User talk:Noyster/Archive 5

616:

properly the editings are being made & I think the editings made by other language speaking person are biased& not given any proper space to do anything new for Knowledge & only the native English speakes are able to make any kind of editings for English Knowledge but you have given comments on to make good standard of English well, that's true it actually needs to make formally changes any articles not only on Knowledge but also in any other formal articles.I think for nepalese people like me, the access to English Knowledge is rare according to your frank vision quoted on this take page to you.I am so sorry for being a Nepalese citizen & I curse to the nation for not able to offer English language properly for only me but the approaches of English is limited to only sophisticated guy in my thought.But, what is meant by simple English Knowledge if you say, my standard of English is not good enough then why does the Knowledge looks for simple English for wiki articles? Well, I may make further developmenteEnglish in later days, but I think any kind of articles would be in need of reverting stage in your senses when there is not good standard of English for just Nepalese people am I right?Noyster you are native speaker of English therefore you are quite excellent at English, but whatever on the articles is seen mistakes these are needed to make corrections I see that, and on the one hand, I am weak at English whereas on next hand iam quite biased in English Knowledge, but I was about to offer few contributions for wikipedia but I am quite afraid of ever being reverting by you therefore I once more wanna say, I need your constant helps in developing the English Knowledge like other Knowledge. Hmm! I am just entered here in English wikipedia but in nepali Knowledge I am about to habituated already.A articles " gastric problem was changed by me few days ago, but even that was revereted or deleted by some one else. If the the articles are required further editions or more changes these are done in accordance with the rules & regulations of wikipedia where eiditings are free to add but what to do if these eiditings are reverted & removed immediately. There is no point in offering new articles for English Knowledge while the article are ignored or completely removed by showing silly reasons. Anyway, I feel good good, even being reverted all articles because I will have habit of writing & will achieve suggests but no all the time these are becoming mistakes this might be just pretending.OK, Noyster, if I make further mistakes like this on other editing then you can give me more consultations to go simultaneously in Knowledge by offering true articles as much as proof are found.I hope, you don't get me wrong for this long reply though you don't feel any bore to reply& you be thinking me just nonsense guy but I am not like that it may be because of not well understanding in English that iam lagged behind in comment strongly but unfortunately, I couldn't do that.

680:

looked up the object we need here on Knowledge because we can print out if the articles are truely derieved from any hard evidences therefore, I don't worry for my small mistakes I make for Knowledge. I wouldn't make any complaints you but I tried many articles editings & some of the article were from here of local places that I made ," Hetrung was water fall or fountain" with this heading I had saved new article in English language but even that might have been deleted because I tried reviewing it but couldn't get again.You also might have heard about "Hetrung water fall "which is elevated 365 metres high & located at my own local area therefore I tried to let it know to everyone through Knowledge so that it can be viewed by all readers simply.Dear Noyster,please I wanna request you not to be furious when you find this additional complaints though it may have not reverted you. I hope, you are getting my points simply or understanding my responses & few complaints but everyone would be annoyed or angry when something they made will be removed or deleted by other editors because this is, it takes a lotta time to make full articles& on purpose of making articles many evidences are procured doing or making many efforts. And in addition, I would like to focus your attention on the ways of editings people make that why a article having same title is being removed & written with A to z changes ?as a example, I saw a article named" depression" cardiac arrest " where there has been found different views of the editors & these article have been edited many times, so, you tell me dear which editings are the true articles that a reader can believe? Because, anyone may be looking for the real article which theyare ssuffering from.As a example, I am a patient of chronic gastric& laryngitis infected therefore I want to see the symptoms of these diseases & find them but after few days if I see again the symptoms of these then again symptoms are found different so, I feel nervous & not believe in Knowledge articles. OK, my dear I am so glad to have chance to make complaints of this kind of articles & hope, you leave or make me again satisfied with this complaints. Let's go ahead simultaneously to promote English Knowledge.":(mahendra)

739:" hi, good evening Noyster, I am sorry I made you bored, but I forgot, I had saved that at Nepali Knowledge I have just found it here on Knowledge of Nepali therefore don't feel any wrong. I will improve my way of complaining from now therefore I hope, you don't get angry for this my mistakes because at first I thought it was saved in English Knowledge but only yesterday I checked it & found that it is on nepali Knowledge.OK, if that is not reliable then I feel good to ignore it now because I looked up few symptoms of gastric & laryngitis but when I go to hospital to see& to have consultation of doctors then doctor advices & tells different symptoms of them therefore I don't trust now for medical uses to wikipedia. OK, my chap your helps like these are really appreciated so, let's close our controversial subject from now OK, we shall begin another subject now.yea, right now I knew you that you also are a person like me but not new like me you are old for wikipedia or you experienced for wikipedia. But my friend as for me, I wanna ask you about a matter that I am confused with " how can I add new article here ? I want to write it in English language if you found my way of language is OK for English Knowledge." Mahendra" 376:(ca.1169) draco normannicus (standard of the normans);Floriant et Florete (ca.1250);Guillem Torroella (1360-70) the Faula;Gervase of Tilbury (ca.1210) otia imperialia;Caesar of Heisterbach (approx) dialogus miracolorum;Stephen of Bourbon (1261) like Caesar;Cat Lupet (pseudonym of an Italian poet XIII approx);Wolfram von Eschenbach (ca. 1210) Parzifal;Le Chevalier du papegau (approx XIV);Jaufre (ca.1180) Arthurian romance langue d'oc;La Bataille Loquifer (ca1170);Roger of Hoveden (ca.1191) deeds henrici II (legacy excalibour);Jean de Preis or d'Outremeuse (ca.1400) (mediterranean avalon). (a) The island belongs to Morgan le Fay( connection with Morgan le Fay; main feature) and in the sources is often spoken of Mount Etna indicated as Aetna, and Arabic Gibel or MontGibel. The Sicily is really Avalon and all these texts are available online (look for them on google). (you named Earl of Great Britain and Sicily ;D)-- 807: 31: 190:. "Sentient thought" is an expression frequently encountered. The adjective "sentient" qualifies the noun "thought", as in "deep thought". We could think deeply about what exactly is meant by "sentient thought". I would take it to mean "thought, as performed by a sentient being". However, "sentience thought" is two nouns together, and I can assure you that it would not be considered normal English usage. Thank you for your interest and I look forward to your further contributions 712:. Yes, Knowledge is highly imperfect. This is the inevitable result of running an "encyclopedia that anyone can edit". Articles are subject to deliberate damage and to well-intentioned changes by people who think they know something, but know it wrong or can't express themselves adequately. Many editors work hard to remove damaging edits as fast as possible, but at any one time any article may contain something that is incorrect. 645:. You don't have to apologise for not being a native English speaker. Very many who contribute successfully to English Knowledge do not have English as their first language. Other editors will correct small mistakes in spelling or grammar. We always prefer to make corrections rather than revert a useful edit, and we do not revert for "silly" reasons but only if we think the edits are not useful and we cannot improve them. 825: 949:

objection is that this particular award lacks the status to be worthy of mention in a WP article, as indicated by the fact that there is no article about the award itself, as there is for the Streamy and Webby awards. I'm not seeing independent sources on which such an article could be based, either. If you disagree, maybe the people at

664:(d) when necessary you can communicate with other editors. As a small example, you did not read or understand what is in the blue box at the top of this talk page. As a result I have had to spend time moving your post to the bottom of the page, adding your username with the date and time, and adding a section heading. 506:

were deleting sourced content or adding nonsense characters, so it is obvious that they would be reverted. Your later edits did quote references for the opinions given and this is what is needed, thus those edits have been retained and I hope you will continue to make constructive contributions in that manner

341:. I see another editor has now removed the template message or "tag" about needing additional citations, as its wording is no longer applicable due to the recent death of Theo Colborn. It is open to any editor to remove such tags when they consider they have dealt with the problem. Equally, any editor may 236:

I wanted to reply to your message to me concerning my edit action of the article crash nitro kart.I'm sorry, I didn't know you had to add citations and I didn't know how. I just saw the sequel on YouTube and the App Store and saw that nothing was on the article about it so I added it. How do I create

679:

post from mahendra: "Good evening Noyster, I feel good to have this heart relieving response by you here on this page, yea, that's very true that references are indeed required for the articles to make it edit so that reader can tell & believe this article is met with hard evidence & can be

170:

was rejected. The phrase "One such engine even develops sentient thought due to a recursive algorithmic loop" is, to the best of my knowledge, wrong, since "sentient" is an adjective. It should either be "becomes sentient" or "develops sentience" (my edit). For the sake of honesty, English is not my

973:

I was unaware that Knowledge discriminated between the legitimacy of awards based on whether or not they have their own article in the encyclopedia. I've seen various other citations to sources that don't have such articles that have been accepted, but I am a relatively new user, and I may not be

615:

