Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality

1490:

views as "playing hard to get." Esoglou has a long history of disruption in a range of topic areas where he feels his religious beliefs to be in conflict with some aspects of the topic, and is incapable of editing neutrally or respecting the sources in those areas. He has been topic-banned three times. A productive outcome would be his withdrawal, voluntary or not, from any potentially "controversial" areas relating to religion (as Dominus said, it's possible he could be productive were this temptation removed). If ArbCom taking the case is needed for this to happen, I'm all for it, but I'd also be content if it were enough of a wake-up call for him to leave both me and these articles alone without being forced to. Were that the case, I'm not sure sanctions would be necessary, as users other than Esoglou, including myself, have been perfectly capable of reaching compromise and consensus through discussion. I think the article talk page shows clearly that productive discussion both wrt what content to include and wrt how to phrase things is and has been going on. –

1226:, I fear that the dispute has been ongoing, which led to several full protections. I contacted Esoglou and Roscelese about the dispute, but neither party is willing to compromise. In fact, Esoglou has been accusatory in his talk, and Roscelese has been reluctant to contact Esoglou and considered him troublesome. I advised them to file a request for arbitration or mediation, but they have yet to do so. Actually, mediation would have been ineffective because of Roscelese and Esoglou's long-term animosities toward each other. I checked other articles that they have been working on. There have been edit warrings, but I can came up only "homosexuality and Roman Catholicism" as a place of dispute. Roscelese mentioned some abortion-related article, but I guess she meant 1556:

article space, I would not be frustrated. If Esoglou's did, we might also have an NPOV problem, but for the aforementioned systemic bias that I contend exists against conservatism and against the Catholic Church. I feel that it is in the long run detrimental to both of these editors, who could be spending fruitful time improving articles, rather than locking horns in dispute. The dispute is detrimental to the morale of Knowledge, which depends on collegial editing and cooperation. Roscelese has unilaterally disconnected herself from this goal, in refusing to discuss with Esoglou, but insisting on interacting with him in article space. I agree that sanctions need to be in place, but

1400:

culpability for homosexual activity (what the document denies is that the tendency "always and totally" removes culpability). This is what I was speaking against. Although the culpability of my mistake may perhaps be attenuated by the fact that the latest version seemed to me just another in the series of reverts, with no indication in the edit summary or on the talk page that it was different, I am confessedly at fault for not having noticed the change. It is good to have this evidence of some flexibility. If we discussed the matter together, we could surely agree that what the document says is that the tendency does not make homosexual activity

1230:. My only concern is the "homosexuality and Roman Catholicism" article, which has suffered from endless content disputes and is currently fully protected the fourth or fifth time. I don't know what is going on between two editors. However, when I contacted Esoglou, somehow I found him less trustworthy than I hoped for. Maybe I'm taking Roscelese's side, but there is yet to be an evidence of Esoglou's misconduct. Perhaps all parties involved should explain the whole dispute. I am filing this request in hopes for stability of the article (and other related articles). 1898:(because he is primarily here to practice religious apologetics), as well as his battlefield approach to editing religious articles, his persistent reliance on primary sources and his persistent uncivil behavior towards his fellow editors (which is getting worse, not better), I believe that a topic ban is in order pertaining to all religious subjects and subjects controversial in religion, particularly abortion, birth control, homosexuality, marriage and divorce, broadly construed. I believe that 2440:

point-making, edit-warring and gaming the system, are prohibited, as is the use of the site to pursue feuds and quarrels. Editors should also avoid accusing others of misconduct when this is done repeatedly or without simultaneously providing evidence or for the purpose of gaining an advantage in a content dispute. Editors who repeatedly violate these standards of conduct may be sanctioned. Editors who have genuine grievances against others are expected to avail themselves of the

1942:'s talk page. At best, it was in exceedingly poor taste and grossly uncivil. Whatever possessed him to leave a picture of a lesbian bondage scene on the page of a lesbian editor with whom he cannot be said to be on cordial terms is beyond my power of comprehension. It is too serious to dismiss as an awkward attempt at humor, and, in spite of AGF, I have great difficulty viewing this as anything other than a sign of overt antipathy toward a fellow editor, and a gross breach of 123: 3897: 1909:, I also encounter her from time to time. Though we have had our disagreements, and still do, they are resolved civilly and with appeal to and in accordance with out policies and guidelines. She is always willing to listen and discuss, and goes far beyond the call of duty in this area, and even sometimes beyond the call of reason, in my opinion. I understand her frustration with 1470:

it, and who say that ensuring accurate reporting of what the Catholic Church actually said is "pushing the official position", while distorting what it said is "appropriately representing" LGBT concerns, or who say that the document itself, as officially published by the Catholic Church itself and so a self-published source, is an unreliable source for what the document says.

3963:

While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still

3930:

Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction

2459:

4) Editors will sometimes make mistakes and suffer occasional lapses of judgement in well-meaning furtherance of the project's goals. However, strong or even exceptional contributions to the encyclopaedia do not excuse repeated violations of basic policy. Editors who have already been sanctioned for

1666:

I am more than happy to enter into some sort of an editing interaction ban with Rosclese, provided that the street goes both ways. You yourself admitted that he followed me to the Cordileone article. Why should that keep happening? I'd be happy never needing to put up with Roscelese again, but not at

1530:

policies. Edit-warring tenaciously is a hallmark of her tactics. In any given article, you can count on Roscelese's POV to begin glistening in the text, because she routinely reverts Esoglou and he is more willing to discuss than to revert her reverts (of course he does do this as well, but when it's

1489:

I'm going to make my statement brief, since, as I've pointed out in diffs compiled on my talk, Esoglou has a history of creepy and homophobic behavior towards me and is evidently behaving the way he does in order to get me to talk to him, rather than respecting my stated intent not to do so, which he

1404:

inculpable and, moreover, that the document does not say, as claimed, that the activity is always the result of "deliberate choice", but only that some degree of freedom remains. It would be much simpler if Roscelese would only agree to have the article quote the primary source, instead of insisting

1771:

I'll say more later on when I have some more time to look at the possibility of other DR methods, but given the number of times the article has been fully protected it would seem that regular admin intervention hasn't been successful in managing this issue, so an arbitration case might be helpful in

1594:

that I believed their action to be stalking, which is very clear from their edit-history. At that time, their edits shared 7 articles with Roscelese; they had directly followed her to four of them to revert her (having never edited them before), whilst on the others they exhibit simple reversion of

1399:

I see I have made a mistake, for which I apologize. Above, I copied exactly Roscelese's latest version, but I did not realize that it was different from the claim that she had repeatedly reverted to for so long, when her claim was that the document declared that homosexual tendency never attenuates

4158:

Any block, restriction, ban, or other sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy in this case must be logged in this section. Sanctions issued pursuant to a remedy (most commonly, discretionary sanctions) should be logged below. For sanctions the required information is the user or page

1714:

standard, while Roscelese is merely interested in bringing up LGBT concerns where they are not appropriately represented. Esoglou uses a variety of tactics to try and quote Catholic texts straight rather than describing them through the eyes of reliable observers. Roscelese tries to emphasize third

1380:

George Ho speaks of "Roscelese and Esoglou's long-term animosities toward each other". I disagree with Roscelese's presentation of certain matters, and with her constant reverting (without discussion on the talk page) to her own text in spite of attempts to preserve more objective statements or to

1469:

of solving the remaining problem of the claim that the same document denies the possibility that there may be cases of reduction of culpability because of orientation. And yet there are those who blame me for not having accepted submissively whatever Roscelese kept reverting to without discussing

2106:

I'd also like opinions on whether a motion enacting (a) discretionary sanctions related to the intersection of religion and sexuality ; (b) discretionary sanctions related to Catholicism and Homosexuality ; (c) a mutual interaction ban between the Roscelese and Esoglou; and/or (d) broad or narrow

2439:

3) Knowledge users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users and to approach disputes in a constructive fashion, with the aim of reaching a good-faith solution. Personal attacks, incivility, assumptions of bad faith, harassment, disruptive

