Knowledge

User:Steel1943

Source 📝

57:(which was renamed "FFDeletion" to "FFDiscussion" as a result), and going through 2 failed RFAs (I have no desire to do those again ... I'm good where I'm at, and it seems that's one stance of mine which the community agrees). It's been a ride, and I both do not see any ways I could propose such a massive change anymore, nor do I see any need for there to be any more such massive changes in the future. I think most of what could be done on Knowledge has been done, leaving editors to work on the always ongoing tasks of adding new material, preserving the material, fixing issues with new material and changes (where I tend to hover), and protect the encyclopedia from bad actors. 101: 39:
been as motivated or encouraged to proactively engage in thoughtful conversation or research. Turns out that at this time, it seems Knowledge has been a glue to keeping my mind intact, something I would have thought I would have confirmed prior to now. (I think my most recent retirement/absence was my ... 5th in the last 12 years?)
48:
Since starting to edit in 2012, my goal has been to help and improve Knowledge in whatever ways I can with the knowledge I have. And yes, I soon after realized that Knowledge is a site where one editor's idea of an improvement can be another editor's idea of a disservice to the encyclopedia. I was a
42:
Also, I realized the response I had to an editor prior to my most recent "retirement" was a bit over-the-top; not saying I haven't been over-the-top in the past, but lately I had attempted to be a bit more self-conscious of having such reactions to others upon editing again in 2021 (after an editing
38:
After not editing Knowledge for a while, I realized that my brain has not been as sharp. Apparently, taking the time to realize, propose, and make corrections to various aspects of Knowledge has been stimulating my brain quite a bit. I found that over the past month (June–July 2024), I just have not
28:
Hello. Steel1943 here. You may have seen me before ... editing something or making changes to Knowledge at various times since 2012. I originally joined Knowledge so I could be part of whatever Knowledge was growing into; thus the reason though I did not perform my first edit until 2011 (2nd edit in
33:
So ... if you've known my editing tendencies on Knowledge for a while, you may ask ... why does this editor keep leaving or retiring, then coming back? Well, I don't have a specific answer for you there for any of the previous instances, but I can tell you why I'm back this time (July 2024):
49:
bit more ambitious on Knowledge than I am now: I recall proposing and wanting a "Draft:" namespace before its official proposal, proposing and orchestrating the official depreciation of
144: 106: 43:
absence that lasted over a year). After some self-reflection, I thought ... dang, I was trying to avoid going down this path again, but it happened.
61:
Anywho, not sure if you read all of that, but if you did, you have my thanks ... and let's get back to making Knowledge the premier 💕!
70: 89:(while potentially expecting some sort of response and/or explanation for their actions) and move on. 115: 128: 74: 66: 8: 82: 78: 86: 50: 138: 54: 29:
2012), I registered my account in 2006. Yeah, it was like that.
100: 23:
read past the 1st paragraph if we have never crossed paths.
145:
Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
127:Oh, and to retain the link from before ... here is 136: 19:DISCLAIMER: Bunch of TLDR here, feel free to 65:P.S. It's good to remember ... we are all 137: 95: 13: 75:editors who are paid to edit pages 14: 156: 87:hit the other editor with a trout 99: 1: 119:and does not wish to be one. 77:), so let's not perform any 7: 10: 161: 71:Wikimedia Foundation 69:here (well, except 132: 123: 122: 53:to merge it with 152: 131:of my user page. 126: 103: 96: 160: 159: 155: 154: 153: 151: 150: 149: 135: 134: 124: 92: 64: 60: 47: 32: 27: 12: 11: 5: 158: 148: 147: 129:"The old days" 121: 120: 104: 94: 45: 44: 40: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 157: 146: 143: 142: 140: 133: 130: 118: 117: 116:administrator 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 97: 93: 90: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 62: 58: 56: 52: 41: 37: 36: 35: 30: 25: 24: 22: 16: 125: 114: 110: 91: 63: 59: 46: 31: 26: 20: 18: 17: 15: 107:This editor 79:bludgeoning 67:volunteers 139:Category 83:hounding 85:; just 51:WP:NFCR 55:WP:FFD 73:and 113:an 111:not 109:is 81:or 21:not 141::

Index

WP:NFCR
WP:FFD
volunteers
Wikimedia Foundation
editors who are paid to edit pages
bludgeoning
hounding
hit the other editor with a trout

This editor
administrator
"The old days"
Category
Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.