User talk:Bangabandhu

962:'s article. First of all, thank you for your work defending the Wiki from undisclosed COI, self-promotion, and sockpuppetry. I really wish that her husband hadn't decided to take matters into his own hands, but it is too late now I suppose. He is far from the first to get tripped up in this fashion. Anyway, I'm talking with other Smithsonian and Hirshhorn staff to try and increase their awareness of about how to edit ethically and avoid COI. I hope that, in the end, the result will be a better, more useful encyclopedia around art-related topics and biographies. Cheers, 3746: 3352: 3297: 2795: 2593: 3432: 3837: 3785: 1350: 2318: 3537: 2631: 2521: 4402: 4314: 4135: 3893: 3188: 2891: 2445: 2071: 534: 2681: 2262:

as which one is official. I appreciate what you're doing, but I think your efforts would be most useful to the projectif they were directed at external links in the text body, not external links that are already in the external links section. External (not as reference) links in the body really disrupt the flow of the text and far more likely to divert traffic than something in the external links section.

2177: 1516: 1451: 1122: 886: 379: 4272: 3854:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3802:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1826:. They didn't make it clear whether you had also acknowledged receipt. We've all experienced cases where a wrong file is attached or anti-spam software filters it out, so we like to close the loop on requests by hearing from the requester that they actually received the article they wanted. You can do this by marking the request 3112:

company, so why pick that one? I prefer to stick with secondary sources - if the issue is significant enough to merit mention in the Washington Post or the Washington Business Journal, its a good indication of its notability. Did any media write about that testimony/case? I suggest adding it back in, citing that source.

3651:

Hi Bangabandhu, thank you for keeping an eye on the CORE page. I have been trying to edit it to update the info given that the company has changed since 2019. There is a new co-founder in Ann Lee, per their website. I understand you are trying to make sure the edits are accurate, but please check the

2153:

certainly is currently) remains a redlink thirty days after the date of death, it must be removed. The reason why this is not done earlier is to allow creation of an article if notability can be proven. In the case of Braga, notability remains a possibility, despite what any of us might think. On the

2261:

I think the purpose of the guideline is to prevent traffic from being diverted to commercial or self-promoting sites. That's not the case here. Readers, like me, want to know about all the official accounts of our elected officials. It just isn't helpful for you to choose between Twitter or Facebook

995:

Hi, I do mostly agree with your opinions that the Jack Evans page is poorly organized and contains some random, piecemeal information. As I mentioned, I am trying to improve the pages for dc government officials and information generally. Some of those pages are in need some serious attention and it

2251:

subject. In this case we should chose only the facebook or only the twitter, except if there are compelling reasons to link both. In my experience, generally facebook pages tell more about the subject than the twitter, but I am willing to be convinced otherwise. What would be your suggestion? --

1369:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use

4013:

together. I noticed that you changed it and referred it back to the previous content that had a lot of issues and did not tell a full story about me. I'd like for you to either restore the page to the contents previously published. Or allow me to do so and leave my page alone. Thanks in advanced.

4012:

Greetings, this is Oye Owolewa himself. There's an article about me that recently published that went into detail about my life. I've included information that is very important for the general public to know. The entire biography is factual and was referenced. A lot of time was spent putting that

2292:

Right, I understand how you're interpreting the guidelines. I don't think deleting elected official's Twitter accounts makes a stronger entry, especially when you're arbitrarily deciding between Facebook and Twitter and the guidelines discourage Facebook links. Why not just leave well enough alone

3708:

Donot turn this page into your personal views page, Knowledge is not place for propaganda. We have structure for all articles about Law enforcement, this article is not any different. Just compare. I have to inform administratotors about your actions. Once again, this is not a propaganda place.

3111:

You're not putting a space in ref name - wikipidia doesn't know how to read refname, so it came out all mangled. I reverted the addition because the significance of that case isn't clear, or the quote that you added. I'm sure there's pages of pages of testimony in most court cases involving the

2250:

OK, it is time we discuss. We tend to chose only one official website. Since there is no 'subject.com' official website (controlled by the subject) we tend to chose from one of the social networking sites controlled by the subject, and preferably the one that is most informative regarding the

4079:

Apart from the tone, which is self-aggrandizing and unencyclopedic, none of the sources support any of the content. Providing a link to a URL of subject is much different from providing an independent, verified source. The same is true for all of the additions to the article. It is especially

3045:

Thank you for your suggestion to improve the page. I added a couple of links, and I am removing the template. The foundation of the museum was quite a noteworthy event in the history of the Nazi occupation in Ukraine, and is cited in numerous sources, including those of Ukraine's governmental

2604:

You and I seem to be talking well past one another and I think we're spending too much time at it. I've put up a posting asking for some additional eyes. I've said really nothing about the substance, figuring a review of the article and its Talk page will do, and I tried to be evenhanded in

3652:

sources on the article to verify the info. All the info is verified. If you have any direct questions, I'm happy to provide info. (For example: Jenkins was the co-founder of J/p hro, not CORE). Please review the edits before you undo them. Thanks for your help in keeping an eye on the page.

3065:

Hello Bangabandhu, Several years ago I stumbled across a large number of articles on federal judges. Most of them were direct copies of pages from Federal Judicial Center biography pages. That bothered me but I couldn't find any Knowledge policy or guideline that argued against it. The

2216: 2457:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2903:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

837:

Oh, and please do edit freely whatever i put into the Delauter article or anywhere related. This is really not my interest area by the way. I was only ever interested because I saw Cunard making legitimate points at wp:AN or wp:ANI and I thought Cunard deserved support. cheers,

4282:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

3563:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

319:). If you are interested in continuing to contribute to Ronan Farrow, or opening a point for discussion on the Talk page about reinserting your contributions, I would be happy to lend my 0.02. I thought your contributions were appropriate and reasonable. 2228: 2083:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1541: 1476: 1147: 911: 404: 2811:

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

1697:

as a lot of the content on the city page is about subjects outside of the city and really belongs on the district page. My note was written about 7 years ago. It looks like the page has changed a lot but hasn't improved very much. It appears that

314:

undone by a IP editor. I used to attempt to edit that entry but gave up because it was so overrun by sockpuppets trying to massage the bio. I wanted to let you know I've filed a sockpuppet investigation request for the editor who undid your edits

2657:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2547:

2042:

Are you sure that a requirement of a catenary arch is that has uniform thickness? It's my impression that weighted catenaries are a subset of catenary arches. Also, there's not enough content for weighted cateneries to merit a separate entry.

811: 785: 3368:

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

1702:. Sources are very important. You really should add a source for something like the names of metro neighborhoods. If you don't have a source and are just listing neighborhoods based on your memory, you should remove those contributions. 2982:

The article's content itself is well-written and neutral, but the section titles for "Contracting practices", "Other awards", and "Staffing" are misleading and give a biased impression of the company's history to a reader skimming the

2201: 719:, the newspaper would be the "publisher=", is the usage I see. A "work=" might be part of describing an item as something unusual, different than a newspaper article, but i am not sure what. Maybe the work= field is more useful with 3602:

You're welcome. Now if someone could just straighten out NPOL so that editors don't misinterpret NPOL to exclude major party candidates in high profile races who have already won a primary. I'd start the process but don't know how.

4031:

There's a lot of issues here. First, Knowledge is not a place for you to write your autobiography, or share a version of yourself you want the world to see. Knowledge specifically discourages users writing about themselves, see

1036:

Yes. removed out of date information from multiple councilmember pages and tried to create common formatting. Beginning the process of adding new, detailed information, but seem to have gone down the wormhole on this jack evans

3070:

article is on my watch list so I noticed the talk page section you started. I've done what I can to clear up a misunderstanding regarding public domain sources. I'll leave the debate regarding the article's content to others.

2212: 1851:

Hi. I'll reply there as well, but I haven't received the article. A link was posted to it for downloading, but I don't have account at OCLC to access. Not sure how to send a wikimail, as suggested. Thanks for the follow up.

1752:

Hi. Yeah, that was the first article I wrote, and it was a long time ago. I didn't really know what I was doing and didn't cite anything. Much of it, I recall, came from a history of him by the Smithsonian Institute.

3567:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2661:

2551:

768:(Oops, I have accessed the FNP too many times so it won't let me see the article and get the correct author and publication date here, so I just put in the ones that were correct for Bud Otis's profile, instead). 1264:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1209:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 705:

when naming a reference to be able to re-use it, you don't need to use quotes if it is a single word. E.g. ref name=fnpprofile and ref name=fnpprofile/ rather than ref name="fnpprofile"/ saves a few electrons.

2856:, and I would advise you to refrain from editing the article. Should you continue to edit the article, tread carefully, because you will be subject to the aforementioned discretionary sanctions going forward. 4080:

important that you not change content that is factual and supported by references. You seem to want to change that you were born in Nigeria, as multiple sources state, and write that you were born in Boston.

3397: 2840: 4431:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4343:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4162:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3920:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3215:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2915:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2469:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2095:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 128:

about the back and forth the editors seem to be having regarding the 2004 Hammer incident, and about the section in general, so I'd love to get your views there so we can get some resolution. Best--

2959: 3093:

I did not know how to insert a foot note. Could you help with this. There is much more to say about this company and its alleged criminal activities and mysterious deaths. Are you interested?

2343:

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

3587:

Thanks for letting me know about the deletion review for Madison Cawthorn. The article was reinstated, and I feel satisfied that the more inclusionist point of view was validated in this case.

1891: 1823: 4040:, a sole purpose account that has only edited that page. The comment above suggests that's actually you. It is important you familiarize yourself with guidelines against multiple accounts, 3161: 2767:

I'd never seen him mentioned as John, so without the sourcing I thought it was vandalism. I don't understand how anyone could seriously argue that no source is better than a primary source.

2280:. Our policies and guidelines suggest to minimize links. And that is also reflected in the template documentation of many of the templates that are in use for social networking sites. 344:

article. While we cannot use this extraneous material based on the nature alone, the content is only sourced to blogs and unreliable sources. You may wish to review the guidelines for

4447: 4359: 4178: 3936: 3231: 2931: 2485: 2111: 1623:

Thank you for your message. I quickly wanted to let you know that it wasn't me. I just simply created my first account and haven't had a chance to contribute to any articles yet.

400: 3389: 3333: 1974: 1472: 907: 4416: 4328: 4148: 3906: 3382: 3326: 3201: 1143: 2384: 1537: 4054:, a citywide body of elected school leaders representing Boston's public schools. He went on to serve as vice president, and later president. Owolewa also partnered with both 3313:

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

2586: 1993: 3374: 3318: 4266: 958:

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I've been in contact with User:Artmaven77 and other folks at the Hirshhorn museum about the recent policy violations that happened on

3017: 2852:

you in what appears to be clear evidence of a COI. Having directed personal animosity towards an article subject arguably makes your involvement with that article a

661:

Hi there. I twice wrote out a longer note here only to find my browser crashed and my unsaved edit was lost. Can you please just read my mind, instead? Thanks, --

3132:

I wanted to give you a heads up that I will be making some edits to the IRD page. If you want to make changes after me, please lets first discuss in the Talk page.

3101: 976:

Thanks for the note and for your involvement. Its great that the Smithsonian has someone on staff who is familiar with acceptable Knowledge policy and discourse.

4074:. It proved a momentous occasion. Overwhelmed by the cultural and historical significance of the nation's capital, Owolewa decided it would one day be his home. 3526: 3370: 3341: 3314: 1399: 1298: 4066:

as the alternative student representative. In 2008, he was one of a hundred students nationwide chosen to visit Washington D.C. and meet Supreme Court Justices

3846: 3831: 3794: 3266: 1070: 2605:

describing our general disagreement. I hope you agree. Sorry for the template - I'd have told you about this anyhow - but the page said I needed to do it.

