47:
220:
As far as demonstrating support for doing notifications, this is already instructed for requesters in the instructions for SPI to notify users and is a frequently requested feature. The feature is ready to go as soon as we have a reasonable discussion here and double check the listed criteria above.
176:
The suspected sock(s)/master must not already have a mention of the casename on their talk page (if there is the bot will assume that they have already been notified). (Also if one of the two templates above are on the page referencing the case name it will not post for the same reason). --
203:
The suspected sock(s)/master must not be blocked for longer then 1 month. If they are, the bot presumes that they have merely been referenced as an example of the case behavior (it happens) and therefor the bot does not leave a notice. They can't reply to it
164:
On SPI case creation or when a new account is added to a case the bot will notify that account that they have been mentioned. The bot has several criteria for doing the notifications, this request is for making sure that I have thought of all the edge cases.
183:
285:
173:
The reporter of the case must have more then X edits where X is some value between 50 and 250 (I've not made my mind up on what value is most appropriate).
67:
234:
253:
72:
213:
87:
21:
82:
117:
146:
This is another user talk page request. This time the bot will be notifying accounts mentioned in an SPI case.
102:
92:
112:
239:
107:
97:
193:
77:
57:
221:
I will probably do a few tests on our test case but that is independent of this request. ——
8:
228:
135:
58:
17:
279:
223:
130:
247:
179:
gah copied and pasted this from a conversation we had, the two templates
46:
264:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:
The template the bot will use for notifying users is at
270:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
245:
Sounds ok, let's let this percolate for a few days.
42:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
277:
36:The following discussion is an archived debate.
286:Approved Knowledge bot requests for approval
14:
278:
214:User:SPCUClerkbot/spinotify-UserNotice
27:
28:
297:
44:The result of the discussion was
45:
216:. It will subst the template.
13:
1:
7:
10:
302:
254:03:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
235:03:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
267:Please do not modify it.
39:Please do not modify it.
150:Already has a bot flag
22:Requests for approval
144:Function Overview:
184:Socksuspectnotice
162:Function Details:
293:
269:
250:
231:
226:
198:
192:
188:
182:
138:
133:
49:
41:
301:
300:
296:
295:
294:
292:
291:
290:
276:
275:
274:
265:
248:
242:
229:
224:
196:
190:
186:
180:
136:
131:
123:
62:
37:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
299:
289:
288:
273:
272:
259:
257:
256:
241:
238:
219:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
194:Uw-socksuspect
174:
122:
121:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
80:
75:
73:Approved BRFAs
70:
63:
61:
59:SPCUClerkbot 2
56:
55:
54:
32:
30:
18:Knowledge:Bots
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
298:
287:
284:
283:
281:
271:
268:
262:
261:
260:
255:
252:
251:
244:
243:
237:
236:
233:
232:
227:
217:
215:
202:
200:
195:
185:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
157:
154:
151:
147:
145:
141:
140:
139:
134:
127:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
65:
64:
60:
52:
48:
43:
40:
34:
33:
31:
23:
19:
266:
263:
258:
246:
222:
218:
211:
178:
161:
160:
155:
152:
149:
148:
143:
142:
129:
125:
124:
50:
38:
35:
29:
240:Discussion
113:rights log
103:page moves
126:Operator:
108:block log
280:Category
83:contribs
51:Approved
20: |
249:MBisanz
204:anyway.
230:eagle
153:(Y/N)
137:eagle
88:count
16:<
189:and
118:flag
98:logs
78:talk
68:BRFA
225:nix
132:nix
128:——
93:SUL
282::
197:}}
191:{{
187:}}
181:{{
158:Y
199:.
156::
120:)
66:(
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
