913:
478:
215:
837:
53:
751:
582:
277:
180:
776:
Ramu, your continued addition of non-disambig item on a disambig page, and your incivil response to suggestions and offers of help on the corresponding talk page, make your actions nothing but disruptive, essentially indistinguishable from vandalism. Hence this final warning, to let you know that if
667:
That is a form of advertising, which is already violating
Knowledge policy. Also for your information I can make an edit, before discussing, because I am not proposing on anything, if anyone oppose then talk dicussion is definitely require, I didn't this is several article inclduing the following and
704:
And you may say I my attitude sucks and I use sarcasm too much. And here is something for you, I don't give a damn to you people who uses vulgar Right Wing force and who aren't willing to talk with others like to be a victim of conditioning, because as far as ANI goes, you should me you have NOTHING
801:
The warning was not about adding an article. If you had added an article first, then you could add a disambig item to that article. Instead, you keep adding a non-disambig item that other editors keep trying to explain is not appropriate. This is disruptive, and your inability to discuss it is,
424:
Due to your having archived portions of the SSD, ATA/ATAPI, etc. threads some of the sections on those topics that remain, are left starting with statements by you that are referring to things no longer on the page. But that was due to your archiving, not this "un-refactoring" (i.e. those sections
165:
painful. Sometimes you will be right, and sometimes you will be wrong. This time the consensus is: you're wrong but well-intentioned (the former is less important than the later) . . . and as in all things good or bad, I hope you can convince yourself to take the upside, then . . . : Create a
988:
Ramu, it is not my intention to be your opponent. I have offered help, and continued to offer civil constructive advice on the apex talk page. I have reverted you three times today, which is the limit, and I'll stop there. It's not really that hard to work on articles together; when you get
1068:
Knowledge is a community of people that engages civilly and constructively in developing and improving articles. You may not be vandalizing, but it is expected that you conduct yourself in a way that is conducive to collaboration. So, take this as a word of caution and re-consider the way you
34:
Your edits have been reverted twice by a well-known mathematician. Please refrain from adding tangential material to that article. You most certainly think your additions are appropriate, but mathematics is considerably more vast than you think. The functions that you listed are covered, at a
399:
Yesterday a couple of people in the rename review discussion commented very strongly that "organizing" it had made it very disorganized, and worse, was continuing to further disorganization as new threads were being created in various places throughout the page, instead of just at the end.
100:
Ramu, so far no other person on the talk page has supported discussing GPGPU or CUDA in the article on functions. I have to say I also find it very tangential to the topic of that article. Please discuss the issue on the talk page rather than just re-inserting the material into the article,
693:
Do I also need to tell you that, over and over and over again, they are bias people like you that kept on
Agreeing with the Majority, nonetheless how ridiculous they are, they ignore the people who actually want to "make a world a better world place" as stated in the survey.
445:
btw, based on things I've seen on other pages, it seems that if you want the talk page to serve as a work list or schedule for improving the page, the usual thing is to just add a new section with that as a topic, rather than rearrange the existing sections.
728:
When multiple users feel the need to constantly revert your work (and you consistently ask basic questions on the talk page), it would be considered good manners for you to talk about your editing first. Regarding of how you feel about the majority,
1039:
Ramu50, I think that the very fact that you think of other editors as your "opponents" (your word) is part of the problem. We are not here to be your opponents, we are here to help you understand and work within the existing guidelines and policies.
848:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
68:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
963:
And you have constantly not willing to discuss the
Disambiguation strucuture after numerous WP:3RR. Discuss before you revert, because so far you have been able to provide any support for the dismabiguation style you wish to keep.
975:
Give me reason why I am being block, since I follow
Knowledge policy, while the opponnet is not following the guidelines, I have given evidence on the Aegia APEX and Disambiguation strucuture and apparently they aren't.
414:
So, I have removed the upper level organization and put the bulk of the page (other than the "requrested move", "archives", and "references" sections) back to chronological order by the first entry in each thread.
