245:
35:
361:
considered "spoilers" and may be excluded from the result, if necessary to achieve a result. Examples of spoiling behavior include not posting/supporting any position, posting opposition without making/supporting counterproposals, or posting proposals which make no attempt to include the posted positions of other editors.
228:
make a better proposal that includes all sides. An editor who does not make an effort to meet those obligations is more visible in having not made an effort to include others' views, and may be excluded from the discussion if necessary to reach a conclusion. It makes it easier to show who is acting in good faith.
395:
If all the proposals fail and there are no new counterproposals, the discussion is considered to be in deadlock and without consensus. Any editor who posted or responded to a position may propose that it is in a state of deadlock, and an action to take. However, alternative proposed resolutions may
227:
This consensus-building method encourages results that include all the editors' stated positions. Importantly, it also mitigates the ability to filibuster or obstruct a discussion. It does that by requiring editors to state their positions up front, and obligating editors who object to a proposal to
287:
Though it's acceptable to respond in opposition to a position, it's better to first post one's own position. That makes sure it's among the positions other editors are requested to include in a resolution. In some cases, posting an alternative position may be all the response that's necessary.
379:
A proposed resolution in which all the responses are at least "neutral" is deemed to have achieved consensus. Everyone has in effect said they can at least live with it. The definition of "all" is responses after 72 hours or by all the editors who have posted or responded to positions in the
231:
Even with that said, we're all human. So it can't possibly be perfect. We're looking for an improvement good enough to make
Knowledge more fun, or at least not setting up valuable volunteers to drive each other away, while retaining its basic principle of large scale consensus-based decision
360:
A central point to this method is to channel or mitigate effects of "spoilers", editors who might never compromise in a discussion. It gives them a productive direction and an expectation to compromise. Editors who do not participate in a good-faith effort to move the discussion forward are
351:
Editors indicating opposition to a proposed resolution are obligated to make a counterproposal which they believe will satisfy the participants. The counterproposal is made with the same proposed resolution message box. Though it may refer to a previous proposal and only specify changes.
311:
Any editor may make a proposed resolution which they believe will satisfy all the parties involved. Each editor participating in the discussion will respond (with traditional bolded wording or a provided template) indicating
275:
Consensus building can be useful in issues where people take sides. In order to begin this consensus building method, an editor posts a message box with their position. The message box links to the procedure document.
399:
An editor proposing that consensus has not been reached must in the same statement propose an action to take. The same reaction templates are used in response to these proposals.
403:
Postpone the decision because a resolution still appears possible. Perhaps some time is needed for research. Maybe a break is needed for a day so heads can cool down.
483:
221:
201:
method for
Knowledge talk pages and other discussions. Participants should observe from their experience what changes are needed. The intent is to adhere to
343:
After a proposed resolution has been posted, any new positions are considered late. Late positions are not valid until that editor posts a counterproposal.
217:
409:
Accept a resolution which has an existing majority supporting it, and include a minority opinion. The minority opinion may be some text or a link to a
220:. Dissatisfaction with unproductive discussions has been cited as a major problem for participants. A WikiMedia Strategy task force also considered
355:
551:
184:
520:
299:
216:
to make group decisions. Left to their own devices, discussions often don't end well. Knowledge's decline in participation has been
556:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
346:
546:
454:
255:
260:
If the matter can be resolved through simple direct discussion, then this consensus-building method does not get involved.
17:
383:
98:
263:
477:
177:
51:
471:
459:
279:
198:
367:
291:
502:
143:
89:
541:
419:
Abandon the issue as deadlocked. (This should be avoided. But reality dictates it has to be included here.)
138:
55:
449:
296:
Once positions are known, editors may discuss them. The goal is to find a solution everyone can live with.
170:
118:
465:
444:
536:
153:
239:
128:
511:", online copy of book by C. T. Lawrence Butler and Amy Rothstein (1987) Food Not Bombs Publishing
148:
123:
108:
73:
503:"Breaking Robert's Rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus and get results"
410:
236:. So let's find what it takes to achieve these needed improvements in consensus building!
133:
8:
429:
158:
113:
252:
In general, these steps follow the basic recommended consensus decision-making process.
434:
284:
Each editor is encouraged to post their position, or agree with an already-posted one.
103:
65:
439:
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
413:. For anyone who wants to make a statement, this gives them all the room they want.
43:
514:
206:
202:
496:
530:
474:– 1972 paper on realities of Human nature in apparently-structureless groups
416:
Select a neutral third party to refer the question for a binding decision.
244:
490:
406:
Accept a resolution which has an existing 3/4 majority supporting it.
213:
508:
505:, book by Susskind and Cruikshank (via Knowledge ISBN tool)
423:
468:– on unregistered contributors in the consensus process
218:
the subject of a Wall Street
Journal front-page article
517:, Northwest Intentional Communities Association (NICA)
363:
This part of the process is intended to be different.
248:
Flowchart of basic consensus decision-making process.
305:
224:. And that decline has still continued for years.
528:
222:ideas for improving consensus-building processes
389:
484:Outline: improve consensus-building processes
178:
373:
185:
171:
269:
243:
14:
529:
521:Thousands of editors leaving Knowledge
552:Knowledge essays explaining processes
455:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
29:
497:A short guide to consensus building
24:
300:Editor posts a proposed resolution
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
568:
557:Knowledge essays about consensus
472:The Tyranny of Structurelessness
460:Knowledge:Good editing practices
33:
306:proposed resolution message box
499:, Public Disputes Program, MIT
232:making. Remember the saying,
197:This is a recommendation of a
13:
1:
240:The consensus-building method
547:Knowledge dispute resolution
450:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
396:also continue to be posted.
347:Others make counterproposals
234:Perfect is the enemy of done
7:
509:"On Conflict and Consensus.
466:Knowledge:IPs are human too
445:Knowledge:Assume good faith
10:
573:
486:at WikiMedia Strategy wiki
390:no-consensus message boxes
356:"Spoilers" may be excluded
256:Discussions start as usual
63:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge
478:Commons:Polling templates
212:Knowledge typically uses
523:, The Star, Nov 23, 2009
384:Consensus is not reached
264:Editor posts a position
207:avoid instruction creep
249:
374:consensus message box
280:Others post positions
247:
209:as much as possible.
54:, as it has not been
542:Knowledge discussion
480:on WikiMedia Commons
368:Consensus is reached
328:(can live with it),
292:Discussion continues
270:position message box
144:Ownership of content
515:Basics of Consensus
430:Knowledge:Consensus
139:No personal attacks
18:Knowledge:CONSBUILD
435:Knowledge:Civility
250:
199:consensus building
119:Dispute resolution
440:Knowledge:Be bold
203:keeping it simple
195:
194:
84:
83:
16:(Redirected from
564:
537:Knowledge essays
187:
180:
173:
90:Conduct policies
86:
85:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
527:
526:
493:
426:
386:
370:
358:
349:
302:
294:
282:
266:
258:
242:
191:
154:Username policy
80:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
570:
560:
559:
554:
549:
544:
539:
525:
524:
518:
512:
506:
500:
492:
491:External links
489:
488:
487:
481:
475:
469:
463:
457:
452:
447:
442:
437:
432:
425:
422:
421:
420:
417:
414:
407:
404:
385:
382:
369:
366:
357:
354:
348:
345:
314:strong support
301:
298:
293:
290:
281:
278:
265:
262:
257:
254:
241:
238:
193:
192:
190:
189:
182:
175:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
129:Editing policy
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
93:
92:
82:
81:
78:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
532:
522:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
494:
485:
482:
479:
476:
473:
470:
467:
464:
461:
458:
456:
453:
451:
448:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
427:
418:
415:
412:
408:
405:
402:
401:
400:
397:
393:
391:
381:
377:
375:
365:
364:
353:
344:
341:
339:
338:strong oppose
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
309:
307:
297:
289:
285:
277:
273:
271:
261:
253:
246:
237:
235:
229:
225:
223:
219:
215:
210:
208:
204:
200:
188:
183:
181:
176:
174:
169:
168:
166:
165:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
99:Block evasion
97:
96:
95:
94:
91:
88:
87:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
398:
394:
387:
380:discussion.
378:
371:
362:
359:
350:
342:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:weak support
321:
317:
313:
310:
303:
295:
286:
283:
274:
267:
259:
251:
233:
230:
226:
211:
196:
149:Sockpuppetry
124:Edit warring
74:WP:CONSBUILD
41:
330:weak oppose
109:Clean start
42:This is an
531:Categories
462:(proposal)
411:user essay
134:Harassment
214:consensus
159:Vandalism
114:Consensus
424:See also
104:Civility
66:Shortcut
326:neutral
318:support
392:below
376:below
334:oppose
308:below
272:below
44:essay
388:See
372:See
304:See
268:See
205:and
533::
340:.
336:,
332:,
324:,
320:,
316:,
186:e
179:t
172:v
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
