510:
ligula. Donec ut elit sed eros vehicula vestibulum. Sed ex nisl, ultricies id ex non, fermentum euismod augue. Nullam hendrerit in massa non elementum. Proin ac nunc quis mi hendrerit sodales. Vivamus non consectetur libero. In finibus massa gravida mattis ultricies. Aliquam aliquam tortor sapien, ac commodo tortor congue quis. Duis ultrices velit ut malesuada elementum. Maecenas dapibus sem id elit molestie, scelerisque efficitur est aliquam. Quisque tempus velit nibh, et pulvinar ipsum fermentum a. Nunc et sollicitudin massa. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nunc a quam a nibh mollis tempus sed et ligula. Praesent vehicula eros felis, at lacinia tortor faucibus et. Pellentesque porta lorem eu ex bibendum tincidunt. Etiam molestie lacus ac dignissim ullamcorper. In ligula leo, faucibus et tempus sed, malesuada eget orci. Donec varius sollicitudin dui, eu imperdiet lacus fringilla at. Donec congue sollicitudin fringilla. Proin a ultricies nulla. Sed
174:
requires participants to be an extended-confirmed editor with 30 days and 500 edits tenure. However, it's generally enough to make the voter look very silly and lose the respect of the community if they do or say something inappropriate, particularly with unqualified oppose votes, very long oppose votes, demanding excessively high criteria such as a high edit count, long tenure, Featured
Articles, asking unnecessary or implausible questions, or arguing with the other voters.
747:
668:
631:
518:
456:
257:
220:
239:, nothing is required here other than having been around long enough to understand the process and to be able to comment in a polite and fair manner. So, either you are new to Knowledge and you think you have enough experience to voice your opinion in meta areas, or you have been around a while and would like to contribute earnestly to the way the project is managed. Either way, four important things to reflect upon in your participation at RfA are:
84:
487:, 25 words is generally sufficient while 50 - 60 words should be enough to explain your more serious concerns or even influence the voting. If you are bringing new evidence rather than just repeating what other voters have said (not a good idea), an absolute maximum of 200 words should be more than sufficient. Do not use the RfA process as a venue to simply vent your own points of view.
24:
113:
742:
more than 2 questions or ask multiple questions under the guise of one question. Candidates can be expected to answer up to about 10 or 12 questions from participants but many more is simply bothersome and remember that answering additional questions is not required. One cannot seriously oppose a candidate for declining to answer.
528:. If a vote does not make sense, all it will do is make the voter look silly. In some cases, entirely inappropriate votes or comments might be indented, struck, or even removed by other editors in good standing - they will certainly be discounted by the closer. Put yourself in the position of the candidate - if this were
153:. Candidates for adminship must be nominated (either by another user or by themselves), answer some questions, and then be subjected to a 7-day community discussion as to whether they will be accepted as admins by the community. The most successful candidates will almost always have edited Knowledge for at least
333:
Another thing that makes RfA very different from elections for politicians or classroom spokespersons is that RfA is not a popularity or an unpopularity contest. Your own opinion of the candidate may not reflect his or her general work and/or behaviour at all. If you've seen him or her being nice
313:
In the third analogy, the best advice is really to do your own research. Those who you follow (what we call 'pile-on' voting) may be quite wrong. In fact some of the more honest ones may come back after some thinking and change their vote or cancel it entirely. If you copied such a
173:
It's been proven that poor voting and or commenting at RfA is what discourages good editors from volunteering to become admins. Like all the other major language editions of
Knowledge, participants are required to meet certain requirements before they are allowed to vote at RfA, and English Knowledge
605:
The question section is there for a purpose. That general purpose is to address any concerns you have about a candidate, which can include checking the candidate's understanding regarding
Knowledge's policies-and-guidelines in areas in which they intend to work, asking them to clarify their thinking
561:
If you can't make your mind up after doing all that research, or if your feelings and findings are not enough for you to make a firm commitment to support or oppose the RfA, you can place a comment in the 'Neutral' section. This may help the closing bureaucrat decide on the outcome in the case
509:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut vel euismod leo. Proin non purus et ipsum elementum luctus ut et arcu. In commodo non turpis sed rhoncus. Aenean in justo dictum, facilisis odio eu, dictum nisl. Aenean suscipit pretium ligula at mollis. Sed vel imperdiet massa, ac sagittis
656:
Comments are often placed on the bottom of the RfA page or on the RfA talk page. Intended to be a place for pointing out technicalities concerning the debate itself, in recent times it has become a general discussion on RfA matters or adminship. These comments do not affect the closing bureaucrat's
439:
There have been many instances where votes were piled on, but the original voter later retracted or changed their vote. The pile-on voters did not retract their vote as well. This is the kind of behaviour that makes the process unfair. Because of that, voters should continue to watch an RfA in case
741:
It's because of some of the additional questions asked by the participants. The questions should relate to the candidate's application for the tools. Trick questions for which there is no correct answer are unfair. Don't ask questions for which you don't yourself know the correct answer. Don't ask
568:
If what you want to say is not directly related to the candidate, or is not a good fit for 'support', 'oppose', or 'neutral', avoid adding to the 'General comments' section. These posts which frequently discuss the RfA process itself will not be taken into account by the closing
Bureaucrat and are
481:
by the rest of the community and counted by the closing
Bureaucrat, you should qualify your reasons by including diffs of evidence you present; consider whether or not your reasons for opposing, such as edit count or tenure, are plausible - read the criteria used by experienced voters in the pages
451:
it's essential that you have done homework we mentioned above has been done. Making an energetic support only to find that after only a dozen or so votes the debate plunges into the depths of the 'oppose' section often demonstrates that your support was a drive-by or a fan vote and was not really
351:
It's not enough to read the nomination statement and the comments of the others and say 'yeah, I agree with that', or simply reading the oppose votes and just piling on. Bear in mind that some of those votes may be wrong, so making a fair vote on RfA means doing a bit of homework – and
497:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec eu rhoncus nulla. Etiam ac orci a ex aliquet interdum quis at nisi. In ac nisl iaculis, ultricies magna sit amet, sagittis neque. Nunc neque nisl, congue ac tempor in, suscipit vel nunc. Aliquam id convallis est, non molestie elit.
