1690:
page and users blocking any suggestion of change without coming up with any alternative or compromise. I can appreciate why heterodox cannot be used in this article, despite it being sanctified by the
Ahmadiyya Muslims themselves. Equally so I raised the question of the legitimacy of calling them an Islamic revival movement which is clearly in breach of NPOV because it is stating categorically and not raising the wealth of opinions evidence both primary and secondary to the contrary. The cited evidence for the quotation I elaborately unravelled as weak by Simon Valentine. That aside I think perhaps we could move forward with "Minority" Islamic Revival Movement. That wouldnt appear to be in breach of NPOV as they are clearly a minority group according to all major sources. So far people have refused to enter into discussion, then other people are contacted who know very little about the issue who simply take the side of the administrator without any knowledge simply because I am new to WP. I have a genuine interest in balancing the article but no one else is suggesting any kind of change. (
1391:
page and has continued to insert his preferred version despite this (and called me a vandal for reverting him). Before this block, and in time for
Steeringly to take part, I raised the NPOV issue at ] but he hasn't participated there. He's also used sources to support his position (that the article should assert in Knowledge's voice that Ahdmadiyya is heterodox, rather than point out that many Muslims, etc believe it to be heterodox) with sources that do not make this statement although he interprets them as though they do. His only edits relate to this article. And he's been warned about edit warring enough so that he should know his edits aren't exempt as he's claimed. I've been tempted to go to ANI or AIV but refrained, asking instead an uninvolved editor, DBigXray for his help which he gave above.
1420:"Uninvolved" but close associate. I agree you are right Heterodox is inappropriate. I am understanding more about what is and isnt acceptable for WP. People make mistakes and I genuinely am trying to make acceptable change to the article. I have to point out that you are incorrect Doug some of the links affirmed my statement, others I agree suggested it was the opinion of Muslims. I hadnt participated on ] as I wasn't aware it was there. Treat me like a new student regarding WP otherwise of course I will miss certain things. My only edits relate to this article as I am new to WP. I can edit a few other things if it helps. Where can I read more about consensus? (
1770:
first volume. Anyway, the first sentence says "The
Ahmadiyah (or Ahmadiyya) movement is a modern Muslim messianic movement..." That particular phrasing might be the best option available. First, by pretty much any standards, a group founded in 1889 is generally counted as "modern", at least in the religion field. The fact that it is "messianic" is both accurate, and, in general, an indication that the beliefs it proposes are significantly different than those that came before. Messianic claimants have been, so far as I can tell, generally rather un-orthodox and belief in them has tended to be rejected by the pre-existing groups in the field.
1747:
listen to people. Oh, and be patient. That's key. We don't have to fix everything at once. It's easy to forget that, I know I do at times. And as I think I've said, I'm not really interested in editing the article, but I will try to help keep it NPOV. And this particular religious group has a lot of editors, mainly IPs, attacking it, not just in the article you've been editing but in others, eg I reverted some random name calling of them in another article today. I'm not sure why I've ended up with a lot of
Islamic related articles on my watch list, but I seem to have quite a few now.
977:, I am glad that you are participating in the discussion on the talk page of Ahmadiyya. Its generally seen that new users who are only aware of one side of the story find the current state of article as incorrect and accordingly they feel that their side of the story is the correct side. But Wiki articles have to follow a neutral path and give a world view of the subject. As you are new here it would be benefecial for you to read these articles below (if you have not already read these)
1151:
1317:
administrator should be warned for not being objective instead he is militantly protecting an article from scholarly amendments. I have explained at length the reason for the changes and have a full grounding in the area of both Islam and
Ahmadiyya. I have not requested Islamic be removed from the article after discussion that self identity is enough to go against consensus. I have simply tried to add a scholarly amendment which supports the flow of the article.
1474:
1231:
883:
190:
1098:
1810:
849:
790:
1786:. Those articles are probably at least as important to Islamic content here as the Ahmadiyya article is, but they are still in much worse shape. It might be helpful for you as an editor to maybe get a bit of time in with less controversial articles, and getting a bit better feel for how things work around here in terms of style, referencing, and so forth. Anyway, just a few ideas.