Hi, noyster I am sorry for that mistakes I made here on" abudhabi mall" but I wanna say you that I was about to add some changes or additional info on which all details were not completed & I removed by mistakes " see also" sometimes something happens, its normal but I couldn't understand how

505:

Thank you for your enquiry. None of us should be spreading "our own point of view" in Knowledge articles. The reason why I and Red Pen of Doom were reverting contributions was that, to all appearances, they were merely the opinions of the editors themselves. Some of the edits from your IP address

425:

Many thanks, Noyster I will certainly reread the guidance. I am striving to eliminate all subjectivity in order to make these articles as factual as possible. I am also reading articles about other novels to see how other people have introduced more referencing, but this is proving a challenge

948:

The only difference I can see in this case was that the addition was made in text form rather than in a table. OK, "unencyclopedic" would be a better description than "spam links". All the reverted additions gave a ref to the Screenchart website, so yes, they could be checked at that level. The

375:

The more ancient tales of Arthurian characters speak of the fairy Morgan who lived Etna ... the main feature of Avalon and to be the residence of the fairy Morgan ... and stories following the same geographical area and ethnic speaking of Sicily as avalon. The sources (sicily):Stephen of Rouen

482:

Hi noyster. Thanks for guiding me how wikipedia works. This editor red pen of doom is spreading false propaganda and his own point of view which is quite disappointing and laughable. He needs to be cautioned because he's a comparatively old user. Expecting a reply as a new user. Regards.

110:

Sorry you have a problem with "free speech". Unfortunately most libs are very thin skinned, especially when it comes to such sensitive topics as race. They(you) can dish it out but have a lot of trouble on the "incoming"! Especially when it comes to the TRUTH. OUCH!!!Derrickmcdreamy60

915:

That may be so, but this case does not seem to fit that rap sheet. The information was cited, the citation checked out, and the content seems to be both a valuable addition to the article and encyclopaedic. It wasn't a spam link this time, so the edit shouldn't have been reverted.

314:

Hi, I have been working on updating the page "Theo Colborn," and have included many more citations. This page has an alert box stating "This biographical article needs additional citations for verification," How do I go about getting the alert box at the top of the page removed?

309: 395:, where the replies to your similar post are still present although the post itself was removed. Please note that if you are the person who has been blocked, you are not supposed to open new accounts or to edit any page apart from 139:

Derrick, before you do any more on Knowledge please take another look at some of the guidance you have been sent, and try to understand that Knowledge is not a forum to air personal opinions whatever they may

327: 536:

This is the English-language wikipedia. Sorry, we do not accept content in other languages, even for a short period. Perhaps you meant to post your translation on the

214:

For some reason I completely missed the "thought" after "sentient". My apologies! I agree that the phrase in its original version is correct. Sorry for the confusion.

752: 345:

tags to an article when they perceive a problem. In either case, they should be prepared to defend their action if challenged. More about tagging can be found at

119: 931: 792: 414: 500: 334: 319: 245: 349:. Let me stress though that it is always valuable work to improve the referencing of any Knowledge article, thus your efforts are much appreciated 155: 560: 953:

could give a further opinion. Also note that the user continued when on a final warning and their "What did I do wrong?" query had been answered

593: 694: 521: 364: 215: 187: 172: 471: 280: 943: 580:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 968: 925: 910: 577: 448:

If this were so then we could have to conclude that the books were not "Notable" enough to have their own articles, by the tests outlined

385: 223: 205: 889: 880:

The edit you reverted - made by Xtina fighter2 - seems to have been well sourced and correct. I'm wondering why you reverted the edit.

772: 717:

I hope I have helped you to understand a few points about Knowledge. I am just one person and not always on line, but we do offer a

180: 736: 669:

If you are interested in Simple English Knowledge, that is a separate Wiki to this one. Here is a link to Simple English Knowledge

532:

i have as homework from my university to translate the source to greek for wikipedia..did i make any mistake for the translation?

690: 632: 127: 435: 875: 768: 765:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 161: 895:

Please take a look at the warning on the user's talk page - has done nothing but add these spam links to numerous articles

131: 304: 610: 581: 866: 484: 381: 978:

for a review by the appropriate authorities. I think it's best that we allow them to carry out that review in peace.

701:. There is no record of any article on English Knowledge containing the word "Hetrung", either existing or deleted. 453: 253: 554: 257: 721:, an enquiry service for new editors where you should get a timely reply if you have further specific questions 492: 576:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 310:

Question about getting the "This biographical article needs additional citations for verification" tag removed

842: 757:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

705: 377: 97: 846: 661:(c) readers and editors can tell where the information comes from (by references, as I explained before). 569: 562: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 628: 420: 123: 38: 295: 930:

It is also important to note that the information seemed to have been placed in the proper section.

537: 452:. This would be a disappointing outcome, for an author even I have heard of: perhaps the people at 370: 797: 286: 683: 642: 624: 488: 323: 850: 620: 431: 249: 241: 115: 833:

Congratulations, Noyster! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the

426:

since there isn't much written directly about Ambler's novels; they're not famous enough.

8: 845:

to Knowledge at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the

939: 934:

made a proper contribution to the article, if a little sloppy on the copyediting side.

921: 885: 854: 718: 658:(b) other editors can tell that your contributions are useful additions to the article. 962: 904: 788: 779:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

730: 709: 589: 548: 527: 515: 465: 408: 358: 346: 274: 199: 149: 47: 17: 670: 219: 176: 105: 975: 950: 838: 815: 443: 427: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

862: 698: 287: 806: 689:(1) I don't understand what you say about "Hetrung waterfall". Have a look at 167: 935: 917: 881: 299: 231: 954: 896: 784: 780: 722: 674: 585: 540: 507: 457: 449: 400: 350: 338: 266: 191: 141: 392: 298:

registration request has completed. Please be sure to edit carefully. —

477: 974:

fully aware of the guidelines for awards. I've submitted a request to

858: 762: 758: 171:

native language, but the difference seems pretty clear to me.

824: 168:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Analytical_Engine#In_popular_culture

568:

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to

578:

Knowledge:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding

761:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 337:

and thank you for your contributions to the article on

655:(a) readers can tell what your contributions mean. 166:Hi, I'm not sure I get the reason why my edit on 753:Disambiguation link notification for December 26 704:(2) I'm sorry you have not been well. We do say 693:: you have only edited two articles up to now - 695:International English Language Testing System 686:Replying to a couple of points in your post: 710:"Knowledge itself is not a reliable source" 237:citations? Reply on my talk page please. 706:"don't use Knowledge for medical advice" 853:. Thank you and keep up the good work! 14: 570:participate in the request for comment 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 25: 265:(Replied on other user's talk page) 23: 24: 996: 652:need to edit in such a way that: 823: 805: 603:Discussion with Mahendra Niraula 29: 837:classification threshold using 13: 1: 876:Reverting edit to Vsauce page 793:09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC) 737:11:15, 26 December 2014 (UTC) 635:) 02:27 am, 25 December 2014) 594:00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 555:10:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC) 522:22:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 493:13:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 472:16:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 436:13:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 415:16:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 386:22:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC) 365:09:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC) 328:20:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 305:01:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC) 281:19:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 258:18:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 224:11:39, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 206:11:00, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 181:10:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC) 156:12:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 132:12:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 976:the WikiProject you provided 162:My edit of Analytical Engine 7: 969:10:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 944:10:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 926:09:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 911:09:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 890:09:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 867:12:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC) 582:WP:Feedback request service 10: 1001: 611:Post from Mahendra Niraula 849:and stay in touch at the 822: 804: 691:this record of your edits 454:WP:WikiProject Literature 296:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser 841:. We thank you both for 456:could help find sources 378:King Arthur resurrected 538:Greek-language version 814:The Anti-Vandalism + 574:Talk:Elizabeth Warren 563:Talk:Elizabeth Warren 42:of past discussions. 781:opt-out instructions 843:your contributions 771:• Join us at the 561:Please comment on 421:Eric Ambler novels 873: 872: 776: 749: 748: 637: 623:comment added by 261: 244:comment added by 135: 118:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 18:User talk:Noyster 992: 965: 960: 951:this WikiProject 907: 902: 857:(developer) and 827: 809: 802: 801: 766: 733: 728: 636: 625:Mahendra Niraula 617: 599: 598: 551: 546: 518: 513: 504: 468: 463: 447: 411: 406: 371:Avalon is Sicily 361: 356: 302: 277: 272: 260: 238: 202: 197: 152: 147: 134: 120:Derrick,mcdreamy 112: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1000: 999: 995: 994: 993: 991: 990: 989: 963: 956: 905: 898: 878: 820: 800: 798:Congratulations 773:DPL WikiProject 755: 750: 731: 724: 618: 613: 604: 566: 549: 542: 530: 516: 509: 498: 480: 466: 459: 441: 423: 409: 402: 373: 359: 352: 312: 300: 292: 275: 268: 239: 234: 200: 193: 164: 150: 143: 113: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 998: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 932:Xtina fighter2 877: 874: 871: 870: 829: 828: 821: 812: 810: 799: 796: 754: 751: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 715: 714: 713: 702: 699:Abu Dhabi Mall 667: 666: 665: 662: 659: 656: 646: 612: 609: 606: 605: 602: 597: 565: 559: 558: 557: 529: 526: 525: 524: 479: 476: 475: 474: 422: 419: 418: 417: 372: 369: 368: 367: 311: 308: 291: 285: 284: 283: 233: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 209: 208: 163: 160: 159: 158: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 997: 977: 972: 971: 970: 967: 961: 959: 952: 947: 946: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 914: 913: 912: 909: 903: 901: 894: 893: 892: 891: 887: 883: 869: 868: 864: 860: 856: 855:West.andrew.g 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 831: 830: 826: 819: 817: 811: 808: 803: 795: 794: 790: 786: 782: 777: 774: 770: 764: 760: 738: 735: 729: 727: 720: 716: 711: 707: 703: 700: 696: 692: 688: 687: 685: 682: 681: 678: 677: 673: 672: 671: 668: 663: 660: 657: 654: 653: 651: 647: 644: 640: 639: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 608: 607: 601: 600: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 564: 556: 553: 547: 545: 539: 535: 534: 533: 523: 520: 514: 512: 502: 497: 496: 495: 494: 490: 486: 473: 470: 464: 462: 455: 451: 445: 440: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 416: 413: 407: 405: 398: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 383: 379: 366: 363: 357: 355: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331: 330: 329: 325: 321: 316: 307: 306: 303: 297: 289: 282: 279: 273: 271: 264: 263: 262: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 225: 221: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 207: 204: 198: 196: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 174: 169: 157: 154: 148: 146: 138: 137: 136: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 957: 899: 879: 834: 832: 813: 778: 756: 725: 675: 649: 619:— Preceding 614: 573: 567: 543: 531: 510: 481: 460: 424: 403: 396: 374: 353: 342: 339:Theo Colborn 317: 313: 293: 269: 240:— Preceding 235: 194: 165: 144: 114:— Preceding 109: 78: 43: 37: 847:leaderboard 501:2.49.19.192 485:2.49.19.192 393:Talk:Avalon 391:Please see 335:Jrrochester 320:Jrrochester 318:Thank you, 36:This is an 783:. Thanks, 719:"Teahouse" 444:Astrofella 428:Astrofella 333:Greetings 246:Ohmysasuke 98:Archive 10 851:talk page 767:Read the 641:Good day 528:excuse me 399:talk page 347:this page 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 936:Crossark 918:Crossark 882:Crossark 818:Barnstar 684:Mahendra 648:But you 643:Mahendra 633:contribs 621:unsigned 397:your own 301:xaosflux 254:contribs 242:unsigned 128:contribs 116:unsigned 106:Untitled 958:Noyster 900:Noyster 785:DPL bot 763:Punjabi 726:Noyster 676:Noyster 586:Legobot 544:Noyster 511:Noyster 461:Noyster 404:Noyster 354:Noyster 290:Request 288:WP:PERM 270:Noyster 195:Noyster 145:Noyster 39:archive 964:(talk) 906:(talk) 759:Multan 732:(talk) 550:(talk) 517:(talk) 467:(talk) 410:(talk) 360:(talk) 276:(talk) 216:Fndari 201:(talk) 188:Fndari 173:Fndari 151:(talk) 839:STiki 835:1,000 816:STiki 584:. — 294:Your 232:Reply 16:< 940:talk 922:talk 886:talk 863:talk 859:Widr 789:talk 708:and 697:and 629:talk 590:talk 489:talk 450:here 432:talk 382:talk 324:talk 250:talk 220:talk 177:talk 124:talk 769:FAQ 572:on 343:add 186:Hi 966:, 955:: 942:) 924:) 908:, 897:: 888:) 865:) 791:) 734:, 723:: 650:do 631:• 592:) 552:, 541:: 519:, 508:: 491:) 478:Pk 469:, 458:: 434:) 412:, 401:: 384:) 362:, 351:: 326:) 278:, 267:: 256:) 252:• 222:) 203:, 192:: 179:) 153:, 142:: 140:be 130:) 126:• 94:→ 64:← 938:( 920:( 884:( 861:( 787:( 775:. 627:( 588:( 503:: 499:@ 487:( 446:: 442:@ 430:( 380:( 322:( 248:( 218:( 175:( 122:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index