User talk:Noyster/Archive 4

31: 746: 109: 1380:. In the cite web template you used, the field name "title = " was missing in front of the US patent number. I've now inserted this, and hope the result is what you wanted. If not, the free-text fields you have available in the template are lastname, firstname, title and publisher, and you can distribute your information over these as you see fit. Oh, and could you sign your talk-page posts with the ~~~~, so we can see straight away who you are? Regards 1996: 1255: 1645: 1431:

copy on my user page (or hers) so we can remove things that are not verifiable according to policies, or find the right kind of references, and run the drafts past you guys. Is it okay to leave up what is there, for the moment? Not sure how fast we can work. PS - if we can talk on MY talkpage I would appreciate it. Still getting used to all the Wiki markups.

935:. I am kind of in need of help on this article please. The Knowledge is trying to delete this article because they did not find good reference or something. Can you please help me to keep this article? Editing and adding enough information on this article so that it cannot be deleted? I look forward for your reply soon. Thank you. 1456:

they were acceptable based on them being user-created videos that are not copyrighted. Could you please clarify which aspect of the policy on posting YouTube video links was in violation? If it is a matter of using references, should I follow the same model as this Knowledge site which uses YouTube video links:

1455:

I'll first admit that I am a new contributor to Knowledge, so I appreciate any further guidance on what is and is not acceptable edits. For reference, I recently added YouTube links to an existing article that summarizes the episodes posted by Watch It Played. Those links were removed but I thought

979:

Lastly, I am sorry to have to say that the article before I edited it was far from Knowledge standards. It was so far out as to make me think you should take a look at some other Knowledge articles, about anything that interests you, to learn more about how articles are normally written and what they

669:

No, there will be no need for redirects. When you have opened your new account, just put a note on the previous user page to indicate that it is not in use. No-one else can use an account bearing that name. I'm sorry you have had this inconvenience and wish you success with editing Knowledge. You may

317:

Not sure how to source this for you but it what we serve as our regimental liqueur at our mess dinners. It was selected in Wainwright Alberta in October 20011 by the incoming commanding officer. The SALH perpetuate the 19th Alberta Dragoons. The latter unit had a squadron in Whitehorse. - Regards

962:

to support the information. Of the five sources currently listed, the first appears to be Regmi's own website, and the second and third are just directory entries: none of these would be accepted as sources for this article. What we need is references to anything written about Regmi or his films by

1337:

are for: to discuss and finally agree on how the article is going to reflect the different views. Your lengthy insertion on the talk page didn't give a clue how you proposed to reach an acceptable balance in the article. Unfortunately the other editor removed it entirely, and you re-inserted it and

904:

That's OK, any page on Knowledge is visible to all, even my talk page here can be viewed by anyone if they care to look. I added the citation for the Daniel Allen Butler quote, as I saw it in your original enquiry. I would say you are going the right way about this, sticking to the sources, even if

1430:

I've contacted the person who set it up for us, and we will work to fix the problems. Hopefully wikipedia will be patient as we do so. Neither of us have created an article before. I understand better about the conflict of interest, and needing to change the references. I'm planning to put a draft

984:

you were sent also links to useful guidance about how to contribute. In one sentence, we don't prefer one belief or opinion over any other, we stick to known facts and always refer back to what has already been published on the subject. So what I suggest is that before contributing again, you take

878:

Thanks for your reply. As for you saying that I may open an account, I am not that skilled at knowing passwords or usernames so the only way I can edit is just as anonymous sadly. I have recently added to the Edward Smith page the statements that he made when asked if he was faced with disaster. I

548:

Below is copy of response of page regarding subject: Thank you for your message. At Home Education and Development is not an "official" organization, although future plans for such is intended. I would like to keep the name in use for my account and am willing to make another account if necessary.

