User talk:Etamni - Knowledge

2872:

other project. This piqued my curiosity, and I found that the editor was blocked here without a warning, for edits that, at worst, were good faith edits that lacked proper citations and edit summaries. I reviewed a number of those edits and, despite the lack of citations, was able to find sources confirming each of the changes except one (and that one was to remove a category that wasn't supported by the article or WP:RS -- thus also a good edit). Is that what we want here? To block all the IPs for not understanding our very complex rules? This IP was blocked for 60 days; a lot of actual vandalism results in shorter blocks. Ultimately, I hope the editor registers an account so that everyone can be clear on who made what edit, but who are we -- any of us -- if we insist on IP editors following the rules to the letter, but we don't follow them ourselves when enforcing them? (As for comments about the quantity and distribution of my edits, please note that I was previously involved in anti-vandalism which often results in a 1:1 ratio of edits to article space and user talk space -- one to fix the vandalism and one to warn the vandal. I was also involved in XfD for a time, which results in numerous edits outside of article space. Finally, please note that I am currently much more involved in another Knowledge project and not as active here as I was six months ago. Ultimately, these things are irrelevant and a distraction -- the important question was whether or not the IP should have been blocked. I don't think it should have been.) Regards,

782: 3675: 1820:

the category was called B or 2, but rather wanted to know what the significance of this categorisation was. This is not a hard thing to understand at all. Specified jargon needs explaining. If you genuinely think that "Category B" is understandable without any explanation to the majority of readers, and if you genuinely think that something can be both important enough to mention in the first sentence of the lead and irrelevant enough to not need mentioning at all in the body of the article, you really don't know much about how encyclopaedia articles are supposed to be written.

3435: 977: 3668: 3299: 2257: 3210: 3959: 2322: 3442: 3365: 2625: 2484: 2392: 4039: 3873: 3732: 3594: 3111: 2750: 898: 858: 815: 27: 1834:. The other is concise and objective and complies with the core policies. This edit was designed to irritate those who don't understand what an encyclopaedia is and see Knowledge as simply a game where people with user names antagonise and tone police and attack people without user names. Sadly Knowledge really lacks a good way of dealing with editors who make false accusations of vandalism and otherwise play this idiotic game. 79: 3358: 2618: 2477: 2385: 1979: 486: 1572: 1090: 291: 2712: 2553: 40: 3696: 3321: 2279: 59: 3000: 1518:

version, I went with that and put it into the article. Because of your query, I've now looked at the station's home page and see that the black version of the logo is in use. I'm not invested in this change (that is, I don't have strong feelings about the logo either way) so use whichever version most accurately represents the station's actual logo.

1850:

because you like provoking others, not because you really don't believe that the things people are best known for are really what they are best known for (even when the statement is properly sourced). Likewise, you have an extensive history of edit warring with people over the importance of details that may or may not be trivial, and then breaking

3976:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1791:. I can't take credit for it, but it just makes sense to me. I like your essay on the subject as well, btw! Personally, I use welcome templates and vandalism templates (since any resolution to a persistent vandal requires demonstrating they were final-warned, and the templates ensure a consistent way of documenting such warnings). 2934:

Hi, The page for Pradeep Gupta, CMD, CyberMedia India Ltd was deleted by you in Jan this year. Would like to understand in more detail your reason given for the same, (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). The article rightly

2871:

Since you seem so concerned about how I ended up discussing this IP user's block, I'll explain here: This user posted a request on a different Knowledge project where I am active, asking to be unblocked. He/she was directed to make the request on EnWiki instead, since the user was not blocked on that

1894:

you won't be able to edit any longer. You obviously have good command of language, and many of your edits make perfect sense, but you just don't seem willing to work for consensus on pages you choose to edit, and you jump right into potty-mouth remarks with editors who've not done the same with you.

