User talk:Curps/archive25

674:-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) hQQOA5ErWbbpmdMMEBAA+AQXf7o48RIKMv5XRHkeSX72YU5t0SkOzew+gzva37Fp EuLBaKJpKXNFSeIujgz77yp1v5BikAr2/CZ94x7bqEkyWsNslSc3obDOuQ4SBnBf K0ZBbFjo+2oL5qMLvbFrq+t1C4WvLlEiPcL3JA5ZGXMW1QTTjgTJCcw04RY6TQPm OfNTcturdMnaOPiJqKjo37MwfrxWxgFPr+KJf/LwNt8liHU17ZSDmKWZ1r4/zA+B YSqQxdqL7gLIIbacO6jC+fIF76lfu93lQdz+/9vymfFxs1SGhSeKVDrVI96BnDz7 DNS99fYrZvP8h2sKXj19ykVxBxnCCzyUgBgMh6BL+FMt8nskbtePyOz8JfW3OmA2 RxJc1G6HVhP+LYbXRpokkiAmIxuB3zc7dm/hFI1vH4JI6sDZ8dYvdm5KjCjjKAbj OXM2AmLx3Sao9pDkiIK7VwhxQH3jfm/5d+DFuLXs8YSwZPak1IoiRUW3rNZ6RV3G zq95zRaDpGJttRahLknmPuLdArlekHoT8DxRvLjgNQh78XvjN1dq3tmYYevPYz4Z gzys9+0CzZo3sB46j/W79Ylsg2tFluTt8Zj86GK4OcxpkUYd5sRU4cjMe6mN9VH1 swOfp8/+6X0vWtzSzzSVxDLX8lKg74UlWtB0/+eItzUzuPrDkQLekzrLl4miPmQP /3LsXX7y+YzREmRABQb3bzYblBAhdwvh8ElKFdoDISNWnDU+jtE4OKZSSuPeR/2T pMc1Bx22YCKnoG56ct2Ih2yRLwuDYmQ/mhJDgjY3FiQP0nlHyPy+YZHL3Nc3TZlr OWZA0QXgHxV7lMKjEW/3kz/KYeH94g4vvCxyrUELLQgc6DlWl4AewzQ+AyZJaiOz dX33NLzGIbjDma26sm/wo0x6s/RySrABdXrsvo2W19D4bfvJO1NLvITXxtnIshOX R8VQA0IWgmj2OwGn5ss1niu8YpORuQd0T8wGprfU55WgxExQgBXZuKdL5lPb24qD O8JS417fjwR/SDzcO6iNZvwEyssdZ+gCp6RXikPdxyOwoWChPBHw5a4+BaVSMzgB oiuK+UDCr3V5pzU9RfRVJBc8oSMVR89q4RgbZ923KJOvTKS3RClsaByBrM2cpEG3 A0LSj55+6BbtNFIiRjLV87FysTItpAzidS5zgZsKC1OUtc3i4ec1v56UGU2o+S68 XN1xq38Wh3g4OW8etSAOQW6LQqiOKQBiWx8Pvsta52wT4hlLGrFM6DDL+HKWJCyv 51mG4JTwOlMQWbsZdzcV6sxpu/yajP0hiNNf7YCp2mTNmlHGWLyUOR6FjewvMSKW LRU43rgcgdc7W1q2DT4JZgOBipQ0YWvDa6pbkmijcRB60nQBnltUo8V+meLwflFv tIemt1uYhBftp2HVjCa1ShgJgL6U8BPetzRQRB7eVfUeO+4I0v1HTGBkuZpAy4Pw i5EBsNFRR1AmgMb4OORd7xxMh1ZTvB0sc3zva1Nizsc21VJ115mFOBbMrzEoyZl7 baDF24XUig== =VC2R -----END PGP MESSAGE----- 418:

like Knowledge down in flames. You should read the article and see the actual differences, rather than simply following strict guidelines you've made up in your head. you have a chance. Don't blow it. I'll be here when you get done thinking. I like you, I really really like you. And you know what, despite yourself, right now, you like me, because I asked you do what we all come to wikipedia for in the first place, and that's to think. no matter how many times you label me as something i'm not, I'm thinking and making you do it too. And that's as vibrant as a breath in a ragged lung, coming to life on it's own accord, after years on a lung machine.... come on buddy, you'll see my point. Read what I've written, and you'll see the truth. Or not. I'll be back, just you wait and see. just you wait and see. I love waiting. Waited for years for peace of mind. how about you?

843:

with arbitration that others up to this point have not, and it involves in some way banning the accounts of a person so that he may not speak his case? I do not claim to be one as intelligent and evolved as you so I can not nor will I not question the wisdom of your decisions. After all, it is YOU who are the genius, not me. For now I only humbly request on bended keyboard that you let the rest of us on what this plan of yours is. I must confess I am most eager to find out. After all, I am a mere peasant, and I can not see how this would be beneficial to the problem at hand. Obviously YOU can and have, and those of us who have pondered the wisdom of such actions would be greatly delighted and honored for you to inform of us what you have in mind.

4321:

non-AfD-related vandalism. If by some stretch of the imagination, this was a genuine clueless user, he'd be so clueless that there would be no hope of useful contributions. Frankly, I don't believe it for a minute. Generally, freshly-created sockpuppets that are clearly up to no good are simply blocked; a genuine user on the other hand we try to work with or mentor. If you feel strongly about it, I won't wheel war with you, but I don't see any good in it. For what it's worth I was careful to close only the AfDs that had basically unanimous keeps with a sufficient number of votes, that still leaves about 3 or 4 open. --

1228:

now at your request. What other accounts are you referring to when you say "almost every account that I've created"? Unicode accounts are not routinely blocked. Some accounts were created in which Cyrillic or Greek letters are used to spoof Latin-alphabet letters (in some cases to impersonate existing users and in other cases for no apparent reason), and these have been blocked as intentionally confusing or misleading. However, in general, Russian, Greek, Chinese, Korean, Arabic, etc. usernames are fine as far as I'm concerned. --

1431: 3280: 3124:

created and has untrue information on it and I correctly edit that info, why do you revert back to the untrue information and warn me about vandalism? You need to be true to the other users and stop allowing false info to be spread. This is America and the truth prevails. Thanks for your answers in advance, I look forward to reading the rational for these acts.

2128:), to see whether it would be possible to use such an account without giving it admin powers. Of course, that left me caught behind the autoblocker... fun, fun (I have never seen the blocked text before - it's pretty intimidating/startling). Do you think that this is an unacceptable use of a sock (ie, do you have any problem with unblocking the account?) 1108:. It shouldn't be too much to remove the autoblock and just use a regular block; in fact, with ISP's starting up everyweek, IP addresses are all over the place - that's why there are quite a few "why me" complaints. Is it the true vandal just pretending - I really don't know, but if the request is legit, we'll have to follow through. Keep me posted. -- 1850:'s user page on how he suspected that Chadbryant was using a sockpuppet, Chad removed the remarks. So tell me how the hell is it okay for Chad to do it but when it happens to him it's not? Why are you letting him persist in this vandalistic behavior? You can't seriously take a look at that history list and tell me it's justified. -- 3022:, which Alex Cain has been asked many, many times to refrain from. Admins CAN block on sight if the Arbitration Committee hypothetically decides to ban a user (either temporarily or permanently). Blocking IPs is problematic because of the possibility of collateral damage; if you feel that an Alltel customer might be violating the 4215:

would you feel if you and I just kept an eye on him, and I tried to maintain communication with him? I'm still not entirely sure that he's editing in bad faith, and I try to be easy on the blocks. But of course, if he continues to be a numbskull and it becomes obvious he's ignoring my advice, I'll block him.

4214:

Hey there Curps. Good job on closing all those AfD nominations early. I thought of doing the same thing earlier but decided against it since I had already voted in some of the nominations and had started a (frustrated) dialogue on Cr0w bar's talk page. But I'm not sure he needs to be blocked. How

3705:

I have now replied on that page. In the discussion on that page, I haven't seen anyone else calling for the bot to be turned off, other than yourself. And I'm fairly sure you've been aware of the bot's existence for some time now, as have many other members of the admin community, so it's not clear

2238:

I have listed the above article for unprotection. Rather than an edit war over a POV tag (which you listed at the participants' talk pages), I feel the greater concern is the removal of properly sourced information which paints the company in a negative light by one participant. The WFG article has

1841:

You fail to get the point. Chad has no access on Knowledge to IP addresses and/or DNS locations. He is not an administrator in any form. Yet you allow him to vandalize user pages at random with this pathetic and childish (and truth be told, somewhat excessively paranoid) sockpuppet accusations. I

1599:

For pete's sake, 207.193.126.124 is a frickin MONSTER. He never does anything constructive and spams "wikipedia sucks" all over articles. He's been blocked NINE times and the block time has risen to one week as of the latest two blocks. I think a block of 24 hours is way way too light. Putting him in

1227:

What do you mean when you say "almost every account"? I blocked your account with the Unicode "FULL BLOCK" character (and note that wasn't an autoblock, I typed in an explanatory summary), plus the two "chip off the old..." accounts which seemed to be sockpuppets of the first one. They're unblocked

1135:

Many users said that the # of search results doesn't matter in determining article-worthiness. Mikkalai based his afd off of that (though people say he wasn't supposed dto). Once an article has been AFD'd, is the rule to keep it off Knowledge forever, or what condition needs to be met in order to let

4302:

read as an advertisement when he nominated it. I vote clueless. Anyway, no need to get into a big fight over the severity of his actions. Though I'm not sure an indefinite ban is required... isn't a 24 hour block more in line with blocking policy? I'd prefer that if he came back, he came back as

3405:

Ok, I understand. Could I ask if the devs and assorted people have looked at it and seen that it's OK? Don't get me wrong: I think that your work here is invaluable. But I just want to know how to react when people talk about the "secret, unapproved block bot," which I've heard bandied about lately.

2880:

for details. Chadbryant is creating comments intended for no purpose other than to cause trouble or incite it in the first place. There is absolutely no need for these remarks, and I'm pretty sure they violate Knowledge policy in some way. Is there something you can do to help stop this, please?