2129: 1761: 611: 1980: 3779: 3659: 3560: 2510: 2432: 1933:

Hi! I was going to update the map but I don't think I can overwrite the file because I'm a new user. Could you do it for me? Here is the updated svg file:

1638: 454: 252: 199: 2614: 217: 4205: 4062:

to create a Boston Latin School Pre-College Initiative, serving as the group’s president from 2006 to 2008. Between 2007 and 2008, Owolewa served on the

4021: 3962: 3097: 525: 4229: 3257: 2949: 2503: 3038: 2136: 27: 4301: 3714: 3090:

I tried to add more information about Fort Myer from a Court Case alleging that the Fort Myer family of companies are a RICO enterprise. (Racketeers)

1968: 1293: 213: 3420: 3127: 2620: 2544: 1678: 1667: 1589: 3577: 1238: 564: 164: 4232:

it back to the article while the discussion is still ongoing. I kindly ask you to remove it until consensus is reached. Thank you for considering.

3165: 3133: 2638: 2622: 2283:

While doing this, I also take out inline external links, and sometimes clear out improper referencing, tag articles that are unreferenced, etc. --

688: 617: 3284: 3055: 2165: 1439: 1338: 270: 3724:

What "structure" are you referring to? All contributions to the page are well-sourced and relevant. I wish the same were true for your comments.

2606: 2060: 1634: 1110: 2725: 1801: 1378:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 1000:

is my first, major endeavor, as he is Chairman of the Council and his page contains very little information, but 's page also lacks rich detail.

651: 160: 4474: 4386: 4017: 3878: 2654: 578: 520: 300: 247: 3400:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3344:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3173: 3141: 2843:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 2561: 266: 3989: 3826: 3695: 2150: 1060: 1046: 1031: 601: 592: 3733: 3710: 3121: 3105: 3971: 3686:

There are a slew of other issues. We can take it up on the talk page so that other editors can contribute and it will be documented there.

3085: 2708: 2671: 1343: 1922: 1861: 4125: 3883: 2781: 2597: 1998: 3612: 3521: 3032: 2378: 2302: 2287: 2271: 571: 4260: 4089: 3178: 3039: 2883: 2437: 2240: 2193: 1394: 2578: 4002: 3973: 3549: 3415: 2643: 2533: 1781: 1419: 1362: 1318: 1090: 631: 470: 280: 227: 174: 2364: 2052: 4279: 4047:

The biggest problem with your edits was that nothing you added was actually corroborated by the sources you provided. For example,

3718: 3289: 2312: 2034: 1907: 1366: 1243: 854: 194: 146: 3866: 3814: 1725:. A discussion on the talk page to return the information to the article is taking place. Perhaps you would like to participate. 1722: 1009: 4120: 3774: 2761: 2170: 459:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

70: 3154:

Your latest addition to the page including the "Beltway Bandit" comment is subjective opinion from questionable source material.

1845: 73:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out

4394: 4306: 3759: 3501: 1188: 2206: 273:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 220:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 167:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1867: 1777: 1774:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1415: 1412:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1314: 1311:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1086: 1083:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 627: 624:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 466: 463:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 276: 223: 170: 4245: 3080: 4470: 4382: 4201: 3958: 3752: 3745: 3253: 2945: 2730: 2499: 2125: 1289: 1234: 3641: 1953: 1699: 4095: 3739: 3701: 3667: 2352: 478: 1675: 2160: 1806: 1304: 1276:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1221:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3850:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3798:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2149:. This is agreed by past consensus of interested editors: if a link to a person listed and properly referenced (which 1646: 4215: 3060: 1989: 990: 31: 141: 125: 4025: 1949: 1578: 1509: 1742: 1183: 4466: 4378: 4197: 3954: 3505: 3393: 3337: 3249: 2941: 2495: 2121: 1285: 1230: 948: 621: 328: 985: 367: 3979:

Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Knowledge related to

3626: 3596: 1642: 1597: 449: 3855: 3803: 874: 677: 110: 4297: 4241: 3671: 2417: 2255: 1766:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1404:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1303:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1075:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

971: 849: 672: 616:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

257:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

96: 58: 1615: 1540:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1475:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

1146:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

910:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

403:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

4440: 4352: 4171: 3929: 3224: 3000: 2924: 2738: 2731: 2696: 2478: 2104: 1985: 48: 2741:, providing a citation for cases like this can be problematic and tricky. Sometimes people complain about 4452: 4364: 4183: 3941: 3618: 3493: 3443: 3421: 3236: 2936: 2490: 2116: 1945: 1281: 1226: 3497: 3378: 3322: 2821: 1653: 996:

seems like you have the interest and research knowledge of local sources to provide excellent content.

417:

their necks", and stating that "there won't be much money left because we are spending it."<ref: -->

2878: 2832: 3702: 3663: 3553: 3480: 3067: 2647: 2537: 2358: 1381: 63: 4007: 3984: 2849: 2825: 924:

93ad-0000779e2340.html Lunch with the FT: He has seen the future], August 18, 2006. Financial Times

460: 316: 34:. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 2569:

Thanks for letting me know. Have you sent the same notification to the other editors of the page?

2367:, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. – 4108: 3155: 1818:

Demetri Porphyrios, "Classicism is not a Style," in "Architectural Design" vol. 52, no. 5/6, 1982

1714: 1042: 1005: 560: 399:

by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just

2154:

4th January 2017, Braga may well stay on the list (if blue), or disappear if still red. Thanks.

3051: 2965: 2716:

Thanks for this and thanks for saving that Gardner article in your talkspace. Someday, I hope.

2376: 2333: 2236: 1554:'. Princeton Architectural Press, 1994 and Edward Chaney, Inigo Jones's 'Roman Sketchbook, 2006 423:{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/jun/22/sting-six-children-not-inherit-180m- 43: 38: 2745:. If you have any thoughts about how to balance these competing interests, I'd be interested. 4428: 4340: 4159: 3917: 3637: 3212: 2912: 2466: 2092: 1444: 541: 527: 360: 133: 115: 4050:

While in high school Owolewa dedicated himself to community service. In 2006, he joined the

3358:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

3303:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

2801:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1566: 1497: 1171: 936: 437: 4439:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4351:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4170:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4116: 3928:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3770: 3655: 3544: 3528: 3439: 3425: 3223:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2923:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2817: 2742: 2477:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2188:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2145:

Hi. There is provision for notability to be proven over a period of 30 days in the article

2103:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1903: 1841: 1682: 1671: 1630: 1593: 1574: 1505: 1358: 1272:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1217:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1179: 1115: 944: 860: 445: 305: 92: 2336:, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at 2332:

on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at

1051:

Your edits to Knowledge will be more accurate than your characterization of them, I hope.

8: 4220:

Hello, there's been disagreement about whether to include the name of the lawfirm in the

3629: 3619: 3582: 3573: 3509: 3410: 3169: 3137: 2757: 2749: 2337: 2016: 1277: 1222: 879: 816: 745: 656: 333: 324: 74: 2023:

This is why I feel there should be two articles. Certainly they should be cross-linked.

101:

Thanks for the note. I've been contributing for over a year, but the links are helpful.

4225: 4041: 3592: 3280: 2610: 2428: 2409: 1981:

Talk:Initiative_71#Rename_to_Cannabis_in_Washington.2C_D._C..2C_split_off.2C_or_what.3F

1160:

have housed cremated ashes. In ], ashes of the deceased may be placed in a columbarium

1038: 1001: 967: 735: 723: 713: 598: 575: 556: 205: 1756: 4410: 4322: 4293: 4237: 4142: 4055: 4033: 3900: 3476: 3195: 3076: 3047: 2899: 2528: 2512: 2453: 2369: 2245: 2232: 2181: 2155: 2079: 2061: 1934: 1895: 1830: 1797: 1788: