Knowledge

:Commercial editing - Knowledge

Source 📝

148:, or editing for profit, is very controversial on Knowledge. Editors with a financial conflict of interest (such as business owners and public-relations professionals acting on their behalf) should recognize the risk of editing affected articles directly. A better approach is to disclose the conflict of interest, make suggestions on talk pages and noticeboards, and request edits using the 24: 131: 300:
An editor who appears to be editing for profit can often be identified because their contributions will focus on a narrow set of articles, and have a peculiar point of view that is always positive or negative, or their edits may have the tone of advertising. It is not necessary, nor even allowed, to
251:
This essay discourages editing for profit. It does not intend to discourage experts from editing articles in their field of study, nor to prevent editing at work. Subject-matter experts can contribute to Knowledge articles related to their area of expertise. They must ensure that their external
263:
Many people use Knowledge as a reference while working. If a user notices an opportunity to improve an article, they are encouraged to do so, so long as they avoid editing any article related to their employer or its competitors. For example, a software engineer working at
177:
you expect to derive monetary or other tangible benefits from editing Knowledge as an owner of, or significant stakeholder in, an organization or product you wish to write about, or by having some other form of close financial relationship with the subject of the article,
371:
Subjects, including people, businesses and groups, have an interest to ensure that articles about them are accurate and up to date. If you are concerned about how you are presented on Knowledge, please
181:
you are editing articles related to a business competitor or litigation adversary, or an interest group that advocates for or against your business or industry.
174:
you are receiving monetary or other tangible benefits to edit Knowledge on behalf of an individual or organization, whether as an employee or contractor, or
321:, or making minor spelling or grammar corrections. However, it is preferable for such editors to request help from neutral editors at noticeboards such as 185:
Other forms of financial conflict may exist. Good practice is not to edit Knowledge in order to gain a commercial advantage for you or your associates.
436: 229: 359:
template until they have been thoroughly reviewed and repaired by neutral editors. When an article is unequivocal advertising, it may be
286:
journalist who writes about Washington politics could edit Knowledge's article on the United States Congress, or a reviewer who works for
411: 97: 390: 385: 292:
could edit a Knowledge article about a winery. However, editors should not edit articles about the organizations for whom they work.
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
416: 317:
An editor with a financial conflict will not lose editing privileges for reverting vandalism, removing clear violations of the
219: 93: 194: 113: 109: 257: 40: 351:
Articles that appear to have been written by editors with a close connection to the subject may be tagged using the
400: 441: 373: 81: 167: 44: 236: 161: 77: 252:
financial relationships in the field do not interfere with their responsibility to follow Knowledge's
431: 203:
distinguishes between paid editing with or without a conflict of interest. Examples of paid editing
139:
Knowledge is a non-commercial website. Editing for profit is frowned upon by many community members.
405: 246: 253: 8: 395: 348:. Such accounts may be blocked indefinitely when used solely for disruptive purposes. 282: 188: 332:
If an editor persists in commercial editing after being warned, their account may be
152: 47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 302: 212: 32: 360: 333: 337: 326: 322: 306: 288: 425: 345: 341: 318: 200: 305:
of an editor. Cases of suspected commercial editing may be reported at the
354: 228:
hiring experts to review technical or medical articles, as was done by the
225:
paying translators to move material between different-language Wikipedias;
366: 376:
to request help. Rest assured that all inquiries are handled swiftly.
265: 277: 309:. A determination is made by inspecting the edits, not the editor. 295: 273: 269: 65:
