559:
especially true of scholarship. For example, for a peer-reviewed publication, a scholarly mathematician should know the consensus of mathematical knowledge on a topic or should not publish at all on that topic. However, Knowledge has no such requirement for its editors. An editor who knows just one fact and just one source about it is allowed to add the fact and the source to
Knowledge, as long as all policies and guidelines are satisfied, and other editors can separately add more facts and sources from their knowledge. We strive to reach the state where the article as a whole is not the result of cherrypicking of some sources from many sources; for example, neutrality or due weight may require it, but an individual editor is not required to be neutral, only the article is, and an article's neutrality and balancing of weight are often achieved by adding content, without necessarily deleting other content. Our concern against cherrypicking when editing a Knowledge article is generally against cherrypicking specifically from within a single source.
440:, database copies, and library hard copies of a newspaper are limited to one edition per day, and that is not necessarily the last edition. Some newspapers that maintain their own websites may choose to put the latest version on the website, and sometimes corrections are even added days or weeks later, but that is not guaranteed. Databases may or may not be updated to match newspapers' own websites, since database publishers are often separate from newspaper publishers, even if they are connected by contract. In any case, we use what is available, and, if we have a choice, we should use the best available, and we cite what we use.
420:
corrected between printings even if they're of the same edition. Unfortunately, library catalogues often do not indicate what printing is in a library, differentiating only between editions. It is possible that, for current editions of modern books, libraries tend to buy first printings whereas bookstores may stock more recent printings, although you may have to visit in person to find out. Printings are often marked in a modern book on the copyright page but only in a code, such as a line that says only "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10" or perhaps "10 9 8 7 6 5 4", in which the smallest number visible is often the printing number.
475:
and not to add
Washington's. However, if another editor adds Washington's view, you may not delete it on the grounds that you disagree. No matter how sure you are that Washington is wrong to the bone, leave the content and the citation in place. What you may do is add a source that disputes Washington's view. This is consistent with Knowledge being a work continually undergoing improvement and no editor is required to know or believe every source. Thus, to choose one source and not another is not cherrypicking from one source.
134:
661:, article), I argue now that doubtless someone besides Keynes said it and, given the content and if said by enough people, doubtless a scholar said it and it's useful and harmless to include it here (in a non-article) with the qualification, rather than write it in my own words and less wittily, somewhat as if I invented the notion. If an attribution to a presumably now-anonymous scholar can be provided, it'll be good to add it.
516:
it from the same sourcing that you believe was cherrypicked by another editor, you should be able to find evidence of cherrypicking. Speculation is not an acceptable ground for continuing to challenge content as cherrypicked. In general, the better course is to find any contradictory or significant qualifying information yourself and to edit the page to reflect what you have found.
453:
ethology is reliable, that author's view has changed and the later view is authoritative, regardless of which edition was first or third. However, if a distinction can be found between two views about one subject, both would be authoritative for that author and we would not report a change. If the distinction is minor, the earlier view may not be entitled to weight in
Knowledge.
390:
past. While an individual editor is not required to know all of the significant sources on a subject, it is helpful if you do, or if you know at least some of them. Therefore, if you are familiar with a different and unused source that should be used, feel free to edit an article consistently with the different source, if the source is otherwise eligible to be used in
Knowledge.
42:
119:
281:
work has not less than the highest quality, but neither artist knows about the other, so neither one is criticizing the other. In effect, the book is a source that contains multiple sources, which you can treat separately. If you're editing an article about artist B but not about artist A, you don't have to report what artist A said.
538:
denied that superiority. This can happen because a publisher wants a catchier title in order to encourage more sales, and some publishing contracts take control of the titles away from the authors. We do not ordinarily report a fact on the basis of a book title alone, but in a case like this we would be especially unlikely to do so.
377:
has several volumes, consider all the volumes. That kind of source may have relevant content sprinkled across all the volumes. You may have to read all of them. For some, searching the index (even reading the whole index from A to Z) is needed. For some, you'll need to search online inside a source for various terms.
229:
with the effect of changing the meaning of what the source is saying. It is cherrypicking even if the source is precisely cited. It is still cherrypicking even if the editor meant well in changing the meaning; the issue is not the editor's intention, but how the
Knowledge article represents the source's meaning.
293:
Some subjects are grounded in critique of society or of another subject. For instance, a belief system may contradict another. Given that a
Knowledge article is about only one subject, not every contradiction from outside of that subject need be reported, but substantial contradiction probably should
162:
often means selecting from the general range of sources on a topic so as to misrepresent a consensus or to misrepresent what has been published. For that, the remedy is to edit to reflect what another editor missed, because we don't expect an editor to know all the sources on a topic or even all of a
524:
Contradiction may justify deleting contradicted information more weakly sourced, but often it justifies presenting both sides of a topic, as by leaving intact the original statement and adding a new statement, so readers can know multiple perspectives. Which course to follow depends on the case, but
474:
Suppose Smith wrote a book with one view and
Washington wrote another book with a contradictory view. Suppose you agree with Smith but not with Washington. Provided they came from different sources, e.g. different books or different websites, when you edit an article, you're free to add Smith's view
410:
It may be appropriate to cite an older edition even when a newer edition is also being cited, or instead of a newer edition, but this would be rare. The older information would have to be entitled to weight apart from the newer. One case is when writing about the historical development of an idea or
406:
Citing multiple editions in one article is permissible if the content is sourced to multiple editions. A statement being kept and which is supported by an older edition should continue to be supported by the older edition in a citation, unless an editor has found that the newer edition also supports
398:
A later edition of a work usually replaces all earlier editions. Earlier editions are usually not authoritative as sourcing against later editions. However, an editor may not know of a newer edition or may not have access to it. Therefore, it generally is not cherrypicking to get information from an
249:
Earlier and later within a single source is generally not earlier or later in time. Exceptions may occur if a single source presents chronologically ordered material, such as an anthology of dated writings, a history, or a biography. However, even if an author is known to complete the writing of one
241:
Politics is a field in which changing one's mind is commonly criticized, at least in the United States. A claim is that a lack of consistency over time may make a candidate less trustworthy. However, while that may be more relevant to electing one or another candidate, it is less relevant to editing
