654:! Thank you for reaching out and for thinking of me. I understand your main interest is in collaborating on an album article, but could I ask off the bat whether you'd possibly have any interest in collaborating on a Springsteen song article instead? My reasons are as follows. In a nutshell it'd seem less ambitious and easier for me to wrap my head around tackling a song in my current situation. Basically I don't have really a lot of free time or extra mental bandwidth currently. But if it was a song article I could at least partly use the "I'm Goin' Down" article as a sort of a template to guide some of my planning and figure out less stuff from scratch. I think having that would also help to keep me more focused against the distractions of real life, and increase the chances I could stay on task during the collaboration. I'm not saying I'd necessarily aim to make the structure exactly the same, but just having the "I'm Goin' Down" article as somewhat of a model would be helpful. If it happened the song article we collaborated on was a Born in the U.S.A. tune, that'd be even more helpful because I could reuse a lot of the same sources and spend less time digging for info. (But even if it was a song from another album there are still some of my sources I could no doubt still use.) All of the above reasons, plus by its very nature an album tends to be a broader topic than a song, and more ambitious from that point of view as well, so that's another reason why I'd be more hesitant to tackle an album article in my current situation. If you really have your heart set on an album collaboration, I'd say the only one I could see myself possibly tackling right now would be Born in the U.S.A., again simply because I already have a lot of the background, etc. at my fingertips and fresh in my mind from having done the IGD article kind of recently. Also a disclaimer that overall I'm quite a bit more familiar with the Boss's 80s and early 90s period than his 70s stuff. Another disclaimer is that regardless of what we might decide, I'm going to be especially busy for the next month and a half, then will have some free time during December, then busy again around Christmas, but in the new year will have time again. However, even if we did start something now, I could still chip away at the article now a bit at a time. But if what I'm proposing about a song or about BITUSA is not what you're keen on, that's of course totally cool too. In that case I'd encourage you to work on Darkness or Greetings and maybe can collaborate another time instead. :-)
283:, thanks for thinking of me when you're feeling lonely with your music! :-) I'm listening to Jaco right now. There are some bits I'm enjoying pretty well. I'm going to listen to it a little more before I fully comment on it. As for me, there's nothing I've been obsessed with lately, or any new cool new stuff I've discovered recently that's likely to blow you away. But if we're talking about guilty pleasures, I especially like Ed Sheeran's recent hit "Shivers" for one. :-) And here's that I didn't get to listen to much as kid growing up when they were most popular, but I've recently rediscovered when I got an anthology by them that has lots of catchy songs on it. Here's a mellow and (for me) irresistible I recently discovered by another 70s/80s duo that I've always been a fan of. And here's in my freewheeling single days when I taught English in Japan 20 years ago that I didn't know who it was, made a terrible-sounding recording of a bit of it (coming from the coffee shop speakers) on my camera, and spent the next two decades on a quest trying to identify it, which I finally did a number of months ago! Yeah, again, I'm not necessarily expecting any of this to be your cup of tea, but it's the best I could come up with on short notice. :-) Do feel free to share any more of your faves anytime at all.
695:, either "Cover Me" or "Dancing" sound good to me. Neither was recorded among the May 1982 tracks, so I'm glad we wouldn't be belabouring the story already told in IGD about the tracks being recorded while he decided what to do with the Nebraska songs, and then eventually being temporarily shelved. Also as you may know, both have interesting backstories: "Cover" written for Donna Summer but Jon Landau decided it was too good to give away, and "Dancing" written after the album was otherwise completed but Landau urged Bruce to write one more song. I'm guessing there'll be more sources about "Dancing" as (likely) more has been written about it over the years. For that reason, I'd have a slight preference for "Cover Me" in that it might be less ambitious to scour the available sources, but really, I could go either way if you happen to prefer "Dancing". Yeah, both are appealing for different reasons. One other thing: I kind of have a medium strong preference for the Harvard style of citation, but if you have a strong preference not to use Harvard, I could be flexible. Just let me know. :-)
1042:
1113:
339:! I'd never heard of Damien Rice, but I like that song very much, very cool. I'm glad you like the Johnny Pearson one. I know nothing about the Fall but would be thrilled to collaborate, I'm sure I can find ways to contribute regardless. :-) I see you've already made a ton of edits. I'll just let you know that how much I can contribute depends partly on how much of a hurry you are to see it reach fruition; in my present circumstances right now I can only dedicate a bit (or possibly medium small amount) of time to Knowledge. But by all means I'd be happy to make lots of contributions slowly but surely if there are no big deadlines. Talk again soon!
93:
563:
947:
453:, thanks for the links! I'll do my darnedest to get at least a bit familiar with the Fall while working on this. It'll be good for my musical education and will hopefully help the article too! BLZ, yeah, I hear some similarities between the Pearson track and the Sims you linked. Good stuff. Cool, well, I just hope I'll be able to find enough time to contribute enough that I'll be considered a "bonafide collaborator"! :D Talk again soon,
751:, I finally got to starting adding some content to "Cover Me". I hope to have a chance to edit a bit more in the next couple of weeks, and then as I mentioned I'll be unavailable for two or three weeks after Christmas. Above you didn't mention objecting to using the Harvard style, so if that's really OK, I'll likely begin by changing over some of the existing citations to Harvard. Cheers!
850:
Thank you for the response, and take as much time as you need. There is absolutely no rush with this one. If I decide to pursue a FAC with this article, I would do so in late
December, and if it is not considered suitable for a FAC, I am just happy that I was able to expand and strengthen the article
626:
Hey there friend! I was wondering if you're planning on doing any more
Springsteen articles in the future? I recently acquired Guesdon and Margotin (using that to add personnel to song articles) and might consider going through his albums from Greetings to Tunnel. (The main one I wanna do is Darkness
873:
Apologies for the double post, but I just wanted to let you know that I decided to archive the peer review due to lack of engagement and I did not want to take away any attention from newer peer reviews. I have put the article up for a FAC just to see what happens there. I just wanted to update you
668:
As I finish wrapping up Duran's Seven and the Ragged Tiger I'd be more than happy to tackle a song (especially for starters). For BitUSA I'd personally go for any of the singles but my personal choices would be "Cover Me", "Dancing", or "Glory Days". But, given the title track's significance as one
375:
Hey! Welcome back and welcome aboard! FYI, that ping won't send me a notification anymore now that I've changed usernames, but, no worries, that's nbd—like, your expression of fondness for any of the work of Ed
Sheeran is far more concerning. But I concur with Ceoil about the Johnny Pearson track
387:
soundtrack. And that's a lovely story, carrying a recording of a recording of such a wistful song two decades into the future to finally put a name to it :-).Very glad to have you on the case! It's apt in a way too, despite your unfamiliarity with the wonderful and frightening world of the Fall,
321:, the greatest of all the post punk albums. You are obs most welcome to join, you know "a lot", though how much into the FALL, I'm not sure, although our taste is very similar otherwise. But it would be great and make me proud to see you there in any capacity. Talk later.
917:
There's no need to apologize. We are all busy so I completely understand that. Thank you for the FAC review and I will be addressing everything in a few. I feel bad for archiving the peer review because I did not want to send a wrong impression to you about that.
591:
300:
All very interesting, thank you very much and am going through, and am finding little in your posts that I dont like - the Johnny
Pearson track is lovely. Here is my current guilty pleasure, and liz's also, though its a few years dated. Best as
902:, sorry I kept thinking I was going to get to it soon, and then I knew I was going to get to it this weekend, and I meant to let you know a few times my review was imminent, but apologies I missed the PR. I'll start looking at your FAC tonight.
1151:! 2023 has gotta be good, I'm feeling positive about it. :-) Next year looking forward to jazzing up lots of content, lots of cool stories about musicians or other artsy types with you! Take it easy, and I'll be in touch again real soon.
144:, introduced: "My first foray into FAC in 2.5 years, I brought this article about the Bruce Springsteen song to GA in 2016 and have expanded it in the last nine months, largely from Newspapers.com as well as some online books, etc."! --
1088:
you're back! I've missed you. This is a really nice
Christmas surprise to see you back on here, and I look forward to hopefully crossing paths with you lots in the new year. Have wonderful holidays and all the best!
814:
I plan on taking a long break after this particular project because I have been feeling burned out lately with
Knowledge. I hope you are doing well and staying safe out there. Have a great rest of your weekend!
392:
as affecting/epic as "Sad Eyed Lady of the
Lowlands" and as cryptic/biblical as, well, median Dylan, not to mention the oblique climax is possibly an allusion to a certain event in Dylan's life circa mid-'66.
976:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
992:
388:
because I regard Mark E. Smith as the best contender for the title of "the
English Dylan", or "the Punk Dylan", or "the Post-Modern Dylan" (to Bob's high modernism), take your pick.
961:
578:
100:
36:
26:
361:. Newspapers.com has 17 hits for the album from 1985, and several of these may be full album reviews. I'll start with these and then spread out from there. Cheers,
540:
56:
811:
article? I am debating on bringing through the FAC process next month, but I would like to get as much feedback as possible to see if that is a viable option.
612:
1019:
484:
480:
514:
74:
500:
179:
153:
135:
467:
532:
406:
370:
802:
669:
of the most misunderstood songs in rock music I think that would be good as well. Just lmk what you decide and we can get started. :-) –
428:
218:
1127:
Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021
348:
312:
268:
250:
232:
330:
801:
Hello again. Apologies for this random message. I just have a quick question. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any insight on
117:
939:
40:
479:
for 13 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at
44:
589:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
194:
I know I was the one gone for a long time but it’s good to see a familiar face around here again. Hope you’ve been well. :)
1015:
833:! I hope you've been really well. I should have time to start looking at this next week, sometime after Monday. Talk soon!
709:
I bet "Cover" would be easier as well. I'd be good to start with that, and possibly "Dancing" further down the line. :-) –
549:
760:
462:
292:
1041:
860:
627:
but if I'm at it might as well go in order). I was jw what your plans were, so maybe we could collaborate? Cheers. –
203:
1175:
927:
883:
842:
782:
742:
726:
704:
686:
663:
824:
1160:
1074:
1011:
1098:
1139:
259:
on; Jacko's bass lines melt my mind. Feel free, so I don't feel so lonely, so share other guilty pleasures.
1112:
985:
601:
80:
644:
377:
997:
777:
721:
681:
639:
318:
1128:
488:
1052:
Have a great
Christmas, and may 2023 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
796:
52:
496:
358:
149:
113:
506:
Thanks for all of your work on this article and congratulations on it being chosen as TFA. —
973:
381:
1103:
984:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
189:
733:
PS "New Moon on Monday" is my favourite DD song. Give it lots of love in the article! ;-)
8:
1156:
1094:
1027:
838:
756:
738:
700:
659:
528:
507:
483:, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at
458:
389:
366:
344:
288:
246:
214:
175:
131:
70:
491:
from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work.
1070:
400:
62:
48:
65:, sorry I missed this FAC. Glad to see the nomination was successful for you. Cheers!
955:
492:
167:
145:
123:
109:
17:
255:
as a catch up, my taste is mellowing with age, and am completely obsessed with this
1004:
969:
923:
879:
856:
820:
597:
468:
199:
141:
1171:
1135:
773:
717:
677:
635:
621:
424:
326:
308:
264:
228:
415:
that I consider that a collab, but so great to do a page together - officially!
92:
981:
520:
416:
302:
256:
1085:
1066:
977:
570:
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
476:
446:
395:
354:
223:
Seconded re welcome back Moise. Just a fleeting note but must catch up soon.
32:
1152:
1090:
834:
807:
752:
734:
696:
655:
573:
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
524:
454:
412:
362:
340:
284:
242:
210:
171:
127:
66:
919:
899:
875:
852:
830:
816:
606:
195:
988:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1167:
1148:
1131:
965:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
767:
748:
711:
692:
671:
651:
629:
562:
450:
420:
336:
322:
304:
280:
260:
238:
224:
946:
475:
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as
1053:
1001:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
991:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
959:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
39:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
317:
By the way myself and Blz are talking about a collab on
972:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
27:Request for input on a featured article candidacy
541:June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
485:Knowledge talk:Today's featured article/May 2022
481:Knowledge:Today's featured article/May 13, 2022
411:Welcome aboard Mosie! You helped so much with
43:. The instructions for the review process are
1036:A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!
241:. I also look forward to catching up soon!
1166:Sounds like a plan Moisej, and talk soon.
91:
1039:
1110:
357:, have started collecting sources here:
14:
47:. Thanks in advance for any comments.
765:Yep go ahead and I'll follow suit! –
956:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
940:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
874:about it. Hope you are doing well!
594:to opt out of any future messages.
209:Cool, welcome back to you too. :-)
23:
561:
24:
1187:
1111:
1040:
945:
995:and submit your choices on the
487:. I suggest that you watchlist
13:
1:
1176:04:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
1161:04:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
1140:04:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
1099:16:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
1075:11:15, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
1020:00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
974:Knowledge arbitration process
928:17:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
861:05:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
843:05:35, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
825:03:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
783:17:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
761:17:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
419:is another good entry point.
57:11:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
1121:Best wishes for the holidays
884:17:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
743:21:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
727:22:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
705:21:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
687:14:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
664:03:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
645:14:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
376:tho, wow. Reminds me of the
31:Greetings, I have nominated
7:
851:since I last worked on it.
576:Interested in taking part?
37:featured article nomination
10:
1192:
1012:MediaWiki message delivery
501:14:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
489:Knowledge:Main Page/Errors
371:05:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
349:01:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
331:04:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
319:This Nation's Saving Grace
313:00:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
293:00:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
269:03:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
251:01:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
1117:
588:
233:19:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
219:18:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
204:17:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
136:02:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
118:07:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
99:
90:
75:02:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
41:featured article criteria
1009:to your user talk page.
613:04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
550:Good article nominations
533:03:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
515:19:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
477:today's featured article
378:library music–style jamz
180:02:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
154:06:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
555:June 2022 Backlog Drive
463:21:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
429:09:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
407:07:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
803:my current peer review
566:
359:User:Moisejp/sandbox14
970:Arbitration Committee
953:Hello! Voting in the
565:
1130:& fecking 2022!
797:Peer review question
140:Thank you today for
81:Precious anniversary
87:
986:arbitration policy
567:
519:Thanks very much,
85:
1145:
1144:
1104:Another year gone
1082:
1081:
1022:
619:
618:
471:scheduled for TFA
106:
105:
18:User talk:Moisejp
1183:
1115:
1108:
1107:
1044:
1032:
1031:
1028:Merry Christmas!
1010:
1008:
949:
609:
556:
545:
544:
512:
405:
95:
88:
84:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1106:
1077:
1062:
1057:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1002:
950:
942:
799:
781:
725:
685:
643:
624:
607:
554:
543:
508:
473:
394:
192:
83:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1189:
1179:
1178:
1143:
1142:
1124:
1123:
1118:
1116:
1105:
1102:
1080:
1079:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1038:
1029:
1026:
993:the candidates
962:eligible users
951:
944:
943:
941:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
866:
865:
864:
863:
798:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
771:
731:
730:
729:
715:
675:
633:
623:
620:
617:
616:
590:
586:
585:
584:
583:
574:
571:
558:
557:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
472:
469:I'm Goin' Down
466:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
191:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
159:
158:
157:
156:
142:I'm Goin' Down
104:
103:
97:
96:
82:
79:
78:
77:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1188:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1078:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1055:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1006:
1000:
999:
994:
989:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
966:
964:
963:
958:
957:
948:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
901:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
885:
881:
877:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
862:
858:
854:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
840:
836:
832:
827:
826:
822:
818:
812:
810:
809:
804:
784:
779:
775:
770:
769:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
745:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
723:
719:
714:
713:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
683:
679:
674:
673:
667:
666:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
648:
647:
646:
641:
637:
632:
631:
615:
614:
611:
610:
603:
599:
593:
587:
581:
580:
575:
572:
569:
568:
564:
560:
559:
553:
551:
547:
546:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
513:
511:
505:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
470:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
404:
403:
399:
398:
391:
386:
385:
379:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
133:
129:
126:, thank you!