1169:

Slow down that autoscript. You've blocked almost every account that i've created and that contains Unicode. And now you've also blocked another guy who's created an account w/ unicode. Remember that the MediaWiki software autoblocks the IP of whoever you block. Other Admins dont know what's going on

417:

look, what you're doing is thinking too much. you haven't looked at the actuality of the differences. you are just knee jerking along. I can't compete with you on the blockage. I wouldn't want to. But I will tell you this, that sort of blind inability to see the truth is what will bring a great idea

858:

I block each account because you start up the same nonsense each and every time: personal attacks (and with earlier sockpuppets, petty vandalism). You also simultaneously admit to and deny using multiple accounts, saying in effect (paraphrasing): "you can't prove those accounts are sockpuppets, so

842:

yet as soon as you find an account I create, you ban it. I can see how that is an intelligent move. After all, what better way for a person to request arbitration than to have his account banned? That IS your plan, right? You have looked "outside the box" and found an entirely new way of dealing

4243:

I saw all his contributions. In fact, you'll notice I reverted his first quite odd one. My suspicions, due to his jumping in to AfD so early, are that he is a returning user, i.e. a sockpuppet, but he hasn't done a lot of damage yet. I was heartened by the fact that he responded to my comments,

3082:

You still will not explain my warning. Editing true information is not a violation of the rules as I read them. Am I wrong here? If my info is disputed, I would be shocked. Because a user does not like the truth does not give you the right to edit the true information off of the page. That is

2826:

indefinitely, seemingly automatically because he vandalised my userpage by moving it to another page. While I am thankful that you reverted the move and blocked Z0l, I still doubt Z0l was your average pagemove vandal. Judging by his contributions, he rather seems to be some kind of nerdy schoolboy

2755:

I'm not that well-trained on making articles look encyclopedic from the get-go. Maybe on articles that are already well-established, but to -make- articles -become- well-established is a responsibility I rest on other users' shoulders. After they bring it up to par, I usually check back to inspect

271:

Perhaps Curps has other things to do, other than answer you immediately. We can contact the service provider, and speak with them on your activities. It's general practice for ISPs to not tolerate spammers, virus creators, spyware spreaders, and the like using their networks. While Knowledge is an

225:

Yes the anonymous IP range appears to be as you stated, however "Irshad Deen" would be the contact person (employee) of Sri Lanka Telecom Internet (ie, the person you'd complain to, rather than complain about). The actual vandal would either be a customer of Sri Lanka Telecom Internet, or perhaps

2779:

The place for "why wasn't this created sooner" comments is a talk page, not the article itself. After all, that's your personal comment, not part of the description of the topic itself. To signal that the page needs attention, you can put various templates, which I see you are already doing. --

2729:

Hmmm, if server load is an issue, it might help if there was some "checkuser lite" that just returned the IP address and didn't perform all kinds of cross-checking for sockpuppets and matches with other usernames. However, I think I'd run it sparingly on specific individual usernames rather than

2669:

I understand why you don't want people to know the inner workings of your bot but as I am clearly not a vandal or a troll I was wondering if you can explain your bot to me using a more private form of communication (email preferably). I'll of course keep the inner workings to myself and it would

846:

You ARE banning each account I make because of your Great Plan, right? After all, you are far too intelligent and wise to tell someone to take it to arbitration but then ban them each time they show up. Ha, ha, that is certainly a joke that I will share with others around the hay fields and horse

3123:

Why would you edit out info I edit in when it is all true? I do not understand why you want all of the wikipedia readers to be misled about somebody or something. This site is not a communist site....it should not be censored because the true information you do not want to read. If a page is

863:

for your dispute with Chad Bryant months ago and showed no inclination to do so. I still have no idea what that dispute is about, and don't particularly care to find out. Over the top feuding is part of wrestling storylines, not something you should be trying to carry out across the pages of

2705:

affectionately call it) to use CheckUser access? The problem with that is that as I understand it, running CheckUser requests is taxing on the servers, and programming the bot to do for every user you block could potentially slow down the site. So, the question is, would you plan to use those

1542:

What's really funny is that when someone posts on User pages that there is a possible sockpuppet of Chad's, he instantly jumps to remove the comments made, yet he has no problem posting over and over again the "DickWitham" sockpuppet accusation without rhyme or reason. But then again being a

44:

As I understand it this article is almost definately written by someone in the group and that is not allowed I think? also if you serach these cats in google nothing comes back so it is pretty much "Unremarkable People or Group" (As listed under Speedy Deletion Guidelinezz) matter if u ask me

4320:

Since he's a returning user or sockpuppet, as we both agree, I think he has the option of returning under his original username. Even if you argue that a few of his AfDs might plausibly not be bad faith, that still leaves the rest which are. Not to mention his first edit which was simple

2938:

Note for admins: Please be aware that since Mr. Bryant's abuse is now known by many users but few admins, he has taken to vandalism and abuse in a blatant and aggressive account. My accounts are not generally "blocked on sight," and I would dare Mr. Bryant to prove this otherwise -- even

2898:

Note for admin(s): Please be aware that since Mr. Cain's registered accounts are now generally blocked on sight by a variety of other admins, he has taken to vandalism and abuse without using an account. The one non-educational ISP available to him limits his IP ranges to 166.102.89.* and

2685:

I'd really prefer to say as little as possible about it even by e-mail. If I discussed it in private with some admins (a few have asked already) it would be difficult to justify not discussing it with all the other admins, and information known by 800 people is not particularly secure or

888:

Hi. You blocked user "blowhole" for a day for the 3RR and I am grateful. But he is also guilty of Wikistalking and he is a sockpuppet. Look at his user contributions and he is following contributors to their user talk pages. I would hope that Wikistalking is more than a 24 hour ban.

1562:

When it comes to sorting out these kinds of claims and counterclaims, well, only the Arbitration Committee is vested with the authority to do that (plus, they are given access to enhanced sockpuppet checking tools). Only they can come up with some kind of final ruling on all this. --

1327:

is an example of what I mentioned because that's a Greek capital Alpha that looks exactly like a capital A, which could easily have been a malicious impersonator of your account. Various people have tried to create spoof accounts of Jimbo Wales, for instance, or various admins. --

1825:

for purposes of harassing Chad Bryant (and dozens if not hundreds more), and when they're tagged with a template you revert and try to insist these are legitimate users? There just happens to be a guy out there named CHad Bryant with a capital H out there, and the similarity of

1491:) has taken up the fight for the user who has made a full-time job of attacking me and having his sockpuppets blocked. He is spouting much the same rhetoric, and creating edit wars with baseless accusations of sockpuppetry and reinstating personal attacks from that other user. - 3484:

Yes, blocked registered users can still use e-mail (that's one way to ask to get unblocked, for instance). I don't think anon IPs can use e-mail (because they don't provide an e-mail themselves), so he would have gotten your e-mail from some other means (perhaps a prior e-mail

3138:

I am talking about user Madchen Hoch. My info is accurate and undisputed yet you remove it. Because the user does not like the true info should not allow you as a censor to remove it and warn me about vandalism. Everything I have written is true and accurate...EVERYTHING.

3078:

I do not understand the policy here. If I edit information that is blatantly false and misleading, you edit me and warn me about vandalism. I do not think anyone disputes my information. If they do, I would love to see why. My info is factually correct...please explain.

1524:

I assure you that I am not a sockpuppet nor do I condone the actions of Alex Cain. I just don't condone the actions of Chad. He may say that he only removes comment by Alex Cain because he's a sockpuppet, but he has also struck out comments by myself and deleted comments by

4364:

On what basis are you reverting me? Just because you consider me a sockpuppet that shouldn't edit at all, or because of the specific removal of this template? As I said before, there is no consensus to use this template, and surely it's incumbent on those who want to

2765:

hasn't been touched by anyone else the last time I checked and I usually like to see the article grow within minutes, hours at most. After a day, I get worried. Maybe I need to 'adjust' these kinds of expectations. However, such adjustments can't happen overnight.

1518:

page, Chad has made numerous personal attacks against me and included in that is some libel that I tried to remove, but Chad threatened me with administrative action because I was editing his comments. Apparently it's only a one way street accoriding to

106:

Thanks for your help. I've got to go to school now, though. Also, can you help me find where (somewhere in Knowledge namespace) it says that your contributions to articles "will be edited without mercy"? Riff doesn't seem too clear on that fact. Thanks.

721:

Hi Curps, I was pre-emptively creating doppelganger accounts and hadn't yet added the doppelganger tag from my regular account, when you and MarkGallagher indef-banned the accounts and blocked my IP. Could you unblock my IP please? Thanks

3238:

User 198.203.175.175 is an open proxy. I found this outside of wikipedia used as a proxy to do harm elsewhere and I checked inside wikipedia and there it is. The contritions of this seem to be from different users, but on the talk page

775:

Hi, if someone has vandalized multiple articles and there don't seem to be any good edits from now on I think we should go straight to more serious test3 test4 or bv templates otherwise we just cannot get these people blocked. Thanks

4180:

This a list of users who have been vandalizing on my user page for a while now. So Mcfly85 can't use them again, can you block them? Can I also ask that you watch my user page for vandals and block his sockpuppets when they show up?

1783:. Unfortunately, due to the autoblocking feature of Mediawiki software, this causes the underlying IP address to be blocked. You were affected because you happen to share the same IP or ISP as the blocked user "Jimmy Wales II". -- 2960:

that Alltel is his only option for an ISP in his rural town, and the modem pool there limits him to addresses in the 166.102.104.* and 166.102.89.* subnets. Is there any way to have these IP ranges blocked for any period of time? -

1806:. . . and take a look at that? It seems Chad has flipped out and lost it completely, going on a sockpuppet-template posting spree. Is there anything you can do about this? I'm reverting as many as I can, but DAMN! Look at that. -- 217:

are registered to Irshad Deen who actually works within Sri Lanka Telecom Internet. Could you personally double check me, so that I can contact them with confidence that this person is at least an accomplice to the vandalism? --

999:

That was an insult to me, which I do not appreciate. I am being conspired against! The whole day anon IPs from Aol have been reverting my every edit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please, Please stop them or get a restraining order or something!

2537:

at the same time. Your block, being shorter, takes precedence. I chose to block for a week since the earlier, shorter blocks seem to have had no effect, and since there seem to be no recent constructive edits. There's also

26:

I added October 26,1947 and a paragraph on Rashid Ali. When I did this the page on Iraq, went crazy(this was a accident)can you please turn it back to normal? How do I add this to the article without the article going crazy?