599:

advises all users to exercise caution if editing articles about businesses, organizations, products, or other subjects that they are closely connected to. If you choose to edit articles that are in any way related to your company or group, you will need to carefully follow Knowledge's

1781:

The problem continues. How can we encourage this editor to start to include some text in their new stubs? And preferably a source, too. Any thoughts? You were one of the three editors at ANI who seemed to understand the problem. (I'll also leave this message with Drmies and NE Ent).

1462:

The service that I am seeking to offer is one that has been requested by others who have discovered the same Wiki page in that they were looking for a means to view a referenced game. I would like to provide that value in a way that is in accordance with the Knowledge guidelines.

1510:, is a very reasonable one and would largely remove the objections. Also you wouldn't need to add an extra column to the table. There's even a handy template for formatting YouTube references. All you do is paste the following into the places you want to insert a reference: 1311:

The answers to all your questions on this topic you can find on the page of Avalon, check the chronology of the "Talk Page". The whole truth and the reality is contained in a long speech of Sweet Xeper(user). To some this was inconvenient and that's why it was censored,

1552:. I greatly appreciate your advice and consultation. I've updated the page (except for the other table that you noted) using the guidance you provided. I'll get to that one soon if the current edits are acceptable. Again thanks for your time and efforts with me. -- 967:

in widely-read newspapers, magazines or books, or major news websites. If this kind of coverage cannot be found, we have to conclude that Regmi is not yet "notable" enough to have an article in Knowledge. What we mean by "notable" is briefly explained in

1924:

I just wanted to thank you for your lovely message you left on my page a few days ago. I look forward to making successful edits. If I do anything wrong, please let me know and I will fix it. Every mistake I make is never on purpose! -Savannah xoxo

1670: 416:

on our part. You can do that sort of thing on other websites, but here, we can only use sources that have already been published. The newspaper article looks interesting, but of course throws no direct light on mess dinners of recent years. Good

1521:

and replace ID with the YouTube ID of the particular video (e.g. zu_pitEH974), and TITLE with the title of the video. You may even want to do the same with the other YouTube links which (I now see) are in the lower table in the

975:

The last two websites in the list I cannot connect to, and if others also have this problem, then they won't help either. Please don't quote YouTube, Facebook or Twitter as "sources", as none of these are independent of the

706:

Thank you very much for your assistance. There was no inconvenience at all, just a good learning experience. I'll continue to read more information about contributing to Knowledge to become a successful Knowledge editor.

344:

before you can add it", so that any reader can check on its accuracy and find out more if they want. Even the regiment's own website might be acceptable as a source in a case like this, but I don't see anything

1929:

You're welcome Savannah and good luck with editing. If you post on any talk pages please always remember the ~~~~ at the end of your post, so that your username and the date will appear automatically like

541: 1342:. (This applies even to those who edit from different IP addresses, which only hampers communication). If you wish to continue on Knowledge, please make more effort to work collaboratively with others 947:. You may be the person this article is about, or be closely related to him. If so, we would encourage you to write about other topics instead. Someone else has already put a warning about this on 642: 295: 291: 1811:. Doesn't look as if we can. The editor seems impervious to anything on their talk page, and has not enabled email. In such a case, talk of "collaboration" misses the mark. I've posted to 879:

have also removed Henry Senior from one of the pargraphs because as shown "Shots in the Dark"; The reliability of his statements is unknown. Also who says Daniel's story is apocryphal?

585:. As you have made few substantive edits as yet, I would recommend that you start a fresh account and discard the present one. § I would also like to draw your attention to the further 287: 659: 565: 1666: 277: 117: 549:

Would you please direct me on how? I am reviewing the username policy page for more information. Sincerely, At Home Education and Development (talk) 09:41, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

601: 1012: 1497:

there's no guarantee that the links are both technically accessible to all and legally acceptable, (2) in quantity they risk turning the article into a directory or

1317: 154: 307: 1593: 1165: 828: 689: 620: 199: 1450: 492: 1306: 1171: 720: 712: 1773: 1321: 239: 1561: 1475: 194: 1812: 1721: 1633: 1205: 868: 312: 234: 536: 456: 405: 381: 333: 1875: 1058: 1043: 1035: 716: 708: 272: 1951: 1801: 1569: 1553: 1483: 1467: 1138:

This way of editing is effort I know, but it's the only way for your work to succeed on Knowledge. A fairly readable guide to adding references is

113: 1984: 1063:

Knowledge articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media

290:, to move pronunciations and other info out of article lead sections. I'm inviting editors who participated in that discussion to comment on the 1263:

Message added 16:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1357: 955: 932: 1067:

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Knowledge articles... Doing so violates Knowledge's neutral point of view policy

920: 1913: 1491:

Sorry your first efforts met with reverts, first by the bot then by me. The problems with adding all the YouTube links are, (1) as indicated

1413: 1159: 823: 486: 432: 360: 724: 217:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 1971:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 1587: 1542: 1230:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 1096:

In what reliable sources have these rumours been published? Probably none, as if it was that "reliable" it wouldn't publish mere "rumours".

808: 795:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 259:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 1968: 1243: 1227: 792: 256: 218: 655: 561: 133: 931:

Hello, Thank you for your recent edits. I really appreciate your help. I noticed that you did a professional edit for one of my article

1896: 775: 148: 1830: 1613: 1210: 1185: 848: 516: 174: 102: 498: 2048: 651: 634: 630: 557: 1020: 767: 1609: 1606:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1181: 1178:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 844: 841:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 592: 512: 509:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 170: 167:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1301: 1887: 1733: 1440: 213: 201: 1372:

article that I've created. I cannot fix the error in reference #3. What's wrong with it? -- 08:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

1707: 1313: 889: 671: 577:

usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person

556:

and I would like to use my username implying shared use, in conjunction with my personal name. Thanks for your message.

1972: 1729: 1507: 1395: 1231: 796: 283: 260: 222: 1883: 1856: 448: 397: 373: 325: 1051: 1945: 248: 241: 882:

I have also added your reply to me on the article's talk page, although I probably should have asked first, sorry.

1767: 1102:

An opinion, not neutral at all but trying to make the person look good. If any such opinion been published by an

897: 715:) 08:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC) I also made the note on the previous page indicating that it is no longer in use. 641:

conflict of interest as a user of wikipedia. I admit that my potential violation was a result of not completely

1427: 638: 596: 1967:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 1493: 1226:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 985:

some more time to find out more about how we work, and perhaps polish up your English a little more. Good luck

791:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 579:

requires the username itself to make this clear, as in the examples quoted of the form "<Personal name: -->

255:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 1598:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1170:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1016: 1000: 833:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

497:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

208: 159:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1669:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

633:

as a username. Since that name will no longer be in use as a username, after creating a new account, should

340:

I believe you of course ... but ... sorry, the policy is "Even if you're sure something is true, it must be

1960: 1953: 94: 736: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1248: 629:

Thank you for your reply. I carefully read the policy that you highlighted in question and will not use

439: 116:

regarding an issue where I mentioned your edit. The complaint is not about your actions. The thread is

38: 388: 2014: 2006: 1989: 1273: 1265: 948: 2041: 2004:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1683:

cinepanettoni-scomunicato-due-volte_7944089.html ''"Papa' cinepanettoni scomunicato due volte"''

1421: 981: 1862: 1750: 1725: 1363: 893: 838: 784: 777: 121: 1879: 1638: 1599: 1409: 1219: 1212: 1047: 1039: 452: 401: 377: 329: 1695: 1871: 1852: 1717: 1703: 1436: 1297: 885: 444: 393: 369: 321: 303: 207:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

8: 2035: 1836: 1557: 1471: 819: 763: 1919: 1846: 1498: 1034:

page? please help me mate. i am all new to this wikipedia editing. thanks in advance.

637:

be set up for a redirect as outlined in ? I'd like to make clear that I never intended

1980: 1939: 1907: 1824: 1774: 1761: 1629: 1620: