User talk:Magnus Manske/old

1389:

the copyright of existing works already in the public domain was not reinststated (which is why a lot of people think the 1995 EU harmonisation regulations were so wrong in being retrospective). However, the existing copyrights were extended. Works then in copyright were automatically renewed if before renewal and those that had earlier been renewed were extended as well. That took the term of protection to 75 years from publishing for older works. In 1998, the current situation, minus the DMCA, was created. Copyrights were extended for a further 20 years to life+70 for works created in 1978 and after and 95 years for existing published works still in copyright. That is where the 1923 rule came from, since 1923 was 75 years before 1998. The advancement of the public domain for published works was effectively frozen until the start of 2019, when works from 1923 will come out of copyright on the expiry of their 95 year term.

1599:

require human judgement. For example, with medium-resolution pictures (such as the type typically making up a "full-size" image, 640 x 480, for example, there is only a very limited amount of information to work from. If you resize such an image by an exact even number (e.g., 50%; 33.3%, you frequently find that the result is noticably better than a resize by a non-even number. An arbitary thumnail resize size (e.g., 250px, 400px) does not do this. (Unless it happens to be an even number: e.g., 250px from a 1000px original.) Similarly, it is often useful to crop differently for the thumb, and light and colour levels sometimes need to be adjusted. Only the human eye can judge these matters. Finally, one usually gets a superior thumbnail by resizing the original image (typically 2000-odd pix), not a derivitave image. This is something the softweare cannot do (unless we all start uploading 1MB+ image files.)

2025:

Anlegen von de.wikisource.org gestoppt hat) die Problematik deutlich machen. Mir reichen die Englischkenntnisse wohl nicht aus. Jedenfalls ist es ein leichtes erst mal einen großen Teil der Nutzer auszusperren (durch das englische Interface) und dann eine Abstimmung zu starten. Mein Vorschlag um die Ablehner von de.wikisource.org zu überzeugen, wäre ein ganz pragmatischer. Stell doch einfach mal das Interface auf deutsch oder französisch oder spanisch um. Bist du so mutig? Nur um mal die Reaktion zu testen. Warum soll Englisch hier bevorzugt sein? Grüße B von wikisource.org --

1696:

eye can judge. (Sometimes - not often - I resort to Photoshop or Photostudio because none of the 4 PMView presets are quite right.) And some pictures simply look terrible when you sharpen them with the orthodox filter. Typically (but not always) these are ones where the original is a little grainy - this happens often with my bird pictures as I have to use a high ISO to get the shot at all, particularly with shade-loving species like robins and pittas. Sometimes the best answer is to

307:

does any Knowledge contributor's length of time have to do with anything? Are you awarded a Medal of Valor or something after X number of days service? Quality, not quantity, counts. So far, 99% of your photos would be better left undone. Instead of trying to be a hero and getting people like Zoe to stroke your ego, slow down and do things properly. Looking at a page with your kind of minimal input and poor quality, overwhelming photos, is what turns people away from Knowledge....DW

959:" on your list of topics. There are quite a few random things that link to it, so I just created a brief, probably insufficient, disambig page & I know from the dog breeds side there isn't yet really an appropriate page to link to ("dog breed" redirects to "list of dog breeds" which in the long run I think will end up being 2 separate articles, for example...) Anyway, thought that if you had something in mind for the topic, this might spur you to contribute. 405:

keeps photos to a maximum of approximately 1/3 page width or smaller. Your monster photo ruins the Knowledge text (which people find hard to read on any website) by diminishing it to mumbo jumbo. Please fix your photos not just on my suggestion or even because that is how companies and people far more knowledgeable than you or I do, but because it makes common sense if you actually look at the article!....DW

1338:

protection of life of the author plus 70 years in the EU. That protection is retrospective as well. If you can find the author and say that he died 70 years ago, or if you put forward a claim that you cannot find the author with reasonable work, meaning that the photograph qualifies for 70 years of copyright protection from publication, then you can claim that the copyright has expired worldwide.

1721:

in that direction, BTW. Personally, I dislike it (too white and glary, I like much prefer dark backgrounds), but I am realist enough to recognise that it will be popular, and to respect it as a very professionl looking result. One day, when I've finished my current task (tweaking the old Wikistandard CSS up until I'm really happy with it), I'll make a Monobook derivative that's easy on the eye.

2103: 1223:. I would wish to avoid too much of edit wars after having started to link to the article. In particular, I would not wish to see the current disputes over German-Polish matters automatically extend also to this article, why I kindly ask you for comments now, in advance, in order to try to find wordings acceptable to as many as possible of concerned wikipedians. 1000:

However, I'm not quite sure what the best strategy might be. There was a discussion somewhere in the last week or so about having gallery pages... Anyway, I'm rambling a bit, but wanted to let you know that I noticed & appreciate the effort & if you have any more ideas on handling that, you're welcome to join in. I also asked this question on

621:

participate and also ask you whether it's OK to use some of the Knowledge content for our public release (I realize the license is GFDL, but I still wanted to make sure that we don't just launch without asking). Send me email and I can give you the URL and password for the internal site. patrick@appliedminds.net

1717:

with Windows on it: he doesn't know why he knows, but Joe Average knows that the (expensive, and very carefully crafted) look of the Windows desktop is "better". Microsoft spend an incredible amount of money on getting the fine details of fonts and layouts just so — and they do it because they know it works.

523:, I'm getting a "Host 'larousse.wikipedia.org' is blocked because of many connection errors. Unblock with 'mysqladmin flush-hosts'" error when trying to access the mailing list. I'm assuming that this is something Brion is not doing while he's away, and that you'll know what it is and want to do it<G: --> 1977:

Dear Mr. Veyt, as you left no indication where to answer you, I'll do it here. Freepedia is an independent mirror of wikipedia, and thus not under mine (or any others) control, except the owner of freepedia. I have searched the wikipedia for "Thierry Veyt", but found no match. As yo have not given me

1681:

Given that auto-thumbnailing is probably ineviatable, your suggestions are good ones. In my experience, around 70% to 80% of all images respond well to a moderate sharpening. (Not sure how to measure that: PMView, my favourite image viewer/editor has 4 pre-set levels: mild (you can't even see it most

1630:

Off the top of my head, I can't see why that should be. I just tried a test page out, and it worked fine. An Explorer thing? Nope. At least it seems OK in Explorer 6. (I'm running MediaWiki 1.3b3, with various small modifications that are probably not relevant - and no, I haven't altered the Monobook

1598:

quality, as the best thumbnailing method varies from one picture to another. It's not just that different pictures require different degrees of sharpening (a matter that can only be judged by eye), though that is a major factor. There is a whole range of other factors in the thumbnailing process that

1348:

Pre-1923 things are indeed public domain in the US, with no exceptions. However, they are NOT public domain worldwide automatically. As I said, photographs in the EU are life+70 and have been since 1995. So, let's imagine that our hypothetical photographer was 25 in 1890 or so when the photograph was

975:

Hi Magnus! Today I've been following you around doing a minor change to your most excellent conversions from old pic syntax to new pic syntax. I find that, with the new syntax, 300px looks too big so I've been changing you from 300px to 250px. I have no idea what causes this effect, it's probably due

306:

Tried nice--that didn't work. Have had to replace more of your oversized photos that in addition are ALL far too dark. A good width is certainly not 350 pixels, I have no idea where you get that. Please LOOK at your handiwork after you load it. And, what in the name of hell, beyond moronic stupidity,

1720:

If we want to compete with (e.g.) Encarta or Britanica — and we should, for together we can do better — we need to do that stuff too. We need to work harder on our presentaton, on the little things that no-one notices but all add up to provide that "feel of quality". The Monobook style is a big step