214: 3560:

Can you unblock 68.96.23.7? s/he's having a hard time not vandalising pages ever since s/he tried to stop a few days ago. I personally didn't mind that s/he did it and I am willing to give him/her another chance. Thanks.

3222:

made the same edit. Note this was a throwaway account freshly created for the purpose of making that one vandalism edit. If someone creates a throwaway account and vandalizes with it, well, they've thrown it away. --

3155:

As you can see on WP:RFAr, we're basically waiting on you getting an email. Gmail requires an email to send the invitation to ... if you catch me on IRC (DavidGerard), just ask. Or indeed ask anyone else with Gmail! -

3185:

for vandalism. I find it curious that he was blocked for one edit, and just wanted to ask if he's vandalized before under other usernames. I just wanna keep a lookout for this guy if he's a constant nuisance. Thanks.

1867:

Since the sockpuppet tags are in fact true, as you have not even tried to deny, they should stay, and your removing them is vandalism. Over time, various admins have reverted your repeated removals of these tags. --

3682:

After getting some feedback I have been convinced that it would be a bad idea to just block you without further input so as such I am asking you politely to please turn off your bot until more input can be gotten at

620:, who continues removing my addition to that article, has clearly been chasing me away. On the other hand, I've been wanting an administrator to block that user since he or she kept coming back editing that article. 4342:

Ok. I agree with you on the AfD's, and I think I might be choosing the wrong user to do my "why do softy admins always get their cases taken over by the hardasses" rant. It is late here, and I am going to bed.

3579:

page, I hope you'll consider making more changes and alterations with the rest of the group who are currently discussing the articles prospects in its talk page! Once again, thanks for the hard work you put into

791: 1513:

of his edits in that time frame. Also, that user vandalized my talk page with threatening remarks about how "he always wins" and for me to "shut my cock holster" because I am a "little Canadian bitch." On the

1951:

Fine, then. I hearby officially and congruently deny each and every one of the sockpuppet tags that he has placed onto the various User pages on Knowledge. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm having breakfast with

1342:

Thanks for blocking User:BLOCK ME FOREVER AGAIN!! I saw this user on recent changes and would have blocked him myself, but I'm not an admin and you responded before I could request one. Keep up the good work!

2464:

First of all, I removed barbecues because they do not have a predominantly "white trash" connotation. Outdoor barbecues are solidly middle-class, and moreover I know several upper-class people have had them.

272:

unusual case, most also recognize the importance of participating with one of the world's largest websites. More likely than not, we can have them internally identify you, and terminate your service. --

1130: 1529:

because he didn't like what we were saying. I know you don't care about the edit war from a newsgroup. Neither do I. All I care about is the problems stemming from all this as it relates to Knowledge.

831:

Hi. "Cainman" here, among other dozens and dozens of names. I would just like to compliment you on your genius. You are obviously superior to me and everyone else on Knowledge. Are you a member of

2588: 1893:

and the 72.* users aren't even ME. But whatever. If you and Chad are playing pocket pool with each other, that's none of my business. Shows loads of what kind of person you are, though. Perhaps

2761:

I knew asking why an article wasn't created already would bring it the attention it needs, so I didn't see much harm in that. Otherwise, new articles could stay untouched for months. For example,

3490:

He's using regular ISP ranges in some cases, but other do seem to be open proxies, however, I haven't run tests on them yet and am just putting the standard temporary blocks on them for now. --

1765:

The reason given is: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Jimmy Wales II". The reason given for Jimmy Wales II's block is: "impostor/too similar to existing user...".

2803:. Untouched by anyone else for days, even with two top-page templates and two bottom-page templates. What else did I forget to put that would cause people to flock on over and spruce it up? -- 518:

Not all readers of the English Knowledge are fully fluent in English. An organization with the same name as a common pronoun may be very confusing to some people who do not know English well.

1242:(that I use in my signatures) and another account that I cant remember. I found it hard to believe you did those by hand since you blocked em so fast. (no kidding, you need to be renamed to 3785:}}. I'm sure you're aware that it's a the third time it's been vandalized? Any way you can block it? (and also let me know what you did so that I can do this myself next time?) Thanks! 3261: 528: 869:

Just knock off the personal attacks (schoolyard taunts), don't revert sockpuppet tags on old accounts which quite obviously were sockpuppets, and be serious for once about going through

893:

24 hours is standard for 3RR. He's also using uncivil language in talk page contributions and edit summaries, but that doesn't fit the strict definition of "clearcut vandalism" as per

3219: 3182: 4257:

Creating bad-faith AfDs is damage enough, it wastes the time of all the people who voted keep and speedy keep. His edit summaries are pretend-clueless or intentionally nonsensical (

2069: 3904: 4222:

Take a closer look, this is a bad-faith troll... his first edit was vandalism (not AfD-related), and a number of his justifications for nomination are intentional nonsense, eg

1714: 570: 3706:

why you consider it urgent to turn off the bot right this very minute, before the discussion you initiated even takes place or reaches any consensus to do such a thing. --

1775:

NOTE: Next time, check on who you are blocking, like me, instead of blocking random innocent people. User:Cigammagicwizard|Cigammagicwizard]] 23:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

3354: 2701:

Hello, Curps. While I would fully trust you with CheckUser privileges, I have one concern about giving you CheckUser access. Would you program BlockBot (as users in the

2745:

Please write articles in an encyclopedic style. You should not write "come on why wasn't this article created a long time ago?" in the text of the article itself. --

1505:

page, you'll see that right after I made comments to Chad that he probably would not like, Chad stopped making contributions from 10:42 EST to 11:03 EST. This guy, --

1140: 3723:

Thanks for watching out for my user page. Double thanks for taking the effort to realize that it was me anyway. The double-e in the name was a long-missed typo :)

3458:

Hey Curps, I've noticed that you've done a bit of the reverting/blocking of this particular all-caps vandal. He's also constantly adding content against consensus to

4273:). I believe in accepting good faith, but this is no clueless and semi-literate newbie, it's a returning user (as you yourself agree), and he's up to mischief. -- 2895:

sockpuppets you have created (most of which have been indefinitely blocked). Your only motivation for removing content from that talk page is to cover up your abuse.

2956:

Short & simple inquiry - the "DickWitham" troll is no longer registering accounts, and is utilizing his ISP's dynamic IP assignments to abuse Knowledge. He has

2912:

Let's cut the bullshit, mmmkay? You are not "detailing" anything. This is just as sad and pathetic as your "FAQ" you created out of your obsession over my person.

920:

page, and lying about my revert record. I see he has had previous problems, and I have issued a warning, can you block him or tell me the next step in the process?

3737: 767: 325: 1298:

Sorry I was a little blunt... I usually dont mind as that's a good job you are doing but the admin I was talking to was refusing to unblock the account. ~ Cheers

3753:

Hello Curps, I couldn't help noticing your extremely effective vandal-fighting technique, and was wondering what tool, if any, you use to patrol recent changes.

3387:

to the sock puppets he created (which you have blocked), further trash-talking about me, and has possibly created yet another sock puppet which I've reported to

2239:

seen a fair bit of POV pushing (both for and against the company), but there has been little of what I would characterize as legitimate content disagreement. —

2163: 48:

hope I was of some help, thinking maybe about registerin a name on the site and adding some fresh new information about the author George Saunders, he is great

4044: 4016: 2511: 1627: 1619: 1355: 33:

Hey yo Curps I have been trying to keep it real here on wikipedia making helpful additions and so on and when I was searching some articles this caught my eye

3470:

seem to think he's using open proxies. Thus, would it be appropriate to permanently block the IPs he uses? I think there's some sort of longer explanation at

2172:

That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. That user was a hard-working good contributor. Also the supermarket information should be in those pages.

3329: 2345: 2084: 2030: 1957: 1898: 1851: 1807: 1723: 1666: 1548: 191: 168: 124: 111: 2628:

It's supposed to be against protection policy to protect an article linked from the main page. I'm not sure if I agree with that, but that's how it is. --

1683: 1526: 897:(at first I mistook one of his edits to be impersonation and vandalism, but that was in error, I didn't check back far enough). You could try the steps of 3562: 3369: 3026:

you could formulate a complaint to them (Alltel Abuse: abuse@alltel.net, +1-800-990-4449), re their terms of service "Termination by Us" section clause b)

2944: 2882: 2165: 1894: 991: 967: 305:

I undid the autoblocks a while back. I only found two however. I hope the problem is solved for now, although AOL autoblocks remain an ongoing issue. --

2565:

I see that you have threatened the above user with blocking if he persists in vandalism. I've just found that he has added a player who does not exist to

2293: 2176: 4100: 3848: 3471: 3215: 3110: 2494: 848: 617: 321: 4370: 2480: 2361: 2173: 296: 89: 1382: 780: 3544: 3023: 1854: 482: 457: 336:- they're both in Ottawa, Canada, coincidentally), he has since reverted your correction. Is 24 hours all he deserves (on both his IP addresses)? -- 2999: 2978: 2827:

who came up with his own Internet slang neologism and wanted to use Knowledge to gain notability for it. And to think I threatened him with a block

1324: 1239: 1046:

What you're asking is beyond the power of an ordinary admin. Only the Arbitration Committee can issue the equivalent of a "restraining order", see

73:

and related templates for suggesting that an article might be speedied. Good luck and hope you find the time to make some future contributions. --

41:

I do not know how to request an article for deletion so I thought I'd bring it to your attention since u seem to have your business pretty together

4230:, and a few more in that vein. This is also a newly-created user... what genuine newbie starts out nominating AfDs as the first thing they do? -- 4156: 2706:

privileges manually or would you allocate them to your bot? I know this is a quite sensitive issue, so if you prefer, you could contact me through

2559: 2283:), which explains why I didn't see the previous Afd when I nominated it under its current title. The nomination was in good faith in any case. -- 2026: 1147: 583: 188: 165: 121: 108: 590: 4208: 3365: 3170: 2273: 2965: 2947: 2903: 1543:

hypocrite is pretty much what Chad's life is all about. That and harrassing the cashier at McDonalds for there not being enough pickles on his

2101: 1922:

Since the sockpuppet tags are in fact true, as you have not even tried to deny, his adding them is not vandalism and your removing them is. --

1302: 1274: 1250: 1209: 1178: 990:

He has a difficult time dealing with other editors because they're apparently either conspiring against him, or just not very good christians--

2974:

Short and simple? Don't you mean wide and fat? And now you're trying to block me on Knowledge? Don't make me laugh. Whoops -- too late. --

1580:

You are a bit overzealous when it comes to blocking people, Curps. No need to block someone for minor vandalisms on talk pages or user pages.

