93:
409:, images shall not be resized when being used as thumbnails. In other words, when an image is set to a thumbnail, the size defaults to 180px and should not be changed. Any forced image resizing, aside from the image in the infobox, will be removed. It must have a valid caption. Captions must either be a sentence fragment with no end-punctuation or full sentences with end punctuation. Keep captions consistent throughout the article.
146:
31:
67:
399:– Overlinking is a big problem in many Knowledge articles. For wikilinking terms, the rule of thumb is this: once in the lead, once in the infobox, and once in the body. Only things relevant to the article or subject should be wikilinked. Dates should not be wikilinked. When using citations, only wikilink the publisher on the first mention, and that's it.
391:– It should follow consistent structure with other similar articles. One common mistake is using too many section or having sections or subsections that are too short. If a section or subsection is only one paragraph long, then it may not be needed and can be combined into another section or subsection. This keeps the Table of Contents short and concise.
319:. Lead sections must be at a minimum of two paragraphs and no more than four paragraphs. It should not be too short or too long. There should also be no inline citations in the lead; it should be verifiable material already mentioned in the body of the article, which doesn't require the need of a citation when mentioned in the lead.
281:
If the article does not meet any of the quick-fail criteria above, then the first thing I do is a comprehensive read of the article, which means, for me, printing out a hard copy of the article, sitting down with a beverage and a pen (normally green), and marking all writing errors I see. Most simple
297:
whenever possible; only when absolutely necessary should passive voice be used. Another big thing for me is paragraph length. They should be between four and six sentences long, and they should remain of consistent length throughout the article if possible. Paragraphs that are too long tend to drone
385:, ... parameters. Avoid using redundant citations—only use one citation at the end of the covered material. If multiple citations are being used, then make sure they're in numerical order. All citations must remain consistent throughout the article and not change style part of the way through.
257:
exceptions in regards to expansion). Ideally, users should be able to leave the article alone for a week with little or no changes to the content. If this doesn't happen, then that's a good indication that the article still has issues that needs to be worked out, normally via
282:
grammatical, syntax, or prose errors I will correct myself, but for more complex errors or those which if I change it would change the meaning of that passage, I leave to the nominator to correct. I will not pass on
252:
Item 4 and 5 together require that the article be stable. Good articles, in practice, must have some sense of completeness and closure to it. There should be no recent edit-warring or ongoing expansion (with
421:– Click on "What links here" on the left side of the page, and click "Hide transclusions" and "Hide links". This will show you all redirects to the page. First, make sure they are valid redirects per
443:– if disambiguation is necessary, then it needs to be done correctly. The appropriate dablinks must be placed on top of the article. Dab pages should mention the article at hand.
307:
140:
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
131:
before it gets there. I also borrow reviewing tips from other users, all of which have given me motiviation for writing this page.
86:
process, help prepare those articles towards FA quality, and help ensure that good articles represent
Knowledge's better works.
271:
127:
and help maintain a high standard for such articles. This also attempts to address issues commonly brought up with most
47:
426:
51:
369:. Date formats are supposed to be YYYY-MM-DD. When citing the author's name or authors' names, use the
161:. Just as with this three-legged stool, the article will fall apart if one of these are missing.
455:
329:. Do not mix and match citation templates; stick with one throughout. That is, if you have
8:
187:
395:
353:
343:
363:
333:
227:
101:
406:
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
430:
254:
197:
97:
39:
283:
434:
326:
242:
226:
Article is unstable; that is, is currently under or has had significant recent
177:
154:
415:– the big thing I see in infoboxes is the usage of flagicons. Don't use them.
149:
Any good article nominee must adhere the three most basic content guidelines:
449:
316:
290:
246:
207:
158:
128:
124:
120:
75:
17:
359:
in the article for instance, then they should all be changed to the general
294:
259:
115:
105:
83:
79:
237:
Items 1 through 3 are obvious. The cornerstones of
Knowledge articles are
422:
238:
217:
170:
150:
249:. The article will fall apart if even one of these things are missing.
