185:
the article losing perspective on dylan's importance musically and culturally; so in addition to the punctuation, referencing etc. an all round success I would say. As far as
Bjorner, i'm in two minds as a) it's obviously a great and authoritative source on dylan but b) even if we get it through the FARC, most likely some other editor will come along in 2 moths or 6 months or a year or whatever, and question it - so i'm personally of the belief that if we have another source with the same info, we should use that one to save us all infinitely recurrent ballache, and keep Bjorner as an external link. However, you clearly have access to many more dylan books than I, so ultimataly i'll leave that to your discretion - but if I do happen to come across alternate sources how would you suggest I proceed? If you're happy to periodically argue the legitimacy of Bjorner I'm also happy to let them stay if it's consensus. As for any other problems we might face - some editors will obviously still make an issue of the length, but i believe we've made the article much more focused, and we'll have to hope the consensus is that the subject warrants the attention (your comparison to the size of
217:
lifted with all the improvements that have been made. Kudos! Two items that I believe need attention, one longer term and the other soon. As I noted previously, Dylan's first year was pivotal, and a lot is glossed over between his arrival and the
Shelton article. Otherwise, it's as if he arrived, played some clubs, and got signed, which hardly does the story justice biographically. That should not be of concern for FAR, but to let you know, I've scoured Sounes, Heylin and Gray for detail and will be looking at other sources to add information on Feb-Oct '61. That's longer term. The short-term item is the statement on Baez and Dylan performing at rallies. As far as I know, the March on Washington was their only rally together, and the Mississippi Voter Rally with Seeger was the only other demonstration he attended post-1961. I don't disagree he was prominent, but that's more because of his songs than what he actually did. To that I'll add: If this is the weakest link 1960-70 (and I believe it is), things are in good shape for this formative period.
1619:
the other day, I couldn't believe my eyes, somebody had thrown out (1) a 4-disc set of Bob Marley CDs, and (2) the R.S. "Cover to Cover" 4-disc CD-ROM set that has every issue from 1967–2007! I think you might have mentioned before that you had the latter. This was something I quite wanted to get when it came out, but I think decided at the time that it wasn't within my budget. I can't understand why anyone would just throw out stuff like that. Even if they don't want it, we have a table in our building here people leave books and stuff—they could have left it there—or given it to the local large thrift shop, which is only a few blocks away. Anyways, needless to say I snatched both items. UPDATE: I installed the "Cover to Cover" reader on my Mac but the application keeps quitting unexpectedly before it even gets started; on my wife's old
Windows computer I'm not sure if the disc player still works, but it didn't read the reader's installer disc at all. Argh, ok, according to
170:
connects with the previous thought, but a more specific reference such as a synonym or additional fact would more naturally carry it along. Instead, "this" tends to punctuate the statement as the writer's observation rather than one of plain fact (what I referred to as "self-conscious"). However, in trying not to change anything else, I created a construction problem, whereas the construction you restored is better. A good example, one where I think I satisfied the problem, was the later reference to Gray's "price gouging" remark, which originally started with "this." Referencing fact at the beginning of the sentence, in my opinion, gives it more substance/natural weight and avoids causing the reader to pause. The same sort of solution is called for here, but it may take a more extensive re-write, as the Gray sentence did.
111:
available. Obviously, this discussion would never have taken place if the books had been cited instead of the website, but then readers would have been denied what
Bjorner has so generously made available. Maybe the link ought to go directly to the Yearly Chronicles page to satisfy the little old lady at the foundation, but I must say there's a certain charm to Olof's home page – which is to say, does information have to be slickly packaged to be deemed reliable? Anyway, I hope this puts the issue to rest. If you don't mind, I plan to email some comments to you regarding the article and to volunteer to help wherever I can. That may take a few days. In the meantime, I intend to add a one-liner or so to the FAR to second the expert opinions.
155:
Direction Home years, yes, I think maybe we were editing that same bit at the same time and you may have had to change back my edit twice - sorry about that. I meant to write "focused on the years 1961 to 1966" not "1961 and 1966." But I am happy to keep the bookends about arriving in NYC and the motorcycle accident. I also agree we don't want the article just dates, and I guess we just have to find the right balance of how much additional info to include without including too much. Anyhow, cool, it's a pleasure to collaborate with you. If I make any further trims you're not happy with, don't feel at all bad about reverting them, because I really don't mind. Cheers,
2292:
364:
reluctant to play such a long track, "Like a
Rolling Stone" reached number two in the US charts and became a worldwide hit. The track has been described as revolutionary in its combination of different musical elements, the youthful, cynical sound of Dylan's voice, and the directness of the question in the chorus: "How does it feel?". "Like a Rolling Stone" transformed Dylan's career and is today considered one of the most influential compositions in post-war popular music and has since its release been both a music industry and popular culture milestone which elevated Dylan's image to iconic. The song has been covered by numerous artists, including
678:"'the colors of Friday were dull/ as cathedral bells were gently burnin'/ strikin' for the gentle/ strikin' for the kind/ strinkin' for the crippled ones/ an' strikin' for the blind" are quoted twice. Surely once is enough. In "Lyrics" the article seems to state that the song is set in night, between sunset and midnight. In "Interpretation", we are told "the sun slowly rises". So what time is it? I wish I could help you to improve this article to FAC but I'm afraid I've been run over by work. I'll try to look at it again and make some further constructive edits.
2627:
73:
least a year searching high and low. Meanwhile, I haven't found any sources that contradict him on major issues, just a couple quibbles. Also, Olaf is an important figure in
Dylanology. Using him as a source (he's not at all part of the story, like Weberman) leads others to his door. BTW, I haven't abandoned my suggestions regarding the Dylan article. I fully intend to return, as soon as I wrap up a couple commitments on the local (eastern Pa.) pages I've been contributing to. See you soon. And keep up the good work.
1658:
wrote me, I plugged in an external disc drive again and tried but... nada. Es ist kaput. Speaking of RS I remember reading avidly about the
Chicago Conspiracy Trial in RS in 1969/70. I recently watched the Netflix film and it brought back lots of memories. How Bobby Seale was treated in court. How the Yippie leader and Judge Hoffman had the same surname, and occasionally Abbie Hoffman said to the Judge, "Oh, Father." The film is very wordy but I enjoyed several of the performances and the rhetoric of the time.
2027:
1731:. Can't remember if I may have told you, I had tickets to see the Stones last year but the tour was postponed until this fall, but tragically Vancouver was not one of the tour dates kept; its cancellation was announced just a couple of weeks ago. I saw them 30 years ago but haven't managed to since, and wanted to see them one more time. Dunno how many tours they have left in them—Charlie Watts is I believe 80, and is actually missing this tour to recover from surgery. I hope you're well, take care.
1970:, but as I've said even if I tried to buy every box set he puts out, I'd have too little time these days to delve very deep into them. Maybe I'll get it at some point, but in the meantime do tell me how the versions of those two songs are. Possibly I can listen to snippets of them on some official online platform like Amazon or AllMusic. I still have to put the versions of SITLT in the WTRF article into a table. Possibly today if I have time, will see. Then we can add the new version.
632:
the whole wide universe”, seem to reflect more on Oswald than
Kennedy, or at least to embrace the assassin as much as his victim in their magnanimity." But of course Karlin is not substantiating BD denial re CoF. The only link that does that is Rolling Stone. They don't say where they get the BD denial from, still it is a kind of reference, so I'll add it to article until something better surfaces. ("igenen the mind" ??? No idea where that came from. Must be computer malfunction!)
37:
2364:
2411:
431:
is to highlight 1) the fact that the
Bilderberg group and conspiracy theories about its real purpose were featured in international news because of the visit of Estulin to Cuba on 26 August; and 2) how Marxists are concerned about the effect it might have on socialist and progressive movements around the world. However, the Seattle Times blog post will be a useful source in a different paragraph. So thank you. --
2586:
1352:
new procedure that would replace FAR. I know you've been doing lots of work over the years to maintain the article, and I'm sorry I haven't done more. I haven't had really a lot of
Knowledge time the last number of months (I think maybe you haven't either, for even longer than me) but I'd be happy to make time, with you if you're willing and able, to try to clean it up to everyone's satisfaction. Cheers,
1975:]. She didn't get into too many details, and I believe she's intending to come back when she has time. Possibly you can ping her if her lack of comments are holding you back from getting far on trimming that you have time to do now. I gather she has been busy and has had some setbacks in real life. I can sympathize that tackling commenting on such a big article is not a small task.