1716:

react to them. This is why printers have spent centuries refining print typefaces; this is why the major sites like (e.g.) MSN spend thousands on web design (and still bugger the code up — but that's MSN for you); this is why Joe Average looks at a KDE desktop or a Gnome desktop and buys the machine

1695:

the makeup a woman is wearing: if you notice it at all, it's too much; seriously yuko. If you don't realise that it's there, it makes her more beautiful without you ever realising why.) More commonly, the image needs more than the default amount. Sometimes the "strong" setting is required - only the

1639:

page: headings, text, pictures, overall visual effect. Most 'pedia editors just don't look at the pictures, it seems, at least they certainly don't look at them in the same critical way that they look at text and instantly spot the smallest error of spelling or punctuation. Most of the photographers

1510:

Could you please revert what you've done to the constellation maps? We've spent a lot of time creating proper thumbnails and decided to stick with them even with the extended image syntax, partly due to layout reasons, and partly because of the blur effect the automatic thumbnail has. Moreover, it

1378:

To amplify the situation further, the US used to have fixed copyright terms for everything. Copyright protection in the US for published works originally required registration of said works. That registration acquired a 28 year term of copyright protection. At the appropriate time near the expiry of

1312:

basically said (if I remember correctly) "This is Hurlstone, and everyone there's gay". It might be true that there are gay people, but unless you can cite a source that shows a highly unusual amount of gay people there, your strong emphasis on gay people there is quite biased. Please have a look at

607:

If you don't want to be on it that's fine with me. The contact list contains information regarding how much access each person has, and there's a field where you can indicate if you don't want to be contacted at all. So there's no reason you can't be on it. At the moment, it seems as if everyone who

544:

to the list of registered bots? It's well debugged and non-controversial, and has been working without causing any fuss on and off for a couple of days. If it is registered, I intend to speed it up to one hit per minute, with an extra safety back-off feature (measure transaction time, take min of a

209:

anti-American positions in articles, fine. If you want to say "americans should burn in hell" on your user page, that's fine with wikipedia policy (although doing that on an American server IMHO clearly shows your state of mind). But I agree with the people on the mailing list (didn't see opposition

163:

three times already. The point I made in my last change to redirect was : "Anguilla is not an independent nation, and as such has not foreign relations - these are handled by the UK; this article will therefore never have content". I think this article has no reason for being, and if the only useful

1388:

In 1978 a new act came into force which altered things fundamentally. The registration requirement was abolished and copyright for new works, which you refer to, shifted from a fixed term to a term dependent on the life of the author plus 50 years. However, in keeping with the common law tradition,

1300:

Magnus. Hi brother. I see you deleted my Hurlstone page. This was uncalled for, especially due to your reasons given. I myself am homosexual, and many of my best friends are also homosexual. The majority of us also attend or have attended this school, and thus are in the position to make comment on

1170:

I want to say a big thank you for the work you're doing on converting my pics to the new syntax. Obviously there's a small problem with captions that contained links but I would be inclined not to worry about that and convert them regardless. Perhaps one day that problem will be solved then perhaps

760:

It looks like only the image description page was deleted, though strangely the talk page still exists. It looks like we can't use it but I'm not sure I completely understand what Anthère is saying about it. I'll check and get it deleted if it is copyvio or replace it in the article if it's not. Do

404:

In one breath you say that 250 pixels (which by the way equals inches) is the proper width for Knowledge photos but then you turn around and put back a photo twice that size!!!! WHY? Note, very large photos are turn offs on the Internet. Microsoft, IBM, and every major information site in the world

1740:

This associates the manually created thumbnail with the larger image in a machine-readable fashion. It should only be used if the manual thumbnail is of significant better quality than the automatic one ("significant" being up to you:-) or the manual thumbnail shows an alternate view (e.g., only a

1708:

notice things like detailed image quality, not consciously. Nor does the casual eye see details like correct punctuation (proper mdashes and the like, subscripts and superscripts that work (or work as well as HTML allows them to); correct maths expressions; appropriate page layout (sensible use of

2007:

hi, I am swedish and really dont like write in english... someone have wrote that your picture of Image:Christmas tree.jpg is a Abies Nordmanniana but I am not sure that is right? We have your picture on the swedish wikipedia whith that text, and I want too know whats is correct. In my books that

1751:

By the way, and off-topic, I've spent some time recently combing through the codebase picking out the more prominent hard-coded FONT= tags and replacing them with named classes. Is this a task that it's sensible for me to document somewhere (presumably on meta) in the hope that it will eventually

1543:

As it happens, the particular two images in question come up surprisingly well when auto-thumbnailed, and are not much inferior to the hand-generated ones, but this is unusual. Most of the auto-thumbnails are glaringly obvious. In the fauna pages, and particularly with the images I took myself, I

1368:

In the US anything pre-1923 is public domain. Only in the US. Since the Knowledge servers are in the US, that is the copyright rule that is followed for those servers. However, if you are outside of the US, then different rules apply. Since you are in Germany, German copyright law applies to your

2024:

zu Gemüte führen. Ich finde die Abstimmung dort eine Farce, da sich die, die kein englisch können ja erst gar nicht beteiligen konnten. Ich zumindest hatte schon Probleme bis dorthin zu finden. Vielleicht kannst du als deutsch-sprechender Tim Starling (der wenn ich es richtig verstanden habe das

1670:

carefully chosen exceptions to the general rule. There was a preexisting discussion about these two images - nothing to do with image degredation caused by auto-thumbnailing - so they were the two that I used to illustrate my point - random examples, in other words. (Hint: as always with images,

703:

Auf der deutschen Knowledge scheinen nur Du und Brion als Developer (bzw. Admin-Rechte-Vergeber) auf. Da Brion sehr beschäftigt ist, wollte ich Dich fragen, ob Du die 3 neuen Admins "aktivieren" könntest (die zum teil schon ein Monat auf Admin-Status warten... fast schon peinlich, ist aber nicht

1533:

Second, the real problem: image quality. I have written about this at length elsewhere (and could doubtless find those discussions easily enough if need be, but the 'pedia is dog slow right now so I won't try searching), but the executive summary is that auto-thumbnailed images very rarely look

1203:

I've for long (a year, actually) been itched by the way Knowledge-links are done with often sloppy distinctions between nationality, citizenship and ethnicity (with regard to persons) and also between nations and countries. This is particularly obvious in the case of people or entities that are

1337:

I notice that you've uploaded an image of Karl Weierstrass and claimed that it is public domain throughout the world due to its age. That is a potentially incorrect claim. Up until 1995 it would certainly have been public domain in both the US and UK, but now photographs can potentially have a

1801:

Among other things, the images can't be put on a CD. The copyright of the portrait painter or photographer has probably expired in most of these cases, but I think their digital image of that original painting or photograph would be copyright... if someone photographs the Mona Lisa, they can

1408:

However, we may not be completely clear with that work anyway. I checked with the Smithsonian Institute as to who is the author of that particular work. It turns out it is not a photograph at all. It is apparently a lithograph of a previous photograph. That means it could have been made after

999:

Hey, thanks for all the work converting those to thumbnails. I'm thinking, though, that having all those images (even thumbnails) on one page is not a great thing for people dialling up the web--that's why I inserted one set of images as individual links to the images rather than as images.

57:

I just played around with a copy of it, and it was me who misinterpreted the whole thing. I thought you had tried to align the element names/links to the graphic! Now I realized it is an "up-and-down"-link. So, it was all right in the first place, I was just confused by the "labelling" of the

1354:

Copyright law is a complicated matter. It is quite correct to say that said photo is public domain in the US, but unless the photographer is known and died in 1933 or earlier (until the end of this year of course when 1934 comes into play) or reasonable inquiry cannot turn up the name of the

620:

I'm working on a project based on the wikipedia MediaWiki engine to create a set of annotations on Neal Stephenson's upcoming book Quicksilver. It's going to be a public site. I've seeded some of the entries with text from the Knowledge for our internal release, and I wanted to invite you to

1614:

less work. But work is not the problem - even with images (the poor relation to the text around here) we have plenty of willing workers. I for one am more than happy to put in the extra time it takes to produce a quality finished product. Hell, some of the pictures I have uploaded here took

2036:

Möglicherweise hast Du auf der Proposal-Seite den Abschnitt "Software update" nicht gesehen. Die (wohl noch dieses Jahr) kommende Software-Version ermöglicht es, dass jeder Benutzer die Sprache seines Interfaces bestimmen kann. Damit dürfte sich das Problem größtenteils erledigt haben.

