372:. What little information on that page that is correct is so far out of context as to be meaningless. Expect for the first half of the first sentence, everything is completely wrong. Case in point, the animation in the upper right should show the black object being deflected to the right of it's motion in the upper animation. Whatever it's trying to demonstrate, it's not this deflection, which by definition IS the Coriolis effect. Obviously, this article came about with an inordinate amount of contention requiring 6 archived files of discussion. I understand that it is inadvisable to wade into this, but what advice would you give to me. Should I contact an admin, write a whole new page and see if it can't be locked.
258:
34:
437:, was surprised there wasn't an article on him yet, and then went around linking the dozen or so mentions I found of him in various articles. Just because something is a stub or is split from a larger article doesn't mean it should be deleted. And I think over a dozen incoming links should be taken into account since the mentions were added independently (I assume) and not as some sort of spam campaign. So threatening the article with deletion (it appears the IP is talking about an
169:
490:
The unregistered user makes some good points, actually. You should perhaps write your own argument and link to the relevant policy and guidelines, rather than quoting the off-the-cuff statement I wrote above! ("Just because something is a stub or is split from a larger article doesn't mean it should
459:
to make sure you've included enough info (concentrate on "the person is a significant...subject of...major news agencies or publications", and "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews") to satisfy the notability criteria and you should be good to go. Also, the phrase "award-winning" is
464:.) Better to just state that he is a spoken-word poet and then talk about the awards in a separate paragraph. I think the fact that the Rockefeller Fellowship annually awards what they consider "50 of the country's 'greatest living artists'" is significant. Hope this helps!
202:. Currently, there are no formal plans--this is simply an opportunity to meet fellow Wikipedians before trekking around PDX to photograph sites on the Register. Not interested in coming downtown? You can still
124:- unfortunately, I don't see any discussion about this particular town at that page. It appears that the link goes to the wrong place? You don't know where to really find this discussion, do you? Thanks,
143:
Replying because
Valfontis isn't around much right now. There's a custom search at the top of this page (upper right, 'archives'). I found the relevant section here:
348:...for the props about Morning Edition. It was funny, because they actually interviewed me about the Philip Roth thing, but changed the story up. Hope you're well,
460:
kind of a red flag for some people. In other words, self-promoting editors/fans sometimes just state that someone has won awards without citing the awards. (See
314:
267:
120:, at the very bottom of the talk page, there is a claim that there is a discussion about a city called Ocean Grove in Oregon at this talk page archive:
476:
207:
175:
419:) I am proud that something I wrote even attracted the attention of an awesome editor such as yourself. You may edit my edits anytime.--
179:
491:
be deleted.") I'd recommend spending time researching and expanding the article, instead of worrying about the merger proposal.
431:
Awww. You're welcome. I had the redlink on my watchlist and I was just trying to figure out why. I think because I heard him on
236:
Rats, I'm not in
Portland on the weekends. Anyone is free to meet up with me briefly weekday afternoons though. Lemme know.
144:
191:
310:
306:
298:
183:
416:
138:
433:
396:
330:
222:
41:
319:
211:
199:
121:
100:
92:
87:
75:
70:
62:
354:
286:
278:
206:
as part of the international photo competition. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work
129:
388:
Thanks for your contributions to this wonderful project. Hope you have a great
Thanksgiving! --
257:
377:
496:
469:
389:
323:
241:
215:
194:(NRHP) is the main focus of Knowledge Takes Portland. This year the event will kick off at
117:
368:
This is for Val and her stalkers (boy that sounds weird) So, I'm checking my facts on the
8:
484:
424:
412:
350:
273:
125:
248:
461:
373:
302:
456:
442:
152:
369:
475:
For your amusement, you may want to take a glance the Merge proposal discussion
49:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
492:
480:
465:
449:
420:
282:
237:
50:
17:
438:
210:(number of images uploaded, links to galleries, successes, feedback, etc.
148:
168:
203:
263:<font=3>WIKIPEDIA LOVES LIBRARIES: MULTNOMAH COUNTY EDIT-ATHON!
249:
You're
Invited to Knowledge Loves Libraries 2012 (Portland, Oregon)!
455:--that might fit doesn't apply) seems a bit premature. Read up on
187:
159:
445:--this asserts notability, so the only speedy criterion--
320:
Click here for more information about meetups in
Portland
212:
Click here for more information about meetups in
Portland
363:
313:. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work
145:User:Valfontis/Archive 9#Ocean_Grove.2C_Oregon.3F
190:. Photographing sites in Portland listed on the
174:<font=3> You're invited to participate in
415:—a definite improvement. (Somebody is out to
160:You're Invited! Knowledge Takes Portland 2012
188:Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States
14:
383:
47:Do not edit the contents of this page.
364:Uh oh, I think I stepped in something
192:National Register of Historic Places
28:
411:Thank you for the edit you made to
23:
305:. You can view details about this
180:each September in Portland, Oregon
24:
513:
265:You're invited to participate in
132:) 13:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
487:) 21:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
472:) 21:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
427:) 20:48, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
256:
244:) 16:46, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
196:Saturday, September 22nd at noon
167:
155:) 16:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
108:
32:
380:) 19:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
289:. The event will take place on
262:
252:
229:15:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
178:, an annual event which occurs
173:
163:
403:19:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
268:Knowledge Loves Libraries 2012
13:
1:
499:) 17:37, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
281:for the purpose of improving
176:Knowledge Takes Portland 2012
360:20:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
337:21:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
255:
166:
7:
406:
10:
518:
417:delete that stubby article
291:Saturday, October 27, 2012
343:
200:Pioneer Courthouse Square
122:User:Valfontis/Archive 13
279:Multnomah County Library
184:Knowledge Takes America
45:of past discussions.
307:Wiki Loves Libraries
118:Talk:Seaside, Oregon
413:Marc Bamuthi Joseph
384:Happy Thanksgiving!
353: •
204:upload your images
341:
340:
303:downtown Portland
233:
232:
139:talk page stalker
106:
105:
57:
56:
51:current main page
509:
454:
448:
399:
392:
391:Another Believer
359:
357:
333:
326:
325:Another Believer
287:Multnomah County
276:
260:
253:
225:
218:
217:Another Believer
171:
164:
142:
84:
59:
58:
36:
35:
29:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
452:
446:
409:
402:
397:
390:
386:
370:Coriolis effect
366:
355:
349:
346:
336:
331:
324:
318:
299:Central Library
272:
264:
251:
228:
223:
216:
162:
136:
113:Hi, Valfontis,
111:
101:Archive 25
93:Archive 21
88:Archive 20
82:Archive 19
80:
76:Archive 18
71:Archive 17
63:Archive 15
33:
26:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
408:
405:
394:
385:
382:
365:
362:
351:Steven Walling
345:
342:
339:
338:
328:
261:
250:
247:
246:
245:
231:
230:
220:
172:
161:
158:
157:
156:
126:Ego White Tray
110:
107:
104:
103:
98:
95:
90:
85:
78:
73:
68:
65:
55:
54:
37:
18:User:Valfontis
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
498:
494:
489:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
471:
467:
463:
458:
451:
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:Snap Judgment
430:
429:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
404:
400:
393:
381:
379:
375:
371:
361:
358:
352:
334:
327:
321:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
270:
269:
259:
254:
243:
239:
235:
234:
226:
219:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
170:
165:
154:
150:
146:
140:
135:
134:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
109:Your archives
102:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
83:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
66:
64:
61:
60:
52:
48:
44:
43:
38:
31:
30:
27:
19:
453:}}
447:{{
432:
410:
387:
374:Watchwolf49z
367:
347:
294:
290:
285:relating to
266:
195:
115:
112:
81:
46:
40:
25:
295:2:00-4:00pm
182:as part of
39:This is an
462:WP:PEACOCK
441:and not a
277:hosted by
274:edit-athon
147:. Cheers,
493:Valfontis
481:Foobarnix
466:Valfontis
457:WP:ARTIST
421:Foobarnix
238:Valfontis
297:at the
42:archive
443:speedy
407:thanks
344:Thanks
309:event
149:tedder
450:db-a7
293:from
283:stubs
271:, an
16:<
497:talk
485:talk
477:here
470:talk
425:talk
398:Talk
378:talk
356:talk
332:Talk
322:! --
315:HERE
311:here
242:talk
224:Talk
214:! --
208:HERE
186:and
153:talk
130:talk
479:.--
439:AfD
301:in
198:at
116:At
97:→
67:←
495:(
483:(
468:(
423:(
401:)
395:(
376:(
335:)
329:(
317:.
240:(
227:)
221:(
151:(
141:)
137:(
128:(
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