620:
The Apex I edit is an dismabiguation. Knowledge never state disambiguation require citations, the APEX is as notable as ACML libraries developement and your action is bias and hence I am reverting it again.
656:
without an edit summary or a discussion. I've seen enough of this. Last warning for this stuff. If you edit another template or article without prior discussion, I'm blocking you for a month. --
442:( I have to admit though that after the first archiving of a lot of the stale topics, that left a lot fewer topics... so it's not as in need of an upper-level structure as it first appeared. )
191:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
716:
Ok fine, pretend I am being narrowminded and not letting the past be the past, but why do edit
Knowledge, may I ask. I am serious, not meant be sarcasm if you'll felt it was inferred. --
364:
PLEASE do not remove text from the
Wikiquette forum. If claims against you are found to be false, the original editor will be asked to retract them by using the strikethrough command.
456:
btw, I agree with your sentiments expressed on your user page re religion. Heinlein: "Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unknown without help." More
789:
Adding an article that meets notability and manual style of guidelines is not consider vandalism losers. Go read the vandalism policy before you start talking anything stupid. --
439:
Due to the objections received I think that reverting back to the "organized" form is currently not allowable, even though I think we both think the "organized" form is better.
1002:
You have to stop editing in this disruptive a manner. This is why you were blocked before. If you continue doing this you are likely to be permanently blocked from editing.
357:
44:
671:
So you think you are an adminstrators and therefore everything you said is correct, have you even not pay attention to what the
Knowledge survey scope is focusing on
815:
For my 2c, I am still unconvinced of the value of having this on the dab page. I advocate removing it, and the couple other items that are not linked to an article.
668:
no one has a problem with it, except this article, so let me ask you, are you the one who have your own mental hatred against newcomers or what the deal with you
396:
There was a previous comment by an anon editor strongly disapproving of the new organization of the talk page. I didn't think much of that at the time, but ...
40:
297:
35:
different level, in articles about different branches of mathematics. If you insist on making those additions, I suggest you discuss them on the
121:). I have avoided removing it myself so far only to leave time for discussion on the talk page, where I left my opinion. — Carl
449:
So, this heads-up... I didn't want you to look at the page and think "oh no, what has he done NOW!" I hope you take this in the spirit (
1005:
Please, calm down and stop editing this way. It's rude to all the other contributors and is not helping out the encyclopedia content.
292:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
322:
303:
585:
Welcome to
Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
353:
946:
253:
118:
652:
and instead chose to continue to edit templates and articles without discussion at all. Instead you chose to edit
411:) state that if anyone objects to the "refactoring" it should be reverted. And there have been three objections.
861:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
529:
81:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
1013:
777:
you add it again, rather than discuss it civilly on the talk page, you will be blocked from further editing.
675:
285:
161:
I'm with Carl on this. Truly, we're not trying to gang up on you. I've been where you're at, and I found it
866:
432:
The SSD, ATA/ATAPI, etc., criticisms sections actually fared pretty well (at least I don't think they look
281:
86:
938:
893:
850:
845:
506:
245:
196:
188:
70:
65:
36:
436:
disorganized) and this way the flow of the threads really does reflect the sequence of the discussion.
649:
590:
329:
Linux distributions, or it's a personal attack. The first is contentious. The second is unacceptable.
1009:
926:
921:
856:
771:
490:
485:
293:
231:
222:
184:
76:
418:(There's a whole template system for archives which I intend to put to use soon, but not tonight.)
820:
606:
586:
204:
1021:
You may be right, or you may be wrong. But the block is not about that. I would suggest you read
598:
934:
602:
498:
241:
101:
especially when the same material has been removed by two different editors. — Carl
93:
61:
28:
457:
334:
900:
page back to normal style, you will probably be in violation, and may be blocked for that.
742:
681:
661:
541:
521:
374:
8:
862:
816:
763:
730:
494:
200:
82:
1057:
994:
981:
969:
905:
881:
841:
807:
794:
783:
721:
710:
637:
626:
614:
569:
558:
408:
325:. Either the "bullshit" comment implies that you think Solaris and the X Window System
311:
236:
192:
171:
57:
90:
705:
as an administrator. Actually I would respect admin like
SheffieldSteel than you. --
137:
Ramu,you have now reverted three times on that article. I encourage you to read the
330:
141:. If you revert again, there is a high chance you will be blocked. Knowledge has a
1074:
1030:
956:
738:
657:
605:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
537:
533:
517:
349:
698:
117:
The material you are inserting was removed by Arthur Rubin and by Jitse Nelson (
404:
1045:
1022:
990:
901:
877:
803:
779:
686:
610:
565:
554:
465:
450:
367:
307:
167:
152:
138:
128:
108:
609:, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
393:
jeh here. I'm afraid another monkey wrench has been thrown into the works.
912:
653:
477:
214:
142:
505:
after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
1053:
977:
965:
790:
717:
706:
633:
622:
17:
836:
52:
1070:
1026:
952:
260:
758:
you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
302:
Here is an example of the personal attacks you have been engaging in:
632:
Discuss this at the dismabiguation talk page, not on my user page. --
403:
One of the objectors pointed out that the talk page guidelines (see
1041:
750:
461:
148:
124:
104:
183:
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be
553:
I reverted your APEX reorg, as it was left in a half-done state.
1025:
and try that approach when the block expires. Enjoy the break.
528:
I told you to discuss and form a consensus first. Instead, you
350:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Ramu50
26:
827:
581:
343:
276:
179:
897:
873:
759:
594:
145:
that you are on the verge of violating. — Carl
421:
I have checked twice to be sure I didn't drop anything.
317:
937:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
244:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
166:
new, useful, effective article and link it to . Bill
733:is how we do things. Have a discussion and try to
933:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
896:. If you keep reverting our attempts to fix the
240:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
689:(cleanup + Categorization + advertising removal)
300:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
60: according to the reverts you have made on
305:Please refrain from doing so. Thanks!! :)
564:And I reverted your new unsupported addition.
195:, even if they do not technically violate the
344:A Wikiquette alert about you has been filed
385:
840:You currently appear to be engaged in an
536:after numerous discussion at WP:ANI. --
56:You currently appear to be engaged in an
597:, is not consistent with our policy of
14:
318:Personal attacks and contentious edits
643:
1069:participate and engage with others.
1063:
865:among editors. If necessary, pursue
85:among editors. If necessary, pursue
648:Ramu, I see that you have ignored
471:
23:
945:}} below, but you should read our
911:
497:. Please stop. You are welcome to
476:
252:}} below, but you should read our
213:
24:
1087:
360:) 18:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
314:) 16:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
270:
1060:) 04:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
984:) 04:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
972:) 04:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
925:from editing in accordance with
908:) 04:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
884:) 04:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
835:
797:) 00:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
786:) 20:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
749:
724:) 01:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
713:) 20:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
664:) 05:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
640:) 00:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
629:) 00:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
617:) 00:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
580:
575:
572:) 18:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
561:) 06:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
489:from editing in accordance with
429:started with such statements).
348:See relevant discussion thread:
275:
207:) 02:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
178:
51:
47:) 21:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
1048:) 18:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
1016:) 04:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
997:) 04:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
935:make constructive contributions
830:
823:) 03:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
810:) 03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
745:) 04:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
524:) 00:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
242:make constructive contributions
174:) 23:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
1078:03:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
960:04:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
887:
544:) 00:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
381:11:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
337:08:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
331:Chris Cunningham (not at work)
267:03:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
157:23:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
113:21:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
13:
1:
1034:04:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
941:by adding the text {{unblock|
676:List of BSD operating systems
509:by adding the text {{unblock|
284:: Please see Knowledge's
248:by adding the text {{unblock|
226:from editing for a period of
133:21:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
96:21:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
468:) 09:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
282:Template talk:AMD processors
187:from editing Knowledge. The
7:
927:Knowledge's blocking policy
495:abuse of editing privileges
491:Knowledge's blocking policy
453:) in which it's intended.
