38:
112:
Sorry about this. A drive-by editor has thought fit to close the PR after less than 2 days and has, for some inexplicable reason, nominated the article for FA. I have naturally opposed the nomination as premature (some might also say discourteous, but let it pass) and will get the PR reinstated as
96:
I have Sir Thomas up for peer review with a view to getting the article up to FA standard. If you have time and are interested I should welcome any comments you may like to make on the PR page. No hurry on this. Regards.
72:
23:
122:
84:
106:
66:
45:
89:
80:
8:
118:
102:
76:
54:
17:
113:
soon as I can. Meanwhile, sorry you are being mucked about by this other editor.
53:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
114:
98:
90:
73:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Justus Weiner (2nd nomination)
24:User talk:Peter cohen/Archives/2011/March
14:
51:Do not edit the contents of this page.
32:
30:
31:
134:
36:
13:
1:
67:AfD of article you worked on
7:
10:
139:
123:10:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
107:17:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
85:04:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
49:of past discussions.
61:
60:
55:current talk page
22:(Redirected from
18:User talk:Dronkle
130:
40:
39:
33:
27:
138:
137:
133:
132:
131:
129:
128:
127:
94:
69:
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
136:
126:
125:
93:
91:Thomas Beecham
88:
68:
65:
63:
59:
58:
41:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
135:
124:
120:
116:
111:
110:
109:
108:
104:
100:
92:
87:
86:
82:
78:
74:
64:
56:
52:
48:
47:
42:
35:
34:
25:
19:
95:
77:Jaque Hammer
71:Please see:
70:
62:
50:
44:
43:This is an
115:Tim riley
99:Tim riley
46:archive
16:<
119:talk
103:talk
81:talk
121:)
105:)
83:)
75:.
117:(
101:(
79:(
57:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.