1136:

Dechronification back on again? (Remember, the search result count doesn't matter. Too many have told me this to dismiss it as speculation. --

1021:

They've also been calling me a troll, and lying about me. These personal attacks must STOP. Please Curps can you help me out, or do anything.

1004: 970: 4182: 3227: 3065: 2348: 1692: 1654: 1643: 2225: 2001: 1960: 1926: 1901: 1872: 1673: 1551: 3598: 2105: 2059: 1306: 1278: 1254: 1213: 1182: 994: 730: 194: 171: 127: 3204: 1604: 1469: 1445:

You are, undoubtedly in my mind, one of the best vandal-fighters on this here encyclopedia. Just wanted to tell you how much you rock. -

877: 4152: 3696: 3684: 3316: 2799: 2762: 2654: 2645: 2632: 2394:

Hi Curps, please could you add an email address, or if you already have one stored, allow others to email you through Knowledge. Thanks,

2381: 1025: 660: 650: 309: 299: 3044: 3028:"if you use a Service in a manner that adversely affects Service to other customers or harasses our customers, our employees, or others" 2518: 1533: 817:

Did you reported D agnostic when he vandalized me last time? I could use that evidence for my case. Do you knok any kick-ass advocate?--

2823: 2155: 2142: 2125: 2124:

Amazing efficiency, but I actually came up with that account to test an idea regarding Geni's sock account for unwatched articles (see

2087: 1401: 1205:

accts, no vandalism coming from them, witty usernames, and deserve no block anymore than Radiant! deserves a block for using !. Thanks

1104:, and it turns out that the autoblock used against him accidentally blocked out another user, as I discovered on a request for unblock 140: 3710: 3430: 3268: 2690: 1392: 1058: 985: 821: 3992: 3908: 3528: 629: 120:

Apparently you're way ahead of me. Still, being able to cite that on his page might do some good, any idea where I could find that? -

3511: 3494: 3448: 2807: 2784: 2770: 2734: 2730:

routinely or automatically. Probably the Arb Com members could provide guidance, since they've been doing this for a while now. --

2595: 2553: 1158: 4347: 4325: 4307: 4277: 4248: 2569:. I have never heard of Omar "Fat Boy" Bdawi and neither has google (even under variant spellings). I conclude that it is vandalim. 2479:(income group != social class) the "white trash" stereotype is not mutually exclusive with a middling or even upper-middle income. 1842:

don't expect you to be the fucking Marines here, but you could at least act like the National Guard. It should be noted that when

1567: 550:

thanks for blocking all those imposters of me recently, theyve alos started using ben0n now to try and avoide detction,thanks again

406: 371: 358: 3781:

I've never blocked an article or template, but you seem to know a little bit more of what you're doing. I saw you reverted the {{

2885: 2411: 2360:

Hey curps, seeing as how you're an admin and everything, couldn't you just speedy delete the entire thing as a nonsense article?--

2258: 1810: 1719:

Rather than an edit war perhaps discussing this in the relevant section of the article tlak page would be helpful. Many thanks.--

1588: 3796: 3728: 2861: 1199: 1196: 600: 477: 3323: 2723: 1584:

A bit? He blocks everyone for anything and everything. He is abusing his power. Curps, I suggest you stop assuming bad faith. --

859:

I'll keep creating new accounts to revert it whenever someone puts a sockpuppet tag on them". You were requested to go through

3612: 2374: 279: 60: 3247: 2679: 2483: 3478: 3424: 3193: 3058: 2287: 1749: 1630: 639: 3132: 1370:. However, I dearly think that the autoblocking of 24 hours is by far not enough, and I really think that even as far as a 851: 4076: 3589: 3264:- don't know if I made any errors, or maybe lagging behind on Knowledge's state of the art. You're the expert (I'm not). -- 3147:

and that's my name too, whenever i go out, the people always shout, there goes Curps/archive25! fa la la la la la, la, la!

2891:

Detailing your abuse and boasts/threats of continuing said abuse are more than relevant for a talk page regarding the over

2622: 2132: 2066: 2056: 1993:? You and the former Iraqi information minister seem to share a credibility problem. If you have a case, take it through 1670: 933: 924: 425:

I'm not taking a position in the editing dispute; I'm not familiar with the article content and topic. However, you are a

3087:

Can you be more specific? I'm not sure what you're referring to. By the way, you can sign your talk page edits by adding

3034: 2530: 3771: 3176: 2389: 2248: 1709: 769: 329: 3379:

OK. I've followed all the procedures, reported to all the admin boards, and shut my mouth and taken the abuse. But now,

3291: 1125: 747: 4244:

and I think he may have some potential to be an ok contributor. But I'm not going to get into a wheel war over this.

3741: 3436: 3336: 3095: 3015: 2749: 2696: 1388:

What you're asking for is beyond the powers of an admin to do. You'd have to contact developers or ArbCom members. --

1374:

for this IP is in order. I would also like for all of his edits to be deleted, therefore completely disappearing from

1171: 1047: 807: 4373: 2539: 2504: 2364: 762: 577: 539: 522: 4202: 4000: 3916: 3824: 3603: 2075: 1798:

Awright, I know you probably don't care about this (since you love to ban me and all) but could you please check out

332:) for vandalism for 24 hours. However, besides personally attacking me (twice, possibly - I suspect that he is also 114: 2573: 2444: 1637: 1495: 624: 441: 96: 4048: 4020: 3880: 3676: 3565: 3388: 3359:

This guy is persistant, I think he is on a dynamic ip range. We are watching him in the channel. He is upset about

2264: 1515: 1502: 977:

Well, "blanking paragraphs" in this case seems to be a content dispute. We can't really block for that as per the

711: 490: 340: 4234: 3113: 3101:

I am talking about user Madchen Hoch. I have been warned for providing true and completely accurate information.

2354: 1456: 1434: 1350: 680: 3936: 3776: 3453: 3441:

Ok, I understand its only 24 hours or less for autoblocks. Thanks for responding. I am amazed at your abilities.

3160: 3118: 2196: 2097:

Hey just to let you know shortly I'll be creating accts w/ variations of my name per duplicate protections. Thx.

2034: 563: 554: 506: 184: 56: 3555: 1793: 1787: 252: 4132: 3964: 3252: 2664: 2524: 1594: 1087: 1077:

Hey Curps, I know it is like 2 in the morning, or at least where I am, it is ... but anyways, I followed up on

1051: 949: 818: 3417: 981:. Why don't you guys try mediation or seek the opinions of some of the other recent editors of that page? -- 392: 4223: 4104: 4004: 3988: 3920: 3852: 3667:

If you continue you may be blocked until such time as you guarantee to stop using your bot without approval.

3584: 3548: 3019: 2867: 2407: 2231: 1728: 905: 597: 265: 230: 3395: 151:

Absolute bullshit. My mate Riff shouldnt be blocked whatsoever and you, Curps, are a dickhead for doing so.

4084: 3748: 3166:

Disregard that, I just saw your note on WP:RFAr that you have an email set up! I'll just let the AC know -

3011: 2306: 2186:

Looks like I need a nap. Didn't even notice it was a User page. Thanks for saving my bacon so quickly. —

1994: 898: 870: 860: 835:, because if not you should be. Someone as wise as you should not let their gifts go unused in the public. 758:

Yeah I have noticed that I'm going to make sure that it is a complete Revert thanks for the notice anyway,

671:

If you are still in need of a gmail account, decrypt the following. It may only be good for a short time.

634:

You seem to dislike them, and you put an indefinite block on one that has been harassing me lately, namely

295:...every time I try and edit a page, seems to have wiped out most of the 64.12.0.0 to 64.12.255.255 range-- 209:

Hi Curps, thanks for all of your effort in dealing with Batzarro and his socks. I ran his anon IPs through

3214:

in that time frame (while it was "In the news" on the main page), there were a number of edits earlier by

2215: 1615: 1412: 3328: 2449: 2334: 2320: 2318: 2312: 2308: 1779:

The user that was blocked was "Jimmy Wales II", and this was a proper block because it is an impostor of

1575: 1506: 1332: 1232: 911: 716: 430: 4088: 3218:

changing the image to "Harper is stoned.jpg", sometimes with minor text vandalism. Not long after, the

2336: 2330: 2314: 2304: 333: 239:

Great, thank you for that. I'll hold off on contacting SLT until Batzarro vandalises another page. --

4160: 3996: 3912: 3073: 2740: 2338: 2332: 2117: 2875: 2851: 2324: 2322: 3836: 3832: 3320: 3240: 3199: 2711: 2403: 2316: 2181: 1601: 1397:

This vandal attack is currently being discussed at the incidents noticeboard. (Link removed above) --

1151: 978: 894: 347: 4060: 4032: 3892: 3018:

as its last resort). In the meantime I've blocked Swiper No Swiping and 166.102.89.32 for yet more

2328: 2310: 77: 4072: 4056: 4028: 3984: 3948: 3900: 3888: 3233: 2707: 2609: 2548: 2468:"In the common definition, 'white trash' would not be applied to upper class or even middle class" 2326: 2046: 826: 594: 434: 385: 4144: 4080: 3976: 1889:

So you're just going to let him run rampant on Knowledge, vandalising user pages as he sees fit.

1099: 961: 3944: 3864: 3804: 2992: 2302: 2042: 1375: 1361: 706: 559:

thanks for getting all 10 of the recent bunch :) ive tagged them all with {{attackuser-m|Benon}}

412: 1488: 4140: 3972: 3828: 3782: 3462:. He's also vandalised(?) my talk page and sent a very rude e-mail to me(threats and cursing). 2975: 2558: 2416: 1706: 1660: 1609: 1360:

Thanx for blocking "#91914", an autoblocking of the IP that was used to repetitively vandalize

1095: 1072: 957: 635: 582: 536: 519: 346:

If he avoids extreme profanity in his edit summaries, it's just an editing dispute, and as per

315: 4172: 4052: 4024: 3884: 3057:

to his admission of being limited in his ISP choices, and does so using an IP administered by

2957: 2921:

And you want to talk about removing content to cover up abuse? Why do you continually revert

2209: 429:

of an indefinitely banned user, creating multiple sockpuppets for the purposes of evading the

4207: 4112: 3940: 3860: 3820: 3265: 2584: 2566: 2432: 2232: 2080: 2038: 2019: 1736: 1729: 847:

stables as we go about our daily tasks! You have made me laugh, and for that I thank you. --

812: 666: 258:

answer me(whats up now) u have found the batcave. Reply now16:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)(Bat)

4136: 4116: 3968: 3054: 1091: 953: 3876: 3856: 3791: 3595: 3296: 3187: 2488: 1689: 1585: 1418:

I hereby bestow upon you this can of Wiki-raid for your work at killing sockpuppets dead.

1119: 605: 545: 499: 486: 467: 426: 101: 93: 3507:

at the e-mail address (which I've hidden from general view for politeness' sake). Thanks,

838:

The reason I say you are so wise and knowing is because you wish for me to arbitrate with

8: 4359: 4068: 3932: 3760: 3646: 3412: 3346: 3273: 3244: 2922: 2718: 2580: 2543: 2439: 2270: 2192: 1847: 1822: 1754: 1440: 1407: 753: 286: 4164: 2092: 4168: 4128: 3960: 3288: 2534: 2272:. Please remove the afd, unless you want to repeat. As it will fail i can assure you -- 2118: 1890: 1745: 1476: 1083: 945: 801: 796: 785: 701: 691: 643: 4108: 3474:. Just wondering. Also, can blocked users still use the e-mail user function? Thanks, 2269:

The page you no,minated for deletion already went through this process, and was kept.

4369:

things like that, which affect hundreds of articles, to establish a consensus first.

3733: 3651:

I am giving you official warning to cease using your bot since it is in violation of

3167: 3157: 2399: 2222: 1507:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=24.131.237.219

1451: 1426: 379: 3575:

I just popped by to say hello and thank you for your fixes for the vandalism at the

2876:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Category_talk:Knowledge:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Dick_Witham

2587:

being a prank, but I just reverted for now. If he persists, you can try posting to

2579:

That's actually a standard warning (a bit stronger than usual because he vandalized

4295: 3816: 3630: 2642: 2619: 2615: 1780: 1700: 1337: 883: 759: 419: 204: 161: 2510:

Someone already did so one minute after you posted above. In general, posting to

642:

that covers most of this). He's got another sock puppet that he's playing with at

4299: 4040: 4012: 3872: 3786: 3581: 3576: 3552: 3459: 3442: 3062: 3041: 2996: 2962: 2900: 2498: 2280: 1990: 1831: 1827: 1818: 1492: 1463: 1344: 1202: 1109: 839: 574: 389: 17: 593:. I would do it but I'm not aware of the details they are referring to. Cheers. 3928: 3538: 3463: 3426:(final diff of the series). Developers haven't voiced any concerns so far. -- 3423:

David Gerard made some comment in the RfArb vetting discussion about this, see

3400: 3360: 3211: 3104: 2244: 2187: 2152: 2129: 1270:

No really, you did them by hand or did you write some specialised tool for it?

685: 3307:

page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on

2606:

i think that guy is just too insulting to firefox (not crups0 don't you agree

4124: 3956: 3689: 3669: 3652: 3636: 3504: 3407: 3392: 3339:, but you've already been on it. This really should get through when it does 3312: 3150: 2848: 2702: 2672: 2638: 2425: 2052: 1953: 1740: 1379: 1371: 1079: 1022: 1001: 941: 930: 921: 696: 657: 647: 621: 512: 351: 249: 83: 3718: 3262:

Knowledge:Naming conventions (standard letters with diacritics)#Printability

2210:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Checkuser_vetting

1626:

repeat cartoon blanking vandalism on the Mohammed controversy from that IP.

4291: 4096: 3844: 3374: 3341: 3308: 3304: 3297: 2991:

Mr. Cain acknowledges Yet Another Sockpuppet - and as usual, he uses it to

2395: 2212: 1720: 1446: 1419: 1164: 917: 613: 606: 461: 273: 240: 219: 1801: 210: 36: 4298:

should link there. And I don't think all his AfD noms were bad faith...

3623: 3609: 3570: 3525: 3508: 3475: 3467: 3380: 2817: 2804: 2767: 2715: 2570: 2458: 2450: 2436: 2203: 1398: 1137: 777: 67: 2583:

itself after some prior vandalism). You may be right about the edit to

367:

Fine. The issue on the page seems to be solved now, anyway. Thanks. --

4344: 4322: 4304: 4274: 4245: 4231: 4216: 3765: 3755: 3707: 3491: 3427: 3224: 3129: 3092: 3040:

Documentation of Mr. Cain's Knowledge abuse has been sent to Alltel. -

3031: 2940: 2926: 2858: 2781: 2746: 2731: 2687: 2651: 2629: 2592: 2515: 2421:

Hey Curps. I've noticed that you use ~~~~~ instead of ~~~~ when giving

2378: 2284: 2255: 2139: 1998: 1923: 1869: 1843: 1784: 1680: 1651: 1640: 1564: 1530: 1484: 1477: 1389: 1329: 1229: 1155: 1055: 982: 902: 874: 744: 726: 677: 560: 551: 503: 438: 403: 368: 355: 337: 306: 262: 227: 137: 74: 966:'s recent edits, then block him for as long as you feel is nessesary-- 3128:

Can you be more specific? I don't know what you're referring to. --

2240: 1768:

1)This is my brother's user name on another user on my computer. 2)I

1243: 3617: 2857:

Well, he could be reblocked for shorter. Perhaps I'll do that. --

2836: 2109: 1310: 1282: 1258: 1217: 1186: 734: 399: 2797:

Those various templates don't work by themselves, apparently. See

1636:

I did not place that block. You'd have to ask the admin who did:

4294:

and his question was a good one, though that doesn't explain why

4287: 4268: 2670:

probably allay my fears about you getting checkuser quite a bit.

1759:

For three times, you have autoblocked me because of this reason:

1688:

Oh well, I wasted a perfectly good welcom brochure on it then. --

1544: 1131:

What'll it take for Dechronification to be allowed on here again?

164:. Probably a handy thing to have lying around when you need it. - 2298:

You don't notice anything fishy about most of those keep votes?

1600:

a rocket and firing him into the sun would be more appropriate.

1105: 2831:

you had blocked him indefinitely... (And may I just say "There

472:

User is against the islamic domination of middle eastern life.

3622:

Thanks, FireFox undid the block. No harm done. Thanks anyway.

2756:

how they did, and touch up the article further when necessary.

1430: 656:

I was starting to wonder if anyone actually cared. Thank you.

293:". The reason given for Rainbow Fucker's block is: "user...". 2835:

no Dana... there is only... Z0l!" just because I wanted to?)

873:

with Chad Bryant, and then I won't need to keep blocking. --

832: 532: 4259:"very short article plus who is really when you thing evil?" 3503:

OK, makes sense. The e-mail was from his seeming sockpuppet

3279: 1462:

That's incorrect, I'm afraid. There's no "one of" about it.

1762:"Your user name or IP address has been blocked by Curps." 3391:. What else do I need to do in order to get this to stop? 3809:

Can you look at the contributions of the following users:

2650:

Well, I'll let some other admin go ahead and do that. --

248:

OK i am batzarro! You have tracked me,big deal,now what?

3283:

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! :) -

2601: 1802:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Chadbryant

1150:

which resulted in deletion. What you can do is post to

136:

I don't recall offhand. Maybe search would find it. --

63:

for nominating articles. There are some templates like

37:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Big_Game_Hunters_(sketch_comedy)

1705:...for fixing the backslash problem. Sorry 'bout that. 790:

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my userpage, then

2512:

Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism

2279:

It seems the previous Afd was under a different name (

1715:

Including Pope JPII in LGBT Rights Opposition Category

646:. If you could intervene, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. 4265:), and his reply to you was rather nonsensical too ( 388:. b/c you're most recent on the block log. thanks. 226:

might be using open proxies (I haven't checked). --

4303:the same username, so I could keep an eye on him. 3659:

Unauthorized (no official authorization to use bot)

3524:Alright, thanks for your attention to this matter. 3355:

The vandal that just vandalised your user talk page

3010:The place to settle any underlying issues would be 289:

because your IP address has been recently used by "

