4849:
6119:
don't quite understand, and as announcement that the editor(s) who wrote the article that it needs to be fixed. What this does is place the burden of solving the template or tag solely on the editor(s) who wrote the article. If you don't invest yourself in attempting to resolve the issues you perceive to be in the article, you just leave the editor(s) who wrote the article to either assume you have no idea what you're talking about or guess. Guessing is a form of original research. Collaborate. Discuss what you think needs to be fixed. If the editor(s) who wrote the article disagree with you, access the sources. Learn more about the source material and how the article was constructed. In my experience and opinion, drive-by taggers and templaters are simply unwilling to do any of this work. They see themselves as proactive in using a template. If they aren't willing to do a fraction of the work involved in writing the article, I see them as lazy. This also promotes article ownership when the editor(s) who wrote the article are the only ones who have read the sources. Why should they listen to you and treat the template seriously when you insist on doing as little work as possible? Also,
3002:, and seem to vary from TFA practice by for example, having the death year have only two digits when the century's the same. I would have no trouble with minor changes to conform with MOS (though I think we can assume a recent FA is more or less MOS-compliant). But now we have an article blurb which has significant textual differences from the article lede. There should be some deference, I think, to the principal author and/or nominator, or if Tony wants to make changes that go beyond obvious MOS issues, at least he should open dialogue with the writers/nominators. These aren't corrections, he's making judgment calls (i.e. whether or not the comparison with Mackenzie King should be in there) that I think are unwise and that really should be left to the editors who improved the article and brought it to this point, or at least to the director or his delegate. As I am about to check out of my hotel, it will probably be several hours before I can reply to any comments, but I will accept whatever you have to say about this without further complaint, but Tony1 had a month to suggest whatever changes he wanted to the blurb while it was sitting at TFA/R.--
3174:
course, as well, would be for TFA noms, since the vast majority are granted, to have the blurbs edited, or better, changes proposed, during the course of the nomination, perhaps on WT:TFA/R. I do have the concerns about tracking the lede in the article. And, to be honest, I would rather have the article I got to FA advertised on the main page of the world's seventh leading website with my words, not Tony's. Yes, I am human and selfish in that regard, but is that so terrible? After all, we don't get paid! I did not visit any archives or libraries on
Macdonald, but I did spend well over a hundred dollars on books, and I don't think I will be able to use them again for another article, and with the second volume of Gwyn's bio out in September, that's another thirty dollars. I think the allure of that is important to at least some TFA nominators, and if there is something that would have an advanced expert in English going tsk, but be unnoticed by the general population and is not offensive to the MOS, I think we should go with the article author, one of the body of people on whom TFA relies on the supply side.--
6135:
and protected by advocates, and the best I can do on any of those articles is add maintenance tags, knowing that the article owners outnumber me and won't NPOV the articles. And, I have worked on boatloads of medical articles that are often egregiously and dangerously wrong, but since I don't have access to full text of medical journal articles, I can't always fix them (and even if I did have access, it wouldn't be physically possible for me to correct all of them). In both of these cases, the maintenance tags serve to alert our readers that the articles contain very bad, even dangerously bad, information (and many medical editors have long felt that medical articles should have an equivalent of our BLP policy). At any rate, that (dangerous medical misinfo or alarming POV and advocacy) is not the situation for this particular FA, which is where I'm in violent agreement with others opining here.
4925:
6068:@Snowman - There is also the consideration that over 30 percent of featured articles have maintenance tags/banners of some sort on them, some of them in place since 2008. Since it's impractical to consider over 1,000 articles at imminent risk for being taken to FAR, we have the talk page notification system in place to warn editors that a FAR is being considered. This requirement (for a talk page notification) has been in place for a year, and appears to be working quite well. I have personally dropped notes on several articles that appeared to have been abandoned, only to have surprising results when editors appeared out of the woodwork to complete cleanup work. Other times, nothing happens. However, we would prefer that articles retain FA status, while remaining at FA quality, and if we can attain that result without the process of a full FAR, so much the better.
5984:, but User:Nikkimaria has reversed this. My nomination is because the article text fails criteria 2c, because of inadequate in-line referencing of the prose and also no referencing in the table. There has been a {{Out of date|section|date=August 2010}} template on the article on a poorly referenced section for about one year, and so editors have had plenty of notice to revise the article already, and I feel that discussion on the talk page about a FAR is only going to delay improvements unduly. The "Out of date" template invites users to make improvements by saying; "Please help improve the article by updating it." I think that notification with this maintenance template that has been on the page for more that a year is adequate notification. I am also not happy about the Encyclopædia Britannica article, because there are some inconsistencies with the
4831:
4840:
6162:
from their usual contributions to the Wiki. I think that quite often editors add maintenance tags knowing that they will not be able to contribute easily and fluently to an article outside of there sphere of interest often preferring to make contributions in a particular science or subject area based on many years of experience of work, study, or perhaps a hobby. I reiterate that I think that the presence of thousands of maintenance tags on FAs indicates that the systems on the Wiki to maintain the quality of FAs has failed. I feel that editors should be able to start a FAR on any FA containing long standing maintenance tags without having to discuses it on the articles talk page, because the maintenance tags provide a very visual signal that a article has a problem and many maintenance tags are specific.
6522:
5453:
4867:
4916:
7094:, and would value a comment by you as you are both concerned with Featured articles on the main page and a programmer. I would like to now if it would be possible to implement a method for having the day's featured article automatically become watchlisted for me everyday, and the previous days featured article automatically become delisted. I am bringing this up for discussion since I realize I will not actually bother watchlisting and delisting a new article everyday, but since I already refresh my watchlist frequently if it was already watchlisted I would be likely to monitor it, and I believe other editors are in a similar state. Thanks
4889:
4858:
4813:
4804:
4465:
4880:
4907:
3504:
the term was listed in the dictionary, a 2,000-page tome and standard work in this field, when it was not, and it was a key consideration in the voluminous discussions as to whether the article should be named after the word, or after Dan Savage's campaign to create such a word. I hope that you might familiarise yourself with the evidence in the RfC/U, as well as other editors' views expressed to date at the RfC/U page, and then perhaps reconsider your rash comment. It was not a fair assessment, nor one I believe actually based on a proper review of the evidence. Regards, --
3575:- I'm not saying Cirt is a model editor. And since I'm not about to rebut every one of the many allegations thrown at him, I'll even concede that some of them are could be true. But the fact remains that a large number of the allegations in the RFC are without merit - some are plainly factually wrong, and many are accusations of what is otherwise normal editing behavior. When the allegations are looked at in detail, one is left with a distinct feeling of 'where's the beef?' And this dumping of harmless diffs is a recurring pattern where Cla is concerned (For see
3214:
last two digits of the year is definitely not the standard formatting used for the main page). Unless I'm missing something, the two sentences I described above as non-cosmetic (about
William Lyon Mackenzie King having a longer tenure and explaining what the Canadian Pacific Railroad was) are not redundant with anything else in the blurb, and definitely a judgement call. (Personally, I think it helps to have a sentence explaining what the Canadian pacific railraod was; the sentence about King needn't be there but it's not exactly hurting anything either.)
399:" regarding music samples and I an not so impressed with the version of the song that you added in terms of its ability to present a depiction of what the song sounds like to the reader. I have attempted to add samples that I would want to hear if I were a reader. This has led to debate on the article's contents. This leads me to note two things about the article which passed at FAC 15 months ago. First, the author is now claiming that there are particular notable renditions of the song that are associated with it although none are mentioned in the
3673:(e.c.) Cla68 and Jayen, I find Raul's opinion balanced and rooted in solid evidence (of lack thereof). I will, by the way, be writing a brief statement there critical of Cirt's naive behaviour and failure to understand a few basic things, in case you think I'm coming from a biased perspective. Yes, you don't have to be paid by an external agent to commit a breach. But more AGF about his future intentions at this stage would be welcome. This spiralling witch-hunt has consumed too much of your valuable time. Why not drop it and keep a watch on him?
3498:
Grunge'. The lexicon had an authentic ring, but turned out to be a hoax perpetrated by a record company employee in
Seattle. An example of deliberate coining is the word 'santorum', purported to mean 'a frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex'. In point of fact, the term is the child of a one-man campaign by syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage to place the term in wide usage. From its appearance in print and especially on the Internet, one would assume, incorrectly, that the term has gained wide usage.
5342:
4822:
3298:
keen that a few days be available for community input. In particular, where there seem to be no main authors available, it would be good to encourage other editors to do a quick run-through of the text. On just one matter, image use guidelines and policy have changed over the past 18 months, and many FAs could do with an audit of pic locations and size. Text-squashing is still under-recognised as a problem, because everyone assumes all readers see the dispaly as they do. I see some pretty messy image use in older FAs.
6211:. Not because the article was deficient, but because the editor disliked the topic. This is so prevalent that in the past year, maybe twice has someone actually made a valid point with a template or tag in an article I watch. I think this has been explained well enough by people involved in FAs. If you wish to push for FARs with no discussions when the instructions say you need to start a discussion to resolve issues in the article, your FARs are going to be rejected. But do as you wish I guess. Everyone else does. --
1696:
encourage them to take an interest by presenting the TFA as something they are already familiar with, then we are acting contrary to those goals. Obviously the lead paragraph needs some trimming to fit the requisite size for the Main Page space, and in many cases alternative names will be a suitable place to make those cuts for conciseness, but what is the thinking in making it an assumption that these names, only necessary because wp:commonname has been overlooked, should not be shown on the main page?
2633:
140:
4934:
4383:
4764:
3966:
grammatically, but I felt that and similar usages were not as nuanced. I felt it especially important in this case as
Macdonald was not premier on 30 June 1867, the day before Confederation, Belleau was. I felt it was a good way of hinting to the reader that fact, which given the fact that Macdonald was prime minister for 19 of the following 23 years, might otherwise be lost. It's not a big deal either way, but I suspect that a lot of word choices could be lost that way.--
3491:. We all get edit summaries wrong sometimes, and this may have been an innocent oversight, but deleting four paragraphs of unflattering information from a clearly promotional article about a company, written at the personal request of someone professionally associated with that company, with an edit summary of "better to keep in chronological order" raises a justifiable eyebrow and is part of the overall promotional pattern that some editors perceive in Cirt's editing.
4790:
832:
1a standards while others have replaced the village's location with something about some MP resinging, which I feel has major issues with "recentism" and undue weight. I don't think the blurb is fit to go on the Main Page as it is at the moment, but in two hours, only admins will be able to edit it so I'm backing off to avoid the appearance of being under-handed (by reverting just before cascading protection takes effect) or of using my tools in a dispute.
6391:
5596:
5488:
1235:
6603:- This argument has been invoked since time immemorial and maybe I'm missing something, but I've never found it especially compelling. (If advertising is raising of awareness of a commercial product, and if Knowledge's mission is raising awareness of all manner of subjects, then advertising is part of our mission.) Is someone out there going to conclude, based on seeing this article on the main page, that we're paid shills for the horror movie industry?
2743:
6876:
4505:
4781:
5695:. If another similar article doesn't appear as TFA between August 8 and November 8, it would get another point. Beckham is definitely similar, as he was the governor of Kentucky. If you think Governor of Kentucky could survive for November 8 with 3 points, go ahead and run Beckham on Thursday. If not, I'd like to request that you schedule another article for Thursday to give Governor of Kentucky the best shot of running on election day. Thanks!
4288:
3563:- His edit was 100% supported by the citation. He said the dictionary said it's an example of coined usage, and did not claim that it had its own entry. And I see nothing in the full citation to make that any less true. If you assumed from his edit that santorum had its own entry, you should have checked the dictionary yourself, or at least asked him that directly. It sounds to me like you are blaming him for your own faulty assumption.
7619:
6319:
4898:
7413:
7180:
6080:
continue to stack up in their thousands. I think that a maintenance tag gives adequate notice of a problem on a article, and I think that a maintenance tag being on the page for a few months should provoke a FAR without the additional need to start a discussion on the talk page. Clearly, that there are currently thousands of maintenance tags on FAs is a failure of the quality maintenance of FAs.
3035:. As you will note, I recognized the validity of your concern over the generic term "prime minister". The rest seem purely judgement calls, plus the variation from TFA practice I noted above. This article sat at TFA/R for almost a month and no one complained about the blurb. Where were you then? I'm not going to get into the "take lessons in English", Tony, let's stick to business.--
3141:
know the most about the topic). Now if you have an issue with the blurb-matches-the-article principle itself, I'd be happy to discuss that with you and anyone else who wants to talk about it. (I like it that way but I'm not married to the idea) But you can't unilaterally decide to ignore it. About his second concern, that some of your edits went beyond cosmetic MOS editing, looking at
7036:
3468:
6853:
This year, however, we're broadening the scope and reach of the fundraiser by incorporating more voices and different people on the funding banners and appeals that will start running full-time on
November 7th. We're testing new messages and finding some really great results with editors and staff members of the Foundation. You can see the current progress of the tests
3881:
personal page ("to make sure I receive it") are noted in turn. My question is, if you object to your self-described threatening actions being called those of a bully, what else would you call them? Collegial? I'll take any reply from you on this thread, and hereby request that you stay off my page permanently, as I find your manner and tactics offputting at best.
666:
the
Nafaanra language has not widely caught on yet. As such, I personally don't think having a written sample of the Nafaanra language is very important to the article (or at least not important enough to prevent it being on the main page). Perhaps a spoken sample would be more useful if you are looking for something to put on the main page when the article runs.
4791:
4792:
6857:. I'm curious if you would want to participate in an interview with me as part of this process? The interviews usually last 60 minutes and involve a number of questions about your personal editing experiences, as well as general questions about Knowledge and its impact in the world. Please let me know by emailing mroth (at) wikimedia.org. Thanks!
6410:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
5615:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
2037:
TFA since it began, whereas this is on a non-Anglosphere topic and very different to those which have been used before. (As you probably know, I dislike the liturgical-calendar "April 1 is odd topics, October 31 is morbid topics" approach to TFA but if we're going to have this tradition, we may as well do it as well as possible.) –
7750:
407:. Also, the article has no musical structure section to teach the casual and trained interested parties what the song sounds like. Again this is a notable deficiency in the article, especially for an FA. Since you have enough of an interest in this article to have provide a musical sample, you may want to consider current concerns at
4015:. You have been behaving in a very aggressive way about the blurb and the article. Truth is, you don't own diddly-squat of either. Stop acting as though it's yours, and read the details below the edit-box, which you by default agree to. Enough of this. When the blurb comes up again, I'll be back to edit it. We can talk about it then.
3693:. I will grant you that the Shorter OED says, "2b: In legal use: more than one ... 4: As a vague numeral: Of an indefinite (but not large) number exceeding two or three; more than two or three but not very many", but bacon recipes hardly qualify as "legal use". Sorry this wasn't a more agreeable conversation; I'll leave it at that. --
3690:
6485:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3544:"If creating an article on some obscure restaurant is a crime, we're all guilty. Even Jimbo, whose complaint in the AFD is cited above, has done it. Remember the Mzoli's Meats controversy? Plenty of people in the AFD thought that Cirt's article was sufficiently sourced and notable. Are they secretly promoting anti-Scientology too?"
3540:"If the statements from the RfC/U were as outlandish as you characterised them to be, they would have been unlikely to attract support from some longstanding and widely respected editors like DGG and SlimVirgin, who would clearly deserve sanction as well then for supporting them. That is absurd, and you have simply made a mistake."
6197:, among others. Very frequently someone will come along with no experience in constructing any article and put a template on it, like POV. Some months ago I had a baffling 3-week discussion at the talk page of the Lesbian article to remove a sentence in the lead that was very clearly supported by at least 14 cited sources and
4794:
5551:
3569:- I've seen the evidence. I'm unconvinced by it. So are most of the people who have seen it. Perhaps in the future you should concentrate on one or two or a small number of actual bad behaviors, supported by convincing evidence, instead of producing a laundry list of allegations and a mountain of mostly harmless diffs.
2837:
A 24-hour lead-time would enable proper support for the finished product, for you and the delegate. I'd previously imagined competition so intense for these spots that they'd be queued in line for a week before their MP appearance: but it's not so. Can you advise whether it's a short-staffing issue? I started
3271:- I'm not really sure I follow what you are saying here. I fully support anyone who wants to tweak articles and blurbs that are about to hit the main page to fix non-substantive/style issues. Substantive content-related changes, in my opinion, should be postponed until after the article is off the main page.
3153:) were substantial, and the rest were cosmetic. Assuming the latter were MOS complaint, I think the right thing for Wehwalt to do would have been to make those same cosmetic edits to the article itself, revert the substantial ones to the blurb, and have a discussion on the article's talk page about them.
176:
6852:
Hi Raul, I hope you're well. My name is
Matthew Roth and I'm a Storyteller working on the 2011 fundraiser with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. In past years, we've relied on Jimbo to carry the bulk of the fundraising weight and he's done very well helping us hit our yearly funding targets.
6201:
involved could understand why I was arguing for keeping the sentence in. As if everyone involved had never heard of reliable sources and original research. Because, I surmise, they hadn't. Neither had they actually read the article, much less the sources. My most recent experience was someone placing
6134:
I understand and agree with the general points being raised by Moni and
Malleus (I once cleaned up that article a bit, it's not that hard), but disagree that there is never good reason for maintenance tags. Two examples: I have worked extensively on a suite of articles on Knowledge that are "owned"
6118:
In my experience, a maintenance tag is a nifty gadget some editors use in articles when they don't understand what they're doing. It seems to be an end run around the "collaborative" part of the encyclopedia. Editors simultaneously use it to complain about something in an article, like POV, that they
6045:
Pointing out a problem is doing something worthwhile. I do not monitor FA articles systematically. Before today, I do not recall seeing this article during the year while the maintenance template was present. Actually, I have made what I think are some improvements to the article. However, I do not
5229:
The
National Archives has hundreds of thousands of digitized documents in its holdings. We are working on a bulk upload to Commons of one particular cache of about 123,000 TIFF master files in the next few days! Once uploaded, these will require a massive community effort to help categorize the files
1438:
Mark, my belated congratulations on your wedding, and best wishes to you and your bride for a long and happy marriage !! As mentioned earlier, I've been swamped with IRL business, and am likely to remain so through June. Neither
Karanacs nor Laser brain have edited for about a month, so I seem
993:
are technically correct, as none of the zillions of other artworks of this subject as yet have articles, I don't think they are very helpful unless the work concerned is very clearly the best known of the subject, which is certainly not the case here, or in other examples I've seen. At some point the
7201:
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us
6748:
essay, I agree with the principle expressed there that the main page isn't the same as the rest of the encyclopedia. The main page is akin to the showcase in front of the book store, where we can exercise a difference standard of judgement in what to put there compared to the rest of Knowledge. (The
5932:
Just an observation that in the last 3 months you've had only 11 main page articles involving subjects from non-dominant countries, and none from English speaking countries outside US, Europe, Australia and NZ. The only person from those countries featured in that time was Hòa thượng Thích Quảng Đức
3999:
Thanks, but as I have some experience in article writing and what to tell the reader then, I think I am content to do it my way. The reason I mentioned this is that Raul mentioned it specifically. All the more reason why copyedits of blurb without consultation with principal editors before TFA day
3921:
is that Cla68 is clearly, here and elsewhere, in violation of said wikipedia policy and has pushed his luck with it. Also worthy of contemplation is that Cla fails to respond to Raul's detailed refutations, above, of why Cla started this dramatic "Walk the Walk" '24-hour warning' thread; instead we
3556:
misleading, like saying you are doing X and instead doing Y. Cirt's edit summary said he was doing X, and he did X and Y. An incomplete edit summary (including a blank one) and a misleading one are not the same thing. Or, to put it another way, by your logic a blank edit summary is a misleading one.
3497:
As we drew from written sources, we were also mindful of the possibility of hoax or intentional coinings without widespread usage. An example of a hoax is the 15th November, 1992, article in the New York Times on the grunge youth movement in Seattle. The article included a sidebar on the 'Lexicon of
3217:
But we're getting lost in the weeds here of that particular blurb. The big picture I'm getting at here is that, for almost any blurb I schedule, there is clearly room for reasonable people to disagree about what should and should not be there. When an article is about to hit the main page, it's best
3213:
I'm not saying he was right to revert your edit in its entirety. I think many of your changes were good ("Macdonald became the first prime minister of the new nation" is a better construction than "Macdonald was designated as the first Prime Minister of the new nation") some were not (using only the
3196:
Very easy to say that, but I'd like to know exactly why my multi-word edit, which was all an impovement as far as I can see, was reverted, rather than just the matters noted in the edit-summary. Repetitions were re-introduced, and a new inconsistency. Is that what you mean by "defer to the wishes of
2836:
Raul, I don't know whether this has been a chronic problem, but the default situation for the selection of some TFAs seems to be precariously close to the time they have to be locked. This meant, for example, that the other day the community was denied direct access to the ability to edit the blurb.