228:
As to contradictory information that needs to be reported in
Knowledge, if, for example, a source says "Charlie loves all blue coats and hates all red coats", to report in Knowledge that according to that source "Charlie loves all... coats" is cherrypicking from the source. It is cherrypicking words
574:
is 'selecting relevant information and not selecting irrelevant information'. We're supposed to do that when writing for
Knowledge. For example, if you're writing an article about one person and basing it on a source about that person's family, you generally should select only information about the
515:
to persist in claiming that cherrypicking occurred unless evidence of it has been uncovered. You may know a subject very well and believe an article to be erroneous, but either you know it from other sourcing (but a conflict between multiple sources is not evidence of cherrypicking) or, if you know
431:
Newspapers traditionally have idiosyncratic ways of labeling different editions in the course of a day, especially in past decades, so that the labels may not make clear which is earlier or later, especially to an out-of-town reader. Additionally, the publisher may arbitrarily designate one edition
376:
While
Knowledge may consider a "source" to be just p.32 of a certain book, to prevent cherrypicking you should consider a source in its larger sense. While many sources are organized for speedy lookups, some are not or your interest may not allow looking in just one place. For instance, if a source
367:
On the other hand, merely additional information does not have to be provided. For example, if a source says "brain surgery is difficult" and goes on to state the experience of a surgeon who performed it without changing the meaning of the main information, the surgeon's experience does not have to
358:
Either contradictory or qualifying information may be found anywhere in a source, not necessarily adjacent to the main information. For example, while the main information may be in a middle chapter of a book, contradictory or qualifying information may be in an endnote, in an introduction, or on a
346:
Qualifying information is information that might not contradict the main information but that alters how the main information should be understood. For example, to quote a source that says that most Americans sleep late and skip work but to ignore that the source limits that by saying "on weekends"
324:
Different fields of study have points of disagreement with each other. Even if the same author writes on multiple fields or disciplines in a single source, a Knowledge article within one field of scholarship generally does not have to report contradictions emanating solely from other fields, unless
237:
Timing matters. A statement at a given point in time may contradict any statement that was made earlier in time. However, a statement that is earlier in time does not contradict a later statement, even by the same person. Anyone is permitted to change their views. Generally, it does not discredit a
537:
A book's title appears to be a statement of fact but the author, inside the book or elsewhere, denies what the title says is correct as a statement of fact. This did happen with one book, the title of which placed one class of people as superior to another class, whereas inside the book the author
419:
Printings and impressions may be treated like editions for these editorial purposes. Although in the U.S. different printings of one edition tend to be identical or very similar, generally there is no law requiring that and they may differ in any way a publisher wishes. For instance, errors may be
389:
However, an article as a whole should reflect the range of sources available on the article's subject. This does not require using every source that exists, just that the sourcing cited be reasonably representative of the range of sources that exist. This applies regardless of who edited it in the
284:
This can be a difficult concept to apply with integrity and consistency. It is easier if a book is an anthology, but it can be true of many other books as well. For example, it is common for journalists to interview multiple sources for one book; and many studies and surveys in the social sciences
280:
Suppose one book has several in-depth profiles of different artists. According to the book, artist A says it's necessary to schedule four hours a day to paint in order to produce masterpieces but artist B says one should never schedule time for painting but should instead await inspiration, so the
152:
If you are familiar with multiple credible sources on a subject and they are significantly different from each other, you may realize that Knowledge's policies and guidelines support reporting from some or all of the sources, and you should edit accordingly. If one editor is not familiar with some
533:
A book says that according to one religion only persons A, B, and C are prophets but according to another religion only persons D, E, and F are prophets. Although that is contradictory, in an article about both religions both statements should be reported, perhaps in the form of a fully disclosed
332:
Linguists tend not to rank cultures as dominant versus subcultural or as developed versus underdeveloped while sociologists tend to do exactly that, not because one is ignorantly insensitive and the other is cruelly chauvinist but because linguists need to learn the languages and ranking does not
493:
A consensus in a field or discipline is not usually the responsibility of one author, even if the author is an especially influential leader. A change in that consensus, such as on whether light needs ether as a medium for travel, is reportable in Knowledge when sourcing reflecting consensus has
402:
If an editor finds that a later edition contradicts or qualifies an earlier edition that was cited in Knowledge, the editor who found it should treat the newer edition as if it is a separate source and edit the Knowledge article, perhaps replacing or editing old content and old citations or just
385:
When editing Knowledge, it's not cherrypicking in general to miss contradictory or qualifying information from a different source than a source that had information already being used, because we don't expect editors to be familiar with all of the possible sources that could be cited on a topic.
529:
An author says something is true and a year later retracts the statement. Usually, report only the later statement or nothing at all. The exception would be if the earlier statement remains especially notorious after the retraction and must be discussed even though it was retracted, but that is
462:
Editors should not be considered like authors, even if an editor's name is more prominent than that of any author. Generally, what is published is the view or intellectual responsibility of an author and may or may not be that of an editor. An editor may even approve the publication of directly
250:
chapter before beginning research for the next, do not assume that earlier or later in a source equates with earlier or later in time unless the source's content makes that chronological ordering clear. Even in sources that appear to rely on chronology, be careful about literary devices such as
452:
do not matter because any later work that contradicts or qualifies any earlier work replaces the earlier work as authority. For example, if an author wrote in 1993 in the third edition of a Paris travel guide that ethology is wholly nonsense but in 2002 in the first edition of a cookbook that
558:
has a wider meaning that is not entirely useful for the editing of Knowledge. In those outside media, authors may be expected to have sufficient knowledge of a subject to refrain from misrepresenting the state of knowledge by cherrypicking sources from all the sources on the subject. This is
212:
Not all information must be presented. A source must be fairly represented for the purpose of the article and that includes contradictory and qualifying information, but, other than that, information need not be added if (for example) it is not due the weight or is redundant.
411:
of an author's views. Another case is when two editions of the same work are actually about different subjects; an example is with some popular guides to computer software, where an older edition of a book may be about an older version of the same software.
510:
It is legitimate to ask on a page's talk page once about whether cherrypicking occurred in a specific case. If your question is based on speculation, that is where you may speculate, and even then only if reasonable. Beyond that, however, it is against
336:
A scientist may be expected to start with a hypothesis and challenge it with a scientific investigation to ensure thoroughness while a lawyer or detective may be expected to start with no hypothesis and find what a forensic investigation yields free of
149:, in a negative sense, means selecting information without including contradictory or significant qualifying information from the same source and consequently misrepresenting what the source says. This applies both to quotations and to paraphrasings.
3128:
1168:
604:
238:
person that they reject older views, or probably most research scientists would have no credibility. One scholar reputedly said, when challenged about changing his mind, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"
2329:
407:
the statement, in which case updating the citation to reflect the newer edition is helpful, or that the newer edition contradicts the statement, in which case the statement and the citation should both be updated.
1733:
386:
Therefore, to have gotten information from one source without acknowledging that it was contradicted or qualified in another source is not a valid criticism of an editor's work in Knowledge as cherrypicking.
347:
is to omit qualifying information and misrepresent the source on Americans' work customs. While qualifying information is infinite and cannot all be quoted or paraphrased, if it is significant, include it.
749:
Reportedly, the old consensus was affirmative; Einstein disagreed; and some scientists questioned or denied Einstein's view for a few decades. Einstein's view survived as the new consensus of the field.
1198:
333:
provide much help to that end while sociologists specifically study relationships between peoples and thus study rankings without necessarily agreeing with those rankings in their own value systems.
2464:
3015:
478:
If Smith's and Washington's views are in the same source, you must report both views, and not only the one you agree with. They're in the same source and you may not cherrypick from a source.
350:
This example of qualifying information is from a book: "I have taken artistic license in conveying both reality and essence" and "ome conversations... are not intended... as verbatim quotes."
2895:
2067:
184:(policy): Neutral point of view, by selectively presenting one point of view from available reliable sources that actually support two or more points of view that may conflict with each other
2424:
607:(using these sources is not cherrypicking in the negative sense discussed in this essay but some editorial decisions in creating these sources may be akin to cherrypicking by other people)
2233:
1828:
3268:
459:
Anthologies should be considered as collections in which each contribution has its own authorship, whether that results in all the contributions having the same or different authors.
242:
an article. We may report that a candidate held one view at one time and another view at another time, sourcing each view, or report only one view if that is all that is entitled to
3278:
2576:
1213:
3544:
3539:
3208:
2830:
1535:
2955:
534:
disagreement. The reason is that the book is itself relying on two other sources, each of which may be authoritative for its own subject but not for the other source's subject.
880:
3333:
3020:
1633:
789:
3318:
163:
consensus. Our concern within Knowledge is about cherrypicking from within a source or closely-related multiple sources, and an editor should be careful in handling that.
3656:
3068:
1608:
2132:
153:
sources, another editor who is can edit accordingly. Irrespective of one editor's views, an article as a whole needs to conform to Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
1663:
1360:
3338:
2745:
1931:
1385:
1308:
890:
2785:
2765:
1728:
1698:
1010:
246:
in the article, but generally the view that came later in time is not contradicted by the view that came earlier in time for purposes of reporting in Knowledge.
2022:
1748:
1510:
1098:
1025:
965:
940:
930:
174:
The main information from a source, insofar as stated in Knowledge, must be accompanied by any contradictory and qualifying information from the same source.
3483:
2790:
1430:
2870:
2825:
2735:
2685:
1951:
1678:
1653:
285:
report what respondents said, and the result may be people disagreeing with each other without knowing about each other, thus not criticizing each other.
3378:
1668:
1303:
1288:
2705:
1268:
141:
for an article, without seeing the true meaning of the source. Likewise, some people will select only red cherries or dark purple cherries from a farm.
3646:
3592:
2860:
2775:
1891:
1743:
1648:
1263:
1223:
1078:
3651:
3488:
2581:
2494:
2092:
1833:
1658:
1583:
1318:
1293:
1218:
1000:
830:
28:
2915:
2865:
2720:
2469:
2414:
2399:
2012:
1350:
1233:
1113:
3448:
2077:
1823:
1560:
1485:
1055:
127:
Do not cherrypick. When selecting information from a source, include contradictory and significant qualifying information from the same source.
3343:
2995:
2840:
2760:
2429:
2178:
2107:
1961:
1258:
545:
3388:
2945:
2152:
1643:
1530:
1520:
1410:
1313:
1298:
2930:
2900:
2710:
2459:
2454:
1991:
1440:
1395:
1325:
471:
Different sources may sometimes be treated differently. A case where this would be appropriate may be shown with a hypothetical example:
3636:
3243:
1688:
1063:
777:
2042:
243:
193:
3198:
3073:
2960:
2675:
2072:
1758:
1540:
1525:
1370:
1283:
1093:
900:
885:
481:
57:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3549:
3468:
2850:
2810:
2524:
2193:
2147:
2137:
2057:
1573:
1475:
1405:
1193:
466:
359:
cover. Many sources are well organized and make finding everything you need relatively simple, but not all sources are so helpful.
3631:
3328:
2690:
2127:
1873:
1861:
1365:
1045:
905:
642:
575:
one person and ignore most information about most other people, even though they're all extensively detailed in the same source.
17:
3158:
3078:
2489:
2434:
2404:
1941:
1818:
1035:
875:
802:
205:
254:
in biographies, as where a military veteran has a flashback to a wartime experience, as they can make chronologies uncertain.