1969:

asks that the equivalent of the official Vatican newspaper source be used", that is precisely the problem. We should be using reliable INDEPENDENT secondary sources, not self-serving self-published sources. Church documents are written in a opaque, vague and intentionally ambiguous "secret code"

1883:

once every six months or so, and the problem is always the same: a penchant for propagating religious apologetics and whitewashing issues related to his church based on appeal to extremely and intentionally ambiguous primary church documents without the benefit of secondary independent scholarly

1809:

work. I'd be hesitant to impose broad DS in a completely new area (unlike Acupuncture) in a summary proceeding. I don't think an IBAN would work by itself and would need to be accompanied by an article or topic ban of some sort. However I don't think removing only these two editors will have the

1634:

Roscelese has been an ideologically driven edit warrior on this topic. She constantly toes the line on 3RR (occasionally crossing it) and has gotten herself blocked because of her actions on this article, and other similar ones. She reverts minor, sometimes grammatical corrections by editors she

3971:

All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally

3967:

These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special

3734:

is subject to an indefinite editing restriction from the date of enactment of this remedy. Dominus Vobisdu is limited to one revert per page per day (except for indisputable vandalism and BLP violations), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should Dominus

1555:

In summary, this deadlock between them may be good for the project, or at least it is better than simply allowing only one of them to run roughshod over all these topic articles. Each of them provides the perfect counterbalance to the other's POV. If Roscelese's POV didn't constantly win out in

1525:

Now for Roscelese's view. Similar to Esoglou, she perceives systemic bias, in this instance the bias she opposes is that against the LGBT movement and individuals, as well as the pro-choice movement. I am not sure how much bias there can be against those things, except from a small minority of

1521:

will not succeed if the goal is to settle the matter between these two editors. Third, neither of these two are alone. They each have allies who agree with them and back up their edits. In the interest of full disclosure, I will say that I am an ally of Esoglou. I routinely oppose Roscelese in

1516:

It is worth noting three things. First, contrary to what Esoglou claims above, the dispute is about POV and personalities. Second, when I say "the dispute" I mean the ongoing feud between Roscelese and Esoglou, not merely in the cited article today. This feud stretches back for years over many

2503:

1) Although this longstanding dispute is mostly focused on articles at the intersection of Catholicism and aspects of human sexuality and reproduction, in particular homosexuality and abortion, it has spilled over into other related areas, including associated organisations and associated

1709:

This is a behavior issue rather than a content one. Esoglou works to wear down his ideological opponents by continual argument, picked up again and again where previous discussion was unfruitful. Esoglou is here to push the official position of the Catholic Church hierarchy, meeting the

1747:

is the same; the model's name, Dani, has been taken out of the file name, but it's still Dani that is shown bound in ropes. When I saw that note from Esoglou I was affronted, and I understood Roscelese's reaction. I thought that it was demeaning, sexist, belittling and disrespectful.

1719:, Padresfan94 swings through with the obvious and sole intent to frustrate Roscelese. If Esoglou and Padresfan94 were removed from the equation, I disagree with the expressed concern that Roscelese would push the ideological pendulum so far left as to unbalance the articles involved, 1955:

It also bothers me that he has been previously banned for tendentious editing in an area that he was too personally involved in. This points to a long-term problem with this editor, and decreases my faith in his ability to edit neutrally on topics related to his personal religious

1738:

The rope bondage image used by Esoglou in apparent humor, which was taken very differently by Roscelese, was deleted at Commons under one name, but uploaded again under another name. I saw the first version in Roscelese's talk page history after noticing her angry edit summary

1254:

a picture of some model, which is now deleted in Commons. I can't say whether the model was naked or not, but Roscelese took it as an insult. Esoglou has denied that he hurt Roscelese, but Roscelese claimed that this started a long-term animosity. She told me in her talk page.

1662:

It is incredibly unfair to accuse me of sock puppetry and then say "of course, the evidence wouldn't prove that untrue, but trust me, it's true". If you think I'm a sock puppet of that guy then file an investigation and stop dragging my name through the mud. Put up or shut

1638:

Everyone else here, including the people that I have some times disagreed, is capable of compromise except her. She has been blocked 6 times already, if she keeps editing like this she will continue to be blocked. She needs to be backed off of Catholic articles for a

1970:

which makes them impossible to interpret at face value. Independent scholarly analysis is required, not self-serving spin doctoring. As for simply using quotes from church documents without any commentary by reliable independent secondary sources, that would violate

3289:

was created on 8 August 2014 and has made about 200 edits, mostly within the locus of this dispute. Despite the relatively short time they have edited, and their relatively low edit count, they are no stranger to controversy and disruptive conduct. Padresfan94 has:

1582:

I think the dispute between Roscelese and Esoglou has been covered adequately by other editors. My bigger concern, as an admin active on this and other homosexuality-related articles, is the possibility/probability of tag-teaming and/or sockpuppetry. One editor,

2147:

Gender/sexuality is becoming an increasingly hot topic on Knowledge and a case is useful way to help explore some of the issues. I don't think this one should be a motion either. DS seems way too heavy a hammer for now, and i-bans and t-bans usually need a case.

2276:

It's clear that while the content disputes may actually come to a resolve, that the underlying factors of behavior are still an issue whether it's one content dispute or another. With the amount of full protections also, I feel it's time we pick this one up. --

1834:

Given that Black Kite has shown that at least one other editor likely requires sanctions against them to resolve this issue (and the sort of thing Black Kite is talking is what's sometimes difficult to pin down at AE) I think a full case is likely needed here.

1547:

when it suits her and she needs to delete or rework some section to her liking. Admittedly, she is often right, and because she is craftier and more tenacious than her opponents, almost always gets her way. Recently, I was introduced to an applicable term,

1526:

editors. I don't even think Esoglou shows unhealthy bias against these things, just that he happens to agree with the Catholic Church's position on them. Roscelese's mission seems to be to represent LGBT and pro-choice views as favorable, at the expense of

1369:

the baselessness of her interpretation of these sources. On the talk page of the article I have repeatedly tried to engage her in a conversation about her interpretation. Others too have tried to get her to see that she is mistaken, the most recent being

3864:

Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:

1365:, "said that, as homosexual sexual activity is the result of deliberate choice, it is not therefore made inculpable by natural orientation". Roscelese says that this claim is based on the document itself and on two secondary sources. I have explained 2420:. Where different scholarly viewpoints exist on a topic, those views enjoying a reasonable degree of support should be reflected in article content. An article should fairly represent the weight of authority for each such view, and should not give 1772:

trying to resolve the issue. I'm also of the opinion that discretionary sanctions will be helpful in this area (and wished I had them when I protected the article), possibly even more broadly in the Roman Catholicism or Christianity area (see also

3931:

placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.

1890:

Furthermore, I have begun to have serious doubts about his good faith, especially when he tried to "enlist" me on his side of this pissing contest without my permission, which I also warned him against on the article talk page.

2812: 2742: 72: 4135:

These restrictions may be appealed to the committee twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. Should Roscelese breach any of these restrictions, she may be blocked for per the

3593:

1442:

on the image that I saw as a humorous comment on attempts to tie me up from editing. Those who saw it as in no way humorous considered it grounds enough to actually tie me up. And some want me punished for it again.

3926:

Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.

3356: 3327: 3313: 3218: 3178: 1201: 3854:

This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the

3214: 3204: 3174: 3133: 1603:

is clearly indicated here; why would a "brand new" editor suddenly gravitate towards another and start reverting her edits? I think we can safely assume a link here - and even in the unlikely even there is none,

2993: 2970: 2949: 2912: 2868: 2770: 2793: 2365: 67: 3964:

request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.

3821:

0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.

2774: 1381:

offer modifications aimed at meeting her objections. But I feel no animosity towards her. Unfortunately, her strong animosity towards me shows in her edit summaries and in various other places, most recently

1186: 3579:

indefinitely restricted to making no more than one revert per page per day (except for indisputable vandalism and BLP violations), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page;

1995: 1196: 1191: 61: 50: 1659:

If you had been following this discussion more closely you would have noted the times that Esoglau and I have disagreed with each other, calling out edits "indistinguishable" borders on irresponsible.

2018: 923: 2479:

is undesirable as it disrupts the editing process and inflames rather than resolves content disputes. Users who engage in multiple reverts of the same content but are careful not to breach the

56: 45: 3005: 820: 1405:

on some interpretation of it. The cited secondary source's interpretation is that, the stronger the tendency, the greater the reduction of culpability. Again, I apologize for my mistake.

1887:

I have warned him repeatedly that WP is not the place to practice apologetics and PR spinning, and, though he seems to agree for a short while, he quickly falls back into his old habits.

1181: 1687:

Given that I protected the article once back in August 2014 I'm not sure that I'm really involved. However, seeing it has been fully protected 8 times in 6 months something needs doing.

39: 2074:

Awaiting more statements, but from what is here so far it does look like some form of action is likely to be required from us - whether that is a full case or not I'm not yet certain.

1699: 3828: 2268: 2185: 2304: 1347: 3984: 3672:

is indefinitely banned from the English Knowledge. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

3510:

is indefinitely banned from the English Knowledge. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

2167: 1950:

respond if someone left a picture of a Catholic priest fondling a pre-teen altar boy on his talk page? I, for one, would be highly offended, and would fail to see any "humor" in it.

1805:

I think something like imposing discretionary sanction on this and closely related articles for 6 months to see if that solves the problem and if not a full case can be heard then

1757: 1676: 1552:. Roscelese's behavior matches this description well. Her cold, condescending attitude, toward people she does not like or agree with, makes for difficulty in resolving disputes. 2236: 2065: 2049: 2038: 2288: 2083: 766: 2342: 2325: 2255: 2202: 2137: 2116: 2101: 1854: 2382:

1) The purpose of Knowledge is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for

1042: 2124:

per my colleagues and the traditional issues that have been brought up since my last comment this needs a case I think. I would not be opposed to discretionary sanctions on

1161: 2220: 344: 1157: 1732: 1648: 3884: 381: 213: 1619: 1458: 3453:

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

1829: 1569: 1503: 1328: 1264: 1239: 1465:, which was apparently drafted in English, was published first in that language and only later in other languages has been corrected; and now Gaijin42 seems to be 4244: 4226: 4205: 4184: 1479: 146: 2398:

is prohibited. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good faith.

1615:

needs both a topic ban and a (one-way) interaction ban from following Roscelese. There are other problematic editors here, but this would at least be a start.

1452: 1414: 1394: 939: 375: 2767: 1587:, became active on this article recently, and if their actions are not actually tag-teaming with Esoglou, they are indistinguishable from this behaviour. 1165: 502: 1682: 2088:

I am now convinced that we need to do something here, but I'm still not certain whether that is a full case or not. I'd particularly like to hear from

4130:

is indefinitely prohibited from engaging in conduct which, in the opinion of any uninvolved administrator, casts aspersions, or personalises disputes.

3431: 3429: 3310: 3307: 3304: 3301: 3295: 3211: 3130: 3127: 3124: 3121: 339: 3298: 3118: 3585:

indefinitely prohibited from engaging in conduct which, in the opinion of any uninvolved administrator, casts aspersions, or personalises disputes.

371: 167: 159: 4159:

the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), and basis or context.

4075:

is subject to the following restrictions. Other than in cases of indisputable vandalism or BLP violations, they are indefinitely prohibited from:

2758: 2755: 2752: 496: 490: 3033: 2977: 2391: 4016: 3739:

below. This restriction may be appealed to the committee twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

4145: 1338:

I almost forgot; Master of Puppets has been semi-inactive since December 2014. I wonder if his statement may impact an arbitrator's decision.

472: 1206: 313: 2713:

engaged in baiting using inappropriate sexualised imagery and, over a thirty-month period, continued baiting knowing it had caused offence:

2387: 3772: 3705: 3399: 1595:

her edits. I would point out that Padresfan94's account was created only 12 days before the (at that time inevitable) indefinite block of

1066: 3801:

is admonished for edit warring, and is strongly reminded to use discussion and dispute resolution rather than engage in future edit wars.

2600:

has been editing since December 2009 and has made about 32,000 edits, mostly to articles about Christianity. Esoglou previously edited as

1704: 1629: 1560:

to apply them evenly on both sides, or these topics will begin to have even more serious NPOV problems if one faction is given free rein.

163: 3198: 3192: 2764: 2722: 1720: 1599:

for the harassment of Roscelese. There is of course no proof of a relationship between the two, and Checkuser would be useless now, but

484: 333: 178: 156: 1577: 3873: 3344: 2535: 1358: 414: 366: 304: 223: 151: 1766: 1511: 1484: 1461:

that I selected for attention, but that Roscelese refused to discuss. We now have an agreed text on Jeannine Deckers; the claim that

1217: 1696: 887: 329: 3353: 3350: 3324: 3201: 3195: 3189: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3162: 3159: 3153: 3150: 3144: 2990: 2946: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2909: 2906: 2900: 2897: 2865: 2862: 2852: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2809: 2806: 2803: 2800: 2761: 2734: 3643: 3260: 1293: 1288: 964: 844: 440: 309: 4232: 4211: 4190: 4169: 1352: 4256:

Also include sanctions against individuals which are enforcing a page sanction in this section, below the recorded page sanction.

3013: 3009: 2061:

and explicitly reject disposing of the matter by motion. There's enough issues here to merit a full case's evidentiary process.

1297: 1114: 899: 784: 319: 299: 182: 4101: 4046: 3877: 3544: 3156: 3147: 3084: 2903: 2846: 2834: 2787: 917: 905: 688: 640: 540: 324: 237: 218: 287: 3766: 3699: 3393: 1624: 1343: 1280: 1060: 893: 796: 358: 249: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2967: 2964: 2888: 2885: 2882: 2879: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 4272: 4162: 3481: 2858: 2571: 911: 814: 802: 592: 282: 1591: 4078:

making more than one revert per page per day, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page;

1860: 1518: 1457:

I am grateful to those who have interacted with Roscelese on the talk page of the article and have, it seems, solved the

1223: 790: 208: 137: 25: 3347: 3341: 3338: 2665: 1517:

articles, mostly in the topics of Catholicism, homosexuality, and abortion. I feel that proposing sanctions for merely

808: 1153: 3816: 3637: 3254: 2618: 2353: 958: 838: 2714: 1382: 1357:

The dispute is about content. At present the precise point of dispute is Roscelese's insistence that the document "

1251: 517: 1339: 1108: 730: 3037: 2730: 2726: 2718: 1875:

would only agree to have the article quote the primary source, instead of insisting on some interpretation of it."

1366: 1302: 4095: 4040: 3948:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or 3836: 3538: 3320: 3185: 3078: 2960: 2919: 2781: 2383: 1846: 1821: 1787: 1499: 1006: 682: 634: 534: 274: 114: 4153: 2894: 2891: 2855: 2849: 3919:

prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).

3796: 3729: 3423: 2875: 2395: 1740: 1274:

I don't know if this is relevant or not, but Roscelese and Esoglou's animosities might have gone way back. See

1212: 1202:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive263#User:Roscelese reported by User:Padresfan94 (Result: Stale)

1090: 742: 260: 203: 21: 4231:

Slugger O'Toole indefinitely banned from making any reports to administrative noticeboards about Roscelse per

3790: 3784: 3723: 3717: 3582:

indefinitely prohibited from making rollback-type reverts that fail to provide an explanation for the revert;

3475: 3417: 3411: 3334: 3294:

engaged in edit-warring, and continued the same edit wars after article protection. Paired offsets: Sep 2014

3140: 3117:

engaged in edit-warring, and continued the same edit wars after article protection. Paired offsets: Sep 2014

2748: 2565: 2125: 1692: 1466: 1314: 1084: 1078: 1018: 881: 760: 748: 586: 195: 2694:, which were seemingly good hand/bad hand accounts editing within the same broad topic area. ("Top edits": 4001: 3667: 3434: 3284: 2441: 1985: 1146: 1036: 1024: 988: 868: 736: 433: 245: 143: 1138: 4125: 4070: 3778: 3711: 3655: 3568: 3405: 3272: 3108: 2659: 1072: 1012: 976: 856: 778: 754: 712: 664: 564: 255: 173: 3923:

Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.

1913:, especially since they appear to have more frequent interaction with each other than I do with either. 1126: 4113: 4058: 3888: 3749: 3682: 3556: 3505: 3364: 3096: 3047: 3023: 2780:

continued, even during this case, to focus on a contributor rather than on content in talk page posts:

2612: 2595: 2531: 1030: 700: 652: 616: 552: 294: 2695: 3760: 3693: 3661: 3493: 3387: 3278: 3226: 2689: 2583: 2183: 1284: 1054: 982: 862: 604: 2703: 2642: 1187:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive812#Disruptive editing behavior of User:Esoglou

2784: 2699: 2677: 2498: 2300: 1902:

is capable of editing productively in areas that do not touch upon his personal religious beliefs.

1688: 1310: 1132: 876: 512: 4250: 3735:

Vobisdu exceed this limit or fail to discuss a content reversion, they may be blocked for per the

2630: 4119: 4064: 3811: 3649: 3620: 3562: 3266: 3102: 2956: 2818: 2527: 2509: 1532: 1176: 970: 850: 706: 658: 558: 426: 2460:

disruptive behavior may be sanctioned more harshly for repeated instances of similar behaviors.

2476: 2411: 2358: 2089: 1306: 1171: 1120: 773: 1635:

perceives to be of a different POV and then refuses to participate in talk page discussions.

1197:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive865#Repeated reverting without discussing

1192:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive864#Repeated reverting without discussing

4107: 4052: 3631: 3550: 3499: 3248: 3090: 2589: 2434: 2377: 1850: 1825: 1791: 1753: 1728: 1672: 1644: 1531:

a matter of quantity and persistence, Roscelese always wins out.) She is exceedingly good at

952: 832: 694: 646: 610: 546: 133: 17: 3755: 3688: 3520: 3382: 2264: 2232: 2178: 2033: 2026:

I strongly oppose doing a motion here. I think that i-bans or t-bans require a full case --

2013: 1616: 1431: 1276: 1227: 1102: 1049: 724: 103: 3912:

No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:

8: 4240: 4089: 4034: 3532: 3487: 3458: 3376: 3072: 2683: 2577: 2493: 2296: 2283: 2133: 2112: 2097: 2079: 1842: 1817: 1783: 1565: 1549: 1495: 1324: 1260: 1235: 1000: 676: 628: 598: 528: 89: 1773: 1374: 2636: 2319: 2249: 2198: 2162: 1925:. I also suspect that this user is a sock of a banned user that has a vendetta against 1596: 935: 3225:

Roscelese has been blocked on several occasions in the past, mostly for edit-warring.

2738: 1744: 3469: 2671: 2559: 2149: 1990: 1975: 1895: 1711: 1475: 1448: 1410: 1390: 580: 2128:

and related articles as a temporary injunction for the duration of the case though.

3626: 3243: 2624: 1922: 1749: 1724: 1668: 1640: 1612: 1584: 1423: 947: 827: 4006: 3433:. Dominus Vobisdu has previously been blocked for "disruptive editing" and "3RR": 2790: 3237: 2653: 2517: 2421: 2339: 2228: 2062: 2046: 2027: 2007: 1962: 1918: 1716: 1605: 1435: 1097: 719: 98: 4081:

making rollback-type reverts that fail to provide an explanation for the revert;

1810:

desired effect given that there are other parties involved in the edit warring.

4236: 4217: 4196: 4175: 4084: 4029: 3527: 3067: 2606: 2417: 2278: 2129: 2108: 2093: 2075: 1939: 1926: 1906: 1872: 1837: 1812: 1800: 1778: 1600: 1561: 1544: 1527: 1491: 1419: 1320: 1256: 1231: 995: 671: 623: 523: 84: 1439: 1182:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive810#Topic ban for Esoglou

398: 4266: 4011: 3061: 2480: 2470: 2372: 2335: 2316: 2246: 2216: 2194: 1943: 1427: 1371: 931: 2751:

a content dispute by repeatedly alluding to an editor's sexual orientation:

2444:

mechanism rather than engage in unbridled criticism across multiple forums.

402: 3464: 2554: 2513: 1971: 1966: 1947: 1935: 1910: 1899: 1880: 1866: 1540: 1536: 1471: 1444: 1406: 1386: 575: 3954:

is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.

2424:

to views held by a relatively small minority of commentators or scholars.

3916:

the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or

3446: 2548: 2454: 2107:

topic bans for Roscelese and Esoglou, would likely resolve this dispute.

2368:, where comments and discussion from the voting phase is also available. 2648: 3869:

ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;

3610: 1978:. That would also turn the article into a non-encyclopedic quote farm. 1776:, which is only related through Christianity). As I said, more later. 1723:. Her work elsewhere shows a strong understanding of what is neutral. 2601: 122: 3887:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through 3043: 3029: 3019: 2737:. Note: The original Jun 2012 image was deleted at Commons but was 2523: 2211: 400: 3004:

topic ban/editing restriction about Eastern Orthodox teachings:

403: 3985:

procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision

404: 3987:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

3831:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

3363:

Padresfan94 has previously been blocked for edit-warring:

2857:. Additionally, has misrepresented sources to violate the 2799:

engaged in insulting, sarcastic or dismissive commentary:

1996:

Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (13/0/0/0)

1865:

Actually, I was going to keep out of this until I read

2980:

by adding citation tags to already sourced material:

930:

By Arbcom consensus, removed on 9/2 as uninvolved. --

3139:engaged in incivility, has cast aspersions and has 1934:I am deeply troubled and disappointed by the photo 3573:is subject to the following restrictions. She is: 2161:as a full case, would not support doing a motion. 2092:, who has been trying to mediate this discussion. 1592:User_talk:Padresfan94#Just_to_make_things_clear... 2963:policies, to include material from poor sources: 4264: 3829:procedure for the standard enforcement provision 1535:to prove her points. She routinely appeals to 4017:Motion: Roscelese restricted (September 2015) 1222:When I looked at many protection requests on 434: 3951:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA 2416:2) Article content must be presented from a 3677:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3515:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3371:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3333:engaged in incivility, cast aspersions and 3232:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3056:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2543:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2488:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2449:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2429:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2403:Passed 10 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3806:Passed 9 to 1 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3744:Passed 9 to 1 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3604:Passed 8 to 2 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 3441:Passed 9 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2536:Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute 2465:Passed 9 to 0 at 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 1869:'s "apology" above, specifically the line 1359:On the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons 441: 427: 4025:case is modified to read the following: 1162:Accusation of outright misrepresentation 1158:"Lack of Roscelese's personal consensus" 1154:Talk:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism 4021:Remedy 2 (Roscelese restricted) of the 3889:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee 2001:Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other) 14: 4265: 4210:Roscelese blocked for four weeks per 3968:functionary blocks of whatever nature. 1743:on my watchlist, so I can attest that 3000:Esoglou's previous remedies include: 1667:the cost of her following me around. 482:Watchlist all case (and talk) pages: 4189:Roscelese blocked for two weeks per 3891:(or, if email access is revoked, to 214:Clarification and Amendment requests 4168:Roscelese blocked for one week per 3874:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 2364:All tallies are based the votes at 1519:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism 1224:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism 31: 3883:submit a request for amendment at 2859:Biography of living persons policy 32: 4284: 1611:If nothing else comes fron this, 1246:Responding to Esoglou's statement 4148:at 03:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 4137: 3941:For a request to succeed, either 3895: 3736: 3613:at 03:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 3595: 2392:furtherance of outside conflicts 1683:Statement by CambridgeBayWeather 1522:articles touching these topics. 1361:", known also by its incipit as 476:on 03:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC) 121: 3908:Modifications by administrators 2955:given weight, in breach of the 1741:"get the fuck off my talk page" 457:on 08:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 4138:standard Enforcement provision 3737:standard Enforcement provision 3596:standard Enforcement provision 3323:, to push a pro-Catholic POV: 1929:. This should be investigated. 1625:Statement by Master of Puppets 1334:Waiting for Master of Puppets? 13: 1: 3860:Appeals by sanctioned editors 3428:has engaged in edit-warring: 2394:, or publishing or promoting 2126:Homosexuality and Catholicism 1894:Based on a strong element of 1871:"It would be much simpler if 3846:0) Appeals and modifications 3319:attempted, in breach of the 2930:, a partisan point-of-view: 2918:attempted, in breach of the 2343:07:46, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 2326:22:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 2305:15:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2289:05:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2269:23:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2256:20:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2237:19:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2221:16:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2203:11:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2186:11:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2168:06:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2138:12:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2117:18:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2102:18:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2084:12:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2066:23:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2050:08:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2039:00:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2019:01:36, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1965:'s comment below about how " 1861:Statement by Dominus Vobisdu 1855:22:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1830:22:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1758:23:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1733:20:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1715:party sources. Then, like a 1700:17:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1677:08:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1649:07:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1620:18:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1608:is clearly being violated. 1570:16:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1504:16:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1480:07:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1453:07:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1415:15:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1395:06:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1348:01:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 1329:20:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1265:20:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 1240:01:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 940:02:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 465:on 01:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 345:Conflict of interest reports 7: 4273:Knowledge arbitration cases 4245:11:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC) 3972:discussed at another venue. 3878:administrators’ noticeboard 3817:Enforcement of restrictions 3210:incorrectly used rollback: 3046:, essentially for baiting: 3028:three-month topic ban from 2874:conducted, against policy, 2354:Temporary injunction (none) 1340:Gh87 in the public computer 1207:User talk:Master of Puppets 174:Search archived proceedings 10: 4289: 4206:15:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC) 4023:Christianity and Sexuality 3750:Dominus Vobisdu admonished 3683:Dominus Vobisdu restricted 2749:unnecessarily personalised 2532:World Congress of Families 2045:Awaiting more statements. 219:Arbitrator motion requests 4227:15:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC) 4185:17:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC) 4002:Discussion by Arbitrators 3896: 3837:Appeals and modifications 3042:six-month topic-ban from 3018:formal warning regarding 2006:waiting for statements -- 1463:Homosexualitatis problema 1363:Homosexualitatis problema 1250:Esoglou gave Roscelese a 2739:subsequently re-uploaded 2483:are still edit warring. 2334:You can only vote once, 1705:Statement by Binksternet 1654:Responding to Black Kite 1630:Statement by Padresfan94 1147:Prior dispute resolution 3983:In accordance with the 3962: 3827:In accordance with the 3621:Padresfan94 site banned 3036:and misuse of sources: 2743:Binksternet's statement 2528:Crisis Pregnancy Center 2510:Salvatore J. Cordileone 1578:Statement by Black Kite 1166:Full protection (again) 3872:request review at the 3219:Padresfan94's evidence 3179:Padresfan94's evidence 2819:misrepresented sources 2813:Binksternet's evidence 2388:advocacy or propaganda 1767:Statement by Callanecc 1512:Statement by Elizium23 1485:Statement by Roscelese 1218:Statement by George Ho 1213:Preliminary statements 3335:personalised disputes 3186:ownership of articles 3141:personalised disputes 3034:battleground behavior 2418:neutral point of view 2412:Neutral point of view 415:Track related changes 275:Arbitration Committee 115:Knowledge Arbitration 18:Knowledge:Arbitration 4251:Page-level sanctions 4163:Individual sanctions 3812:Proposed enforcement 3521:Roscelese restricted 3357:Callanecc's evidence 3328:Callanecc's evidence 3314:Callanecc's evidence 3306:, Dec 2014/Jan 2015 3215:Callanecc's evidence 3205:Callanecc's evidence 3175:Callanecc's evidence 3134:Callanecc's evidence 2994:Roscelese's evidence 2978:battleground conduct 2971:Roscelese's evidence 2950:Roscelese's evidence 2913:Roscelese's evidence 2869:Roscelese's evidence 2794:Callanecc's evidence 2771:Roscelese's evidence 2499:Locus of the dispute 2435:Standards of conduct 2378:Purpose of Knowledge 1986:Preliminary decision 1721:which is 109 of them 1432:User:Dominus Vobisdu 1353:Statement by Esoglou 1277:Catholics for Choice 1228:Catholics for Choice 224:Enforcement requests 152:Guide to arbitration 3459:Esoglou site banned 2922:, to make articles 2775:MastCell's evidence 1745:this second version 1689:CambridgeBayWeather 1438:, I have commented 1177:User talk:Roscelese 877:CambridgeBayWeather 95:Drafting arbitrator 3123:Nov 2014-Jan 2015 2442:dispute resolution 2366:/Proposed decision 1597:User:Badmintonhist 246:Contentious topics 144:Arbitration policy 4225: 4204: 4183: 4144:Passed 8 to 0 by 3978: 3977: 3876:("AE") or at the 3455: 3321:neutrality policy 3014:modified May 2011 2920:neutrality policy 2876:original research 2504:biographies. Eg: 2481:three revert rule 2396:original research 2303: 2166: 2090:Master of Puppets 2002: 1917:Also, agree with 1617:Black Kite (talk) 1270:Reply to Gaijin42 1172:User talk:Esoglou 1152:Many sections at 942: 774:Master of Puppets 509: 451: 450: 418: 386: 256:General sanctions 204:All open requests 134:About arbitration 107: 93: 76: 68:Proposed decision 65: 54: 43: 4280: 4257: 4224: 4222: 4215: 4203: 4201: 4194: 4182: 4180: 4173: 4129: 4102:deleted contribs 4074: 4047:deleted contribs 3902: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3842: 3841: 3800: 3773:deleted contribs 3733: 3706:deleted contribs 3671: 3644:deleted contribs 3572: 3545:deleted contribs 3509: 3482:deleted contribs 3451: 3427: 3400:deleted contribs 3288: 3261:deleted contribs 3112: 3085:deleted contribs 2693: 2666:deleted contribs 2646: 2619:deleted contribs 2599: 2572:deleted contribs 2494:Findings of fact 2322: 2299: 2286: 2281: 2252: 2182: 2165: 2154: 2036: 2030: 2016: 2010: 2000: 1923:User:Padresfan94 1804: 1613:User:Padresfan94 1585:User:Padresfan94 1533:WP:Wikilawyering 1424:User:Binksternet 1318: 1300: 1142: 1115:deleted contribs 1094: 1067:deleted contribs 1046: 992: 965:deleted contribs 929: 927: 872: 845:deleted contribs 824: 770: 716: 689:deleted contribs 668: 641:deleted contribs 620: 593:deleted contribs 568: 541:deleted contribs 518:Involved parties 513:Case information 508: 507: 480: 471:Case amended by 443: 436: 429: 417: 412: 405: 384: 340:Clerk procedures 332: 290: 261:Editor sanctions 238:Active sanctions 196:Open proceedings 166: 125: 111: 110: 101: 87: 70: 59: 48: 37: 4288: 4287: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4263: 4262: 4255: 4253: 4218: 4216: 4197: 4195: 4176: 4174: 4165: 4156: 4154:Enforcement log 4087: 4032: 4019: 4014: 4009: 4004: 3979: 3935:Important notes 3894: 3892: 3847: 3839: 3819: 3814: 3758: 3756:Dominus Vobisdu 3752: 3691: 3689:Dominus Vobisdu 3685: 3629: 3623: 3530: 3523: 3467: 3461: 3449: 3385: 3383:Dominus Vobisdu 3379: 3377:Dominus Vobisdu 3246: 3240: 3070: 3064: 3010:placed Feb 2011 2651: 2604: 2557: 2551: 2518:The Singing Nun 2501: 2496: 2473: 2457: 2437: 2414: 2380: 2375: 2361: 2356: 2320: 2284: 2279: 2265:NativeForeigner 2250: 2176: 2150: 2034: 2028: 2014: 2008: 1998: 1993: 1988: 1963:User:Marauder40 1961:In response to 1919:User:Black Kite 1863: 1798: 1774:this AE request 1769: 1707: 1685: 1632: 1627: 1580: 1514: 1487: 1436:User:Marauder40 1355: 1291: 1275: 1220: 1215: 1149: 1100: 1052: 1050:Dominus Vobisdu 998: 950: 879: 830: 776: 722: 674: 626: 578: 526: 520: 515: 510: 483: 481: 477: 466: 458: 447: 413: 407: 406: 401: 391: 390: 389: 378: 361: 351: 350: 349: 336: 328: 316: 291: 286: 277: 267: 266: 265: 240: 230: 229: 228: 198: 188: 185: 170: 162: 140: 109: 30: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 4286: 4276: 4275: 4260: 4252: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4229: 4208: 4187: 4164: 4161: 4155: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4141: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4082: 4079: 4018: 4015: 4013: 4010: 4008: 4005: 4003: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3990: 3989: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3952: 3949: 3943: 3942: 3921: 3920: 3917: 3910: 3909: 3905: 3904: 3881: 3870: 3862: 3861: 3849: 3848: 3845: 3840: 3838: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3751: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3684: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3622: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3609:Superseded by 3587: 3586: 3583: 3580: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3460: 3457: 3448: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3378: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3361: 3360: 3331: 3317: 3239: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3223: 3222: 3208: 3182: 3137: 3063: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3052: 3051: 3040: 3026: 3016: 2998: 2997: 2974: 2953: 2916: 2872: 2816: 2797: 2778: 2746: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2539: 2538: 2520: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2472: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2406: 2405: 2384:other purposes 2379: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2360: 2359:Final decision 2357: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2329: 2328: 2307: 2297:GorillaWarfare 2291: 2271: 2258: 2239: 2223: 2205: 2188: 2170: 2156: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2119: 2104: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2053: 2052: 2043: 2042: 2041: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1987: 1984: 1982: 1980: 1979: 1958: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1940:User:Roscelese 1931: 1930: 1927:User:Roscelese 1907:User:Roscelese 1873:User:Roscelese 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1832: 1768: 1765: 1763: 1761: 1760: 1706: 1703: 1693:Uqaqtuq (talk) 1684: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1486: 1483: 1459:three problems 1420:User:George Ho 1354: 1351: 1336: 1335: 1272: 1271: 1248: 1247: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1169: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1095: 1047: 993: 945: 944: 943: 825: 771: 717: 669: 621: 573: 519: 516: 514: 511: 479: 469: 461: 453: 449: 448: 446: 445: 438: 431: 423: 420: 419: 409: 408: 399: 397: 396: 393: 392: 388: 387: 379: 374: 369: 363: 362: 357: 356: 353: 352: 348: 347: 342: 337: 327: 322: 317: 312: 307: 302: 297: 292: 285: 279: 278: 273: 272: 269: 268: 264: 263: 258: 253: 242: 241: 236: 235: 232: 231: 227: 226: 221: 216: 211: 206: 200: 199: 194: 193: 190: 189: 187: 186: 181: 176: 171: 161: 154: 149: 141: 136: 130: 127: 126: 118: 117: 35:Main case page 33: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4285: 4274: 4271: 4270: 4268: 4261: 4258: 4246: 4242: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4228: 4223: 4221: 4213: 4209: 4207: 4202: 4200: 4192: 4188: 4186: 4181: 4179: 4171: 4167: 4166: 4160: 4149: 4147: 4142: 4139: 4134: 4127: 4124: 4121: 4118: 4115: 4112: 4109: 4106: 4103: 4100: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4086: 4083: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4072: 4069: 4066: 4063: 4060: 4057: 4054: 4051: 4048: 4045: 4042: 4039: 4036: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4024: 3995: 3994: 3992: 3991: 3988: 3986: 3981: 3980: 3970: 3966: 3960: 3959: 3953: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3936: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3918: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3907: 3906: 3901:wikimedia.org 3890: 3886: 3882: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3851: 3850: 3844: 3843: 3832: 3830: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3807: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3798: 3795: 3792: 3789: 3786: 3783: 3780: 3777: 3774: 3771: 3768: 3765: 3762: 3757: 3745: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3738: 3731: 3728: 3725: 3722: 3719: 3716: 3713: 3710: 3707: 3704: 3701: 3698: 3695: 3690: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3666: 3663: 3660: 3657: 3654: 3651: 3648: 3645: 3642: 3639: 3636: 3633: 3628: 3614: 3612: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3597: 3590: 3588: 3584: 3581: 3578: 3577: 3575: 3574: 3570: 3567: 3564: 3561: 3558: 3555: 3552: 3549: 3546: 3543: 3540: 3537: 3534: 3529: 3516: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3507: 3504: 3501: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3480: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3466: 3456: 3454: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3435: 3432: 3430: 3425: 3422: 3419: 3416: 3413: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3401: 3398: 3395: 3392: 3389: 3384: 3372: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3365: 3358: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3345: 3342: 3339: 3336: 3332: 3329: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3308: 3305: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3286: 3283: 3280: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3250: 3245: 3233: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3202: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3190: 3187: 3183: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3169: 3166: 3163: 3160: 3157: 3154: 3151: 3148: 3145: 3142: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3092: 3089: 3086: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3074: 3069: 3057: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2995: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2965: 2962: 2958: 2957:verifiability 2954: 2951: 2947: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2810: 2807: 2804: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709:Esoglou has: 2707: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2691: 2688: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2650: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2603: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2585: 2582: 2579: 2576: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2556: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2508:Biographies: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2482: 2478: 2466: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2443: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2423: 2419: 2409: 2404: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2370: 2369: 2367: 2351: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2295: 2292: 2290: 2287: 2282: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2254: 2253: 2248: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2164: 2163:Seraphimblade 2160: 2157: 2155: 2153: 2146: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2072: 2067: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2031: 2025: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2011: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1983: 1977: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1912: 1908: 1903: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1877: 1876: 1874: 1868: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1833: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1814: 1808: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1775: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1713: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1636: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1607: 1602: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1586: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1558:I implore you 1553: 1551: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1523: 1520: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428:User:Gaijin42 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1403: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1372:User:Gaijin42 1368: 1364: 1360: 1350: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1295: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1198: 1195: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1185: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1099: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1002: 997: 994: 990: 987: 984: 981: 978: 975: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 957: 954: 949: 946: 941: 937: 933: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 907: 904: 901: 898: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 878: 874: 873: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 852: 849: 846: 843: 840: 837: 834: 829: 826: 822: 819: 816: 813: 810: 807: 804: 801: 798: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 780: 775: 772: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 726: 721: 718: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 673: 670: 666: 663: 660: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 625: 622: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 600: 597: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 577: 574: 572: 566: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 533: 530: 525: 522: 521: 506: 505: 500: 499: 494: 493: 488: 487: 478: 475: 474: 467: 464: 459: 456: 444: 439: 437: 432: 430: 425: 424: 422: 421: 416: 411: 410: 395: 394: 383: 380: 377: 373: 370: 368: 365: 364: 360: 355: 354: 346: 343: 341: 338: 335: 331: 326: 323: 321: 318: 315: 311: 308: 306: 303: 301: 298: 296: 293: 289: 284: 281: 280: 276: 271: 270: 262: 259: 257: 254: 251: 247: 244: 243: 239: 234: 233: 225: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 209:Case requests 207: 205: 202: 201: 197: 192: 191: 184: 180: 177: 175: 172: 169: 165: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 142: 139: 135: 132: 131: 129: 128: 124: 120: 119: 116: 113: 112: 108: 105: 100: 96: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 69: 63: 58: 52: 47: 41: 36: 27: 23: 19: 4259: 4254: 4219: 4198: 4177: 4157: 4143: 4122: 4116: 4110: 4104: 4098: 4092: 4067: 4061: 4055: 4049: 4043: 4037: 4022: 4020: 3982: 3934: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3922: 3911: 3863: 3853: 3852: 3826: 3820: 3805: 3793: 3787: 3781: 3775: 3769: 3763: 3753: 3743: 3726: 3720: 3714: 3708: 3702: 3696: 3686: 3676: 3664: 3658: 3652: 3646: 3640: 3634: 3624: 3608: 3603: 3592: 3591: 3589: 3576: 3565: 3559: 3553: 3547: 3541: 3535: 3526: 3524: 3514: 3502: 3496: 3490: 3484: 3478: 3472: 3462: 3452: 3450: 3440: 3420: 3414: 3408: 3402: 3396: 3390: 3380: 3370: 3362: 3355:. (Context: 3312:. (Context: 3281: 3275: 3269: 3263: 3257: 3251: 3241: 3231: 3224: 3173:. (Context: 3132:. (Context: 3105: 3099: 3093: 3087: 3081: 3075: 3065: 3055: 2999: 2948:. (Context: 2927: 2923: 2769:. (Context: 2741:. (Context: 2731:Dec 2014 (2) 2727:Dec 2014 (1) 2708: 2686: 2680: 2674: 2668: 2662: 2656: 2639: 2633: 2627: 2621: 2615: 2609: 2592: 2586: 2580: 2574: 2568: 2562: 2552: 2542: 2514:Noel Treanor 2502: 2487: 2477:Edit warring 2474: 2471:Edit warring 2464: 2458: 2448: 2438: 2428: 2422:undue weight 2415: 2407: 2402: 2381: 2363: 2362: 2349: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2293: 2273: 2263: 2260: 2245: 2241: 2225: 2210: 2207: 2190: 2177: 2172: 2158: 2152:Roger Davies 2151: 2144: 2121: 2058: 2023: 1999: 1981: 1967:User:Esoglou 1948:User:Esoglou 1946:. How would 1936:User:Esoglou 1911:User:Esoglou 1904: 1900:User:Esoglou 1893: 1889: 1886: 1881:User:Esoglou 1879:I bump into 1878: 1870: 1867:User:Esoglou 1864: 1836: 1811: 1806: 1777: 1770: 1762: 1708: 1686: 1637: 1633: 1610: 1590:I noted, at 1589: 1581: 1573: 1557: 1554: 1524: 1515: 1507: 1488: 1467:on the verge 1462: 1456: 1418: 1401: 1398: 1379: 1362: 1356: 1337: 1273: 1252:message with 1249: 1221: 1135: 1129: 1123: 1117: 1111: 1105: 1087: 1081: 1075: 1069: 1063: 1057: 1039: 1033: 1027: 1021: 1015: 1009: 1003: 985: 979: 973: 967: 961: 955: 920: 914: 908: 902: 896: 890: 884: 875: 865: 859: 853: 847: 841: 835: 817: 811: 805: 799: 793: 787: 781: 763: 757: 751: 745: 739: 733: 727: 709: 703: 697: 691: 685: 679: 661: 655: 649: 643: 637: 631: 613: 607: 601: 595: 589: 583: 571:filing party 570: 561: 555: 549: 543: 537: 531: 503: 497: 491: 485: 470: 468: 462: 460: 454: 452: 94: 80: 79: 77: 34: 3880:("AN"); and 3627:Padresfan94 3300:, Nov 2014 3244:Padresfan94 3238:Padresfan94 2976:engaged in 1991:Clerk notes 1750:Binksternet 1725:Binksternet 1669:Padresfan94 1641:Padresfan94 1019:protections 948:Binksternet 900:protections 828:Padresfan94 797:protections 743:protections 463:Case closed 455:Case opened 179:Ban appeals 157:Noticeboard 4220:Sandstein 4199:Sandstein 4178:Sandstein 4120:block user 4114:filter log 4065:block user 4059:filter log 4012:Amendments 3993:Comments: 3855:Committee. 3791:block user 3785:filter log 3724:block user 3718:filter log 3662:block user 3656:filter log 3563:block user 3557:filter log 3500:block user 3494:filter log 3418:block user 3412:filter log 3326:(Context: 3279:block user 3273:filter log 3213:(Context: 3203:(Context: 3184:displayed 3103:block user 3097:filter log 3006:3RR report 2992:(Context: 2969:(Context: 2961:neutrality 2911:(Context: 2867:(Context: 2811:(Context: 2792:(Context: 2684:block user 2678:filter log 2637:block user 2631:filter log 2590:block user 2584:filter log 2522:Abortion: 2455:Recidivism 2386:, such as 2373:Principles 2340:Courcelles 2229:Dougweller 2063:Courcelles 2047:Courcelles 2029:Guerillero 2009:Guerillero 1976:WP:SOAPBOX 1896:WP:NOTHERE 1712:WP:NOTHERE 1697:Sunasuttuq 1133:block user 1127:filter log 1098:Contaldo80 1085:block user 1079:filter log 1031:page moves 983:block user 977:filter log 912:page moves 863:block user 857:filter log 809:page moves 755:page moves 720:Black Kite 707:block user 701:filter log 659:block user 653:filter log 611:block user 605:filter log 559:block user 553:filter log 385:(pre-2016) 372:Statistics 305:Procedures 99:Dougweller 81:Case clerk 4237:Thryduulf 4233:AE report 4212:AE report 4191:AE report 4170:AE report 4126:block log 4085:Roscelese 4071:block log 4030:Roscelese 3893:arbcom-en 3797:block log 3730:block log 3668:block log 3569:block log 3528:Roscelese 3506:block log 3424:block log 3285:block log 3109:block log 3068:Roscelese 3062:Roscelese 2690:block log 2643:block log 2596:block log 2130:Thryduulf 2109:Thryduulf 2094:Thryduulf 2076:Thryduulf 1884:sources. 1838:Callanecc 1813:Callanecc 1801:Thryduulf 1779:Callanecc 1562:Elizium23 1550:"brinker" 1492:Roscelese 1321:George Ho 1257:George Ho 1232:George Ho 1139:block log 1091:block log 1025:deletions 996:Callanecc 989:block log 906:deletions 869:block log 803:deletions 749:deletions 713:block log 672:Elizium23 665:block log 624:Roscelese 617:block log 565:block log 524:George Ho 310:Elections 85:Lankiveil 4267:Category 4096:contribs 4041:contribs 3767:contribs 3700:contribs 3638:contribs 3539:contribs 3476:contribs 3447:Remedies 3394:contribs 3255:contribs 3217:and and 3079:contribs 3048:Jun 2012 3044:Abortion 3038:Jan 2012 3030:Abortion 3024:Dec 2011 3020:Abortion 2735:Jan 2015 2723:Feb 2014 2719:Nov 2012 2715:Jun 2012 2660:contribs 2613:contribs 2566:contribs 2524:Care Net 2336:LFaraone 2195:Euryalus 1956:beliefs. 1938:left on 1847:contribs 1822:contribs 1788:contribs 1606:WP:STALK 1500:contribs 1164:", and " 1109:contribs 1061:contribs 1007:contribs 959:contribs 932:Euryalus 888:contribs 839:contribs 785:contribs 731:contribs 683:contribs 635:contribs 587:contribs 535:contribs 57:Workshop 46:Evidence 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 4007:General 3465:Esoglou 2928:discuss 2924:reflect 2696:Esoglou 2555:Esoglou 2549:Esoglou 2321:Faraone 2251:Faraone 2035:My Talk 2015:My Talk 1905:As for 1601:WP:DUCK 1545:WP:NPOV 1528:WP:NPOV 1472:Esoglou 1445:Esoglou 1407:Esoglou 1402:totally 1387:Esoglou 1294:protect 1289:history 1156:, like 576:Esoglou 382:Reports 320:History 300:Members 295:Contact 283:Discuss 147:(CU/OS) 4146:motion 4140:below. 3885:"ARCA" 3611:motion 3598:below. 2926:, not 2311:Accept 2301:(talk) 2294:Accept 2285:(ʞlɐʇ) 2274:Accept 2261:Accept 2242:Accept 2226:Accept 2208:Accept 2191:Accept 2179:Salvio 2173:Accept 2159:Accept 2145:Accept 2122:Accept 2059:Accept 2024:Accept 1944:WP:NPA 1921:about 1639:while. 1543:, and 1298:delete 1037:rights 1013:blocks 918:rights 894:blocks 815:rights 791:blocks 761:rights 737:blocks 473:motion 325:Clerks 183:Report 3754:4.2) 3687:4.1) 3113:has: 2704:Soidi 2649:Soidi 2217:talk 1972:WP:OR 1807:might 1717:hound 1541:WP:OR 1537:WP:RS 1315:views 1307:watch 1303:links 498:Wshp. 486:Front 359:Audit 16:< 4241:talk 4108:logs 4090:talk 4053:logs 4035:talk 3779:logs 3761:talk 3712:logs 3694:talk 3650:logs 3632:talk 3551:logs 3533:talk 3488:logs 3470:talk 3406:logs 3388:talk 3267:logs 3249:talk 3177:and 3091:logs 3073:talk 3066:3) 3032:for 2959:and 2773:and 2700:Lima 2672:logs 2654:talk 2647:and 2625:logs 2607:talk 2602:Lima 2578:logs 2560:talk 2338:;) 2233:talk 2199:talk 2134:talk 2113:talk 2098:talk 2080:talk 1974:and 1851:logs 1843:talk 1826:logs 1818:talk 1792:logs 1784:talk 1754:talk 1729:talk 1673:talk 1645:talk 1566:talk 1496:talk 1476:talk 1449:talk 1440:here 1411:talk 1391:talk 1383:here 1375:here 1367:here 1344:talk 1325:talk 1319:. -- 1311:logs 1285:talk 1281:edit 1261:talk 1236:talk 1121:logs 1103:talk 1073:logs 1055:talk 1001:talk 971:logs 953:talk 936:talk 882:talk 851:logs 833:talk 779:talk 725:talk 695:logs 677:talk 647:logs 629:talk 599:logs 581:talk 547:logs 529:talk 376:Talk 367:Talk 334:Talk 314:Talk 168:Talk 138:Talk 104:Talk 90:Talk 73:Talk 62:Talk 51:Talk 40:Talk 26:Case 4243:) 3625:3) 3525:2) 3463:1) 3381:5) 3242:4) 3191:, 3120:, 2706:). 2553:2) 2475:5) 2212:DGG 2193:-- 1663:up. 1385:. 1160:, " 1043:RfA 924:RfA 821:RfA 767:RfA 504:PD. 492:Ev. 250:Log 4269:: 4235:. 4214:. 4193:. 4172:. 3937:: 3903:). 3436:. 3366:. 3359:.) 3352:, 3349:, 3346:, 3343:, 3340:, 3337:: 3330:.) 3316:.) 3309:, 3303:, 3297:, 3221:.) 3207:.) 3200:, 3197:, 3194:, 3188:: 3181:.) 3170:, 3167:, 3164:, 3161:, 3158:, 3155:, 3152:, 3149:, 3146:, 3143:: 3136:.) 3129:, 3126:, 3022:: 3012:, 3008:, 2996:.) 2989:, 2986:, 2983:, 2973:.) 2966:, 2952:.) 2945:, 2942:, 2939:, 2936:, 2933:, 2915:.) 2908:, 2905:, 2902:, 2899:, 2896:, 2893:, 2890:, 2887:, 2884:, 2881:, 2878:: 2871:.) 2864:, 2861:: 2854:, 2851:, 2848:, 2845:, 2842:, 2839:, 2836:, 2833:, 2830:, 2827:, 2824:, 2821:: 2808:, 2805:, 2802:, 2796:.) 2789:, 2786:, 2783:, 2777:). 2766:, 2763:, 2760:, 2757:, 2754:, 2745:.) 2733:, 2729:, 2725:, 2721:, 2717:, 2702:, 2698:, 2534:, 2530:, 2526:, 2516:, 2512:, 2390:, 2314:. 2280:DQ 2244:. 2235:) 2219:) 2201:) 2175:. 2136:) 2115:) 2100:) 2082:) 2032:| 2012:| 1853:) 1849:• 1845:• 1828:) 1824:• 1820:• 1794:) 1790:• 1786:• 1756:) 1731:) 1695:, 1691:, 1675:) 1647:) 1568:) 1539:, 1502:) 1498:⋅ 1478:) 1451:) 1434:, 1430:, 1426:, 1422:, 1413:) 1393:) 1377:. 1346:) 1327:) 1313:| 1309:| 1305:| 1301:| 1296:| 1292:| 1287:| 1283:| 1263:) 1255:-- 1242:. 1238:) 938:) 569:, 501:, 495:, 489:, 97:: 83:: 66:— 55:— 44:— 4239:( 4128:) 4123:· 4117:· 4111:· 4105:· 4099:· 4093:· 4088:( 4073:) 4068:· 4062:· 4056:· 4050:· 4044:· 4038:· 4033:( 3799:) 3794:· 3788:· 3782:· 3776:· 3770:· 3764:· 3759:( 3732:) 3727:· 3721:· 3715:· 3709:· 3703:· 3697:· 3692:( 3670:) 3665:· 3659:· 3653:· 3647:· 3641:· 3635:· 3630:( 3571:) 3566:· 3560:· 3554:· 3548:· 3542:· 3536:· 3531:( 3508:) 3503:· 3497:· 3491:· 3485:· 3479:· 3473:· 3468:( 3426:) 3421:· 3415:· 3409:· 3403:· 3397:· 3391:· 3386:( 3287:) 3282:· 3276:· 3270:· 3264:· 3258:· 3252:· 3247:( 3111:) 3106:· 3100:· 3094:· 3088:· 3082:· 3076:· 3071:( 3050:. 2815:) 2692:) 2687:· 2681:· 2675:· 2669:· 2663:· 2657:· 2652:( 2645:) 2640:· 2634:· 2628:· 2622:· 2616:· 2610:· 2605:( 2598:) 2593:· 2587:· 2581:· 2575:· 2569:· 2563:· 2558:( 2317:L 2247:L 2231:( 2215:( 2197:( 2132:( 2111:( 2096:( 2078:( 1841:( 1816:( 1803:: 1799:@ 1782:( 1752:( 1727:( 1671:( 1643:( 1564:( 1494:( 1474:( 1447:( 1409:( 1389:( 1342:( 1323:( 1317:) 1279:( 1259:( 1234:( 1168:" 1141:) 1136:· 1130:· 1124:· 1118:· 1112:· 1106:· 1101:( 1093:) 1088:· 1082:· 1076:· 1070:· 1064:· 1058:· 1053:( 1045:) 1040:· 1034:· 1028:· 1022:· 1016:· 1010:· 1004:· 999:( 991:) 986:· 980:· 974:· 968:· 962:· 956:· 951:( 934:( 926:) 921:· 915:· 909:· 903:· 897:· 891:· 885:· 880:( 871:) 866:· 860:· 854:· 848:· 842:· 836:· 831:( 823:) 818:· 812:· 806:· 800:· 794:· 788:· 782:· 777:( 769:) 764:· 758:· 752:· 746:· 740:· 734:· 728:· 723:( 715:) 710:· 704:· 698:· 692:· 686:· 680:· 675:( 667:) 662:· 656:· 650:· 644:· 638:· 632:· 627:( 619:) 614:· 608:· 602:· 596:· 590:· 584:· 579:( 567:) 562:· 556:· 550:· 544:· 538:· 532:· 527:( 442:e 435:t 428:v 330:+ 288:+ 252:) 248:( 164:+ 106:) 102:( 92:) 88:( 75:) 71:( 64:) 60:( 53:) 49:( 42:) 38:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality - Knowledge

Index