1391:

No worries on the registration thing. Without knowing your history (and all I had to go on was the contributions from your IP address or addresses), I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the minimal requirements for registration, since some people expect they have to provide identifying info,

1315:

likes what I do. About "via", I just find that word a bit "lazy". It seems to be a word that some writers use when they don't know which preposition is appropriate. You'll notice that I have left it in in a couple of places where the meaning "by way of" (geographically) is intended. Otherwise, either

1257:

I am not sure I am sending you a message correctly, but after reading the talk page on the moral panic section, it seems that there is community consensus that not only the sources are bad, but the topic in itself is questionable. I believe asserting this as fact in wikipedia is incorrect, however I

2823:

by a newcomer. I'm sure you are aware of the decrease in active editors across all of Knowledge; I suspect that one of the reasons for this is a drop in conversions of new "IP" editors into registered editors. In this case, a prior block expired and a new block was placed on the account without any

1893:

from time to time? It doesn't mean that the subject is only known for the listed accomplishments or activities or events (etc.), only that it appears to be what the subject is most widely known for. The really sad part is that sooner or later, all of your available socks will be blocked, and then

1873:

You knowingly made a false accusation of vandalism. What possible reason was there for that, except to provoke? And it's really not hard to understand the difference between objective facts and subjective claims about what people think of the facts. Do tell, though, exactly how you know what the

1819:

As for BBC Canada, certainly the information was correct. That was not disputed by anyone. Correct, though, is not the criterion we use to determine whether something gets included in the encyclopaedia or not. The person who added the clarification tags didn't actually give a damn about whether

2797:

I note that you have taken it upon yourself to comment on this user's unblock request, and have included a comment which could be taken as being critical of the blocking admin (who was not me). While it is true that you created your account over five years ago, you have in reality only one year's

1203:

that appeared when you added this section to my talk page. In the case of the edit you are referring to, it was inadvertent that I hit the save button before adding the edit summary. If you had looked at a larger collection of my edits, you would have realized that I rarely make an edit without

2824:

warning whatsoever, for edits that, at worst, were good faith edits by an inexperienced editor. I do not believe that any of the IP's edits that I reviewed were intended to harm the encyclopedia. Blocking is explicitly for the purpose of protecting the encyclopedia from harm, not for punishment.

1849:

Your history on this issue appears to go back a long time -- obviously you don't understand that "best known for" is not a POV but refers to what the most people know the person for. I'm not going to waste a lot of time arguing with you about this issue -- it's obvious that you make the changes

1498:

look to be distorted and misshapen. I’ve seen this kind of error before, and it’s typically the result of a poor, automated vectorization job of a bitmap image. I know that Knowledge favors vector images, but I strongly argue that this is not a good rendering of the official logo. Until a better

2844:

Very few editors here have made over a million edits, and fifteen years experience would be tricky given the present age of the website. But this is not relevant; you are at present inexperienced, and your comment made on this blocked user's page serves no useful purpose. Intention to harm the

2094:

is shutting down service for all customers effective 12:01 AM local time on November 6, 2015. I will be without an ISP until sometime the following week, when my local cable provider will finally show up to install their service. My IP address will change. I expect to remain active in some

1517:

Go ahead and change it. The blue logo was about to be deleted as being a "fair use" logo that wasn't being used. I Googled the station and ended up on their facebook page instead of their official page. In the "photos" section, I saw what looked like the blue logo, and not seeing the black

1737:

and stating "no reason given for restoring this nonsensical text" despite the fact that you have been in an extended edit war over this article for quite awhile now, using a variety of IP addresses, and I'm sure you know exactly why administrators are restoring the text you keep blanking.

3606:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2042:

Real life is intruding upon my time here, or perhaps I have it backwards. In any case, if you really, really need to reach me, you can ping me or use the e-mail functions and I should see your message. I'll pop in periodically, but not as often as I have been for the past few months.

3744:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1917:. Assuming an average of a day to get consensus on removing that phrase on one of them (balancing the time to do several in one hit against time wasted by being blocked for edit warring and / or incivility), he should get the backlog fixed in a little under, ooooh, 13 years. 1010:

Hi. In the UK, towns are "granted" city status - an area of just a few hundred people can be granted city status if it's important enough yet an area of a few hundred thousand can still be merely a town if it hasn't been granted city status. Despite it's large population,

2845:

encyclopedia is not an absolute prerequisite for block; a block may be placed to prevent accidental harm as well. Given that you are entitled to edit where you will, arguing the point with two (or three counting me) experienced admins is not likely to be productive. --

1337:

Thanks for your response to this issue. It's a thorny one, and I suspect there's a lot more edits than I've discovered. I have a dynamic IP, so it's hard to contact me. Can you tell me which admin you alerted to this so I can follow the response? Thanks for your help.

3498:

Hi, sorry to waste your time. I'm not sure how I manged to change that article. I was scared off by the learning curve when I took a cursory look at the formatting it takes to edit Knowledge successfully sometime back when flip phones were still a thing. Sorry again.

772:. Reading the wikis will not be interrupted, but editing will be paused. These twice-yearly processes allow WMF's site reliability engineering teams to remain prepared to keep the wikis functioning even in the event of a major interruption to one of our data centers. 425: 2798:

experience; indeed, only 2000+ edits are not a large body of experience in any time frame. May I respectfully suggest that you would be better employed editing mainspace articles, rather than partaking of discussions in which you can have no meaningful influence?--

1815:

Good old Ritchie333, can always rely on him to give a spam link to his idiotic attack page. As for vandalism, if you really know what vandalism is then you were just making a personal attack. What a twat. See, we can all do that. I suggest you grow up a bit.

1765:) Sadly Knowledge really lacks a good way of dealing with editors who make good (or at the very least good faith) edits but cannot work with others or accept alternative points of view. We've tried all sorts of things but nothing has stuck. PS: I am a 2969:, which I was not part of. If you believe that the article should be restored, you can ask the deleting administrator to restore the article to your userspace where you may work on it to improve it to the point that it will meet Knowledge's standards. 919: 3123:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1705:(you removed info due to unanswered clarification tag -- the info was correct, it appears the prior tagger didn't understand why it was "Category B Services" in one part of the article and "Category 2 Services" in another part -- had they clicked the 1874:

population of the world as a whole thinks of 17 year old actor John Bell. Do people in Ghana think the same as people in India? What about Australia? What proportion of the world's population, would you estimate, has never actually heard of him?

3566:

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Knowledge that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

868:

The API now enables 5,000 on-demand API requests per month and twice-monthly HTML snapshots freely (gratis and libre). More information on the updates and also improvements to the software development kits (SDK) are explained on

809:

for editors include updates for: dark mode colors for Links and for quiet Buttons (progressive and destructive), visited Link colors for both light and dark modes, and background colors for system-messages in both light and dark

1040:, thank you for your quick reply. I'm thinking the usage in the article should be changed to "community" as others are likely to see the change, look up the population numbers, and also think that it was too big to be called a 2818:

Hello Anthony. I really don't think that any person needs to have 1,000,000 edits and fifteen years' experience here in order to recognize when a blocking mistake has been made, or when blocking might be perceived as being

3552:

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at

795: 791: 3968: 2891:

I appreciate your explanation, though your opinion on whether or not the user should have been blocked is ultimately of no consequence. Your assertion that they were blocked without a warning is inaccurate. I count

901:

The Wikidata Query Service (WDQS) is used to get answers to questions using the Wikidata data set. As Wikidata grows, we had to make a major architectural change so that WDQS could remain performant. As part of the

1888:

Just following your regular pattern, eh? Even after I sent one of your socks a plate of welcome-cookies the other day? Shame shame. Would it interest you to know that even Encyclopedia Britannica uses the term

2334:

Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you.

3951: 2211:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3524:

Not sure which article you mean -- I've been somewhat inactive of late, so that reply is probably to something from last year. The most important thing is to learn from mistakes, not repeat them, and move on.

2148:

I found an article on the LA Times site and also confirms the fact, so used that as an additional citation. There are few others, check my reply on talk page for links. Your advice is appreciated. Thank you.

1914: 798:". Alt-text helps people with visual impairments to read Knowledge articles. The team aims to learn if adding alt-text to images is a task that editors can be successful with. Please share any feedback on 2896:

prior to the first block on 20 February, with three warnings for adding unsourced content. "Add a reference" is not a complicated rule. The project is very concerned that biographies of living people be

355: 350: 2142:

Hi Etamni. Thanks for taking a look on my edit on the M&M's wikipedia page. I wrote a reply on my talk page, but don't know how to @ you, so you can see it also, so thought I send a message here.

2095:

capacity during this transition by using my alternative account and accessing it from my cell phone. During this time, I will be unable to see pings, but e-mail notes will still go through. Thanks,

4068:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3900:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3756:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3618:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3135:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 806: 799: 3491: 2989: 903: 1132:. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. 2761: 4084: 3916: 3772: 3634: 3151: 4053: 3886: 3015: 3184: 705: 3007: 1443:

It looks like you figured it out. Good job on getting that started, btw! There are additional comments on the article's talk page that you may be interested in seeing.

1358:

was notified via talk page. As a side note, I hope you know that creating an account is pretty easy. Come up with a username and a password; no personal info required.

3079: 2741: 3561: 1595:

to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

1269: 4000: 873:. While Wikimedia Enterprise APIs are designed for high-volume commercial reusers, this change enables many more community use-cases to be built on the service too. 1382: 1343: 3517: 2935:

indicates the importance and significance of the subject. There's no mis-interpretation of any kind in the article. Request for your re-review and restoration.

557: 200: 190: 1226:

For clarification, I also rarely add edit summaries when editing pages in my userspace or adding to talk pages, since the changes to both are self-explanatory.

195: 565: 537: 513: 3183:

Hi Etamni. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at

937: 2952: 2936: 2724:

Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools.

3027: 505: 2961:

was not deleted by me. Only an administrator can delete a page, and I am not an administrator. A review of the records shows that the page was deleted by

957: 2790: 521: 185: 3169: 2771: 3075: 2927: 918:

will continue to serve the full Wikidata graph until March 2025. After this date, it will only serve the main graph. For more information, please see

1330: 1196: 1182: 3942: 1713:(you changed "best known for his role as" to "He has played" -- a change that is not really meaningful, but is designed to irritate other editors); 3790: 3652: 493: 3098: 2958: 1584: 545: 529: 1824:

you changed "best known for his role as" to "He has played" -- a change that is not really meaningful, but is designed to irritate other editors

843: 2944: 2240: 3067: 2966: 468: 1347: 2893: 4111: 3805: 3861: 3502:- Unable to even edit a simple message, some random user who can't can't stand how easy it is to open the wrong link on the mobile site 1758: 3062: 862: 3722: 3584: 880:) as well as released two beta datasets (English and French Knowledge) from that endpoint to Hugging Face for public use and feedback ( 2886: 2853: 345: 3032: 1908: 1883: 1868: 1752: 1631: 3855: 3562:

http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_018zAupAU3J2KqN&Q_CHL=gl

2983: 2310: 1843: 1725:(And here again, you removed the "best known for" language of the article, calling it "absurd"); And then finally, you resumed your 1679: 1298: 765: 3539: 3093: 2180: 1457: 392: 3988: 3249:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 2570: 1436: 1406: 1386: 1377:

Thanks. One of the reasons I approached John from Idegon about this matter is because he respects my decision not to register ...

1372: 945: 933: 832: 818:

It is now possible to include clickable wikilinks and external links inside code blocks. This includes links that are used within

752: 2910: 2671: 2549:

I just noticed your edit notice says "Please don't template me!" .... I'm hoping you'll be happy with this kind of template tho

1953: 1927: 1805: 1779: 1218: 4031: 3832: 3816: 3797: 3480: 3276: 3229: 3040: 2665: 2601: 2188: 1655: 1550: 1532: 1416: 1200: 884:). These pre-parsed data sets enable new options for researchers, developers, and data scientists to use and study the content. 596: 326: 3486: 1875: 1835: 1671: 1602: 941: 608: 397: 2129: 2077: 1392:

and may be reluctant to do so for various reasons. I'm all for IP users making positive contributions to the encyclopedia.

4107: 3938: 3786: 3648: 3165: 2236: 1265: 1063: 670: 2733: 2356: 1576: 3509: 3407: 2524: 1826:- one is a verbose and unverifiable assumption about what an unspecified demographic thinks of something, which violates 1588: 646: 578: 3282: 2806: 2463: 1787:, thanks for the information about our IP editor; it made an interesting read! As for the template, you can find it at 3821: 2992: 2757: 2223:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1378: 1339: 591: 311: 306: 217: 3972:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1722: 1511: 751:

from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

3418: 3349: 3196: 2685: 2609: 2538: 2468: 2444: 2000: 1502:

I didn’t want to undo your edit because I didn’t want to be a jerk – I want to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks. --

1019: 994: 677: 461: 316: 3841:-- I'm not editing Knowledge as much as I used to. Other than that, doing OK. I wish you well also. --Kind regards, 1925: 1777: 1610: 1325: 1181:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

421: 338: 284: 928: 747: 4103: 3934: 3782: 3644: 3340: 3176: 3161: 2700: 2430: 2376: 2232: 418: 372: 301: 3715: 2030: 1273: 1204:

summarizing it somehow, and except for vandalism reverts, I rarely fail to add even more info to the talk page.

3426: 3044: 2298: 2143: 1475: 1424: 1304: 737: 3977: 3579: 2838: 660: 2158: 2109: 1190: 805:

The Codex color palette has been updated with new and revised colors for the MediaWiki user interfaces. The

382: 4077: 4010:

I see you don't like templates. I mentioned you in a post at the Administrator's Noticeboard regarding the

3909: 3851: 3765: 3627: 3535: 3144: 2979: 2882: 2834: 2597: 2176: 2125: 2105: 2073: 2053: 2026: 1949: 1904: 1864: 1801: 1748: 1646: 1627: 1528: 1453: 1402: 1368: 1294: 1236: 1214: 1094: 665: 630: 586: 454: 321: 723: 387: 4089: 3921: 3777: 3639: 3245:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

3156: 2351: 2228: 1967: 1788: 1031: 781: 377: 3828:

Long time. Been busy with a child and adjusting to being a full-time parent. Hope you’re doing well. -

1854:

when people try to discuss them with you. I no longer wish to be part of your sport. Have a nice day.

145:

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

4026: 3474: 3270: 3223: 3058: 2851: 2804: 2659: 2063:

Extended wikibreak is over, although the general concept of remaining busy in real life still applies!

1710: 558:

Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors

2057: 1702: 1048:" again. Additionally, something probably belongs in the article's talk page to explain this change. 965: 633:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 506:

Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

3513: 3464:

Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Knowledge.

3287: 3201: 3048: 2788: 1879: 1839: 1714: 1701:

is also a subject that I suspect isn't your strong suit. Here are some diffs of your changes today:

1675: 1606: 990: 48:

is busy and is going to be on Knowledge in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

3659: 2940: 2753: 2245: 2154: 2083: 1432: 1139: 718: 514:

Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

124: 104: 4015: 2729: 1592: 822:

tags and on code pages (JavaScript, CSS, Scribunto and Sanitized CSS). Uses of template syntax

695:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 651: 637: 790:

Editors who use the iOS Knowledge app in Spanish, Portuguese, French, or Chinese, may see the

4065: 3897: 3753: 3615: 3545: 3468: 3264: 3217: 3132: 3078:, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in 3052: 2906: 2862: 2846: 2813: 2799: 2653: 1996: 1563: 1144: 1003: 700: 688: 3674: 1199:, thank you for your concern. I hope you are paying attention to page notices, such as the 709:

to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

4076:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3908:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3764:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3626:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3575: 3505: 3143:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2459: 2219:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1923: 1775: 1598: 1261: 1186: 1164: 986: 877: 684: 641: 602: 485: 443: 403: 261: 3047:

as that page is purely meant for informational purposes. I would encourage you to post on

2587:, the edit notice is a reference to template warnings; nice templates are always welcome! 8: 3838: 3829: 2768: 2224: 1706: 1546: 1507: 1250: 1149: 1081: 696: 363: 3690:

Hi Etamni, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

3314:

Hi Etamni, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

3242: 2150: 1851: 1734: 1698: 1428: 953: 271: 4047: 4022: 4005: 3880: 3740: 3602: 3192: 3119: 3100: 3089: 3023: 2725: 2200: 2190: 2035: 1694: 1175: 1129: 1113: 1105: 3434: 4096: 4061: 3928: 3893: 3749: 3611: 3128: 2902: 2866: 2220: 2204: 2135: 2011: 1992: 1321: 1281: 1169: 984:

Thanks for being my first!! And...just continue being the first... It'll be FUN!!

710: 622: 1499:

vectorization is made, I really feel like we should change to the new logo image.

835:

system by improving the logging and by removing an incorrect placeholder message.

3996: 3810: 3571: 2962: 2455: 2347: 1932: 1918: 1784: 1770: 1730: 1098: 1027: 976: 257: 736:(Instead of subscribing, the following is transcluded -- saves space -- info at 680:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge. 4073: 4011: 3905: 3761: 3703: 3623: 3395: 3328: 3255: 3140: 2582: 2558: 2512: 2286: 2216: 2208: 1827: 1766: 1580: 1542: 1503: 881: 826:

are also linked to the template page. Thanks to SD0001 for these improvements.

3554: 2272:

Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

1280:

I'm happy to discuss this, but the more appropriate place is on the article's

4069: 3901: 3757: 3619: 3136: 2212: 1690: 1667: 1663: 1159: 1012: 876:

The Snapshot API (html dumps) have added beta Structured Contents endpoints (

132: 98: 870: 4018: 3973: 3235: 3188: 3085: 3019: 1718: 656: 282: 3843: 3527: 2971: 2874: 2826: 2589: 2168: 2117: 2097: 2065: 2045: 2018: 1941: 1896: 1856: 1831: 1793: 1762: 1740: 1709:

link, it would have been apparent that the designation changed in 2011);

1666:. Do you know what it is and were simply making a personal attack? See 1638: 1619: 1520: 1445: 1394: 1360: 1317: 1286: 1228: 1206: 1125: 1051: 4080:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3953:

Orphaned non-free image File:Plants vs. Zombies Idaho lottery ticket.jpg

3912:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3768:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3667: 3630:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3298: 3209: 3147:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2256: 4057:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4017:. You probably saw the ping, but the rules require a talk page notice. 3992: 3890:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3357: 2617: 2476: 2384: 2336: 2321: 1037: 1023: 3051:

instead as that is the proper discussion site for ClueBot NG. Cheers,

4038: 3872: 3731: 3593: 3246: 3238: 3110: 2091: 1154: 785:

A screenshot of the interface for the Alt Text suggested-edit feature

65: 3441: 3364: 2624: 2483: 2391: 3451: 3389: 3374: 2649: 2634: 2508: 2493: 2420: 2416: 2401: 1697:, which are two other activities you have been engaging in today. 1670:. Either way, false accusations of vandalism are not acceptable. 1717:(Again removed "best known for" and other language -- reverted by 949: 2207:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

1978: 1662:

Are you too stupid to understand what vandalism is? Try reading

1483: 1284:

since, undoubtedly, there are others who are interested as well.

4093:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3925:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 794:

after editing an article, or completing a suggested edit using "

4083:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

4051:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3915:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3771:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3633:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3185:

Knowledge:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right

3150:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1575:

Constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, but a

1495: 78: 39: 3884:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

3493:

Apologies (pretty much all you need to know. delete whenever)

2999: 1571: 769: 148: 3006:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

2767:

As template creator, I thought you might have some input. -

2711: 2016:, I really wasn't hungry enough to eat a whole one anyway ;) 838: 836: 827: 692: 728: 1487: 1045: 1041: 3692:

Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!

3555:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics

1939:

and other variations, I suppose. That's quite a backlog!

1541:

Awesome, thanks for the reply and thanks for the email! --

906:, we have new SPARQL endpoints available for serving the " 3808:

for mesopedians. Would you mind joining in it? Regards.--

2762:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

3804:

Hi greetings, I created an Wikipedian association named

1591:

for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our

907: 4064: