4917:
article. For example, one brief mention in a book or article or paper might say Such-And-Such
Tabernacle was built in 1880, while another article says 1877, and another says 1882. Sometimes the authors are mistaken, or thinking of the beginning of construction, or the end of construction, or a particular event during construction, or the dedication. This is even the case when referencing the "experts", all of which were cited in my work in these articles 5 years ago. What do we say when there is such basic non-uniformity and the references don't explain themselves? I believe that we should find reliable sources, and those should overrule all the disagreeing references that only mention the tabernacle in passing. We are unlikely to find reliable, secondary sources where each tabernacle is the primary subject of the source. Some tabernacles are famous, and some are not, but they are all part of the notable tradition of Latter-day Saint tabernacles. But community histories are often helpful in providing better research and better explanations that clearly document more of the details of these buildings. But those histories are often not available online and sometimes require traveling to a regional library or local library in that community. Time consuming.
502:
terms. I'm all for lots of kinds of moderation and all. But I'm fundamentally quite liberal in nearly every way. And since liberal is a relative measurement depending on locale, I suppose that even someone I might think of as conservative may still be a liberal Mormon. In particular, I tried to choose userbox graphics (such as the Tree of Life) that represented the abstract theological goal rather than symbols that mainly appeal to fervently conservative (and largely regional Utah) culture. Sometimes there can seem like a complete disconnect between one's intimate understanding and relationship with spiritual and theological truths, and the face of the culture chiefly associated with the religion. How culture and religion can be very separate things (and sometimes mutually contradictory), but in the most conservative Utah culture they are not really seen as separate. Someone close to me once suggested that the Church especially needs many more liberal (and even respectfully critical) voices, and a much greater diversity of views and tolerance and respect thereof. In Utah, I find such tolerance and respect to be just about zero. But a cultural schism need not mean a complete alienation of being somehow Mormon. -
575:. And I believe in individual search, individual pondering, and individual prayer, and the free individual dictates of ones conscience. Sometimes one can be in the Church, and sometimes not—I have understood a church to mean a temporal organization of mortals in commonly agreed worship—something that as such is fallible to the errors of mortal man and periodically collapses and reorganizes. I believe in prophets, seers and revelators but also recognize them as human beings, who are capable of prophecy but also of human error. And I believe that this is the point of common affirmation of sworn-in religious leaders by a vote of hands, and that every one of those hands is just as human. And I believe that, when all else fails, when we are alienated have nothing left but ourselves (as with Joseph Smith in the wood), we can ask for more direct counsel. ...that, and I also believe in social democracy, civil liberties, social justice, adequate welfare for all in need, and the strict separation of religion and state (because when a state becomes subservient to a religion, then the religion becomes subservient to the state, e.g. politics, nationalisms, popular passions and realpolitik). ...and that's
2921:: But another reason I keep this userbox (despite reconsidering it several times) is a show of support for other Latter-day Saints who are liberal (politically and spiritually). I want them to feel they are not alone and that they should keep their legitimate place within Mormonism and within the LDS Church. It is common for the church to seem authoritarian, or for members to assume everyone is a strong conservative, and in my shy way I want to be evidence to the contrary. There are a number of young people who have given up on the Church in recent years, and I think the Church would be better off if they stayed, and I think often they would be better off if they stayed. If someone's rigid social or doctrinal model for the Church breaks, they don't have to discard it entirely but instead they may find a more flexible model that works well. They can keep their family and community relationships, and keep an open dialogue and respect for people who they might be inclined to flatly disagree with.
4284:?). I know that is not supposed to be the final criteria for notability, but it is often used as a rule of thumb, and voters don't have to justify their rationale. I think your strongest arguments were not given full consideration, but they might have been lost while wading through so much debate. As I see it, Ben Park is a strong up-and-coming voice in the new generation of young Mormon Studies scholars. He goes way back with Juvenile Instructor and was in the new Maxwell Institute restructuring. He has published several papers and articles, and he is quoted in the news media and academic papers, but his work or person might not be the direct subject of secondary sources. I think Park's "depth-of-coverage is not substantial", but I don't know whether your multiple listed independent sources are each "more than trivial". My opinions are somewhat flimsy in this debate. ——
654:) 05:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC) After thinking about the subject I have realized that people have confused Mormon liberals and liberal Mormons. Being in favor of civil liberties and social justice does not require accepting those who reject the teachings of the Lord. For this reason, Mormon liberals are very different than liberal Mormons. Liberal Mormons are those who reject the historical reality of the Book of Mormon, the objective binding power of revelation and that the Lord means what he says when he limits sexual intimacy to between a man and a woman legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife. On the other hand, Mormon liberals are people who strongly believe in varous politically liberal positions without using such positions to reject the Church and its teachings, or to undermine the fact that the prophet speaks the word of the Lord.
4280:
Honestly, I think Park might be able to merit his own article, but it's not a slam dunk. Grow has a better case since he's been at it longer and has published several books, which afforded him more opportunity to build recognition and citations and win some awards (MHA, AML, Evans
Biography). Grow's recent documentary books on Relief Society and the Council of 50 are significant and I expect them to reap many citations (in time). Park is influential in his own way, primarily as a commentator on Mormon history and politics in blogs or editorial journalism, but he has also published multiple journal articles and served in scholarly societies. But his positions have been relatively junior and he is not yet a main author of any books, even though insiders know him and probably expect a promising, long career (
2929:: But I also acknowledge your point that using labels like "Liberal Mormon" can signal that there are rivaling factions in the Church. I wonder if someone who said they were a "Liberal Catholic" might be seen as opposing their institutional church. Labels bring assumptions, which can be walls that distance us, making us believe we are miles apart, when in reality we may be more alike than we think. Should we instead say "Catholic who is liberal", or just simply "Catholic"? But we still need words that can be brief descriptions without a lengthy clarification. Maybe the problem is that the phrase seems so contrasting, since Mormons are assumed to be so conservative. Has there been a rift? (To clarify that I am within the Church's big tent, I also have an ordinary LDS userbox.)
1042:
faithful (or the "spiritually weak"). I think this gives control to the critics, who are left to present evidence and drive the conversation. It also makes the Church look like it has something to hide, as if it could be undone by some dangerous information. I don't believe the Church will be damaged by criticism or by having its faults known. We don't have to insist that believers always agree, doctrine never changes, the Church is always perfect, or leaders are always wise and unselfish. My faith will not be destroyed by these things, though it may be changed (maybe even enriched). I am also not threatened by believers or unbelievers who come to different conclusions than me.
3993:
pulpit/Ensign/General
Conference, and the Handbook is a leadership guide, not scripture. So President Nelson's brief comments may have helped settle this question for some. Though it is not canonized, it is "the mind of the Lord and the will of the Lord." There's room for technical discussion about what that means (particularly in light of the later clarifications), but it does suggest the Church stands behind the change, gives it doctrinal weight, and opposes the idea that it was a management misstep. Again, I'm not arguing the CES comments must be mentioned here, but I think it should be mentioned somewhere on WP, perhaps at
3952:
they are actively attending church. And greater discretion is given to local leaders to determine who qualifies, with instruction to keep the best interests of the child. This seems to nullify many criticisms of the new policy, since I would think that children who are unbaptized or do not attend church and are living with same-sex parents are extremely unlikely to want to join or be ordained. (Although, I guess I could imagine scenarios where a divorced parent, or grandparents, or aunts/uncles want the child to be involved with the church.) Now I'm not sure how to discuss the new policy over at
1476:. However, since Best spent the last 35 years working in the Church archives, and is an expert on documents it is looking like it will be hard to find enough info on her to create an article, especially since people are going to say that The Mormon Times being part of the Deseret News, which is owned by the LDS Church, which employees her, creates a situation that some will claim lacks "intellectual independence". I am trying to make sure I find all leads before creating the article, so if you have any advice on sources I would appreciate it. Thank you for your help.
610:
the argument first. On my mission, I remember teaching that the Church was perfect. I don't think so now, because the Church is operated by imperfect people who aren't guided in every breath by the perfect Savior. Even prophets make mistakes, as Joseph Smith certainly insisted, and have need of forgiveness. It is inspiring for me that God guides flawed sinners, because I am a flawed sinner. We all are. This may be a reflection of my more liberal religious perspective, in an culture that can stress perfect performance and exact obedience.
1145:
by some. He engages in assuming "gay" meant in 1918 what it does today, and then falsely attributes the term to Evan
Stephens to support his malicious attack on that good man. I think you also have to bear in mind both the maliciousness of Quinn in his attack on President Packer and that at heart Migley does not respect built images. In some ways, anti-Mormon writers like Palmer get away with stuff because no one applies the rigourous scrutiny to them they apply to LDS figures. There is a need for open exposure of some people.
4998:
discrepancies about construction dates should be raised as academic-type notes (using "ref group=note" and "reflist|group=note" to display a "Notes" section, as opposed to regular source footnotes) in the individual tabernacle articles. The list-article row should just choose one date to display, not get bogged down in detail that is properly brought up at the individual article. When issues are properly resolved or explained at individual articles, then remove warning tags in the corresponding list-article row.
2913:, sensitively identified a number of my reasons. I'm more a moderate than a radical, but I am probably more politically liberal in my thinking than is expected for a Mormon (based on what I imagine is the common stereotype). I believe in asking questions and coming to personal answers, which may diverge from orthodox interpretations. I believe in an evolving faith that resonates from my heart and mind, beyond merely accepting external principles. I want to have an open mind (whether I do is another matter).
982:, although he was a co-editor on this and a few other works. He was also a co-author of the LDS Children's Enclyclopedia. Not having read that book I am not sure how good it is. Since I had Dr. Huntington as a professor at BYU I may be too close to him to create an unbissed article, but actually the problem is that someone decided to go on a deletion spree against my recently created articles. They deleted about 16 articles I have written, some of which clearly met establshed notability criteria.
2655:. It looks like you have already done extensive research on this, and have a good working draft; I think your table is also a great idea. Since this is in your userspace (and has been since April) I assume you think that this may not ready yet for the article mainspace. Would you be willing to allow others to work with you on this page within your user space &/or would you be willing to copy this article over to a LDS Wikiproject page where interested parties could then help with it? --
1944:
777:
5024:
sources. I think it would be helpful to include the tags you mention: (1) "under construction" at the top, (2) in-line warnings for broken references, and (3) move unresolved dates into notes. For that last one, that could mean that several tabernacles would not have a year at all (for construction beginning, completion, or sale/destruction), but just an endnote describing the different cited years for those affected events. This could be a good starting point.
2283:
5444:
5379:
2814:
5245:
5073:
4812:
4511:
4147:
682:
2964:
1659:
1581:
4921:
the more current sources over the last 5 years. That last one includes Utah journalism that sometimes writes updated pieces with expert quotes, and scholarly work like books, theses, and scholarly journals (UHQ, JMH, BSQ, Dialogue). New source material has been published, but I haven't put in the time to keep current with it, and we'd have to scan through recent published work to identify the new sources. ——
4990:
construction" tag, and insert a bunch of small other warning-type tags about each broken reference, etc., into each row as necessary. And work ahead from there over the next month or two, going back and forth with each separate tabernacle article toimprove them too and resolve the dates and sources issues. And post at Talk pages of individual tabernacles about their issues and recruit other editors to help.
646:) 05:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Either you people have not searched the true beliefs of Affirmation, or you do not accept the word of the Lord. Affirmation holds as a bisic tenet that homosexual relations are acceptable. This is in direct violation of the teachings of the Lord. They try to often speak as open advocates for acceptance, but they want acceptance through rejecting the teachings of the Lord.
4023:
3517:
3442:
3233:
5333:
3128:
4695:
567:
carefully on that. And I do believe in Earth's spirit. I also believe a variety of other things that, once I said with a calm straight face, had other Mormon editors blowing up at me in talk pages. My orthodoxy is anathema to many of them, as much of their orthodoxy is anathema to me. But I still believe in Joseph Smith, in free agency, and in a highly critical
2438:
much non-LDS scholarly review of the Hypo, so opinions of mainstream
Egyptologists have been hard to find. I chose to use observations and commentary of Egyptian language and writing by Wilkinson, Betro and others as they apply to the images and let the reader decide how accurate Joseph Smith's explanations come to the current understanding of hieroglyphics.
2215:"... Smith gave instructions to his woodcut engraver on the missing portions of Facsimile No. 2, evidently telling him to insert some characters for the sake of aesthetics but Joseph Smith made no attempt to interpret those characters on the facsimile, which he certainly would have done if he was as daring and/or as stupid as many critics style him."
410:(i.e. senior lecturers at a university) so he must have meant something different. The discussion is whether he meant "those who profess", (i.e. everyone who adheres to the religion, a much more common meaning than used now) or merely all the leaders. The only evidence we have is an LDS reference to a Bible verse that implies he meant everyone.
1847:
2338:
2867:
it might be interpreted as a Church which is forming (or devolving) into factions and special interest groups. Remember that most modern churches have gone through (or are going through) division, schisms, and reorganizations. So it wouldn't be surprising that this kind of terminology could confuse people.
4920:
I think this article could be ready for mainspace if we: (1) fix the remaining messy dates, since this is such basic information and shouldn't be fraught with disagreement; (2) clean up the poor references, especially broken links where we can no longer tell what the reference even was; (3) reference
2934:
I still hope that in quietly referring to liberal
Mormons it makes it more ordinary and provides further evidence that loyal Mormons do not have to fit the cultural/social/political mold. I suspect that there are liberals throughout the Mormon people (more than you'd think, though still a minority),
1157:
has published a long string of pro-immigration reform articles, and I can go on. Utah
Republicans are more pro-immigration reform than Michigan Democrats. The reason Utah Democrats have fared so poorly over the last two decades is because so many of them rejected Bill Orton as not a real Democrat.