1454:

Hi, I agree that 300px is at the "outer limits" ;-) for thumbnails; so far, I just tried to keep the images at their original size. But, I will try to remember reducing the thumbnails to 250px in the future, which ought to do just as well. For those I already did, feel free to fix

1349:

taken. That means that the photographer would be born around 1865. For someone born in 1865 to live until 1935 would not be unreasonable at all. That's 70 years old. In that case it would still be 18 months for a photograph taken by that person to remain in copyright in the EU.

608:

has root access is in the US, so at certain times of the day it can be very hard to contact one of them. So by all means, ask Jimbo for full access. On wikitech-l I specifically requested that Eloquence be given full access but I was ignored. Maybe Jimbo just didn't see it. --

228:

Some of us think that a "Wkipedian America Lovers" is analagous to a "Wikipedias Proud Nazis and Nigger-Haters". In fact, Im fairly certain that they are the same thing. We should have the right to form a group just like the vegetarians, who as basically the Anti-Meat group.

1497:

Hallo Magnus! Kannst du bitte auf de.wikipedia im Kategorie:-Namensraum die Subpages aktivieren? Für Monohierarchische Klassifikationen wäre es von Vorteil, wenn sich Namensbestandteile mit "/" aufteilen lassen würden wie im Benutzer:- und Knowledge:-Namensraum. Danke! --

1671:

start by looking for the sharp-edged detail: in this case, look at the feet. Once you have seen that, your eye will be drawn to differences in the other parts of the pictures: the eye (always the most important part of any animal picture), the plumage, the background.)

1590:

page. Human nature being what it is, the reader swiftly forms an overall impression. Pictures catch the eye first (along with headlines and the overall "shape" created by the use of white space). Poor quality fuzzy pictures immediately tell the reader that the page is

113:

I'm afraid you'll have to explain that to me. Would that "Recent changes replacement" use the watchlist, or the "watch links" function? Also, is there a "list of lists on wikipedia" page? That would cover the lists as well, without the (rather inelegant) self-link.

1544:

revert auto-thumbnails on sight. (The rest of the 'pedia is too much for me, but I'd do that too if time permitted.) Also, since the thumbnailing craze came along, I no longer upload full-size photographs (because I hate seeing them wrecked by auto-thumbnailing).

2074: 340:

the table in Phase II - having all the users lined-up made it easy to check for vandalism and sub-par edits. But on annoying thing about the new RC is that cur/hist don't are not lined-up. This makes it more difficult to check on articles in quick succession.

1028:

at the page, see how the un-thumbnailed image looks real enough to touch, compared to the other two that are sitting behind gray prison walls, not to mention the visual noise that has been added. Doesn't anybody have a sense of graphic design around here?

837:-Seite hat mich in die Irre geführt, da es dort "This image is not licenced under the GFDL. It is under a non-commercial-use only licence. Copyrights." als möglichen Tag für ein Bild gibt. Ergo meine Folgerung, dass eine solche Lizenz möglich ist. Hab das 1409:

Weierstrass died. It may also not have been published until recently. If that is the case then the copyright on it has a long time to run. The SI is probably perfectly correct in their claim of copyright over the work, despite the lifetime of its subject.

438:

Done. You were not logged in when writing the above message. DW, is that you? Someone fixed DWs typos (similar to the "Thank" above) in January, with the IP 64.228.30.103. The IP you wrote your above message under is 64.228.30.118. A coincidence, surely?

91:. While in general we should remove self-links, I belive topic pages like these pose an exception for a few reasons. The pages themselves fall into the category of the topic they list. In the future, some people may use pages like that in place of 1320:

You can imaging that there are quite a lot of people who create articles like "XYZ is gay!", and that they can't stay on this (or any) encyclopedia. YOur article read a lot like that. If I misread, maybe you'd like to write about Hurlstone, and

1756:

PHP programmer (i.e., not me!), because it requires matching stylesheet changes, and because the code is a moving target. My particular interest is in creating low-glare skins (light text on dark background), but it may well be applicable more

1907:

Magnus, I just saw you start a MB WikiReader. I know nothing about the topic, but if you need copyediting or checking to see about readability from someone with no knowledge, I'd love to help out. WikReaders are becoming an interest for me.

1154:

A way round this is to put the links on the Image Description page. Unfortunately, if the reader doesn't click on the magnifier then they never see the links. However, until the caption permits links, I think that's better than external

1070:"The usual gang of idiots" is the long-running reference to free-lance contributors in Mad's contents page. I will immediately fix Alfred's middle name, thereby returning Knowledge to the straight and narrow path to truth and wisdom! - 1379:

the original copyright term, a further registration could be made to extend the copyright term for another 28 years, for a total of 56 years. In stages this gradually got extended. What matters today is what happened in 1978 and 1998.

122:

It mentions on those pages that they were created to be used by people with Watch links. It seems to me, that anyone interested in seeing recent changes on musical pages, would also want to have the option of seeing changes to the

590:

I would also be interested in downloading WINOR, binaries or source, if it can be made available. My C++ by far outstrips my PHP so it could be possible that I could contribute something to the technical side of Knowledge. Thanks

286:

Note you have put up several excellent images. However, could you take the time and scale down these and future ones by about 40% (good Wiki width is about 2.5") as the size overpowers the text and the page viewer. Thanks....DW

1119: 1045:

Hi. I like the idea of the stub articles, but before adding them, please check if we have them under a slighly different name. For example, we have very extensive articles on all of the Ottoman emperors (see, for example

1450:

Hi Magnus, I'm following you around at the moment reducing 300px wide landscape-format pics to 250px and portrait-format pics to 200px. We had sort-of agreement on the 250px size, as per this quote from my Talk Page -

1785:. I went to osti.gov but couldn't find the picture there. I'm looking for such information as the date and location of the test, the size and type of the bomb, and other such information. Thanks for finding it! -- 1538:

images are a vital part of providing an overall quality encyclopedia. You don't see Britannica illustrating its pages with fuzzy, greyed-out images like those which have started proliferating on the Knowledge of

243:

Someone just mentioned on the mailing list that these "special interest group" pages could live on the meta wikipedia. While I generally dislike such pages, I (and others, I guess) could live with that solution.

1647:

This is a great pity, as we are well down the path of degrading what could have been a wonderful asset. Substandard images really, really bug me. (Sure, quite a few of my own are far from perfect: but they are

1398:

So, to claim something from 1922 is public domain worldwide, as you had done, is not necessarily correct. However to claim that it is public domain in the US only, which is what I have altered the claim to, is

224:

Are people required to use the mailing list to state their objections? Several people had stated their objections on the page you deleted! That argument about how proud nazi users=anti-america was used before.

1606:

because if you specify italic in the CSS then there is no way to un-italicise words that need it (such as botanical names, which in italic text should be normal) as the stylesheet overrides the user-entered

1972:

On the site of freepedia , I am quoted as a vandal what I had never been. I had reported an act of vandalism , this is very different . Could you please correct this error. Yours faithfully Thierry Veyt

1700:

sharpen (rare case), or (more often) to use a different sharpening algorithm, an unsharp mask. This can give superb results, or make a complete mess of the picture: you just have to try it and see.

