80:
were hidden by codes become unblocked so now I can see it. I will edit it to fix the formatting as much as possible but there are other issues, as well. Your lone reference does not in fact include all of the information in your article. Your user name suggests that you are affiliated with the subject of your article which is contrary to wikipedia's guidelines about conflicts of interest. Your article reads like an advertisement or promotional piece - Knowledge is not a web hosting site or directory of services - it is a collection of encyclopedia articles. The subject of an encyclopedia article must be "notable" in the sense that independent, third party, reliable and verifiable sources have written about the subject and you have drawn your facts about the subject from those sources. You must then cite those sources as references.
26:
79:
Good day. When I looked at your submission this morning in
Articles for Creation, nothing was showing up at all. I see there are some serious formatting issues in the portion of the article that is now visible so that may be why. Sometimes after an article has been reviewed those portions that
128:
If you can revise your article so that it is drawn from independent, third party sources, it is properly sourced, and those sources demonstrate that your subject clearly meets the criteria of corporate notability, then please feel free to resubmit it for review. I remain concerned about the
35:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
41:
51:
16:
18:
60:
55:
8:
87:
68:
Thank you for your contributions to
Knowledge! Snowysusan 21:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
107:
117:
112:
97:
74:
122:
102:
92:
32:
40:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
47:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
25:
42:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Total Hair
Experts (T-H-X)
118:
Policy regarding self promotional and advertising articles
50:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
132:
Best
Regards Snowysusan 14:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
31:Thank you for your recent submission to
83:The help pages you need to review are:
13:
24:
14:
141:
113:Notability criteria for companies
1:
93:Independent reliable sources
7:
56:real time chat with helpers
10:
146:
98:Referencing for beginners
29:
123:What wikipedia is not
33:Articles for Creation
28:
19:Articles for creation
88:Conflict of interest
61:reviewer's talk page
17:Your submission at
129:conflict, though.
75:Total Hair Experts
30:
137:
63:
145:
144:
140:
139:
138:
136:
135:
134:
103:Manual of Style
77:
72:
71:
59:
22:
12:
11:
5:
143:
126:
125:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
76:
73:
70:
69:
65:
64:
48:
45:
37:
36:
23:
21:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
142:
133:
130:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
108:Verifiability
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
81:
67:
66:
62:
57:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
38:
34:
27:
20:
131:
127:
82:
78:
58:, or on the
52:help desk
54:, via
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