998:
Well, keep up the work of creating articles in wikipedia. If you need help in preserving an article ask me, and I will try and see what I can do to prevent deletions. I have occasionally managed to dig up more sources or find language in wikipedia's notability guidelines to save articles, but after
994:
I am still hoping to find ways to resore a few of the recently deleted articles, but am mostly thinking once I get someone to give me access to the texts of the articles I had deleted I will move them to mormonwiki.com . That site is largely focused on primariy doctrinal issues, as it was created by
990:
series, who has also written several other works. However you might have intended to write an article on the baptist pastor Dennis A. Wright who for a time was head of the Utah
Mission, Inc. It gets really confusing, especially since there is another Dennis A. Wright who is an author from Australia
501:
Really... I hadn't thought there was much of an ambiguity. When it comes to Utah, "liberal" tends to still mean conservative, but I'm not from the area either. Not from the continent, even. I'd be considered more of a liberal in
California or Massachusetts terms, and maybe center-left in European
5474:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
5409:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
5027:
I'm also worried that a reader might see the incomplete data and just enter data from one of the sources, not recognizing that some of those details don't agree with some other sources. But those disagreements on the cited facts can be worked out on the talk page or in reverts or edit comments. In
3951:
I haven't had many reverts, but I am really glad you pointed this out to me. I had no idea about this further clarification. It seems that children in same-sex households may receive all ordinances as long as (1) they had already been baptized (presumably before entering such a household), and (2)
2870:
I commend you for your willingness to question and discover things as they really are. I think that is the scientific method alluded to in the Book of Mormon's "Faith as a seed" analogy. I just wonder if the label you are using for your approach to spiritual discovery is perhaps a possible stumbling
1631:
She's really not showing up very much. I'm not sure where else to search, but you can try Google using "christy best" followed by some logical word like byu, centerville, mormon, church, lds, utah, archive, document, manuscript, etc. You'll have to wade through a ton of irrelevant junk and you may
1144:
Well, I have never had anyone at Mormon wiki gripe about any article I create. Although you do have a point about
Midgley, I think you also have to bear in mind how frustrating it is to deal with liars like Quinn. Quinn is really annoying, all the more so because he is praised as a great historian
1041:
is that I have been very active my entire life, yet didn't know about many significant, unpleasant historical matters. When I found out, it was as told by critics, or in rumors with lots of misinformation. The Church made some efforts to revise, control, suppress or sanitize history to protect the
947:
My first reaction to your statements about Faith Promoting verses Frank history is that it is a false diachotomy. I would recomend the reading of works by Louis Midgley and Gary Novak (Novak is his last name, I might be off on the first) who point out that the claim to historical accuaracy is built
609:
Well said. I greatly respect one who can ask hard questions, explore the issue deeply, and have the courage to face conclusions that might challenge our life's plans and assumptions. I also tread carefully on many subjects, and often hesitate to make decisions because I want to grasp both sides of
539:
As a self-described Liberal Mormon (from California), I also think the Church needs more liberal voices and tolerance of dissent. Some people have a way of respectfully disagreeing with the larger Church, without making enemies or condemning themselves (I don't know how to do that yet). Utah isn't
527:
Does "Liberal Mormon" describe one's politics or religion, and to what degree? Are they Democrats? Socialists? Green? Do they reject certain doctrines or want to reform the Church. Do they disagree with some Church policies or culture? Are they are bearded men? Working mothers? War opponents?
347:
Interesting Johnpacklambert how you seem to know my mind. To state my POV clearly, I am not here to speak ill of those who defend the Book of Mormon. I am only interested in facts and keeping balance in all of the articles I edit. I welcome any criticism and look forward to working with you and Rich
302:
I have noticed this issue coming up with some of the things I do. I know that I am stating the truth, however make sure that there is a source. I applaud you for all the work you have done, especially on destabalizing some of Descartes 1979s anti-Mormon articles. He is a BYU grad and an ex-Mormon
4279:
I read through everything I could find on that talk page, and in the AfD discussion, and I don't know where to come down on this. I don't know whether the notability criteria should be challenged or reduced to simpler data inputs, or whether they should be guidelines that allow for argumentation.
2866:
Either way I am a little concerned that we might be wise to look for a better term. I say this because I think people outside the Church context might not see this merely as a healthy reflection of a Church which has a broadening culture and tolerance and is not scared to look to its past, but that
2862:
Just a question for clarity. You identify as a "Liberal Mormon." I am trying to wrap my brain around the term. Do you mean you are a Liberal politically (i.e. Libertarian a la Ron Paul or Liberal a la Harry Reid)? Or am I right that is it more of a sense that you are comfortable looking at the full
2437:
Feel free to re-format/contribute to the article. It's been a couple of years since I started it and my scripting skills are quite out of date. I would be happy to provide further source references. I was attempting to gather material that was relevant to the matter. I don't think there has been
2234:
I don't have any strong feelings of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers. My take is that Joseph Smith didn't know Egyptian and organized an effort to devise the papyri's language, with hopes that God would reveal the answers when they studied it out in their minds. My feeling is that Mormons are free to
1725:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page
1089:
I feel bad that some of your creations have been deleted. Your many, many contributions reveal you have much more energy than me. I can't say whether all articles met Knowledge's notability criteria, but I like increased information availability and I recognize the importance in the LDS community
1052:
Historiographical integrity could also be measured by this dichotomy, though those labels are as subjective as "faith-promoting" and "frank". I doubt we can achieve detached objectivity since our views are always tainted by our own bias and culture. And authors often pejoratively accuse others of
613:
Those who explore LDS history honestly know that the Church has made mistakes and created problems. And I'm not naive enough to think that our modern day is superior. We have problems that someday people will look back on and be thankful are in the past. For example, I'm sure happy I didn't have
370:
If this is a personal squabble, I'd rather not have it played out on my talk page. Again, I respect you both greatly as Wikipedians in my same areas of interest, so I'm flattered you'd take notice of me, but please consider the civility of your tone. I don't want this getting in the way of future
328:
Just for the record, I do feel I've contributed good material to Knowledge, but I have no beef with Descartes1979. One can make good and true contributions to Mormon articles without being sympathetic to it. His views may not match my faith, but I'm not on a crusade against anyone here. I'd like
90:
were removed. I can download both books' PDFs as well as see the full view in the Google Books web display. A few pages are skipped in the web display, but the downloaded PDF shows these as scanned blank pages. I'll probably restore these links since I can't see indications of withheld content.
5031:
As you said, volunteers are more likely to want to help if it's in mainspace, instead of draftspace that might never get published. I am also interested the resulting mainspace article still having me as the author of the baseline work. I'm a little embarrassed by my own vanity about this, but I
4997:
Note, a mainspace list-article does not have to be perfectly self-contained. Where there is an existing separate tabernacle article, a list-article row can/should be a summary, and does not even need to repeat the detailed referencing in the separate tabernacle article. Perhaps issues like source
4916:
Sadly I never finished my work on these pages, but I would love to find a way to do so. I put an enormous amount of work into trying to nail down all the messy details. I still do not believe it is ready for publication, because there are numerous conflicting basic details or poor sources in the
3927:
states: "When a child living with such a same-gender couple has already been baptized and is actively participating in the Church, provisions of Section 16.13 do not require that his or her membership activities or priesthood privileges be curtailed or that further ordinances be withheld." Thus, I
1032:
I didn't want to set up an all-embracing dichotomy for history, just to reveal my appreciation for history that unabashedly lays out all sides and evidence, "warts and all," to quote Bushman. I think I'm like many Mormons, who love their history and don't want bombshells dismissed or suppressed.
637:
I suggest a reading of Louis Migley's comments on the term "liberal Mormon". He talks about a self-declared group of Liberal Mormons who used to term to describe their "liberation" from the Church. I also think you need to work harder to sepearate The Church for the members. In the Doctrine and
566:
Yeah, I guess those are a lot of different things to consider. Perhaps it's less important that someone else thinks you are liberal, and more of what you consider for yourself. And I consider myself a liberal, both socially and politically. I do believe in a Heavenly Mother, though I tread very
425:
Oops, sorry for the misstep. I should checked first before the edit. In my defense, professors can be any instructors or teachers (not necessarily at a college), which is how I read JS. I doubted JS would think all adherents corrupt, such as his family members, unless corrupt meant mistaken. I
5177:
Thank you! I am grateful for this IP block exemption, and I too hope we can figure out a better long-term solution. At the moment, I do not understand what you mean by "Your Rich jj account is not blocked though a hardblock of your chosen IP seems to keep you from editing." My network seems to
4911:
I have myself created many big list-articles, and the list of LDS tabernacles is the kind of thing I would start, although probably not doing as good a job as you have already. I usually just work in mainspace. Hmm, i wonder, if you are not active right now in Knowledge, if I could move them to
2784:
I remember that you had commented somewhere or another that sometimes you've encountered !voters in rfds that take LDS sources as overly local or regional to help establish notability, or something to that effect. I used a statistical approach--citing the 2% of the US pop that are LDS--in an rfd
1491:
I don't think she is an ideal subject for a Knowledge article. She hasn't really published doesn't seem to have visible influence. As you note, her career has been working behind the scenes in the Church Archives, so there is little mention of her anywhere. What I found I've divided into these
409:
Hi. Thanks for your contributions to this article, but the actual meaning of the words in use are under debate on the talk page of that article. Please don't just wade in and apply your interpretation. It's very unlikely that Joseph Smith meant the 'common' interpretation of the word 'professors'
306:
On another note, if you want to add someone to a category, remember it is good to mention in the article that they belong in that category first. I think you have done fairly good on this, but that is what this discussion section made me think of. Even if there are links to sources that clearly
5215:
I do not know why this network gives me an internet-facing IP address from those Amazon ranges. I am inside an organization's network, which has its own IT department that designed and manages this network with an eye toward security and risk isolation. I don't have detailed knowledge of their
4672:
to update the article to give a more current picture of the company. I have had several discussions with editors on the Talk page, and one of the points editors have raised is how the article does not actually explain how the company exists today. There has been some great discussion on the Talk
2414:
I wanted to say you're welcome on the new Deseret Book images. I've been using the educational version of Adobe Creative Suite to extract the SVG images from public Adobe PDF files from LDS-related entities. If you don't know much about SVG, it is a vector graphic which means a small file with
1781:
are not unwarranted or misplaced at all. In fact, you raised some valid points. Thank you for contributing to the discussion, and I hope you will participate in more of the discussions on our noticeboards. These discussions help familiarize users with the finer points of applying our policies
5023:
I suppose I'm open to having my work moved into mainspace. I'm self conscious about how messy it looks right now, and an unfavorable reader can use a lot of valid criticisms against the article. It got messy because once I started into the research I found so much inconsistency among the best
183:
Perhaps those adding categories (myself included) should take it upon themselves to add the relevant details to the article first. As for sources, I admit I still haven't found the definitive reference where he went public as a Democrat. With overwhelming Republican pressures in his religious
1026:
I agree that faith-promoting history and frank history can be the same thing. I don't believe honest history must be controversial (but it might help). I also don't believe modern historical work should be perfect. Accurate history is problematical because sources are scarce, objectivity is
3104:
Believe it or not the newsletter has been well received. We have received as many compliments as complaints, of which there were about 10. This mailing was huge: the recipient-to-complaint ratio is only 0.7% And we got over 400 pageviews. Oh--between you and me I was not in favor of the Lent
951:
Even at that, I think you have created a false diachotomy. Fred Woods, Ricahrd I. Kimball and many others tell history how it was, yet especially in the case of Woods he also throwns in quotes like "I had put my idols all upon the atar and there was no turning back". I would say that "faith
21:
I don't understand the point of providing links to google books for books that they do not provide the complete text for. If there's just snippet views provided, what's the point? Does WP have a policy on this? If the full text is provided, then I can see that would be a useful external link.
4989:
It remains there is no proper list-article in mainspace. Order-wise, I would be inclined to move yours _right now_ to mainspace and link to it from the navigation template and the "Tabernacle (LDS Church)" article. And per your concerns about dates and sources, put on it an overall "under
2758:, as I think it's important to have this available ASAP. I'd suggest also moving the list you've created to its separate public page. You could leave the sandbox page for personal (historical edit) reference, but it'd be nice to have at least a limited tabernacle list readily available... ~
1980:
I mean seriously, do you really think if you read that article to most LDS in the Church they would be happy with its tone, scope and sequence? If so we are unlikely to agree on anything. If not, please don't ever try to speak for my POV again. They appear on opposite sides of the issue.
1973:
Please recognize when you do that you instantly paint an image of what common LDS thought and POV is. But seriously, do not assume you represent my opinion or POV just because we are both LDS. In fact, judging from your willingness to distance yourself from being a "Utah Mormon" (another
4523:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
3067:
Thanks for unsubscribing me. I could have done it myself but didn't get around to it (after I learned it was an option). I still don't think I should even have to unsubscribe when I am a member of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, not WikiProject Christianity. Maybe it's okay to
4824:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
3992:
I do not have a strong position on this, but my take was that this wasn't clear from the beginning. Amidst conflicting unofficial early reports and later PR clarifications, some suggested that this was merely a policy, subject to change or refinement. It wasn't announced from the
1673:, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see
528:
Evolution proponents? Liberals may like extreme Mormon ideas (Heavenly Mother, female priesthood, Earth's spirit), or doubt Mormon supernaturalism. Maybe they believe more, maybe they believe less. It's hard for me to define, because I think of a wide spectrum. I think both
4944:
109:
I noticed links to archive.org texts weren't removed, so maybe something strange was happening with your access to GB. It appears all the Talmage GB links were also full views. I'll restore them too. I admire your contributions to WP and no offense taken, Good Ol’factory.
5032:
really did put a lot of work and passion into this for a few years, and I'd like my account in the edit history as introducing the text instead of another account that just copied it over to mainspace. I'm thinking a move would accomplish this for the List article. For the
3556:
3481:
1584:
955:
A more broad delination would be polemical verses detached. Yet some of the most polemical histories are the works of such authors as D. Michael Quinn (what can be more polemical than an attempt to claim Joseph Smith was a homosexual) and Palmer (aka Peter Pry Jr.).
1027:
unattainable, and we don't easily identify with the relative culture of people and events in different times and circumstances. I'm a history enthusiast, not a trained historian, so I don't know the accepted methodology and I hope this makes sense to other people too.
3105:
thing--but the editor-in-chief was insistent. Anyway if just 1 editor returns to active editing, whether at LDS, or SDA, or even Salem Witch Trials, then this would have been worth it. I hope sharing the big picture gives you a new appreciation of the possibilites. –
2098:
I'm not an authority so I might not know of several major sources on this topic. I have found several pro-Mormon sources by actual scholars, though I expect any writings on these contested issues to be challenged by other compentent experts, inside and outside the
1090:
of general authorities, BYU professors, authors and historical figures. I agree that some of your articles definitely should not have been deleted, especially the two you mentioned. I hope those can be appealed since I'm sure they'll be recreated again someday.
4948:
1153:) 05:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC) I guess I also have to take issue with previous claims that Utah is overwhelmingly dominated by conservatives. Ray L. Huntington is a profeesed Democrat, David Magleby is one of the biggest defenders of campaign finance reform, The
1005:
and an article on a one-time majority leader of the Arizona State Senate deleted, I am beganing to realize that even people who tell you to go read the notability guidelines to see why your article was deleted often have no clue what these guidelines actually
1917:. In the future I'll just add the category back rather than reverting someone else's edit that removed it. By the way, I find your work outstanding. Whenever I see your name pop up on one of the pages on my watchlist, I always know it was a good edit.
4159:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
4074:
4062:
3568:
3493:
3051:
Rich, I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused by the newsletter delivery. I'm going to personally unsubscribe you to prevent future deliveries. This is the first issue of the relaunch and I appreciate your patience as we get things straightened out. –
322:
I went ahead and added the references supporting the category in question (although I would have liked more explicit/direct ones). I agree with your philosophy that articles should explain the categories used, and I know I should clean up my act on
3258:
3097:
How? WP:LDS was founded in 2004, has 4 FAs, 97 members and 3983 articles. I think there could be and should be more LDS articles and more LDS FAs. But you need more members. When this newsletter hits the talk pages of your members most of them will
5178:
perpetually use IPs from multiple blocked ranges (associated with Amazon, I think). These ranges clearly look blocked to me, and I do not have a choice in what IP I am assigned by this network. Let me know any additional input I can provide. ——
2235:
accept or reject the KEP, along with much of the fringe in Mormonism. Others might be less generous, such as critics ("This disproves Mormonism!") or fundamentalists ("The KEP is like scripture!"). Nibley seems to be widely cited on this topic:
2840:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
1974:
condescending if not stereotypical thing to do)I am left to assume you do not represent mainstream LDS thought. If that is the case, please include that in your writing so that individuals like myself aren't put in their place by an associate.
2624:
I am very interested in these subjects. I was looking forward to Ardis Parshall's encyclopedia but didn't know it had already been published. My time is very limited so I don't know if I will be able to address these articles anytime soon.
1969:
Man, it sure is annoying when people point the guns inward. I find it very frustrating having people attack my position because they are LDS and don't think the same way I do. The term for that is condescending, and it is very poor etiquette.
4583:
I've updated the page about the Hymnal to use titles and copied from the lds.org site. It appears you were working on a project like that and I would *love* for you to look over my work and help improve it. I'm a non-member husband of an LDS
4617:
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Knowledge that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
965:
However, at least two articles you planned on creating I created and have since seen them deleted. One was on Ray L. Huntington. It is a good question to ask, are his writtings enough to make him notable. Personally I thought his bio of
5216:
network design and why IT uses these IP addresseIs, since I'm just a user on their network. I have used this organization's network to edit Knowledge in the past, so I assume they transitioned to this address range sometime this year. ——
4603:
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at
5323:
4883:
196:
Attorney Lew Cramer helped the Republican National Committee recruit 1,000 Utah students, mostly Mormon, for President Bush's re-election campaign in "battlefront states." Then he called "Jeopardy" phenom Ken Jennings. One problem.
1033:
Lets talk about the controversy and get it out on the table. I agree with B.H. Roberts view to not fear critical examination, and try to follow where reason takes us. I prefer history that tries to discover rather than advocate.
2220:" never tried to claim was accurate... He produced, or one of his assistants produced, an aesthetically pleasing symmetrical document ... and Joseph scrupulously avoids claiming to translate or explain any resulting gibberish!"
4475:
3466:
5156:
Hello Rich jj. I saw your unblock request on the OTRS system. Your Rich jj account is not blocked though a hardblock of your chosen IP seems to keep you from editing. Though it's a bit unorthodox, I have granted you temporary
3147:
1561:
985:
The other aritcle you planned on writing that I did and had deleted was on Dennis A. Wright. That was a complexed write, since there are many Dennis A. Wrights. I assume you planned on writting one on the co-author of the
3082:
I definitely see your point about WP:X sending newsletters out to other projects. I just wanted to share with you that the newsletter is not a WP:X newsletter, nor a "mainline Christianity" newsletter, but a newsletter for
1061:, he looks un-detached and polemical. I enjoy and agree with most FARMS publications, but I wish they'd defend their positions more and expose their enemies less. Quinn and Palmer can be answered in respectful civility.
5192:
Glad you made it here. But how does it happen that you are editing from an Amazon range? If you prefer not to discuss here, you could turn on Knowledge email in your preferences and we could continue privately. Thanks,
1632:
not find anything worth using. I can't say the sources I found can establish notability. I'm actually interested in knowing what she did at the archives during the 70s, when Leonard Arrington was around. Good luck.
2844:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. –
283:
Thanks for clarifying. I'm not sure how the information would be integrated into the article, but I'm at least satisfied that some sources actually exist. Wish there was a better way to provide sources for categories.
5033:
4969:
4905:
2652:
4367:
3767:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
3552:
3477:
1079:
section some time ago, and it has since expanded to include everything I want to see if it gets created (turns blue). Many of those articles really wouldn't be notable. I just renamed it to the more accurate
486:
And thanks for making it! I'm sure there are many liberal Mormons active within Knowledge, but I doubt many users look through all the userboxes. Plus, there's the ambiguity about what a liberal Mormon is.
3056:
22:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Incidentally, it is not a Catholic newsletter--WPCatholic was just featured for January. It is for all Christianity-related subprojects. LDS will be featued in an upcoming issue. –
995:
the Mormon Good Foundation, but no one seems to have objected to any of the biographies I have created there, even though the only reason to many of them is that they were not being wlecomed in wikipedia.
2670:
I would love others to help edit this page in my userspace. I'd like to keep it here since I already have an extensive history of edits that could be useful for me to find past information that I may have
5161:
which will at least for the moment allow you to edit through the blocked IP. If you can respond here, please do so because long term we should figure out a better way for you to access the system. Thanks,
1727:
4576:
4993:
I would be less happy to ever help on a draftspace list which might not ever get promoted to mainspace, and could be "beaten" at any time by anything crappy being started in mainspace. Been there, done
1619:
1158:
When a LDS Democrat breaks with the party as clearly as did Orin Hatch with the Republican party on the issue of tobacco regulation than, and only then, will the Democrats be able to get many LDS votes.
5272:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
5100:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
4836:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
4535:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
4171:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
638:
Covenants the Lord describes the Church as "The Only true and living Church with which I the Lord am well pleased". So I think we need to bear in mind the Church is perfect, but the members are not.
3123:
Hi there - I am the Director, Community Advocacy for the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit that supports Knowledge. It's very important that I talk to you - would you please email me at philippe
4058:
2058:
I will help where I can. I may have my opinions but I'm not much of an expert. I'm certainly willing to try to find more authoritative sources related to any specific questions you may have. ——
5345:
540:
devoid of tolerance, but it's in a strongly conservative region and produces conservative church leaders. And questioning your leaders or finding fault with their positions is quite taboo. -
959:
This explains why some of the aritcles you plan on creating I would never bother making. yet, I am making this post because I have in fact created some of the articles you plan on creating.
2707:
like the one above, I think you'd get several people that are likely to help. Since it's your userpage, I'd rather that you announce it directly, rather than me mention it, if that's OK. --
4673:
page. As disclosure, I do have a financial conflict of interest, as I am here on behalf of Magnetar Capital as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Are you interested in reviewing this request?
2551:, btw. (Sort of.) And you might also notice that I sort of cheated w/regard to Hagland, Parshall, and Stapley. That is, I did a quick paraphrase of their bottom-of-the-page bio blurbs from
426:
carelessly assumed this was straining to criticize JS on everything, but I see now that there is foundation to this issue. Thank you for your careful explanation of the issue to me here.
4577:
3156:
3149:
2024:
thank you very much for working on this article. i kind of rewrote some of it to be more 'just the facts' style.. figured i cant go wrong with the basic facts, you know? thank you again.
1717:
307:
prove they belong in the category unless it states in the article "Smith is a Latter-day Saint", "Jones attended Yale" or "Philips is a Republican" people are likely to complain about it.
169:? I'm not saying he isn't, but there's nothing in the article to support it. (It's always kinda bothered me that categories don't seem to have any convenient way of attaching a source.)
143:
I found a source that says Jensen became Church historian in 2005; that the position was not filled by anyone from 1997 to 2005; and that Larsen held the position from 1985 to 1997. See
2837:
1647:
5288:
5116:
4852:
4551:
4187:
3825:
3820:
3254:
2901:
This isn't the first time that I've totally overlooked a comment on my talk page for years. Maybe nobody will see this, so this reply is mostly for me to explain something to myself.
2043:
Hey Rich, I was wondering if you could answer some questions of mine with regard to the Book of Abraham? You seem to have some background with regard to the subject. Let me know! --
3994:
3975:
3829:
2388:
848:
I agree. The present form of the article makes it look like his most notable act is being on the Joseph Smith Papers staff. I'll do my best to find some better sources. Thanks!
3852:
5258:
5086:
4453:
2470:
5363:
3812:
1711:
1666:
1652:
2615:
3974:
there is mostly unnecessary because I'm sure the church would say that all policy changes are revelation. All such details probably have their place somewhere in the article
1053:
polemics in order to support their own polemical position. This includes some from FARMS, who I enjoy reading and often agree with, including Midgley himself. When Midgley
3168:
2576:
to go with on them. But I have no idea who these other guys are----well...I of course read a lot of Ardis Parshall's blogposts, too, and know of Stapley and Hagland through
2557:
and instead of making them into stand-alone blp's, I simply put a quick biographical paragraph in about them where they'd been listed already by somebody as contributors to
4220:
Community input is politely requested for Jimbo's tkpg with regard ur expertise in gen. notability per wp:GNG & applicabilities of eg wp:PROF, wp:AUTH, etc. w/in AfD's
2704:
2648:
2380:
2294:
4361:
4612:
2275:
1577:
5450:
5435:
2572:
Anyway, the reason I took a stab at MacKinnon and Briggs is because I've read their stuff (just one paper of McKinnon's but four or five of Briggs's). So I had that
2909:: My use of the Liberal Mormon userbox is something more bold than I'm normally inclined. I don't like to stake ideological claims, especially publicly. But you,
4721:
3017:
3012:
3007:
3002:
925:
4593:
1751:
1100:
I really like the idea of MormonWiki as an alternative that is more tolerant of all Mormon information. I have a few reservations that I hope improve over time:
5470:
3390:
3345:
3173:
2871:
block for those following behind you. I'm in no way suggesting you hide who you are, merely that you're prudent in the way you self-label so as not to confuse.
897:
579:
personal take. ^^ I certainly knew that not all liberal Mormons would be carbon clones of me—why should they? There are all sorts of ways people are liberal. -
4274:
4091:
3701:
3300:
2786:
1243:
Great job! I just turned the name blue ("into a link"...) so you really ought to put it in the column in your talkpage project page for "articles created" IMO.
2310:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
5433:
4666:
article and participated in discussions on its Talk page; I'm wondering if you still have any interest in this topic? If so, would you be open to reviewing
2803:
5478:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
5413:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
2306:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
3869:
3656:
3585:
2821:
2805:
2415:
mathematical formulas to draw the letters and shapes, so it can scale to any size and avoids pixelated images. Glad to get some feedback on the work. :D
1610:
2651:
about creating an article about LDS Tabernacles. In trying to prepare for creating that, I noticed a link on one of the tabernacle images that pointed to
4205:
3816:
2519:
975:
4498:
4408:
2634:
2489:
1421:
sounds too promotional/positive/feature storyish, I think. Could you step in and tweak it to have moreso of the dryness appropriate to an encyclopedia?
737:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
4403:
3191:
5314:
2495:
2477:
1187:
254:
5142:
4870:
4569:
2186:"Understanding Facsimile 2 of the Book of Abraham" (no link) by James R. Harris in the Sidney B. Sperry Symposium on the Pearl of Great Price (1982)
1129:
For now, I still feel like Knowledge's fussiness helps produce a better product, and its visibility makes it a more important place to contribute.
1124:
There are fewer editors to provide peer-reviews, quality improvements, and verify citations (except for in quotations, references aren't even used).
3035:
1987:
You stated in your first sentence an inkling you ought not to have posted. That inkling I would call inspiration. next time, please, listen to it.
942:
4254:
3187:
3102:
A precious few of your inactive members will login to find out what's going on at WP:LDS. Hopefully a few of those will return to active editing.
5385:
5370:
4325:
4136:
2849:
2373:
921:
3796:
2683:
Sections haven't been written for their historical development/significance and cultural role. I have only gathered some notes on those topics.
1807:
I would just like to thank you for all the work you have done to expand the article on Dr. Law. It has been greatly inproved through your work.
303:
who is determined to speak ill of those who defend the Book of Mormon and the Book of Abraham, so I applaud you for having difused his attacks.
4773:
4640:
4315:
4293:
3808:
3546:
1469:
1167:
1015:
3430:
3385:
3221:
2592:
1552:
5405:
4715:
4331:
4131:
3741:
3340:
2513:
2025:
1375:
1112:
It can't link to various non-Mormon subjects that are relevant and informative (civic groups, academic institutions, historical events, etc).
3834:
4657:
4235:
4047:
3909:
3696:
3651:
1535:
1387:
1338:
1304:
1268:
1001:
663:
464:
4686:
1984:
You just undermined in one posting my dignity, my contribution to the discussion, and any influence for good I may have potentially had.
1106:
It lacks many important Mormon articles that Knowledge has and needs a lot of expansion on its other articles (this might change someday).
5493:
5368:
5235:
4448:
817:
I second that. Nice work particularly on trying to separate all the mission presidents from the missionary categories. That's a big job!
5063:
4804:
4503:
3846:
3541:
2863:
expanse of Church History to a point that the imperfections of the early brethren don't keep you up nights worrying about such things?
2794:
2611:
2588:
1831:
1766:
1641:
1138:
676:
338:
4303:
4006:
3987:
3965:
2680:
I haven't had access to an important 2005 thesis on the subject by Aaron McArthur (listed in the sources at the bottom of the article)
2265:
2093:
2067:
1936:
880:
866:
857:
838:
article per your explanation. It would be good if the article could be expanded, because as it stands right now he looks non-notable.
762:
130:
119:
104:
65:
44:
5458:
5393:
4784:
4753:
4652:
4428:
4111:
3889:
3721:
3676:
3601:
3410:
3365:
3320:
3201:
2826:
2773:
2466:
if ya could throw a few words out there into article space--- um, say, for an article stubs or even mini-stubs for one or another of
1460:
I was going to create an article on her, especially since she was listed as one of the geniuses of Joseph Smith documents along with
480:
396:
380:
357:
292:
274:
4613:
http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_brZ0V6EwEhnGFcp&Q_CHL=gl
2731:
2697:
2156:
435:
2944:
2878:
1529:
5225:
5202:
5187:
4261:
September 9, 2016)? Please chime in on a way to determine such questions in a much more consistent manner than at present...here:
4086:
3590:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to
1578:
Author of "Guide to sources for studies of Mormon women: In the Church Archives, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints"
623:
588:
549:
511:
496:
5337:
1547:
862:
Nice improvement on the article. It certainly is quite an improvement! and makes notability more obvious than it was initially.
61:. I tried to get full views but could not no matter what I tried, so I deleted the links. You can restore them if I'm mistaken.
5428:
5053:
5010:
3746:
3580:
3109:
3077:
2798:
2745:
2400:
1731:
1648:
1231:
962:
Where they still exists, the situation is pretty neutral and I would welcome any helpful edits you can make to the articles.
742:
316:
3505:
3194:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1921:
419:
4952:
4749:
4424:
4421:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
4382:
4107:
4104:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
4016:
3885:
3882:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3842:
3717:
3714:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3672:
3669:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3597:
3594:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3406:
3403:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3361:
3358:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3316:
3313:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
3197:
2790:
2607:
2584:
329:
all viewpoints represented and I've really appreciated contributions made by both you and Descartes1979. Kudos to you both.
177:
151:
5310:
5138:
4939:
Thank u for ur reply and notice to my talk page. i appreciate ur conscientiousness then and now. Hmm, now there are also
4866:
4668:
4565:
4349:
4212:
4201:
4097:
3792:
2603:
2449:
2085:
2044:
572:
465:
1279:
Started stubs for BBC and T&S too. Don't bother with your time to reply to my having given you this notice, of course.
100:
OK, I must be doing something wrong. I'll fiddle around with it some more too. Feel free to restore the links, and sorry.
3838:
3510:
1914:
928:
for deletion. I suspect you'll disagree with me on these, which is fine- I don't want the deletions to sneak by. Cheers,
184:
community, perhaps he guards his politics. Speculation aside, my sources are mostly inferences and second-hand reports:
842:
701:
Most of the sources appear to be self-published or non-independent sources. Wouldn't appear to pass WP:BIO/WP:POLITICIAN
225:
5341:
5325:
4912:
mainspace anyhow? Better than creating a duplicative, separate list in mainspace. --Doncram 08:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
4648:
4399:
4311:
4270:
4231:
3779:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
3435:
3142:
3133:
wikimedia.org at your earliest opportunity? Again, it's very important and urgent that I speak with you. Thank you.
2708:
2656:
1957:
1596:
1392:
1172:
937:
404:
144:
5171:
4630:
3945:
2424:
2298:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2223:
1485:
614:
to live through the black priesthood ban. But hope for a brighter future doesn't make current problems any easier. -
4739:
4414:
2429:
2006:
1555:
915:
2895:
1816:
4930:
4899:
2716:
2664:
1904:
1407:
707:
166:
156:
26:
5306:
5134:
4862:
4561:
4466:
4197:
3788:
3471:
2454:
2172:
1674:
746:
711:
138:
4343:
2010:
1950:
1943:
1186:
And, how I spat out what's currently there is not as fun as REAL ocean surfing but here goes. I'd never noticed
4635:
3971:
3711:
2768:
2130:
2116:
5454:
4298:
I think your somewhat more exclusionist of bent than my own does not align all that well with what it says at
3864:
2311:
2033:
952:
promoting" and "frank" are not the only, or even necesarily the most likely delineations of forms of history.
821:
696:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
5001:
Could we possibly work together along those lines? I do hope we can capture, build upon your good work. :) --
4799:
4644:
4413:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
4395:
4307:
4266:
4227:
4096:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3953:
3929:
3875:
3874:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3707:
3706:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3662:
3661:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3624:
3609:
3533:
3458:
3395:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3350:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3305:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
3178:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
126:
I think I got things working now (just so you know), and it was my fault. Sorry again for the inconvenience.
3257:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
1364:
459:
5281:
5158:
5151:
5109:
4877:
4845:
4598:
4544:
4339:
4262:
4223:
4180:
2583:
Anyway, Rich, if you're able to, thanks! Otherwise, if you'd not be able to do it right away, no problem.--
1910:
1885:
1553:
Author of "Report of the Survey of Selected Territorial Records Extant at the Utah State Archives" in 1987.
471:
Wow, someone actually used the userbox I designed! I was skeptical anyone else ever would. Thanks. ^_^ -
234:. (No, that's not really such an unusual combination.) I suspect Jennings would never vote for Mitt Romney.
3295:
1355:
Thankyou for fixing up and improving the article on Lynn M. Hilton. It is a lot better due to your edits.
258:
218:
in both the House and Senate and Donald Rumsfeld's departure from the White House (follow his hyperlinks).
5479:
5414:
5293:
5121:
4890:
article that I just started. Hey, it looks like a great list-article, could it be moved to mainspace? --
4857:
4556:
4192:
3933:
3784:
3061:
2409:
2052:
1868:
1797:
1690:
1605:
1523:
1378:. I am posting this notice because I saw that you were a recent editor at one of the pages listed below:
1195:
1191:
689:
1927:
Since I am always impressed with your contributions, I am truly proud of such a compliment. Thanks. ——
1058:
800:
190:
40:
document in original scanned layout, usually by downloading the pdf. Which book are you referring to?
4462:
4302:, Rich jj, but I certainly appreciate your take. In any case, I've posted again on Jimbo's forum here:
3355:
3159:, I see you have made a table of all of the songs/writer/composers. Are you interesting in adding that?
1899:
1783:
1682:
1450:
1178:
827:
5348:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
4389:
2379:
I know this is a bot, so this reply is for my own reference/memory. I agree with this deletion since
1778:
1508:
910:
673:
Rich, John Dehlin here. I'd love to chat with you. Ping me if you get a sec. johndehlin@gmail.com
5462:
5397:
4735:
4726:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
3118:
2854:
2830:
2165:
1812:
1743:
1481:
1360:
1163:
1150:
1011:
715:
659:
651:
643:
312:
5389:
1677:
for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
571:, and things like that. I also believe in the Lord's love, and the Lord's acceptance, and the Lord
262:
4707:
4678:
3983:
3941:
3914:
3591:
3138:
2089:
2048:
2017:
455:
4785:
https://www.hjnews.com/news/delta-phis-come-home/article_b5c5f6cf-cbd7-540d-ae19-f61f90cc5b5e.html
991:
and who writes on time. In some cases these authors get garbled together in listings of authors.
730:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
5041:
4973:
4940:
4778:
3920:
3271:
Magazine | url=http://www.ldsmag.com/lds-church-history/article/1/11068 | accessdate=2014-05-22}}
2755:
2642:
1686:
1455:
1403:
1382:
568:
392:
353:
289:
174:
4955:(started in 2010, a navigation template which is a stripped-down kind of list). There is essay
4465:
for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our
2879:
http://www.mormontimes.com/article/16366/FAIR-conference-Secret-Mormon-codes-and-Egyptian-papers
95:'s publication links. Specifically, what parts of these texts have you have seen as incomplete?
4082:
3860:
3576:
3501:
3068:
auto-subscribe members within your own project, but not members of affiliated projects too. ——
2712:
2677:
The table is too massive and needs to be refined/condensed while still being somewhat sortable.
2660:
2078:
2. Why did Joseph's engraver try to input the missing text in the outside edge of Facsimile #2?
1791:
1696:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
1369:
758:
415:
32:
I agree limited previews are marginally useful. Sometimes books on Google Books have snippet
5269:
5097:
4833:
4532:
4168:
3924:
2890:
2688:
Do you think others would help improve and refine my article and prepare it for mainspace? ——
2420:
2002:
1964:
1913:. I think I meant to re-add that one, but I guess I forgot. My intent was just to re-add the
1802:
1689:
their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the
4472:
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can
4355:
3283:
5280:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
5198:
5167:
5108:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4884:
User:Rich jj/Sandbox/List of tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
4844:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4743:
4626:
4543:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4214:
4179:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
4034:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
3851:, I thought I'd let you know an RFC has been started over reliable sources. Please join in
3775:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3528:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
3453:
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
3351:
3291:
2548:
2445:
1994:
1808:
1737:
1678:
1509:
Owner of a historic home in Centerville, which is a registered historic site with the city.
1477:
1356:
1159:
1146:
1007:
655:
647:
639:
308:
16:
5346:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Clark Planetarium & IMAX® Theatre
3956:. It was already so complicated and lengthy, and each clarification adds more layers. ——
1503:
1177:
I don't mean to be presumptuous but was wondering if you could throw in a couple of lines
1084:, although I still want to create several of those articles (especially the ones in bold).
8:
5489:
5424:
5028:
the end, it will be nice to actually put these articles to use and continue work on them.
4711:
4703:
4682:
4674:
3979:
3937:
3780:
3134:
2507:
1918:
1881:
1864:
863:
839:
818:
750:
723:
584:
507:
476:
451:
148:
127:
101:
62:
23:
5040:
might work. Perhaps I could take a little time to copy my paragraphs into the existing
4746:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1562:
Identified as one of the numerous BYU/Church people who helped in some way with the new
1118:
Some topics or claims might not be as "positive" as The More Good Foundation would like.
4494:
4484:
4418:
4249:(The Church Historian's Press, which is an imprint of Deseret Book; 2016), notable? Is
3801:
3400:
3088:
3046:
2764:
1422:
1399:
1314:
1280:
1244:
1207:
1072:
1054:
967:
835:
828:
796:
731:
388:
349:
285:
170:
3278:
Terryl Givens said of his legacy, "Marlin Jensen has done more to further the cause of
2238:
253:
Posts and comments on various blogs show a common view of his Democratic affiliation,
5252:
5080:
5006:
4895:
4820:
4769:
4760:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4519:
4444:
4435:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4281:
4155:
4137:
4127:
4118:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
4078:
4027:
3905:
3896:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3856:
3756:
3747:
3737:
3728:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3692:
3683:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3647:
3638:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3630:
3572:
3521:
3497:
3446:
3426:
3417:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3381:
3372:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3336:
3327:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
3217:
3208:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
2559:
2501:
2369:
2356:
2193:
2160:
1784:
1715:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
1511:
1418:
754:
411:
2950:
2330:
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
2153:. I didn't read these but they might discuss the missing text in the outside edge.
5358:
5300:
5265:
5128:
5093:
5034:
User:Rich jj/Sandbox/Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
4976:? I assume urs has some different sources, material, wording? And perhaps open a
4970:
User:Rich jj/Sandbox/Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
4906:
User:Rich jj/Sandbox/Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
4829:
4795:
4663:
4589:
4528:
4250:
4164:
4052:
3776:
3760:
3246:
3226:
3183:
3179:
3164:
2910:
2882:
2779:
2653:
User:Rich jj/Sandbox/Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
2538:
2483:
2416:
2303:
2029:
2018:
1998:
1837:
1558:
This may suggest she has worked with the Utah State archives or historical society.
1071:
I should clarify that I don't intend to create articles on all the red links in my
933:
767:
92:
79:
58:
54:
4375:
1846:
5194:
5163:
4887:
4731:
4727:
4622:
3396:
3287:
3237:
2568:
for each one so that I could redirect their name directly to their teensy blurb.)
2565:
2441:
2352:
2189:
1701:
447:
2109:. It looks like they see problems with interpreting the figures as simply from
1670:
1669:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
706:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
87:
83:
5484:
5419:
5277:
5105:
4959:
about how categories, lists, and navigation templates are complementary things.
4956:
4945:
Category:Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Utah
4841:
4540:
4176:
4070:
4039:
3772:
3764:
3564:
3489:
3282:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
2307:
2282:
1877:
1860:
890:
738:
580:
503:
472:
441:
4605:
4255:
here: "The Mormon Council of Fifty: What Joseph Smith’s Secret Records Reveal"
4069:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
3970:
I'll look more into the 21st century entry. I think describing the changes as
3853:
Talk:List_of_ministers_of_the_Universal_Life_Church#RFC:_Reliable_sources here
3563:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
3488:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
2877:
Oh yeah, you seemed interested in the KEP. Thought you might be interested in
791:
For making countless edits to some important articles. Keep up the good work!
5273:
5101:
4837:
4536:
4490:
4299:
4172:
3768:
3306:
3039:
2759:
2324:
1782:
while also helping us keep an eye on articles that may need some attention.
1772:
1350:
971:
905:
792:
693:
533:
529:
3997:, though that article is still missing several details about the policy. ——
2935:
but they hide it or feel they don't belong. That's what I want changed. ——
5217:
5179:
5045:
5037:
5002:
4977:
4922:
4891:
4765:
4761:
4440:
4436:
4285:
4242:
4123:
4119:
3998:
3957:
3901:
3897:
3879:
3733:
3729:
3688:
3684:
3643:
3639:
3422:
3418:
3377:
3373:
3332:
3328:
3213:
3209:
3106:
3069:
3058:
3053:
2936:
2737:
2723:
2689:
2626:
2392:
2384:
2365:
2299:
2257:
2059:
1928:
1891:
1823:
1758:
1633:
1473:
1130:
872:
849:
615:
541:
488:
427:
372:
330:
266:
162:
111:
41:
1530:
Jensen again calls her a mentor and "tremendous scholar in her own right".
668:
5349:
4791:
4662:
Hi Rich jj! A long while back, you'd made some constructive edits to the
4585:
3160:
3030:
2247:
2242:
2198:
2134:
2038:
1461:
978:
on Palestianian families is notable. He also edited a few works such as
929:
776:
5284:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
5112:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
4848:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
4547:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
4183:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1859:
Thanks for your care and diligence, especially in editing LDS articles.
524:
I also appreciate that your graphics weren't predictable Mormon imagery.
5262:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
5090:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
4949:
Category:Tabernacles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
3087:. This is similar to the newly established Christianity Noticeboard at
1465:
1412:
810:
681:
2963:
1532:
This is from an interview conducted by the LDS blog By Common Consent.
243:
211:
5244:
5072:
4811:
4510:
4146:
3310:
1548:
Was a council member of The Utah Women's History Association in 1983.
1524:
Robin Jensen called her a genius in the field of documentary editing.
4578:
Hymns of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1985 book)
3157:
Hymns of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1985 book)
3150:
Hymns of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (1985 book)
3029:
is the newsletter of Christianity on Knowledge • It is published by
2705:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement#LDS Tabernacles
2075:
1. Why did Joseph seemingly misidentify the figures in Facsimile #3?
2838:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Brahman-Atman Yoga (2nd nomination)
2176:
2120:
1658:
1417:
My verbage in the three sentences I tossed out for the new article
4043:
3537:
3462:
3242:
3995:
Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
3976:
Homosexuality and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
3763:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
3615:
2846:
2553:
5297:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
5125:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
4480:, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
1977:
You write that you assume good faith. I don't see it this time.
5336:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
5287:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
5115:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
4851:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
4550:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
4186:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
3666:
3250:
2337:
the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click
2190:"A Translation and Commentary of the Joseph Smith Hypocephalus"
1536:
Examined the John V. Long papers prior to their potential sale.
5332:
5256:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
4304:
User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Jimmy_Wales.2C_please_offer_your_opinion
1376:
Talk:Limited geography model#Several merge proposals - my take
1313:( ^--Ditto if ya get around to writing the two of these, too.)
4330:
Owing2 2116 AML scholarship book honors for best non-fiction
2541:(and maybe somewhat sloppily, actually)--and also do a super
2351:
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off
1374:
There is a proposed merge that I think would interest you at
5044:
article, along with the tags indicating work in progress. ——
2789:, which seems a reasonable rebuttal to that sentiment IMO.--
1960:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1721:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
948:
around false assumptions about the knowability of the past.
741:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
4101:
1601:
article on the condition of the first Joseph Smith journal.
1190:'s longstanding article on Knowledge -- but, after reading
36:, but I've selected books where you may still access their
4606:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics
2327:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
718:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
5084:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
4454:
Speedy deletion nomination of Ken Garff Automotive Group
710:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
232:
Ken Jennings of Jeopardy fame is a Mormon and a Democrat
230:
I never watch the game show "Jeopardy," but I know that
5471:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Selected Manifestations
5449:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
5384:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
5268:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
5096:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4832:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4730:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
4531:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4417:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
4167:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
4100:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3936:. Thanks for your efforts to help the LDS Wikiproject.
3878:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3710:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3665:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3399:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3354:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3309:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
3182:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
2819:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2208:
2131:"All the Court's a Stage: Facsimile 3, a Royal Mumming"
1606:
Gave opinion on the provenance of an archival document.
5457:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
5392:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
4374:
4247:
The Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846
980:
The Book of Mormon and the Message of the Four Gospels
3253:
by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
2462:
ya might be so inclined...I think it would be really
999:
having seen the article on the current editor of the
216:
Jennings had high spirits from the Democratic victory
4469:
in short articles to learn what should be included.
3928:
think the information you added would apply more to
2825:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
2081:
3. What do you make of the Kirtland Egyptian Papers?
1615:
article about Church acquisition of some artifacts.
5324:"Clark Planetarium & IMAX® Theatre" listed at
2276:Orphaned non-free image File:Deseret Book logo.jpg
2149:Articles dealing with other facsimiles, including
3755:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
387:My apologies - feel free to remove my comments.--
212:on the day after the 2006 congressional elections
4722:Disambiguation link notification for September 7
3266:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
3091:. And let me also share with you that this is a
536:are liberal Mormons, but in very different ways.
4886:because it was in the "what links here" at new
3391:Disambiguation link notification for February 3
3346:Disambiguation link notification for January 16
3174:Disambiguation link notification for January 28
1526:-- I believe this is the article you mentioned.
4641:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ulisses Soares
4092:Disambiguation link notification for August 19
3809:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church
3702:Disambiguation link notification for August 28
3301:Disambiguation link notification for August 27
1757:Yeah that's my mistake. Please delete it. ——
1671:section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1055:has argumentative showdowns with his opponents
5406:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Brant Gardner
4388:
2239:"The Meaning of The Kirtland Egyptian Papers"
1712:the page that has been nominated for deletion
920:I wanted to let you know that I've nominated
4461:I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
3870:Disambiguation link notification for March 2
3657:Disambiguation link notification for July 18
3586:Disambiguation link notification for July 11
2674:The reason I haven't finished this is that:
1388:Proposed Book of Mormon geographical setting
1002:Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
4968:I have not compared them, but perhaps your
2522:--sometime in the near future! (like, um...
1620:Quoted on the same story, this time in the
208:Ken Jennings: Confessions of a Trivial Mind
4409:Disambiguation link notification for May 5
3038:• To unsubscribe add yourself to the list
1949:Hello, Rich jj. You have new messages at
1681:subjects and should provide references to
1580:, copies of which are in select libraries.
3923:because I believe they are misleading. A
1734:the page or have a copy emailed to you.
1518:Known for her documentary/archival skills
970:was quite good, and the work he did with
774:
573:not holding certain things against people
3135:Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation
2722:I'll have to do that next week or so. ——
2606:. It needs citations, eventually, tho.--
943:Philosphy, discussion and related issues
4326:WP need scholar Julie M. Smith blp stub
2173:"The Facsimiles of the Book of Abraham"
692:template has been added to the article
2344:To opt out of these bot messages, add
2117:"Facsimile 3 and Book of the Dead 125"
371:useful and interesting contributions.
5338:Clark Planetarium & IMAX® Theatre
4953:Template:Latter-day Saint Tabernacles
3240:. I have automatically detected that
3155:I'm adding back the list of songs to
2157:"Facsimiles From the Book of Abraham"
246:listing famous Mormon Democrats, and
5253:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
5081:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
4821:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
4658:Proposed updates at Magnetar Capital
4520:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
4156:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
4098:List of Latter Day Saint periodicals
3018:Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism
2604:Mormonism: A Historical Encyclopedia
466:User:Gilgamesh~enwiki/Liberal Mormon
5459:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
5394:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
5236:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
4306:, for whatever it might be worth.--
4263:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Suggested_fix
4224:User talk:Jimbo Wales#Suggested fix
2827:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2649:discussion with the LDS WikiProject
1915:Category:American Latter Day Saints
13:
5468:The discussion will take place at
5403:The discussion will take place at
5064:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
4805:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
4504:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
2962:
2647:A user at this IP recent opened a
2302:. However, the image is currently
2281:
2181:A Guide to the Joseph Smith Papyri
1942:
1726:does get deleted, you can contact
1657:
1393:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon
1202:, I discovered it, Motley, and---
680:
677:Proposed deletion of Boyd Petersen
145:Talk:Church Historian and Recorder
14:
5504:
4980:to rename/move the mainspace one?
4951:(with just 5 non-Utah ones), and
4467:suggestions for essential content
4415:Journal of Book of Mormon Studies
3781:review the candidates' statements
3013:Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
2836:The article will be discussed at
1853:The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
224:, a conservative political blog,
5442:
5377:
5344:. This discussion will occur at
5331:
5243:
5071:
4810:
4693:
4509:
4145:
4021:
3919:I reverted your recent edits to
3515:
3440:
3231:
3126:
2812:
2125:Astronomy, Papyrus, and Covenant
2072:Thanks! I'll get right to it...
1845:
1788:
1591:Quoted/cited by LDS/Utah writers
1504:Bio from the Joseph Smith Papers
809:Nice work with all you edits to
775:
5291:and submit your choices on the
5119:and submit your choices on the
4855:and submit your choices on the
4702:This is has been done. Thanks!
4554:and submit your choices on the
2791:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
2608:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
2585:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
53:Just some of the ones added to
4818:Hello, Rich jj. Voting in the
4790:Would that be enough to start?
4621:Sincere thanks for your help!
4517:Hello, Rich jj. Voting in the
4499:06:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
4153:Hello, Rich jj. Voting in the
3787:. For the Election committee,
3757:Arbitration Committee election
3748:ArbCom elections are now open!
3712:Mutual Improvement Association
2891:
2387:article. (Also stated in the
2383:has replaced this file in the
1779:WP:BLPN#Death of Bill Sparkman
1767:22:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
1752:22:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
1642:22:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
1486:19:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
460:18:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
5315:01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
5270:Knowledge arbitration process
5143:00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
5098:Knowledge arbitration process
4871:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
4834:Knowledge arbitration process
4800:15:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
4774:09:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
4594:14:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
4533:Knowledge arbitration process
4206:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
4169:Knowledge arbitration process
4017:Reference errors on 18 August
3954:Mormonism in the 21st century
3930:Ordinance (Latter Day Saints)
3876:Mormonism in the 19th century
3806:As someone interested in the
3797:13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
3708:Mormonism in the 19th century
3663:Mormonism in the 20th century
3625:Mormonism in the 20th century
3610:Mormonism in the 19th century
3534:Mormonism in the 20th century
3459:Mormonism in the 20th century
3143:06:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
2746:18:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
2732:02:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
2717:23:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
2698:14:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
2665:01:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
2341:to file an un-delete request.
2312:our policy for non-free media
1900:19:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
1886:01:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
1869:01:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
1667:People from Mulberry, Florida
1653:People from Mulberry, Florida
911:02:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
858:04:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
843:01:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
763:12:03, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
749:, where it may be deleted if
206:From a post on his own blog,
5226:15:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
5203:00:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
5188:13:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
5172:16:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
4716:21:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
4570:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
3431:09:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
3386:09:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
3222:09:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3034:For submissions contact the
3008:What are You doing For Lent?
2886:
2799:22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
2580:means, i.e., blogs, as well.
1832:21:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1817:05:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
1564:Massacre at Mountain Meadows
822:21:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
801:18:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
7:
5036:general article, I think a
4687:19:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
4190:and submit your choices on
4132:09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
4087:00:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
3934:Baptism (Latter Day Saints)
3865:23:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
3783:and submit your choices on
3742:09:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
3511:Reference errors on 10 July
3341:09:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
2896:06:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
2883:
2774:23:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
2635:03:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
2616:00:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
2593:17:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
2333:If you receive this notice
1798:11:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
1451:17:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
1059:casts others as anti-Mormon
716:Knowledge's deletion policy
624:23:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
589:20:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
550:18:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
512:08:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
497:20:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
481:20:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
436:21:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
420:20:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
397:23:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
381:23:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
358:19:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
339:14:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
317:03:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
10:
5509:
5429:01:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
5364:04:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
5307:MediaWiki message delivery
5135:MediaWiki message delivery
4947:(with 16 members now) and
4863:MediaWiki message delivery
4653:21:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
4631:12:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
4562:MediaWiki message delivery
4463:Ken Garff Automotive Group
4316:23:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
4294:22:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
4275:19:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
4236:00:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
4198:MediaWiki message delivery
4188:the candidates' statements
4007:13:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
3988:14:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
3966:13:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
3946:19:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
3789:MediaWiki message delivery
3436:Reference errors on 8 June
3356:Union Theological Seminary
3284:these opt-out instructions
3169:14:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
2945:15:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
2450:05:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
2425:23:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
2401:14:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
2374:05:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
2295:File:Deseret Book logo.jpg
2034:13:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
2011:02:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
1937:11:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
1922:23:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
1542:Found in historian circles
1339:22:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1305:09:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1269:22:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1232:18:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1173:Feminist Mormon Housewives
1139:17:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1048:Polemical versus detached:
1039:The reason I feel this way
1016:02:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
938:18:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
446:Thanks for helping out on
405:Mormonism and Christianity
293:18:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
248:Jennings is the last entry
131:02:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
120:14:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
105:03:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
66:23:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
45:22:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
27:22:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
5494:01:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
5455:significantly contributed
5390:significantly contributed
4908:, which also looks good.
3910:09:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
3697:09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
3652:09:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
3629:added a link pointing to
3614:added a link pointing to
3581:00:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
3127:
3110:06:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
3100:receive an offwiki email.
3085:Christianity on Knowledge
3078:23:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
3062:22:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
2430:Joseph Smith Hypocephalus
2266:22:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
2166:Encyclopedia of Mormonism
2094:16:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
2068:03:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
2053:20:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
1844:
1665:A tag has been placed on
1408:18:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
1022:On historical philosophy:
916:Mormon magazine deletions
881:00:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
867:00:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
781:
739:proposed deletion process
152:04:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
5326:Redirects for discussion
5305:to your user talk page.
5221:
5183:
5133:to your user talk page.
5054:15:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
5049:
5011:14:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
4931:07:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
4926:
4900:08:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
4483:You can leave a note on
4289:
4259:Religion & Politics,
4075:report it to my operator
4002:
3961:
3569:report it to my operator
3506:00:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
3494:report it to my operator
3296:21:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
3073:
3031:WikiProject Christianity
2940:
2850:10:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
2829:or whether it should be
2741:
2727:
2703:If you post comments to
2693:
2630:
2396:
2261:
2063:
1932:
1905:Thanks for catching this
1895:
1827:
1762:
1637:
1365:20:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
1168:05:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1134:
876:
853:
743:speedy deletion criteria
664:05:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
619:
545:
492:
431:
376:
334:
275:16:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
270:
178:23:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
157:Ken Jennings a Democrat?
115:
88:Life of Heber C. Kimball
5451:Selected Manifestations
5436:Selected Manifestations
5340:and has thus listed it
5042:Tabernacle (LDS Church)
4974:Tabernacle (LDS Church)
4941:Tabernacle (LDS Church)
4645:Hodgdon's secret garden
4487:if you have questions.
4449:11:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
4404:21:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
4396:Hodgdon's secret garden
4308:Hodgdon's secret garden
4267:Hodgdon's secret garden
4228:Hodgdon's secret garden
3925:First Presidency letter
3921:Priesthood (LDS Church)
3467:unnamed parameter error
3259:my operator's talk page
2927:The Problem With Labels
2756:Tabernacle (LDS Church)
2471:Lowell C. "Ben" Bennion
2455:Just a heads up that...
2355:and leave a message on
2209:Book of Abraham Project
1383:Limited geography model
569:limited geography model
139:Church historian source
5480:the configuration page
5415:the configuration page
4972:should be merged with
4636:AfD for Ulisses Soares
4032:automatically detected
3526:automatically detected
3451:automatically detected
2967:
2287:
2105:Articles dealing with
1947:
1730:to request that they
1662:
1628:
1205:
926:Desert Saints Magazine
785:The Morning Star Award
753:to delete is reached.
708:criteria for inclusion
685:
236:
203:
199:Jennings is a Democrat
91:Later, I'll check out
5266:Arbitration Committee
5250:Hello! Voting in the
5159:WP:IP block exemption
5094:Arbitration Committee
5078:Hello! Voting in the
4830:Arbitration Committee
4529:Arbitration Committee
4476:contest this deletion
4165:Arbitration Committee
4138:ArbCom Elections 2016
3761:Arbitration Committee
3542:broken reference name
2966:
2346:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
2292:Thanks for uploading
2285:
1946:
1661:
1495:
1183:
1075:page. I created the
747:Articles for Deletion
745:or it can be sent to
712:What Knowledge is not
684:
228:
194:
188:The Salt Lake Tribune
161:How do you know that
5453:, to which you have
5388:, to which you have
5152:Your unblock request
4878:LDS tabernacles list
4762:opt-out instructions
4599:Select Survey Invite
4437:opt-out instructions
4120:opt-out instructions
3898:opt-out instructions
3730:opt-out instructions
3685:opt-out instructions
3640:opt-out instructions
3592:disambiguation pages
3419:opt-out instructions
3374:opt-out instructions
3352:Sterling M. McMurrin
3329:opt-out instructions
3249:may have broken the
3210:opt-out instructions
2602:article today, btw:
2549:William P. MacKinnon
2389:old file's talk page
2357:my owner's talk page
1951:Eustress's talk page
348:jj in the future. --
5461:or if it should be
5396:or if it should be
4943:(started in 2010),
4740:fix with Dab solver
3765:arbitration process
3192:fix with Dab solver
2822:Brahman-Atman Yoga
2806:Brahman-Atman Yoga
2508:Jonathan A. Stapley
2410:Deseret Book images
2381:an improved version
2308:You may add it back
2207:W. V. Smith of the
1728:one of these admins
1198:Bloggernacle review
813:-related articles!
240:The Mormon Democrat
5282:arbitration policy
5110:arbitration policy
4882:Hi, I came across
4846:arbitration policy
4752:• Join us at the
4742:). Such links are
4611:Your survey Link:
4545:arbitration policy
4427:• Join us at the
4419:Dialogue (journal)
4253:, who reviews him
4181:arbitration policy
4140:: Voting now open!
4110:• Join us at the
3888:• Join us at the
3777:arbitration policy
3720:• Join us at the
3675:• Join us at the
3600:• Join us at the
3409:• Join us at the
3401:Aaronic priesthood
3364:• Join us at the
3319:• Join us at the
3200:• Join us at the
3043:
2968:
2348:to your talk page.
2288:
1958:remove this notice
1948:
1663:
1597:Quoted in another
1104:Comprehensiveness:
968:William Huntington
836:Mark Ashurst-McGee
834:I've restored the
829:Mark Ashurst-McGee
686:
5321:
5320:
5149:
5148:
4904:And I see linked
4757:
4744:usually incorrect
4432:
4115:
4056:
3893:
3725:
3680:
3631:Palmyra, New York
3605:
3550:
3475:
3414:
3369:
3324:
3205:
3119:Please contact me
3042:
3024:
2992:
2991:
2855:General Greetings
2772:
2560:By Common Consent
2520:Stanley J. Thayne
2502:Ardis E. Parshall
2300:claim of fair use
2211:gave his opinion:
2194:Michael D. Rhodes
2161:Michael D. Rhodes
2014:
1997:comment added by
1874:
1873:
1777:Your comments at
1472:as quoted in the
1419:Stay LDS / Mormon
976:Brace A. Chadwick
871:Thanks! I try.
806:
805:
690:proposed deletion
222:The Hedgehog Blog
5500:
5446:
5445:
5381:
5380:
5356:
5335:
5304:
5247:
5240:
5239:
5132:
5075:
5068:
5067:
4814:
4747:
4736:check to confirm
4701:
4697:
4696:
4664:Magnetar Capital
4513:
4479:
4422:
4393:
4392:
4378:
4251:Benjamin E. Park
4149:
4105:
4050:
4025:
4024:
3915:Recent roll-back
3883:
3850:
3832:
3715:
3670:
3595:
3544:
3519:
3518:
3469:
3444:
3443:
3404:
3359:
3314:
3276:
3262:
3247:Marlin K. Jensen
3235:
3234:
3195:
3188:check to confirm
3184:Thomas W. Murphy
3180:Third Convention
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3025:
2996:In this issue...
2959:
2958:
2911:User:Canadiandy1
2907:Personal Reasons
2893:
2888:
2885:
2848:
2816:
2815:
2762:
2539:Robert H. Briggs
2490:David J. Howlett
2484:Kristine Haglund
2347:
2290:
2139:Abraham in Egypt
2111:Book of the Dead
2019:Magnetar Capital
2013:
1991:
1990:Not impressed.
1961:
1890:I'm honored. ——
1849:
1842:
1841:
1796:
1787:
1750:
1746:
1740:
1707:
1706:
1700:
1683:reliable sources
1448:
1436:
1336:
1302:
1266:
1229:
1077:Future creations
901:
779:
772:
771:
729:
728:
722:
669:From John Dehlin
93:James E. Talmage
80:Orson F. Whitney
59:James E. Talmage
55:Orson F. Whitney
5508:
5507:
5503:
5502:
5501:
5499:
5498:
5497:
5482:. Delivered by
5447:
5443:
5440:
5417:. Delivered by
5382:
5378:
5375:
5350:
5329:
5298:
5238:
5154:
5126:
5066:
4888:Lehi Tabernacle
4880:
4875:
4874:
4815:
4807:
4781:
4779:Delta Phi Kappa
4754:DPL WikiProject
4732:Delta Phi Kappa
4728:Sigma Gamma Chi
4724:
4694:
4692:
4660:
4638:
4601:
4581:
4574:
4573:
4514:
4506:
4473:
4458:Hello Rich jj,
4456:
4429:DPL WikiProject
4411:
4335:
4328:
4218:
4213:In some benign
4210:
4209:
4193:the voting page
4150:
4142:
4112:DPL WikiProject
4094:
4022:
4019:
3917:
3890:DPL WikiProject
3872:
3823:
3807:
3804:
3785:the voting page
3751:
3722:DPL WikiProject
3704:
3677:DPL WikiProject
3659:
3602:DPL WikiProject
3588:
3516:
3513:
3441:
3438:
3411:DPL WikiProject
3397:June Conference
3393:
3366:DPL WikiProject
3348:
3321:DPL WikiProject
3303:
3272:
3241:
3232:
3229:
3202:DPL WikiProject
3176:
3153:
3125:
3124:
3121:
3049:
3044:
3022:
3003:From the Editor
2977:
2956:
2857:
2817:
2813:
2810:
2782:
2645:
2643:LDS Tabernacles
2566:template:Anchor
2496:Edward H. Jeter
2478:Jessie L. Embry
2457:
2432:
2412:
2345:
2279:
2278:
2041:
2022:
1992:
1967:
1962:
1955:
1919:Good Ol’factory
1907:
1840:
1809:Johnpacklambert
1805:
1775:
1744:
1738:
1735:
1704:
1698:
1697:
1656:
1649:Speedy deletion
1478:Johnpacklambert
1458:
1456:Christy L. Best
1431:
1423:
1415:
1372:
1357:Johnpacklambert
1353:
1315:
1281:
1245:
1208:
1192:Emily Jensen's
1188:A Motley Vision
1175:
1160:Johnpacklambert
1147:Johnpacklambert
1082:Things to watch
1008:Johnpacklambert
945:
918:
895:
893:
864:Good Ol’factory
840:Good Ol’factory
832:
819:Good Ol’factory
770:
726:
720:
719:
679:
671:
656:Johnpacklambert
648:Johnpacklambert
640:Johnpacklambert
469:
448:David W. Patten
444:
407:
309:Johnpacklambert
159:
149:Good Ol’factory
141:
128:Good Ol’factory
102:Good Ol’factory
63:Good Ol’factory
24:Good Ol’factory
19:
12:
11:
5:
5506:
5441:
5439:
5434:Nomination of
5432:
5376:
5374:
5369:Nomination of
5367:
5342:for discussion
5328:
5322:
5319:
5318:
5289:the candidates
5259:eligible users
5248:
5237:
5234:
5233:
5232:
5231:
5230:
5229:
5228:
5208:
5207:
5206:
5205:
5153:
5150:
5147:
5146:
5117:the candidates
5087:eligible users
5076:
5065:
5062:
5061:
5060:
5059:
5058:
5057:
5056:
5029:
5025:
5016:
5015:
5014:
5013:
4999:
4995:
4991:
4984:
4983:
4982:
4981:
4963:
4962:
4961:
4960:
4934:
4933:
4918:
4879:
4876:
4853:the candidates
4816:
4809:
4808:
4806:
4803:
4788:
4787:
4780:
4777:
4723:
4720:
4719:
4718:
4704:16912 Rhiannon
4675:16912 Rhiannon
4659:
4656:
4637:
4634:
4600:
4597:
4580:
4575:
4552:the candidates
4515:
4508:
4507:
4505:
4502:
4455:
4452:
4410:
4407:
4327:
4324:
4323:
4322:
4321:
4320:
4319:
4318:
4221:
4217:
4211:
4151:
4144:
4143:
4141:
4135:
4093:
4090:
4071:false positive
4067:
4066:
4040:Neylan McBaine
4018:
4015:
4014:
4013:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4009:
3980:FallingGravity
3938:FallingGravity
3916:
3913:
3871:
3868:
3803:
3800:
3754:
3750:
3745:
3703:
3700:
3658:
3655:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3621:
3620:
3619:
3618:
3587:
3584:
3565:false positive
3561:
3560:
3512:
3509:
3490:false positive
3486:
3485:
3437:
3434:
3392:
3389:
3347:
3344:
3302:
3299:
3280:
3279:
3268:
3267:
3228:
3225:
3175:
3172:
3152:
3146:
3120:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3048:
3045:
3033:
3023:
3021:
3020:
3015:
3010:
3005:
2998:
2993:
2990:
2989:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2975:
2973:
2970:
2969:
2957:
2955:
2954:: January 2012
2949:
2948:
2947:
2931:
2930:
2923:
2922:
2919:Public Reasons
2915:
2914:
2903:
2902:
2856:
2853:
2811:
2809:
2804:Nomination of
2802:
2781:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2701:
2700:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2681:
2678:
2672:
2644:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2619:
2618:
2596:
2546:
2531:I was able to
2529:
2528:
2517:
2511:
2505:
2499:
2493:
2487:
2481:
2474:
2456:
2453:
2431:
2428:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2404:
2403:
2363:
2361:
2360:
2349:
2342:
2331:
2328:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2254:
2253:
2252:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2217:
2212:
2204:
2203:
2187:
2184:
2170:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2128:
2100:
2086:63.226.104.225
2082:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2045:63.226.104.225
2040:
2037:
2021:
2016:
1966:
1963:
1954:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1906:
1903:
1872:
1871:
1856:
1855:
1850:
1839:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1804:
1801:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1691:Article Wizard
1675:Knowledge:Stub
1655:
1651:nomination of
1646:
1645:
1644:
1627:
1626:
1617:
1608:
1603:
1588:
1587:
1569:
1568:
1559:
1550:
1539:
1538:
1533:
1527:
1515:
1514:
1506:
1494:
1493:
1457:
1454:
1414:
1411:
1396:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1371:
1370:Merge proposal
1368:
1352:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1174:
1171:
1142:
1141:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1119:
1113:
1107:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1086:
1085:
1069:
1063:
1062:
1050:
1044:
1043:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1024:
944:
941:
917:
914:
892:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
831:
826:
825:
824:
808:
804:
803:
788:
787:
782:
780:
769:
766:
704:
703:
678:
675:
670:
667:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
611:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
537:
525:
517:
516:
515:
514:
468:
463:
452:Intothewoods29
443:
440:
439:
438:
406:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
385:
384:
383:
363:
362:
361:
360:
342:
341:
325:
324:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
278:
277:
251:
244:"Hall of Fame"
242:website has a
237:
219:
204:
158:
155:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
124:
123:
122:
98:
97:
96:
71:
70:
69:
68:
48:
47:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5505:
5496:
5495:
5491:
5487:
5486:
5481:
5476:
5475:the article.
5473:
5472:
5466:
5464:
5460:
5456:
5452:
5437:
5431:
5430:
5426:
5422:
5421:
5416:
5411:
5410:the article.
5408:
5407:
5401:
5399:
5395:
5391:
5387:
5386:Brant Gardner
5372:
5371:Brant Gardner
5366:
5365:
5362:
5361:
5357:
5355:
5354:
5347:
5343:
5339:
5334:
5327:
5317:
5316:
5312:
5308:
5302:
5296:
5295:
5290:
5285:
5283:
5279:
5275:
5271:
5267:
5261:
5260:
5255:
5254:
5249:
5246:
5242:
5241:
5227:
5223:
5219:
5214:
5213:
5212:
5211:
5210:
5209:
5204:
5200:
5196:
5191:
5190:
5189:
5185:
5181:
5176:
5175:
5174:
5173:
5169:
5165:
5160:
5145:
5144:
5140:
5136:
5130:
5124:
5123:
5118:
5113:
5111:
5107:
5103:
5099:
5095:
5089:
5088:
5083:
5082:
5077:
5074:
5070:
5069:
5055:
5051:
5047:
5043:
5039:
5035:
5030:
5026:
5022:
5021:
5020:
5019:
5018:
5017:
5012:
5008:
5004:
5000:
4996:
4992:
4988:
4987:
4986:
4985:
4979:
4975:
4971:
4967:
4966:
4965:
4964:
4958:
4954:
4950:
4946:
4942:
4938:
4937:
4936:
4935:
4932:
4928:
4924:
4919:
4915:
4914:
4913:
4909:
4907:
4902:
4901:
4897:
4893:
4889:
4885:
4873:
4872:
4868:
4864:
4860:
4859:
4854:
4849:
4847:
4843:
4839:
4835:
4831:
4826:
4823:
4822:
4813:
4802:
4801:
4797:
4793:
4786:
4783:
4782:
4776:
4775:
4771:
4767:
4763:
4758:
4755:
4751:
4745:
4741:
4737:
4733:
4729:
4717:
4713:
4709:
4705:
4700:
4691:
4690:
4689:
4688:
4684:
4680:
4676:
4671:
4670:
4665:
4655:
4654:
4650:
4646:
4642:
4633:
4632:
4628:
4624:
4619:
4615:
4614:
4609:
4607:
4596:
4595:
4591:
4587:
4579:
4572:
4571:
4567:
4563:
4559:
4558:
4553:
4548:
4546:
4542:
4538:
4534:
4530:
4525:
4522:
4521:
4512:
4501:
4500:
4496:
4492:
4488:
4486:
4481:
4478:
4477:
4470:
4468:
4464:
4459:
4451:
4450:
4446:
4442:
4438:
4433:
4430:
4426:
4420:
4416:
4406:
4405:
4401:
4397:
4391:
4387:
4384:
4381:
4377:
4373:
4369:
4366:
4363:
4360:
4357:
4354:
4351:
4348:
4345:
4341:
4338:
4337:Find sources:
4333:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4305:
4301:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4291:
4287:
4283:
4278:
4277:
4276:
4272:
4268:
4264:
4260:
4256:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4240:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4233:
4229:
4225:
4216:
4215:wp:CANVASSING
4208:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4194:
4189:
4184:
4182:
4178:
4174:
4170:
4166:
4161:
4158:
4157:
4148:
4139:
4134:
4133:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4116:
4113:
4109:
4103:
4099:
4089:
4088:
4084:
4080:
4076:
4072:
4064:
4060:
4054:
4049:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4036:
4035:
4033:
4029:
4008:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3977:
3973:
3969:
3968:
3967:
3963:
3959:
3955:
3950:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3935:
3931:
3926:
3922:
3912:
3911:
3907:
3903:
3899:
3894:
3891:
3887:
3881:
3877:
3867:
3866:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3848:
3844:
3840:
3836:
3831:
3827:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3810:
3799:
3798:
3794:
3790:
3786:
3782:
3778:
3774:
3770:
3766:
3762:
3758:
3749:
3744:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3726:
3723:
3719:
3713:
3709:
3699:
3698:
3694:
3690:
3686:
3681:
3678:
3674:
3668:
3664:
3654:
3653:
3649:
3645:
3641:
3632:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3623:
3622:
3617:
3613:
3612:
3611:
3608:
3607:
3606:
3603:
3599:
3593:
3583:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3566:
3558:
3554:
3548:
3543:
3539:
3535:
3531:
3530:
3529:
3527:
3523:
3508:
3507:
3503:
3499:
3495:
3491:
3483:
3479:
3473:
3468:
3464:
3460:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3452:
3448:
3433:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3415:
3412:
3408:
3402:
3398:
3388:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3370:
3367:
3363:
3357:
3353:
3343:
3342:
3338:
3334:
3330:
3325:
3322:
3318:
3312:
3308:
3307:Jeff Benedict
3298:
3297:
3293:
3289:
3285:
3277:</ref: -->
3275:
3270:
3269:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3260:
3256:
3255:edit the page
3252:
3248:
3244:
3239:
3224:
3223:
3219:
3215:
3211:
3206:
3203:
3199:
3193:
3189:
3185:
3181:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3151:
3145:
3144:
3140:
3136:
3112:
3111:
3108:
3101:
3096:
3095:
3090:
3086:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3060:
3055:
3041:
3037:
3032:
3028:
3019:
3016:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3006:
3004:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2997:
2988:
2985:
2984:
2979:
2972:
2971:
2965:
2961:
2960:
2953:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2933:
2932:
2928:
2925:
2924:
2920:
2917:
2916:
2912:
2908:
2905:
2904:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2894:
2889:
2880:
2875:
2874:Kind wishes,
2872:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2852:
2851:
2842:
2839:
2834:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2823:
2807:
2801:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2775:
2770:
2766:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2752:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2682:
2679:
2676:
2675:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2581:
2579:
2575:
2570:
2567:
2563:
2561:
2556:
2555:
2550:
2547:
2544:
2540:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2527:
2526:
2521:
2518:
2515:
2512:
2509:
2506:
2503:
2500:
2497:
2494:
2491:
2488:
2485:
2482:
2479:
2475:
2472:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2465:
2461:
2452:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2435:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2407:
2402:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2343:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2329:
2326:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2315:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2296:
2289:
2284:
2267:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2250:
2249:
2244:
2240:
2237:
2236:
2233:
2230:
2225:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2206:
2205:
2201:
2200:
2195:
2191:
2188:
2185:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2171:
2168:
2167:
2162:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2152:
2148:
2145:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2114:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2020:
2015:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1988:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1975:
1971:
1965:Et tu, Brute?
1959:
1952:
1945:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1902:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1854:
1851:
1848:
1843:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1803:Reuben D. Law
1800:
1799:
1794:
1793:
1786:
1780:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1741:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1718:the talk page
1714:
1713:
1703:
1694:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1660:
1654:
1650:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1623:
1618:
1616:
1614:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1567:
1565:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1537:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1513:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1443:
1441:
1435:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1400:Descartes1979
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1377:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1340:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1278:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1204:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1180:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1031:
1030:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1003:
996:
992:
989:
988:Saints at War
983:
981:
977:
973:
972:Camille Fronk
969:
963:
960:
957:
953:
949:
940:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
922:Mormon Artist
913:
912:
909:
908:
907:
899:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
865:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
847:
846:
845:
844:
841:
837:
830:
823:
820:
816:
815:
814:
812:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
786:
783:
778:
773:
765:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
735:
733:
732:its talk page
725:
717:
713:
709:
702:
699:
698:
697:
695:
694:Boyd Petersen
691:
683:
674:
666:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
625:
621:
617:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
551:
547:
543:
538:
535:
534:Sonia Johnson
531:
530:Hugh B. Brown
526:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
485:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
467:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
437:
433:
429:
424:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
398:
394:
390:
389:Descartes1979
386:
382:
378:
374:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
359:
355:
351:
350:Descartes1979
346:
345:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
327:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
304:
294:
291:
287:
286:RobertJWalker
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
233:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
192:
189:
186:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
171:RobertJWalker
168:
164:
154:
153:
150:
146:
132:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
107:
106:
103:
99:
94:
89:
85:
82:'s writings,
81:
77:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
67:
64:
60:
56:
52:
51:
50:
49:
46:
43:
39:
35:
31:
30:
29:
28:
25:
5483:
5477:
5469:
5467:
5448:
5438:for deletion
5418:
5412:
5404:
5402:
5383:
5373:for deletion
5359:
5352:
5351:
5330:
5292:
5286:
5263:
5257:
5251:
5155:
5120:
5114:
5091:
5085:
5079:
4910:
4903:
4881:
4856:
4850:
4827:
4819:
4817:
4789:
4759:
4725:
4698:
4667:
4661:
4639:
4620:
4616:
4610:
4602:
4582:
4555:
4549:
4526:
4518:
4516:
4489:
4485:my talk page
4482:
4474:
4471:
4460:
4457:
4434:
4412:
4385:
4379:
4371:
4364:
4358:
4352:
4346:
4336:
4329:
4258:
4246:
4245:, editor of
4243:Matthew Grow
4219:
4191:
4185:
4162:
4154:
4152:
4117:
4095:
4079:ReferenceBot
4068:
4063:Ask for help
4031:
4028:ReferenceBot
4020:
3918:
3895:
3880:W. W. Phelps
3873:
3857:Me-123567-Me
3805:
3752:
3727:
3705:
3682:
3660:
3637:
3589:
3573:ReferenceBot
3562:
3557:Ask for help
3525:
3522:ReferenceBot
3514:
3498:ReferenceBot
3487:
3482:Ask for help
3450:
3447:ReferenceBot
3439:
3416:
3394:
3371:
3349:
3326:
3304:
3281:
3273:
3230:
3207:
3177:
3154:
3122:
3103:
3099:
3093:
3092:
3084:
3050:
3026:
2995:
2994:
2987:January 2012
2986:
2974:
2951:
2926:
2918:
2906:
2876:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2858:
2847:Shannon Rose
2843:
2835:
2820:
2818:
2808:for deletion
2783:
2709:208.81.184.4
2702:
2657:208.81.184.4
2646:
2599:
2582:
2577:
2573:
2571:
2569:
2558:
2552:
2542:
2532:
2530:
2525:
2523:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2440:
2436:
2433:
2413:
2405:
2385:Deseret Book
2364:Thank you.
2362:
2334:
2318:PLEASE NOTE:
2317:
2316:
2293:
2291:
2280:
2246:
2231:
2219:
2214:
2197:
2180:
2164:
2150:
2146:
2141:(1981, 2002)
2138:
2124:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2042:
2023:
1989:
1986:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1908:
1889:
1875:
1852:
1806:
1790:
1785:Wilhelm Meis
1776:
1742:
1736:
1722:
1716:
1709:
1695:
1664:
1621:
1612:
1598:
1590:
1589:
1571:
1570:
1563:
1541:
1540:
1517:
1516:
1498:Biographical
1497:
1496:
1474:Mormon Times
1470:Robin Jensen
1459:
1445:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1424:
1416:
1397:
1373:
1354:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1316:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1282:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1246:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1197:
1185:
1184:
1176:
1155:Deseret News
1154:
1143:
1121:
1115:
1110:Unconnected:
1109:
1103:
1095:
1081:
1076:
1067:On articles:
1066:
1047:
1038:
1021:
1000:
997:
993:
987:
984:
979:
974:(Olson) and
964:
961:
958:
954:
950:
946:
919:
904:
903:
898:WPLDS invite
894:
833:
807:
784:
755:CultureDrone
736:
705:
700:
687:
672:
636:
576:
470:
445:
412:DJ Clayworth
408:
305:
301:
247:
239:
231:
229:
221:
215:
207:
198:
195:
187:
163:Ken Jennings
160:
142:
42:User:Rich jj
37:
33:
20:
17:Google books
5294:voting page
5122:voting page
4858:voting page
4557:voting page
4362:free images
4026:Hello, I'm
3520:Hello, I'm
3445:Hello, I'm
3236:Hello, I'm
3148:Updates to
3094:good thing.
2564:(I added a
2524:today? lol)
2514:Jared Tamez
2417:GreenwoodKL
2248:BYU Studies
2243:Hugh Nibley
2199:BYU Studies
2151:Facsimile 2
2135:Hugh Nibley
2107:Facsimile 3
1999:Canadiandy1
1993:—Preceding
1909:Thanks for
1822:Thanks! ——
1739:Intelligent
1710:the top of
1613:Church News
1599:MormonTimes
1462:Dean Jessee
1196:BYU Studies
1096:MormonWiki:
5278:topic bans
5195:EdJohnston
5164:EdJohnston
5106:topic bans
4842:topic bans
4764:. Thanks,
4748:(Read the
4623:Porteclefs
4541:topic bans
4439:. Thanks,
4282:WP:TOOSOON
4222:... here:
4177:topic bans
4122:. Thanks,
4077:. Thanks,
4073:, you can
4048:cite error
3972:revelation
3900:. Thanks,
3802:RFC notice
3773:topic bans
3732:. Thanks,
3687:. Thanks,
3642:. Thanks,
3571:. Thanks,
3567:, you can
3496:. Thanks,
3492:, you can
3465:caused an
3421:. Thanks,
3376:. Thanks,
3331:. Thanks,
3288:BracketBot
3286:. Thanks,
3238:BracketBot
3212:. Thanks,
3047:Newsletter
2859:Hey Rich,
2754:I created
2442:DWmFrancis
1611:Quoted in
1466:Ron Esplin
811:LDS Church
724:dated prod
5485:SDZeroBot
5420:SDZeroBot
5274:site bans
5102:site bans
4838:site bans
4669:a request
4537:site bans
4423:Read the
4241:I.e.: Is
4173:site bans
4106:Read the
4046:caused a
4044:your edit
4030:. I have
3884:Read the
3769:site bans
3716:Read the
3671:Read the
3596:Read the
3540:caused a
3538:your edit
3524:. I have
3463:your edit
3449:. I have
3405:Read the
3360:Read the
3315:Read the
3311:Doubleday
3243:your edit
3196:Read the
2545:-stub for
2202:(1977).
1878:John Foxe
1861:John Foxe
1585:See also:
1582:See also:
1556:See also:
1512:See also:
1116:Openness:
751:consensus
581:Gilgamesh
504:Gilgamesh
473:Gilgamesh
4994:that. :(
4491:Arbustum
3227:May 2014
3036:Newsroom
2780:Heads up
2769:contribs
2760:Araignee
2736:Done. ——
2671:removed.
2304:orphaned
2224:boap.org
2177:John Gee
2121:John Gee
2007:contribs
1995:unsigned
1956:You can
1911:this fix
1792:Quatsch!
1572:Writings
1122:Quality:
906:Eustress
793:Eustress
768:Congrats
193:in 2005:
191:reported
167:Democrat
38:complete
5463:deleted
5398:deleted
5301:NoACEMM
5218:Rich jj
5180:Rich jj
5129:NoACEMM
5046:Rich jj
5003:Doncram
4957:wp:CLNT
4923:Rich jj
4892:Doncram
4766:DPL bot
4441:DPL bot
4368:WPÂ refs
4356:scholar
4286:Rich jj
4124:DPL bot
4038:On the
3999:Rich jj
3958:Rich jj
3902:DPL bot
3826:protect
3821:history
3734:DPL bot
3689:DPL bot
3644:DPL bot
3616:Preston
3532:On the
3457:On the
3423:DPL bot
3378:DPL bot
3333:DPL bot
3214:DPL bot
3070:Rich jj
3027:Ichthus
2952:Ichthus
2937:Rich jj
2831:deleted
2738:Rich jj
2724:Rich jj
2690:Rich jj
2627:Rich jj
2554:Patheos
2434:Rich -
2393:Rich jj
2366:DASHBot
2323:I am a
2258:Rich jj
2163:in the
2099:Church.
2060:Rich jj
1929:Rich jj
1892:Rich jj
1824:Rich jj
1759:Rich jj
1679:notable
1634:Rich jj
1622:Liahona
1492:groups:
1131:Rich jj
873:Rich jj
850:Rich jj
616:Rich jj
542:Rich jj
489:Rich jj
428:Rich jj
373:Rich jj
331:Rich jj
267:Rich jj
112:Rich jj
5353:BD2412
4792:Naraht
4586:Naraht
4584:woman.
4340:Google
4300:wp:BIO
4042:page,
3830:delete
3759:. The
3667:Moroni
3536:page,
3461:page,
3251:syntax
3161:Naraht
3107:Lionel
3089:WT:XNB
3059:Lionel
3054:Lionel
2978:CHTHUS
2598:I did
2516:and/or
2251:(1971)
2183:(2000)
2169:(1992)
2127:(2005)
2026:Decora
1838:Thanks
1732:userfy
1723:speedy
1702:hangon
1687:verify
930:tedder
891:Invite
714:" and
442:Thanks
226:states
5038:wp:RM
4978:wp:RM
4383:JSTOR
4344:books
3847:views
3839:watch
3835:links
2887:iandy
2884:Canad
2391:.) ——
2335:after
2113:125.
1773:BLP/N
1685:that
1566:book.
1351:Thnks
1179:there
1073:works
450:. :)
323:this.
165:is a
84:Elias
34:views
5490:talk
5425:talk
5311:talk
5264:The
5222:talk
5199:talk
5184:talk
5168:talk
5139:talk
5092:The
5050:talk
5007:talk
4927:talk
4896:talk
4867:talk
4828:The
4796:talk
4770:talk
4708:Talk
4699:Done
4679:Talk
4649:talk
4627:talk
4590:talk
4566:talk
4527:The
4495:talk
4445:talk
4400:talk
4376:FENS
4350:news
4332:LINK
4312:talk
4290:talk
4271:talk
4232:talk
4202:talk
4163:The
4128:talk
4102:RLDS
4083:talk
4053:help
4003:talk
3984:talk
3962:talk
3942:talk
3906:talk
3861:talk
3843:logs
3817:talk
3813:edit
3793:talk
3738:talk
3693:talk
3648:talk
3577:talk
3547:help
3502:talk
3472:help
3427:talk
3382:talk
3337:talk
3292:talk
3218:talk
3165:talk
3139:talk
3074:talk
3040:here
2941:talk
2892:talk
2795:talk
2787:here
2765:talk
2742:talk
2728:talk
2713:talk
2694:talk
2661:talk
2631:talk
2612:talk
2600:this
2589:talk
2578:that
2574:feel
2543:mini
2533:stub
2476:or--
2464:cool
2446:talk
2421:talk
2397:talk
2370:talk
2353:here
2339:here
2262:talk
2090:talk
2064:talk
2049:talk
2030:talk
2003:talk
1933:talk
1896:talk
1882:talk
1865:talk
1828:talk
1813:talk
1763:talk
1745:sium
1638:talk
1482:talk
1464:and
1404:talk
1361:talk
1329:e, n
1295:e, n
1259:e, n
1222:e, n
1164:talk
1151:talk
1135:talk
1057:and
1012:talk
1006:are.
934:talk
924:and
877:talk
854:talk
797:talk
759:talk
660:talk
652:talk
644:talk
620:talk
585:talk
546:talk
532:and
508:talk
493:talk
477:talk
456:talk
432:talk
416:talk
393:talk
377:talk
354:talk
335:talk
313:talk
290:Talk
271:talk
263:here
261:and
259:here
255:here
175:Talk
116:talk
86:and
57:and
4750:FAQ
4714:)
4712:COI
4685:)
4683:COI
4425:FAQ
4390:TWL
4265:.--
4226:.--
4108:FAQ
4059:Fix
4057:. (
3932:or
3886:FAQ
3753:Hi,
3718:FAQ
3673:FAQ
3598:FAQ
3553:Fix
3551:. (
3478:Fix
3476:. (
3407:FAQ
3362:FAQ
3317:FAQ
3245:to
3198:FAQ
2325:bot
2314:).
2245:in
2241:by
2196:in
2192:by
2179:in
2175:by
2159:by
2137:in
2133:by
2123:in
2119:by
2039:BoA
1708:to
1693:.
1468:by
1446:now
1321:t m
1287:t m
1251:t m
1214:t m
78:In
5492:)
5465:.
5427:)
5400:.
5313:)
5303:}}
5299:{{
5276:,
5224:)
5201:)
5186:)
5170:)
5141:)
5131:}}
5127:{{
5104:,
5052:)
5009:)
4929:)
4898:)
4869:)
4861:.
4840:,
4798:)
4772:)
4756:.)
4738:|
4710:·
4681:·
4651:)
4643:--
4629:)
4608:.
4592:)
4568:)
4560:.
4539:,
4497:)
4447:)
4402:)
4394:--
4370:)
4334:.
4314:)
4292:)
4273:)
4234:)
4204:)
4196:.
4175:,
4130:)
4085:)
4061:|
4005:)
3986:)
3978:.
3964:)
3944:)
3908:)
3863:)
3855:.
3845:|
3841:|
3837:|
3833:|
3828:|
3824:|
3819:|
3815:|
3795:)
3771:,
3740:)
3695:)
3650:)
3579:)
3555:|
3504:)
3480:|
3429:)
3384:)
3339:)
3294:)
3220:)
3190:|
3167:)
3141:)
3076:)
2943:)
2881:--
2833:.
2797:)
2767:•
2744:)
2730:)
2715:)
2696:)
2663:)
2633:)
2625:——
2614:)
2591:)
2460:If
2448:)
2423:)
2399:)
2372:)
2264:)
2256:——
2232:3.
2147:2.
2103:1.
2092:)
2084:--
2066:)
2051:)
2032:)
2009:)
2005:•
1935:)
1898:)
1884:)
1876:--
1867:)
1830:)
1815:)
1765:)
1705:}}
1699:{{
1640:)
1484:)
1442:e
1440:er
1434:E
1429:t
1427:us
1425:↜J
1413:Hi
1406:)
1398:--
1363:)
1327:er
1323:e,
1319:us
1317:↜J
1293:er
1289:e,
1285:us
1283:↜J
1257:er
1253:e,
1249:us
1247:↜J
1220:er
1216:e,
1212:us
1210:↜J
1181:?
1166:)
1137:)
1014:)
936:)
900:}}
896:{{
879:)
856:)
799:)
761:)
734:.
727:}}
721:{{
688:A
662:)
622:)
587:)
577:my
548:)
510:)
495:)
479:)
458:)
434:)
418:)
395:)
379:)
356:)
337:)
315:)
288:|
273:)
257:,
214:,
210:,
173:|
147:.
118:)
110:--
5488:(
5423:(
5360:T
5309:(
5220:(
5197:(
5182:(
5166:(
5137:(
5048:(
5005:(
4925:(
4894:(
4865:(
4794:(
4768:(
4734:(
4706:(
4677:(
4647:(
4625:(
4588:(
4564:(
4493:(
4443:(
4431:.
4398:(
4386:·
4380:·
4372:·
4365:·
4359:·
4353:·
4347:·
4342:(
4310:(
4288:(
4269:(
4257:(
4230:(
4200:(
4126:(
4114:.
4081:(
4065:)
4055:)
4051:(
4001:(
3982:(
3960:(
3940:(
3904:(
3892:.
3859:(
3849:)
3811:(
3791:(
3736:(
3724:.
3691:(
3679:.
3646:(
3604:.
3575:(
3559:)
3549:)
3545:(
3500:(
3484:)
3474:)
3470:(
3425:(
3413:.
3380:(
3368:.
3335:(
3323:.
3290:(
3274:}
3261:.
3216:(
3204:.
3186:(
3163:(
3137:(
3072:(
2976:I
2939:(
2793:(
2771:)
2763:(
2740:(
2726:(
2711:(
2692:(
2659:(
2629:(
2610:(
2587:(
2562:.
2510:,
2504:,
2498:,
2492:,
2486:,
2480:,
2473:?
2444:(
2419:(
2395:(
2368:(
2359:.
2286:âš
2260:(
2226:)
2222:(
2088:(
2062:(
2047:(
2028:(
2001:(
1953:.
1931:(
1894:(
1880:(
1863:(
1826:(
1811:(
1795:)
1789:(
1761:(
1636:(
1624:.
1480:(
1444:,
1437:h
1432:M
1402:(
1359:(
1335:…
1333:w
1331:o
1325:h
1301:…
1299:w
1297:o
1291:h
1265:…
1263:w
1261:o
1255:h
1228:…
1226:w
1224:o
1218:h
1162:(
1149:(
1133:(
1010:(
932:(
902:—
875:(
852:(
795:(
757:(
658:(
650:(
642:(
618:(
583:(
544:(
506:(
491:(
475:(
454:(
430:(
414:(
391:(
375:(
352:(
333:(
311:(
269:(
265:.
250:.
201:.
114:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.