92:
315:– It is imperative that good articles meet all aspects of Knowledge's
308:
User:BQZip01/FA Tips § Follows the
Knowledge:Manual of Style
141:
Knowledge:Reviewing good articles § First things to look for
233:
Article is about a still-evolving current event without closure.
145:
183:
Article, upon nomination, still has valid cleanup tags—such as
165:
The following will immediately fail any good article nominee:
108:
reviewers must also inspect good articles with the same rigor.
203:—or still has many valid smaller maintenance tags such as
78:
has high standards when it comes to promoting articles to
433:. All valid redirects need to be categorized (see
447:
272:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles § Process
276:
427:Knowledge:Redirect#Undesirable redirects
301:
144:
91:
429:, then they need to be deleted via the
286:until such noted errors are corrected.
82:status. These standards complement the
14:
448:
176:Article is clearly not written from a
134:
265:
61:
25:
119:and outlines my review process for
23:
325:– Inline citations need to follow
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
48:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
24:
467:
65:
29:
298:out, which tunes out readers.
13:
1:
7:
129:featured article candidates
112:The following describes my
10:
472:
305:
269:
138:
73:This page in a nutshell:
277:Checking for good prose
125:reviewing good articles
104:in a rigorous fashion,
289:A big thing for me is
162:
109:
302:Manual of style check
243:neutral point of view
178:neutral point of view
155:neutral point of view
148:
123:. This branches past
121:good article nominees
95:
50:, as it has not been
247:no original research
159:no original research
102:U.S. Marine recruits
135:Quick fail criteria
266:Full article check
260:dispute resolution
171:verifiable sources
163:
110:
169:Complete lack of
90:
89:
60:
59:
463:
431:deletion process
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
362:
358:
352:
348:
342:
338:
332:
323:Inline citations
222:
216:
212:
206:
202:
196:
192:
186:
98:drill instructor
84:featured article
69:
68:
62:
33:
32:
26:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
446:
445:
425:; if there are
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
360:
356:
350:
346:
340:
336:
330:
317:manual of style
310:
304:
279:
274:
268:
220:
214:
210:
204:
200:
194:
190:
184:
143:
137:
66:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
459:
458:
441:Disambiguation
389:Section layout
303:
300:
278:
275:
267:
264:
235:
234:
231:
224:
181:
174:
136:
133:
114:standards for
88:
87:
70:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
457:
454:
453:
451:
444:
442:
438:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
414:
410:
408:
407:WP:MOS#Images
404:
400:
398:
397:
392:
390:
386:
365:
355:
345:
335:
328:
324:
320:
318:
314:
309:
299:
296:
293:. Try to use
292:
291:passive voice
287:
285:
273:
263:
261:
256:
250:
248:
244:
240:
239:verifiability
232:
229:
225:
219:
209:
199:
189:
182:
179:
175:
172:
168:
167:
166:
160:
156:
152:
151:verifiability
147:
142:
132:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
116:good articles
107:
103:
100:inspects his
99:
96:Just as this
94:
85:
81:
77:
74:
71:
64:
63:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
18:User:MuZemike
440:
439:
418:
417:
412:
411:
403:Image layout
402:
401:
394:
393:
388:
387:
367:}}
361:{{
357:}}
351:{{
347:}}
341:{{
337:}}
331:{{
322:
321:
313:Lead section
312:
311:
295:active voice
288:
280:
255:common sense
251:
236:
228:edit warring
221:}}
215:{{
211:}}
205:{{
201:}}
195:{{
191:}}
185:{{
164:
113:
111:
106:good article
80:good article
72:
37:
456:User essays
396:Overlinking
306:Main page:
270:Main page:
139:Main page:
38:This is an
188:refimprove
419:Redirects
354:cite news
344:cite book
450:Category
379:|first2=
364:citation
334:cite web
76:MuZemike
435:WP:RCAT
413:Infobox
383:|last2=
371:|first=
327:WP:CITE
198:cleanup
405:– Per
375:|last=
349:, and
245:, and
157:, and
40:essay
16:<
423:WP:R
208:fact
437:).
213:or
193:or
452::
381:,
377:,
373:,
339:,
284:1a
262:.
241:,
218:rs
153:,
230:.
223:.
180:.
173:.
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