3473:
3443:
3438:
3233:
3213:
3010:
2770:
2439:
2394:
2389:
2198:
2082:
1986:
1723:
1435:
1380:
1355:
1335:
1273:
1243:
1148:
1138:
910:
443:
222:
3641:
3408:
3283:
3133:
2855:
2755:
2551:
2359:
2238:
2087:
1683:
1505:
1455:
995:
3423:
3363:
3288:
2780:
2750:
2670:
2499:
1470:
1460:
1425:
1238:
1143:
865:
257:
3433:
3298:
3273:
3253:
3153:
3048:
2925:
2384:
2293:
2253:
2157:
1813:
1798:
1673:
1278:
1128:
1083:
1040:
1015:
975:
825:
3575:
3403:
3383:
3308:
3303:
2875:
2364:
2007:
1916:
1778:
1713:
1623:
1613:
1588:
1550:
1545:
1480:
1248:
1208:
1153:
678:
542:
Qualification probably does not require deletion or even debate, as long as significant qualifications are reported.
58:
3597:
3463:
3000:
2479:
2409:
2288:
2273:
2188:
1971:
1763:
1108:
855:
850:
3511:
399:
earlier edition and not from a later edition. (An editor with a later edition is encouraged to edit accordingly.)
190:(policy): No original research, by presenting a statement not supported by any source, not even the cited sourcing
3393:
3203:
3173:
3138:
2965:
2444:
2354:
2268:
1911:
1881:
1753:
935:
196:(policy): Not giving undue weight to a view, by omitting information that shows that it is relatively unimportant
181:
2655:
3559:
3428:
3258:
2985:
2885:
2695:
2571:
2484:
2449:
2374:
2344:
2208:
2032:
1981:
1808:
1793:
1718:
1490:
1340:
1183:
970:
915:
840:
770:
722:(https://archive.org/) (this also has old Web pages), and paid-for databases (often free in libraries) such as
599:
202:(guideline): Not giving a fringe view undue weight, by omitting information that shows that it is a fringe view
187:
2142:
3534:
3348:
3263:
3025:
2970:
2890:
2845:
2800:
2795:
2680:
2514:
2474:
2369:
2334:
2309:
2017:
1838:
1618:
1593:
1500:
1495:
1375:
1163:
1088:
1005:
920:
835:
62:
562:
3585:
3358:
3238:
3118:
3093:
2920:
2556:
2519:
2509:
2112:
2052:
1906:
1203:
1178:
1133:
1030:
985:
960:
950:
925:
3478:
3293:
3178:
3103:
2990:
2910:
2880:
2730:
2349:
2319:
2283:
2173:
2037:
1956:
1738:
1603:
1568:
1415:
1173:
1123:
1118:
845:
589:
512:
657:, June 25, 2011, 3:14 a.m.) and, given that Google said it turned up 441,000 matches for the quotation (
3580:
3529:
3168:
3163:
3123:
3108:
3098:
2975:
2820:
2725:
2228:
2218:
2117:
1926:
1901:
1788:
1073:
945:
736:
138:
3626:
3554:
3323:
3188:
3088:
3005:
2950:
2940:
2905:
2740:
2715:
2700:
2541:
2263:
2203:
1936:
1773:
1708:
1703:
1693:
1445:
1068:
820:
763:
414:
199:
2935:
594:
362:
3228:
3183:
2546:
2419:
2379:
2183:
1921:
1450:
895:
502:
Cherrypicking should not be done, regardless of whether the result is a quotation or a paraphrase.
437:
301:
158:
497:
208:(guideline): Not using an unreliable source, by omitting information that would show unreliability
87:
3458:
3398:
3373:
3313:
3223:
3218:
2805:
2622:
2324:
2314:
2102:
2097:
1515:
1188:
990:
80:
494:
reported that change, but one author's change of view usually is not a change in the consensus.
329:
A theologian and a mathematician may contradict each other on the role of a deity in arithmetic.
3418:
3368:
3148:
3143:
3113:
2602:
2566:
2561:
2258:
2062:
1896:
1420:
1253:
1228:
1103:
617:
353:
101:
94:
3413:
2980:
2835:
2339:
2248:
2243:
2027:
1946:
1803:
1465:
456:
Coauthors who form a stable group can be considered like a single author for these purposes.
251:
3353:
2815:
2612:
2536:
1400:
1345:
1330:
870:
860:
605:
Knowledge:Children's, adult new reader, and large print sources questionable on reliability
8:
3453:
3063:
2632:
2607:
2586:
1966:
1598:
1390:
955:
653:, as accessed November 27, 2012), although one blog poster argued that it is reasonable (
638:
487:
295:
271:
315:
2627:
2617:
2531:
2504:
1768:
1020:
519:
307:
263:
216:
72:
371:
137:"Cherry-picking" a source is selecting only the information favourable to an editor's
27:
This page is about source cherrypicking. For the guideline on rule cherrypicking, see
3129:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
3083:
2047:
1886:
1783:
980:
707:
675:
65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
2223:
2213:
2122:
786:
715:
50:
624:
486:
This is about consensus in a field or discipline. For consensus in Knowledge, see
1976:
719:
711:
3248:
3193:
2278:
1578:
341:
133:
3620:
703:
2330:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
699:
393:
380:
169:
288:
755:
695:
426:
29:
Knowledge:Gaming the system § Gaming the use of policies and guidelines
1734:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
801:
674:(N.Y.: Avon Books, 1st Avon Books Trade Printing April 1990, © 1988 (
433:
232:
177:
Failure to do so often violates Knowledge's policies and guidelines:
620:(for an article with largely one-sided views regardless of sourcing)
730:
1199:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
423:
Knowledge's citations almost never show which printing is cited.
221:
For the policy on not going beyond what sourcing expresses, see
463:
contradictory statements in one work, such as in an anthology.
3016:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
724:
2896:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2068:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
694:
Websites supporting searches include, for hardcopy sources,
2425:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2234:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1829:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1169:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
578:
505:
3269:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3279:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
2831:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2465:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1536:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
645:
Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?
2577:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1214:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
525:
hypothetical examples may illuminate the difference:
881:
Editing Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
651:(probably online only), February 11, 2011, 9:19 a.m.
3657:Knowledge essays introducing or defining new terms
3540:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3319:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
803:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
3618:
1664:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1609:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1361:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
672:Famous For 15 Minutes: My Years With Andy Warhol
641:, that is doubted for want of a primary source (
3339:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3069:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2746:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1386:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
891:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
3021:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2766:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1932:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1699:Counting and sorting are not original research
1729:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1011:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
771:
595:Knowledge:Coatrack (the section Fact picking)
3259:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2023:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1749:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1026:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
966:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
941:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
714:(http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/), the
448:With regard to one author's views, editions
2791:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1511:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
3484:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2871:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2826:News coverage does not decrease notability
2736:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2686:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1679:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1654:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
778:
764:
3379:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1669:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1289:Identifying and using independent sources
3647:Knowledge essays about original research
3545:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2706:Big events make key participants notable
2654:
1269:Formatting bilateral relations templates
785:
728:(for books and journals) and those from
132:
3652:Knowledge essays about reliable sources
3593:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
3209:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
2956:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2861:Notability is not a level playing field
2776:How the presumption of notability works
1892:Contributing to complicated discussions
1744:How the presumption of notability works
1264:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1079:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
14:
3619:
3489:You should not write meaningless lists
2786:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2093:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1860:
1834:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1659:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1224:Don't hope the house will build itself
1001:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
831:All Five Pillars are equally important
403:adding new content and new citations.
145:In the context of editing an article,
3509:
3046:
2916:One sentence does not an article make
2866:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2653:
2582:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2495:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2013:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1952:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1859:
1584:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1351:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1114:An unfinished house is a real problem
1099:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
800:
759:
554:Outside of Knowledge, in many media,
482:Consensus change outside of Knowledge
432:as authoritative and, almost always,
3449:Things that should not be surprising
3144:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2470:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2415:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2400:Don't call people by their real name
2078:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1486:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
702:(http://books.google.com/) and, for
467:Different authors of different works
113:
36:
3344:No one cares about your garage band
3047:
2996:What is and is not routine coverage
2841:No one cares about your garage band
2761:Existence does not prove notability
2179:Assume the assumption of good faith
2108:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1962:Relationships with academic editors
1824:Why was the page I created deleted?
1259:Featured articles may have problems
24:
3389:Please do not murder the newcomers
2946:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2430:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2153:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1644:Adjectives in your recommendations
1531:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1521:What an article should not include
1411:The problem with elegant variation
1219:Don't get hung up on minor details
63:thoroughly vetted by the community
59:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
3668:
3637:Knowledge essays about neutrality
2711:Businesses with a single location
1992:You have a right to remain silent
1441:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1396:Potential, not just current state
1326:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
710:(http://www.gutenberg.org/), the
444:Same author across multiple works
3510:
2460:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2455:Don't ignore community consensus
1689:Confusing arguments mean nothing
258:Multiple sources within a source
117:
40:
2961:Sources must be out-of-universe
2676:All high schools can be notable
2073:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1759:Identifying blatant advertising
1541:The world will not end tomorrow
1526:Knowledge is a work in progress
1371:Not everything needs a template
1284:How to write a featured article
901:External criticism of Knowledge
886:Editors will sometimes be wrong
3632:Knowledge essays about editing
3550:Avoid writing redundant essays
3469:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
3199:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3074:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2901:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2851:Notability cannot be purchased
2811:Masking the lack of notability
2148:Knowledge is not about winning
1574:Copyediting reception sections
1476:Temporary versions of articles
1406:Principle of Some Astonishment
1194:Creating controversial content
1094:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
743:
688:
664:
631:
600:Knowledge:How to mine a source
13:
1:
3576:About policies and guidelines
3329:List of jokes about Knowledge
2691:Articles with a single source
2138:Two wrongs don't make a right
2128:The rules of polite discourse
2058:It's not the end of the world
1819:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
1366:Not everything needs a navbox
1234:Don't "teach the controversy"
1046:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
906:Here to build an encyclopedia
698:(http://www.amazon.com/) and
637:Although often attributed to
363:Merely additional information
294:be reported or summarized as
3159:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3079:Alternatives to edit warring
1942:Maintaining a friendly space
1036:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
498:Paraphrasings and quotations
7:
3642:Knowledge behavioral essays
3444:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3439:The first rule of Knowledge
3234:Editing under the influence
3011:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2771:Google searches and numbers
2490:Don't template the regulars
2405:Don't call the kettle black
2199:Be excellent to one another
2083:Revert notification opt-out
1987:We are all Wikipedians here
1436:Put a little effort into it
1381:Obtain peer review comments
1336:Introduction to structurism
1274:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1244:Editors are not mindreaders
1149:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1139:Beef up that first revision
911:Leave it to the experienced
876:Don't search for objections
10:
3673:
3474:Why not create an account?
3409:Requirements for adminship
3284:How to vandalize correctly
3214:Don't delete the main page
3134:Avoid using preview button
2856:Notability comparison test
2440:Don't fight fire with fire
2435:Don't eat the troll's food
2395:Don't call a spade a spade
2390:Don't bludgeon the process
2239:Encourage full discussions
2088:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1724:Don't attack the nominator
1684:But there must be sources!
1506:Try not to leave it a stub
1456:Source your plot summaries
485:
368:be provided in Knowledge.
305:
261:
220:
70:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge
26:
3568:
3522:
3518:
3505:
3424:Sarcasm is really helpful
3364:Notability is not eternal
3289:How to win a citation war
3059:
3055:
3042:
2751:Every snowflake is unique
2671:Advanced source searching
2666:
2662:
2649:
2595:
2552:No, you can't have a pony
2500:Do not insult the vandals
2360:Don't be high-maintenance
2302:
2166:
2000:
1917:Encouraging the newcomers
1872:
1868:
1855:
1632:
1559:
1461:Specialized-style fallacy
1426:Pruning article revisions
1254:Endorsements (commercial)
1239:Editing on mobile devices
1144:Blind men and an elephant
1119:Articles have a half-life
1054:
866:Dissent is not disloyalty
836:Avoid vague introductions
813:
809:
796:
415:Printings and impressions
3434:The Night Before Wikimas
3299:Ignore every single rule
3274:How to get away with UPE
3154:Before they were notable
2926:Overreliance upon Google
2721:Common sourcing mistakes
2294:Settle the process first
2254:Imagine others complexly
2158:Writing for the opponent
2133:There is no common sense
1814:Unopposed AFD discussion
1799:Relisting can be abusive
1674:Avoid repeated arguments
1279:Give an article a chance
1129:Avoid mission statements
1089:Advanced text formatting
1084:Advanced article editing
1041:Knowledge is a community
1016:The rules are principles
976:Product, process, policy
826:Articles must be written
125:This page in a nutshell:
3569:Policies and guidelines
3404:Requests for medication
3384:Please bite the newbies
3309:Mess with the templates
2876:Notability means impact
2410:Don't call things cruft
2385:Don't be the Fun Police
2315:Knowledge:Because I can
2194:Avoid the word "vandal"
2008:A thank you never hurts
1779:Liar liar pants on fire
1714:Deletion is not cleanup
1624:Writing better articles
1614:Write the article first
1589:Gender-neutral language
1561:Writing article content
1551:Writing better articles
1546:Write the article first
1481:Tertiary-source fallacy
1249:Encourage the newcomers
1209:Dictionaries as sources
1154:Build content to endure
712:Perseus Digital Library
649:The Wall Street Journal
18:Knowledge:CHERRYPICKING
3598:Policy writing is hard
3464:Knowledge is an MMORPG
3304:Is that even an essay?