1782: 300:

Hi there is a vandal with sysop powers on fr. Knowledge. He had already cracked my password. Now he is using the password of anthere. Could you please remove all sysop powers please. Regards. --

214:

abuse wikipedia pages to form an anti-Americans club here. I think that's beyond rude. The next step in that direction would be "wikipedia:Proud Nazi users" or "wikipedia:nigger-hating users". --

2238: 2127: 940:

the page looked better to me before the image was thumbnailed. I was wondering what concern you were addressing by thumbnailing the fire photo there. Feedback would be appreciated. Cheers, --

553:

Magnus, thanks for registering the Anomebot! However, the Anomebot's edits are showing up in Recent Changes, so I'm stopping it for now. Can you check that the live code has been updated? --

1078:

Hi. I just noticed the images you uploaded from Gray's Anatomy. How far did you get with this? Did you pick images at random? Some obvious ones like the male pelvis (fig 241) are missing.

1152:

article. Do you think it looks ugly with the caption below the picture box? So I've gone back to the "usual" syntax. Of course now the links to British Airways and Air Canada have gone.

1992: 1037:

I already grumbled on meta, to little effect. I'm hoping that this is just a phase, sort of like when people new to desktop publishing made "ransom note" usage of different typefaces.

2066:

Sorry, I don't remember if I did upload that. I probably did. Can't remember the source either; looked on google image search, but no luck (well, except on the Spanish wikipedia;-) --

1276:

Magnus, what can I do to get en.wikibooks, es.wikibooks, zh.wikibooks, etc. language-specific subdomains? Is it difficult to do? Who does it and how do I get them to do it? Thanks, -

131:

Mention that the page that lists musical topics does not have an entry on the musical topics list, so people can view the history of that manually or add it to their watchlist.

1191:

article, I officially declared Nupedia dead. If you know anything in particular as to why it died (or anything else in general), it would probably help that article greatly.

240:

Of course, you can form such a group. And of course you can have a webpage about it. Just not in an NPOV encyclopedia. I recommend either a North Korea or a Iraqui server ;-)

1369:

actions, and since I am in the UK, then British copyright law applies to my actions. However, we still have to follow US copyright law as well when editing the Knowledge.

198:

Anti-Americans have a right to work on an American server and state that they disagree with American policy. There were also several requests made not to delete the page.

1602:

As you more-or-less say, the caption font problem merely needs some revisions to the CSS. Easy stuff: small font, centered, get rid of the messy frames. Leave italics

449: 2051: 1746:

A truly excellent suggestion, Magnus. I'm afraid I traded in my wikipedia-l subscription on a wikitech-l one some time ago though, so you will need to bring it up.

1562:

do that, but would need to be implemented comprehensively, and need some work in the CSS. Those of us who work with images a lot (people like me and Adrian P) had

1458:

I didn't want to seem like a mindless vandal, walking behind you and changing all your most-excellent new-syntax conversions. Can we agree on those two px values?

1098:

Bugger, all images including missing ones show blue using the Media namespace. I don't think I want to have 1247 show up on one page. Is there a way round this?

1949: 1477:

22:37, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)) Hi. You've uploaded a sea ice pic - very nice - BUT you've callded it NOOA - should be NOAA. I rtied but couldn't move it. Can you?

362:. One of the things I am missing from that proposal is the ladder like arrangement of the diff links, which I find more intuitive than the cur/last links. -- 2026: 503: 1809:

In other words, I think {{PD}} should change to {{noncommercial}} and the image description should have a footnote link to the permissions page, like so.

326:

Thanks! I'd like to redo the table layout RC, but it wasn't very popular in Phase II, AFAIK. How about one that can be sorted by user instead of time? --

416:

quite a bit. Could you check it? Aslo, if you still have the source for the image tca.png: in step 4 a CO2 should leave, and in IV the CH2 should be CH

374:

just yet (instead of the "enhanced recent changes"). Looks good, but the roll/unroll button doesn't work, partly because of bad Mozilla rendering (see

191:

I deleted it on several requests that were made on the mailing list. Anti-americans should not work on an American server, anyway. (I'm German, BTW) --

2083:

Note: For/to Magnus Manske and to anyone else who is going to read this, please be reminded that this post/message may or might be a little bit too

171:

Sorry, actually I didn't notice it was changed back, I'm just wading through the "double redirects" page. I'll try to avoid Anguilla from now on. --

1841: 1437: 1422: 1359: 830: 1499: 786: 647:

AFAIK, it's commonly referred to just as "wrist" or worst, as "wrist joint", not as "wrist-joint". You might want to move the text to fix it. --

358:

the RC table proposal you referred to is mine (you should have known, every large wiki-tech proposal of the last few months is mine ;-), it is

2009: 1666:

for examples of the human eye producing superior images. (Scroll down to the pictures: about 3/4 to the end). Note carefully that there were

1342: 1652:

and the moment I can improve on them I will. But if they are only going to get turned into grey-fuzz auto thumbnails, why should I bother?)

1958: 461: 1978:

any information about the place of your "misquoting" either, I cannot do anything for you. More precise information would be mandatory. --

846: 561:

I think what's happening is that the bot code is not suppressing the image creation or upload log entries in Recent Changes, although it

484: 1245: 910: 976:

to the border. If you disagree with what I'm doing then I'll stop doing it and leave your work alone. What do you think? Best Wishes,

681: 311:

Nonsense. Magnus' photos are perfectly fine. If anything, we need larger versions linked to from the small versions for printing. --

655:

Magnus - I see you were the first non-anon contributor to . Were you by any chance the original (anon) author of that article? --

1566:

achieved a unified look - and, I might add, one that was a lot better than the current thumbnail styling, which is (IMO) horrible.

95:. If the scope of their Recent changes suddenly decreased because of a vandal, that should appear on their Recent changes page. -- 1271: 2133: 1623:

to produce, and thusands of kilometres of travel. Compared to that, an extra 2 minutes to create a quality thumbnail is nothing.

164:

information we can provided is a see to (which is likely also the only information there ever), we should make it a redirect.

1686:

too much). The ImageMagic equivalent of the "moderate" setting in PMView, applied across the board, would help a great deal.

2230:

contributions for this Wiki-achievement will always be remembered in this Knowledge plus by the whole Wikipedian community!

1057: 866: 545:

multiple of this and the programmed delay) that will stop it from being a nuisance when the server is heavily loaded. --

33: 2206:! Without you doing it, then who else would go and do it, right? Similar to the greatest feat of a Nepalese mountaineer 1644:

they click the image. For them, the thumbnail is merely a link to The Real Thing (i.e., their superb full-size image).

1187:

Hey Magnus - I have a request. I saw on your main page that you were a contributor to Nupedia. About 3 weeks ago in our

1682:

of the time); moderate (just right 4 times out of 5), subtle but effective; strong (usually too much; and very strong (

397:

Haven't got a clue what you are talking about, re photos. I copy yours and reload. Is there a problem with that?...DW

1325:

mention the gay community there. That is, in case it it worth mentioning, meaning it is unusually large, active, etc.

1534:

anywhere near as sharp and clear as manually-created ones. As a photographer, I care about images, and believe that

1314: 514:

Dice, without. Anyway, he's moving Hephaestos' page to different places; could you block him please? Thanks.

492: 375: 1691:

20-something percent will suffer. Some look obviously sharpened (seing visible sharpening in an image is like

937: 254: 160: 1089:

Yeah. I'll create a page listing all of the Gray's Anatomy images by number to check which one's we've got.

931: 751:

Image:Alexander-fleming.jpg, the source of the image is not public domain (in fact it is unspecified, cfr.

2033:

Ich werde mal hier antworten, da Deine (?) Benutzerseite bei wikisource nicht sehr frequentiert scheint...

1887: 1840:

You loaded up the pictures in the article alkan.Could you please write about the licece of the pictures?--

257:. I'm not sure how I did it, but it was not intended. I have just released today's edits of this article. 2179: 1209: 838: 319:

Sweet! I love the new RC. It is a bit messy... Any chance of bringing back the RC table org thingy? ;) --

1305:

Hi, not-so-close relative (I don't have a brother, unless there's something my parents didn't tell me:-)

1227: 772: 137:

Include a self-link, which, I agree, doesn't pose the most elegant solution even if we hide it somehow.

2002: 2055: 1474: 735: 237:

Do we have a "Wikipedian America Lovers" page? I don't think so. Why don't we have one? Take a guess!

1819: 1122:, seems to load pretty smoothly. There are some fantastic unused images there. Weheehay! Well done. 69:

Oh, OK. I'll revert to the slightly wider image then (which is just a wee bit better on my eyes). --

1924:

points to a page requiring authentication. Can you remove the link and post an extract instead? --

1530:

First, the minor issue. The frame arrangement and font selection looks terrible. Really ugly stuff.

1355:

photographer, then it is quite incorrect to say that the photograph is out of copyright worldwide.

771:

Ok, well, if you're sure - I've replaced the image in the article. I've copied your comment to the

88: 1889:

comment in the article body. I could not revert the edit without following up on his comment. :-)

862: 1945:

Hi, Mr Magnus Manske, I think they're is an error in your amino acids list: Arginine should be :

1635:

With all that said, I recognise that few here on the 'pedia agree with me. I like to look at the

1062:

Are you sure Alfred E. Newman's middle name is East? That's a new one to this lifelong Mad fan -

1001: 17: 1797:

You're captioning these as PD, but I think they're claiming copyright and placing restrictions:

2119: 2008:

tree look quite different. Your picture is more like a Abies alba ore abies procera perhaps? --

1853: 1752:

make its way into a future revision? I'm hesitant because it's a trivially simple task for any

124: 84: 1940: 1480: 1239: 625:"Image201.png" -- pretty bad file names! "GraysAnatomy201" would have been a better choice -- 2235: 2124: 1220: 853:

Hi Magnus :) Please help me in my eternal struggle to have headers starting at ==! Thanks :)

472:'s back to user Michael's content in a sneaky way. I just want to make sure it is or isn't 50:

by 10 pixels. Does this work for your browser? If not I suppose I could shave off more... --

834: 656: 496: 275: 2146:!!! It is truly a great pleasure for me to write (ermmm..... I mean edit) this message of 2021: 1663: 636: 78: 8: 2175: 898: 755:), contrary to what is noted on the image description. -- Looxix 14:59, 15 Sep 2003 (UTC) 515: 349: 2045: 1704:

I believe that, on one level, your description of the average reader is correct. People

792: 2067: 2038: 1991:

Hallo Magnus, könntest du bitte die alten Versionen (und bitte nur die Alten :-) ) von

1979: 1894: 1877: 1802:

1329: 822: 529: 440: 381: 327: 292: 278: 258: 245: 215: 192: 172: 115: 59: 2015: 1709:

white spage, balanced heading sizes, carefully matched fonts and background colours.

1640:

here don't follow my logic either: the photographers, in the main, don't look at the

1433:

BTW, the point about 1977 was incorrect and was only added in March. I've removed it.

1212:

is often outright unhistorical and wrong, but this has until now been the most usual.

1165: 2214:

person in the world to have ever reach or scale the world's tallest/highest mountain

1921: 1434: 1419: 1356: 1339: 1126: 1113: 1102: 1093: 1082: 1071: 1063: 941: 925: 805: 609: 601: 541: 413: 291:

Didn't see this, because it wasn't on the talk page. Good wiki width is 350 pixel. --

1511:

would have been good to discuss it first with us on the respective project page. –

2189: 2056:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Fertilisation&diff=0&oldid=97888

1462: 1264: 1176: 1159: 1137: 987: 978: 779: 765: 746:

Hi Magnus, I think it was supposed to have been deleted. The copyvio page stated:

432: 1558:

I do not agree that thumbnails "give the whole project a more unified look". They

1554:

Thanks for your comprehensive reply, Magnus. Let's ponder your points one by one.

1277: 1109:

Ok, what kind of pressure is this going to put on the DB though? Can it handle it?

695: 2075:

CONGRATULATIONS for being one of the FIRST Wikipedian Editor to edit-improve the

1781: 1486: 1284: 1038: 1030: 797: 668: 428: 320: 301: 70: 51: 41: 1143: 1136:

When you upload public domain images, can you tag them with {{msg:PD}}. Thanks,

994: 861:

Hallo Magnus, könntest du bitte aus deutschen Knowledge die Bearbeitungsversion

2219: 2207: 2171: 1829: 1776: 1047: 869: 854: 812: 739: 689: 566: 554: 546: 421: 363: 312: 165: 92: 36:

about a concept for nav bars and locator maps (there is a prototype example at

1964: 1505: 2215: 1996: 1890: 1873: 1301:

the school. Your thoughts and response would be appreciated. Thanks brother.

1293: 1233: 1009: 985:

Your quick and friendly reply on the above topic is much appreciated. Thanks.

964: 863:

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Winston_Churchill&oldid=684892

711: 648: 1915: 1328:

So, if I have misinterpreted your intentions, I welcome you to wikipedia! --

881:

What's with al the "list of encyclopedia topics (xx)"? lol, I'm a noobie...

1909: 1872:. Do you still have the drawing file, or shall I try to correct it myself. 1825: 1512: 1292:

I must have forgotten that it was discussed .. what makes it a bad idea? -

1192: 1123: 1110: 1099: 1090: 1079: 922: 726: 718: 664: 626: 477: 473: 469: 465: 453: 142: 96: 2110:

for being one of the FIRST Wikipedians to arrive to help edit-improve the

876: 738:

in line with your wikilegal post. Hope you approve. Tweak if you like. :)

674: 2185: 2184:

named after you as "officially" decreed, designated, or appointed by the

2059: 1933: 1925: 1857: 1786: 1763: 1725: 1656: 1548: 882: 776: 762: 641: 583: 487:

is Michael, please ban and delete the account, or whatever is nessesary.

277:

we don't have an article on yet. Maybe we should make a list of these? --

2198: 2162:) Wikipedian Editor to arrive and edit-improve the English Knowledge's 1813: 1803: 1418:

Now do you see what I mean about copyright law being very complicated?

1283:

That would be a very very bad idea - we have already gone over that. --

1249: 1149: 1051: 1021: 914: 902: 890: 600:

Did you get my email regarding an emergency developer contact list? --

592: 468:'s ip range (i.e. 152.163.25x.xxx)? He has been reverting articles of 149: 1492: 752: 574: 359: 2163: 2111: 2076: 2022:

http://wikisource.org/Wikisource:Scriptorium/Language_domain_proposal

1810: 1798: 1586:

Not even close. When a reader looks at the page, the reader sees the

1309: 1257: 103: 99: 1792: 1770: 1576:

look OK. Not many. Any yes, I am comparing same size with same size.

865:

entfernen. Es handelt sich um eine Urheberrechtsverletzung (Quelle:

579: 1712:

But, although people don't consciously notice these things, people

1005: 960: 956: 392: 265: 230: 199: 184: 145: 2058:) do you remember the origin of this picture ? Thanks in advance. 1856:

is GFDL because we use it on french wikipedia. Thanks in advance.

336:

Hm. That would be useful for vandal/newbie patrol. BTW, I for one

1869: 1216: 1188: 47: 37: 1986: 1468: 667:

by 168.221.143.70. I fixed it by reverting to your last edit.

615: 205:

Sorry, I forgot to add "IMHO" to that statement. If you want to

1865: 2196:

has been made in this Knowledge on this very historical date:

2174:! But and however I could not send him a message into his own 1902: 1518: 1248:, there were no articles beginning with AL. Is that possible? 1015: 183:

Please revert your vandalism of the anti-American users page.

2192:

of this whole Wikimedia Foundation! It is only from you that

2102: 1628:

The MonoBook skin heading lines go right through the caption.

889:

See the list again, I've put up some explanatory text. :-) —

688:

Should articles be converted to use the new table markup? --

637: 371: 2095:

into this discussion or talk page here. Thus, kindly please

1847: 1445: 1157:

Please revert if you don't like what I've done. Best Wishes,

2202: 842: 153: 107: 1835: 1148:

Hi! I just noticed your change, to the new syntax, in the

970: 950: 897:

Magnus: Thanks a lot for doing this. I've mentioned it on

253:

Magnus, Thank you for reverting my accidental deletion of

1485:

How did you compile this list? I think it is very good --

370:

Yes, thanks! I have implemented something similar on the

1198: 1182: 1724:

And one day I'll go to bed at a sensible hour! Enough!

452:. I think an administrator should take some action. 1120:

Knowledge:Gray's Anatomy images with missing articles

821:

Thanks a lot! Makes me fel all warm and tingly :-) --

264:

Magnus, nice work on adding all of the pictures. --

1779:

and it would be helpful to have more information on

1580:

Thumbnails are only there to give a brief impression

134:

Have Watch links also watch the page with the links.

921:How did generate the list of Encyclopaedia topics? 476:. If it is him, please ban the account. Thanks. 1775:Hi, Magnus, I was working on writing captions for 495:broken or is it supposed to look like that now? -- 1886:I didn't spot the mistake. An anon inserted this 1864:Someone pointed out that the one-letter code for 83:I disagree with your removal of the self-link on 2020:Hallo Magnus, vielleicht kannst du dir auch mal 1219:, which I've started at the temporary location 1131: 565:suppressing the entries for normal edits. --- 32:Hey Magnus; I've started a new thread over at 1951:File:Arginine correction for Amino acids.jpg 1852:Hi Magnus, I'd like to know if your picture 811:Happy belated Magnus Manske Day!!!! cheers, 804:A toast to you and your inventions--Prosit! 377:), partly because of my lousy JavaScript ;-) 46:Magnus; I reduced the width of the image at 2132: 427:Would you be good enough to scale down the 1246:Knowledge:List of encyclopedia topics (02) 911:Knowledge:List of encyclopedia topics (57) 524:! -- Someone else 02:39 20 Jun 2003 (UTC) 389:I understand. Thanks for the suggestion. 2158:(i.e. can also be regarded as one of the 1948: 1215:That's why I'm considering an article on 1058:Vital topic from the usual gang of idiots 1024:now looks much worse than it did before. 913:into sections like all the other ones? — 2142:Dear Magnus Manske, what can I say man? 2101: 141:Sorry, if I came off a bit truculent. -- 2054:as you are the creator of the article ( 1735:] uses "bla_small.jpg" as the thumbnail 380:If you know how to fix it, go ahead! -- 14: 1732:] generates a normal, fuzzy thumbnail 2050:Hi magnus, it seems you had uploaded 1570:Thumbnails are usually *not* that bad 1526:My beef with thumbnails is twofold. 1171:you or I will go round linking them! 274:There are many pictures of people on 682:MediaWiki User's Guide: Using tables 540:Dear Magnus, could you possibly add 401:I still don't get it. Go away....DW 40:). Join in if you are interested. -- 1226:I look forward to your comments at 753:http://wwwihm.nlm.nih.gov/copy.html 34:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Elements 23: 2178:)!!! What is more, you even had a 1993:Image:Map of Ukraine political.png 1868:in this image should be K and not 1799:http://www.sil.si.edu/permissions/ 1572:. They are usually bloody aweful. 1244:Hi Magnus, I just noticed that on 460:Could a developer check to see if 412:Magnus, I reorganized and rewrote 159:Magnus, I see you've changed back 24: 2249: 2123:award to you! Congratulations! -- 1174:You're doing a great job. Thanks, 932:1906 San Francisco earthquake pix 761:you believe it is public domain? 2134: 1780: 1020:Gawd those gray boxes are ugly, 2116:!!! Therefore, this will be my 1594:You cannot batch-thumbnail and 1272:Multiple languages on Wikibooks 210:there so far), that one should 2003:About Image:Christmas tree.jpg 936:Hi. In the particular case of 785:Why did you remove my name on 493:Knowledge:Most wanted articles 13: 1: 2113:English Knowledge's Main Page 2099:into this message! Thank you. 2077:English Knowledge's Main Page 1820:Leucite and 1911 Encyclopedia 938:1906 San Francisco earthquake 909:P.S. could you perhaps split 707:Die 3 Namen findest Du hier: 255:Genetically modified organism 161:Foreign relations of Anguilla 2135:File:Hand with thumbs up.jpg 582:'s download link is dead. -- 271:Thanks, I'm not done yet ;-) 7: 1932:Thanks for changing it. -- 1210:Federal Republic of Germany 127:page. I see three options: 10: 2254: 2239:08:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2128:05:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 2082: 1941:Error in Amino Acids 2.jpg 1928:12:29, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC) 1912:09:46, Aug 18, 2004 (UTC) 1789:17:45, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC) 1481:List of encylopedia topics 1240:Articles beginning with AL 1228:User talk:Ruhrjung/Germans 928:22:40, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)~ 736:Image:Nucleus ER golgi.jpg 586:07:10, Jul 31, 2003 (UTC) 2070:15:39, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC) 2062:00:35, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1999:20:32, 2004 Oct 31 (UTC) 1982:10:37, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC) 1961:15:53, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1936:13:22, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC) 1860:09:51, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC) 1844:12:09, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC) 1816:17:40, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC) 1806:17:35, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC) 1741:part) of the larger image 1728:16:43, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1689:Unfortunately, the 'other 1659:14:45, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1551:12:55, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1515:10:36, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1502:17:54, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1489:18:43, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1252:02:40, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC) 1236:23:54, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC) 1195:06:23, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC) 1179:19:43, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1162:09:34, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1140:19:03, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1085:13:06, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1066:14:17, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1054:12:38, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1033:14:36, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1012:23:16, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 981:21:38, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 967:19:32, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC) 944:15:22, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC) 885:15:28, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC) 857:09:30, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC) 825:10:54, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC) 808:22:36, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC) 800:05:06, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC) 782:12:55, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC) 768:18:33, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC) 742:19:34, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC) 692:17:29, Dec 5, 2003 (UTC) 671:22:17, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC) 659:18:13, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC) 651:09:30, 22 Sep 2003 (UTC) 629:09:17, 22 Sep 2003 (UTC) 612:01:03, 29 Aug 2003 (UTC) 604:02:31, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC) 595:12:32, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC). 510:Dice, with spaces, not My 456:02:35 May 15, 2003 (UTC) 366:16:43 Jan 16, 2003 (UTC) 348:Good to see you around. 233:20:33 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC) 202:19:28 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC) 187:12:48 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC) 2097:do not forward and reply 2041:10:26, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC) 2029:17:39, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC) 2012:10:34, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1899:07:42, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1832:04:12, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC) 1678:: you can't miss it. :) 1465:13:55, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1438:18:15, 11 May 2004 (UTC) 1423:18:04, 11 May 2004 (UTC) 1360:14:40, 11 May 2004 (UTC) 1343:11:47, 11 May 2004 (UTC) 1332:18:35, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC) 1287:04:38, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC) 1267:09:28, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC) 1074:14:56, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) 1041:17:15, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC) 990:22:24, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC) 905:15:30, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 849:17:15, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC) 815:22:39, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC) 721:14:00, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC) 557:12:26 14 Jul 2003 (UTC) 549:22:14 13 Jul 2003 (UTC) 450:User talk:Dewlaylomo/ban 443:09:30 Apr 15, 2003 (UTC) 424:19:37 Mar 2, 2003 (UTC) 384:20:12 Jan 16, 2003 (UTC) 281:12:56 Dec 31, 2002 (UTC) 261:21:26 Dec 2, 2002 (UTC) 248:13:24 Nov 11, 2002 (UTC) 218:20:29 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC) 195:19:24 Nov 10, 2002 (UTC) 175:17:01 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC) 118:08:13 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC) 89:List of computing topics 79:Self-link on topic lists 2052:Image:Fertilisation.jpg 2046:License if you remember 1882:19:54, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1854:Image:Amino acids 2.png 1766:00:50, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC) 1002:Talk:List of dog breeds 917:15:52, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 893:15:30, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC) 793:happy Magnus Manske Day 729:17:08, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC) 663:I noticed vandalism on 569:10:40 17 Jul 2003 (UTC) 532:08:45 20 Jun 2003 (UTC) 522:Howdy, Magnus<G: --> 518:01:57 8 Jun 2003 (UTC) 499:08:18 7 Jun 2003 (UTC) 480:17:40 4 Jun 2003 (UTC) 295:15:18 Jan 1, 2003 (UTC) 62:08:28 Oct 1, 2002 (UTC) 18:User talk:Magnus Manske 2166:(just right after the 2139: 2130: 2016:Disput über Wikisource 1995:löschen. Danke dir. -- 1256:There's an article on 1166:New syntax for my pics 773:image description page 448:Please take a peak at 125:List of musical topics 85:List of musical topics 2154:to you for being the 2138: 2120:Guinness World Record 2105: 1315:Neutral point of view 1221:User:Ruhrjung/Germans 955:I see that you have " 717:Danke und Grüsse :-) 2232:Kudos and well done! 1920:Your latest link on 1650:the best ones I have 1475:William M. Connolley 1460:Best Wishes, Adrian. 835:Knowledge:Copyrights 696:3 neue Admins auf DE 1144:Links in Thumbnails 995:Pageless dog photos 899:Knowledge:Goings-on 464:is loging in using 2220:Sir Edmund Hillary 2181:Wiki-festival date 2140: 2131: 1965:Error in freepedia 1610:Auto-thumbnailing 1506:Constellation maps 725:VIELEN Dank!! :-) 506:is also Michael-- 504:user:My Green Dice 2226:efforts and your 1922:Mitochondrial DNA 1916:Mitochondrial DNA 1897: 1880: 712:Briont To Do List 704:Brions schuld!) 542:User:The Anomebot 414:citric acid cycle 2245: 2136: 1954: 1952: 1895: 1878: 1784: 1463:Adrian Pingstone 1265:Adrian Pingstone 1208:. A link to the 1177:Adrian Pingstone 1160:Adrian Pingstone 988:Adrian Pingstone 979:Adrian Pingstone 877:Newbish Question 675:New table markup 433:User:Black Widow 2253: 2252: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2199:26th of January 2100: 2087:, either it is 2081: 2048: 2018: 2005: 1989: 1967: 1950: 1943: 1918: 1905: 1850: 1838: 1824:Hi, please see 1822: 1795: 1773: 1655:Best regards — 1521: 1513:Torsten Bronger 1508: 1495: 1483: 1471: 1448: 1308:Your "article" 1274: 1242: 1201: 1185: 1168: 1146: 1134: 1060: 1018: 997: 973: 953: 934: 879: 795: 700:Hallo Magnus, 698: 677: 657:Finlay McWalter 645: 618: 577: 497:Dante Alighieri 429:Rudyard Kipling 419: 81: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2251: 2236:onWheeZierPLot 2208:Tenzing Norgay 2176:user talk page 2125:onWheeZierPLot 2089:wrongly edited 2080: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2047: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2034: 2017: 2014: 2004: 2001: 1988: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1966: 1963: 1942: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1917: 1914: 1904: 1901: 1884: 1883: 1849: 1846: 1837: 1834: 1821: 1818: 1794: 1791: 1777:Nuclear weapon 1772: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1759: 1758: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1633: 1632: 1624: 1608: 1600: 1592: 1577: 1567: 1541: 1540: 1531: 1520: 1517: 1507: 1504: 1494: 1493:Enable Supages 1491: 1482: 1479: 1470: 1467: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1363: 1362: 1351: 1350: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1326: 1318: 1306: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1289: 1288: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1262: 1261: 1241: 1238: 1231: 1200: 1197: 1184: 1181: 1175: 1167: 1164: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1145: 1142: 1133: 1130: 1117: 1116: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1076: 1075: 1059: 1056: 1048:Abdul Hamid II 1043: 1042: 1017: 1014: 996: 993: 992: 991: 986: 977: 972: 969: 952: 949: 947: 933: 930: 919: 918: 895: 894: 878: 875: 874: 859: 851: 845:lizensiert. -- 829:Danke für den 827: 819: 818: 817: 816: 794: 791: 758: 757: 744: 732: 731: 730: 715: 714: 697: 694: 676: 673: 661: 653: 644: 635: 634: 632: 623: 617: 614: 598: 597: 596: 576: 575:WINOR download 573: 572: 571: 570: 552: 538: 536: 534: 533: 520: 516:Koyaanis Qatsi 501: 489: 482: 458: 446: 445: 444: 431:photo. Thank. 417: 410: 408: 400: 387: 386: 385: 378: 353: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 331: 330: 317: 316: 315: 298: 297: 296: 284: 283: 282: 272: 251: 250: 249: 241: 238: 222: 221: 220: 219: 196: 181: 179: 177: 176: 157: 139: 138: 135: 132: 120: 119: 93:Recent changes 80: 77: 76: 75: 74: 73: 64: 63: 58:elements... -- 30: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2250: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2210:, who is the 2209: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2137: 2129: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2115: 2114: 2109: 2108:Magnus Manske 2104: 2098: 2094: 2093:mis-discussed 2090: 2086: 2085:unintentional 2078: 2069: 2068:Magnus Manske 2065: 2064: 2063: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2040: 2039:Magnus Manske 2035: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2028: 2027:80.128.33.194 2023: 2013: 2011: 2000: 1998: 1994: 1981: 1980:Magnus Manske 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1962: 1960: 1955: 1953: 1946: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1927: 1923: 1913: 1911: 1900: 1898: 1892: 1888: 1881: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1859: 1855: 1845: 1843: 1833: 1831: 1827: 1817: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1805: 1800: 1793:si.edu images 1790: 1788: 1783: 1778: 1771:Image details 1765: 1761: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1744: 1739: 1738: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1727: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1710: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1685: 1679: 1677: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1658: 1653: 1651: 1645: 1643: 1638: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1545: 1537: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1516: 1514: 1503: 1501: 1490: 1488: 1478: 1476: 1466: 1464: 1456: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1331: 1330:Magnus Manske 1327: 1324: 1319: 1316: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1237: 1235: 1229: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1213: 1211: 1207: 1196: 1194: 1190: 1180: 1178: 1172: 1163: 1161: 1151: 1141: 1139: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1065: 1055: 1053: 1049: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1013: 1011: 1007: 1003: 989: 984: 983: 982: 980: 968: 966: 962: 958: 948: 945: 943: 939: 929: 927: 924: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 904: 900: 892: 888: 887: 886: 884: 873: 871: 867: 864: 858: 856: 850: 848: 844: 841:aber nun als 840: 836: 832: 831:Lizenzhinweis 826: 824: 823:Magnus Manske 814: 810: 809: 807: 803: 802: 801: 799: 790: 788: 787:hepburn_chart 783: 781: 778: 774: 769: 767: 764: 756: 754: 749: 748: 747: 743: 741: 737: 728: 724: 723: 722: 720: 713: 710: 709: 708: 705: 701: 693: 691: 686: 685: 683: 672: 670: 666: 660: 658: 652: 650: 643: 639: 633: 630: 628: 622: 613: 611: 605: 603: 594: 589: 588: 587: 585: 581: 568: 564: 560: 559: 558: 556: 550: 548: 543: 537: 531: 530:Magnus Manske 527: 526: 525: 519: 517: 513: 509: 505: 500: 498: 494: 488: 486: 481: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 457: 455: 451: 442: 441:Magnus Manske 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 425: 423: 415: 409: 406: 402: 398: 395: 394: 390: 383: 382:Magnus Manske 379: 376: 373: 369: 368: 367: 365: 361: 356: 352: 351: 339: 335: 334: 333: 332: 329: 328:Magnus Manske 325: 324: 323: 322: 314: 310: 309: 308: 304: 303: 294: 293:Magnus Manske 290: 289: 288: 280: 279:Magnus Manske 276: 273: 270: 269: 268: 267: 262: 260: 256: 247: 246:Magnus Manske 242: 239: 236: 235: 234: 232: 226: 217: 216:Magnus Manske 213: 208: 204: 203: 201: 197: 194: 193:Magnus Manske 190: 189: 188: 186: 180: 174: 173:Magnus Manske 170: 169: 168: 167: 162: 156: 155: 151: 147: 144: 136: 133: 130: 129: 128: 126: 117: 116:Magnus Manske 112: 111: 110: 109: 105: 101: 98: 94: 90: 86: 72: 68: 67: 66: 65: 61: 60:Magnus Manske 56: 55: 54: 53: 49: 44: 43: 39: 35: 29: 28: 19: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2211: 2197: 2193: 2180: 2167: 2159: 2155: 2152:commendation 2151: 2147: 2143: 2141: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2049: 2019: 2006: 1990: 1971: 1968: 1956: 1947: 1944: 1919: 1906: 1885: 1851: 1839: 1826:Talk:Leucite 1823: 1808: 1796: 1774: 1753: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1711: 1705: 1703: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1688: 1683: 1680: 1675: 1674:Look at the 1673: 1667: 1661: 1654: 1649: 1646: 1641: 1636: 1634: 1627: 1620: 1616: 1611: 1603: 1595: 1591:substandard. 1587: 1583: 1579: 1573: 1569: 1563: 1559: 1553: 1546: 1542: 1535: 1525: 1523:Hi Magnus, 1522: 1509: 1496: 1484: 1472: 1453: 1449: 1435:David Newton 1420:David Newton 1357:David Newton 1340:David Newton 1336: 1323:as one point 1322: 1299: 1275: 1243: 1225: 1214: 1205: 1202: 1186: 1173: 1169: 1147: 1135: 1118: 1077: 1072:DavidWBrooks 1064:DavidWBrooks 1061: 1044: 1025: 1019: 998: 974: 954: 946: 942:Infrogmation 935: 920: 896: 880: 872:29 Feb 2004 860: 852: 828: 820: 806:Jwrosenzweig 796: 784: 770: 759: 750: 745: 733: 716: 706: 702: 699: 687: 679: 678: 665:Nuclear pore 662: 654: 646: 631: 624: 619: 610:Tim Starling 606: 602:Tim Starling 599: 578: 562: 551: 539: 535: 521: 511: 507: 502: 490: 483: 474:User:Michael 470:User:Michael 466:User:Michael 459: 447: 426: 411: 407: 403: 399: 396: 391: 388: 357: 355:Hey Magnus, 354: 347: 337: 318: 305: 299: 285: 263: 252: 227: 223: 211: 206: 182: 178: 158: 150:October 10th 140: 121: 82: 45: 31: 26: 25: 2170:Wikipedian 2144:WWWOOOOOWWW 1987:Löschwunsch 1969:Dear sir , 1487:Oldak Quill 1469:Sea ice pic 1204:denoted as 1138:Maximus Rex 642:Wrist-joint 616:quicksilver 104:October 9th 2168:very FIRST 1903:WikiReader 1626:Hmmm .... 1519:Thumbnails 1150:Boeing 767 1022:Tanganyika 1016:Ugly boxes 798:Kingturtle 734:I updated 669:WormRunner 491:So.... is 462:User:Eddie 302:Youssefsan 2172:TwoOneTwo 2164:Main Page 1848:License ? 1842:Van Flamm 1830:Ortolan88 1631:CSS yet.) 1446:Pic sizes 1310:Hurlstone 1278:Karl Wick 1258:aluminium 1155:captions. 855:Dysprosia 690:Noldoaran 567:The Anome 555:The Anome 547:The Anome 485:User:Fuck 422:AxelBoldt 372:test wiki 364:Eloquence 313:Eloquence 100:Wednesday 2228:earliest 1997:Steschke 1836:Pictures 1662:PS: see 1619:or even 1500:Nichtich 1399:correct. 1294:karlwick 1234:Ruhrjung 1193:→Raul654 971:Pic size 957:pedigree 951:Pedigree 901:. :-) — 649:Alex.tan 207:describe 166:Jeronimo 146:Thursday 27:Old talk 2222:, your 2216:Everest 2194:history 2186:founder 1957:Thanks 1910:Lyellin 1762:Best — 1757:widely. 1596:improve 1564:already 1547:Best — 1536:quality 1217:Germans 1199:Germans 1189:Nupedia 1183:Nupedia 1124:Mintguy 1111:Mintguy 1100:Mintguy 1091:Mintguy 1080:Mintguy 923:Mintguy 727:Fantasy 719:Fantasy 640:versus 627:Tarquin 580:m:WINOR 143:Ellmist 97:Ellmist 48:lithium 38:Lithium 2218:after 2212:second 2203:2002ad 2156:SECOND 2148:praise 2060:Tipiac 2010:Damast 1934:Sundar 1926:Sundar 1866:lysine 1858:Tipiac 1787:ke4roh 1764:Tannin 1726:Tannin 1693:seeing 1657:Tannin 1549:Tannin 1206:German 883:ugen64 833:. Die 777:Angela 763:Angela 740:Martin 584:Menchi 528:Done. 2224:first 2160:FIRST 2118:Wiki- 1959:ZeBob 1814:Curps 1804:Curps 1706:don't 1637:whole 1621:weeks 1607:tags. 1588:whole 1560:could 1539:late. 1455:them. 1250:Danny 1052:Danny 915:Timwi 903:Timwi 891:Timwi 775:too. 680:(see 638:Wrist 508:Green 341:--mav 338:loved 259:David 16:< 2190:boss 2150:and 1896:T@lk 1879:T@lk 1754:real 1676:feet 1664:here 1642:page 1617:days 1574:Some 1039:Stan 1031:Stan 1026:Look 1010:Talk 965:Talk 868:).-- 847:Epix 843:GFDL 839:Bild 813:Jack 593:Pete 360:here 154:2002 108:2002 87:and 2188:or 2106:To 2091:or 2079:!!! 1891:JFW 1874:JFW 1828:. 1812:-- 1698:not 1684:way 1668:not 1604:off 1584:No! 1285:mav 1127:(T) 1114:(T) 1103:(T) 1094:(T) 1083:(T) 1006:Elf 1004:. 961:Elf 926:(T) 512:Red 393:172 321:mav 266:Zoe 231:Lir 212:not 200:Lir 185:Lir 71:mav 52:mav 42:mav 2234:-- 2201:, 2037:-- 1893:| 1876:| 1714:do 1612:is 1582:. 1232:-- 1132:PD 1050:. 1008:| 963:| 870:El 789:? 563:is 478:MB 454:MB 439:-- 420:. 350:KQ 244:-- 152:, 148:, 114:-- 106:, 102:, 1870:L 1473:( 1317:. 1260:! 1230:. 780:. 766:. 684:) 418:2

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index