2537:" going forward as a featured article candidate? As with the GA nominations, I'm happy to respond to the review comments, but wouldn't proceed without you as co-nominator (or without your blessing). If you're happy with this, let me know which you prefer to go forward first. I'll check for any significant new sources, given how much stuff on Dylan is being published. Regards,
1621:] newer Mac OS's don't support the set at all, and there is no patch. There is a patch for Windows. Maybe I'll try to see if I can get it to work on my wife's computer--not sure if her disc drive is the issue or not. Well, I guess that explains why someone threw this out--maybe they had a Mac or they didn't know about the Windows patch. Do you ever still use your set?
1502:, which I was involved in the FAR in 2011 but have been really bad at maintaining, and it's not in great shape. Anyway, I'm chipping away at it as time permits. I had intended to be more active in helping you maintain the Dylan article but didn't get past my little flurry of edits in March. I actually still haven't gotten to getting his new album yet.
1806:, it's £120 for 5 CDs, £24 each for music recorded 40 years ago. Shocking. But I'll probably get it. I'm looking forward to "When The Night Comes Falling from the Sky" which I always thought was a great song that was done a great disservice by Arthur Baker's big shoulder pads disco production. Good to hear from you and take care
1606:
Reading the article gave me a bit of a different point of view. From that point of view, TBT's ranking really is not surprising at all, as I'm sure it doesn't closely match the sensibilities of people whose musical backgrounds are really different than, say, the core group of R.S. critics. Like you, I was also glad to see
1570:
was a bigger cultural moment, establishing the album as an art format. I can understand BD albums arriving in the order BOTT, H61R, BonB, It looks like boomers are upset. The Who and U2 do not make the Top 75. I guess this is the inevitable result of trying to cram an art form 70 years old into a Top
1118:
Nice to hear from you. We're all well. I'm not sure I can add much of substance to the points you raise. I noted your Today's Featured Article request. It made me think O boy Did we miss a trick! 24 May is Bob's 80th birthday so maybe we should have made a request for BD on Main Page. He deserves it!
1034:
Unfortunately, there is another request for another big anniversary article for the same day. Oh well, I guess we'll just have to see how many votes each gets. But another option is, for whichever of the two doesn't get June 3, there's also June 4 whereby the article would still be June 3 for several
777:
Hi Mick, Merry Christmas! I hope you're well and have time to relax over the holiday season with loved ones. Here things are going well, no complaints. I have about 10 days off work and am doing various family activities. By the way, an interesting development on my talk page, where Eddie Korvin, the
631:
Thanks for your comments and links. I'm aware of the furore over Tom Paine speech, but neither speech nor subsequent "clarifications" mention CoF. I like the Karlin essay in TLS, and his point, "“For the countless confused, accused, misused, strung-out ones and worse / And for every hung-up person in
184:
Hi Mick, thanks for your lovely note. I agree that the article has been greatly improved through FAR - it's funny how much cruft can accumulate without you noticing until you actually have to actively weed it out - and i hope that the new legacy section has assuaged any fears you might have had about
169:
Regarding your note, like Moisejp, I appreciate your asking and also enjoy the collaborative process. Revert away as needed. As for the sentence on the first sanctioned re-mix, the edit is a hard to explain because it's a style/better writing issue. But I'll try. "This" at the beginning of a sentence
154:
Hi Mick, no problem at all. I was fully expecting when I made all those edits that some of them were going to be edited back or partially edited back, which is fine. I figured, what the heck, I'd try to cut the 2000s section down a bit, and see which changes you and others were happy with. For the No
1397:
Hi Mick, I hope all's well. Just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten about maintaining/improving the Dylan article. I've been busy and my little Knowledge time has been a bit scattered on various stuff the last couple of months, but I do plan to jump back into the Dylan article hopefully soon
1351:
may be fit for demotion from FA. I haven't read all the details enough to figure out if they're saying it should go to FAR—it's already been 11 years since its last FAR, that we both participated in—or possibly if some people are proposing the Wiki community could use it and other articles to test a
714:
Hi Mick, how’ve you been? Are you planning to get the 6-disc More Blood, More Tracks? I’m leaning towards not but we’ll see. It has a new version of “SITLT”; we’ll have to add it to the “WTRF” article. Who would have thought when we worked on that article in 2012 that a further three versions of the
693:
This has been an on-going incremental effort to improve the article and it would be nice to hear your added comments when you might have time. I have cut back the Wilentz and Bell quotes. Also, the previous editor apparently invented the "sun coming out" which is not in the song, though the clearing
236:
Do you think there might be a COI problem if I cite the doc. If its a problem, let me know or send an email. Otherwise I'm poncing about with the article while getting up to speed on the sources, but I'd very much like to have you on board if its given a push, seeing as how you wrote it. O and merry
192:
OT: Yes, everything is great here in Vienna as normal, although we've just had an extremely disastrous election which has made me infinitely distrustful of about 1 of every 3 people I meet. Where exactly did your parents come from in Vienna, do you know? Would it be possible for me to gain access to
130:
Hi Mick gold, how are you doing? My No Direction Home is the 1987 Ballantine paperback edition. I guess I should have checked mine was the same edition before adding that page number. Anyway, yes, it is in the "Heresy Toward Dogma?" section. So, yes、by all means, why don't you go with your edition's
1657:
I did buy "Cover to Cover" CD-Rom set and initially I had great fun with it. I seem to remember using it to find account of BD recording with Leon Russell when we were working on WTRF. But at some point something happened in Windows software (or in the Matrix) and they simply wouldn't run. When you
1643:
I think the point of these lists is to generate controversy and once upon a time I enjoyed arguing about lists. e.g. List Bob Dylan's best albums from 1 to 39. I guess I used to care but... Things Have Changed. The latest RS list just looks incoherent to me, and there is so much music on it I don't
1618:
Speaking of R.S., there is a garbage dumpster by my apartment building parking lot and sometimes people throw away mildly interesting stuff, and I've gotten in the habit of peeking in out of curiosity. Until now I have never seen anything interesting enough that I actually wanted to salvage it. But
804:
Merry Christmas to you too! I have listened to more of BS 14, More Blood, and there are wonderful things on it, including some marvellous versions of Idiot Wind. Interesting to see Eddie Korvin on your talk page. It would be interesting to read his interview and to hear the 71/2 ips tape he refers
554:
Thanks and I'm certainly pleased someone is putting intelligent effort into improving "Chimes of Freedom". I had a quick look and made small changes, inc Ian Bell's name. My hunch is if you take it to featured article nomination, some editors are going to query the length of the quotes, eg the Bell
430:
I appreciate your contribution. However, you are missing the point of this paragraph. The intent isn't to mention that Estulin has gotten some publicity in the mainstream press since there are other conspiracy theorists (such as Alex Jones) we could have singled out for that distinction. The intent
1874:
update his page. Larry is a poet who also is a songwriter. He would like to bolster the article's poetry section. He has a book 'American Cycle' being released this year - a work that has taken 47 years. Would you be able and willing to help me update his page? I would propose updates according to
1686:
I've just installed it and it works. Now the CD-Roms are accessible again. I've been busy lately on another production, about Brazilian Narco gangs, so I'm not sure when I'll have time but I can now browse through those Rolling Stones again. Thanks for that. I'll try to send you a link to the Cuba
1513:
has dropped to #335. It's a travesty! In 1987, the same magazine ranked it #13 on the best albums 1967–1987, which is a lot closer to where it should be. Oh well, I can only explain the drop by guessing that among the judges for the 2003, 2012, and 2020 lists there are some younger critics who may
1075:
Also as we discussed, I tried to add all the "SITLT" versions in to a table, but I couldn't manage the table to display in the footnote. It may be related to the kind of footnote or the kind of table (I tried some different combinations), I'm not sure, and there may be a way out there to get it to
1004:
Thanks Moisejp.I can see that has happened and it makes a lot more sense of an odd situation with the RTR wiki links. It's always a pleasure hearing from you and you are always making constructive edits and helping to keep WP on the right path. I wish I had more time for WP editing but hopefully I
216:
You, Moisejp, Warchef and others are doing a great job in honing the Dylan article. The rough edges and extraneous detail are all but gone, and it reads quite well. Though I haven't seen the article from when FA was originally awarded (I'll look it up), I can't imagine how the designation could be
2905:
I’m also sort of retired. I was a freelance TV producer but I haven’t produced anything this year, so that is nature’s way of telling me to slow down! We’ve acquired our first grandchild and I’d like to do more travelling. I’m hoping to visit Vietnam which I’ve been thinking about for the last 55
677:
I've made some copy edits, trying to make the prose sharper. A couple of comments. As I mentioned above, if you take it to WP:FAC, some editors are going to query the length of the quotes, eg the Bell quote is 155 words, and will suggest you paraphrase the material more. The lines of Dylan's poem
134:
In the last few weeks, I have really enjoyed seeing the team effort as everyone has come together to try to pass this FAR. I'm sure we will, but I think surely this article has become even better, more concise, better referenced, more consistent, by having gone through the FAR process, so that is
110:
I'm in awe. That's taking the role of editor beyond what I ever expected to see. Outstanding! I finally had a chance to pore over the FAR and was also impressed by your responses and restraint. I then looked through the Swede's site (nobody that he is) and found even more material than I knew was
87:
Shall do on backing you up. I took a look at the FAR page, only very briefly and I haven't had a chance to look back at the article itself, so I don't have much feedback on the dialogue at the moment. I did try the link one of the editors included, the one that connects to Olof's home page, which
72:
Hi, Mick! I'm not sure what you have in mind in terms of supporting Olaf as a reference, but I can't think of any more accurate or thorough a source on the issues he's researched. For example, in building a Dylan timeline, I found only a small handful of dates that he doesn't have, and I spent at
1213:
Congratulations! WTRF looks great on the main page. A good read and an interesting addition to the critical shenanigans surrounding Bob's 80th. After we got used to 30 years of Bob on his NET it's a reminder that he was v low profile for 3 years. I confess I do miss James Taylor, it added a tiny
1178:
Happy (belated) 80th to Bob! I like "Railroad Bill" and "Pretty Saro" a lot too. I haven't listened to ASP in a while, need to listen to it again to remember the other tracks you mentioned. Just a quick note that WTRF will be on the main page in a few hours or so. Just now I did a final round of
363:
was unhappy with both the song's length at over six minutes and its heavy electric sound, and were hesitant to release it. It was only when a month later a copy was leaked to a new popular music club and heard by influential DJs that the song was put out as a single. Although radio stations were
252:
Ok, I might tap you for sources as I go, and no worries about being preoccupied, its great to see the work ye are doing on Dylan. As much as anything I just wanted to let you know what I was up to, given you are the main author. I'm doing general bits on van der Wyeden at the moment, but want to
1497:
Hi Mick. How have you been? Has the pandemic had a big effect on your documentary work? I hope you and your loved ones are all safe and well. We're all well here. I've been working from home the last six months with no problems. Lately I've been really busy and not on Knowledge much. My current
1605:
The link you sent me about the futility of R.S.'s top 500 list was interesting. I grew up reading R.S. and I know the magazine shaped my musical tastes quite a lot. I never thought of the range of music they spotlighted as being exclusionary, but just as being good, common-sense quality stuff.