3001:What notability is not
2756:Existence ≠Notability
2365:Don't be inconsiderate
2289:Read before commenting
2274:Mind your own business
2189:Avoid personal remarks
1764:Identifying test edits
1109:A navbox on every page
1064:100K featured articles
861:Concede lost arguments
856:Competence is required
618:Template:Cherry picked
372:One source or multiple
156:Outside of Knowledge,
142:
3394:Pledge of Tranquility
3139:Avoid using wikilinks
2966:Subjective importance
2480:Don't spite your face
2269:Keep it down to earth
2033:Beware of the tigers!
1972:Too long; didn't read
1912:Edit at your own pace
1882:Accepting other users
1649:AfD is not a war zone
996:There is no seniority
936:Neutrality of sources
325:they are criticisms.
302:Mixed fields of study
136:
61:, as it has not been
3560:Quote your own essay
3429:Sausages for tasting
3254:Five Fs of Knowledge
3204:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3174:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2986:Vanispamcruftisement
2886:Notability sub-pages
2696:Avoid template creep
2656:Essays on notability
2572:There are no oracles
2355:Don't be a WikiBigot
2209:Call a spade a spade
1982:Unblock perspectives
1809:The Heymann Standard
1794:Overzealous deletion
1754:I just don't like it
1491:There is no deadline
1356:"Murder of" articles
1184:Common-style fallacy
1056:Article construction
971:Process is important
916:Levels of competence
841:Be a reliable source
625:Notes and references
590:WP:Civil POV pushing
570:A positive sense of
563:Positive meaning of
3349:No one really cares
3264:Go ahead, vandalize
3026:Two prongs of merit
2971:Third-party sources
2891:Notabilitymandering
2846:No one really cares
2801:Inherent notability
2796:Independent sources
2681:Alternative outlets
2515:Nationalist editing
2485:Don't take the bait
2450:Don't help too much
2375:Don't be prejudiced
2345:Don't be an ostrich
2310:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2043:Deletion as revenge
2018:Advice for hotheads
1839:No Encyclopedic Use
1719:Does deletion help?
1619:Writing about women
1501:The deadline is now
1496:There is a deadline
1376:Nothing is in stone
1006:Tendentious editing
921:Levels of consensus
639:John Maynard Keynes
513:assuming good faith
488:Knowledge:Consensus
166:Do not cherrypick.
3359:No sorcery threats
3239:Embrace Stop Signs
3119:Assume good wraith
3094:Anti-Wikipedianism
2931:Perennial websites
2921:Other stuff exists
2557:Passive aggression
2520:No angry mastodons
2510:Hate is disruptive
2370:Don't be obnoxious
2335:Don't be a fanatic
2113:Most ideas are bad
2053:Forgive and forget
1862:Essays on civility
1471:Run an edit-a-thon
1204:Deprecated sources
1179:Citation underkill
1164:Chesterton's fence
1134:Be neutral in form
1031:Knowledge in brief
986:Reasonability rule
951:Oversimplification
926:Most ideas are bad
546:Larger meaning of
520:Deletion or debate
354:Where to find them
143:
3614:
3613:
3610:
3609:
3606:
3605:
3501:
3500:
3497:
3496:
3479:Yes legal threats
3294:Ignore all essays
3179:Complete bollocks
3104:Asshole John rule
3038:
3037:
3034:
3033:
2991:What BLP1E is not
2911:One hundred words
2881:Notability points
2645:
2644:
2641:
2640:
2445:Don't give a fuck
2320:Civil POV pushing
2284:Mutual withdrawal
2174:Assume good faith
2143:Knowledge clichés
2038:Civility warnings
1957:Please say please
1907:Editors' pronouns
1851:
1850:
1847:
1846:
1739:Follow the leader
1604:Use our own words
1569:Avoid thread mode
1416:Pro and con lists
1174:Citation overkill
1124:Autosizing images
846:Civil POV pushing
708:Project Gutenberg
550:outside Knowledge
131:
130:
112:
111:
88:WP:CHERRY-PICKING
16:(Redirected from
3664:
3627:Knowledge essays
3555:Finding an essay
3520:
3519:
3507:
3506:
3169:Butterfly effect
3164:Boston Tea Party
3124:Assume stupidity
3109:Assume bad faith
3099:Articlecountitis
3057:
3056:
3044:
3043:
2976:Trivial mentions
2821:Minimum coverage
2664:
2663:
2651:
2650:
2350:Don't be ashamed
2229:Discussing cruft
2219:Deny recognition
2118:Nothing is clear
1927:Expect no thanks
1870:
1869:
1857:
1856:
1789:Nothing is clear
1636:deleting content
1319:Tertiary sources
1074:Acronym overkill
946:The one question
811:
810:
798:
797:
791:
787:Knowledge essays
780:
773:
766:
757:
756:
750:
747:
741:
716:Internet Archive
692:
686:
668:
662:
635:
381:Multiple sources
318:
274:
223:WP:STICKTOSOURCE
170:Main information
121:
120:
114:
104:
97:
90:
83:
81:WP:CHERRYPICKING
44:
43:
37:
21:
3672:
3671:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3617:
3616:
3615:
3602:
3564:
3535:Value of essays
3514:
3493:
3324:Legal vandalism
3189:Counting juntas
3089:Anti-Wikipedian
3051:
3049:Humorous essays
3030:
3006:What to include
2951:Run-of-the-mill
2941:Read the source
2906:Offline sources
2701:Bare notability
2658:
2637:
2591:
2542:No Confederates
2340:Don't be a jerk
2298:
2264:Keep it concise
2204:Beyond civility
2162:
1996:
1937:How to be civil
1902:Don't retaliate
1864:
1843:
1774:Keep it concise
1709:Delete the junk
1704:Delete or merge
1694:Content removal
1628:
1594:Myth vs fiction
1555:
1446:Robotic editing
1309:Science sources
1304:Primary sources
1294:History sources
1069:Abandoned stubs
1050:
821:Article content
805:
792:
784:
754:
753:
748:
744:
720:Wayback Machine
693:
689:
670:Violet, Ultra,
669:
665:
636:
632:
627:
581:
568:
552:
522:
508:
500:
491:
484:
469:
446:
429:
417:
396:
383:
374:
365:
356:
344:
322:
321:
314:
310:
304:
291:
278:
277:
270:
266:
260:
235:
226:
219:
172:
118:
108:
107:
100:
93:
86:
79:
75:
67:
66:
41:
35:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3670:
3660:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3612:
3611:
3608:
3607:
3604:
3603:
3601:
3600:
3595:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3583:
3572:
3570:
3566:
3565:
3563:
3562:
3557:
3552:
3547:
3542:
3537:
3532:
3526:
3524:
3516:
3515:
3503:
3502:
3499:
3498:
3495:
3494:
3492:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3236:
3231:
3229:Editsummarisis
3226:
3221:
3216:
3211:
3206:
3201:
3196:
3191:
3186:
3184:Counting forks
3181:
3176:
3171:
3166:
3161:
3156:
3151:
3146:
3141:
3136:
3131:
3126:
3121:
3116:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3096:
3091:
3086:
3081:
3076:
3071:
3066:
3060:
3053:
3052:
3040:
3039:
3036:
3035:
3032:
3031:
3029:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2741:Don't cite GNG
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2716:But it's true!
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2693:
2688:
2683:
2678:
2673:
2667:
2660:
2659:
2647:
2646:
2643:
2642:
2639:
2638:
2636:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2613:WikiHarassment
2610:
2605:
2599:
2597:
2593:
2592:
2590:
2589:
2584:
2579:
2574:
2569:
2564:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2547:No queerphobia
2544:
2539:
2534:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2377:
2372:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2306:
2304:
2300:
2299:
2297:
2296:
2291:
2286:
2281:
2276:
2271:
2266:
2261:
2256:
2251:
2246:
2241:
2236:
2231:
2226:
2221:
2216:
2211:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2191:
2186:
2184:Assume no clue
2181:
2176:
2170:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2161:
2160:
2155:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2125:
2120:
2115:
2110:
2105:
2100:
2095:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2075:
2070:
2065:
2060:
2055:
2050:
2045:
2040:
2035:
2030:
2025:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2004:
2002:
1998:
1997:
1995:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1939:
1934:
1929:
1924:
1922:Enjoy yourself
1919:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1884:
1878:
1876:
1866:
1865:
1853:
1852:
1849:
1848:
1845:
1844:
1842:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1651:
1646:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1630:
1629:
1627:
1626:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1565:
1563:
1557:
1556:
1554:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1451:Sham consensus
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1186:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1060:
1058:
1052:
1051:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
896:Explanationism
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
817:
815:
807:
806:
794:
793:
783:
782:
775:
768:
760:
752:
751:
742:
687:
663:
643:Zweig, Jason,
629:
628:
626:
623:
622:
621:
609:
608:
602:
597:
592:
580:
577:
567:
561:
551:
544:
540:
539:
535:
531:
521:
518:
507:
504:
499:
496:
483:
480:
468:
465:
445:
442:
428:
425:
416:
413:
395:
392:
382:
379:
373:
370:
364:
361:
355:
352:
343:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
320:
319:
311:
306:
303:
300:
290:
287:
276:
275:
267:
262:
259:
256:
234:
231:
218:
217:Contradictions
215:
210:
209:
203:
197:
191:
185:
171:
168:
129:
128:
122:
110:
109:
106:
105:
102:WP:CHERRY-PICK
98:
91:
84:
76:
71:
68:
56:
55:
47:
45:
33:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3669:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3624:
3622:
3599:
3596:
3594:
3591:
3587:
3584:
3582:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3574:
3573:
3571:
3567:
3561:
3558:
3556:
3553:
3551:
3548:
3546:
3543:
3541:
3538:
3536:
3533:
3531:
3528:
3527:
3525:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3508:
3504:
3490:
3487:
3485:
3482:
3480:
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3459:Watchlistitis
3457:
3455:
3454:The WikiBible
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3399:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3397:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3374:Play the game
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3314:My local pond
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3235:
3232:
3230:
3227:
3225:
3224:Edits Per Day
3222:
3220:
3219:Editcountitis
3217:
3215:
3212:
3210:
3207:
3205:
3202:
3200:
3197:
3195:
3192:
3190:
3187:
3185:
3182:
3180:
3177:
3175:
3172:
3170:
3167:
3165:
3162:
3160:
3157:
3155:
3152:
3150:
3147:
3145:
3142:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3117:
3115:
3112:
3110:
3107:
3105:
3102:
3100:
3097:
3095:
3092:
3090:
3087:
3085:
3082:
3080:
3077:
3075:
3072:
3070:
3067:
3065:
3062:
3061:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3045:
3041:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2806:Insignificant
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2689:
2687:
2684:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2674:
2672:
2669:
2668:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2652:
2648:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2623:WikiLawyering
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2600:
2598:
2596:WikiRelations
2594:
2588:
2585:
2583:
2580:
2578:
2575:
2573:
2570:
2568:
2565:
2563:
2560:
2558:
2555:
2553:
2550:
2548:
2545:
2543:
2540:
2538:
2535:
2533:
2530:
2526:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2420:Don't cry COI
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2381:
2380:Don't be rude
2378:
2376:
2373:
2371:
2368:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2325:Cyberbullying
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2305:
2301:
2295:
2292:
2290:
2287:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2277:
2275:
2272:
2270:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2260:
2257:
2255:
2252:
2250:
2247:
2245:
2242:
2240:
2237:
2235:
2232:
2230:
2227:
2225:
2222:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2195:
2192:
2190:
2187:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2171:
2169:
2165:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2151:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2139:
2136:
2134:
2131:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2116:
2114:
2111:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2103:The last word
2101:
2099:
2098:The grey zone
2096:
2094:
2091:
2089:
2086:
2084:
2081:
2079:
2076:
2074:
2071:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2059:
2056:
2054:
2051:
2049:
2046:
2044:
2041:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2031:
2029:
2026:
2024:
2021:
2019:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2005:
2003:
1999:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1935:
1933:
1930:
1928:
1925:
1923:
1920:
1918:
1915:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1905:
1903:
1900:
1898:
1895:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1877:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1858:
1854:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1727:
1725:
1722:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1662:
1660:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1637:
1631:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1564:
1562:
1558:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1516:Walled garden
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1341:Mine a source
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1220:
1217:
1215:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1189:Concept cloud
1187:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1165:
1162:
1160:
1159:Cherrypicking
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
991:Systemic bias
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
818:
816:
812:
808:
804:
799:
795:
788:
781:
776:
774:
769:
767:
762:
761:
758:
746:
739:
738:
733:
732:
727:
726:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:public domain
701:
697:
691:
684:
680:
679:0-380-70843-4
677:
673:
667:
660:
656:
652:
650:
646:
640:
634:
630:
619:
616:
615:
614:
613:
606:
603:
601:
598:
596:
593:
591:
588:
587:
586:
585:
576:
573:
572:cherrypicking
566:
565:cherrypicking
560:
557:
556:cherrypicking
549:
548:cherrypicking
543:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
517:
514:
503:
495:
489:
479:
476:
472:
464:
460:
457:
454:
451:
441:
439:
435:
424:
421:
412:
408:
404:
400:
391:
387:
378:
369:
360:
351:
348:
335:
331:
328:
327:
326:
317:
313:
312:
309:
299:
297:
286:
282:
273:
269:
268:
265:
255:
253:
247:
245:
239:
230:
224:
214:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
179:
178:
175:
167:
164:
161:
160:
159:cherrypicking
154:
150:
148:
147:cherrypicking
140:
139:point of view
135:
126:
123:
116:
115:
103:
99:
96:
95:WP:CHERRYPICK
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
69:
64:
60:
54:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
19:
3523:About essays
3512:About essays
3419:Rouge editor
3369:Oops Defense
3149:Barnstaritis
3114:Assume faith
2936:Pokémon test
2781:High Schools
2603:WikiBullying
2567:Superhatting
2562:POV railroad
2259:Just drop it
2063:Nobody cares
1897:Divisiveness
1421:Printability
1314:Style guides
1158:
1104:Amnesia test
961:Paraphrasing
745:
735:
729:
723:
700:Google Books
690:
682:
671:
666:
658:
654:
648:
644:
633:
611:
610:
583:
582:
571:
569:
564:
555:
553:
547:
541:
523:
509:
501:
492:
477:
473:
470:
461:
458:
455:
449:
447:
430:
422:
418:
409:
405:
401:
397:
388:
384:
375:
366:
357:
349:
345:
323:
292:
283:
279:
248:
240:
236:
227:
211:
176:
173:
165:
157:
155:
151:
146:
144:
124:
48:
3530:Essay guide
3414:Rouge admin
2981:Video links
2836:No big loss
2525:just madmen
2475:Don't shout
2249:How to lose
2244:Get over it
2028:Be the glue
1947:Negotiation
1804:Relist bias
1634:Removing or
1466:Stub Makers
1299:Law sources
1229:Don't panic
49:This is an
3621:Categories
3586:Guidelines
3354:No, really
3334:LTTAUTMAOK
2816:Make stubs
2537:No racists
2279:Say "MOBY"
2001:Philosophy
1874:The basics
1431:Publicists
1401:Presentism
1346:Merge Test
1331:Inaccuracy
814:Philosophy
696:Amazon.com
683:Disclaimer
681:)), p. v (
434:microforms
427:Newspapers
342:Qualifiers
252:flashbacks
3064:Adminitis
2633:WikiPeace
2608:WikiCrime
2587:UPPERCASE
1967:Thank you
1599:Proseline
1391:Permastub
956:Paradoxes
871:Don't lie
737:EbscoHost
612:Templates
296:criticism
200:WP:FRINGE
73:Shortcuts
3581:Policies
2731:Coatrack
2628:WikiLove
2618:WikiHate
2532:No Nazis
2505:Griefing
1769:Immunity
1021:Trifecta
851:Cohesion
731:ProQuest
579:See also
506:Remedies
394:Editions
308:Shortcut
289:Critique
272:WP:MSWAS
264:Shortcut
194:WP:UNDUE
3244:Emerson
3084:ANI flu
2048:Failure
1887:Apology
1784:Nothing
981:Purpose
706:works,
316:WP:MFOS
182:WP:NPOV
2726:Clones
2303:Don'ts
2224:Desist
2214:Candor
2123:Reader
584:Essays
450:per se
244:weight
233:Timing
1977:Truce
725:JStor
647:, in
530:rare.
337:bias.
206:WP:RS
188:WP:OR
51:essay
3249:Fart
3194:Crap
1579:Coup
931:Need
734:and
676:ISBN
438:PDFs
2167:Dos
790:(?)
718:or
659:id.
655:id.
3623::
685:).
436:,
298:.
779:e
772:t
765:v
740:.
490:.
225:.
53:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.