Knowledge

User talk:JonathanMFeldman

Source 📝

434:
could turn to the page for a reference. Second, I am working on a rather long 61 page single spaces already treatment of Gerassi for a book. So, why would I dump all my material in this blurb for free? This is nothing Gerassi would have done, so why should I? He would have thought it wierd in fact. Third, if you wanted to complement what I wrote, why not simply edit my piece and make changes? Instead, because I don't self-plagiarize, you go on and on about what I did not say. If you thought it was all that important to make these additions, you could have made them. Also, you could have written the first reference to him yourself, but you did not. Why not? Because I suspect you enjoy the role of a gatekeepper more than being a researcher. Now, I can not find any Knowledge entry for John Gerassi. So, I hope you are satisfied. Regards,
411:. I'm also a bit surprised that you made no reference to John Gerassi's 1966 truly wonderful "The Boys of Boise," written about the Boise Sex Scandal in 1955/56. Of course, if you had included a reference to The Boys of Boise then you would likely have come across the film made last year by Seth Randal called "The Fall of '55" which relied heavily on The Boys of Boise by Gerassi. Indeed a more complete bibliography or a bibliography at all would have likely been appropriate. The bare reference to just a few of his books, without even so much as a note about or quote from the reviews (mostly positive) those books received seemed to me to be insufficient. There are lots of reviews available online. 727: 333: 275: 538: 223: 180: 61: 23: 672: 407:. Of course, a good starting point for your research might have been the detailed interview of Gerassi by Tony Monchinski. (It appears you do know of their association, having cited the work they did together as a reference without in fact having taken anything from the book for your article). The interview, in case you would like to review it, is at 433:
Look, I don't know who you are, but you come across as an arrogant know it all. This in my opinion is par for the course in Knowledge, which seems to attract a certain type, form over substance. First of all, I wanted to at least give a very brief mention about whom Tito Gerassi was, so that readers
426:
I am sorry you feel that you have not been treated fairly by me but these are just some examples of information and sources that would have, in my opinion, improved your article so that it was not so devoid of content, context and references that it tended in fact to mislead, rather than inform, the
418:
Without question, I would have thought, since Gerassi passed away in 2012, what was written about his life after he died would help inform your reader. There is a truly remarkable obituary/memorium by Michel Contat in Le Monde. Albeit in French, it is nevertheless infused with great insight into
414:
Your reference to Gerassi as an activist in the New Left seemed to me to be a bit simplistic without referring to his long history, work, and association with various important groups and organizations on the left. I think most people would have found his open support of FARC leader Granda and
261:
Reply: What are you talking about? WHat is a PROMOTIONAL LINK? BE EXPLICIT! BE CLEAR! This amounts to INUENDO. WHAT IS A "SOAP BOX"? Give an example?! The term "advertising" is used to refer to products. What product do you think I was selling? I haven't used Knowledge to advertise any
342:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 284:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 415:
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez in 2005 was just a little bit noteworthy. Even a nod to the many books he has written from a socialist (some might even say Marxist) perspective and his writings about socialist/communist leaders would have provided somewhat more insight for your reader.
201:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
44:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
717: 450:
Your article on the holocaust is misleading. It contains misleading information. Who can I write to so that the inaccurate impression that is left by the article can be corrected? How can you have an article about this topic and not
657: 391:
Actually, in my view, the article just wasn't thorough nor carefully researched. John "Tito" Gerassi is a fascinating subject and deserved quite a bit more effort than you expended on this submission.
495:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 607: 479: 76:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
623:, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 383:
Knowledge continues to engage in academic pseudo postering when it comes to the truth. It supports propaganda and nitpicking when it is given perfectly verifiable information.
262:
product? Every intellectual is PROMOTING SOMETHING. That is what intellectuals do, they promote ideas. These comments are vague and lack logic. Regards, JonathanMFeldman
198: 41: 747: 693: 652: 145: 524: 420: 350: 300: 376: 323: 620: 608: 549: 531: 492: 480: 290: 626:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
498:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
443: 555:
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply
243: 602: 529: 421:
http://www.lemonde.fr/disparitions/article/2012/08/10/john-tito-gerassi-l-ami-americain-de-sartre-mort-a-81-ans_1744962_3382.html
471: 65: 573:
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
586: 557: 386: 211: 265: 54: 163: 102: 95:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
255: 580:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:
359: 197: 40: 399:. Perhaps even some mention of his family and, in particular, just a bit more about his father; see for example: 707: 659: 267: 235: 120: 73: 69: 309: 703: 636:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
508:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
173: 135: 16: 134:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
119:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
128: 124: 463: 435: 368: 648: 637: 598: 520: 509: 459: 216: 188: 31: 354: 304: 8: 574: 251: 184: 27: 396: 317:
Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge! Snowysusan 01:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
64:
Welcome to Knowledge. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
689: 207: 50: 630: 502: 159: 726: 706:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 644: 616: 594: 590:, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. 516: 488: 455:
Hannah Arendt or Zygmunt Bauman? This is not serious. Regards, JonathanMFeldman
408: 395:
More about his life and education would have been helpful; for an example, see:
195:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 111:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
38:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 544:
Hello JonathanMFeldman. It has been over six months since you last edited your
247: 151: 112: 556: 743: 545: 339: 325: 281: 289:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
678: 663: 227: 203: 46: 403:. Maybe something about the controversy that swirled around him in 2006: 346:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
296:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
231: 155: 146:
Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Swedish general election, 2010
698:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
582:{{subst:Refund/G13|Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi}} 699: 738: 725:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
404: 332: 274: 105:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
400: 681:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 60: 593:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.
192: 35: 671: 714:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
430:
All the best. Snowysusan 01:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
349:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
299:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
187:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you must
183:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
30:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you must
26:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
702:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 397:
http://dlib.nyu.edu/findingaids/html/tamwag/alba_018/
244:a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion 621:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi 609:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi 493:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi 481:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi 291:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/John Gerassi 144:Possible COI violation. The case is pending at: 136:our frequently asked questions for organizations 367:Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge! 409:http://clogic.eserver.org/4-2/monchinski.html 242:acceptable, Knowledge is not intended to be 735:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 633:of the content if it meets requirements. 505:of the content if it meets requirements. 696:to see how you can improve the article. 338:Thank you for your recent submission to 280:Thank you for your recent submission to 692:. You may like to take a look at the 688:, which is recorded on the article's 619:. I just wanted to let you know that 491:. I just wanted to let you know that 238:about beliefs, products or services 548:draft article submission, entitled 13: 670: 536: 331: 273: 14: 758: 684:The article has been assessed as 419:Gerassi's life and views. (See 405:http://www.bloggernews.net/12336 221: 196: 178: 59: 39: 21: 401:http://www.fernandogerassi.com/ 72:. In keeping with Knowledge's 643:Thank you for your attention. 584:, paste it in the edit box at 515:Thank you for your attention. 226:Please do not add promotional 212:13:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 164:03:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 55:23:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 377:23:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 68:on Knowledge, you may have a 603:14:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC) 444:12:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC) 387:RE: More bias from wikipedia 256:20:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 230:to Knowledge, as you did to 125:verifiability of information 7: 525:15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 427:reader about the subject. 355:real time chat with helpers 305:real time chat with helpers 10: 763: 748:18:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 653:01:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 728:leaving us some feedback 704:create articles yourself 439: 372: 675: 541: 336: 278: 82:exercise great caution 66:you have written about 708:Articles for Creation 674: 660:Articles for creation 540: 340:Articles for Creation 335: 326:Articles for creation 282:Articles for Creation 277: 268:Articles for creation 121:neutral point of view 74:neutral point of view 530:Your draft article, 360:reviewer's talk page 310:reviewer's talk page 154:may be of itnerest. 103:deletion discussions 70:conflict of interest 658:Your submission at 558:edit the submission 324:Your submission at 266:Your submission at 676: 542: 337: 279: 666:has been accepted 476: 462:comment added by 446:Jonathan Feldman 174:Your recent edits 17:Your recent edits 754: 730: 720: 629:You may request 589: 583: 572: 571: 566: 565: 560: 539: 501:You may request 475: 464:JonathanMFeldman 456: 436:JonathanMFeldman 369:JonathanMFeldman 362: 312: 225: 224: 200: 182: 181: 63: 43: 25: 24: 762: 761: 757: 756: 755: 753: 752: 751: 750: 716: 710:if you prefer. 668: 613: 585: 581: 569: 568: 563: 562: 561:and remove the 537: 535: 485: 457: 389: 381: 358: 329: 321: 320: 308: 271: 236:objective prose 222: 219: 191:by typing four 189:sign your posts 179: 176: 129:autobiographies 34:by typing four 32:sign your posts 22: 19: 12: 11: 5: 760: 733: 732: 723: 694:grading scheme 683: 669: 667: 656: 615:Hi there, I'm 612: 606: 534: 528: 487:Hi there, I'm 484: 478: 453: 452: 388: 385: 380: 379: 364: 363: 347: 343: 330: 328: 322: 319: 318: 314: 313: 297: 294: 286: 285: 272: 270: 264: 260: 228:external links 218: 215: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 138:. Thank you. 117: 116: 113:Knowledge:Spam 106: 96: 18: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 759: 749: 745: 741: 740: 736: 729: 724: 721: 719: 713: 712: 711: 709: 705: 701: 695: 691: 687: 682: 680: 673: 665: 661: 655: 654: 650: 646: 641: 639: 638:WP:REFUND/G13 634: 632: 627: 624: 622: 618: 610: 605: 604: 600: 596: 591: 588: 578: 576: 559: 553: 551: 547: 533: 527: 526: 522: 518: 513: 511: 510:WP:REFUND/G13 506: 504: 499: 496: 494: 490: 482: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 449: 448: 447: 445: 441: 437: 431: 428: 424: 422: 416: 412: 410: 406: 402: 398: 393: 384: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 361: 356: 352: 348: 345: 344: 341: 334: 327: 316: 315: 311: 306: 302: 298: 295: 292: 288: 287: 283: 276: 269: 263: 258: 257: 253: 249: 246:. Thank you. 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 214: 213: 209: 205: 199: 194: 190: 186: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 137: 132: 130: 126: 122: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 99:participating 97: 94: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 62: 57: 56: 52: 48: 42: 37: 33: 29: 737: 734: 715: 697: 685: 679:John Gerassi 677: 664:John Gerassi 642: 635: 631:Userfication 628: 625: 614: 592: 579: 554: 550:John Gerassi 543: 532:John Gerassi 514: 507: 503:Userfication 500: 497: 486: 467: 458:— Preceding 454: 432: 429: 425: 417: 413: 394: 390: 382: 357:, or on the 307:, or on the 259: 239: 220: 217:January 2012 177: 133: 118: 108: 98: 92: 88: 81: 77: 58: 20: 232:Disarmament 686:Stub-Class 645:HasteurBot 617:HasteurBot 595:HasteurBot 570:{{db-g13}} 564:{{db-afc}} 517:HasteurBot 489:HasteurBot 185:talk pages 28:talk pages 718:help desk 700:Knowledge 690:talk page 587:this link 575:mainspace 351:help desk 301:help desk 248:bobrayner 472:contribs 460:unsigned 234:. While 93:creating 611:concern 483:concern 204:SineBot 152:WP:NPSK 109:linking 89:editing 47:SineBot 546:WP:AFC 353:, via 303:, via 193:tildes 156:Lihaas 150:Also, 127:, and 84:when: 36:tildes 744:talk 451:cite: 78:avoid 649:talk 599:talk 521:talk 468:talk 440:talk 423:). 373:talk 252:talk 208:talk 160:talk 51:talk 739:DGG 567:or 552:. 101:in 91:or 80:or 746:) 662:: 651:) 640:. 601:) 577:. 523:) 512:. 474:) 470:• 442:) 375:) 254:) 240:is 210:) 202:-- 162:) 131:. 123:, 115:). 53:) 45:-- 742:( 731:. 722:. 647:( 597:( 519:( 466:( 438:( 371:( 293:. 250:( 206:( 158:( 49:(

Index

talk pages
sign your posts
tildes

SineBot
talk
23:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

you have written about
conflict of interest
neutral point of view
deletion discussions
Knowledge:Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability of information
autobiographies
our frequently asked questions for organizations
Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Swedish general election, 2010
WP:NPSK
Lihaas
talk
03:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
talk pages
sign your posts
tildes

SineBot
talk
13:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
external links

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.