646:
Both DannyMusic and I have been making enhancements to the article to incrementally move it towards an FA nomination. If you might have any ideas or possibly something like a check list of things to do for improving the article, then it might be useful for moving the article forward towards FA
1119:
But then the thought of how much madness and vandalism might descend on the article sobered me up. I still spend time trying to revert all the minor edits and vandalism that make the BD article worse. I have occasional bouts of WP energy. The last sustained burst was to improve the article on
1614:
tunes. Lately I've been on Knowledge less and less (gosh, I haven't made any content edits in over a month). But I see the top 500 list is indeed online, and (if nobody has done so already) I will try hard to fit in time to update the R.S. ranking for TBT and other articles we've worked on.
1761:
songs, fewer than I thought, but anyway it's definitely too expensive for me.) Oh well, there may still be worthwhile stuff on the 2-disc. I'll have to listen to previews or excerpts closer to the release date and decide whether to get it. (Still definitely want to get the extended
1541:. I'm not sure what's happening next. Pandemic has thrown productions into turmoil. I haven't been terribly active on WP, I've tried to keep an eye on main BD article to stop mad edits and allegations of alcoholism. I had a burst of energy recently, after I saw a good doc about
1214:
soupçon of spice to the critical commentary. I see several references to material in Bob Dylan Archive in Tulsa, are they recent additions? I have the impression that BDA has not yet provided detailed account of contents as they're still cataloguing/sorting all the stuff. Best,
1085:, I didn't end up getting it yet, but did listen to excerpts of all the songs on iTunes. There's some nice stuff in there, maybe I'll eventually get to buying it. About the two tunes I asked you about, I found the two "Sarah Jane" alternate takes to be almost the same as the
2650:
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Lasting for over 11 minutes, Bob Dylan’s song "Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands" occupied an entire side of his 1966 double album Blonde on Blonde. It has polarised music critics." - I wonder why the title in the infobox is like in
2332:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the
2876:
I'm also devoting more time to my radio show as well as projects related to our house which just about dates to the Revolution. So little time, so much to do. Or to put that another way: I wake up in the morning, fold my hands and pray for rain... You now the rest.
2196:
songs, so I'm not expecting it to be picked up very soon. Obviously nominating it is no barrier to further improvements being made in the meantime - I'll keep an eye on the talk page. I've sent you something by Paul Williams, that I think could be useful for
1222:) 09:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Ahhh now I remember! It was Eddie Korvin's dramatic appearance on your Talk page in December 2018. I recently plugged in to 3 day conference from UT Institute for Bob Dylan Studies. Some good stuff, especially from Sean Wilentz.
1025:
Hiya Mick. How've you been? I hope this thread is not too old and you don't mind me adding here. If you prefer, this could be moved to a new section. Maybe I'll do this one in bullet form. I've got various scattered (but still related!) stuff to mention.
1514:
not have had as much exposure to TBT?? But maybe not, because there are still lots and lots of oldie albums near the top of the 2020 list; maybe even older critics genuinely feel TBT has not aged as well. Hard for me to fathom, but that may just be me.
745:
So I guess Bjorner will have to update his website in the light of "MBMT". I have added it to the "WTRF" article with a cite to the bobdylan.com website. You are welcome to change it if you can see a more elegant way to cite this new recording. Best,
2475:
805:
to. I guess it would necessitate a pilgrimage to Tulsa, which I won't undertake in the near future. That Lucky Old sun is a song Bob has often performed, before recording a marvellous version on Shadows In the Night. Best wishes for the new year.
2915:
The words that go through my mind each morning aren’t from Bob but Leonard Cohen: "The birds, they sang at the break of day. Start again I heard them say." You probably know the feeling, I've retired but I've never been busier. All best wishes
1536:
It's nice to hear from you. We're Ok, so far. I was just finishing 2 part doc on effect of Cuban revolution on the rest of the globe as pandemic hit. So that was on Arte in Europe, BBC in UK, and it's available on amazon.com in US, it's called
742:. It arrived this morning, I haven't had time to listen to it yet. I see there is a new "SITLT" on Disc 3 and it's credited to A&R Studios, New York, September 17, 1974. When I look at Bjorner's log of that date, it doesn't list the song.
1597:
on the US Amazon Prime and just now tried to purchase it (only 99 cents per episode), but as I suspected it doesn't let me buy it from Canada. Too bad. It doesn't seem to be available on the Canadian Amazon Prime. I read an online review in
1076:
work (maybe if I look at lots of articles I could find an example of a table in a footnote somewhere and copy that template) but I don't have time to spend too long on it for now (who knows, maybe at a later time). I saved what I tried here
737:
Thanks for your comment. I've been terribly busy with work, so apologies for late reply. Things have been hectic so I haven't done much on WP lately except try to keep an eye on the main BD article and prevent errors. I've bought the 6 disc
2948:
Finished what I could. Listings need full cites at some point, but that's just part of general cleanup, nothing that interferes with usefulness. Now to get ready for Christmas with family and friends. Hope your holidays are joyous as well.
1064:] says "The recordings on Bob Dylan – 1970 were first released in a limited edition on December 4 as part of the Bob Dylan – 50th Anniversary Collection copyright extension series (which began in 2012)" but doesn't go as far as calling
1938:
Hi Moisejp, I hope you're well. Earlier last year there was a small flurry of comments from SG and a couple of other editors about BD article. Where are they? I'm trying to find these comments, as I work on pruning the article. Thanks
1187:
and your contributions including most of the Critical comments section and other parts are a big part of that. I'd like to say again what a pleasure it was working on this and other articles with you. Cheers, hope to talk again soon.
2467:
869:
Yet another "SITLT" performance released! I added it to "WTRF". Maybe if the 1976 leg of the Rolling Thunder Revue gets released on a future Bootleg Series, the known May 1976 live performance will also see the light of the day. :-)
2101:
Yes, that sounds admirable in principle. I don't seem to have as much time as I used to devote to writing/editing WP articles on Dylan but I applaud your intentions. I have a lot of books on Bob. There is a recent one on BonB,
2728:
One suggestion for the bibliography. Have you considered using "masks" instead of repeating the names of authors who have multiple works? Masking makes the listings easier to read, giving the page a cleaner look. For example:
2930:
Ditto on the above concerning retirement and the like, except for grandchildren—my daughter's 32 and in no hurry—and Vietnam. On the latter I still think of that sorry chapter, usually accompanied by Bruce Cockburn's "Rocket
2482:
2106:
1840:. I've noticed your name at other articles on 1960s rock music and wanted to let you know, in case you would be interested in offering a review, which would be much appreciated if you have the time and interest. Thanks.
419:
discussion of Estulin's claims which you have deleted. I have no wish to engage in an edit war if you have feeling of ownership of this page. My interest in Bilderberg was triggered by Jon Ronson's documentaries. best
2725:. Earlier this year an editor changed the infobox date to December 17, 1967 based on one source and then the fact no citations had been provided for December 27. Based on what I've found, I plan to revert the change.
2463:
2448:
253:
focus specifically on the Descent in a few weeks time. The doc gives a very good framework for structuring an expansion. O and thanks for the spelling catch, though I agree the current heading title isn't adequate.
1727:], maybe you know it, it's a wonderful collection of tunes. Also looking forward to alternate takes including "Tight Connection" and "Blind Willie McTell". And looking forward to the upcoming 2-disc version of
1160:. There are no electrifying moments but it's a very pleasant listen because you feel as if you're eavesdropping on Dylan + musicians in the studio. My biggest revelation of this phase of Dylan's career was the
576:
When you write about JFK assassination as possible genesis of song, you say "Although Dylan has denied that this is the case," I would love to know where Dylan has made this assertion. Do you have a ref? Best,
1833:
2081:
songs as GAs. Would you be interested in being a co-nominator? (This won't necessarily involve any further effort on your part; I'm happy to work on the articles and respond to reviewer comments.) Regards,
2599:
531:
Recently, I have been looking at the GA for "Chimes of Freedom" with the thought of possibly improving it towards a featured article nomination eventually. Could you glance at it at some point in time?
854:
about Mr. Tambourine Man. I can't think of anything to say about the Dylan portal cos I have not been active on it. It's good to see you are still busy editing a variety of WP music topics. All best,
2447:
2126:
really helpful - Sanders has interviewed Bob Johnston, Charlie McCoy, Al Kooper, Mac Gayden, Hargus Robbins, Henry Strzelecki and Wayne Moss, amongst others, and has acccess to the 18-disc set of
824:. It's sad, but it seems there isn't much traffic. I haven't commented on the proposal for deletion yet, still thinking if there's anything I can say. I hope you're well, will catch up more soon.
1896:
I'm afraid real life is keeping me extremely busy at the moment. I do not have time to edit many WP pages which I have a strong desire to improve. I do not have time to edit Larry Beckett. Best,
415:
Hi Loremaster, did you simply click the "undo" button after I attempted to improve the prose of this article? I had thought that some of my edits improved the style, and included a web ref to a
495:
Thanks for the response, and sorry I didn't notice your answer sooner- sometimes when I get more than one response, I don't notice the earlier ones. Nice to see that you found it! The whole
1179:
mostly very small cleanup. The biggest edit I did was to remove the mention of James Taylor. I hope you don't mind. Although it's a kind of fun detail, I feel it may be best to remove for
1566:
is a much better collection of songs, and was enormously influential in successfully carrying off art-rock string quartet, avant-garde electronic distortion, and Indian musical language.
2663:
two days before he died - was taken on a cemetery returning from a funeral last year. It pictures a promise, - let's work on the articles he left under construction. -- (forgot to sign)
1144:
would be a limited edition, it would not be replaced after initial run sold out. I've looked at their website but haven't yet found anything I could recommend as a WP:RS on this point.
977:
760:
Thanks for your edit, Mick, it looks great! Take care, hang in there with your busyness, and I hope you have some relaxing time coming up for yourself. Ciao for now, keep in touch!
1509:
has published it's latest Top 500 Albums list. Not sure if it's online yet. When it is, we'll need to update all the rankings in the various FA articles. I skimmed through and saw
2934:
Regarding the masks, consider it done, in a matter of days. And thanks for the reminder of the line from "Anthem." More hopeful words to live by and pass on. Best to you as well.
2371:
2034:
1164:
set. I found it amazing, I thought "Pretty Saro", "This Evening So Soon", "Railroad Bill", and "Tattle O'Day" were as good as anything on SP, perhaps superior. Wonderful stuff.
2655:, but the article is different. No topic for the next three days, - never even think about moving an article while linked from the Main page. - Sad eyes - I mourn the death of
189:
is an excellent point in our favour I feel), and that it doesn't lose its focus through its length. I'll read through it again now and see if there is anything else I can see.
983:].) I also updated a number of red links to this name. I'm glad you noticed that I got the name wrong. Take care, my friend. It's always a pleasure to be in contact with you.
2462:
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at
1802:
with excellent Mick Taylor on slide, and I believe there's another version which will be on sale as a 45 from Third Man Records. I'm dismayed by the price of 6CD version of
92:. If I'm missing something in the thread, however, ignore this comment. The overall point is that someone who's published 11 volumes-plus on a subject that are available on
396:
No probs - looks fine - Jonathon Sedgwick's allegation was pretty flaky and I wasn't sure whether to include it or not. Congrats on getting featured article - great work.
591:
Those were nice edits from you overnight. The section you mention here was written by a previous editor. Here is a useful link for some discussion of Dylan and JFK here:
2866:
Anyway, I didn't want to take the liberty of changing the article without asking. But if you like this approach, let me know, and I'd be happy to do the "grunt" work.
949:
I know how to edit articles but not how to change the name of an article. Perhaps you could contact an Administrator about deleting the article, and then create a new
2073:" articles and have done fantastic work on them. I was thinking about tidying the articles up and adding some further information, with a view to nominating them as
300:
821:
2433:
Hi Mick, I added this manually as the bot only notifies one nominator. Thanks for all your excellent work on the article, it really made a difference. Regards,
2507:
2388:
2338:
472:
Taylor talks about Dylan being the most gracious musician (not exact quote, but pretty much like it) that he ever worked with, and discusses Dylan's prolific
1344:
604:. Dylan's exact words as far as I can see at this moment were “The whole thing about my reactions to the assassination is overplayed,” which is quoted here:
599:
1684:
846:
Hi, I've been away in Paris editing a documentary about Cuba which has been going on for months. Just got back. So I've been rather inactive on WP. I did
470:
282:
1089:
version, and for "Lily of the West" the versions were very different, and one of them was quite interesting (but even so I don't love it as much as the
610:. Separately, from your edits last night, your version "igenen the mind", I have altered to "within the mind", and you can change it further as needed.
2430:
within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
2243:
1827:
906:, but these 2 box set releases have not been given numbers in the Bootleg Series. If you agree with me, I think it can be fixed. Someone has added
2442:
1875:
the COI rules on Larry's page for review, which would all be formatted correctly for addition if approved. Thank you for your consideration! Best
1035:
hours North American time; I had to resort to that option for one off my TFAs in the past, and it's not perfect but is OK as far as I'm concerned.
93:
2560:"? It's an intriguing song. I'm not sure how much time I'll have to contribute but I'm happy to support you and do as much as I am able. Best,
2575:
2329:
1841:
520:
2869:
How ya doin'? I've been retired about five years, and more recently I've been working on a few American history pages, one of which was the
2134:.) I'll start on one of the articles shortly, and get in touch again before nominating it. On another issue, your input would be welcome at
2870:
2604:
1854:
1031:
914:
but it is a red link. Many thanks for being an active editor & contacting me. I'm still dashing between London and Paris. Best wishes,
1962:
is out. Have you had a good listen to it? How are the alternate versions of "Sarah Jane" and "Lily of the West". You're familiar with the
339:. Its confrontational lyrics originate in an extended piece of verse Dylan wrote in June 1965, when he returned exhausted from a grueling
2478:. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
1884:
743:
2642:
1849:
1799:, We're Ok. In fact we're off on vacation to Crete tomorrow so we're packing. I noticed Blind Willie McTell landed on YouTube yesterday
778:
engineer from the "WTRF" session, made contact about some small corrections to the article. (PS, have you got in some good listening of
694:
of the mist is depicted in the lyrics. Maybe it looks better now after the edits I put in on this earlier today given your suggestions.
2491:
2481:
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at
1923:
1905:
1425:
703:
656:
641:
619:
564:
2709:
2691:
1289:
440:
1696:
1576:
586:
343:. During a difficult two days pre-production, Dylan struggled to find the essence of the song, which was demoed without success as a
193:
any of your documentaries would you say? As always, it's a great pleasure collaborating with you and you're doing a marvelous job on
2261:
2006:
1993:
Hi Moisejp, Thanks for the SandyGeorgia ref. I've continued to prune BD today and added a comment on Talk page. The situation with
1984:
1815:
1775:
1740:
1667:
1587:
1466:
1437:
1391:
1337:
1231:
1197:
1173:
992:
970:
937:
923:
863:
814:
769:
755:
1102:
2616:
1948:
1610:
at #3. I saw Joni Mitchell in concert in 1998 when she and Van Morrison opened for Dylan, but unfortunately she didn't play any
1420:
Good to hear from you. I try to improve the Dylan article, have removed some cruft and trivia. I was stimulated to re-write the
303:. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the
2419:
2427:
2353:
1997:
is odd. It's been released in USA but will not be released in UK until end of March, so I'll let you know when I've heard it.
2165:
2156:. Please have a look and see what you think. (Maybe on the talk page there, so it's more visible to other editors.) Regards,
2091:
1933:
1030:
I think you saw I requested "WTRF" to be Today's Featured Article on June 3 for the single's release's fiftieth anniversary:
879:
833:
791:
724:
262:
820:
Hi Mick, you likely have already seen this, but the Bob Dylan portal (i.e., WikiProject Dylan), and various other portals,
709:
2422:
for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a
2249:
2135:
2055:
489:
278:
2831:
2813:
2795:
2569:
2415:
2405:
2227:
2210:
2183:
2147:
2117:
1261:
2856:
2777:
2751:
2671:
2060:
541:
322:
226:
2323:
1837:
981:, which is how it is listed on Bobdylan.com. (The "Bob Dylan –" part seems superfluous, but that's how it's listed
687:
480:" in the studio, and Taylor decided then to put it on his album. He isn't specific about the album name, though. --
424:
1480:
555:
quote is 155 words, and will suggest you paraphrase the material more. I'll take another look when I'm less busy.
451:
I thought that text would be questioned... nice to meet you by the way.. Anyhow, there's a good documentary with
96:
is clearly an authority, not just an ardent fan. No need to respond, just let me know when you post your position.
2530:
2189:
2153:
2131:
2066:
602:
59:
2666:
The image commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page, and
1683:, I have to thank you! Your post made me go look for Windows patch for RS "Cover to Cover" and I found it here:
2976:
2943:
2925:
2546:
1277:
1249:
851:
405:
285:. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director,
144:
2958:
2593:
2577:
2557:
2534:
2401:
2394:
2276:
2198:
2070:
892:
Hi, Thanks for adding the new version of SITLT to the WTRF article. Thanks also for creating the article for
317:
296:
22:
19:
16:
2697:
2248:
Hi, Mick: Passing along the following notification I received from BennyOnTheLoose: I've started a topic at
2383:
2291:
2014:
1492:
268:
206:
179:
164:
2675:
1800:
1046:
yet. I don't think I'm going to, partly because I don't want to mess up the official title like I did for
246:
2886:
2349:
2334:
1630:
1523:
1407:
1361:
1311:
1158:
446:
211:
1648:
cannot possibly be the Beatles' most significant album. I don't mind BOTT as top BD album. I also think
120:
105:
82:
1243:
958:
911:
2739:
2667:
2660:
2638:
2597:, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Knowledge. The
2542:
2438:
2206:
2188:
Having responded to your points on the talk page, and added an image, I've gone ahead and nominated "
2161:
2143:
2087:
847:
601:. Here is Dylan writing about his poorly received comments on Lee Harvey after the loss of JFK here:
499:
interview -(all the clips) are actually interesting. Would it be too much for you to leave a note on
373:
27:
2603:
has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may
125:
2476:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary
1185:
But anyway, if I may be so immodest on behalf of both of us, I think the article looks pretty great
902:
526:
410:
1140:
in UK, which is fanzine I've written for but they also sell Dylan merchandise. Their website said
2466:. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at
2390:
2074:
516:
485:
2315:
592:
2897:
2705:
2687:
2379:
2345:
2051:
391:
340:
2218:
Thanks for nominating RDW. I'll have a look at the Paul Williams email. Best wishes for 2023.
2714:
2634:
1919:
1880:
1578:
It would be admirable if you have the time to insert new TBT ranking into the article. Best,
1542:
699:
652:
615:
537:
2719:
A great resource! I'm using the bibliography at the moment to pin down the release date for
1866:
I'm wondering if you ever help COI editors, of which I am one. I am attempting to help poet
469:. I think watching all the parts are really interesting, but regarding Dylan, in part four:
2553:
2538:
2468:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence
2434:
2328:
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
2215:
2202:
2171:
2157:
2139:
2098:
2083:
1257:
608:
436:
382:
331:
299:). If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of
274:
2472:
Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes.
1753:, "Don't Ever Take Yourself Away", which I believe was already released officially on the
8:
2849:
2721:
2607:
to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,
2512:
1980:
1183:, especially since thousands of people are likely to read the article in the coming day.
477:
231:
2763:
2503:
2358:
2043:
1454:
512:
481:
369:
149:
2174:. This is looking good. I'll try to make some constructive comments on the Talk page.
1549:, I re-wrote the JC article. I think his photos and film making are really impressive.
511:, that printed reference will be available? It would be much appreciated, I'm sure! --
2954:
2939:
2882:
2853:
2828:
2810:
2792:
2774:
2748:
2744:
2701:
2683:
2521:
tracks are good articles, I'm thinking about my next Dylan project (I'm torn between
2375:
2272:
2257:
2047:
1771:
1736:
1626:
1519:
1403:
1357:
1307:
1193:
1098:
988:
933:
875:
829:
787:
765:
720:
401:
290:
222:
202:
175:
160:
140:
116:
101:
78:
2626:
1644:
recognise. Would anyone try to make a list of the 500 Best Books? I will argue that
1068:
itself limited edition, but still they're not listing it among his official albums (
2612:
2124:
That Thin, Wild Mercury Sound: Dylan, Nashville, and the Making of Blonde on Blonde
2104:
That Thin, Wild Mercury Sound: Dylan, Nashville, and the Making of Blonde on Blonde
1915:
1893:
1876:
1845:
1398:
and pick up where I left off in trying to find areas to clean up. Talk again soon,
1297:
695:
672:
648:
626:
611:
571:
549:
533:
500:
459:, which is cut into 5 parts. In part 4 of 5, Taylor discusses the work he did with
360:
2464:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
2311:
1324:
Thanks. Happy New Year and all best wishes for you & your family in 2020. As
1271:
1253:
1120:
715:
tune would see the light of day in addition to the two we mentioned at the time!
432:
258:
242:
67:
2108:
which I don't have and it looks useful. Good luck, I will try to help if I can.
2026:
2968:
2917:
2561:
2456:
2282:
2267:
I just noticed Benny attached the invite above. Please forgive the redundancy.
2219:
2175:
2109:
1998:
1955:
1940:
1911:
1897:
1860:
1807:
1688:
1659:
1579:
1484:
1458:
1429:
1383:
1329:
1281:
1223:
1215:
1165:
1006:
962:
915:
855:
806:
747:
679:
633:
578:
556:
421:
2679:
2652:
1302:
Happy New Year, Mick. All the best in 2020. I hope all is going well for you.
135:
good. (Too bad if we end up having to lose Bjorner, though.) Have a good day!
89:
2907:
2841:
2770:
2499:
1867:
1499:
1180:
356:
186:
1966:
version of each, right? As I mentioned, I really love them. I'd like to get
2964:
2950:
2935:
2893:
2878:
2734:
2656:
2268:
2253:
2192:" as a GA. There's a large GA backlog at the moment, including three other
1976:
1794:
1767:
1732:
1678:
1638:
1622:
1575:
at No.3. This is quite an interesting essay on the whole cultural exercise
1531:
1515:
1474:
1446:
1415:
1399:
1377:
1369:
1353:
1319:
1303:
1208:
1189:
1113:
1094:
999:
984:
944:
929:
887:
871:
841:
825:
799:
783:
761:
732:
716:
397:
365:
308:
286:
218:
198:
171:
156:
136:
112:
97:
88:
does look like a fan site. More useful (and impressive), I think, would be
74:
36:
928:
Oops, I assumed it was a Bootleg Series. Do you know how we can fix this?
2608:
2252:, and thought you might be interested in contributing to the discussion.
1958:. I've been meaning to write to you, either on here or by email. I think
1871:
508:
496:
473:
452:
56:
605:
197:
and your dedication would be the envy of any wikipedia editor. peace :)
2307:
2130:, which has studio dialogue etc. (My Dylan-related books are listed at
1328:
used to sing: "It's getting better all the time. (Can't get no worse)"
348:
254:
238:
2363:
598:
article which repeats the comment about a possible Dylan denial here:
1571:
500. It seems skewed towards 21st century material. I'm happy to see
1348:
1280:. Hope this helps. May be able to contribute more easily next week.
460:
377:
352:
336:
304:
194:
52:
1973:
The conversation with Sandy you were asking about can be found here
2474:
Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at
2426:
under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
1757:
soundtrack a few years ago. (Even the 5-disc version only has four
1069:
465:
456:
507:
gets around to adding that album to Taylor's (and other people's)
1562:
the Beatles' highest album at No. 5. It seems obvious to me that
2585:
1709:
Mick, how've you been? Here all's well. I didn't end up getting
1345:
Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates#Discussion_of_samples
2896:. Good to hear from you. Your suggestion about “masks” for the
978:
Bob Dylan – The Rolling Thunder Revue: The 1975 Live Recordings
2529:
songs). In parallel to that, how would you feel about either "
1054:
may be the official title, but Dylan's website also mentions
1042:
as we discussed. I noticed nobody has created an article for
975:
Thanks, Mick. I asked an administrator to change the name to
344:
455:
carrying on a running conversation I found some time ago on
900:. I think it has been released as a box set, comparable to
1479:
I hope you and your family are well. Your opinion about
1558:
Top 500 baffling. I can't understand how anyone can make
2306:
Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season.
1713:
but am looking forward to getting the 2-disc version of
1453:], there is a discussion of Bob Dylan and Alcohol here,
953:
article. Hopefully that would then link to the red link
2682:(whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --
2591:
Congratulations, Mick gold! The article you nominated,
2330:
Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Holocaust in Poland
1382:
I've created a new section for our conversation. Best,
2873:. Which is what brought the masking approach to mind.
896:
but I think you may have made a mistake by calling it
2900:
is a good one. Please go ahead and make the changes.
2374:
were found precious. That's what you are, always. --
2065:
Hi Mick, I see you're the major contributor to the "
607:. A fairly good 2018 TLS article can be found here:
2807:
Blonde On Blonde: Bob Dylan's mercurial masterpiece
2659:, and this image - given to him with thanks for GA
1374:Thanks. I see what you mean. I've added a comment.
955:
The Rolling Thunder Revue: The 1975 Live Recordings
951:
The Rolling Thunder Revue: The 1975 Live Recordings
908:
The Rolling Thunder Revue: The 1975 Live Recordings
894:
The Rolling Thunder Revue: The 1975 Live Recordings
2762:
283:Knowledge:Today's featured article/January 8, 2011
281:on January 8, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at
51:For your diligent, valiant and patient efforts on
2765:Like a Rolling Stone: Bob Dylan at the Crossroads
1347:there is discussion among some FAC regulars that
347:. A breakthrough was made when it was tried in a
273:Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of
2825:Blood on the Tracks: Dylan's Masterpiece in Blue
1870:, former lyricist partner of singer/songwriter
335:" is a 1965 song by American singer-songwriter
2740:Invisible Republic: Bob Dylan's Basement Tapes
2449:World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
1060:Bob Dylan – 1970 (50th Anniversary Collection)
476:abilities, stating that Dylan wrote the song "
2789:Bob Dylan by Greil Marcus: Writings 1968–2010
2244:When did the Bob Dylan World Tour 1966 start?
1457:. Any comments you wish to make are welcome.
359:riff for which the track is known. However,
55:, which saved it from delisting it as an FA!
2871:Bibliography of slavery in the United States
2490:For a guide to the arbitration process, see
2362:
2967:and All best wishes for holidays and 2024.
1032:Knowledge:Today's featured article/requests
2625:
2492:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration
2025:
1426:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
307:so Knowledge doesn't look bad. :D Thanks!
90:Olof Björner's Bob Dylan Yearly Chronicles
2846:Wicked Messenger: Bob Dylan and the 1960s
2822:
2804:
2250:Talk:Bob_Dylan_World_Tour_1966#Tour_dates
2136:Talk:Bob_Dylan_World_Tour_1966#Tour_dates
2840:
2289:
2077:, as part of my ambition to see all the
1828:FAN for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album)
1038:I added the new version of "SITLT" from
1451:Following my deletion of this material
1424:section by that burst of discussion on
2786:
2760:
2733:
2420:Talk:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands/GA1
34:
1498:project is to try to slowly clean up
1481:Dylan's alleged racism against Croats
131:page number if you haven't already.
2418:for comments about the article, and
2152:Hi Mick, I've had a go at expanding
1855:Assistance with Songwriter/Poet Page
351:format, and rookie session musician
1505:In the magazine stands today I saw
13:
2416:Talk:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2339:Arbitration Committee's procedures
2132:User:BennyOnTheLoose/Library#Dylan
1652:has some wonderful material on it.
1602:and it sounds really interesting.
277:know that it will be appearing as
14:
2994:
1745:Oh, looking again I see only one
1248:Hi, would you please weigh in on
822:are being considered for deletion
2584:
2409:
2290:
2201:, via Knowledge Email. Regards,
1838:Aftermath (Rolling Stones album)
1595:Castro's Revolution vs the World
1539:Castro's Revolution vs the World
1252:? Thank you kindly either way. -
1070:https://www.bobdylan.com/albums/
850:IMDb as an EL. And I did make a
35:
1687:films in an email. Best wishes
1343:By the way, heads up that here
1157:was similar to several critics
2556:. Shall we try our luck with "
2497:For the Arbitration Committee,
2061:Blonde on Blonde song articles
1123:, which is now better I think.
959:Bob_Dylan_discography#Box_sets
912:Bob_Dylan_discography#Box_sets
279:the main page featured article
106:16:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
83:21:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
60:03:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
2977:17:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
2959:15:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
2944:19:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
2926:12:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
2887:06:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
2710:15:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
2692:16:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
2594:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2578:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2558:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2535:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2517:Hi Mick, now that all of the
2402:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2395:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2384:07:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
2354:20:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
2324:Arbitration case notification
2316:16:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
2199:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2184:10:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
2166:12:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
2071:Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands
2056:08:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
1985:22:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
1949:19:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
1934:SandyGeorgia comment on Dylan
1850:14:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
1834:a featured-article nomination
1078:], in case you're interested.
815:11:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
792:17:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
263:02:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
247:17:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
23:User talk:Mick gold/Archive 3
20:User talk:Mick gold/Archive 2
17:User talk:Mick gold/Archive 1
2617:16:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
2531:Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35
2300:Best wishes for the holidays
2277:00:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
2262:23:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
2190:Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35
2154:Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35
2148:19:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
2118:19:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
2092:14:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
2067:Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35
1924:21:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
1906:17:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
1885:21:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
1749:track will be on the 2-disc
1697:15:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
1668:18:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
1631:03:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
1588:12:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
1524:00:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
1483:would be appreciated. Best,
782:? How is it?) All the best,
770:05:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
756:15:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
725:15:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
710:Spanish Is the Loving Tongue
521:13:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
490:17:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
441:00:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
425:20:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
406:01:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
227:14:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
45:The Barnstar of High Culture
7:
2827:. Independently published.
2809:. Independently published.
2228:09:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
2211:22:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
1910:Thanks for letting me know
1832:Hi Mick. I recently opened
1816:13:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
1776:20:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
1741:17:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
1392:09:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
1362:07:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
1338:17:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
1312:20:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
323:20:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
207:20:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
180:16:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
165:14:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
145:12:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
121:21:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
10:
2999:
2805:Markhorst, Jochen (2020).
2696:more music and flowers on
2508:00:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
2443:19:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
2122:Great, thanks. I've found
1554:I'm afraid I find the new
1467:18:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
1438:00:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
1408:02:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
864:09:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
834:06:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
2661:Gates of Heaven Synagogue
2633:
2624:
2570:08:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
2547:08:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
2451:: Arbitration case opened
2296:
2033:
2024:
2007:09:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
1290:07:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
1262:16:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
704:20:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
688:18:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
657:01:57, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
642:15:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
620:12:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
587:06:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
565:12:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
542:12:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
41:
2972:
2921:
2565:
2223:
2179:
2113:
1901:
1811:
1692:
1663:
1583:
1493:15:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
1488:
1462:
1433:
1387:
1333:
1285:
1232:09:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
1227:
1219:
1198:18:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
1174:10:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
1169:
1103:17:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1010:
993:06:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
971:20:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
966:
938:18:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
924:17:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
919:
903:The 1966 Live Recordings
880:17:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
859:
810:
751:
683:
637:
582:
560:
301:the suggested formatting
2698:Rossini's rare birthday
2680:sung by today's subject
898:Bootleg Series, Vol. 15
780:More Blood, More Tracks
740:More Blood, More Tracks
594:. Also, here is a 2013
2898:Bob Dylan bibliography
2367:
1751:Springtime in New York
1747:Between Saved and Shot
1723:Between Saved and Shot
1715:Springtime in New York
1650:Rough & Rowdy Ways
1455:Talk:Bob_Dylan#Alcohol
1048:Rolling Thunder Review
2600:nomination discussion
2366:
1717:. I know some of the
1543:John Cohen (musician)
1162:Another Self Portrait
1050:above! It seems like
1005:will... any day now.
2672:music by Tchaikovsky
2523:Highway 61 Revisited
2335:guide to arbitration
2015:Precious anniversary
1422:Shadows In the Night
332:Like a Rolling Stone
269:Main page appearance
2850:Seven Stories Press
2722:John Wesley Harding
2527:Blood on the Tracks
2484:the case's FAQ page
2404:you nominated as a
2021:
478:Blind Willie McTell
447:Blind Willie McTell
212:FAR Further Comment
2906:years – since the
2715:Dylan bibliography
2674:(an article where
2653:the official audio
2368:
2044:Prayer for Ukraine
2019:
1721:outtakes from the
1511:The Basement Tapes
1244:Mr. Tambourine Man
370:The Rolling Stones
2791:. PublicAffairs.
2648:
2647:
2346:GeneralNotability
2321:
2320:
2040:
2039:
1593:Hi Mick. I found
1186:
463:, beginning with
237:christmas. Best,
65:
64:
28:Barnstar for you!
2990:
2862:
2837:
2819:
2801:
2783:
2768:
2757:
2629:
2622:
2621:
2588:
2519:Blonde on Blonde
2513:FAC nominations?
2413:
2412:
2294:
2287:
2286:
2194:Blonde on Blonde
2128:The Cutting Edge
2079:Blonde on Blonde
2029:
2022:
2018:
1914:. All the best!
1798:
1682:
1642:
1535:
1478:
1450:
1419:
1381:
1373:
1323:
1275:
1212:
1184:
1117:
1056:Bob Dylan – 1970
1003:
948:
891:
845:
803:
736:
676:
630:
575:
553:
527:Your Dylan edits
501:Talk:Mick Taylor
411:Bilderberg Group
361:Columbia Records
320:
314:
311:
39:
32:
31:
2998:
2997:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2859:
2834:
2816:
2798:
2780:
2754:
2717:
2676:one of the four
2620:
2619:
2589:
2581:
2554:BennyOnTheLoose
2539:BennyOnTheLoose
2515:
2453:
2435:BennyOnTheLoose
2410:
2398:
2370:Ten years ago,
2361:
2359:Always precious
2341:may be of use.
2326:
2285:
2246:
2216:BennyOnTheLoose
2203:BennyOnTheLoose
2172:BennyOnTheLoose
2158:BennyOnTheLoose
2140:BennyOnTheLoose
2099:BennyOnTheLoose
2084:BennyOnTheLoose
2063:
2017:
1936:
1857:
1830:
1792:
1676:
1636:
1547:Different Johns
1529:
1472:
1444:
1413:
1375:
1367:
1317:
1300:
1269:
1246:
1206:
1153:My response to
1121:W. Eugene Smith
1111:
997:
942:
885:
839:
797:
730:
712:
670:
624:
569:
547:
529:
449:
413:
394:
389:
388:
355:improvised the
341:tour of England
318:
312:
309:
271:
234:
214:
152:
128:
70:
30:
12:
11:
5:
2996:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2932:
2912:
2911:
2902:
2901:
2864:
2863:
2857:
2842:Marqusee, Mike
2838:
2833:979-8629525448
2832:
2820:
2815:979-8629122043
2814:
2802:
2797:978-1610391993
2796:
2784:
2778:
2758:
2752:
2716:
2713:
2678:is pictured),
2646:
2645:
2631:
2630:
2590:
2583:
2582:
2580:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2514:
2511:
2498:
2452:
2446:
2397:
2393:nomination of
2387:
2360:
2357:
2325:
2322:
2319:
2318:
2303:
2302:
2297:
2295:
2284:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2245:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2062:
2059:
2042:My mind is on
2038:
2037:
2031:
2030:
2016:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
1988:
1987:
1971:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1912:User:Mick gold
1861:User:Mick gold
1856:
1853:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1743:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1671:
1670:
1654:
1653:
1591:
1590:
1551:
1550:
1470:
1469:
1441:
1440:
1395:
1394:
1341:
1340:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1201:
1200:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1106:
1105:
1079:
1073:
1062:. Hmm, the ad
1036:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
867:
866:
818:
817:
775:
774:
773:
772:
711:
708:
707:
706:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
528:
525:
524:
523:
448:
445:
444:
443:
412:
409:
393:
392:Dylan/Sedgwick
390:
327:
326:
270:
267:
266:
265:
233:
230:
213:
210:
151:
148:
127:
126:Shelton's book
124:
69:
66:
63:
62:
48:
47:
42:
40:
29:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2995:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2956:
2952:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2914:
2913:
2909:
2908:Tet offensive
2904:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2874:
2872:
2867:
2860:
2858:1-58322-686-9
2855:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2830:
2826:
2821:
2817:
2812:
2808:
2803:
2799:
2794:
2790:
2785:
2781:
2779:1-58648-382-X
2776:
2772:
2771:PublicAffairs
2767:
2766:
2759:
2755:
2753:0-330-33624-X
2750:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2736:
2735:Marcus, Greil
2732:
2731:
2730:
2726:
2724:
2723:
2712:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2694:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2664:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2623:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2601:
2596:
2595:
2587:
2579:
2576:Promotion of
2571:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2510:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2495:
2493:
2488:
2486:
2485:
2479:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2460:
2458:
2450:
2445:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2431:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2407:
2403:
2396:
2392:
2386:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2365:
2356:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2342:
2340:
2336:
2331:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2301:
2298:
2293:
2288:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2105:
2100:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2080:
2076:
2075:Good Articles
2072:
2068:
2058:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2023:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1873:
1869:
1868:Larry Beckett
1864:
1862:
1852:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1760:
1756:
1755:Hawaii Five-O
1752:
1748:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1640:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1609:
1603:
1601:
1596:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1556:Rolling Stone
1553:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1533:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1512:
1508:
1507:Rolling Stone
1503:
1501:
1500:Pixies (band)
1495:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1417:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1379:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1346:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1321:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1276:I've made my
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1210:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1182:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1122:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1012:
1008:
1001:
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
982:
980:
979:
974:
973:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
946:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
927:
926:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:
899:
895:
889:
884:
883:
882:
881:
877:
873:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
843:
838:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
823:
816:
812:
808:
801:
796:
795:
794:
793:
789:
785:
781:
771:
767:
763:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
744:
741:
734:
729:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
705:
701:
697:
692:
691:
690:
689:
685:
681:
674:
658:
654:
650:
645:
644:
643:
639:
635:
628:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
596:Rolling Stone
593:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
573:
568:
567:
566:
562:
558:
551:
546:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
522:
518:
514:
513:Leahtwosaints
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
482:Leahtwosaints
479:
475:
471:
468:
467:
462:
458:
454:
442:
438:
434:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
418:
417:Seattle Times
408:
407:
403:
399:
387:
385:
384:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
325:
324:
321:
315:
306:
302:
298:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
229:
228:
224:
220:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
190:
188:
187:Ronald Reagan
182:
181:
177:
173:
167:
166:
162:
158:
147:
146:
142:
138:
132:
123:
122:
118:
114:
108:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
85:
84:
80:
76:
61:
58:
54:
50:
49:
46:
43:
38:
33:
25:
24:
21:
18:
2875:
2868:
2865:
2845:
2824:
2806:
2788:
2764:
2738:
2727:
2720:
2718:
2702:Gerda Arendt
2695:
2684:Gerda Arendt
2670:. Listen to
2665:
2649:
2598:
2592:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2516:
2496:
2489:
2483:
2480:
2471:
2461:
2454:
2432:
2423:
2406:good article
2400:The article
2399:
2376:Gerda Arendt
2369:
2343:
2327:
2299:
2247:
2193:
2127:
2123:
2103:
2078:
2064:
2048:Gerda Arendt
2041:
2002:
1994:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1944:
1937:
1865:
1858:
1831:
1803:
1763:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1728:
1722:
1719:Shot of Love
1718:
1714:
1710:
1649:
1645:
1617:
1611:
1607:
1604:
1600:The Guardian
1599:
1594:
1592:
1572:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1546:
1538:
1510:
1506:
1504:
1496:
1471:
1421:
1396:
1342:
1325:
1301:
1247:
1161:
1154:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1065:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1024:
976:
954:
950:
907:
901:
897:
893:
868:
819:
779:
776:
739:
713:
669:
647:nomination.
595:
530:
504:
464:
450:
416:
414:
395:
381:
366:Jimi Hendrix
330:
328:
293:
275:this article
272:
235:
215:
191:
183:
168:
153:
133:
129:
109:
86:
71:
44:
15:
2823:—— (2020).
2787:—— (2013).
2761:—— (2005).
2605:nominate it
2428:nominate it
2408:has passed
2283:Hi and best
2138:. Regards,
2035:Nine years!
1916:LeepKendall
1894:LeepKendall
1877:LeepKendall
1872:Tim Buckley
1766:, though!)
1568:Sgt. Pepper
1326:Sgt. Pepper
1250:this thread
696:JohnWickTwo
673:JohnWickTwo
649:JohnWickTwo
627:JohnWickTwo
612:JohnWickTwo
572:JohnWickTwo
550:JohnWickTwo
534:JohnWickTwo
509:discography
497:Mick Taylor
474:songwriting
453:Mick Taylor
374:The Wailers
232:The Descent
2931:Launcher."
2500:~ ToBeFree
1804:Springtime
1764:Tattoo You
1729:Tattoo You
1646:Abbey Road
1560:Abbey Road
1278:Suggestion
1272:SusanLesch
1254:SusanLesch
1093:version).
852:suggestion
433:Loremaster
349:rock music
150:More Dylan
2969:Mick gold
2918:Mick gold
2562:Mick gold
2457:Mick gold
2424:bold link
2220:Mick gold
2176:Mick gold
2110:Mick gold
1999:Mick gold
1956:Mick gold
1941:Mick gold
1898:Mick gold
1808:Mick gold
1689:Mick gold
1660:Mick gold
1580:Mick gold
1485:Mick gold
1459:Mick gold
1430:Mick gold
1384:Mick gold
1349:Bob Dylan
1330:Mick gold
1282:Mick gold
1224:Mick gold
1216:Mick gold
1166:Mick gold
1132:I bought
1007:Mick gold
963:Mick gold
916:Mick gold
856:Mick gold
807:Mick gold
748:Mick gold
680:Mick gold
634:Mick gold
579:Mick gold
557:Mick gold
461:Bob Dylan
422:Mick gold
378:Green Day
353:Al Kooper
337:Bob Dylan
305:Main Page
195:Bob Dylan
53:Bob Dylan
2910:in 1968.
2844:(2005).
2737:(1997).
2344:Thanks,
2337:and the
2020:Precious
1725:bootleg
1564:Revolver
1428:. Best,
1298:Comments
1081:Back to
505:somebody
503:so when
466:Infidels
457:You Tube
297:contribs
2965:Allreet
2963:Thanks
2951:Allreet
2936:Allreet
2894:Allreet
2892:Thanks
2879:Allreet
2745:Picador
2668:Vami_IV
2657:Vami_IV
2552:Thanks
2269:Allreet
2254:Allreet
2170:Thanks
2069:" and "
1977:Moisejp
1795:Moisejp
1768:Moisejp
1759:Between
1733:Moisejp
1679:Moisejp
1639:Moisejp
1623:Moisejp
1532:Moisejp
1516:Moisejp
1475:Moisejp
1447:Moisejp
1416:Moisejp
1400:Moisejp
1378:Moisejp
1370:Moisejp
1354:Moisejp
1320:Moisejp
1304:Moisejp
1209:Moisejp
1190:Moisejp
1114:Moisejp
1095:Moisejp
1000:Moisejp
985:Moisejp
945:Moisejp
930:Moisejp
888:Moisejp
872:Moisejp
842:Moisejp
826:Moisejp
800:Moisejp
784:Moisejp
762:Moisejp
733:Moisejp
717:Moisejp
383:more...
287:Raul654
219:Allreet
199:Warchef
172:Allreet
157:Moisejp
137:Moisejp
113:Allreet
98:Allreet
75:Allreet
68:Bjorner
2643:places
2609:FrB.TG
2533:" or "
2455:Hello
2414:; see
1842:isento
1181:WP:Blp
848:defend
94:Amazon
57:plange
2639:music
2635:story
2389:Your
2308:Ceoil
1964:Dylan
1136:from
1091:Dylan
1087:Dylan
398:Dunks
357:organ
345:waltz
313:hotch
255:Ceoil
239:Ceoil
2973:talk
2955:talk
2940:talk
2922:talk
2883:talk
2854:ISBN
2829:ISBN
2811:ISBN
2793:ISBN
2775:ISBN
2749:ISBN
2706:talk
2688:talk
2613:talk
2566:talk
2543:talk
2525:and
2504:talk
2439:talk
2380:talk
2350:talk
2312:talk
2273:talk
2258:talk
2224:talk
2207:talk
2180:talk
2162:talk
2144:talk
2114:talk
2088:talk
2052:talk
2046:. --
2003:talk
1995:1970
1981:talk
1968:1970
1960:1970
1945:talk
1920:talk
1902:talk
1881:talk
1846:talk
1836:for
1812:talk
1772:talk
1737:talk
1711:1970
1693:talk
1664:talk
1627:talk
1612:Blue
1608:Blue
1584:talk
1573:Blue
1520:talk
1489:talk
1463:talk
1434:talk
1404:talk
1388:talk
1358:talk
1334:talk
1308:talk
1286:talk
1258:talk
1228:talk
1220:talk
1194:talk
1170:talk
1155:1970
1142:1970
1138:Isis
1134:1970
1099:talk
1083:1970
1066:1970
1058:and
1052:1970
1044:1970
1040:1970
1011:talk
989:talk
967:talk
934:talk
920:talk
876:talk
860:talk
830:talk
811:talk
788:talk
766:talk
752:talk
721:talk
700:talk
684:talk
653:talk
638:talk
616:talk
583:talk
561:talk
538:talk
517:talk
486:talk
437:talk
402:talk
376:and
316:and
291:talk
259:talk
243:talk
223:talk
203:talk
176:talk
161:talk
141:talk
117:talk
102:talk
79:talk
2372:you
2097:Hi
1954:Hi
1892:Hi
1863:.
1859:Hi
957:in
910:to
380:. (
2975:)
2957:)
2942:)
2924:)
2885:)
2852:.
2848:.
2773:.
2769:.
2747:.
2743:.
2708:)
2700:--
2690:)
2641:·
2637:·
2615:)
2568:)
2545:)
2506:)
2494:.
2487:.
2470:.
2459:,
2441:)
2391:GA
2382:)
2352:)
2314:)
2275:)
2260:)
2226:)
2209:)
2182:)
2164:)
2146:)
2116:)
2090:)
2054:)
2005:)
1983:)
1947:)
1922:)
1904:)
1883:)
1848:)
1814:)
1774:)
1739:)
1695:)
1666:)
1629:)
1586:)
1545:,
1522:)
1491:)
1465:)
1436:)
1406:)
1390:)
1360:)
1336:)
1310:)
1288:)
1260:)
1230:)
1196:)
1172:)
1101:)
1072:).
991:)
969:)
961:.
936:)
922:)
878:)
862:)
832:)
813:)
790:)
768:)
754:)
723:)
702:)
686:)
655:)
640:)
618:)
585:)
563:)
540:)
519:)
488:)
439:)
404:)
386:)
372:,
368:,
310:Tb
261:)
245:)
225:)
205:)
178:)
163:)
143:)
119:)
104:)
81:)
2971:(
2953:(
2938:(
2920:(
2881:(
2861:.
2836:.
2818:.
2800:.
2782:.
2756:.
2704:(
2686:(
2611:(
2564:(
2541:(
2502:(
2437:(
2378:(
2348:(
2310:(
2271:(
2256:(
2222:(
2205:(
2178:(
2160:(
2142:(
2112:(
2086:(
2050:(
2001:(
1979:(
1943:(
1918:(
1900:(
1879:(
1844:(
1810:(
1797::
1793:@
1770:(
1735:(
1691:(
1681::
1677:@
1662:(
1641::
1637:@
1625:(
1582:(
1534::
1530:@
1518:(
1487:(
1477::
1473:@
1461:(
1449::
1445:@
1432:(
1418::
1414:@
1402:(
1386:(
1380::
1376:@
1372::
1368:@
1356:(
1332:(
1322::
1318:@
1306:(
1284:(
1274::
1270:@
1256:(
1226:(
1218:(
1211::
1207:@
1192:(
1168:(
1116::
1112:@
1097:(
1013:)
1009:(
1002::
998:@
987:(
965:(
947::
943:@
932:(
918:(
890::
886:@
874:(
858:(
844::
840:@
828:(
809:(
802::
798:@
786:(
764:(
750:(
735::
731:@
719:(
698:(
682:(
675::
671:@
651:(
636:(
629::
625:@
614:(
581:(
574::
570:@
559:(
552::
548:@
536:(
515:(
484:(
435:(
400:(
329:"
319:©
294:·
289:(
257:(
241:(
221:(
201:(
174:(
159:(
139:(
115:(
100:(
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.