538:
If you don't like the
Knowledge system of adminship, RfA is not the place to get the system changed, so don't use RfA as a political platform; your vote will not be counted and you'll only make yourself look silly. Propose changes by all means but please do it somewhere else, such as
360:
We'll just give you a list here of things for you to check, then we'll give you a list of links below to examples of criteria that some of the regular users base their votes on (each RfA also contains a list of links that will lead you to some of the things to check):
756:- if this were your RfA, how many questions would you be prepared to answer? Think about this for a moment, because for some questions it can take several hours to find and write the best answer. Fortunately again, candidates are not obliged to answer users' questions.
462:
You are not obliged to leave a comment with your support vote because it's generally assumed that you concur with the nomination. However, most users do offer a friendly word. If the RfA already has opposition, a detailed support addressing that opposition and
599:
There is a limit of two questions per editor, with relevant follow-ups permitted. The two-question limit cannot be circumvented by asking questions that require multiple answers (e.g. asking the candidate what he or she would do in each of five
3303:
1343:
234:
Knowledge welcomes all registered users to express their opinion on requests for adminship. Unlike our major other-language
Wikipedias where you would need to be registered for about three months and have made at least 500 edits to
314:
vote, your vote would be wrong too and unless you change it the candidate wouldn't be given fair consideration. You should therefore consider following an RfA you have voted on in case you may wish to change your mind.
317:
In the fourth analogy, probably not. It is therefore of no more concern of ours whether or not a candidate has contributed to other projects belonging to the
Wikimedia Foundation as whether or not the candidate has contributed to
734:
It's because some voters demand to see a lot of quality article creations such as GA and FA. Having written just a few clean, well referenced articles is usually enough to show a good knowledge of article creation, layout, and
338:
yourself, and generally doing a lot of good work for
Knowledge and getting it right, you would be well within your rights to want to support the candidate. If you've seen him or her being rude to a lot of people
2504:
719:
MUST be polite, and objective. If someone is rude, you must NOT be rude back. All this would do is create drama and turn the RfA process into the nasty place that it's gotten a bad reputation for being, driving candidates
1908:
706:, to describe RfA. Think about that for a moment and try to figure out why he said it. Well, the answer is that we are not getting enough users of the right calibre who are prepared to go through the process.
730:
It's because some voters require a long tenure. Plenty of our admins get elected with only 15 or 18 months on
Knowledge. It's their work that counts. It's through the right kind of work that they gain their
384:
Has the user added enough new content to articles to demonstrate a knowledge of basic article policy and required elements - note that the creation of new articles, or elevation of articles to GA or FA are
1373:
125:. Being a Knowledge administrator is not the same as being a moderator on an Internet forum. The tasks are many and varied and require a high degree of competency and judgement. In particular, see:
2639:
290:
If you were a driving test examiner in Norway, would you insist that the candidate also has driving experience in Papua New Guinea, The Marshall Islands, the Central African Republic, and Thailand?
330:. More broadly, we are not interested in what a candidate does in real life with the rest of their free or professional time. Even asking about it in the question section would be inappropriate.
3190:
610:
in order to satisfy any questions you have about how well suited that candidate is to become an admin. A review of 100s of RfA however will clearly demonstrate that many questions are posed by:
715:
It's because of the unfriendly – sometimes even very unpleasant – way users occasionally make their votes – usually in the Oppose section. This also means that if you disagree with a vote,
343:
yourself, generally not doing a lot of good work for Knowledge and getting it wrong a lot of the time, then you may be right in thinking that the candidate should not be an admin.
3070:
2242:
2599:
727:. Opinions are different, but generally candidates nowadays will not pass if they have less than around 6,000 manual edits. Insisting on as many as 20,000 though, would not be appropriate.
2408:
2003:
3443:
226:
Of course, voting 'as per' someone else is no good, they might already have got it completely wrong - it happens! They might also have later changed their vote completely - did you?
3453:
2751:
1388:
252:
Are you basing your vote partly (or even wholly) on what the candidate has done on other Wikimedia projects (e.g. Commons, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, other language Wikipedias, etc.)?
3719:
3714:
3383:
3005:
1710:
3130:
1055:
3508:
3195:
1808:
964:
3493:
3243:
1783:
800:
161:
of edits in various 'maintenance' areas of the project, and will have made many good contributions to articles, but it's not so much the quantity of their work, but the
2307:
430:- there may be many hints to their readiness for the task of admin. Does it project the image to people of all ages and backgrounds that Knowledge is a serious project?
285:
Would you vote Oppose or Support just because that's the way most people appear to be voting or just because your best friend told you that's how you should vote?
1838:
1535:
3513:
2920:
2106:
1560:
1483:
1065:
524:
Don't take the candidate's previous actions or comments elsewhere out of context, and do be sure of your facts. Anything older than 12 months is probably outdated -
565:
Put yourself in the shoes of the candidate - if this were your RfA, and some participants are voting 'neutral', how would you like them to express themselves?
2960:
2940:
1903:
1873:
1185:
280:
Would you vote against your local policeman or shopkeeper who is running for mayor just because he scolded you for riding your bicycle on the sidewalk/pavement?
2197:
1923:
1685:
1273:
1200:
1140:
1115:
1105:
3658:
2965:
1605:
783:
760:
687:
99:
3045:
3000:
2910:
2860:
2126:
1853:
1828:
3553:
1843:
1478:
1463:
3811:
2880:
1443:
890:
470:
Put yourself in the shoes of the candidate – if this were your RfA, how would you like the participants who are supporting you to express themselves?
738:
It's because some voters oppose for minor blocks that are more than a year old or simply for good-faith minor mistakes which any busy editor can make.
263:
If you are new to participating at RfA, read the last few RfAs of both the successful and failed kind, and see how it works and the things not to do.
3767:
3035:
2950:
2066:
1918:
1823:
1438:
1398:
1253:
674:
Before leaving a comment at an RfA consider whether or not your comment is absolutely relevant to the RfA; or is it really a topic for discussion at
3663:
2756:
2669:
2267:
2008:
1833:
1758:
1493:
1468:
1393:
1175:
1005:
275:
If you were on the jury in a clear case of stealing, would you vote 'not guilty' just because the person who was charged seemed to be a nice guy?
3090:
3040:
2895:
2644:
2589:
2574:
2187:
1525:
1408:
1288:
3623:
2252:
1998:
1735:
1660:
1230:
916:
3518:
3170:
3015:
2935:
2604:
2353:
2282:
2136:
1433:
3563:
3120:
2327:
1818:
1705:
1695:
1585:
1488:
1473:
638:
95:
562:
of a close call. Sometimes, neutral votes lean towards support or oppose, and sometimes they offer some friendly advice to the candidate.
3105:
3075:
2885:
2634:
2629:
2166:
1615:
1570:
1500:
790:
3418:
1863:
1238:
952:
2217:
482:
linked below. Bear in mind that one small error in a candidate's history of thousands of edits may not necessarily be a deal breaker.
102:
which expands, with examples, of good and inappropriate votes. It is strongly advised to read all three before participating at RfA.
3816:
3373:
3248:
3135:
2850:
2247:
1933:
1715:
1700:
1545:
1458:
1268:
1075:
1060:
871:
866:
368:
Check the breakdown of their work by looking at their pie chart and how often they have been editing over the previous months (the
43:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3724:
3643:
3025:
2985:
2699:
2368:
2322:
2312:
2232:
1748:
1650:
1580:
1368:
855:
695:
3503:
2865:
2302:
2048:
2036:
1540:
1220:
1080:
3333:
3253:
2664:
2609:
2579:
2116:
1993:
1210:
1050:
977:
3648:
3618:
3613:
3408:
3388:
3185:
2945:
2614:
2569:
2564:
2373:
2257:
2161:
1898:
1610:
1555:
1530:
1510:
1448:
1418:
1323:
1313:
1085:
675:
659:
570:
298:
In the second analogy probably not either, but here is the difference with Knowledge: at political elections, we only vote
3583:
3458:
3308:
3030:
2930:
2726:
2534:
2413:
2262:
1858:
1680:
1630:
1170:
177:
3598:
3538:
3463:
2955:
2925:
2845:
2674:
1645:
1635:
1600:
1413:
1318:
1040:
795:
3608:
3473:
3448:
3428:
3328:
3223:
3100:
2559:
2468:
2428:
2332:
1988:
1973:
1848:
1453:
1303:
1258:
1215:
1190:
1150:
1000:
3750:
3578:
3558:
3483:
3478:
3050:
2539:
2182:
2091:
1953:
1888:
1798:
1788:
1763:
1725:
1720:
1655:
1423:
1383:
1328:
810:
44:
514:- Now that's probably really long enough, don't you think? Imagine if someone were to write 400 words or even more!
3772:
3638:
3175:
2654:
2584:
2463:
2448:
2363:
2146:
1938:
1283:
1030:
1025:
146:
36:
3686:
3806:
3568:
3378:
3348:
3313:
3140:
2619:
2529:
2443:
2086:
2056:
1928:
1110:
126:
2830:
246:
Do you want to oppose the candidate because they have drawn your attention to something you may have done wrong?
3734:
3603:
3433:
3160:
3060:
2870:
2746:
2659:
2624:
2549:
2519:
2383:
2207:
2156:
1983:
1968:
1893:
1665:
1515:
1358:
1145:
1090:
1015:
945:
2317:
846:
576:
467:
disagreeing with it is likely to carry more favour with others, and contribute more to the overall consensus.
3709:
3523:
3438:
3200:
3145:
3065:
3020:
2975:
2970:
2855:
2689:
2649:
2544:
2509:
2484:
2192:
2013:
1793:
1768:
1675:
1670:
1550:
1338:
1263:
1180:
1095:
1010:
553:
In 2021, the community reached a consensus that this was "a poor reason as we can find work for new admins".
48:
3760:
3533:
3413:
3293:
3268:
3095:
2731:
2694:
2684:
2287:
2227:
2081:
1378:
1353:
1308:
1205:
1160:
1135:
1125:
1100:
377:
Has the user worked in enough different meta areas (back office stuff) to get a good understanding of the
556:
443:
249:
Are you applying a set of personal criteria that may be far more demanding than what is actually required?
3653:
3468:
3353:
3278:
3165:
3085:
3055:
2905:
2524:
2494:
2458:
2348:
2212:
2131:
1913:
1778:
1743:
1590:
1348:
1298:
1293:
1020:
473:
3755:
3704:
3343:
3338:
3298:
3283:
3273:
3150:
2995:
2900:
2403:
2393:
2292:
2101:
2076:
1963:
1248:
1120:
3801:
3729:
3498:
3363:
3263:
3180:
3125:
3115:
3080:
2915:
2890:
2875:
2716:
2438:
2378:
2111:
1948:
1883:
1878:
1868:
1620:
1243:
995:
938:
3110:
3403:
3358:
2721:
2594:
2554:
2358:
2096:
1625:
1070:
840:
834:
828:
150:
3633:
3573:
3548:
3488:
3398:
3393:
2980:
2797:
2499:
2489:
2277:
2272:
1690:
1363:
1333:
1165:
860:
805:
724:
692:
and then you will be ready to vote, but before you do, please just read the next section below.
592:
3593:
3543:
3323:
3318:
3288:
2777:
2741:
2736:
2433:
2237:
2071:
1595:
1428:
1403:
1278:
902:
816:
3588:
3155:
3010:
2514:
2423:
2418:
2202:
2121:
1978:
1640:
532:
RfA, and the participants are opposing you, how would you like them to express themselves?
3528:
2990:
2787:
2711:
1575:
1520:
1505:
1045:
1035:
134:
Whether they pass or fail, candidates at RfA are entitled to a fair and supportive process.
8:
3628:
3238:
2807:
2782:
2761:
2141:
1773:
1565:
1130:
236:
187:
Do I already know enough about Knowledge to be joining discussions about back-room stuff?
614:
New and/or inexperienced users who haven't fully understood what adminship is all about.
243:
Do you want to support the candidate because they have done you a favour or a good turn?
66:
2802:
2792:
2706:
2679:
1943:
1195:
850:
623:
People simply fishing for answers to general issues they should already know but don't.
544:
190:
Do I really know enough about what adminship entails to be voting or commenting at RfA?
58:
647:
to the process or whether other users will just perceive it as one of the cases above.
3304:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
3258:
2222:
2061:
1958:
1155:
399:
Has the candidate been active in helping new users to overcome what is hard to them?
229:
51:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
2398:
2388:
2297:
961:
920:
32:
619:'Oh, I can ask questions here too. Goody, goody, I'll think of something to ask.'
2151:
589:) your vote rather than blanking it. It will win you respect from the community.
651:
3423:
3368:
2453:
1753:
327:
3795:
540:
410:
403:
393:
295:
In the first analogy, if you were a fine responsible citizen, probably not.
122:
420:
approach (i.e. that of a responsible adult) when talking with other editors?
2505:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
94:
This is one of three important advice pages for RFA voters. The others are
703:
772:
678:? Using the RfA comment section just because it's there would be silly.
930:
746:
667:
630:
617:
Users who noticed that users can ask questions at RfA so they thought:
517:
455:
256:
219:
168:
1909:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
976:
409:
Does the candidate understand policy, such as for example when doing
193:
How long did I take to research the candidate before making my vote?
319:
1374:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
423:
Does the candidate appear to be 'over-eager' to want be an admin?
323:
347:
How can you therefore arrive at these conclusions objectively?
702:
You'd be surprised, but that was a phrase used by our founder,
3191:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
587:
If you want to recuse yourself completely, strike (<s: -->
3071:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2243:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
352:
sometimes it can take you half an hour or even longer.
2600:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2409:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2004:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1344:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
849:– Detailed and up to date. Major contributor to RfA and
369:
3444:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
877:
581:
To another section: Indent your vote and add the words:
3454:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
3006:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2640:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1711:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
681:
2752:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1389:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
452:
based at all on what the candidate has contributed.
149:. The tasks that admins actually do are described at
1056:
Editing Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
396:
cases - do you think his or her judgement was fair?
3715:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
3494:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
891:Knowledge:RfA reform (continued)/Question profiles
831:– (2009) Comprehensive (but by a now-blocked user)
978:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
3793:
1839:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1784:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
1536:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
3514:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3244:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2921:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1561:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1066:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
759:If you have understood everything above, click
3196:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2941:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2107:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1874:Counting and sorting are not original research
903:"Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2021 review"
381:in order for you to trust them in using them?
1904:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1186:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
946:
754:Put yourself in the position of the candidate
657:decision. The place for these is strictly at
365:Check how long the user has been on Knowledge
306:them, while on Knowledge, RfA has both votes
302:a candidate - there is no system for voting
3434:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2198:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1924:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1201:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1141:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
1116:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
725:voters require edit counts that are too high
2966:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1686:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
785:Arguments to avoid in adminship discussions
689:Arguments to avoid in adminship discussions
643:. Think very carefully if your question is
479:If you want your vote to be taken seriously
100:Arguments to avoid in adminship discussions
3659:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3046:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3001:News coverage does not decrease notability
2911:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2861:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1854:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1829:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
953:
939:
663:, the official forum for such discussions.
374:will provide you with all these details).
3812:Matters related to requests for adminship
3554:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1844:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
1464:Identifying and using independent sources
768:Good luck with your participation at RfA!
606:about past decisions, and similar things
121:This advice is based on 100s of previous
3720:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2881:Big events make key participants notable
2829:
1444:Formatting bilateral relations templates
960:
837:– (2007) Short view, mainly on civility.
485:Keep your evidence as short as possible
143:The process of becoming an administrator
3768:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
3384:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
3131:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3036:Notability is not a level playing field
2951:How the presumption of notability works
2067:Contributing to complicated discussions
1919:How the presumption of notability works
1439:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1254:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
392:Check out the candidate's comments on
310:(Support), and votes against (Oppose).
3794:
3664:You should not write meaningless lists
2961:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2268:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2035:
2009:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1834:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1399:Don't hope the house will build itself
1176:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
1006:All Five Pillars are equally important
3684:
3221:
3091:One sentence does not an article make
3041:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2828:
2757:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2670:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2188:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2127:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2034:
1759:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
1526:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1289:An unfinished house is a real problem
1274:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
975:
934:
676:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship
660:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship
637:Most importantly, read the advice at
3624:Things that should not be surprising
3319:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2645:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2590:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2575:Don't call people by their real name
2253:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1661:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
440:they may wish to change their mind.
413:in places where they are allowed to?
107:
78:
18:
3519:No one cares about your garage band
3222:
3171:What is and is not routine coverage
3016:No one cares about your garage band
2936:Existence does not prove notability
2354:Assume the assumption of good faith
2283:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2137:Relationships with academic editors
1999:Why was the page I created deleted?
1434:Featured articles may have problems
686:When you have done all that, read *
13:
3564:Please do not murder the newcomers
3121:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2605:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2328:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1819:Adjectives in your recommendations
1706:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1696:What an article should not include
1586:The problem with elegant variation
1394:Don't get hung up on minor details
745:
666:
629:
543:or by testing the waters first at
516:
454:
255:
218:
49:thoroughly vetted by the community
45:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
3828:
2886:Businesses with a single location
2167:You have a right to remain silent
1616:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1571:Potential, not just current state
1501:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
791:Generally accepted RfA principles
640:Should you ask a question at RfA?
389:required by policy for adminship.
96:Should you ask a question at RfA?
3817:Knowledge essays about adminship
3685:
2635:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2630:Don't ignore community consensus
1864:Confusing arguments mean nothing
843:– (2008) User 'Has no criteria'.
503:Example 200 words (1,318 bytes):
147:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
111:
82:
22:
3136:Sources must be out-of-universe
2851:All high schools can be notable
2248:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1934:Identifying blatant advertising
1716:The world will not end tomorrow
1701:Knowledge is a work in progress
1546:Not everything needs a template
1459:How to write a featured article
1076:External criticism of Knowledge
1061:Editors will sometimes be wrong
697:"A horrible and broken process"
3725:Avoid writing redundant essays
3644:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
3374:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3249:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3076:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
3026:Notability cannot be purchased
2986:Masking the lack of notability
2323:Knowledge is not about winning
1749:Copyediting reception sections
1651:Temporary versions of articles
1581:Principle of Some Astonishment
1369:Creating controversial content
1269:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
909:
895:
884:
91:Reading time: approx. 13 mins.
1:
3751:About policies and guidelines
3504:List of jokes about Knowledge
2866:Articles with a single source
2313:Two wrongs don't make a right
2303:The rules of polite discourse
2233:It's not the end of the world
1994:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
1541:Not everything needs a navbox
1409:Don't "teach the controversy"
1221:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
1081:Here to build an encyclopedia
491:Example 50 words (303 bytes):
3334:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3254:Alternatives to edit warring
2117:Maintaining a friendly space
1211:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
829:User:A Nobody, RfA Standards
7:
3619:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3614:The first rule of Knowledge
3409:Editing under the influence
3186:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2946:Google searches and numbers
2665:Don't template the regulars
2580:Don't call the kettle black
2374:Be excellent to one another
2258:Revert notification opt-out
2162:We are all Wikipedians here
1611:Put a little effort into it
1556:Obtain peer review comments
1511:Introduction to structurism
1449:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1419:Editors are not mindreaders
1324:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1314:Beef up that first revision
1086:Leave it to the experienced
1051:Don't search for objections
10:
3833:
3649:Why not create an account?
3584:Requirements for adminship
3459:How to vandalize correctly
3389:Don't delete the main page
3309:Avoid using preview button
3031:Notability comparison test
2615:Don't fight fire with fire
2610:Don't eat the troll's food
2570:Don't call a spade a spade
2565:Don't bludgeon the process
2414:Encourage full discussions
2263:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1899:Don't attack the nominator
1859:But there must be sources!
1681:Try not to leave it a stub
1631:Source your plot summaries
863:– (2011) – very up-to-date
56:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge
3743:
3697:
3693:
3680:
3599:Sarcasm is really helpful
3539:Notability is not eternal
3464:How to win a citation war
3234:
3230:
3217:
2926:Every snowflake is unique
2846:Advanced source searching
2841:
2837:
2824:
2770:
2727:No, you can't have a pony
2675:Do not insult the vandals
2535:Don't be high-maintenance
2477:
2341:
2175:
2092:Encouraging the newcomers
2047:
2043:
2030:
1807:
1734:
1636:Specialized-style fallacy
1601:Pruning article revisions
1429:Endorsements (commercial)
1414:Editing on mobile devices
1319:Blind men and an elephant
1294:Articles have a half-life
1229:
1041:Dissent is not disloyalty
1011:Avoid vague introductions
988:
984:
971:
796:Advice for RfA candidates
416:Does the candidate use a
3609:The Night Before Wikimas
3474:Ignore every single rule
3449:How to get away with UPE
3329:Before they were notable
3101:Overreliance upon Google
2896:Common sourcing mistakes
2469:Settle the process first
2429:Imagine others complexly
2333:Writing for the opponent
2308:There is no common sense
1989:Unopposed AFD discussion
1974:Relisting can be abusive
1849:Avoid repeated arguments
1454:Give an article a chance
1304:Avoid mission statements
1264:Advanced text formatting
1259:Advanced article editing
1216:Knowledge is a community
1191:The rules are principles
1151:Product, process, policy
1001:Articles must be written
841:User:Animum/RfA criteria
835:User:Acalamari/RfA views
626:People just being silly.
426:Look at the candidate's
151:Knowledge:Administrators
119:This page in a nutshell:
3744:Policies and guidelines
3579:Requests for medication
3559:Please bite the newbies
3484:Mess with the templates
3051:Notability means impact
2585:Don't call things cruft
2560:Don't be the Fun Police
2490:Knowledge:Because I can
2369:Avoid the word "vandal"
2183:A thank you never hurts
1954:Liar liar pants on fire
1889:Deletion is not cleanup
1799:Writing better articles
1789:Write the article first
1764:Gender-neutral language
1736:Writing article content
1726:Writing better articles
1721:Write the article first
1656:Tertiary-source fallacy
1424:Encourage the newcomers
1384:Dictionaries as sources
1329:Build content to endure
811:Common oppose reasoning
577:If you change your mind
178:The first questions to
3807:Requests for adminship
3773:Policy writing is hard
3639:Knowledge is an MMORPG
3479:Is that even an essay?
3176:What notability is not
2931:Existence ≠ Notability
2540:Don't be inconsiderate
2464:Read before commenting
2449:Mind your own business
2364:Avoid personal remarks
1939:Identifying test edits
1284:A navbox on every page
1239:100K featured articles
1036:Concede lost arguments
1031:Competence is required
917:"User talk:John Cline"
750:
671:
634:
603:
551:No need for the tools:
526:let bygones be bygones
521:
459:
260:
223:
37:Requests for adminship
3569:Pledge of Tranquility
3314:Avoid using wikilinks
3141:Subjective importance
2655:Don't spite your face
2444:Keep it down to earth
2208:Beware of the tigers!
2147:Too long; didn't read
2087:Edit at your own pace
2057:Accepting other users
1824:AfD is not a war zone
1171:There is no seniority
1111:Neutrality of sources
749:
670:
633:
596:
569:often best placed at
520:
458:
404:taggings for deletion
259:
230:Advice for RfA voters
222:
128:What adminship is not
47:, as it has not been
3735:Quote your own essay
3604:Sausages for tasting
3429:Five Fs of Knowledge
3379:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3349:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3161:Vanispamcruftisement
3061:Notability sub-pages
2871:Avoid template creep
2831:Essays on notability
2747:There are no oracles
2530:Don't be a WikiBigot
2384:Call a spade a spade
2157:Unblock perspectives
1984:The Heymann Standard
1969:Overzealous deletion
1929:I just don't like it
1666:There is no deadline
1531:"Murder of" articles
1359:Common-style fallacy
1231:Article construction
1146:Process is important
1091:Levels of competence
1016:Be a reliable source
645:absolutely necessary
608:related to Knowledge
402:Are the candidate's
334:to a lot of people
165:which is important.
3524:No one really cares
3439:Go ahead, vandalize
3201:Two prongs of merit
3146:Third-party sources
3066:Notabilitymandering
3021:No one really cares
2976:Inherent notability
2971:Independent sources
2856:Alternative outlets
2690:Nationalist editing
2660:Don't take the bait
2625:Don't help too much
2550:Don't be prejudiced
2520:Don't be an ostrich
2485:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2218:Deletion as revenge
2193:Advice for hotheads
2014:No Encyclopedic Use
1894:Does deletion help?
1794:Writing about women
1676:The deadline is now
1671:There is a deadline
1551:Nothing is in stone
1181:Tendentious editing
1096:Levels of consensus
823:Users' RfA criteria
3534:No sorcery threats
3414:Embrace Stop Signs
3294:Assume good wraith
3269:Anti-Wikipedianism
3106:Perennial websites
3096:Other stuff exists
2732:Passive aggression
2695:No angry mastodons
2685:Hate is disruptive
2545:Don't be obnoxious
2510:Don't be a fanatic
2288:Most ideas are bad
2228:Forgive and forget
2037:Essays on civility
1646:Run an edit-a-thon
1379:Deprecated sources
1354:Citation underkill
1339:Chesterton's fence
1309:Be neutral in form
1206:Knowledge in brief
1161:Reasonability rule
1126:Oversimplification
1101:Most ideas are bad
813:, a humorous essay
751:
723:It's because some
672:
635:
522:
460:
411:Non admin closures
261:
224:
3789:
3788:
3785:
3784:
3781:
3780:
3676:
3675:
3672:
3671:
3654:Yes legal threats
3469:Ignore all essays
3354:Complete bollocks
3279:Asshole John rule
3213:
3212:
3209:
3208:
3166:What BLP1E is not
3086:One hundred words
3056:Notability points
2820:
2819:
2816:
2815:
2620:Don't give a fuck
2495:Civil POV pushing
2459:Mutual withdrawal
2349:Assume good faith
2318:Knowledge clichés
2213:Civility warnings
2132:Please say please
2082:Editors' pronouns
2026:
2025:
2022:
2021:
1914:Follow the leader
1779:Use our own words
1744:Avoid thread mode
1591:Pro and con lists
1349:Citation overkill
1299:Autosizing images
1021:Civil POV pushing
557:Voting 'Neutral'
444:Voting 'Support'
140:
139:
106:
105:
93:
77:
76:
3824:
3802:Knowledge essays
3730:Finding an essay
3695:
3694:
3682:
3681:
3344:Butterfly effect
3339:Boston Tea Party
3299:Assume stupidity
3284:Assume bad faith
3274:Articlecountitis
3232:
3231:
3219:
3218:
3151:Trivial mentions
2996:Minimum coverage
2839:
2838:
2826:
2825:
2525:Don't be ashamed
2404:Discussing cruft
2394:Deny recognition
2293:Nothing is clear
2102:Expect no thanks
2045:
2044:
2032:
2031:
1964:Nothing is clear
1811:deleting content
1494:Tertiary sources
1249:Acronym overkill
1121:The one question
986:
985:
973:
972:
966:
962:Knowledge essays
955:
948:
941:
932:
931:
925:
924:
923:. 18 March 2011.
913:
907:
906:
899:
893:
888:
593:Asking questions
536:Too many admins:
474:Voting 'Oppose'
145:is described on
115:
114:
108:
89:
86:
85:
79:
69:
26:
25:
19:
3832:
3831:
3827:
3826:
3825:
3823:
3822:
3821:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3777:
3739:
3710:Value of essays
3689:
3668:
3499:Legal vandalism
3364:Counting juntas
3264:Anti-Wikipedian
3226:
3224:Humorous essays
3205:
3181:What to include
3126:Run-of-the-mill
3116:Read the source
3081:Offline sources
2876:Bare notability
2833:
2812:
2766:
2717:No Confederates
2515:Don't be a jerk
2473:
2439:Keep it concise
2379:Beyond civility
2337:
2171:
2112:How to be civil
2077:Don't retaliate
2039:
2018:
1949:Keep it concise
1884:Delete the junk
1879:Delete or merge
1869:Content removal
1803:
1769:Myth vs fiction
1730:
1621:Robotic editing
1484:Science sources
1479:Primary sources
1469:History sources
1244:Abandoned stubs
1225:
996:Article content
980:
967:
959:
929:
928:
915:
914:
910:
901:
900:
896:
889:
885:
880:
801:How we got here
775:
773:Further reading
700:
684:
654:
595:
579:
559:
476:
446:
356:What homework?
232:
184:
171:
112:
83:
73:
72:
65:
61:
53:
52:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3830:
3820:
3819:
3814:
3809:
3804:
3787:
3786:
3783:
3782:
3779:
3778:
3776:
3775:
3770:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3758:
3747:
3745:
3741:
3740:
3738:
3737:
3732:
3727:
3722:
3717:
3712:
3707:
3701:
3699:
3691:
3690:
3678:
3677:
3674:
3673:
3670:
3669:
3667:
3666:
3661:
3656:
3651:
3646:
3641:
3636:
3631:
3626:
3621:
3616:
3611:
3606:
3601:
3596:
3591:
3586:
3581:
3576:
3571:
3566:
3561:
3556:
3551:
3546:
3541:
3536:
3531:
3526:
3521:
3516:
3511:
3506:
3501:
3496:
3491:
3486:
3481:
3476:
3471:
3466:
3461:
3456:
3451:
3446:
3441:
3436:
3431:
3426:
3421:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3404:Editsummarisis
3401:
3396:
3391:
3386:
3381:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3359:Counting forks
3356:
3351:
3346:
3341:
3336:
3331:
3326:
3321:
3316:
3311:
3306:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3286:
3281:
3276:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3256:
3251:
3246:
3241:
3235:
3228:
3227:
3215:
3214:
3211:
3210:
3207:
3206:
3204:
3203:
3198:
3193:
3188:
3183:
3178:
3173:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2916:Don't cite GNG
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2891:But it's true!
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2858:
2853:
2848:
2842:
2835:
2834:
2822:
2821:
2818:
2817:
2814:
2813:
2811:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2788:WikiHarassment
2785:
2780:
2774:
2772:
2768:
2767:
2765:
2764:
2759:
2754:
2749:
2744:
2739:
2734:
2729:
2724:
2722:No queerphobia
2719:
2714:
2709:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2692:
2687:
2682:
2677:
2672:
2667:
2662:
2657:
2652:
2647:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2617:
2612:
2607:
2602:
2597:
2592:
2587:
2582:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2557:
2552:
2547:
2542:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2481:
2479:
2475:
2474:
2472:
2471:
2466:
2461:
2456:
2451:
2446:
2441:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2406:
2401:
2396:
2391:
2386:
2381:
2376:
2371:
2366:
2361:
2359:Assume no clue
2356:
2351:
2345:
2343:
2339:
2338:
2336:
2335:
2330:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2305:
2300:
2295:
2290:
2285:
2280:
2275:
2270:
2265:
2260:
2255:
2250:
2245:
2240:
2235:
2230:
2225:
2220:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2200:
2195:
2190:
2185:
2179:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2170:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2097:Enjoy yourself
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2053:
2051:
2041:
2040:
2028:
2027:
2024:
2023:
2020:
2019:
2017:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1996:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1966:
1961:
1956:
1951:
1946:
1941:
1936:
1931:
1926:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1901:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1881:
1876:
1871:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1815:
1813:
1810:
1805:
1804:
1802:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1786:
1781:
1776:
1771:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1751:
1746:
1740:
1738:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1698:
1693:
1688:
1683:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1626:Sham consensus
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1563:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1491:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1321:
1316:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1235:
1233:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1071:Explanationism
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
1003:
998:
992:
990:
982:
981:
969:
968:
958:
957:
950:
943:
935:
927:
926:
908:
905:. August 2021.
894:
882:
881:
879:
876:
875:
874:
869:
864:
858:
853:
844:
838:
832:
825:
824:
820:
819:
814:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
780:
779:
774:
771:
744:
743:
739:
736:
732:
728:
721:
712:
711:
699:
694:
683:
680:
664:
653:
650:
648:
628:
627:
624:
621:
615:
594:
591:
586:
578:
575:
558:
555:
513:
506:
505:
504:
494:
493:
492:
483:
475:
472:
449:Voting early:
445:
442:
437:
436:
432:
431:
424:
421:
414:
407:
400:
397:
390:
382:
375:
366:
358:
357:
349:
348:
328:Wikipediocracy
293:
292:
287:
282:
277:
271:
270:
268:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
231:
228:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
209:
206:
203:
195:
194:
191:
188:
183:
176:
170:
169:Can you do it?
167:
157:and will have
138:
137:
116:
104:
103:
87:
75:
74:
71:
70:
62:
57:
54:
42:
41:
29:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3829:
3818:
3815:
3813:
3810:
3808:
3805:
3803:
3800:
3799:
3797:
3774:
3771:
3769:
3766:
3762:
3759:
3757:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3749:
3748:
3746:
3742:
3736:
3733:
3731:
3728:
3726:
3723:
3721:
3718:
3716:
3713:
3711:
3708:
3706:
3703:
3702:
3700:
3696:
3692:
3688:
3683:
3679:
3665:
3662:
3660:
3657:
3655:
3652:
3650:
3647:
3645:
3642:
3640:
3637:
3635:
3634:Watchlistitis
3632:
3630:
3629:The WikiBible
3627:
3625:
3622:
3620:
3617:
3615:
3612:
3610:
3607:
3605:
3602:
3600:
3597:
3595:
3592:
3590:
3587:
3585:
3582:
3580:
3577:
3575:
3574:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3572:
3570:
3567:
3565:
3562:
3560:
3557:
3555:
3552:
3550:
3549:Play the game
3547:
3545:
3542:
3540:
3537:
3535:
3532:
3530:
3527:
3525:
3522:
3520:
3517:
3515:
3512:
3510:
3507:
3505:
3502:
3500:
3497:
3495:
3492:
3490:
3489:My local pond
3487:
3485:
3482:
3480:
3477:
3475:
3472:
3470:
3467:
3465:
3462:
3460:
3457:
3455:
3452:
3450:
3447:
3445:
3442:
3440:
3437:
3435:
3432:
3430:
3427:
3425:
3422:
3420:
3417:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3399:Edits Per Day
3397:
3395:
3394:Editcountitis
3392:
3390:
3387:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3377:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3337:
3335:
3332:
3330:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3320:
3317:
3315:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3305:
3302:
3300:
3297:
3295:
3292:
3290:
3287:
3285:
3282:
3280:
3277:
3275:
3272:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3255:
3252:
3250:
3247:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3236:
3233:
3229:
3225:
3220:
3216:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3187:
3184:
3182:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3164:
3162:
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2981:Insignificant
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2843:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2827:
2823:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2798:WikiLawyering
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2775:
2773:
2771:WikiRelations
2769:
2763:
2760:
2758:
2755:
2753:
2750:
2748:
2745:
2743:
2740:
2738:
2735:
2733:
2730:
2728:
2725:
2723:
2720:
2718:
2715:
2713:
2710:
2708:
2705:
2701:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2688:
2686:
2683:
2681:
2678:
2676:
2673:
2671:
2668:
2666:
2663:
2661:
2658:
2656:
2653:
2651:
2648:
2646:
2643:
2641:
2638:
2636:
2633:
2631:
2628:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2618:
2616:
2613:
2611:
2608:
2606:
2603:
2601:
2598:
2596:
2595:Don't cry COI
2593:
2591:
2588:
2586:
2583:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2573:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2556:
2555:Don't be rude
2553:
2551:
2548:
2546:
2543:
2541:
2538:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2500:Cyberbullying
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2482:
2480:
2476:
2470:
2467:
2465:
2462:
2460:
2457:
2455:
2452:
2450:
2447:
2445:
2442:
2440:
2437:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2405:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2395:
2392:
2390:
2387:
2385:
2382:
2380:
2377:
2375:
2372:
2370:
2367:
2365:
2362:
2360:
2357:
2355:
2352:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2344:
2340:
2334:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2299:
2296:
2294:
2291:
2289:
2286:
2284:
2281:
2279:
2278:The last word
2276:
2274:
2273:The grey zone
2271:
2269:
2266:
2264:
2261:
2259:
2256:
2254:
2251:
2249:
2246:
2244:
2241:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2231:
2229:
2226:
2224:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2206:
2204:
2201:
2199:
2196:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2181:
2180:
2178:
2174:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2052:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2033:
2029:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1992:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1962:
1960:
1957:
1955:
1952:
1950:
1947:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1937:
1935:
1932:
1930:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1897:
1895:
1892:
1890:
1887:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1877:
1875:
1872:
1870:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1816:
1814:
1812:
1806:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1785:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1760:
1757:
1755:
1752:
1750:
1747:
1745:
1742:
1741:
1739:
1737:
1733:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1691:Walled garden
1689:
1687:
1684:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1516:Mine a source
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1364:Concept cloud
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1334:Cherrypicking
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1232:
1228:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1166:Systemic bias
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1117:
1114:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
993:
991:
987:
983:
979:
974:
970:
963:
956:
951:
949:
944:
942:
937:
936:
933:
922:
918:
912:
904:
898:
892:
887:
883:
873:
870:
868:
865:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
848:
845:
842:
839:
836:
833:
830:
827:
826:
822:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
807:
806:RfA inflation
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
786:
782:
781:
777:
776:
770:
769:
765:
764:
763:
757:
755:
748:
740:
737:
733:
729:
726:
722:
718:
714:
713:
709:
708:
707:
705:
698:
693:
691:
690:
679:
677:
669:
665:
662:
661:
649:
646:
642:
641:
632:
625:
622:
620:
616:
613:
612:
611:
609:
602:
601:
590:
584:
574:
572:
566:
563:
554:
552:
548:
546:
542:
537:
533:
531:
527:
519:
515:
511:
502:
501:
500:
499:
490:
489:
488:
486:
480:
471:
468:
466:
457:
453:
450:
441:
435:Keep watching
434:
433:
429:
425:
422:
419:
415:
412:
408:
405:
401:
398:
395:
391:
388:
383:
380:
376:
373:
372:
367:
364:
363:
362:
355:
354:
353:
346:
345:
344:
342:
337:
331:
329:
325:
321:
315:
311:
309:
305:
301:
296:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
272:
269:
266:
265:
264:
258:
251:
248:
245:
242:
241:
240:
238:
227:
221:
210:
207:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
189:
186:
185:
181:
175:
166:
164:
160:
156:
155:several years
152:
148:
144:
136:
135:
130:
129:
124:
120:
117:
110:
109:
101:
97:
92:
88:
81:
80:
68:
64:
63:
60:
55:
50:
46:
40:
38:
34:
28:
21:
20:
3698:About essays
3687:About essays
3594:Rouge editor
3544:Oops Defense
3324:Barnstaritis
3289:Assume faith
3111:Pokémon test
2956:High Schools
2778:WikiBullying
2742:Superhatting
2737:POV railroad
2434:Just drop it
2238:Nobody cares
2072:Divisiveness
1596:Printability
1489:Style guides
1279:Amnesia test
1136:Paraphrasing
911:
897:
886:
856:NoSeptember
817:RFA by month
784:
767:
766:
761:
758:
753:
752:
716:
710:Why is that?
701:
696:
688:
685:
673:
658:
655:
644:
639:
636:
618:
607:
604:
598:
597:
582:
580:
567:
564:
560:
550:
549:
535:
534:
529:
525:
523:
508:
507:
496:
495:
484:
478:
477:
469:
464:
461:
448:
447:
438:
427:
417:
386:
378:
371:edit counter
370:
359:
350:
340:
335:
332:
316:
312:
307:
303:
299:
297:
294:
289:
284:
279:
274:
262:
233:
225:
180:ask yourself
179:
172:
162:
158:
154:
142:
141:
133:
132:
127:
118:
90:
30:
3705:Essay guide
3589:Rouge admin
3156:Video links
3011:No big loss
2700:just madmen
2650:Don't shout
2424:How to lose
2419:Get over it
2203:Be the glue
2122:Negotiation
1979:Relist bias
1809:Removing or
1641:Stub Makers
1474:Law sources
1404:Don't panic
921:Jimbo Wales
731:experience.
704:Jimmy Wales
600:scenarios).
588:</s: -->
583:Moved to...
205:30 minutes?
202:20 minutes?
31:This is an
3796:Categories
3761:Guidelines
3529:No, really
3509:LTTAUTMAOK
2991:Make stubs
2712:No racists
2454:Say "MOBY"
2176:Philosophy
2049:The basics
1606:Publicists
1576:Presentism
1521:Merge Test
1506:Inaccuracy
989:Philosophy
326:, or even
3239:Adminitis
2808:WikiPeace
2783:WikiCrime
2762:UPPERCASE
2142:Thank you
1774:Proseline
1566:Permastub
1131:Paradoxes
1046:Don't lie
735:sourcing.
498:Vivamus.
428:user page
406:accurate?
267:Analogies
237:mainspace
159:thousands
3756:Policies
2906:Coatrack
2803:WikiLove
2793:WikiHate
2707:No Nazis
2680:Griefing
1944:Immunity
1196:Trifecta
1026:Cohesion
872:Wisdom89
778:See also
652:Comments
465:politely
320:Facebook
59:Shortcut
35:on the
3419:Emerson
3259:ANI flu
2223:Failure
2062:Apology
1959:Nothing
1156:Purpose
878:Sources
847:Kudpung
341:besides
336:besides
324:Twitter
304:against
211:Longer?
208:1 hour?
163:quality
67:WP:RFAV
2901:Clones
2478:Don'ts
2399:Desist
2389:Candor
2298:Reader
851:WT:RfA
682:Ready?
571:WT:RfA
545:WT:RfA
541:WP:RfC
418:mature
394:WP:ANI
2152:Truce
867:T-rex
861:Swarm
720:away.
379:tools
33:essay
3424:Fart
3369:Crap
1754:Coup
1106:Need
762:HERE
530:your
182:are:
123:RfAs
98:and
2342:Dos
965:(?)
717:you
387:not
308:for
300:for
131:.
3798::
919:.
585:.
573:.
547:.
512:.
322:,
954:e
947:t
940:v
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
