187:
919:
1166:
1031:
809:
325:
105:
410:
488:, an edit that changes the structure of a sentences (such as merging 2 sentences) would not likely qualify as a minor edit, especially if done in the lead. Should you remain doubtful, do please further elaborate on why you believe your edit DOES qualify as minor. Thank you for your attention on this matter.
630:
I’m not saying the edit was reverted because it was minor, do please avoid creating false scenarios. I’m not creating my own policy, just stating something out of common sense that your controversial edit is not eligible as minor. It doesn’t say on the policy that you can mark a controversial edit as
759:
controversial. Although editing without changing the meaning of text can merit a minor edit, another aspect of minor edits is that it can’t be the subject of dispute. That is why edits are allowed to be minor in the first place, so that people know which edits do not require attention and/or may not
525:
It's the only WP policy that applies here; whether the change is in the body or lead is irrelevant. (At any rate, someone reverted it for consistency with other MLB franchise articles.) As an aside, you don't need to ping an editor when posting on their talk page, the software automatically notifies
258:
So, I saw your revert edit. While yes, you have a point, but I feel like if this is the general article for astigmatism, it should cover astigmatism in animals as well, but its just that no one has added information of astigmastism in animals yet, as with a LOT of other medical articles that have
613:
An edit being marked as minor and an edit being reverted are independent of each other; my edit was reverted to ensure MLB franchise articles have a matching intro structure, not because I marked the edit as minor. Knowledge is built by consensus; don't create your own policy. I have cited the
591:
I can’t, because it doesn’t say. However, that’s not to say that lead reformatting would count as minor if the edit in question is controversial. As with yours, it got reverted. And why would an edit be minor if it got reverted? That’s just it, it’s a rule of thumb. You need to count the other
1110:
Hi
Mindmatrix, I would like to know why my modification has been rejected? I think it is a useful link with a concret exemple of what is an 'International Fixed Calendar' and how it works. Could you please explain why such decision? Many thanks in advance, Kind regards,
1105:
750:
I can understand how the misunderstanding that I made where I said : the editor who reverted found your edit as not an improvement. That is my fault. However, it’s not a matter of who thought your edit was an improvement, it’s the fact that it’s
413:
Hi
Mindmatrix! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Knowledge—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
1204:
1173:
1159:
1154:
652:
As indicated above, the policy clearly states "rearrangement of text without modification of the content" is a minor edit. It seems absurd that anyone finds improving sentence flow as controversial, but so be it.
890:
I think you removed my edition to the Chines Room entry. Before removing it again, please contact me. Knowledge will not let me provide my email address directly but it is pbassett29 at gmail dot com
570:"A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content should be flagged as minor edits."
1066:
725:", not because the editor found it controversial or not an improvement (at least, based on the edit summary). And as I've already stated, I did not consider the edit controversial.
1082:
860:
378:
156:
1085:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
863:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
381:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
159:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
965:
614:
relevant policy to you several times, and you have acknowledged you cannot find any aspect of the policy that states what you claim. There is nothing further to discuss.
844:
893:
Thank you, Paul
Bassett PS: I contributed the entry on Frame Technology (software engineering) several years ago, but cannot log in now to Knowledge because of my VPN.
1120:
707:
No it’s true, someone reverted your edit, not finding it as an improvement. In any case, it’s safer to not mark an edit as minor if it may be controversial. Cheers.
464:—where this is not contentious)" (emphasis mine), which I assume also applies to the converse of splicing paragraphs. I found the separate sentences rather halting.
294:
140:
1218:
926:
912:
1076:
362:
308:
447:
1116:
854:
150:
332:
1135:
304:
372:
312:
112:
1112:
1192:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under
1185:
1181:
1023:
907:
816:
289:
1003:
198:
1038:
721:
Don't make false statements or assumptions about other editors' motivations or reasoning. The edit was reverted with the edit summary "
1018:
769:
736:
716:
702:
682:
664:
640:
625:
601:
586:
551:
537:
497:
475:
1106:
diffhist m
International Fixed Calendar 01:22 −56 Mindmatrix talk contribs (revert - rm per WP:ELNO) Tag: Manual revert thank
880:
1100:
1155:
986:
398:
894:
765:
712:
678:
636:
597:
547:
493:
439:
435:
248:
226:
801:
253:
1189:
575:
Please show me where in the policy it states that editing the lead should not be marked as a minor edit in this context.
285:
542:
Thank you for letting me know about the ping, just please explain why lead editing is irrelevant in minor edit context.
1177:
1059:
1050:
97:
176:
761:
708:
674:
647:
632:
608:
593:
558:
543:
504:
489:
431:
990:
317:
1149:
510:
457:
281:
460:, one point of which states "Formatting that does not change the meaning of the page (e.g., moving a picture,
1069:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
847:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
365:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
236:
143:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
902:
877:
395:
978:
930:
908:
631:
minor; that would only apply to grammar fixes and vandalism. Ok then, you have a good rest of your day.
1086:
1072:
982:
864:
850:
382:
368:
160:
146:
1055:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
833:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
349:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
129:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1131:
1125:
898:
837:
828:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
20:
203:
873:
722:
453:
391:
300:
133:
124:
244:
222:
755:
an improvement. It’s not the case of who found your edit controversial, it’s the fact that it
1043:
821:
485:
337:
117:
1014:
403:
354:
344:
8:
994:
419:
415:
760:
be a subject of discussion. In this case, your edit you marked as minor, is. Thank you.
266:
1145:
1134:. If you have a spare moment, could you please update the corresponding section in the
1097:
939:
1002:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the
426:
of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
961:
240:
218:
948:
516:"Formatting that does not change the meaning of the page (e.g., moving a picture,
1010:
726:
692:
654:
615:
576:
564:
527:
481:
465:
427:
232:
172:
1193:
947:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
885:
1140:
1094:
263:
971:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
269:
131:... that the entire inventory of historic string instruments in Canada's
274:
I believe these should be cited but I don't have the skill to add them.
186:
262:
Here, have some official research papers about astigmatism in animals:
168:
691:, not a statement of fact. In my opinion, it was a clear improvement.
1199:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may
1067:
Template:Did you know nominations/International
Register of Electors
1030:
808:
324:
104:
1209:
1063:
no longer requires residency in Canada in the preceding five years?
303:
corrected my understanding of the division operator. Thank you.
137:
are loaned to musicians in a competition held every three years?
217:
Same location pictured as 2019. - Thank you for the article! --
409:
942:). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.
845:
Template:Did you know nominations/Canadian Dental Care Plan
456:, which does not contravene the minor edit guidelines. See
1130:
Hey
Mindmatrix, thanks for creating the article about the
747:
giving rise or likely to give rise to public disagreement.
280:
Just someone who wants more animal coverage on
Knowledge.
141:
Template:Did you know nominations/Musical
Instrument Bank
989:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
954:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
484:
I do believe you edited the lead on this one, no? Per
363:
Template:Did you know nominations/Imhotep (board game)
295:
Thanks for fixing my incorrect
Relational Algebra edit
267:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1810233/
1176:
indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a
1174:
Category:1999 establishments in Prince Edward Island
1160:
Category:1999 establishments in Prince Edward Island
1065:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
843:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
835:... that more than one million applications for the
361:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
139:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
359:
stated that it can be chaotic and "extremely mean"?
723:that's the standard in US and Canada sports pages
1136:Domestic policy of the Justin Trudeau government
1194:section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
511:Help:Minor edit#What to mark as minor changes
458:Help:Minor edit#What to mark as minor changes
1138:article as well? It's a little outdated. --
1024:DYK for International Register of Electors
185:
1047:was updated with a fact from the article
825:was updated with a fact from the article
341:was updated with a fact from the article
264:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18593249/
121:was updated with a fact from the article
1207:and removing the speedy deletion tag.
841:were approved in its first three months?
960:notice, but please explain why in your
509:I already stated the reason above, per
270:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/598274/
1057:... that as of 2019, inclusion in the
1006:of each individual page for details.
351:... that a review of the board game
237:made the pictured festival possible
13:
1164:
1077:International Register of Electors
1060:International Register of Electors
1051:International Register of Electors
949:deleted for any of several reasons
938:Disambiguation page not required (
933:because of the following concern:
917:
430:for more information. Thank you.
14:
1229:
802:DYK for Canadian Dental Care Plan
254:About your revert edit from mine.
199:Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht
1029:
807:
520:—where this is not contentious)"
518:splitting one paragraph into two
462:splitting one paragraph into two
408:
323:
103:
1081:, and the hook may be added to
859:, and the hook may be added to
377:, and the hook may be added to
155:, and the hook may be added to
98:DYK for Musical Instrument Bank
452:I assume you are referring to
1:
1219:19:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
399:00:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
313:01:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
422:. Any edit that changes the
318:DYK for Imhotep (board game)
290:06:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
249:22:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
7:
993:allows discussion to reach
974:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
957:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
762:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
709:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
675:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
648:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
633:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
609:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
594:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
559:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
544:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
505:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
490:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
432:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)
227:08:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
177:00:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
10:
1234:
985:exist. In particular, the
881:12:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
770:02:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
737:23:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
717:15:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
703:13:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
683:19:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
665:15:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
641:01:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
626:01:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
602:12:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
587:01:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
552:00:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
538:23:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
498:15:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
476:23:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
440:20:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
1190:Categories for discussion
1172:A tag has been placed on
1150:10:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1132:Canadian Dental Care Plan
1121:08:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
1019:10:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
979:proposed deletion process
855:Canadian Dental Care Plan
838:Canadian Dental Care Plan
829:Canadian Dental Care Plan
669:Except for one thing: it
282:LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist
184:
1186:featured topics category
1101:00:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
903:18:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
1178:disambiguation category
966:the article's talk page
151:Musical Instrument Bank
134:Musical Instrument Bank
125:Musical Instrument Bank
1201:contest the nomination
1188:, under discussion at
1169:
1126:Updates on Dental Care
1087:Did you know talk page
945:
922:
865:Did you know talk page
383:Did you know talk page
259:been seen in animals.
161:Did you know talk page
1168:
991:articles for deletion
935:
931:proposed for deletion
927:AGCO (disambiguation)
921:
913:AGCO (disambiguation)
418:or reverting obvious
687:That, of course, is
373:Imhotep (board game)
345:Imhotep (board game)
1083:the statistics page
861:the statistics page
379:the statistics page
157:the statistics page
1170:
983:deletion processes
923:
231:On the Main page:
214:
1205:visiting the page
1182:category redirect
1080:
909:Proposed deletion
858:
404:Minor edit notice
376:
194:
193:
192:
154:
1225:
1217:
1167:
1143:
1070:
1033:
1007:
976:
975:
959:
958:
920:
848:
811:
741:con·tro·ver·sial
734:
729:
700:
695:
673:an improvement.
662:
657:
651:
623:
618:
612:
584:
579:
562:
535:
530:
508:
473:
468:
451:
416:typo corrections
412:
366:
333:29 February 2024
327:
189:
182:
181:
144:
107:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1208:
1165:
1163:
1156:Speedy deletion
1139:
1128:
1108:
1092:
1091:
1034:
1026:
1001:
987:speedy deletion
973:
972:
956:
955:
918:
916:
895:184.148.173.225
888:
870:
869:
812:
804:
732:
727:
698:
693:
660:
655:
645:
621:
616:
606:
582:
577:
565:Help:Minor edit
556:
533:
528:
502:
471:
466:
445:
428:Help:Minor edit
406:
388:
387:
328:
320:
297:
256:
215:
166:
165:
108:
100:
95:
12:
11:
5:
1231:
1162:
1158:nomination of
1153:
1127:
1124:
1107:
1104:
1035:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1022:
997:for deletion.
977:will stop the
915:
906:
887:
884:
813:
806:
805:
803:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
748:
745:
742:
573:
572:
571:
523:
522:
521:
486:WP:COMMONSENSE
405:
402:
329:
322:
321:
319:
316:
296:
293:
255:
252:
212:
211:
208:
207:
205:Happy New Year
197:
196:
191:
190:
180:
113:3 January 2024
109:
102:
101:
99:
96:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1230:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1206:
1202:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1133:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1096:
1090:
1088:
1084:
1078:
1074:
1068:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1045:
1040:
1032:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1005:
998:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
969:
967:
963:
952:
950:
944:
943:
941:
934:
932:
928:
914:
910:
905:
904:
900:
896:
891:
883:
882:
879:
875:
868:
866:
862:
856:
852:
846:
842:
840:
839:
832:
831:
830:
824:
823:
818:
817:11 April 2024
810:
771:
767:
763:
758:
754:
749:
746:
743:
740:
739:
738:
735:
730:
724:
720:
719:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
701:
696:
690:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
663:
658:
649:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
629:
628:
627:
624:
619:
610:
605:
604:
603:
599:
595:
590:
589:
588:
585:
580:
574:
569:
568:
566:
560:
555:
554:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
539:
536:
531:
526:that editor.
524:
519:
515:
514:
512:
506:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
474:
469:
463:
459:
455:
449:
448:DirtySocks357
444:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
411:
401:
400:
397:
393:
386:
384:
380:
374:
370:
364:
360:
357:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
340:
339:
334:
326:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
292:
291:
287:
283:
278:
275:
272:
271:
268:
265:
260:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
224:
220:
213:
210:
206:
201:
200:
188:
183:
179:
178:
174:
170:
164:
162:
158:
152:
148:
142:
138:
136:
135:
128:
127:
126:
120:
119:
114:
106:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
18:
1211:
1210:
1200:
1198:
1171:
1129:
1109:
1093:
1058:
1056:
1049:
1048:
1044:Did you know
1042:
1036:
1000:
999:
981:, but other
970:
962:edit summary
953:
946:
937:
936:
925:The article
924:
892:
889:
871:
836:
834:
827:
826:
822:Did you know
820:
814:
756:
752:
731:
697:
689:your opinion
688:
670:
659:
620:
581:
532:
517:
470:
461:
423:
407:
389:
358:
353:
350:
343:
342:
338:Did you know
336:
330:
298:
279:
276:
273:
261:
257:
241:Gerda Arendt
230:
219:Gerda Arendt
216:
204:
202:
195:
167:
132:
130:
123:
122:
118:Did you know
116:
110:
16:
1039:1 July 2024
940:WP:ONEOTHER
886:ChineseRoom
299:You fixing
1073:here's how
1011:FastilyBot
851:here's how
482:Mindmatrix
369:here's how
233:the person
147:here's how
995:consensus
929:has been
744:adjective
592:fingers.
454:this edit
420:vandalism
305:MrSamples
277:Regards,
1141:Nsophiay
1095:RoySmith
1009:Thanks,
1113:Aballan
1004:history
424:meaning
355:Imhotep
301:my edit
17:Archive
1098:(talk)
964:or on
878:(talk)
733:matrix
699:matrix
671:wasn’t
661:matrix
622:matrix
583:matrix
534:matrix
472:matrix
396:(talk)
169:Z1720
1184:, a
1180:, a
1146:talk
1117:talk
1015:talk
899:talk
766:talk
728:Mind
713:talk
694:Mind
679:talk
656:Mind
637:talk
617:Mind
598:talk
578:Mind
563:Per
548:talk
529:Mind
494:talk
467:Mind
436:talk
309:talk
286:talk
245:talk
235:who
223:talk
209:2024
173:talk
93:2023
89:2022
85:2021
81:2020
77:2019
73:2018
69:2017
65:2016
61:2015
57:2014
53:2013
49:2012
45:2011
41:2010
37:2009
33:2008
29:2007
25:2006
21:2005
1203:by
1196:.
1037:On
911:of
874:PMC
815:On
753:not
392:PMC
331:On
111:On
1215:iz
1148:)
1119:)
1089:.
1075:,
1041:,
1017:)
968:.
951:.
901:)
876:♠
867:.
853:,
819:,
768:)
757:is
715:)
681:)
639:)
600:)
567::
550:)
513::
496:)
438:)
394:♠
385:.
371:,
335:,
311:)
288:)
247:)
239:--
225:)
175:)
163:.
149:,
115:,
91:|
87:|
83:|
79:|
75:|
71:|
67:|
63:|
59:|
55:|
51:|
47:|
43:|
39:|
35:|
31:|
27:|
23:|
19::
1212:L
1144:(
1115:(
1079:)
1071:(
1013:(
897:(
872:♠
857:)
849:(
764:(
711:(
677:(
650::
646:@
635:(
611::
607:@
596:(
561::
557:@
546:(
507::
503:@
492:(
480:@
450::
446:@
434:(
390:♠
375:)
367:(
307:(
284:(
243:(
221:(
171:(
153:)
145:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