3260:Would be very grateful if you had a look at this: 2929:pointed out, you can't have it go both ways, Chad. 1650:I see someone else has unblocked it just now. -- 1411: 3142: 2925:? Or the 24.*.*.* IP that follows in same? As 2221:This is wonderful news, congratulations Curps. 1956:& the former Iraqi Information Minister. -- 1148:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dechronification 612:Hi, Curps. I apologize for the profanity at the 3685:Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard#Curps_Bot 2591:, which usually gets the quickest response. -- 350:there's nothing really blockable there (unless 2024:Sorry to bother you, but can you please block 1356:About this featured article vandal we just had 3315:. I would be grateful for your comments at 929:Oh yeah, they are also blanking paragraphs. 589:You may want to block this one as well, see 447: 3317:Knowledge:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1 2542:. Anyway, I'll defer to your judgement. — 3608:Thanks for asking Kelly Martin about it.-- 3543:Hi Curps. I think that perhaps a block of 2514:will usually get the fastest response. -- 2126:Knowledge:Requests_for_adminship/Genisock2 1817:You have created sockpuppet accounts like 690:for the vandalism revert on my userpage! — 354:gets violated or something like that). -- 320:Hello, Curps. I noticed that you blocked 284:Seems to be an AOL user, I keep getting.. 1772:have a usename close to Jimmy Wales II. 2943:has stated that he does not do this. -- 2589:Knowledge:Intervention against vandalism 1054:to explain in detail your complaint. -- 211:http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois.pl 14: 4263:what is an "all" and how does it mean? 4228:what is an "all" and how does it mean? 3059:Georgia College & State University 2475:is tricky, but if we're talking about 2375:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion 901:, or wait and see how he proceeds. -- 61:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion 2497:because of their repeated vandalism. 640:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Braaad 160:Found it. Or at least, close enough. 2151:Thanks. And thanks for the block. 916:152.163.100.69 is baiting me on the 2138:Since it's you, I unblocked it. -- 770:Special:Contributions/68.72.232.155 213:just now, and all but one from the 92:page. I think it needs a revert. -- 55:There are various details given at 23: 3337:Knowledge:Blocking policy proposal 3016:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration 1897:was right about you all along. -- 1246:or something) Thx for the unblock 1050:. As a first step, you could try 1048:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration 529:List of commonly confused homonyms 88:Hey Curps, someone vandalized the 24: 4384: 2435:). Is there any reason for that? 1739:why he is autoblocked. Thanks. -- 630:Destructive Trolling Sock Puppets 4271:be redirected to traced memory?" 3389:Knowledge:Requests for CheckUser 3311:in the hopes of advancing it to 3303:Greetings! You have edited the 3278: 3220:User:The Fountain 1500 2500 2006 1516:Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship 1503:Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship 1429: 1413: 743:OK, should be unblocked now. -- 2637:Isn't it times like this where 2294:previous AfD (sockpuppet fest?) 1735:Hi could you please explain to 1622:- and you'd see that there was 794:the user. Much appreciated! -- 185:Knowledge:Ownership of articles 57:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 3335:I was going to tell you about 3210:If you look at other edits to 2712:wikipedia-en-vandalism channel 2067:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 2057:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1679:No. It's already blocked. -- 1671:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1238:Hehe, you also blocked my own 1174:(eg just "user..."). ~ Cheers 1052:Knowledge:Requests for comment 819:T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 569:For evidence, I'd like you to 280:Cleanup on isle Rainbow F***er 13: 1: 4374:20:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4348:07:37, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4326:07:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4308:07:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4278:07:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4249:06:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4235:06:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 4224:A rising tide lifts all boats 4203:03:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 3797:01:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 3772:00:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 3711:02:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC) 3697:19:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 3677:19:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 3613:07:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 3599:04:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 3585:22:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3566:22:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3556:22:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3547:might be appropriate, due to 3529:22:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3512:21:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3495:21:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3479:21:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3449:19:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3431:05:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3418:05:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3396:03:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 3370:01:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC) 2618:until the vandal calms down? 2431:notices to vandals (example: 1154:to propose undeleting it. -- 3662:Use of admin powers by a bot 3590:Vandalism on Tookie Williams 3324:18:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3292:15:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3269:14:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3248:09:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3243:it has vandalism warnings. 3228:03:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3205:02:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3171:00:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC) 3161:23:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3133:23:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3114:22:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3096:23:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3066:20:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3045:19:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3035:19:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 3024:terms of service of that ISP 3012:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 3000:18:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2979:18:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2966:18:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2948:17:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2904:17:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2886:17:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2862:15:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2852:14:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2808:06:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2785:06:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2771:06:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2750:06:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2735:04:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2724:03:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2691:05:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2680:00:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2655:22:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2646:22:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2633:22:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2623:22:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2596:05:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 2574:11:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2554:10:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2519:00:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC) 2505:23:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2484:23:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2445:22:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2412:19:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2382:19:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2365:19:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2349:21:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2288:19:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2259:19:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2249:18:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2226:19:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2216:09:07, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2177:01:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2156:00:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC) 2143:23:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 2133:22:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 2088:14:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 2070:07:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 2060:07:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 2002:08:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1995:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 1961:07:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1927:05:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1902:05:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1873:04:43, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1855:04:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1811:01:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1788:02:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1750:23:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1724:23:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1710:10:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1693:06:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1684:06:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1674:06:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1655:06:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1644:06:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1631:05:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1605:19:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1568:18:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1552:02:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 1534:16:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1496:16:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1470:07:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1457:13:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1435:11:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1402:03:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1393:02:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1383:02:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1351:01:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1333:00:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 1233:23:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1223:(Aka, the Unicode Defender!) 1159:23:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1141:13:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1126:07:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1059:06:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1026:05:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 1005:05:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 995:05:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 986:05:49, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 971:05:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 934:05:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 925:05:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 906:05:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 899:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 878:05:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 871:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 861:Knowledge:Dispute resolution 852:04:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 822:03:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 808:01:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 781:16:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 763:12:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 748:14:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 712:11:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 681:07:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 661:03:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 651:03:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 625:22:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 601:21:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 578:19:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 564:19:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 555:17:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 540:17:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 523:16:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 507:08:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 442:08:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 433:. See the comment I left on 407:04:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 393:01:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 372:21:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 359:04:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 341:23:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 310:04:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 300:21:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 266:17:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 253:16:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 231:16:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 195:12:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 172:12:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 141:12:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 128:12:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 115:12:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 7: 3655:for the following reasons: 3183:The Fountain 1500 2500 2006 3177:The Fountain 1500 2500 2006 3083:not the right thing to do. 3055:attempts to remove the link 2390:Please add an email address 1509:-- on the other hand, made 638:(I've got an active RfC at 431:Knowledge:Three revert rule 10: 4389: 3437:RE: autoblock of school IP 2697:CheckUser and Blocking bot 1589:22:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC) 51:your friend, 66.229.17.88 3604:egregious username vandal 3241:User_talk:198.203.175.175 2822:You seem to have blocked 2373:The article doesn't meet 2081:User_talk:Dante26#Blocked 2076:AOL autoblocks, ... again 1378:'s history tab. Thanx. 1195:Could you please unblock 1152:Knowledge:Deletion review 979:Knowledge:Blocking policy 939:In short, please examine 895:Knowledge:Blocking policy 452:What about my talk page? 348:Knowledge:Blocking policy 97:22:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 78:22:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 4290:really is redirected to 2710:, or preferably, on the 2265:The Smurfs and communism 2254:I've unprotected it. -- 2208:Just so you are aware - 1669:fly by RC, is it yours? 435:User talk:Dimes for eyes 398:I'll keep an eye on the 386:User talk:217.115.218.80 384:for your consideration: 3777:Current Sports Template 3641:08:02, 11 February 2006 3454:That Rocky Marciano Guy 3181:I saw that you blocked 3119:You Edit out true info? 3091:at the end of them. -- 2093:Achille / Doppelgangers 2055:is getting stale now. 1376:Restoration spectacular 1362:Restoration spectacular 535:and means the pronoun. 4286:Actually, the article 3783:Template:Current Sport 3253:Diacritic printability 2665:your checkuser vetting 2525:Blocking 166.66.16.116 1834:is just a coincidence? 1595:Not overzealous enough 1437: 1170:or why you block them 2868:Chadbryant once again 2614:Why not just protect 2585:Rugby union positions 2567:Rugby union positions 2433:User talk:88.109.81.2 2340:???? I've never seen 2233:World Financial Group 1989:You deny it even for 1737:User:Cigammagicwizard 1730:User:Cigammagicwizard 1417: 636:User:T`sitra Yel Darb 3749:Vandal fighting Tool 3731:comment was added by 3321:PedanticallySpeaking 2457:You're wrong on the 1794:Chadbryant's rampage 1620:User:165.230.149.152 1146:There was a vote at 480:comment was added by 3985:Teenage_wedding_and 3901:The_last_time_I_saw 3594:'Preciate the rv.-- 3330:User:217.33.207.195 2993:deface my talk page 2581:Knowledge:Vandalism 2065:Saw that, thanks. 1823:User:AnaleaseBryant 1576:overzealous blocker 1501:If you look at the 912:User:152.163.100.69 717:Doppelganger blocks 595:CambridgeBayWeather 527:At least one page ( 192:(Er...let's shimmy) 169:(Er...let's shimmy) 125:(Er...let's shimmy) 112:(Er...let's shimmy) 3074:Explain my warning 2958:admitted elsewhere 2741:Encyclopedic Style 2166:User:Ti Exi Yexyes 2119:User:GuettardaSock 1438: 644:User:Vinnie von Go 3745: 3719:User:Ahhwhereeami 3694: 3674: 3485:correspondence?). 3472:User:Dijxtra/Sock 3368: 3216:User:Brook street 2976:Swiper No Swiping 2899:166.102.104.*. - 2686:confidential. -- 2677: 2641:comes into play? 2552: 2495:User:72.136.67.28 2344:on 1 AfD before-- 2247: 2200: 2182:Oops, Good Catch. 2112: 1748: 1707:Joey Q. McCartney 1414:File:Wikiraid.png 1368: 1313: 1285: 1261: 1220: 1189: 737: 571:see this category 537:Anthony Appleyard 520:Anthony Appleyard 494: 261:OK answer me???? 187:is even better. - 4380: 4296:Radical feminism 4200: 4197: 4194: 4191: 4188: 4185: 4176: 4148: 4120: 4092: 4064: 4036: 4008: 3980: 3952: 3924: 3896: 3868: 3840: 3768: 3763: 3758: 3724: 3692: 3688: 3672: 3668: 3642: 3415: 3410: 3364: 3349: 3344: 3282: 3266:Francis Schonken 3234:Found open proxy 3202: 3196: 3190: 3189:Buchanan-Hermit™ 3090: 3020:personal attacks 3014:(which includes 2845: 2842: 2839: 2721: 2675: 2671: 2616:Music of Nigeria 2610:Music of Nigeria 2546: 2533:we both blocked 2442: 2430: 2424: 2243: 2190: 2114: 2104: 2050: 1781:User:Jimmy Wales 1744: 1527:User:LtColMüller 1466: 1454: 1449: 1433: 1424: 1415: 1366: 1315: 1305: 1287: 1277: 1263: 1253: 1222: 1212: 1191: 1181: 1123: 1113: 1103: 965: 827:You are a genius 804: 799: 739: 729: 704: 699: 694: 498:See my reply on 473: 456:That post is by 162:Knowledge:Rights 90:Hadi Tacosolavni 72: 66: 4388: 4387: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4362: 4212: 4198: 4195: 4192: 4189: 4186: 4183: 4151: 4123: 4109:Fish page moves 4095: 4067: 4039: 4011: 3983: 3955: 3927: 3899: 3871: 3843: 3815: 3807: 3805:Mcfly85 vandals 3794: 3779: 3766: 3761: 3756: 3751: 3721: 3690: 3670: 3649: 3640: 3634: 3620: 3606: 3596:Beth Wellington 3592: 3577:Michael Jackson 3573: 3545:User:68.96.23.7 3541: 3460:Frederic Chopin 3456: 3439: 3413: 3408: 3403: 3377: 3357: 3347: 3342: 3333: 3301: 3276: 3255: 3236: 3200: 3194: 3188: 3179: 3153: 3145: 3121: 3107: 3088: 3076: 2870: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2820: 2743: 2719: 2699: 2673: 2667: 2612: 2604: 2563: 2527: 2491: 2455: 2440: 2428: 2422: 2419: 2392: 2357: 2296: 2281:Smurf Communism 2267: 2236: 2206: 2184: 2170: 2122: 2098: 2095: 2078: 2025: 2022: 1991:User:CHadbryant 1846:made a note on 1832:User:Chadbryant 1828:User:CHadbryant 1819:User:CHadbryant 1796: 1757: 1733: 1717: 1703: 1663: 1628:165.230.149.154 1612: 1597: 1586:GorillazFanAdam 1578: 1481: 1464: 1452: 1447: 1443: 1420: 1410: 1358: 1340: 1299: 1271: 1247: 1206: 1203:User:Pattersonc 1175: 1167: 1133: 1117: 1111: 1078: 1075: 940: 914: 886: 829: 815: 802: 797: 788: 773: 756: 723: 719: 702: 697: 692: 688: 675: 669: 632: 610: 587: 548: 515: 470: 458:user:Sargonious 450: 415: 413:Biff Protection 382: 318: 282: 207: 104: 94:MonkeyCMonkeyDo 86: 70: 64: 31: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Curps 12: 11: 5: 4386: 4361: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4355: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4333: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4300:Kwality Wall's 4281: 4280: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4238: 4237: 4211: 4206: 4178: 4177: 4149: 4121: 4117:Fish block log 4093: 4069:Piece_10_cough 4065: 4037: 4009: 3981: 3953: 3925: 3897: 3869: 3841: 3806: 3803: 3801: 3792: 3778: 3775: 3750: 3747: 3727:The preceding 3720: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3700: 3699: 3666: 3664: 3663: 3660: 3648: 3645: 3628: 3619: 3616: 3605: 3602: 3591: 3588: 3572: 3569: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3498: 3497: 3487: 3486: 3464:User:Antandrus 3455: 3452: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3402: 3399: 3376: 3373: 3361:Rocky Marciano 3356: 3353: 3332: 3327: 3300: 3295: 3275: 3272: 3254: 3251: 3245:DyslexicEditor 3235: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3212:Stephen Harper 3178: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3152: 3149: 3144: 3141: 3136: 3135: 3120: 3117: 3106: 3103: 3099: 3098: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3048: 3047: 3009: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2969: 2968: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2923:PyterTaravitch 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2907: 2906: 2896: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2819: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2774: 2773: 2758: 2757: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2698: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2666: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2611: 2608: 2603: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2562: 2560:User:Powpow 13 2557: 2544:Ilmari Karonen 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2490: 2487: 2454: 2448: 2418: 2417:No sig in test 2415: 2391: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2368: 2367: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2346:205.188.117.65 2342:19 sockpuppets 2295: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2266: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2235: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2205: 2202: 2183: 2180: 2169: 2168:as an NCV sock 2164:Accusation of 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2146: 2145: 2121: 2116: 2094: 2091: 2085:205.188.117.65 2077: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2051:, the note to 2021: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1958:166.102.104.75 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1899:166.102.104.75 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1852:166.102.104.75 1848:PyterTaravitch 1836: 1835: 1813:aka "Cainman" 1808:166.102.104.75 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1756: 1753: 1732: 1727: 1716: 1713: 1702: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1662: 1661:Is this yours? 1659: 1658: 1657: 1647: 1646: 1611: 1610:Please Unblock 1608: 1596: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1549:166.102.104.33 1537: 1536: 1521: 1520: 1483:It seems that 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1442: 1439: 1409: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1395: 1357: 1354: 1339: 1336: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1265: 1264: 1225: 1224: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1132: 1129: 1074: 1073:Kin Khan block 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 974: 973: 913: 910: 909: 908: 885: 882: 881: 880: 866: 865: 854:aka "Cainman" 828: 825: 814: 811: 787: 784: 772: 766: 755: 752: 751: 750: 718: 715: 687: 684: 673: 668: 665: 664: 663: 631: 628: 609: 604: 586: 584:User:CorkedFun 581: 567: 547: 544: 543: 542: 525: 514: 511: 510: 509: 500:your talk page 476:The preceding 469: 466: 465: 464: 449: 446: 445: 444: 414: 411: 410: 409: 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 362: 361: 317: 316:24 hour block? 314: 313: 312: 294: 291:Rainbow Fucker 285: 281: 278: 277: 276: 246: 245: 244: 243: 234: 233: 215:suspected list 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 177: 176: 175: 174: 155: 154: 153: 152: 146: 145: 144: 143: 131: 130: 103: 100: 85: 82: 81: 80: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4385: 4376: 4375: 4372: 4368: 4349: 4346: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4327: 4324: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4309: 4306: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4279: 4276: 4272: 4270: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4255: 4250: 4247: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4210: 4209:User:Cr0w bar 4205: 4204: 4201: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3795: 3790: 3789: 3784: 3774: 3773: 3770: 3769: 3764: 3759: 3746: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3732: 3730: 3712: 3709: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3698: 3693: 3686: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3673: 3661: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3654: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3637: 3632: 3627: 3626: 3618:RE: IP blocks 3615: 3614: 3611: 3601: 3600: 3597: 3587: 3586: 3583: 3578: 3568: 3567: 3564: 3563:Evan Robidoux 3558: 3557: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3530: 3527: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3505:User:Projects 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3496: 3493: 3489: 3488: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3451: 3450: 3447:*\o/* *\o/* 3446: 3445: 3432: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3416: 3411: 3398: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3372: 3371: 3367: 3363:I believe. -- 3362: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3345: 3338: 3331: 3326: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3299: 3294: 3293: 3290: 3289:Mailer Diablo 3286: 3281: 3271: 3270: 3267: 3263: 3258: 3250: 3249: 3246: 3242: 3229: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3203: 3197: 3191: 3184: 3172: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3148: 3140: 3134: 3131: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3102: 3097: 3094: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3067: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3046: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3001: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2980: 2977: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2959: 2955: 2954: 2949: 2946: 2945:166.102.89.32 2942: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2905: 2902: 2897: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2884: 2883:166.102.89.32 2878: 2877: 2873: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2850: 2846: 2834: 2830: 2825: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2786: 2783: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2736: 2733: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2722: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2704: 2692: 2689: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2676: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2607: 2597: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2561: 2556: 2555: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2536: 2535:166.66.16.116 2532: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2503:*\o/* *\o/* 2502: 2501: 2496: 2493:Please block 2486: 2485: 2482: 2478: 2477:income groups 2474: 2469: 2466: 2462: 2460: 2452: 2447: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2414: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2383: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2358: 2350: 2347: 2343: 2339: 2337: 2335: 2333: 2331: 2329: 2327: 2325: 2323: 2321: 2319: 2317: 2315: 2313: 2311: 2309: 2307: 2305: 2303: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2289: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2260: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2234: 2227: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2211: 2201: 2198: 2194: 2189: 2179: 2178: 2175: 2167: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2120: 2115: 2113: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2090: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2020:GNAA accounts 2003: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1954:George Orwell 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1895:TruthCrusader 1892: 1891:Chad Arbuckle 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1874: 1871: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1856: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1812: 1809: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1712: 1711: 1708: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1672: 1668: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1590: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1569: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1523: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1479: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1416: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1353: 1352: 1349:*\o/* *\o/* 1348: 1347: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1326: 1314: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1286: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1221: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1190: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1173: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1139: 1128: 1127: 1124: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1107: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1006: 1003: 998: 997: 996: 993: 992:152.163.101.5 989: 988: 987: 984: 980: 976: 975: 972: 969: 968:152.163.101.5 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 938: 937: 936: 935: 932: 927: 926: 923: 919: 907: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 890: 879: 876: 872: 868: 867: 862: 857: 856: 855: 853: 850: 844: 841: 836: 834: 824: 823: 820: 813:Need evidence 810: 809: 806: 805: 800: 793: 783: 782: 779: 771: 768:Vandalism of 765: 764: 761: 749: 746: 742: 741: 740: 738: 736: 732: 728: 714: 713: 710: 709: 705: 700: 695: 683: 682: 679: 672: 667:Gmail Account 662: 659: 655: 654: 653: 652: 649: 645: 641: 637: 627: 626: 623: 619: 615: 608: 603: 602: 599: 596: 592: 585: 580: 579: 576: 572: 566: 565: 562: 557: 556: 553: 541: 538: 534: 530: 526: 524: 521: 517: 516: 508: 505: 501: 497: 496: 495: 492: 488: 484: 481: 479: 463: 459: 455: 454: 453: 443: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 408: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 391: 387: 373: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 360: 357: 353: 349: 345: 344: 343: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 311: 308: 304: 303: 302: 301: 298: 292: 288: 275: 270: 269: 268: 267: 264: 259: 256: 254: 251: 242: 238: 237: 236: 235: 232: 229: 224: 223: 222: 221: 216: 212: 196: 193: 190: 189:Tim Rhymeless 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 173: 170: 167: 166:Tim Rhymeless 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 150: 149: 148: 147: 142: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 126: 123: 122:Tim Rhymeless 119: 118: 117: 116: 113: 110: 109:Tim Rhymeless 99: 98: 95: 91: 79: 76: 69: 62: 58: 54: 53: 52: 49: 46: 42: 39: 38: 34: 28: 19: 4366: 4363: 4292:Trace Memory 4266: 4262: 4258: 4227: 4213: 4179: 3810: 3808: 3800: 3787: 3780: 3754: 3752: 3734:Ahhwhereeami 3726: 3722: 3665: 3650: 3639: 3635: 3624: 3621: 3607: 3593: 3574: 3559: 3542: 3457: 3443: 3440: 3404: 3384: 3383:is back and 3378: 3358: 3340: 3334: 3305:Katie Holmes 3302: 3298:Katie Holmes 3284: 3277: 3259: 3256: 3237: 3180: 3168:David Gerard 3158:David Gerard 3154: 3146: 3137: 3122: 3111:Mikereichold 3108: 3100: 3081: 3077: 3027: 3008: 2892: 2879: 2874: 2872:Please see 2871: 2832: 2828: 2821: 2798: 2744: 2700: 2668: 2613: 2605: 2564: 2528: 2499: 2492: 2489:Please block 2476: 2472: 2470: 2467: 2463: 2456: 2420: 2393: 2341: 2297: 2268: 2237: 2223:Hall Monitor 2207: 2185: 2171: 2123: 2099: 2096: 2079: 2023: 1830:to the real 1805: 1800: 1797: 1774: 1769: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1734: 1718: 1704: 1664: 1623: 1616:user history 1614:Look up the 1613: 1598: 1579: 1510: 1482: 1468: 1444: 1421: 1367:link removed 1365: 1359: 1345: 1341: 1325:User:Αchille 1322: 1300: 1272: 1248: 1240:User:Αchille 1226: 1207: 1176: 1172:Irc Log here 1168: 1134: 1116: 1110: 1076: 928: 918:masturbation 915: 887: 849:166.102.89.7 845: 837: 830: 816: 795: 789: 774: 757: 724: 720: 707: 689: 676: 670: 633: 618:83.88.137.34 614:Meat Puppets 611: 607:Meat Puppets 588: 568: 558: 549: 546:my imposters 531:) points to 475: 471: 468:How about... 462:user:Zanimum 451: 416: 383: 322:70.48.238.65 319: 290: 283: 274:user:zanimum 260: 257: 247: 241:user:zanimum 220:user:zanimum 208: 105: 102:Riff Johnson 87: 50: 47: 43: 40: 35: 32: 25: 4371:Rahcngierof 4360:foreignchar 4267:"why would 3817:Warrierknog 3647:Bot Warning 3468:User:Titoxd 3381:User:Braaad 3274:My Userpage 2643:Pepsidrinka 2620:Pepsidrinka 2481:Mike Church 2459:White trash 2451:White trash 2362:64.12.117.5 2355:db:nonsense 2174:A Texas Guy 1755:Autoblocked 1441:Dear Curps, 1408:A New Award 760:Betacommand 754:Betacommand 420:Goregonzola 297:64.12.117.5 287:Autoblocked 4169:block user 4165:page moves 4141:block user 4137:page moves 4113:block user 4085:block user 4081:page moves 4057:block user 4053:page moves 4041:Guesswho05 4029:block user 4025:page moves 4013:Rolston910 4001:block user 3997:page moves 3973:block user 3969:page moves 3945:block user 3941:page moves 3917:block user 3913:page moves 3889:block user 3885:page moves 3873:Blinded_By 3861:block user 3857:page moves 3833:block user 3829:page moves 3582:Manboobies 3553:TigerShark 3444:Dustimagic 3257:Hi Curps, 3063:Chadbryant 3042:Chadbryant 2997:Chadbryant 2963:Chadbryant 2901:Chadbryant 2881:Thanks. -- 2500:Dustimagic 2106:2006-02-05 2043:block user 2039:page moves 1618:of the IP 1493:Chadbryant 1485:User:Tv316 1478:User:Tv316 1465:ENCEPHALON 1346:Dustimagic 1307:2006-02-03 1279:2006-02-03 1255:2006-02-02 1214:2006-02-02 1183:2006-02-02 1096:block user 1092:page moves 958:block user 954:page moves 864:Knowledge. 840:Chadbryant 786:Thank you! 731:2006-02-01 575:Slgrandson 483:Sargonious 427:sockpuppet 4367:introduce 4173:block log 4145:block log 4089:block log 4061:block log 4033:block log 4005:block log 3977:block log 3949:block log 3929:Compassio 3921:block log 3893:block log 3865:block log 3837:block log 3631:user talk 3551:. Thanks 3549:this edit 3385:admitting 3053:Mr. Cain 2800:Hitman.us 2763:hitman.us 2540:this edit 2471:Defining 2461:article. 2153:Guettarda 2130:Guettarda 2047:block log 2027:Boris_Red 1665:Just saw 1244:The Flash 1100:block log 962:block log 616:article. 402:page. -- 380:a spammer 334:this user 4161:contribs 4133:contribs 4125:Nippy432 4105:contribs 4077:contribs 4049:contribs 4021:contribs 3993:contribs 3965:contribs 3957:Back2buk 3937:contribs 3909:contribs 3881:contribs 3853:contribs 3825:contribs 3742:contribs 3729:unsigned 3691:Jtkiefer 3671:Jtkiefer 3406:Thanks. 3393:McNeight 3366:Cool Cat 3195:CONTRIBS 2824:User:Z0l 2674:Jtkiefer 2274:Larsinio 2035:contribs 1741:Martyman 1602:Argyrios 1489:contribs 1380:NicAgent 1372:hard ban 1088:contribs 1080:Kin_Khan 1023:Chooserr 1002:Chooserr 950:contribs 942:chooserr 931:Chooserr 922:Chooserr 884:Blowhole 803:darkness 792:blocking 658:McNeight 648:McNeight 622:Alex 101 491:contribs 478:unsigned 400:mortgage 330:contribs 250:Deendodd 205:Batzarro 30:Thanks. 4288:another 4269:another 4097:BK Fish 3845:Koollid 3580:Wiki.-- 3409:Bratsch 3109:Thanks 2602:Firefox 2453:article 2396:Talrias 2213:Raul654 2197:Contrib 2188:Bill W. 2102:Achille 1721:Sjharte 1690:Marinus 1545:Big Mac 1448:Jersyko 1422:ALKIVAR 1303:Achille 1275:Achille 1251:Achille 1210:Achille 1179:Achille 693:Nightst 460:. -- 3653:WP:BOT 3610:Shanel 3539:Threat 3526:Makemi 3509:Makemi 3476:Makemi 3401:Re: Hi 3343:Sceptr 3313:WP:FAC 3285:Cheers 3201:SPEAK! 3105:revert 2805:Shultz 2768:Shultz 2639:WP:IAR 2571:GordyB 2053:WP:AIV 1746:(talk) 1701:THanks 1399:cesarb 1338:Thanks 1323:Well, 1201:Theyr 1138:Shultz 778:Arniep 686:Thanks 598:(Talk) 352:WP:3RR 255:(Bat) 4345:moink 4323:Curps 4305:moink 4275:Curps 4246:moink 4232:Curps 4217:moink 3788:tiZom 3708:Curps 3695:---- 3675:---- 3492:Curps 3428:Curps 3309:WP:PR 3225:Curps 3151:Email 3130:Curps 3093:Curps 3032:Curps 2941:Curps 2927:tv316 2859:Curps 2829:after 2782:Curps 2747:Curps 2732:Curps 2708:email 2688:Curps 2678:---- 2652:Curps 2630:Curps 2593:Curps 2531:seems 2516:Curps 2473:class 2379:Curps 2377:. -- 2285:Curps 2256:Curps 2140:Curps 2108:21:26 1999:Curps 1997:. -- 1924:Curps 1870:Curps 1844:tv316 1785:Curps 1770:never 1681:Curps 1652:Curps 1641:Curps 1639:. -- 1565:Curps 1531:tv316 1519:Chad. 1390:Curps 1364:with 1330:Curps 1309:00:07 1281:00:01 1257:23:58 1230:Curps 1216:22:28 1185:22:12 1156:Curps 1120:Reply 1056:Curps 983:Curps 903:Curps 875:Curps 833:MENSA 798:light 745:Curps 733:11:21 727:Quarl 703:llion 678:Jmax- 561:Benon 552:Benon 533:there 513:There 504:Curps 502:. -- 439:Curps 437:. -- 404:Curps 390:Derex 369:Jugbo 356:Curps 338:Jugbo 307:Curps 263:Huure 228:Curps 138:Curps 84:Block 75:Curps 16:< 4157:talk 4153:Godd 4129:talk 4101:talk 4073:talk 4045:talk 4017:talk 3989:talk 3961:talk 3933:talk 3905:talk 3877:talk 3849:talk 3821:talk 3793:(2¢) 3738:talk 3466:and 3375:Nuts 3089:~~~~ 3061:. - 2995:. - 2849:Talk 2716:Tito 2549:talk 2437:Tito 2426:test 2245:Talk 2241:Lomn 2193:Talk 2031:talk 1821:and 1667:this 1547:. -- 1453:talk 1198:and 1165:Whoa 1106:page 1084:talk 946:talk 591:this 573:. -- 487:talk 326:talk 59:and 3744:) . 3625:haz 3571:Hi! 3319:. 3143:LOL 3030:-- 2893:120 2818:Z0l 2703:CVU 2529:It 2204:FYI 2195:) ( 1511:all 1112:Jay 708:(?) 493:) . 4261:, 4226:: 4171:• 4167:• 4163:• 4159:• 4143:• 4139:• 4135:• 4131:• 4115:• 4111:• 4107:• 4103:• 4087:• 4083:• 4079:• 4075:• 4059:• 4055:• 4051:• 4047:• 4031:• 4027:• 4023:• 4019:• 4003:• 3999:• 3995:• 3991:• 3975:• 3971:• 3967:• 3963:• 3947:• 3943:• 3939:• 3935:• 3919:• 3915:• 3911:• 3907:• 3891:• 3887:• 3883:• 3879:• 3863:• 3859:• 3855:• 3851:• 3835:• 3831:• 3827:• 3823:• 3767:re 3757:Wh 3740:• 3687:. 3287:, 3198:.. 3192:.. 3186:-- 2847:| 2833:is 2766:-- 2720:xd 2714:. 2441:xd 2429:}} 2423:{{ 2410:) 2406:| 2402:| 2199:) 2083:-- 2045:• 2041:• 2037:• 2033:• 1624:no 1098:• 1094:• 1090:• 1086:• 960:• 956:• 952:• 948:• 489:• 328:• 71:}} 68:db 65:{{ 4199:6 4196:1 4193:3 4190:D 4187:W 4184:S 4175:) 4155:( 4147:) 4127:( 4119:) 4099:( 4091:) 4071:( 4063:) 4043:( 4035:) 4015:( 4007:) 3987:( 3979:) 3959:( 3951:) 3931:( 3923:) 3903:( 3895:) 3875:( 3867:) 3847:( 3839:) 3819:( 3762:e 3736:( 3725:— 3633:) 3629:( 3414:e 3348:e 2844:P 2841:I 2838:J 2551:) 2547:( 2408:c 2404:e 2400:t 2398:( 2191:( 2110:Z 2100:— 2049:) 2029:( 1743:- 1487:( 1427:™ 1311:Z 1301:— 1283:Z 1273:— 1259:Z 1249:— 1218:Z 1208:— 1187:Z 1177:— 1122:) 1118:( 1102:) 1082:( 964:) 944:( 735:Z 725:— 698:a 485:( 474:— 448:? 324:( 107:-

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index