2360:
Many thanks, Raul, for the advice on writing blurbs and your specific edit to improve TFL June 13. We are just beginners in this arena, and while we learn the ropes, your input and guidance is much appreciated. I'll try to write up advice such as you give above into a hints and tips section if I can
831:
Raul (or TPSs, preferably admins because it will be protected in a couple of hours), perhpas you could take a look at the changes the TFA blurb for the 29th. The primary contributor of the article has made some pretty major modifications. Some of them have introduced prose that doesn't come close to
665:
did not read or write until recently. It looks like the picture Mark Dingemanse found was of Nafana people being taught to read Nafaanra using a system of writing first developed in the 1970s. The article says that only 1-5% of the Nafana people are literate in Nafaanra, suggesting that writing in
293:
article - added a new section "75th birthday tributes" with some content and six references. My plan was to continue to beef it up as the date of Roy's 75th birthday approaches (April 23) and other tributes become known. I am stunned to discover that all my hard work was reverted by another editor
7872:
Yeah that was his previous account name and i believe he renamed it to º¡º for one reason or another, i guess he got bored of wikipedia and quit. although its strange that he left no notice or no trace. Either that or he kicked the bucket; or just simply made a new account. But then again isnt that
7282:
If schools see "The Human Centipede" as a front-page "can't avoid looking at it," Featured Article they will block Knowledge. Imagine yourself as an elementary school principal and you saw 5th graders looking at the front page of Knowledge with "The Human Centipede," as the FA. What do you do next?
6740:
To address your specific question of why the Mrs. Jameson is worse than the human centipede, sexuality is more of a taboo subject than violence/horror - particularly in the case of someone who makes a living having sex - which means Jameson is going to cause more outrage. Admittedly, this judgement
6586:
of this film and that was gross. I read Cliftonian's description of the sequel. That was really gross, and would certainly give me pause about putting Human Centipede II on the main page, if it should ever become an FA. By comparison, this movie almost seems tame. I don't see this one as being in a
6559:
Hi there, my request to have the human centipede on the main page was met with overwhelming opposition to which I have no argument with, to be honest I expected that sort of response. However, out of interest, would the article be finding it's way onto the banned list? Or would it be ok to nominate
6057:
There is no point at all in slapping maintenance tags on an article as they are almost universally ignored. Where FAs are concerned the proper course of action is to raise the issue on the article talk page, and if it's sufficiently serious (I haven't looked at the EB article) then an FAR may be in
5876:
as a potential helper. I took a little bit of video on my phone at a gig on Saturday which I'd like to potentially upload to the artist's page, but I don't have a clue how to convert it to the format acceptable for WP. Do I need to buy/download special software to do it? Any advice you can offer
3880:
The 24 hours is long past, and you have not acted, so your actions, which you admit are a threat, appear to me to be empty. Feel free to "note" any comment of mine that you want (which smacks of your attempt to foment a 'Cirt's enablers' list at his recent Rfc/U), and your wording and posting on my
3751:
That would be my impression as well, Prioryman. I've tried to stay away from this mess but it appears that the time has come to take exception to this RfC/U. At one point Cla wanted to create an "Cirt's enablers" list, but was forced to drop that tactic. Most decent people avoid unpleasant ones,
3735:
said he is taking corrective action. What, then, is the RfC/U supposed to achieve? It has predictably degenerated into a re-run of the Santorum fight (not surprising as JN466 advertised the RfC/U prominently on the Santorum talk page) and is proving nothing more than an exercise in mud-slinging and
3503:
Cirt's summary said, "The 2006 edition of The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English cited santorum as an example of "deliberate coining", and he placed that summary both in the lead and body of the article. This wording misled editors (including myself at first) into thinking
3483:
for example and complaints from multiple editors about BLP violations and bullying. In view of the latter, I was disappointed with the ad-hominem nature of your own comment. If the statements from the RfC/U were as outlandish as you characterised them to be, they would have been unlikely to attract
3418:
Oh, it's not just that I disagree with your conclusions. It's obvious to me (and lots of other people) that your whole purpose with that RFC is to harass Cirt, and your method is to throw shit at the wall until something sticks, by trumping up ordinary editing behavior to make it seem nefarious. If
3140:
Tony - Wehwalt's concern here is two-fold: you made changes to the blurb that were not made to the article, which violates the above principle; and he believes that the changes you made were not merely cosmetic, but substantial, and that you need to work with the articles' authors (who, presumably,
2490:
I'd interpret it somewhat differently. I'd say that as the new guy on the block FL is desperate to prove itself, and what was meant was that as such they're very keen to make certain that MoS compliance and so is rigorously enforced; the rest was just the normal foot in mouth stuff. But as you say,
2274:
To my knowledge, the only major thing we haven't done is protected everything that should be. That's not an oversight, but down to the fact that myself and RexxS are non-admins, and we're two of the people best-placed to deal with any minor issues during the formal approval stage. The proposal will
2245:
I know that you've seen the current thread on the main page. But just to keep you up to date, we're just doing a final few checks and tweaks to the Today's featured list process, with the intention of requesting formal approval tonight. Everything going well, the first list will hopefully go on the
2036:
for later this month. You might want to pull it; I believe it was written intentionally as an April 1 TFA, and I think it makes sense to keep it back. While we do have other potential candidates, AFAIK they're all on English history or US places, which have been the themes for I think every April 1
1695:
Could I ask what the reason for the avoidance of common names is? Surely the purpose of an encyclopaedia is to inform, and the point of TFA is to draw attention to our better articles. If we avoid informing people what we are talking about by the terms they will recognise, and dodge the chance to
1120:
would probably have become this year's TFA on 1 April if I had submitted it to FAC early enough. (There is even more April Fools material than what is currently in the article. E.g. the inventor's house was previously a Catholic church built by Protestants against the protest of an official Swedish
115:
I've closed the AN/I thread. If there are wider issues, I'd suggest that you thrash them out with him or open an RfC/U. However, it'd best to not call him a 'dick' or any other such insults; if part of the problem with his editing is incivility then dishing out more incivility in response is hardly
7564:
I haven't started an edit war, and I don't want one either. I don't like tags and I'm pretty reluctant to use them. (And I *really* hate 'drive by' taggers - people who drop them on articles without making an effort to fix the issue, or even explain why they added it). With that said, however, the
6161:
It seems to me that some people have presented a bigoted stereotype of editors who add maintenance tags to articles. Some people do a lot of editing within there own sphere of interest or knowledge and editing outside of this sphere would be outside of their comfort zone and could be a distraction
5896:
on Commons may be of help to you. However, I am concerned by your description of what you want to upload, as someone who's done concert photography while dodging crowd surfers and security guards. If your video depicts the artist performing a copyrighted work, i.e. a song, it's a derivative work
4163:
If I wish to override him? Don't twist the truth to try to bully me. Read what I wrote again: it stands. Now, if you persist with this aggressive ownership, I'll be pushing for FAC to be closed down or radically overhauled, to stop editors such as you from breaching the pillars. I've wasted enough
3864:
Jusdafax, it wasn't an empty threat. I don't mind when someone disagrees with me, but when someone calls me a liar, I remember it. Please feel free to put my user talk page on your watchlist, and I've noted that you have called me a bully for taking exception to being called a liar. I will also
2314:
Protection is unnecessary. The main page and main page/tomorrow are both cascade protected, which means that as soon as blurbs are <24 hours from hitting the main page, they will not be editable by non-admins. (Check the TFA blurbs to confirm this - they are cascade protected, but otherwise not
776:
This is the first official meeting of our proposed Wikimedia DC chapter, with discussion of bylaws and next steps. Other agenda items include, update everyone on our successful Wikimania bid and next steps in the planning process, discuss upcoming activities that we want to do over the summer and
7555:
I was surprised by your comments. The editors at the article come from both ends of the political spectrum. In spite of this we have been working well together, far left and far right. No edit warring, no page protection. I must admit it was a welcome change from some of the drama I dealt with at
5958:
Therein lies the issue of systemic bias. It is not enough to say there are more featured articles from the core countries, because systemic bias promotes those areas at the expense of others. Countering systemic bias involves a degree of positive discrimination favouring articles from those other
5776:
Both of the American flights need some work; I did point that out in the discussion but nothing seems to be done. Just uncited statements and whatnot, if you requested it I'm sure it would be done quickly (I prefer not to work on 9/11 articles before I'm urged to fix it, for a number of personal
5735:
No, as long as you and Raul are aware of my intent to nominate Governor of Kentucky for election day and don't see a major problem with that, go ahead and run Beckham. Since I usually do articles about long-dead folks, I rarely get a chance to request an article for TFA that has a date connection
3427:
had a misleading edit summary. Cirt said "better to keep in chronological order", moved a paragraph into the correct chronological position, and deleted two others. While his edit summary did not deal with the entirety of his edit, this is common editing practice. An edit summary does not have to
3297:
Your full support for the polishing and scrutiny of the article is gladly noted; I think it's really important, given how FAs can sometimes degrade over time, even factually (shouldn't a TFA about a modern topic, including BLPs, be updated before the TFA day, where necessary?). This is why I'm so
3294:
all accessible at the article, in full context, and lower-value links can have the effect of reducing visits to the TFA. I also suspect that removing a sentence or two from a blurb often makes it crisper, and a blurb is essentially a short text, space-poor. In an article, a lead is expected to be
2858:
I concur with Tony here; scheduling far in advance would be good in other ways as well, as it would give time for people to notice if there were reasons not to run an article. ("I was saving that for his 100th birthday", "I'm about to do a total rewrite", "I'll be on vacation on that day and it's
2129:
Everyone has their own personal bailiwick when it comes to FA scheduling. Certain article authors don't want their articles go up, ever; other people think certain categories are over-represented and don't want to see those articles scheduled again anytime soon. You'll just have to discover these
6079:
I think that editors could have got the impression that maintenance tags have no urgency for article enhancements as a FAR is not threatened, because this new rule that a FAR must start with a discussion on the talk page of the article. I think that it is likely that maintenance tags on FAs will
3173:
That is a reasonable course of action, though not intuitive, I think you will grant. However, it takes a situation where raising a concern does not result in: well, I won't repeat it all. And considering the latest screed on Dabomb's talk page, it is not a comfortable situation. A reasonable
3057:
I was quite open there about the logic of my review, in which your lead failed by any standard and I had to oppose. I hope you're able to make the suggested changes in your own FA lead, which neatly parallel your objections to non-admins' participation in the blurb copy-editing process, and your
3014:
You have a real hide to completely revert my edit in one swoop, damaging the text, introducing inconsistencies, and then claiming some precious principle that text in a blurb should be the same as in a lede. They are two different genres, and the original editors of the article, if they're still
2475:
Maybe it means when you have a full week to scrutinize anything that hits the main page, you have the luxury of taking everything very seriously ? We don't all have that luxury -- we rely on the reviewers that show up. Anyway, it didn't seem a very gracious comment, glad it's gone :)
7823:
albeit a very long time ago by wikipedia standards (7 years ago!) and i dont know if you knew º¡º but it is very odd that he/she edited practically everyday and just suddenly disappeared on 4th may 2003 without a trace and i have a sneaking supcision that they might of actually passed away, any
7352:
It's obvious that the editors on the Front Page believe that occasional outrageous articles have educational goals worthy of subverting the least-astonishment principle in placement set by the Wikimedia foundation, so I defer to their judgement. I canceled my recurring donation to Wikimedia.org
6736:
Ed is correct that Jenna Jameson is the only FA I wouldn't put on the main page, and even that isn't quite written in stone. The criteria by which I make this decision is entirely subjective, based on which articles I think are going to cause an unacceptably large 'fallout' for myself/the other
5242:
We are currently working on a system for including links to pages on Wikimedia projects in the National Archives online catalog. The Wikimedia projects are hosting an increasing number of transcriptions of National Archives documents and high-quality image and video files that are not available
3403:
I already know that you and at least four other people, disagree with the conclusions of me and other editors. What I'm still waiting for, and time is ticking, on you to back up your statement of "demonstratably false". This statement means, I assume, that you can back up your allegation with
1379:
It was not nominated. Raul selects some community nominations to fill slots, but the majority are entirely his decision. There would not be anything to see, in other words, other than the TFA itself. Generally, a note is placed on the article talk page, and on the user talk page of the major
348:
Notability can be subjective - especially when we're not familiar with the person/place/thing. I took a look at the venues hosting the two tribute concerts specifically mentioned and researched the artists before deciding to include them. If anything both affirm Roy's worldwide influence. The
336:
Well, listing non notable artists would be a question of editorial judgment. Since there's a fair amount to say about Orbison, I'm sure, I'd lean against it but I'm not doing the writing so I'm not there, so to speak. It seems to be something to work out on talk page, although it is certainly
6262:
with a proposal. The requirement for talk page notification was put into place through community consensus and discussion, and it will not be removed because of the disagreement of one editor. If you can find a community consensus that supports your view, then so be it - Nikki and I are only
6149:
Who said there's never a good reason to place tags or templates on articles? I've done it myself, but always with a note on the talk page asking what's up. I can't say what Malleus' point is, but mine certainly was that if you tag or template an article, you should be prepared to discuss the
294:
who said two of my references were "questionable" and therefore notability was in question. I thought we were to assume good faith. I don't do shabby work and one of my objectives here is to help as much as I can cleaning-up articles and citing sources (as evidenced by my participation in
6206:
because s/he completely misunderstood what neutrality means. S/he thought it meant never expressing strong language, like "astonishing" or "desolate", even if the sources had clearly made a point that was adequately summarized by these words. A couple years ago, I watched some angry editor
742:
Nothing wrong about the article per se, but is there a conflict of interest posting this on the main page so close to the release date of the upcoming movie on the same subject? What better free advertising than to be mentioned on the main page of one of the most visited sites on the web.
4031:
If you think there should be a change, please bring it up on the article talk page, where it will attract the attention of our Canadian editors. As substantive changes to the blurb must bring with them parallel changes to the lede, you will need to build some consensus. This is not that
5243:
through NARA's own site. Links to these Wikimedia pages in the documents' actual catalog records will benefit the end user by providing them access to further resources about the documents, and they will also demonstrate the National Archives commitment to supporting Wikimedians' efforts.
3965:
I just wanted to note, Raul, that the "designated as" language in the Macdonald lede and blurb was a deliberate word choice, meant to remind the reader that someone had to make Macdonald prime minister, that is, the governor general, in this case, Lord Monck. "became" might be superior
7635:. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the
6749:
notability of a topic is the criteria for inclusion on the rest of Knowledge, but I think the decision whether or not to put it on the main page involves more than that) That being said, however, that essay isn't particularly useful because it avoids says what that standard should be.
3349:
If you're going to accuse me of something this serious and unethical, then you should be prepared to go through with your threat to seek "consequences" for what you say has taken place. If not, I recommend that you retract your statement, or I will act on it. I'll give you 24 hours.
5023:
is an opportunity for Wikipedians to get their work related to National Archives holdings spotlighted on Archives.gov and the National Archives' tumblr. Each day the National Archives selects a document related to the day's date to showcase. The goal is to get articles related to the
2206:
I previously wasn't one to push for a TFA request for any of the Michigan highway articles because I'm trying to pin down some better designation dates. (M-28 and M-35 date to the system creation, but the initial system highway designations were only assigned on paper.) That said,
2130:
things as you go along. And don't worry if you make a mistake or someone drops a note on your talk page asking that you reconsider a choice you've made - it's bound to happen. Be polite and reasonably accommodating (particularly towards the wishes of the articles' authors) :)
718:
I wouldn't know where to find a longer clip (all my knowledge on the subject comes from reading the article and doing a short Google search). Are any of the main authors of the article still active on Knowledge? Maybe one of them would be able to provide a longer audio clip.
6275:
Yes, I might start a discussion on the FAR talk page, and I realise that the policy would require a consensus to change it. This is User Raul654's talk page. I understand that he is the FAR project leader, and I am initially hoping that he will comment indicating his opinion.
4215:
Can you give me a link or tell me what section it is in? That page is now quite long and I'd like there to be no misunderstandings. I am anxious to make peace with you, Tony, but we both have to give some for that to be possible. I am interested in seeing what you have to
3319:"Featured content". She has damaged herself, FAC, and me by impugning my honesty, and it's not going to stop there, obviously. I now cannot review at FAC without fear that she will act in ways that are influenced by a conflict of interest. It is a most undesirable situation.
3362:
The RFC you wrote is full of accusations that are either false (claiming that it is a misrepresentation of a source to say two is "several") or otherwise invalid (normal editing spun in such as way as to make it seem nefarious). And I'm not the only one who has noticed:
2868:
Have you guys talked to Dabomb87? I had the impression he was doing much of the actual scheduling right now and that he had pledged to keep 3 or 4 days ahead. My favorite excuse (not used yet) "Can you schedule it for after the 27th when the statute of limitation runs
1800:
as featured article for May 28. The date has a special meaning as it marks the Republic Day or Independence Day for the Azerbaijani people. However I do not know the exact procedure on how to get a featured article of the day. Could you please help me on this matter?
2612:
I make it a point to defer to the author's wishes. I hadn't seen Scorpion's comment, but if I had, I would not have scheduled it. Thanks for catching that, Dabomb. And I'm also going to be traveling from the 23rd until the 26th, but I'll schedule them ahead of time.
6776:'s (1) failure to set a record for most blow jobs in a day or (2) dying in surgery her 6 or 8th breast enlargement. Jameson at least has written a book which has sold very well, which makes me think that her appearance should not cause too many headaches.
3239:
Why must there be this one-to-one matching? A blurb has quite a different function from a lead; it's not paragraphed, by convention, for example. And if the choice is clear in time, the article should really be given a once-over, too, don't you think?
3902:
I agree with Justdafax, that on occasion Cla68 is a bully. Regarding the liar accusation, I have witnessed Cla68 lying to ArbCom about me while bullying me. He blatantly lied to ArbCom in an attempt to try to get ArbCom to apply sanctions against me.
442:
As a result of this post, I have looked at the talk page and weighed in there: I don't think Dr. Blofeld showing up to support TTT is surprising, unexpected, or constitutes "a ruckus", and I hope TTT will learn more about sound files before trying to
853:
I looked at the blurb, see your concerns, and reinstated the original blurb. If the blurb is changed again without discussion, I'll request protection. I can't find discussion anywhere of the new blurb, but it does seem to contain undue text.
7422:
We will be holding an edit-a-thon, working together to improve Knowledge content related to DC history, arts, civil rights, or whatever suits your interests. There may also be opportunities to help with scanning historic photos plus some swag!
7295:
Having worked in education for some years I would imagine blocking wikipedia wouldn't prove very popular with teaching staff who are often completely reliant on wikipedia to plan their lessons, so I severely doubt this would ever happen :)
2769:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
1147:
It's clear that there is no guarantee that it will become TFA on a certain date. But I think it has very good chances, or I would not have asked. And in fact I would not have taken it through FAC if it were not a perfect fit for the occasion.
5901:
and I'm dubious if you could meet the ten criteria. If, on the other hand, you are depicting the artist interacting with the crowd between songs, that would probably be OK, although there are a couple of potential mines you could still step
3836:
who in my view is badly in need of strong corrective action by the community. Though it appears his 24-hour ultimatum was an empty threat, should he issue any further threats or actual actions against you for speaking out about the ongoing
5032:
the same day that the National Archives features the document. Alternatively, other appropriate articles related to National Archives holdings not already selected will be used for new documents of the day by NARA staff and posted to their
1121:
delegation, and later a pub.) Now it has been promoted, but I just discovered that there might be a risk it will become TFA before the next suitable date (1 April 2012), with no prior warning. Is there any good process for preventing this?
3752:
and what with the wikihounding and forum shopping we have seen, the goal appears to be to discourage a prolific content creator who is shown more than willing to work with his detractors. Whatever Cirt does, it is never enough for them.
3982:
designated him. Many Americans, for example, won't understand the business of governor-generals. The blurb (and the article opening) would be better to avoid this, since presumably the issue will be explained in the body of the article.
1530:
Yes! Someone out there got the joke :) (I 100% intentionally choose that article as a reference to all of us who, when May 22 rolls around, are still here and weren't raptured away. The article title seemed intimately appropriate).
1718:
But in cases such as this, the binomial is not the common name for anyone except experts in the field, and if there is to be recognition (which is the purpose of naming anything) then at least some of the common names need to be given.
6597:. Cannibal Holocaust didn't cause a peep, and Gropecunt Lane was one of the most viewed FAs ever. If past experience is any guide, it's the banal articles (like Bulbasaur or Grace Sherwood) which always seem to cause the most problems.
1443:. If you have any time this week or next to run through FAC, it would ease the burden on me, considering my online time in the next few weeks is very limited. I've been able to keep up with archiving, but not with promoting. Best,
5379:
when you have a chance? I tried to find one to add in but came up empty handed. It will likely be easier for you to provide it than for me to continue to plumb the depths of newspaper reports and websites trying to find it. Cheers,
2318:
Also, the blurbs themselves have been a bit wonky. The featured list should be the first link in the blurb, that link should be one of the first phrases in the blurb, and the writer should be careful not to introduce any new errors
5124:
4793:
3614:
I concede that this is not a major point, and indeed a silly one to argue about, but I find your bending over backwards to argue that "several" means "two", in support of Cirt and against all major dictionaries, strange and indeed
2165:
Speaking of things like that.. I'm going to be on the road most of June (8th-23rd) so probably not a good idea to schedule any of mine during that period. I won't have sources, I won't be around on a regular schedule, etc. etc...
947:
Cheers Raul - looks just great. I only tweaked the blurb because I got a message on my talk page to say I could. I hadn't finished when the above conversation started, and was just trying to work out what might draw people to the
3714:
Well, I certainly agree about Wiktionary. But I'm uneasy that this is occupying so much time and space, when Cirt himself seems to have accepted that he's been very unwise in the past and has withdrawn from problematic areas.
3466:
Well, I too think your comment was uncalled for. First, while this is really one of the most minor points in the RfC/U, several is defined as "more than two or three, but not many" both in the Oxford English Dictionary and
1416:
What Wehwalt said. Most of the featured articles that appear on the main page were not nominated, but instead selected by me using a pseudorandom process involving tea leaves, chicken entrails, and a cat named Skipper.
4734:
to featured or good status in English and other languages. Prizes for winners will be a gift package from the National Archives including a book of your choice or a tote bag, and other swag, plus, of course, a special
6609:
On a couple of related notes, if we're going to use it at all, I like Andrzejbanas's suggestion that we use it for Halloween. And the suggested picture is terrible. A better one should be located or none used at all.
2773:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
462:
271:
I don't think we have a standard for that. Personally, I wouldn't do it - unlike linking authors or titles in refs (which, IMO, is a good idea) I don't think links to the imprint or publisher are particularly useful.
7897:
Fair enough ill leave the status quo , besides knowing my luck ill probably end up being misunderstood/interpreted and banned again as i have learnt from a simular situation i was in.... 13:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
5643:
772:
The next DC Wikimedia meetup is scheduled for Saturday, May 7, 3:30-5:30 pm at the Tenleytown Library (adjacent to the Tenleytown Metro Station, Red Line), followed by dinner & socializing at some nearby place.
5048:. On Wikisource, editors transcribe, proofread, and arrange documents. This helps to make little-known documents more discoverable, or well-known documents more searchable, and improves accessibility. See the files
3218:
to err on the side the status quo and not make substantive edits until after it's off the main page. And for any edits you make, it's important that the article match the blurb (with the exceptions I noted above).
1981:
1190:
I saw a comment by an editor who wasn't notified before 'his' article became TFA. I have no idea if this is the norm or was a rare exception. Would a hidden comment at the top of the article help in such a case?
628:
4994:) and would like to request an article be written for the team, if Wikipedians deem it notable. It is hoped that making more information about the group available on Knowledge will increase public awareness of
1014:
for May 27th's article of the day. Lindemann was the captain of the German battleship Bismarck and was killed in action 70 years ago on that date. How do I go about nominating the article for that day? Thanks
3542:- I'm not going to fall into the trap of defending every one of Cirt's tens of thousands of edits from the level of pedantic criticism expressed in that RFC. But I do think Gamaliel said it best when he said
3165:
Also, about the allegations of retribution on the FAC, I see from the ANI discussion that Sandy is aware of it. I'm going to trust her judgement to evaluate the validity of that objection. 00:10, 1 July 2011
7486:
today. I responded to the oppose this morning, but the !voter did not have a chance (or take a chance) to respond before it was replaced. This oppose made the difference in replacing Governor of Kentucky or
6402:
1246:
4227:
Also, I am packing up to get ready for several days of archival research. More coins, though I think you slight RHM22 when you say I own the field. RHM22 has, I believe, six or seven FAs on numismatics.--
6000:
The best way to "get the FAR going as soon as possible" is to follow the instructions at FAR, which include posting a note on article talk. The Knowledge will not be damaged by allowing a few more days.
3484:
support from some longstanding and widely respected editors like DGG and SlimVirgin, who would clearly deserve sanction as well then for supporting them. That is absurd, and you have simply made a mistake.
1986:
1942:
1048:
Might it be useful to include the year 2009 in the description of this article? It is in the article title, but I found it a little confusing to have all those dates and no year to anchor them to. Thanks.
6034:
Because nobody dealt with it, so why don't you? There's a damn sight too much of this slapping on a tag and running going on here, but then it's easier than actually doing anything worthwhile I suppose.
5852:
I know you created this redirect in good faith, but it serves no purpose to do anything other than offend Bush. There is no need for a redirect; it is not something that many people will likely look up.
6560:
it again at some more appropriate time in the future? Eg ten year anniversary or something similar. I'm just curious and would like to know now so I don't waste anyone's time should that time come. cya
4000:
is a bad idea, if you do not know the material, nuance can be lost. And by the way, it is governor general in Canada, not governor-general as in Australia, as I gather you consider the natural usage?--
3904:
7091:
2257:
2664:
5119:
7118:. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you.
3740:
on and off Knowledge. It is hard to avoid the impression that the RfC/U is being used to lay the groundwork for an arbitration case and that the ultimate objective is to get rid of Cirt altogether.
2911:
to measure support for a proposal that blurbs for the three featured-content sections on the main page be posted for community input at least 24 hours ahead of the deadline for cascade-protection.
3431:
You claim he misstated the content of a source by using the word "several" to characterize the two recipes from Everything Tastes Better with Bacon that were The Best American Recipes 2003–2004.
3689:
Pardon me if I consider the OED, Webster's, Longman and Collins more authoritative sources than Wiktionary. The links I gave are all the pertinent ones from the first page of a Google search for
3120:
Ok, so I'm going to proceed from FA process first principles here. Wehwalt is right that the rule of thumb is that the blurb and the article text should be identical or close to it, except for:
2250:
1174:
I'm fine with holding off until next April. But my memory is imperfect, so if I should happen to forget your request and accidentally schedule it, please drop a note here so I can unschedule it.
4097:. You are perfectly welcome to discuss changes that are made, at the article talk page or, if concerning the TFA blurb, on user talk pages. Your aggressive behaviour last time was unacceptable.
7769:
38:
article. Please could you remove this from the FAC list as it has not received sufficient support at this time and the reviews are more about style issues than FA criteria. Thank you. Regards,
4848:
1353:, is today's featured article. I am curious about its nomination, but I have been unable to find it anywhere in the request page's history. Do you know of an easier way to locate it? Thanks.
5499:
4970:
The National Archives' Archival Recovery Team (ART) is a team of law enforcement agents and archivists who investigate NARA's lost and stolen documents. They have received media attention (
75:
looks to be getting close to a keep without FARC. However, it's going to be yours to close, as I initiated the review and have remained intimately involved in it. Also, sent you an e-mail.
4480:
in, Washington, D.C., on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to
3259:- is that really the case? I believe the FA criteria explicitly state that the lead should serve a concise summary of an article, such that it can be used in blurb form on the main page.
1136:
for the 125th anniversary in a few months), but there is no guarantee that it will be TFA next April 1. There's a lot of water to flow under the bridge between now and then, you know!--
3534:"First, while this is really one of the most minor points in the RfC/U, several is defined as "more than two or three, but not many" both in the Oxford English Dictionary and Websters"
4396:
3626:
Cla68 and me for bringing that RfC in light of that response is truly bizarre, all the more so as the RfC in part concerns use of of the main page for political advocacy. Regards, --
2275:
run all week, but if it is going well, we will lock down everything that should be protected on Wednesday, and double-check that we haven't missed anything on Thursday and Friday.
1273:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any
6888:
Yes, congrats on ACF - I see you have been doing work on Stanford too! I was planning to get back to that next. Amazing how many articles there still are to be written. Good job!
6446:
5129:
4140:
Raul is the featured article director, confirmed by the community. If you wish to override him, I"m not quite sure how you do it, but certainly community consensus is involved.--
6308:
6107:
Slap and run seems to be the usual. I discovered a cn in Khrushchev apparently from someone who didn't realize that it's OK to cite at the end of a paragraph for its contents.--
4755:, a tour of the building by NARA staff, and then time for a scanathon and editathon in the research rooms and library until the building closes at 5 pm. Keep your schedules open!
7670:
3561:"This wording misled editors (including myself at first) into thinking the term was listed in the dictionary, a 2,000-page tome and standard work in this field, when it was not"
3142:
3032:
2999:
1440:
2292:
All the template that are used when a TFL appears on the main page have indeed been protected. The TFLs themselves become protected automatically through cascading protection.
1269:
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
6454:
3373:"It looks to me like a handful of editors have made a hobby of finding issue with Cirt's behavior, to the point of stretching the truth to fit a predetermined point of view."
7329:
Imagine yourself as an elementary school principal and you saw 5th graders looking at the front page of Knowledge with "The Human Centipede," as the FA. What do you do next?
5149:
7510:
6981:
4632:
with a para-break. Anyway, what is the reason to remove paragraph breaks? Why is blurb different then a lead? Could it be that blurb has been an issue all along? Regards,
4613:
the next day, I didn't revert him (I hadn't noticed the change) and took it to mean that I endorsed the change. Anyway, I'm glad to see it's been resolved, and thanks for
2278:
As someone with quite possibly more relevant main page experience than anyone else, I was wondering if you had any final thoughts before we go ahead with this? Regards, —
7802:
3494:
To claim that Cirt did not misrepresent Partridge is not a view I can support, nor is it supported by editors generally who have worked on that article. The source said,
1519:
631:? I haven't read it thoroughly, but my sense is that there are no outstanding issues. I may not be able to get online today to promote, so if you see anything else at
1670:
I had not seen that before I removed it. I'm not thrilled at the prospect of setting a precedent on this article, but I'll grit my teeth and add two of the names back.
7331:- Maybe I'd realize how futile it is to try to censor the internet from middle schoolers who know there are things on the internet that adults don't want them to see?
1094:
I've wanted to go scuba diving since I was 8 years old, and I finally got the chance on Thursday. It was *AWESOME*. Got moderately sunburned but it was well worth it.
994:
move will hopefully need to be reversed, as other treatments get articles, which will now mean a requested move. Congratulations & I hope all goes smoothly, btw.
7016:
It's over when we say it's over! I just bluelinked a few on the new list. If that's finalized parsing, I can spin through and fix the ones requiring fixes. Pokeback!
6538:, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided!
4078:
Consulting with the principal editor on substantive matters, and making parallel changes to the lede, with no substantive change if consensus cannot be accomplshed.--
3347:
6968:
6478:
5283:
3480:
3367:"But what I see here is an attempt to spin a whole bunch of non-issues and minor complaints into a pattern of nefarious behavior that is not backed by any evidence."
3058:
unexpected principle that a blurb should depart from the lead of the associated article (whereas the blurb serves a quite different purpose to the lead). Thank you.
367:
Hey, Raul. Check me out. I'm the subject of two unrelated threads here back to back, this one and the one below. I don't think that has ever happened. But Kmzundel,
6263:
following the wishes of the community in this matter, and so it is not up to us to unilaterally (or bilaterally in this case) allow one editor to change the rules.
3448:
An example of deliberate coining is the word 'santorum', purported to mean 'a frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex'.
3127:
Birth and death dates - If the year of birth and death are known, they should be given, with the month and day omitted; if either is unknown, both should be omitted
2388:
7257:
5025:
1481:
out of the blurb for the TFA the 22nd. The album has nothing to do with anything, obviously, and it looks abit odd, and has been out of the lead now anyway. Ta.
325:
I'm sure that is NOT what the editor is saying. I suspect he/she is referring to the musicians doing the tribute concerts and/or the other musicians referenced.
4594:
Unless my memory is failing me badly, I don't believe I ever approved a one paragraph blurb. (I've been inactive for a week because of a funeral and then work)
3185:
Where there's stylistic disagreement, I think it's perfectly reasonable to defer to the wishes of the article author(s), at least until it's off the main page.
184:
Looking ahead, I hereby award this barnstar for your choice of TFA on 12 April, following the pattern of the preceding week. Keep up the good work! —
5688:
4421:
for July 30 without asking permission or going through the normal TFA/requests process. Thought it would be worth letting you know about it; the diff is here:
1740:
6173:
Ok fella, you just spun right beyond the sphere of sense with your "bigoted stereotype" and this is why: I edit articles about actual bigots and stereotypes:
6023:(available for a few more days). I feel that some damage to the Knowledge has already been done. Why did a FA have a maintenance template for about one year?
5683:
on September 1. While I always find it rewarding to have my work featured as TFA, I really don't want this article's appearance to hurt my chances of getting
5515:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
3046:
Raul, Tony went to my latest FA C and opposed within minutes of the above. He had not reviewed oneof my noms in a year.That raises a serious conduct issue.--
1262:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
868:
I'm here for a few more hours. (The crazy train gets under way tonight once my fiance flies in and we go into final wedding prep). From looking at the edits,
7686:
6915:
3550:"Misleading edit summaries of the kind Cirt made are regularly cited in arbitrtation decisions, and are explicitly mentioned in the arbitration principles. "
7648:
An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our
5511:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
1258:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
7057:, an editathon, Knowledge meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at
6815:
Scotland and especially Glascow have defused much of the exposive power of the c-word. Americans make allowances for the speech acts of the British Isles.
2545:
2338:
I prefer the templates to be protected, as TFL is not present every day, vandals could still have their way with the templates from tuesdays to saturdays.
1825:
990:
825:
444:
6593:- I find this complaint to be lacking in perspective. We've featured outrageous stuff on the main page before and the sky didn't come crashing down, nor
3290:
The single-para idea is very appropriate. My view is that linking should be sparser in a blurb than in an the corresponding article lead, since the links
7589:
Then you should probably get your facts straight. (A) That the Iraq War was based on lies and deceptions is a proven historical fact. I suggest you read
5466:
in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together!
5100:
4484:. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate!
1293:
Just making sure you know that there's no scheduled TFA for tomorrow, since you scheduled three weeks' worth on 26 April, which run out at midnight UTC.
6091:
I've just caught up with this 30% business-- most of those are dead external links. That happens, and doesn't necessarily mean integrity is affected.
3404:
actual evidence, not opinion. You make a statement as serious as the one you made, you had better be prepared to back it up, which so far you haven't.
2411:
We like to think we take prose, the Manual of Style, and Knowledge's policies such as verification even more seriously than featured article candidates.
5846:
5144:
4124:
Raul can say what he likes, but he needs consensus, and there is none for your aggressive ownership. Looks like there will be another fight coming up.
2782:
2211:'s first section opened to traffic on November 20 2001, so I'm planning on requesting that for the tenth anniversary this year. I know the guys behind
2059:
1652:
7349:, a stat I believe probably holds true in other English speaking countries. This TFA isn't going to convince anyone to unblock us, quite the opposite.
6459:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
5254:
5080:
5020:
3315:
Raul, I note your "trust" in Sandy's judgment. I'm afraid you're being fooled; it appears to be part of a continuing campaign against me for writing
2063:
1941:
The most important thing is to get the archive and footers in place. Using the featured article stuff as a template, I've started it for you here --
1213:
1192:
1149:
1122:
392:
889:
873:
869:
4610:
4422:
3573:"and then perhaps reconsider your rash comment. It was not a fair assessment, nor one I believe actually based on a proper review of the evidence."
2324:
72:
4521:. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!
2082:
1648:
893:
7649:
2320:
1918:, and I'm wondering if you could point me to the key templates that are used for TFA, so I don't have to reinvent the wheel. Thanks in advance.
6954:
6349:
The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond. We encourage everyone to attend!
5873:
2268:
1028:
632:
5988:
article. I would like to get the FAR going as soon as possible. My impression is that User Nikkimaria is not being as helpful as he could be.
4606:
3557:
I've never seen the arbcom or anyone else ever make that claim. What he did was not ideal, but your allegation against him is (still) false.
3488:
2590:
1278:
4659:
has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved.
4050:
Also, Raul, please feel free to run any of the articles of which I am principal author at your discretion. We'll see how it goes, I guess.--
3476:
3428:
summarize the entire contents of an edit - hell, it's optional to begin with. Your allegation that his edit summary was misleading is false.
7590:
6737:
admins/Wikipedia. I also prefer to avoid speculating on hypotheticals beacuse such discussions tend to generate far more heat than light.
4713:
3444:
The 2006 edition of The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English cited santorum as an example of "deliberate coining".
7577:
I don't know you, you don't know me, but with your number of edits, you should know better than to say that the war was "based on lies".
6649:
2800:
2750:
2734:
2594:
6694:
Looks like I've stirred up a bit of trouble; sorry Raul. Kiefer, as far as I know, the only article on the unofficial, informal list is
5687:
as TFA on November 8 (the day of the gubernatorial election in Kentucky). I announced my intent to nominate Governor of Kentucky at the
2945:
originate from? I've noticed in the history that you and Pstudier are really the oldest still active users from when our project began.
7907:
4924:
3424:
2685:
permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
7070:
6489:. You are receiving this message because you have been identified as one of the top five editors of the article based on edit counts.
4254:
I'm sure that Raul would take boredom for the sake of peace between us. I dislike conflict and I think you will find me reasonable.--
371:, where you first posted. Did you forget that you posted there or were you just hoping to find someone who makes less sense than I? --
5658:
I'm unsure it matters too much either way, however I'm concerned about being rushed into this without considering the implications.--
5049:
4718:
3802:
Well, I'm not surprised at this; like I said above, I always thought the RfC/U was a pretext to fit Cirt up for an arbitration case.
2766:
2755:
5985:
5947:
Are there large numbers of eligible articles in those subjects available, or is Raul doing the best he can with materials to hand?--
5376:
7597:
for starters; (B) Although perfectly factual, in the related article edits, I did not use the word lie, I quoted verbatim from the
4609:
with no paragraph break. TCO's notion of the "director's approval" of the paragraph break probably refers to the fact that when he
3487:
Misleading edit summaries of the kind Cirt made are regularly cited in arbitrtation decisions, and are explicitly mentioned in the
3260:
755:
Sorry, I didn't see this until today. No, I don't really consider it much of a problem to feature it close to the movie's release.
52:
If you wouldn't mind, please could you reject this FAC. The article needs some rework based on a recent paper. Thank you. Regards,
6422:
5627:
3583:
from RA regarding Cla from 2008) So thank you for your invitation to retract my comment, but I will let it stand precisely as is.
3015:
around, are quite welcome to edit the blurb too. I suggest you take lessons in English, Wehwalt, before you tell me how to write.
1763:
6933:
6745:
6663:
6639:
6342:
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see
4559:
Do you agree that an FA with plagiarism in it should be stripped of FA immediately? There're some concerns over that in the FAR.
3267:) The single-paragraph thing is a stylistic choice on my part. It's not meant to convey a functional difference between the two.
1746:
Hi Raul, I'd just like to say it is a great choice for tomorrow's featured article. I'm guessing it is being featured because of
298:). That said, having my hard work so casually dismissed is very discouraging. Would really appreciate you taking a look at the
153:
7254:
alligator on that date, you might want to put it on November 2, the date of landfall in Nova Scotia of the storm (blurb) below.
6764:
Thanks very much for your personal reply. I agree with almost all of your comments, apart from the previously mentioned Jameson/
4839:
1611:
Whoops - I didn't mean to make that edit. I think I accidentally reverted you while looking at my watchlist. Sorry, my mistake.
7347:
6482:
5842:
4538:
4351:
3817:
2958:
1542:
I just posted something about this on my Facebook status, then came here to ask if it was deliberate. Epic. Kudos to you, sir.
7419:
Knowledge Loves Libraries comes to DC on Saturday, November 5th, from 1-5pm, at the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial Library.
3841:
of Cirt, I for one would appreciate a notice on my talkpage, since my watchlist is busy and I sometimes miss things. Thanks!
7881:
Not an easy answer. It really depends on why he discontinued the old account, and what he is doing with the new account. See
4655:
4830:
1439:
to be all alone at FAC. I've entered a commentary on the Philip Baird Shearer RFC, so would appreciate if you could handle
6923:
6573:
6553:
5819:
isn't a featured article, so unless you are going to make it one in a real hurry, it's not an option for this year. As for
5139:
4564:
2838:
568:. Sandy of all people knows that notable rendition is a totally made-up standard that is not relevant to any discussion.--
549:
7820:
Hi this may seem pretty out of the blue but ive been checking/verifying missing wikipedians and i noticed you posted this
4983:
4747:
event at the National Archives II facility in College Park, MD. There will be a regular social meetup, a discussion with
2994:
I am becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the broad range of changes that Tony1 is introducing into blurbs, including
7928:
7653:
7062:
6964:
6521:
5452:
5052:. If you are new to Wikisource and would like to participate, there are experienced Wikisourcerors willing to be mentors.
7885:
for legitimate uses of a second account. But be careful about making allegations as sometimes these can be construed as
6150:
article's deficiencies, and at least be willing to assist in resolving the problems prompting the tags and templates. --
1707:
The article title is supposed to be the common name, and alternate names should not be necessary - hence, they are cut.
4974:
2264:
1915:
1050:
851:
578:
475:
421:
289:
Raul, sorry to bother you, but you are my only "friend" here who I can ask. Yesterday I did a good bit of work on the
6406:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
5611:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
5503:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1596:
1560:
Brilliant indeed - I posted the article on Facebook too. David Gerard posted something similar on NewsTechnica called
1250:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
7513:)? Nikki and I are both involved, but I think that it's ready to close, unless you see something we don't... Thanks!
7325:
Count me in with Coolhug's comment above - I find your assertion that they will block Knowledge to be highly dubious.
7227:
6486:
4455:
3576:
2790:
222:
I noticed it, it just seemed silly to bring it up. But then I'm always reading the monthly lists for "similarity".--
197:
6713:.... (I do share Lenny Bruce's confusion about why Jenna Jameson would be banned but The Human Centipede welcomed.)
4980:
3580:
3552:- saying his edit summary is misleading does not make it so. The arbitration principles refer to summaries that are
2891:
There must be a serious staffing/time issue: the blurbs for tomorrow onwards, for the rest of the month, are blank.
5753:
Raul, I've scheduled TFAs through September 10, and I'll leave it up to you to decide what goes up for 9/11. Best,
4943:
2712:
2508:
2285:
1877:
1839:
Doh. I checked to see if it was an FA, but I didn't check if it had appeared on the main page. I'll revert myself.
600:
582:
479:
425:
5713:
is perenially underused, with the three points, that article should have no problem staying on the requests page.
2637:
515:
408:
388:
7450:
6368:
5736:
that modern folks would know or care about. Thanks for noticing the article and considering it main-page worthy.
4355:
2908:
796:
3546:
You are dredging up common editing behavior and trying to spin it to make it look like Cirt was up to no good.
3536:- the fact that any dictionaries support Cirt's edit means that your allegations of mis-summarizing are false.
3471:. And by focusing on this point, a minor detail in the RfC/U, you are ignoring the substantial evidence of what
499:
368:
7801:
FYI: Per discussion at Knowledge:Main Page/Errors, I've written a new TFA summary for the Battle of Tippecanoe
7784:
7377:
6650:
referred to your having made a list of "banned articles", which you would block from appearing on the main page
6532:
5644:
Knowledge talk:Today's featured article/requests#Question: What is the reasoning behind the five article limit?
4971:
3945:
3892:
3852:
3763:
3705:
3667:
3658:
3638:
3516:
6411:
5616:
5516:
5282:
Hi Raul, given your experience of running sensitive subjects as TFA, you may have a view on the discussion at
4614:
3978:
I see your point, but the word is clunky and unexplained at the opening. Passive voice raises the question of
2880:
Note that Dabomb87 is away for a few more days. Don't expect anything from him until 28 June at the earliest.
1263:
700:
Oh man, those things (the speaker symbols) are tiny. I would never have noticed if I weren't looking for them.
6670:
A response to 1-2 of these would be quite informative, and a response to all 3 would be more than I expect.
2577:
Mark, I'm going to be away during June 21–28. Hopefully there should be no problems, but let me if there is.
7848:
Although that account was last active 11 May 2007, do you know any other user accounts he might of been on?
4915:
4866:
7715:
7631:. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Knowledge may not meet the criteria required by
7353:
because I won't fund practical jokes on casual visitors, but wish you luck with the project in the future.
6827:
6795:
6725:
6685:
6450:
4730:
4526:
4513:
1406:
1368:
125:
7226:
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see
7206:
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
4343:
4299:
4277:
3269:
And if the choice is clear in time, the article should really be given a once-over, too, don't you think?
2822:
2072:
Ah, that's Dabomb and not you; he may be unaware of the previous discussions. I'll ping him. –
786:
and see a list of additional tentatively planned meetups & activities for late May & June on the
7231:
5302:
4195:
No, but its reputation is at stake. Please see my suggestion for a happy medium, at a similar thread at
3446:
As your own "evidence" (I use the term loosely) shows, the entry is entirely supportive of his summary:
678:
A spoken sample would be fantastic - better than a picture - and definitely suitable for the main page.
559:
7632:
7151:
6208:
6062:
6039:
4724:
4576:
4575:
It's interesting that you removed the paragraph break in TFA. When I did the same several hours ago, I
4347:
3385:"First, I find that the attacks on Cirt have been much worse than anything I can see assembled above. "
2942:
2885:
2518:
2495:
2469:
1589:
624:
5981:
5705:
Acdixon, I was the one who scheduled Beckham. Don't worry too much; I have no problem with scheduling
3653:. Isn't that weird, that you would only manage to turn up defs that happened to support your opinion?
3265:
The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of its most important aspects.
7779:
7601:
which said that "But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of going to war.
7373:
6046:
want to spend a lot of time on this article, because I am happier editing other sorts of Wiki pages.
5173:
3663:
3654:
2759:
2689:
1864:
as 29 May Today's Featured article because there is a tournament final on the previous day (28 May).
1515:
949:
541:
6624:
Hey, thanks for this detailed response. I might see what I can do about that Halloween idea.... cya
3295:
more expansive. When the reader clicks on ...more, I believe they go back to the top of the article.
7909:(support ban), but it is one subsection off and I think was supposed to be up a section. Best, Rob
7729:(0 to 4). You have been credited with the original idea, so i thought you might be interested. -
7316:
7268:
6919:
5607:
5177:
5161:
4977:
4888:
4477:
4428:
4400:
2085:, not the pigeon photography article. Yea, he's probably not aware that that's an April 1 special.
1961:
7627:
7594:
7123:
6528:
6508:
6343:
5637:
5090:
4989:
4857:
4473:
4418:
3619:
1270:
1020:
164:
146:
139:
117:
6808:
strikes me as more likely to generate controversy, which it did to a remarkably small extent. —
6698:. It's been this way for years, and there's absolutely no need to raise a huge ruckus about it.
3622:
that Cirt should be stripped of OTRS access and, ideally autopatrolled status. That you want to
3608:
526:
shows almost all renditions in articles are not described as notable versions in the text. See "
7639:
7434:
7404:
7209:
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
6296:
6281:
6227:
6167:
6143:
6099:
6085:
6051:
6028:
6009:
5993:
5918:
5885:
5828:
5463:
5439:
5361:
5353:
5328:
4965:
4812:
4744:
4489:
4464:
3911:
3436:
3087:
2953:
2949:
2812:
2484:
2459:
2421:
2208:
1861:
1755:
1451:
1054:
862:
782:
657:
I may be mistaken and am certainly not an expert on the subject, but my impression is that the
643:
574:
471:
455:
417:
7202:
in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
4579:
that this was intentional. I mean, it did seem to persist for awhile without you noticing. --
2662:
or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape (
2491:
prepping one article a week is rather an easier challenge than dealing with tens of articles.
7809:
7693:
7677:
7660:
7582:
7541:
7518:
7147:
7051:
7040:
7028:
6989:
6818:
6786:
6716:
6676:
6587:
different ballpark than previous films that we've run, like Cannibal Holocaust and Halloween.
6268:
6073:
6059:
6036:
5650:
5398:
5290:
5165:
4439:
3832:
Raul, on further consideration I'd like to commend you for showing Cla68 for what he is... a
3105:
3097:
2881:
2786:
2552:
2515:
2492:
2466:
1884:
1824:
Hi Raul, I saw you have put this at TFA for May 28, don't know whether you were aware it was
1561:
1331:
1302:
916:
841:
302:
article and letting me know if you think the revert was justified. Thank you for your time!
193:
92:
80:
7482:
on November 8. It had 11 supports and 1 oppose on the request page before being replaced by
6594:
4906:
4879:
619:
Raul, I'm recused from Lecen's FAC nominations because we've interacted at the talk page of
7774:
7722:
7489:
7483:
7475:
7358:
7288:
7099:
7021:
6960:
6911:
6893:
6432:
5706:
5684:
5532:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a
5134:
4367:
2778:
2645:
2505:
2282:
2227:
2212:
2066:
1966:
1311:
I know. I've scheduled tomorrow's article already. I'll put more in the queue a bit later.
1216:
1195:
1152:
1125:
2597:
and the general consensus was to save Bart for a more "special" date, I switched him out.
395:. I am quite new to adding music .ogg files to articles. There is currently a ruckus at "
349:
deletion seemed harsh when so much worse writing is often accepted and/or tagged instead.
8:
7865:
7841:
7606:
7598:
7570:
7565:
timeline article needs one, for reasons I've explained at great length on the talk page.
7530:
7389:
7336:
7313:
7263:
7250:
has prepared a blurb that was originally meant for November 1, but since you've put that
7163:
6941:
6754:
6615:
6383:
6016:
5770:
5406:
4599:
4530:
on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.
4424:
4414:
4359:
4094:
4012:
3825:
3807:
3745:
3612:
3588:
3459:
3397:
3276:
3223:
3190:
3158:
3151:
a means of transportation and freight conveyance which helped unite Canada as one nation.
2971:
2618:
2565:
2434:
2332:
2135:
2101:
2090:
2052:
1997:
1950:
1844:
1818:
1771:
1724:
1712:
1701:
1675:
1616:
1581:
1536:
1496:
1463:
1422:
1316:
1179:
1099:
1077:
964:
929:
901:
881:
787:
760:
748:
712:
683:
608:
277:
212:
104:
5691:
as soon as it was eligible to go there. Right now, it should get 3 points, according to
3136:
Length - if the lead is longer than the blurb should be, it has to be selectively edited
1892:
7911:
7772:
from nearly 2000 entries to a little over 70 entries. Thanks for all your hard work! --
7734:
7247:
7119:
6858:
6259:
6258:(undent) @Snowman - If that is how you feel, then you should start a discussion at the
6120:
5758:
5729:
5718:
5352:
is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving
5185:
5181:
4803:
4622:
4617:, because TBH I wasn't quite sure why we always stuck to one paragraph either. Cheers,
4518:
4196:
3940:
3887:
3847:
3758:
3700:
3633:
3511:
2982:
2722:
2602:
2582:
2445:
2171:
2123:
2112:
2096:
All fixed. I figured little things like this would crop up as Dabomb gets up to speed.
2033:
1971:
1869:
1797:
1687:
1661:
1227:
1187:
1117:
1016:
724:
694:
671:
354:
330:
307:
160:
6311:, is holding its Annual Membership Meeting at 1pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011 at the
3934:
My question: how much more of this will the rank-and-file community and admins allow?
1031:, make sure that you read all of the instructions before delving in. Hope this helps,
819:
689:
There appear to be several audio clips in the article. Would one of those be usable?
7857:
7506:
7458:
7005:
6543:
6494:
6277:
6223:
6186:
6182:
6163:
6136:
6112:
6092:
6081:
6047:
6024:
6002:
5989:
5952:
5914:
5907:
5881:
5824:
5782:
5663:
5582:
5569:
5471:
5397:
The source is Cal Thomas himself, via Behind the Breaks, via Lawrence O'Donnell. See
5357:
4821:
4664:
4485:
4326:
4259:
4232:
4221:
4189:
4145:
4118:
4083:
4055:
4037:
4005:
3971:
3923:
3907:
3179:
3079:
3051:
3040:
3007:
2995:
2946:
2874:
2818:
2501:
It's a fair point. Although I've yet to come across a week with tens of days in it. —
2477:
2452:
2414:
2391:
about the FL slot on the main page? I've also asked the other guys to do so. Thanks.
2350:
2304:
2199:
2191:
2016:
1976:
1930:
1900:
1806:
1782:
1751:
1444:
1385:
1206:
1163:
1141:
1133:
999:
978:
855:
658:
636:
586:
569:
483:
466:
448:
429:
412:
342:
319:
227:
5543:
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
4313:
337:
appropriate for you to seek advice from Raul or anyone else who cares to chime in.--
7874:
7849:
7825:
7821:
7806:
7578:
7537:
7514:
7301:
7079:
6985:
6984:. Nikki and I have both been significantly involved in it, so can't close. Thanks!
6629:
6565:
6264:
6069:
5816:
5797:
5789:
5647:
5508:
5287:
5277:
5169:
4581:
4436:
3918:
3784:
3610:
3599:
support Cirt's edit, as they are in universal agreement that several is defined as
3101:
3093:
2549:
2218:
are looking at at the anniversary of the sinking (November 10) for a possible TFA.
2047:
I'm not sure what you're talking about -- it's not scheduled as far as I can tell.
1881:
1644:
1627:
1604:
1569:
1471:
1399:
1361:
1349:
1323:
1294:
1255:
908:
833:
461:
If you want to bring up stuff irrelevant to the issue, it seems that I had already
185:
88:
76:
57:
43:
7749:
5230:
on Commons and add them to articles on Knowledge or transcribe them on Wikisource.
7354:
7284:
7095:
7017:
6889:
6836:
6809:
6460:
6426:
6216:
6194:
6155:
6128:
6020:
5858:
5631:
5565:
5535:
5423:
5391:
5312:
5157:
5104:
5094:
5084:
4633:
4363:
4330:
4312:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
4246:
4207:
4172:
4132:
4105:
4070:
4023:
3991:
3927:
3870:
3838:
3833:
3792:
3723:
3681:
3618:
In response to the problems highlighted in the RfC, over a dozen editors to date
3604:
3454:
If you are still waiting for an apology, I hope you are not holding your breath.
3409:
3355:
3327:
3306:
3248:
3205:
3066:
3023:
2919:
2899:
2860:
2849:
2502:
2429:
The questionable statement pointed out by Sandy not withstanding, it looks good.
2399:
2366:
2327:, for example, should be rewritten so the link is at the beginning of the blurb.
2279:
2221:
2073:
2038:
1833:
1503:
1482:
1282:
1088:
1066:
1036:
1011:
564:
554:
532:
507:
376:
295:
87:
A ping on this, since it seems to be maturing. Your decision, though, obviously.
35:
7882:
7833:
7708:
7308:
7058:
7000:
Just read your laws, and love them. Raul's Razor is especially great. Thanks! -
6805:
6535:
6474:
6021:
web cast at about 6.15 to 6.30 am - 15 to 30 mins from the start of the program
5965:
5939:
5898:
5724:
If you still don't want Beckham to run though, I don't mind switching him out.
5710:
5676:
5512:
5487:
5341:
5041:
4986:
4752:
4685:
4646:
4629:
4524:
There also is a Knowledge & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist
3803:
3741:
2062:. I wasn't notified, either. I only noticed because the article was protected.
1720:
1697:
1637:
1550:
1259:
744:
704:
590:
545:
522:
that I can find. It seems to be made up for convenience. A quick run through
487:
433:
404:
400:
260:
7652:
or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
7143:
5638:
Proposal to increase the maximum number of nominations at WP:TFAR from 5 to 10
5480:
4992:
3647:
This is indeed an utter waste of time on your part. Unaccountably, you missed
2707:
2632:
2118:
While I'm here, are there any other unusual situations I need to be aware of?
1347:
Hello. I was alerted yesterday to the fact that the article that I worked on,
629:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Princess Maria Amélia of Brazil/archive1
7886:
7730:
7479:
7311:
featured on Knowledge's main page, some schools blocked access to Knowledge.
7198:
6699:
6695:
6583:
5754:
5725:
5714:
5680:
5529:
5029:
4995:
4618:
4336:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
3935:
3882:
3842:
3753:
3695:
3628:
3506:
2978:
2941:
I'm just curious as the currently oldest still active participant, where did
2718:
2598:
2578:
2441:
2167:
2119:
2108:
1865:
1683:
1657:
1543:
1514:
I was hoping this talk section had some humor about the correlation with the
1112:
811:
720:
690:
667:
662:
396:
350:
326:
303:
5197:
4933:
4184:
I do not think you would be able to get FAC closed down. Have a nice day.--
3731:
This is one of the aspects of the RfC/U that I find most puzzling. Cirt has
2260:, so that users can see what the page will look like when lists are there.
387:
Raul, I have been informed that I have cast aspersions in your direction at
247:
I searched, and can't find a good definitive answer - therefore, here I am!
7890:
7861:
7837:
7602:
7566:
7557:
7526:
7494:
7454:
7385:
7332:
7159:
7001:
6937:
6750:
6611:
6539:
6490:
6407:
6372:
6108:
5948:
5903:
5778:
5766:
5738:
5697:
5692:
5659:
5612:
5578:
5504:
5467:
5402:
4748:
4660:
4595:
4542:
4481:
4382:
4255:
4228:
4217:
4185:
4141:
4114:
4079:
4051:
4033:
4001:
3967:
3821:
3606:
3584:
3567:"I hope that you might familiarise yourself with the evidence in the RfC/U"
3455:
3393:
3272:
3219:
3186:
3175:
3154:
3075:
3047:
3036:
3003:
2967:
2870:
2675:
2614:
2561:
2430:
2341:
2328:
2295:
2195:
2131:
2097:
2086:
2048:
2007:
1993:
1946:
1921:
1896:
1840:
1814:
1802:
1778:
1767:
1708:
1671:
1612:
1577:
1532:
1492:
1459:
1418:
1381:
1312:
1251:
1202:
1175:
1159:
1137:
1095:
1073:
995:
974:
960:
925:
897:
877:
800:
756:
708:
679:
604:
527:
523:
519:
338:
315:
273:
223:
208:
100:
17:
3442:
You claim that Cirt misstated the contents of a source when he wrote that
1914:
Hi Raul. I'm currently volunteering to build the backend for the proposed
876:
was fine. I'm going to fix it by taking the best parts of both revisions.
795:
Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at
7297:
7215:
7075:
6625:
6561:
6288:
6203:
6190:
6178:
5793:
4763:
3736:
partisan sniping. I read somewhere that JN466 has been pursuing this for
1623:
1600:
1392:
1354:
1132:
You can certainly ask Raul to hold the article (I have asked him to hold
620:
537:
445:"learn how to do a FS to keep up my main page been there done that thing"
299:
290:
53:
39:
7158:
It's reproduced in Goodrich (1933, plate 59). He should be facing left.
7146:
One of the images is reversed, and I think it is the color one. Thanks.
6019:(national radio in the UK) this morning and it got some criticisms; see
5709:
in November after slotting in Beckham for September 1. Considering that
5284:
Knowledge talk:Today's featured list#Semi-protection of hepatitis C list
3439:
Your allegation that cirt mistated the contents of that source is false.
2560:
Oh yes, by all means. I didn't realize it was still labeled as a trial.
1777:
I must agree, excellent decision Raul. I very much enjoyed the article.
7115:
7107:
6907:
i would like you to chnge my username from shivangikohli1 to maddy123
6527:
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special
6212:
6151:
6124:
5893:
5854:
5792:(this year) are on the same day too. dont have to pander to stereotypes
5413:
5381:
5305:
5201:
5120:
Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii
5045:
4295:
4281:
4239:
4200:
4165:
4125:
4098:
4063:
4016:
3984:
3866:
3788:
3716:
3674:
3405:
3351:
3320:
3299:
3241:
3198:
3059:
3016:
2912:
2892:
2842:
2392:
2362:
1829:
1084:
1062:
1032:
503:
372:
6875:
5927:
5297:
4780:
4504:
4447:
4238:
I'm sure Raul is bored of this: I've left the link on your talk page.
4093:
the owner of the article. Please read the text the edit box, and note
2695:
Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so
1587:
175:
7462:
7114:
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move
6773:
6440:
6376:
5961:
5935:
4546:
2859:
likely to prompt a lot of questions only I can answer"…) –
2671:
1747:
804:
253:
6384:
Orphaned non-free image File:University of Delaware coat of arms.svg
6353:
2828:@ 20:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC) (changed on 20:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC))
1880:(to save Raul having to look for which final you're talking about).
1380:
contributors and/or FA nominators after Raul puts it in the queue.--
1228:
Orphaned non-free image File:University of Delaware coat of arms.svg
824:
611:) 05:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC) (And Moni, it saddens me to hear that)
5588:
3926:
all of which, as I see it, is in the service ongoing violations of
3472:
2966:
I'm sorry, but I honestly don't know. I've only edited there once.
1565:
314:
Is the editor saying Roy Orbison isn't notable (raises eyebrows)?--
6601:
It's a commercial product and we'd be giving them free advertising
6312:
5646:- as the page is for your benefit primarily, you may have a view.
3100:) 14:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Never mind - all settled. Cheers, --
2807:
You were "informed" twice of the AfD discussion? Ouch. I'm sorry.
6932:
It looks like that account name is already taken. You'll have to
6174:
5841:
3865:
post this response to your talkpage to make sure you receive it.
2696:
2682:
2194:
is going to be nominated for October 28, its 125th anniversary.--
156:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
5278:
Pre-emptive semi-protection of a featured list on the main page?
5253:
To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your name from
4897:
2544:
The non-specific date nomination slot has now been in place for
737:
7396:
7221:
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
6854:
6576:
to using the article on the main page and my response to them:
6318:
5550:
the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click
4644:
4537:
You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list
3649:
Consisting of a number more than one but not very many; diverse
2240:
1441:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Guy Fawkes Night/archive1
7412:
7179:
3197:
the article author"? I don't agree unless they're reasonable.
1549:
Absolutely brilliant! I just fell off my chair with laughter!
1433:
1342:
6468:
6335:
report on the activities and accomplishments of the past year
5820:
5564:
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off
5130:
Resolutions of the Joint Committee on the Washington Monument
4673:
4669:
4307:
unreferenced product article with no indication of notability
3530:- Funny enough, I feel exactly the same way about your RFC.
3147:
he is surpassed in tenure only by William Lyon Mackenzie King
6982:
Knowledge:Featured article review/League of Nations/archive2
5913:
Oh, fair enough, didn't realise that, I'll leave it then --
4716:
was announced. We are aiming to improve the articles on the
3437:
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/several_1
3419:
you want some outright falsities in your RFC, here you go:
810:
241:
In citation templates, should the publisher name be linked?
6481:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
5892:
Hi, hope you don't mind if a talk page stalker weighs in.
5481:
Orphaned non-free image File:Foundation and earth cover.jpg
4959:
This section includes special requests from the NARA staff:
3479:; as well as views on systematic NPOV violations expressed
1005:
7613:
7035:
6957:. I found it irrelevant and not suitable for Knowledge .
6638:
1113:
Preventing an article from becoming TFA on the wrong date?
1072:
Thanks for minding the shop while I'm away, Woody :)
907:
Thanks Sandy and well done Raul. Oh, and congratualtions!
599:
There seem to be a lot of different things at issue here.
518:) Notable version is not a standard relevant to any other
7144:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:The_Translator_G364.jpg
7105:
6329:
election of the Board of Directors for the next two years
6304:
5540:
template, along with your question, beneath this message.
2831:
2798:
2627:
2387:
Hi Raul, long-time-no-speak! Could you please check over
2263:
The meat and bones of the process itself can be found at
707:, but I would prefer something a bit longer in duration.
403:. If this is the case, the FA process is not working for
207:- I was wondering when someone would notice that :)
7449:
You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list
7346:
1 out of 6 schools in Australia already block Knowledge
7307:
Abe, please provide a citation demonstrating that after
6741:
is subject and open to debate, but that's how I see it.
6367:
You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list
5765:
Great. I think I'm going to go with one of the flights.
3433:
some; an amount that is not exact but is fewer than many
2253:: this contains the source code that we intend to use.
2249:
An exact working model of the main page can be found at
767:
6772:
Previously I (and others) had opposed a DYK mentioning
6552:
5150:
Alexander Hamilton's commission to take rank as Colonel
4354:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
3477:
Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Cirt#Outside_view_by_DGG
3124:
Title issues - the title does not fit the lead sentence
3031:
I made two edits in four minutes, the combined diff is
2748:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2732:
2539:
2379:
1739:
7027:
6847:
6500:
6421:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
6289:
You're invited! Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting
5670:
5626:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
5464:
Knowledge meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon
4319:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1277:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
896:
about this discussion so everyone's on the same page.
7511:
WP:Featured article review/League of Nations/archive2
6953:
please look into this article for speedy deletion ..
5431:
3651:
3603:
than two or three. These are from the top of Google:
3450:
Your claim that he misummarized this source is false.
603:
where I tried to summarize them and give my opinion.
4011:
No, you are breaking a basic policy of the site: no
2754:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
1061:
I've added that in now, it seemed reasonable to me.
6980:Hi Raul - We're going to need your help in closing
5928:
Watch out for systemic bias in the featured article
5298:
Proposal for changing the text at the bottom of TFA
5101:
Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom
5067:
A list of some recent contributions to the project:
4448:
Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass
3475:described as "outrageously promotional" editing at
6441:File:Mordechai Vanunu head.jpg listed for deletion
6338:social gathering afterwards at a nearby restaurant
6332:approval of a budget for the 2011-2012 fiscal year
5675:I just received a note on my talk page today that
5375:Hi Raul - could you please pop in your source for
4276:
4062:And I'll be along to copy-edit the blurb, thanks.
3257:A blurb has quite a different function from a lead
2907:After reading these comments, I've started an RfC
2256:Edoktor has created an "always Monday" version at
2004:Thank you so much! That will get me along nicely.
1322:I never doubted you. I was just checking. ;)
502:. Still no, but this and the thread above. QED. --
393:Knowledge:Featured sound candidates/Amazing Grace
5975:
5874:Knowledge:Creation and usage of media files#Video
5081:District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act
3816:Cla - I have responded to your RFAR comment with
1826:Knowledge:Today's featured article/August 6, 2006
826:Knowledge:Today's featured article/April 29, 2011
7768:for helping reduce the number of entries in the
7129:
5872:Sorry for troubling you - I found you listed at
5589:Orphaned non-free image File:Good life cover.jpg
2548:- is it now time to say that the trial is over?
2361:find a suitable page to place it on. Regards, --
2081:Ah, I needed to purge the archive. I was seeing
625:Neither Karanacs nor Laser brain has been online
6659:refer to the principles guiding such a list, or
5788:Why does it have to be USA limited. Chile abnd
5145:Susan B. Anthony petition for remission of fine
4339:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
4322:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
1653:Knowledge:Today's featured article/May 23, 2011
627:for several days; would you be able to look at
7405:Knowledge Loves Libraries DC & edit-a-thon
6417:Note that any non-free images not used in any
6222:I feel that their is no need for me to reply.
5622:Note that any non-free images not used in any
5286:, regarding the next scheduled TFL. Regards,
2688:If you can, share what you're bringing at the
2644:This message is being sent to inform you of a
2636:You could be having this much fun! Seriously,
1083:No problem, I hope you're enjoying the break!
1043:
7906:Hi Raul, I didn't want to move your post here
7740:
7461:) 19:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC), on behalf of
7426:You're invited and we hope to see you there!
6058:order if it's not satisfactorily dealt with.
4517:on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the
4498:
4409:
3932:and now anyone who dares to speak up for him.
738:Shakespeare authorship and the upcoming movie
516:Talk:Amazing_Grace#US_Air_Force_sound_samples
409:Talk:Amazing_Grace#US_Air_Force_sound_samples
389:Talk:Amazing_Grace#US_Air_Force_sound_samples
7591:Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations
7397:You're invited! Knowledge Loves Libraries DC
7372:...for your comment at ANI. I appreciate it
6403:File:University of Delaware coat of arms.svg
6297:DC Meetup 23 & Annual Membership Meeting
4567:and a clue-bat • 23:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
3922:are treated to what appears to be a show of
3528:"I too think your comment was uncalled for."
2241:Today's featured list looks just about ready
1982:Knowledge:Today's featured list/May 30, 2011
1247:File:University of Delaware coat of arms.svg
661:was not traditionally written, and that the
7796:
6352:You may join the chapter at the meeting or
4476:is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the
4164:time today, so don't expect anything more.
4113:I am simply repeating what Raul told you.--
2977:Don't remember but I didn't originate it.
2269:Knowledge:Today's featured list/submissions
1434:Congratulations, recusal, and plea for help
1343:Question regarding Today's Featured Article
1029:Knowledge:Today's featured article/requests
973:Congrats from here as well! Best wishes.--
236:
6469:Featured article review for Yom Kippur War
5877:will be very gratefully received :-)
4570:
2705:To subscribe to future events, follow the
382:
145:Hello, Raul654. You have new messages at
7901:
7747:
7170:
7068:All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and
4996:the documents they are seeking to recover
4680:
2767:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Bought in
2451:I'm still curious what it means :)
2440:The offending sentence has been removed.
2258:Knowledge:Main Page/sandbox/TFL (visible)
1957:Here is a full list of pages I created:
73:WP:Featured article review/Japan/archive1
7034:
6866:
5823:, isn't that a country, not an event? --
5044:has a sister WikiProject on Wikisource,
4656:WikiProject National Archives newsletter
4456:Archives of American Art Backstage Pass!
4302: because of the following concern:
3261:Knowledge:Manual of Style (lead section)
3145:, I think two of your changes (excising
2998:. They go well beyond mere corrections
2631:
2060:WP:Today's featured article/June 6, 2011
1987:Knowledge:Today's featured list/May 2011
1943:Knowledge:Today's featured list/May 2011
1006:Featured Article of the day for May 27th
174:
7764:I award this Working Man's Barnstar to
7614:Non-free use of File:Xenocide cover.jpg
7469:
6746:Knowledge:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page
6664:Knowledge:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page
6640:Knowledge:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page
5303:Talk:Main_Page#Adding_the_FA.2FGA_count
4511:You are invited to the first Knowledge
4325:notice, but please explain why in your
3392:I will not be retracting my statement.
2817:If you reply here, please leave me a {{
2593:here, but since the primary author was
1622:No biggie, I've done that too. Cheers,
14:
7737: :) 16:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7505:Hi Raul - Can I ping you to close the
7085:
6902:
6835:We do? That's news to me! ;) —
6595:did Nazis once again ride on dinosaurs
6313:Tenley-Friendship Neighborhood Library
5986:History of the Encyclopædia Britannica
5557:To opt out of these bot messages, add
5250:
5211:
4760:
4628:I think TCO point was that it went it
4373:
2989:
2832:Tight scheduling for TFA chosen blurbs
2628:You're invited to the New York Wiknic!
2251:Knowledge:Main Page/sandbox/TFL (live)
1909:
1491:Someone beat me to it, but it's done.
1458:Sure - I'll look it over later today.
989:Raul, While I realize that moves like
6445:A file that you uploaded or altered,
5933:on June 15. That's a fair while ago.
5320:
4714:multilingual featured article contest
3130:Alternative names - should be omitted
2650:that is being held in your area next
2027:
1643:Hi Raul, did you catch the report at
768:DC Meetup: May 7 @ Tenleytown Library
7497: 16:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
7065:events being held across the USA.
6554:The Human Centipede (First Sequence)
2572:
1741:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
649:
550:On the Banks of the Wabash, Far Away
6848:Interview with Wikimedia Foundation
6702: 16:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6501:DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8
5748:
5671:J.C.W. Beckham main page appearance
5500:File:Foundation and earth cover.jpg
5412:Great, I'll add that in. Thanks! --
2756:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
2514:So have I. Have you been drinking?
1595:Hi, can you tell me the reason for
1470:
821:. Your thoughts much appreciated.
635:and have time ... :) :)
23:
7617:
7411:
7178:
6948:
6389:
6317:
5594:
5507:. However, the image is currently
5486:
5432:DC-area Meetup, Saturday, August 6
5340:
4503:
4463:
4314:deleted for any of several reasons
4286:
3960:
1254:. However, the image is currently
1233:
465:before the example you point to.--
138:
26:
24:
7943:
7493:. Thanks for your consideration.
6783:Sincerely and with best regards,
6497:) 14:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
6437:) 07:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
6271:) 23:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
6219:) 21:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
6207:consistently place a template at
6170:) 19:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
6158:) 16:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6146:) 15:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6131:) 13:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6115:) 13:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6088:) 13:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6076:) 11:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
6054:) 22:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
6031:) 21:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
6012:) 21:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
5996:) 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
5968:) 07:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
5955:) 20:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
5942:) 06:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
5910:) 12:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
5888:) 07:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
5140:A Petition For Universal Suffrage
2765:The article will be discussed at
2465:It means that someone fucked up.
1636:
7748:
7174:
6874:
6520:
6509:National Archives Backstage Pass
6284:) 12:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
6230:) 12:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
6102:) 05:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
5921:) 13:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
5861:) 22:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
5785:) 16:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
5773:) 15:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
5761:) 20:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
5451:
5440:National Archives Backstage Pass
5125:Petition from women of Brookline
4932:
4923:
4914:
4905:
4896:
4887:
4878:
4865:
4856:
4847:
4838:
4829:
4820:
4811:
4802:
4788:
4779:
4762:
4615:explaining your reasoning to him
4554:
4381:
3595:I am mystified. Dictionaries do
3379:"most of it is simply overblown"
3342:
3263:says basically the same thing. (
3086:Raul, could you please help fix
2741:
1878:2011 UEFA Champions League Final
1546: 06:04, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1477:Hi Raul, can you take the words
984:
369:I replied to you on my talk page
7836:(and possibly more names too).
7585:) 03:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7533:) 20:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
7521:) 14:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
7474:I hope you will still consider
7380:) 09:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7291:) 03:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7154:) 23:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
7126:) 21:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
7102:) 19:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
7082:) 04:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
7024:) 06:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
7008:) 17:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
6995:
6992:) 12:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
6546:16:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
6465:15:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
6065:22:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
6042:22:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
5831:) 01:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
5800:) 00:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
5356:professionals. See you Friday!
5239:Inclusion in the online catalog
2265:Knowledge:Today's featured list
1521:
1504:
1483:
1201:Such notifications now occur.--
797:Knowledge:Meetup/DC/Invite/List
7868:) 16:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
7844:) 14:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
7694:
7690:
7678:
7674:
7661:
7657:
7654:media copyright questions page
7609:) 06:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7573:) 19:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
7544:) 22:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
7392:) 17:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7361:) 18:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7339:) 17:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7304:) 07:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7166:) 02:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
6975:
6896:) 03:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
6757:) 18:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6618:) 15:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
6568:) 15:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
6533:Archivist of the United States
6447:File:Mordechai Vanunu head.jpg
6305:Wikimedia District of Columbia
5976:FAR on Encyclopædia Britannica
5732:) 19:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
4395:Thanks for creating the whole
3133:Honorifics - should be omitted
2083:the first article he scheduled
614:
284:
13:
1:
7934:05:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
7877:16:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
7852:16:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
7828:12:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
7812:10:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
7790:18:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7775:
7702:
7671:File:Shadow hegemon cover.jpg
7665:11:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7560:19:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
7274:17:19, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
6971:) 19:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6944:) 14:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
6926:) 14:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
6632:) 16:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
6412:our policy for non-free media
6309:officially recognized chapter
6015:The article was mentioned on
5721:) 19:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
5666:) 12:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
5617:our policy for non-free media
5554:to file an un-delete request.
5517:our policy for non-free media
5370:
4743:Plans are in the works for a
4686:WikiProject National Archives
4647:WikiProject National Archives
1796:Dear Raul, I want to propose
1264:our policy for non-free media
1002:) 19:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
981:) 16:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
904:) 00:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
884:) 23:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
865:) 23:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
751:) 17:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
715:) 16:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
697:) 16:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
686:) 16:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
674:) 16:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
646:) 11:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
510:) 22:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
458:) 22:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
379:) 22:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
345:) 13:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
333:) 12:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
322:) 11:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
110:
107:) 05:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
7893:00:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
7780:
7698:14:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7682:11:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
7650:criteria for speedy deletion
7320:08:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
7277:
7234:12:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
6863:17:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
6832:20:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6812:19:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6690:15:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6529:backstage pass and scanathon
6479:featured article review here
6451:Knowledge:Files for deletion
6423:criteria for speedy deletion
5737:
5701:13:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
5696:
5654:11:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
5628:criteria for speedy deletion
5585:) 06:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
5409:) 13:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
5364:) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
4625:) 21:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
4607:scheduled the TFA on July 14
4602:) 18:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
4492:) 16:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
4431:) 19:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
3670:) 09:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)]
3400:) 23:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
3358:) 22:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
3082:) 00:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
3074:I've begun an AN/I thread.--
3054:) 16:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3010:) 12:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
2888:) 18:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
2877:) 18:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
2839:a thread on the MP talk page
2711:or add your username to the
2585:) 18:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
2511:— 01:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2487:) 22:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2462:) 22:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2448:) 17:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2437:) 14:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2408:What does that mean ??
1649:removing the alternate names
1479:during the terrorist attacks
1279:criteria for speedy deletion
967:) 16:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
932:) 16:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
763:) 20:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
727:) 17:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
357:) 13:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
310:) 08:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
280:) 05:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
230:) 11:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
215:) 02:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
200:) 02:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
167:) 13:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
95:) 14:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
83:) 15:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
62:) 16:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
48:) 22:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
7:
7815:
7785:
7550:
6839:20:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6800:19:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6730:16:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
6662:respond to the user essay "
6656:make such a list public, or
6591:It could damage the project
6580:It's too graphic/outrageous
5742:20:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
5634:03:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
5546:If you receive this notice
5458:On Saturday, August 6, the
4719:Declaration of Independence
4370:) 13:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
4358:allows discussion to reach
4235:) 15:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4192:) 13:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4121:) 12:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4086:) 11:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4058:) 02:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4008:) 12:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
3974:) 11:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3914:) 16:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3828:) 23:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3748:) 23:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3661:) 16:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3591:) 13:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3462:) 01:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3193:) 02:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3182:) 01:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3161:) 00:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3108:) 16:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
3043:) 13:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
2985:) 20:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2974:) 20:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2793:) 18:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
2725:) 19:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
2621:) 18:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
2605:) 18:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
2568:) 01:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2424:) 12:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2335:) 19:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2288:— 18:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2202:) 19:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2190:One thing on my articles:
2126:) 16:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2104:) 15:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2055:) 15:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2000:) 20:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1872:) 11:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1836:) 22:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1821:) 21:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1809:) 20:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1774:) 17:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
1758:) 17:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
1715:) 17:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1704:) 17:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1678:) 07:28, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1619:) 03:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1607:) 03:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1584:) 03:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1539:) 04:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1499:) 16:20, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
1454:) 14:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1388:) 18:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1319:) 17:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1044:Featured article for May 12
956:14:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
921:11:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
846:22:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
814:- ideas about organization?
438:19:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
133:
10:
7948:
7873:against Knowledge policy?
7832:No, he came back under as
7758:The Working Man's Barnstar
7741:For the last few months...
7633:Knowledge:Non-free content
7453:. -- Message delivered by
6371:. -- Message delivered by
6344:see candidate instructions
6209:E.O. Green School shooting
5474:21:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
5393:13:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
5317:01:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
5294:12:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
5057:
5021:Today's Document challenge
5016:Today's Document challenge
5005:
4950:
4698:
4676:
4672:
4667:21:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
4590:18:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
4541:. -- Message delivered by
4499:GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup
4410:Out-of-turn TFA scheduling
4389:The Barnstar of Good Humor
4262:) 15:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4224:) 15:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4148:) 12:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4040:) 12:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
3873:) 07:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3810:) 08:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3795:) 08:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3412:) 00:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3279:) 04:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3226:) 03:57, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3071:18:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3028:13:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
2962:19:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
2904:07:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
2865:18:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
2854:18:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
2698:bring enough food to share
2556:01:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2540:"Trial program" at WP:TFAR
2498:23:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2472:22:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2404:12:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
2369:) 21:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2138:) 17:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2115:) 16:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2093:) 15:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2032:I notice you've scheduled
1953:) 18:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1903:) 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1847:) 00:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1785:) 20:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1727:) 06:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
1630:) 16:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1590:Talk:Kids for cash scandal
1572:) 11:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1562:God: "Sorry, you all suck"
1502:Good service around here.
1466:) 16:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1425:) 16:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1209:) 21:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1182:) 19:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1144:) 15:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1091:) 10:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1080:) 13:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
1069:) 10:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
1057:) 09:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
1023:) 16:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
799:. -- Message delivered by
595:22:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
492:22:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
267:03:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
130:22:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
66:
34:I'm the nominator for the
7754:
7723:"Wikistress" image series
7556:Pro-life et al. –
7431:
7403:
7367:
7063:Knowledge Loves Libraries
6934:file a usurpation request
6873:
6780:I admire your work at FA.
6507:
6483:featured article criteria
6390:
6295:
5595:
5438:
5425:13:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
5327:
4745:meetup and backstage pass
4636:00:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
4454:
4443:19:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
4403:19:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
4380:
4344:proposed deletion process
4251:15:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4212:15:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4137:12:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4110:12:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4075:04:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
4028:12:22, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
3996:16:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3783:I mentioned your name in
3728:17:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3711:17:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3644:16:53, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3620:have supported DGG's view
3311:04:28, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3253:04:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3210:03:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
2924:11:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
2681:Take along your friends (
2521:01:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2357:19:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2311:19:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2078:15:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2069:15:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2043:15:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
1937:17:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1888:11:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1860:Hello. I want to suggest
1855:
1791:
1692:08:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1666:07:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
1588:Revert of my question at
1526:04:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1516:2011 end times prediction
1487:15:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
1413:18:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1375:17:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1333:Penny for your thoughts?
1307:14:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1304:Penny for your thoughts?
1285:03:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
1234:
1166:) 16:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1102:) 13:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1039:) 16:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
918:Penny for your thoughts?
843:Penny for your thoughts?
542:National Anthem of Russia
170:
147:Lanthanum-138's talk page
7797:TFA Battle of Tippecanoe
7625:Thank you for uploading
7500:
7242:
6572:I'll quickly break down
5980:I have started a FAR on
5864:
5608:File:Good life cover.jpg
5226:Major image contribution
4709:Featured article contest
4478:Archives of American Art
4177:13:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
3950:17:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3897:08:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3857:06:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3768:05:25, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
3686:17:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3522:11:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3332:17:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
2758:or whether it should be
2383:—could you please check?
2236:18:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
2174:19:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
2023:20:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
1962:Template:TFL archive/day
1576:Thank you, guys :)
1553:06:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
1508:16:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
1336:17:57, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1198:21:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1155:16:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1128:15:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
1010:I would like to promote
924:Thanks Mitchell :)
560:Symphony No. 3 (Górecki)
447:on a Featured article.
237:Cites publisher wikilink
7628:File:Xenocide cover.jpg
7595:Niger uranium forgeries
7384:You're welcome :)
7232:Global message delivery
5982:Encyclopædia Britannica
5897:and would have to meet
5568:and leave a message on
5091:Court of the Patriarchs
4771:From our recent uploads
4740:August 6 backstage pass
4571:One paragraph please...
4419:Super Smash Bros. Melee
4331:the article's talk page
2936:
2246:main page on June 13.
1219:21:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
383:Aspersions and concerns
188: Tivedshambo
116:going to help matters.
7902:Didnt want to refactor
7622:
7416:
7183:
7171:New Page Patrol survey
7142:on Wikimedia Commons:
7138:Please take a look at
7045:
7011:
6395:
6325:Agenda items include:
6322:
5600:
5492:
5345:
5246:
5233:
5207:
5055:
5001:
4966:Archival Recovery Team
4758:
4508:
4468:
4291:
3500:
3489:arbitration principles
2957:digging mountains for
2641:
2413:
1862:Manchester United F.C.
1288:
1239:
633:the bottom of the page
180:
143:
7621:
7415:
7258:User:Hurricanehink/PS
7182:
7052:Knowledge:The Musical
7041:Knowledge:The Musical
7038:
7029:Knowledge:The Musical
6882:The Teamwork Barnstar
6584:the South Park parody
6449:, has been listed at
6400:Thanks for uploading
6393:
6321:
5689:pending requests page
5605:Thanks for uploading
5598:
5559:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
5497:Thanks for uploading
5490:
5344:
5236:
5223:
5070:
5013:
4962:
4712:This week, our first
4706:
4507:
4467:
4356:articles for deletion
4300:proposed for deletion
4290:
3495:
2635:
2589:Also, I hope I'm not
2409:
1916:Today's featured list
1244:Thanks for uploading
1237:
178:
142:
7490:SS Edmund Fitzgerald
7484:Battle of Tippecanoe
7476:Governor of Kentucky
7470:Governor of Kentucky
7374:William M. Connolley
7092:started a discussion
6709:? My middle name is
5707:Governor of Kentucky
5685:Governor of Kentucky
5570:my owner's talk page
5198:Archives.gov grabber
5028:on the main page in
4415:User: TheLoverofLove
3738:two and a half years
3664:William M. Connolley
3655:William M. Connolley
1967:Template:TFL archive
952:Myosotis Scorpioides
872:wasn't so good, but
7716:Stress user topicon
7707:Hi Raul654, i have
7687:File:Richbiotch.ogg
7599:Downing Street memo
7435:RSVP + more details
7197:Hello Raul654! The
7086:Request for comment
7048:You are invited to
6903:rename my user name
6867:A barnstar for you!
6652:. Would you please
6511:- Who should come?
6017:Today (BBC Radio 4)
5513:You may add it back
5442:- Who should come?
5331:- Who should come?
5030:""Did You Know...?"
4458:- You are invited!
4401:Whoop whoop pull up
4374:A barnstar for you!
3785:this ArbCom request
2990:Tony1's corrections
1910:The tech behind TFA
1570:reviews needed
1260:You may add it back
1212:Brilliant! Thanks.
788:Knowledge:Meetup/DC
7824:thoughts on this?
7725:, with adjustable
7623:
7417:
7188:New page patrol –
7184:
7061:), as part of the
7046:
6396:
6323:
6202:a POV template at
5601:
5561:to your talk page.
5493:
5346:
5321:DC Meetup, July 29
5026:selected documents
4519:Walters Art Museum
4509:
4469:
4348:deletion processes
4292:
3691:several dictionary
3090:? Thanks so much.
2642:
2546:just over one year
2315:protected at all).
2107:Sorry about that.
2034:Pigeon photography
2028:Pigeon photography
1972:Template:TFLfooter
1798:Azerbaijani people
1240:
1118:Pigeon photography
181:
154:remove this notice
144:
7933:
7932:
7922:
7919:
7915:
7858:User:BigFatBuddha
7794:
7793:
7770:Stanford Archives
7721:template for the
7507:League of Nations
7466:
7465:
7443:
7442:
7240:
7239:
7235:
7190:Survey Invitation
6963:comment added by
6928:
6914:comment added by
6900:
6899:
6831:
6799:
6777:
6729:
6689:
6550:
6549:
6473:I have nominated
6453:. Please see the
6408:claim of fair use
6380:
6379:
6361:
6360:
6187:Save Our Children
6183:Rosewood massacre
5969:
5943:
5613:claim of fair use
5505:claim of fair use
5478:
5477:
5460:National Archives
5368:
5367:
5275:
5274:
5271:
5270:
5267:
5266:
5263:
5262:
5258:
5188:
5174:George Orwell III
5068:
5061:New contributions
4954:Special requests:
4940:
4939:
4873:
4872:
4795:
4772:
4550:
4549:
4496:
4495:
4407:
4406:
4278:Proposed deletion
2996:John A. Macdonald
2841:related to this.
2826:
2813:I dream of horses
2795:
2781:comment added by
2726:
2716:
2573:Availability note
2389:what I've written
2215:Edmund Fitzgerald
2192:Statue of Liberty
1992:Hope that helps.
1977:Template:TFLempty
1522:« ₣M₣ »
1252:claim of fair use
1134:Statue of Liberty
894:let Myosotis know
807:
659:Nafaanra language
650:Nafaanra language
594:
491:
437:
266:
244:First time only?
7939:
7925:
7924:
7917:
7913:
7910:
7887:personal attacks
7875:User:Goldblooded
7856:He also went by
7850:User:Goldblooded
7826:User:Goldblooded
7789:
7787:
7782:
7777:
7752:
7745:
7744:
7728:
7720:
7714:
7696:
7692:
7680:
7676:
7663:
7659:
7644:
7638:
7620:
7448:
7446:
7401:
7400:
7319:
7271:
7266:
7225:
7175:
7148:BoringHistoryGuy
7116:Burma to Myanmar
7108:Burma to Myanmar
6972:
6927:
6908:
6878:
6871:
6870:
6861:
6830:
6824:
6816:
6798:
6792:
6784:
6771:
6728:
6722:
6714:
6688:
6682:
6674:
6524:
6505:
6504:
6463:
6435:
6429:
6398:
6392:
6366:
6364:
6293:
6292:
6140:
6121:please see this.
6096:
6006:
5960:
5934:
5847:Anybody But Bush
5817:Ganesh Chaturthi
5790:Ganesh Chaturthi
5749:September 11 TFA
5741:
5700:
5603:
5597:
5560:
5539:
5495:
5455:
5436:
5435:
5421:
5389:
5325:
5324:
5315:
5310:
5252:
5220:
5219:
5178:Kathleen.wright5
5162:Theornamentalist
5155:
5066:
4936:
4927:
4918:
4909:
4900:
4891:
4882:
4875:
4874:
4869:
4860:
4851:
4842:
4833:
4824:
4815:
4806:
4797:
4796:
4783:
4776:
4775:
4770:
4766:
4678:
4677:
4674:
4670:
4587:
4584:
4577:got two comments
4562:
4561:Ten Pound Hammer
4536:
4534:
4514:Baltimore meetup
4452:
4451:
4435:Sorted, thanks.
4397:WikiMovie series
4385:
4378:
4377:
4341:
4340:
4324:
4323:
4289:
4249:
4244:
4210:
4205:
4175:
4170:
4135:
4130:
4108:
4103:
4073:
4068:
4026:
4021:
3994:
3989:
3948:
3943:
3938:
3895:
3890:
3885:
3855:
3850:
3845:
3766:
3761:
3756:
3726:
3721:
3708:
3703:
3698:
3684:
3679:
3641:
3636:
3631:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3330:
3325:
3309:
3304:
3251:
3246:
3208:
3203:
3069:
3064:
3026:
3021:
2922:
2917:
2902:
2897:
2882:The Rambling Man
2863:
2852:
2847:
2827:
2816:
2794:
2775:
2745:
2744:
2717:
2710:
2704:
2669:
2647:Knowledge picnic
2591:stepping on toes
2481:
2456:
2418:
2402:
2397:
2356:
2353:
2347:
2310:
2307:
2301:
2235:
2232:
2224:
2223:Imzadi 1979
2076:
2041:
2022:
2019:
2013:
1936:
1933:
1927:
1690:
1664:
1523:
1506:
1485:
1472:God Hates Us All
1448:
1411:
1404:
1397:
1373:
1366:
1359:
1350:Taare Zameen Par
1334:
1328:
1326:HJ Mitchell
1305:
1299:
1297:HJ Mitchell
1271:my contributions
1242:
1236:
919:
913:
911:HJ Mitchell
859:
844:
838:
836:HJ Mitchell
794:
777:fall, and more.
640:
572:
469:
452:
415:
265:
263:
257:
256: Chzz
251:
190:
157:
128:
124:
120:
7947:
7946:
7942:
7941:
7940:
7938:
7937:
7936:
7931:
7904:
7818:
7799:
7773:
7743:
7726:
7718:
7712:
7705:
7656:. Thank you. —
7642:
7636:
7618:
7616:
7553:
7503:
7472:
7444:
7399:
7370:
7312:
7280:
7269:
7264:
7245:
7223:
7220:
7195:
7193:
7173:
7136:
7112:
7088:
7073:
7043:
7033:
7014:
6998:
6978:
6958:
6951:
6949:speedy deletion
6909:
6905:
6869:
6859:
6850:
6819:
6817:
6787:
6785:
6717:
6715:
6677:
6675:
6648:Another editor
6643:
6557:
6503:
6471:
6461:
6443:
6433:
6427:
6387:
6386:
6375:, on behalf of
6362:
6291:
6195:Stonewall riots
6138:
6094:
6004:
5978:
5930:
5867:
5850:
5843:Speedy deletion
5751:
5679:will appear as
5673:
5640:
5592:
5591:
5576:
5558:
5533:
5484:
5483:
5434:
5419:
5387:
5373:
5323:
5313:
5306:
5300:
5280:
5259:
5216:
5156:Credit goes to
5062:
5050:being worked on
5010:
4960:
4955:
4948:
4789:
4768:
4703:
4694:
4693:
4691:
4690:
4653:The first ever
4651:
4585:
4582:
4573:
4560:
4557:
4552:
4545:, on behalf of
4532:
4501:
4450:
4412:
4376:
4352:speedy deletion
4338:
4337:
4321:
4320:
4287:
4285:
4247:
4240:
4208:
4201:
4173:
4166:
4133:
4126:
4106:
4099:
4071:
4064:
4024:
4017:
3992:
3985:
3963:
3961:Separate thread
3946:
3941:
3936:
3893:
3888:
3883:
3853:
3848:
3843:
3764:
3759:
3754:
3724:
3717:
3706:
3701:
3696:
3682:
3675:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3526:
3517:
3512:
3507:
3423:You claim that
3345:
3328:
3321:
3307:
3300:
3249:
3242:
3206:
3199:
3067:
3060:
3024:
3017:
2992:
2939:
2920:
2913:
2900:
2893:
2861:
2850:
2843:
2834:
2815:
2811:
2805:
2776:
2746:
2742:
2739:
2729:
2713:invitation list
2706:
2690:discussion page
2663:
2638:consider coming
2630:
2575:
2542:
2479:
2454:
2416:
2400:
2393:
2385:
2351:
2342:
2339:
2305:
2296:
2293:
2243:
2231:
2228:
2222:
2219:
2074:
2039:
2030:
2017:
2008:
2005:
1931:
1922:
1919:
1912:
1891:See discussion
1858:
1794:
1744:
1688:
1662:
1641:
1593:
1475:
1446:
1436:
1407:
1400:
1393:
1369:
1362:
1355:
1345:
1332:
1324:
1303:
1295:
1291:
1231:
1230:
1115:
1046:
1012:Ernst Lindemann
1008:
987:
917:
909:
857:
842:
834:
829:
816:
803:, on behalf of
792:
770:
740:
652:
638:
617:
565:Thespis (opera)
555:Sylvia (ballet)
533:Gianni Schicchi
450:
385:
287:
261:
255:
252:
239:
186:
183:
173:
158:
151:
150:
136:
126:
122:
118:
113:
99:Taken care of.
69:
36:Epsilon Eridani
29:
27:Epsilon Eridani
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
7945:
7927:
7903:
7900:
7895:
7894:
7870:
7869:
7846:
7845:
7817:
7814:
7798:
7795:
7792:
7791:
7761:
7760:
7755:
7753:
7742:
7739:
7711:and created a
7704:
7701:
7700:
7699:
7683:
7615:
7612:
7611:
7610:
7575:
7574:
7552:
7549:
7548:
7547:
7546:
7545:
7502:
7499:
7471:
7468:
7441:
7440:
7429:
7428:
7408:
7407:
7398:
7395:
7394:
7393:
7369:
7366:
7365:
7364:
7363:
7362:
7350:
7341:
7340:
7326:
7322:
7321:
7309:Gropecunt Lane
7305:
7279:
7276:
7244:
7241:
7238:
7237:
7211:
7210:
7207:
7186:
7172:
7169:
7168:
7167:
7140:The Translator
7135:
7132:The Translator
7128:
7111:
7110:- ongoing poll
7104:
7090:Hello. I have
7087:
7084:
7069:
7059:Lincoln Center
7039:
7032:
7026:
7013:
7010:
6997:
6994:
6977:
6974:
6950:
6947:
6946:
6945:
6916:Shivangikohli1
6904:
6901:
6898:
6897:
6885:
6884:
6879:
6868:
6865:
6849:
6846:
6845:
6844:
6843:
6842:
6841:
6840:
6806:Gropecunt Lane
6802:
6801:
6781:
6778:
6769:
6762:
6734:
6733:
6732:
6731:
6668:
6667:
6660:
6657:
6642:
6637:
6636:
6635:
6634:
6633:
6607:
6606:
6605:
6604:
6598:
6588:
6574:the objections
6556:
6551:
6548:
6547:
6536:David Ferriero
6525:
6517:
6516:
6502:
6499:
6475:Yom Kippur War
6470:
6467:
6442:
6439:
6385:
6382:
6359:
6358:
6340:
6339:
6336:
6333:
6330:
6300:
6299:
6290:
6287:
6286:
6285:
6256:
6255:
6254:
6253:
6252:
6251:
6250:
6249:
6248:
6247:
6246:
6245:
6244:
6243:
6242:
6241:
6240:
6239:
6238:
6237:
6236:
6235:
6234:
6233:
6232:
6231:
6105:
6104:
6103:
5977:
5974:
5973:
5972:
5971:
5970:
5929:
5926:
5925:
5924:
5923:
5922:
5880:All the best,
5866:
5863:
5849:
5845:nomination of
5840:
5839:
5838:
5837:
5836:
5835:
5834:
5833:
5832:
5806:
5805:
5804:
5803:
5802:
5801:
5750:
5747:
5746:
5745:
5744:
5743:
5722:
5677:J.C.W. Beckham
5672:
5669:
5668:
5667:
5639:
5636:
5590:
5587:
5574:
5573:
5562:
5555:
5544:
5541:
5482:
5479:
5476:
5475:
5456:
5448:
5447:
5433:
5430:
5429:
5428:
5427:
5426:
5372:
5369:
5366:
5365:
5347:
5337:
5336:
5322:
5319:
5299:
5296:
5279:
5276:
5273:
5272:
5269:
5268:
5265:
5264:
5261:
5260:
5251:
5248:
5247:
5245:
5244:
5240:
5234:
5232:
5231:
5227:
5218:
5217:
5214:
5209:
5208:
5206:
5205:
5194:
5193:
5153:
5152:
5147:
5142:
5137:
5132:
5127:
5122:
5116:
5115:
5113:
5109:
5108:
5098:
5088:
5077:
5076:
5074:
5064:
5063:
5060:
5056:
5054:
5053:
5039:
5035:
5034:
5017:
5012:
5011:
5008:
5003:
5002:
5000:
4999:
4968:
4957:
4956:
4953:
4949:
4941:
4938:
4937:
4929:
4928:
4920:
4919:
4911:
4910:
4902:
4901:
4893:
4892:
4884:
4883:
4871:
4870:
4862:
4861:
4853:
4852:
4844:
4843:
4835:
4834:
4826:
4825:
4817:
4816:
4808:
4807:
4799:
4798:
4785:
4784:
4759:
4757:
4756:
4741:
4737:
4736:
4731:Bill of Rights
4710:
4705:
4704:
4701:
4696:
4695:
4682:
4681:
4650:
4643:
4642:
4641:
4640:
4639:
4638:
4637:
4611:put in a break
4572:
4569:
4556:
4553:
4502:
4500:
4497:
4494:
4493:
4470:
4460:
4459:
4449:
4446:
4445:
4444:
4425:Difluoroethene
4411:
4408:
4405:
4404:
4392:
4391:
4386:
4375:
4372:
4362:for deletion.
4342:will stop the
4310:
4309:
4284:
4275:
4274:
4273:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4268:
4267:
4266:
4265:
4264:
4263:
4225:
4179:
4178:
4160:
4159:
4158:
4157:
4156:
4155:
4154:
4153:
4152:
4151:
4150:
4149:
4048:
4047:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4041:
3962:
3959:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3951:
3917:My reading of
3899:
3898:
3875:
3874:
3859:
3858:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3797:
3796:
3780:
3779:
3778:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3687:
3616:
3524:
3523:
3501:
3492:
3485:
3452:
3451:
3440:
3429:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3413:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3382:
3376:
3370:
3344:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3317:The Signpost's
3283:
3282:
3281:
3280:
3236:
3235:
3234:
3233:
3232:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3215:
3168:
3167:
3138:
3137:
3134:
3131:
3128:
3125:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3044:
2991:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2975:
2938:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2833:
2830:
2821:}} message on
2804:
2799:Nomination of
2797:
2740:
2738:
2733:Nomination of
2731:
2629:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2607:
2606:
2574:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2541:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2426:
2425:
2384:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2370:
2316:
2242:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2229:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2116:
2094:
2029:
2026:
2025:
2024:
1990:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1955:
1954:
1911:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1743:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1640:
1638:Boletus edulis
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1592:
1586:
1574:
1573:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1474:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1391:Cool, thanks.
1344:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1290:
1287:
1281:. Thank you.
1229:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1158:Fair enough!--
1114:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1007:
1004:
986:
983:
971:
970:
969:
968:
953:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
828:
823:
815:
809:
769:
766:
765:
764:
739:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
705:File:Muura.ogg
701:
651:
648:
616:
613:
601:I've commented
597:
596:
546:Old Dan Tucker
496:
495:
494:
493:
384:
381:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
286:
283:
282:
281:
238:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
217:
216:
172:
169:
137:
135:
132:
112:
109:
97:
96:
68:
65:
64:
63:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
7944:
7935:
7930:
7921:
7908:
7899:
7892:
7888:
7884:
7880:
7879:
7878:
7876:
7867:
7863:
7859:
7855:
7854:
7853:
7851:
7843:
7839:
7835:
7834:User talk:O^O
7831:
7830:
7829:
7827:
7822:
7813:
7811:
7808:
7804:
7788:
7783:
7778:
7771:
7767:
7763:
7762:
7759:
7756:
7751:
7746:
7738:
7736:
7732:
7724:
7717:
7710:
7697:
7688:
7684:
7681:
7672:
7668:
7667:
7666:
7664:
7655:
7651:
7646:
7641:
7640:di-fails NFCC
7634:
7630:
7629:
7608:
7604:
7600:
7596:
7592:
7588:
7587:
7586:
7584:
7580:
7572:
7568:
7563:
7562:
7561:
7559:
7543:
7539:
7535:
7534:
7532:
7528:
7524:
7523:
7522:
7520:
7516:
7512:
7508:
7498:
7496:
7492:
7491:
7485:
7481:
7477:
7467:
7464:
7460:
7456:
7452:
7439:
7438:
7436:
7430:
7427:
7424:
7420:
7414:
7410:
7409:
7406:
7402:
7391:
7387:
7383:
7382:
7381:
7379:
7375:
7360:
7356:
7351:
7348:
7345:
7344:
7343:
7342:
7338:
7334:
7330:
7327:
7324:
7323:
7318:
7315:
7310:
7306:
7303:
7299:
7294:
7293:
7292:
7290:
7286:
7275:
7273:
7272:
7267:
7260:
7259:
7255:
7253:
7249:
7248:Hurricanehink
7236:
7233:
7229:
7222:
7219:
7218:to take part.
7217:
7214:Please click
7208:
7205:
7204:
7203:
7200:
7194:
7192:
7191:
7181:
7177:
7176:
7165:
7161:
7157:
7156:
7155:
7153:
7149:
7145:
7141:
7133:
7127:
7125:
7121:
7120:Fyunck(click)
7117:
7109:
7103:
7101:
7097:
7093:
7083:
7081:
7077:
7072:
7066:
7064:
7060:
7056:
7055:
7053:
7042:
7037:
7031:in NYC Oct 22
7030:
7025:
7023:
7019:
7009:
7007:
7003:
6993:
6991:
6987:
6983:
6973:
6970:
6966:
6965:59.94.255.147
6962:
6956:
6943:
6939:
6935:
6931:
6930:
6929:
6925:
6921:
6917:
6913:
6895:
6891:
6887:
6886:
6883:
6880:
6877:
6872:
6864:
6862:
6860:Matthew (WMF)
6856:
6838:
6834:
6833:
6829:
6825:
6823:
6814:
6813:
6811:
6807:
6804:
6803:
6797:
6793:
6791:
6782:
6779:
6775:
6770:
6767:
6763:
6760:
6759:
6758:
6756:
6752:
6747:
6742:
6738:
6727:
6723:
6721:
6712:
6708:
6704:
6703:
6701:
6697:
6696:Jenna Jameson
6693:
6692:
6691:
6687:
6683:
6681:
6671:
6665:
6661:
6658:
6655:
6654:
6653:
6651:
6646:
6641:
6631:
6627:
6623:
6622:
6621:
6620:
6619:
6617:
6613:
6602:
6599:
6596:
6592:
6589:
6585:
6581:
6578:
6577:
6575:
6571:
6570:
6569:
6567:
6563:
6555:
6545:
6541:
6537:
6534:
6530:
6526:
6523:
6519:
6518:
6514:
6510:
6506:
6498:
6496:
6492:
6488:
6484:
6480:
6476:
6466:
6464:
6458:
6457:
6452:
6448:
6438:
6436:
6430:
6425:. Thank you.
6424:
6420:
6415:
6413:
6409:
6405:
6404:
6397:
6381:
6378:
6374:
6370:
6357:
6355:
6350:
6347:
6345:
6337:
6334:
6331:
6328:
6327:
6326:
6320:
6316:
6314:
6310:
6307:, the newest
6306:
6302:
6301:
6298:
6294:
6283:
6279:
6274:
6273:
6272:
6270:
6266:
6261:
6260:FAR talk page
6229:
6225:
6221:
6220:
6218:
6214:
6210:
6205:
6200:
6196:
6192:
6188:
6184:
6180:
6176:
6172:
6171:
6169:
6165:
6160:
6159:
6157:
6153:
6148:
6147:
6145:
6141:
6133:
6132:
6130:
6126:
6122:
6117:
6116:
6114:
6110:
6106:
6101:
6097:
6090:
6089:
6087:
6083:
6078:
6077:
6075:
6071:
6067:
6066:
6064:
6061:
6056:
6055:
6053:
6049:
6044:
6043:
6041:
6038:
6033:
6032:
6030:
6026:
6022:
6018:
6014:
6013:
6011:
6007:
5999:
5998:
5997:
5995:
5991:
5987:
5983:
5967:
5963:
5957:
5956:
5954:
5950:
5946:
5945:
5944:
5941:
5937:
5920:
5916:
5912:
5911:
5909:
5905:
5900:
5895:
5891:
5890:
5889:
5887:
5883:
5878:
5875:
5870:
5862:
5860:
5856:
5848:
5844:
5830:
5826:
5822:
5818:
5814:
5813:
5812:
5811:
5810:
5809:
5808:
5807:
5799:
5795:
5791:
5787:
5786:
5784:
5780:
5775:
5774:
5772:
5768:
5764:
5763:
5762:
5760:
5756:
5740:
5734:
5733:
5731:
5727:
5723:
5720:
5716:
5712:
5708:
5704:
5703:
5702:
5699:
5694:
5690:
5686:
5682:
5678:
5665:
5661:
5657:
5656:
5655:
5653:
5652:
5649:
5645:
5635:
5633:
5630:. Thank you.
5629:
5625:
5620:
5618:
5614:
5610:
5609:
5602:
5586:
5584:
5580:
5571:
5567:
5563:
5556:
5553:
5549:
5545:
5542:
5537:
5531:
5527:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5520:
5518:
5514:
5510:
5506:
5502:
5501:
5494:
5489:
5473:
5469:
5465:
5462:is hosting a
5461:
5457:
5454:
5450:
5449:
5445:
5441:
5437:
5424:
5422:
5418:
5417:
5411:
5410:
5408:
5404:
5400:
5396:
5395:
5394:
5392:
5390:
5386:
5385:
5378:
5363:
5359:
5355:
5351:
5348:
5343:
5339:
5338:
5334:
5330:
5326:
5318:
5316:
5311:
5309:
5304:
5295:
5293:
5292:
5289:
5285:
5256:
5249:
5241:
5238:
5237:
5235:
5228:
5225:
5224:
5222:
5221:
5213:
5212:
5210:
5203:
5199:
5196:
5195:
5191:
5190:
5189:
5187:
5183:
5179:
5175:
5171:
5167:
5166:Inductiveload
5163:
5159:
5151:
5148:
5146:
5143:
5141:
5138:
5136:
5133:
5131:
5128:
5126:
5123:
5121:
5118:
5117:
5114:
5111:
5110:
5106:
5102:
5099:
5096:
5092:
5089:
5086:
5082:
5079:
5078:
5075:
5072:
5071:
5069:
5059:
5058:
5051:
5047:
5043:
5040:
5037:
5036:
5031:
5027:
5022:
5018:
5015:
5014:
5007:
5006:
5004:
4997:
4993:
4990:
4987:
4984:
4981:
4978:
4975:
4972:
4969:
4967:
4964:
4963:
4961:
4952:
4951:
4947:
4945:
4935:
4931:
4930:
4926:
4922:
4921:
4917:
4913:
4912:
4908:
4904:
4903:
4899:
4895:
4894:
4890:
4886:
4885:
4881:
4877:
4876:
4868:
4864:
4863:
4859:
4855:
4854:
4850:
4846:
4845:
4841:
4837:
4836:
4832:
4828:
4827:
4823:
4819:
4818:
4814:
4810:
4809:
4805:
4801:
4800:
4787:
4786:
4782:
4778:
4777:
4774:
4767:
4765:
4754:
4750:
4746:
4742:
4739:
4738:
4733:
4732:
4727:
4726:
4721:
4720:
4715:
4711:
4708:
4707:
4700:
4699:
4697:
4689:
4687:
4679:
4675:
4671:
4668:
4666:
4662:
4658:
4657:
4648:
4635:
4631:
4627:
4626:
4624:
4620:
4616:
4612:
4608:
4604:
4603:
4601:
4597:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4589:
4588:
4578:
4568:
4566:
4555:Blaise Pascal
4551:
4548:
4544:
4540:
4531:
4529:
4528:
4522:
4520:
4516:
4515:
4506:
4491:
4487:
4483:
4479:
4475:
4471:
4466:
4462:
4461:
4457:
4453:
4442:
4441:
4438:
4434:
4433:
4432:
4430:
4426:
4423:
4420:
4416:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4393:
4390:
4387:
4384:
4379:
4371:
4369:
4365:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4345:
4334:
4332:
4328:
4317:
4315:
4308:
4305:
4304:
4303:
4301:
4297:
4283:
4279:
4261:
4257:
4253:
4252:
4250:
4245:
4243:
4237:
4236:
4234:
4230:
4226:
4223:
4219:
4214:
4213:
4211:
4206:
4204:
4198:
4194:
4193:
4191:
4187:
4183:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4176:
4171:
4169:
4162:
4161:
4147:
4143:
4139:
4138:
4136:
4131:
4129:
4123:
4122:
4120:
4116:
4112:
4111:
4109:
4104:
4102:
4096:
4092:
4088:
4087:
4085:
4081:
4077:
4076:
4074:
4069:
4067:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4057:
4053:
4039:
4035:
4030:
4029:
4027:
4022:
4020:
4014:
4010:
4009:
4007:
4003:
3998:
3997:
3995:
3990:
3988:
3981:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3973:
3969:
3949:
3944:
3939:
3933:
3930:against Cirt
3929:
3925:
3920:
3916:
3915:
3913:
3909:
3905:
3901:
3900:
3896:
3891:
3886:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3872:
3868:
3863:
3862:
3861:
3860:
3856:
3851:
3846:
3840:
3839:Wiki-hounding
3835:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3827:
3823:
3819:
3818:one of my own
3809:
3805:
3801:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3794:
3790:
3786:
3782:
3781:
3767:
3762:
3757:
3750:
3749:
3747:
3743:
3739:
3734:
3730:
3729:
3727:
3722:
3720:
3713:
3712:
3710:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3692:
3688:
3685:
3680:
3678:
3672:
3671:
3669:
3665:
3662:
3660:
3656:
3652:
3650:
3646:
3645:
3643:
3642:
3637:
3632:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3613:
3611:
3609:
3607:
3605:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3593:
3592:
3590:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3570:
3568:
3564:
3562:
3558:
3555:
3551:
3547:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3535:
3531:
3529:
3521:
3520:
3515:
3510:
3502:
3499:
3493:
3490:
3486:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3461:
3457:
3449:
3445:
3441:
3438:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3421:
3420:
3411:
3407:
3402:
3401:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3386:
3383:
3380:
3377:
3374:
3371:
3368:
3365:
3364:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3357:
3353:
3348:
3343:Walk the walk
3331:
3326:
3324:
3318:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3310:
3305:
3303:
3293:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3255:
3254:
3252:
3247:
3245:
3238:
3237:
3225:
3221:
3216:
3212:
3211:
3209:
3204:
3202:
3195:
3194:
3192:
3188:
3184:
3183:
3181:
3177:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3135:
3132:
3129:
3126:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3089:
3084:
3083:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3072:
3070:
3065:
3063:
3056:
3055:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3029:
3027:
3022:
3020:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2973:
2969:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2961:
2960:
2955:
2951:
2948:
2944:
2923:
2918:
2916:
2910:
2906:
2905:
2903:
2898:
2896:
2890:
2889:
2887:
2883:
2879:
2878:
2876:
2872:
2867:
2866:
2864:
2857:
2856:
2855:
2853:
2848:
2846:
2840:
2829:
2824:
2820:
2814:
2808:
2802:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2771:
2768:
2763:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2752:
2736:
2730:
2727:
2724:
2720:
2714:
2709:
2702:
2700:
2699:
2693:
2691:
2686:
2684:
2679:
2677:
2673:
2668:
2667:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2648:
2639:
2634:
2620:
2616:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2584:
2580:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2555:
2554:
2551:
2547:
2520:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2504:
2500:
2499:
2497:
2494:
2489:
2488:
2486:
2482:
2474:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2464:
2463:
2461:
2457:
2450:
2449:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2438:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2412:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2403:
2398:
2396:
2390:
2382:
2368:
2364:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2348:
2345:
2337:
2336:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2321:like this one
2317:
2313:
2312:
2308:
2302:
2299:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2287:
2284:
2281:
2276:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2261:
2259:
2254:
2252:
2247:
2234:
2233:
2225:
2217:
2216:
2210:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2173:
2169:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2137:
2133:
2128:
2127:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2105:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2077:
2071:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2042:
2035:
2020:
2014:
2011:
2003:
2002:
2001:
1999:
1995:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1934:
1928:
1925:
1917:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1887:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1808:
1804:
1799:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1742:
1726:
1722:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1686:
1685:
1680:
1679:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1665:
1660:
1659:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1639:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1591:
1585:
1583:
1579:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1545:
1541:
1540:
1538:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1517:
1507:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1486:
1480:
1473:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1453:
1449:
1442:
1424:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1412:
1410:
1405:
1403:
1398:
1396:
1390:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1374:
1372:
1367:
1365:
1360:
1358:
1352:
1351:
1335:
1329:
1327:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1306:
1300:
1298:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1267:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1241:
1218:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1181:
1177:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1056:
1052:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1017:MisterBee1966
1013:
1003:
1001:
997:
992:
985:Article moves
982:
980:
976:
966:
962:
958:
957:
955:
954:
951:
946:
945:
931:
927:
923:
922:
920:
914:
912:
906:
905:
903:
899:
895:
891:
888:
887:
886:
885:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
864:
860:
852:
850:Raul is away;
849:
848:
847:
845:
839:
837:
827:
822:
820:
813:
812:unit cohesion
808:
806:
802:
798:
791:
789:
785:
784:
778:
774:
762:
758:
754:
753:
752:
750:
746:
726:
722:
717:
716:
714:
710:
706:
702:
699:
698:
696:
692:
688:
687:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:
673:
669:
664:
663:Nafana people
660:
655:
647:
645:
641:
634:
630:
626:
622:
612:
610:
606:
602:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
571:
567:
566:
561:
557:
556:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:(copied from
513:
512:
511:
509:
505:
501:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
468:
464:
463:learned a bit
460:
459:
457:
453:
446:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:Amazing Grace
394:
390:
380:
378:
374:
370:
356:
352:
347:
346:
344:
340:
335:
334:
332:
328:
324:
323:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
279:
275:
270:
269:
268:
264:
262: ►
259:
258:
248:
245:
242:
229:
225:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
202:
201:
199:
195:
191:
189:
177:
168:
166:
162:
161:Lanthanum-138
155:
148:
141:
131:
129:
121:
108:
106:
102:
94:
90:
86:
85:
84:
82:
78:
74:
61:
60:
55:
51:
50:
49:
47:
46:
41:
37:
32:
19:
7905:
7896:
7871:
7847:
7819:
7800:
7765:
7757:
7727:stress_level
7719:}}
7713:{{
7706:
7647:
7645:tag itself.
7643:}}
7637:{{
7626:
7624:
7576:
7554:
7504:
7488:
7473:
7445:
7433:
7432:
7425:
7421:
7418:
7371:
7328:
7281:
7265:HurricaneFan
7262:
7261:
7256:
7251:
7246:
7224:
7213:
7212:
7196:
7189:
7187:
7185:
7139:
7137:
7131:
7113:
7089:
7067:
7050:
7049:
7047:
7015:
6999:
6996:Raul's Razor
6979:
6959:— Preceding
6955:Eshan Sharma
6952:
6910:— Preceding
6906:
6881:
6851:
6821:
6789:
6765:
6743:
6739:
6735:
6719:
6710:
6706:
6679:
6673:Sincerely,
6672:
6669:
6647:
6644:
6608:
6600:
6590:
6582:- I watched
6579:
6558:
6531:meetup with
6512:
6472:
6455:
6444:
6418:
6416:
6401:
6399:
6388:
6363:
6351:
6348:
6341:
6324:
6303:
6257:
6198:
5979:
5931:
5915:ChrisTheDude
5882:ChrisTheDude
5879:
5871:
5868:
5851:
5825:Demiurge1000
5752:
5693:User:Wehwalt
5674:
5651:
5641:
5623:
5621:
5606:
5604:
5593:
5577:Thank you.
5575:
5547:
5538:}}
5534:{{
5523:PLEASE NOTE:
5522:
5521:
5498:
5496:
5485:
5459:
5443:
5415:
5414:
5383:
5382:
5374:
5358:SarahStierch
5350:DC MEETUP 21
5349:
5332:
5329:DC Meetup 21
5307:
5301:
5291:
5281:
5215:Future plans
5154:
5065:
4958:
4942:
4769:
4761:
4729:
4725:Constitution
4723:
4717:
4683:
4654:
4652:
4580:
4574:
4558:
4533:
4525:
4523:
4512:
4510:
4486:SarahStierch
4482:American art
4440:
4413:
4388:
4346:, but other
4335:
4327:edit summary
4318:
4311:
4306:
4294:The article
4293:
4241:
4202:
4167:
4127:
4100:
4095:WP:OWNERSHIP
4090:
4065:
4049:
4018:
4013:WP:OWNERSHIP
3986:
3979:
3964:
3931:
3908:Bill Huffman
3815:
3737:
3732:
3718:
3694:
3676:
3648:
3627:
3623:
3600:
3596:
3581:this comment
3572:
3571:
3566:
3565:
3560:
3559:
3553:
3549:
3548:
3543:
3539:
3538:
3533:
3532:
3527:
3525:
3505:
3496:
3453:
3447:
3443:
3432:
3417:
3384:
3378:
3372:
3366:
3346:
3322:
3316:
3301:
3296:
3291:
3268:
3264:
3256:
3243:
3200:
3150:
3146:
3139:
3119:
3085:
3061:
3018:
2993:
2979:Paul Studier
2956:
2940:
2914:
2894:
2844:
2835:
2823:my talk page
2809:
2806:
2803:for deletion
2777:— Preceding
2772:
2764:
2749:
2747:
2737:for deletion
2728:
2708:mailing list
2703:
2697:
2694:
2687:
2680:
2676:Central Park
2665:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2646:
2643:
2576:
2553:
2543:
2410:
2394:
2386:
2381:The Signpost
2380:
2343:
2297:
2277:
2273:
2262:
2255:
2248:
2244:
2220:
2214:
2189:
2031:
2009:
1991:
1956:
1923:
1913:
1885:
1859:
1795:
1752:IrishStephen
1745:
1682:
1656:
1642:
1594:
1575:
1520:
1513:
1478:
1476:
1437:
1408:
1401:
1394:
1370:
1363:
1356:
1348:
1346:
1325:
1296:
1292:
1274:
1268:
1245:
1243:
1232:
1173:
1116:
1051:132.244.72.6
1047:
1009:
988:
972:
959:No problem.
950:
910:
892:. I've also
835:
830:
817:
793:
781:
780:Please RSVP
779:
775:
771:
741:
656:
653:
618:
598:
570:TonyTheTiger
563:
553:
531:
528:Dixie (song)
497:
467:TonyTheTiger
413:TonyTheTiger
386:
366:
288:
254:
249:
246:
243:
240:
204:
187:
182:
159:
114:
98:
70:
58:
44:
33:
30:
18:User:Raul654
7805:. Thanks! —
7579:NYyankees51
7538:Dana boomer
7515:Dana boomer
6986:Dana boomer
6976:FAR request
6768:preference.
6744:As for the
6513:You should.
6265:Dana boomer
6204:Roy Orbison
6191:Harvey Milk
6179:Emmett Till
6070:Dana boomer
5777:reasons).--
5648:Bencherlite
5444:You should.
5401:(1:15 in).
5333:You should.
5288:Bencherlite
4944:...see more
4474:Smithsonian
4437:Bencherlite
4350:exist. The
3579:thread and
3102:Skeezix1000
3094:Skeezix1000
2810:Good luck,
2783:Willrocks10
2550:Bencherlite
1882:Bencherlite
1764:are correct
1681:OK thanks.
1597:this revert
1186:Thanks. At
870:this change
621:Hugo Chavez
615:FAC recusal
538:My Belarusy
300:Roy Orbison
291:Roy Orbison
285:Roy Orbison
89:Dana boomer
77:Dana boomer
7889:. –
7703:Wikistress
7669:Ditto for
7355:Abe Froman
7285:Abe Froman
7228:NPP Survey
7096:AerobicFox
7018:Jokestress
6890:Jokestress
6837:David Levy
6810:David Levy
6711:sotto voce
6705:A ruckus?
6645:Hi Raul,
6462:damiens.rf
6456:discussion
6428:Skier Dude
5632:Courcelles
5371:Cal Thomas
5186:Zhaladshar
5182:BirgitteSB
5135:H. R. 4982
5112:Wikisource
5105:Fetchcomms
5095:CutOffTies
5085:Fetchcomms
5038:Wikisource
4688:Newsletter
4649:Newsletter
4634:SunCreator
4565:his otters
4527:Happy Hour
4417:scheduled
4364:Dialectric
4296:TeleZapper
4282:TeleZapper
3924:WP:TAGTEAM
3834:Wiki-bully
3615:troubling.
3369:- Gamaliel
2862:iridescent
2666:directions
2325:This blurb
2075:iridescent
2040:iridescent
1750:. Cheers,
1518:. :(
1283:Courcelles
587:WP:CHICAGO
484:WP:CHICAGO
430:WP:CHICAGO
111:Promethean
71:Hi Raul -
7709:been bold
7463:User:Aude
7278:10/31 TFA
7130:Eakins's
6828:Wolfowitz
6796:Wolfowitz
6774:Sexy Cora
6766:Centipide
6726:Wolfowitz
6686:Wolfowitz
6377:User:Aude
5894:This page
5416:Jezebel's
5384:Jezebel's
5377:this edit
5073:Knowledge
4735:barnstar.
4692:July 2011
4547:User:Aude
4360:consensus
4298:has been
3919:WP:BATTLE
3906:Regards,
3804:Prioryman
3742:Prioryman
3425:this edit
3381:- JoshuaZ
3375:- macwhiz
2801:Bought in
2751:Bought in
2735:Bought in
2672:Manhattan
2660:1 to 8 PM
2595:reluctant
1748:Towel Day
1721:Kevin McE
1698:Kevin McE
1645:WP:ERRORS
805:User:Aude
745:Delmlsfan
7816:User:º¡º
7731:Benzband
7551:Timeline
7536:Thanks!
7252:dinosaur
6961:unsigned
6924:contribs
6912:unsigned
6761:Hi Raul!
6515:Really.
6419:articles
6063:Fatuorum
6040:Fatuorum
5869:Hi Raul
5755:Dabomb87
5726:Dabomb87
5715:Dabomb87
5624:articles
5509:orphaned
5491:⚠
5446:Really.
5335:Really.
5255:the list
5170:Digipoke
4619:Dabomb87
4089:You are
4032:forum.--
3928:WP:HOUND
3624:sanction
3577:this RFC
3554:actually
3473:User:DGG
3469:Websters
3387:- Hobit.
3143:the diff
3000:see here
2819:Talkback
2791:contribs
2779:unsigned
2719:BrownBot
2652:Saturday
2599:Dabomb87
2579:Dabomb87
2519:Fatuorum
2496:Fatuorum
2470:Fatuorum
2442:Dabomb87
2168:Ealdgyth
2120:Dabomb87
2109:Dabomb87
1866:TGilmour
1275:articles
1256:orphaned
1238:⚠
948:article.
874:this one
721:Calathan
691:Calathan
668:Calathan
405:WP:SONGs
351:Kmzundel
327:Kmzundel
304:Kmzundel
296:WP:URBLP
250:Cheers,
152:You can
134:Talkback
7883:WP:SOCK
7862:Raul654
7838:Raul654
7766:Raul654
7603:Raul654
7567:Raul654
7527:Raul654
7495:Acdixon
7455:AudeBot
7386:Raul654
7333:Raul654
7317:of Doom
7160:Raul654
7106:Moving
7002:Darouet
6938:Raul654
6751:Raul654
6612:Raul654
6540:Dominic
6373:AudeBot
6278:Snowman
6224:Snowman
6175:Lesbian
6164:Snowman
6139:Georgia
6109:Wehwalt
6095:Georgia
6082:Snowman
6060:Malleus
6048:Snowman
6037:Malleus
6025:Snowman
6005:Georgia
5990:Snowman
5959:places.
5949:Wehwalt
5904:Wehwalt
5899:WP:NFCC
5779:Wehwalt
5767:Raul654
5739:Acdixon
5711:WP:TFAR
5698:Acdixon
5660:Wehwalt
5579:DASHBot
5528:I am a
5468:Dominic
5403:Raul654
5158:Prosody
5046:WS:NARA
5042:WP:NARA
5033:tumblr.
5009:Ongoing
4753:WP:NARA
4749:Dominic
4661:Dominic
4630:WP:TFAR
4596:Raul654
4543:AudeBot
4256:Wehwalt
4229:Wehwalt
4218:Wehwalt
4186:Wehwalt
4142:Wehwalt
4115:Wehwalt
4080:Wehwalt
4052:Wehwalt
4034:Wehwalt
4002:Wehwalt
3968:Wehwalt
3822:Raul654
3733:already
3585:Raul654
3456:Raul654
3394:Raul654
3273:Raul654
3220:Raul654
3187:Raul654
3176:Wehwalt
3155:Raul654
3076:Wehwalt
3048:Wehwalt
3037:Wehwalt
3004:Wehwalt
2968:Raul654
2959:5 years
2871:Wehwalt
2869:out?"--
2760:deleted
2683:newbies
2658:. From
2656:June 25
2615:Raul654
2562:Raul654
2516:Malleus
2493:Malleus
2480:Georgia
2467:Malleus
2455:Georgia
2431:Raul654
2417:Georgia
2329:Raul654
2196:Wehwalt
2132:Raul654
2098:Raul654
2087:Raul654
2049:Raul654
1994:Raul654
1947:Raul654
1897:Wehwalt
1841:Raul654
1815:Raul654
1803:Neftchi
1779:Neftchi
1768:Raul654
1766:, sir.
1709:Raul654
1672:Raul654
1647:before
1613:Raul654
1578:Raul654
1533:Raul654
1493:Raul654
1460:Raul654
1447:Georgia
1419:Raul654
1382:Wehwalt
1330:|
1313:Raul654
1301:|
1203:Wehwalt
1176:Raul654
1160:Wehwalt
1138:Wehwalt
1096:Raul654
1074:Raul654
996:Johnbod
975:Wehwalt
961:Raul654
926:Raul654
915:|
898:Raul654
878:Raul654
858:Georgia
840:|
801:AudeBot
790:page.
757:Raul654
709:Raul654
703:I like
680:Raul654
639:Georgia
605:Raul654
591:WP:FOUR
500:re this
488:WP:FOUR
451:Georgia
434:WP:FOUR
401:WP:LEAD
339:Wehwalt
316:Wehwalt
274:Raul654
224:Wehwalt
209:Raul654
192: (
127:Windows
101:Raul654
67:Closing
31:Hello,
7923:|
7891:Lionel
7776:Sesame
7558:Lionel
7525:Done.
7480:WP:TFA
7447:Note:
7368:Thanks
7314:Parrot
7298:Coolug
7076:Pharos
7054:in NYC
7044:in NYC
6822:Kiefer
6820:
6790:Kiefer
6788:
6720:Kiefer
6718:
6680:Kiefer
6678:
6626:Coolug
6562:Coolug
6477:for a
6365:Note:
6354:online
6199:no one
6193:, and
5794:Lihaas
5536:helpme
5314:(talk)
5184:, and
4751:about
4586:abjotu
4535:Note:
4329:or on
4248:(talk)
4216:say.--
4209:(talk)
4197:WT:FAC
4174:(talk)
4134:(talk)
4107:(talk)
4072:(talk)
4025:(talk)
3993:(talk)
3725:(talk)
3683:(talk)
3329:(talk)
3308:(talk)
3250:(talk)
3207:(talk)
3068:(talk)
3025:(talk)
2947:Simply
2921:(talk)
2901:(talk)
2851:(talk)
2401:(talk)
2346:dokter
2300:dokter
2226:
2012:dokter
1926:dokter
1856:29 May
1813:Done.
1792:May 28
1684:Graham
1658:Graham
1624:CliffC
1601:CliffC
1188:WT:TFA
654:Raul,
498:Raul,
179:Groan!
171:Groan!
119:Fences
7914:OBERT
7810:Myers
7807:Kevin
7781:honey
7509:FAR (
7501:Ping?
7134:G-364
6213:Moni3
6152:Moni3
6137:Sandy
6125:Moni3
6093:Sandy
6003:Sandy
5902:on.--
5865:Video
5855:JDDJS
5821:Chile
5815:Well
5548:after
5420:Ponyo
5388:Ponyo
5202:Slakr
5192:Tools
4728:, or
4583:tariq
3867:Cla68
3789:Cla68
3406:Cla68
3352:Cla68
3166:(UTC)
2950:south
2670:) in
2478:Sandy
2453:Sandy
2415:Sandy
2363:RexxS
2067:Adler
1830:Woody
1651:from
1599:? --
1505:Ceoil
1484:Ceoil
1445:Sandy
1217:Adler
1196:Adler
1153:Adler
1126:Adler
1085:Woody
1063:Woody
1033:Woody
856:Sandy
637:Sandy
524:WP:FA
520:WP:FA
504:Moni3
449:Sandy
373:Moni3
123:&
16:<
7918:FROM
7866:talk
7842:talk
7803:here
7786:tart
7735:talk
7685:And
7607:talk
7593:and
7583:talk
7571:talk
7542:talk
7531:talk
7519:talk
7478:for
7459:talk
7451:here
7390:talk
7378:talk
7359:talk
7337:talk
7302:talk
7289:talk
7216:HERE
7164:talk
7152:talk
7124:talk
7100:talk
7080:talk
7071:here
7022:talk
7006:talk
6990:talk
6969:talk
6942:talk
6920:talk
6894:talk
6855:here
6755:talk
6630:talk
6616:talk
6566:talk
6495:talk
6491:Brad
6487:here
6434:talk
6369:here
6282:talk
6269:talk
6228:talk
6217:talk
6168:talk
6156:talk
6144:Talk
6129:talk
6113:talk
6100:Talk
6086:talk
6074:talk
6052:talk
6029:talk
6010:Talk
5994:talk
5966:talk
5962:Mdw0
5953:talk
5940:talk
5936:Mdw0
5919:talk
5908:talk
5886:talk
5859:talk
5829:talk
5798:talk
5783:talk
5771:talk
5759:talk
5730:talk
5719:talk
5664:talk
5642:See
5583:talk
5566:here
5552:here
5407:talk
5399:this
5362:talk
5354:GLAM
5308:Tony
5019:The
4702:News
4684:The
4645:The
4623:talk
4600:talk
4539:here
4490:talk
4472:The
4429:talk
4368:talk
4260:talk
4242:Tony
4233:talk
4222:talk
4203:Tony
4190:talk
4168:Tony
4146:talk
4128:Tony
4119:talk
4101:Tony
4084:talk
4066:Tony
4056:talk
4038:talk
4019:Tony
4006:talk
3987:Tony
3972:talk
3912:talk
3871:talk
3826:talk
3808:talk
3793:talk
3746:talk
3719:Tony
3677:Tony
3668:talk
3659:talk
3601:more
3589:talk
3481:here
3460:talk
3410:talk
3398:talk
3356:talk
3323:Tony
3302:Tony
3277:talk
3244:Tony
3224:talk
3201:Tony
3191:talk
3180:talk
3159:talk
3149:and
3106:talk
3098:talk
3088:this
3080:talk
3062:Tony
3052:talk
3041:talk
3033:here
3019:Tony
3008:talk
2983:talk
2972:talk
2952:....
2943:MOTD
2937:MOTD
2915:Tony
2909:here
2895:Tony
2886:talk
2875:talk
2845:Tony
2787:talk
2723:talk
2619:talk
2603:talk
2583:talk
2566:talk
2485:Talk
2460:Talk
2446:talk
2435:talk
2422:Talk
2395:Tony
2367:talk
2355:) —
2352:talk
2333:talk
2309:) —
2306:talk
2267:and
2200:talk
2172:Talk
2136:talk
2124:talk
2113:talk
2102:talk
2091:talk
2064:Hans
2058:See
2053:talk
2021:) —
2018:talk
1998:talk
1951:talk
1935:) —
1932:talk
1901:talk
1893:here
1876:The
1870:talk
1845:talk
1834:talk
1819:talk
1807:talk
1783:talk
1772:talk
1762:You
1756:talk
1725:talk
1713:talk
1702:talk
1676:talk
1628:talk
1617:talk
1605:talk
1582:talk
1564:. --
1537:talk
1497:talk
1464:talk
1452:Talk
1423:talk
1386:talk
1317:talk
1214:Hans
1207:talk
1193:Hans
1180:talk
1164:talk
1150:Hans
1142:talk
1123:Hans
1100:talk
1089:talk
1078:talk
1067:talk
1055:talk
1037:talk
1027:See
1021:talk
1000:talk
991:this
979:talk
965:talk
930:talk
902:talk
890:Done
882:talk
863:Talk
818:See
783:here
761:talk
749:talk
725:talk
713:talk
695:talk
684:talk
672:talk
644:Talk
609:talk
548:", "
544:", "
540:", "
508:talk
456:Talk
391:and
377:talk
355:talk
343:talk
331:talk
320:talk
308:talk
278:talk
228:talk
213:talk
205:Grin
165:talk
105:talk
93:talk
81:talk
59:talk
45:talk
7691:Moe
7675:Moe
7658:Moe
7243:FYI
7199:WMF
7074:!--
7012:ACF
6707:Moi
6414:).
6315:.
5681:TFA
5619:).
5530:bot
5519:).
4280:of
4091:not
3980:who
3947:fax
3937:Jus
3894:fax
3884:Jus
3854:fax
3844:Jus
3765:fax
3755:Jus
3707:466
3640:466
3597:not
3518:466
3292:are
2674:'s
2271:.
2213:SS
2209:M-6
1895:.--
1566:mav
1551:Cam
1402:pho
1364:pho
1289:FYI
1266:).
623:.
583:BIO
562:",
558:, "
552:",
536:, "
530:",
480:BIO
426:BIO
411:.--
54:RJH
40:RJH
7929:CN
7920:LI
7860:.
7689:—
7673:—
7270:25
7230:.
6936:.
6922:•
6700:Ed
6666:"?
6356:.
6346:)
6189:,
6185:,
6181:,
6177:,
6123:--
5380:--
5180:,
5176:,
5172:,
5168:,
5164:,
5160:,
4991:,
4988:,
4985:,
4982:,
4979:,
4976:,
4973:,
4773::
4722:,
4605:I
4563:,
4399:!
4333:.
4316:.
4199:.
3942:da
3889:da
3849:da
3820:.
3787:.
3760:da
3435:-
3092:--
2954:..
2789:•
2762:.
2701:!
2692:.
2678:.
2654:,
2340:—
2323:)
2294:—
2170:-
2006:—
1945:.
1920:—
1828:?
1689:87
1663:87
1655:?
1544:Ed
1409:is
1371:is
593:)
490:)
436:)
7926:/
7916:M
7912:R
7864:(
7840:(
7733:(
7695:ε
7679:ε
7662:ε
7605:(
7581:(
7569:(
7540:(
7529:(
7517:(
7457:(
7437:!
7388:(
7376:(
7357:(
7335:(
7300:(
7287:(
7162:(
7150:(
7122:(
7098:(
7078:(
7020:(
7004:(
6988:(
6967:(
6940:(
6918:(
6892:(
6826:.
6794:.
6753:(
6724:.
6684:.
6628:(
6614:(
6564:(
6544:t
6542:·
6493:(
6431:(
6394:⚠
6280:(
6267:(
6226:(
6215:(
6166:(
6154:(
6142:(
6127:(
6111:(
6098:(
6084:(
6072:(
6050:(
6027:(
6008:(
5992:(
5964:(
5951:(
5938:(
5917:(
5906:(
5884:(
5857:(
5827:(
5796:(
5781:(
5769:(
5757:(
5728:(
5717:(
5662:(
5599:⚠
5581:(
5572:.
5472:t
5470:·
5405:(
5360:(
5257:.
5204:)
5200:(
5107:)
5103:(
5097:)
5093:(
5087:)
5083:(
4998:.
4946:.
4665:t
4663:·
4621:(
4598:(
4488:(
4427:(
4366:(
4258:(
4231:(
4220:(
4188:(
4144:(
4117:(
4082:(
4054:(
4036:(
4004:(
3970:(
3910:(
3869:(
3824:(
3806:(
3791:(
3744:(
3702:N
3697:J
3666:(
3657:(
3635:N
3630:J
3587:(
3513:N
3508:J
3458:(
3408:(
3396:(
3354:(
3275:(
3222:(
3189:(
3178:(
3157:(
3104:(
3096:(
3078:(
3050:(
3039:(
3006:(
2981:(
2970:(
2884:(
2873:(
2825:.
2785:(
2721:(
2715:.
2640:.
2617:(
2601:(
2581:(
2564:(
2509:C
2506:F
2503:W
2483:(
2458:(
2444:(
2433:(
2420:(
2365:(
2349:(
2344:E
2331:(
2319:(
2303:(
2298:E
2286:C
2283:F
2280:W
2230:→
2198:(
2134:(
2122:(
2111:(
2100:(
2089:(
2051:(
2015:(
2010:E
1996:(
1949:(
1929:(
1924:E
1899:(
1868:(
1843:(
1832:(
1817:(
1805:(
1781:(
1770:(
1754:(
1723:(
1711:(
1700:(
1674:(
1626:(
1615:(
1603:(
1580:(
1568:(
1535:(
1495:(
1462:(
1450:(
1421:(
1395:Ω
1384:(
1357:Ω
1315:(
1205:(
1178:(
1162:(
1140:(
1098:(
1087:(
1076:(
1065:(
1053:(
1035:(
1019:(
998:(
977:(
963:(
928:(
900:(
880:(
861:(
759:(
747:(
723:(
711:(
693:(
682:(
670:(
642:(
607:(
589:/
585:/
581:/
579:C
577:/
575:T
573:(
506:(
486:/
482:/
478:/
476:C
474:/
472:T
470:(
454:(
432:/
428:/
424:/
422:C
420:/
418:T
416:(
375:(
353:(
341:(
329:(
318:(
306:(
276:(
226:(
211:(
198:c
196:/
194:t
163:(
149:.
103:(
91:(
79:(
56:(
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.