280:Regarding your comments on
232:Knowledge's blocking policy
10:
1092:
737:people of your views. --
483:You have been temporarily
947:guide to appealing blocks
254:guide to appealing blocks
139:three revert limit policy
607:Knowledge:Citing sources
548:
386:AT Attachment talk page
296:for disruption. Please
916:
481:
218:
143:policy on edit warring
62:Function (mathematics)
29:Function_(mathematics)
27:Your contributions to
915:
766:Knowledge again, you
601:. Take a look at the
480:
217:
1010:Georgewilliamherbert
989:unblocked, try it.
894:WP:three-revert rule
682:List of MSN Services
853:. If you continue,
802:frankly, puzzling.
323:Don't do this again
288:policy. Comment on
286:no personal attacks
230:in accordance with
73:. If you continue,
37:article's talk page
917:
892:Ramu, please read
872:Do not revert the
867:dispute resolution
678:(redlinks cleanup)
644:Warning once again
507:contest this block
482:
219:
87:dispute resolution
1077:
1064:A word of caution
1033:
959:
939:contest the block
851:three-revert rule
846:three-revert rule
380:
266:
246:contest the block
189:three-revert rule
156:
132:
112:
71:three-revert rule
66:three-revert rule
1083:
1073:
1029:
955:
943:your reason here
844:. Note that the
839:
753:
650:my prior warning
593:, as you did to
584:
511:your reason here
472:Blocked (Nvidia)
379:
377:
372:
365:
279:
265:
263:
250:your reason here
182:
146:
122:
102:
64:. Note that the
55:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1066:
950:
890:
876:page again! --
833:
774:from editing.
646:
591:reliable source
578:
551:
534:Template:Nvidia
514:
474:
388:
375:
368:
366:
346:
340:
320:
273:
261:
257:
210:
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1089:
1065:
1062:
1050:
1049:
1036:
1035:
1018:
1017:
1006:
1003:
999:
998:
918:You have been
910:
889:
886:
832:
829:
825:
824:
817:Carl.bunderson
812:
811:
747:
746:
702:
701:
691:
690:
684:
679:
645:
642:
577:
574:
550:
547:
546:
545:
475:
473:
470:
387:
384:
383:
382:
354:219.77.139.158
345:
342:
319:
316:
272:
271:September 2008
269:
220:You have been
212:
201:Carl.bunderson
176:
175:
135:
134:
98:
97:
41:VasileGaburici
31:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1088:
1079:
1076:
1072:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
987:
986:
985:
983:
979:
973:
971:
967:
961:
958:
954:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
914:
909:
907:
903:
899:
895:
885:
883:
879:
875:
870:
868:
864:
860:
858:
852:
847:
843:
838:
828:
822:
818:
814:
813:
809:
805:
800:
799:
798:
796:
792:
787:
785:
781:
778:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
752:
744:
740:
736:
732:
727:
726:
725:
723:
719:
714:
712:
708:
700:
697:
696:
695:
688:
687:Live Services
685:
683:
680:
677:
674:
673:
672:
669:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
641:
639:
635:
630:
628:
624:
618:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:verifiability
596:
592:
588:
583:
576:November 2008
573:
571:
567:
562:
560:
556:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
523:
519:
512:
508:
504:
503:contributions
502:
496:
493:for repeated
492:
488:
487:
479:
469:
467:
463:
459:
454:
452:
447:
443:
440:
437:
435:
430:
428:
422:
419:
416:
412:
410:
406:
401:
397:
394:
391:
378:
373:
371:
363:
362:
361:
359:
355:
351:
341:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
315:
313:
309:
306:
304:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
268:
264:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
233:
229:
225:
224:
216:
211:
208:
206:
202:
199:. Thank you.
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
173:
169:
164:
160:
159:
158:
154:
151: ·
150:
144:
140:
130:
127: ·
126:
120:
116:
115:
114:
110:
107: ·
106:
95:
92:
88:
84:
80:
78:
72:
67:
63:
59:
54:
50:
49:
48:
46:
42:
39:. Sincerely,
38:
30:
19:
1067:
1051:
1008:Thank you.
974:
962:
951:
942:
931:edit warring
930:
920:temporarily
919:
891:
871:
859:from editing
854:
834:
831:Breaking 3RR
826:
788:
775:
767:
756:last warning
755:
754:This is the
748:
734:
715:
703:
692:
670:
666:
654:Windows Live
647:
631:
619:
603:welcome page
579:
563:
552:
515:
510:
500:
484:
455:
448:
444:
441:
438:
433:
431:
426:
423:
420:
417:
413:
402:
398:
395:
392:
389:
369:
347:
339:
326:
321:
301:
289:
274:
258:
249:
237:Edit warring
235:
227:
221:
209:
193:edit warring
177:
162:
136:
99:
91:Arthur Rubin
79:from editing
74:
33:
888:3RR warning
855:you may be
409:WP:REFACTOR
390:Greetings,
75:you may be
18:User:Ramu50
1052:Q2 2009 --
739:Ricky81682
658:Ricky81682
538:Ricky81682
518:Ricky81682
513:}} below.
1071:≈ jossi ≈
1027:≈ jossi ≈
953:≈ jossi ≈
863:consensus
764:vandalize
762:. If you
731:consensus
298:stay cool
83:consensus
991:Dicklyon
902:Dicklyon
878:Raysonho
842:edit war
804:Dicklyon
780:Dicklyon
735:convince
611:Dicklyon
566:Dicklyon
555:Dicklyon
530:reverted
308:Jaysweet
228:24 hours
168:Wvbailey
58:edit war
949:first.
922:blocked
857:blocked
772:blocked
486:blocked
427:already
405:WP:TALK
376:(drive)
290:content
259:—
256:first.
223:blocked
185:blocked
77:blocked
1075:(talk)
1054:Ramu50
1031:(talk)
1023:WP:BRD
978:Ramu50
966:Ramu50
957:(talk)
791:Ramu50
718:Ramu50
707:Ramu50
634:Ramu50
623:Ramu50
587:citing
501:useful
451:WP:AGF
294:blocks
94:(talk)
499:make
262:slakr
89:. —
16:<
1058:talk
1046:talk
1014:talk
995:talk
982:talk
970:talk
929:for
906:talk
898:apex
882:talk
874:Apex
821:talk
808:talk
795:talk
784:talk
768:will
760:Apex
743:talk
722:talk
711:talk
699:Apex
662:talk
638:talk
627:talk
615:talk
595:Apex
570:talk
559:talk
549:APEX
542:talk
522:talk
466:talk
460:. --
458:here
434:more
407:and
358:talk
335:talk
312:talk
234:for
205:talk
172:talk
163:very
153:talk
129:talk
119:diff
109:talk
45:talk
1042:Jeh
869:.
770:be
532:at
516:--
462:Jeh
370:BMW
327:are
197:3RR
149:CBM
125:CBM
105:CBM
976:--
964:--
621:--
589:a
352:--
333:-
1056:(
1044:(
1012:(
993:(
980:(
968:(
904:(
880:(
819:(
806:(
793:(
782:(
741:(
720:(
709:(
660:(
636:(
625:(
613:(
568:(
557:(
540:(
520:(
464:(
356:(
310:(
203:(
170:(
155:)
147:(
131:)
123:(
111:)
103:(
43:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
