336:
of these articles specifically use "won the MBillionth award" as a hook. That to me seems to be a reasonable indication of notability. - Re
Daiyusha's question above: I don't think that works backwards... winning one award is rarely enough to satifsy notability on its own outside the really
237:
This award on its own doesn't seem to be notable. All the articles here are about a single individual or a company winning it. The main focus of the article ,in all cases,is the recipient. Not to mention just few sources which can be considered reliable or independent.
206:
422:. Joe has this exactly right, it the absence of substantial treatment by reliable sources there is no showing of notability, and no basis for the article. Arguing otherwise would lead to a
123:
200:
414:
443:
159:
321:
302:
283:
389:
115:
67:
265:
365:
247:
166:
291:
132:
127:
86:
272:
136:
61:
119:
221:
310:
106:
188:
91:
374:
344:
256:
If this article is kept after discussion, is receiving this award enough criteria for a page to be created about a company??
182:
141:
66:
178:
153:
100:
228:
79:
17:
436:
149:
194:
96:
332:. It is true that the focus of the individual source articles is whoever won the award, but most of the
145:
460:
40:
75:
423:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
456:
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
385:
36:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
403:
of coverage in reliable sources. Being mentioned in the title is neither here nor there. –
8:
261:
243:
409:
314:
295:
276:
53:
432:
214:
356:
257:
239:
404:
427:
337:
prestigious and selective class of awards. --16:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
377:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
347:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
213:
383:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
353:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:). No further edits should be made to this page.
309:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
227:
273:list of Science-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
311:list of Asia-related deletion discussions
14:
23:
24:
475:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
13:
1:
7:
116:MBillionth Award South Asia
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
68:MBillionth Award South Asia
10:
480:
390:04:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
366:14:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
322:09:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
303:09:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
284:09:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
266:09:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
248:08:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
399:. Notable topics are the
453:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
444:21:49, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
415:11:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
62:22:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
80:Articles for deletion
441:
439:So let it be done
434:
413:
392:
368:
364:
324:
305:
286:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
471:
437:
433:
407:
388:
382:
380:
378:
363:
361:
354:
352:
350:
348:
319:
308:
300:
289:
281:
270:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
467:
461:deletion review
440:
393:
384:
373:
371:
369:
357:
355:
343:
341:
315:
296:
277:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
466:
465:
447:
446:
438:
417:
381:
370:
351:
340:
339:
338:
326:
325:
306:
287:
268:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
464:
462:
458:
454:
449:
448:
445:
442:
435:
431:
430:
425:
424:walled garden
421:
418:
416:
411:
406:
402:
398:
395:
394:
391:
387:
386:North America
379:
376:
367:
362:
360:
349:
346:
335:
331:
328:
327:
323:
320:
318:
312:
307:
304:
301:
299:
293:
288:
285:
282:
280:
274:
269:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
452:
450:
428:
419:
400:
396:
372:
358:
342:
333:
329:
317:CAPTAIN RAJU
316:
298:CAPTAIN RAJU
297:
279:CAPTAIN RAJU
278:
253:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
54:Scott Burley
49:
47:
31:
28:
201:free images
359:Sandstein
457:talk page
330:Weak keep
37:talk page
459:or in a
375:Relisted
345:Relisted
258:Daiyusha
240:Daiyusha
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
401:subject
254:Comment
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
429:Xymmax
420:Delete
397:Delete
334:titles
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
52:. --
16:<
410:talk
262:talk
244:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
405:Joe
229:TWL
158:– (
426:.
313:.
294:.
275:.
264:)
246:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
412:)
408:(
260:(
242:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.