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
115:
111:
102:
98:
94:
89:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:Jo-Jo Eumerus
61:
60:
59:
58:
54:
50:
49:Jo-Jo Eumerus
46:
42:
38:
34:
33:Lake Estancia
19:
1146:
1120:
1083:
1049:
1035:
996:
990:
967:
960:
954:
952:
828:
813:
808:Manos Arriba
806:
800:
766:
710:
670:
628:
625:
622:Springsteen?
605:
595:
579:Sign up here
577:
548:
509:
493:Gog the Mild
474:
445:
413:Cut the Crap
401:
396:
383:
279:
237:Aw, thanks,
193:
190:Welcome back
168:Gerda Arendt
146:Gerda Arendt
124:Gerda Arendt
110:Gerda Arendt
107:
30:
1084:Holy moly,
998:voting page
166:Thank you,
101:Nine years!
982:topic bans
592:Click here
390:This one's
353:Ceoil and
257:from 13:18
978:site bans
521:AjaxSmack
510:AjaxSmack
417:Jerusalem
397:—blz 2049
382:original
380:from the
1147:Thanks,
1086:SchroCat
1067:SchroCat
805:for the
447:Blz 2049
355:blz 2049
86:Precious
1153:Moisejp
1091:Moisejp
1054:Krampus
1005:NoACEMM
835:Moisejp
753:Moisejp
735:Moisejp
697:Moisejp
656:Moisejp
525:Moisejp
455:Moisejp
363:Moisejp
341:Moisejp
301:always.
285:Moisejp
243:Moisejp
211:Moisejp
172:Moisejp
128:Moisejp
67:Moisejp
1061:Cheers
920:Aoba47
900:Aoba47
876:Aoba47
853:Aoba47
831:Aoba47
817:Aoba47
608:buidhe
196:FrB.TG
170:. :-)
35:for a
1168:Ceoil
1149:Ceoil
1132:Ceoil
768:zmbro
749:zmbro
712:zmbro
693:zmbro
672:zmbro
652:zmbro
630:zmbro
451:Ceoil
421:Ceoil
337:Ceoil
323:Ceoil
305:Ceoil
281:Ceoil
261:Ceoil
239:Ceoil
225:Ceoil
16:<
1172:talk
1157:talk
1136:talk
1095:talk
1071:talk
1016:talk
968:The
924:talk
880:talk
857:talk
839:talk
821:talk
778:cont
774:talk
757:talk
739:talk
722:cont
718:talk
701:talk
691:OK,
682:cont
678:talk
660:talk
640:cont
636:talk
529:talk
497:talk
459:talk
425:talk
384:Sims
367:talk
345:talk
327:talk
309:talk
289:talk
265:talk
247:talk
229:talk
215:talk
200:talk
176:talk
150:talk
132:talk
114:talk
71:talk
53:talk
45:here
898:Hi
829:Hi
776:) (
747:Hi
720:) (
680:) (
650:Hi
638:) (
402:➠❏
335:Hi
1174:)
1159:)
1138:)
1097:)
1073:)
1018:)
1007:}}
1003:{{
980:,
926:)
882:)
859:)
841:)
823:)
759:)
741:)
703:)
662:)
604:)
600:·
531:)
523:!
499:)
461:)
449:,
427:)
369:)
347:)
329:)
311:)
291:)
267:)
249:)
231:)
217:)
202:)
178:)
152:)
134:)
116:)
108:--
73:)
55:)
1170:(
1155:(
1134:(
1093:(
1069:(
1056:!
1014:(
922:(
878:(
855:(
837:(
819:(
780:)
772:(
755:(
737:(
724:)
716:(
699:(
684:)
676:(
658:(
642:)
634:(
602:c
598:t
596:(
582:!
552:|
527:(
495:(
457:(
423:(
365:(
343:(
325:(
307:(
287:(
263:(
245:(
227:(
213:(
198:(
174:(
148:(
130:(
112:(
69:(
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