1628:. What you were blocked for is edit warring, which is the repeated re-insertion of your own changes, whether they are right or not, after they have been contested and reverted. So even if "heterodox" was appropriate, you were still edit warring and would still have been blocked - your being right would not have allowed you to edit war. Do you understand that key point? --
1689:
Thanks Mcewan, I appreciate your advice. As someone new to wikipedia I suppose I need to learn the correct procedures, then actually adhere to them. Otherwise WP would be a mess I suppose. It's incredibly frustrating to simply have administrators and wikipedians who have personal reasons to protect a
1668:
for this article which you have probably seen. When your block expires, can I suggest you calmly make a suggestion there about some alternative to using the word "heterodox", which I now see can't be used in that way in the lead paragraph (because
Knowledge itself is not in a position to rule on what
1390:
Just to make it clear, I semi-protected the article before all this due to IP vandalism. I have not used my tools in this debate and gone to some length to suggest venues where
Steeringly can discuss this and pointed him to policies and guidelines. Steeringly has not had consensus on the article talk
1746:
Very glad to hear that. I really have been trying to help you both edit and avoid being blocked (or topic banned, you can be banned from a whole topic, eg
Islamic related articles). That would be a shame. The important thing for you now is to avoid edit warring or anything that looks like it, and to
1643:
Boing boing boing... Sorry I didnt make my self clear, I understood the reasons for my block. The only reason I was edit warring as I know it now was, was because of the use of the word heterodox. I understood that it was unacceptable to use heterodox and therefore the reason for my edit warring was
1571:
This is a copy-paste of part of the instructions for appealing a block, followed by a sentence which has nothing to do with edit-warring, which is the reason for your block. There is nothing here that would be a reason to overturn a valid block. 48 hours is not a long time; while you wait for your
1769:
edited by
Lindsay Jones, published that same year. So far as I can see, that source is possibly the most highly regarded reference source in the field, although, obviously, like any other huge 10,000 page work, some of the articles will be better than others. This article is on pages 200-201 of the
1559:
that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead. I more clearly understand the issue of why
Heterodox is inappropriate language without specifying who believes it. It is not for WP to
1343:
However, edit warring is repeatedly reverting, and the fact that you are convinced that your edits were right does not stop it being edit warring. In fact, the policy on edit warring would be meaningless if it said "unless you believe you are right", as in almost all edit wars all the participants
937:
but I haven't used my Admin tools, I've been advising you about policy. The source you added does not call them heterodox but says they are separated from Sunni and other Muslims, and in any case I believe that we cannot, in Knowledge's voice, call any religion heterodox, we can only report that
1316:
I have fully explained my reasons why this is not edit warring in our detailed conversations in the Talk page and also the Islam page. if you look through the history of the conversations it was agreed that whilst controversial it was a legitimate entry. By definition it is not edit warring The
1708:
Um, I've been discussing it with you. I've not been resistant to saying they are considered heterodox by many Muslims. I certainly support having the article state they are illegal in some places. I don't care if they are called a revival movement. Up until now my interest has been preventing
1709:
vandalism, specifically pov vandalism trying to change Islamic to non-Islamic. I've had next to no involvement in actually editing the article. I don't think any of the editors have any personal preferences other than to make sure it meets our policies and guidelines, and you need to read
1341:"I believe this is exempt under the guidelines of WP:EW as I have clearly demonstrated that the article contrary to your assertions is improved by the changes. I believe you are incorrectly citing the 3RR rule when a contributor is trying to make legitimate change to an article."
916:
Hi Doug, What exactly are you referring too? I think your potentially exercising an abuse of your position to limit legitimate changes. Can you cite any wikirules that corroborate this, as I am unclear what I have done? How do I report the potential bias of an administrator?
817:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
1072:
And you are an equally valuable contributor, kindly do not get offended and use the time to understand the guidelines that I have posted above and on the sidebar on the right. So that when you return you can contribute constructively without violating
1713:. Attacking other editors or impugning their motives will not get you very far. I don't think any of the articles belong to any Islamic religion - we all just care about Knowledge. And I'm not the only Admin involved, by the way.
1773:
Also, I think that in general it might help if you got a bit more experience in working and developing other articles, which might not be as inherently controversial. There are I think 13 articles which have entires in the Jones
1128:
and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
180:
or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
1624:
I don't actually think you understand the reason for your block at all. You were not blocked for use of the word "heterodox" - that would be something to discuss on the article Talk page and decide by
1405:
I saw that and I was a bit concerned at first but it took only very basic looking to realize that the protection was not related to Steeringly which is why I didn't bring it up with you.--v/r -
1783:
149:, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered
464:
1025:, and do not accuse him wrongly, So far he has not used any of his admin powers against you and I know he will never. It would be best for the article if you could work out a
1730:
Sorry Doug. My time in the Sin Bin has given my overactive imagination time to cool off. I have read the rules over a few times and hopefully will contribute to consensus. (
1339:
You evidently think that repeatedly reverting is not edit warring as long as your edits are "right". In addition to your statement above, on the article talk page you wrote
808:
814:
957:
Hi Doug, I have shown that the article itself confirms that the Ahmadiyya are specifically Heterodox, I have evidenced this from the Ahmadiyya website and other sources. (
353:
1538:
1295:
1616:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1382:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
534:
1456:
1112:
1082:
1042:
769:
276:
1782:. I'm fairly sure that there are at least a few others which don't even exist yet, which can be found in the list I created of the articles there at
1731:
1691:
1645:
1492:
1421:
1318:
1249:
1057:
974:
958:
918:
833:
440:
611:
511:
1450:
1106:
1076:
1036:
763:
270:
620:
1669:
is orthodox/heterodox in a religion). Also if you can explain what you intend, other editors may be able to help to arrive at a consensus.
1795:
1756:
1722:
951:
375:
348:
1464:
1090:
1050:
672:
1644:
removed, and I now fully comprehend the reason edit warring is inapropriate and counter productive. But nonetheless thanks anyway (
1412:
866:
You know this is being discussed, you know that you don't have consensus, and you know that you've been told that this is not NPOV.
736:
315:
1514:
1271:
99:
95:
592:
57:
681:
488:
416:
1739:
1699:
1601:
1367:
1195:
634:
557:
479:
1637:
571:
1065:
966:
926:
911:
876:
841:
686:
1684:
1586:
525:
1509:
1486:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1266:
1243:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
827:
813:
807:
581:
516:
30:
1840:
709:
380:
861:
576:
88:
1532:
1357:
1289:
1814:
1591:
1501:
1258:
1201:
853:
469:
398:
333:
241:
1653:
1429:
1400:
1326:
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge:
1633:
1497:
1254:
389:
292:
777:
284:
1659:
1523:
1348:
involve two or more editors who all believe that they are "trying to make legitimate change to an article."
1280:
1209:
729:
641:
459:
343:
338:
301:
253:
209:
138:
62:
42:
22:
1223:
1179:
695:
629:
365:
328:
257:
1029:
on talk, see the various steps, how to make one. Later on if you feel that is necessary you can take a
1826:
601:
452:
435:
306:
107:
52:
1542:
1519:
1299:
1276:
1487:
1244:
1213:
1158:
899:
783:
566:
474:
447:
263:
67:
707:
1629:
1528:
1505:
1481:
1285:
1262:
1238:
887:
703:
544:
539:
430:
425:
205:
103:
1835:
1056:
Thank you I am sure you are right regarding Doug. Clearly he is a valuable contributer. Regards (
895:
754:
722:
118:
216:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
1353:
1175:
1167:
501:
249:
221:
197:
177:
114:
37:
1791:
1582:
606:
1752:
1718:
1396:
947:
907:
872:
798:
646:
403:
370:
130:
81:
8:
1625:
1205:
1136:
1026:
1009:
996:
939:
794:
651:
360:
245:
213:
150:
1830:
1803:
1125:
663:
658:
169:
47:
172:
is a good place to start learning about Knowledge. If you have any questions, see the
1349:
1144:
986:
823:
506:
184:
125:
1787:
1680:
1610:
1577:
1409:
1376:
1220:
1185:
1000:
161:
1778:
which are still at "stub" class, as can be seen from the statistics page found at
805:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
1779:
1748:
1714:
1392:
1033:. but please do not edit war your own version without discussing first. thanks --
1022:
943:
903:
868:
154:
146:
1665:
982:
711:
173:
1818:
1710:
1672:
If you just continue with re-inserting the word you likely be blocked again.
1030:
1018:
934:
231:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
1573:
1178:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
1005:
990:
819:
1676:
1406:
1217:
832:
Thank you I am such a Newb when it comes to wikipedia. Much appreciated (
244:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
1121:
229:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
1761:
If I might make a few suggestions. One, I am currently looking at the
864:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
1822:
1171:
891:
857:
201:
142:
26:
84:– do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
705:
160:
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Knowledge is
102:. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be
94:
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a
712:
240:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
1097:
802:
1821:
of published material to articles as you apparently did to
1664:
Hello Steeringly. I have got involved in the debate on the
256:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
1208:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
797:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
1598:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1364:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1618:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1384:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
793:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
74:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Knowledge
1212:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
248:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1480:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1237:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
938:
others do. Please, if you decide to go to ANI, read
153:; doing so will result in your account or IP being
1174:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1139:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
235:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
1765:entry written in 2005 by Yohanan Friedman in the
1560:categorically state what is and is not Heterodox
750:Also adding some more guidelines on the sidebar
100:Knowledge's Biography of Living Persons policy
730:
1443:All the links you need to know are here on
91:– this is one of Knowledge's core policies.
1829:for all of your contributions. Thank you.
1572:block to expire, you could carefully read
1200:During a dispute, you should first try to
737:
723:
200:according to the reverts you have made on
894:. This contravenes Knowledge's policy on
852:Please do not add commentary or your own
196:You currently appear to be engaged in an
1576:, which will help you when you return.
1012:(these two must always be kept in mind)
898:. If you continue to do so, you may be
1445:User_talk:Steeringly#Your_recent_edits
1444:
1440:Where can I read more about consensus?
1135:Spread the peace of doves by adding {{
612:Deletion guidelines for administrators
137:Do not add troublesome content to any
856:to Knowledge articles, as you did to
260:. If you engage in an edit war, you
1017:Also i would request you to please
124:If you are testing, please use the
13:
1784:User:John Carter/Religion articles
1472:
1344:believe they are right. Edit wars
1229:
1149:
1096:
222:Knowledge's policy on edit warring
188:
14:
1851:
98:to any Knowledge page and follow
1808:
881:
860:. Doing so violates Knowledge's
847:
812:
806:
788:
220:Please be particularly aware,
208:with others, to avoid editing
1:
1202:discuss controversial changes
1162:from editing for a period of
355:Don't disrupt to make a point
38:The five pillars of Knowledge
1574:the rules about edit-warring
862:neutral point of view policy
535:Categories, lists, templates
58:How to write a great article
7:
1484:, who declined the request.
1241:, who declined the request.
376:Other behavioral guidelines
10:
1856:
1841:22:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
1194:, but you should read the
1767:Encyclopedia of Religion,
1602:guide to appealing blocks
1368:guide to appealing blocks
1196:guide to appealing blocks
1176:make useful contributions
952:19:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
927:19:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
912:19:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
902:from editing Knowledge.
877:18:54, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
842:00:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
828:00:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
381:WMF friendly space policy
285:10:45, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
1796:20:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1776:Encyclopedia of Religion
1757:17:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1740:16:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1735:
1723:14:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1700:21:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1695:
1685:20:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1654:16:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1649:
1638:08:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1592:13:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1465:08:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1430:21:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1425:
1413:15:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1401:13:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1358:13:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1327:13:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1322:
1224:13:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1091:07:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
1066:21:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
1061:
1051:10:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
967:09:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
962:
922:
837:
778:11:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
517:Other editing guidelines
480:Other content guidelines
349:Don't bite the newcomers
214:try to reach a consensus
204:. Users are expected to
176:, add a question to the
890:content, as you did to
250:appropriate noticeboard
1477:
1234:
1154:
1101:
193:
1529:change block settings
1476:
1286:change block settings
1233:
1190:Your reason here ~~~~
1153:
1100:
465:Don't copy long texts
192:
89:neutral point of view
1660:Ahmadiyya suggestion
399:Talk page guidelines
334:Conflict of interest
293:Knowledge guidelines
155:blocked from editing
1630:Boing! said Zebedee
1182:by adding the text
886:Please stop adding
470:Don't create hoaxes
1813:Please do not add
1478:
1235:
1210:dispute resolution
1155:
1102:
682:Naming conventions
460:Offensive material
344:Disruptive editing
339:Courtesy vanishing
254:dispute resolution
194:
170:Knowledge tutorial
82:Respect copyrights
63:Naming conventions
43:How to edit a page
31:your contributions
1815:original research
1180:appeal this block
1140:
1019:assume good faith
854:personal analysis
784:Your recent edits
747:
746:
552:
551:
512:Understandability
411:
410:
366:Gaming the system
329:Assume good faith
1847:
1838:
1833:
1825:. Please cite a
1812:
1811:
1615:
1609:
1590:
1548:
1546:
1535:
1517:
1515:deleted contribs
1475:
1462:
1460:
1454:
1381:
1375:
1305:
1303:
1292:
1274:
1272:deleted contribs
1232:
1193:
1170:, as you did at
1152:
1137:subst:Peace dove
1134:
1124:! Doves promote
1120:has given you a
1118:
1116:
1110:
1088:
1086:
1080:
1048:
1046:
1040:
885:
884:
851:
850:
816:
810:
792:
791:
775:
773:
767:
759:
753:
739:
732:
725:
713:
602:Deletion process
496:
495:
455:
454:Non-free content
436:Reliable sources
356:
323:
322:
289:
288:
282:
280:
274:
191:
133:
108:reliable sources
53:Picture tutorial
48:Editing tutorial
29:. Thank you for
1855:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1836:
1831:
1827:reliable source
1819:novel syntheses
1809:
1806:
1662:
1621:
1613:
1607:
1606:, then use the
1595:
1580:
1562:
1536:
1526:
1512:
1495:
1488:blocking policy
1473:
1458:
1452:
1449:
1387:
1379:
1373:
1372:, then use the
1361:
1330:
1293:
1283:
1269:
1252:
1245:blocking policy
1230:
1227:
1214:page protection
1183:
1150:
1147:
1142:
1114:
1108:
1105:
1084:
1078:
1075:
1044:
1038:
1035:
882:
848:
801:by typing four
799:sign your posts
789:
786:
771:
765:
762:
757:
751:
743:
714:
706:
621:Project content
567:Manual of Style
475:Patent nonsense
453:
448:Fringe theories
354:
302:Guidelines list
278:
272:
269:
258:page protection
189:
187:
129:
68:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
1853:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1771:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1661:
1658:
1641:
1640:
1596:
1569:
1565:Decline reason
1557:
1553:Request reason
1550:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1362:
1337:
1333:Decline reason
1314:
1310:Request reason
1307:
1228:
1156:You have been
1148:
1146:
1143:
1132:
1130:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1054:
1053:
1014:
1013:
1003:
994:
979:
978:
955:
954:
933:You can go to
785:
782:
781:
780:
755:Guideline list
745:
744:
742:
741:
734:
727:
719:
716:
715:
710:
708:
704:
702:
699:
698:
692:
691:
690:
689:
684:
676:
675:
669:
668:
667:
666:
661:
656:
655:
654:
644:
639:
638:
637:
624:
623:
617:
616:
615:
614:
609:
604:
596:
595:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
579:
574:
561:
560:
554:
553:
550:
549:
548:
547:
545:Disambiguation
542:
540:Categorization
537:
529:
528:
526:Categorization
522:
521:
520:
519:
514:
509:
504:
492:
491:
485:
484:
483:
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
457:
450:
445:
444:
443:
433:
431:External links
428:
426:Citing sources
420:
419:
413:
412:
409:
408:
407:
406:
401:
393:
392:
386:
385:
384:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
358:
351:
346:
341:
336:
331:
319:
318:
312:
311:
310:
309:
304:
296:
295:
238:
237:
232:
217:
186:
183:
166:
165:
158:
135:
122:
111:
106:with multiple
92:
85:
78:
77:
75:
71:
70:
65:
60:
55:
50:
45:
40:
19:
18:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1852:
1843:
1842:
1839:
1834:
1832:Pass a Method
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1657:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1620:
1619:
1612:
1605:
1603:
1594:
1593:
1588:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1568:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1540:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1507:
1506:global blocks
1503:
1502:active blocks
1499:
1494:
1489:
1485:
1483:
1482:administrator
1466:
1463:
1461:
1455:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1389:
1388:
1386:
1385:
1378:
1371:
1369:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1336:
1334:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1313:
1311:
1306:
1301:
1297:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1264:
1263:global blocks
1260:
1259:active blocks
1256:
1251:
1246:
1242:
1240:
1239:administrator
1226:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1197:
1191:
1187:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1141:
1138:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1117:
1111:
1099:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1081:
1073:guidelines.--
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1041:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1002:
998:
995:
992:
988:
984:
981:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
968:
964:
960:
953:
949:
945:
941:
936:
932:
931:
930:
928:
924:
920:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
896:verifiability
893:
889:
879:
878:
874:
870:
867:
863:
859:
855:
845:
843:
839:
835:
830:
829:
825:
821:
815:
809:
804:
800:
796:
779:
776:
774:
768:
756:
749:
748:
740:
735:
733:
728:
726:
721:
720:
718:
717:
701:
700:
697:
694:
693:
688:
685:
683:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
671:
670:
665:
662:
660:
657:
653:
650:
649:
648:
645:
643:
640:
636:
633:
632:
631:
630:Project pages
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
619:
618:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
591:
590:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
569:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
556:
555:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
532:
531:
530:
527:
524:
523:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
493:
490:
487:
486:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
456:
451:
449:
446:
442:
439:
438:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
415:
414:
405:
402:
400:
397:
396:
395:
394:
391:
388:
387:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:
308:
307:Policies list
305:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
291:
290:
287:
286:
283:
281:
275:
267:
266:from editing.
265:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:
225:
223:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
182:
179:
175:
171:
163:
159:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
120:
119:sock puppetry
116:
112:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:living person
93:
90:
86:
83:
80:
79:
76:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
35:
34:
32:
28:
24:
16:
15:
1807:
1775:
1766:
1762:
1729:
1688:
1674:
1671:
1663:
1642:
1617:
1599:
1597:
1570:
1564:
1563:
1558:
1552:
1551:
1524:creation log
1491:
1479:
1448:
1439:
1438:
1419:
1383:
1365:
1363:
1350:JamesBWatson
1345:
1340:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1315:
1309:
1308:
1281:creation log
1248:
1236:
1199:
1189:
1168:edit warring
1163:
1157:
1133:
1104:
1103:
1074:
1055:
1034:
1027:WP:CONSENSUS
1010:WP:CONSENSUS
997:WP:SYNTHESIS
956:
940:WP:Boomerang
915:
880:
865:
846:
831:
787:
761:
635:WikiProjects
502:Article size
268:
261:
239:
234:
228:
219:
210:disruptively
195:
178:village pump
167:
115:edit warring
20:
1788:John Carter
1578:FisherQueen
607:Speedy keep
390:Discussions
206:collaborate
162:not a forum
143:copyrighted
141:, such as:
87:Maintain a
1804:April 2013
1763:Ahmadiyyah
1749:Dougweller
1732:Steeringly
1715:Dougweller
1692:Steeringly
1646:Steeringly
1520:filter log
1493:Steeringly
1422:Steeringly
1393:Dougweller
1319:Steeringly
1277:filter log
1250:Steeringly
1058:Steeringly
1023:Dougweller
987:WP:PRIMARY
975:Steeringly
959:Steeringly
944:Dougweller
919:Steeringly
904:Dougweller
892:Ahmadiyya
869:Dougweller
834:Steeringly
795:talk pages
687:Notability
652:User boxes
647:User pages
404:Signatures
371:User pages
316:Behavioral
174:help pages
104:referenced
21:Hello and
1823:Ahmadiyya
1666:talk page
1626:consensus
1600:read the
1539:checkuser
1498:block log
1366:read the
1296:checkuser
1255:block log
1206:consensus
1204:and seek
1172:Ahmadiyya
1145:July 2012
1001:WP:FRINGE
888:unsourced
858:Ahmadiyya
659:Shortcuts
642:Templates
361:Etiquette
246:consensus
242:talk page
224:states:
212:, and to
202:Ahmadiyya
185:June 2012
151:vandalism
27:Knowledge
1780:WP:ISLAM
1587:contribs
1510:contribs
1267:contribs
1216:. v/r -
1188:|reason=
1164:48 hours
1126:WikiLove
664:Subpages
593:Deletion
572:contents
441:medicine
252:or seek
198:edit war
17:Welcome!
1675:Thanks
1611:unblock
1533:unblock
1377:unblock
1346:usually
1290:unblock
1186:unblock
1159:blocked
983:WP:NPOV
900:blocked
820:SineBot
507:Be bold
489:Editing
417:Content
264:blocked
262:may be
139:article
126:Sandbox
23:welcome
1711:WP:AGF
1677:Mcewan
1198:first.
1031:WP:RFC
1021:with
973:Hello
935:WP:ANI
803:tildes
696:Search
582:tables
145:text,
1604:first
1370:first
1006:WP:DR
991:WP:RS
673:Other
577:lists
558:Style
147:libel
131:do so
1837:talk
1792:talk
1753:talk
1736:talk
1719:talk
1696:talk
1681:talk
1650:talk
1634:talk
1583:talk
1426:talk
1397:talk
1354:talk
1323:talk
1166:for
1122:dove
1062:talk
1008:and
963:talk
948:talk
923:talk
908:talk
873:talk
838:talk
824:talk
168:The
1817:or
1543:log
1490:).
1459:ray
1453:Big
1300:log
1247:).
1115:ray
1109:Big
1085:ray
1079:Big
1045:ray
1039:Big
811:or
772:ray
766:Big
279:ray
273:Big
128:to
117:or
113:No
25:to
1794:)
1755:)
1742:)
1738:)
1721:)
1702:)
1698:)
1683:)
1656:)
1652:)
1636:)
1614:}}
1608:{{
1585:·
1567::
1555::
1537:•
1531:•
1527:•
1522:•
1518:•
1513:•
1508:•
1504:•
1500:•
1447:--
1432:)
1428:)
1399:)
1380:}}
1374:{{
1356:)
1335::
1325:)
1312::
1294:•
1288:•
1284:•
1279:•
1275:•
1270:•
1265:•
1261:•
1257:•
1192:}}
1184:{{
1068:)
1064:)
999:,
989:,
985:,
969:)
965:)
950:)
942:.
929:)
925:)
910:)
875:)
844:)
840:)
826:)
818:--
760:--
758:}}
752:{{
1790:(
1751:(
1734:(
1717:(
1694:(
1679:(
1648:(
1632:(
1589:)
1581:(
1547:)
1545:)
1541:(
1496:(
1457:X
1451:D
1424:(
1410:P
1407:T
1395:(
1352:(
1321:(
1304:)
1302:)
1298:(
1253:(
1221:P
1218:T
1113:X
1107:D
1083:X
1077:D
1060:(
1043:X
1037:D
993:,
961:(
946:(
921:(
917:(
906:(
871:(
836:(
822:(
770:X
764:D
738:e
731:t
724:v
277:X
271:D
164:.
157:.
134:.
121:.
110:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.