Knowledge

User talk:Kristenlevenick

Source 📝

26: 163: 101:. If, after you have reviewed these help files, you can revise your article to include more third party sources please feel free to resubmit it for review. In the meantime, if I can be of any more assistance you may contact me at [[User talk:Snowysusan |my talk page. Best Regards, Snowysusan 08:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 88:
Good morning! I have looked at the article again and here is the major problem. It is based entirely on information from the company (the news article) and information from the company's website. Without reliable, third party sources, that have discussed the company it is self promotional.
35:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 79:
Hi there. Thanks for following up. I will be happy to help you. Let me review it again, give it some thought and I will get back to you later this evening (it's 1:30 p.m. where I am now). Cheers. Snowysusan 16:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
41: 120:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 205:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
51: 184:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 174: 156: 117: 105: 123:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
180:
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
89:
Knowledge requires that articles rely on sufficient independent, reliable sources to establish "notability." It may help if you review
221: 154: 149: 16: 18: 104: 60: 133:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
209:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 206: 145: 134: 55: 8: 181: 186: 68:
Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge! Snowysusan 21:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
127: 217: 141: 113: 169:
Hello, Kristenlevenick. It has been over six months since you last edited your
98: 94: 170: 90: 32: 40:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
47:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
213: 25: 212:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.
83: 74: 50:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
99:
the criteria for notability in relation to companies
42:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/InstaMed 185: 95:guidance on advertising and self promotion 130:of the content if it meets requirements. 91:Knowledge's guide on independent sources 31:Thank you for your recent submission to 116:. I just wanted to let you know that 13: 161: 24: 14: 232: 140:Thank you for your attention. 1: 7: 173:draft article submission, " 56:real time chat with helpers 10: 237: 222:13:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC) 150:01:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 166: 29: 171:Articles for Creation 165: 33:Articles for Creation 28: 19:Articles for creation 155:Your draft article, 61:reviewer's talk page 187:edit the submission 17:Your submission at 167: 30: 228: 201: 200: 195: 194: 189: 164: 126:You may request 63: 236: 235: 231: 230: 229: 227: 226: 225: 198: 197: 192: 191: 190:and remove the 162: 160: 110: 86: 77: 72: 71: 59: 22: 12: 11: 5: 234: 159: 157:Draft:InstaMed 153: 118:Draft:InstaMed 112:Hi there, I'm 109: 106:Draft:InstaMed 103: 85: 82: 76: 73: 70: 69: 65: 64: 48: 45: 37: 36: 23: 21: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 233: 224: 223: 219: 215: 210: 208: 203: 188: 183: 178: 176: 172: 158: 152: 151: 147: 143: 138: 136: 135:WP:REFUND/G13 131: 129: 124: 121: 119: 115: 107: 102: 100: 96: 92: 81: 67: 66: 62: 57: 53: 49: 46: 43: 39: 38: 34: 27: 20: 211: 204: 179: 168: 139: 132: 128:Userfication 125: 122: 111: 87: 78: 58:, or on the 199:{{db-g13}} 193:{{db-afc}} 142:HasteurBot 114:HasteurBot 207:this link 182:mainspace 52:help desk 175:InstaMed 84:InstaMed 75:InstaMed 202:code. 108:concern 54:, via 214:Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ 218:talk 177:". 146:talk 97:and 196:or 220:) 148:) 137:. 93:, 216:( 144:( 44:.

Index

Articles for creation

Articles for Creation
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/InstaMed
help desk
real time chat with helpers
reviewer's talk page
Knowledge's guide on independent sources
guidance on advertising and self promotion
the criteria for notability in relation to companies
Draft:InstaMed
HasteurBot
Draft:InstaMed
Userfication
WP:REFUND/G13
HasteurBot
talk
01:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Draft:InstaMed
Articles for Creation
InstaMed
mainspace
edit the submission
this link
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ
talk
13:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.