521:
520:
510:
505:
504:
503:
490:
489:
483:
482:
481:
480:
475:
470:
462:
461:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
445:
440:
427:
426:
420:
419:
416:
415:
414:
413:
411:Disambiguation
408:
406:Categorization
403:
395:
394:
392:Categorization
388:
387:
386:
385:
380:
375:
370:
358:
357:
351:
350:
349:
348:
343:
338:
333:
328:
323:
316:
311:
310:
309:
299:
297:External links
294:
292:Citing sources
286:
285:
279:
278:
275:
274:
273:
272:
267:
259:
258:
252:
251:
250:
249:
244:
239:
234:
229:
224:
217:
212:
207:
202:
197:
185:
184:
178:
177:
176:
175:
170:
162:
161:
145:
144:
138:
126:
125:
122:
121:
114:
106:
101:
98:
83:
82:
73:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2816:
2805:
2802:
2801:
2799:
2784:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2774:
2769:
2762:
2760:
2759:
2754:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2740:
2739:
2736:
2726:
2723:
2721:
2718:
2716:
2713:
2711:
2708:
2706:
2703:
2702:
2700:
2698:
2688:
2685:
2676:
2666:
2663:
2661:
2658:
2654:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2646:
2642:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2633:
2631:
2629:
2619:
2616:
2609:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2581:
2579:
2575:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2538:Accessibility
2536:
2532:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2521:
2517:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2484:
2483:Summary style
2481:
2480:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2472:
2469:
2467:
2457:
2451:
2448:
2447:
2445:
2443:
2433:
2430:
2423:
2413:
2410:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2395:
2394:
2392:
2390:
2380:
2377:
2370:
2360:
2357:
2355:
2352:
2350:
2347:
2345:
2342:
2338:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2325:
2324:
2322:
2320:
2310:
2307:
2300:
2288:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2234:
2232:
2230:
2220:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2179:
2176:
2174:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2164:
2161:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2148:
2146:
2136:
2133:
2126:
2116:
2113:
2111:
2108:
2106:
2103:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2068:Autobiography
2066:
2064:
2061:
2060:
2058:
2056:
2046:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1999:Verifiability
1997:
1996:
1994:
1992:
1982:
1979:
1972:
1964:
1963:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1948:
1941:
1933:
1928:
1926:
1921:
1919:
1914:
1913:
1910:
1902:
1899:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1885:
1882:
1879:
1876:
1873:
1870:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1840:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1829:
1825:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:Unclean hands
1817:
1815:
1812:
1811:
1804:
1800:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1785:
1776:
1774:
1772:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1753:
1745:
1738:
1734:
1724:
1722:
1717:
1716:wikilawyering
1713:
1709:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:autoconfirmed
1660:
1655:
1654:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1616:
1615:
1613:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1596:
1591:
1590:
1588:
1580:
1579:
1577:
1573:
1567:
1563:
1558:
1557:
1555:
1554:
1548:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1528:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1502:
1496:
1495:autobiography
1492:
1487:
1486:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1469:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1449:
1448:
1446:
1445:article title
1442:
1441:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1379:
1377:
1373:
1364:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1349:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:contradiction
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1254:
1245:
1241:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1229:
1226:(or at least
1225:
1216:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1192:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1170:
1163:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1139:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1081:
1075:
1073:
1072:filibustering
1064:
1063:
1060:
1050:
1049:WP:FILIBUSTER
1046:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1028:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1004:
997:
991:
990:point of view
987:
983:
979:
974:
973:
971:
965:
961:
956:
955:
953:
947:
943:
942:3-revert rule
939:
935:
930:
926:
922:
917:
916:
914:
908:
903:
902:
900:
899:wikilawyering
896:
895:
893:
883:
879:
876:
872:
869:
868:WP:PLAYPOLICY
865:
864:
861:
854:
848:
839:
835:
834:
831:
821:
819:
815:
811:
803:
799:
796:
792:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
767:
760:
757:
756:Filibustering
754:
749:
746:
743:
741:
737:
736:Wikilawyering
734:
733:
732:
729:
726:
722:
718:
714:
704:
700:
699:mistakes and
696:
694:
690:
686:
682:
677:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:
606:
601:
599:
594:
592:
587:
586:
584:
583:
567:
566:
563:
560:
559:
554:
551:
549:
546:
545:
544:
543:
540:
537:
536:
531:
528:
526:
523:
519:
516:
515:
514:
511:
509:
506:
502:
499:
498:
497:
496:Project pages
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
485:
484:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
465:
464:
463:
460:
457:
456:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
435:
434:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
422:
421:
412:
409:
407:
404:
402:
399:
398:
397:
396:
393:
390:
389:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
317:
315:
312:
308:
305:
304:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
284:
281:
280:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
253:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
179:
174:
173:Policies list
171:
169:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
157:
156:
152:
142:
139:
132:
131:
119:
115:
112:
108:
107:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
81:
79:
74:
67:
66:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
2780:
2771:
2763:
2756:
2748:
2741:
2705:Terms of Use
2690:
2641:WikiProjects
2621:
2558:Lead section
2478:Article size
2459:
2435:
2382:
2372:Enforcement
2312:
2261:
2222:
2198:Sockpuppetry
2188:Edit warring
2138:
2048:
1984:
1960:
1955:Five pillars
1953:
1801:
1782:
1770:
1766:noticeboards
1744:WP:Mediation
1736:
1730:
1712:court of law
1705:
1527:
1363:WP:TITFORTAT
1293:misdirection
1067:Stonewalling
1035:WP:STONEWALL
845:
807:
768:
764:
740:pettifogging
730:
712:
710:
678:
666:make a point
615:
614:
501:WikiProjects
368:Article size
231:
140:
75:
48:WP:WHACAMOLE
2349:Attack page
2337:Biographies
1850:(guideline)
1844:(guideline)
1721:sockpuppets
1659:dummy edits
1503:Gaming the
1434:WP:GAMENAME
1376:tit for tat
1313:destabilize
1295:, baseless
1281:gaslighting
1261:WP:GASLIGHT
1206:WP:FIXFIRST
838:WP:GAMETYPE
473:Speedy keep
256:Discussions
2653:User boxes
2648:User pages
2287:Signatures
2163:Harassment
2095:Plagiarism
2063:Notability
1789:disruptive
1686:to become
1675:vandalizes
1669:articles,
1661:to become
1583:education.
1479:sockpuppet
1455:, such as
1335:or means,
1329:pretending
1305:repetition
1301:projection
1287:, reality
1285:re-writing
1279:Employing
1076:repeatedly
897:Bad-faith
890:See also:
750:principles
725:disruptive
711:An editor
697:good-faith
689:good-faith
553:Notability
518:User boxes
513:User pages
270:Signatures
237:User pages
182:Behavioral
149:See also:
86:exceptions
60:WP:NOTGAME
2660:Shortcuts
2354:Oversight
2302:Deletion
2257:Etiquette
2168:Vandalism
2158:Consensus
2034:Image use
2024:Copyright
1694:articles.
1677:articles.
1532:Shortcuts
1507:process.
1491:biography
1348:Shortcuts
1253:Shortcuts
1138:Shortcuts
1080:consensus
1027:Shortcuts
938:violating
934:vandalism
860:Shortcuts
847:gaming.
775:invidious
766:unaware.
721:bad faith
701:bad-faith
662:consensus
630:bad faith
525:Shortcuts
508:Templates
227:Etiquette
118:WP:GAMING
103:Shortcuts
90:consensus
52:WP:MMORPG
44:WP:WGAMES
2798:Category
2665:Subpages
2531:Contents
2500:Hatnotes
2425:Editing
2407:Blocking
2153:Civility
2128:Conduct
2083:Medicine
1974:Content
1807:See also
1706:Because
1640:WP:PGAME
1632:Shortcut
1562:citation
1426:Shortcut
1248:changes.
1198:Shortcut
1183:reverts.
1101:tag team
986:reliable
830:Shortcut
824:Examples
795:civility
681:loophole
670:edit war
530:Subpages
459:Deletion
438:contents
307:medicine
36:WP:GAMES
2563:Linking
2490:Be bold
2402:Banning
1903:(essay)
1897:(essay)
1886:(essay)
1880:(essay)
1868:(essay)
1862:(essay)
1684:sandbox
1477:Use of
1084:clearly
816:or the
810:blocked
640:" in a
638:victory
626:process
373:Be bold
355:Editing
283:Content
111:WP:GAME
2553:Layout
2548:Images
1566:verify
1463:, and
1289:denial
1228:tag it
1224:fix it
1153:WP:BFN
1129:, and
745:letter
717:policy
648:in an
644:or an
622:policy
562:Search
448:tables
40:WP:BTG
2568:Lists
2519:Style
1795:, or
1750:(see
1742:(see
1671:moves
1311:– to
1307:, or
982:cited
539:Other
443:lists
424:Style
32:WP:VG
1771:diff
994:See
940:the
2682:(?)
2679:WMF
2613:(?)
2427:(?)
2374:(?)
2304:(?)
2130:(?)
1976:(?)
1943:(?)
1410:RfC
1401:FAC
1399:or
1397:GAN
1393:PoV
1384:RFA
1070:or
992:. (
944:. (
781:or
719:in
676:.
650:RfC
624:or
2800::
2770::
2755::
1773:ed
1710:a
1653:.
1485:.
1459:,
1447:.
1327:,
1299:,
1291:,
1125:,
1121:,
1074:–
998:.)
927:".
820:.
738:,
656:,
2766:G
2751:P
2694:P
2625:G
2463:G
2439:P
2386:P
2316:P
2226:G
2142:P
2052:G
2030:)
2026:(
1988:P
1931:e
1924:t
1917:v
1754:)
1746:)
1497:.
1193:.
1094:.
1061:.
948:)
804:.
797:.
785:.
604:e
597:t
590:v
96:.
80:.
62:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.