In November 2013, there were three main discussions and votes
379: 312: 423: 232:, or to remedy suspected copyright violations; 195:Knowledge:Conflict of interest § Paid editing 336:for violations of relevant policies such as 412:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Paid editing 401:Portland Communications#Knowledge editing 391:US Congressional staff edits to Knowledge 386:Conflict of interest editing on Knowledge 417:Knowledge:Public relations and marketing 437:Knowledge conflict of interest editing 424: 125: 18: 13: 319:biography of living persons policy 303:investigate the real life identity 45:thoroughly vetted by the community 41:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 14: 453: 276:(a product of Apple's competitor 235:working on behalf of Knowledge's 170:if any of the following applies: 307:Conflict of interest noticeboard 272:, but they should avoid editing 207:a conflict of interest include: 129: 22: 268:could help improve the article 162:Financial conflicts of interest 211:responding to requests on the 201:conflict of interest guideline 1: 243:and similar scholarly work. 218:accepting remuneration as a 94:Paid editing policy proposal 7: 247:Experts and editing at work 10: 458: 192: 110:Conflict of interest limit 16:Essay on editing Knowledge 408:, an alternate viewpoint 396:Bell Pottinger#Criticism 258:policies, and guidelines 137:This page in a nutshell: 406:Knowledge:Don't cry COI 220:Wikipedian-in-residence 442:Knowledge paid editing 189:Non-commercial editing 59:Paid Editing Proposals 338:neutral point of view 193:Further information: 166:You have a financial 43:, as it has not been 346:conflict of interest 342:no original research 329:(for biographies). 325:(for businesses) or 168:conflict of interest 146:Commercial editing 237:Education program 230:Google Foundation 143: 142: 124: 123: 67:on paid editing: 53: 52: 449: 432:Knowledge essays 361:speedily deleted 358: 157: 151: 133: 132: 126: 78:No paid advocacy 55: 54: 26: 25: 19: 457: 456: 452: 451: 450: 448: 447: 446: 422: 421: 382: 369: 367:Requesting help 352: 315: 298: 249: 197: 191: 164: 155: 149: 130: 49: 48: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 455: 445: 444: 439: 434: 420: 419: 414: 409: 403: 398: 393: 388: 381: 378: 368: 365: 314: 311: 297: 294: 289:Wine Spectator 283:New York Times 280:). Likewise a 248: 245: 241: 240: 233: 226: 223: 216: 190: 187: 183: 182: 179: 175: 163: 160: 141: 140: 134: 122: 121: 106: 105: 90: 89: 74: 73: 72: 69: 68: 66: 62: 61: 51: 50: 38: 37: 29: 27: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 454: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 429: 427: 418: 415: 413: 410: 407: 404: 402: 399: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 384: 383: 377: 375: 364: 362: 356: 349: 347: 343: 339: 335: 330: 328: 324: 320: 310: 308: 304: 296:Investigation 293: 291: 290: 285: 284: 279: 275: 271: 267: 261: 259: 255: 244: 238: 234: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 206: 202: 196: 186: 180: 176: 173: 172: 171: 169: 159: 154: 147: 138: 135: 128: 127: 119: 115: 111: 108: 107: 103: 99: 95: 92: 91: 87: 83: 79: 76: 75: 71: 70: 64: 63: 60: 57: 56: 46: 42: 36: 34: 28: 21: 20: 370: 350: 331: 316: 299: 287: 281: 262: 250: 242: 213:reward board 204: 198: 184: 165: 145: 144: 136: 117: 101: 100:) (closed: 85: 58: 30: 116:) (closed: 84:) (closed: 31:This is an 426:Categories 374:contact us 254:principles 158:template. 278:Microsoft 380:See also 313:Remedies 153:edit COI 334:blocked 327:WP:BLPN 323:WP:COIN 274:ASP.NET 205:without 118:opposed 102:opposed 86:opposed 344:, and 266:Apple 33:essay 199:The 114:talk 98:talk 82:talk 355:COI 270:C++ 428:: 363:. 357:}} 353:{{ 340:, 260:. 256:, 178:or 156:}} 150:{{ 120:) 104:) 88:) 239:; 222:; 215:; 112:( 96:( 80:( 35:.

Index

essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
No paid advocacy
talk
Paid editing policy proposal
talk
Conflict of interest limit
talk
edit COI
conflict of interest
Knowledge:Conflict of interest § Paid editing
conflict of interest guideline
reward board
Wikipedian-in-residence
Google Foundation
Education program
principles
policies, and guidelines
Apple
C++
ASP.NET
Microsoft
New York Times
Wine Spectator
investigate the real life identity
Conflict of interest noticeboard
biography of living persons policy
WP:COIN
WP:BLPN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.